UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
|
x
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012
OR
|
¨
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from ____________ to ____________
Commission file number: 000-26427
Stamps.com Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
Delaware
|
77-0454966
|
|
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
|
|
Incorporation or Organization)
|
Identification No.)
|
1990 E. Grand Avenue
El Segundo, California 90245
(Address of Principal Executive Offices and Zip Code)
Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (310) 482-5800
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
Title of each class
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
|
Common Stock, $.001 par value
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
Large accelerated filer ¨
|
Accelerated filer x
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer ¨
|
Smaller reporting company ¨
|
|
|
(do not check if smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x
As of June 30, 2012, the aggregate market value of voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was $365,258,099 (based upon the closing price for shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock as reported by The NASDAQ Stock Market on that date). As of February 28, 2013, there were 15,319,433 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock issued and outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K.
STAMPS.COM INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012
|
Page
|
|||
|
1
|
|||
|
ITEM 1.
|
1
|
||
|
ITEM 1A.
|
10
|
||
|
ITEM 1B.
|
17
|
||
|
ITEM 2.
|
17
|
||
|
ITEM 3.
|
18
|
||
|
ITEM 4.
|
18
|
||
|
19
|
|||
|
ITEM 5.
|
19
|
||
|
ITEM 6.
|
22
|
||
|
ITEM 7.
|
23
|
||
|
ITEM 7A.
|
37
|
||
|
ITEM 8.
|
38
|
||
|
ITEM 9.
|
38
|
||
|
ITEM 9A.
|
38
|
||
|
ITEM 9B.
|
38
|
||
|
40
|
|||
|
ITEM 10.
|
40
|
||
|
ITEM 11.
|
40
|
||
|
ITEM 12.
|
40
|
||
|
ITEM 13.
|
40
|
||
|
ITEM 14.
|
40
|
||
|
41
|
|||
|
ITEM 15.
|
41
|
||
PART I.
This Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). You can find many (but not all) of these statements by looking for words such as “approximates,” “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “plans,” “would,” “may” or other similar expressions in this Report. Our forward-looking statements relate to future events or our future performance and include, but are not limited to, statements concerning our business strategy, future commercial revenues, market growth, capital requirements, new product introductions, expansion plans and the adequacy of our funding. Other statements contained in this Report that are not historical facts are also forward-looking statements.
We claim the protection of the safe harbor contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We caution investors that any forward-looking statements presented in this Report, or that we may make orally or in writing from time to time, are based on beliefs and assumptions made by us and information currently available to us. Such statements are based on assumptions, and the actual outcome will be affected by known and unknown risks, trends, uncertainties and factors that are beyond our control or ability to predict. Although we believe that our assumptions are reasonable, they are not guarantees of future performance, and some will inevitably prove to be incorrect. As a result, our actual future results can be expected to differ from our expectations, and those differences may be material. Accordingly, investors should use caution in relying on forward-looking statements, which are based on known results and trends at the time they are made, to anticipate future results or trends.
For discussion of some of the factors that could affect our results, see Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Item 1A. “Risk Factors.”
This Report and all subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. We do not undertake any obligation to release publicly any revisions to our forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Report.
Stamps.com, NetStamps, Stamps.com Internet Postage, PhotoStamps, Hidden Postage and the Stamps.com logo are our trademarks. This Report also references trademarks of other entities. References in this Report to “we” “us” “our” or “company” are references to Stamps.com, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
|
ITEM 1.
|
Overview
Stamps.comÒ is the leading provider of Internet-based postage solutions. Our customers use our service to mail and ship a variety of mail pieces, including postcards, envelopes, flats and packages, using a wide range of United States Postal Service (the “USPS”) mail classes, including First Class Mail®, Priority Mail®, Express Mail®, Media Mail®, Parcel Post®, and others. Our customers include individuals, small businesses, home offices, medium-size businesses and large enterprises, and within these segments we target both mailers and shippers. We were the first ever USPS-licensed vendor to offer PC Postage® in a software-only business model in 1999.
Services and Products
PC Postage Business
Our PC Postage solutions enable our customers to buy and print USPS approved postage and services with just a personal computer (“PC”), printer and Internet connection, right from their home or office.
We offer the following PC Postage products and services to our customers:
|
·
|
PC Postage Services. After completing the registration process, customers can purchase and print postage 24 hours a day, seven days a week through our software or web interface. When a customer purchases postage for use through our service, the customer pays the face value of the postage, and the funds are transferred directly from the customer’s account to the USPS’s account. The customer then draws down their prepaid account balance as they print postage and repurchases postage as necessary. Customers typically pay a monthly subscription fee for access to our service.
|
Our USPS-approved PC Postage service enables users to print “electronic stamps” directly onto envelopes, plain paper, or labels using only a standard personal computer, printer and Internet connection. Our service currently supports a variety of USPS and international mail classes. Customers can also add to their mail pieces USPS Special Services such as Delivery Confirmation TM, Signature Confirmation TM, Registered Mail, Certified Mail, Insured Mail, Return Receipt, Collect on Delivery and Restricted Delivery. Our customers can print postage (1) on NetStamps® labels, which can be used just like regular stamps, (2) directly on envelopes, postcards or on other types of mail or labels, in a single-step process that saves time and provides a professional look, (3) on plain 8.5” x 11” paper or on special labels for packages, and (4) on integrated customs forms for international mail and packages.
For added convenience, our PC Postage services incorporate address verification technology that verifies each destination address for mail sent using our service against a database of all known addresses in the United States. Our PC Postage service is also integrated with common small business and productivity software applications such as word processing, contact and address management, and accounting and financial applications. We also offer several different versions of NetStamps, such as Themed NetStamps and Photo NetStamps that allow customers to add stock or full custom designs to their mail while still providing the same NetStamps convenience of printing and using postage whenever it is needed.
We offer multiple PC Postage service plans with different features and capabilities targeted to meet different customer needs. Our Pro Plan offers a basic set of Stamps.com mailing and shipping features with single-user capability. Our Premiere plan typically targeted at larger small businesses adds multiple-user functionality, automated Certified Mail forms, additional reference codes and higher allowable postage balances as compared to our Pro Plan feature set. Our Professional Shipper plan is typically targeted at higher volume shippers such as fulfillment houses, retailers and e-commerce merchants and features direct integration into a customer’s order databases, faster label printing speed, the ability to customize and save shipping profiles, and integrations with many of the industry’s leading shipping management systems. We have launched shipping integrations with several of these e-commerce focused companies over the past three years. Our Enterprise plan is typically targeted at organizations with multiple geographic locations and features enhanced reporting that allows a central location, such as a corporate headquarters greater visibility and control over postage expenditures across their network of locations.
Customers typically pay us a monthly service fee ranging from $15.99 to $39.99 depending on the service plan. In certain circumstances, customers may be on a plan where they do not owe us any monthly service fees. We have an arrangement with the USPS under which if a customer or integration partner prints a certain amount of Priority or Express Mail postage, they can qualify to have their service fees waived or refunded and the USPS compensates us directly. In addition, we also have plans for less than $15.99 which offer more limited functionality targeted at retaining customers who print a lower volume of postage.
|
·
|
PC Postage Integrations. As part of our PC Postage services, we offer back-end integration solutions where we provide the electronic postage for transactions to partners who manage the front-end process. Our software integrates directly into the most popular e-commerce platforms, allowing web store managers to completely automate their order fulfillment process by processing, managing, and shipping orders from virtually any e-commerce source through a single interface without manual data entry. Managers can retrieve order data and print complete shipping labels for all USPS mail classes, including First Class International®.
|
In July 2010 we launched a partnership with Amazon.com that makes our domestic and international shipping labels available to Amazon.com Marketplace users. The service allows customers to automatically pay for postage using their Marketplace Payments account, to set a default ship-from address so they do not have to type or write it for each shipment, and to automatically populate the ship-to address on the label. Domestic and international mail classes are supported, and Marketplace users may request carrier pickup from the USPS. A transaction fee of $0.07 per label is charged to non-subscription customers for each label printed. In October 2012, Amazon.com launched an internally developed Marketplace USPS shipping solution based on a permit mail system. Amazon's shipping solution is utilized by merchants for certain mail classes while our shipping solution is utilized for the other mail classes. In addition, we continue to provide the integrated Amazon.com Marketplace solution to our existing Stamps.com subscription customers.
During the first quarter of 2011, we began providing the electronic postage for shipping transactions generated by Click-N-Ship®, a web-based service available at USPS.com that allows USPS customers to purchase and print shipping labels for domestic and international Priority and Express packages at no additional mark-up over the cost of postage.
|
·
|
Mailing & Shipping Supplies Store. Our Mailing & Shipping Supplies Store (our “Supplies Store”) is available to our customers from within our PC Postage software and sells NetStamps labels, shipping labels, other mailing labels, dedicated postage printers, scales, and other mailing and shipping-focused office supplies. Our Supplies Store features a store catalog, messaging regarding our free or discounted shipping promotions, cross-selling product recommendation during the checkout process, product search capabilities, and same day shipping of orders with expedited and rush shipping options.
|
|
·
|
Branded Insurance. We offer Stamps.com branded insurance to our customers so that they may insure their mail or packages in a fully integrated, online process that eliminates any trips to the post office or the need to complete any special forms. Our branded insurance is provided in partnership with Parcel Insurance Plan and is underwritten by Fireman's Fund.
|
PhotoStamps
PhotoStamps is a patented form of postage that allows consumers to turn digital photos, designs or images into valid US postage. With this product, individuals or businesses can create customized US postage using pictures of their children, pets, vacations, celebrations, business logos and more. PhotoStamps can be used as regular postage to send letters, postcards or packages. The product is available via our separately-marketed website at www.photostamps.com. Customers upload a digital photograph or image file, customize the look and feel by choosing a border color to complement the photo, select the value of postage, and place the order online. Each sheet includes 20 individual PhotoStamps, and orders arrive via US Mail in a few business days.
Customer Value Proposition for our PC Postage Business
Our PC Postage customers can save time in a number of ways including: (1) mailing or shipping from their home or office 24 hours a day and 7 days a week, avoiding the time that would ordinarily be spent in a trip to the post office; (2) generating mass mailings quickly and easily by printing the address and postage together in a single step process; (3) using our software as an integrated package with most small business productivity applications such as word processors, financial applications and address books; and (4) generating large volumes of shipping labels easily by integrating directly with the database or file system of e-commerce systems.
Our PC Postage customers can also save money in a number of ways including: (1) receiving a discount versus USPS retail post offices of up to 20% off Priority Mail, up to 63% off Express Mail, up to 9% off Priority Mail International, up to 10% off Express Mail International, up to 18% off First Class Package Service, and up to 10% off First Class Package International Service. In addition, “Commercial Plus” customers who meet certain higher volume requirements receive additional discounts which can result in total discounts up to 35% off of Priority Mail, up to 63% off Express Mail, up to 14% off Priority Mail International and up to 16% off Express Mail International; (2) receiving a discount versus USPS retail post office of up to $0.70 per package on Delivery Confirmation service; (3) automatically checking destination addresses against the USPS address database, so postage is not wasted on undeliverable-as-addressed mail; (4) avoiding wasted postage by calculating the exact amount of postage that is needed depending on mail class, mail form, weight and distance to the destination; (5) tracking and controlling postage expenditures using reports and cost codes built into our service; and (6) paying a monthly service fee that is up to 60% less than the total cost of an entry-level postage meter, where users typically pay monthly rental fees, maintenance fees, postage purchase surcharges, cleaning fees, and fees for proprietary ink cartridges.
The advanced reporting and administrative controls available with our PC Postage service delivers benefits including: (1) greater visibility into postage activity vs. traditional solutions; and (2) improved tracking and control of postage, which can help customers manage and reduce postage expenditures. The advanced reporting and controls capability is particularly relevant to our enterprise customers who are managing postage across multiple locations.
Our PC Postage customers can enhance their productivity and image by: (1) producing more professional looking mail vs. stamped mail, thereby helping a smaller business resemble a larger business; and (2) transforming a two-step process into a one-step process by printing addresses and postage together. The enhanced productivity and image gained through our software is particularly relevant to our home and small business customers.
Our PC Postage customers can also optimize their shipping operations in a number of ways including: (1) sending USPS packages with Hidden Postage™, which hides the actual amount paid for postage (a useful feature for e-commerce companies that may not want the recipient to see actual shipping cost information); (2) reducing customer support costs by automatically generating and sending package delivery status e-mails to customers; (3) providing a complete record of all packages sent with the ability to retrieve delivery status information; (4) generating a single bar-coded form that represents multiple packages in a single shipment so that the USPS can scan the single form to accept all of the packages at once and the customer gets a record that all the packages were accepted by the USPS; (5) adding our integrated package insurance; and (6) processing large batch shipments via data import or database integrations. The ability to optimize shipping operations is particularly relevant to our higher volume shipping customers.
Marketing of PC Postage
We target our PC Postage marketing at small businesses, home offices, medium-size businesses and large enterprises, and within these segments we target both mailers and shippers. We market our PC Postage services through the following channels:
|
Ÿ
|
Affiliate Channels. We utilize the traffic and customers of smaller web sites and other businesses or individuals that are too small to qualify for a partnership directly with us by offering financial incentives for these small businesses and individuals to drive traffic to our web site through a third party affiliate management company.
|
|
Ÿ
|
Direct Mail. We send direct mail pieces to prospective customers with prospect lists purchased from third parties or obtained from partners.
|
|
Ÿ
|
Direct Sales. We utilize a direct sales force for higher-priced Enterprise and Professional Shipper versions of our PC Postage service.
|
|
Ÿ
|
Offline Marketing Programs. We utilize various other offline advertising and marketing programs including telemarketing, tradeshows, retail and other programs.
|
|
Ÿ
|
Partnerships. We work with strategic partners in order to leverage their web site traffic, marketing programs, and existing customer base to distribute our PC Postage software. For example, these partnerships may result in a link to our website from a partner’s website, a copy of our software included along with a partner’s software product, the distribution of our software at a retail location, or the bundling of our software with a hardware device. Our partnerships include Microsoft, Avery Dennison, Hewlett Packard and the USPS.
|
|
Ÿ
|
Remarketing. We remarket our services to former customers. Our remarketing efforts are generally focused on new features that may relate to the reasons former customers stopped using our service. We utilize e-mail and regular mail to communicate new features of our products to our former customers.
|
|
Ÿ
|
Shipping Integrations. We market our services through integrations with e-commerce platforms, multi-carrier shipping management software, shopping cart software and other order-entry management applications. Our shipping integration partnerships include Amazon, the USPS, QuickBooks and others.
|
|
Ÿ
|
Traditional Media. We utilize television commercials and a variety of traditional and internet-based radio endorsements to advertise our service.
|
|
Ÿ
|
Online Advertising. We work with companies to advertise our services online through paid searches, banner ads, permission-based emails, and other online advertising vehicles.
|
|
Ÿ
|
USPS Referrals. We utilize the nationwide USPS Account Manager network to market and sell our services to customers. We market to the account managers by attending regional and national meetings and forums, and participating in local vendor calls. We also receive referrals directly from the USPS website at www.USPS.com.
|
|
Ÿ
|
Enhanced Promotion Online Advertising. We work with various companies to advertise our service in various places across the Internet. This channel typically offers an additional promotion directly to the customer by the partner in order to get the customer to try our service. This channel tends to attract more consumer oriented customers. We reduced our investment in the enhanced promotional channel during recent years.
|
Marketing of PhotoStamps
We target our PhotoStamps marketing at consumers and businesses. We market or have marketed our PhotoStamps product through the following channels:
|
Ÿ
|
Online advertising, including paid search, banner ads, permission-based emails, and other online advertising methods;
|
|
Ÿ
|
Partnerships including HP/Snapfish and others;
|
|
Ÿ
|
Retail distribution of a boxed PhotoStamps product;
|
|
Ÿ
|
Remarketing to our existing customers; and
|
|
Ÿ
|
Traditional offline methods of consumer advertising.
|
In recent years, we reduced our consumer-focused marketing spending in order to lower our customer acquisition costs and improve our expected returns and profitability in the PhotoStamps business.
2013 Business Strategy
PC Postage Business
Our 2013 PC Postage business strategy includes the following major initiatives and plans. These initiatives and plans are subject to change without notice based on our analysis of market and business conditions, and constitute “forward-looking statements”, and accordingly are subject to the qualification and limitations on forward-looking statements we discuss at the beginning of Part I of this Report.
|
·
|
Increase our Small Business Marketing Spending. Based on recent analysis and trends, we continue to experience a strong return on our investment in our small business PC Postage customers, who have a lifetime value of more than twice the cost of acquiring those customers. Accordingly, we plan to increase our small business customer acquisition spend by an estimated 5% to 15% in 2013 versus 2012.
|
We plan to continue increasing our investment in direct mail, online advertising and traditional media as well as refining our customer acquisition process through affiliates, partners, telemarketing and other areas. Our goal is to continue to increase our small business customer acquisition expenditures while keeping our cost per customer acquired at a reasonable level and maintaining our customer economics and resulting in an attractive expected return on investment.
|
·
|
Optimize our Business Model and Improve our Customer Experience. We plan to continue optimizing our registration process and post-registration customer interactions to improve the initial experience a customer has with our service by shortening and streamlining the registration process and facilitating easier purchasing of postage by customers during registration. We plan to expand our usage of demo videos and online how to videos. We also plan to continue expanding our presence in social networking sites and continue expanding our customer web portal and enhancing content on our website.
|
We plan to launch new features in our software including continued enhancements to our batch shipping capabilities such as batch printing tools, design enhancements, international custom forms with hidden postage, and forms that can be use with thermal printers. We also plan to broaden our support for USPS services such as Express Mail Flat Rate Padded Envelope, which offers cost effective overnight delivery, Parcels Select service which offers the lowest USPS rates for ground delivery, and USPS Special Services that include Adult Signature requirement and Hold for Pickup services on packages.
|
·
|
Enhance our Enterprise Solutions Sales and Marketing Efforts. Customers continue to be attracted to our enterprise solution versus a postage meter. We believe this customer preference is based on our dramatically lower cost of ownership and the greater visibility into individual employee activity available from our sophisticated centralized front-end reporting tool, with features typically not available with a postage meter, such as real time data, improved web-based postage management tools, and enhanced web-based financial and administrative controls for central decision makers.
|
In 2013, we plan to continue increasing, optimizing and refining our enterprise customer lead generation and sales and marketing efforts. We plan to continue working on improving the efficiency of our sales team. We also plan to increase the number of enterprise customers as well as increase the number of locations with existing customers.
|
·
|
Enhance our High Volume Shipper Solutions and Sales and Marketing Efforts. We continue to attract high volume shippers such as warehouses, fulfillment houses, e-commerce shippers, larger retailers, and other types of high volume shippers to our service through our efforts in these areas. In 2012 we continued to invest in our shipping technology and our sales and marketing efforts. As a result, postage printed by our high volume shipping customers in 2012 was up 66% compared to 2011.
|
In 2013 we plan to optimize our business in this area by (1) continuing to introduce improvements in the software and features to further improve the scalability of the product to the largest high-volume customers, (2) adding new shopping cart integrations for easier data export and import from the tools that customers like to use, and (3) continuing to scale our sales and marketing efforts using our national sales force.
In addition, while our online enhanced promotion channel tends to attract customers with lower lifetime values relative to acquisition costs, we continue to see an acceptable return on our investment in this channel. We plan to continue to operate this channel so long as it provides an attractive return. We currently expect to continue to maintain our level of investment in this area in 2013 at levels comparable to 2012.
PhotoStamps
In 2013 we plan to continue marketing PhotoStamps, but with limited spending and expectations. We will continue our program of focused direct-to-website PhotoStamps marketing spending with a goal of keeping the overall cost per acquisition at a level that provides an attractive financial return. While we do not expect to increase our investment in PhotoStamps in the short-term, we believe that there are potential opportunities to grow the business in a better economic environment.
Competition
The market for our products is competitive. Some of our current direct competitors in the PC Postage and Customized Postage categories include:
Endicia.com/Dymo. Endicia is a group within Newell Rubbermaid’s Office Products division that offers a software-based PC Postage service similar to our PC Postage service under the brand name Endicia, a custom postage offering similar to our PhotoStamps service under the brand name PictureItPostage, and a NetStamps-like service in conjunction with Dymo (an affiliated company also owned by Newell Rubbermaid) under the brand names Dymo Stamps and Dymo Printable Postage. All three of these services are directly competitive with our own services in these areas.
Dymo Stamps is different from our service in its business model. Its service is offered without a monthly service fee, which is one of its primary marketing messages versus our service. To use the Dymo Stamps feature, however, customers must purchase Dymo Stamps labels through Endicia at a price that is significantly higher per label than the price for our NetStamps labels.
Pitney Bowes, Inc. Pitney Bowes is the current market leader in the U.S. traditional postage meter business, with revenues of $4.9 billion in 2012. Pitney Bowes launched its initial software-based PC Postage product in 2000 and currently offers a PC Postage product under the name pbSmartPostage, which was launched during 2010. Pitney Bowes has historically offered a PC Postage product under the name ShipStream Manager but it appears from their website that the ShipStream Manager product is being discontinued and those customers are being converted to the pbSmartPostage product. During 2004 Pitney Bowes also began offering an Internet-based service for printing a single label for use in shipping a package that does not require a monthly subscription fee, in partnership with eBay. Pitney Bowes offers a customized postage offering (branded ZazzleStamps) through a partnership with Zazzle.com, Inc., a small, private U.S. company that specializes in custom products.
We also compete with traditional postage meters offered by Pitney Bowes and others in the U.S. market. We believe that our customers choose our PC Postage service over traditional postage meters primarily to save money. We also believe that our PC Postage service can offer superior capabilities to postage meters in certain areas, such as the ability to integrate tightly with small business productivity applications and the ability to easily monitor and track USPS packages. We believe customers choose postage meters over our solutions because of the perceived ease of use of those products versus our current approach of software that runs on a PC.
We believe that our customers choose our PC Postage service over that of other PC Postage competitors because of our superior user interface and our larger breadth of features. For example, we are the only PC Postage service that is tightly integrated into the native capabilities of Microsoft Office for use with Office’s mailing capabilities such as mail merge and envelope printing; we are the only PC Postage provider with an integration partnership with Amazon.com serving their Marketplace users; we support more address books than any other PC Postage software; and we are the only company that offers the additional customer choice of our Themed and Photo NetStamps labels. Based on USPS data, we have the highest number of PC Postage customers of any PC Postage provider.
Based on USPS data and on our own estimates, we believe that PhotoStamps is a leading brand in the USPS’s customized postage program. When compared to competitive offerings, we think PhotoStamps offers the best product and overall customer experience in the industry. PhotoStamps was also the first commercially available customized postage product, and we believe it has the best brand recognition among its competitors.
Other Competition. We also compete with traditional methods of accessing US postage, such as postage stamps, USPS retail locations, and USPS online services such as Click-N-Ship (though we provide the electronic postage for that USPS service), and those available through eBay/PayPal. All of these methods are typically available with no additional markup over the face value of postage. We believe that our customers choose our service over these traditional methods of accessing postage because of convenience and the capabilities and features that are not available through these traditional methods. We believe customers choose traditional methods over our solutions as a way to obtain postage without paying additional fees above the face value of postage. In our high volume shipping solution we also compete with alternatives to the USPS for package services such as FedEx and UPS.
Industry Overview
Business Market Size
Our PC Postage mailing and shipping service is currently targeted primarily at U.S. small offices, home offices, small businesses, enterprises and high volume shippers, and within these segments we target both mailers and shippers. We believe the number of businesses that we can serve with our current products are as follows: (1) 22.6 million sole proprietorships; (2) 4.6 million small businesses with 1 to 9 employees (typically using our single user Pro service); (3) 1.2 million small businesses with 10 to 99 employees (typically using our Pro or our multi-user Premier service); (4) 109 thousand medium and large businesses with 100 or more employees, which represent 1.5 million separate locations (typically using our Enterprise service). In addition we believe there are approximately 24 million non-income generating home offices such as those used for corporate after-hours work or telecommuting, that we can service with our current solutions. Finally, we also can serve (typically through our enhanced promotion online advertising channel) the individual consumer market. Data provided herein is based on statistics provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
US Mail Volume
According to the USPS Fiscal 2012 Annual Report, the total USPS revenue was $65 billion during its fiscal year ended September 30, 2012. Of this amount approximately $46 billion was represented by mail classes that are addressable using our current solution (First Class, Priority Mail, Express Mail, Media Mail, Parcel Post, international mail, and special services). The $46 billion in postage is comprised of (1) $28.7 billion in First Class mail (2) $11.5 billion in package and shipping services (3) $2.8 billion in international mail and (4) $2.8 billion in other mailing services. We believe that some portion of this $46 billion is a potential market for purchasing and printing postage using PC Postage.
Based on the USPS Fiscal 2011 Household Diary Study, consumer-to-consumer personal correspondence mail volume was approximately 4.4 billion pieces per year (0.6 billion personal letters, 1.9 billion holiday greeting cards, 1.2 billion non-holiday greeting cards, and 0.6 billion other). We also estimate that an additional 5.3 billion pieces per year are sent between businesses and consumers as first class primary business advertising mail, and an additional 6.5 billion pieces per year are sent from businesses to consumers as First Class correspondence mail. We believe that consumer-to-consumer and business-to-consumer advertising mail are two potential markets for use of PhotoStamps.
The PC Postage Certification and Regulatory Approval Process
Our technology must meet strict U.S. government security standards. Our PC Postage products (including any follow-on technology) must complete extensive USPS testing and evaluation in the areas of operational reliability, financial integrity and security to become certified for commercial distribution, and each additional implementation of a particular product or function requires additional evaluation and approval by the USPS prior to commercial distribution. The USPS certification process to become an USPS approved PC Postage vendor is a standardized, ten-stage process that took the existing approved vendors years to complete. Each stage requires USPS review and authorization to proceed to the next stage of the certification process. The USPS has no published timeline or estimated time to complete each of the ten stages of the program. The most significant stage requires a vendor to complete three phases of beta testing. In 1999 we were approved and launched the first software-only PC Postage service. In May 2009 we successfully completed the market test of our PhotoStamps product.
Our Technology
Our servers are located in high-security data centers and operate with proprietary security software. These servers create the data used to generate information-based indicia. They also process postage purchases using secure technology that meets USPS security requirements. Our service currently uses a Windows-based client application that supports a variety of label and envelope options and a wide range of printers. In addition, our application employs an internally-developed user authentication mechanism for additional security.
Our transaction processing servers are a combination of secure, commercially available and internally-developed technologies that are designed to provide secure and reliable transactions. Our implementation of system hardware meets government standards for security and data integrity. The performance and scalability of our PC Postage system is designed to allow many users to simultaneously process postage transactions through our system. Our database servers are designed and built with industry-leading database technologies.
We rely on a combination of patent, trade secret, copyright and trademark laws and contractual restrictions, such as confidentiality agreements and licenses, to establish and protect our rights in our products, services, know-how and information. We have a portfolio of issued and pending US and international patents. We also have a number of registered and unregistered trademarks. We plan to apply for more patents and trademarks in the future. Our issued and pending patents have a range of expiration dates from 2014 until 2032. See Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-- Research and Development” for the amount spent during each of the last three fiscal years on company-sponsored research and development activities.
Section 382 Update
We currently have federal and state net operating loss (“NOL”) carry-forwards of approximately $210 million and $100 million, respectively, which when combined with our other tax credits and tax assets have a potential value of up to $72 million in tax savings over the next 19 years. Under Internal Revenue Code Section 382 rules, if a “change of ownership” is triggered, our NOL asset may be impaired. A change in ownership can occur whenever there is a shift in ownership by more than 50 percentage points by one or more “5% shareholders” within a three-year period. We estimate that as of December 31, 2012 we were at approximately a 22% level compared with the 50% level that would trigger impairment of our NOL asset.
Under our certificate of incorporation, any person or entity, including any company or investment firm that wishes to become a “5% shareholder” (as defined in our certificate of incorporation) must first obtain a waiver from our board of directors. In addition any person or entity, including any company or investment firm that is already a “5% shareholder” of ours cannot make any additional purchases of our stock without a waiver from our board of directors. These NOL protective measures contained in our certificate of incorporation (the “NOL Protective Measures”) are more particularly discussed in our Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 2, 2008.
On July 22, 2010, our Board of Directors suspended the NOL Protective Measures by approving a waiver from the NOL Protective Measures to all persons and entities, including companies and investment firms. As a result, our stockholders are now allowed to become “5% shareholders” and existing “5% shareholders” are allowed to make additional purchases of our stock each without having to comply with the restrictions contained in the NOL Protective Measures. This waiver may be revoked by our Board of Directors at any time if the Board deems the revocation necessary to protect against a Section 382 “change of ownership” that would limit our ability to utilize future NOLs. For complete details about this waiver from the NOL Protective Measures, please see our Form 8-K filed on July 28, 2010.
As of February 28, 2013, we had 15,319,433 shares outstanding, and therefore ownership of approximately 766,000 shares or more would currently constitute a “5% shareholder”. We strongly urge that any stockholder contemplating becoming a 5% or more shareholder contact us before doing so.
Employees
As of December 31, 2012, we had approximately 233 employees not including temporary or contract workers. Our employees work in various departments including customer support, research and development, sales and marketing, information technology and general administration. None of our employees are represented by a labor union. We believe that we have a good relationship with our employees.
Segments, Geographical and Revenue Information
We operate in a single market segment, “Internet Mailing and Shipping Services” and therefore have only one reportable segment. All of our operations, revenue and assets are within the United States. During 2012, 2011 and 2010, we did not recognize revenue from any one customer that represented 10% or more of revenues. See Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations--Results of Operations for years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011,” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations--Results of Operations for years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010,” for the percentage of total revenue contributed by categories of similar products or services that accounted for 10 percent or more of consolidated revenue. Our product and insurance revenues are subject to seasonal variations with the fourth and first calendar quarters being typically seasonally stronger and the second and third calendar quarters being typically seasonally slower. Our service revenue does have some seasonal variation driven by typically seasonally stronger customer acquisition and usage in the fourth and first calendar quarters and typically seasonally slower customer acquisition and usage in the second and third calendar quarters. Our PhotoStamps revenue is typically seasonally stronger in the fourth calendar quarter due to the holidays.
Company Information
We were founded in September 1996 and we were incorporated in Delaware in January 1998 as StampMaster, Inc., changing our name to Stamps.com Inc. in December 1998. We completed our initial public offering in June 1999. Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol “STMP.”
Our principal executive offices are located at 1990 E. Grand Avenue, El Segundo, CA 90245, and our telephone number is (310) 482-5800.
Available Information
We make available on our website (www.stamps.com), free of charge, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed or furnished to the SEC (information contained on our website is not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K). Our Annual Report on Form 10-K may also be obtained free of charge by written request to Investor Relations, Stamps.com Inc., 1990 E. Grand Avenue, El Segundo, CA 90245.
|
ITEM 1A.
|
You should carefully consider the following risks and the other information in this Report and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) before you decide to invest in our company or to maintain or increase your investment. The risks included in this section are not exhaustive, and additional factors could adversely affect our business and financial performance. We operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for management to predict all such risk factors, nor can it assess the impact of all such risk factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, results of operations or financial condition would likely suffer. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.
This Report contains forward-looking statements based on the current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections about us and the Internet. See the discussion of forward-looking statements on page 1 of Part I of this Report.
Risks Related to Our Business
We may not successfully implement strategies to increase the adoption of our services and products, which would limit our growth, adversely affect our business and cause the price of our common stock to decline.
Our continuing profitability depends on our ability to successfully implement our strategy of increasing the adoption of our services and products. Factors that might cause our revenues, margins and operating results to fluctuate include the factors described below in this section as well as:
|
|
·
|
The costs of our marketing programs to establish and promote our brands;
|
|
|
·
|
The demand for our services and products;
|
|
|
·
|
Our ability to develop and maintain strategic distribution relationships;
|
|
|
·
|
The number, timing and significance of new products or services introduced by us and by our competitors;
|
|
|
·
|
Our ability to develop, market and introduce new and enhanced products and services on a timely basis;
|
|
|
·
|
The level of service and price competition;
|
|
|
·
|
Our operating expenses;
|
|
|
·
|
USPS regulation and policies relating to PC Postage and PhotoStamps;
|
|
|
·
|
The modification or termination of financial compensation arrangements with the USPS; and
|
|
|
·
|
General economic factors.
|
We may implement pricing plans and promotions that may adversely affect our future revenues and margins.
Our ability to generate gross margins depends upon our ability to generate significant revenues from a large base of active customers. In order to attract customers in the future, we may run special promotions and offers, such as trial periods, discounts on fees, postage and supplies, and other promotions. In addition, we may offer new pricing plans for new and existing customers. We cannot be sure that customers will be receptive to future fee structures and special promotions that we may implement. Even though we have established a sizeable customer base, we still may not generate sufficient gross margins to remain profitable. In addition, our ability to generate revenues or sustain profitability could be adversely affected by the special promotions or additional changes to our pricing plans.
If we do not successfully attract and retain skilled personnel for permanent management and other key personnel positions, we may not be able to effectively implement our business plan.
Our success depends largely on the skills, experience and performance of the members of our senior management and other key personnel. Any of these individuals can terminate his or her employment with us at any time. If we lose key employees and are unable to replace them with qualified individuals, our business and operating results could be seriously harmed. In addition, our future success will depend largely on our ability to continue attracting and retaining highly skilled personnel. We may be unable to successfully attract, assimilate or retain qualified personnel. Further, we may be unable to retain the employees we currently employ or attract additional qualified personnel to replace those key employees that may depart. The failure to attract and retain the necessary personnel could seriously harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The success of our business will depend upon the continued acceptance by customers of our service.
We must minimize the rate of loss of existing customers while adding new customers. Customers cancel their subscription to our service for many reasons, including a perception that they do not use the service sufficiently. Also customers may feel the costs for service are too high, they may be going out of business, or they may have other issues that are not satisfactorily resolved. We must continually add new customers both to replace customers who cancel and to continue to grow our business beyond our current customer base. If too many of our customers cancel our service, or if we are unable to attract new customers in numbers sufficient to grow our business, our operating results will be adversely affected. Further, if excessive numbers of customers cancel our service, we may be required to incur significantly higher marketing expenditures than we currently anticipate to replace these customers with new customers.
If we fail to effectively market and sell our services and products, our business will be substantially harmed and could fail.
In order to acquire customers and achieve widespread distribution and use of our services and products, we must develop and execute cost-effective marketing campaigns and sales programs. We currently rely on a combination of marketing techniques to attract new customers including direct mail, online marketing and business partnerships. We may be unable to continue marketing our services and products in a cost-effective manner. If we fail to acquire customers in a cost-effective manner, our results of operations will be adversely affected.
If we fail to meet the demands of our customers, our business will be substantially harmed and could fail.
Our services and products must meet the commercial demands of our customers, which include home businesses and offices, small and medium sized businesses, corporations and individuals. We cannot be sure that our services will appeal to or be adopted by an ever-growing range of customers. If we are unable to ship products such as items from our Supplies Store or PhotoStamps in a timely manner to our customers, our business may be harmed. Moreover, our ability to obtain and retain customers depends, in part, on our customer service capabilities. If we are unable at any time to address customer service issues adequately or to provide a satisfactory customer experience for current or potential customers, our business and reputation may be harmed. If we fail to meet the demands of our customers, our results of operations will be adversely affected.
A failure to further develop and upgrade our services and products could adversely affect our business.
Any delays or failures in developing our services and products, including upgrades of current services and products, may have a harmful impact on our results of operations. The need to extend our core technologies into new features and services and to anticipate or respond to technological changes could affect our ability to develop these services and features. Delays in features or upgrade introductions could cause a decline in our revenue, earnings or stock price. We cannot determine the ultimate effect these delays or the introduction of new features or upgrades will have on our revenue or results of operations.
The termination of agreements with our integration partners could adversely affect our business.
We have partnership agreements with many integration partners in the high volume shipping area of our business. These partners integrate our PC Postage services into their offerings. The termination or modification of any of these agreements by us or our partners could result in lost customers, reduced postage printed and lost revenue, and our results of operations could be adversely affected.
Increases in payment processing fees would increase our operating expenses and adversely affect our results of operations.
Our customers pay for our services predominately using credit cards and debit cards and, to a lesser extent, by use of automated clearing house payments. Our acceptance of these payment methods requires our payment of certain fees. From time to time, these fees may increase, either as a result of rate changes by the payment processing companies or as a result of a change in our business practices that increase the fees on a cost-per-transaction basis. If these fees for accepting payment methods increase in future periods, it may adversely affect our results of operations.
A decline in our ability to effectively bill our customers by credit card and debit card would adversely affect our results of operations.
Our ability to effectively charge our customers through credit cards and debit cards is subject to many variables, including our own billing technology and practices, the practices and rules of payment processing companies, and the practices and rules of issuing financial institutions. If we do not effectively charge and bill our customers in future periods through credit cards and debit cards, it would adversely affect our results of operations.
Third party assertions of violations of their intellectual property rights could adversely affect our business.
Substantial litigation regarding intellectual property rights exists in our industry. Third parties may currently have, or may eventually be issued, patents upon which our products or technology infringe. Any of these third parties might make a claim of infringement against us. We may become aware of, or we may increasingly receive correspondence claiming, potential infringement of other parties’ intellectual property rights. We could incur significant costs and diversion of management time and resources to defend claims against us regardless of their validity. Any associated costs (including settlements cost, judgments and legal expenses) and business distractions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, litigation in which we are accused of infringement might cause product development delays, require us to develop non-infringing technology or require us to enter into royalty or license agreements, which might not be available on acceptable terms, or at all. If a successful claim of infringement were made against us and we could not develop non-infringing technology or license the infringed or similar technology on a timely and cost-effective basis, our business could be significantly harmed or fail. Any loss resulting from intellectual property litigation could severely limit our operations, cause us to pay license fees, or prevent us from doing business.
A failure to protect our own intellectual property could harm our competitive position.
We rely on a combination of patent, trade secret, copyright and trademark laws and contractual restrictions, such as confidentiality agreements and licenses, to establish and protect our rights in our products, services, know-how and information. We have a portfolio of issued and pending US and international patents. We also have a number of registered and unregistered trademarks. We plan to apply for more patents in the future. We may not receive patents for any of our patent applications. Even if patents are issued to us, claims issued in these patents may not protect our technology. In addition, a court might hold any of our patents, trademarks or service marks invalid or unenforceable. Even if our patents are upheld or are not challenged, the costs of enforcing our patents can be material, and third parties may develop alternative technologies or products without infringing our patents. If our patents fail to protect our technology or our trademarks and service marks are successfully challenged, our competitive position could be harmed. We also generally enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants and other third parties to control and limit access and disclosure of our confidential information. These contractual arrangements or other steps taken to protect our intellectual property may not prove to be sufficient to prevent misappropriation of technology or deter independent third party development of similar technologies. Additionally, the laws of foreign countries may not protect our services or intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States.
System and online security failures could harm our business and operating results.
Our services depend on the efficient and uninterrupted operation of our computer and communications hardware systems. In addition, we must provide a high level of security for the transactions we execute. We rely on internally-developed and third-party technology to provide secure transmission of postage and other confidential information. Any breach of these security measures would severely impact our business and reputation and would likely result in the loss of customers and revenues. Furthermore, if we fail to provide adequate security, the USPS could prohibit us from selling postage over the Internet.
Our systems and operations are vulnerable to damage or interruption from a number of sources, including fire, flood, power loss, telecommunications failure, break-ins, earthquakes and similar events. Our Internet host provider does not guarantee that our Internet access will be uninterrupted, error-free or secure. Our servers are also vulnerable to computer viruses, physical, electrical or electronic break-ins and similar disruptions. We have experienced minor system interruptions in the past and may experience them again in the future. In addition, we are susceptible to system and operational disruptions caused by substantial changes to the demand for our services and surges in the use of our service by customers. Any substantial system interruptions in the future, whatever the cause, could result in the loss of data and could completely impair our ability to generate revenues from our service. Our servers also periodically experience directed attacks intended to cause a disruption in service. Any attempts by hackers to disrupt our service or our internal systems, if successful, could harm our business, be expensive to remedy and damage our reputation.
Our insurance may not be sufficient to cover expenses related to system and operational disruptions or attacks on our Web site, servers or internal systems. We do not presently have a full disaster recovery plan in effect to cover the loss of all facilities and equipment. We do, however, have a secondary location that mirrors our core system infrastructure to allow us to operate from a second location. We have business interruption insurance; however, we cannot be certain that our coverage will be sufficient to compensate us for losses that may occur as a result of business interruptions.
A significant barrier to electronic commerce and communications is the secure transmission of confidential information over public networks. Anyone who is able to circumvent our security measures could misappropriate confidential information or cause interruptions in our operations. We may be required to expend significant capital and other resources to protect against potential security breaches or to alleviate problems caused by any breach. We rely on specialized technology from within our own infrastructure and from specialized third parties to provide the security necessary for secure transmission of postage and other confidential information. Advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries in security technology, or other events or developments may result in a compromise or breach of the algorithms we use to protect customer transaction data. Should someone circumvent our security measures, our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations could be seriously harmed. Security breaches could also expose us to a risk of loss or litigation and possible liability for failing to secure confidential customer information. As a result, we may be required to expend a significant amount of financial and other resources to protect against security breaches or to alleviate any problems that they may cause.
We are exposed to various risks associated with the credit and capital markets.
Our cash equivalents and investments are comprised of money market, U.S. government obligations, asset-backed securities and public corporate debt securities. The current global economic crisis has had an unprecedented negative impact on the global credit and capital markets. We have unrealized losses on certain securities in our investment portfolio. Further sustained declines in the fair value of these securities could lead to an increased risk that an other than temporary impairment exists. Uncertainties in the credit and capital markets or credit rating downgrades on any investments in our portfolio could cause impairment to our investment portfolio, which could negatively affect our financial condition, cash flow, and reported earnings.
Our results are impacted by the macroeconomic environment, which has experienced a severe global economic downturn during the past few years.
We believe the performance of our PC Postage and PhotoStamps businesses are influenced by macro-economic trends. The United States economy has been experiencing a financial downturn characterized by high unemployment, limited availability of credit, increased rates of default and bankruptcy and lower levels of consumer and business spending. A continuation of this economic downturn, or a weak recovery from the downturn, could negatively affect our business, operating results and financial condition in a number of ways. For example, customers may leave our service, and efforts to attract new customers may also be adversely impacted. In addition, customers may delay or decrease spending with us or may not pay us, or may delay paying us.
Risks Related to Our Industry
Postal Reform may negatively affect or cause disruptions to our services and business.
The USPS has reached its Congressionally mandated debt limit and faces an ongoing fiscal liquidity crisis. It has embarked on cost cutting initiatives and has asked Congress to enact various Postal Reform measures. Among the measures proposed are cutbacks in delivery schedules (such as Saturday delivery), mail processing capability, and retail post office hours and locations. Any such changes actually approved and implemented may adversely affect the products and services we are able to offer our customers and could therefore seriously harm our business. Additionally, absent Congressional action, the fiscal crisis could interrupt basic USPS operations, as well as payments to USPS suppliers such as Stamps.com, each of which could also seriously harm our business.
USPS regulations or fee assessments may cause disruptions or discontinuance of our business.
We are subject to continued USPS scrutiny and other government regulations. The availability of our services is dependent upon us continuing to meet USPS performance specifications and regulations. The USPS could change its certification requirements or specifications for PC Postage or revoke or suspend the approval of one or more of our services at any time. If at any time we fail to meet USPS requirements, we may be prohibited from offering our services, and our business would be severely and negatively impacted. In addition, the USPS could suspend or terminate our approval or offer services that compete against us, any of which could stop or negatively impact the commercial adoption of our services. Any changes in requirements or specifications for PC Postage could adversely affect our pricing, cost of revenues, operating results and margins by increasing the cost of providing our services.
The USPS could also decide that PC Postage should no longer be an approved postage service due to security concerns, financial difficulties within the USPS or other issues. Our business would suffer dramatically if we are unable promptly to adapt our services to any new requirements or specifications or if the USPS were to discontinue PC Postage as an approved postage method. Alternatively, the USPS could introduce competitive programs or amend PC Postage requirements to make certification easier to obtain, which could lead to more competition from third parties or the USPS itself. If we are unable to compete successfully, particularly against large, traditional providers of postage products, such as Pitney Bowes, who enter the online postage market, our revenues and operating results will suffer.
The USPS could decide that PhotoStamps should no longer be an approved product for such reasons as the belief that PhotoStamps presents an unacceptable risk to USPS revenues, exposes the USPS or its customers to legal liability, or causes public or political embarrassment or harm to the USPS in any way. If the USPS were to discontinue PhotoStamps, our revenues and operating results will suffer.
In addition, USPS regulations may require that our personnel with access to postal information or resources receive security clearance prior to doing relevant work. We may experience delays or disruptions if our personnel cannot receive necessary security clearances in a timely manner, if at all. The regulations may limit our ability to hire qualified personnel. For example, sensitive clearance may only be provided to US citizens or aliens who are specifically approved to work on USPS projects.
Finally, any approved USPS market test or new service that benefits us could also ultimately be suspended or cancelled by the USPS, causing disruptions to our business.
The USPS could modify or terminate agreements and other financial compensation arrangements.
The USPS could decide to amend, renegotiate or terminate agreements or financial compensation arrangements that exist now or in the future. For instance, if the USPS decides to amend, renegotiate or terminate our credit card cost sharing agreement, which is an agreement that governs the allocation of credit card fees paid by the USPS and us, our revenues and operating results will likely suffer. In addition, if the USPS decides to amend, renegotiate or terminate our arrangement under which we are compensated directly by the USPS for customers or integration partners who print a certain amount of Priority or Express Mail postage, our revenue and operating results will likely suffer.
If we are unable to compete successfully, particularly against large, traditional providers of postage products, such as Pitney Bowes, our revenues and operating results will suffer.
The PC Postage segment of the market for postage is relatively new and is competitive. At present, Pitney Bowes and Endicia.com (a wholly owned subsidiary of Newell Rubbermaid) are authorized PC Postage providers with commercially available software. If any more providers become authorized, or if Pitney Bowes or Endicia.com provide enhanced offerings, our operations could be adversely impacted. We also compete with other forms of postage, including traditional postage meters provided by companies such as Pitney Bowes, postage stamps and permit mail.
We may not be able to establish or maintain a competitive position against current or future competitors as they enter the market. Many of our competitors have longer operating histories, larger customer bases, greater brand recognition, greater financial, marketing, service, support, technical, intellectual property and other resources than us. As a result, our competitors may be able to devote greater resources to marketing and promotional campaigns, adopt more aggressive pricing policies and devote substantially more resources to web site and systems development. This increased competition may result in reduced operating margins, loss of market share and a diminished brand. We may from time to time make pricing, service or marketing decisions or acquisitions as a strategic response to changes in the competitive environment. These actions could result in reduced margins and seriously harm our business.
We could face competitive pressures from new technologies or the expansion of existing technologies approved for use by the USPS. We may also face competition from a number of indirect competitors that specialize in electronic commerce and other companies with substantial customer bases in the computer and other technical fields. Additionally, companies that control access to transactions through a network or Web browsers could also promote our competitors or charge us a substantial fee for inclusion. In addition, changes in postal regulations could adversely affect our service and significantly impact our competitive position. We may be unable to compete successfully against current and future competitors, and the competitive pressures we face could seriously harm our business.
If we do not respond effectively to technological change, our services and products could become obsolete and our business will suffer.
The development of our services, products and other technology entails significant technical and business risks. To remain competitive, we must continue to enhance and improve the responsiveness, functionality and features of our online operations. The Internet and the electronic commerce industry are characterized by rapid technological change, changes in user and customer requirements and preferences, frequent new product and service introductions embodying new technologies, and the emergence of new industry standards and practices.
The evolving nature of the Internet or the postage markets could render our existing technology and systems obsolete. Our success will depend, in part, on our ability to (i) license or acquire leading technologies useful in our business, (ii) enhance our existing services, (iii) develop new services or features and technology that address the increasingly sophisticated and varied needs of our current and prospective users, and (iv) respond to technological advances and emerging industry and regulatory standards and practices in a cost-effective and timely manner.
Future advances in technology may not be beneficial to, or compatible with, our business. Furthermore, we may not be successful in using new technologies effectively or adapting our technology and systems to user requirements or emerging industry standards on a timely basis. Our ability to remain technologically competitive may require substantial expenditures and lead time. If we are unable to adapt in a timely manner to changing market conditions or user requirements, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be seriously harmed.
Our operating results could be impaired if we or the Internet become subject to additional government regulation.
Changes in the laws and regulations applicable to the Internet or us, including those relating to user privacy, pricing, content, copyrights, distribution, characteristics and quality of products and services, and export controls, could seriously harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, the applicability of existing laws to the Internet is uncertain with regard to many issues, including property ownership, export of specialized technology, sales tax, state income taxes, libel and personal privacy, and changes in their interpretation could similarly harm us. The application of laws and regulations from jurisdictions whose laws do not currently apply to our business, or the application of existing laws and regulations to the Internet and other online services could also harm our business.
We have employees and offer our services in multiple states, and we may in the future expand internationally. These jurisdictions may claim that we are required to qualify to do business as a foreign corporation in each state or foreign country. Our failure to qualify as a foreign corporation in a jurisdiction where we are required to do so could subject us to taxes and penalties. Other states and foreign countries may also attempt to regulate our services or prosecute us for violations of their laws. States are aggressively pursuing Internet business for various taxes and the obligation to pay any of such taxes may result in serious harm to our financial condition.
Risks Related to Our Stock
The tax value of our net operating losses could be impaired if we trigger a change of control pursuant to Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code.
We currently have federal and state NOL carry-forwards of approximately $210 million and $100 million, respectively, which when combined with our other tax credits and tax assets has a potential value of up to $72 million in tax savings over the next 19 years. Under Internal Revenue Code Section 382 rules, if a “change of ownership” is triggered, our NOL asset may be impaired. A change in ownership can occur whenever there is a shift in ownership by more than 50 percentage points by one or more “5% shareholders” within a three-year period. We estimate that as of December 31, 2012 we were at approximately a 22% level compared with the 50% level that would trigger impairment of our NOL asset.
Under our certificate of incorporation, any person or entity, including company or investment firm, that wishes to become a “5% shareholder” (as defined in our certificate of incorporation) must first obtain a waiver from our board of directors. In addition any person or entity, including any company or investment firm, that is already a “5% shareholder” of ours cannot make any additional purchases of our stock without a waiver from our board of directors. These NOL Protective Measures are more particularly discussed in our Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the SEC on April 2, 2008.
On July 22, 2010, our Board of Directors suspended the NOL Protective Measures by approving a waiver from the NOL Protective Measures to all persons and entities, including companies and investment firms. As a result, as of the date of filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, our stockholders are now allowed to become “5% shareholders” and existing “5% shareholders” are allowed to make additional purchases of our stock each without having to comply with the restrictions contained in the NOL Protective Measures. This waiver may be revoked by our Board of Directors at any time if the Board deems the revocation necessary to protect against a Section 382 “change of ownership” that would limit our ability to utilize future NOLs. For complete details about this waiver from the NOL Protective Measures, please see our Form 8-K filed on July 28, 2010. As of February 28, 2013, we had 15,319,433 shares outstanding, and therefore ownership of approximately 766,000 shares or more would currently constitute a “5% shareholder”. We strongly urge that any stockholder contemplating becoming a 5% or more shareholder contact us before doing so.
Even if we revoke the existing waiver to make the NOL Protective Measures operate again to prevent new “5% shareholders”, we cannot ensure that an “ownership change” will not occur.
Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code is an extremely complex provision with respect to which there are many uncertainties. Accordingly, if the existing waiver were revoked so that the measures were to operate again to prevent new “5% shareholders”, the NOL Protective Measures might not prevent all transfers that might result in an “ownership change.” Alternatively, a court could find that some or all of the NOL Protective Measures are not enforceable, either in general or as to a particular fact situation. Even if the NOL Protective Measures are enforced by state courts, we have not requested a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) regarding the effectiveness of the NOL Protective Measures, and we cannot ensure that the IRS will agree that the NOL Protective Measures are effective for purposes of Section 382. Moreover, our board of directors could still permit a transfer or transfers that result in or contribute towards an “ownership change” if it were to determine that such a transfer is in our best interests. As a result of these and other factors, the NOL Protective Measures, if operative, would serve to reduce, but not eliminate, the risk that we could undergo an “ownership change.” Accordingly, even in such event, we could not assure you that upon audit, the IRS would agree that all of our NOLs are allowable.
Our charter documents could deter a takeover effort, which could inhibit your ability to receive an acquisition premium for your shares.
The provisions of our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and Delaware law could make it difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if it would be beneficial to our stockholders. In addition, we are subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which could prohibit or delay a merger or other takeover of our company, and discourage attempts to acquire us.
In addition, if the existing waiver of our NOL Protective Measures were revoked so that the measures operated again to prevent new "5% shareholders", the NOL Protective Measures could be deemed to have an “anti-takeover” effect because, among other things, they would restrict the ability of a person, entity or group to accumulate more than 5% of our common stock and the ability of persons, entities or groups now owning more than 5% of our common stock to acquire additional shares of our common stock without the approval of our board of directors. As a result, our board of directors might be able to prevent any future takeover attempt. Therefore, the NOL Protective Measures could discourage or prevent accumulations of substantial blocks of shares in which our stockholders might receive a substantial premium above market value and might tend to insulate management against the possibility of removal.
The USPS may object to a change of control of our common stock.
The USPS may raise national security or similar concerns to prevent foreign persons from acquiring significant ownership of our common stock or of our company. The USPS also has regulations regarding the change of control of approved PC Postage providers. These concerns may prohibit or delay a merger or other takeover of our company. Our competitors may also seek to have the USPS block the acquisition by a foreign person of our common stock or our company in order to prevent the combined company from becoming a more effective competitor in the market for PC Postage.
Our stock price is volatile.
The price at which our common stock has traded has fluctuated significantly. The price may continue to be volatile due to a number of factors, including the following, some of which are beyond our control:
|
·
|
variations in our operating results,
|
|
·
|
variations between our actual operating results and the expectations of securities analysts,
|
|
·
|
investors and the financial community,
|
|
·
|
sales by stockholders holding larger blocks of our stock,
|
|
·
|
announcements of developments affecting our business, systems or expansion plans by us or others, and
|
|
·
|
market volatility in general.
|
As a result of these and other factors, investors in our common stock may not be able to resell their shares at or above their original purchase price. In the past, securities class action litigation often has been instituted against companies following periods of volatility in the market price of their securities. This type of litigation, if directed at us, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources.
|
ITEM 1B.
|
None.
|
ITEM 2.
|
Our corporate headquarters are located in El Segundo, California.
On January 23, 2012, we completed the purchase of two adjacent buildings in El Segundo, California that now serve as our corporate headquarters for an aggregate purchase price of $13.4 million. We moved into our new corporate headquarters during the third quarter of 2012. We substantially completed the renovation and construction project on the property in 2012. We occupy a portion of the 99,600 square feet space, with the remaining portion of the space continuing to be leased to the existing tenants. The purchase of the property and renovations were funded out of our cash flow from operations and existing cash and investments.
We believe that our existing facilities are suitable and adequate for our present purposes.
|
ITEM 3.
|
On November 22, 2006, we filed a lawsuit against Endicia, Inc. and PSI Systems, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Central District of California for infringement of eleven of our patents covering, among other things, Internet postage technology. We sought an injunction, unspecified damages, and attorneys’ fees. On November 10, 2008, we were required to select fifteen claims (from over six hundred claims available) to be the subject of the trial. On November 9, 2009, the Court granted the summary judgment motion of Endicia, Inc. and PSI Systems, Inc. that the fifteen claims we selected are invalid. On June 15, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the summary judgment ruling.
On August 8, 2008, PSI Systems, Inc. filed a lawsuit against us in the same court, alleging that we infringed three PSI Systems patents related to Internet postage technology. PSI Systems sought an injunction, unspecified damages, and attorneys’ fees. On September 16, 2008, we filed counterclaims for infringement of four more of our patents. In our counterclaim, we sought an injunction, unspecified damages, and attorneys’ fees. On March 6, 2012, we entered into a binding agreement with PSI Systems, Inc. to resolve all outstanding patent litigation among the parties. On April 23, 2012, we executed a patent license and settlement agreement. Under the terms of the agreement, the parties agreed to a patent cross-licensing arrangement for the patents in dispute in (i) the lawsuit filed by Stamps.com against Endicia, Inc. and PSI Systems, Inc. on November 22, 2006 and (ii) the lawsuit filed by PSI Systems, Inc. against Stamps.com Inc. on August 8, 2008, both in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. In addition, the parties agreed to a five-year period where each will not sue the other for patent infringement. No payments were made to either party as part of the settlement.
In 2001, we were named, together with certain of our current and former board members and/or officers, as a defendant in several purported class-action lawsuits, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The lawsuits alleged violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in connection with our initial public offering and a secondary offering of our common stock. Plaintiffs sought damages and statutory compensation, including interest, costs and expenses (including attorneys’ fees). In October 2009, the court approved a settlement of this action, which does not require us to make any payments. In January 2012, that settlement became final following the resolution of all appeals.
We are subject to various other routine legal proceedings and claims incidental to our business, and we do not believe that these proceedings and claims would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
|
ITEM 4.
|
Not applicable.
PART II.
Market Information
Our common stock is traded on The NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol “STMP”. The following table sets forth the range of high and low dividend adjusted sales prices reported on The NASDAQ Stock Market for our common stock for the following periods:
|
High
|
Low
|
|||||||
|
Fiscal Year 2011
|
||||||||
|
First Quarter
|
$ | 13.83 | $ | 10.97 | ||||
|
Second Quarter
|
$ | 13.56 | $ | 11.86 | ||||
|
Third Quarter
|
$ | 23.78 | $ | 13.28 | ||||
|
Fourth Quarter
|
$ | 32.73 | $ | 19.36 | ||||
|
Fiscal Year 2012
|
||||||||
|
First Quarter
|
$ | 32.87 | $ | 23.39 | ||||
|
Second Quarter
|
$ | 30.31 | $ | 22.25 | ||||
|
Third Quarter
|
$ | 25.47 | $ | 18.84 | ||||
|
Fourth Quarter
|
$ | 28.38 | $ | 20.62 | ||||
Recent Share Prices
The following table sets forth the closing sales prices per share of our common stock on The NASDAQ Stock Market on (i) December 31, 2012 and (ii) February 28, 2013.
|
Closing
Price
|
||||
|
December 31, 2012
|
$ | 25.20 | ||
|
February 28, 2013
|
$ | 24.39 | ||
Stock Performance Graph
The information contained in this section shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or “filed” with the SEC, or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C under the Exchange Act, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically request that such information be treated as soliciting material or specifically incorporate it by reference into such a filing.
The following line graph compares the cumulative total return to stockholders of our common stock from December 31, 2007 to December 31, 2012 to the cumulative total return over such period of (i) NASDAQ Market Index and (ii) Morgan Stanley Internet Index, an equal-dollar-weighted index composed of 23 leading companies involved in Internet commerce, service and software. The graph assumes that $100 was invested on December 31, 2007 in our common stock and in each of the other two indices and the reinvestment of all dividends, if any.
The graph is presented in accordance with SEC requirements. Stockholders are cautioned against drawing any conclusions from this data, as past results are not necessarily indicative of future performance.
|
Base
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
December 31,
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Company/Index
|
2007
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Stamps.com Inc.
|
$ | 100.00 | $ | 80.71 | $ | 73.89 | $ | 108.78 | $ | 246.39 | $ | 237.62 | ||||||||||||
|
NASDAQ
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Market Index
|
$ | 100.00 | $ | 59.46 | $ | 85.55 | $ | 100.02 | $ | 98.22 | $ | 113.85 | ||||||||||||
|
Morgan Stanley
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Internet Index
|
$ | 100.00 | $ | 54.10 | $ | 105.85 | $ | 139.17 | $ | 129.40 | $ | 170.05 | ||||||||||||
Holders
As of February 28, 2013, there were approximately 416 stockholders of record and 15,319,433 shares of our common stock outstanding.
Dividend Policy
We did not pay any dividend during 2012.
Future declaration and payment of dividends will be in the discretion of our Board of Directors and will be dependent upon our future earnings, financial condition and capital requirements.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information as of December 31, 2012 with respect to shares of our common stock that may be issued under our existing stock incentive plans, all of which were approved by our stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares of
|
|
Number of shares of
|
|
|
|
common stock remaining
|
|
common stock to be
|
|
|
|
available for future
|
|
issued upon exercise
|
|
Weighted-average exercise
|
|
issuance under equity
|
|
of outstanding options,
|
|
price of outstanding options,
|
|
compensation plans
|
|
warrants and rights
|
|
warrants and rights
|
|
(excluding shares
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
reflected in column (a))
|
|
|
865,490
|
|
$14.33
|
|
1,861,097
|
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
We did not have any unregistered sales of common stock during 2012.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
During the fourth quarter of 2012, we repurchased 498,900 shares of our common stock as described in the following table:
|
Period
|
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
|
Average Price Paid
per Share
|
Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or
Programs (1)
|
Approximate Dollar
Value of Shares That
May Yet be
Purchased Under the
Plans or Programs
(in 000’s)
|
||||||||||||
|
October 1, 2012 –
October 31, 2012
|
87,000 | $ | 20.94 | 87,000 | $ | 21,500 | ||||||||||
|
November 1, 2012 –
November 30, 2012
|
223,023 | $ | 24.37 | 223,023 | $ | 18,461 | ||||||||||
|
December 1, 2012 –
December 31, 2012
|
188,877 | $ | 24.45 | 188,877 | $ | 13,738 | ||||||||||
(1) On July 19, 2012, the board of directors approved a new share repurchase plan effective upon the expiration of the former plan on August 18, 2012, authorizing the Company to repurchase up to 1.0 million shares of our stock during the following six months. On October 17, 2012, the board of directors approved a new share repurchase plan replacing the July 19, 2012 share repurchase plan effective on October 30, 2012, authorizing the Company to repurchase up to 1.0 million shares of our stock during the following six months.
On February 7, 2013, the Board of Directors approved a new share repurchase plan that replaces all prior repurchase plans and authorizes the Company to repurchase up to 1.0 million shares of our stock during the following six months.
We will consider repurchasing stock in the future by evaluating such factors as the price of the stock, the daily trading volume and the availability of large blocks of stock and any additional constraints related to material inside information we may possess. Our repurchase of any of our shares will be subject to limitations that may be imposed on such repurchases by applicable securities laws and regulations and the rules of The NASDAQ Stock Market. Repurchases may be made in the open market, or in privately negotiated transactions from time to time at our discretion. We have no commitment to make any repurchases.
|
ITEM 6.
|
The following data should be read in conjunction with the “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section and our financial statements, including the notes thereto, included elsewhere in this Report.
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||||||
|
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
PC Postage revenue
|
$ | 110,003 | $ | 93,321 | $ | 78,355 | $ | 73,623 | $ | 73,036 | ||||||||||
|
PhotoStamps revenue
|
5,651 | 8,258 | 7,162 | 8,485 | 11,876 | |||||||||||||||
|
Other revenue
|
7 | 6 | 27 | 16 | — | |||||||||||||||
|
Total revenues
|
115,661 | 101,585 | 85,544 | 82,124 | $ | 84,912 | ||||||||||||||
|
Cost and expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cost of sales
|
27,756 | 26,212 | 23,684 | 22,914 | 22,908 | |||||||||||||||
|
Research and development
|
10,243 | 9,395 | 9,420 | 8,699 | 8,425 | |||||||||||||||
|
Sales and marketing
|
38,755 | 34,569 | 31,174 | 31,735 | 33,538 | |||||||||||||||
|
General and administrative
|
14,750 | 14,181 | 14,590 | 12,961 | 15,581 | |||||||||||||||
|
Legal settlements
|
— | — | 5,211 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
|
Income from operations
|
24,157 | 17,228 | 1,465 | 5,815 | 4,460 | |||||||||||||||
|
Interest and other income, net
|
541 | 562 | 756 | 916 | 2,918 | |||||||||||||||
|
Non-operating asset write-off
|
— | — | 634 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
(13,859 | ) | (8,475 | ) | (3,945 | ) | 554 | (2,786 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Net income
|
$ | 38,557 | $ | 26,265 | $ | 5,532 | $ | 6,177 | $ | 10,164 | ||||||||||
|
Basic net income per share
|
$ | 2.40 | $ | 1.78 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.53 | ||||||||||
|
Diluted net income per share
|
$ | 2.30 | $ | 1.73 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.53 | ||||||||||
|
Weighted average shares outstanding used in basic per-share calculation
|
16,079 | 14,767 | 14,529 | 16,238 | 19,081 | |||||||||||||||
|
Weighted average shares outstanding used in diluted per-share calculation
|
16,793 | 15,168 | 14,685 | 16,369 | 19,345 | |||||||||||||||
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 2.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||||||
|
As of December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
(in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and investments
|
$ | 46,619 | $ | 69,363 | $ | 35,299 | $ | 71,745 | $ | 74,059 | ||||||||||
|
Working capital
|
38,035 | 57,953 | 16,041 | 41,791 | 63,037 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total assets
|
130,852 | 107,980 | 57,442 | 89,258 | 93,258 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
112,954 | 94,007 | 44,238 | 75,605 | 78,341 | |||||||||||||||
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with Item 6. “Selected Financial Data” of this Report and our financial statements and the related notes thereto included in this Report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or anticipated results including those set forth in Item 1A. “Risk Factors” of this Report. See the discussion of forward-looking statements on page 1 of Part I of this Report.
Overview
Stamps.com Ò is the leading provider of Internet-based postage solutions. Our customers use our service to mail and ship a variety of mail pieces, including postcards, envelopes, flats and packages, using a wide range of United States Postal Service (“USPS”) mail classes, including First Class Mail®, Priority Mail®, Express Mail®, Media Mail®, Parcel Post®, and others. Our customers include individuals, small businesses, home offices, medium-size businesses and large enterprises, and within these segments we target both mailers and shippers. We were the first ever USPS-licensed vendor to offer PC Postage® in a software-only business model in 1999.
Section 382 Update
We currently have federal and state NOL carry-forwards of approximately $210 million and $100 million, respectively, which when combined with our other tax credits and tax assets have a potential value of up to $72 million in tax savings over the next 19 years. Under Internal Revenue Code Section 382 rules, if a “change of ownership” is triggered, our NOL asset may be impaired. A change in ownership can occur whenever there is a shift in ownership by more than 50 percentage points by one or more “5% shareholders” within a three-year period. We estimate that as of December 31, 2012 we were at approximately a 22% level compared with the 50% level that would trigger impairment of our NOL asset.
Under our certificate of incorporation, any person or entity, including any company and investment firm, that wishes to become a “5% shareholder” (as defined in our certificate of incorporation) must first obtain a waiver from our board of directors. In addition, any person, including any company and investment firm, that is already a “5% shareholder” of ours cannot make any additional purchases of our stock without a waiver from our board of directors. The NOL Protective Measures contained in our certificate of incorporation are more specifically described in our Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the SEC on April 2, 2008.
On July 22, 2010, our Board of Directors suspended the NOL Protective Measures by approving a waiver from the NOL Protective Measures to all persons and entities, including companies and investment firms. As a result, our stockholders are now allowed to become “5% shareholders” and existing “5% shareholders” are allowed to make additional purchases of our stock each without having to comply with the restrictions contained in the NOL Protective Measures. This waiver may be revoked by our Board of Directors at any time if the Board deems the revocation necessary to protect against a Section 382 “change of ownership” that would limit our ability to utilize future NOLs. For complete details about this waiver from the NOL Protective Measures, please see our Form 8-K filed on July 28, 2010.
As of February 28, 2013, we had 15,319,433 shares outstanding, and therefore ownership of approximately 766,000 shares or more would currently constitute a “5% shareholder”. We strongly urge that any stockholder contemplating becoming a 5% or more shareholder contact us before doing so.
PC Postage Business References
When we refer to our “PC Postage” business, we are referring to our PC Postage Service and Integrations, Mailing & Shipping Supplies Store and Branded Insurance offering. We do not include our PhotoStamps business when we refer to our PC Postage business.
When we refer to our "Core PC Postage business", we are referring to the portion of our PC Postage business targeting our small business, enterprise and high volume shipping customers. When we refer to our "Non-Core PC Postage business", we are referring to the portion of our PC Postage business that targets a more consumer oriented customer through the "enhanced promotion" marketing channel. In the "enhanced promotion" channel, we work with various companies to advertise our service in a variety of sites on the Internet. These companies typically offer an additional promotion (beyond what we typically offer) directly to the customer in order to get the customer to try our service and we find that this channel attracts more consumer oriented customers.
When we refer to our "Core PC Postage revenue," we are referring to revenues from service, product and insurance generated by customers in our Core PC Postage business and when we refer to our "Non-Core PC Postage revenue," we are referring to revenues from service, product and insurance generated by customers in our Non-Core PC Postage business. When we refer to our “Total PC Postage revenue,” we are referring to both Core PC Postage and Non-Core PC Postage revenues generated from all service, product and insurance revenues.
When we refer to our "Core PC Postage marketing channels," we are referring to our marketing channels targeted at acquiring small business, enterprise and high volume shipping customers. These channels include partnerships, online advertising, affiliate channel, direct mail, traditional media advertising and others. When we refer to our "Non-Core PC Postage marketing channel," we are referring to the online enhanced promotion marketing channel.
Within our PC Postage business, we believe it is useful to discuss Core and Non-Core PC Postage because they target different customer types and as a result may represent differing trends. For example, Core PC Postage generally targets businesses and Non-Core PC Postage generally targets consumers.
Results of Operations
Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011
Total revenue increased 14% to $115.7 million in 2012 from $101.6 million in 2011. PC Postage revenue, including service revenue, product revenue and insurance revenue, in 2012 was $110.0 million, an increase of 18% compared to $93.3 million in 2011. Core PC Postage revenue increased 19% to $107.0 million in 2012 from $90.2 million in 2011. Non-Core PC Postage revenue decreased 5% to $3.0 million in 2012 from $3.2 million in 2011. PhotoStamps revenue decreased 32% to $5.7 million in 2012 from $8.3 million in 2011. Other revenue increased 9% to $7,000 in 2012 from $6,000 in 2011.
The following table sets forth the breakdown of revenue for 2012 and 2011 and the resulting percent change (revenue in $000s):
|
2012
|
2011
|
% Change
|
||||||||||
|
Revenues
|
||||||||||||
|
Service
|
$ | 88,173 | $ | 75,535 | 17 | % | ||||||
|
Product
|
14,710 | 13,465 | 9 | % | ||||||||
|
Insurance
|
7,120 | 4,321 | 65 | % | ||||||||
|
PC Postage Revenue
|
110,003 | 93,321 | 18 | % | ||||||||
|
PhotoStamps
|
5,651 | 8,258 | (32 | %) | ||||||||
|
Other
|
7 | 6 | 9 | % | ||||||||
|
Total revenues
|
115,661 | 101,585 | 14 | % | ||||||||
The following table sets forth the breakdown of PC Postage revenue, which includes Core PC Postage revenue and Non-Core PC Postage revenue for 2012 and 2011 and the resulting percent change (revenue in $000s):
|
2012
|
2011
|
% Change
|
||||||||||
|
Core PC Postage Revenue
|
$ | 106,979 | $ | 90,150 | 19 | % | ||||||
|
Non-Core PC Postage Revenue
|
3,024 | 3,171 | (5 | %) | ||||||||
|
PC Postage Revenue
|
110,003 | 93,321 | 18 | % | ||||||||
The increase in Core PC Postage revenue was driven by both an increase in average revenue per paid customer and an increase in paid customers. Average revenue per paid customer increased 5% to $21.18 in 2012 from $20.20 in 2011. Annual average paid customers increased 13% to 421,000 in 2012 from 372,000 in 2011.
We define paid customers for the quarter as ones from whom we successfully collected service fees at least once during that quarter, and we define average paid customers for the year as the average of the paid customers for each of the four quarters during the year.
The following table sets forth the number of paid customers (000s) in the period for our Core PC Postage business:
|
Year
|
First
Quarter
|
Second
Quarter
|
Third Quarter
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
Annual
Average
|
|||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
413 | 418 | 419 | 435 | 421 | |||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
360 | 368 | 374 | 385 | 372 | |||||||||||||||
The following table sets forth the growth in paid customers and average annual revenue per paid customer for our Core PC Postage business:
|
Core PC Postage Business
|
2012
|
2011
|
% Change
|
|||||||||
|
Average paid customers for the year (000s)
|
421 | 372 | 13 | % | ||||||||
|
Average annual revenue per paid customer
|
$ | 254 | $ | 242 | 5 | % | ||||||
|
Core PC Postage Revenue ($000s)
|
$ | 106,979 | $ | 90,150 | 19 | % | ||||||
The increase in paid customers is primarily driven by an increased number of new customers acquired, which was driven by our increased spend in Core PC Postage marketing channels, while our lost customer churn rates remained at levels that were consistent with the prior year.
For our Core PC Postage Business, our average annual and monthly Core PC Postage revenue per paid customer in 2012 was $254 and $21.18 respectively, which increased by 5% compared to $242 and $20.20, respectively in 2011. The increase in average revenue per paid customer was primarily attributable to (1) higher service revenue from our high volume shipping and enterprise customer segments and (2) an increase in insurance revenue per paid customer driven by our focus on shipping and new insurance features.
Revenue by Product
The following table shows our revenue and revenue as a percentage of total revenue for the periods indicated (in $000s except percentage):
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
|
Revenues
|
||||||||
|
Service
|
$ | 88,173 | $ | 75,535 | ||||
|
Product
|
14,710 | 13,465 | ||||||
|
Insurance
|
7,120 | 4,321 | ||||||
|
PhotoStamps
|
5,651 | 8,258 | ||||||
|
Other
|
7 | 6 | ||||||
|
Total revenues
|
$ | 115,661 | $ | 101,585 | ||||
|
Revenue as a percentage of total revenues
|
||||||||
|
Service
|
76 | % | 74 | % | ||||
|
Product
|
13 | % | 13 | % | ||||
|
Insurance
|
6 | % | 4 | % | ||||
|
PhotoStamps
|
5 | % | 8 | % | ||||
|
Other
|
0 | % | 0 | % | ||||
|
Total revenues
|
100 | % | 100 | % | ||||
Our revenue is derived primarily from five sources: (1) service and transaction fees related to our PC Postage service; (2) product revenue from the direct sale of consumables and supplies through our Supplies Store; (3) insurance revenue from our branded insurance offering; (4) PhotoStamps revenue from our PhotoStamps business; and (5) other revenue, consisting of advertising revenue derived from advertising programs with our existing customers.
Service revenue increased 17% to $88.2 million in 2012 from $75.5 million in 2011. The 17% increase in service revenue in 2012 consisted of an 18% increase in service revenue from our Core PC Postage business and a 5% decrease in service revenue from our Non-Core PC Postage business. The increase in our Core PC Postage service revenue is primarily attributable to the following (1) a 13% increase in paid customers driven by increased marketing spend to acquire new Core PC Postage customers and (2) a 4% increase in average service revenue per paid customer driven by higher service revenue per paid customer from our high volume shipping and enterprise customer segments. The decrease in our Non-Core PC Postage service revenue is primarily attributable to continued low levels of marketing spend resulting in a decline in Non-Core PC Postage paid customers.
Product revenue increased 9% to $14.7 million in 2012 from $13.5 million in 2011. The increase is primarily attributable to the following: (1) growth in our paid customer base; (2) the postal rate increase in January 2012 which generated incremental label sales for the period of time around the rate increase; (3) marketing our Supplies Store to our existing customer base; and (4) growth in postage printed, which helps drive sales of consumable supplies such as labels. Total postage printed by customers using our service in 2012 was $1.1 billion, a 71% increase from the $672 million printed in 2011.
Insurance revenue increased 65% to $7.1 million in 2012 from $4.3 million in 2011. This increase is primarily attributable to: (1) the expansion of our existing package insurance offering to cover packages being shipped to international destinations; (2) insurance purchases resulting from our partnership with Amazon.com; and (3) increased insurance purchases by high volume shippers. Postage printed by our high volume shipping customers was up 66% in 2012 compared to 2011.
PhotoStamps revenue decreased 32% to $5.7 million in 2012 from $8.3 million in 2011. The decrease is primarily attributable to: (1) we continued to reduce our PhotoStamps sales and marketing spending in 2012 compared with 2011 to maintain or improve profitability in that business and (2) during the second quarter of 2011, we first applied breakage accounting to our PhotoStamps boxes sold through retail channels which resulted in an incremental $2.2 million of PhotoStamps revenue in 2011 which did not repeat in 2012. Please see Note 2 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—PhotoStamps Retail Boxes” in our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion. PhotoStamps sheets shipped decreased 5% to 319,000 in 2012 from 335,000 in 2011 primarily as a result of the reduced marketing spending. Average revenue per PhotoStamps sheet shipped decreased 3% to $17.71 in 2012 from $18.21 in 2011 as a result of an increase in high volume business orders which typically are typically sold at discounted price compared to consumer website orders.
Other revenue consisting of commissions from the advertising or sale of products by third party vendors to our customer increased 9% to $7,000 in 2012 from $6,000 in 2011. Commission revenue from the advertising or sale of products by third party vendors is currently not material to our consolidated financial statements.
Cost of Revenue
The following table shows cost of revenues and cost of revenues as a percentage of its associated revenue for the periods indicated (in $000s except percentage):
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
|
Cost of Revenues
|
||||||||
|
Service
|
$ | 15,720 | 14,720 | |||||
|
Product
|
5,435 | 4,910 | ||||||
|
Insurance
|
2,334 | 1,506 | ||||||
|
PhotoStamps
|
4,267 | 5,076 | ||||||
|
Total cost of revenues
|
$ | 27,756 | $ | 26,212 | ||||
|
Cost as percentage of associated revenue
|
||||||||
|
Service
|
18 | % | 19 | % | ||||
|
Product
|
37 | % | 36 | % | ||||
|
Insurance
|
33 | % | 35 | % | ||||
|
PhotoStamps
|
76 | % | 61 | % | ||||
|
Total cost as a percentage of total revenues
|
24 | % | 26 | % | ||||
Cost of service revenue principally consists of the cost of customer service, certain promotional expenses, system operating costs, credit card processing fees and customer misprints that do not qualify for reimbursement from the USPS. Cost of product revenue principally consists of the cost of products sold through our Mailing & Shipping Supplies Store and the related costs of shipping and handling. The cost of insurance revenue principally consists of parcel insurance offering costs. Cost of PhotoStamps revenue principally consists of the face value of postage, customer service, image review costs, and printing and fulfillment costs.
Cost of service revenue increased 7% to $15.7 million in 2012 from $14.7 million in 2011. The increase in cost of service revenue is primarily attributable to higher customer service costs to support our growing customer base. Promotional expense, which represents a material portion of total cost of service revenue, is expensed in the period in which a customer qualifies for the promotion, while the revenue associated with the acquired customer is earned over the customer's lifetime. As a result, promotional expense for newly acquired customers may exceed the revenue earned from those customers in that period. Promotional expense decreased 2% to $3.5 million in 2012 from $3.6 million in 2011. The decrease in promotion expense is primarily attributable to lower coupon redemption rates. As a result, cost of service revenue as a percentage of service revenue decreased slightly from 19% in 2011 to 18% in 2012.
Cost of product revenue increased 11% to $5.4 million in 2012 from $4.9 million in 2011. The increase in product costs was driven by increased product revenue. Cost of product revenue as a percentage of product revenue increased slightly from 36% in 2011 to 37% in 2012 as a result of higher fulfillment costs that were not passed on to customers.
Cost of insurance revenue increased 55% to $2.3 million in 2012 from $1.5 million in 2011. The increase is primarily attributable to increased insurance revenue resulting from increased activity by our high volume shipping customers. Cost of insurance revenue as a percentage of insurance revenue decreased slightly from 35% in 2011 to 33% in 2012 as a result of changes and mix shifts in insurance pricing and discounting to the end customers.
Cost of PhotoStamps revenue decreased 16% to $4.3 million in 2012 from $5.1 million in 2011. The decrease is primarily attributable to the decrease in PhotoStamps revenue and the decrease in cost of PhotoStamps revenue related to initial application of PhotoStamps retail box breakage in 2011 that did not repeat in 2012. Cost of PhotoStamps revenue increased from 61% in 2011 to 76% in 2012. This increase was primarily attributable to the initial application of PhotoStamps retail box breakage accounting in 2011 which was at a higher gross margin compared to the rest of the PhotoStamps business. As the initial application of PhotoStamps retail box breakage accounting did not repeat in 2012, Cost of PhotoStamps revenue as a percent of PhotoStamps revenue increased to levels more consistent with years prior to 2011.
Operating Expenses
The following table is our operating expense and operating expense as a percentage of total revenue for the periods indicated (in $000s except percentage):
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
|
Operating Expenses:
|
||||||||
|
Sales and marketing
|
$ | 38,755 | 34,569 | |||||
|
Research and development
|
10,243 | 9,395 | ||||||
|
General and administrative
|
14,750 | 14,181 | ||||||
|
Total operating expenses
|
$ | 63,748 | $ | 58,145 | ||||
|
Operating expenses as a percentage of total revenue:
|
||||||||
|
Sales and marketing
|
34 | % | 34 | % | ||||
|
Research and development
|
9 | % | 9 | % | ||||
|
General and administrative
|
13 | % | 14 | % | ||||
|
Total operating expenses
|
55 | % | 57 | % | ||||
Sales and Marketing
Sales and marketing expense principally consists of spending to acquire new customers and compensation and related expenses for personnel engaged in sales, marketing, and business development activities. Sales and marketing expense increased 12% to $38.8 million in 2012 from $34.6 million in 2011. The increase is primarily due to increased marketing expenditures to acquire customers in our Core PC Postage business. Ongoing marketing programs include the following: traditional advertising, partnerships, customer referral programs, customer re-marketing efforts, telemarketing, direct mail, and online advertising. Sales and marketing expenses as a percent of total revenue was consistent at 34% for both 2011 and 2012.
Research and Development
Research and development expense principally consists of compensation for personnel involved in the development of our services, depreciation of equipment and software, and expenditures for consulting services and third party software. Research and development expense increased 9% to $10.2 million in 2012 from $9.4 million in 2011. The increase is primarily due to headcount-related expenses as we continued to invest in the development and enhancement of our PC Postage solution. Research and development expenses as a percent of total revenue was consistent at 9% for both 2011 and 2012.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expense principally consists of compensation and related costs for executive and administrative personnel, fees for legal and other professional services, depreciation of equipment and software used for general corporate purposes and amortization of intangible assets. General and administrative expense increased 4% to $14.8 million in 2012 from $14.2 million in 2011. The increase is primarily due to the one-time relocation expense we incurred associated with the move to our new corporate headquarters and headcount related expenses. General and administrative expenses as a percent of total revenue decreased slightly from 14% in 2011 to 13% in 2012 as a result of lower litigation expenses in 2012 following the settlement of our patent infringement lawsuit with Endicia in the first quarter of 2012.
Interest and Other Income, Net
Interest and other income, net primarily consists of interest income from cash equivalents, short-term and long-term investments and rental income from our corporate headquarters in El Segundo, California. Interest and other income, net decreased 4% to $541,000 in 2012 from $562,000 in 2011. The decrease is primarily due to lower yields on our investment balances including certain investments in our portfolio that matured and were replaced with lower yield investments.
Provision for Income Taxes
Income tax benefit increased 64% to $13.9 million in 2012 from $8.5 million in 2011. During 2012, our income tax benefit consisted of a reduction of a portion of our valuation allowance on our deferred tax asset (as described below) and federal and state alternative minimum taxes. Our effective income tax rate differs from the statutory income tax rate primarily as a result of the reduction of a portion of our valuation allowance.
We evaluated the appropriateness of our deferred tax assets and related valuation allowance in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 740 based on all available positive and negative evidence. On March 6, 2012, we entered into a binding agreement with PSI Systems, Inc. (“PSI”) to resolve all outstanding patent litigation among the parties. Because the PSI litigation settlement occurred during the first quarter of 2012, we eliminated what had previously been negative evidence at that time. The litigation settlement then became positive evidence because (1) it eliminated the hard-to-predict fluctuations in litigation expenditures, which we expected to be material in future forecasts, (2) it eliminated the potential for a material negative financial judgment against us and (3) it eliminated the possibility of an injunction against us. We believed the other positive and negative evidence we evaluated was consistent (e.g., no material change had occurred) relative to our evaluation of this evidence in prior periods. Based on this discrete event, we extended our forecast of projected taxable income from two years to three years for the portion of our deferred tax asset for which it was more likely than not that a tax benefit would be realized under ASC 740 as of March 31, 2012. As a result, we released a portion of our valuation allowance totaling $11.9 million during the first quarter of 2012.
During the fourth quarter of 2012, we re-evaluated positive and negative evidence relating to our gross deferred tax assets and valuation allowance noting that there was no additional discrete event subsequent to the first quarter of 2012. During the fourth quarter of 2012, we updated our three year forecast of projected taxable income. Based on the updated forecast and a change in the California state tax laws, we recorded another release of a portion of our valuation allowance in the fourth quarter of 2012 totaling approximately $2.5 million. As of December 31, 2012, we recorded approximately $31 million of net deferred tax assets, and we continued to maintain a valuation allowance for the remainder of our gross deferred tax assets.
During 2012, we recorded current tax provision for corporate alternative minimum federal and state taxes of approximately $565,000. During 2011, we were in a taxable loss position for tax reporting purposes and as a result we did not incur any current tax provision.
Expectations for 2013
We expect the following trends for 2013:
|
·
|
We expect total 2013 revenue to be in a range of between $120 million to $130 million.
|
|
·
|
We expect 10% to 15% growth in Core PC Postage revenue for 2013 compared to 2012.
|
|
·
|
We expect Non-Core PC Postage and PhotoStamps revenues to decrease in 2013 compared with 2012, as we expect to minimize investment in these areas of our business.
|
|
·
|
In October 2012, Amazon.com launched an additional Marketplace USPS shipping solution as an alternative to our shipping solution and we expect this to have a negative impact on our 2013 revenue from this partnership.
|
|
·
|
We expect to continue to increase customer acquisition spending on our Core PC Postage marketing channels by 5% - 15% in 2013 compared to 2012. We will continue to monitor our customer metrics and the state of the economy and adjust our level of spending accordingly.
|
|
·
|
We expect research and development expenses to be higher in 2013 as compared to 2012, primarily related to expected increased headcount costs to support the growth in our products and services.
|
|
·
|
We expect general and administrative expenses to be higher in 2013 as compared to 2012, primarily related to increased headcount costs.
|
|
·
|
We expect capital expenditures to be approximately $3.5 million in 2013 reflecting an increased level of investment in our technology platform and data centers to ensure the scalability and reliability of our solutions.
|
As discussed above, our results are subject to macro economic factors and other factors which could cause these trends to be worse than our current expectation or which could cause actual results to be materially different than our current expectations. These expectations are “forward looking statements”, are made only as of the date of this Report and are subject to the qualification and limitations on the forward-looking statements discussion on page 1 of Part I of this Report and the risks and other factors set forth in Item 1A “Risk Factors”. As described in our forward-looking statements discussion, we do not undertake any obligation to release publicly any revisions to our forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Report.
Years Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
Total revenue in 2011 was $101.6 million, an increase of 19% from $85.5 million in 2010. PC Postage revenue, including service revenue, product revenue and insurance revenue, in 2011 was $93.3 million, an increase of 19% compared to $78.4 million in 2010. Core PC Postage revenue increased 22% to $90.2 million in 2011 from $73.8 million in 2010. Non-Core PC Postage revenue decreased 30% to $3.2 million in 2011 from $4.5 million in 2010. PhotoStamps revenue in 2011 was $8.3 million, an increase of 15% compared to $7.2 million in 2010. Other revenue in 2011 was $6,000, a decrease of 78% compared to $27,000 in 2010.
The following table sets forth the breakdown of revenue for 2011 and 2010 and the resulting percent change (revenue in $000s):
|
2011
|
2010
|
% Change
|
||||||||||
|
Revenues
|
||||||||||||
|
Service
|
$ | 75,535 | $ | 64,607 | 17 | % | ||||||
|
Product
|
13,465 | 11,725 | 15 | % | ||||||||
|
Insurance
|
4,321 | 2,023 | 114 | % | ||||||||
|
PC Postage Revenue
|
93,321 | 78,355 | 19 | % | ||||||||
|
PhotoStamps Revenue
|
8,258 | 7,162 | 15 | % | ||||||||
|
Other
|
6 | 27 | (78 | %) | ||||||||
|
Total revenues
|
$ | 101,585 | $ | 85,544 | 19 | % | ||||||
The following table sets forth the breakdown of PC Postage revenue, which includes Core PC Postage revenue and Non-Core PC Postage revenue for 2011 and 2010 and the resulting percent change (revenue in $000s):
|
2011
|
2010
|
% Change
|
||||||||||
|
Core PC Postage Revenue
|
$ | 90,150 | $ | 73,814 | 22 | % | ||||||
|
Non-Core PC Postage Revenue
|
3,171 | 4,541 | (30 | %) | ||||||||
|
Total PC Postage Revenue
|
$ | 93,321 | $ | 78,355 | 19 | % | ||||||
The increase in Core PC Postage revenue was driven by both an increase in paid customers and an increase in average revenue per paid customer. Average revenue per paid customer increased 10% to $20.20 in 2011 from $18.25 in 2010. Annual average paid customers increased 11% to 372,000 in 2011 from 337,000 in 2010.
We define paid customers for the quarter as ones from whom we successfully collected service fees at least once during that quarter, and we define average paid customers for the year as the average of the paid customers for each of the four quarters during the year.
The following table sets forth the total number of paid customers in the period that were originally acquired through our Core PC Postage channels (in thousands):
|
Year
|
First
Quarter
|
Second Quarter
|
Third Quarter
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
Annual
Average
|
|||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
360 | 368 | 374 | 385 | 372 | |||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
336 | 338 | 334 | 340 | 337 | |||||||||||||||
The following table sets forth the growth in paid customers and average annual revenue per paid customer for customers originally acquired through our Core PC Postage channel:
|
Core PC Postage Revenue
|
2011
|
2010
|
% Change
|
|||||||||
|
Average paid customers for the year (in thousands)
|
372 | 337 | 10 | % | ||||||||
|
Average annual revenue per paid customer
|
$ | 242 | $ | 219 | 11 | % | ||||||
|
Core PC Postage Revenue ($000s)
|
$ | 90,150 | $ | 73,814 | 22 | % | ||||||
The increase in paid customers in 2011 was primarily attributable to (1) our increased customer acquisition spending in these channels leading to an increase in the number of customers acquired and (2) reductions in our paid customer churn rates.
For our Core PC Postage Business, our average annual and monthly Core PC Postage revenue per paid customer in 2011 was $242 and $20.20 respectively, which increased by 11% compared to $219 and $18.25, respectively in 2010. The increase in average revenue per paid customer was primarily attributable to (1) higher monthly fees from our high volume shipping and enterprise customer segments, (2) an increase in the average store revenue per paid customer driven by the increased usage of our service and (3) an increase in insurance purchases driven by our focus on shipping and new insurance features.
The following table sets forth our results of operations as a percentage of total revenue for the periods indicated:
|
Twelve months ended
December 31,
|
||||||||
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
|
Total Revenues:
|
||||||||
|
Service
|
74.4 | % | 75.5 | % | ||||
|
Product
|
13.3 | % | 13.7 | % | ||||
|
Insurance
|
4.3 | % | 2.4 | % | ||||
|
PhotoStamps
|
8.1 | % | 8.4 | % | ||||
|
Other
|
0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||
|
Total revenues
|
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||
|
Cost of revenues:
|
||||||||
|
Service
|
14.5 | % | 15.5 | % | ||||
|
Product
|
4.8 | % | 5.1 | % | ||||
|
Insurance
|
1.5 | % | 0.7 | % | ||||
|
PhotoStamps
|
5.0 | % | 6.3 | % | ||||
|
Total cost of revenues
|
25.8 | % | 27.7 | % | ||||
|
Gross profit
|
74.2 | % | 72.3 | % | ||||
|
Operating expenses:
|
||||||||
|
Sales and marketing
|
34.0 | % | 36.4 | % | ||||
|
Research and development
|
9.2 | % | 11.0 | % | ||||
|
General and administrative
|
14.0 | % | 17.1 | % | ||||
|
Legal settlements
|
0.0 | % | 6.1 | % | ||||
|
Total operating expenses
|
57.2 | % | 70.6 | % | ||||
|
Income from operations
|
17.0 | % | 1.7 | % | ||||
|
Asset write-off
|
0.0 | % | -0.7 | % | ||||
|
Interest and other income, net
|
0.6 | % | 0.9 | % | ||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
17.5 | % | 1.9 | % | ||||
|
Income tax benefit
|
-8.3 | % | -4.6 | % | ||||
|
Net income
|
25.9 | % | 6.5 | % | ||||
Revenue
Our revenue is derived primarily from five sources: (1) service and transaction fees related to our PC Postage service; (2) product revenue from the direct sale of consumables and supplies through our Supplies Store; (3) insurance revenue from our branded insurance offering; (4) PhotoStamps revenue from our PhotoStamps business; and (5) other revenue, consisting of advertising revenue derived from advertising programs with our existing customers.
Service revenue increased 17% to $75.5 million in 2011 from $64.6 million in 2010. The increase in service revenue consisted of a 20% increase in service revenue from customers acquired through our non-enhanced promotion channels, which more than offset the 31% decrease in service revenue from customers acquired through our enhanced promotion channel. The 20% increase in service revenue from customers acquired through the non-enhanced promotion channels consisted of 10% increase in successfully billed customers and 9% increase in average service revenue per customer. As a percentage of total revenue, service revenue decreased to 74% in 2011 from 76% in 2010, primarily as a result of the increase in revenue from our insurance offering.
Product revenue increased 15% to $13.5 million in 2011 from $11.7 million in 2010. The increase in product revenue was primarily attributable to the following: (1) growth in our paid customer base; (2) marketing our Supplies Store to our existing customer base; (3) additional SKUs we added to our Supplies Store; and (4) growth in postage printed, which helps drive sales of consumable supplies such as labels. Total postage printed by customers using our service during 2011 was $672 million, a 50% increase from $447 million in 2010. Store orders increased by 14% in 2011 compared to 2010, while the average revenue per store order increased by 1% in 2011 compared to 2010. As a percentage of total revenue, product revenue decreased slightly to 13% in 2011 from 14% in 2010, primarily as a result of the increase in revenue from our insurance offering.
Insurance revenue increased 114% to $4.3 million in 2011 from $2.0 million in 2010. This increase was primarily attributable to (1) the expansion of our existing package insurance offering to cover packages being shipped to international destinations, (2) insurance purchases resulting from our partnership with Amazon.com and (3) increased insurance purchases by high volume shippers. Total postage printed by our high volume shipping customers in 2011 increased by 96% compared to 2010. As a percentage of total revenue, insurance revenue increased to 4% in 2011 from 2% in 2010.
PhotoStamps revenue increased 15% to $8.3 million in 2011 from $7.2 million in 2010. The increase in PhotoStamps revenue was due to the recognition of PhotoStamps retail box breakage revenue. Beginning in the second quarter of 2011, we began recognizing breakage revenue related to our PhotoStamps retail boxes. During the second quarter of 2011, we recognized $2.2 million of retail box breakage revenue of which $2.1 million related to a cumulative catch-up for previously sold and unredeemed PhotoStamps retail boxes originally recorded as deferred revenue. PhotoStamps retail breakage was not material for the third and fourth quarters of 2011. Please see Note 2 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—PhotoStamps Retail Boxes” in our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion. The increase in PhotoStamps revenue from PhotoStamps retail box breakage was partially offset by lower sales of PhotoStamps through our website and other channels. Excluding the PhotoStamps retail box breakage revenue we recognized in the second quarter of 2011, total PhotoStamps revenue decreased 15% to $6.1 million in 2011 from $7.2 million in 2010. We continued to reduce our PhotoStamps sales and marketing spending in 2011 compared with 2010 and as a result, total PhotoStamps sheets shipped during 2011 was approximately 335,000, an 18% decrease compared to 410,000 in 2010. Average revenue per sheet in 2011 excluding the PhotoStamps retail box breakage revenue was $18.1, a 4% increase compared to $17.5 in 2010. As a percentage of total revenue, PhotoStamps revenue was unchanged at 8% in each of 2011 and 2010.
Other revenue consisting of commissions from the advertising or sale of products by third party vendors to our customer base was approximately $6,000 in 2011 compared to $27,000 in 2010. Commission revenue is currently not material to our consolidated financial statements.
Cost of Revenue
Cost of service revenue principally consists of the cost of customer service, certain promotional expenses, system operating costs, credit card processing fees and customer misprints that do not qualify for reimbursement from the USPS. Cost of product revenue principally consists of the cost of products sold through our Mailing & Shipping Supplies Store and the related costs of shipping and handling. The cost of insurance revenue principally consists of parcel insurance offering costs. Cost of PhotoStamps revenue principally consists of the face value of postage, image review costs and printing and fulfillment costs. Total cost of revenue increased 11% to $26.2 million in 2011 from $23.7 million in 2010. As a percentage of total revenue, cost of revenue decreased to 26% in 2011 from 28% in 2010.
Cost of service revenue increased 11% to $14.7 million in 2011 from $13.3 million in 2010. The increase is primarily attributable to higher promotional expense as a result of the increase in customer acquisition and higher redemption rates of our free scale and free postage offers. Promotional expense, which represents a material portion of total cost of service revenue, is expensed in the period in which a customer qualifies for the promotion, while the revenue associated with the acquired customer is earned over the customer's lifetime. As a result, promotional expense for newly acquired customers may exceed the revenue earned from those customers in that period. Promotional expenses were $3.6 million and $2.7 million during 2011 and 2010, respectively. As a percentage of total revenue, cost of service revenue decreased to 15% in 2011 as compared to 16% in 2010.
Cost of product revenue increased 13% to $4.9 million in 2011 from $4.3 million in 2010. The increase in these costs was consistent with the 15% increase in product revenue during the same period. As a percentage of total revenue, cost of product revenue was 5% in both 2011 and 2010.
Cost of insurance increased 135% to $1.5 million in 2011 from $641,000 in 2010, an increase which was higher than the 114% growth in insurance revenue during the same period. The faster growth in cost of insurance as compared to insurance revenue is primarily attributable to discounted pricing offered to customers on certain higher volume shipping plans. As a percentage of total revenue, cost of insurance revenue increased to 2% in 2011 as compared to 1% in 2010.
Cost of PhotoStamps revenue decreased 6% to $5.1 million in 2011 from $5.4 million in 2010. Excluding the PhotoStamps retail box breakage cost we recognized in the second quarter of 2011, total cost of PhotoStamps revenue decreased approximately 14% from 2010 to 2011, which is consistent with the 15% decrease in PhotoStamps revenue excluding the PhotoStamps retail box breakage revenue. The gross margin from PhotoStamps is significantly lower than that of our other sources of revenue because we include the stated value of USPS postage as part of our cost of PhotoStamps revenue. As a percentage of total revenue, cost of PhotoStamps revenue decreased to 5% in 2011 from 6% in 2010.
Sales and Marketing
Sales and marketing expense principally consists of spending to acquire new customers and compensation and related expenses for personnel engaged in sales, marketing, and business development activities. Ongoing marketing programs include the following: traditional advertising, partnerships, customer referral programs, customer re-marketing efforts, telemarketing, direct sales, direct mail, and online advertising. Sales and marketing expense increased 11% to $34.6 million in 2011 from $31.2 million in 2010. The increase is primarily due to increased marketing expenditures to acquire new small business, enterprise and shipping customers, which increased 15% in 2011 compared to 2010. This increase was partially offset by decreases in our PhotoStamps and enhanced promotion marketing expenditures, which decreased by 42% and 5%, respectively, in 2011 compared to 2010. As a percentage of total revenue, sales and marketing expense decreased to 34% in 2011 from 36% in 2010.
Research and Development
Research and development expense principally consists of compensation for personnel involved in the development of our services, depreciation of equipment and software and expenditures for consulting services and third party software. Research and development expense was $9.4 million in both 2011 and 2010. As a percentage of total revenue, research and development expense decreased to 9% in 2011 from 11% in 2010, as we were able to hold our research and development costs consistent as we grew revenue.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expense principally consists of compensation and related costs for executive and administrative personnel, fees for legal and other professional services, depreciation of equipment and software used for general corporate purposes and amortization of intangible assets. General and administrative expense decreased 3% to $14.2 million in 2011 from $14.6 million in 2010. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in legal expenses. As a percentage of total revenue, general and administrative expense decreased to 14% in 2011 from 17% in 2010 as we were able to realize a decrease in our general and administrative costs as we grew revenue.
Legal Settlement
Legal settlements were $5.2 million in 2010. This expense was primarily due to our settlement agreement with Kara Technology Incorporated and Mr. Salim Kara to resolve all outstanding litigation among the parties. We did not incur a similar expense in 2011.
Non-Operating Asset Write-Offs
The non-operating asset write-off was $634,000 in 2010. We incurred $634,000 in capitalized fixed assets related to a project to launch a new third party billing system. During 2010, we made a decision to abandon this project before it was completed and placed in service. As a result, we wrote-off the $634,000 fixed assets in the fourth quarter of 2010. We did not have any similar write-off in 2011.
Interest and Other Income, Net
Interest and other income, net primarily consists of interest income from cash equivalents, short-term and long-term investments and other income, which is currently immaterial to our financial statements. Interest and other income, net decreased 26% to approximately $562,000 in 2011 from $756,000 in 2010. The decrease, both on an absolute basis and as a percentage of total revenue, is primarily due to lower average investment balances, as we sold certain investments and used the cash to pay a one-time $2.00 per share special dividend in the fourth quarter of 2010 and repurchased shares of our common stock.
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes
In 2011 we had an income tax benefit of $8.5 million compared to an income tax benefit of approximately $3.9 million in 2010. The income tax benefit we realized in 2011 and 2010 was due to the release of a portion of our valuation allowance, which is recorded against our gross deferred tax asset. During the fourth quarter of 2011 we released a portion of our valuation allowance totaling approximately $8.5 million as a result of an increase in our projected taxable income. During the second quarter of 2010, we recorded an income tax benefit of approximately $4.0 million when we determined that a release of a portion of our valuation allowance was appropriate as a result of the following discrete events: (1) our attainment of over five consecutive years of taxable income, (2) the material decline of our Section 382 ownership under the Internal Revenue Code from approximately 34% as of March 31, 2010 to approximately 24% as of June 30, 2010 and (3) the settlement of our outstanding patent infringement litigation with Kara Technology, which improved our confidence in our short-term taxable income projection by eliminating the uncertainty of a potential large negative judgment against us and eliminating the related on-going third party litigation expenses. In making the determination to release a portion of our valuation allowance, we considered all available positive and negative evidence, including our recent earnings trend and expected continued future taxable income. As of December 31, 2011, the net deferred tax asset on the balance sheet represented the projected tax benefit we expect to realize over the future two fiscal years, and we continued to maintain a valuation allowance against the remainder of our gross deferred tax asset.
During 2010, the State of California passed legislation that extended the suspension of the use of NOLs to offset current state income tax expense to the years 2010 and 2011. The legislation also raised the limit on the use of tax credits to offset state income tax expense from 50% in 2009 to 100% for 2010 and 2011. As a result, we were able to utilize our tax credits to offset 100% of our state income tax expense in 2010. Since we were in a taxable loss position in 2011, we did not incur any state income tax expense and thus did not have to utilize any tax credits in 2011
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, we had $47 million and $69 million in cash, restricted cash and short-term and long-term investments, respectively. We invest available funds in short-term and long-term money market funds, commercial paper, asset-backed securities, corporate notes and bonds and municipal securities and do not engage in hedging or speculative activities.
On January 23, 2012, we completed the purchase of two adjacent buildings in El Segundo, California that now serves as our corporate headquarters for an aggregate purchase price of $13.4 million. We substantially completed the renovation and construction project on the property in 2012. We moved into our new corporate headquarters during the third quarter of 2012. We occupy a portion of the 99,600 square foot space, with the remaining portion of the space continuing to be leased to the existing tenants. The purchase of the property and renovations were funded out of our cash flow from operations and existing cash and investments.
During 2012, we repurchased 1.5 million shares of our common stock for $31.8 million. During 2013, subject to limitations that may be imposed by applicable securities laws and regulations and the rules of The NASDAQ Stock Market, we may consider repurchasing stock by evaluating such factors as the price of the stock, the daily trading volume and the availability of large blocks of stock and any additional constraints related to material inside information we may possess. We have no commitments to make any such purchases.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $27.3 million and $15.3 million for 2012 and 2011, respectively. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities was primarily attributable to the growth in our revenue and net income and the resulting changes in our operating assets and liabilities.
Net cash used in investing activities was $28.3 million in 2012. Net cash provided by investing activities was $10.5 million in 2011. The increase in net cash used in investing activities was primarily due to the purchase and renovation of our new corporate headquarters and purchase of investments.
Net cash used in financing activities was $23.5 million in 2012. Net cash provided by financing activities was $20.2 million in 2011. The increase in net cash used in financing activities is primarily due to the increase of stock purchased through our stock repurchase program, partially offset by proceeds from employee stock options exercises.
As of December 31, 2012, we do not have any significant contractual obligations or commercial commitments.
We believe our available cash and marketable securities, together with the cash flow from operations, will be sufficient to fund our business for at least the next twelve months.
Critical Accounting Policies
General
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to patents, contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue from product sales or services rendered, as well as commissions from advertising or sale of products by third party vendors to our customer base when the following four revenue recognition criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the selling price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.
Service revenue is primarily derived from monthly subscription and transaction fees and is recognized in the period that services are provided. Product sales, net of return allowances, are recorded when the products are shipped and title passes to customers. Sales of items, including PhotoStamps, sold to customers are made pursuant to a sales contract that provides for transfer of both title and risk of loss upon our delivery to the carrier. Return allowances for expected product returns, which reduce product revenue, are estimated using historical experience. Commissions from the advertising or sale of products by a third party vendor to our customer base are recognized when the revenue is earned and collection is deemed probable.
Customers pay face value for postage purchased for use through our PC Postage software, and the funds are transferred directly from the customers to the United States Postal Service (“USPS”). We do not recognize revenue for this postage, as it is purchased by our customers directly from the USPS.
PhotoStamps revenue, which includes the face value of postage, from the sale of PhotoStamps sheets and rolls is made pursuant to a sales contract that provides for transfer of both title and risk of loss upon our delivery to the carrier.
Sale of PhotoStamps retail boxes are initially recorded as deferred revenue. PhotoStamps revenue related to the sale of these PhotoStamps retail boxes is subsequently recognized when either: 1) the PhotoStamps retail box is redeemed, or 2) the likelihood of the PhotoStamps retail box being redeemed is deemed remote (“breakage”) and there is no legal obligation to remit the value of the unredeemed PhotoStamps retail boxes.
On a limited basis, we allow third parties to offer products and promotions to our customer base. These arrangements generally provide payment in the form of a flat fee or revenue sharing arrangements where we receive payment upon customers accessing third party products and services. Total revenue from such advertising arrangements was not significant during 2012 and 2011.
We provide our customers with the opportunity to purchase parcel insurance directly through our software. Insurance revenue represents the gross amount charged to the customer for purchasing insurance and the related cost represents the amount paid to the insurance broker, Parcel Insurance Plan. We recognize revenue on insurance purchases upon the ship date of the insured package.
PhotoStamps Retail Boxes
We sell PhotoStamps retail boxes that are redeemable for PhotoStamps on our website. The PhotoStamps retail boxes are sold through various third party retail partners. Our PhotoStamps retail boxes are not subject to administrative fees on unredeemed boxes and have no expiration date. PhotoStamps retail box sales are recorded as deferred revenue. Prior to the second quarter of 2011, revenue was recognized only on boxes that were actually redeemed on our website.
During the second quarter of 2011, we concluded that sufficient company-specific historical evidence existed to determine the period of time after which the likelihood of the PhotoStamps retail boxes being redeemed was remote. Based on our analysis of the redemption data, we estimate that period of time to be 60 months after the sale of our PhotoStamps retail boxes.
Beginning in the second quarter of 2011, we began recognizing breakage revenue related to our PhotoStamps retail boxes utilizing the redemption recognition method. Under the redemption recognition method, we recognize breakage revenue from unredeemed retail boxes in proportion to the revenue recognized from the retail boxes that have been redeemed. During the second quarter of 2011, we recognized $2.2 million, which was $0.15 on a per share basis using fully diluted shares as of June 30, 2011 (revenue divided by fully diluted shares outstanding, exclusive of any current or prior period costs related to the retail programs), of retail box breakage revenue, of which $2.1 million related to a cumulative catch-up for previously sold and unredeemed PhotoStamps retail boxes originally recorded as deferred revenue. The retail box breakage revenue recognized was recorded in PhotoStamps revenue. We continue to recognize retail box breakage revenue from PhotoStamps retail boxes using the redemption recognition method. During 2012 and 2011 PhotoStamps retail box breakage revenue was approximately $260,000 and $2.3 million, respectively.
Intangibles
We make an assessment of the estimated useful lives of our patents and other amortizable intangibles. These estimates are made using various assumptions that are subjective in nature and could change as economic and competitive conditions change. If events were to occur that would cause our assumptions to change, the amounts recorded as amortization would be adjusted.
Contingencies and Litigation
We are subject to various routine litigation matters as a claimant and a defendant. We record any amounts recovered in these matters when received. We record liabilities for claims against us when the loss is probable and estimable. Amounts recorded are based on reviews by outside counsel, in-house counsel and management. Actual results could differ from estimates.
Promotional Expense
New PC Postage customers are typically offered promotional items that are redeemed using coupons that are qualified for redemption after a customer is successfully billed beyond an initial trial period. We account for our promotional expense in accordance with Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) 605-50-25, “Recognition – Vendor’s Accounting for Consideration Given to a Customer”, by recognizing a liability for promotional expense based on estimated amounts that will be claimed by customers unless the liability for promotional expense cannot be reasonable and reliably estimated. This includes free postage and a free digital scale and is expensed in the period in which a customer qualifies using estimated redemption rates based on historical data. Promotional expense, which is included in cost of service, is incurred as customers qualify and thereby may not correlate directly with changes in revenue, as the revenue associated with the acquired customer is earned over the customer’s lifetime.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASC Topic No. 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”), which requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be recognized using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences between the book and tax basis of recorded assets and liabilities. ASC 740 also requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some or all of the net deferred tax assets will not be realized. We record a valuation allowance to reduce our gross deferred tax assets, which are primarily comprised of U.S. Federal and State tax loss carry-forwards, to the amount that is more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50 percent) to be realized. In order for us to realize our deferred tax assets, we must be able to generate sufficient taxable income. We evaluate the appropriateness of our deferred tax assets and related valuation allowance in accordance with ASC 740 based on all available positive and negative evidence including our recent earnings, expected future taxable income and the federal and state effective tax rates related to future taxable income.
Based on our evaluation of these factors, we reduced our valuation allowances in 2012 and 2011. The portion credited to the income statement was approximately $14.4 million and $8.5 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2012, our recorded net deferred tax asset represents approximately three years of forecasted taxable income as we currently do not believe forecasted taxable income projections beyond three years can be supported at a more likely than not level. In the event we were to determine that we would not be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets valuation allowance would be charged to earnings in the period in which we make such a determination. Likewise, if we later determine that it is more likely than not that additional deferred tax assets would be realized, we would reverse the applicable portion of the previously provided valuation allowance.
Property and Equipment
We account for property and equipment at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. We compute depreciation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset, generally three to five years for furniture, fixtures and equipment and ten to forty years for building and building improvements. We have a policy of capitalizing expenditures that materially increase assets’ useful lives and charging ordinary maintenance and repairs to operations as incurred. When property or equipment is disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation and amortization are removed from the accounts, and any gain or loss is included in operations.
On January 23, 2012, we completed the purchase of our new corporate headquarters in El Segundo, California, for an aggregate purchase price of $13.4 million of which approximately $7.2 million was allocated to land value and $5.5 million was allocated to building value. The purchase was accounted for as a business combination. The building is being depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of 40 years; the land is an asset that does not get depreciated. As a result of the purchase we also acquired existing leases of building tenants, and $700,000 of the initial purchase price was allocated to lease-in-place intangible assets and is being amortized over the remaining actual lease terms, which are as long as 5.5 years.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies--Recent Accounting Pronouncements” of our accompanying consolidated financial statements regarding recent accounting pronouncements and our expectation of their impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Our exposure to market rate risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our investment portfolio. We have not used derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio. None of the instruments in our investment portfolio are held for trading purposes. Our cash equivalents and investments consist of money market, U.S. government obligations, asset-backed securities and public corporate debt securities with weighted average maturities of 220 days at December 31, 2012. Our cash equivalents and investments approximated $47 million and had a weighted average interest rate of 0.8%. Interest rate fluctuations impact the carrying value of the portfolio. The fair value of our portfolio of marketable securities would not be significantly affected by either a 10 % increase or decrease in the rates of interest due primarily to the short-term nature of the portfolio. We do not believe that the future market risks related to the above securities will have a material adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
Our consolidated financial statements, schedules and supplementary data, as listed under Item 15, appear in a separate section of this Report beginning on page F-1.
None.
|
ITEM 9A.
|
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act).
As of the end of the period covered by this Report, our management evaluated, with the participation of our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded, as of that time, that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Our internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to our management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on our assessment and those criteria, management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2012.
Ernst & Young, LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm who also audited our consolidated financial statements, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, which is included herein.
Changes in internal controls
During the quarter ended December 31, 2012, there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
|
ITEM 9B.
|
None.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Stamps.com Inc. and Subsidiary
We have audited Stamps.com Inc. and Subsidiary’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Stamps.com Inc. and Subsidiary’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Stamps.com Inc. and Subsidiary maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the balance sheets of Stamps.com Inc. and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012 of Stamps.com Inc. and Subsidiary and our report dated March 15, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
|
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
|
Los Angeles, California
March 15, 2013
PART III.
The information required under this item is incorporated by reference herein to our proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders, which will be filed with the SEC by not later than 120 days after our fiscal year end.
|
ITEM 11.
|
The information required under this item is incorporated by reference herein to our proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders, which will be filed with the SEC by not later than 120 days after our fiscal year end.
|
ITEM 12.
|
The information required under this item is incorporated by reference herein to our proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders, which will be filed with the SEC by not later than 120 days after our fiscal year end.
The information required under this item is incorporated by reference herein to our proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders, which will be filed with the SEC by not later than 120 days after our fiscal year end.
The information required under this item is incorporated by reference herein to our proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders, which will be filed with the SEC by not later than 120 days after our fiscal year end.
PART IV.
(a) Documents filed as part of this report.
1. Financial Statements. Our following financial statements are included in a separate section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K commencing on the pages referenced below:
Stamps.com Inc. and Subsidiary Financial Statements
|
Page
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
F-1
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2012 and 2011
|
F-2
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.
|
F-3
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 .
|
F-4
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.
|
F-5
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010
|
F-6
|
|
Notes to Financial Statements
|
F-7
|
2. Financial Statement Schedules. All of our financial statement schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable, not required, or the information is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.
3. Exhibits. The following Exhibits are incorporated herein by reference or are filed with this report as indicated below:
|
Exhibit Number
|
Description
|
|
3.1
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company.(11)
|
|
3.2
|
Bylaws of the Company.(3)
|
|
3.3
|
Resolution Amending Bylaws of Stamps.com Inc. (13)
|
|
4.1
|
Specimen common stock certificate.(4)
|
|
10.1
|
Patent Assignment from Mohan P. Ananda to the Company, dated January 20, 1998.(1)
|
|
10.2
|
Assignment and License Agreement between the Company and Mohan P. Ananda, dated January 20, 1998.(1)
|
|
10.3
|
1998 Stock Plan and Forms of Notice of Grant and Stock Option Agreement.(2) +++
|
|
10.4
|
1999 Stock Incentive Plan (as amended and restated on April 25, 2000).(7) +++
|
|
10.5
|
1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (as amended and restated on February 9, 2000).(6) +++
|
|
10.6
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and its directors and officers.(1) +++
|
|
10.7+
|
Patent License and Settlement Agreement dated December 19, 2003 by and between Stamps.com Inc. and Pitney Bowes Inc. (8)
|
|
10.8++
|
Agreement dated July 14, 2004 by and between Stamps.com Inc., eBay Inc. and PayPal, Inc. (9)
|
|
Exhibit Number
|
Description
|
|
10.9
|
Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Option (1999 Stock Incentive Plan).(5) +++
|
|
10.10
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement (1999 Stock Incentive Plan).(5) +++
|
|
10.11
|
Form of Addendum to Stock Option Agreement—Involuntary Termination Following Corporate Transaction/Change in Control (1999 Stock Incentive Plan).(5) +++
|
|
10.12
|
Form of Addendum to Stock Option Agreement—Limited Stock Appreciation Right (1999 Stock Incentive Plan).(5) +++
|
|
10.13
|
Form of Stock Issuance Agreement (1999 Stock Incentive Plan).(5) +++
|
|
10.14
|
Form of Addendum to Stock Issuance Agreement—Involuntary Termination Following Corporate Transaction/Change in Control (1999 Stock Incentive Plan).(5) +++
|
|
10.15
|
Form Automatic Stock Option Agreement (1999 Stock Incentive Plan).(5) +++
|
|
10.16
|
Form Notice of Grant of Non-Employee Director—Automatic Stock Option (Initial) (1999 Stock Incentive Plan).(5) +++
|
|
10.17
|
Form Notice of Grant of Non-Employee Director—Automatic Stock Option (Annual) (1999 Stock Incentive Plan).(5) +++
|
|
10.18
|
Form of Enrollment/Change Form for Employee Stock Purchase Plan.(5) +++
|
|
10.19
|
Form of Stock Purchase Agreement for Employee Stock Purchase Plan.(5) +++
|
|
10.20
|
Stock Purchase Agreement (12) +++
|
|
10.21
|
2010 Equity Incentive Plan.(13) +++
|
|
10.22
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement.(14) +++
|
|
10.23
|
Settlement Agreement among the Company, Kara Technology Incorporated and Salim Kara.(15)
|
|
10.24
|
Agreement of Purchase And Sale and Joint Escrow Instructions.(16)
|
|
14
|
Code of Ethics.(10)
|
|
21
|
List of Subsidiaries: PhotoStamps Inc., a California corporation
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.(17)
|
|
|
Power of Attorney by G. Bradford Jones.(17)
|
|
|
Power of Attorney by Mohan Ananda.(17)
|
|
|
Power of Attorney by Lloyd I. Miller.(17)
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.(17)
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.(17)
|
|
Exhibit Number
|
Description
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Office pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.(17)
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Office pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.(17)
|
|
(1)
|
Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 26, 1999 (File No. 333-77025).
|
|
(2)
|
Incorporated herein by reference to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 13, 1999 (File No. 333-77025).
|
|
(3)
|
Incorporated herein by reference to Amendment No. 2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 7, 1999 (File No. 333-77025).
|
|
(4)
|
Incorporated herein by reference to Amendment No. 4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 22, 1999 (File No. 333-77025).
|
|
(5)
|
Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 28, 1999 (File No. 333-81733).
|
|
(6)
|
Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2000 (File No. 333-33648).
|
|
(7)
|
Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 1, 2000 (File No. 333-42764).
|
|
(8)
|
Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 22, 2003 (File No. 000-26427).
|
|
(9)
|
Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 16, 2004 (File No. 000-26427).
|
|
(10)
|
Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 14, 2008 (File No. 000-26427).
|
|
(11)
|
Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 8, 2008 (File No. 000-26427).
|
|
(12)
|
Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2010 (File No. 000-26427).
|
|
(13)
|
Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 23, 2010 (File No. 000-26427).
|
|
(14)
|
Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 28, 2010 (File No. 333-168360).
|
|
(15)
|
Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 8, 2010 (File No. 000-26427).
|
|
(16)
|
Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 14, 2012 (File No. 000-26427).
|
|
(17)
|
Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
|
|
+
|
Confidential treatment requested and received as to certain portions.
|
|
++
|
Confidential treatment has been requested for certain confidential portions of this exhibit pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Exchange Act. In accordance with Rule 24b-2, these confidential portions have been omitted from this exhibit and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
|
|
+++
|
Denotes management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Stamps.com Inc. and Subsidiary
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Stamps.com Inc. and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Stamps.com Inc. and Subsidiary at December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Stamps.com Inc. and Subsidiary’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 15, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
|
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
|
|
|
Los Angeles, California
|
|
|
March 15, 2013
|
STAMPS.COM INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
December 31,
|
||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
|
Assets
|
||||||||
|
Current assets:
|
||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 29,576 | $ | 54,087 | ||||
|
Restricted cash
|
— | 500 | ||||||
|
Short-term investments
|
6,323 | 1,397 | ||||||
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
14,432 | 10,466 | ||||||
|
Other current assets
|
5,602 | 5,476 | ||||||
|
Total current assets
|
55,933 | 71,926 | ||||||
|
Property and equipment, net
|
28,631 | 2,165 | ||||||
|
Intangible assets, net
|
1,262 | 837 | ||||||
|
Long-term investments
|
10,720 | 13,379 | ||||||
|
Deferred income taxes
|
30,549 | 16,125 | ||||||
|
Other assets
|
3,757 | 3,548 | ||||||
|
Total assets
|
$ | 130,852 | $ | 107,980 | ||||
|
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
||||||||
|
Current liabilities:
|
||||||||
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
$ | 16,366 | $ | 12,075 | ||||
|
Deferred revenue
|
1,532 | 1,898 | ||||||
|
Total current liabilities
|
17,898 | 13,973 | ||||||
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
||||||||
|
Stockholders’ equity:
|
||||||||
|
Common stock, $.001 par value Authorized shares: 47,500 in 2012 and 2011 Issued shares: 27,472 in 2012 and 26,856 in 2011 Outstanding shares: 15,319 in 2012 and 16,163 in 2011
|
50 | 49 | ||||||
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
649,694 | 637,483 | ||||||
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 12,153 shares in 2012 and 10,693 shares in 2011
|
(155,260 | ) | (123,472 | ) | ||||
|
Accumulated deficit
|
(381,781 | ) | (420,338 | ) | ||||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
251 | 285 | ||||||
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
112,954 | 94,007 | ||||||
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$ | 130,852 | $ | 107,980 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
STAMPS.COM INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||||||
|
Revenues:
|
||||||||||||
|
Service
|
$ | 88,173 | $ | 75,535 | $ | 64,607 | ||||||
|
Product
|
14,710 | 13,465 | 11,725 | |||||||||
|
Insurance
|
7,120 | 4,321 | 2,023 | |||||||||
|
PhotoStamps
|
5,651 | 8,258 | 7,162 | |||||||||
|
Other
|
7 | 6 | 27 | |||||||||
|
Total revenues
|
115,661 | 101,585 | 85,544 | |||||||||
|
Cost of revenues:
|
||||||||||||
|
Service
|
15,720 | 14,720 | 13,282 | |||||||||
|
Product
|
5,435 | 4,910 | 4,337 | |||||||||
|
Insurance
|
2,334 | 1,506 | 641 | |||||||||
|
PhotoStamps
|
4,267 | 5,076 | 5,424 | |||||||||
|
Total cost of revenues
|
27,756 | 26,212 | 23,684 | |||||||||
|
Gross profit
|
87,905 | 75,373 | 61,860 | |||||||||
|
Operating expenses:
|
||||||||||||
|
Sales and marketing
|
38,755 | 34,569 | 31,174 | |||||||||
|
Research and development
|
10,243 | 9,395 | 9,420 | |||||||||
|
General and administrative
|
14,750 | 14,181 | 14,590 | |||||||||
|
Legal settlements
|
— | — | 5,211 | |||||||||
|
Total operating expenses
|
63,748 | 58,145 | 60,395 | |||||||||
|
Income from operations
|
24,157 | 17,228 | 1,465 | |||||||||
|
Non-operating asset write-off
|
— | — | (634 | ) | ||||||||
|
Interest income and other income, net
|
541 | 562 | 756 | |||||||||
|
Income before taxes
|
24,698 | 17,790 | 1,587 | |||||||||
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
(13,859 | ) | (8,475 | ) | (3,945 | ) | ||||||
|
Net income
|
$ | 38,557 | $ | 26,265 | $ | 5,532 | ||||||
|
Net income per share:
|
||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
$ | 2.40 | $ | 1.78 | $ | 0.38 | ||||||
|
Diluted
|
$ | 2.30 | $ | 1.73 | $ | 0.38 | ||||||
|
Weighted average shares outstanding :
|
||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
16,079 | 14,767 | 14,529 | |||||||||
|
Diluted
|
16,793 | 15,168 | 14,685 | |||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
STAMPS.COM INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands)
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||||||
|
Net income
|
$ | 38,557 | $ | 26,265 | $ | 5,532 | ||||||
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
||||||||||||
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on investments
|
(34 | ) | (138 | ) | 629 | |||||||
|
Comprehensive income
|
$ | 38,523 | $ | 26,127 | $ | 6,161 | ||||||
STAMPS.COM INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(in thousands)
|
Common Stock
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
|
Treasury
Stock at Cost
|
Accumulated Deficit
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
(Loss) Income
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
15,681 | $ | 47 | $ | 630,322 | $ | (104,344 | ) | $ | (450,214 | ) | $ | (206 | ) | $ | 75,605 | ||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
— | — | — | — | 5,532 | — | 5,532 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Unrealized gain on investments
|
— | — | — | — | — | 629 | 629 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
— | — | 2,840 | — | — | — | 2,840 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Return of capital
|
— | — | (27,023 | ) | — | — | — | (27,023 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Dividend
|
— | — | — | — | (1,921 | ) | — | (1,921 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Exercise of stock options
|
280 | — | 2,024 | — | — | — | 2,024 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shares issued under the ESPP
|
48 | — | 359 | — | — | — | 359 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock repurchase
|
(1,519 | ) | — | — | (13,807 | ) | — | — | (13,807 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
14,490 | $ | 47 | $ | 608,522 | $ | (118,151 | ) | $ | (446,603 | ) | $ | 423 | $ | 44,238 | |||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
— | — | — | — | 26,265 | — | 26,265 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Unrealized loss on investments
|
— | — | — | — | — | (138 | ) | (138 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
— | — | 3,419 | — | — | — | 3,419 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Exercise of stock options
|
2,043 | 2 | 25,036 | — | — | — | 25,038 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shares issued under the ESPP
|
56 | — | 506 | — | — | — | 506 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock repurchase
|
(426 | ) | — | — | (5,321 | ) | — | — | (5,321 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance at December 31, 2011
|
16,163 | $ | 49 | $ | 637,483 | $ | (123,472 | ) | $ | (420,338 | ) | $ | 285 | $ | 94,007 | |||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
— | — | — | — | 38,557 | — | 38,557 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Unrealized loss on investments
|
— | — | — | — | — | (34 | ) | (34 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
— | — | 3,991 | — | — | — | 3,991 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Exercise of stock options
|
560 | 1 | 7,305 | — | — | — | 7,306 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shares issued under the ESPP
|
56 | — | 915 | — | — | — | 915 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock repurchase
|
(1,460 | ) | — | — | (31,788 | ) | — | — | (31,788 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance at December 31, 2012
|
15,319 | $ | 50 | $ | 649,694 | $ | (155,260 | ) | $ | (381,781 | ) | $ | 251 | $ | 112,954 | |||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
STAMPS.COM INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||||||
|
Operating activities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
$ | 38,557 | $ | 26,265 | $ | 5,532 | ||||||
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
1,649 | 885 | 894 | |||||||||
|
Non-operating asset write-off
|
— | — | 634 | |||||||||
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
3,991 | 3,419 | 2,840 | |||||||||
|
Deferred income taxes
|
(14,424 | ) | (8,475 | ) | (3,979 | ) | ||||||
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Accounts receivable
|
(3,966 | ) | (5,598 | ) | (501 | ) | ||||||
|
Other current assets
|
110 | (1,461 | ) | (727 | ) | |||||||
|
Other assets
|
(209 | ) | (517 | ) | 556 | |||||||
|
Deferred revenue
|
(366 | ) | (2,295 | ) | 123 | |||||||
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
1,948 | 3,064 | (572 | ) | ||||||||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
27,290 | 15,287 | 4,800 | |||||||||
|
Investing activities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Sale of short-term investments
|
1,621 | 10,831 | 4,835 | |||||||||
|
Purchase of short-term investments
|
(6,473 | ) | (8 | ) | (14,776 | ) | ||||||
|
Sale of long-term investments
|
8,254 | 3,473 | 19,506 | |||||||||
|
Purchase of long-term investments
|
(5,703 | ) | (1,982 | ) | (9,984 | ) | ||||||
|
Release (purchase) of restricted cash
|
500 | (500 | ) | 554 | ||||||||
|
Acquisition of property, equipment and intangibles
|
(26,481 | ) | (1,308 | ) | (1,507 | ) | ||||||
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
(28,282 | ) | 10,506 | (1,372 | ) | |||||||
|
Financing activities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Dividend payment
|
— | — | (1,921 | ) | ||||||||
|
Return of capital
|
— | — | (27,023 | ) | ||||||||
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
7,306 | 25,038 | 2,024 | |||||||||
|
Issuance of common stock under ESPP
|
915 | 506 | 359 | |||||||||
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
(31,740 | ) | (5,321 | ) | (13,807 | ) | ||||||
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
(23,519 | ) | 20,223 | (40,368 | ) | |||||||
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
(24,511 | ) | 46,016 | (36,940 | ) | |||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
54,087 | 8,071 | 45,011 | |||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 29,576 | $ | 54,087 | $ | 8,071 | ||||||
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
||||||||||||
|
Income taxes paid during the period
|
$ | 221 | $ | 124 | $ | 199 | ||||||
|
Capital expenditure accrued but not paid at period end
|
$ | 2,294 | — | — | ||||||||
|
Treasury stock accrued but not paid at period end
|
$ | 49 | — | — | ||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
STAMPS.COM INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
1.
|
Description of Business
|
Stamps.com Inc. and Subsidiary (“the Company” or “we”) are the leading provider of Internet-based postage solutions. Our customers use our service to mail and ship a variety of mail pieces, including postcards, envelopes, flats and packages, using a wide range of United States Postal Service (the “USPS”) mail classes, including First Class Mail®, Priority Mail®, Express Mail®, Media Mail®, Parcel Post®, and others. Our customers include individuals, small businesses, home offices, medium-size businesses and large enterprises, and within these segments we target both mailers and shippers. We were the first ever USPS-licensed vendor to offer PC Postage® in a software-only business model in 1999.
|
2.
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Stamps.com Inc. and PhotoStamps Inc. In October 2009, we formed PhotoStamps Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary, for the purpose of managing our retail gift card operations. Because 100% of the voting control is held by us, we have consolidated PhotoStamps Inc. in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates and Risk Management
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates, and such differences may be material to the financial statements. Examples include estimates of loss contingencies, promotional coupon redemptions, the number of PhotoStamps retail boxes that will not be redeemed, deferred income taxes and estimates regarding the useful lives of our building, patents and other amortizable intangible assets.
Contingencies and Litigation
We are subject to various routine litigation matters as a claimant and a defendant. We record any amounts recovered in these matters when received. We record liabilities for claims against us when the loss is probable and estimable. Amounts recorded are based on reviews by outside counsel, in-house counsel and management. Actual results could differ from estimates.
Cash Equivalents and Investments
We consider all highly liquid investments with an original or remaining maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents.
Our cash equivalents, restricted cash and investments consisted of money market funds, U.S. government obligations, asset-backed securities and public corporate debt securities at December 31, 2012 and 2011. All investments are classified as available for sale and are recorded at market value using the specific identification method. Realized gains and losses are reflected in interest and other income, net while unrealized gains and losses are included as a separate component of stockholders' equity.
STAMPS.COM INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Accounts Receivable
Our accounts receivable relate to PC Postage services, PhotoStamps sales, branded insurance provided to customers prior to billing and other receivables. Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount, net of allowances for uncollectible accounts of approximately $239,000 and $117,000 as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and were $14.4 million and $10.5 million as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
We evaluate the collectability of our accounts receivable based on a combination of factors. If we become aware of a customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations, an allowance is recorded to reduce the net receivable to the amount reasonably believed to be collectible from the customer. For all other customers, we recognize allowances for doubtful accounts based on the length of time the receivables are past due, the current business environment and our historical experience. If the financial condition of our customers deteriorates, resulting in their inability to make payments, additional provisions are recorded in that period. Accounts receivable are written off against the allowance for uncollectible accounts when we determine amounts are no longer collectible.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Carrying amounts of certain of our financial instruments, including cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable, approximate fair value due to their short maturities. The fair values of investments are determined using quoted market prices for those securities or similar financial instruments.
Concentration of Risk
Our cash, restricted cash, cash equivalents and investments are subject to market risk, primarily interest rate and credit risk. Our investments are managed by a limited number of outside professional managers within investment guidelines set by us. Such guidelines include security type, credit quality and maturity and are intended to limit market risk by restricting our investments. From time to time, our investments held with financial institutions may exceed Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits. Interest rate fluctuations and changes in credit ratings impact the carrying value of our portfolio.
During 2012, 2011 and 2010, we did not recognize revenue from any one customer that represented 10% or more of revenues.
We do not have any customers representing 10% or more of total accounts receivable as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. We have accounts receivable from one partner that represented approximately 40% and 42% of the total accounts receivable balance as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Inventories
Inventories consist of finished products sold through our supplies store and are accounted for using the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market. Inventories reported as a component of other current assets in 2012 and 2011 were $3.4 million and $2.2 million, respectively.
Property and Equipment
We account for property and equipment at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. We compute depreciation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset, generally three to five years for furniture, fixtures and equipment and ten to forty years for building and building improvements. We have a policy of capitalizing expenditures that materially increase assets’ useful lives and charging ordinary maintenance and repairs to operations as incurred. When property or equipment is disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation and amortization are removed from the accounts, and any gain or loss is included in operations.
STAMPS.COM INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
On January 23, 2012, we completed the purchase of our new corporate headquarters in El Segundo, California, for an aggregate purchase price of $13.4 million of which approximately $7.2 million was allocated to land value and $5.5 million was allocated to building value. The purchase was accounted for as a business combination. The building is being depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of 40 years; the land is an asset that does not get depreciated. As a result of the purchase we also acquired existing leases of building tenants, and $700,000 of the initial purchase price was allocated to lease-in-place intangible assets and is being amortized over the remaining actual lease terms which are as long as 5.5 years.
Trademarks, Patents and Intangible Assets
Acquired trademarks, patents and other intangibles are included in intangible assets, net in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and are carried at cost less accumulated amortization. Cost associated with internally developed intangible assets is typically expensed as incurred as research and development costs.
Amortization is calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets, ranging from approximately 5 to 17 years. During 2012, 2011 and 2010, amortization expense, including the amortization of trademarks, patents and lease-in-place intangible asset, was approximately $269,000, $47,000 and $13,000, respectively.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Intangible Assets
Long-lived assets including intangible assets with definitive useful lives are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.
Intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives are not amortized but, instead, tested at least annually for impairment while intangible assets that have finite useful lives continue to be amortized over their respective useful lives.
Intangible assets are tested for impairment using a two-step process. The first step is to determine the fair value of the reporting unit, which may be calculated using a discounted cash flow methodology, and compare this value to its carrying value. If the fair value exceeds the carrying value, no further work is required, and no impairment loss would be recognized. If the fair value is less than the carrying value, the second step is performed. The second step is an allocation of the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the reporting unit's assets and liabilities under a hypothetical purchase price allocation. Based on the annual evaluations performed by us, there was no impairment of intangible assets during the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 or 2010.
Deferred Revenue
The majority of our deferred revenue relates to PhotoStamps retail boxes. We sell our PhotoStamps retail boxes to our customers through our website and selected third parties. Proceeds from the sale of our PhotoStamps retail boxes are initially recorded as a liability when received. We record the liability for outstanding PhotoStamps retail boxes in deferred revenue.
STAMPS.COM INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue from product sales or services rendered, as well as commissions from advertising or sale of products by third party vendors to our customer base when the following four revenue recognition criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the selling price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.
Service revenue is primarily derived from monthly subscription and transaction fees and is recognized in the period that services are provided. Product sales, net of return allowances, are recorded when the products are shipped and title passes to customers. Sales of items, including PhotoStamps, sold to customers are made pursuant to a sales contract that provides for transfer of both title and risk of loss upon our delivery to the carrier. Return allowances for expected product returns, which reduce product revenue, are estimated using historical experience. Commissions from the advertising or sale of products by a third party vendor to our customer base are recognized when the revenue is earned and collection is deemed probable.
Customers pay face value for postage purchased for use through our PC Postage software, and the funds are transferred directly from the customers to the United States Postal Service (“USPS”). We do not recognize revenue for this postage, as it is purchased by our customers directly from the USPS.
PhotoStamps revenue, which includes the face value of postage, from the sale of PhotoStamps sheets and rolls is made pursuant to a sales contract that provides for transfer of both title and risk of loss upon our delivery to the carrier.
Sale of PhotoStamps retail boxes are initially recorded as deferred revenue. PhotoStamps revenue related to the sale of these PhotoStamps retail boxes is subsequently recognized when either: 1) the PhotoStamps retail box is redeemed, or 2) the likelihood of the PhotoStamps retail box being redeemed is deemed remote (“breakage”) and there is no legal obligation to remit the value of the unredeemed PhotoStamps retail boxes.
On a limited basis, we allow third parties to offer products and promotions to our customer base. These arrangements generally provide payment in the form of a flat fee or revenue sharing arrangements where we receive payment upon customers accessing third party products and services. Total revenue from such advertising arrangements was not significant during 2012 and 2011.
We provide our customers with the opportunity to purchase parcel insurance directly through our software. Insurance revenue represents the gross amount charged to the customer for purchasing insurance and the related cost represents the amount paid to the insurance broker, Parcel Insurance Plan. We recognize revenue on insurance purchases upon the ship date of the insured package.
PhotoStamps Retail Boxes
We sell PhotoStamps retail boxes that are redeemable for PhotoStamps on our website. The PhotoStamps retail boxes are sold through various third party retail partners. Our PhotoStamps retail boxes are not subject to administrative fees on unredeemed boxes and have no expiration date. PhotoStamps retail box sales are recorded as deferred revenue. Prior to the second quarter of 2011, revenue was recognized only on boxes that were actually redeemed on our website.
During the second quarter of 2011, we concluded that sufficient company-specific historical evidence existed to determine the period of time after which the likelihood of the PhotoStamps retail boxes being redeemed was remote. Based on our analysis of the redemption data, we estimate that period of time to be 60 months after the sale of our PhotoStamps retail boxes.
STAMPS.COM INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Beginning in the second quarter of 2011, we began recognizing breakage revenue related to our PhotoStamps retail boxes utilizing the redemption recognition method. Under the redemption recognition method, we recognize breakage revenue from unredeemed retail boxes in proportion to the revenue recognized from the retail boxes that have been redeemed. During the second quarter of 2011, we recognized $2.2 million, which was $0.15 on a per share basis using fully diluted shares as of June 30, 2011 (revenue divided by fully diluted shares outstanding, exclusive of any current or prior period costs related to the retail programs), of retail box breakage revenue, of which $2.1 million related to a cumulative catch-up for previously sold and unredeemed PhotoStamps retail boxes originally recorded as deferred revenue. The retail box breakage revenue recognized was recorded in PhotoStamps revenue. We continue to recognize retail box breakage revenue from PhotoStamps retail boxes using the redemption recognition method. During 2012 and 2011 PhotoStamps retail box breakage revenue was approximately $260,000 and $2.3 million, respectively.
Cost of Service Revenue
Cost of service revenue principally consists of the cost of customer service, certain promotional expenses, system operating costs, credit card processing fees and customer misprints that do not qualify for reimbursement from the USPS. Cost of product revenue principally consists of the cost of products sold through our Mailing & Shipping Supplies Store and the related costs of shipping and handling. The cost of insurance revenue principally consists of parcel insurance offering costs. Cost of PhotoStamps revenue principally consists of the face value of postage, image review costs and printing and fulfillment costs.
Promotional Expense
New PC Postage customers are typically offered promotional items that are redeemed using coupons that are qualified for redemption after a customer is successfully billed beyond an initial trial period. We account for our promotional expense in accordance with Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) 605-50-25, “Recognition – Vendor’s Accounting for Consideration Given to a Customer”, by recognizing a liability for promotional expense based on estimated amounts that will be claimed by customers unless the liability for promotional expense cannot be reasonable and reliably estimated. This includes free postage and a free digital scale and is expensed in the period in which a customer qualifies using estimated redemption rates based on historical data. Promotional expense, which is included in cost of service, is incurred as customers qualify and thereby may not correlate directly with changes in revenue, as the revenue associated with the acquired customer is earned over the customer’s lifetime. During 2012, 2011 and 2010 promotional expense was $3.5 million, $3.6 million and $2.7, respectively.
Research and Development Costs
Research and development expense principally consist of compensation for personnel involved in the development of our services, depreciation of equipment and software and expenditures for consulting services and third party software.
Sales and Marketing
Sales and marketing expense principally consists of spending to acquire new customers and compensation and related expenses for personnel engaged in sales, marketing, and business development activities. Ongoing marketing programs include the following: traditional advertising, partnerships, customer referral programs, customer re-marketing efforts, telemarketing, direct sales, direct mail, and online advertising.
Advertising Costs
We expense the costs of producing advertisements as incurred, and expense the costs of communicating and placing the advertising in the period in which the advertising space or airtime is used. For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, advertising and tradeshow costs were $8.7 million, $7.0 million and $5.5 million, respectively.
STAMPS.COM INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Internet Advertising
We recognize Internet advertising expense based on the specifics of the individual agreements. Under partner and affiliate agreements, third parties refer prospects to our web site, and we pay the third parties when the customer completes the customer registration process, or in some cases, upon the first successful billing of a customer. We record these expenses on a monthly basis as prospects are successfully converted to customers. Under Internet search advertising, we record expenses based on actual “click activity” on our displayed advertisements following targeted key word searches.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expense principally consists of compensation and related costs for executive and administrative personnel, fees for legal and other professional services, depreciation of equipment and software used for general corporate purposes and amortization of intangible assets.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”), which requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be recognized using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences between the book and tax basis of recorded assets and liabilities. ASC 740 also requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some or all of the net deferred tax assets will not be realized. We record a valuation allowance to reduce our gross deferred tax assets, which are primarily comprised of U.S. Federal and State tax loss carry-forwards, to the amount that is more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50 percent) to be realized. In order for us to realize our deferred tax assets, we must be able to generate sufficient taxable income. We evaluate the appropriateness of our deferred tax assets and related valuation allowance in accordance with ASC 740 based on all available positive and negative evidence.
Under the guidance related to uncertain tax positions, we are required to determine whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the position. A tax position that meets the more likely than not recognition threshold is measured to determine the amount of liability or benefit to recognize in the financial statements.
Net Income per Share
Net income per share represents net income attributable to common stockholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during a reported period. The diluted net income per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock, including stock options (commonly and hereafter referred to as “common stock equivalents”), were exercised or converted into common stock. Diluted net income per share is calculated by dividing net income during a reported period by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus common stock equivalents for the period.
STAMPS.COM INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The following table reconciles share amounts utilized to calculate basic and diluted net income per share (in thousands, except per share data):
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||||||
|
Net income
|
$ | 38,557 | $ | 26,265 | $ | 5,532 | ||||||
|
Basic - weighted average common shares
|
16,079 | 14,767 | 14,529 | |||||||||
|
Dilutive effect of common stock equivalents
|
714 | 401 | 156 | |||||||||
|
Diluted - weighted average common shares
|
16,793 | 15,168 | 14,685 | |||||||||
|
Net income per share:
|
||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
$ | 2.40 | $ | 1.78 | $ | 0.38 | ||||||
|
Diluted
|
$ | 2.30 | $ | 1.73 | $ | 0.38 | ||||||
The calculation of dilutive shares excludes the effect of the following options that are considered anti-dilutive (in thousands):
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||||||
|
Anti-dilutive stock option shares
|
119 | 1,023 | 1,928 | |||||||||
Stock-Based Compensation
We estimate the fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model and recognize stock-based compensation expense during each period based on the value of that portion of share-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest during the period, reduced for estimated forfeitures. We estimate forfeitures at the time of grant based on historical data and revise, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Compensation expense recognized for all employee stock options granted is recognized using the straight-line method over their respective vesting periods of three to five years.
During the fourth quarter of 2010, in connection with our special dividend of $2.00 per share, in order to prevent that dividend from diluting or enlarging the rights of the holders of outstanding stock options and purchase rights under certain of our employee plans, including our equity plans, we reduced the exercise price of affected options and rights in a manner that is both value neutral and that did not result in the incurrence of any incremental stock-based compensation expense. Because the exercise price could not be adjusted in this manner without adverse tax consequences for certain option grants, we made value neutral cash payments with respect to those option grants, which compensated option holders for lost economic value in those option grants. These cash payments were expensed as compensation and did not affect our stock-based compensation expense. We did not recognize any similar cash payment in 2012 and 2011.
STAMPS.COM INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The following table sets forth the stock-based compensation expense that we recognized for the periods indicated (in thousands):
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||||||
|
Stock-based compensation expense relating to:
|
||||||||||||
|
Employee and director stock options
|
$ | 3,438 | $ | 3,112 | $ | 2,725 | ||||||
|
Employee stock purchases
|
553 | 307 | 115 | |||||||||
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
$ | 3,991 | $ | 3,419 | $ | 2,840 | ||||||
|
Stock-based compensation expense relating to:
|
||||||||||||
|
Cost of revenues
|
$ | 325 | $ | 278 | $ | 253 | ||||||
|
Sales and marketing
|
873 | 764 | 727 | |||||||||
|
Research and development
|
893 | 750 | 575 | |||||||||
|
General and administrative
|
1,900 | 1,627 | 1,285 | |||||||||
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
$ | 3,991 | $ | 3,419 | $ | 2,840 | ||||||
We use the Black-Scholes option valuation model to estimate the fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant, which requires us to make a number of highly complex and subjective assumptions, including stock price volatility, expected term, risk-free interest rates and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors. In the case of options we grant, our assumption of expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our stock price over the term equal to the expected life of the options. We base the risk-free interest rate on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the expected life of the options assumed at the date of grant. The estimated expected life represents the weighted-average period the stock options are expected to remain outstanding, determined based on an analysis of historical exercise behavior.
The following are the weighted average assumptions used in the Black-Scholes valuation model for the periods indicated:
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||||||
|
Expected dividend yield
|
— | — | — | |||||||||
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
0.37 | % | 1.39 | % | 1.67 | % | ||||||
|
Expected volatility
|
50 | % | 48 | % | 49 | % | ||||||
|
Expected life (in years)
|
3.7 | 4.4 | 4.5 | |||||||||
|
Expected forfeiture rate
|
7 | % | 9 | % | 20 | % | ||||||
We elected to utilize the alternative transition method for calculating the tax effects of stock-based compensation. The alternative transition method includes computational guidance to establish the beginning balance of the additional paid-in capital pool (“APIC Pool”) related to the tax effects of employee stock-based compensation, and a simplified method to determine the subsequent impact on the APIC Pool for employee stock-based compensation awards that are vested and outstanding upon adoption of ASC 718. There has been no tax benefit recognized to date from the exercise of stock options. A tax benefit will be recorded in additional paid-in capital when these deductions reduce our future income taxes payable.
At December 31, 2012, we had approximately $5.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under our stock incentive plans, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.0 years.
STAMPS.COM INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Treasury Stock
During 2012, 2011 and 2010, we repurchased 1.5 million shares for $31.8 million, 426,000 shares for $5.3 million and 1.5 million shares for $13.8 million, respectively.
Segment Information
We operate in a single segment. We are a provider of Internet-based postage solutions located in a single geographic location from which substantially all of our revenue is generated. While components of revenue include both services and products associated with our postage solutions, our Chief Executive Officer, who is the chief operating decision maker, evaluates performance, makes operating decisions and allocates resources based on the financial data provided in our financial statements as a single operating segment.
Website Development Costs
We develop and maintain our website. Costs associated with the operation of our website consist primarily of software and hardware purchased from third parties and administrative cost relating to the maintenance and development of the website. Costs related to the purchase of software and hardware are capitalized based on our capitalization policy. These capitalized costs are amortized based on their estimated useful life. Administrative costs related to the maintenance and development of our website are expensed as incurred.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2012, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-02, Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) — Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment (ASU 2012-02), which provides the option for companies to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50%) that an indefinite-lived intangible is impaired. This is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. We do not anticipate the adoption of ASU 2012-02 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
|
3.
|
Intangible Assets
|
We have amortizable and non-amortizable intangible assets consisting of patents, trademarks, other intellectual property and lease-in-place intangible assets with a gross carrying value of $9.4 million and $8.7 million as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and accumulated amortization of $8.1 million and $7.8 million as of December 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. During 2012, we completed our purchase of our new corporate headquarters for an aggregate purchase price of $13.4 million. As a result of the purchase we also acquired existing leases of building tenants, and $700,000 of the initial purchase price was allocated to lease-in-place intangible assets and is being amortized over the remaining actual lease terms, which are as long as 5.5 years. The expected useful lives of our amortizable intangible assets range from approximately 5 to 17 years. As of December 31, 2012, the remaining weighted average amortization period for our amortizable intangible assets is 5.2 years. During 2012, we assessed whether events or changes in circumstances occurred that could potentially indicate that the carrying amount of our intangible assets may not be recoverable. We concluded that there were no such events or changes in circumstances during 2012 and determined that the fair value of our intangible assets was in excess of their carrying value as of December 31, 2012. Aggregate amortization expense on patents, trademarks and lease-in-place intangible asset was approximately $269,000, $47,000 and $13,000 for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Our expected yearly amortization expense for the next five years is approximately $141,000.
STAMPS.COM INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
|
4.
|
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments
|
Our cash equivalents, restricted cash and investments consist of money market, U.S. government obligations, asset-backed securities and public corporate debt securities at December 31, 2012 and 2011. We consider all highly liquid investments with an original or remaining maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. All of our investments are classified as available for sale and are recorded at market value using the specific identification method. Realized gains and losses are reflected in other income, net using the specific identification method. Net realized gain and loss during the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 is not material to our financial statements. Unrealized gains and losses are included as a separate component of stockholders' equity. We do not intend to sell investments with an amortized cost basis exceeding fair value, and it is not likely that we will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases. We have four securities with a total fair value of $98,000 that have unrealized losses of approximately $9,000 as of December 31, 2012.
The following table summarizes realized gains and losses for the period indicated (in thousands):
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
|
Realized gain
|
$ | 11 | $ | 11 | $ | 62 | ||||||
|
Realized loss
|
(2 | ) | — | (97 | ) | |||||||
|
Net realized gain (loss)
|
$ | 9 | $ | 11 | $ | (35 | ) | |||||
On at least a quarterly basis, we evaluate our available for sale securities and record an “other-than-temporary impairment” (“OTTI”) if we believe their fair value is less than historical cost and it is probable that we will not collect all contractual cash flows. We did not record any OTTI during 2012 and 2011 after evaluating a number of factors including, but not limited to:
|
|
·
|
How much fair value has declined below amortized cost
|
|
|
·
|
The financial condition of the issuers
|
|
|
·
|
Significant rating agency changes on the issuers
|
|
|
·
|
Our intent and ability to hold the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value
|
STAMPS.COM INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The following table summarizes our cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and investments as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):
|
December 31, 2012
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Cost or
|
Gross
|
Gross
|
||||||||||||||
|
Amortized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Estimated
|
|||||||||||||
|
Cost
|
Gains
|
Losses
|
Fair Value
|
|||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Cash
|
$ | 7,043 | — | — | $ | 7,043 | ||||||||||
|
Money market
|
22,533 | — | — | 22,533 | ||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
29,576 | — | — | 29,576 | ||||||||||||
|
Short-term investments:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate notes and bonds
|
5,248 | 66 | — | 5,314 | ||||||||||||
|
U.S. government and agency securities
|
1,005 | 4 | — | 1,009 | ||||||||||||
|
Short-term investments
|
6,253 | 70 | — | 6,323 | ||||||||||||
|
Long-term investments:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate bonds and asset backed securities
|
10,539 | 190 | (9 | ) | 10,720 | |||||||||||
|
Long-term investments
|
10,539 | 190 | (9 | ) | 10,720 | |||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents and investments
|
$ | 46,368 | 260 | (9 | ) | $ | 46,619 | |||||||||
|
December 31, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Cost or
|
Gross
|
Gross
|
||||||||||||||
|
Amortized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Estimated
|
|||||||||||||
|
Cost
|
Gains
|
Losses
|
Fair Value
|
|||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Cash
|
$ | 8,768 | — | — | $ | 8,768 | ||||||||||
|
Money market
|
45,319 | — | — | 45,319 | ||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
54,087 | — | — | 54,087 | ||||||||||||
|
Restricted cash:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Money market
|
500 | — | — | 500 | ||||||||||||
|
Restricted cash
|
500 | — | — | 500 | ||||||||||||
|
Short-term investments:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate notes and bonds
|
1,400 | 6 | (9 | ) | 1,397 | |||||||||||
|
Short-term investments
|
1,400 | 6 | (9 | ) | 1,397 | |||||||||||
|
Long-term investments:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate bonds and asset backed securities
|
12,084 | 309 | (38 | ) | 12,355 | |||||||||||
|
U.S. government and agency securities
|
1,007 | 17 | — | 1,024 | ||||||||||||
|
Long-term investments
|
13,091 | 326 | (38 | ) | 13,379 | |||||||||||
|
Cash and equivalents, restricted cash and investments
|
$ | 69,078 | 332 | (47 | ) | $ | 69,363 | |||||||||
Restricted cash of $500,000 as of December 31, 2011 was related to the escrow for the purchase of our new corporate headquarters building.
STAMPS.COM INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The following table summarizes contractual maturities of our marketable fixed-income securities as of December 31, 2012 (in thousands):
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
|||||||
|
Due within one year
|
$ | 6,253 | $ | 6,323 | ||||
|
Due after one year through five years
|
10,539 | 10,720 | ||||||
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
— | — | ||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 16,792 | $ | 17,043 | ||||
|
5.
|
Fair Value Measurements
|
Financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are classified in one of the three following categories, which are described below:
|
Level 1 -
|
Valuations based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets in an active market.
|
|
Level 2 -
|
Valuations based on quoted prices in markets where trading occurs infrequently or whose values are based on quoted prices of instruments with similar attributes in active markets.
|
|
Level 3 -
|
Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and involve management judgment and our own assumptions about market participants and pricing.
|
The following table summarizes our financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):
|
Fair Value Measurement at Reporting Date Using
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Description
|
December 31,
2012
|
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
|
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
|
||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 29,576 | $ | 29,576 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
|
Available-for-sale debt securities
|
17,043 | — | 17,043 | — | ||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 46,619 | $ | 29,576 | $ | 17,043 | $ | — | ||||||||
STAMPS.COM INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
|
Fair Value Measurement at Reporting Date Using
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Description
|
December 31,
2011
|
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
|
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
|
||||||||||||
|
Cash, restricted cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 54,587 | $ | 54,587 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
|
Available-for-sale debt securities
|
14,776 | — | 14,776 | — | ||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 69,363 | $ | 54,587 | $ | 14,776 | $ | — | ||||||||
The fair value of our available-for-sale debt securities included in the Level 2 category is based on the market values obtained from an independent pricing service that were evaluated using pricing models that vary by asset class and may incorporate available trade, bid and other market information and price quotes from well established independent pricing vendors and broker-dealers.
There were no non-financial assets or liabilities that were required to be measured at fair value as of December 31, 2012 and 2011.
|
6.
|
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses
|
The following table summarizes our accounts payable and accrued expenses as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
|
Payroll and related accrual
|
$ | 3,783 | $ | 3,252 | ||||
|
Cost of sale, inventory and materials accrual
|
2,366 | 2,601 | ||||||
|
Construction and related fixed asset accrual
|
2,216 | — | ||||||
|
Professional fees accrual
|
690 | 598 | ||||||
|
Sales and marketing related accrual
|
2,832 | 2,529 | ||||||
|
Operating expenses related accrual
|
1,651 | 1,142 | ||||||
|
Other accruals
|
2,828 | 1,953 | ||||||
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
$ | 16,366 | $ | 12,075 | ||||
|
7.
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
|
As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, our allowance for doubtful accounts totaled approximately $239,000 and $117,000, respectively. Increases in our allowance for doubtful accounts totaled approximately $122,000 and $9,000 for 2012 and 2011, respectively. There were no material write-offs against the allowance for doubtful accounts during 2012 or 2011.
STAMPS.COM INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
|
8.
|
Property and Equipment
|
Property and equipment is summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
|
Land
|
$ | 7,156 | $ | — | ||||
|
Building
|
4,886 | — | ||||||
|
Building improvements
|
13,569 | — | ||||||
|
Furniture and equipment
|
1,362 | 2,178 | ||||||
|
Computers and software
|
8,311 | 14,494 | ||||||
|
Leasehold improvements
|
— | 1,769 | ||||||
| 35,284 | 18,441 | |||||||
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
(6,653 | ) | (16,276 | ) | ||||
|
Property and equipment, net
|
$ | 28,631 | $ | 2,165 | ||||
During 2012, 2011 and 2010, depreciation expense was approximately $1.4 million, $838,000 and $881,000, respectively. Prior to 2010, we incurred $634,000 in capitalized fixed assets related to a project to launch a new third party billing system. During 2010, we made a decision to abandon this project before it was completed and went live. As a result, we wrote-off $634,000 of fixed assets in the fourth quarter of 2010. We did not have any similar write-off in 2012 or 2011.
|
9.
|
Income Taxes
|
During 2012, our net income tax benefit consisted of federal and state minimum taxes and a reduction of a portion of our valuation allowance on our deferred tax asset (as described below). Our effective income tax rate differs from the statutory income tax rate primarily as a result of the reduction of a portion of our valuation allowance. We evaluated the appropriateness of our deferred tax assets and related valuation allowance in accordance with ASC 740 based on all available positive and negative evidence. A valuation allowance is recorded against a portion of our gross deferred tax assets as we have determined the realization of these assets does not meet the more likely than not criteria.
During the second quarter of 2010, we recorded an income tax benefit of approximately $4.0 million when we determined that a release of a portion of our valuation allowance was appropriate as a result of the following discrete events: (1) the attainment of over five consecutive years of taxable income, (2) the material decline of our Section 382 ownership under the Internal Revenue Code from approximately 34% as of March 31, 2010 to approximately 24% as of June 30, 2010, and (3) the settlement of our outstanding patent infringement litigation with Kara Technology, which improved our confidence in our short-term taxable income projection by eliminating the uncertainty of a potential large negative judgment against us and eliminating the related on-going third party litigation expenses. During the fourth quarter of 2011, we released a portion of our valuation allowance totaling approximately $8.5 million as a result of an increase in our projected taxable income.
On March 6, 2012, we entered into a binding agreement with PSI Systems, Inc. (PSI) to resolve all outstanding patent litigation among the parties. Because the PSI litigation settlement occurred during the first quarter of 2012, we eliminated what had previously been negative evidence at that time. The litigation settlement then became positive evidence because (1) it eliminated the hard-to-predict fluctuations in litigation expenditures, which we expected to be material in future forecasts, (2) it eliminated the potential for a material negative financial judgment against us and (3) it eliminated the possibility of an injunction against us. We believe the other positive and negative evidence we evaluated is consistent (e.g., no material change has occurred) relative to our evaluation of this evidence in prior periods. Based on this discrete event, we extended our forecast of projected taxable income from two years to three years for the portion of our deferred tax asset for which it was more likely than not that a tax benefit would be realized under ASC 740 as of March 31, 2012. As a result, we released a portion of our valuation allowance totaling $11.9 million during the first quarter of 2012. During the fourth quarter of 2012, based on our updated forecast of three year projected taxable income and a change in the California state tax laws, we recorded another release of a portion of our valuation allowance totaling approximately $2.5 million.
STAMPS.COM INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
In making these determinations, we considered the available positive and negative evidence, including our recent earnings trend, expected future taxable income and the federal and state effective tax rates related to the future taxable income. As of December 31, 2012, we continued to maintain a valuation allowance for the remainder of our gross deferred tax assets.
In September 2008, the State of California passed legislation temporarily suspending the use of NOLs to offset current state income tax expense for the tax years 2008 and 2009. In October 2010, the State of California passed legislation extending this suspension for tax years 2010 and 2011. We did not incur any additional California state income tax as a result of the state NOL suspension during the year ended December 31, 2010 as we were able to offset 100% of our state income tax liability through the use of our research and development tax credits. During 2011 we were in a taxable loss position for tax reporting purposes and as a result we did not use any tax credits. We recorded a current tax provision for corporate alternative minimum federal taxes and state taxes of approximately $565,000, $0 and $34,000 during the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Total tax benefit recorded was approximately $13.9 million, $8.5 and $3.9 million during the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Under the guidance related to uncertain tax positions, we are required to determine whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the position. A tax position that meets the more likely than not recognition threshold is measured to determine the amount of liability or benefit to recognize in the financial statements.
In accordance with the guidance we have evaluated our research and development tax credits for uncertain tax positions. As of December 31, 2012 we have research and development tax credits totaling $6.8 million for Federal and California purposes. In addition, we had $1.9 million of unrecognized federal tax benefits which is subject to examination by the taxing authorities and upon further examination, we may increase or decrease our unrecognized tax benefit based on the results of the examination.
The following is a tabular reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
|
Unrecognized
Tax Benefits
|
||||
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
$ | (1,710 | ) | |
|
Additions for tax positions of prior years
|
(23 | ) | ||
|
Addition for tax position of the current year
|
— | |||
|
Settlement
|
— | |||
|
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
$ | (1,733 | ) | |
|
Reduction for tax positions of prior years
|
71 | |||
|
Addition for tax position of the current year
|
(83 | ) | ||
|
Settlement
|
— | |||
|
Balance at December 31, 2011
|
$ | (1,745 | ) | |
|
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
|
— | |||
|
Additions for tax position of the current year
|
(160 | ) | ||
|
Settlement
|
— | |||
|
Balance at December 31, 2012
|
$ | (1,905 | ) | |
STAMPS.COM INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Our policy is to recognize interest and penalties expense, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense. As of December 31, 2012, we have not recorded any interest and penalty expense.
We remain subject to examination by the relevant tax authorities. These include the 2009 through 2011 tax years for federal purposes and the 2010 through 2011 tax years for California purposes.
Our effective tax rate differs from the statutory federal income tax rate primarily as a result of the establishment of a valuation allowance for the future benefits to be received from the deferred tax assets including net operating loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards. The tax effect of temporary differences that give rise to a significant portion of the deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2012 and 2011 are presented below (in thousands):
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
|
Deferred tax assets (liabilities):
|
||||||||
|
Net operating loss carryforward
|
$ | 63,830 | $ | 77,737 | ||||
|
Tax credits
|
5,467 | 4,161 | ||||||
|
Depreciation
|
(139 | ) | 84 | |||||
|
Amortization
|
494 | 775 | ||||||
|
Accruals
|
2,214 | 2,540 | ||||||
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
71,866 | 85,297 | ||||||
|
Valuation allowance
|
(41,317 | ) | (69,172 | ) | ||||
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
$ | 30,549 | $ | 16,125 | ||||
We have NOL carryforwards of approximately $210 million and $100 million for federal and state income tax purposes, respectively, at December 31, 2012 which can be carried forward to offset future taxable income. We have available tax credit carryforwards of approximately $5.3 million and $3.1 million for federal and state income tax purposes, respectively at December 31, 2012, which can be carried forward to offset future taxable liabilities. Our federal NOLs will begin to expire in 2020, and our state NOLs will begin to expire in 2013. The federal tax credits begin to expire in 2018. Under California law, California tax credits do not have an expiration date.
We recognize excess tax benefits associated with the exercise of stock options directly to stockholders’ equity only when realized. Accordingly, deferred tax assets are not recognized for NOL resulting from excess tax benefits. As of December 31, 2012, deferred tax assets do not include approximately $9.1 million of these excess tax benefits from employee stock option exercises that are a component of our NOL carryforwards. Accordingly, additional paid-in capital will increase up to an additional $9.1 million if and when such excess tax benefits are realized.
The Federal Tax Reform Act of 1986 and similar state tax laws contain provisions that may limit the NOL carryforwards to be used in any given year upon the occurrence of certain events, including a significant change in ownership interests.
We maintain a study to understand the status of net operating losses. Based on that study, we believe that we have not undergone an Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 382 change of ownership that would trigger an impairment of the use of our NOLs since our secondary offering in December 1999. Under IRC Section 382 rules, a change in ownership can occur whenever there is a shift in ownership by more than 50 percentage points by one or more “5% shareholders” within a three-year period. When a change of ownership is triggered, the NOLs may be impaired. We estimate that, as of December 31, 2012 we were at approximately 22% level compared with the 50% level that would trigger impairment of our NOLs.
STAMPS.COM INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The benefit for income taxes consists of (in thousands):
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||||||
|
Current:
|
||||||||||||
|
Federal
|
$ | 411 | $ | — | $ | 34 | ||||||
|
State
|
154 | — | — | |||||||||
| 565 | — | 34 | ||||||||||
|
Deferred:
|
||||||||||||
|
Federal
|
(15,958 | ) | (7,245 | ) | (3,396 | ) | ||||||
|
State
|
1,534 | (1,230 | ) | (583 | ) | |||||||
| (14,424 | ) | (8,475 | ) | (3,979 | ) | |||||||
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
$ | (13,859 | ) | $ | (8,475 | ) | $ | (3,945 | ) | |||
Differences between the benefit for income taxes and income taxes at the statutory federal income tax rate are as follows (in thousands):
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||||||
|
Income tax at statutory federal rate
|
$ | 8,823 | $ | 6,057 | $ | 534 | ||||||
|
State income taxes, net of federal benefit
|
1,516 | 1,044 | 36 | |||||||||
|
Effect of permanent differences
|
12 | 12 | 467 | |||||||||
|
Change in valuation allowance - discrete release
|
(14,424 | ) | (8,475 | ) | (3,979 | ) | ||||||
|
Other changes in valuation allowance, net (1)
|
(13,431 | ) | (7,225 | ) | (1,026 | ) | ||||||
| Change in state rate | 4,186 | — | — | |||||||||
|
Unrecognized tax benefits
|
160 | 12 | 23 | |||||||||
|
Other
|
(701 | ) | 100 | — | ||||||||
| $ | (13,859 | ) | $ | (8,475 | ) | $ | (3,945 | ) | ||||
(1) Other changes in valuation allowance, net includes the tax effect of utilization of net operating losses of $13 million, $0 and $401,000 for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, which were provided for as part of the valuation allowance prior to utilization.
10. Employee Stock Plans
Stock Incentive Plans
Our 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (the “1999 Plan”), which became effective in June 1999, was the successor to the 1998 Stock Plan (the “1998 Plan”). Upon approval of the 1999 Plan, all outstanding options under the 1998 Plan were transferred to the 1999 Plan, and no further option grants were made under the 1998 Plan. All outstanding options under the 1998 Plan continue to be governed by the terms and conditions of the existing option agreements for those grants, unless our compensation committee decides to extend one or more features of the 1999 Plan to those options. In June 2009, our 1999 Plan expired and no further options grants were made under the 1999 Plan. Our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2010 Plan”) was approved by our stockholders in June 2010. Under the 2010 Plan, we are authorized to issue 3,500,000 shares of common stock and stock units, although “full value” awards (such as restricted stock and restricted stock units) will be counted against the 2010 Plan’s overall limits as two shares (rather than one), while options and stock appreciation rights will be counted as one share. A summary of stock option activity is as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
STAMPS.COM INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
|
Options Outstanding
|
Weighted
Average
|
|||||||
|
Number of Options
|
Exercise
Price
|
|||||||
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
3,176 | $ | 14.38 | |||||
|
Granted
|
207 | 11.33 | ||||||
|
Forfeited
|
(325 | ) | 21.69 | |||||
|
Exercised
|
(280 | ) | 7.22 | |||||
|
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
2,778 | $ | 12.58 | |||||
|
Granted
|
1,718 | 13.20 | ||||||
|
Forfeited
|
(136 | ) | 12.01 | |||||
|
Exercised
|
(2,043 | ) | 12.25 | |||||
|
Balance at December 31, 2011
|
2,317 | $ | 13.36 | |||||
|
Granted
|
192 | 25.50 | ||||||
|
Forfeited
|
(88 | ) | 21.44 | |||||
|
Exercised
|
(560 | ) | 13.04 | |||||
|
Balance at December 31, 2012
|
1,861 | $ | 14.33 | |||||
The weighted-average fair value of stock grants for 2012, 2011 and 2010 using the Black-Scholes valuation method are as follows:
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||||||
|
Weighted-average fair value of stock options with an exercise price equal to the market price on the grant date
|
$ | 5.04 | $ | 5.05 | $ | 4.71 | ||||||
|
Weighted-average fair value of stock options with an exercise price greater than the market price on the grant date
|
— | — | — | |||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 5.04 | $ | 5.05 | $ | 4.71 | ||||||
Weighted average exercise prices for stock options exercised in 2012 are as follows:
|
2012
|
||||
|
Weighted-average exercise price of stock options with an exercise price equal to the market price on the grant date
|
$ | 13.04 | ||
|
Weighted-average exercise price of stock options with an exercise price greater than the market price on the grant date
|
13.40 | |||
|
Total weighted-average exercise price
|
$ | 13.04 | ||
STAMPS.COM INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The following tables summarize information concerning outstanding and exercisable options at December 31, 2012 (in thousands, except number of years and per share amounts):
|
Options Outstanding
|
Options Exercisable
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Range of Exercise Prices
|
Number
Outstanding
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining Contractual
Life (in Years)
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price per
Share
|
Number
Exercisable
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price per
Share
|
|||||||||||||||||
| $ | 0.00 - $9.99 | 74 | 5.5 | $ | 8.98 | 54 | $ | 8.88 | ||||||||||||||
| $ | 10.00 - $19.99 | 1,520 | 7.5 | 12.67 | 724 | 12.78 | ||||||||||||||||
| $ | 20.00 - $29.99 | 256 | 8.1 | 25.03 | 82 | 24.25 | ||||||||||||||||
| $ | 30.00 - $39.99 | 11 | 6.5 | 31.45 | 5 | 31.64 | ||||||||||||||||
| $ | 0.00 - $39.99 | 1,861 | 7.5 | $ | 14.33 | 865 | $ | 13.74 | ||||||||||||||
The following table summarizes stock option activity for 2012:
|
Number of Stock
Options
(in thousands)
|
Weighted Average Exercise
Price
|
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life
(in years)
|
Aggregate Intrinsic
Value
(in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2011
|
2,317 | $ | 13.36 | |||||||||||||
|
Granted
|
192 | 25.50 | ||||||||||||||
|
Exercised
|
(560 | ) | 13.04 | |||||||||||||
|
Forfeited or expired
|
(88 | ) | 21.44 | |||||||||||||
|
Balance at December 31, 2012
|
1,861 | $ | 14.33 | 7.5 | $ | 20,504 | ||||||||||
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2012
|
865 | $ | 13.74 | 6.3 | $ | 9,979 | ||||||||||
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pretax intrinsic value, based on our closing stock price of $25.20 at December 31, 2012, the last trading day of 2012, which would have been received by award holders had all award holders exercised their awards that were in-the-money as of that date.
The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $9.41, $5.05 and $4.71, respectively. The weighted average grant date fair value of options vested during 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $5.03, $4.78 and $6.12, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2012, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $8.4 million, $25.1 million and $1.9 million, respectively.
STAMPS.COM INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The following table summarizes the status of our non-vested stock options as of December 31, 2012:
|
Non-vested
Number of Stock
Options
(in thousands)
|
Weighted Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
|
|||||||
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2011
|
1,550 | $ | 5.07 | |||||
|
Granted
|
192 | 9.41 | ||||||
|
Vested
|
(658 | ) | 5.03 | |||||
|
Forfeited / Cancelled
|
(88 | ) | 8.58 | |||||
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2012
|
996 | $ | 5.67 | |||||
As of December 31, 2012, there was $5.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.0 years.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
In June 1999, our Board of Directors adopted an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP), which allows our eligible employees to purchase shares of common stock, at semi-annual intervals, with their accumulated payroll deductions.
Eligible participants may contribute up to 15% of cash earnings through payroll deductions, and the accumulated deductions will be applied to the purchase of shares on each semi-annual purchase date. The purchase price per share is equal to 85% of the fair market value per share on the participant’s entry date into the offering period or, if lower, 85% of the fair market value per share on the semi-annual purchase date.
Upon adoption of the plan, 150,000 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance. This reserve automatically increases on the first trading day in January each year, by an amount equal to 1% of the total number of outstanding shares of our common stock on the last trading day in December in the prior year. In no event will any annual increase exceed 260,786 shares.
In July 2009, our Board of Directors amended our ESPP to extend it for a period of ten years beyond its original expiration date of July 31, 2009. Under this amendment, the total shares available for issuance may not increase. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, we had approximately 1.8 million shares available for issuance under our ESPP. Total shares of common stock issued pursuant to the ESPP during 2012, 2011 and 2010 were approximately 56,000, 56,000 and 48,000, respectively.
Savings Plan
During 1999, we implemented a savings plan for all eligible employees, which qualifies under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Participating employees may contribute up to 20% of their pretax salary, but not more than statutory limits. We match 50% of the first 4% a participant contributes. We expensed approximately $303,000, $276,000 and $228,000 in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, related to this plan.
STAMPS.COM INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
|
11.
|
Legal Proceedings
|
On November 22, 2006, we filed a lawsuit against Endicia, Inc. and PSI Systems, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Central District of California for infringement of eleven of our patents covering, among other things, Internet postage technology. We sought an injunction, unspecified damages, and attorneys’ fees. On November 10, 2008, we were required to select fifteen claims (from over six hundred claims available) to be the subject of the trial. On November 9, 2009, the Court granted the summary judgment motion of Endicia, Inc. and PSI Systems, Inc. that the fifteen claims we selected are invalid. On June 15, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the summary judgment ruling.
On August 8, 2008, PSI Systems, Inc. filed a lawsuit against us in the same court, alleging that we infringed three PSI Systems patents related to Internet postage technology. PSI Systems sought an injunction, unspecified damages, and attorneys’ fees. On September 16, 2008, we filed counterclaims for infringement of four more of our patents. In our counterclaim, we sought an injunction, unspecified damages, and attorneys’ fees. On March 6, 2012, we entered into a binding agreement with PSI Systems, Inc. to resolve all outstanding patent litigation among the parties. On April 23, 2012, we executed a patent license and settlement agreement. Under the terms of the agreement, the parties agreed to a patent cross-licensing arrangement for the patents in dispute in (i) the lawsuit filed by Stamps.com against Endicia, Inc. and PSI Systems, Inc. on November 22, 2006 and (ii) the lawsuit filed by PSI Systems, Inc. against Stamps.com Inc. on August 8, 2008, both in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. In addition, the parties agreed to a five-year period where each will not sue the other for patent infringement. No payments were made to either party as part of the settlement.
In 2001, we were named, together with certain of our current and former board members and/or officers, as a defendant in several purported class-action lawsuits, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The lawsuits alleged violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in connection with our initial public offering and a secondary offering of our common stock. Plaintiffs sought damages and statutory compensation, including interest, costs and expenses (including attorneys’ fees). In October 2009, the court approved a settlement of this action, which does not require us to make any payments. In January 2012, that settlement became final following the resolution of all appeals.
We are subject to various other routine legal proceedings and claims incidental to our business, and we do not believe that these proceedings and claims would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
|
12.
|
Subsequent Events
|
We are not aware of any material subsequent events or transactions that have occurred that would require recognition in the financial statements or disclosure in the notes to the financial statements.
STAMPS.COM INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
|
13.
|
Quarterly Information (Unaudited)
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
||||||||||||||||
|
March
|
June
|
September
|
December
|
|||||||||||||
|
(in thousands except per share data)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Fiscal Year 2012:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Revenues
|
$ | 28,293 | $ | 28,227 | $ | 29,071 | $ | 30,070 | ||||||||
|
Gross profit
|
21,030 | 21,589 | 22,578 | 22,708 | ||||||||||||
|
Income from operations
|
4,421 | 5,824 | 7,085 | 6,827 | ||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
16,360 | (2) | 5,923 | 6,977 | 9,297 | (2) | ||||||||||
|
Net income per share:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
$ | 1.01 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.43 | $ | 0.60 | ||||||||
|
Diluted
|
$ | 0.95 | $ | 0.34 | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.58 | ||||||||
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
16,250 | 16,468 | 16,103 | 15,502 | ||||||||||||
|
Diluted
|
17,173 | 17,196 | 16,675 | 16,129 | ||||||||||||
|
Fiscal Year 2011:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Revenues
|
$ | 22,817 | $ | 26,630 | (1) | $ | 24,918 | $ | 27,220 | |||||||
|
Gross profit
|
16,593 | 19,945 | 18,596 | 20,239 | ||||||||||||
|
Income from operations
|
2,584 | 5,627 | 4,434 | 4,583 | ||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
2,675 | 5,677 | 4,528 | 13,385 | ||||||||||||
|
Net income per share:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
$ | 0.18 | $ | 0.40 | $ | 0.31 | $ | 0.85 | ||||||||
|
Diluted
|
$ | 0.18 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.81 | ||||||||
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
14,484 | 14,321 | 14,556 | 15,694 | ||||||||||||
|
Diluted
|
14,613 | 14,450 | 15,059 | 16,551 | ||||||||||||
Quarterly and year-to-date computations of per share amounts are made independently. Therefore, the sum of per share amounts for the quarters may not agree with per share amounts for the year shown elsewhere in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
____________
(1) During the second quarter of 2011 we recognized $2.2 million of retail box breakage revenue, of which $2.1 million related to a cumulative catch-up for previously sold and unredeemed PhotoStamps retail boxes originally recorded as deferred revenue. The retail box breakage revenue recognized was recorded in PhotoStamps revenue.
(2) During the first quarter of 2012 we released a portion of our valuation allowance totaling approximately $11.9 million. During the fourth quarter of 2012 we released another portion of our valuation allowance totaling approximately $2.5 million (See Income Taxes - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Annual Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Los Angeles, State of California, on the 15th day of March 2013.
|
STAMPS.COM INC.
|
|||
|
By:
|
/s/ KENNETH MCBRIDE
|
||
|
Kenneth McBride
|
|||
|
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Board of Directors
|
|||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
|
Signature
|
Title
|
Date
|
|
/s/ KENNETH MCBRIDE
|
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
March 15, 2013
|
|
Kenneth McBride
|
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
/s/ KYLE HUEBNER
|
Chief Financial Officer and Co-President
|
March 15, 2013
|
|
Kyle Huebner
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
*
|
Director
|
March 15, 2013
|
|
Mohan P. Ananda
|
||
|
*
|
Director
|
March 15, 2013
|
|
G. Bradford Jones
|
||
|
*
|
Director
|
March 15, 2013
|
|
Lloyd I. Miller
|
*By Kenneth McBride as Attorney-in-fact.