SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-KSB
--------------------------------
(Mark One)
|X| ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004
OR
|_| TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from . . . . . . . . . . to . . . . . . . . . .
Commission File Number 0-21816
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
-------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its
charter)
DELAWARE 52-1490422
----------------------------------- --------------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
595 Blossom Road
Suite 309
Rochester, NY 14610
-------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (585) 654-5525
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock,
Par value $.001
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ ] No |X|
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-B is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to
this Form 10-KSB. [ ]
For the year ended December 31, 2004, the revenues of the registrant were
$5,735,012.
As of July 15, 2005, 19,206,965 shares of the Registrant's common stock were
outstanding. The aggregate market value of the common stock of the Registrant
held by non-affiliates of the Registrant as of July 15, 2005 (based upon the
closing price on the "pink sheets" maintained by the National Quotation Bureau
Incorporated of $.16 on July 15, 2005) was approximately $3,073,114.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
NONE
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
Form 10-KSB
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
----
PART I
Item 1. Business..........................................................................3
Item 2. Properties.......................................................................24
Item 3. Legal Proceedings................................................................24
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders..............................25
PART II
Item 5. Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters.........................26
Item 6. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operation.........................................................27
Item 7. Financial Statements.............................................................36
Item 8. Change in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
and Financial Disclosure.........................................................36
Item 8A. Controls And Procedures..........................................................36
PART III
Item 9. Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons; Compliance With
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act................................................37
Item 10. Executive Compensation...........................................................39
Item 11. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters......................................................42
Item 12. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions...................................44
Item 13. Exhibits.........................................................................45
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services...........................................47
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENT INFORMATION
Certain statements made in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB are "forward-
looking statements" (within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995) regarding the plans and objectives of management for future
operations. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and
other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to
be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements
expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking
statements included herein are based on current expectations that involve
numerous risks and uncertainties. Our plans and objectives are based, in part,
on assumptions involving judgments with respect to, among other things, future
economic, competitive and market conditions and future business decisions, all
of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are
beyond our control. Although we believe that our assumptions underlying the
forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could prove
inaccurate and, therefore, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking
statements included in this report will prove to be accurate. In light of the
significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included
herein particularly in view of the current state of our operations, the
inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a statement by us or any
other person that our objectives and plans will be achieved. Factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by
such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the factors set
forth herein under the headings "Business," "Risk Factors" and "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
2
PART I
ITEM 1: BUSINESS
We are not current in our periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Until 2004 we were not able to pay our auditors, Freed Maxick &
Battaglia, CPAs, P.C., for fees incurred prior to their work on the 2002 audit.
As a result they ceased all work on our behalf. Subsequently the company emerged
with a new business model, and we generated revenues sufficient to meet our past
due obligations to our auditors and complete all filing requirements.
Because we did not have financial statements with an independent auditors'
report thereon for the year ended December 31, 2002, we were not able to file
our 2002 10-KSB by its due date. For the same reason, we were unable to file our
Form 10-Q's for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd quarters of 2003, our Form 10-KSB for the
year ended December 31, 2003, our Form 10-Q's for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd quarters
of 2004, our Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, and our form 10-Q
for the first quarter of 2005. During 2004, we brought our account current with
Freed Maxick & Battaglia, CPAs, P.C., and they resumed work on our behalf and
completed the audit of our financial statements for the years ended December 31,
2002, 2003 and 2004. Contemporaneous with this filing, we are filing all of our
delinquent periodic reports.
Overview
Beginning in 2003, we restructured our business and began operating under a new
business model. On January 3, 2003, our former president and chief executive
officer, Clifford G. Brockmyre II, resigned and was replaced by Michael S.
Smith, one of our board members. At the same time, we moved our corporate
headquarters from Warwick, Rhode Island to Rochester, New York. On April 30,
2003, Dr. Allan Robbins and Paul Delmore were appointed to fill two existing
vacancies on our board. Mr. Brockmyre remained on our board of directors until
October 30, 2003 at which time he resigned. On March 15, 2004, Brian Corridan
resigned from our board.
In conjunction with our change of management in 2003, we decided to restructure
our business. Beginning in the second quarter of 2003 we commenced operations in
the field of information technology (IT) consulting services and biometric
technology, and we opened an office in the Washington DC metropolitan area. We
now provide business and technology integration and systems support primarily to
U.S. government clients. We focus on aligning business processes with technology
for delivery of solutions to meet our clients' exact needs and providing expert
management services to the lifecycle of technology-based projects.
We sold a portion of the business of our Laser Fare, Inc. subsidiary (LF)
(primarily the medical and engraving business) as of December 31, 2003 and the
remaining business as of December 31, 2004, although we continued to operate the
business during the disposal process.
We were incorporated under the laws of the state of Delaware on October 14,
1986. On January 7, 1998, we changed our name from Infinite Machines Corp. to
Infinite Group, Inc. Our principal corporate headquarters are located at 595
Blossom Road, Suite 309, Rochester, NY 14610. As of January 1, 2005, our
business is exclusively in the field of IT services and biometric technology. We
maintain a website at www.us-igi.com. The content of our website shall not be
deemed part of this report.
Our Business
Information Technology Services
During 2004, we provided services in the field of IT services. We provide
business and technology integration and systems support to U.S. government and
commercial clients. Our work includes leading edge operations supporting complex
programs in Advanced Computing Environments, Wireless Technology, Human Capital
Services, Financial Services, Enterprise Architecture, and Earned Value
Management. We focus on aligning business processes with technology for delivery
of solutions meeting our clients' exact needs in the following seven practice
areas:
3
Enterprise Architecture. Our staff is expert in Service Oriented
Architecture (SOA). Our approach to developing architecture for our clients' IT
needs begins with the business model. Business drives the need for solutions and
technology enables those solutions to be implemented. By understanding the
business drivers, we establish the architecture framework to build or extend the
computing environment with right sized technology solutions that maximize
business processes while minimizing the cost to the client.
Software Development. We follow a systematic approach to developing
software. Whether it is a full systems development lifecycle or portions of one,
we approach our development tasks with process discipline to ensure tasks are
defined, objectives established and progress measured. We develop enterprise
software such as PeopleSoft and custom solutions using the .NET framework or
J2EE. We understand the value of web services and develop them from the SOA
framework. We developed a PeopleSoft solution for and are managing the
integration of software products with the Enterprise Architecture of the
Department of Homeland Security. We also provide software development support to
a large systems integrator.
Network Solutions. We operate one of the nation's largest wide area
networks for a major establishment of the U.S. government. We provide this
support under a subcontract we entered into in 2004 with a large systems
integrator. Referred to as Advanced Computing Environment, our team of server
experts supports over 2,000 servers and some 200,000 client stations from two
large data centers in Maryland and Colorado. Operating around the clock, we
consistently exceed the requirements of our service level agreements. We also
support a nationwide wireless telecommunications initiative of the U.S.
Department of Homeland Security, including technical, program, project, and
portfolio management.
Systems Engineering. We provide critical systems engineering support to
the Advanced Computing Environment program and other projects for the Department
of Homeland Security. Our engineers design and build systems supporting a mix of
business activities. We both manage and execute engineering projects supporting
complex wide area networks and local area networks in Windows and UNIX
environments, and we provide engineering support for a nationwide wireless
operation. Our engineers follow proven methodologies to transition systems from
concept to operations.
Program Management. Our program managers are subject matter experts who
are especially skilled in managing complex programs dealing with leading edge
technologies. Our engagements span a broad range of tasks such as feasibility
studies, concept and strategy planning, business process development and
reengineering, and project execution. Our staff has a thorough understanding of
the technical basis for management and therefore provides clients with expertise
connecting technical delivery with sound project management using earned value
management processes. We are providing program, portfolio, and project
management services to the Department of Homeland Security as dedicated services
to the Wireless Management Office. We supported the creation of a program to
support this nationwide telecommunications initiative. We developed,
implemented, and are managing earned value management systems for this
multi-billion dollar program as well as providing master scheduling services.
Portfolio Management. We define, implement, and manage portfolios as an
integral part of program management. We have proven experience in establishing
portfolios as an effective strategy to assess the overall performance of a
program through the projects that the program manages. Using performance
measures that are defined for the program, the project portfolio can be better
evaluated. In addition to overall program performance management, financial
performance is supported through portfolio management by capturing planned and
actual investments and their associated business cases. Through the use of
industry standard software, such as ProSight, we ensure that the originator of
the business case focuses on the accuracy and completeness of program and
project information and that the program management office focuses on program
management best practices. We created Portfolio Management Governance Models and
are building a web based Portfolio/Project Management Environment.
4
Project Management. Managing technology-driven projects is a complex
process requiring skilled personnel to deliver on the actual work as well as
requiring expert project managers who can plan and execute the work. We have a
proven methodology for project management, which includes standards for Earned
Value Management that can be applied to any project type. We have created
web-based project management environments using commercial off-the-shelf portals
as well as custom developed portals. In either case, we integrate the entire
process of delivery with project management standards to optimize performance.
The portals provide a mechanism to engage the entire stakeholder community in
the delivery process and enable team personnel to plan, perform, measure, and
report on delivery. We created a comprehensive project management system and are
implementing earned value management-based project management standards for the
Department of Homeland Security.
During 2004, we derived approximately 60% of our revenue from our Advanced
Computing Environment subcontract. We also entered into several subcontracts
under which we provide IT services to various programs and divisions of the U.S.
Department of Homeland Security. These subcontracts provided the balance of our
2004 revenue.
In December 2003, we were awarded a Federal Supply Schedule Contract by the U.S.
General Services Administration (GSA) for IT consulting services. Having a GSA
Contract allows us to compete for and secure prime contracts with all executive
agencies of the U.S. government as well as other national and international
organizations. To date, we have not derived any revenue under the GSA Contract,
but have used the contract as a basis for pricing our current work. We have
several federal procurements on the horizon that are GSA schedule planned
purchases, so we expect to generate revenue through our GSA contract in the
future.
During 2004, we continued the development of an access control terminal and
related software called TouchThru.(TM) TouchThru(TM) is a self-contained
terminal enabling physical access control using biometric identification. It
incorporates fingerprint matching technology licensed from Ultra-Scan
Corporation, a private biometric technology company headquartered in Buffalo,
New York. TouchThru(TM) will be the first biometric product we introduce, and we
intend to be in a position to market and sell that product beginning in 2006. We
plan to market and sell TouchThru(TM) in a variety of industries and markets,
including the federal, state and local government, health care, travel and
general security and access control.
We have demonstrated and displayed working prototypes of TouchThru(TM) at
several trade shows. These preliminary marketing efforts have produced positive
feedback and several early stage prospects. We believe these early marketing
efforts will provide us with good information that will be used to formulate and
implement our marketing strategy. We have trademarked TouchThru(TM), True
Identity Access(TM), and True Identity Access Control(TM), phrases which we
intend to use in the marketing effort.
The U.S. Government Technology Services Market
The ongoing transformation of the U.S. government's information systems and
communication networks is creating an increase in its demand for IT services.
According to INPUT, the leading analyst organization that tracks and reports on
contracting and procurement activities of the U.S. federal, state and local
governments, U.S. government IT spending that is contracted out is projected to
increase by $19.6 billion from $59.2 billion in government fiscal 2005 to $78.8
billion in government fiscal 2010, a compound annual growth rate of
approximately 5.9%.
We expect that the U.S. government's need for the types of IT services that we
provide will continue to grow in the foreseeable future, as a result of the high
priority placed by the government on the transformation of its information
technology programs. INPUT forecasts that the percentage of IT spending that is
contracted out by the U.S. government will reach a high of 86% of total IT
spending in government fiscal 2009.
We believe the following industry trends will also continue to drive the U.S.
government technology services market:
5
o Continued focus on mission-critical initiatives. Since the events of
September 11, 2001, the U.S. government has made the transformation
of its information technology infrastructure a major priority.
According to INPUT, the U.S. government IT services "commercial"
segment, which is comprised of outsourcing, professional services,
consulting, training, systems integration and processing services,
is projected to grow from $25.1 billion in government fiscal 2004 to
$35.3 billion in government fiscal 2009, representing a projected
compounded annual growth rate of 7.1%.
o Increased Federal Government reliance on outsourcing. According to
INPUT, outsourcing through the use of outside providers to provide
U.S. government services is projected to grow from $11.7 billion in
government fiscal 2004 to $17.4 billion in government fiscal 2009,
representing a projected compounded annual growth rate of 8.3%.
We believe that the U.S. government is increasingly turning to the information
technology industry to execute support processes and functions that were
traditionally performed by government employees. According to INPUT, the size of
the federal government workforce, which includes only civilian employees and
non-uniform military personnel in federal civilian agencies and the Department
of Defense, decreased by 1.1 million workers during the period 1990 through
2000, representing a 22% decline. The GAO has warned of further attrition due to
retirement of federal government workers during the period 2003 through 2006.
We believe that homeland security will have the greatest impact on three
specific segments of the federal government IT market: information security,
communications and knowledge management. We believe that the rapid pace of
technological innovations and the federal government's increasing reliance on
complex IT infrastructure, combined with a decline in the size of the federal
government workforce, as described above, make it increasingly difficult for
many governmental agencies to operate and upgrade their information technology
systems. We expect that several trends will contribute to the U.S. government's
increased use of service providers to fulfill a larger portion of its IT
responsibilities, and we believe that we will continue to gain new engagements
to the extent that the government increases its reliance on outsourcing for its
IT needs. These trends include:
o The aging of the Federal Government's workforce. According to INPUT,
the U.S. government has estimated that more than 30% of current
members of the government workforce, as described above, in
supervisory positions will be eligible for retirement by 2007, and
the average age of government employees increased from 42 years of
age in 1990 to 46 years of age in 2004. In April 2001, the GAO
concluded in a report that the U.S. government's human capital
challenges were adversely affecting the ability of many agencies to
carry out their missions. The GAO reiterated this conclusion in its
January 2003 updated Report.
o Increased U.S. Government emphasis on competitive sourcing. The
current administration has made competitive sourcing a major
initiative of its management agenda. According to the President's
Management Agenda, which was issued in 2001 and for which progress
reports continue to be issued, nearly half of all U.S. government
employees perform tasks that are available in the commercial
marketplace. To the extent that the size of the U.S. government
workforce decreases, we believe that the government will have an
increased need for entities that offer the technical skills,
familiarity with government processes and procedures and skilled
personnel that are necessary to meet the diverse information
technology requirements of the various U.S. government agencies.
Increased spending on homeland security.
In the wake of the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, there has been an
increased emphasis on homeland security, including protecting critical
infrastructure. According to INPUT, the total addressable information technology
budget for the Department of Homeland Security is projected to grow from $3.8
billion in government fiscal 2004 to $5.9 billion in government fiscal 2009,
representing a compound annual growth rate of 9.9%.
6
The Laser Group and Photonics Group
In 2003 we decided to eliminate our Laser Group and our Photonics Group. On
December 31, 2003, we sold certain assets and liabilities of LF to LFI, Inc.
(LFI). These assets related to the laser engraving and medical products
manufacturing and assembly businesses of the Laser Group. The principals of LFI
are former employees of our Laser Group, including Mr. Brockmyre, our former
chairman and chief executive officer. The purchase price for the assets
consisted of LFI's assumption of certain of our liabilities in the aggregate
amount of approximately $358,000. On December 31, 2004, we sold the remaining
assets of LF to Rolben Acquisition Corporation, a company affiliated with LFI,
and recognized a loss on disposition of approximately $224,000 during the year
ended December 31, 2004. The purchase price for the remaining assets consisted
of Rolben's assumption of substantially all of the liabilities of LF and the
delivery of promissory notes in the aggregate amount of approximately $2.1
million. Because certain required consents were not yet obtained, we remained
obligated under several notes to UPS Capital Business Credit (UPS) and the Rhode
Island Industrial Facilities Corporation (RIIFC) in the same amounts as the
notes from Rolben. In May 2005, the UPS and RIIFC notes were paid in full and we
were released from all of our obligations thereunder. At the same time, the
notes from Rolben to us terminated.
During 2003 and 2004, we continued to operate the LF business during the
disposal process. We also decided to shut down our Photonics Group. Without the
government funding provided by our DARPA contract, we decided that we could not
raise the funds necessary to successfully commercialize our laser diode
technology in the foreseeable future.
Recent Capital Raising Activities
At various times during 2003, 2004 and 2005, we issued restricted shares of
common stock in private placement transactions as follows:
Shares Average Price
Issued Consideration Per Share
------ ------------- ---------
Shares issued in financing transactions 9,620,388 $ 486,000 $ 0.05
Shares issued for debt conversions 1,747,500 87,375 $ 0.05
Shares issued as employee compensation 1,500,000 75,000 $ 0.05
Stock issued upon exercise of options 25,000 2,500 $ 0.10
------------------------------------------
12,892,888 $ 650,875 $ 0.05
==========================================
At various times subsequent to December 31, 2002, various related parties loaned
us a total of $675,800. These loans are evidenced by unsecured promissory notes
bearing interest at 6% per annum. The principal and accrued interest on these
notes are due and payable between January 1, 2006 and January 1, 2007 and are
convertible at the option of the holder at any time after November 30, 2005 into
common stock at a price of $.05 per share. (One note in the principal amount of
$44,000 is due on January 1, 2006 and is not convertible.) If the principal
amounts of all of the convertible notes were converted, we would issue a total
of 12,636,000 shares to these two note holders. In addition, we issued several
short-term promissory notes to another individual in the aggregate amount of
$265,000 bearing interest at 12% per annum. These promissory notes, which are
not convertible, are due in January 2006 and require monthly payments of
interest only.
On August 5, 2003, the Bank of Western Massachusetts (BWM) sold a note issued by
us in the principal amount of approximately $203,000 and the rights thereunder
to a related third party. The sale of the note is evidenced by a non-recourse
assignment agreement between BWM and the third party. On December 31, 2003, the
new noteholder agreed to extend the term of the new note to January 1, 2007 in
exchange for the right to convert the principal amount of the note and all
accrued interest into shares of our common stock at any time after November 30,
2005 at a price of $.05 per share. As of December 31, 2004, we were obligated to
the new noteholder for principal and accrued interest in the aggregate amount of
$234,690. If the principal amount and accrued interest as of December 31, 2004
were converted, we would issue a total of 4,693,800 shares to the new
noteholder.
7
Our new business strategy described above, as well as the various capital
raising activities we engaged in subsequent to December 31, 2002, have allowed
us to continue operations during that period. We believe, but can offer no
assurances, that our current operations, as restructured, coupled with our
demonstrated ability to raise capital, will provide sufficient working capital
to fund our operations through 2005.
Competition
We compete mainly with other IT professional services firms operating in the
federal, state and local government marketplace. We have entered into
subcontracts with systems integrators holding multi-year, multi-million dollar
contracts with the U.S. government. In such cases, our competition is mainly
with other IT services companies classified as small business entities by
government standards. For prime contracts with the U.S. government, we
anticipate that our competition will range from small business set aside
contracts to full and open competition with large firms such as Northrop Grumman
Information Technologies, Science Applications International Corp., EDS Corp.,
Computer Sciences Corp., Unisys, SRA International and SI International, Inc.
We also compete with a significant number of established and startup companies
that have developed or are developing and marketing software and hardware for
fingerprint biometric access control and security applications. Some of these
companies have developed or are developing and marketing semiconductor or
optically based direct contact fingerprint image capture devices, or retinal
blood vessel, iris pattern, hand geometry, voice or facial structure solutions.
Our fingerprint scanning product, TouchThru(TM), faces intense competition from
a number of competitors who are actively engaged in developing and marketing
fingerprint and hand-recognition products, including Recognition Systems, Inc.
(a company owned by Ingersoll Rand, Inc.), Identix, Incorporated, Cogent, Inc.,
Heimann Biometric Systems GmbH, Sagem Morpho, Inc., Printrak International,
Inc., (a company owned by Motorola, Inc.), Cogent, Inc. and CrossMatch
Technologies, Inc. In addition, we will face competition from non-biometric
technologies such as certificate authorities, and traditional key, card,
surveillance systems and passwords. The biometric security market is a rapidly
evolving and intensely competitive market, and we believe that additional
competitors will enter the market and become significant long-term competitors.
At June 30, 2005, our primary biometric product, TouchThru(TM), was in the
development stage and we have not earned any revenues from the sale of that
product nor do we have a backlog of orders.
Our competitors in general have substantially greater capital resources,
research and development staffs, manufacturing capabilities, sales and marketing
resources, facilities and experience than we do.
8
Patents and Intellectual Property
In 2003 we acquired certain non-exclusive rights to use intellectual property
owned by Ultra-Scan Corporation under a license agreement with a term of
three-years. Ultra-Scan's intellectual property covers ultrasonic (acoustic
imaging) biometric identification systems and fingerprint matching algorithms
and related software.
In 2004, we acquired trademarks for TouchThru(TM), True Identity Access(TM) and
True Identity Access Control(TM).
Employees
As of June 30, 2005, we had a total of 68 full-time employees, including 58 in
information technology services, two in executive management, two in engineering
and product development, four in finance and administration and two in marketing
and sales. We are not subject to any collective bargaining agreements and we
believe that our relations with our employees are good. We believe that we are
currently staffed at an appropriate level to implement and carry out our
business plan for the next 12 months.
Our ability to develop, manufacture and market our products and services, and to
establish and maintain a competitive position in our businesses will depend, in
large part, upon our ability to attract and retain qualified technical,
marketing and managerial personnel, of which there can be no assurance.
Risk Factors
In addition to the other information provided in our reports, you should
consider the following factors carefully in evaluating our business and us.
Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us, which we currently
deem immaterial or that are similar to those faced by other companies in our
industry or business in general, such as competitive conditions, may also impair
our business operations. If any of the following risks occur, our business,
financial condition, or results of operations could be materially adversely
affected.
Risks Related to Information Technology Consulting
We depend on subcontracts with the U.S. government for most of our revenue, and
our business would be seriously harmed if the government ceased doing business
with us or significantly decreased the amount of business it does with us.
We derived 100% of our total revenue from continuing operations in 2003 and 2004
from U.S. government contracts as a subcontractor. We expect that we will
continue to derive most of our revenue for the foreseeable future from work
performed under U.S. government contracts. If we were suspended or prohibited
from contracting with the U.S. government, or if our reputation or relationship
with the U.S. government were impaired, or if any of the foregoing otherwise
ceased doing business with us or significantly decreased the amount of business
it does with us, our business, prospects, financial condition and operating
results would be materially adversely affected.
Our business could be adversely affected by changes in budgetary priorities of
the U.S. government.
Because we derive a significant portion of our revenue from subcontracts with
the U.S. government, we believe that the success and development of our business
will continue to depend on our successful participation in U.S. government
contract programs. Changes in U.S. government budgetary priorities could
directly affect our financial performance. A significant decline in government
expenditures, a shift of expenditures away from programs which call for the
types of services that we provide or a change in U.S. government contracting
policies, could cause U.S. governmental agencies to reduce their expenditures
under contracts, to exercise their right to terminate contracts at any time
without penalty, not to exercise options to renew contracts or to delay or not
enter into new contracts. Any of those actions could seriously harm our
business, prospects, financial condition or operating results. Moreover,
although our contracts with governmental agencies often contemplate that our
services will be performed over a period of several years, Congress usually must
approve funds for a given program each government fiscal year and may
significantly reduce or eliminate funding for a program. Significant reductions
in these appropriations by Congress could have a material adverse effect on our
business. Additional factors that could have a serious adverse effect on our
U.S. government contracting business include:
9
o changes in U.S. government programs or requirements;
o budgetary priorities limiting or delaying U.S. government spending
generally, or by specific departments or agencies in particular, and
changes in fiscal policies or available funding, including potential
governmental shutdowns;
o reduction in the U.S. government's use of technology solutions
firms; and
o an increase in the number of contracts reserved for small
businesses, or small business set asides, which could result in our
inability to compete directly for these prime contracts.
Our profitability will suffer if we are not able to maintain our pricing and
utilization rates and control our costs.
Our profit margin, and therefore our profitability, is largely a function of the
rates we charge for our IT Services and the utilization rate, or chargeability,
of our employees. Accordingly, if we are not able to maintain the rates we
charge for our services or an appropriate utilization rate for our employees, we
will not be able to sustain our profit margin and our profitability will suffer.
The rates we charge for our IT Services are affected by a number of factors,
including:
o our clients' perception of our ability to add value through our
services;
o competition;
o introduction of new services or products by us or our competitors;
o pricing policies of our competitors; and
o general economic conditions.
Our utilization rates are also affected by a number of factors, including:
o seasonal trends, primarily as a result of holidays, vacations, and
slow downs by our clients, which may have a more significant effect
in the fourth quarter;
o our ability to transition employees from completed engagements to
new engagements;
o our ability to forecast demand for our services and thereby maintain
an appropriately balanced and sized workforce; and
o our ability to manage employee turnover.
We have implemented cost-management programs to manage our costs, including
personnel costs, support and other overhead costs. Some of our costs, like
office rents, are fixed in the short term, which limits our ability to reduce
costs in periods of declining revenues. Our current and future cost-management
initiatives may not be sufficient to maintain our margins as our level of
revenue varies.
10
If our clients are not satisfied with our services, our ability to compete for
future work and our financial condition may be adversely affected.
If we fail to meet our contractual obligations, we could be subject to legal
liability, which could adversely affect our business, operating results and
financial condition. The provisions we typically include in our contracts which
are designed to limit our exposure to legal claims relating to our services and
the applications we develop may not protect us or may not be enforceable under
some circumstances or under the laws of some jurisdictions. It is possible,
because of the nature of our business, that we may be exposed to legal claims in
the future. Currently we do not maintain professional liability insurance. In
the event we secure such coverage, the policy limits may not be adequate to
provide protection against all potential liabilities. As a consulting firm, we
depend to a large extent on our relationships with our clients and our
reputation for high-quality services to retain and attract clients and
employees. As a result, claims made against our work may damage our reputation,
which in turn, could impact our ability to compete for new business.
Our contracts can be terminated by our clients with short notice.
Our clients typically retain us on a non-exclusive, engagement-by-engagement
basis. Although they may be subject to penalty provisions, clients may generally
cancel a contract at any time. In addition, clients typically may reduce their
use of our services under such contract without penalty. If any significant
client terminates its relationship with us or substantially decreases its use of
our services, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations. When contracts are terminated, we lose the
associated revenue and we may not be able to eliminate associated costs in a
timely manner. In addition, contracts with the U.S. government contain
provisions and are subject to laws and regulations that provide the U.S.
government with rights and remedies not typically found in commercial contracts.
Among other things, the U.S. government may terminate contracts, with short
notice, for convenience and may cancel multi-year contracts if funds become
unavailable.
Unfavorable government audits could require us to refund payments we have
received, to forego anticipated revenue and could subject us to penalties and
sanctions.
The government agencies we work for generally have the authority to audit and
review our contracts with them and/or subcontracts with prime contractors. As
part of that process, the government agency reviews our performance on the
contract, our pricing practices, our cost structure and our compliance with
applicable laws, regulations and standards. If the audit agency determines that
we have improperly received reimbursement, we would be required to refund any
such amount. If a government audit uncovers improper or illegal activities by us
or we otherwise determine that these activities have occurred, we may be subject
to civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, including
termination of contracts, forfeitures of profits, suspension of payments, fines
and suspension or disqualification from doing business with the government. Any
such unfavorable determination could adversely impact our ability to bid for new
work.
The IT services industry is highly competitive, and we may not be able to
compete effectively.
We operate in a highly competitive industry that includes a large number of
participants. We believe that we currently compete principally with other IT
professional services firms, technology vendors and the internal information
systems groups of our clients. Many of the companies that provide services in
our markets have significantly greater financial, technical and marketing
resources than we do. Our marketplace is experiencing rapid changes in its
competitive landscape. Some of our competitors have sought access to public and
private capital and others have merged or consolidated with better-capitalized
partners. These changes may create more or larger and better-capitalized
competitors with enhanced abilities to compete for market share generally and
our clients specifically, in some cases, through significant economic incentives
to clients to secure contracts. These competitors may also be better able to
compete for skilled professionals by offering them large compensation
incentives. In addition, one or more of our competitors may develop and
implement methodologies that result in superior productivity and price
reductions without adversely affecting the competitors' profit margins. In
addition, there are relatively few barriers to entry into our markets and we
have faced, and expect to continue to face, competition from new entrants into
our markets. As a result, we may be unable to continue to compete successfully
with our existing or any new future competitors.
11
Our future success depends on our ability to continue to retain and attract
qualified employees.
We believe that our future success depends upon our ability to continue to
train, retain, effectively manage and attract highly skilled technical,
managerial, sales and marketing personnel. Employee turnover is generally high
in IT services industry. If our efforts in these areas are not successful, our
costs may increase, our sales efforts may be hindered, and or our customer
service may degrade. Although we invest significant resources in recruiting and
retaining employees, there is often significant competition for certain
personnel in the IT services industry. From time to time, we experience
difficulties in locating enough highly qualified candidates in desired
geographic locations, or with required specific expertise.
Our contracts with the U.S. government may be terminated or adversely modified
prior to completion, which could adversely affect our business.
U.S. government contracts generally contain provisions, and are subject to laws
and regulations, that give the U.S. government rights and remedies not typically
found in commercial contracts, including provisions permitting the U.S.
government to:
o terminate our existing contracts;
o reduce potential future income from our existing contracts;
o modify some of the terms and conditions in our existing contracts;
o suspend or permanently prohibit us from doing business with the U.S.
government or with any specific government agency;
o impose fines and penalties;
o subject us to criminal prosecution;
o subject the award of some contracts to protest or challenge by
competitors, which may require the contracting U.S. agency or
department to suspend our performance pending the outcome of the
protest or challenge and which may also require the government to
solicit new bids for the contract or result in the termination,
reduction or modification of the awarded contract;
o suspend work under existing multiple year contracts and related task
orders if the necessary funds are not appropriated by Congress;
o decline to exercise an option to extend an existing multiple year
contract; and
o claim rights in technologies and systems invented, developed or
produced by us.
The U.S. government may terminate a contract with us either "for convenience"
(for instance, due to a change in its perceived needs or its desire to
consolidate work under another contract) or if we default by failing to perform
under the contract. If the U.S. government terminates a contract with us for
convenience, we generally would be entitled to recover only our incurred or
committed costs, settlement expenses and profit on the work completed prior to
termination. If the U.S. government terminates a contract with us based upon our
default, we generally would be denied any recovery for undelivered work, and
instead may be liable for excess costs incurred by the U.S. government in
procuring undelivered items from an alternative source. We may in the future
receive show-cause or cure notices under contracts that, if not addressed to the
U.S. government's satisfaction, could give the government the right to terminate
those contracts for default or to cease procuring our services under those
contracts.
12
Our U.S. government contracts typically have terms of one or more base years and
one or more option years. Many of the option periods cover more than half of the
contract's potential term. U.S. governmental agencies generally have the right
not to exercise options to extend a contract. A decision to terminate or not to
exercise options to extend our existing contracts could have a material adverse
effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of
operations.
Certain of our U.S. government contracts also contain "organizational conflict
of interest" clauses that could limit our ability to compete for certain related
follow-on contracts. For example, when we work on the design of a particular
solution, we may be precluded from competing for the contract to install that
solution. While we actively monitor our contracts to avoid these conflicts, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to avoid all organizational conflict of
interest issues.
In addition, U.S. government contracts are frequently awarded only after formal
competitive bidding processes, which have been and may continue to be
protracted, and typically impose provisions that permit cancellation in the
event that funds are unavailable to the public agency. There is a risk that we
may not be awarded any of the competitive bidding processes, which have been and
may continue to be protracted, and typically impose provisions that permit
cancellation in the event that funds are unavailable to the public agency. In
some cases, unsuccessful bidders for public agency contracts are provided the
opportunity to formally protest certain contract awards through various
agencies, administrative and judicial channels. The protest process may delay a
successful bidder's contract performance for a number of weeks, months or more,
or cancel the contract award entirely. Although we have not previously
experienced a substantial number of contract delays or cancellations due to
protest initiated by losing bidders, there is a risk that we may not be awarded
contracts for which we bid or, if awarded, that substantial delays or
cancellation of purchases may follow as a result of such protests.
The competitive bidding process presents a number of risks, including the
following:
o we expend substantial funds, managerial time and effort to prepare
bids and proposals for contracts that we may not win;
o we may be unable to estimate accurately the resources and cost that
will be required to service any contract we win, which could result
in substantial cost overruns; and
o we may encounter expense and delay if our competitors protest or
challenge awards of contracts to us in competitive bidding, and any
such protest or challenge could result in a requirement to resubmit
bids on modified specifications or in the termination, reduction or
modification of the awarded contract.
If we fail to establish and maintain important relationships with government
entities and agencies, our ability to successfully bid for new business may be
adversely affected.
To develop new business opportunities, we primarily rely on establishing and
maintaining relationships with various government entities and agencies. We may
be unable to successfully maintain our relationships with government entities
and agencies, and any failure to do so could materially adversely affect our
ability to compete successfully for new business.
13
Our business may suffer if our facilities or our employees are unable to obtain
or retain the security clearances or other qualifications needed to perform
services for our clients.
Many of our U.S. government contracts require employees and facilities used in
specific engagements to hold security clearances and to clear National Agency
Checks and Defense Security Service checks. Some of our contracts require us to
employ personnel with specified levels of education, work experience and
security clearances. Depending on the level of clearance, security clearances
can be difficult and time-consuming to obtain. If our employees or our
facilities lose or are unable to obtain necessary security clearances or
successfully clear necessary National Agency or Defense Security Service checks,
we may not be able to win new business and our existing clients could terminate
their contracts with us or decide not to renew them, and in each instance our
operating results could be materially adversely affected.
We must comply with a variety of laws, regulations and procedures and our
failure to comply could harm our operating results.
We must observe laws and regulations relating to the formation, administration
and performance of U.S. government contracts which affect how we do business
with our clients and impose added costs on our business. For example, the
Federal Acquisition Regulation and the industrial security regulations of the
Department of Defense and related laws include provisions that:
o allow our U.S. government clients to terminate or not renew our
contracts if we come under foreign ownership, control or influence;
o require us to disclose and certify cost and pricing data in
connection with contract negotiations;
o require us to prevent unauthorized access to classified information;
and
o require us to comply with laws and regulations intended to promote
various social or economic goals.
We are subject to industrial security regulations of the Department of Homeland
Security and other federal agencies that are designed to safeguard against
foreigners' access to classified information. If we were to come under foreign
ownership, control or influence, we could lose our facility security clearances,
which could result in our U.S. government customers terminating or deciding not
to renew our contracts, and could impair our ability to obtain new contracts.
In addition, our employees often must comply with procedures required by the
specific agency for which work is being performed, such as time recordation or
prohibition on removal of materials from a location.
Our failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations or procedures, including
federal procurement regulations and regulations regarding the protection of
classified information, could result in contract termination, loss of security
clearances, suspension or prohibition from contracting with the U.S. government,
civil fines and damages and criminal prosecution and penalties, any of which
could materially adversely affect our business.
14
The U.S. government may revise its procurement or other practices in a manner
adverse to us.
The U.S. government may revise its procurement practices or adopt new
contracting rules and regulations, such as cost accounting standards. It could
also adopt new contracting methods relating to GSA contracts, government-wide
contracts, or adopt new standards for contract awards intended to achieve
certain social or other policy objectives, such as establishing new set-aside
programs for small or minority-owned businesses. In addition, the U.S.
government may face restrictions from new legislation or regulations, as well as
pressure from government employees and their unions, on the nature and amount of
services the U.S. government may obtain from private contractors. These changes
could impair our ability to obtain new contracts or contracts under which we
currently perform when those contracts are put up for recompetition bids. Any
new contracting methods could be costly or administratively difficult for us to
implement, and, as a result, could harm our operating results. For example, the
Truthfulness, Responsibility and Accountability in Contracting Act, proposed in
2001, would have limited and severely delayed the U.S. government's ability to
use private service contractors. Although this proposal was not enacted, it or
similar legislation could be proposed at any time. Any reduction in the U.S.
government's use of private contractors to provide federal information
technology services could materially adversely impact our business.
Failure to maintain strong relationships with other government contractors could
result in a decline in our revenue.
We derived 100% of our total revenue in 2003 and 2004 from contracts under which
we acted as a subcontractor. As a subcontractor, we often lack control over
fulfillment of a contract, and poor performance on the contract by others could
tarnish our reputation, even when we perform as required. We expect to continue
to depend on relationships with other contractors for a portion of our revenue
in the foreseeable future. Moreover, our revenue and operating results could be
materially adversely affected if any prime contractor chooses to offer services
of the type that we provide or if any prime contractor teams with other
companies to independently provide those services.
Risks Related to Biometrics
Our biometrics business will not grow unless the market for biometric solutions
expands both domestically and internationally.
Our product revenues and a portion of our service revenues will be derived from
the sale of biometric products and services. Biometric solutions have not yet
gained widespread commercial acceptance. We cannot accurately predict the future
growth rate, if any, or the ultimate size of the biometric technology market.
The expansion of the market for our products and services depends on a number of
factors including without limitation:
o the cost, performance and reliability of our products and services
and the products and services of competitors;
o customers' perception of the perceived benefit of biometric
solutions;
o public perceptions of the intrusiveness of these solutions and the
manner in which firms are using the information collected;
o public perceptions regarding the confidentiality of private
information;
o proposed or enacted legislation related to privacy of information;
o customers' satisfaction with our products and services; and
o marketing efforts and publicity regarding these products and
services.
Certain groups have publicly objected to the use of biometric products for some
applications on civil liberties grounds and legislation has been proposed to
regulate the use of biometric security products. From time to time, biometrics
technologies have been the focus of organizations and individuals seeking to
curtail or eliminate such technologies on the grounds that they may be used to
diminish personal privacy rights. If such initiatives result in restrictive
legislation, the market for biometric solutions may be adversely affected. Even
if biometric solutions gain wide market acceptance, our products and services
may not adequately address the requirements of the market and may not gain
market acceptance.
15
The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 have increased financial
expectations that may not materialize.
The September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks may have created an increase in
awareness for biometric security solutions generally. However, it is uncertain
whether the actual level of demand for our biometric products and services will
grow as a result of such increased awareness. Increased demand may not result in
an actual increase in our product or services revenues. In addition, it is
uncertain which security solutions, if any, will be adopted as a result of the
terrorism and whether our products will be a part of those solutions. Efforts in
the war against terrorism or the war with Iraq may actually delay funding for
the implementation of biometric solutions generally. Even if our products are
considered or adopted as solutions to the terrorism, the level and timeliness of
available funding are unclear. These factors may adversely impact us and create
unpredictability in revenues and operating results.
The biometrics industry is characterized by rapid technological change and
evolving industry standards, which could render existing products obsolete.
Our future success will depend upon our ability to develop and introduce a
variety of new products and services and enhancements to these new product and
services in order to address the changing and sophisticated needs of the
marketplace. Frequently, technical development programs in the biometric
industry require assessments to be made of the future directions of technology
and technology markets generally, which are inherently risky and difficult to
predict. Delays in introducing new products, services and enhancements, the
failure to choose correctly among technical alternatives or the failure to offer
innovative products and services at competitive prices may cause customers to
forego purchases of our products and services and purchase those of our
competitors.
Continued participation by us in the market for fingerprint identification
systems that are linked to forensic quality databases under the jurisdiction of
governmental agencies may require the investment of our resources in upgrading
our products and technology for us to compete and to meet regulatory and
statutory standards. We may not have adequate resources available to us or may
not adequately keep pace with appropriate requirements in order to effectively
compete in the marketplace.
Our lengthy and variable sales cycle will make it difficult to predict operating
results.
Certain of our products often have a lengthy sales cycle while the customer
evaluates and receives approvals for purchase. If, after expending significant
funds and effort, we fail to receive an order, a negative impact on our
financial results and stock price could result.
It is difficult to predict accurately the sales cycle of any large order for any
of our products. If we do not ship and or install one or more large orders as
forecast for a fiscal quarter, our total revenues and operating results for that
quarter could be materially and adversely affected.
The substantial lead-time required for ordering parts and materials may lead to
excess or insufficient inventory.
The lead-time for ordering parts and materials and building our products can be
many months. As a result, we must order parts and materials and build our
products based on forecasted demand. If demand for our products lags
significantly behind our forecasts, we may produce more products than we can
sell, which can result in cash flow problems and write-offs or write-downs of
obsolete inventory.
16
Loss of sole or limited source suppliers may result in delays or additional
expenses.
We obtain certain components and complete products from a single source or a
limited group of suppliers. With the exception of Ultra-Scan Corporation, from
whom we obtain the ultra-sound based fingerprint scanner, we do not have
long-term agreements with any of our suppliers. We will experience significant
delays in manufacturing and shipping of products to customers if we lose these
sources or if supplies from these sources are delayed. As a result, we may be
required to incur additional development, manufacturing and other costs to
establish alternative sources of supply. It may take several months to locate
alternative suppliers, if required, or to re-tool our products to accommodate
components from different suppliers. We cannot predict if we will be able to
obtain replacement components within the time frames we require at an affordable
cost, or at all. Any delays resulting from suppliers failing to deliver
components or products on a timely basis in sufficient quantities and of
sufficient quality or any significant increase in the price of components from
existing or alternative suppliers could have a severe negative impact on our
financial results and stock price.
We may be subject to loss in market share and market acceptance as a result of
manufacturing errors, delays or shortages.
Performance failure in our products or certain of our services may cause loss of
market share, delay in or loss of market acceptance, additional warranty expense
or product recall, or other contractual liabilities. The complexity of certain
of our fingerprint readers makes the manufacturing and assembly process of such
products, especially in volume, complex. This may in turn lead to delays or
shortages in the availability of certain products, or, in some cases, the
unavailability of certain products. The negative effects of any delay or failure
could be exacerbated if the delay or failure occurs in products or services that
provide personal security, secure sensitive computer data, authorize significant
financial transactions or perform other functions where a security breach could
have significant consequences.
If a product or service launch is delayed or is the subject of an availability
shortage because of problems with our ability to manufacture or assemble the
product or service successfully on a timely basis, or if a product or service
otherwise fails to meet performance criteria, we may lose revenue opportunities
entirely and/or experience delays in revenue recognition associated with a
product or service in addition to incurring higher operating expenses during the
period required to correct the defects. There is a risk that for unforeseen
reasons we may be required to repair or replace a substantial number of products
in use or to reimburse customers for products that fail to work or meet strict
performance criteria. We carry product liability insurance, but existing
coverage may not be adequate to cover potential claims.
We may be subject to repair, replacement, reimbursement and liability claims as
a result of products that fail to work or to meet applicable performance
criteria.
There is a risk that for unforeseen reasons we may be required to repair or
replace a substantial number of products in use or to reimburse customers for
products that fail to work or meet strict performance criteria. We attempt to
limit remedies for product or service failure to the repair or replacement of
malfunctioning or noncompliant products or services, and also attempt to exclude
or minimize exposure to product and related liabilities by including in our
standard agreements warranty disclaimers and disclaimers for consequential and
related damages as well as limitations on our aggregate liability. From time to
time, in certain complex sale or licensing transactions, we may negotiate
liability provisions that vary from such standard forms. There is a risk that
our contractual provisions may not adequately minimize our product and related
liabilities or that such provisions may be unenforceable. We carry product
liability insurance, but existing coverage may not be adequate to cover
potential claims. We will maintain warranty reserves as deemed adequate by
management.
Our TouchThru(TM) access control device is at an early stage of development and
may not achieve market acceptance.
One of our primary focuses is the development of our TouchThru(TM) biometric
access control device. Many of the benefits of automated finger-print readers in
general, and ultra-sound based systems in particular, are not widely known.
Therefore, we anticipate that we will need to educate our target markets to
generate demand for our products and services and, as a result of market
feedback; we may be required to further refine these services. In order to
persuade potential customers to purchase our product and services, we will need
to overcome industry resistance to, and suspicion of new technologies. We cannot
assure you that our TouchThru(TM) access control system will be successfully
developed, marketed or produced.
17
We face intense competition from other biometric solution providers as well as
identification and security systems providers.
A significant number of established and startup companies have developed or are
developing and marketing software and hardware for fingerprint biometric
security applications that currently compete or will compete directly with our
current fingerprint security and identity related line of products and
applications. Some of these companies have developed or are developing and
marketing semiconductor or optically based direct contact fingerprint image
capture devices, or retinal blood vessel, iris pattern, hand geometry, voice or
facial structure solutions. If one or more of these technologies or approaches
were widely adopted, it could significantly reduce the potential market for our
products. Our security and identity related products and applications also
compete with non-biometric technologies such as certificate authorities, and
traditional key, card, surveillance systems and passwords. Many competitors
offering products that are competitive with our security and identity related
line of products and applications have significantly more financial and other
resources than we have. The biometric security market is a rapidly evolving and
intensely competitive market, and we believe that additional competitors will
enter the market and become significant long-term competitors.
Our fingerprint scanning product, TouchThru(TM), faces intense competition from
a number of competitors who are actively engaged in developing and marketing
fingerprint and hand-recognition products, including Recognition Systems, Inc.
(a company owned by Ingersoll Rand, Inc.), Identix, Incorporated, Heimann
Biometric Systems GmbH, Sagem Morpho, Inc., Printrak International, Inc., (a
company owned by Motorola, Inc.), Cogent, Inc. and CrossMatch Technologies, Inc.
We expect competition to increase and intensify in the near term in the
biometrics markets. Companies competing with us may introduce products that are
competitively priced, that have increased performance or functionality or that
incorporate technological advances not yet developed or implemented by us. Some
present and potential competitors have financial, marketing, research, and
manufacturing resources substantially greater than ours.
In order to compete effectively in this environment, we must continually develop
and market new and enhanced products at competitive prices and must have the
resources available to invest in significant research and development
activities. The failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our
business operations, financial results and stock price.
Failure to maintain the proprietary nature of our technology, intellectual
property and manufacturing processes could have a material adverse effect on our
business, operating results, financial condition and stock price and on our
ability to compete effectively.
Ultra-Scan Corporation, our licensor of the fingerprint scanning technology
principally relies upon patent, trademark, copyright, trade secret and contract
law to establish and protect its proprietary rights. There is a risk that claims
allowed on any patents or trademarks it holds may not be broad enough to protect
its technology. In addition, Ultra-Scan's patents or trademarks may be
challenged, invalidated or circumvented and we cannot be certain that the rights
granted thereunder will provide competitive advantages to us. Moreover, any
current or future issued or licensed patents, or trademarks, or currently
existing or future developed trade secrets or know-how may not afford sufficient
protection against competitors with similar technologies or processes, and the
possibility exists that certain of Ultra-Scan's already issued patents or
trademarks may infringe upon third party patents or trademarks or be designed
around by others. In addition, there is a risk that others may independently
develop proprietary technologies and processes, which are the same as,
substantially equivalent or superior to ours, or become available in the market
at a lower price.
18
There is a risk that we have infringed or in the future will infringe patents or
trademarks owned by others, that we will need to acquire licenses under patents
or trademarks belonging to others for technology potentially useful or necessary
to us, and that licenses will not be available to us on acceptable terms, if at
all.
Ultra-Scan may have to litigate to enforce its patents or trademarks or to
determine the scope and validity of other parties' proprietary rights. An
adverse outcome in any litigation may have a severe negative impact on our
financial results and stock price.
Risks Related to our Business
We experienced losses in 2002 and 2003.
Our historical operations have not been profitable until 2004. As of December
31, 2003 and 2004, respectively, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately
$29.4 million and $28.8 million. Although we began to operate the IT business
profitably beginning in the second quarter of 2004, and our IT business was
profitable for the year, we cannot assure you that our profitability will
continue.
We are highly leveraged, which increases our operating deficit and makes it
difficult for us to grow.
At December 31, 2004, we had current liabilities, including trade payables, of
$3.8 million and long-term liabilities of $3.3 million and a working capital
deficit of $2.1 million. We continue to experience working capital shortages
that impair our business operations and growth strategy. If we incur operating
losses and experience working capital limitations, our business, operations and
financial condition will be materially adversely affected.
We have significant liabilities related to the O&W pension plan.
At December 31, 2004, the O&W defined benefit pension plan had an accrued
pension obligation liability of $2,177,287 and an accumulated other
comprehensive loss of $2,755,891 which we recorded as a reduction of
stockholders' equity. This was due to a decrease in the market value of plan
assets from $3,621,035 at December 31, 2003 to $3,510,324 at December 31, 2004
comprised of payment of benefits of $402,174 and an investment return of
$367,617 less expenses paid of $76,154. The benefit obligation decreased during
2004 by $123,638 to $5,687,611 at December 31, 2004 as a result of benefits paid
of $402,174 and an actuarial gain of $60,091 offset by interest cost of
$338,627.
We are required to contribute amounts in 2004 and future years to fund the
deficiency. We did not make a contribution in 2002, 2003 or 2004 and we
currently do not have the funds available to make such contributions. We have
recorded defined benefit pension expense of approximately $200,000 in 2003 and
$160,000 in 2004.
We have been dependent on a limited number of high net worth individuals to fund
our working capital needs.
During 2003, 2004 and through June 30, 2005, we raised approximately $1.7
million in a combination of equity, debt conversion and debt transactions from a
limited number of high net worth investors. We cannot provide assurance that we
will be continue to raise additional capital from this group of investors, or
that we will be able to secure funding from additional sources.
19
We will require additional financing in the future, which may not be available
on acceptable terms.
We will require additional funds to continue our development of TouchThru(TM)
and for working capital and general corporate purposes. We cannot provide
assurance that adequate additional financing will be available or, if available,
will be offered on acceptable terms. Moreover, our IT Services billings generate
accounts receivable that are generally paid within 30 to 60 days from the
invoice date. The cost of those sales generally consists of employee salaries
and benefits that we must pay prior to our receipt of the accounts receivable to
which these costs relate. We therefore need sufficient cash resources to cover
such employee-related costs which, in many cases, require us to borrow funds on
disadvantageous terms. We have secured an accounts receivable financing line of
credit in the amount of $800,000 from an independent finance organization that
provides us with the cash needed to cover such employee-related costs. As we
grow, additional working capital will be required to support this difference in
the timing of cash receipts versus payroll disbursements. Finally, any
additional equity financing may be dilutive to stockholders, and debt
financings, if available, may involve restrictive covenants that further limit
our ability to make decisions that we believe will be in our best interests. In
the event we cannot obtain additional financing on terms acceptable to us when
required, our operations will be materially adversely affected and we may have
to cease or substantially reduce operations.
If we do not successfully integrate the businesses that we acquire, our results
of operations could be adversely affected.
We may grow our business by acquiring companies and businesses that we feel have
synergy and will complement our business plan. We regularly evaluate potential
business combinations and aggressively pursue attractive transactions. We may be
unable to profitably manage businesses that we may acquire or we may fail to
integrate them successfully without incurring substantial expenses, delays or
other problems that could negatively impact our results of operations.
Acquisitions involve additional risks, including:
o diversion of management's attention;
o difficulty in integration of the acquired business;
o loss of significant clients acquired;
o loss of key management and technical personnel acquired;
o assumption of unanticipated legal or other financial liabilities;
o becoming significantly leveraged as a result of debt incurred to
finance acquisitions;
o unanticipated operating, accounting or management difficulties in
connection with the acquired entities;
o costs of our personnel's time, travel, legal services and accounting
services in connection with a proposed acquisition; that may not be
recovered;
o impairment charges for acquired intangible assets, including
goodwill that decline in value; and
o dilution to our earnings per share as a result of issuing shares of
our stock to finance acquisitions.
Also, client dissatisfaction or performance problems with an acquired firm could
materially and adversely affect our reputation as a whole. Further, the acquired
businesses may not achieve the revenue and earnings we anticipated. We will
continue to evaluate from time to time, on a selective basis, other strategic
acquisitions if we believe they will help us obtain well-trained, high-quality
employees, new product or service offerings, additional industry expertise, a
broader client base or an expanded geographic presence. There can be no
assurance that we will be successful in identifying candidates or consummating
acquisitions on terms that are acceptable or favorable to us. In addition, there
can be no assurance that financing for acquisitions will be available on terms
that are acceptable or favorable. We may issue shares of our common stock as
part of the purchase price for some or all of these acquisitions. Future
issuances of our common stock in connection with acquisitions also may dilute
our earnings per share.
20
If we fail to adequately manage the size of our business, it could have a severe
negative impact on our financial results or stock price.
Our management believes that in order to be successful we must appropriately
manage the size of our business. This may mean reducing costs and overhead in
certain economic periods, and selectively growing in periods of economic
expansion. In addition, we will be required to implement operational, financial
and management information procedures and controls that are efficient and
appropriate for the size and scope of our operations. The management skills and
systems currently in place may not be adequate and we may not be able to manage
any significant reductions or growth effectively.
We may have difficulties in managing our growth.
Our future growth depends, in part, on our ability to implement and expand our
financial control systems and to expand, train and manage our employee base and
provide support to an expanded customer base. If we cannot manage growth
effectively, it could have material adverse effect on our results of operations,
business and financial condition. In addition, acquisitions and expansion
involve substantial infrastructure costs and working capital. We cannot provide
assurance that we will be able to integrate acquisitions, if any, and expansions
efficiently. Similarly, we cannot provide assurance that we will continue to
expand or that any expansion will enhance our profitability. If we do not
achieve sufficient revenue growth to offset increased expenses associated with
our expansion, our results will be adversely affected.
We depend on the continued services of our key personnel.
Our future success depends, in part, on the continuing efforts of our senior
executive officers, Michael S. Smith and James M. Frost. The loss of any of
these key employees may adversely affect our business. At this time we do not
have any term "key man" insurance on any of these executives. If we lose the
services of any of these senior executives, our business, operations and
financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
Risks Related to our Common Stock
Five stockholders own a significant portion of our stock and may delay or
prevent a change in control or adversely affect the stock price through sales in
the open market.
As of June 30, 2005, five individuals owned approximately 22.7%, 9.1%, 6.9%,
5.7% and 5.5% respectively of our outstanding common stock. In addition, two
different individuals have the right to convert debt into shares of common stock
at $.05 per share. If each party converted all of the debt into common stock,
these two individuals would own approximately 30.5% and 18.4%, respectively, of
our outstanding common stock. The debt is not convertible prior to November 30,
2005. The concentration of large percentages of ownership in any single
stockholder may delay or prevent a change in control. Additionally, the sale of
a significant number of our shares in the open market by a single stockholder or
otherwise could adversely affect our stock price.
Our stock price is volatile and could be further affected by events not within
our control.
The trading price of our common stock has been volatile and will continue to be
subject to:
o volatility in the trading markets generally;
o significant fluctuations in our quarterly operating results;
o announcements regarding our business or the business of our
competitors;
o changes in prices of our or our competitors' products and services;
o changes in product mix; and
o changes in revenue and revenue growth rates for us as a whole or for
geographic areas, and other events or factors.
Statements or changes in opinions, ratings or earnings estimates made by
brokerage firms or industry analysts relating to the markets in which we operate
or expect to operate could also have an adverse effect on the market price of
our common stock. In addition, the stock market as a whole has from time to time
experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations which have particularly
affected the market price for the securities of many small cap companies and
which often have been unrelated to the operating performance of these companies.
Finally, the market on which our stock trades may have a significant impact on
the price and liquidity or our shares.
21
Our quarterly revenues, operating results and profitability will vary from
quarter to quarter and other factors that may result in increased volatility of
our share price.
Our quarterly revenues, operating results and profitability have varied in the
past and are likely to vary significantly from quarter to quarter, making them
difficult to predict. This may lead to volatility in our share price. The
changes in the market price of our common stock may also be for reasons
unrelated to our operating performance. Some other factors that may cause the
market price of our common stock to fluctuate substantially include:
o the failure to be awarded a significant contract on which we have
bid;
o the termination by a client of a material contract;
o announcement of new services by us or our competitors;
o announcement of acquisitions or other significant transactions by us
or our competitors;
o changes in or failure to meet earnings estimates by securities
analysts;
o sales of common stock by IGI or existing stockholders, or the
perception that such sales may occur;
o adverse judgments or settlements obligating us to pay liabilities;
o unforeseen legal expenses, including litigation costs;
o changes in the value of the defined pension plan assets, required
cash contributions and related pension expense as well as the impact
of regulatory oversight of pension plans in general;
o changes in management;
o general economic conditions and overall stock market volatility;
o changes in or the application of accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States;
o reduced demand for products and services caused, for example, by
competitors;
o the lack of availability or increase in cost of key components and
subassemblies;
o the inability to timely and successfully complete development of
complex designs and components, or manufacture in volume and install
certain of our products;
o changes in the mix of products and services we or our distributors
sell;
o cancellations, delays or contract amendments by government agency
customers;
o expenses related to acquisitions or mergers; and
o impairment charges arising out of our assessments of goodwill and
intangibles.
The price of our common stock may be adversely affected by the possible issuance
of shares as a result of the exercise of outstanding warrants and options.
As of June 30, 2005 we have granted options to employees and directors covering
3,788,500 shares of our common stock under our stock option plans, including
2,518,000 options which are subject to stockholder ratification. In addition, we
have issued warrants to purchase 140,000 shares of our common stock at June 30,
2005. As a result of the actual or potential sale of these shares into the
market, our common stock price may decrease.
We have been delisted from the NASDAQ market.
Prior to March 2003, our common stock was traded on the NASDAQ SmallCap Market.
As a result of our failure to maintain certain listing requirements, our stock
was delisted and now trades on the "pink sheets" maintained by the National
Quotation Bureau Incorporated. As a consequence of such delisting, investors
will find it more difficult to dispose of or to obtain accurate quotations as to
the market value of our securities. Among other consequences, we believe that
delisting from NASDAQ in fact caused a decline in our stock price, and could
increase the difficulty of obtaining future financing.
22
The liquidity of our stock is severely reduced as a result of its classification
as "penny stock".
The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted regulations which generally
define a "penny stock" to be any non-NASDAQ equity security that has a market
price (as therein defined) of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise
price of less than $5.00 per share. Because our securities are subject to the
existing rules on penny stocks, the market liquidity for our securities is
severely adversely affected. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless
exempt, the rules require substantial additional disclosure obligations and
sales practice obligations on broker-dealers where the sale is to persons other
than established customers and accredited investors (generally, those persons
with assets in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000, or
$300,000 together with their spouse). For transactions covered by these rules,
the broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchase
of the common stock and have received the purchaser's written consent to the
transaction prior to the purchase. Additionally, for any transaction involving a
penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require the delivery, prior to the
transaction, of a risk disclosure document mandated by the Commission relating
to the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must disclose the commissions
payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current
quotations for the securities and, if the broker-dealer is the sole market
maker, the broker-dealer must disclose this fact and the broker-dealer's
presumed control over the market. Finally, monthly statements must be sent
disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and
information on the limited market in penny stocks. Consequently, the "penny
stock" rules restrict the ability of broker-dealers to sell the common stock and
accordingly the market for our common stock.
Some provisions in our charter documents and bylaws may have anti-takeover
effects.
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that may make it
more difficult for a third party to acquire us, with the result that it may
deter potential suitors. For example, our board of directors is authorized,
without action of the stockholders, to issue authorized but unissued common
stock and preferred stock. The existence of undesignated preferred stock and
authorized but unissued common stock enables us to discourage or to make it more
difficult to obtain control of us by means of a merger, tender offer, proxy
contest or otherwise.
Absence of dividends to stockholders.
We have never declared a dividend on our common stock. We do not anticipate
paying dividends on the common stock in the foreseeable future. We anticipate
that earnings, if any, will be reinvested in the expansion of our business and
debt reduction.
We have agreed to limitations on the potential liability of our directors.
Our certificate of incorporation provides that, in general, directors will not
be personally liable for monetary damages to the company or our stockholders for
a breach of fiduciary duty. Although this limitation of liability does not
affect the availability of equitable remedies such as injunctive relief or
rescission, the presence of these provisions in the certificate of incorporation
could prevent us from recovering monetary damages.
23
ITEM 2: PROPERTIES
The table below lists our manufacturing and administrative office locations and
square feet owned or leased. The Rochester, NY and Arlington, VA rent includes
utilities. The properties of Laser Fare were sold on December 31, 2004.
Owned Leased Annual Rent Termination Date
----- ------ ----------- ----------------
At December 31, 2004:
Arlington, VA 1,658 $ 48,082 2007
Rochester, NY 1,348 $ 16,176 2005
We believe all properties are in good operating condition.
ITEM 3: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are the plaintiff in a lawsuit filed in the Superior Court, State of Rhode
Island on August 13, 1999 captioned Infinite Group, Inc. vs. Spectra Science
Corporation and Nabil Lawandy. In the action, we assert that by fraud and in
breach of fiduciary duties owed, Spectra and its president, Nabil Lawandy,
caused us to sell to Spectra shares of Spectra's Series A Preferred stock at a
substantial discount to fair market value. We allege that in entering into the
transaction we relied on various representations made by Spectra and Mr.
Lawandy, which were untrue at the time they were made. In the action, we seek
compensatory damages in the amount of $500,000 plus statutory interest, punitive
damages as well as an award of attorney's fees and costs. One of Spectra's
counterclaims was dismissed by the court in response to our motion for summary
judgment. The trial was completed in February 2005, and the jury returned a
verdict in our favor in the amount of approximately $600,000. We have filed a
notice of appeal with respect to the damages portion of the verdict. On June 1,
2005, Spectra voluntarily dismissed with prejudice its remaining pending
counterclaim against us. We have entered into an escrow agreement with the
defendants pursuant to which approximately $600,000 representing the amount of
the judgment has been deposited. Withdrawal of the funds will be permitted only
upon the date that judgment in the matter becomes a final, non-appealable
decision, or earlier upon the written agreement of all parties.
We are the respondent in an arbitration proceeding filed on December 10, 2002
captioned J. Terrence Feeley v. Infinite Group, Inc. Claimant, a former employee
and former member of our board of directors, alleges that the parties entered
into a consulting agreement dated June 27, 2002 relative to the early
termination of claimant's employment requiring certain cash payments to be made.
Claimant alleges that we have failed or refused to make such cash payments and
have breached the agreement and seeks all monies owed to him, said amount
alleged to be approximately $130,000. We answered the claim by admitting that a
letter agreement was entered into but denied all of the remaining allegations.
We also filed a counterclaim in the arbitration proceeding. We filed a related
claim against Mr. Feeley in the Superior Court, State of Rhode Island on
September 5, 2003. We claim that he breached certain provisions of his
employment agreement, breached fiduciary duties he owed to us and violated
several provisions of the June 27, 2002 letter agreement. We seek compensatory
damages in amounts to be shown at trial, and preliminary and permanent
injunctive relief and other relief as may be appropriate.
24
Mr. Feeley's arbitration claims are pending before the American Arbitration
Association and an arbitrator selected by the parties. Our claims against Mr.
Feeley are pending in the Rhode Island Superior Court. In January of 2004, the
parties agreed to stay arbitration proceedings and to mediate all the disputes
under procedures available through the Superior Court. To date, neither party
has initiated mediation proceedings.
We are the plaintiff in a lawsuit filed on April 22, 2005 in the Supreme Court,
State of New York, captioned Infinite Group, Inc. v. Mark Ackley and Ackco, Inc.
In this action, we allege that Mr. Ackley, our former chief operations officer
and director of business development, breached his contractual and fiduciary
obligations to us by causing a company he controls to enter into a consulting
arrangement with and perform services for another firm while employed by us. We
terminated Mr. Ackley's employment for cause on March 11, 2005. We also allege
that Mr. Ackley is in violation of his non-compete obligations contained in his
employment agreement. We seek monetary damages in amounts to be proved at trial
as well as preliminary and permanent injunctive relief as may be appropriate.
Other than the foregoing proceeding, we are not a party to any material legal
proceeding.
ITEM 4: SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None
25
PART II
ITEM 5: MARKET FOR OUR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Prior to March 2003, our common stock was traded on the NASDAQ SmallCap Market.
As a result of our failure to maintain certain listing requirements, our stock
was delisted and now trades on the "pink sheets" maintained by the National
Quotation Bureau Incorporated under the symbol IMCI.PK. The following table sets
forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing bid quotations per
share for our common stock. Quotations represent interdealer prices without an
adjustment for retail markups, markdowns or commissions and may not represent
actual transactions:
Year Ended December 31, 2005 High Low
------------------------------- ------------- -----------------
First Quarter $ 0.20 $ 0.07
Second Quarter $ 0.34 $ 0.10
Year Ended December 31, 2004 High Low
------------------------------- ------------- -----------------
First Quarter $ 0.08 $ 0.01
Second Quarter $ 0.25 $ 0.05
Third Quarter $ 0.50 $ 0.09
Fourth Quarter $ 0.20 $ 0.04
Year Ended December 31, 2003 High Low
------------------------------- ------------- -----------------
First Quarter $ 0.21 $ 0.10
Second Quarter $ 0.15 $ 0.01
Third Quarter $ 0.13 $ 0.01
Fourth Quarter $ 0.07 $ 0.01
Year Ended December 31, 2002 High Low
------------------------------- ------------- -----------------
First Quarter $ 2.94 $ 2.01
Second Quarter $ 2.22 $ 1.45
Third Quarter $ 1.89 $ 0.68
Fourth Quarter $ 1.25 $ 0.13
Year Ended December 31, 2001 High Low
------------------------------- ------------- -----------------
First Quarter $ 4.23 $ 1.50
Second Quarter $ 3.99 $ 1.69
Third Quarter $ 3.32 $ 1.60
Fourth Quarter $ 4.17 $ 1.50
As of June 30, 2005 we had approximately 1,300 beneficial stockholders.
26
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities.
At various times during 2003, 2004 and 2005, we issued restricted shares of
common stock in private placement transactions as follows:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shares Average Price
Issued Consideration Per Share
------ ------------- ---------
Shares issued in financing transactions 9,620,388 $ 486,000 $ 0.05
Shares issued for debt conversions 1,747,500 87,375 $ 0.05
Shares issued as employee compensation 1,500,000 75,000 $ 0.05
Shares issued upon exercise of options 25,000 2,500 $ 0.10
==========================================================
12,892,888 $ 650,875 $ 0.05
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
These transactions were exempt from registration, as they were nonpublic
offerings made pursuant to Sections 4(2) and 4(6) of the Act. All shares issued
in the transactions described hereinabove bore an appropriate restrictive
legend.
Dividend Policy
We have never declared or paid a cash dividend on our common stock. It has been
the policy of our board of directors to retain all available funds to finance
the development and growth of our business. The payment of cash dividends in the
future will be dependent upon our earnings and financial requirements and other
factors deemed relevant by our board of directors.
ITEM 6: MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Cautionary statement identifying important factors that could cause our actual
results to differ from those projected in forward looking statements.
Pursuant to the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995, readers of this report are advised that this document
contains both statements of historical facts and forward looking statements.
Forward looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, which
could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the
forward looking statements. Examples of forward looking statements include, but
are not limited to (i) projections of revenues, income or loss, earnings per
share, capital expenditures, dividends, capital structure and other financial
items, (ii) statements of our plans and objectives with respect to business
transactions and enhancement of shareholder value, (iii) statements of future
economic performance, and (iv) statements of assumptions underlying other
statements and statements about our business prospects.
This report also identifies important factors, which could cause actual results
to differ materially from those indicated by the forward looking statements.
These risks and uncertainties include the factors discussed under the heading
"Risk Factors" beginning at page 9 of this report.
The following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with our financial
statements and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report.
27
We are not current in our periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Until 2004 we were not able to pay our auditors, Freed Maxick &
Battaglia, CPAs, P.C. for fees incurred prior to their work on the 2002 audit.
As a result they ceased all work on our behalf.
Because we did not have financial statements with an independent auditors'
report thereon for the year ended December 31, 2003, we were not able to file
our 2003 10-KSB by its due date. For the same reason, we were unable to file our
Form 10-Q's for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd quarters of 2003, our Form 10-KSB for the
year ended December 31, 2003, our Form 10-Q's for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd quarters
of 2004, our Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 and our form 10-Q
for the 1st quarter of 2005. During 2004, we brought our account current with
Freed Maxick & Battaglia, CPAs, P.C., and they resumed work on our behalf and
completed the audit of our financial statements for the years ended December 31,
2003 and 2004. Contemporaneous with this filing, we are filing all of our
delinquent periodic reports.
Disposal of Plastics Group
In 2001 and during the first quarter of 2002, we sold or discontinued operations
of our Plastics Group. Our Plastics Group, which had been comprised of Osley &
Whitney, Inc. (O&W) and Express Pattern, Inc. (EP), provided rapid prototyping
services and proprietary mold building services. O&W and EP were discontinued or
sold in 2002.
In cooperation with O&W's secured lender, the majority of O&W's equipment and
furnishings were sold at public auction on March 12, 2002, and accounts
receivable were remitted to the secured lender as paid. The O&W land and
building were sold at auction on July 22, 2002 for $650,000 and the transaction
closed on August 8, 2002. This transaction completed the liquidation the O&W's
assets, resulting in a net obligation to a secured lender, including accrued
interest and closing expenses, of approximately $211,000. This amount was
evidenced by a new note issued by O&W to the secured lender, which we
guaranteed. The note accrued interest at 7.75% per annum, provided for twelve
monthly payments of $7,276 plus interest, and required a balloon payment of
approximately $145,000 in November 2003. On August 5, 2003, the secured lender
sold the note and the rights thereunder to a third party related to us. The sale
of the note is evidenced by a non-recourse assignment agreement between the
lender and the related third party. On December 31, 2003, the new noteholder
agreed to extend the term of the new note to January 1, 2007 in exchange for the
right to convert the principal amount of the note and all accrued interest into
shares of our common stock at any time after November 30, 2005 at a price of
$.05 per share. As of December 31, 2004, we were obligated to the new noteholder
for principal and accrued interest in the aggregate amount of $234,690.
During the fourth quarter of 2002, we sold all of the issued and outstanding
stock of O&W to an unrelated third party for nominal consideration. As part of
the stock sale agreement, we retained the O&W pension asset and related
obligation, which obligations are included in accrued pension obligation and
accumulated other comprehensive loss on the consolidated balance sheet at
December 31, 2003 and 2004. As a result of the sale of stock, we wrote off the
outstanding intercompany receivables due from O&W in 2002. The net impact on the
sale and asset write off resulted in a gain of approximately $693,000, which is
included in loss on disposal of discontinued operations for the year ending
December 31, 2002.
At December 31, 2003, the O&W defined benefit pension plan had an accrued
pension obligation liability of $2,190,214 and an accumulated other
comprehensive loss of $2,930,364 which we recorded as a reduction of
stockholders' equity. This was due to an increase in the market value of plan
assets from $3,315,256 at December 31, 2002 to $3,621,035 at December 31, 2003
comprised reductions due to payment of benefits of $418,680 offset by an
increase from the return on investments of $ 724,459.. The benefit obligation
increased during 2003 by $336,841 to $5,811,249 at December 31, 2003 as a result
of interest cost of $344,944 and an actuarial loss of $410,577 which were offset
by benefits paid of $418,680.
28
At December 31, 2004, the O&W defined benefit pension plan had an accrued
pension obligation liability of $2,177,287 and an accumulated other
comprehensive loss of $2,755,891 which we recorded as a reduction of
stockholders' equity. This was due to a decrease in the market value of plan
assets from $3,621,035 at December 31, 2003 to $3,510,324 at December 31, 2004
comprised of payment of benefits of $402,174 and an investment return of
$367,617 less expenses paid of $76,154. The benefit obligation decreased during
2004 by $123,638 to $5,687,611 at December 31, 2004 as a result of benefits paid
of $402,174 and an actuarial gain of $60,091 offset by interest cost of
$338,627.
We were required to contribute amounts in 2004 and future years to fund the
deficiency. We did not make a contribution in 2002, 2003 or 2004 and we
currently do not have the funds available to make such contributions. We have
recorded defined benefit pension expense of approximately $200,000 in 2003 and
$160,000 in 2004. In March 2005, we filed a funding waiver application
requesting waivers of the minimum funding standard for the 2005 plan year of
$513,551 and for the 2004 plan year of $979,328 (which includes quarterly cash
disbursements aggregating approximately $455,000 for the year ended December 31,
2004 and unfunded prior year amounts). We are also evaluating strategies to
improve the plan's performance.
Sale of Express Pattern (EP) Assets
On March 14, 2002, we sold the net assets of EP for $725,000, consisting of
$575,000 in cash (of which $300,000 was paid to the O&W secured lender) and a
five-year 8% subordinated $150,000 note, due upon maturity with quarterly
interest payments. The purchasers included a former employee of EP and Thomas J.
Mueller, our chief operating officer, who is a passive investor in the
purchasing entity. The sale was negotiated at "arm's length" by disinterested
management with the former employee and his advisors. During 2002, we offset a
portion of the $150,000 note with the closing costs of the sale amounting to
approximately $26,000 paid by EP in completing the deal. In addition, we wrote
off $50,000 of the note, because this amount was originally intended to cover
contingencies that did not materialize. The loss resulting from this offset and
write off amounting approximately to $76,000 is included in loss on disposal of
discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations
for the year ended December 31, 2002. The interest earned on this note through
December 31, 2002 in the amount of $9,633 has been fully reserved, because we
feel collection of the interest is doubtful at this time. The remaining balance
of the note at December 31, 2004 after the offset and write-off is approximately
$74,000.
Recent Sales of Certain Business Segments
During 2002, our business had two segments, our Laser Group and our Photonics
Group. In 2002, we discontinued our Photonics Group. In 2003 we continued to
operate our Laser Group subsidiary although in 2003, we decided to sell the net
assets of the Laser Group and sold a portion of the business on December 31,
2003 and the remaining business on December 31, 2004.
Closing of Photonics Group
Our Photonics Group, which included Infinite Photonics, Inc. and the Advanced
Technology Group, manufactured and marketed our proprietary grating coupleted
surface emitting laser (GCSEL) diodes. As noted below, our Photonics Group
ceased operations in 2002. On January 23, 2002, Infinite Photonics, Inc. signed
and commenced a $12.0 million research and development contract with DARPA
(contract, #MDA972-02-C-0013), which was scheduled to conclude by the end of
2003. The purpose of the contract was to provide DARPA with pump and source
laser diodes and grating coupled semiconductor optical amplifiers with powers
much higher than the current industry standard of about 0.3 watts (more than one
watt with a goal as high as ten watts), high repetition rates (up to 20,000
laser pulses per second), and high beam quality (minimum beam spreading of the
laser).
29
On October 30, 2002 the contract was terminated for the government's convenience
under the clause entitled Termination, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
52.249.6. The DARPA contract had provided substantially all of the revenue of
the Photonics Group. As of December 31, 2004, we have substantially completed
the contract termination process. Substantially all costs associated with the
termination process have been reimbursed. The termination of the contract has
had a detrimental effect to the development of our technology. The company
released all Photonics Group employees and the operations of the Photonics Group
are dormant. We also determined that our Photonics Group patents were impaired,
and consequently recorded an impairment loss of approximately $468,000, which is
included in loss on disposal of discontinued operations in the statement of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2002.
Sale of Laser Group
Our Laser Group was comprised of Laser Fare, Inc. (LF) and Mound Laser &
Photonics Center, Inc. (MLPC) and provided comprehensive laser-based materials
processing services to leading manufacturers. We disposed of MLPC in 2002 and
the operations ceased. In 2003, we decided to sell the net assets of LF. We sold
a portion of Laser Fare's business related to medical products and engraving on
December 31, 2003 to LFI, Inc., an entity owned by two former employees of our
Laser Group, including our former chairman and chief executive officer. The
transaction resulted in a loss on disposition of approximately $99,000 during
the year ended December 31, 2003. The purchase price for the assets consisted of
LFI's assumption of certain of our liabilities in the aggregate amount of
approximately $358,000 at December 31, 2003. We sold the remaining assets of our
Laser Group to Rolben Acquisition Corporation, a company affiliated with LFI, on
December 31, 2004 and recognized a loss on disposal of approximately $224,000
during the year ended December 31, 2004. The purchase price for the remaining
assets consisted of Rolben's assumption of substantially all of the liabilities
of Laser Fare, Inc. and the delivery of promissory notes in the aggregate amount
of approximately $2.1 Million. Because certain required consents were not yet
obtained, we remain obligated under several notes to UPS Capital Business Credit
("UPS") and the Rhode Island Industrial Facilities Corporation ("RIIFC") in the
same amounts as the notes from Rolben. Upon the delivery of the consents and the
full assumption of the RIIFC and UPS obligations by Rolben, and our release from
those obligations, the notes from Rolben to us will terminate.
Strategy
In 2003, 2004 and 2005 we raised capital from private placements of debt and
equity securities.
Our business plan included:
o the completion of our disposal of the Laser Group commenced in 2003,
and
o our focus beginning in 2003 in the field of information technology
(IT) consulting services and the emerging area of biometric
technology.
Our IT services include strategic staffing, program management, project
management, technical engineering, software development, and enterprise resource
planning. Beginning in 2003, we have entered into several subcontract agreements
with a number of prime contractors to several U.S. government agencies.
In December 2003, we were awarded a Federal Supply Schedule Contract by the U.S.
General Services Administration (GSA) for IT consulting services. Having a GSA
Contract allows us to compete for and secure prime contracts with all executive
agencies of the U.S. Government as well as other national and international
organizations.
In 2003, we entered into a License Agreement with Ultra-Scan Corporation, a
privately held technology company headquartered in Buffalo, New York. The
License Agreement gives us the ability to use, market and sell certain
proprietary fingerprint recognition technology. We have completed the
development of an access control terminal and related software called
Touch-Thru(TM) incorporating that technology. We intend to be in a position to
market and sell that product beginning in 2006 in a variety of industries and
markets, including the federal, state and local government, health care, travel
and general security and access control.
30
In the past several years the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued new
standards, which we have determined, did not have any effect on our financial
statements and we anticipate they will not have a material effect on our
financial statements through December 31, 2004.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have financed our operations beginning in 2003 through a series of private
placements of debt and equity securities and cash generated by ongoing
operations.
We also established in 2004 a financing line with a financial institution that
allows us to sell selected accounts receivable invoices to the financial
institution with full recourse against the company. We pay a per diem fee for
each day the invoice remains unpaid.
January, 2004, we also entered into a line of credit agreement with one of our
prime contractors whereby the prime contractor may lend amounts when requested
by us based on the balance of accounts receivable due from the prime contractor.
The customer has agreed to advance us money under the line of credit note
agreement in the amount of the outstanding invoices up to $600,000 at an agreed
upon interest rate.
As of December 31, 2004, we had cash of $97,297 available for our working
capital needs and planned capital asset expenditures.
The financial statements for 2004 and 2003 reflect management's decision to sell
the assets, certain liabilities and businesses of LF. Accordingly, the
corresponding assets and liabilities of LF have been classified as assets and
liabilities of discontinued operations and the operating results have been
classified as income(loss) from discontinued operations.
As a result of the above transactions, we only operated the Laser Group in 2004
as a discontinued operation until its sale was completed in 2004. The Laser
Group had income from discontinued operations of $415,969 in 2004.
At December 31, 2004 we had a working capital deficit of $1,972,840, ($1,961,461
after eliminating the assets and liabilities of our discontinued operations).
The working capital deficit was primarily caused by our primary lenders not
having issued their waivers for certain loan covenant violations that existed at
December 31, 2004 at our Laser Fare subsidiary, which resulted in
re-characterizing our long-term debt to current liabilities. The loan covenants
are measured annually at December 31st. The loans totaled $2,116,847 at December
31, 2004. The loan covenant violations which existed at December 31, 2004
related to failure to meet certain levels of working capital, debt to tangible
net worth ratio and exceeding capital expenditure limits.
We closed debt and equity financing transactions in 2003, 2004 and 2005 and
installed two receivables-based financing arrangements to provide liquidity
using our accounts receivable as collateral.
Asset Based Convertible Note-Originated and Terminated in 2002
On February 5, 2002, we completed a $1 million debt financing with Laurus Master
Fund, Ltd. ("Laurus"). We received $1 million in cash, less fees amounting to
$89,000, in exchange for its issuance of a $1 million two-year convertible note
bearing interest and fees at the annual rate of 15% payable monthly. The annual
fees were subject to reduction by 1% for every $100,000 in note principal amount
converted, up to an aggregate 10%. The outstanding principal and interest was
due in full on February 5, 2004. The note was convertible, at the option of the
holder, into shares of common stock at a price of $2.00 per share. In the event
of a default, the conversion price was subject to downward adjustment.
31
On June 21, 2002, we completed an additional $500,000 debt financing with
Laurus. We received $500,000 in cash, less fees amounting to $37,000, in
exchange for the issuance of a $500,000 two-year convertible note bearing
interest and fees at the annual rate of 15% payable monthly. The proceeds from
this note were unrestricted and were secured by substantially all of our other
assets and our Infinite Photonics, Inc. subsidiary. The annual fees were subject
to reduction by 1% for every $50,000 in note principal amount converted, up to
an aggregate 10%. This note was convertible into shares of common stock at the
option of the holder at a price of $2.00 per share. In the event of a default,
the conversion price was subject to downward adjustment. In connection with this
transaction, detachable warrants to purchase 25,000 shares of common stock at
$2.40 per share were issued to Laurus. The warrants were immediately exercisable
and expire five years from the date of grant.
Termination of the DARPA contract in October 2002 constituted an event of
default under our financing agreements with Laurus. Upon occurrence of this
event, the $1.0 million two-year convertible note issued on February 5, 2002 and
the $500,000 convertible note issued on June 21, 2002 became immediately due and
payable. As a result, Laurus took immediate possession of the funds held by the
Photonics Group in restricted bank accounts. Approximately $1.474 million was
withdrawn from these accounts and applied in reduction of the outstanding
balance. We satisfied the remaining deficiency in July 2004 by a cash payment to
Laurus of $34,000 and the issuance of 50,000 shares of our common stock.
Future Trends
We believe that our operations, as currently structured, together with our
current financial resources, will result in improved financial performance in
fiscal 2005.
As of December 31, 2004, we continued to guarantee and were directly liable for
certain obligations aggregating approximately $2.1 million of the sold business
of Laser Fare. In May 2005, the UPS and RIIFC notes were paid in full and we
were released from all of our obligations thereunder. At the same time, the
notes from Rolben to us terminated.
At December 31, 2004 we had an accrued pension obligation liability of
$2,177,287 and an accumulated other comprehensive loss of $2,755,891 recorded as
a reduction of stockholders' equity. We are required to contribute amounts in
2004 and future years to fund the deficiency. We did not make a contribution in
2002, 2003 or 2004 and we currently do not have the funds available to make such
contributions. We have recorded defined benefit pension income of approximately
$35,000 in 2002. We have recorded defined benefit pension expense of
approximately $200,000 in 2003 and $160,000 in 2004. In March 2005, the Company
filed a funding waiver application requesting waivers of the minimum funding
standard for the 2005 plan year of $513,551 and for the 2004 plan year of
$979,328 (which includes quarterly cash disbursements aggregating approximately
$455,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004 and unfunded prior year amounts).
We are evaluating strategies to improve the plan's investment performance.
There is no assurance, that our current resources will be adequate to fund the
liabilities of the former businesses, our current operations and business
expansion or that we will be successful in raising additional working capital.
Our failure to raise necessary working capital could force us to curtail
operations, which would have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition and results of operations.
Results of Operations
Laser Group
As part of its restructured business plan, we made a decision in 2003 to
eliminate certain non-core businesses and placed the assets and business of its
LF subsidiary for sale. During the year ended December 31, 2004, LF had income
from discontinued operations of $268,439 (loss from discontinued operations of
$504,723 in 2003), which is included in income (loss) from discontinued
operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
32
On December 31, 2003, we sold certain assets and liabilities of LF to LFI, Inc.
("LFI") relating to the laser engraving and medical products manufacturing and
assembly businesses of LF. The principals of LFI are former employees of LF,
including our former chairman and chief executive officer. The purchase price
for the assets was certain assumed liabilities of LF and/or the Company. On
December 31, 2004, we completed the sale of the remaining assets, including the
assumption of certain liabilities, to an affiliate of LFI, relating to all the
remaining laser businesses of LF. The purchase price was the assumed liabilities
of LF and the receipt of notes receivable in the amount of approximately $2.1
million. LF recorded a loss on sale of approximately $99,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2003. LF reclassified the operating assets and liabilities of its
businesses as held for sale. The balances of the assets held for sale at
December 31, 2003 was $2,919,154 with related liabilities of $781,847.
Photonics Group
During the fourth quarter of 2002, following termination of the DARPA contract,
we released all Photonics Group employees and ceased operations. As a result,
the results of the Photonics Group were recorded as a discontinued operation
with a sustained a loss from discontinued operations of $344,000 for 2001 and a
gain of $84,000 for 2002. In 2002 impairments of patents and property and
equipment were also recorded amounting to $468,000 and $148,000, respectively.
Comparison of the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003
In 2004, revenues were $5,735,012 on cost of goods sold of $4,126,607 resulting
in a gross profit of $1,608,405 from continuing operations. Revenues from
continuing operations in 2003 were $483,538 on cost of sales of $370,187
resulting in a gross profit of $113,351. The increase of $5,251,474 or 1,086% in
revenues for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to the year ended
December 31, 2003 was due to our new IT consulting services business which
commenced operations in the second quarter of 2003 and grew considerably in 2004
with the addition of several new contracts and task orders. Gross profit also
increased by $1,495,054 from 2003 to 2004. Gross profit increased from 23.4% in
2003 to 28.0% in 2004 principally due a reduction in cost of goods sold
associated with converting several outside consultants to employees in 2004.
General and administrative expenses were $1,038,977 for the year ended December
31, 2004 as compared to $1,015,719 for the year ended December 31, 2003. General
and administrative expenses include corporate overhead such as compensation and
benefits for administrative and finance personnel, rent, insurance, professional
fees, travel, and office expenses. General and administrative expenses for the
year ended December 31, 2004 increased by $23,258 or 2.3% due to the increases
in employee compensation and related fringe benefits expenses. As a percentage
of sales, general and administrative expense decreased to 18.1% for the year
ended December 31, 2004 from 210% for the year ended December 31, 2003, which is
a more realistic level due to the relatively low sales volume of 2003. We
anticipate that general and administrative expenses will increase as we continue
to transition our business strategy and incur travel and other expenses
associated with managing a larger business. We expect increases in accounting
and legal expenses in 2005 due to our focus on completing audits of our
financial statements and related public information filings.
General and administrative expense includes expenses of the Osley & Whitney
defined benefit retirement plan of approximately $160,000 and $200,000 for the
years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Selling expenses were $4,617 for the year ended December 31, 2004 as compared to
$26,673 for the year ended December 31, 2003. A portion of the effort to develop
new business for 2004 and 2003 is included in general and administrative expense
since certain members of management also devote a portion of their time to
developing new revenue opportunities and contracts. We expect that selling
expenses will increase in the future as we develop new contract opportunities.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $21,982 for the year ended
December 31, 2004 compared to the year ended December 31, 2003. We are operating
our new corporate headquarters in Rochester, New York with less capital
equipment than our previous headquarters, which was located in Rhode Island.
Beginning in the second quarter of 2003, we purchased equipment related to our
Rochester headquarters office, acquired a technology license and capitalized
software development costs related to our TouchThru(TM) products.
33
Research and development expense totaled $285,659 for the year ended December
31, 2004 as compared to $137,314 for the year ended December 31, 2003, an
increase of 108%. The increase in research and development expense was due to
our continuing development of our TouchThru(TM) biometric access control product
in 2004. TouchThru(TM) is a self-contained terminal enabling physical access
control using biometric identification. It incorporates fingerprint matching
technology licensed from Ultra-Scan Corporation, a private technology company
headquartered in Buffalo, New York. TouchThru(TM) will be the first biometric
product we introduce, and we intend to be in a position to market and sell that
product beginning in 2006. We plan to market and sell TouchThru(TM) in a variety
of industries and markets, including the federal, state and local government,
health care, travel and general security, and access control.
Interest expense was $86,916 during 2004 as compared to $52,485 during 2003, an
increase of $34,431, or 65.6%. The increase was caused by the general increase
in outstanding indebtedness to related parties.
We had income from continuing operations of $162,012 for the year ended December
31, 2004 as compared to a loss from continuing operations of $1,130,767 for the
year ended December 31, 2003. This improvement in performance was the result of
increased revenues from our IT consulting services business as new contracts and
task orders were added in 2004.
We recorded income from discontinued operations of $415,969, including a
$223,803 loss on disposal in 2004 as compared to a loss from discontinued
operations of $86,019 including a loss on disposal of $87,587 in 2003.
For the year ended December 31, 2004, we recorded net income of $577,981
consisting of income from continuing operations of $162,012, or $.01 per share
and income from discontinued operations of $415,969 or $.03 per share. This
compares to a net loss of $(1,216,786) or $(.15) per share consisting of loss
from continuing operations of ($1,130,767) or $(.14) per share and a loss of
$(86,019) or $(.01) per share from discontinued operations for the year ended
December 31, 2003. The improvement in profitability is attributable to growth of
sales and gross profit from our new IT Services which allowed us to fund our
research and development, general and administrative, and interest expenses.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
There are several accounting policies that we believe are significant to the
presentation of our consolidated financial statements. These policies require
management to make complex or subjective judgments about matters that are
inherently uncertain. Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements present a
summary of significant accounting policies. The most critical accounting
policies follow.
Revenue Recognition
Consulting revenues are recognized as the consulting services are provided.
Customer deposits received in advance are recorded as liabilities until
associated services are completed. During the year ended December 31, 2004 sales
to three customers accounted for 87% (98% for one customer in 2003) of total
revenues from continuing operations and 40% (95% in 2003) of accounts receivable
at December 31, 2004.
Accounts Receivable Provisions
As part of the financial reporting process, management estimates and establishes
reserves for potential credit losses relating to the collection of certain
receivables. This analysis involves a degree of judgment regarding customers'
ability and willingness to satisfy its obligations to us. These estimates are
based on past history with customers and current circumstances. Management's
estimates of doubtful accounts historically have been within reasonable limits
of actual bad debts. Management's failure to identify all factors involved in
determining the collectibility of an account receivable could result in bad
debts in excess of reserves established.
34
Deferred Tax Asset Valuation and Income Taxes
Management calculates the future tax benefit relating to certain tax timing
differences and available net operating losses and credits available to offset
future taxable income. This deferred tax asset is then reduced by a valuation
allowance if management believes it is more likely than not that all or some
portion of the asset will not be realized. This estimate is based on historical
profitability results, expected future performance and the expiration of certain
tax attributes which give rise to the deferred tax asset. As of the balance
sheet date, a reserve has been established for the entire amount of the deferred
tax asset. In the event, we generate future taxable income we will be able to
utilize the net operating loss carry forwards subject to any utilization
limitations. This will result in the realization of the deferred tax asset,
which has been fully reserved. As a result, we would have to revise estimates of
future profitability and determine if its valuation reserve requires downward
adjustment.
At December 31, 2004, we had federal net operating loss (NOL) carry forwards of
approximately $26.4 million that expire in years 2009 through 2024. Our ability
to utilize the federal NOL carry forwards may be impaired if we continue to
incur operating losses and may be limited by the change of control provisions if
we issue substantial numbers of new shares or stock options.
Defined Benefit Plan Assumptions
We have a defined benefit plan, under which participants earned a retirement
benefit based upon a formula set forth in the plan. We record income or expense
related to the plan using actuarially determined amounts that are calculated
under the provisions of SFAS No. 87, "Employers' Accounting for Pensions." Key
assumptions used in the actuarial valuations include the discount rate and the
anticipated rate of return on plan assets. These rates are based on market
interest rates, and therefore fluctuations in market interest rates could impact
the amount of pension income or expense recorded for these plans. Despite our
belief that these estimates are reasonable for these key actuarial assumptions,
future actual results will likely differ from our estimates, and these
differences could materially affect our future financial statements either
unfavorably or favorably.
The discount rate enables a company to state expected future cash flows at a
present value on the measurement date. We have little latitude in selecting this
rate since it is based on the yield on high-quality fixed income investments at
the measurement date. A lower discount rate increases the present value of
benefit obligations and increases pension expense.
To determine the expected long-term rate of return on pension plan assets,
management considers a variety of factors including historical returns and asset
class return expectations based on the plan's current asset allocation.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
We evaluate at each balance sheet date the continued appropriateness of the
carrying value of our long-lived assets including our long-term receivables and
property, plant and equipment in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposals of Long Lived Assets." We review long-lived assets for impairment when
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of any such
assets may not be recoverable. If indicators of impairment are present,
management would evaluate the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated
by those assets compared to the carrying amount of those items. The net carrying
value of assets not recoverable is reduced to fair value. We consider continued
operating losses, or significant and long-term changes in business conditions,
to be the primary indicators of potential impairment. In measuring impairment,
we look to quoted market prices, if available, or the best information available
in the circumstances.
Stock-Based Compensation
We disclose the pro forma compensation cost relating to stock options granted
under employee stock option plans, based on the fair value of those options at
the date of grant. This valuation is determined utilizing the Black- Scholes,
option-pricing model, which takes into account certain assumptions, including
the expected life of the option and the expected stock volatility and dividend
yield over this life. These assumptions are made based on past experience and
expected future results. In the event the actual performance varies from the
estimated amounts, the value of these options may be misstated.
35
Effect of New Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock Based
Compensation: A Comparison of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, and Its Related Interpretations, and IASB Proposed IFRS,
Share-based Payments." SFAS 148 amends SFAS 123 to provide alternative methods
of transition for an entity that voluntarily changes to the fair value based
method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. It also amends the
disclosure provisions of that Statement to require prominent disclosure about
the effects on reported net income of an entity's accounting policy decisions
with respect to stock-based compensation. The statement also amends APB Opinion
No. 28, "Interim Financial Reporting", to require disclosure about those effects
in interim financial information. We have chosen not to voluntarily change to
the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation
but has adopted the disclosure rules of SFAS 148.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, "Share Based Payment," that
requires companies to expense the value of employee stock options and similar
awards for annual periods beginning after June 15, 2005 and applies to all
outstanding and unvested stock-based awards at a company's adoption date. We are
in the process of reviewing the impact of the adoption of this statement and
believe that the adoption of this standard will not have a material effect on
the Company's consolidated financial position and results of operations.
ITEM 7: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The response to this item is submitted as a separate section of this report
beginning on page F-1.
ITEM 8: CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
There are not and have not been any disagreements between the us and our
accountants on any matter of accounting principles, practices or financial
statements disclosure.
ITEM 8A: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our management, with the
participation of the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer,
carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our "disclosure controls and
procedures" (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange
Act") Rules 13a-15(e) and 15-d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by
this report (the "Evaluation Date"). Based upon that evaluation, the chief
executive officer and the chief financial officer concluded that, as of the
Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective, providing
them with material information relating to the company as required to be
disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act on a timely
basis.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There were no changes in
our internal controls over financial reporting, known to the chief executive
officer or the chief financial officer, that occurred during our fiscal fourth
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
36
PART III
ITEM 9: DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Set forth below are the names, ages and positions of our directors and executive
officers.
Affiliated
Name Age Position Since
------------------------- ------- ------------------------------------------------------ -----------
Michael S. Smith 51 Chairman of the board, president, chief 1995
executive officer and chief financial officer
James D. Frost 56 Chief technology officer and director of delivery 2003
Paul J. Delmore (1) 48 Director 2003
Allan M. Robbins (1) 54 Director 2003
Deanna Wohlschlegel 34 Corporate secretary and controller 2003
(1) Member of the audit and compensation committees.
Each director is elected for a period of one year and serves until his successor
is duly elected by our stockholders. Officers are elected by and serve at the
will of our board of directors.
Background
The principal occupation of each of our directors and executive officers for at
least the past five years is as follows:
Michael S. Smith became a director in 1995 and assumed the positions of
chairman, president, chief executive officer and chief financial officer in
January 2003. Before joining us, Mr. Smith co-founded and served as the
president and chief executive officer of Micropub Systems International Inc., a
brewery system manufacturer, from July 1997 to January 2003. Mr. Smith holds a
BA degree from Cornell University and a JD degree from Cornell University School
of Law.
James D. Frost is our chief technology officer and director of delivery. Mr.
Frost is a Professional Engineer possessing over 25 years of experience at
senior and executive levels in information technology, engineering, and
environmental business units. Prior to joining us, Mr. Frost was the practice
director for Ciber, Inc. where he was responsible for managing the technical IT
practice for the federal systems division and the commercial division for the
mid-atlantic region. Mr. Frost also led the business process re-engineering and
start-up operations for multiple small business enterprises. He has served as
the operations manager for ABB Environmental Services, and the deputy program
manager and section head at Lee Wan & Associates in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Mr.
Frost has also served 20 years in the United States Navy as a Navy Civil
Engineer Corps Officer.
Paul J. Delmore became a director in April 2003 and is a member of the audit and
compensation committees. Mr. Delmore is a partner in Simpson, Delmore, Greene
LLP, a full service law firm located in San Diego, California. Mr. Delmore's
practice includes representation of small companies, private and public, with
respect to early formation issues, private placements, regulatory requirements
for sale of securities, assistance with regulatory filing concerns and mergers
and acquisitions. Mr. Delmore has a BA degree from the State University of New
York at Oswego and a JD degree from the University of San Diego School of Law.
Mr. Delmore is a member of the State Bar of California, the San Diego County Bar
Association, the Association of Southern California Defense Counsel and the San
Diego Defense Lawyers Association.
37
Dr. Allan M. Robbins became a director in April 2003 and is a member of the
audit and compensation committees. Dr. Robbins is the Medical Director, Clinical
Director and Chief Surgeon at Robbins Eye Associates and Robbins Laser Site in
Rochester, New York. He has also served as the CEO of the Genesee Valley Eye
Institute. Dr. Robbins has been recognized and received the AMA Commendation for
Continuing Medical Education as well as the Americas Top Ophthalmologists
2002-2003 Award from the Consumers Research Council of America. Dr. Robbins is a
member of the New York State Medical Society, New York State Ophthalmologist
Society, Rochester Ophthalmologist Society, American Academy of Ophthalmology,
American College of Surgeons, International Society of Cosmetic Laser Surgeons,
International Society of Refractive Surgery (ISRS), Refractive Surgery Interest
Group (AAO), is a member of the Monroe County Medical Society Committee for
Alternative Medicine, and the American Society of Cataract and Refractive
Surgery (ASCRS).
Deanna Wohlschlegel has been our corporate secretary and controller since May
2003. Prior to that Ms. Wohlschlegel was corporate controller for Micropub
Systems International, Inc. from January 1999 until joining the company. She has
an associates degree in accounting from Finger Lakes Community College.
Committees of the Board of Directors
Our board of directors has an audit committee and a compensation committee. The
audit committee reviews the scope and results of the audit and other services
provided by our independent accountants and our internal controls. The
compensation committee is responsible for the approval of compensation
arrangements for our officers and the review of our compensation plans and
policies. At December 31, 2003 and 2004, each committee was comprised of Messrs.
Delmore and Robbins, also non-employee independent outside directors.
Stock Options
The following table provides information with respect to options exercised by
the named executive officers during 2004 and the number and value of unexercised
options held by the named executive officers as of December 31, 2004.
Number of Shares Underlying
Dollar Unexercised Options at December Value of Unexercised In-the-Money
Number of Shares Value 31, 2004 Options at December 31, 2004 (1)
Underlying Options Realized on -------------------------------- ---------------------------------
Name Exercised Exercise Exercisable Nonexercisable Exercisable Nonexercisable
-------------------- --------- -------- ----------- -------------- ----------- --------------
Michael S. Smith __ $ - 500,000 __ $ 25,000 $ -
James D. Frost __ $ - 500,000 __ $ 25,000 $ -
Mark J. Ackley(2) __ $ - 500,000 __ $ 25,000 $ -
Total __ $ - 1,500,000 __ $ 75,000 $ -
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
38
(1) For the purpose of this calculation value is based upon the difference
between the exercise price of the options and the stock price at December
31, 2004 of $.10 per share.
(2) Mr. Ackley was our former Chief Operating Officer and Director of Business
Development. His employment was terminated for cause in March 2005, and
his options have expired.
There were no stock options issued to executives during 2004.
Director Compensation
We do not pay any directors' fees. Directors are reimbursed for the costs
relating to attending board and committee meetings.
Audit Committee Financial Expert
The Audit committee is comprised of Paul Delmore, as chairman, and Allan
Robbins. The Board has determined that Paul Delmore qualifies as our "audit
committee financial expert," as that term is defined in Item 401(e) of
Regulation S-B, and "independent" as that term is used in Item7 (d) (3)(iv) of
schedule 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Code of Ethics
We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our principal executive
officer, principal financial officer and other persons performing similar
functions, as well as all of our other employees and directors. This code of
ethics is posted on our website at www.us-igi.com.
ITEM 10: EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary compensation. The following table sets forth certain information
concerning compensation paid for services in all capacities awarded to, earned
by or paid to our chief executive officer and the other most highly compensated
executive officers during 2003 and 2004 whose aggregate compensation exceeded
$100,000.
39
All other
Name and Principal Position Year Salary Bonus compensation (1)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael S. Smith
President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer and Director commencing May 1, 2003, 2004 $ 181,789 $ 3,500 $854
2003 $ 108,856 $ 30,000 __
Mark J. Ackley
Chief Operating Officer and Director of Business 2004 $ 173,682 $ 10,000 __
Development commencing April 19, 2003 2003 $ 103,846 $ 15,000 __
James D. Frost
Chief Technology Officer and Director of Delivery 2004 $ 173,978 $ 10,000 __
commencing May 12, 2003 2003 $ 89,423 $ 15,000 __
Clifford G. Brockmyre II
President and Chief Executive Officer
through January 3, 2003, CEO Laser Fare from January 3, 2004 __ __ __
2003 through December 31, 2003 2003 $ 149,376 $ 1,500 __
Clifford G. Brockmyre III
President Laser Fare, Inc. 2004 $ 90,679 $ 1, 050 __
through December 31, 2004 2003 $ 107,655 $ 2,099 __
(1) Reflects stock grants, Company matching contributions to the
employee's IRA Plan and Company paid life insurance premiums.
Employment Agreements
We were released from all obligations to Mr. Brockmyre under his Employment
Agreement in connection with our sale of the Laser Fare business in 2003.
In 2003, we entered into employment agreements with Messrs. Smith, Ackley and
Frost. These agreements are essentially identical and provide, among other
things, for annual base compensation of $150,000 for five-year terms. In
addition, each agreement provides for the issuance of 500,000 shares of our
common stock with a value of $25,000 as of the date of issuance and 500,000
employee stock options exercisable at $.05 per share. Each agreement also
provides for, among other things, incentive compensation, termination benefits
in the event of death, disability and termination for other than cause, and a
covenant against competition. Mr. Ackley's employment was terminated for cause
in March, 2005.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
We have stock option plans, which were adopted by our board and approved by our
shareholders, covering an aggregate of 1,840,000 unexercised shares of our
common stock at December 31, 2004, consisting of both incentive stock options
within the meaning of Section 422 of the United States Internal Revenue Code of
1986 (the Code) and non-qualified options. The option plans are intended to
qualify under Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Incentive stock
options are issuable only to our employees, while non-qualified options may be
issued to non-employees, consultants, and others, as well as to employees. We
also have a stock option plan which was adopted by our board in March 2005,
which has not yet been approved or ratified by our shareholders, covering an
aggregate of 4,000,000 unexercised shares of our common stock at June 30, 2005,
consisting of both incentive stock options within the meaning of Section 422 of
the Code and non-qualified options.
40
The option plans are administered by the compensation committee of the board of
directors, which determines those individuals who shall receive options, the
time period during which the options may be partially or fully exercised, the
number of share of common stock that may be purchased under each option, and the
option price.
The per share exercise price of an incentive or non-qualified stock option may
not be less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date the
option is granted. The aggregate fair market value (determined as of the date
the option is granted) of the shares of common stock for which incentive stock
options are first exercisable by any individual during any calendar year may not
exceed $100,000. No person who owns, directly or indirectly, at the time of the
granting of an incentive stock option to him or her, more than 10% of the total
combined voting power of all classes of stock of the company shall be eligible
to receive any incentive stock option under the option plans unless the option
price is at least $110% of the fair market value of our common stock subject to
the option, determined on the date of grant. Non-qualified options are not
subject to this limitation.
An optionee may not transfer an incentive stock option, other than by will or
the laws of descent and distribution, and during the lifetime of an optionee,
the option will be exercisable only by him or her. In the event of termination
of employment other than by death or disability, the optionee will have three
months after such termination during which to exercise the option. Upon
termination of employment of an optionee by reason of death or permanent total
disability, the option remains exercisable for one year thereafter to the extent
it was exercisable on the date of such termination. No similar limitation
applies to non-qualified options.
Pursuant to our option plans, each new non-employee director is automatically
granted, upon becoming a director, an option to purchase 7,500 shares of our
common stock at the fair market value of such shares on the grant date. In
addition, each non-employee director is automatically granted an option to
purchase 5,000 shares at the fair market value of such shares on the date of
grant, on the date of our annual meeting of stockholders. These options vest 1/3
upon grant and 1/3 at the end of each subsequent year of service. In April 2003,
we granted 7,500 options to each of our two new directors. In March 2005, we
granted 50,000 non-qualified options to each of our two outside directors. At
June 30, 2005, we have granted 142,000 options to members of the board of
directors of which 137,000 are exercisable at June 30, 2005 at prices ranging
from $.10 to $9.40.
Options under the option plans must be granted within 10 years from the
effective date of each respective plan. Incentive stock options granted under
the plan cannot be exercised more than 10 years from the date of grant, except
that incentive stock options issued to greater than 10% stockholders are limited
to four-year terms. All options granted under the plans provide for the payment
of the exercise price in cash or by delivery of shares of common stock already
owned by the optionee having a fair market value equal to the exercise price of
the options being exercised, or by a combination of such methods of payment.
Therefore, an optionee may be able to tender shares of common stock to purchase
additional shares of common stock and may theoretically exercise all of his
stock options without making any additional cash investment.
Any unexercised options that expire or that terminate upon an optionee's ceasing
to be affiliated with the company become available once again for issuance.
The following table summarizes as of June 30, 2005 the (i) currently exercisable
options granted under our plans and (ii) all other securities subject to
contracts, options, warrants and rights or authorized for future issuance
outside our plans. The shares covered by outstanding options or authorized for
future issuance are subject to adjustment for changes in capitalization stock
splits, stock dividends and similar events.
41
Equity Compensation Plan Table
Number of securities
Weighted-average remaining available for
Number of securities to exercise price of future issuance under equity
be issued upon exercise outstanding compensation plans (excluding
of outstanding options, options, warrants securities reflected in
warrants and rights and rights column (a))
(a) (b) (c)
Equity Compensation Plans Approved
By Security Holders(1) 1,270,500 $0.06 569,500
Equity Compensation Plans Not
Approved By Security Holders(2) 2,518,000 $0.18 1,482,000
Non qualified Options and Warrants
to Service Providers 140,000 $1.98 --
Total 3,928,500 $ .20 2,051,500
(1) Includes the 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998 and 1999 Stock Option Plans
(2) Includes the 2005 Stock Option Plan
At June 30, 2005, we had notes payable and accrued interest of $349,552 due to
Allan Robbins, a member of our board of directors, and $566,399 due to a related
third party. These notes and accrued interest are convertible into shares of our
common stock at $.05 per share at the option of the note holder at any time
after November 30, 2005. If the principal and accrued interest were converted in
full, we would be required to issue 6,991,043 common shares to the board member
and 11,327,971 common shares to the third party.
If all of the aforementioned incentive and non-qualified options and warrants
were to be exercised and notes including accrued interest were to be converted
to shares of our common stock, we would be obligated to issue an additional
22,247,514 common shares as of June 30, 2005.
Compensation committee interlocks and insider participation in compensation
decisions
None of the directors serving on the compensation committee of our board of
directors is employed by us. In addition, none of our directors or executive
officers is a director or executive officer of any other corporation that has a
director or executive officer who is also a member of our board of directors.
ITEM 11: SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The following table, together with the accompanying footnotes, sets forth
information, as of June 30, 2005, regarding stock ownership of all persons known
by us to own beneficially 5% or more of our outstanding common stock, all
directors, and all directors and executive officers as a group.
42
Shares of
Name of Common Stock Percentage
Beneficial Owner Beneficially Owned (1) (2) of Class (3)
------------------------------- -------------------------- ------------
Directors and Executive Officers
Michael S. Smith 1,517,000(4) 6.9%
Paul J. Delmore 4,884,500(5) 22.4%
Allan M. Robbins 57,500(6) *
James D. Frost 2,000,000(7) 9.2%
All directors and
executive officers as a
group (4 persons) 8,459,000 38.7%
5% Stockholders
David Slavny 1,100,000 5.7%
Clifford G. Brockmyre (8) 1,047,463 5.5%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* less than 1%
(1) Pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, shares of
common stock which an individual or group has a right to acquire within 60
days pursuant to the exercise of options or warrants or upon the
conversion of securities are deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of
computing the percent of ownership of such individual or group, but are
not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage
ownership of any other person shown in the table.
(2) Assumes that all currently exercisable options or warrants or convertible
notes owned by the individual have been exercised.
(3) Assumes that all currently exercisable options or warrants owned by
members of the group have been exercised.
(4) Includes 527,000 shares subject to currently exercisable options and
500,000 shares subject to currently exercisable options which are subject
to shareholder ratification
(5) Includes (i) 4,827,000 shares owned of record by Upstate Holding Group,
LLC, an entity wholly-owned by Mr. Delmore, (ii) 7,500 shares subject to
currently exercisable options, and (iii) 50,000 shares subject to
currently exercisable options which are subject to shareholder
ratification.
(6) Includes 7,500 shares subject to currently exercisable options and 50,000
shares subject to currently exercisable options which are subject to
shareholder ratification.
(7) Includes 500,000 shares subject to currently exercisable options and
1,000,000 shares subject to currently exercisable options which are
subject to shareholder ratification.
(8) Includes 20,000 shares owned by Mr. Brockmyre's wife as to which shares
Mr. Brockmyre disclaims beneficial ownership. The information with respect
to this stockholder was derived from his Officers and Directors
Questionnaire.
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our officers and
directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of
our equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Officers, directors and
greater than ten-percent stockholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish
us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. To the best of our
knowledge, based solely on review of the copies of such forms furnished to us,
or written representations that no other forms were required, we believe that
all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors and
greater than ten percent (10%) stockholders were complied with during ended
December 31, 2004 with the following exceptions: Allan Robbins, James Frost,
Michael Smith, Paul Delmore and Upstate Holding Group, LLC did not timely file
their individual Annual Change in Beneficial Ownership of Securities on Form 5.
With respect to any of our former directors, officers, and ten percent (10%)
stockholders, we do not have any knowledge of any known failures to comply with
the filing requirements of Section 16(a).
43
ITEM 12: CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Mr. Brockmyre's son, Clifford G. Brockmyre III, was employed as the General
Manager of our Laser Fare, Inc. subsidiary at an annual salary of $100,000
through December 31, 2004, at which time the business, assets and certain
liabilities of Laser Fare were sold. Mr. Brockmyre is no longer affiliated with
us.
We believe that Mr. Brockmyre's employment with LF was on terms no less
favorable to us than could have been obtained from third parties. As a matter of
policy, in order to reduce the risks of self-dealing or a breach of the duty of
loyalty to the company, all transactions between the company and any of its
officers, directors or principal stockholders are for bona fide purposes and are
approved by a majority of the disinterested members of our Board.
44
ITEM 13: EXHIBITS
The Exhibits listed below are filed as part of this Report:
3.1 Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company. (1)
3.2 Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation dated January 7,
1998. (5)
3.3 Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation dated February
16, 1999. (6)
3.4 By-Laws of the Company. (1)
4.1 Specimen Stock Certificate. (1)
10.1 Form of Stock Option Plan. (2)
10.2 Form of Stock Option Agreement. (1)
10.3 Lease Agreement between Rhode Island Industrial Facilities Corporation and
HGG Laser Fare, Inc. for certain equipment and operating facility in
Smithfield, Rhode Island. (3)
10.4 Loan Agreement between HGG Laser Fare, Inc. and First National Bank of New
England and dated December 21, 1995. (4)
10.5 Consulting Agreement between J. Terrence Feeley and the Company dated June
27, 2002. (7)
10.6 Employment Agreement between Mark Ackley and the Company dated April 7,
2003.(7)
10.7 Employment Agreement between Michael Smith and the Company dated May 5,
2003. (7)
10.8 Employment Agreement between James Frost and the Company dated May 12,
2003. (7)
10.9 License Agreement between Ultra-Scan Corporation and the Company dated
June 11, 2003. (7)
10.10 Promissory Note dated August 13, 2003 in favor of Carle C. Conway. (7)
10.11 Promissory Note dated January 16, 2004 in favor of Carle C. Conway. (7)
10.12 Promissory Noted dated March 11, 2004 in favor of Carle C. Conway. (7)
10.13 Promissory Note dated December 31, 2003 in favor of Northwest Hampton
Holdings, LLC. (7)
10.14 Asset Purchase Agreement between LFI, Inc., Laser Fare, Inc. and the
Company dated December 31, 2003. (7)
10.15 Modification Agreement to Promissory Notes between Northwest Hampton
Holdings, LLC and the Company dated December 1, 2004. (7)
10.16 Modification Agreement to Promissory Notes between Allan Robbins and the
Company dated December 1, 2004. (7)
10.17 Asset Purchase Agreement between Rolben Acquisition Company, Laser Fare,
Inc. and the Company dated December 31, 2004. (7)
10.18 Modification Agreement No. 2 to Promissory Notes between Northwest Hampton
Holdings, LLC and the Company dated June 1, 2005 (7)
10.19 Modification Agreement No. 2 to Promissory Notes between Allan Robbins and
the Company dated June 1, 2005 (7)
14.1 Code of Ethics (7)
21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant. (7)
23.1 Consent of Freed Maxick & Battaglia, CPAs, PC, independent registered
public accounting firm.*
31.1 Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
31.2 Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
32.1 Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
32.2 Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
-----------------------
* Filed as an exhibit hereto.
(1) Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (File #33-61856). This Exhibit is incorporated herein by
reference.
(2) Incorporated by reference to 1993 Preliminary Proxy Statement.
(3) Incorporated by reference to Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 1994.
45
(4) Incorporated by reference to Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 1995.
(5) Incorporated by reference to Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 1997.
(6) Incorporated by reference to Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal
year ended December, 31, 1998.
(7) Incorporated by reference to Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal
year ended December, 31, 2002.
46
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The aggregate fees billed by our principal accounting firm, Freed Maxick &
Battaglia, CPAs, PC, for fees billed for fiscal years ended December 31, 2004
and 2003 are as follows:
2004 2003
-------- --------
Audit fees $ 66,032 $ 82,712
Audit related fees -- --
-------- --------
Total audit and audit related fees $ 66,032 $ 82,712
Tax fees -- --
All other fees -- --
-------- --------
Total fees $ 66,032 $ 82,712
======== ========
Audit-Related Fees
The audit related Fees set forth in the table above consist primarily of
consulting on regulatory filings and consulting and research on specific
accounting issues that pertained to our on-going operations and the disposition
transactions we consummated.
Tax Fees
The tax fees were zero for the periods presented.
All Other Fees
All other fees were zero for the periods presented.
Each of the permitted non-audit services has been pre-approved by the Audit
Committee or the Audit Committee's Chairman pursuant to delegated authority by
the Audit Committee, other than de minimus non-audit services for which the
pre-approval requirements are waived in accordance with the rules and
regulations of the SEC.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
The Audit Committee charter provides that the Audit Committee will pre-approve
audit services and non-audit services to be provided by our independent auditors
before the accountant is engaged to render these services. The Audit Committee
may consult with management in the decision-making process, but may not delegate
this authority to management. The Audit Committee may delegate its authority to
pre-approve services to one or more committee members, provided that the
designees present the pre-approvals to the full committee at the next committee
meeting.
47
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d), the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on July 26,
2005 on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Infinite Group, Inc.
By: /s/ Michael S. Smith
-----------------------------------
Michael S. Smith, President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this Report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the
capacities indicated.
/s/ Michael S. Smith
------------------------------
Michael S. Smith Chief Executive Officer, President and Director July 26, 2005
/s/ Michael S. Smith
------------------------------
Michael S. Smith Acting Chief Financial Officer July 26, 2005
(principal financial and accounting officer)
/s/ Paul J. Delmore
------------------------------
Paul J. Delmore Director July 26, 2005
/s/ Allan M. Robbins
------------------------------
Allan M. Robbins Director July 26, 2005
48
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
================================================================================
DECEMBER 31, 2004
with
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
CONTENTS
================================================================================
Page
----
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm............. F-1
Consolidated Financial Statements:
Balance Sheets............................................... F-2
Statements of Operations..................................... F-3
Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Deficiency............ F-4
Statements of Cash Flows..................................... F-5 - F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.......................... F-7 - F-36
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Infinite Group, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Infinite
Group, Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, changes in stockholders' deficiency and cash flows for
the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that
we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. Infinite Group, Inc. is
not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal
control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that
are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of Infinite Group, Inc.'s internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Infinite
Group, Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the consolidated results of
their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
FREED MAXICK & BATTAGLIA, CPAs, PC
Buffalo, New York
March 31, 2005, except for Note 18, as to which the date is June 20, 2005
F-1
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
================================================================================
December 31,
-----------------------------
ASSETS 2004 2003
------------ ------------
Current assets:
Cash $ 97,297 $ 16,515
Restricted funds 30,327 26,500
Accounts receivable, net of allowances 1,054,623 165,830
Notes receivable, current portion 270,347 --
Other current assets 41,207 1,060
Assets held for sale -- 2,919,154
Assets of discontinued operations 205,921 870,287
------------ ------------
Total current assets 1,699,722 3,999,346
Property and equipment, net 239,907 99,435
Other assets:
Note receivable 1,940,857 73,897
Intangible assets, net 50,526 62,918
------------ ------------
1,991,383 136,815
------------ ------------
$ 3,931,012 $ 4,235,596
============ ============
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY
Current liabilities:
Notes payable:
Bank $ 50,207 $ 152,122
Other 176,184 30,000
Related parties 9,906 9,906
Accounts payable 504,327 613,712
Accrued expenses 542,066 359,804
Current maturities of long-term obligations 2,172,572 2,360,840
Liabilities held for sale -- 781,847
Liabilities of discontinued operations 217,300 933,349
------------ ------------
Total current liabilities 3,672,562 5,241,580
Long-term obligations:
Bank 64,133 32,852
Related parties 1,100,124 887,124
Accrued pension obligation 2,177,287 2,190,214
------------ ------------
Total liabilities 7,014,106 8,351,770
------------ ------------
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 14 and 17)
Stockholders' deficiency:
Common stock, $.001 par value, 20,000,000 shares
authorized;17,561,965 (10,624,465 in 2003) shares
issued and outstanding 17,562 10,624
Additional paid-in capital 28,375,198 28,026,510
Common stock, 1,500,000 shares authorized, not issued -- 75,000
Accumulated deficit (28,719,963) (29,297,944)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (2,755,891) (2,930,364)
------------ ------------
Total stockholders' deficiency (3,083,094) (4,116,174)
------------ ------------
$ 3,931,012 $ 4,235,596
============ ============
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-2
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
================================================================================
Years Ended
December 31,
-----------------------------
2004 2003
------------ ------------
Sales $ 5,735,012 $ 483,538
Cost of goods sold 4,126,607 370,187
------------ ------------
Gross profit 1,608,405 113,351
Costs and expenses:
General and administrative 1,038,977 1,015,719
Depreciation and amortization 29,874 7,892
Research and development 285,659 137,314
Selling 4,617 26,673
Loss on disposal of asset -- 3,611
------------ ------------
Total costs and expenses 1,359,127 1,191,209
------------ ------------
Operating income (loss) 249,278 (1,077,858)
Other expense:
Interest expense:
Related parties (86,916) (37,879)
Other -- (14,606)
------------ ------------
Total other expense (86,916) (52,485)
------------ ------------
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
income tax expense 162,362 (1,130,343)
Income tax expense (350) (424)
------------ ------------
Income (loss) from continuing operations 162,012 (1,130,767)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, including
$223,803 loss on disposal ($87,587 loss on disposal in 2003)
(Note 4) 415,969 (86,019)
------------ ------------
Net income (loss) $ 577,981 $ (1,216,786)
============ ============
Net income (loss) per share - basic:
Income from continuing operations $ .01 $ (.14)
Income from discontinued operations .03 (.01)
------------ ------------
Net income (loss) $ .04 $ (.15)
============ ============
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic 15,121,985 8,146,747
============ ============
Net income per share - diluted:
Income from continuing operations $ .01 $ (.14)
Income from discontinued operations .03 (.01)
------------ ------------
Net income (loss) $ .04 $ (.15)
============ ============
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted 16,069,623 8,146,747
============ ============
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY
Years Ended December 31, 2004 and 2003
================================================================================
Accumulated
Common Stock Additional Common Stock Other
---------------------- Paid-in Authorized Accumulated Comprehensive
Shares Amount Capital Not issued Deficit Loss Total
----------- ------- ----------- -------- ------------ ----------- -----------
Balance - December 31, 2002 6,314,077 $ 6,314 $27,817,820 $ -- $(28,081,158) $(3,098,705) $(3,355,729)
Sales of common stock 3,350,388 3,350 161,650 -- -- -- 165,000
Issuance of common stock
as satisfaction of liabilities 960,000 960 47,040 -- -- -- 48,000
Common stock authorized,
not issued -- -- -- 75,000 -- -- 75,000
Net loss -- -- -- -- (1,216,786) -- (1,216,786)
Other comprehensive loss:
Change in minimum
pension obligation -- -- -- -- -- 168,341 168,341
-----------
Total comprehensive loss (1,048,445)
----------- ------- ----------- -------- ------------ ----------- -----------
Balance - December 31, 2003 10,624,465 10,624 28,026,510 75,000 (29,297,944) (2,930,364) (4,116,174)
Sales of common stock 4,670,000 4,670 236,330 -- -- -- 241,000
Issuance of common stock
as satisfaction of liabilities 742,500 743 36,383 -- -- -- 37,126
Issuance of common stock
in connection with the
exercise of stock options 25,000 25 2,475 -- -- -- 2,500
Common stock issued 1,500,000 1,500 73,500 (75,000) -- -- --
Net income -- -- -- -- 577,981 -- 577,981
Other comprehensive income:
Change in minimum
pension obligation -- -- -- -- -- 174,473 174,473
-----------
Total comprehensive income 752,454
----------- ------- ----------- -------- ------------ ----------- -----------
Balance - December 31, 2004 17,561,965 $17,562 $28,375,198 $ -- $(28,719,963) $(2,755,891) $(3,083,094)
=========== ======= =========== ======== ============ =========== ===========
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
================================================================================
Years Ended
December 31,
-----------------------------
2004 2003
------------ ------------
Operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 577,981 $ (1,216,786)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
used in operating activities of continuing operations:
(Income) loss from discontinued operations (415,969) 86,019
Depreciation and amortization 29,874 7,892
Loss on disposal of asset -- 3,611
Expenses satisfied through issuance of debt or
equity instruments 37,126 75,000
Cash transferred to discontinued operations -- (15,589)
(Increase) decrease in assets:
Accounts receivable (888,793) (165,730)
Other current assets (40,147) (67)
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:
Accounts payable (109,385) 35,343
Accrued expenses 182,262 (16,348)
Accrued pension obligations 161,546 199,403
------------ ------------
Net cash used in operating activities of
continuing operations (465,505) (1,007,252)
Net cash provided by operating activities of
discontinued operations 370,308 659,661
------------ ------------
Net cash used in operating activities (95,197) (347,591)
------------ ------------
Investing activities:
Net cash used in investing activities of
continuing operations:
Increase in restricted funds, net (3,827) (1,382)
Purchase of property and equipment (118,856) (63,110)
Purchase of intangible asset -- (12,070)
------------ ------------
Net cash used in investing activities of
continuing operations (122,683) (76,562)
------------ ------------
Net cash used in investing activities
of discontinued operations -- (128,959)
------------ ------------
Net cash used in investing activities (122,683) (205,521)
------------ ------------
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - CONTINUED
================================================================================
Years Ended
December 31,
-----------------------------
2004 2003
------------ ------------
Financing activities:
Net borrowings from notes payable - other 146,184 --
Net repayments of bank notes payable (101,915) (78,610)
Net borrowings (repayment) of notes payable -
related party -- (44,000)
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term
obligations - related party 329,000 887,124
Repayments of notes payable - related party (72,000) --
Repayments of long-term obligations (246,107) (396,346)
Proceeds from issuances of common stock,
net of expenses 243,500 165,000
------------ ------------
Net cash provided by financing activities of
continuing operations 298,662 533,168
Net cash used in financing activities of
discontinued operations -- --
------------ ------------
Net cash provided by financing activities 298,662 533,168
------------ ------------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 80,782 (19,944)
Cash - beginning of year 16,515 36,459
------------ ------------
Cash - end of year $ 97,297 $ 16,515
============ ============
Supplemental continuing operations cash flow
disclosures:
Cash paid for:
Interest $ 47,152 $ 23,501
============ ============
Income taxes $ 2,157 $ 424
============ ============
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
================================================================================
NOTE 1. - PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION AND BUSINESS
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the financial
statements of Infinite Group, Inc. (IGI), and each of its wholly owned
subsidiaries: Infinite Photonics, Inc. (IP), Laser Fare, Inc. (LF), and LF's
wholly-owned subsidiary, Mound Laser and Photonics Center, Inc. (MLPC); Osley
and Whitney, Inc. (O&W) ; Express Tool, Inc. (ET); Materials and Manufacturing
Technologies, Inc. (MMT); Express Pattern (EP) and MetaTek, Inc. (MT)
(collectively "the Company"). The Company has operated in the following four
segments at various times throughout 2004 and 2003: IT Services Group (IGI), the
Laser Group (LF, MLPC, ET, MMT and MT) the Photonics Group (IP) and the Plastics
Group (O&W and EP). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have
been eliminated.
Through 2003 the Company has continued to change its business focus.
During 2003, the Company started a new business focusing in the field of
information technology consulting and integration and on the emerging area of
biometric technology as a complement to that effort (IT Services Group). Also,
in early 2003 the Company decided to sell essentially all the assets and
liabilities of its Laser Group (Note 4). Continuing in 2004 and 2003 the Company
was still winding down the previously discontinued operations of the Laser,
Plastics and Photonics groups.
NOTE 2. - MANAGEMENT PLANS
Business Strategy
Beginning in 2003 and continuing into 2004, the Company began involvement
in the field of information technology (IT) consulting and integration,
concentrating on the emerging area of biometric technology as a complement to
that effort. The Company's IT services include strategic staffing, program
management, project management, technical engineering, software development and
enterprise resource planning. The Company has entered into several Subcontract
Agreements with a number of prime contractors to the Federal Government
The Company entered into a three year Subcontract Agreement with a large
computer equipment manufacturer pursuant to which it is engaged in a server
management and service program with an establishment of the U.S. government.
In December 2003, the Company was awarded a Federal Supply Schedule
Contract by the U.S. General Services Administration ("GSA"). Having a GSA
Contract allows the Company to compete for and secure prime contracts with all
executive agencies of the U.S. Government as well as other national and
international organizations.
F-7
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
================================================================================
NOTE 2. - MANAGEMENT PLANS - CONTINUED
In 2003, the Company entered into a License Agreement with a privately
held technology company. The License Agreement gives the Company the ability to
use, market and sell certain proprietary fingerprint recognition technology. The
Company has completed development of an access control terminal and related
software called Touch-Thru(TM) incorporating that technology. The Company
intends to be in a position to market and sell the Touch-Thru(TM) product
beginning in 2006 to a variety of industries and markets, including the federal,
state and local government, health care, travel and general security and access
control.
As part of its restructured business plan, the Company made a decision
during 2003 to eliminate certain non-core businesses. On December 31, 2003, the
Company and LF entered into an asset purchase agreement with LFI, Inc. ("LFI")
relating to the purchase by LFI of certain assets and the assumption of certain
liabilities of LF relating to the laser engraving and medical products
manufacturing and assembly businesses of LF (Note 4).
On October 30, 2002, Infinite Photonics, Inc. (included in the Photonics
Group) received a Notice of Termination of its DARPA Contract. The Contract was
terminated for the Government's convenience under the clause entitled
Termination, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 52.249.6. The Company worked
very closely with the Government throughout the settlement process. The Company
presented the Terminating Contracting Officer with all costs associated with the
terminated contract and has finalized a negotiated settlement. All work
allowable under the Contract that has occurred as of the termination date, and
all reasonable costs allowable under the settlement provisions, have been
reimbursed by the Government.
Because of the Government's termination of the DARPA contract, the
Company's new management team decided to discontinue the Photonics segment of
its business (Note 4). Without the government funding provided by the DARPA
contract, management did not believe that sufficient funds could be raised to
successfully commercialize its laser diode technology in the foreseeable future.
Consequently, the Company decided to restructure its business along different
lines.
On December 31, 2002, the former chairman and chief executive officer of
the Company resigned to become the chief executive officer of Laser Fare.
Companies controlled by this executive acquired the assets and assumed certain
liabilities of Laser Fare in two closings which took place on December 31, 2003
and 2004 (Note 4). As a result of the first acquisition on December 31, 2003,
this executive resigned his position with Laser Fare to join the acquiring
company. A former outside board member assumed the positions of chairman of the
board, president and chief executive officer of the Company on January 6, 2003.
F-8
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
================================================================================
NOTE 2. - MANAGEMENT PLANS - CONTINUED
Capital Formation Strategy
On August 5, 2003, the financial institution which held the consolidated
promissory note obligation with O&W, that was guaranteed by IGI (Note 9b), sold
the obligation to a related third party. The sale of the consolidated promissory
note is evidenced by a non-recourse assignment agreement between the financial
institution and the related third party. The financial institution assigned the
rights under the consolidated promissory note to the related third party. As of
December 31, 2004 the Company is obligated to the related third party for
principal and accrued interest in the aggregate amount of approximately $235,000
($219,000 - 2003). During 2004 the terms of the note were revised and the
principal is now due on January 1, 2007 with principal and accrued interest
convertible at the option of the holder any time after September 1, 2005 into
shares of common stock at $.05 per share.
At various times subsequent to December 31, 2002 and through March 31,
2005, the Company issued an aggregate of 9,620,388 shares of common stock to
nine individual investors resulting in proceeds of $486,000 or an average price
of $.05 per share.
At various times subsequent to December 31, 2002 and through March 31,
2005, the Company issued 1,747,500 shares of common stock as payment for notes
payable and certain services performed for the Company. The fair market value of
the common stock issued equaled the amount of the outstanding liabilities, which
amounted to an aggregate of $87,375 or $.05 per share. In addition, the Company
issued 1,500,000 common shares for employee services, which were valued at
$75,000 or $.05 per share.
At various times subsequent to December 31, 2002 and through March 31,
2005 a related third party and one board member loaned the Company a total of
$675,800. These loans are evidenced by unsecured promissory notes bearing
interest at 6% per annum. The principal and accrued interest on all but one of
these notes are due and payable on January 1, 2007 and are convertible at the
option of the holder at any time after September 1, 2005 into common stock at a
price of $.05 per share (one note in the principal amount of $44,000 is due on
May 18, 2005 and is not convertible).
In addition, at various times subsequent to December 31, 2002 the Company
issued several short-term promissory notes to another individual, who is a
shareholder and the former president of the Company, in the aggregate amount of
$265,000, each note bearing interest at 12% per annum. The promissory notes are
to be repaid with monthly payments of interest only with a lump sum payment of
the principal and interest due in January 2006. These notes have no conversion
provisions.
The new business strategy described above, as well as the various capital
raising activities engaged in by the Company subsequent to December 31, 2004
have allowed the Company to continue operations. The Company believes, but can
offer no assurances, that its current operations, as restructured, coupled with
its demonstrated ability to raise capital will provide sufficient working
capital to fund its operations through 2005 and beyond.
F-9
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
================================================================================
NOTE 3. - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Restricted Funds - Restricted funds represent escrow funds set aside to
meet scheduled payments pursuant to a capital lease financing arrangement (Note
9). These funds are held in cash deposit and treasury trust accounts.
Accounts Receivable - Credit is granted to substantially all customers
throughout the United States. The Company carries its accounts receivable net of
an allowance for doubtful accounts. On a periodic basis, the Company evaluates
its accounts receivable and establishes the allowance for doubtful accounts,
based on a history of past write-offs and collections and current credit
conditions. The Company's policy is to not accrue interest on past due
receivables. Management has determined that a reserve of approximately, $25,000
for doubtful accounts for continuing operations is necessary for the year ended
December 31, 2004 (no reserve - December 31, 2003). As of December 31, 2003
there was an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable of approximately $54,000
relating to assets held for sale.
Sale of Certain Accounts Receivable - During 2004, the Company established
a financing line with a financial institution (the Purchaser). In connection
with the factoring line of credit the Company adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards Board (SFAS) Statement No. 140, "Accounting for Transfers
and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities". SFAS 140
enables the Company to sell selected accounts receivable invoices to the
Purchaser with full recourse against the Company. These transactions qualify for
a sale of assets since (1) the Company has transferred all of its right, title
and interest in the selected accounts receivable invoices to the financial
institution, (2) the Purchaser may pledge, sell or transfer the selected
accounts receivable invoices, and (3) the Company has no effective control over
the selected accounts receivable invoices since it is not entitled to or
obligated to repurchase or redeem the invoices before their maturity and it does
not have the ability to unilaterally cause the Purchaser to return the invoices.
Under SFAS 140, after a transfer of financial assets, an entity recognizes the
financial and servicing assets it controls and the liabilities it has incurred,
derecognizes financial assets when control has been surrendered, and
derecognizes liabilities when extinguished.
Pursuant to the provisions of SFAS 140, the Company reflects the factoring
transactions as a sale of assets and establishes an accounts receivable from the
Purchaser for the retained amount less the costs of the transaction and less any
anticipated future loss in the value of the retained asset. The retained amount
is generally equal to 20% of the total accounts receivable invoice sold to the
Purchaser, less .95% of the total invoice as a factoring fee for the first 10
days the invoice remains open. Every day the invoice remains unpaid greater than
10 days, the Company is required to pay an additional .09% per day. The
estimated future loss reserve for each receivable included in the estimated
value of the retained asset is based on the payment history of the accounts
receivable customer and is included in the allowance for doubtful accounts, if
any.
Property and Equipment - Additions to property and equipment are recorded
at cost and are depreciated over their estimated useful lives for financial
statement purposes. The cost of improvements to leased properties is amortized
over the shorter of the lease term or the life of the improvement. Maintenance
and repairs are charged to expenses as incurred while improvements are
capitalized.
F-10
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
================================================================================
NOTE 3. - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - CONTINUED
Intangible Assets - Intangible assets consist of deferred financing costs
and a technology license.
Deferred financing costs are amortized using the straight-line method over
the terms of the related financing instruments, which range from two to fifteen
years. The technology license is amortized using the straight-line method over
two years.
Impairment of Goodwill and Intangible Assets - The Company adopted the
provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 142 (FASB 142),
"Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets". This standard specifies, among other
things, that goodwill no longer be amortized but instead is subject to an
impairment test, which is to be performed at least annually. In addition
intangible assets that are subject to amortization are to be reviewed for
potential impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying
amounts may not be recoverable.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets - The Company adopted the provisions of
the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No. 144 (FASB 144),
"Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets", which provides
guidance in the accounting for impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. For
long-lived assets to be held and used, the new statement required the
recognition of an impairment loss when the undiscounted cash flows will not be
adequate to recover the carrying amount. The computation incorporates a
probability-weighted cash flow estimation approach. The Company periodically
reviews the recoverability of the carrying value of its long-lived assets. In
determining whether there is an impairment, the Company compares the sum of the
expected future net cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) to
the carrying amount of the asset. In addition, the Company will consider other
significant events or changes in the economic and competitive environments that
may indicate that the remaining estimated useful lives of its long-lived assets
may warrant revision.
As a result of management's decision to sell certain assets of Laser Fare
as of 2003, the Company wrote down the net assets to the net realizable value,
which resulted in a loss of approximately $99,000, which is included in loss
from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2003.
Revenue Recognition - Consulting revenues are recognized as the consulting
services are provided. Customer deposits received in advance are recorded as
liabilities until associated services are completed.
During the year ended December 31, 2004 sales to three customers accounted
for 87% of total revenues from continuing operations (98% for one customer in
2003) and 40% of accounts receivable at December 31, 2004 (95% - 2003).
Advertising - The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. No
advertising expense from continuing operations was incurred for the year ended
December 31, 2004 ($10,000 - 2003).
F-11
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
================================================================================
NOTE 3. - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - CONTINUED
Research and Development Costs - All costs related to internal research
and development are expensed as incurred. Research and development expense from
continuing operations amounted to $285,659 for the year ended December 31, 2004
($137,314 - 2003) and consists primarily of salaries and related fringe benefits
and consulting fees associated with the development of its Touch Thru(TM)
biometric access control product.
Income Taxes - The Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries file
consolidated federal income tax returns. Deferred taxes are provided on an asset
and liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible
temporary differences, operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and deferred
tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary
differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation
allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that
some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred
tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws
and rates on the date of enactment.
Earnings Per Share - Basic income per share is based on the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the periods presented.
Diluted income per share is based on the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding, as well as dilutive potential common shares which, in the
Company's case, comprise shares issuable under the stock options and stock
warrants. The treasury stock method is used to calculate dilutive shares, which
reduces the gross number of dilutive shares by the number of shares purchasable
from the proceeds of the options and warrants assumed to be exercise. In a loss
year, the calculation for basic and diluted earnings per share is considered to
be the same, as the impact of potential common shares is anti-dilutive.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted
earnings per share as of December 31, 2004:
Numerator:
Income available to common stockholders
from continuing operations $ 162,012
============
Weighted average shares outstanding 15,121,985
============
Denominator for diluted income per share:
Weighted average shares outstanding 15,121,985
Common stock options and stock warrants 947,638
------------
Weighted average shares and conversions 16,069,623
============
As of December 31, 2003, all outstanding stock options, warrants and
convertible obligations have not been considered common stock equivalents
because their assumed exercise would be anti-dilutive. If the Company had
generated earnings during the year ended December 31, 2003, common stock
equivalent shares would have been added to the weighted averages shares
outstanding and resulted in 16,252,480 shares.
F-12
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
================================================================================
NOTE 3. - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - CONTINUED
Use of Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments - The carrying amounts of cash,
accounts receivable and accounts payable and accrued expenses are reasonable
estimates of their fair value due to their short maturity. Based on the
borrowing rates currently available to the Company for loans similar to its term
debt and notes payable, the fair value approximates its carrying amount.
Stock Based Compensation - The Company accounts for its employee stock
option plans under APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees." Accordingly, compensation expense is recognized for the excess of
the fair market value of the Company's common stock over the exercise price. In
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation," (SFAS No. 123) the Company discloses the summary
of proforma effects to reported net income (loss) and income (loss) per share
for 2004 and 2003, as if the Company had elected to recognize compensation costs
based on the fair value of the options granted at grant date (Note 11). Stock
options and warrants issued to non-employees are recognized as compensation
expense based on the fair value of the services received or the fair value of
the equity instruments issued, whichever is more readily determinable.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements - Subsequent to December 31, 2004, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued a revision to SFAS 123
entitled SFAS 123 R - "Share-Based Payment", requiring companies to include the
fair value of stock options granted as an expense in the statement of
operations. This revision will become effective for the Company commencing
January 1, 2006. See Note 11 for the impact of expensing the fair value of
options granted.
F-13
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
================================================================================
NOTE 4. - DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Photonics - On October 30, 2002, the Company's IP subsidiary received a
Notice of Termination of its DARPA contract. The contract was terminated for the
Government's convenience under the clause entitled Termination, Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 52.249.6. The DARPA contract had provided
substantially all of the revenue of the Company's IP Subsidiary. As a result of
the termination, management has decided to suspend the activities of the
Photonics Group and liquidate the remaining assets. During the year ended
December 31, 2002 the Company had income from operations up until the decision
by management to suspend the activities of the Photonics Group of approximately
$84,000. During the year ended December 31, 2002, impairments of the
intellectual property and property and equipment were recorded, amounting to
approximately $468,000 and $148,000, respectively. During 2003, the Company
continued to collect receivables and pay obligations. As a result, the Company
recognized income from discontinued operations of approximately $419,000
relating to the release of certain obligations. These amounts are included in
the loss from discontinued operations in the accompanying statement of
operations.
Plastics - On March 29, 1999, the Company acquired 100% of the common
stock of O&W, a mold building Company. The aggregate consideration paid for the
stock was $1.5 million ($300,000 in cash and $1,200,000 in promissory notes).
The O&W acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting.
In April 1999 the Company formed EP, to compliment its O&W subsidiary. EP was
formed to allow customers' design engineers to produce rapid prototype parts. In
the fourth quarter of 2001 IGI's Board of Directors resolved to dispose of O&W
and EP. The formal plan consisted of shutting down the operations of the O&W
subsidiary and selling the net assets of the EP subsidiary. Effective November
30, 2001, the Company shut down the operations of O&W and terminated all of the
employees.
As of December 31, 2001 a loss on disposal of discontinued operations of
$622,000 was recorded, representing the writedown of property, plant and
equipment and inventory to their net realizable value ($472,000) and an
allowance for doubtful accounts receivable ($150,000). During the first quarter
of 2002, all of the inventory and equipment of O&W were sold at auction,
resulting in net proceeds of approximately $416,000 and a gain of approximately
$27,000. The carrying value of the O&W land and building was reduced by $151,000
as of June 30, 2002, based on the estimated net proceeds at that time. This land
and building was sold at auction during the third quarter of 2002 for $650,000,
resulting in an additional loss of approximately $70,000, including closing
costs. The aggregate loss from these 2002 transactions was approximately
$194,000 and is included in loss on disposal of discontinued operations in the
accompanying consolidated statement of operations.
F-14
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
================================================================================
NOTE 4. - DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS - CONTINUED
The proceeds from the liquidation were used to repay a portion of the
remaining mortgage, term loan and demand note bank obligations, which were
secured by the assets. In addition, a portion ($300,000) of the proceeds from
the sale of the net assets of EP were used to repay a portion of these secured
obligations. These obligations were also guaranteed by IGI. The remaining net
obligation to the secured lender after the repayments, including accrued
interest and closing expenses, amounted to approximately $211,000. IGI assumed
this remaining outstanding balance and reduced its intercompany receivable from
O&W. The secured lender agreed to convert the balance into a 7.75% term loan due
in monthly installments of approximately $7,275 based on a 30-month amortization
schedule, with a balloon payment of approximately $145,000 due in October of
2003. See Note 9b for further discussion on this outstanding obligation.
On March 14, 2002, the Company sold the net assets of its EP subsidiary
for $725,000, consisting of $575,000 in cash (of which $300,000 was paid to the
O&W secured lender) and a five-year 8% subordinated $150,000 note, due upon
maturity with quarterly interest payments. The purchasers included a former
employee of EP and the Company's chief operating officer at the time of sale.
The sale was negotiated at "arm's length" by disinterested management with the
former employees and his financier. The gain resulting from this transaction
amounted to approximately $45,000 and is included in loss on disposal of
discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations
for the year ended December 31, 2002. During the year ended December 31, 2002
EP's operations resulted in income up until the decision to dispose of the
Plastics Group of approximately $3,000, which is included in loss from
discontinued operations in the accompanying statement of operations. During
2002, IGI offset a portion of the $150,000 note with the closing costs of the
sale amounting to approximately $26,000 paid by EP in completing the deal. In
addition, the Company wrote off $50,000 of the note, because this amount was
originally intended to cover contingencies that did not materialize. The loss
resulting from this offset and write off amounting to approximately $76,000 was
included in loss on disposal of discontinued operations in the consolidated
statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2002. The interest
earned on this note through December 31, 2004 in the amount of $21,633 ($15,529
- 2003) has not been recognized because management believes collection of the
interest is doubtful at this time. The remaining balance of the note at December
31, 2004 and 2003 after the offset and write-off is approximately $74,000.
Laser - On December 31, 2003, the Company and LF entered into an asset
purchase agreement with LFI, Inc. ("LFI") relating to the purchase by LFI of
certain assets and the assumption of certain liabilities of LF relating to the
laser engraving and medical products manufacturing and assembly businesses of LF
(the "Purchase Agreement"). The principals of LFI are former employees of LF,
including the former chairman and chief executive officer of the Company. The
purchase price for the assets was assumed liabilities of LF and/or the Company.
On December 31, 2004, the Company completed the sale of the remaining assets,
including the assumption of certain liabilities, to an affiliate of LFI,
relating to all the remaining laser businesses of LF. The purchase price was the
assumed liabilities of LF plus the issuance of several notes by the buyer to LF.
LF recorded a loss on sale of approximately $99,000 for the year ended December
31, 2003. LF reclassified the operating assets and liabilities to assets and
liabilities held for sale at December 31, 2003. The balances of the assets held
for sale at December 31, 2003 was $2,919,154 with related liabilities of
$781,847. During the year ended December 31, 2004, LF had income from operations
of approximately $494,000 (2003 - loss from operations of approximately
$417,000) which is included in income (loss) from discontinued operations in the
accompanying statements of operations.
F-15
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
================================================================================
NOTE 4. - DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS - CONTINUED
In accordance with FASB 144, the disposal of the Photonics, Plastics and
Laser segments have been accounted for as a disposal of business segments and
accordingly, the assets and liabilities for LF, IP, O&W, and EP have been
segregated from continuing operations in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets and classified as assets of discontinued operations. The operating
results for all three segments are segregated and reported as discontinued
operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and cash
flows.
The following is a summary of financial position and results of operations
at December 31, 2004 and 2003 and for the years then ended for the disposed
Photonics (IP), Plastics (O&W and EP), and Laser (LF) segments:
December 31,
----------------------------
Financial Position 2004 2003
------------ ------------
Assets held for sale:
Current assets $ -- $ 858,949
Property and equipment -- 2,060,205
------------ ------------
Total assets held for sale $ -- $ 2,919,154
============ ============
Accounts payable and accrued
expenses held for sale $ -- $ 781,847
============ ============
Current assets and total assets of
discontinued operations $ 205,921 $ 870,287
============ ============
Liabilities of discontinued operations:
Accounts payable and accrued
expenses $ 212,300 $ 928,349
Unsecured note payable 5,000 5,000
------------ ------------
Total liabilities of discontinued
operations $ 217,300 $ 933,349
============ ============
Years Ended December 31,
----------------------------
Results of Operations 2004 2003
------------ ------------
Revenue from discontinued operations $ 3,051,820 $ 6,195,517
============ ============
Income from discontinued operations $ 639,772 $ 1,568
Loss on disposal of discontinued
operations (223,803) (87,587)
------------ ------------
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations $ 415,969 $ (86,019)
============ ============
F-16
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
================================================================================
NOTE 5. - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment consists of:
December 31,
Depreciable ----------------------------
Lives 2004 2003
----------------- ------------ ------------
Land N/A $ -- $ --
Building and leaseholds 18 - 40 years -- --
Machinery and equipment 3 - 10 years 145,025 61,943
Furniture and fixtures 5 - 7 years -- --
Software 3 - 5 years 138,057 57,355
------------ ------------
283,082 119,298
Accumulated depreciation (43,175) (19,863)
------------ ------------
$ 239,907 $ 99,435
============ ============
NOTE 6. - NOTES RECEIVABLE
Notes receivable at December 31, 2004 consist of:
Note receivable with monthly interest and principal payments of
$4,000 plus an additional $5,000 monthly principal curtailment with
interest at prime rate (5.25% at December 31, 2004) plus 3%. $ 50,207
Term notes receivable due in monthly principal and interest
installments of approximately $13,000 each with interest at prime
rate (5.25% at December 31, 2004) plus .75% and 1%:
through February 2011 697,990
through December 2014 974,110
Term note receivable related to capital lease with annual principal
payment of $40,000 and interest at 7.25% through 2012. 415,000
Note receivable due in connection with the sale of EP (see Note 4). 73,897
-----------
2,211,204
Less current portion (270,347)
-----------
Notes receivable, net of current portion $ 1,940,857
===========
F-17
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
================================================================================
NOTE 6. - NOTES RECEIVABLE - CONTINUED
In connection with sale of assets and assumption of certain liabilities of
LF by Rolben Acquisition Company (Rolben) at December 31, 2004, Rolben issued
notes receivables in the following amounts: $50,207, $697,990, $974,110 and
$415,000.
Rolben pledged as security for payment of these notes a security interest
in all of the personal property of Rolben and the common stock of Rolben and
LFI, Inc. and shares of common stock of the Company owned by one of the
principals of Rolben & LFI.
During the second quarter of 2005, these notes receivable were repaid in
full by Rolben (see Note 18).
NOTE 7. - INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Intangible assets consist of the following:
December 31,
-----------------------------
2004 2003
------------ ------------
Technology license $ 12,070 $ 12,070
Deferred financing costs 119,499 119,499
------------ ------------
131,569 131,569
Accumulated amortization (81,043) (68,651)
------------ ------------
$ 50,526 $ 62,918
============ ============
The approximate future amortization expense for the next five years is as
follows:
2005 $ 9,400
2006 $ 6,400
2007 $ 6,400
2008 $ 6,400
2009 $ 6,400
NOTE 8. - NOTES PAYABLE
Notes payable consists of the following:
December 31,
----------------------------
2004 2003
------------ ------------
Note payable - bank (a) $ 50,207 $ 152,122
Notes payable - other (b) 176,184 30,000
Notes payable - related parties (c) 9,906 9,906
------------ ------------
$ 236,297 $ 192,028
============ ============
F-18
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
================================================================================
NOTE 8. - NOTES PAYABLE - CONTINUED
(a) Demand Notes - LF maintained a line of credit with a financial
institution that provided for borrowings of up to $525,000 with
interest at the bank's prime rate plus .50%. During November 2001,
LF refinanced the outstanding balance on the line of credit, which
amounted to approximately $285,000, into a demand note. The bank
demand note required monthly principal and interest payments
amounting to approximately $5,800 through November 2002, at which
point the remaining unpaid balance was due. This due date has been
extended with a reduction of required monthly principal and interest
payments to approximately $4,000. In addition, LF is required to pay
a monthly principal curtailment of $5,000. The outstanding balance
as of December 31, 2004 amounted to $50,207 ($152,122 in 2003) and
bears interest at the bank's prime rate (5.25% at December 31, 2004)
plus 3%. All the assets of LF and the guarantee of the Company
secure the note.
(b) Notes Payable - Other - During 2003, $30,000 was reclassified from
notes payable -related parties since the holder was no longer a
stockholder in 2003. At December 31, 2004, $30,000 ($30,000 - 2003)
was outstanding and bears interest at 10%.
During 2004, the Company entered into a line of credit note an
agreement with one if its prime contractors whereby the prime
contractor may lend amounts when requested by the Company based on
the balance of accounts receivable due from the prime contractor.
According to the terms of the subcontract agreement, the customer is
required to pay the Company on the outstanding invoices upon and to
the extent of funding from the U.S. Government. Therefore, the
customer has agreed to advance the Company money from time to time
under the line of credit note agreement in the amount of the
outstanding invoices due from the prime contractor, but not to
exceed $600,000. The advances bear interest at prime rate (as
published in the New York Times) for the first 45 days the advance
is outstanding. Interest after the first 45 days floats at the prime
rate plus 2% (effective rate of 7.25% at December 31, 2004). The
advances are secured by a security interest in current and future
invoices and proceeds. Each advance is due and payable in full
including all principal and accrued interest on the date that the
invoice with respect to which the advance is made is paid. Any
payments not made timely are accessed a 5% late fee. The balance due
to the prime contractor was $146,184 at December 31, 2004.
(c) Notes Payable - Related Parties - During the year ended December 31,
2001 the Company issued various unsecured short-term notes payable
to the former president/ principal stockholder. The remaining
obligation due to the former president/ principal stockholder at
December 31, 2002 was $24,000 and bears interest at 10%. The
obligation was eliminated during 2003 in connection with the sale of
certain assets of LF.
During 2000 and 2001, the Company issued unsecured short-term notes
payable to various employees/ stockholders. The remaining obligation
due to these employees/ stockholders at December 31, 2002 amounted
to $59,906, and bear interest at rates that range from 8% to 10%.
During 2003, the Company repaid $20,000 and $30,000 was reclassified
to notes payable - other since the note holder was no longer a
stockholder in 2003. At December 31, 2004 there is $9,906 ($9,906 -
2003) outstanding, which is comprised of a note for $5,000, which
bears interest at 10%, and a note for $4,906, which bears interest
at 8%.
F-19
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
================================================================================
NOTE 9. - LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS
Long-term obligations consists of:
December 31,
----------------------------
2004 2003
------------ ------------
Term notes - bank (a) $ 1,747,705 $ 1,908,692
Term notes - related parties (b) 1,144,124 887,124
Capital lease obligations (c) 445,000 485,000
------------ ------------
3,336,829 3,280,816
Less current maturities and reclassifications 2,172,572 2,360,840
------------ ------------
Total long-term obligations $ 1,164,257 $ 919,976
============ ============
Future annual maturities subsequent to December 31, 2005 are as follows:
$277,257 - 2006 and $887,000 - 2007.
(a) Term Notes - A $1,250,000 bank term promissory note that requires
monthly principal and interest payments amounting to approximately
$13,000 through February 2011. The outstanding balance as of
December 31, 2004 amounted to $697,791 ($790,366 - 2003) and bears
interest at the bank's prime rate (5.25% at December 31, 2004) plus
1.0%. All the assets of LF and the guarantee of the Company secure
the note. The Company was in violation of certain loan covenants as
of December 31, 2004 and 2003. These violations related to exceeding
certain levels of the ratio of debt to intangible net worth, not
meeting the minimum current ratio or the working capital ratio, and
exceeding capital expenditure limits. Accordingly, the entire
outstanding portion of the note has been classified as current as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003.
A $1,260,000 bank term promissory note that requires monthly
principal and interest payments amounting to approximately $13,000
through December 2014. The outstanding balance as of December 31,
2004 amounted to $974,056 ($1,046,945 - 2003) and bears interest at
the bank's prime rate (5.25% at December 31, 2004) plus .75%. The
Company has violated certain covenants under the term of this and
other notes outstanding with the same bank. Accordingly, the entire
outstanding portion of the note has been classified as current as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003.
During the fourth quarter of 2002, the Company's contract with DARPA
was terminated which resulted in an event of default under the
Company's financing agreements with Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. Upon
occurrence of this event, the $1.0 million two year convertible note
issued on February 5, 2002 and the $500,000 convertible note issued
on June 21, 2002 became immediately due and payable. As a result,
Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. took immediate possession of the funds held
in the restricted bank accounts. Approximately $1.474 million was
applied as a reduction of the outstanding obligation. As of December
31, 2003, $34,000 remained outstanding and was included in the
current portion of long-term obligations. The principal balance and
accrued interest was satisfied in 2004 through the issuance of
50,000 common shares and payment of $34,000.
F-20
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
================================================================================
NOTE 9. - LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS - CONTINUED
The Company entered into loans in 2004 and 2003 relating to the
financing of equipment. The loans have an aggregate balance of
$75,858 at December 31, 2004 ($37,381 - 2003), bear interest at
rates ranging from 3.5 % to 5.8% and are due in aggregate monthly
installments of approximately $1,200 through July 31, 2007 at which
time the remaining principal balance of approximately $45,000 is
due.
(b) Notes Payable - Related Parties - During the year ended December 31,
2004 the Company issued two secured notes payable to a stockholder
aggregating $115,000. During the year ended December 31, 2003 the
Company issued a secured note payable to this same stockholder for
$150,000. All of these borrowings bear interest at 12% and are due
in January 2006. The notes are secured by a first lien on accounts
receivable that are not otherwise used by the Company as collateral
for other borrowings and by a second lien on all other accounts
receivable. Amounts outstanding at December 31, 2004 amounted to
$265,000 ($150,000 - 2003).
During 2004 and 2003, the Company issued various unsecured notes
payable to a member of the board of directors amounting to $314,000
at December 31, 2004 ($240,000 - 2003) which bear interest at 6%.
Effective December 1, 2004 the terms of the notes were modified. The
maturity dates were extended to January 1, 2007 with principal and
accrued interest convertible at the option of the holder any time
after September 1, 2005 into shares of common stock at $.05 per
share.
In addition during 2004 the Company borrowed $44,000 from this same
member of the board of directors. The note is unsecured and bears
interest at 6% and is due in May 2005.
IGI guaranteed and assumed the outstanding secured bank obligations
of O&W (Note 4). The remaining obligation with this financial
institution was evidenced by a new consolidated promissory note. The
new consolidated promissory note was to be amortized over thirty
months, and repaid in twelve monthly installments of $7,276 plus
interest at 7.75% per annum with a balloon payment of approximately
$145,000 due in November 2003. The outstanding balance as of
December 31, 2002 amounted to $197,544. During 2003 the bank sold
this obligation to a related third party (Note 2). The outstanding
balance as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 amounted to $203,324 and
bears interest at 7.75% per annum. Effective December 31, 2003, the
terms of the note were revised and principal is due on January 1,
2007 with principal and accrued interest convertible at the option
of the holder any time after September 1, 2005 into shares of common
stock at $.05 per share.
During the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company
issued various notes to the same related party amounting to $317,800
at December 31, 2004 ($293,800 - 2003). The notes bear interest at
6% and previously were to mature on January 1, 2006. Effective
December 1, 2004, the terms of the notes were revised and the entire
principal is due on January 1, 2007 with principal and accrued
interest convertible at the option of the holder any time after
September 1, 2005 into shares of common stock at $.05 per share.
F-21
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
================================================================================
NOTE 9. - LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS - CONTINUED
(c) Capital lease obligations - The Company is obligated under a capital
lease for the LF operating facility. The lease provides for monthly
payments to an escrow account in amounts sufficient to allow for the
repayment of the principal of the underlying tax-exempt bonds
together with interest at 7.25% through June 2012. The outstanding
balance as of December 31, 2004 amounted to $445,000 ($485,000 -
2003). Annual payments of principal are $40,000 for fiscal 2004 and
increase by $5,000 annually through June 2012. Under the terms of
this credit facility, the Company is prohibited from paying
dividends or making other cash distributions. According to the terms
of the lease agreement, the Company is required to comply with
certain covenants. Certain of these covenants were violated at
December 31, 2004 and 2003. Accordingly, the entire outstanding
portion of this obligation has been classified as current.
Minimum future annual payments of long-term obligations as of December 31,
2004 are as follows:
2005 $ 313,017
2006 543,280
2007 1,167,191
2008 294,818
2009 304,926
Thereafter 996,347
---------------
Total minimum payments 3,619,579
Less amount representing interest (282,750)
---------------
3,336,829
Less current maturities 55,725
Less current maturities due to violation
of covenant 2,116,847
---------------
Total long-term obligations $ 1,164,257
===============
NOTE 10. - STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY
A. Preferred Stock
The certificate of incorporation authorizes the board of
directors to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock. The
stock is issuable in series that may vary as to certain rights and
preferences, as determined upon issuance, and has a par value of
$.01 per share. As of December 31, 2004 and 2003 there were no
preferred shares issued or outstanding.
F-22
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
================================================================================
NOTE 10. - STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY - CONTINUED
B. Common Stock
During the year ended December 31, 2004, the following common stock
transactions took place:
o The Company issued 4,670,000 shares of common stock to
accredited investors at prices ranging from $.05 to $.10 per
share, resulting in proceeds of $241,000.
o The Company issued 742,500 shares of common stock as
satisfaction of liabilities amounting to $37,126. The fair
market value of the shares issued equaled the amount of the
recorded liability relieved.
o An employee exercised stock options resulting in the issuance
of 25,000 shares of common stock. Total consideration
resulting from this exercised option amounted to $2,500.
o The Company authorized the issuance of 1,500,000 common shares
at $.05 per share in 2003, resulting in $75,000 of
compensation expense. The shares were authorized to three
employees as consideration for accepting employment. These
shares were issued during 2004.
During the year ended December 31, 2003, the following common stock
transactions took place:
o The Company issued 3,350,388 shares of common stock to
accredited investors at $.05 per share, resulting in proceeds
of $165,000.
o The Company issued 960,000 shares of common stock as
satisfaction of outstanding legal fees amounting to $48,000.
The fair market value of the shares issued equaled the amount
of the recorded liability relieved.
o The Company authorized the issuance of 1,500,000 common shares
at $.05 per share, resulting in $75,000 of compensation
expense. The shares were authorized to three employees as
consideration for accepting employment. However the shares
were not issued during 2003.
C. Equity Line of Credit
On November 20, 2000, the Company entered into an equity line
of credit agreement with an accredited investor Cockfield Holdings
Limited (Cockfield) to purchase up to 3,000,000 shares of common
stock of the Company over a three-year period beginning February 9,
2001. During this three-year period, the Company could request a
drawdown under the equity line of credit by selling shares of the
Company's common stock to the investor. The price per share was
determined using a formula based on 87.5% of the Company's closing
share price 20 days immediately following the drawdown date.
F-23
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
================================================================================
NOTE 10. - STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY - CONTINUED
On July 23, 2002, the Company and Cockfield agreed to
terminate the equity line of credit agreement. As a result of the
termination, the Company was released, and the Company released
Cockfield, from any further obligation under the terms. Unamortized
capitalized costs associated with this transaction, amounting to
$67,269, were charged to expense during the year ended December 31,
2002 as a result of the termination.
In conjunction with the establishment of the equity line of
credit, the Company issued warrants to this investor to purchase
200,000 shares of the Company's common stock for an exercise price
of $3.135, which expire November 30, 2003. These warrants survived
the termination of the agreement.
D. Warrants
In connection with the issuance of notes payable to the
Company's president and principal stockholder during 1998, 536,000
detachable warrants were issued. These warrants are exercisable for
$5.60 per share. As the warrants vested, they were valued and
recorded as additional paid-in capital. These warrants expired in
2003.
In connection with common stock issued to the Company's
president/principal stockholder during 2000, the Company issued
warrants to purchase 33,900 shares of common stock at exercise
prices ranging from $1.63 to $3.42 per share. The warrants vested
immediately and have a three-year term. A portion of the proceeds,
amounting to $105,666 determined utilizing the Black-Scholes pricing
model, was allocated to these warrants. During 2000, 25,000 of these
warrants were exercised. During 2003 the remaining balance of 8,900
warrants expired.
In connection with a private placement transaction during
2000, the Company issued warrants to various accredited investors to
purchase an aggregate of 4,300 shares of common stock at an exercise
price of $3.95 per share. The warrants vest immediately and have a
three-year term. A portion of the proceeds, amounting to $8,514,
determined utilizing the Black-Scholes pricing model, was allocated
to these warrants. These warrants expired in 2003.
In connection with a private placement transaction during
2000, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 50,000 shares of
common stock. The warrant is exercisable for a four-year term
commencing May 31, 2001 at an exercise price of $1.63 per share. For
services rendered in connection with the financing the Company also
granted the purchaser's designee a warrant to purchase 100,000
common shares at a price of $2.00 per share, exercisable for a
four-year period commencing May 31, 2001. A portion of the proceeds,
amounting to $66,025 and $127,779, respectively, determined
utilizing the Black-Scholes pricing model, was allocated to these
warrants. These warrants expire on May 31, 2005.
F-24
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
================================================================================
NOTE 10. - STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY - CONTINUED
In connection with the equity line of credit, discussed above
in item C, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 200,000 shares
of the Company's common stock. In addition, the Company issued, to a
placement agent, a warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of common
stock. Both warrants were exercisable immediately for a price of
$3.135 per share. These warrants expired on November 30, 2003.
In connection with the private placement transactions during
2001, the Company issued warrants to various accredited investors to
purchase 24,000 shares of common stock at exercise prices ranging
from $3.00 to $4.00. The warrants vested immediately and had a
three-year term. A portion of the proceeds, amounting to $51,706,
determined utilizing the Black-Scholes pricing model, was allocated
to these warrants. These warrants expired in 2004.
In addition, in connection with the private placement
transactions during 2001, the Company issued warrants to various
placement agents to purchase 49,400 warrants at exercise prices
ranging from $3.00 to $4.00. The warrants vested immediately and had
a three year term. A portion of the proceeds, amounting to $62,414,
determined utilizing the Black-Scholes pricing model, was allocated
to these warrants. These warrants expired in 2004.
In connection with the debt financing during 2002, the Company
issued detachable warrants to Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. to purchase
75,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $2.40 per share. The
warrants were immediately exercisable and expire five years from the
date of grant. The warrant value amounting to $103,872 was
determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. These
warrants expire in 2007.
During 2002, the Company granted common stock warrants to
purchase 200,000 shares of the Company's common stock as
satisfaction of outstanding liabilities arising from consulting
services amounting to $58,826. The warrants are exercisable at $3.00
per share, vested immediately and expire in 2005.
There were no warrants granted during the years ended December 31, 2004
and 2003.
The following is a summary of the warrant activity for the past two years:
Number Weighted
of Warrants Average
Outstanding Exercise Price
----------- --------------
Outstanding at December 31, 2002 1,347,600 $ 3.93
Expired (849,200) $ 4.70
--------------
Outstanding at December 31, 2003 498,400 $ 2.63
Expired (73,400) $ 3.41
--------------
Outstanding at December 31, 2004 425,000 $ 2.50
==============
F-25
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
================================================================================
NOTE 10. - STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY - CONTINUED
All warrants are exercisable as of December 31, 2004 and 2003. Warrants
outstanding at December 31, 2004 have exercise prices ranging from $1.63 to
$3.00.
NOTE 11. - STOCK OPTION PLANS
The Company's Board of Directors has approved stock option plans adopted
in 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, and 1999 authorizing the granting of
options to purchase up to an aggregate of 2,314,407 shares through December 31,
2004 (2,340,000 - 2003). Such options may be designated at the time of grant as
either incentive stock options or nonqualified stock options. As of December 31,
2004, options to purchase 75,152 shares remain un-issued under these plans.
A. Employee Stock Option Plans
The Company grants stock options to its key employees, as it
deems appropriate. In addition, the Company previously followed an
All Employee Incentive Stock Option Plan whereby all full-time
employees of the Company who met certain eligibility requirements
were granted stock options from the above plans. Subsequent to
January 2, 1999, the Company discontinued grants under this plan.
The options are only exercisable as long as the optionee continues
to be an employee of the Company.
The following is a summary of stock option activity for
individuals classified as employees for the past two years:
Number Weighted
of Shares Average
Under Option Exercise Price
------------ --------------
Outstanding at December 31, 2002 300,581 $ 1.64
Granted 1,610,000 $ .06
Expired (223,006) $ 1.47
--------------
Outstanding at December 31, 2003 1,687,575 $ .16
Granted 258,500 $ .09
Exercised (25,000) $ .10
Expired (25,593) $ 1.38
--------------
Outstanding at December 31, 2004 1,895,482 $ .13
==============
Exercisable at December 31, 2004 1,828,815 $ .13
==============
The average fair value of options granted was $.08 and $.05
per share for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. The exercise price for all options granted equaled or
exceeded the market value of the Company's common stock on the date
of grant.
F-26
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
================================================================================
NOTE 11. - STOCK OPTION PLANS - CONTINUED
Options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2004 are made up of
the following:
Options Outstanding Exercisable
------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------
Weighted
Average
Remaining Weighted Weighted
Number Contractual Average Number Average
of Life in Exercise of Exercise
Options Years Options Options Price
------- ----- ------- ------- -----
Less than $1.50 1,838,500 8.2 $ .06 1,771,833 $ .06
===== ====== ========
$1.50 - $2.50 56,982 1.0 $ 2.50 56,982 $ 2.50
-------------- ===== ====== -------------- ========
Total 1,895,482 7.9 $ .13 1,828,815 $ .13
============== ===== ====== ============== ========
B. Nonqualified Stock Option
In connection with services performed for the Company during
2000, 65,000 options to purchase shares of common stock at a price
of $1.50 were granted. The options were immediately exercisable and
expire on December 31, 2009. The fair value assigned to these
options, determined utilizing the Black-Scholes pricing model,
amounted to approximately $47,000 and has been reflected as
additional paid-in capital.
C. Directors' Stock Option Plan
In April 1993, the Board of Directors and stockholders of the
Company adopted a non-discretionary outside directors' stock option
plan that provides for the grant to non-employee directors of
non-qualified stock options to purchase up to 50,000 shares of
common stock. Under this plan, each non-employee director is granted
7,500 options upon becoming a director and 5,000 each year
thereafter on the date of the Company's annual stockholders'
meeting. There was no annual stockholders' meeting during 2004,
therefore, there were no options granted under this plan during
2004. There were 15,000 options granted under this plan during 2003.
During 2004, 17,500 options were forfeited as a result of a Director
resigning from the Board. There were no forfeitures in 2003. At
December 31, 2004, there were 42,000 (59,500 in 2003) options
outstanding to directors under this plan, of which 37,000 options
were exercisable (46,168 in 2003). These options are exercisable at
prices ranging from $.10 to $9.40 per share. The options vest over a
two-year service period. The options expire at various dates from
2005 to 2013.
F-27
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
================================================================================
NOTE 11. - STOCK OPTION PLANS - CONTINUED
The Company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 - "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation," and, accordingly, does not recognize compensation cost for stock
option grants under fixed awards. If the Company had elected to recognize
compensation cost based on the fair value of the options granted at grant date
as prescribed by SFAS No. 123, net income (loss) and income (loss) per share
from continuing operations would have increased (decreased) as follows:
For the Years Ended
December 31,
------------------------
2004 2003
---------- ----------
Net income (loss) - as reported (000's) $ 578 $ (1,217)
Total stock based employee compensation
expense determined under the fair value
method for all awards (000's) (27) (76)
---------- ----------
Net income (loss) - pro forma (000's) $ 551 $ (1,293)
========== ==========
Basic:
Income (loss) per share as reported $ .04 $ (.15)
========== ==========
Income (loss) per share pro forma $ .04 $ (.16)
========== ==========
Diluted:
Income (loss) per share as reported $ .04 $ (.15)
========== ==========
Income (loss) per share pro forma $ .03 $ (.16)
========== ==========
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on the following
weighted-average assumptions:
2004 2003
------------ ------------
Expected dividend yield 0% 0%
Expected stock price volatility 100% 100%
Risk-free interest rate 4.5% 4.5%
Expected life of options 10 years 9.69 years
F-28
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
================================================================================
NOTE 12. - INCOME TAXES
The components of the income tax (expense) benefit is as follows:
December 31,
-----------------------------
2004 2003
------------ ------------
Current:
Federal $ -- $ --
State (350) (424)
------------ ------------
(350) (424)
Deferred (276,000) (292,000)
Reversal of valuation allowance 276,000 292,000
------------ ------------
$ (350) $ (424)
============ ============
At December 31, 2004, the Company had federal net operating loss
carryforwards of approximately $26,400,000 and state net operating loss
carryforwards of approximately $15,000,000, which expire from 2009 through 2024.
Due to a greater than 50% change in stock ownership of certain subsidiaries, the
utilization of net operating loss carryforwards generated to the date of such
change may be limited.
At December 31, 2004, a net deferred tax asset, representing the future
benefit attributed primarily to the available net operating loss carryforwards,
in the amount of approximately $10,505,000, had been fully offset by a valuation
allowance because management believes that the regulatory limitations on
utilization of the operating losses and concerns over achieving profitable
operations diminish the Company's ability to demonstrate that it is more likely
than not that these future benefits will be realized before they expire.
The following is a summary of the Company's temporary differences and
carryforwards which give rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities:
December 31,
-----------------------------
2004 2003
------------ ------------
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss and tax credit
carryforwards $ 9,544,000 $ 10,000,000
Defined benefit pension liability 870,000 875,000
Reserves and other 138,000 185,000
------------ ------------
Gross deferred tax asset 10,552,000 11,060,000
Deferred tax liabilities:
Property and equipment (47,000) (279,000)
------------ ------------
Gross deferred tax liability (47,000) (279,000)
------------ ------------
Net deferred tax asset 10,505,000 10,781,000
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance (10,505,000) (10,781,000)
------------ ------------
Net deferred tax asset $ -- $ --
============ ============
F-29
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
================================================================================
NOTE 12. - INCOME TAXES - CONTINUED)
The Statutory U.S. Federal rate is 34% for the year ended December 31, 2004 and
2003. The effective income tax rate is (.03)% for the year ended December 31,
2004 and (.06)% for the year ended December 31, 2003. The primary difference
between the U.S. Statutory Federal income tax rate and the effective income tax
rate is the tax impact of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance.
NOTE 13. - EMPLOYEE PENSION AND PROFIT-SHARING PLANS
Profit Sharing Plans - Prior to the sale of LF's businesses, LF had a
qualified salary reduction profit sharing 401(k) plan for eligible employees.
Participants could defer up to 20% of their compensation each year up to the
dollar limit set by the Internal Revenue Code. LF's contribution to the
profit-sharing plan was discretionary. During 2004, a $15,600 ($20,100 in 2003)
discretionary contribution was made to the profit-sharing plan.
Defined Benefit Plan - The Company has a contributory defined benefit
pension plan that covered all salaried and hourly employees at O&W that were
scheduled to work at least 1,000 hours per year. During the year ended December
31, 2001 the Company discontinued the operations of O&W but retained the
obligation to fund the plan into the future. The termination of the employees'
services earlier than expected resulted in a plan curtailment, accounted for in
accordance with Statement of Financial Standards Statement 88 in 2001. No future
benefits will be earned by plan participants. However, the plan will remain in
existence and continue to pay benefits as participants qualify, invest assets
and receive contributions. The Company's policy is to fund pension costs accrued
subject to the Company's available cash to make such contributions. Net periodic
pension expense includes the following components.
For the Years Ended
December 31,
-----------------------------
2004 2003
------------ ------------
Interest cost $ 338,627 $ 344,944
Expected return on plan assets (293,553) (267,553)
Actuarial loss 116,472 122,012
------------ ------------
Total pension expense $ 161,546 $ 199,403
============ ============
F-30
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
================================================================================
NOTE 13. - EMPLOYEE PENSION AND PROFIT-SHARING PLANS - CONTINUED
The following sets forth the funded status of the plan and the amounts
shown in the accompanying balance sheets:
2004 2003
------------ ------------
Projected benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year $ 5,811,249 $ 5,474,408
Interest cost 338,627 344,944
Actuarial loss (gain) (60,091) 410,577
Benefits paid (402,174) (418,680)
------------ ------------
Benefit obligation at end of year 5,687,611 5,811,249
Plan assets at fair value:
Fair value of plan assets at
beginning of year 3,621,035 3,315,256
Actual return of plan assets 367,617 781,856
Benefits paid (402,174) (418,680)
Expenses paid (76,154) (57,397)
------------ ------------
Fair value of plan assets at end of year $ 3,510,324 $ 3,621,035
============ ============
Funded status (deficit) $ (2,177,287) $ (2,190,214)
Unrecognized actuarial loss (2,755,891) (2,930,364)
------------ ------------
(4,933,178) (5,120,578)
Adjustment required to recognize minimum
pension liability 2,755,891 2,930,364
------------ ------------
Accrued pension cost $ (2,177,287) $ (2,190,214)
============ ============
The major actuarial assumptions used in the calculation of the pension
obligation were as follows:
2004 2003
------------ ------------
Discount rate 5.75% 6.5%
Expected return on plan assets 9.25% 8.5%
Rate of increase in compensation N/A N/A
Assets in the trust fund are held for the sole benefit of participating
former employees and retirees. They are comprised of corporate equity securities
and guaranteed investment contracts sponsored by an insurance company.
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets assumption (EROA) is
determined from the plan's asset allocation using historical returns and surveys
of other reporting company's rate of return assumptions. The discount rate
assumption is based on published pension liability indices.
F-31
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
================================================================================
NOTE 13. - EMPLOYEE PENSION AND PROFIT-SHARING PLANS - CONTINUED
The investment strategy is to manage the assets of the plan to generate
sufficient returns to meet the long-term liabilities while maintaining adequate
liquidity to pay current benefits. This strategy is implemented by holding
equity investments while investing a portion of the assets in guaranteed
investment contracts to match the long-term nature of the liabilities.
The Company did not make any contributions for the years ended December
31, 2004 and 2003, although they were required to make minimum required
contributions based upon IRS rules. In March 2005, the Company filed with the
IRS a funding waiver application requesting waivers of the minimum funding
standard for the 2005 plan year of $513,551 and for the 2004 and prior plan
years of $979,328.
The Company's weighted-average asset allocations for its defined benefit
pension plan at December 31, 2004 and 2003, by asset category, are as follows:
Asset Category Target % 2004 2003
---------- ---------- ----------
Equity securities 65% 60% 76%
Guaranteed investment contracts 35 40 24
---------- ---------- ----------
Total 100% 100% 100%
========== ========== ==========
NOTE 14. - COMMITMENTS
A. Lease Commitments
The Company leases certain equipment and its headquarters and branch
office facilities under operating lease agreements that expire at
various dates through 2007. The operating lease agreements for the
factory space and equipment utilized at the LF subsidiary were
transferred to LFI as part of the asset sale (Note 2). Rent expense
for continuing operations under operating leases for the each years
ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, was approximately $27,000.
Following is the approximate future minimum payments required under
these leases:
2005 $ 64,000
2006 52,000
2007 43,000
------------
$ 159,000
============
F-32
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
================================================================================
NOTE 14. - COMMITMENTS - CONTINUED
B. Employment Contracts
In 2003, the Company entered into employment agreements with three
of its officers. The agreements provided for aggregate base
compensation of $450,000 and expire at various times through 2008.
In addition, the agreements provided for the issuance of an
aggregate of 1,500,000 shares of common stock of the Company with a
value of $75,000 and an aggregate of 1,500,000 stock options. The
agreements provide for, among other things, incentive compensation,
termination benefits in the event of death, disability and
termination for other than cause and covenants against competition.
The agreements were subsequently modified or terminated which
revised the Company's annual base compensation commitment to
$350,000 through May 2008.
In 2004, the board of directors approved a bonus to be paid to the
three officers as a reward for their performance in 2003 and 2004.
The officers earned a total of $60,000 through December 31, 2003,
which is included in accrued liabilities at December 31, 2003. The
three officers earned a total of $40,000 during 2004 which has been
included in the accompanying statement of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2004.
In 2003, LF entered into an employment agreement with its former
Chairman and former Chief Executive Officer. The agreement provides
for base compensation of $150,000 for a five-year term as well as,
among other things, incentive compensation, termination benefits in
the event of death, disability and termination for other than cause
and covenants against competition. This agreement terminated when
the employee resigned from LF in late 2003. Subsequent to December
31, 2003, LF entered into an employment agreement with the new
President and Chief Executive Officer at LF that expired on December
31, 2004. The agreement provided for a base compensation of $105,000
per year. In addition, the agreement provided for, among other
things, discretionary bonus compensation.
C. Consulting Agreement
Beginning in 2003 and continuing in 2004, the Company has contracted
with Intelligent Consulting Corporation (ICC) on a month-to-month
basis. ICC provides consulting services relating to the development,
production, marketing and sales of the Company's TouchThru(TM)
access control product as well as other general corporate matters.
The Company paid ICC $137,265 during the year ended December 31,
2004 ($92,688 - 2003).
F-33
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
================================================================================
NOTE 15. - SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Noncash investing and financing transactions, including non-monetary
exchanges, consist of the following:
2004 2003
------------ ------------
Demand note reclassed to long-term obligation $ -- $ 197,544
============ ============
Conversion of legal fees outstanding to common
stock $ -- $ 48,000
============ ============
Common stock authorized not issued, transferred
to issued $ 75,000 $ --
============ ============
Purchase of vehicle through long-term obligations $ 45,120 $ 41,199
============ ============
Conversion of long-term obligation and related
accrued interest and fees to common stock, net
of capitalized costs written off $ 5,000 $ --
============ ============
Asset held for sale sold in exchange for notes
receivable $ 2,137,307 $ --
============ ============
NOTE 16. - BUSINESS SEGMENTS
Prior to 2002, the Company's businesses were organized, managed and
internally reported as three segments. The segments were determined based on
differences in products, production processes and internal reporting. During
2001 the Company approved a plan to discontinue the operations of the Plastics
Group (Note 4). During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company decided to
discontinue the operation of its Photonics Group and liquidated its remaining
assets as a result of its major customer canceling their contract. During 2002,
the Company operated the Laser Group and during the forth quarter of 2003,
decided to sell substantially all of the assets and liabilities of LF. During
2003, the Company reclassified all of the assets and certain liabilities of its
Laser Group as held for sale.
Also, in 2003 the Company started a new business focusing in the field of
information technology consulting and integration and concentrating on the
emerging area of biometric technology as a complement to that effort (Note 2).
Beginning in 2003 and continuing in 2004, the Company's business is organized,
managed and internally reported as one segment, the IT Services Group.
F-34
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
================================================================================
NOTE 16. - BUSINESS SEGMENTS - CONTINUED
A summary of selected consolidated information for the Company's
industry segments during 2004 is set forth as follows:
Laser Photonics IT
2004 Group Group Services Consolidated
---- ----- ----- -------- ------------
Sales to unaffiliated customers $ -- $ -- $ 5,735,012 $ 5,735,012
============ ============ ============ ============
Operating income $ -- $ -- $ 249,278 $ 249,278
============ ============ ============ ============
Income from discontinued operations $ 268,439 $ 147,530 $ -- $ 415,969
============ ============ ============ ============
Interest expense $ -- $ -- $ 86,916 $ 86,916
============ ============ ============ ============
Identifiable assets $ 2,215,142 $ 205,921 $ 1,509,949 $ 3,931,012
============ ============ ============ ============
Depreciation and amortization $ -- $ -- $ 29,874 $ 29,874
============ ============ ============ ============
Capital expenditures $ -- $ -- $ 118,856 $ 118,856
============ ============ ============ ============
Capital expenditures of discontinued segment $ -- $ -- $ -- $ --
============ ============ ============ ============
A summary of selected consolidated information for the Company's
industry segments during 2003 is set forth as follows:
Laser Photonics IT
2003 Group Group Services Consolidated
---- ----- ----- -------- ------------
Sales to unaffiliated customers $ -- $ -- $ 483,538 $ 483,538
============ ============ ============ ============
Operating loss $ -- $ -- $ (1,077,858) $ (1,077,858)
============ ============ ============ ============
Income (loss) from discontinued operations $ (504,723) $ 418,704 $ -- $ (86,019)
============ ============ ============ ============
Interest expense $ -- $ -- $ 52,485 $ 52,485
============ ============ ============ ============
Identifiable assets $ 3,001,662 $ 870,287 $ 363,647 $ 4,235,596
============ ============ ============ ============
Depreciation and amortization $ -- $ -- $ 7,892 $ 7,892
============ ============ ============ ============
Capital expenditures $ -- $ -- $ 63,110 $ 63,110
============ ============ ============ ============
Capital expenditures of discontinued segment $ 128,959 $ -- $ -- $ 128,959
============ ============ ============ ============
F-35
INFINITE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
================================================================================
NOTE 17. - LITIGATION
The Company is the plaintiff in a lawsuit filed in the Superior Court,
State of Rhode Island on August 13, 1999 captioned Infinite Group, Inc. vs.
Spectra Science Corporation and Nabil Lawandy. In the action, the Company
asserts that by fraud and in breach of fiduciary duties owed, Spectra and its
president, Nabil Lawandy, caused us to sell to Spectra shares of Spectra's
Series A Preferred stock at a substantial discount to fair market value. The
Company alleges that in entering into the transaction it relied on various
representations made by Spectra and Mr. Lawandy, which were untrue at the time
they were made. In the action the Company seeks compensatory damages in the
amount of $500,000 plus statutory interest, punitive damages as well as an award
of attorney's fees and costs. One of Spectra's counterclaims was dismissed by
the court in response to our motion for summary judgment. The trial was
completed in February 2005, and the jury returned a verdict in favor of the
Company in the amount of approximately $600,000. The Company has not recorded
the award in its financial statements due to the uncertainty associated with the
judgment.
The Company is the respondent in an arbitration proceeding filed on
December 10, 2002 captioned J. Terrence Feeley v. Infinite Group, Inc. The
Claimant, a former employee of the Company and former member of the Company's
board of directors, alleges that the parties entered into a consulting agreement
dated June 27, 2002 relative to the early termination of claimant's employment
requiring certain cash payments to be made. Claimant alleges that the Company
has failed to make such cash payments and has breached the agreement and seeks
all monies owed to him, said amount being approximately $130,000. The Company
answered the claim by admitting that a letter agreement was entered into but
denied all of the remaining allegations.
The Company also filed a counterclaim in the arbitration proceeding. The
Company filed a related claim against the respondent in the Superior Court,
State of Rhode Island on September 5, 2003. The Company claims that the
defendant breached certain provisions of his employment agreement, breached
fiduciary duties he owed to the Company and violated several provisions of the
June 27, 2002 letter agreement. The Company seeks compensatory damages in
amounts to be shown at trial, and preliminary and permanent injunctive relief
and other relief as may be appropriate. As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, the
Company has recorded the amount under the original agreement less payments made
to date as a liability until they are legally released from obligation.
Mr. Feeley's arbitration claims are pending before the American
Arbitration Association and an arbitrator selected by the parties. The Company's
claims against Mr. Feeley are pending in the Superior Court, State of Rhode
Island. In January of 2004, the parties agreed to stay arbitration proceedings
and to mediate all the disputes under procedures available through the Superior
Court. To date, neither party has initiated mediation proceedings.
NOTE 18. - OTHER SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
2005 Stock Option Plan - In March 2005 the Board of Directors authorized
and approved a 2005 stock option plan. The plan authorizes the granting of
options to purchase up to 4,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock. The
plan shall terminate 10 years after the effective date of the plan. The stock
option plan is subject to the approval of the shareholders of the Company.
Notes Receivable/Note Payable/Long-Term Obligations - In May 2005 notes
receivable from Rolben Acquisition Company aggregating approximately $2,100,000
(see Note 6) were paid off in full. Simultaneous with this, the Company paid off
notes payable - bank and long-term obligations/capital lease obligation (see
Note 9) aggregating approximately $2,100,000.
F-36