--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-KSB
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended Commission File Number
January 31, 2006 0-20722
NEWGOLD INC.
Delaware 16-1400479
----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
(State of Incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer Identification)
Principal Executive Offices:
400 Capital Mall, Suite 900
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 449-3913
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
------------------- -----------------------------------------
None None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
Title of Each Class
-------------------
Common Stock $0.001 Par Value
Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X No
----- -----
Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of
Regulation S-B is not contained in this form, and no disclosure will be
contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB
or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. [ X ]
The issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year were $0.
As of April 26, 2006 the aggregate value of the voting stock held by
non-affiliates of the Registrant, computed by reference to the average of the
bid and ask price on such date was approximately $14,538,465 based upon the
closing price of $0.245 share.
As of April 26, 2006, the Registrant had outstanding 68,604,072 shares of common
stock.
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format: Yes [ ] No [X]
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Certain exhibits required by Item 13 have been incorporated by reference from
Newgold's previously filed Form 8-K's, Form 10-QSB and Form 10-KSB.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE OF
REPORT
-------
PART I.........................................................................1
ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS..................................1
ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.................................14
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.......................................15
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.....15
PART II.......................................................................16
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS AND SMALL BUSINESS ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES..............................................16
ITEM 6. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF
OPERATION...............................................20
ITEM 7 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS....................................33
ITEM 8. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.....................33
ITEM 8A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.................................33
ITEM 8B. OTHER INFORMATION.......................................33
PART III......................................................................34
ITEM 9. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL
PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE
ACT.....................................................34
ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION..................................35
ITEM 11. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS..............39
ITEM 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTION...........40
ITEM 13. EXHIBITS................................................41
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES..................42
SIGNATURES....................................................................44
i
PART I
ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
GENERAL
Newgold, Inc. ("we," "us," "our" or "Newgold") has embarked on a business
strategy whereby it will invest in, explore and if warranted, conduct mining
operations of its current mining properties and other mineral producing
properties. Newgold is a public company that in the past has been engaged in the
exploration, acquisition and development of gold-bearing properties in the
continental United States. Currently, Newgold's principal assets include various
mineral leases associated with the Relief Canyon Mine located near Lovelock,
Nevada along with various items of mining equipment and improvements located at
that site. Newgold has also entered into a joint venture to explore additional
mining properties known as the Red Caps Project and Crescent Valley Project,
both of which are located in Lander County, Nevada.
From 1995 until the beginning of 2000, Newgold had followed the above described
business activity focusing on the exploration and mining of gold and silver ore
deposits. At the beginning of 2000, Newgold's business strategy became focused
on investing in Internet start-up companies. That strategy was not successful
and by mid-2001 Newgold had abandoned such investments. From approximately July
2001 until February 2003 Newgold had been inactive. During the period of
inactivity, ASDi LLC, an entity controlled by A. Scott Dockter who is also the
Chairman and CEO of Newgold, has made the necessary expenditures to maintain the
current status of the Relief Canyon mining claims. In February 2003, Newgold
resumed its business of acquiring, exploring and if warranted developing its
mining properties.
Newgold's mailing address is 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 900, Sacramento, CA 95814;
and its telephone number is (916) 449-3913.
THE COMPANY
Newgold, a Delaware corporation, has been engaged in the acquisition,
development and exploration of gold-bearing properties in the continental United
States since 1995. In fiscal 1999 Newgold placed its only remaining property,
the Relief Canyon Mine, located in Pershing County, Nevada, on a care and
maintenance status. During fiscal 2000, Newgold executed a contract to sell the
Relief Canyon Mine to A. Scott Dockter, Chairman of Newgold; however the sale
was never completed and the asset remains the property of Newgold. It is now
Newgold's intention to resume mining at the Relief Canyon Mine. See "Business"
below for further detail.
Newgold's independent accountants have included a "going concern" explanatory
paragraph in their report dated April 26, 2006 on Newgold's financial statements
for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006, indicating substantial doubt about
Newgold's ability to continue as a going concern (See Note 2 of Financial
Footnotes). If Newgold's exploration program is not
1
successful or if insufficient funds are available to carry out Newgold's
development plans, then Newgold will not be able to execute its business plan.
For financial information regarding Newgold, see "Financial Statements."
BUSINESS
We are an "exploration stage" company engaged in the search and/or verification
of ore deposits (reserves) in our property. Our business will be to acquire,
explore and, if warranted, develop various mining properties located in the
state of Nevada. We plan to carryout comprehensive exploration and development
programs on our properties. While we currently plan to fund and conduct these
activities ourselves, we may in the future outsource some of these activities
through the use of various joint venture, royalty or partnership arrangements
pursuant to which other companies would agree to finance and carryout the
exploration and development programs on our mining properties. Consequently, our
current plan will require the hiring of various mining employees to perform
exploration and mining activities for our various mining properties.
PROPERTIES
RELIEF CANYON MINE
The Relief Canyon Mine is an open-pit, heap leaching operation located
approximately 110 miles northeast of Reno, Nevada. Newgold held 50 unpatented
mining claims covering approximately 1000 acres until October 2004 at which time
Newgold completed re-staking the Relief Canyon mill site and lode claims.
Newgold currently holds a total of 78 claims including 57 mill site claims and
21 unpatented mining claims. The annual payments to maintain these claims are
approximately $15,600. The mine is readily accessible by improved roads. Water
for mining and processing operations is provided by two wells located on the
property in close proximity to the mine and processing facilities. Power is
provided by a local rural electric association and phone lines are present at
the mine site. Relief Canyon is located in the Humboldt Range, a mining district
in Pershing County, Nevada.
Background and History
----------------------
On January 10, 1995, Newgold purchased the Relief Canyon mine from J.D. Welsh &
Associates for $500,000. The mine at that time consisted of 39 unpatented lode
mining claims covering approximately 780 acres and a lease for access to an
additional 800 acres contiguous to the 39 claims located on Newgold's property.
Located on the property are, a building containing five carbon tanks and a
boiler for carbon strip solution, four detoxified leach pads, a preg pond for
gold bearing solution, a barren pond for solution from which gold had been
removed, water rights, and various permits. From acquisition through November
1997, Newgold refurbished the processing facilities by the purchase and
installation of all equipment required to process the gold bearing leach
solution when the mine was returned to production in 1997. During 1997, Newgold
staked an additional 402 claims. However, subsequent to January 31, 1998,
Newgold reduced the total claims to 50 (covering approximately 1,000 acres). In
1999 Newgold placed
2
the mine in a care and maintenance status. The property remained in a care and
maintenance status until October 2004 at which time the re-staking of the Relief
Canyon mill site and lode claims was completed. The Relief Canyon property now
contains 78 claims including 57 mill site claims and 21 unpatented mining
claims.
If mining operations are not resumed at the Relief Canyon mine, it is possible
Newgold may be required to reclaim the mine. Reclamation consists of
recontouring the four heaps to a 3:1 slope, sale and removal of the building and
its contents, evaporation of all water in both ponds and burial of the building
foundation and floor within the ponds' liners under the soil contained in the
pond berms. Finally, native vegetation must be re-established in all areas of
disturbance.
During 1996, Repadre Capital Corporation ("Repadre") purchased for $500,000 a
net smelter return royalty (Repadre Royalty). Repadre was to receive a 1.5%
royalty from production at each of the Relief Canyon Mine and Mission Mines. In
July 1997, an additional $300,000 was paid by Repadre for an additional 1%
royalty from the Relief Canyon Mine. In October, 1997, when the Mission Mine
lease was terminated, Repadre exercised its option to transfer the Repadre
Royalty solely to the Relief Canyon Mine resulting in a total 4% royalty. The
total amount received of $800,000 has been recorded as deferred revenue in the
accompanying financial statements.
Plan for Relief Canyon Production
---------------------------------
Based on past exploration by us and work done by others, we believe the Relief
Canyon Mine presents the potential for gold bearing ore deposits which will
hopefully be validated through further exploration through additional drilling
at the site.
As of January 31, 2006 the Relief Canyon properties include 78 unpatented mining
claims contained in about 1,000 acres.
Newgold's operating plan is to place the most promising mining targets into
production during the 2007 fiscal year, and use the net proceeds from these
operations to fund expanded exploration and development of its entire property
holdings. By this means, Newgold intends to progressively enlarge the scope and
scale of the mining and processing operations, thereby increasing both Newgold's
annual revenues and its net profits.
Newgold's goals for environmental protection and reclamation are for minimal
environmental disturbance during mining, and reclamation and/or restoration of
the disturbed area after mining ceases. The economics of Newgold's operations
will permit this environmentally responsible plan of operations.
We will initially focus on exploring the North Relief Canyon mining property. We
recently posted a $243,204 reclamation bond with the Nevada Bureau of Mining
Regulations and Reclamation ("BMRR") which allows us to apply for new permits
for mining and processing on the property. In addition to posting the
reclamation bond, the property must be brought into compliance with the Bureau
of Land Management ("BLM") and Nevada Department of Environmental Protection
("NDEP") before any work can commence. The estimated time for completing the
permitting process is between 9 months to 18 months. However, once the bond
3
is posted, we expect to be able to carry on limited operations pending full
permitting for full mining operations.
Description of Past Exploration and Existing Development Efforts
----------------------------------------------------------------
Over 400 reverse circulation holes have been drilled at the Relief Canyon
project. Of the 400 holes drilled, 106 had intercepts of gold bearing ore
structures of 0.1 gold/ton content. Additionally there are numerous holes with
several feet of 0.09 - 0.099 gold/ton content.
The ore zone of Relief Canyon is open ended on three sides. It is projected that
additional drilling will increase the size of possible reserves. Most of the
drilling to date was targeted for open pit mining, resulting in shallow holes
which did not test for possible deeper ore deposits. A significant number of
deep holes with 0.3 gold/ton and better were drilled on the North end of the
property. This area is targeted for initial underground mining development.
Additional exploration holes will be drilled when underground mining commences
throughout the various ore zones to determine future development.
Typically, grade values of the Relief Canyon drill holes are reduced as a result
of finds being lost down the hole or vented out as dust. Actual mining and
recovery of gold in the milling process will determine the loss if any which
could be as much as 30%.
Proposed Underground Mining Efforts
-----------------------------------
We will pursue exploration drilling to further identify areas of possible
gold-bearing ore deposits. Results of this additional drilling will allow us to
better plan our eventual underground mining efforts. Further development of our
underground mining activity will also be dependent on the availability of
adequate capital to initiate and sustain this effort. Underground mining is very
expensive costing in the range of $600 to $1,000 per linear foot of underground
development.
Ore Processing
--------------
Some gold-bearing sulfide ores may be processed through a flotation plant. In
flotation, ore is finely ground, turned into slurry, then placed in a tank known
as a flotation cell. Chemicals are added to the slurry causing the
gold-containing sulfides to float in air bubbles to the top of the tank, where
they can be separated from waste particles that sink to the bottom. The sulfides
are removed from the cell and converted into a concentrate that can then be
processed in an autoclave or roaster to recover the gold. The ore is then
processed through an oxide mill.
Higher-grade oxide ores are processed through mills, where the ore is ground
into a fine powder and mixed with water in slurry, which then passes through a
cyanide leaching circuit. Lower grade oxide ores are processed using heap
leaching. Heap leaching consists of stacking crushed or run-of-mine ore on
impermeable pads, where a weak cyanide solution is applied to the top surface of
the heaps to dissolve the gold. In both cases, the gold-bearing solution is then
collected and pumped to facilities to remove the gold by collection on carbon or
by zinc precipitation directly from leach solutions.
4
CRESCENT VALLEY AND RED CAPS MINE
Overview
--------
Newgold is the owner of a 22.22% joint venture interest and is the operator of
the Crescent Red Caps Joint Venture ("Crescent Red Caps"). The remaining 77.78%
interest is held by ASDi LLC, a California limited liability company owned by A.
Scott Dockter, Chairman and CEO of Newgold. Additionally, Newgold, by making
expenditures over the next three years aggregating $2,700,000, will end up with
a 66.66% overall interest in the joint venture. Newgold will then have the
opportunity to purchase the remaining joint venture interest held by Mr. Dockter
based on the results of the exploration work contemplated by these additional
expenditures.
The properties are subject to two leases held by individuals and trusts
affiliated with Sam Bida and Leon Belaustagi. The two leases include
approximately 135 unpatented mining claims and cover approximately 2700 acres.
All gold, silver and other mineral production by Crescent Red Caps is subject to
a 3% net smelter return ("NSR") royalty payable to the lessors except for barite
which is subject to a 10% royalty on ore produced from claims covered by the
leases.
Property
--------
The Crescent Red Caps Properties are located in northeastern Nevada,
approximately 60 miles southwest of Elko, Nevada in Lander County. The
properties are accessed via Nevada State Highway 306, which extends southward
from U.S. Interstate 80, both of which are paved roads.
The Cortez area of interest comprises approximately 640,000 acres along the
Cortez/Battle Mountain trend. The two leases controlled by Crescent Red Caps
include approximately 135 unpatented mining claims and cover approximately 2700
acres located along the Cortez/Battle Mountain trend. Currently no exploration,
development or mining permits have been granted for the areas covered by the
leases.
Geology and Mineralization
--------------------------
The Crescent Red Caps properties are situated along the Cortez/Battle Mountain
trend in north-central Nevada. The principal gold deposits and mining operations
are located on the southwest and south sides of Crescent Valley, which was
formed by basin and range extensional tectonism. Mineralization is sedimentary
rock-hosted and consists of micron-sized free gold particles that are
disseminated throughout the host rock, commonly in association with secondary
silica, iron oxides or pyrite.
Exploration and Development
---------------------------
Approximately 23,000 feet of exploration drilling has been completed in two
different drill programs conducted in 1991 and 1996. Gold mineralization
encountered both in drilling and in surface sampling is tightly structurally
controlled and is confined to narrow shears and fractures developed mainly in
the non-reactive cherts and argillites. Future drill programs will test for more
extensive bodies of mineralization. Upward migration of gold mineralization from
a stockwork system or replacement mineralization of a more reactive host rock at
depth could produce the type of anomalous gold concentrations found at the prior
drill sites.
5
The exploration potential in the immediate project areas remains positive. The
focus in fiscal 2007 will be additional exploration drilling to better delineate
the extent of the Crescent Red Caps area. The deep hole drilling program
involves drilling exploratory holes to a depth of between 1000 ft. and 3000 ft.
INDUSTRY OVERVIEW
The gold mining and exploration industry has experienced several factors
recently that are favorable to Newgold as described below.
The spot market price of an ounce of gold has increased from a low of $253 in
February 2001 to a high of $645 in April 2006. The price was $568.75 as of
January 31, 2006. This current price level has made it economically more
feasible to produce gold as well as made gold a more attractive investment for
many. Newgold is projecting a cash cost per ounce of gold produced in a range of
$170 to $210. Accordingly, the gross margin per ounce of gold produced per the
historical spot market price range above provides significant profit potential
if successful in identifying and mining gold at Relief Canyon mine.
By industry standards, there are generally four types of mining companies.
Newgold is considered an "exploration stage" company. Typically, an exploration
stage mining company is focused on exploration to identify new, commercially
viable gold deposits. "Junior mining companies" typically have proven and
probable reserves of less then one million ounces of gold, generally produces
less then 100,000 ounces of gold annually and / or are in the process of trying
to raise enough capital to fund the remainder of the steps required to move from
a staked claim to production. "Mid-tier" and large mining ("senior") companies
may have several projects in production plus several million ounces of gold in
reserve.
Generally gold reserves have been declining for a number of years for the
following reasons:
o The extended period of low gold prices from 1996 to 2001 made it
economically unfeasible to explore for new deposits for most mining
companies.
o The demand for and production of gold products have exceeded the amount
of new reserves added over the last several consecutive years.
Reversing the decline in lower gold reserves is a long term process. Due to the
extended time frame it takes to explore, develop and bring new production on
line, the large mining companies are facing an extended period of lower gold
reserves. Accordingly, junior companies that are able to increase their gold
reserves more quickly should directly benefit with an increased valuation.
Additional factors causing higher gold prices over the past two years have come
from a weakened United States dollar. Reasons for the lower dollar compared to
other currencies include the historically low US interest rates, the increasing
US budget and trade deficits and the general worldwide political instability
caused by the war on terrorism.
6
COMPETITION
There are four general categories of mining companies: exploration, junior,
mid-tier and large companies. We believe junior companies represent the largest
group of gold companies in the public stock market. All four types of mining
companies may have projects located in any of the gold producing continents of
the world and many have projects located near the Relief Canyon, Red Caps and
Crescent Valley mines in Nevada. Many of our competitors have greater
exploration, production, and capital resources than we do, and may be able to
compete more effectively in any of these areas. Our inability to generate
capital to fund exploration and production capacity near-term, would establish a
competitive cost disadvantage in the marketplace which would have a material
adverse effect on our operations and potential profitability.
We also compete in the hiring and retention of experienced employees.
Consequently, we may not be able to hire qualified miners or operators in the
numbers or at the times desired.
MINING PROPERTY RIGHTS
Relief Canyon Property
----------------------
Our mining property rights are represented by 78 unpatented mill and mining lode
claims which were re-staked in October 2004. Unpatented mining claims are
generally considered subject to greater title risks than patented mining claims
or real property interests that are owned in fee simple. To remain valid, such
unpatented claims are subject to annual maintenance fees. As of January 31,
2006, we were current in the payment of such maintenance fees.
Red Caps Property
-----------------
Our mining property rights are represented by 96 unpatented mining lode claims.
Unpatented mining claims are generally considered subject to greater title risks
than patented mining claims or real property interests that are owned in fee
simple. To remain valid, such unpatented claims are subject to annual
maintenance fees. As of January 31, 2006, the joint venture was current in the
payment of such maintenance fees.
Crescent Valley Property
------------------------
Our mining property rights are represented by 39 unpatented mining lode claims.
Unpatented mining claims are generally considered subject to greater title risks
than patented mining claims or real property interests that are owned in fee
simple. To remain valid, such unpatented claims are subject to annual
maintenance fees. As of January 31, 2006, the joint venture was current in the
payment of such maintenance fees.
EMPLOYEES
As of January 31, 2006, we had two full-time and one part-time employees. We
anticipate hiring additional employees during the current year to work on the
mining sites in Nevada as our
7
exploration program is initiated. While skilled equipment and operations
personnel are in demand, we believe we will be able to hire the necessary
workers to implement our exploration program. Our employees are not expected to
be subject to a labor contract or collective bargaining agreement. We consider
our employee relations to be good.
Consulting services, relating primarily to geologic and geophysical
interpretations, and relating to such metallurgical, engineering, and other
technical matters as may be deemed useful in the operation of our exploration
activities, will be provided by independent contractors.
GOVERNMENT CONTROLS AND REGULATIONS
Our exploration, mining and processing operations are subject to various
federal, state and local laws and regulations governing prospecting,
exploration, development, production, labor standards, occupational health, mine
safety, control of toxic substances, and other matters involving environmental
protection and employment. United States environmental protection laws address
the maintenance of air and water quality standards, the preservation of
threatened and endangered species of wildlife and vegetation, the preservation
of certain archaeological sites, reclamation, and limitations on the generation,
transportation, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes, among other
things. There can be no assurance that all the required permits and governmental
approvals necessary for any mining project with which we may be associated can
be obtained on a timely basis, or maintained. Delays in obtaining or failure to
obtain government permits and approvals may adversely impact our operations. The
regulatory environment in which we operate could change in ways that would
substantially increase costs to achieve compliance. In addition, significant
changes in regulation could have a material adverse effect on our operations or
financial position.
Outlined below are some of the more significant aspects of governmental controls
and regulations which materially affect our interests in the Relief Canyon, Red
Caps and Crescent Valley mines.
Regulation of Mining Activity
-----------------------------
Newgold's mining properties, including care and maintenance, exploration,
development and production activities, is subject to environmental laws,
policies and regulations. These laws, policies and regulations regulate, among
other matters, emissions to the air, discharges to water, management of waste,
management of hazardous substances, protection of natural resources, protection
of endangered species, protection of antiquities and reclamation of land. The
mines are also subject to numerous other federal, state and local laws and
regulations. At the federal level, the mines are subject to inspection and
regulation by the Division of Mine Safety and Health Administration of the
Department of Labor ("MSHA") under provisions of the Federal Mine Safety and
Health Act of 1977. The Occupation and Safety Health Administration ("OSHA")
also has jurisdiction over certain safety and health standards not covered by
MSHA. Mining operations and all future exploration and development will require
a variety of permits. Although we believe the permits can be obtained in a
timely fashion, permitting procedures are complex, costly, time consuming and
subject to potential regulatory delay. We do not believe that existing
permitting requirements or other environmental protection laws and regulations
8
would have a material adverse effect on our ability to explore and eventually
operate the mines. However, we cannot be certain that future changes in laws and
regulations would not result in significant additional expenses, capital
expenditures, restrictions or delays associated with the operation of our
properties. We cannot predict whether we will be able to obtain new permits or
whether material changes in permit conditions will be imposed. Granting new
permits or the imposition of additional conditions could have a material adverse
effect on our ability to explore and operate the mining properties in which we
have an interest.
On June 9, 2005, we received permission from the NDEP to commence designated
environmental activities previously requested by us at the Relief Canyon
property. Subsequent to the 2006 fiscal year end, we made a cash deposit of
$243,204 to cover future reclamation costs as required by the NDEP for the
Relief Canyon Mine. We are now moving forward with the permitting process that
will allow us to perform additional exploration, development and mining
operations. The Red Caps and Crescent Valley properties currently are not part
of any permitting process. During fiscal 2007 Newgold plans on filing the
necessary permits to allow initial exploration activities to begin at both
properties.
Legislation has been introduced in prior sessions of the U.S. Congress to make
significant revisions to the U.S. General Mining Law of 1872 that would affect
our unpatented mining claims on federal lands, including a royalty on gold
production. It cannot be predicted whether any of these proposals will become
law. Any levy of the type proposed would only apply to unpatented federal lands
and accordingly could adversely affect the profitability of portions of any
future gold production from the Relief Canyon mine.
The State of Nevada, where our mine properties are located, adopted the Mined
Land Reclamation Act (the "Nevada Act") in 1989 which established design,
operation, monitoring and closure requirements for all mining facilities. The
Nevada Act has increased the cost of designing, operating, monitoring and
closing mining facilities and could affect the cost of operating, monitoring and
closing existing mine facilities. The State of Nevada also has adopted
reclamation regulations pursuant to which reclamation plans must be prepared and
financial assurances established for existing facilities. The financial
assurances can be in the form of cash placed on deposit with the State or
reclamation bonds underwritten by insurance companies. The State of Nevada has
requested financial assurances from or a posting of a bond by us in the amount
of $464,000. We developed a specific reclamation plan of the Relief Canyon Mine
and began implementation of the plan in April 2005. This work was completed in
the summer of 2005. As a result of completing the work, the State of Nevada
reduced the financial assurance amount to $243,204 which we have deposited in a
blocked account with our bank in Sacramento, California. Our ability to commence
full mining operations at the Relief Canyon Mine is now subject to our obtaining
all necessary mining permits.
Environmental Regulations
-------------------------
Legislation and implementation of regulations adopted or proposed by the United
States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA"), the BLM and by comparable
agencies in various states directly and indirectly affect the mining industry in
the United States. These laws and
9
regulations address the environmental impact of mining and mineral processing,
including potential contamination of soil and water from tailings discharges and
other wastes generated by mining companies. In particular, legislation such as
the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, the Federal Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act ("RCRA"), the Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act and the National Environmental Policy Act require analysis and/or impose
effluent standards, new source performance standards, air quality standards and
other design or operational requirements for various components of mining and
mineral processing, including gold-ore mining and processing. Such statutes also
may impose liability on us for remediation of waste we have created.
Gold mining and processing operations by an entity would generate large
quantities of solid waste which is subject to regulation under the RCRA and
similar state laws. The majority of the waste which is produced by such
operations is "extraction" waste that EPA has determined not to regulate under
RCRA's "hazardous waste" program. Instead, the EPA is developing a solid waste
regulatory program specific to mining operations under the RCRA. Of particular
concern to the mining industry is a proposal by the EPA entitled "Recommendation
for a Regulatory Program for Mining Waste and Materials Under Subtitle D of the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act" ("Strawman II") which, if implemented,
would create a system of comprehensive Federal regulation of the entire mine
site. Many of these requirements would be duplicates of existing state
regulations. Strawman II as currently proposed would regulate not only mine and
mill wastes but also numerous production facilities and processes which could
limit internal flexibility in operating a mine. To implement Strawman II the EPA
must seek additional statutory authority, which is expected to be requested in
connection with Congress' reauthorization of RCRA.
We also are subject to regulations under (i) the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 ("CERCLA" or "Superfund") which
regulates and establishes liability for the release of hazardous substances and
(ii) the Endangered Species Act ("ESA") which identifies endangered species of
plants and animals and regulates activities to protect these species and their
habitats. Revisions to "CERCLA" and "ESA" are being considered by Congress;
however, the impact of these potential revisions on us is not clear at this
time.
The Clean Air Act, as amended, mandates the establishment of a Federal air
permitting program, identifies a list of hazardous air pollutants, including
various metals and cyanide, and establishes new enforcement authority. The EPA
has published final regulations establishing the minimum elements of state
operating permit programs. We will be required to comply with these EPA
standards to extent adopted by the State of Nevada.
In addition, we are required to mitigate long-term environmental impacts by
stabilizing, contouring, resloping, and revegetating various portions of a site.
While a portion of the required work was performed concurrently with prior
operations, completion of the environmental mitigation occurs once removal of
all facilities has been completed. These reclamation efforts are conducted in
accordance with detailed plans which have been reviewed
10
and approved by the appropriate regulatory agencies. We have made the necessary
cash deposits and we made provision to cover the estimated costs of such
reclamation as required by permit.
We believe that our care and maintenance operation at the Relief Canyon Mine, as
it exists today, is in substantial compliance with federal and state regulations
and that no further significant capital expenditures for environmental control
facilities will be required until production resumes at the site. We also
believe we are in substantial compliance with the same federal and state
regulations at the Red Caps and Crescent Valley properties as no exploration,
development or mining activities have yet commenced there
FACTORS AFFECTING NEWGOLD'S BUSINESS
We are a development stage company and an investment in, or ownership position
in our common stock is inherently risky. Some of these risks pertain to our
business in general, and others are risks which would only affect our common
stock. The price of our common stock could decline and/or remain adversely
affected due to any of these risks and investors could lose all or part of an
investment in our company as a result of any of these risks coming to pass.
Readers of this Report should, in addition to considering these risks carefully,
refer to the other information contained in this Report, including disclosures
in our financial statements and all related notes, for a full description of our
business. If any of the events described below were to occur, our business,
prospects, financial condition, or results of operations or cash flow could be
materially adversely affected. When we say that something could or will have a
material adverse effect on it, we mean that it could or will have one or more of
these effects. We also refer readers to the information in this Report,
discussing the impact of Forward-Looking Statements on the descriptions
contained in this Report and included in the Factors discussed below.
As a development stage company with an unproven business strategy, we may not be
able to achieve positive cash flows and our limited history of operations makes
evaluation of our business and prospects difficult. We have been relatively
inactive since April 2001. Consequently, we have only recently reactivated our
business operations and we have not generated any revenues, other than dividend
income, since our reactivation. As a result, we have only a limited operating
history upon which to evaluate our future potential performance. Our prospects
must be considered in light of the risks and difficulties encountered by new
companies which have not yet established their business operations.
We will need additional funds to finance our mining and exploration activities
as well as fund our current operations. We currently have limited cash reserves
and a working capital deficit of $2,130,847 as of January 31, 2006.
Consequently, our ability to meet our long-term obligations in the ordinary
course of business is dependent upon our ability to raise additional capital
through public or private equity financings, establish increasing cash flow from
operations, enter into joint ventures or other arrangements with capital
sources, or secure other sources of financing to fund operations.
Our independent certified public accountants qualified their opinion contained
in our financial statements as of and for the years ended January 31, 1997,
through January 31, 2006 to include
11
an explanatory paragraph related to our ability to continue as a going concern,
stating that " the Company has incurred a net loss of $2,645,231 and had
negative cash flow from operations of $899,807. In addition, the Company had an
accumulated deficit of $19,030,535 and a shareholders' deficit of $2,960,365 at
January 31, 2006." These factors, among others, as discussed in "Note 2- Going
Concern" to the financial statements, raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern." The auditors recognize that
the cash flow uncertainty makes their basic assumptions about value uncertain.
When it seems uncertain whether an asset will be used in a "going concern" or
sold at auction, the auditors assume that the business is a "going concern" for
purposes of all their work, and then they disclose that there is material
uncertainty about that assumption. It is definitely a consequence of our
negative cash flows from operations that we continually need additional cash. At
any time, a serious deficiency in cash flows could occur and it is not always
possible or convenient to raise additional capital. A problem in raising capital
could result in temporary or permanent insolvency and consequently potential
lawsuits by unpaid creditors and perhaps closure of the business. All of these
things are possibilities. It is certain, in any case, that analysts and
investors view unfavorably any report of independent auditors expressing
substantial doubt about a company's ability to continue as a going concern.
The price of gold has experienced an increase in value over the past four years,
generally reflecting among other things declining interest rates in the United
States; worldwide instability due to terrorism; and a slow recovery from prior
global economic slumps. Any significant drop in the price of gold may have a
materially adverse affect on the results of our operations unless we are able to
offset such a price drop by substantially increased production.
Our disclosures of our mineral resources are only estimates. We have no proven
or probable reserves and have no ability to currently measure or prove our
reserves other then estimating such reserves relying on information produced in
the 1990's and thus may be unable to actually recover the quantity of gold
anticipated. We can only estimate a potential mineral resource which is a
subjective process which depends in part on the quality of available data and
the assumptions used and judgments made in interpreting such data. There is
significant uncertainty in any resource estimate such that the actual deposits
encountered or reserves validated and the economic viability of mining the
deposits may differ materially from our expectations.
Gold exploration is highly speculative in nature. Success in exploration is
dependent upon a number of factors including, but not limited to, quality of
management, quality and availability of geological expertise and availability of
exploration capital. Due to these and other factors, the probability of our
exploration program identifying individual prospects having commercially
significant reserves cannot be predicted. It is likely that many of the claims
explored will not contain any commercially viable reserves. As such substantial
funds will be spent on exploration which may identify only a few, if any, claims
having commercial development potential. In addition, if commercially viable
reserves are identified, significant amounts of capital will be required to mine
and process such reserves.
Our mining property rights consist of 78 mill site and unpatented mining claims
at the Relief Canyon Mine and approximately 135 unpatented mining claims
covering approximately 2700 acres
12
located along the Cortez/Battle Mountain trend that are part of the Crescent Red
Caps Joint Venture. The validity of unpatented mining claims is often uncertain
and is always subject to contest. Unpatented mining claims are generally
considered subject to greater title risk than patented mining claims, or real
property interests that are owned in fee simple. If title to a particular
property is successfully challenged, we may not be able to retain our royalty
interests on that property, which could reduce our future revenues.
Mining is subject to extensive regulation by state and federal regulatory
authorities. State and federal statutes regulate environmental quality, safety,
exploration procedures, reclamation, employees' health and safety, use of
explosives, air quality standards, pollution of stream and fresh water sources,
noxious odors, noise, dust, and other environmental protection controls as well
as the rights of adjoining property owners. We believe that we are currently
operating in substantial compliance with all known safety and environmental
standards and regulations applicable to our Nevada property. However, there can
be no assurance that our compliance could be challenged or that future changes
in federal or Nevada laws, regulations or interpretations thereof will not have
a material adverse affect on our ability to resume and sustain mining
operations.
The business of gold mining is subject to certain types of risks, including
environmental hazards, industrial accidents, and theft. Prior to suspending
operations, we carried insurance against certain property damage loss (including
business interruption) and comprehensive general liability insurance. While we
maintained insurance consistent with industry practice, it is not possible to
insure against all risks associated with the mining business, or prudent to
assume that insurance will continue to be available at a reasonable cost. We
have not obtained environmental liability insurance because such coverage is not
considered by management to be cost effective. We currently carry no insurance
on any of our properties due to the current status of the our mining properties
and our current financial condition.
We are substantially dependent upon the continued services of A. Scott Dockter,
our President. We have no employment agreement with Mr. Dockter, nor is there
either key person life insurance or disability insurance on Mr. Dockter. While
Mr. Dockter expects to spend the majority of his time assisting Newgold, there
can be no assurance that Mr. Dockter's services will remain available to
Newgold. If Mr. Dockter's services are not available to us, we will be
materially and adversely affected. However, Mr. Dockter has been a significant
shareholder of Newgold since its inception and considers his investment of time
and money in Newgold of significant personal value.
We have acquired the exploration rights to two mining properties from ASDi LLC
whose sole manager and majority member is A. Scott Dockter, President and CEO of
Newgold. Consequently, Mr. Dockter has a conflict of interest in this joint
venture. Furthermore, ASDi LLC will initially hold a 77.78% interest in a newly
formed Nevada LLC through which the joint venture will be operated. While
Newgold will be the sole manager of the Nevada LLC, Mr. Dockter will be able to
control the joint venture activities through his position with the Manager
(Newgold) and through his ownership and control of the majority member (ASDi
LLC). While Mr. Dockter will endeavor to always act in the best interest of
Newgold and its
13
stockholders, stockholders will have only limited ability to influence or object
to actions taken by the Nevada LLC in exploring, developing and capital spending
on the joint venture properties.
As of January 31, 2006, Newgold had approximately 68,104,072 shares of Common
Stock outstanding and a convertible debenture which is convertible into up to
24,050,025 shares of our Common Stock. Additionally, warrants to purchase a
total of 20,774,583 shares of our Common Stock were outstanding as of January
31, 2006. Furthermore, up to an additional 24,050,025 shares of Common Stock
could become issuable to the convertible debenture holders if a default were to
occur. The possibility that substantial amounts of our outstanding Common Stock
may be sold by investors or the perception that such sales could occur, often
called "equity overhang," could adversely affect the market price of our Common
Stock and could impair our ability to raise additional capital through the sale
of equity securities in the future
At the time of entering into the $1,000,000 Secured Convertible Debenture
("Convertible Debenture") with Cornell Capital Partners, the Fixed Conversion
Price was $0.26 per share which would equal approximately 3,808,073 if the
entire principal were converted into Newgold Common Stock. This represents the
minimum number of shares issuable upon the conversion of the Convertible
Debenture. However, if the market price for Newgold Common Stock should remain
below $0.26 per share, we would be required to issue substantially more shares
of Common Stock upon the conversion of the Convertible Debenture. The issuance
of significantly more shares at a lower conversion price would have a dilutive
effect to our current stockholders.
ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Newgold's executive office is located at 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 900,
Sacramento, California 95814.
Newgold owns 78 unpatented mill and mining claims covering 1000 acres
representing the Relief Canyon mining property located in the Humboldt Range
mining district in Nevada. This property also contains various improvements and
equipment. See "Business - Relief Canyon Mine."
In connection with the Securities Purchase Agreement dated January 27, 2006, we
executed a Security Agreement in favor of Cornell Capital Partners granting them
a first priority security interest in all of our leasehold interests and mining
rights to the Relief Canyon property as well as any equipment or improvements
located in such property. The Security Agreement states that if an event of
default occurs under the Securities Purchase Agreement, Secured Convertible
Debenture or Security Agreement, Cornell Capital Partners have the right to take
possession of the collateral, to operate our business using the collateral, and
have the right to assign, sell, lease or otherwise dispose of and deliver all or
part of the collateral, at public or private sale or otherwise to satisfy our
obligations under these agreements.
Newgold has entered into a joint venture to explore and develop the following
mining properties:
14
Approximately 96 unpatented mining claims covering over 1900 acres
representing the Red Caps mining property located in the Battle
Mountain-Eureka mineral belt in Nevada.
Approximately 39 unpatented mining claims covering over 750 acres
representing the Crescent Valley mining property located in the Battle
Mountain-Eureka mineral belt in Nevada. See "Business-Crescent Valley
and Red Caps Mine."
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On February 4, 2000, a complaint was filed against Newgold by Sun G. Wong in the
Superior Court of Sacramento County, California (Case No. 00AS00690). In the
complaint, Mr. Wong claims that he was held liable as a guarantor of Newgold in
a claim brought by Don Christianson in a breach of contract action against
Newgold. Despite the fact that Newgold settled the action with Mr. Christianson
through the issuance of 350,000 shares of Newgold Common Stock, Mr. Wong,
nevertheless, paid $60,000 to a third party claiming to hold Mr. Christianson's
judgment pursuant to Mr. Wong's guaranty agreement. Similarly, Mr. Wong alleges
that he was held liable as a guarantor for a debt of $200,000 owed by Newgold to
Roger Primm with regard to money borrowed by Newgold. Mr. Primm filed suit
against Newgold which was settled through the issuance of 300,000 shares of
Newgold Common Stock. Nevertheless, Mr. Wong alleges that he remains liable to a
third party claiming to hold Mr. Primm's judgment for approximately $200,000
pursuant to his guaranty of such debt of Mr. Primm. On December 29, 2000, the
superior court entered a default judgment against Newgold in the amount of
$400,553 with regard to the Christianson judgment and an additional $212,500 in
regard to the Primm judgment against Mr. Wong. Newgold believes that Mr. Wong
was not obligated to pay any sums pursuant to his guarantees with regard to the
Christianson and Primm judgments against Newgold. Should Mr. Wong seek to assert
these judgments against Newgold, Newgold cannot predict the outcome of any such
action or the amount of expenses that would be ultimately incurred in defending
any such claims. Newgold is currently negotiating a settlement with Mr. Wong,
however there is no assurance that an acceptable settlement will be consummated.
On May 18, 2004 Paul Ngoyi filed a petition for involuntary bankruptcy against
Newgold (Case No. BK-N-0451511). Mr. Ngoyi claims to be the holder of both the
Christiansen and Primm judgments against Newgold and is claming that Newgold
cannot pay such judgments because it is insolvent. Newgold maintains that Mr.
Ngoyi's claims are invalid as the two judgments were previously satisfied and
that Newgold is not insolvent. A pre-trial hearing was held on April 4, 2005 at
which time Newgold prevailed in having Mr. Ngoyi's petition dismissed. An order
of dismissal was issued May 10, 2005.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None
15
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND SMALL
BUSINESS ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.
MARKET FOR OUR COMMON STOCK
In July 1997, our Common Stock was approved for quotation on the National
Association of Securities Dealers' Over-the-Counter ("OTC") Bulletin Board where
it traded under the symbol "NGLD" until June 2001. In June 2001, our Common
Stock was moved to the "Pink Sheets" published by the Pink Sheets LLC
(previously National Quotation Bureau, LLC). On June 7, 2005, our Common Stock
was again approved for quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board with its symbol of
"NGLD." As of April 26, 2006, the closing bid price of our Common Stock was
$0.24 per share.
PRICE RANGE OF OUR COMMON STOCK
A public trading market having the characteristics of depth, liquidity and
orderliness depends upon the existence of market makers as well as the presence
of willing buyers and sellers, which are circumstances over which we do not have
control. The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices reported
by the OTC Bulletin Board for our Common Stock in the periods indicated. The
quotations below reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown
or commission, and may not represent actual transactions.
NEWGOLD, INC. COMMON STOCK LOW HIGH
YEAR ENDING JANUARY 31, 2006
Fourth Quarter (November-January) $0.12 $0.225
Third Quarter (August-October) $0.10 $0.29
Second Quarter (May-July) $0.20 $0.34
First Quarter (February-April) $0.15 $0.33
YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 2005
First Quarter (November-January) $0.08 $0.33
Second Quarter (August-October) $0.02 $0.25
16
Third Quarter (May-July) $0.15 $0.26
Fourth Quarter (February-April) $0.16 $0.36
STOCKHOLDERS
As of January 31, 2006, there were approximately 1,065 holders of record of our
Common Stock. This amount does not include stockholders whose shares are held in
street name.
DIVIDEND POLICY
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our Common Stock. We
currently anticipate that we will retain all future earnings for the expansion
and operation of our business and do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the
foreseeable future.
SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE
In March 2005 a Special Meeting of Shareholders of Newgold was held for the
purpose of amending the Articles of Incorporation to affect an increase in the
authorized shares of common stock issuable to 250,000,000 shares. At the meeting
the proposal was approved by the Shareholders, with a total of 31,392,611 shares
voting in favor of the amendment, 411,711 voting against the amendment and
10,207 shares abstained from voting.
SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
We have not issued any securities pursuant to any equity compensation plans.
SHARES ISSUABLE UPON CONVERSION OF CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE
Convertible Debentures in the principal amount of $600,000 due January 27, 2009
and $200,000 due March 9, 2009 ("Maturity Dates") are held by Cornell Capital
Partners. A final Convertible Debenture in the principal amount of $200,000 will
be issued to Cornell Capital Partners at the time Newgold's Registration
Statement is declared effective and will have a term of three years. Until the
Maturity Dates, the Convertible Debentures are convertible into shares of our
Common Stock at a per share conversion rate at the time of conversion which will
be the lower of $0.2626 per share or 95% of the lowest Volume Weighted Average
Price of Newgold's common stock during the 30 trading days immediately preceding
the Conversion Date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP (the "Market Conversion Price").
The following table sets forth the number of shares which would be issued to
Cornell Capital Partners upon the conversion of the entire $1,000,000 principal
amount of the Debentures at various assumed Market Conversion Prices:
17
--------------------------------- ----------------------------
Total Shares Issued to
Cornell Capital Under the
Assumed Market Conversion Price Debenture if Full
Per Share Conversion(1)
--------------------------------- ----------------------------
$ 0.2626 or higher 3,808,073
--------------------------------- ----------------------------
$ 0.20 5,000,000
--------------------------------- ----------------------------
$ 0.18 5,555,556
--------------------------------- ----------------------------
$ 0.15 6,666,667
--------------------------------- ----------------------------
$ 0.10 10,000,000
--------------------------------- ----------------------------
$ 0.05 20,000,000
--------------------------------- ----------------------------
(1) Does not include conversion of accrued but unpaid interest on the
Debentures
REPURCHASE OF EQUITY SECURITIES
None
RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
The following issuances of stock, warrants, and other equity securities were
made without any public solicitation to a limited number of investors or related
individuals or entities in separately negotiated transactions. Each investor
represented to us that the securities were being acquired for investment
purposes only and not with an intention to resell or distribute such securities.
Each of the individuals or entities had access to information about our business
and financial condition and was deemed capable of protecting their own
interests. The stock, warrants and other securities were issued pursuant to the
private placement exemption provided by Section 4(2) or Section 4(6) of the
Securities Act or Regulation S under the Securities Act. These are deemed to be
"restricted securities" as defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act and the
warrant certificates and the stock certificates bear a legend limiting the
resale thereof.
During Newgold's fiscal year ended January 31, 2006, it issued the following
securities pursuant to exemptions from registration under the Securities Act:
As previously reported, our Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending April
30, 2005, in February 2005 Newgold issued 500,000 shares of common stock at a
price of $0.15 per share to an investor for total proceeds of $75,000.
Additionally, 500,000 warrants to purchase common stock at a price of $0.30 per
share were issued to the investor. The warrants expire three years from the date
of issuance.
As previously reported, our Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending April
30, 2005, in April 2005 Newgold issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock at a
price of $0.25 per share to investors for total proceeds of $500,000.
Additionally, 1,000,000 warrants to purchase common stock at a price of $0.50
per share were issued to the investors. The warrants expire three years from the
date of issuance.
18
As previously reported, our Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending July 31,
2005, in February 2005 in July 2005 Newgold issued 12,326,231 shares of common
stock at a price of $0.15 per share to the Chief Executive Officer according to
the terms of existing notes payable to the officer. The issuance resulted in the
repayment of principal and interest totaling $1,848,935.
On January 27, 2006, Newgold entered into a Securities Purchase
Agreement (the "Purchase Agreement") and a Registration Rights Agreement (the
"Registration Rights Agreement") in connection with a private placement of a
convertible debenture, in the principal amount of $1,000,000 and bearing
interest of 8% per annum (the " Debenture"). The Debenture will be funded
$600,000 at the closing , $200,000 upon the filing of a resale registration
statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission and $200,000 upon the
registration statement being declared effective. The Debenture is due and
payable on January 27, 2009 unless it is converted into shares of the Company's
common stock or is repaid prior to its expiration date. Additionally, pursuant
to the Purchase Agreement, the investor was issued warrants (the "Warrants") to
purchase an aggregate of 2,500,000 shares of Newgold common stock with 1,250,000
warrants exercisable at $0.20 per share and 1,250,000 warrants exercisable at
$0.30 per share. The Warrants have a term of four years and are immediately
exercisable.
On January 31, 2006 Newgold issued 2,500,000 shares of commons stock at
a price of $0.20 per share to an investor for total proceeds of $500,000.
Additionally, 2,500,000 warrants to purchase common stock at a price of $0.40
per share were issued to the investor. The warrants expire three years from the
date of issuance. The shares were offered and sold exclusively to individuals
residing or entities formed outside the United States and are not deemed to be
"U.S. persons" as that term is defined under Regulation S. Each investor
represented that it is purchasing such shares for its own account. Both the
offer and the sale of the Newgold shares were made outside the United States and
are deemed to be "offshore transactions" as that term is defined under
Regulation S. The share certificate contains a legend indicating that such
shares can only be transferred in compliance with the provisions of Regulation
S. In light of the foregoing, such sales were deemed exempt from registration
pursuant to Regulation S of the 1933 Act. The shares are deemed to be
"restricted securities" as defined in Rule 144 under the 1933 Act.
On January 25, 2006, Newgold entered into a joint venture with ASDi,
LLC to develop two Nevada mining properties known as the Red Caps Project ("Red
Caps") and Crescent Valley Project ("Crescent Valley"). The Red Caps and
Crescent Valley mining claims are currently owned by ASDi, LLC which is owned
and managed by A. Scott Dockter, Chairman and CEO of Newgold. The joint venture
will be operated through a newly formed Nevada limited liability company called
Crescent Red Caps, LLC. The terms of the joint venture provide for ASDi to
contribute the Red Caps and Crescent Valley mining claims to the LLC in exchange
for Newgold issuing 2.5 million shares of its common stock to ASDi and 2.5
million warrants with an exercise price of $0.40 and a term of three years.
Newgold will initially own a 22.22% interest in the LLC and ASDi will hold a
77.78% interest. By expending up to $1,350,000 on each project over the next
three years, Newgold can increase its interest in the LLC to 66.66%. Thereafter,
Newgold has the right to purchase the remaining interest in the LLC held by ASDi
at a price to
19
be determined by the results of the exploration work conducted. Newgold will be
the Manager of the LLC.
During Newgold's fiscal year ended January 31, 2005, it issued the
following equity securities pursuant to exemptions from registration under the
Securities Act:
In April 2004, Newgold borrowed $9,650 from its President, Scott
Dockter. The promissory note is not convertible into stock, is due on April
30,2005, and bears interest at 8% per year. In connection with the loans,
warrants to purchase 64,333 shares of Newgold common stock have been issued. The
warrants have been valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The
warrants were issued at $0.15 per share and expire in five years from the date
of issuance.
In July 2004, Newgold borrowed $8,500 from its President, Scott
Dockter. The promissory note is not convertible into stock, is due on July 31,
2005, and bears interest at 8% per year. In connection with the loans, warrants
to purchase 56,667 shares of Newgold common stock have been issued. The warrants
have been valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The warrants were
issued at $0.15 per share and expire in five years from the date of issuance.
In October 2004, Newgold borrowed $3,081 from its President, Scott
Dockter. The promissory note is not convertible into stock, is due on in one
year and bears interest at 8% per year. In conjunction with this loan, the
President was issued warrants to purchase 20,540 shares of Newgold's common
stock of $0.15 per share. In addition, new convertible promissory notes were
issued to Scott Dockter, Newgold's CEO and James Kluber, Newgold's CFO in the
principal amounts of $1,402,742 and $209,251, respectively. The notes bear
interest at 8% per annum and are due September 30, 2005. In connection with the
issuance of these notes, Newgold issued warrants to purchase 5,798,140 and
1,395,007 shares of common stock to its Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, respectively.
During Newgold's fiscal year ended January 31, 2004, it issued the
following equity securities pursuant to exemptions from registration under the
Securities Act:
In February 2003, one person exercised a warrant to purchase 200,000
shares of Newgold's common stock. The exercise price was $0.10/share.
ITEM 6. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION
For more detailed financial information, please refer to the audited January 31,
2006 Financial Statements included in this Form 10-KSB.
20
CAUTION ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Form 10-KSB includes "forward-looking" statements about future financial
results, future business changes and other events that haven't yet occurred. For
example, statements like we "expect," we "anticipate" or we "believe" are
forward-looking statements. Investors should be aware that actual results may
differ materially from our expressed expectations because of risks and
uncertainties about the future. We do not undertake to update the information in
this Form 10-KSB if any forward-looking statement later turns out to be
inaccurate. Details about risks affecting various aspects of Newgold's business
are discussed throughout this Form 10-KSB and should be considered carefully.
PLAN OF OPERATION FOR THE NEXT TWELVE MONTHS
Certain key factors that have affected our financial and operating results in
the past will affect our future financial and operating results. These include,
but are not limited to the following:
o Gold prices, and to a lesser extent, silver prices;
o Current gold deposits under our control at the Relief Canyon Mine are
estimated by us (based on past exploration by Newgold and work done by
others).
o Our proposed exploration of properties now include 78 unpatented mining
claims contained in about 1000 acres of the Relief Canyon Property; 96
unpatented mining claims contained in about 1900 acres of the Red Caps
Property; and 39 unpatented mining claims contained in about 750 acres
of the Crescent Valley Property.
o Our operating plan is to commence exploration work on all three mining
properties beginning with the Relief Canyon mining property in the
summer of 2006. We expect this exploration program to continue through
the end of 2006. We expect to begin exploration work at the Red Caps
and Crescent Valley properties in the fall of 2006. By the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2007, we plan to resume mining operation at the
Relief Canyon mine. We anticipate by the end of fiscal 2007 to be
realizing production revenue from the Relief Canyon mine. Through the
use of joint ventures, royalties, arrangements and partnerships, we
intend to progressively enlarge the scope and scale of our exploration,
mining and processing operations, thereby potentially increasing our
chances of locating commercially viable ore deposits which could
increase both our annual revenues and ultimately our net profits. Our
objective is to achieve annual growth rates in revenue and net profits
for the foreseeable future.
o We expect to make capital expenditures in calendar years 2006 and 2007
of between $2.5 million and $4 million, including costs related to the
exploration of the Relief Canyon mining property. We will have to raise
additional outside capital to pay for these activities and the
resumption of mine operations and production at the Relief Canyon mine.
21
o Additional funding or the utilization of other venture partners will be
required to fund mining operations, exploration, research, development
and operating expenses at the Red Caps and Crescent Valley properties.
In the past we have been dependent on funding from the private
placement of our securities as well as loans from related and third
parties as the sole sources of capital to fund operations.
RESULTS OF OPERATION
We resumed business operations after having been inactive from July 2001 until
February 2003. Consequently, because we are in the process of reinstituting our
business and mining operations, the results of operations for the last two
fiscal years will likely not be indicative of our current and future operations.
The current management discussion and analysis should be read from the context
of our recent resumption of our mining business.
Operating Results for the Fiscal Years Ended January 31, 2006 and 2005
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Although we commenced efforts to re-establish our mining business early in
fiscal year 2004, no mining operations have commenced and no revenues have been
recognized during the fiscal years 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively. We hope to
be able to commence generating revenues from mining operations during the 2007
calendar year. We have granted a 4% net smelting return royalty to a third party
related to the Relief Canyon mining property which has been recorded as an
$800,000 deferred option income.
During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006 we spent $132,166 on reclamation
and maintenance expenses related to the Relief Canyon mining property.
Reclamation and maintenance expenses expended during the year ended January 31,
2005 were $28,433. These expenses relate primarily to maintenance and retention
costs required to maintain our mining claims. We incurred operating expenses of
$674,778 during the year ended January 31, 2006. Of this amount, $374,001
reflects officer compensation and related payroll taxes during the year and
$157,446 reflect fees for outside professional services. A large portion of the
outside professional services reflects legal and accounting work pertaining to
our annual and quarterly reporting on Form 10-KSB and preparation of an SB-2
registration statement occurring in fiscal year 2006. During the year ended
January 31, 2005 we incurred operating expenses of $353,972 of which $220,000
represents officer compensation and related payroll taxes, $33,510 reflecting
payroll tax penalties and $89,900 reflect fees for outside professional
services. It is anticipated that both mining costs and operating expenses will
increase significantly as we resume our exploration program and mining
operations.
We incurred interest expense of $941,347 during the year ended January 31, 2006
which compares to interest expenses of $614,672 incurred during the year ended
January 31, 2005. The amount of loans outstanding during fiscal year 2006
decreased by $797,742 compared to fiscal year 2005, which was primarily the
result of the Chief Executive Officer's conversion of a convertible note payable
of $1,402,742 into shares of common stock in July 2005 and the convertible
debenture of $600,000 funded in January 2006. The increase in additional
interest
22
expense during fiscal year 2006 was primarily due to the increase in accretion
of warrants issued in October 2004 as a debt discount.
In conjunction with the Convertible Debenture issued January 27, 2006, we
allocated the proceeds received between convertible debt and the detachable
warrants based upon the relative fair market values on the date the proceeds
were received. Subsequent to the initial recording, the change in the fair value
of the detachable warrants, determined under the Black-Scholes option pricing
formula, and the change in the fair value of the embedded derivative in the
conversion feature of the convertible debentures are recorded as adjustments to
the liabilities at January 31, 2006. This resulted in $37,418 of expense
relating to the change in the fair value of the Company's stock reflected in the
change in the fair value of the warrants and derivatives (noted above) and is
included as other income (expense).
In October 2004, we liquidated our investment in marketable securities through
open market transactions. Net proceeds totaled approximately $34,100. This
resulted in a loss on sale of $281,063. There were no sales of marketable
securities for the comparable period in fiscal year 2006.
Due to the fact that the joint venture with ASDi was a related party transaction
with no independent appraisal as to value, the joint venture was assigned a zero
value for accounting purposes and the $859,522 of securities paid by Newgold was
recorded as a loss for accounting purposes.
Our total net loss for the year ended January 31, 2006 increased to $2,645,231
compared to a net loss of $1,278,140 incurred for the fiscal year ended January
31, 2005. The larger net loss in fiscal year 2006 reflects the substantial
increase in operating expenses as we reactivate our mining activities, the
increase in interest expense, the loss recognized from the Crescent Red Caps JV
and a continued lack of revenues recognized during fiscal year 2006.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We have incurred significant operating losses since inception which has resulted
in an accumulated deficit of $19,030,535 as of January 31, 2006. At January 31,
2006, we had cash and other current assets of $701,546 compared to $18,730 at
January 31, 2005 and a net working capital deficit of $2,130,847. Since the
resumption of our business in February 2003, we have been dependent on borrowed
or invested funds in order to finance our ongoing operations. As of January 31,
2006, we had outstanding debentures and notes payable in the gross principal
amount of $1,057,634 (net balance of $1,020,291 after $(597,260) of note payable
discount and $637,417 of derivative liabilities) which reflects a decrease of
$797,742 compared to notes payable in the gross principal amount of $1,855,376,
(net balance of $1,006,088 after $849,288 of note payable discount) as of
January 31, 2005.
As of January 31, 2006 we were in default on a promissory note due to an
unrelated party in the principal amount $176,500.
23
In the quarter ended April 30, 2005 we raised a total of $575,000 through the
sale of 2,500,000 shares of Newgold restricted stock.
In the quarter ended July 31, 2005 we issued 12,326,231 shares of Common Stock
at a price of $0.15 per share to our chief executive officer according to the
terms of existing notes payable to the officer. The issuance resulted in the
repayment of principal of $1,402,742 and interest of $446,193 totaling
$1,848,935.
On January 25, 2006, Newgold entered into a joint venture with ASDi, LLC to
develop two Nevada mining properties known as the Red Caps Project ("Red Caps")
and Crescent Valley Project ("Crescent Valley"). Pursuant to the joint venture,
Newgold will initially own a 22.22% interest in the LLC and ASDi will hold a
77.78% interest. By expending up to $1,350,000 on each project over the next
three years, Newgold can increase its interest in the LLC to 66.66%. Thereafter,
Newgold has the right to purchase the remaining interest in the LLC held by ASDi
at a price to be determined by the results of the exploration work conducted.
On January 27, 2006, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement and a
Convertible Debenture in the principal amount of $1,000,000 and bearing interest
at 8% per annum. The Debenture was funded $600,000 on January 27, 2006 and we
received an additional $200,000 on March 14, 2006 upon the filing of a resale
registration statement with the SEC and we will receive a final $200,000 upon
the registration statement being declared effective by the SEC.
By attempting to resume mining operations, we will require approximately $10
million to $15 million in additional working capital above the amounts realized
from the convertible debenture to bring the Relief Canyon Mine into full
production. It is our intention to pursue several possible funding opportunities
including the sale of additional securities, entering into joint venture
arrangements, or the incurring of additional debt.
Due to our continuing losses from our business operations, the independent
auditor's report dated April 26, 2006, includes a "going concern" explanation
relating to the fact that Newgold's continuation is dependent upon obtaining
additional working capital either through significantly increasing revenues or
through outside financing. As of January 31, 2006, Newgold's principal
commitments included its obligation to pay ongoing maintenance fees on its 78
unpatented mining claims on the Relief Canyon property.
Our management believes that it will need to raise additional capital to
continue to develop, promote and conduct its exploration and mining operations.
Due to our limited cash flow, operating losses and limited assets, it is
unlikely that we could obtain financing through commercial or banking sources.
Consequently, we are dependent on continuous cash infusions from our major
stockholders or other outside sources in order to fund our current operations.
Prior to the transaction with Cornell Capital Partners, Newgold's president had
paid a substantial portion of Newgold's expenses since restarting its business
in February 2003. Although Newgold believes that these creditors and investors
will continue to fund Newgold's expenses based upon their significant debt or
equity interest in Newgold, there is no assurance that such investors will
continue to fund Newgold's ongoing operating expenses. If adequate funds are
24
not otherwise available, through public or private financing as well as
borrowing from other sources, Newgold would not be able to establish or sustain
its mining operations.
Recent Financing Transaction
----------------------------
On January 27, 2006, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the
"Purchase Agreement") and other agreements in connection with the private
placement of a convertible debenture, in the principal amount of $1,000,000 and
bearing interest at 8% per annum (the "Debenture"). The Debenture will be funded
$600,000 on January 27, 2006, $200,000 upon the filing of a resale registration
statement with the SEC and $200,000 upon the registration statement being
declared effective by the SEC. The Debenture is due and payable on March 9, 2009
unless it is converted into shares of Newgold Common Stock or is repaid prior to
its expiration date. The conversion rate is adjustable and at any conversion
date, will be the lower of $0.2626 per share or 95% of the Market Conversion
Price. Consequently, the number of shares of Newgold Common Stock into which the
Debenture may be covered will never be less than 3,808,073 shares but could be
substantially more if the average price of Newgold's Common Stock falls below
$0.2626.
In conjunction with the Purchase Agreement, we entered into an Investor
Registration Rights Agreement (the "Registration Rights Agreement"). The
Registration Rights Agreement requires us to register at least 24,050,025 shares
of our Common Stock to cover the conversion of the Debenture (assuming
conversion prices substantially below $0.26) and 2,500,000 shares of our Common
Stock issuable upon conversion of warrants (the "Warrants") granted to the
Debenture holder. The Registration Statement was filed with the SEC on March 6,
2006. Once effective, we are required to keep this Registration Statement
effective until the Debenture has been fully converted, repaid, or becomes due
and the Warrants have been fully exercised or expire. Both the Debenture and the
Warrants are currently convertible or exercisable, respectively.
In conjunction with the Purchase Agreement, we entered into a Security Agreement
(the "Security Agreement"). The Security Agreement creates a secured interest in
favor of the Debenture holder in our mining interest and assets in the Relief
Canyon Mine property. This security interest was created by recordation of a
Memorandum of Security Agreement filed in Pershing County, Nevada on February
14, 2006. Consequently, should a default occur under the Debenture, the
Debenture holder could take over or sell all of our interests, business and
assets associated with the Relief Canyon Mine.
In conjunction with the Purchase Agreement, we granted 2,500,000 warrants to
purchase shares of Newgold Common Stock, 1,250,000 exercisable at $0.20 per
share and 1,250,000 exercisable at $0.30 per share. The Warrants have a term of
four years. The exercise price may be reduced if shares of Newgold's Common
Stock are sold at a price below the Warrant exercise price.
Lastly, in conjunction with the Purchase Agreement, we entered into a Pledge and
Escrow Agreement whereby up to an additional 24,050,025 shares of Newgold Common
Stock could be issued to the Debenture holder in the event of a default relating
to the Debenture. The precise amount of shares that would be required to be
issued to the Debenture holder would depend on
25
the amount of principal and interest outstanding under the Debenture at the time
a default was declared.
Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, for so long as at least $200,000 of
principal remains outstanding under the Debenture, the Debenture holder will
have approval rights over any major transaction (i.e., merger, stock splits,
sale of assets) or any issuance of common or preferred stock by Newgold with
certain exceptions. The Debenture holder will also have a right of first refusal
for a period of 18 months with regard to any additional capital sought to be
raised by Newgold.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
------------------------------
During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006, Newgold did not engage in any
off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(c) of the SEC's Regulation
S-B.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operation
are based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The
preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and
disclosures on the date of the financial statements. On an on-going basis, we
evaluate our estimates, including, but not limited to, those related to revenue
recognition. We use authoritative pronouncements, historical experience and
other assumptions as the basis for making judgments. Actual results could differ
from those estimates. We believe that the following critical accounting policies
affect our more significant judgments and estimates in the preparation of our
financial statements.
Development Stage Company
-------------------------
Effective January 1, 1995 (date of inception), the Company is considered a
development stage Company as defined in SFAS No. 7. The Company's development
stage activities consist of the development of several mining properties located
in Nevada. Sources of financing for these development stage activities have been
primarily debt and equity financing. The Company has, at the present time, not
paid any dividends and any dividends that may be paid in the future will depend
upon the financial requirements of the Company and other relevant factors.
Valuation of long-lived assets
------------------------------
Long-lived assets, consisting primarily of property and equipment, patents and
trademarks, and goodwill, comprise a significant portion of our total assets.
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that their carrying values may not be recoverable.
Recoverability of assets is measured by a comparison of the carrying value of an
asset to the future net cash flows expected to be generated by those assets. The
cash flow projections are based on historical experience, management's view of
growth rates within the industry, and the anticipated future economic
environment.
26
Factors we consider important that could trigger a review for impairment include
the following:
(a) significant underperformance relative to expected historical
or projected future operating results,
(b) significant changes in the manner of our use of the acquired
assets or the strategy of our overall business, and
(c) significant negative industry or economic trends.
When we determine that the carrying value of long-lived assets and related
goodwill and enterprise-level goodwill may not be recoverable based upon the
existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment, we measure any
impairment based on a projected discounted cash flow method using a discount
rate determined by our management to be commensurate with the risk inherent in
our current business model.
Deferred Reclamation Costs
--------------------------
In August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 143, "Accounting for
Asset Retirement Obligations," which established a uniform methodology for
accounting for estimated reclamation and abandonment costs. The statement was
adopted February 1, 2003. The reclamation costs will be allocated to expense
over the life of the related assets and will be adjusted for changes resulting
from the passage of time and revisions to either the timing or amount of the
original present value estimate.
Prior to adoption of SFAS No. 143, estimated future reclamation costs were based
principally on legal and regulatory requirements. Such costs related to active
mines were accrued and charged over the expected operating lives of the mines
using the units of production method based on proven and probable reserves.
Future remediation costs for inactive mines were accrued based on management's
best estimate at the end of each period of the undiscounted costs expected to be
incurred at a site. Such cost estimates included, where applicable, ongoing
care, maintenance and monitoring costs. Changes in estimates at inactive mines
were reflected in earnings in the period an estimate was revised.
Exploration Costs
-----------------
Exploration costs are expensed as incurred. All costs related to property
acquisitions are capitalized.
Mine Development Costs
----------------------
Mine development costs consist of all costs associated with bringing mines into
production, to develop new ore bodies and to develop mine areas substantially in
advance of current production. The decision to develop a mine is based on
assessment of the commercial viability of the property and the availability of
financing. Once the decision to proceed to development is
27
made, development and other expenditures relating to the project will be
deferred and carried at cost with the intention that these will be depleted by
charges against earnings from future mining operations. No depreciation will be
charged against the property until commercial production commences. After a mine
has been brought into commercial production, any additional work on that
property will be expensed as incurred, except for large development programs,
which will be deferred and depleted.
Reclamation Costs
-----------------
Reclamation costs and related accrued liabilities, which are based on our
interpretation of current environmental and regulatory requirements, are accrued
and expensed, upon determination.
Based on current environmental regulations and known reclamation requirements,
management has included its best estimates of these obligations in its
reclamation accruals. However, it is reasonably possible that our best estimates
of our ultimate reclamation liabilities could change as a result of changes in
regulations or cost estimates.
Valuation of Derivative Instruments
-----------------------------------
FAS No. 133 "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities "
requires bifurcation of embedded derivative instruments and measurement of their
fair value for accounting purposes. In determining the appropriate fair value,
the Company uses the Black Scholes model as a valuation technique. Derivative
liabilities are adjusted to reflect fair value at each period end, with any
increase or decrease in the fair value being recorded in results of operations
as Adjustments to Fair Value of Derivatives. In addition, the fair values of
freestanding derivative instruments such as warrants are valued using Black
Scholes models.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
--------------------------------
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,"Inventory Costs". SFAS No. 151
amends the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight,
handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage) under the guidance in ARB No. 43,
Chapter 4,"Inventory Pricing". Paragraph 5 of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, previously
stated that "...under some circumstances, items such as idle facility expense,
excessive spoilage, double freight, and rehandling costs may be so abnormal as
to require treatment as current period charges...." This Statement requires that
those items be recognized as current-period charges regardless of whether they
meet the criterion of "so abnormal." In addition, this Statement requires that
allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on
the normal capacity of the production facilities. This statement is effective
for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005.
Management does not expect adoption of SFAS No. 151 to have a material impact on
the Company's financial statements.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 152,"Accounting for Real Estate
Time-Sharing Transactions". The FASB issued this Statement as a result of the
guidance provided in AICPA Statement of Position (SOP) 04-2,"Accounting for Real
Estate Time-Sharing Transactions". SOP 04-2 applies to all real estate
time-sharing transactions. Among other items, the SOP provides guidance on the
recording of credit losses and the treatment of selling costs, but does not
change
28
the revenue recognition guidance in SFAS No. 66,"Accounting for Sales of Real
Estate", for real estate time-sharing transactions. SFAS No. 152 amends
Statement No. 66 to reference the guidance provided in SOP 04-2. SFAS No. 152
also amends SFAS No. 67, "Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of
Real Estate Projects", to state that SOP 04-2 provides the relevant guidance on
accounting for incidental operations and costs related to the sale of real
estate time-sharing transactions. SFAS No. 152 is effective for years beginning
after June 15, 2005, with restatements of previously issued financial statements
prohibited. This statement is not applicable to the Company.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153,"Exchanges of Nonmonetary
Assets," an amendment to Opinion No. 29,"Accounting for Nonmonetary
Transactions". Statement No. 153 eliminates certain differences in the guidance
in Opinion No. 29 as compared to the guidance contained in standards issued by
the International Accounting Standards Board. The amendment to Opinion No. 29
eliminates the fair value exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar
productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of
nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. Such an exchange has
commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to
change significantly as a result of the exchange. SFAS No. 153 is effective for
nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in periods beginning after June 15, 2005.
Earlier application is permitted for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in
periods beginning after December 16, 2004. Management does not expect adoption
of SFAS No. 153 to have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R),"Share-Based Payment". SFAS
123(R) amends SFAS No. 123,"Accountung for Stock-Based Compensation", and APB
Opinion 25,"Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees." SFAS No.123(R) requires
that the cost of share-based payment transactions (including those with
employees and non-employees) be recognized in the financial statements. SFAS No.
123(R) applies to all share-based payment transactions in which an entity
acquires goods or services by issuing (or offering to issue) its shares, share
options, or other equity instruments (except for those held by an ESOP) or by
incurring liabilities (1) in amounts based (even in part) on the price of the
entity's shares or other equity instruments, or (2) that require (or may
require) settlement by the issuance of an entity's shares or other equity
instruments. This statement is effective (1) for public companies qualifying as
SEC small business issuers, as of the first interim period or fiscal year
beginning after December 15, 2005, or (2) for all other public companies, as of
the first interim period or fiscal year beginning after June 15, 2005, or (3)
for all nonpublic entities, as of the first fiscal year beginning after December
15, 2005. Management is currently assessing the effect of SFAS No. 123(R) on the
Company's financial statement. On April 14, 2005, the Securities and Exchange
Commission amended the compliance dates to allow companies to implement
Statement No. 123R at the beginning of their next fiscal year, instead of the
next reporting period, that begins after June 15, 2005, or Dec. 15, 2005 for
small business issuers.
In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation ("FIN") No. 47, "Accounting
for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations". FIN No. 47 clarifies that the
term conditional asset retirement obligation as used in FASB Statement No. 143,
"Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations," refers to a legal obligation to
perform an asset retirement activity in which the
29
timing and (or) method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may
or may not be within the control of the entity. The obligation to perform the
asset retirement activity is unconditional even though uncertainty exists about
the timing and (or) method of settlement. Uncertainty about the timing and/or
method of settlement of a conditional asset retirement obligation should be
factored into the measurement of the liability when sufficient information
exists. This interpretation also clarifies when an entity would have sufficient
information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement
OBLIGATION. FIN No. 47 is effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending
after December 15, 2005 (December 31, 2005 for calendar-year companies).
Retrospective application of interim financial information is permitted but is
not required. Management does not expect adoption of FIN No. 47 to have a
material impact on Newgold's financial statements.
In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement of Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 154,
"Accounting Changes and Error Corrections" an amendment to Accounting Principles
Bulletin (APB) Opinion No. 20, "Accounting Changes", and SFAS No. 3, "Reporting
Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements" though SFAS No. 154 carries
forward the guidance in APB No. 20 and SFAS No. 3 with respect to accounting for
changes in estimates, changes in reporting entity, and the correction of errors.
SFAS No. 154 establishes new standards on accounting for changes in accounting
principles, whereby all such changes must be accounted for by retrospective
application to the financial statements of prior periods unless it is
impracticable to do so. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and
error corrections made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005, with
early adoption permitted for changes and corrections made in years beginning
after May 2005.
Effective for reporting periods beginning after April 29, 2004, the Emerging
Issues Task Force (EITF) released Issue 04-2, "Whether Mineral Rights are
Tangible or Intangible Assets." The consensus was that mineral rights acquired
on a business combination are tangible assets and should be recorded as a
separate component of property, plant and equipment either on the face of the
financial statements or in the notes. The Company will comply with the Issue in
the future as required.
Effective for reporting periods beginning after March 31, 2004, the EITF
released Issue No. 04-3, "Mining Assets: Impairment and Business Combinations."
The EITF reached consensus that an entity should include value beyond proven and
probable reserves in the value allocated to mining assets in a purchase price
allocation to the extent a market participant would include such value in
determining the fair market value of the asset. The EITF also reached consensus
that an entity should include the effects of anticipated changes in market
prices of minerals when determining the fair market value of mining assets in a
purchase price equation in a manner consistent with expectations of the
marketplace.
Effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2005, the EITF
released Issue No. 04-6, "Accounting For Stripping Costs Incurred During
Production In The Mining Industry." The EITF reached a consensus of accounting
for "stripping cost", the cost of removing overburden (material overlying a
mineral deposit that must be removed prior to mining) and
30
waste materials, during the production phase and determined that such costs are
considered variable production costs and thus should be included in the cost of
inventory produced during the period in which the stripping costs are incurred.
The consensus applies to only entities involved in finding and removing wasting
natural resources. As such, this statement is not applicable to the Company.
In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation ("FIN") No. 47, "Accounting
for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations". FIN No. 47 clarifies that the
term conditional asset retirement obligation as used in FASB Statement No. 143,
"Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations," refers to a legal obligation to
perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and (or) method of
settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the
control of the entity. The obligation to perform the asset retirement activity
is unconditional even though uncertainty exists about the timing and (or) method
of settlement. Uncertainty about the timing and/or method of settlement of a
conditional asset retirement obligation should be factored into the measurement
of the liability when sufficient information exists. This interpretation also
clarifies when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably
estimate the fair value of an asset retirement OBLIGATION. FIN No. 47 is
effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005
(December 31, 2005 for calendar-year companies). Retrospective application of
interim financial information is permitted but is not required. Management does
not expect adoption of FIN No. 47 to have a material impact on our financial
statements.
In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
("SFAS") No. 154, "Accounting Changes and Error Corrections" ("SFAS No. 154"),
an amendment to Accounting Principles Bulletin Opinion No. 20, "Accounting
Changes" ("APB No. 20"), and SFAS No. 3, "Reporting Accounting Changes in
Interim Financial Statements". Though SFAS No. 154 carries forward the guidance
in APB No.20 and SFAS No.3 with respect to accounting for changes in estimates,
changes in reporting entity, and the correction of errors, SFAS No. 154
establishes new standards on accounting for changes in accounting principles,
whereby all such changes must be accounted for by retrospective application to
the financial statements of prior periods unless it is impracticable to do so.
SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and error corrections made in
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005, with early adoption permitted
for changes and corrections made in years beginning after May 2005. The Company
will implement SFAS No. 154 in its fiscal year beginning February 1, 2006. We
are currently evaluating the impact of this new standard but believe that it
will not have a material impact on the Company's financial position, results of
operations, or cash flows.
In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, "Accounting for Certain Hybrid
Financial Instruments", which amends SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivatives
Instruments and Hedging Activities" and SFAS No. 140, "Accounting for Transfers
and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities". SFAS No.
155 amends SFAS No. 133 to narrow the scope exception for interest-only and
principal-only strips on debt instruments to include only such strips
representing rights to receive a specified portion of the contractual interest
or principle cash flows. SFAS No. 155 also amends SFAS No. 140 to allow
qualifying special-
31
purpose entities to hold a passive derivative financial instrument pertaining to
beneficial interests that itself is a derivative instrument. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact this new Standard but believes that it will not
have a material impact on the Company's financial position, results of
operations, or cash flows.
In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, "Accounting for Servicing
of Financial Assets" ("SFAS NO. 156"), which provides an approach to simplify
efforts to obtain hedge-like (offset) accounting. This Statement amends FASB
Statement No. 140, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets
and Extinguishments of Liabilities", with respect to the accounting for
separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. The Statement
(1) requires an entity to recognize a servicing asset or servicing liability
each time it undertakes an obligation to service a financial asset by entering
into a servicing contract in certain situations; (2) requires that a separately
recognized servicing asset or servicing liability be initially measured at fair
value, if practicable; (3) permits an entity to choose either the amortization
method or the fair value method for subsequent measurement for each class of
separately recognized servicing assets or servicing liabilities; (4) permits at
initial adoption a one-time reclassification of available-for-sale securities to
trading securities by an entity with recognized servicing rights, provided the
securities reclassified offset the entity's exposure to changes in the fair
value of the servicing assets or liabilities; and (5) requires separate
presentation of servicing assets and servicing liabilities subsequently measured
at fair value in the balance sheet and additional disclosures for all separately
recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. SFAS No. 156 is effective
for all separately recognized servicing assets and liabilities as of the
beginning of an entity's fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006, with
earlier adoption permitted in certain circumstances. The Statement also
describes the manner in which it should be initially applied. The Company does
not believe that SFAS No. 156 will have a material impact on its financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
32
ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NEWGOLD, INC.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED
JANUARY 31, 2006 AND 2005
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM F-1
Balance Sheet F-2
Statements of Operations F-4
Statements of Comprehensive Loss F-5
Statements of Shareholders' Deficit F-6
Statements of Cash Flows F-10
Notes to Financial Statements F-14
33
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors
Newgold, Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Sacramento, California
We have audited the balance sheet of Newgold, Inc. (a development stage company)
(the "Company") as of January 31, 2006, and the related statements of
operations, comprehensive loss, shareholders' deficit, and cash flows for each
of the two years in the period ended January 31, 2006 and the period from
January 1, 1995 to January 31, 2006. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provided a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Newgold, Inc. as of January 31,
2006, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two
years in the period ended January 31, 2006 and the period from January 1, 1995
to January 31, 2006 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the
Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the
financial statements, during the year ended January 31, 2006, the Company
incurred a net loss of $2,645,231 and had negative cash flows from operations of
$899,807. In addition, the Company had an accumulated shareholders' deficit of
$2,960,365 at January 31, 2006. These factors, among others, as discussed in
Note 2 to the financial statements, raise substantial doubts about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these
matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include
any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/ SINGER LEWAK GREENBAUM & GOLDSTEIN LLP
------------------------------------------
SINGER LEWAK GREENBAUM & GOLDSTEIN LLP
Los Angeles, California
April 26, 2006
F-1
NEWGOLD, INC.
(A DEVLOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
BALANCE SHEET
JANUARY 31, 2006
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash $ 700,224
Travel advance 1,322
----------------
Total current assets 701,546
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT 19,199
OTHER ASSETS
Restricted cash 243,204
Deferred reclamation costs 270,736
----------------
Total other assets 513,940
----------------
TOTAL ASSETS $ 1,234,685
================
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable $ 798,233
Accrued expenses 1,305,790
Accrued reclamation costs 270,736
Notes payable due to individuals and officers 457,634
----------------
Total current liabilities 2,832,393
----------------
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
Convertible debenture and related derivative liabilities,
net of unamortized discount of $597,260 and deferred
financing costs of $77,500 562,657
Deferred revenue 800,000
----------------
Total long-term liabilities 1,362,657
Total liabilities 4,195,050
F-2
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Common stock, $0.001 par value
250,000,000 shares authorized
68,104,072 shares issued and outstanding 68,104
Additional paid in capital 16,002,066
Deficit accumulated during the development stage (19,030,535)
----------------
Total shareholders' deficit (2,960,365)
----------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT $ 1,234,685
================
F-3
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
NEWGOLD, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2006 AND 2005
AND FOR THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1995 TO JANUARY 31, 2006
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Period
For the Years Ended January 31, From January 1,
---------------------------------- 1995 to January
2006 2005 31, 2006
--------------- --------------- ---------------
NET SALES $ - $ - $ -
COST OF GOODS SOLD 132,166 28,433 302,831
--------------- --------------- ---------------
GROSS (LOSS) (132,166) (28,433) (302,831)
OPERATING EXPENSES (674,778) (353,972) (13,912,008)
--------------- --------------- ---------------
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS (806,944) (382,405) (14,214,839)
--------------- --------------- ---------------
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Interest income 72,687
Dividend income - - 30,188
Other income - - 6,565
Adjustments to fair value of derivatives (37,418) - (37,418)
Interest expense (941,347) (614,672) (2,409,037)
Loss from joint venture (859,522) (859,522)
Loss on sale of marketable securities - (281,063) (281,063)
Bad debt expense - - (40,374)
Loss on disposal of plant, property
and equipment - - (334,927)
Loss on disposal of bond - - (21,000)
--------------- --------------- ---------------
Total other expense (1,838,287) (895,735) (3,873,901)
--------------- --------------- ---------------
NET LOSS $ (2,645,231) $ (1,278,140) $ (18,088,740)
=============== =============== ===============
BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE $ (0.05) $ (0.03)
=============== ===============
BASIC AND DILUTED WEIGHTED-AVERAGE
SHARES OUTSTANDING 56,755,520 47,644,745
=============== ===============
F-4
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
NEWGOLD, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2006 AND 2005
AND FOR THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1995 TO JANUARY 31, 2006
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Period
For the Years Ended January 31, From January 1,
---------------------------------- 1995 to January
2006 2005 31, 2006
--------------- --------------- ---------------
NET LOSS $ (2,645,231) $ (1,278,140) $ (18,088,740)
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Unrealized loss from
marketable securities - - (204,820)
SALE OF SECURITIES WITH PREVIOUS UNREALIZED
HOLDING LOSS - 204,820 204,820
--------------- --------------- ---------------
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS $ (2,645,231) $ (1,073,320) $ (18,088,740)
=============== =============== ===============
F-5
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
NEWGOLD, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT
FOR THE YEARS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2006 AND 2005
AND FOR THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1995 TO JANUARY 31, 2006
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Common Stock Additional Other Com-
------------------------- Paid in prehensive Accumulated
Shares Amount Capital (Loss) Deficit Total
------------ ------------ ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Balance December 31, 1994 6,768,358 $ 6,768 - - $ (636,084) $ (629,316)
Net loss (233,877) (233,877)
------------ ------------ ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Balance December 31, 1995 6,768,358 6,768 - - (869,961) (863,193)
Shares issued to creditors and shareholders
of Warehouse Auto Centers, Inc. 305,709 306 305,403 - (305,709) -
Shares issued to investors and underwriters 5,135,130 5,135 4,701,835 4,706,970
Shares issued to purchase Washington Gulch 3,800,000 3,800 177,200 181,000
Shares issued in exchange for net profits interest 1,431,642 1,432 440,605 442,067
Shares issued to others 21,000 221 220,779 221,000
Shares issued to Repadre 100,000 100 99,900 100,000
Shares issued to repurchase 50% interest
in Relief Canyon 1,000,000 1,000 999,000 1,000,000
Net loss for the period January 1, 1996
to January 31, 1997 (1,803,784) (1,803,784)
------------ ------------ ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Balance January 31, 1997 18,761,839 18,762 6,944,722 - (2,979,454) 3,984,030
Shares issued to Warehouse Auto Centers, Inc.
shareholders subsequently cancelled (25,242) (25) (25,217) (25,242)
Shares issued to others 12,500 13 4,987 5,000
Additional shares issued to investors and
underwriters for delay in share trading 513,514 513 204,487 205,000
F-6
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
NEWGOLD, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT
FOR THE YEARS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2006 AND 2005
AND FOR THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1995 TO JANUARY 31, 2006
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shares issued to Repadre 200,000 200 199,800 200,000
Net loss (5,883,309) (5,883,309)
------------ ------------ ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Balance January 31, 1998 19,462,611 19,463 7,328,779 - (8,862,763) (1,514,521)
Shares issued in exchange for rent 15,000 15 5,985 6,000
Shares issued to IBK 5,616,977 5,617 542,383 548,000
Shares issued in exchange for property 150,000 150 55,350 55,000
Net loss (753,219) (753,219)
------------ ------------ ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Balance January 31, 1999 25,244,588 25,245 7,932,497 - (9,615,982) (1,658,240)
Three-for-two stock split 12,672,441 12,671 (12,671) -
Shares issued in exchange for debt conversion 3,205,674 3,206 1,279,065 1,282,271
Net loss (919,735) (919,735)
------------ ------------ ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Balance January 31, 2000 41,122,703 41,122 9,198,891 - (10,535,717) (1,295,704)
Shares issued for cash 1,796,000 1,796 663,204 665,000
Additional shares issued for delay in registration 239,200 239 (239) -
Shares issued for offering costs 120,000 120 (60,120) (60,000)
Shares issued for legal settlement 1,000,000 1,000 649,000 650,000
Shares issued for services 78,271 78 69,922 70,000
Net loss (2,382,723) (2,382,723)
------------ ------------ ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Balance January 31, 2001 44,356,174 44,356 10,520,657 - (12,918,440) (2,353,427)
Shares issued for cash 2,500,000 2,500 147,500 150,000
Warrants issued with debt 20,000 20,000
F-7
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
NEWGOLD, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT
FOR THE YEARS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2006 AND 2005
AND FOR THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1995 TO JANUARY 31, 2006
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net loss (1,502,366) (1,502,366)
------------ ------------ ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Balance January 31, 2002 46,856,174 46,856 10,688,157 - (14,420,806) (3,685,793)
Shares issued upon exercise of warrants 550,000 550 54,450 55,000
Offering costs (1,467) (1,467)
Warrants issued with debt 13,574 13,574
Net loss (215,533) (215,533)
------------ ------------ ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Balance January 31, 2003 47,406,174 47,406 10,754,714 - (14,636,339) (3,834,219)
Shares issued upon exercise of warrants 200,000 200 19,800 20,000
Warrants issued with debt 63,918 63,918
Other comprehensive loss (204,820) (204,820)
Net loss (470,823) (470,823)
------------ ------------ ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Balance January 31, 2004 47,606,174 47,606 10,838,432 (204,820) (15,107,162) (4,425,944)
Shares issued for cash 671,667 672 100,078 100,750
Offering costs (124,337) (124,337)
Warrants issued with common stock 124,337 124,337
Warrants issued with debt 1,284,234 1,284,234
Sale of marketable securities 204,820 204,820
Net loss (1,278,140) (1,278,140)
------------ ------------ ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Balance January 31, 2005 48,277,841 48,278 12,222,744 - (16,385,302) (4,114,280)
F-8
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
NEWGOLD, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT
FOR THE YEARS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2006 AND 2005
AND FOR THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1995 TO JANUARY 31, 2006
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shares issued for cash 5,000,000 5,000 1,070,000 1,075,000
Shares issued in exchange for
debt conversion 12,326,231 12,326 1,836,609 1,848,935
Shares issued to purchase 22%
interest in Crescent Red Caps LLC 2,500,000 2,500 497,500 500,000
Warrants issued with investment in joint
venture 359,523 359,523
Warrants issued for services 15,690 15,690
Sale of marketable securities
Net loss for the period February
1, 2005 to January 31, 2006 (2,645,231) (2,645,231)
------------ ------------ ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Balance, January 31, 2006 68,104,072 $ 68,104 $ 16,002,066 - $(19,030,535) $ (2,960,365)
============ ============ ============= ============= ============= =============
F-9
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
NEWGOLD, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2006 AND 2005
AND FOR THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1995 TO JANUARY 31, 2006
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Period
For the Years Ended January 31, From January 1,
-------------------------------- 1995 to January
2006 2005 31, 2006
--------------- --------------- -- -----------------
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss ($2,645,231) ($1,278,140) ($18,088,740)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
used in operating activities
Accretion of warrants issued as a debt discount 777,642 443,682 1,274,257
Accretion of beneficial conversion 71,645 35,823 107,468
Accretion of debt discount 2,740 - 2,740
Adjustments to fair value of derivatives 37,417 - 37,417
Loss from joint venture 859,522 - 859,522
Loss on sale of marketable securities - 281,063 281,063
Depreciation and amortization - - 124,157
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment - - 334,927
Impairment in value of property, plant and equipment - - 807,266
Loss on disposal of bond - - 21,000
Impairment in value of Relief Canyon Mine - - 3,311,672
Impairment in value of joint investments - - 490,000
Bad debt - - 40,374
F-10
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
NEWGOLD, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2006 AND 2005
AND FOR THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1995 TO JANUARY 31, 2006
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assigned value of stock and warrants exchanged for services 15,690 - 552,948
Gain on write off of note payable - (7,000)
Judgment loss accrued 250,000
(Increase) decrease in
Restricted cash (243,204) (243,204)
Employee receivable 678 2,000 2,678
Deposits 45,000 4,500
Deferred reclamation costs 243,210 - (194,742)
Prepaid expenses - - (2,900)
Reclamation bonds - - 185,000
Other assets - - (1,600)
Increase (decrease) in
Accounts payable 229,955 28,082 517,273
Accrued expenses (249,871) 89,289 1,963,574
--------------- --------------- -- -----------------
Net cash used by operating activities (899,807) (353,201) (7,370,344)
--------------- --------------- -- -----------------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities - 34,124 34,124
Investment in marketable securities - - (315,188)
Advances from shareholder - - 7,436
Contribution from joint venture partner - - 775,000
Purchase of joint venture partner interest - - (900,000)
Capital expenditures (19,199) - (2,970,706)
F-11
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
NEWGOLD, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2006 AND 2005
AND FOR THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1995 TO JANUARY 31, 2006
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment - 278,783
Investments in joint ventures - - (490,000)
Note receivable - - (268,333)
Repayment of note receivable - - 268,333
Net cash used by investing activities (19,199) (34,124) (3,580,551)
--------------- --------------- -- -----------------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock 1,075,000 100,750 7,559,253
Proceeds from notes payable 527,500 251,043 5,554,548
Principal repayments of notes payable - (21,953) (2,037,706)
Repayment of advances to affiliate - - (231,663)
Deferred revenue - - 800,000
Net cash provided by financing activities 1,602,500 329,840 11,644,432
--------------- --------------- -- -----------------
Net increase in cash 683,494 10,763 693,537
CASH, BEGINNING OF YEAR 16,730 5,967 6,687
--------------- --------------- -- -----------------
CASH, END OF YEAR $ 700,224 $ 16,730 $ 700,224
=============== =============== == =================
F-12
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION FOR THE YEARS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2006 AND 2005
AND JANUARY 1, 1995 THROUGH JANUARY 31, 2006 AS FOLLOWS:
For the Period
For the Years Ended January 31, From January 1,
-------------------------------- 1995 to January
2006 2005 31, 2006
--------------- --------------- -- -----------------
Cash paid for interest $ - $ - $ 161,107
Cash paid for income taxes $ - $ - $ -
Non Cash Investing and Financing Activities:
Conversion of related party note payable to common
stock,including interest payable of $446,193 $ 1,848,935 $ - $ 1,848,935
F-13
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND LINE OF BUSINESS
NEWGOLD, Inc. ("the Company") has been in the business of acquiring, exploring,
developing, and producing gold properties. The Company had rights to mine
properties in Nevada and Montana. Its primary focus was on the Relief Canyon
Mine located near Lovelock, Nevada, where it has performed development and
exploratory drilling and was in the process of obtaining permits to allow
operation of the Relief Canyon Mine. In December 1997, the Company placed the
Relief Canyon Mine on care and maintenance status. The Company also conducted
exploration at its Washington Gulch Mine property in Montana.
In February 2000 the Company began to implement an entirely new business model
of investing in Internet companies. Due to the deterioration of the investment
market for these types of companies later in 2000, the Company abandoned this
investment strategy. From mid-2001 until the beginning of 2003 Newgold was
essentially inactive, only continuing with some of the care and maintenance at
Relief Canyon, as provided for by a non-affiliate company owned by the Chairman
and CEO of Newgold.
The Company has embarked on a business strategy whereby it will invest in and/or
manage gold mining and other mineral producing properties. Currently, the
Company's principal assets include various mineral leases associated with the
Relief Canyon mine located near Lovelock, Nevada along with various items of
mining equipment located at that site as well as a 22% interest in a joint
venture covering two separate leasehold interests covering over 2700 acres in
Lander County, Nevada. The Company's business will be to acquire, explore and,
if warranted, develop various mining properties located in the state of Nevada.
The Company plans to carryout comprehensive exploration and development programs
and when appropriate, begin mining activities on its properties. The Company may
fund and conduct these activities itself, or it may outsource some of these
activities through the use of various joint venture, royalty or partnership
arrangements pursuant to which other companies would agree to finance, carryout
the exploration and development programs, or perform mining operations on
Newgold's mining properties. The Company's current plan may not require the
hiring of significant amounts of mining employees depending upon the level, if
any, of the mining and exploration activities outsourced to other entities.
Merger
------
In November 1996, Newgold, Inc. of Nevada (Old Newgold) was merged into
Warehouse Auto Centers, Inc. (WAC), a public company, which had previously filed
an involuntary petition under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in
the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of New York.
Pursuant to the plan of reorganization and merger (the Plan), (i) WAC which was
the surviving corporation for legal purposes, changed its name to Newgold Inc.
(the Company), (ii) the outstanding shares of Old Newgold were converted into
the right to receive an aggregate of 12,000,000 shares or approximately 69% of
the post merger outstanding common stock of the Company, (iii) each outstanding
share of WAC was converted into the right to receive 1/65 share of the common
stock of the Company, for an aggregate of 51,034 shares or less than 1% of the
post merger outstanding common stock, (iv) unsecured trade debts and other
unsecured pre-petition liabilities were paid in full via the issuance of one
share of the Company's stock, for each $42 of debt, for an aggregate of 63,374
shares or less than 1% of the post merger outstanding common stock, and (v) post
petition creditors received 1 share of stock for each $1 of debt, for an
aggregate of 191,301 shares or approximately 1% of the post merger outstanding
common stock.
F-14
The Plan also required an amendment to the Company's capital structure to
increase the number of shares authorized to 50,000,000 and to reduce the
corresponding par value to $.001.
In connection with the Plan, the Company raised $4,707,000 of cash through the
issuance of convertible debtor certificates. Shortly after confirmation of the
Plan, the debtor certificates were exchanged for 5,135,130 shares of common
stock (including 428,130 shares issued in lieu of paying cash for underwriter's
fees) representing approximately 29% of the post merger outstanding common
stock. An additional bonus of 513,514 shares was issued to investors and
underwriters during the year ended January 31, 1998 for delay in the effective
date of the Company's stock trading.
For accounting purposes, Old Newgold has been treated as the acquirer (reverse
acquisition). Accordingly, the historical financial statements prior to November
21, 1996 are those of Old Newgold. There were no assets or liabilities acquired
in this transaction and there is no impact on the statement of operations.
NOTE 2 - GOING CONCERN
These financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis. During
the years ended January 31, 2006 and 2005 and the period from January 1, 1995 to
January 31, 2006, Newgold incurred net losses of approximately $2,645,231,
$1,278,140 and $18,088,740, respectively. In addition, Newgold had a total
shareholders' deficit of $2,960,365 and was in the development stage since
inception and through January 31, 2006. The Company's ability to continue as a
going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate profitable operations in
the future and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and
repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come
due. The outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with any certainty at this
time. Since inception, the Company has satisfied its capital needs by issuing
equity securities.
Management plans to continue to provide for its capital needs during the year
ended January 31, 2006 by issuing equity securities or incurring additional debt
financing, with the proceeds to be used to re-establish mining operations at
Relief Canyon as well as improve its working capital position. These financial
statements do not include any adjustments to the amounts and classification of
assets and liabilities that may be necessary should the Company be unable to
continue as a going concern.
NOTE 3 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Development Stage Company
-------------------------
Effective January 1, 1995 (date of inception), the Company is considered a
development stage Company as defined in SFAS No. 7. The Company's development
stage activities consist of the development of several mining properties located
in Nevada. Sources of financing for these development stage activities have been
primarily debt and equity financing. The Company has, at the present time, not
paid any dividends and any dividends that may be paid in the future will depend
upon the financial requirements of the Company and other relevant factors.
F-15
Cash and Cash Equivalents
-------------------------
For the purpose of the statements of cash flows, the Company considers all
highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of three months or
less to be cash equivalents.
Restricted Cash
---------------
Restricted cash represents a certificate of deposit with Wells Fargo Bank to
serve as collateral for a reclamation bond with the Nevada Department of
Environmental Protection at the Relief Canyon Mine.
Marketable Securities Available for Sale
----------------------------------------
Investments in equity securities are classified as available-for-sale.
Securities classified as available for sale are marked to market at each period
end. Changes in value on such securities are recorded as a component of Other
comprehensive income (loss). If declines in value are deemed other than
temporary, losses are reflected in Net income (loss).
Property and Equipment
----------------------
Depreciation, depletion and amortization of mining properties, mine development
costs and major plant facilities will be computed principally by the
units-of-production method based on estimated proven and probable ore reserves.
Proven and probable ore reserves reflect estimated quantities of ore which can
be economically recovered in the future from known mineral deposits. Such
estimates are based on current and projected costs and prices. Other equipment
is depreciated using the straight-line method principally over the estimated
useful life of seven years.
Deferred Reclamation Costs
--------------------------
In August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 143, "Accounting for
Asset Retirement Obligations," which established a uniform methodology for
accounting for estimated reclamation and abandonment costs. The statement was
adopted February 1, 2003. The reclamation costs will be allocated to expense
over the life of the related assets and will be adjusted for changes resulting
from the passage of time and revisions to either the timing or amount of the
original present value estimate.
Prior to adoption of SFAS No. 143, estimated future reclamation costs were based
principally on legal and regulatory requirements. Such costs related to active
mines were accrued and charged over the expected operating lives of the mines
using the UOP method based on proven and probable reserves. Future remediation
costs for inactive mines were accrued based on management's best estimate at the
end of each period of the undiscounted costs expected to be incurred at a site.
Such cost estimates included, where applicable, ongoing care, maintenance and
monitoring costs. Changes in estimates at inactive mines were reflected in
earnings in the period an estimate was revised.
Exploration Costs
-----------------
Exploration costs are expensed as incurred. All costs related to property
acquisitions are capitalized.
Mine Development Costs
----------------------
Mine development costs consist of all costs associated with bringing mines into
production, to develop new ore bodies and to develop mine areas substantially in
advance of current production.
F-16
The decision to develop a mine is based on assessment of the commercial
viability of the property and the availability of financing. Once the decision
to proceed to development is made, development and other expenditures relating
to the project will be deferred and carried at cost with the intention that
these will be depleted by charges against earnings from future mining
operations. No depreciation will be charged against the property until
commercial production commences. After a mine has been brought into commercial
production, any additional work on that property will be expensed as incurred,
except for large development programs, which will be deferred and depleted.
Financing Costs
---------------
Financing costs, including interest, are capitalized when they arise from
indebtedness incurred to finance development and construction activities on
properties that are not yet subject to depreciation or depletion. Financing
costs are charged against earnings from the time that mining operations
commence. Capitalization is based upon the actual interest on debt specifically
incurred or on the average borrowing rate for all other debt except where shares
are issued to fund the cost of the project.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
----------------------------------------
Assets other than mining properties and mineral rights are depreciated using the
straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. Capitalized development
costs are amortized on the units of production method considering proven and
probable reserves. Depreciation and depletion rates are subject to periodic
review to ensure that asset costs are amortized over their useful lives.
Impairment
----------
Mining projects and properties are reviewed for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may
not be recoverable. If estimated future cash flows expected to result from the
use of the mining project or property and its eventual disposition are less than
the carrying amount, impairment is recognized based on the estimated fair market
value of the mining project or property. Fair value generally is based on the
present value of estimated future net cash flows for each mining project or
property, calculated using estimates of proven and probable minable reserves,
geological resources, future prices, operating costs, capital requirements and
reclamation costs. A provision for impairment in valuation of development costs
and property, plant and equipment amounted to $800,000 for the year ended
January 31, 2002 and was charged to operating expense. After these adjustments
all development costs and property, plant and equipment have been fully written
off.
Management's estimates of future cash flows are subject to risks and
uncertainties. Therefore, it is reasonably possible that changes could occur
which may affect the recoverability of the Company's investment in mineral
properties.
Risks Associated with Gold Mining
---------------------------------
The business of gold mining is subject to certain types of risks, including
environmental hazards, industrial accidents, and theft. Prior to suspending
operations, the Company carried insurance against certain property damage loss
(including business interruption) and comprehensive general liability insurance.
While the Company maintained insurance consistent with industry practice, it is
not possible to insure against all risks associated with the mining business, or
prudent to assume that insurance will continue to be available at a reasonable
cost. The Company has not obtained environmental liability insurance because
such coverage is not considered by management to be cost effective. The Company
currently carries no insurance on any of its properties due to the current
status of the mine and the Company's current financial condition.
F-17
Reclamation Costs
-----------------
Reclamation costs and related accrued liabilities, which are based on the
Company's interpretation of current environmental and regulatory requirements,
are accrued and expensed, upon determination.
Based on current environmental regulations and known reclamation requirements,
management has included its best estimates of these obligations in its
reclamation accruals. However, it is reasonably possible that the Company's best
estimates of its ultimate reclamation liabilities could change as a result of
changes in regulations or cost estimates.
Valuation of Derivative Instruments
-----------------------------------
FAS No. 133 "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities "
requires bifurcation of embedded derivative instruments and measurement of their
fair value for accounting purposes. In determining the appropriate fair value,
the Company uses the Black Scholes model as a valuation technique. Derivative
liabilities are adjusted to reflect fair value at each period end, with any
increase or decrease in the fair value being recorded in results of operations
as Adjustments to Fair Value of Derivatives. In addition, the fair values of
freestanding derivative instruments such as warrants are valued using Black
Scholes models.
Revenue Recognition
-------------------
Revenues will be recognized when deliveries of gold are made, title and risk of
loss passes to the buyer and collectibility is reasonably assured. Deferred
revenue represents non-refundable cash received in exchange for royalties on net
smelter returns on the Relief Canyon Mine. Deferred revenue will be amortized to
earnings based on estimated production in accordance with the royalty agreement.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
-----------------------------------
The Company's financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents and
accounts payable - trade. The carrying amounts for these financial instruments
approximate fair value due to their short maturities.
Comprehensive Income
--------------------
The Company utilizes SFAS No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income." This
statement establishes standards for reporting comprehensive income and its
components in a financial statement. Comprehensive income as defined includes
all changes in equity (net assets) during a period from non-owner sources.
Examples of items to be included in comprehensive income, which are excluded
from net income, include foreign currency translation adjustments, minimum
pension liability adjustments, and unrealized gains and losses on
available-for-sale marketable securities. Comprehensive income is presented in
the Company's financial statements since the Company did have unrealized gain
(loss) of from changes in equity from available-for-sale marketable securities.
Income Taxes
------------
The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability method, which requires
the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future
tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements
or tax returns. Under this method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the
tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax bases of assets
and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each period end based
on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which
the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are
established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount
expected to be realized.
F-18
As of January 31, 2005, the deferred tax assets related to the Company's net
operating loss carry-forwards are fully reserved. Due to the provisions of
Internal Revenue Code Section 338, the Company may not have any net operating
loss carry-forwards available to offset financial statement or tax return
taxable income in future periods as a result of a change in control involving 50
percentage points or more of the issued and outstanding securities of the
Company.
Estimates
---------
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Loss Per Share
--------------
The Company utilizes SFAS No. 128, "Earnings per Share." Basic loss per share is
computed by dividing loss available to common shareholders by the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted loss per share is
computed similar to basic loss per share except that the denominator is
increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been
outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional
common shares were dilutive. Common equivalent shares are excluded from the
computation if their effect is anti-dilutive.
The following common stock equivalents were excluded from the calculation of
diluted loss per share since their effect would have been anti-dilutive:
2006 2005
--------------- ---------------
Warrants 20,774,583 11,724,583
Concentrations of Credit Risk
-----------------------------
Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of
credit risk consist of cash and cash equivalents. The Company places its cash
and cash equivalents with high credit, quality financial institutions. At times,
such cash and cash equivalents may be in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation insurance limit of $100,000. The Company has not experienced any
losses in such accounts and believes it is not exposed to any significant credit
risk on cash and cash equivalents.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
--------------------------------
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,"Inventory Costs". SFAS No. 151
amends the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight,
handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage) under the guidance in ARB No. 43,
Chapter 4,"Inventory Pricing". Paragraph 5 of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, previously
stated that ". . . under some circumstances, items such as idle facility
expense, excessive spoilage, double freight, and rehandling costs may be so
abnormal as to require treatment as current period charges. . . ." This
Statement requires that those items be recognized as current-period charges
regardless of whether they meet the criterion of "so abnormal." In addition,
this Statement requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the
costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production
facilities. This statement is effective for inventory costs incurred during
fiscal years beginning after June 15,
F-19
2005. Management does not expect adoption of SFAS No. 151 to have a material
impact on the Company's financial statements.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 152,"Accounting for Real Estate
Time-Sharing Transactions". The FASB issued this Statement as a result of the
guidance provided in AICPA Statement of Position (SOP) 04-2,"Accounting for Real
Estate Time-Sharing Transactions". SOP 04-2 applies to all real estate
time-sharing transactions. Among other items, the SOP provides guidance on the
recording of credit losses and the treatment of selling costs, but does not
change the revenue recognition guidance in SFAS No. 66,"Accounting for Sales of
Real Estate", for real estate time-sharing transactions. SFAS No. 152 amends
Statement No. 66 to reference the guidance provided in SOP 04-2. SFAS No. 152
also amends SFAS No. 67, "Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of
Real Estate Projects", to state that SOP 04-2 provides the relevant guidance on
accounting for incidental operations and costs related to the sale of real
estate time-sharing transactions. SFAS No. 152 is effective for years beginning
after June 15, 2005, with restatements of previously issued financial statements
prohibited. This statement is not applicable to the Company.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153,"Exchanges of Nonmonetary
Assets," an amendment to Opinion No. 29,"Accounting for Nonmonetary
Transactions". Statement No. 153 eliminates certain differences in the guidance
in Opinion No. 29 as compared to the guidance contained in standards issued by
the International Accounting Standards Board. The amendment to Opinion No. 29
eliminates the fair value exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar
productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of
nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. Such an exchange has
commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to
change significantly as a result of the exchange. SFAS No. 153 is effective for
nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in periods beginning after June 15, 2005.
Earlier application is permitted for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in
periods beginning after December 16, 2004. Management does not expect adoption
of SFAS No. 153 to have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.
In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation ("FIN") No. 47, "Accounting
for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations". FIN No. 47 clarifies that the
term conditional asset retirement obligation as used in FASB Statement No. 143,
"Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations," refers to a legal obligation to
perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and (or) method of
settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the
control of the entity. The obligation to perform the asset retirement activity
is unconditional even though uncertainty exists about the timing and (or) method
of settlement. Uncertainty about the timing and/or method of settlement of a
conditional asset retirement obligation should be factored into the measurement
of the liability when sufficient information exists. This interpretation also
clarifies when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably
estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation. FIN No. 47 is
effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005
(December 31, 2005 for calendar-year companies). Retrospective application of
interim financial information is permitted but is not required. Management does
not expect adoption of FIN No. 47 to have a material impact on Newgold's
financial statements.
In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement of Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 154,
"Accounting Changes and Error Corrections" an amendment to Accounting Principles
Bulletin (APB) Opinion
F-20
No. 20, "Accounting Changes", and SFAS No. 3, "Reporting Accounting Changes in
Interim Financial Statements" though SFAS No. 154 carries forward the guidance
in APB No. 20 and SFAS No. 3 with respect to accounting for changes in
estimates, changes in reporting entity, and the correction of errors. SFAS No.
154 establishes new standards on accounting for changes in accounting
principles, whereby all such changes must be accounted for by retrospective
application to the financial statements of prior periods unless it is
impracticable to do so. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and
error corrections made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005, with
early adoption permitted for changes and corrections made in years beginning
after May 2005.
Effective for reporting periods beginning after April 29, 2004, the Emerging
Issues Task Force (EITF) released Issue 04-2, "Whether Mineral Rights are
Tangible or Intangible Assets." The consensus was that mineral rights acquired
on a business combination are tangible assets and should be recorded as a
separate component of property, plant and equipment either on the face of the
financial statements or in the notes. The Company will comply with the Issue in
the future as required.
Effective for reporting periods beginning after March 31, 2004, the EITF
released Issue No. 04-3, "Mining Assets: Impairment and Business Combinations."
The EITF reached consensus that an entity should include value beyond proven and
probable reserves in the value allocated to mining assets in a purchase price
allocation to the extent a market participant would include such value in
determining the fair market value of the asset. The EITF also reached consensus
that an entity should include the effects of anticipated changes in market
prices of minerals when determining the fair market value of mining assets in a
purchase price equation in a manner consistent with expectations of the
marketplace.
Effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2005, the EITF
released Issue No. 04-6, "Accounting For Stripping Costs Incurred During
Production In The Mining Industry." The EITF reached a consensus of accounting
for "stripping cost", the cost of removing overburden (material overlying a
mineral deposit that must be removed prior to mining) and waste materials,
during the production phase and determined that such costs are considered
variable production costs and thus should be included in the cost of inventory
produced during the period in which the stripping costs are incurred. The
consensus applies to only entities involved in finding and removing wasting
natural resources. As such, this statement is not applicable to the Company.
In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, "Accounting for Certain Hybrid
Financial Instruments", which amends SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivatives
Instruments and Hedging Activities" and SFAS No. 140, "Accounting for Transfers
and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities". SFAS No.
155 amends SFAS No. 133 to narrow the scope exception for interest-only and
principal-only strips on debt instruments to include only such strips
representing rights to receive a specified portion of the contractual interest
or principle cash flows. SFAS No. 155 also amends SFAS No. 140 to allow
qualifying special-purpose entities to hold a passive derivative financial
instrument pertaining to beneficial interests that itself is a derivative
instrument. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this new Standard but
believes that it will not have a material impact on the Company's financial
position, results of operations, or cash flows.
F-21
In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, "Accounting for Servicing of
Financial Assets" ("SFAS NO. 156"), which provides an approach to simplify
efforts to obtain hedge-like (offset) accounting. This Statement amends FASB
Statement No. 140, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets
and Extinguishments of Liabilities", with respect to the accounting for
separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. The Statement
(1) requires an entity to recognize a servicing asset or servicing liability
each time it undertakes an obligation to service a financial asset by entering
into a servicing contract in certain situations; (2) requires that a separately
recognized servicing asset or servicing liability be initially measured at fair
value, if practicable; (3) permits an entity to choose either the amortization
method or the fair value method for subsequent measurement for each class of
separately recognized servicing assets or servicing liabilities; (4) permits at
initial adoption a one-time reclassification of available-for-sale securities to
trading securities by an entity with recognized servicing rights, provided the
securities reclassified offset the entity's exposure to changes in the fair
value of the servicing assets or liabilities; and (5) requires separate
presentation of servicing assets and servicing liabilities subsequently measured
at fair value in the balance sheet and additional disclosures for all separately
recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. SFAS No. 156 is effective
for all separately recognized servicing assets and liabilities as of the
beginning of an entity's fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006, with
earlier adoption permitted in certain circumstances. The Statement also
describes the manner in which it should be initially applied. The Company does
not believe that SFAS No. 156 will have a material impact on its financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
NOTE 4 -MARKETABLE SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE
At January 31, 2006 and 2005 the Company held no marketable securities available
for sale. In October 2004 the Company sold all of its investment in marketable
securities. This resulted in net proceeds of $34,124 and a recognized loss of
sale of $281,063.
NOTE 5 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment at January 31, 2006 was recorded at $19,199 and consisted
of additional monitoring wells that were installed at the Relief Canyon Mine
during the year ended January 31, 2006. The Company had previously determined
that the value of its fixed assets at the Relief Canyon Mine were permanently
impaired and wrote off assets with a basis of $800,000. If the Company can
reestablish mining operations at Relief Canyon it is possible that some of these
assets could be utilized in such operations.
A summary of property, plant and equipment previously written off was as
follows:
` Machinery
& Development Capitalized
Buildings Equipment Costs Interest Total
--------- --------- ----------- ----------- --------
Relief Canyon Mine $ 215,510 $ 277,307 $ 261,742 $ 45,441 $800,000
All office furniture and equipment has been fully depreciated as of January 31,
2006.
F-22
NOTE 6 - NOTES PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTIES AND INDIVIDUALS
Unsecured notes payable to individuals and related parties consist of the
following at January 31, 2006:
Loans from officers:
Convertible notes payable $ 209,251
The notes bear interest at 8% per year.
In October 2004, the Company consolidated the amounts owed to the Chief
Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer referred to in Note 10
(excluding accrued interest payable) into new convertible notes payable
due September 30, 2005. The notes and any interest accrued on the new
notes are convertible into common shares of the Company at a conversion
price of $0.15 per share. On July 31, 2005 the Chief Executive Officer
converted his note payable and accrued interest payable on all of his
notes payable into 12,326,231 common shares of Newgold. In connection with
the loans, warrants to purchase 5,798,140 and 1,395,007 shares of common
stock have been issued to the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief
Financial Officer, respectively.
Term notes payable $ 24,844
The notes bear interest at 8% per year.
The notes are due October 31, 2006 and January 31, 2007. Newgold is not in
default with respect to these loans. In connection with the loans,
warrants to purchase 141,540 shares of common stock have been issued. The
warrants have been valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model
(see Note 8). The warrants were issued at $0.15 per share and expire in
five years from the date of issuance.
Loan from individual. $ 176,500
The note bears interest at 8% per year.
The note is currently due. The Company is in default with respect to this
loan.
Other non-interest bearing advances 47,039
-----------
Total notes payable to individuals and related parties $ 457,634
===========
Interest expense was $941,347, $614,672 and $2,409,037 for the years ended
January 31, 2006 and 2005, and the period from January 1, 1995 to January 31,
2006, respectively.
NOTE 7 - CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE
On January 27, 2006, Newgold entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the
"Purchase Agreement") and other agreements in connection with the private
placement of a convertible debenture, in the principal amount of $1,000,000 and
bearing interest at 8% per annum (the "Debenture"). The Debenture was funded
$600,000 on January 27, 2006, with additional fundings due as follows: $200,000
upon the filing of a resale registration statement with the SEC and $200,000
upon the registration statement being declared effective by the SEC. Of the
$600,000 funded on January 27, 2006, $77,500 was paid for various loan fees and
closing costs. The Debenture is due and payable on January 27, 2009 unless it is
converted into shares of Newgold Common Stock or is repaid prior to its
expiration date. The conversion rate is adjustable and at
F-23
any conversion date, will be the lower of $0.2626 per share or 95% of the Market
Conversion Price.
In conjunction with the Purchase Agreement, Newgold entered into an Investor
Registration Rights Agreement (the "Registration Rights Agreement"). The
Registration Rights Agreement requires Newgold to register at least 24,050,025
shares of our Common Stock to cover the conversion of the Debenture (assuming
conversion prices substantially below $0.2626) and 2,500,000 shares of our
Common Stock issuable upon conversion of warrants (the "Warrants") granted to
the Debenture holder. Newgold is required to keep this Registration Statement
effective until the Debenture has been fully converted, repaid, or becomes due
and the Warrants have been fully exercised or expire. Both the Debenture and the
Warrants are currently convertible or exercisable, respectively.
In conjunction with the Purchase Agreement, Newgold entered into a Security
Agreement (the "Security Agreement"). The Security Agreement creates a secured
interest in favor of the Debenture holder in our mining interest and assets in
the Relief Canyon Mine property. This security interest was created by
recordation of a Memorandum of Security Agreement filed in Pershing County,
Nevada on February 14, 2006. Consequently, should a default occur under the
Debenture, the Debenture holder could take over or sell all of our interests,
business and assets associated with the Relief Canyon Mine.
The transaction, to the extent that it is to be satisfied with common stock of
the Company, would normally be included as equity obligations. However, in the
instant case, due to the indeterminate number of shares which might be issued
under the embedded convertible note debt conversion feature, the Company is
required to record a liability for the fair value of the detachable warrants and
the embedded convertible feature of the note payable (included in the
liabilities as a "derivative liability").
The accompanying financial statements comply with current requirements relating
to warrants and embedded conversion features as described in FAS 133, EITF 98-5,
00-19, and 00-27, and APB 14 as follows:
o The Company allocated the proceeds received between convertible debt
and the detachable warrants based upon the relative fair market values
on the date the proceeds were received.
o Subsequent to the initial recording, the change in the fair value of
the detachable warrants, determined under the Black-Scholes option
pricing formula, and the change in the fair value of the embedded
derivative in the conversion feature of the convertible debentures are
recorded as adjustments to the liabilities at January 31, 2006.
o $37,418 of expense relating to the change in the fair value of the
Company's stock reflected in the change in the fair value of the
warrants and derivatives (noted above) is included as other income
(expense).
o Accreted interest of $2,740 as of January 31, 2006.
The following table summarizes the various components of the convertible notes
as of January 31, 2006:
F-24
Derivative liabilities $ 637,417
Convertible debenture 600,000
Unamortized discount (597,260)
Deferred financing costs (77,500)
----------------
Total convertible debt
and financing costs $ 562,657
================
NOTE 8 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Except for the advance royalty and rent payments noted below, the Company is not
obligated under any capital leases or non-cancelable operating lease with
initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one year as of January 31, 2005.
However, minimum annual royalty payments are required to retain the lease rights
to the Company's properties.
Relief Canyon Mine
------------------
The Company purchased the Relief Canyon Mine from J.D. Welsh Associates (Welsh)
in January 1995. The mine consisted of 39 claims and a lease for access to an
additional 800 acres contiguous to the claims. During 1997, the Company staked
an additional 402 claims. Subsequent to January 31, 1998, the Company reduced
the total claims to 50 (approximately 1,000 acres). The annual payment to
maintain these claims is $5,000. As part of the original purchase of Relief
Canyon Mine, Welsh assigned the lease from Santa Fe Gold Corporation (Santa Fe)
to the Company. The lease granted Santa Fe the sole right of approval of
transfer to any subsequent owner of the Relief Canyon Mine. Santa Fe had
accepted lease and minimum royalty payments from the Company, but has declined
to approve the transfer. Due to Welsh's inability to transfer the Santa Fe
lease, the original purchase price of $500,000 for Relief Canyon Mine was
reduced by $50,000 in 1996 to $450,000.
Subsequent to January 31, 1998, the lease was terminated by Santa Fe. Management
believes loss of the Santa Fe lease will have no material adverse affect on the
remaining operations of the mine operation or the financial position of the
Company.
During 1996, Repadre Capital Corporation ("Repadre") purchased for $500,000 a
net smelter return royalty (Repadre Royalty). Repadre was to receive a 1.5%
royalty from production at each of the Relief Canyon Mine and Mission Mines. In
July 1997, an additional $300,000 was paid by Repadre for an additional 1%
royalty from the Relief Canyon Mine. In October, 1997, when the Mission Mine
lease was terminated, Repadre exercised its option to transfer the Repadre
Royalty solely to the Relief Canyon Mine resulting in a total 4% royalty. The
total amount received of $800,000 has been recorded as deferred revenue in the
accompanying financial statements.
Crescent Red Caps Joint Venture
-------------------------------
Newgold is the owner of a 22.22% joint venture interest and is the operator of
the Crescent Red Caps Joint Venture ("Crescent Red Caps"). The remaining 77.78%
interest is held by ASDi LLC, a California limited liability company owned by A.
Scott Dockter, Chairman and CEO of Newgold. Additionally, Newgold, by making
expenditures over the next three years aggregating $2,700,000, will end up with
a 66.66% overall interest in the joint venture. Newgold will then have the
opportunity to purchase the remaining joint venture interest held by Mr. Dockter
based on the results of the exploration work contemplated by these additional
expenditures.
F-25
The Company acquired its 22.22% in the joint venture by issuing to ASDi LLC
2,500,000 shares of its restricted common stock and a warrant to purchase
2,500,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $0.40. The warrant has a term
of three years. The common stock was valued at $0.20 per share for a total of
$500,000. The fair market value of the warrants was calculated to be $359,522 as
determined by the methodology described in Note 9. The Company recorded this
investment as a loss form the joint venture of $859,522 for the year ended
January 31, 2006.
The properties are subject to two leases which include approximately 135
unpatented mining claims and cover approximately 2700 acres. All gold, silver
and other mineral production by Crescent Red Caps is subject to a 3% net smelter
return ("NSR") royalty payable to the lessors except for barite which is subject
to a 10% royalty on ore produced from claims covered by the leases.
Litigation
----------
On February 4, 2000, a complaint was filed against the Company by Sun G. Wong in
the Superior Court of Sacramento County, California (Case No. 00AS00690). In the
complaint, Mr. Wong claims that he was held liable as a guarantor of Newgold in
a claim brought by Don Christianson in a breach of contract action against
Newgold. Despite the fact that Newgold settled the action with Mr. Christianson
through the issuance of 350,000 shares of Newgold common stock, Mr. Wong,
nevertheless, paid $60,000 to a third party claiming to hold Mr. Christianson's
judgment pursuant to Mr. Wong's guaranty agreement. Similarly, Mr. Wong alleges
that he was held liable as a guarantor for a debt of $200,000 owed by Newgold to
Roger Primm with regard to money borrowed by Newgold. Mr. Primm filed suit
against the Company which was settled through the issuance of 300,000 shares of
Newgold common stock. Nevertheless, Mr. Wong alleges that he remains liable to a
third party claiming to hold Mr. Primm's judgment for up to $200,000 pursuant to
his guaranty of such debt of Mr. Primm.
On December 29, 2000, the superior court entered a default judgment against
Newgold in the amount of $400,553 with regard to the Christianson judgment and
an additional $212,500 in regard to the Primm judgment against Mr. Wong. The
Company believes that Mr. Wong was not obligated to pay any sums pursuant to his
guarantees with regard to the Christianson and Primm judgments against Newgold
and, as a result, Mr. Wong should not have any recourse against the Company for
reimbursement. Should Mr. Wong seek to assert these judgments against the
Company, the Company cannot predict the outcome of any such action or the amount
of expenses that would be ultimately incurred in defending any such claims. The
Company is currently negotiating a settlement with Mr. Wong; however there is no
assurance that an acceptable settlement will be consummated.
The Company is involved in various other claims and legal actions arising in the
ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate
dispositions of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the
Company's financial position, results or operations or liquidity.
NOTE 9 - SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT
The following common stock transactions occurred during the period from January
1, 1995 to January 31, 2006:
F-26
Common Stock
------------
In January 1996 3,800,000 shares were issued for the purchase of rights to the
Washington Gulch property. The site was acquired from a former officer of the
Company. The property consists of a mill site located in Montana. The value of
the common stock issued on the property was recorded at the cash value of the
net monetary assets received which amounted to $181,000.
In June, 1996 the Company exchanged several "net profits interests" for shares
of common stock of the Company. A net profit interest is a royalty based on the
profit remaining after recapture of certain operating, capital and other costs
as defined by agreement. Net profits interests sold for $442,037 were
repurchased for 1,431,642 shares of common stock.
In October 1996 the Company issued 1,000,000 shares, valued at $1 per share, to
Casmyn Corp. as partial consideration for the repurchase of their 50% interest
in the Relief Canyon Mine.
In November 1996, the Company sold 100,000 shares in exchange for $100,000 in
cash to Repadre Capital Corporation.
In November 1996, Newgold, Inc. of Nevada (Old Newgold) was merged into
Warehouse Auto Centers, Inc. (WAC), a public company, which had previously filed
an involuntary petition under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in
the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of New York.
Pursuant to the plan of reorganization and merger (the Plan), (i) WAC which was
the surviving corporation for legal purposes, changed its name to Newgold, Inc.
(the Company), (ii) the outstanding shares of Old Newgold were converted into
the right to receive an aggregate of 12,000,000 shares or approximately 69% of
the post merger outstanding common stock of the Company, (iii) each outstanding
share of WAC was converted into the right to receive 1/65 share of the common
stock of the Company, for an aggregate of 51,034 shares or less than 1% of the
post merger outstanding common stock, (iv) unsecured trade debts and other
unsecured pre-petition liabilities were paid in full via the issuance of one
share of the Company's stock for each $42 of debt, for an aggregate of 63,374
shares or less than 1% of the post merger outstanding common stock, and (v) post
petition 1 share of stock for each $1 of debt, for an aggregate of 191,301
shares or approximately 1% of the post merger outstanding common stock. The Plan
also required an amendment to the Company's capital structure to increase the
number of shares authorized to 50,000,000 and to reduce the corresponding par
value to $.001.
In connection with the Plan, the Company raised $4,707,000 of cash through the
issuance of convertible debtor certificates. Shortly after confirmation of the
Plan, the debtor certificates were exchanged for 5,135,130 shares of common
stock (including 428,130 shares issued in lieu of paying cash for underwriter's
fees) of the Company representing approximately 29% of the post merger
outstanding common stock.
In the bankruptcy reorganization of WAC, all creditors were issued stock in
settlement of accounts payable. During fiscal 1998 post petition creditors had
the option of receiving cash in lieu of stock. Five creditors returned 25,242
shares to the Company, resulting in a charge to stockholders' deficit of
$25,242.
In May 1997, the Company issued 12,500 shares to a note holder in payment of a
$5,000 note, which had originally been issued in exchange for an agreement to
defer filing a judgment for collection of the $200,000 note.
F-27
The Company's stock was approved by NASD for trading on July 7, 1997. On May 27,
1997, the investors in the WAC bankruptcy reorganization, which had been
approved by the court on November 21, 1996, were issued a ten-percent bonus of
470,700 shares for the delay in trading. An additional 42,814 shares issued to
the investment bankers for a total of 513,514 shares. A total of $205,000 was
credited to stockholders' deficit for the transaction.
In October 1997 Repadre Capital Corp. exercised warrants to purchase 200,000
shares 1997 at $1.00 per share.
The employment contract for the corporate counsel stipulated the Company would
pay the rent for a law office. In March 1998, the Company issued 15,000 shares
in lieu of cash for six months rent. General and administrative expense was
charged $6,000 for the rent. The corporate counsel's office was subsequently
relocated to the Company's headquarters.
In April 1998, the Company closed a Regulation S offering for 5,480,000 shares
to raise $548,000 at $.10 per share. In connection with this offering 136,977
shares were issued as commission to brokers.
As an alternative to gold mining, the Board of Directors approved an exploration
program for a calcium bentonite mine located in southern California. In payment
of a purchase option on the mine, the Company issued 150,000 shares of stock to
the mine owner in May 1998. The Company charged $55,500 to exploration expense
for the option. After completing the due diligence on the mine property, the
Company abandoned development of the mine in August 1998.
On June 8, 1999 the Board of Directors approved a three-for-two stock split,
effected in the form of a 50% stock dividend, payable to stockholders of record
on June 10, 1999.
In January 2000 the Board of Directors, agreed that various creditors of the
Company would settle their debt through conversion of the debt into equity by
issuing stock at a price of $0.40 per share. In total, $1,282,271 of debt was
converted into 3,205,674 shares of stock. $477,977 or 1,194,943 shares were for
amounts owed to the Chairman of the Company; $328,733 or 821,833 shares were for
amounts owed to two directors and $475,561 or 1,188,898 shares were for amounts
owed to other shareholders.
In February 2000, the Company closed a private placement offering or 1,196,000
shares to raise $598,000 at $.50 per share. Additionally, a warrant was issued
with each share to purchase an additional share of common stock at $1 per share.
The warrants expired four years from the original date of closing. In connection
with this offering $60,000 were paid as commission to brokers in the form of
120,000 shares of common stock and were accounted for as offering costs. Due to
the registration of the shares not being completed, as a penalty the Company
issued an additional 239,200 to the investors in August 2000.
In April 2000, the Company issued 78,271 shares of common stock in exchange for
services related to an Internet interview and broadcast with the Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company..
F-28
In April 2000, a $200,000 note payable and a $250,000 judgment payable were
settled and paid off in full by a shareholder of the company. The total balances
due including interest and legal fees had grown to approximately $650,000 at the
time of settlement. The shareholder has received an additional 1,000,000 shares
of stock as reimbursement for the payment of these amounts on behalf of the
Company.
In October 2000 the Company issued 600,000 shares of common stock to an investor
for $67,000.
In February 2001 the Company issued 2,500,000 shares of common stock to an
investor for $150,000.
In January 2003 warrants to purchase 550,000 shares of common stock were
exercised at a price of $0.10 per share. The original exercise price was $1.00
however the investors and the Company renegotiated the exercise price to $0.10
per share.
In February 2003 warrants to purchase 200,000 shares of common stock were
exercised at a price of $0.10 per share. The original exercise price was $1.00
however the investor and the Company renegotiated the exercise price to $0.10
per share.
In January 2005 the Company issued 671,667 shares of commons stock at a price of
$0.15 per share to four investors for total proceeds of $100,750. Additionally,
671,667 warrants to purchase common stock at a price of $0.30 per share were
issued to the investors. The warrants expire three years from the date of
issuance.
In March 2005 a Special Meeting of Shareholders of Newgold was held for the
purpose of amending the Articles of Incorporation to affect an increase in the
authorized shares of common stock issuable to 250,000,000 shares. At the meeting
the proposal was approved by the shareholders, with a total of 31,392,611 shares
voting in favor of the amendment, 411,711 voting against the amendment and
10,207 shares abstained from voting.
In February 2005 Newgold issued 500,000 shares of common stock at a price of
$0.15 per share to an investor for total proceeds of $75,000. Additionally,
500,000 warrants to purchase common stock at a price of $0.30 per share were
issued to the investor. The warrants expire three years from the date of
issuance.
In April 2005 Newgold issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of
$0.25 per share to investors for total proceeds of $500,000. Additionally,
1,000,000 warrants to purchase common stock at a price of $0.50 per share were
issued to the investors. The warrants expire three years from the date of
issuance.
In July 2005 Newgold issued 12,326,231 shares of common stock at a price of
$0.15 per share to the Chief Executive Officer according to the terms of
existing notes payable to the officer. The issuance resulted in the repayment of
principal and interest totaling $1,848,935.
In January 2006 Newgold issued 2,500,000 shares of common stock at a price of
$0.20 per share to ASDi LLC, an entity controlled and managed by the Chief
Executive Officer in exchange for a 22.22% interest in a newly formed entity,
Crescent Red Caps Joint Venture (see Note 8).
F-29
Additionally, 2,500,000 warrants to purchase common stock at a price of $0.40
per share were issued to ASDi LLC. The warrants expire three years from the date
of issuance.
In January 2006 Newgold issued 2,500,000 shares of common stock at a price of
$0.20 per share to an investor for total proceeds of $500,000. Additionally,
2,500,000 warrants to purchase common stock at a price of $0.40 per share were
issued to the investor. The warrants expire three years from the date of
issuance.
Warrants
--------
Newgold has issued common stock warrants to officers of Newgold as part of
certain financing transactions (see Note 6). Newgold has also issued warrants as
part of the issuance of a convertible debt transaction (see Note 7). Newgold has
also issued warrants as part of the issuance of common stock (see this Note 9).
The fair market value of these warrants issued during the years ended January
31, 2006 and 2005 was determined to be $1,365,758 and $1,176,766, respectively,
and was calculated under the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the
following assumptions used:
2006 2005
--------------- ---------------
Expected life 3 - 4 years 5 years
Risk free interest rate 3.77%-4.49% 3.3%-3.71%
Volatility 134% 348%
Expected dividend yield None None
The fair value of these warrants is being amortized to interest expense over one
and three years, the original life of the loans. Total amortization expense for
the years ended January 31, 2006 and 2005 and the period from January 1, 1995 to
January 31, 2006 was approximately $777,642, $443,682 and $1,274,257,
respectively.
The following table presents warrant activity through January 31, 2006:
Number of Shares Weighted Average
Exercise Price
-------------------- ---------------------
Outstanding at January 31, 2000 - $ -
Granted 3,746,000 0.55
Exercised - -
Canceled or expired - -
-------------------- ---------------------
Outstanding at January 31, 2001 and 2002 3,746,000 0.55
Granted 452,463 0.15
Exercised (550,000) (0.10)
Canceled or expired - -
-------------------- ---------------------
Outstanding at January 31, 2003 3,648,463 0.43
Granted 1,265,766 0.15
Exercised (200,000) (0.10)
Canceled or expired (996,000) (1.00)
-------------------- ---------------------
Outstanding at January 31, 2004 3,718,229 0.15
Granted 8,006,354 0.16
Exercised - -
F-30
Number of Shares Weighted Average
Exercise Price
-------------------- ---------------------
Canceled or expired - -
-------------------- ---------------------
Outstanding at January 31, 2005 11,724,583 0.16
Granted 9,050,000 0.37
Exercised - -
Canceled or expired - -
-------------------- ---------------------
Outstanding at January 31, 2006 20,774,583 $ 0.25
==================== =====================
Exercisable at January 31, 2006 20,774,583 $ 0.25
Weighted average remaining contractual term 36 months
NOTE 10 - INCOME TAXES
As of January 31, 2006, the Company had net operating loss carry-forwards of
approximately $11,145,241 available to reduce future Federal taxable income
which, if not used, will expire at various dates through January 31, 2026. Due
to changes in the ownership of the Company, the utilization of these loss
carry-forwards may be subject to substantial annual limitations. Deferred tax
assets (liabilities) are comprised of the following at January 31, 2006:
Deferred Tax Assets
Net Operating Loss Carry-forwards $ 4,774,409
Contribution Carryover 16,029
Accrued Interest Payable 58,498
Accrued Payroll 237,651
Accrued Payroll Tax 162,720
AmortizationDiffBook/Tax 552,469
AccruedAccountsPayable 88,250
Capital Loss Difference 120,416
Stock compensation 6,722
Other 272
Less valuation allowance (5,595,336)
------------------
Total Deferred Tax Assets 422,100
------------------
Deferred Tax Liability
State Taxes (422,100)
------------------
Total Deferred Tax Liabilities (422,100)
------------------
NET DEFERRED TAX ASSETS $ -
==================
The net change in the total valuation allowance for the year ended January 31,
2006 was $816,412. The valuation allowance is provided to reduce the deferred
tax asset to a level which, more likely than not, will be realized.
The expected Federal income tax benefit, computed based on the Company's pre-tax
losses at January 31, 2006 and the statutory Federal income tax rate, is
reconciled to the actual tax benefit reflected in the accompanying financial
statements as follows:
2006 2005
------------ -------------
Statutory regular federal income benefit rate 34.00% 34.00%
State taxes 8.84% 8.84%
F-31
Change in valuation allowance (42.84)% (42.84)%
------------ -------------
Total 0.00% 0.00%
============ =============
Previous to June 21, 1996, the stockholder of the Company elected under Internal
Revenue Code Section 1362 to have the Company taxed as an S Corporation. As
such, all Federal and substantially all State income tax attributes passed
through the Company directly to the stockholder until that date. Additionally,
the Company has not filed any tax returns since 1996.
NOTE 11 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Loans from officers
-------------------
During prior periods, the Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Newgold
loaned Newgold an aggregate of $209,251. As of January 31, 2006 the net
principal balance owing to him was $209,251 and accrued interest payable was
$22,692. See Note 6.
During the 2006 fiscal year, the President of Newgold, Scott Dockter, had loaned
Newgold an aggregate of $5,000. As of January 31, 2006 the net principal balance
owing to him was $24,844 and accrued interest payable was $33,023. See Note 6.
In July 2005 a convertible promissory note with a balance of $1,402,742 and
additional accrued interest of $446,193 due to Mr. Dockter was converted into
12,326,231 shares of Newgold common stock. As of January 31, 2005, Mr. Dockter
had loaned Newgold a total of $24,845 and accrued interest of $32,023. In
addition to the outstanding note payable, Mr. Dockter has been issued Warrants
to purchase up to 12,157,909 shares of Newgold's Common Stock at exercise prices
ranging from $0.15/share to $0.40/share.
On January 25, 2006, Newgold entered into a joint venture with ASDi, LLC to
develop two Nevada mining properties known as the Red Caps Project and Crescent
Valley Project. The Red Caps consists of approximately 96 unpatented mining
claims covering 1900 acres and the Crescent Valley consists of approximately 39
unpatented mining claims covering 750 acres. The Red Caps and Crescent Valley
mining claims are currently owned by ASDi, LLC, which is owned and managed by A.
Scott Dockter, Chairman and CEO of Newgold. The joint venture will be operated
through a newly formed Nevada limited liability company called Crescent Red
Caps, LLC. The terms of the joint venture provide for ASDi to contribute the Red
Caps and Crescent Valley mining claims to the LLC in exchange for Newgold
issuing 2.5 million shares of its Common Stock to ASDi. Additionally, 2,500,000
warrants to purchase common stock at a price of $0.40 per share were issued to
ASDi LLC. The warrants expire three years from the date of issuance. Newgold
will initially own a 22.22% interest in the LLC and ASDi will hold a 77.78%
interest. By expending up to $1,350,000 on each project over the next three
years, Newgold can increase its interest in the LLC to 66.66%. Thereafter,
Newgold has the right to purchase the remaining interest in the LLC held by ASDi
at a price to be determined by the results of the exploration work conducted.
Newgold will be the Manager of the LLC. Accrued Payroll and Expenses Owed to
Officers As of January 31, 2006 Newgold owed the Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of Newgold $75,000 for back wages.
As of January 31, 2006 Newgold owed the Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of
Newgold $102,057 for back wages and $2,500 for accrued expenses.
NOTE 12 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
F-32
In March 2006 Newgold issued 500,000 shares of common stock at a price of $0.20
per share to an investor for total proceeds of $100,000. Additionally, 500,000
warrants to purchase common stock at a price of $0.40 per share were issued to
the investor. The warrants expire three years from the date of issuance.
In March 2006 $200,000 was funded per the terms of the Debenture referred to in
Note 6. Of the $200,000 funded $20,000 was paid for various loan fees and
closing costs. All of the original terms and conditions of the Debenture and
related documents remain unchanged.
ITEM 8. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
No changes or disagreements.
ITEM 8A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
-----------------------------------
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation
of management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the year
covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our principal executive
officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls
and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information
relating to us (including our consolidated subsidiary) that is required to be
included in our periodic reports.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
-----------------------------------------------------
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting..
ITEM 8B. OTHER INFORMATION
None
Newgold has not filed federal income tax returns since 1996. Management does not
believe this failure to file federal tax returns will have a material financial
impact on Newgold due to the fact that Newgold has reported limited revenues and
operating losses during this time period. However, certain penalties and fees
may be assessed against Newgold for the delinquent filing of these tax returns.
Certain states require the filing of annual state tax returns in order to
maintain a corporation's good standing in those states. Newgold has retained an
accountant to prepare these past corporate tax returns which are expected to be
completed and filed during the second quarter of this fiscal year.
F-33
PART III
ITEM 9. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS;
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
The following table sets forth information about the directors and executive
officers of Newgold together with the principal positions and offices with
Newgold held by each:
------------------ ----- ------------------------------------------------- ----------------
NAME OF PERSON AGE POSITION AND OFFICE PRESENTLY HELD WITH NEWGOLD DIRECTOR SINCE
------------------ ----- ------------------------------------------------- ----------------
A. Scott Dockter 50 Chairman, CEO and President 1996
------------------ ----- ------------------------------------------------- ----------------
James W. Kluber 55 Chief Financial Officer and Director 2000
------------------ ----- ------------------------------------------------- ----------------
Biographical information for directors and executive officers:
--------------------------------------------------------------
A. SCOTT DOCKTER has been the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman since
December 2000, assuming such positions upon the resignation of James Cutburth.
Mr. Dockter had previously served as Newgold's CEO and President from November
1996 until February 2000 at which time Mr. Cutburth assumed such positions. Mr.
Dockter has been self-employed in the business sector since 1978 and currently
operates his business through ASD CORP and ASDi LLC. He has held a Class A
General Engineering and Contracting License for more than 20 years, operating
his businesses in California, Nevada and Montana, specializing in earth moving,
mining, pipeline projects, structures, dams, industrial parks and sub divisions.
Mr. Dockter has directed his companies in large landfill operations, underground
concrete structures projects, large excavations, reclamation projects and
others, which include state and local municipal projects. Mr. Dockter has also
been a real estate developer, worked on oil & gas projects and has spent 15
years in the mining industry. He has personally owned mines, operated mines,
constructed mine infrastructures (physical, production and process) and produced
precious metals. In January 2002, Mr. Dockter pleaded guilty to one felony
charge of environmental pollution and was sentenced to 5 months in a Federal
detention camp and a $5,000 fine. The charge related to the release in the
summer 1997 of a hazardous material (asbestos) at a demolition project owned by
Riverfront Development Corporation, a corporation founded by Mr. Dockter of
which he was then the CEO.
JAMES W. KLUBER has been the Chief Financial Officer of Newgold since February
2000 and a director since April 2000. Mr. Kluber has served as a senior
financial consultant in a variety of service and technology environments with
special focus on high growth companies and restructuring operations. He has
successfully raised capital for companies in a variety of markets, utilizing
public and private equity as well as securitized and unsecured debt to
accomplish funding requirements. From December 2001 to September 2003, Mr.
Kluber was the
34
CFO and until October 2005 was the interim CFO of NutraCea a public company
involved in the development and distribution of products based on the use of
stabilized rice bran. Additionally, he was the Senior Vice President and CFO
from 1996 to 1999 for RealPage, Inc. a leading provider of software and services
to the real estate industry. From 1993 to 1996 he served as Vice President of
Financial Operations for two public companies sponsored by Security Capital
Group, ProLogis Trust and Archstone Communities.
The current Directors will serve and hold office until the next annual
stockholders' meeting or until their respective successors have been duly
elected and qualified. Newgold's executive officers are appointed by the Board
of Directors and serve at the discretion of the Board.
FAMILY RELATIONSHIPS
There are no family relationships between any director or executive officer.
BOARD MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES
Our Board of Directors held six meetings during the fiscal year ended January
31, 2006 and acted by unanimous written consent on two occasions. The Board does
not currently have an Audit, Executive or Compensation Committee. At the current
time, the entire Board of Directors acts as Newgold's audit committee. In
addition, we do not have an audit committee financial expert because it does not
currently have a designated audit committee. We have only two directors, both of
whom are also officers of Newgold. We plan to appoint additional directors to
our Board and appoint an independent audit committee during the current year.
SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our
executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of Newgold's
Common Stock to file reports of ownership on Form 3 and changes in ownership on
Form 4 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Such executive
officers, directors and 10% stockholders are also required by SEC rules to
furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely upon
its review of copies of such forms received by it, or on written representations
from certain reporting persons that no other filings were required for such
persons, Newgold believes that, during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006,
its executive officers and directors and 10% stockholders complied with all
applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements except as follows:
Mr. Dockter sold 6,316,414 shares of Newgold Common Stock on September 1, 2005.
He did not file a Form 4 regarding this disposition until September 16, 2005.
Mr. Dockter, through an affiliated entity, acquired 2.5 million shares of
Newgold Common Stock and options to purchase 2.5 million shares of Newgold
Common Stock on January 25, 2006. He did not file a Form 4 timely but reported
this transaction on a Form 5 which was timely filed on February 14, 2006.
35
ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth the compensation of Newgold's Chief Executive
Officer during the last three complete fiscal years and each officer who
received annual compensation in excess of $100,000 during the last completed
fiscal year.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
For Years Ended January 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
Annual Compensation Long Term Compensation
----------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------
Awards Payout
---------------------------- ----------
Securities
Restricted Underlying LTIP All Other
Fiscal Bonus Other Annual Stock Options Payout Compensation
Year Salary ($) Compensation ($) Award(s)($) (#) ($) ($)
-------- -------------- ------- ------------------ ------------- -------------- ---------- --------------
Scott Dockter 2006 $ 180,000(1) -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0-
(CEO) 2005 $ 60,000 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0-
2004 $ 60,000(1) -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0-
James Kluber 2006 $ 160,000(2) -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- 6,000(3)
(CFO) 2005 $ 140,000(2) -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- 6,000(3)
2004 $ 140,000(2) -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- 6,000(3)
-----------------------
(1) Of the amounts shown, the following amounts have been deferred: 2006 -
$75,000. The deferred amount for 2004 was converted to a convertible
note payable on October 1, 2004.
(2) Of the amounts shown, the following amounts have been deferred: 2006 -
$11,057; 2005 - $93,500. The deferred amount for 2004 was converted to
a convertible note payable on October 1, 2004.
(3) Amount reflects a home office allowance
STOCK OPTION PLAN
We do not have a formal stock option plan currently in place. Options to date
have been granted on an individual basis pursuant to individual option
agreements. We expect to adopt a formal stock option plan during this current
fiscal year.
Options/SAR Grants in Last Fiscal Year
--------------------------------------
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to options or
SAR grants of
36
Common Stock during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006 to the Named
Executive Officers.
------------------------- ------------------------- ----------------------- ------------------ ----------------------
Name Number of Securities Percent of Total Exercise or Base Expiration Date
Underlying Options Options Granted to Price
Granted Employees at January ($ Per Share)
31, 2006
------------------------- ------------------------- ----------------------- ------------------ ----------------------
None
------------------------- ------------------------- ----------------------- ------------------ ----------------------
Aggregated Option/SAR Exercises Year-End Table.
-----------------------------------------------
During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006, none of the Named Executive
Officers had exercised any options/SARs issued by Newgold. The following table
sets forth information regarding the stock options held as of January 31, 2006
by the Named Executive Officers.
----------------------------- ------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------
Name Number of Securities Underlying Value of Unexercised
Unexercised Options at In-the-Money Options at
January 31, 2006 January 31, 2006
----------------------------- ------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------
Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable
----------------------------- --------------------- --------------------- -------------------- ----------------------
None
----------------------------- --------------------- --------------------- -------------------- ----------------------
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS
On February 1, 2006, we entered into an employment agreement with A. Scott
Dockter to serve as our chief executive officer for Newgold, Inc. Pursuant to
the agreement, Mr. Dockter will receive an annual salary of $180,000 and an
automobile expense allowance of $1,000 per month. In addition, Mr. Dockter will
be eligible to participate in any discretionary bonuses or employee stock option
plans which may be adopted in the future. The employment agreement has a term of
three years.
On February 1, 2006, we entered into an employment agreement with James W.
Kluber to serve as our chief financial officer of Newgold, Inc. Pursuant to the
agreement, Mr. Kluber will receive an annual salary of $160,000 and an office
expense allowance of $500 per month. In addition, Mr. Kluber will be eligible to
participate in any future discretionary bonuses or employee stock option plans
which may be adopted in the future. The employment agreement has a term of three
years.
EMPLOYEE PENSION, PROFIT SHARING OR OTHER RETIREMENT PLANS
We do not have a defined benefit pension plan or profit sharing or other
retirement plan.
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
Our directors are also officers of Newgold and do not receive any additional
compensation for their services as members of the Board of Directors.
37
We intend to appoint additional directors in the future who may or may not be
employees. For the non-employee directors, we may seek stockholder approval for
a "Director Option Plan" which would serve as the compensation plan for such
directors. No specific plan had been developed as of the end of the last fiscal
year.
CODE OF ETHICS
We have adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to the principal executive
officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing
similar functions.
LIMITATION OF LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION MATTERS
Newgold's bylaws provide that it will indemnify its officers and directors,
employees and agents and former officers, directors, employees and agents unless
their conduct is finally adjudged as grossly negligent or to be willful
misconduct. This indemnification includes expenses (including attorneys' fees),
judgments, fines, and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably
incurred by these individuals in connection with such action, suit, or
proceeding, including any appeal thereof, subject to the qualifications
contained in Delaware law as it now exists. Expenses (including attorneys' fees)
incurred in defending a civil or criminal action, suit, or proceeding will be
paid by Newgold in advance of the final disposition of such action, suit, or
proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of the director,
officer, employee or agent to repay such amount, unless it shall ultimately be
determined that he or she is entitled to be indemnified by Newgold as authorized
in the bylaws. This indemnification will continue as to a person who has ceased
to be a director, officer, employee or agent, and will benefit their heirs,
executors, and administrators. These indemnification rights are not deemed
exclusive of any other rights to which any such person may otherwise be entitled
apart from the bylaws. Delaware law generally provides that a corporation shall
have the power to indemnify persons if they acted in good faith in a manner
reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the
corporation and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no
reasonable cause to believe the conduct was unlawful. In the event any such
person is judged liable for negligence or misconduct, this indemnification will
apply only if approved by the court in which the action was pending. Any other
indemnification shall be made only after the determination by Newgold's Board of
Directors (excluding any directors who were party to such action), by
independent legal counsel in a written opinion, or by a majority vote of
stockholders (excluding any stockholders who were parties to such action) to
provide such indemnification.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of
1933 (the "1933Act") may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling
persons of Newgold pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, Newgold
has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission
such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the 1933 Act and
is, therefore, enforceable.
38
ITEM 11. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The following table sets forth the number of shares of Newgold's Common Stock
beneficially owned as of January 31, 2006 by, (i) each executive officer and
director of Newgold; (ii) all executive officers and directors of Newgold as a
group; and (iii) owners of more than 5% of Newgold's Common Stock.
--------------------------------------- ----------------------- ------------------------ -------------------
NAME AND ADDRESS OF BENEFICIAL OWNER POSITION NUMBER OF SHARES PERCENT
BENEFICIALLY OWNED
--------------------------------------- ----------------------- ------------------------ -------------------
OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
--------------------------------------- ----------------------- ------------------------ -------------------
A. Scott Dockter Chairman and CEO 23,021,306(1) 29%
400 Capitol Mall, Suite 900
Sacramento, CA 95814
--------------------------------------- ----------------------- ------------------------ -------------------
James Kluber CFO, Executive Vice 1,395,007(2) 2%
327 Copperstone Trail President, and
Coppell, TX 75019 Secretary
--------------------------------------- ----------------------- ------------------------ -------------------
All officers and directors as a group 24,416,313 31%
(2 individuals)
--------------------------------------- ----------------------- ------------------------ -------------------
STOCKHOLDERS OWNING 5% OR MORE
--------------------------------------- ----------------------- ------------------------ -------------------
City Natural Resources 5,000,000 (3) 7.1%
High Yield Trust
Mansfield House
1 Southhampton Street
London , England WC2R OLR
--------------------------------------- ----------------------- ------------------------ -------------------
(1) Amount includes 12,157,909 shares issuable under stock warrants
exercisable within 60 days of January 31, 2006.
(2) Amount represents 1,395,007 shares issuable under stock warrants
exercisable within 60 days of January 31, 2006. Amount excludes shares
issuable pursuant to a convertible promissory note in the principal
amount of $209,251.
(3) Amount includes 2,500,000 shares issuable under stock warrants
exercisable within 60 days of January 31, 2006.
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
----------------------------- ------------------------------ --------------------------- ----------------------------
Plan Category Number of securities to be Weighted-average exercise Number of securities
issued upon exercise of price of outstanding remaining available for
outstanding options, options, warrants and future issuance under
warrants and rights right equity compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column
(a))
(a) (b) (c)
----------------------------- ------------------------------ --------------------------- ----------------------------
Equity compensation plans
approved by security holders N/A
----------------------------- ------------------------------ --------------------------- ----------------------------
39
----------------------------- ------------------------------ --------------------------- ----------------------------
Equity compensation plans
not approved by security N/A
holders
----------------------------- ------------------------------ --------------------------- ----------------------------
Total N/A
----------------------------- ------------------------------ --------------------------- ----------------------------
ITEM 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTION
During the 2006 fiscal year, the President of Newgold, Scott Dockter, had loaned
Newgold an aggregate of $5,000. In July 2005 a convertible promissory note with
a balance of $1,402,742 and additional accrued interest of $446,193 due to Mr.
Dockter was converted into 12,326,231 shares of Newgold common stock. As of
January 31, 2005, Mr. Dockter had loaned Newgold a total of $24,845 and accrued
interest of $32,023. In addition to the outstanding note payable, Mr. Dockter
has been issued Warrants to purchase up to 12,157,909 shares of Newgold's Common
Stock at exercise prices ranging from $0.15/share to $0.40/share.
On January 25, 2006, Newgold entered into a joint venture with ASDi, LLC to
develop two Nevada mining properties known as the Red Caps Project and Crescent
Valley Project. The Red Caps consists of approximately 96 unpatented mining
claims covering 1900 acres and the Crescent Valley consists of approximately 39
unpatented mining claims covering 750 acres. The Red Caps and Crescent Valley
mining claims are currently owned by ASDi, LLC, which is owned and managed by A.
Scott Dockter, Chairman and CEO of Newgold. The joint venture will be operated
through a newly formed Nevada limited liability company called Crescent Red
Caps, LLC. The terms of the joint venture provide for ASDi to contribute the Red
Caps and Crescent Valley mining claims to the LLC in exchange for Newgold
issuing 2.5 million shares of its Common Stock to ASDi. Newgold will initially
own a 22.22% interest in the LLC and ASDi will hold a 77.78% interest. By
expending up to $1,350,000 on each project over the next three years, Newgold
can increase its interest in the LLC to 66.66%. Thereafter, Newgold has the
right to purchase the remaining interest in the LLC held by ASDi at a price to
be determined by the results of the exploration work conducted. Newgold will be
the Manager of the LLC.
Should a transaction, proposed transaction, or series of transactions involve
one of our officers or directors or a related entity or an affiliate of a
related entity, or holders of stock representing 5% or more of the voting power
(a "related entity") of our then outstanding voting stock, the transactions must
be approved by the unanimous consent of our board of directors. In the event a
member of the board of directors is a related party, that member will abstain
from the vote.
40
ITEM 13. EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT
----------- ----------------------
2.1(4) Plan of Reorganization and Merger Agreement, dated as of July
23, 1999, between the Registrant and Business Web, Inc.
2.2(6) First Amendment to Plan of Reorganization and Merger
Agreement, dated as of October 31, 1999, between the
Registrant and Business Web, Inc.
2.3(7) Termination Agreement, dated as of December 27, 1999, between
the Registrant and Business Web, Inc.
3.1(2) Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant.
3.2(1) Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of
the Registrant.
3.3(2) Bylaws of the Registrant
4.1(9) Convertible Debenture
4.2.1(9) Form of Warrant - $0.20 exercise price
4.2.2(9) Form of Warrant - $0.30 exercise price
10.1(3) Promissory Note between Newgold and A. Scott Dockter, dated
April 2, 1997, for the principal amount of $100,000.
10.2(3) Promissory Note between Newgold and A. Scott Dockter, dated
April 17, 1997, for the principal amount of $50,000.
10.3(3) Promissory Note between Newgold and A. Scott Dockter, dated
April 30, 1997, for the principal amount of $20,000.
10.4(3) Promissory Note between Newgold and A. Scott Dockter, dated
May 30, 1997, for the principal amount of $35,000
10.5(5) Promissory Note between Newgold and A. Scott Dockter, dated
December 24, 1998, for the principal amount of $24,000.
10.6(7) Warrant to Purchase shares of Common Stock of Business Web,
Inc.
10.7(9) Securities Purchase Agreement dated January 27, 2006 by and
among Newgold and the investor named therein.
10.8(9) Registration Rights Agreement dated January 27, 2006 by and
among Newgold and the investor named therein.
10.9(10) Joint Venture Agreement dated January 25, 2006 between
Newgold, Inc. and ASDi, LLC
10.10(10) Crescent Red Caps LLC - Operating Agreement
10.11(11) Employment Agreement for A. Scott Dockter dated February 1,
2006
10.12(11) Employment Agreement for James W. Kluber dated February 1,
2006
41
14(8) Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.
31.1 Certification by CEO pursuant to Sections 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2 Certification by CFO pursuant to Sections 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32 Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
--------------------
(1) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the fiscal year ended January 31, 1996 filed with the
omission on January 22, 1997.
(2) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement on
Form SB-2 (File No. 33-49920) filed with the Commission on October 14,
1993.
(3) Incorporated by reference to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
for the fiscal year ended January 31, 1997 filed with the Commission on
June 30, 1997.
(4) Incorporated by reference to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
for the fiscal year ended January 31, 1999 filed with the Commission on
October 1, 1999.
(5) Incorporated by reference to Registrant's First Amendment to Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended January 31, 1999, filed
with the Commission on October 20, 1999.
(6) Incorporated by reference to Registrant's Form 8-K filed with the
Commission on November 2, 1999.
(7) Incorporated by reference to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2000 filed with the Commission on
May 17, 2000.
(8) Incorporated by reference to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
for the fiscal year ended January 31 2005 filed with the Commission on
May 2, 2005
(9) Incorporated by reference to Registrant's Form 8-K filed with the
Commission on February 2, 2006
(10) Incorporated by reference to Registrant's Form 8-K/A filed with
Commission on February 27, 2006.
(11) Incorporated by reference to Registrant's SB-2 Registration Statement
filed with the Commission on March 6, 2006.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
During Newgold's fiscal years ended January 31, 2005 and January 31, 2006,
Newgold was billed the following aggregate fees by Singer Lewak Greenbaum &
Goldstein LLP ("SLGG").
Audit Fees.
-----------
The aggregate fees billed by SLGG to Newgold for professional services rendered
for the audit of Newgold's financial statements for the fiscal year, for reviews
of the financial statements included in Newgold's Forms 10-QSB for the fiscal
year, and for services provided by SLGG in connection with statutory or
regulatory filings for the fiscal year, were $25,000 for the fiscal year ended
January 31, 2005 and $59,327 for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006.
42
All Other Fees.
---------------
No fees were billed by SLGG to Newgold for products and services rendered for
fiscal years 2005. In fiscal 2006, SLGG billed $24,598 for Audit-Related Fees,
while no fees were billed for the Tax Fees or other accounting fees.
As stated elsewhere in this report, Newgold did not have a separate Audit
Committee during the fiscal year ended 2006. Consequently, all of the services
performed by SLGG during fiscal year 2006 were reviewed and approved by
Newgold's Board of Directors, which concluded that the provision of the
non-audit services described above were compatible with maintaining the
accountant's independence.
PRE-APPROVED POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
Prior to retaining SLGG to provide services in any fiscal year, the Board of
Directors first reviews and approves SLGG's fee proposal and engagement letter.
In the fee proposal, each category of services (Audit, Audit Related, Tax and
All Other) is broken down into subcategories that describe the nature of the
services to be rendered, and the fees for such services. Newgold's pre-approval
policy provides that the Board of Directors must specifically pre-approve any
engagement of SLGG for services outside the scope of the fee proposal and
engagement letter.
43
SIGNATURES
In accordance with Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Exchange Act, the
registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
NEWGOLD, INC.
Date: May 15, 2006 By /s/ A. SCOTT DOCKTER
---------------------------------------
A. Scott Dockter
President and Chief Executive Officer
In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below
by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and
on the dates indicated.
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
/s/ A. SCOTT DOCKTER
-------------------------
A. Scott Dockter Chairman of the Board, President May 15, 2006
and Chief Executive Officer
/s/ JAMES W. KLUBER
-------------------------
James W. Kluber Director, Secretary and
Chief Financial Officer May 15, 2006
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
44