Florida |
000-49687 |
33-0961490 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation) |
(Commission File Number) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
––––––––––––––––
Copies to:
Richard I. Anslow, Esq.
Kristina L. Trauger, Esq.
Yarona Liang, Esq.
Anslow + Jaclin, LLP
195 Route 9 South, Suite 204
Manalapan, New Jersey 07726
(732) 409-1212 |
–––––––––––––––– |
Item 4.01 |
Changes in Registrant's Certifying Accountant |
(a) |
(i) |
Paritz was terminated as our independent registered public accounting firm effective on September 23, 2009. |
(ii) |
For the two most recent fiscal years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, Paritz’s report on the financial statements did not contain any adverse opinions or disclaimers of opinion, and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles, other than for a going concern. | |
|
(iii) |
The termination of Paritz was approved by our Board of Directors. |
(iv) |
We and Paritz did not have any disagreements with regard to any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure for the audited financials for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, and subsequent interim period from October 1, 2008 through the date of dismissal,
which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Paritz, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with its reports. | |
(v) |
During our fiscal years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, and subsequent interim period from October 1, 2008 through the date of dismissal, we did not experience any reportable events. |
(b) |
We intend to engage a new independent registered public accounting firm and will disclose the appointment on a Form 8K within four (4) business days of such appointment. | |
(i) |
We have not consulted with any other auditor regarding the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, completed or proposed, the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on our financial statements or a reportable event, nor did we consult with any other auditor regarding any disagreements with its prior
auditor on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of the prior auditor, would have caused it to make a reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with its reports. | |
(ii) |
We did not have any disagreements with Paritz and therefore did not discuss any past disagreements with Paritz. | |
(c) |
We have requested Paritz to furnish us with a letter addressed to the SEC stating whether it agrees with the statements made by us regarding Paritz. Attached hereto as Exhibit 16.1 is a copy of Paritz’s letter to the SEC dated September 23, 2009. |
Exhibits |
16.1 |
Letter dated September 23, 2009, Paritz & Company, P.A. regarding their concurrence with the statements made by the Registrant in this Current Report. |
Dated: September 25, 2009 |
China Agro Sciences Corp., a Florida corporation | ||
/s/ Zhengquan Wang | |||
Zhengquan Wang | |||
Chief Executive Officer | |||