Blueprint
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM 6-K
REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE
ISSUER
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934
For
the month of August,
2018
PRUDENTIAL PUBLIC LIMITED
COMPANY
(Translation of registrant's name into
English)
LAURENCE POUNTNEY HILL,
LONDON, EC4R 0HH, ENGLAND
(Address of
principal executive offices)
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports
under
cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
Form
20-F X
Form 40-F
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant by furnishing the
information
contained in this
Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission
pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.
Yes
No X
If
"Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant
in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b):
82-
NEWS RELEASE
08
August 2018
PRUDENTIAL PLC HALF YEAR 2018 RESULTS
PRUDENTIAL DELIVERS HIGH-QUALITY PROFITABLE GROWTH
Performance highlights on a constant (and actual) exchange rate
basis
●
Group IFRS
operating profit1 of £2,405
million, up 9 per cent2 (up 2 per
cent3)
●
Asia new business
profit4
of £1,122 million, up 11 per cent2 (up 3 per
cent3),
IFRS operating profit1 of £1,016
million, up 14 per cent2 (up 7 per
cent3)
and underlying free surplus generation5 of £590
million, up 14 per cent2 (up 7 per
cent3)
●
US variable
annuity separate account assets up 10 per cent2 (up 9 per
cent3)
from 30 June 2017 leading to a 13 per cent2 increase (3 per
cent3
increase) in fee income
●
M&G asset
management first half external net inflows of £3.5 billion
(2017: £7.2 billion), PruFund net inflows of £4.4 billion
(2017: £4.3 billion)
●
Planned demerger
of M&G Prudential from the Group is progressing
well
●
Group Solvency II
surplus6,7 estimated at
£14.4 billion; equivalent to a ratio of 209 per cent (31
December 2017: £13.3 billion, 202 per cent)
●
2018 first interim
dividend of 15.67 pence per share, up 8 per cent3
Mike
Wells, Group Chief Executive, said: “We have made a good
start to 2018, delivering high-quality, profitable growth. At the
same time, we are taking the steps needed for the demerger of
M&G Prudential from the Group, which we announced in March,
alongside implementing M&G Prudential’s merger and
transformation programme, which remains on track to meet its
objectives.
“The
Group’s performance has again been led by Asia, contributing
to an overall increase in IFRS operating profit1 of 9 per
cent2,
growth in underlying free surplus generation5 of 6 per
cent2,
and an increase in new business profit4 of 13 per
cent2
despite a lower level of APE sales.
“In Asia we
have delivered double-digit growth across our key metrics of new
business profit4, up 11 per
cent2,
IFRS operating profit1, up 14 per
cent2,
and underlying free surplus generation, also up 14 per
cent2.
Our growth continues to be high quality with protection new
business profit4 growing by 19 per
cent2,
IFRS insurance margin8 up 17 per
cent2 and
renewal insurance premiums9 up 17 per
cent2.
Our Asia asset manager, Eastspring, has increased IFRS operating
profit1
by 13 per cent2. Our broad-based
portfolio of life insurance and asset management businesses,
high-quality products and multi-channel strategy ensure that we
continue to benefit from the growing customer demand in Asia for
the wealth and health products and services that we
provide.
“In our US
life business, Jackson, variable annuity separate account assets
were 10 per cent2 higher than at 30
June 2017, leading to a rise in fee income as we continued to meet
the need of Americans for retirement income. In the UK and Europe,
continued demand for M&G Prudential’s differentiated
product propositions has resulted in third-party net inflows of
£3.5 billion for our asset management business, M&G, and
net inflows of £4.4 billion in PruFund-related
business.
“Our planned
demerger of M&G Prudential from the Group, which will result in
two separately listed companies, each with its own distinct
investment prospects, demonstrates our commitment to creating
shareholder value. We have mobilised our internal teams for
delivery, positively engaged with external stakeholders and we are
making good progress.
“Each of our
businesses is built around strong and growing customer needs, and
we continue to target growth in high-quality, recurring-premium
health and protection and fee business. I am confident that, as we
create new and better products, build our distribution channels and
improve all our capabilities, we are well placed to continue to
generate profitable growth for our
shareholders.”
Summary financials
|
2018 £m
Half year
|
2017 £m
Half year
|
Change on
AER basis
|
Change on
CER basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
IFRS operating profit based on longer-term investment
returns
|
2,405
|
2,358
|
2%
|
9%
|
Underlying free surplus
generated5,10
|
1,863
|
1,840
|
1%
|
6%
|
Life new business profit4
|
1,767
|
1,689
|
5%
|
13%
|
IFRS profit after tax*,11
|
1,356
|
1,505
|
(10)%
|
(5)%
|
Net cash remittances from business units
|
1,111
|
1,230
|
(10)%
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018 £bn
Half year
|
2017 £bn
Full year
|
Change on
AER basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IFRS
shareholders’ funds
|
15.9
|
16.1
|
(1)%
|
|
EEV
shareholders’ funds
|
47.4
|
44.7
|
6%
|
|
Group
Solvency II capital surplus6,7
|
14.4
|
13.3
|
8%
|
|
*
IFRS profit after
tax includes a £513 million pre-tax loss on the reinsurance of
£12 billion of UK annuity liabilities.
Notes
1
Based on
longer-term investment returns.
2
Period-on-period
percentage increases are stated on a constant exchange rate basis
unless otherwise stated. All amounts are comparable to the six
months ended 30 June 2017 unless otherwise indicated.
3
Growth rate on an
actual exchange rate basis.
4
New business
profit on business sold in the period, calculated in accordance
with EEV principles.
5
For insurance
operations underlying free surplus generated represents amounts
maturing from the in-force business during the period less
investment in new business and excludes non-operating items. For
asset management businesses it equates to post-tax IFRS operating
profit for the period. Restructuring costs are presented separately
from the underlying business unit amount. Further information is
set out in note 10 of the EEV basis results.
6
The Group
shareholder capital position excludes the contribution to Own Funds
and the Solvency Capital Requirement from ring-fenced with-profits
funds and staff pension schemes in surplus. The solvency position
includes management’s calculation of UK transitional measures
reflecting operating and market conditions at each valuation
date.
7
Before allowing
for first interim dividend (31 December 2017: second interim
dividend).
8
Insurance margin
primarily represents profits derived from the insurance risks of
mortality and morbidity. See note I(a) of the additional IFRS
financial information for further details.
9
Gross earned
premiums for contracts in second and subsequent years, comprising
Asia segment IFRS gross earned premium of £7.7 billion less
gross earned premiums relating to new regular and single premiums
of £2.2 billion, plus renewal premiums from joint ventures of
£0.6 billion.
10
The half year 2017
comparative results have been re-presented from those published
previously, following reassessment of the Group’s operating
segments as described in note B1.3 of the IFRS financial
statements. This change in presentation does not alter total
comparative IFRS operating profit or IFRS profit after
tax.
11
IFRS profit after
tax reflects the combined effects of operating results determined
on the basis of longer-term investment returns, together with
negative short-term investments variances, results attaching to
disposal of businesses and corporate transactions, amortisation of
acquisition accounting adjustments and the total tax charge for the
period. In half year 2018 it includes a £513 million pre-tax
loss on the reinsurance of £12 billion (valued as at 31
December 2017) of UK annuity liabilities to Rothesay
Life.
Contact:
Media
|
|
Investors/Analysts
|
|
Jonathan
Oliver
|
+44
(0)20 7548 3537
|
Chantal
Waight
|
+44
(0)20 7548 3039
|
Tom
Willetts
|
+44
(0)20 7548 2776
|
Richard
Gradidge
|
+44
(0)20 7548 3860
|
|
|
William
Elderkin
|
+44
(0)20 3480 5590
|
Notes to Editors:
1.
The results in
this announcement are prepared on two bases: International Financial
Reporting Standards (IFRS) and European Embedded Value (EEV). The
results prepared under IFRS form the basis of the Group's statutory
financial statements. The supplementary EEV basis results have been
prepared in accordance with the amended European Embedded Value
Principles dated April 2016 prepared by the European Insurance CFO
Forum. The Group’s EEV basis results are stated on a post-tax
basis and include the post-tax IFRS basis results of the
Group’s asset management and other operations.
Period-on-period percentage increases are stated on a constant
exchange rate basis unless otherwise stated. Constant exchange
rates results are calculated by translating prior period results
using the current period foreign exchange rate ie current period
average rates for the income statement and current period closing
rates for the balance sheet.
2.
Annual Premium
Equivalent (APE) sales comprise the aggregate of regular premiums
and one-tenth of single premiums from insurance sales.
3.
Operating profit
is determined on the basis of including longer-term investment
returns. EEV and IFRS operating profit is stated after excluding
the effect of short-term fluctuations in investment returns against
long-term assumptions and gains/losses arising on the disposal of
businesses and other corporate transactions including the
reinsurance of UK annuity contracts to Rothesay Life in March 2018.
Furthermore, for EEV basis results, operating profit based on
longer-term investment returns excludes the effect of changes in
economic assumptions and the mark to market value movement on core
borrowings. Separately on the IFRS basis, operating profit also
excludes amortisation of accounting adjustments arising principally
on the acquisition of REALIC completed in 2012.
4.
Total number of
Prudential plc shares in issue as at 30 June 2018 was
2,591,872,867.
5.
A presentation for
analysts and investors will be held today at 11.30am (UK) / 6.30pm
(Hong Kong) in the Conference Centre of Nomura, 1 Angel Lane,
London EC4R 3AB. The presentation will be webcast live and
available to replay afterwards using the following
link:
https://www.investis-live.com/prudential/5b4345b905eeee1000ebbca3/mqwj
To
register attendance in person please send an email to investor.relations@prudential.co.uk
Alternatively, a dial-in facility will be available to listen to
the presentation: please allow time ahead of the presentation to
join the call (lines open half an hour before the presentation is
due to start, ie from 11.00am (UK) / 6.00pm (Hong Kong)). Dial-in:
+44 (0) 20 3936 2999 (UK and International) / 0800 640 6441
(Freephone UK), Participant access code: 721864. Once participants
have entered this code their name and company details will be
taken. Playback: +44 (0) 20 3936 3001 (UK and international
excluding US) / + 1 845 709 8569 (US only) (Replay code: 675129).
This will be available from approximately 3.00pm (UK) / 10.00pm
(Hong Kong) on 8 August 2018 until 11.59pm (UK) on 22 August 2018
and 6.59am (Hong Kong) on 23 August 2018.
6.
2018 First Interim Dividend
|
Ex-dividend
date
|
21
August 2018
(Singapore)
23 August 2018 (UK, Ireland and Hong Kong)
|
|
Record
date
|
24
August 2018
|
|
Payment of
dividend
|
27
September 2018 (UK,
Ireland and Hong Kong)
On or
about 4 October 2018
(Singapore)
On or
about 4 October 2018 (ADR
holders)
|
Prudential plc and
its affiliated companies constitute one of the world’s
leading financial services groups, serving over 26 million
customers, with £664 billion of assets under management (as at
30 June 2018). Prudential plc is incorporated in England and Wales
and is listed on the stock exchanges in London, Hong Kong,
Singapore and New York. Prudential plc is not affiliated in any
manner with Prudential Financial, Inc., a company whose principal
place of business is in the United States of America.
8.
Forward-Looking Statements
This
Prudential Half Year Financial Report may contain
‘forward-looking statements’ with respect to certain of
Prudential's plans and its goals and expectations relating to its
future financial condition, performance, results, strategy and
objectives. Statements that are not historical facts, including
statements about Prudential’s beliefs and expectations and
including, without limitation, statements containing the words
‘may’, ‘will’, ‘should’,
‘continue’, ‘aims’,
‘estimates’, ‘projects’,
‘believes’, ‘intends’,
‘expects’, ‘plans’, ‘seeks’ and
‘anticipates’, and words of similar meaning, are
forward-looking statements. These statements are based on plans,
estimates and projections as at the time they are made, and
therefore undue reliance should not be placed on them. By their
nature, all forward-looking statements involve risk and
uncertainty. A number of important factors could cause Prudential's
actual future financial condition or performance or other indicated
results to differ materially from those indicated in any
forward-looking statement. Such factors include, but are not
limited to, the timing, costs and successful implementation of the
demerger of the M&G Prudential business; the future trading
value of the shares of Prudential plc and the trading value and
liquidity of the shares of the to-be-listed M&G Prudential
business following such demerger; future market conditions, including
fluctuations in interest rates and exchange rates, the potential
for a sustained low-interest rate environment, and the performance
of financial markets generally; the policies and actions of
regulatory authorities, including, for example, new government
initiatives; the political, legal and economic effects of the
UK’s decision to leave the European Union; the impact of
continuing designation as a Global Systemically Important Insurer
or ‘G-SII’; the impact of competition, economic
uncertainty, inflation and deflation; the effect on
Prudential’s business and results from, in particular,
mortality and morbidity trends, lapse rates and policy renewal
rates; the timing, impact and other uncertainties of future
acquisitions or combinations within relevant industries; the impact
of internal projects and other strategic actions failing to meet
their objectives; disruption to the availability, confidentiality
or integrity of Prudential’s IT systems (or those of its
suppliers); the impact of changes in capital, solvency standards,
accounting standards or relevant regulatory frameworks, and tax and
other legislation and regulations in the jurisdictions in which
Prudential and its affiliates operate; and the impact of legal and
regulatory actions, investigations and disputes. These and other
important factors may, for example, result in changes to
assumptions used for determining results of operations or
re-estimations of reserves for future policy benefits. Further discussion of these and other
important factors that could cause Prudential's actual future
financial condition or performance or other indicated results to
differ, possibly materially, from those anticipated in Prudential's
forward-looking statements can be found under the ‘Risk
Factors’ section of this Half Year Financial
Report.
Any forward-looking statements contained in
this Half Year Financial Report speak only as of the date on which
they are made. Prudential expressly disclaims any obligation to
update any of the forward-looking statements contained in this
report or any other forward-looking statements it may make, whether
as a result of future events, new information or otherwise except
as required pursuant to the UK Prospectus Rules, the UK Listing
Rules, the UK Disclosure and Transparency Rules, the Hong Kong
Listing Rules, the SGX-ST listing rules or other applicable laws
and regulations.
Summary Half Year 2018 financial performance
Financial highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life
APE new business sales (APE sales)1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual Exchange Rate
|
|
Constant Exchange Rate
|
|
2018 £m
|
2017 £m
|
Change %
|
|
2017 £m
|
Change %
|
|
Half year
|
Half year
|
|
|
Half year
|
|
Asia
|
1,736
|
1,943
|
(11)
|
|
1,811
|
(4)
|
US
|
816
|
960
|
(15)
|
|
879
|
(7)
|
UK and Europe
|
770
|
721
|
7
|
|
721
|
7
|
Total Group
|
3,322
|
3,624
|
(8)
|
|
3,411
|
(3)
|
Life EEV new business profit and investment in new
business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual Exchange Rate
|
|
Constant Exchange Rate
|
|
2018 Half year £m
|
|
2017 Half year £m
|
|
Change %
|
|
2017 Half year £m
|
|
Change %
|
|
New
Business
Profit
|
Free
surplus
invested in
new
business
|
|
New
Business
Profit
|
Free
surplus
invested in
new
business
|
|
New
Business
Profit
|
Free
surplus
investment
in new
business
|
|
New
Business
Profit
|
Free
surplus
investment
in new
business
|
|
New
Business
Profit
|
Free
surplus
investment
in new
business
|
Asia
|
1,122
|
260
|
|
1,092
|
283
|
|
3
|
(8)
|
|
1,009
|
265
|
|
11
|
(2)
|
US
|
466
|
180
|
|
436
|
246
|
|
7
|
(27)
|
|
399
|
225
|
|
17
|
(20)
|
UK and Europe
|
179
|
100
|
|
161
|
42
|
|
11
|
138
|
|
161
|
42
|
|
11
|
138
|
Total Group
|
1,767
|
540
|
|
1,689
|
571
|
|
5
|
(5)
|
|
1,569
|
532
|
|
13
|
2
|
IFRS
Profit2,3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual Exchange Rate
|
|
Constant Exchange Rate
|
|
2018 £m
|
2017 £m
|
Change %
|
|
2017 £m
|
Change %
|
|
Half year
|
Half year
|
|
|
Half year
|
|
Operating profit before tax based on longer-term investment
returns
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term business
|
927
|
870
|
7
|
|
812
|
14
|
Asset management
|
89
|
83
|
7
|
|
79
|
13
|
Total
|
1,016
|
953
|
7
|
|
891
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term business
|
1,001
|
1,079
|
(7)
|
|
988
|
1
|
Asset management
|
1
|
(6)
|
117
|
|
(6)
|
117
|
Total
|
1,002
|
1,073
|
(7)
|
|
982
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UK and
Europe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term business
|
487
|
480
|
1
|
|
480
|
1
|
General insurance commission
|
19
|
17
|
12
|
|
17
|
12
|
Total insurance operations
|
506
|
497
|
2
|
|
497
|
2
|
Asset management
|
272
|
248
|
10
|
|
248
|
10
|
Total
|
778
|
745
|
4
|
|
745
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income and expenditure
|
(329)
|
(382)
|
14
|
|
(376)
|
13
|
Total operating profit based on longer-term investment returns
before tax and restructuring costs
|
2,467
|
2,389
|
3
|
|
2,242
|
10
|
Restructuring costs4
|
(62)
|
(31)
|
(100)
|
|
(31)
|
(100)
|
Total operating profit based on longer-term
investment returns before tax
|
2,405
|
2,358
|
2
|
|
2,211
|
9
|
Non-operating items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term fluctuations in investment returns
on shareholder-backed business
|
(113)
|
(573)
|
80
|
|
(523)
|
78
|
|
Amortisation of acquisition accounting adjustments
|
(22)
|
(32)
|
31
|
|
(29)
|
24
|
|
(Loss) profit attaching to disposal of businesses
and corporate transactions
|
(570)
|
61
|
n/a
|
|
61
|
n/a
|
Profit before tax
|
1,700
|
1,814
|
(6)
|
|
1,720
|
(1)
|
Tax charge attributable to shareholders' returns
|
(344)
|
(309)
|
(11)
|
|
(295)
|
(17)
|
Profit for the period
|
1,356
|
1,505
|
(10)
|
|
1,425
|
(5)
|
Post-tax
profit - EEV3,5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual Exchange Rate
|
|
Constant Exchange Rate
|
|
2018 £m
|
2017 £m
|
Change %
|
|
2017 £m
|
Change %
|
|
Half year
|
Half year
|
|
|
Half year
|
|
Post-tax operating profit based on longer-term investment
returns
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term business
|
1,753
|
1,641
|
7
|
|
1,519
|
15
|
Asset management
|
77
|
73
|
5
|
|
68
|
13
|
Total
|
1,830
|
1,714
|
7
|
|
1,587
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term business
|
1,005
|
888
|
13
|
|
812
|
24
|
Asset management
|
(2)
|
(4)
|
50
|
|
(4)
|
50
|
Total
|
1,003
|
884
|
13
|
|
808
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UK and
Europe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term business
|
771
|
465
|
66
|
|
465
|
66
|
General insurance commission
|
15
|
14
|
7
|
|
14
|
7
|
Total insurance operations
|
786
|
479
|
64
|
|
479
|
64
|
Asset management
|
221
|
201
|
10
|
|
201
|
10
|
Total
|
1,007
|
680
|
48
|
|
680
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income and expenditure
|
(340)
|
(381)
|
11
|
|
(375)
|
9
|
Post tax operating profit based on longer-term investment returns
before restructuring costs
|
3,500
|
2,897
|
21
|
|
2,700
|
30
|
Restructuring costs4
|
(57)
|
(27)
|
(111)
|
|
(27)
|
(111)
|
Post-tax operating profit based on longer-term
investment returns
|
3,443
|
2,870
|
20
|
|
2,673
|
29
|
Non-operating items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term fluctuations in investment returns
|
(1,234)
|
739
|
n/a
|
|
707
|
n/a
|
|
Effect of changes in economic assumptions
|
592
|
(50)
|
n/a
|
|
(38)
|
n/a
|
|
Mark to market value on core structural borrowings
|
579
|
(262)
|
n/a
|
|
(262)
|
n/a
|
|
Loss attaching to corporate transactions
|
(412)
|
-
|
n/a
|
|
-
|
n/a
|
Post-tax profit for the period
|
2,968
|
3,297
|
(10)
|
|
3,080
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share - based on operating profit after
tax
|
|
Actual Exchange Rate
|
|
Constant Exchange Rate
|
|
2018 pence
|
2017 pence
|
Change %
|
|
2017 pence
|
Change %
|
|
Half year
|
Half year
|
|
|
Half year
|
|
IFRS
|
76.8
|
70.0
|
10
|
|
65.7
|
17
|
EEV
|
133.8
|
111.9
|
20
|
|
104.2
|
28
|
Underlying
free surplus generated3,6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual Exchange Rate
|
|
Constant Exchange Rate
|
|
|
2018 £m
|
|
2017 £m
|
|
Change %
|
|
2017 £m
|
Change %
|
|
|
Half year
|
|
Half year
|
|
|
|
|
Half year
|
|
|
|
|
Long-
term
|
Total
|
|
Long-
term
|
Total
|
|
Long-
term
|
Total
|
|
Long-
term
|
Total
|
Long-
term
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
513
|
590
|
|
480
|
553
|
|
7
|
7
|
|
449
|
517
|
14
|
14
|
US
|
595
|
593
|
|
555
|
551
|
|
7
|
8
|
|
508
|
504
|
17
|
18
|
UK and Europe
|
488
|
724
|
|
527
|
742
|
|
(7)
|
(2)
|
|
527
|
742
|
(7)
|
(2)
|
Total Group before restructuring costs
|
1,596
|
1,907
|
|
1,562
|
1,846
|
|
2
|
3
|
|
1,484
|
1,763
|
8
|
8
|
Restructuring costs4
|
(15)
|
(44)
|
|
(6)
|
(6)
|
|
(150)
|
(633)
|
|
(6)
|
(6)
|
(150)
|
(633)
|
Total Group
|
1,581
|
1,863
|
|
1,556
|
1,840
|
|
2
|
1
|
|
1,478
|
1,757
|
7
|
6
|
Cash
remitted by the business units to the Group3,7
|
|
|
|
|
2018 £m
|
2017 £m
|
|
|
Half year
|
Half year
|
Change %
|
Asia
|
391
|
350
|
12
|
US
|
342
|
475
|
(28)
|
UK and Europe
|
341
|
390
|
(13)
|
Other UK (including Prudential Capital)
|
37
|
15
|
147
|
Total Group
|
1,111
|
1,230
|
(10)
|
Cash and capital
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
|
|
Half year
|
Half year
|
Change %
|
First interim dividend per share relating to the reporting
period
|
15.67p
|
14.50p
|
8
|
Holding company cash and short-term investments
|
£2,210m
|
£2,657m
|
(17)
|
Group Solvency II capital
surplus8,9
|
£14.4bn
|
£12.9bn
|
12
|
Group Solvency II capital
ratio8,9
|
209%
|
202%
|
+7pp
|
|
|
|
|
Group shareholders' funds (including goodwill attributable to
shareholders)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018 £bn
|
2017 £bn
|
|
|
Half year
|
Half year
|
Change %
|
IFRS
|
15.9
|
15.4
|
3
|
EEV
|
47.4
|
40.5
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018 %
|
2017 %
|
|
|
Half year
|
Half year
|
|
Return on IFRS shareholders'
funds10
|
25
|
24
|
|
Return on embedded value10
|
15
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
|
|
Half year
|
Half year
|
Change %
|
EEV shareholders' funds per share (including
goodwill attributable to shareholders)11
|
1,830p
|
1,567p
|
17
|
EEV shareholders' funds per share (excluding
goodwill attributable to shareholders)12
|
1,774p
|
1,510p
|
17
|
Notes
1
APE sales is a
measure of new business activity that comprises the aggregate of
regular premiums and one-tenth of single premiums on new business
written during the period for all insurance products, including
premiums for contracts designated as investment contracts under
IFRS 4. It is not representative of premium income recorded in the
IFRS financial statements. Further explanation of the differences
is included in note D of the Additional EEV financial
information.
2
IFRS operating
profit is management’s primary measure of profitability and
provides an underlying operating result based on longer-term
investment returns and excludes non-operating items. Further
information on its definition and reconciliation to profit for the
period is set out in note B1 of the IFRS financial
statements.
3
The half year 2017
comparative results have been re-presented from those previously
published following reassessment of the Group’s operating
segments as described in note B1.3 of the IFRS financial
statements. On re-presentation, Prudential Capital is excluded from
total segment profit and underlying free surplus
generated.
4
Restructuring
costs include business transformation and integration
costs.
5
The EEV basis
results have been prepared in accordance with EEV principles
discussed in note 1 of EEV basis results. A reconciliation between
IFRS and the EEV shareholders’ funds is included in note C of
the Additional EEV financial information.
6
For insurance
operations underlying free surplus generated represents amounts
maturing from the in-force business during the period less
investment in new business and excludes non-operating items. For
asset management businesses it equates to post-tax IFRS operating
profit for the period. Restructuring costs are presented separately
from the underlying business unit amount. Further information is
set out in note 10 of the EEV basis results.
7
Cash remitted to
the Group forms part of the net cash flows of the holding company.
A full holding company cash flow is set out in note II(a) of
Additional IFRS financial information. This differs from the IFRS
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows which includes all cash flows
relating to both policyholders’ and shareholders’
funds. The holding company cash flow is therefore a more meaningful
indicator of the Group’s central liquidity.
8
Estimated before
allowing for first interim dividend.
9
The Group
shareholder capital position excludes the contribution to Own Funds
and the Solvency Capital Requirement from ring-fenced with-profits
funds and staff pension schemes in surplus. The solvency position
includes management’s calculation of UK transitional measures
reflecting operating and market conditions at each valuation
date.
10
Annualised
operating profit after tax and non-controlling interests, as a
percentage of opening shareholders' funds, as set out in note II(c)
of the Additional IFRS financial information and note E of the
additional EEV financial information. Half year profits are
annualised by multiplying by two.
11
Closing EEV shareholders’ funds divided by issued shares, as
set out in note F of the Additional EEV financial
information.
12
Closing EEV shareholders’ funds less goodwill attributable to
shareholders divided by issued shares, as set out in note F of the
Additional EEV financial information.
Group Chief Executive’s
Report
I am pleased to report that we
have had a good first half of 2018, delivering high-quality,
profitable growth. This performance has been achieved alongside
good progress towards the demerger of M&G Prudential from
Prudential plc, announced in March, which will create two
separately listed businesses with distinct investment prospects and
capital allocation priorities.
Each
of our businesses is built around strong and growing customer
needs. The savings and protection requirements of the Asian middle
class, the retirement income needs of Americans and the increasing
demand for managed savings solutions in the UK and Europe are
creating sustained opportunities. We continue to target profitable
growth in high-quality, recurring-premium health and protection and
fee business.
Financial performance
Our
financial performance is again led by Asia, which delivered
double-digit growth in new business profit, IFRS operating profit
based on longer-term investment returns1 and underlying free
surplus generation.
As in
previous years, we comment on our performance in local currency
terms (expressed on a constant exchange rate basis) to show the
underlying business trends in a period of currency
movement.
Group
IFRS operating profit increased by 9 per cent2 to £2,405
million (up 2 per cent on an actual exchange rate basis).
Reflecting our strategic priorities and our focus on health and
protection products in Asia, insurance margin was 17 per
cent2
higher. IFRS operating profit from our Asia life insurance business
increased by 14 per cent2 and profit from
Eastspring, our Asia asset management business, by 13 per
cent2, in
line with the uplift in average assets under management. In the US,
total IFRS operating profit was up 2 per cent2, with growth in fee
income driven by higher average separate account balances, offset
by an expected reduction in spread earnings and a higher DAC
amortisation charge. In the UK and Europe, M&G
Prudential’s total IFRS operating profit increased by 4 per
cent, driven by 10 per cent growth in operating profit from asset
management operations.
The
Group’s capital generation continues to be underpinned by our
large and growing in-force portfolio and our focus on profitable,
short-payback business. Our overall in-force underlying operating
free surplus generation3 increased by 5 per
cent2 to
£2,403 million (level on an actual exchange rate basis),
reflecting higher contributions across all our business units,
partly offset by higher restructuring costs, while investment in
new life business increased by 2 per cent2 (decreased by 5 per
cent on an actual exchange rate basis), compared with a 13 per
cent2
increase in new business profit to £1,767 million (5 per cent
on an actual exchange rate basis). Overall net cash remitted to the
corporate centre in the first half of 2018 was £1,111 million
(2017: £1,230 million on an actual exchange rate basis), with
Asia being the largest contributor of net remittances to the Group
at £391 million (2017: £350 million).
The
Group remains strongly capitalised, with a Solvency II cover ratio
of 209 per cent4,5. Over the period,
IFRS shareholders’ funds reduced to £15.9 billion,
reflecting profit after tax of £1.4 billion (including, as
anticipated, a pre-tax loss of £513 million on the reinsurance
of £12 billion6 of annuity
liabilities), the 2017 second interim dividend and negative
revaluation movements. EEV shareholders’ funds increased to
£47.4 billion, equivalent to 1,830 pence per share7,8.
New
business profits increased by 13 per cent2 to £1,767
million (5 per cent on an actual exchange rate basis), reflecting
growth across all our business units, and external asset management
net flows9 were £2.7
billion, driven by M&G Prudential asset
management.
In
Asia, we continue to focus on growing our scale and enhancing the
quality of our returns. New business profit grew by 11 per
cent2,
despite the 4 per cent2 decline in APE
sales, reflecting an improved sales mix, pricing actions and
prioritisation of regular premium health and protection business.
The quality in our sales is also evident in the 19 per
cent2
increase in health and protection-related new business profit.
While headline sales for the half year declined, our businesses saw
improved performance in the second quarter with overall growth of 6
per cent2
compared to the same period in 2017. This quarterly growth was
broad based with six businesses (including Hong Kong and China)
growing at a double digit rate.
In the
US, while variable annuity sales were slightly reduced and
institutional sales were 19 per cent2 lower, the
combination of higher interest rates and beneficial tax reform
underpinned an increase in new business profit of 17 per
cent2.
M&G Prudential
continues to perform well, with robust external net inflows of
£3.5 billion in its external asset management business and
PruFund-related net inflows of £4.4 billion. Life new business
profit increased by 11 per cent, primarily driven by a 7 per cent
increase in APE sales. Overall assets under management10 were £341.9
billion, £9 billion lower than at the end of 2017, mainly as a
result of the £12 billion6 of annuity
liabilities reinsured to Rothesay Life, announced in
March.
Long-term opportunities
We are
focused on long-term, sustainable opportunities arising from
structural trends in Asia, the US, the UK and Europe.
Across
Asia, the multiple insurance markets in which we operate are
benefiting from economic and demographic tailwinds that are driving
demand for our products. Our prospects are underpinned by low
insurance market penetration (currently under 3 per
cent11),
high levels of out-of-pocket healthcare spend (42 per cent of total
spend12),
a fast-rising working population (1 million per month, expected to
rise to 2.5 billion people by 203013) and improved life
expectancy (the number of people over 60 years of age is expected
to double to over 1 billion by 205013). The scale of our
presence across life and asset management, which gives us access to
3.6 billion people14, means that our
business is well placed to benefit from these trends.
In the
United States, the world’s largest retirement market,
approximately 40 million people will reach retirement age over the
next decade alone15. These consumers
have a clear need for investment options that will increase their
savings and protect their incomes for the rest of their lives. We
are broadening the range of options we offer in order to meet the
varied preferences of these consumers and
intermediaries.
In the
UK and Europe, the number of people of retirement age is forecast
to grow by 55 million over the next four decades16. The
region’s wealth is increasingly concentrated in the hands of
the older generations: in the UK the over-55s control two-thirds of
the nation’s total wealth17. Many of these
savers want products that offer better returns than cash, while
smoothing out the ups and downs of markets. M&G Prudential is
ideally placed to meet this growing demand for investment solutions
with its market-leading with-profits fund and comprehensive range
of actively managed funds. Once demerged from the Group, supported
by the benefits of its merger and transformation programme, M&G
Prudential is expected to be in an even better position to serve
these customers as an independent, capital-efficient
business.
Developing our businesses
We are
constantly working to improve what we do for our customers, across
all our markets. We pay close attention to their changing needs and
respond with an evolving suite of high-quality products and
services. At the same time, we constantly develop our capabilities
to serve our customers and add value for our
shareholders.
In
Asia, we are continuing to build our broad-based portfolio of
businesses and improve the way we serve our customers. We employ a
multi-channel strategy to maximise our reach across the region. Our
highly productive agency force is complemented by our bancassurance
partnerships, which have expanded following the signing of new
agreements in Thailand, the Philippines, Indonesia and Vietnam so
far this year. We maintain a contemporary suite of products and
remain at the forefront of product developments, evolving our
offering to meet changing customer needs. In Hong Kong, we launched
a new critical illness product with extended protection for cancer,
heart attacks and strokes, three common causes of death. In
Singapore we unveiled PRUVital cover, a first-in-the-market
protection plan, for customers with four types of pre-existing
chronic medical conditions, and in China we have recently started
offering customers a new savings product, designed with education
costs in mind. To support our agency and bank channels, we also
embrace new digital capabilities to increase efficiency and improve
our customers’ experience. In Hong Kong, for example, we
developed two new innovations, ‘Hospital to Prudential’
and ‘Chatbot Claims’, to redefine the way our customers
and medical professionals manage hospital claims, significantly
reducing the time and effort required. In addition we have recently
announced an exclusive partnership with UK-based Babylon
Health18
that will add a comprehensive set of digital health tools to our
existing world-class protection products. Through a Babylon-enabled
digital platform we will offer customers in up to 12 Asian markets
a world-leading suite of Artificial Intelligence (‘AI’)
health services, including personal health assessment and treatment
information, empowering users to proactively manage their health in
a flexible and cost-efficient manner.
China
represents an important growth opportunity for us. Operating
through our joint venture, CITIC-Prudential, we now have access to
around 70 per cent of the population following the disciplined
expansion of our footprint over the past 18 years. In April we took
another step forward when CITIC-Prudential received regulatory
approval to begin preparations for the establishment of a new
branch in Hunan, China’s seventh-largest province, with a
population of 68 million. Our business in China is the highest
rated in the industry for risk management19, and was among the
first group of insurers to be granted approval to offer a
tax-deferred pension insurance programme, as part of a pilot
programme targeted on Shanghai, Suzhou and Fujian.
Eastspring, our
Asian fund manager is well placed to capitalise on the expected
growth in Asia’s retail mutual fund market. Eastspring has a
presence in 11 markets across the region following its recent entry
into Thailand in July. Eastspring’s consistent investment
performance helped it to win Asian Investor’s prestigious
Asia Fund House of the Year award for 2018, for the third time in
four years. In China, the establishment of our investment
management wholly foreign-owned enterprise will enable Eastspring
to create an on-the-ground team that will operate an onshore
investment management business. This business complements our
existing asset management joint venture partnership with CITIC and
represents an important step in deepening our presence in this
market.
In the
US, we continue to develop our business to ensure that we best
address the opportunity presented by the millions of Americans
entering retirement and their need for secure income. During the
first half of 2018, we continued to strengthen our position in the
US fee-based advisory market through new relationships with key
distributors and the launch of relevant products, including a new
fee-based index annuity. Jackson has also played a leading role in
bringing together 24 of the country’s financial services
organisations to launch the Alliance for Lifetime Income. This aims
to educate Americans about the need for protected retirement
income, enabling more customers to take action to secure their
financial futures.
In the
UK and Europe, M&G Prudential continues to improve customer
outcomes, leveraging our scale, financial strength and
complementary product and distribution capabilities to develop and
deliver capital-efficient investment solutions for a range of
customer needs. It is one year since we announced the merger and
transformation of M&G and Prudential UK & Europe. In that
time, we have made good progress, announcing a new partnership with
Tata Consulting Services to modernise our existing life portfolio,
developing a combined approach to distribution and creating central
service functions. M&G Prudential’s investment products
continue to perform well. We announced £2.1 billion in annual
with-profits bonuses, lifting the value of contracts by up to 10
per cent and marking the ninth consecutive year of positive returns
for investors in our market-leading PruFund. Over the three years
to 30 June, 58 per cent of M&G’s retail funds generated
returns in the upper quartiles of performance. I would like to
thank Anne Richards for her contribution to the Group’s
success as Chief Executive of M&G Investments. As announced on
27 July 2018, Anne is resigning from the Group, effective on 10
August 2018, to take up a new senior position in the financial
services industry, and we wish her all the best.
We are
also continuing to develop our newer but growing businesses in five
markets in Africa. During the first half of the year APE sales rose
to £18 million20 (2017: £8
million), reflecting growth in our agency force and new
distribution agreements with Standard Chartered Bank in Ghana and
Zenith Bank in Nigeria and Ghana.
Demerger of M&G Prudential
At the
same time as delivering growth in operating performance, we have
been focused on progressing the actions needed for the demerger of
M&G Prudential from the Group. Our internal teams have been
mobilised and we are engaging positively with external
stakeholders. We have also announced leadership changes at M&G
Prudential in preparation for the demerger. Clare Bousfield will
become Chief Financial Officer and John Foley, Chief Executive of
M&G Prudential, will take on the additional responsibilities of
becoming Chief Executive of the key regulated entities of M&G
and Prudential UK & Europe. These changes will simplify the way
we make decisions, improve accountability and align management
capabilities with M&G Prudential’s future needs as an
independent listed business. As we outlined in March, we believe we
will be better able to focus on meeting our customers’
rapidly evolving needs and to deliver long-term value to investors
as two separate businesses. Following separation, M&G
Prudential will have control over its business strategy and capital
allocation, which will enable it to play a greater role in
developing the savings and retirement markets in the UK and Europe
through two of the financial sector’s most trusted brands,
M&G and Prudential UK & Europe. Prudential plc, focused on
our market-leading businesses in Asia and the US, will be strongly
positioned to develop consistent, attractive returns and realise
the growth potential across our international
footprint.
Until
the demerger is completed, the Bank of England’s Prudential
Regulation Authority (PRA) will continue to be the group-wide
supervisor of Prudential plc. In line with the current Solvency II
requirements, the PRA will be the group-wide supervisor of M&G
Prudential following the demerger. After the demerger, Prudential
plc’s individual insurance and asset management businesses
will continue to be supervised at a local entity level and local
statutory capital requirements will continue to apply. The
Supervisory College, made up of the authorities overseeing the
principal regulated activities in jurisdictions where the future
Prudential plc will operate, has made a collective decision that
Hong Kong’s Insurance Authority should become the new
Group-wide supervisor for Prudential plc and they have begun
preparations to take over that role. Prudential plc will continue
to be headquartered and domiciled in the United Kingdom and will
continue to hold a premium listing on the London Stock Exchange.
Both Prudential plc and M&G Prudential are expected to meet the
criteria for inclusion in the FTSE 100 index.
Positive outlook
We
remain focused on our purpose, which is to help remove uncertainty
from the big events in the lives of our customers. We have strong
underlying opportunities, a proven ability to deliver for our
customers, an ongoing focus on risk management and a strong balance
sheet. Our planned demerger of M&G Prudential demonstrates our
commitment to creating shareholder value. I am confident that we
are well positioned to continue to grow profitably and provide
value for our shareholders and customers into the
future.
Notes
1
IFRS operating
profit is management’s primary measure of profitability and
provides an underlying operating result based on longer-term
investment returns and excludes non-operating items. Further
information on its definition and reconciliation to profit for the
period is set out in note B1 of the IFRS financial
statements.
2
Increase stated on
a constant exchange rate basis.
3
For insurance
operations underlying free surplus generated represents amounts
maturing from the in-force business during the period less
investment in new business and excludes non-operating items. For
asset management businesses it equates to post-tax IFRS operating
profit for the period. Restructuring costs are presented separately
from the underlying business unit amount. Further information is
set out in note 10 of the EEV basis results.
4
Before allowing
for first interim dividend (31 December 2017: second interim
dividend).
5
The Group
shareholder capital position excludes the contribution to Own Funds
and the Solvency Capital Requirement from ring-fenced with-profits
funds and staff pension schemes in surplus. The solvency position
includes management’s calculation of UK transitional measures
reflecting operating and market conditions at each valuation
date.
6
Relates to
£12.0 billion of IFRS shareholder annuity liabilities, valued
as at 31 December 2017.
7
The EEV basis
results have been prepared in accordance with EEV principles
discussed in note 1 of EEV basis results. A reconciliation between
IFRS and the EEV shareholder funds is included in note C of the
Additional EEV financial information.
8
Closing EEV shareholders’ funds divided by issued shares, as
set out in note F of the Additional EEV financial
information.
9
Net inflows
exclude Asia Money Market Fund (MMF) inflows of £665 million
(2017: net inflows £449 million on an actual exchange rate
basis).
10
Represents M&G
Prudential asset management external funds under management and
internal funds included on the M&G Prudential long-term
insurance business balance sheet.
11
Swiss Re Sigma
2017. Insurance penetration calculated as premiums in % of GDP.
Asia penetration calculated on a weighted population
basis.
12
World Health
Organisation – Global Health Observatory data repository
(2013). Out of pocket as % of Total Health Expenditure. Asia
calculated as a weighted average out of pocket.
13
United Nations,
Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division,
World Population Prospects 2017 Revision.
14
United Nations,
Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division
(2017). World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision, custom data
acquired via website.
15
Based on
approximately 4 million people per year reaching age 65 over the
period 2018-2028 – source: U.S. Census Bureau, Population
Division.
16
Office for
National Statistics & Eurostat.
17
Office for
National Statistics.
18
Exclusivity is in
respect of up to 12 health, life and pension markets in
Asia.
19
Source: 2017
Solvency Aligned Risk Margin Requirements and Assessment (SARMRA)
issued by the China Insurance Regulatory Commission
(CIRC).
20
Given the relative
immaturity of the African business, it is incorporated into the
Group’s EEV results on an IFRS basis and for now it is
excluded from our new business sales and profit
metrics.
Chief Financial Officer’s report on the 2018 first half
financial performance
Our
financial results in the first half of 2018 continue to reflect the
benefits of driving targeted growth in high-quality, recurring
premium health and protection and fee business across our
geographies, products and distribution channels. We have also made
progress in the on-going preparations for the demerger of M&G
Prudential from Prudential plc and in delivering M&G
Prudential’s merger and transformation
programme.
The
growth in our financial performance across a wide range of metrics
has again been led by our businesses in Asia which delivered
double-digit growth in new business profit (up 11 per
cent1),
IFRS operating profit based on longer-term investment returns
(‘IFRS operating profit’) (up 14 per cent1) and underlying
free surplus generation2 (up 14 per
cent1).
In the US, fee income3 increased by 13 per
cent1
supported by higher average separate account balances and continued
positive net flows, but was balanced by an expected reduction in
spread income and increased amortisation of deferred acquisition
costs.
M&G Prudential
delivered external net inflows of £3.5 billion in its asset
management business. This, together with PruFund-related net
inflows of £4.4 billion and the reduction arising from the
previously announced reinsurance of a £12 billion4 UK annuity
portfolio resulted in overall assets under management5 of £341.9
billion at 30 June 2018 (31 December 2017: £350.7 billion).
M&G Prudential remains on track to deliver the announced annual
shareholder cost savings of circa £145 million by 2022 for a
shareholder investment of circa £250 million.
Sterling weakened
moderately compared with most of the currencies in our major
international markets over the first half of 2018. However, average
exchange rates over the first half of 2018 remained above those in
the same period of 2017, leading to a negative effect on the
translation of the results from our non-sterling operations. To aid
comparison of underlying progress, we continue to express and
comment on the performance trends of our international businesses
on a constant currency basis.
During
the first half of 2018 the performance of many equity markets was
subdued and characterised by higher levels of volatility with the
S&P 500 index up 2 per cent, the FTSE 100 index down 1 per cent
and the MSCI Asia excluding Japan down 5 per cent. However, all
these equity markets remain above first half 2017 levels. Longer
term yields increased favourably in the US and in our larger Asia
markets, but were only slightly higher in the UK.
The
key operational highlights in the first half of 2018 were as
follows:
●
New business
profit was 13 per cent
higher at £1,767 million (up 5 per cent on an actual exchange
rate basis). Asia new business profit increased 11 per cent, with
improved new business margins reflecting product mix, pricing
actions and our focus on health and protection business. In the US,
the benefit of tax reform and higher interest rates more than
offset lower headline APE sales volumes to drive new business
profit growth of 17 per cent. At M&G Prudential, higher sales
at an improved margin contributed to 11 per cent
growth.
●
Asset management net
inflows at M&G
Prudential were robust with external net inflows of £3.5
billion (2017: net inflows of £7.2 billion) in its
wholesale/direct and institutional business. Eastspring reported
external net outflows of £0.9 billion excluding money market
funds (2017: net inflows of £2.3 billion on an actual exchange
rate basis) with modestly positive retail net flows offset by
higher institutional bond fund redemptions.
●
IFRS operating profit
based on longer-term investment returns increased 9 per cent to £2,405 million
(2 per cent on an actual exchange rate basis). IFRS operating
profit from our Asia businesses increased by 14 per cent to
£1,016 million driven by the compounding nature of our regular
premium protection businesses. In the US, IFRS operating profit was
2 per cent higher with increased fee income offset by an expected
reduction in spread earnings and a higher DAC amortisation
charge. M&G Prudential’s total IFRS operating
profit was £778 million, 4 per cent higher than the prior
year. Within this, asset management earnings increased by 10 per
cent resulting from higher fees driven by higher average assets
under management, and operating profit from our core with-profits
and annuity life businesses were lower at £255 million (2017:
£288 million), reflecting the impact of the previously announced annuity portfolio
reinsurance.
●
Total IFRS post-tax
profit was £1,356
million (2017: £1,425 million), after a £513 million
anticipated pre-tax loss following the reinsurance of UK annuities
to Rothesay Life, contributing to Group IFRS
shareholders’ equity of £15.9 billion (31 December 2017:
£16.1 billion). EEV basis shareholders’ equity was
£47.4 billion (31 December 2017: £44.7
billion).
●
Underlying free surplus
generation2,6,
our preferred measure of cash generation from our life and asset
management businesses, increased 6 per cent to £1,863 million
(up 1 per cent on an actual exchange rate basis), after financing
new business growth. This performance metric was driven by 14 per
cent growth from our Asian operations and 18 per cent growth in our
US business.
●
Group shareholders’
Solvency II capital surplus7,8
was estimated at £14.4
billion at 30 June 2018, equivalent to a cover ratio of 209 per
cent (31 December 2017: £13.3 billion, 202 per cent). The
movement since the start of the year primarily reflects the
Group’s continuing strong operating capital generation,
partially offset by the payment of the 2017 second interim
dividend.
IFRS Profit6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual Exchange Rate
|
|
Constant Exchange Rate
|
|
|
|
2018 £m
|
2017 £m
|
Change %
|
|
2017 £m
|
Change %
|
|
|
|
Half year
|
Half year
|
|
|
Half year
|
|
Operating profit before tax based on longer-term
investment
returns
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term business
|
927
|
870
|
7
|
|
812
|
14
|
Asset management
|
89
|
83
|
7
|
|
79
|
13
|
Total
|
1,016
|
953
|
7
|
|
891
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term business
|
1,001
|
1,079
|
(7)
|
|
988
|
1
|
Asset management
|
1
|
(6)
|
117
|
|
(6)
|
117
|
Total
|
1,002
|
1,073
|
(7)
|
|
982
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UK and
Europe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term business
|
487
|
480
|
1
|
|
480
|
1
|
General insurance commission
|
19
|
17
|
12
|
|
17
|
12
|
Total insurance operations
|
506
|
497
|
2
|
|
497
|
2
|
Asset management
|
272
|
248
|
10
|
|
248
|
10
|
Total
|
778
|
745
|
4
|
|
745
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income and
expenditure9
|
(329)
|
(382)
|
14
|
|
(376)
|
13
|
Total operating profit based on longer-term investment
returns
before tax and restructuring costs
|
2,467
|
2,389
|
3
|
|
2,242
|
10
|
Restructuring costs9
|
(62)
|
(31)
|
(100)
|
|
(31)
|
(100)
|
Total operating profit based on longer-term
investment returns before tax
|
2,405
|
2,358
|
2
|
|
2,211
|
9
|
Non-operating items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term fluctuations in investment returns on
shareholder-backed business
|
(113)
|
(573)
|
80
|
|
(523)
|
78
|
|
Amortisation of acquisition accounting adjustments
|
(22)
|
(32)
|
31
|
|
(29)
|
24
|
|
(Loss) profit attaching to disposal of businesses
and corporate transactions
|
(570)
|
61
|
n/a
|
|
61
|
n/a
|
Profit before tax
|
1,700
|
1,814
|
(6)
|
|
1,720
|
(1)
|
Tax charge attributable to shareholders' returns
|
(344)
|
(309)
|
(11)
|
|
(295)
|
(17)
|
Profit for the period
|
1,356
|
1,505
|
(10)
|
|
1,425
|
(5)
|
IFRS Earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual Exchange Rate
|
|
Constant Exchange Rate
|
|
2018 pence
|
2017 pence
|
Change %
|
|
2017 pence
|
Change %
|
|
Half year
|
Half year
|
|
|
Half year
|
|
Basic earnings per share based on operating profit after
tax
|
76.8
|
70.0
|
10
|
|
65.7
|
17
|
Basic earnings per share based on total profit after
tax
|
52.7
|
58.7
|
(10)
|
|
55.6
|
(5)
|
IFRS Operating Profit based on longer-term investment
returns
Total
IFRS operating profit increased by 9 per cent (2 per cent on an
actual exchange rate basis) in the first half of 2018 to
£2,405 million.
Asia total operating profit was 14 per
cent higher (7 per cent on an actual exchange rate basis) at
£1,016 million, and includes 13 per cent growth from
Eastspring’s asset management businesses. Life insurance
operating profit was 14 per cent higher at £927 million,
driven by continued growth in insurance margin which increased by
17 per cent, reflecting our focus on recurring premium health and
protection business. This strategy underpins IFRS operating profit
growth of 33 per cent and 22 per cent in Hong Kong and China
respectively. IFRS operating profit in Singapore increased 11 per
cent, while the contribution from Indonesia was the same as in the
first half of last year.
US total operating profit at
£1,002 million increased by 2 per cent (7 per cent decrease on
an actual exchange rate basis), with increased fee income driven by
a 10 per cent increase in separate account balances since 30 June
2017 offset by a decline in spread income, reflecting the impact of
lower yields on our fixed annuity portfolio and reduced
contribution from asset duration swaps, and a higher DAC
amortisation charge. The higher DAC expense arises largely from a
£42 million acceleration of amortisation relating primarily to
the reversal of the benefit received in 2015 under the mean
reversion formula.
UK and Europe total operating
profit of £778 million
was 4 per cent higher, reflecting growth of 10 per cent in asset
management operating profit and 11 per cent in the UK with-profits
transfer. This was partially offset by the anticipated reduction in
profit from in-force annuities following the reinsurance of
£12 billion4 of annuity
liabilities to Rothesay Life in March 2018. Operating earnings in
the first half of 2018 also benefited from management actions of
£63 million (2017: £188 million) and a £166 million
insurance recovery related to the costs of reviewing internally
vesting annuities sold without advice after 1 July 2008, for which
a provision of £400 million had previously been
established.
Life insurance profit drivers
We
track the progress that we make in growing our life insurance
business by reference to our obligations to our customers, which
are referred to in the financial statements as policyholder
liabilities. Each period these increase as we write new business
and collect regular premiums from existing customers and decrease
as we pay claims and policies mature. These policyholder
liabilities contribute, for example, to our ability to earn fees on
the unit-linked element and indicates the scale of the insurance
element, another key source of profitability for the
Group.
Shareholder-backed policyholder
liabilities and net liability flows10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018 £m
|
|
2017 £m
|
|
Half year
|
|
Half year
|
|
Actual Exchange Rate
|
|
Actual Exchange Rate
|
|
At 1
January
|
Net liability
flows11
|
Market and
other
movements
|
At 30
June
|
|
At 1
January
|
Net liability
flows11
|
Market and
other
movements
|
At 30
June
|
Asia
|
37,402
|
1,463
|
(717)
|
38,148
|
|
32,851
|
1,016
|
1,173
|
35,040
|
US
|
180,724
|
82
|
4,344
|
185,150
|
|
177,626
|
1,958
|
(1,805)
|
177,779
|
UK and Europe
|
56,367
|
(1,813)
|
(12,238)
|
42,316
|
|
56,158
|
(1,167)
|
1,500
|
56,491
|
Total Group
|
274,493
|
(268)
|
(8,611)
|
265,614
|
|
266,635
|
1,807
|
868
|
269,310
|
Focusing on the
business supported by shareholder capital, which generates the
majority of life profit, in the first half of 2018 net flows into
our businesses reflected positive net inflows into our Asia and US
operations, which have been offset by outflows from our UK and
Europe operations. US net inflows remained positive, but at a lower
level, reflecting a lower level of institutional business and a
higher level of variable annuity surrenders as our portfolio
develops. The outflow from our UK and Europe operations primarily
reflects the run-off of the in-force annuity portfolio following
our withdrawal from selling new annuity business and outflows from
unit-linked business which is driven by more variable movements in
corporate pension business. This decrease in shareholder
liabilities has been partly offset by the flows into the
with-profit funds of £1.8 billion as shown in the table below.
Market and other movements include the £12 billion4 reduction in
policyholder liabilities arising from the classification of the
annuity liabilities reinsured to Rothesay Life as held for sale.
Excluding this reclassification market and other movements
increased liabilities by £3.4 billion reflecting currency
effects as sterling weakened over the period, partly offset by
adverse market movements in the first half.
Policyholder liabilities and net
liability flows in with-profits business10,12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018 £m
|
|
2017 £m
|
|
|
Half year
|
|
Half year
|
|
Actual Exchange Rate
|
|
Actual Exchange Rate
|
|
At 1
January
|
Net liability
flows11
|
Market and
other
movements
|
At 30
June
|
|
At 1
January
|
Net liability
flows11
|
Market and
other
movements
|
At 30
June
|
Asia
|
36,437
|
2,399
|
31
|
38,867
|
|
29,933
|
2,295
|
1,053
|
33,281
|
UK and Europe
|
124,699
|
1,832
|
(675)
|
125,856
|
|
113,146
|
1,574
|
3,729
|
118,449
|
Total Group
|
161,136
|
4,231
|
(644)
|
164,723
|
|
143,079
|
3,869
|
4,782
|
151,730
|
Policyholder
liabilities in our with-profits business have increased by 2 per
cent13 to
£164.7 billion in the first half of 2018, driven by growth in
M&G Prudential’s PruFund proposition and participating
products in Asia, with consumers seeking protection from the impact
of volatile market conditions. As returns from these funds are
smoothed and shared with customers, the emergence of shareholder
profit is more gradual. The business, nevertheless, remains an
important source of shareholder value.
Analysis of long-term insurance
business pre-tax IFRS operating profit based on longer-term
investment returns by driver14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual Exchange Rate
|
|
Constant Exchange Rate
|
|
2018 £m
|
2017 £m
|
|
2017 £m
|
|
Half year
|
Half year
|
|
Half year
|
|
Operating
profit
|
Average
liability
|
Margin
|
Operating
profit
|
Average
liability
|
Margin
|
|
Operating
profit
|
Average
liability
|
Margin
|
|
|
|
bps
|
|
|
bps
|
|
|
|
bps
|
Spread income
|
454
|
80,938
|
112
|
583
|
89,314
|
131
|
|
543
|
85,504
|
127
|
Fee income
|
1,320
|
172,662
|
153
|
1,279
|
164,152
|
156
|
|
1,175
|
153,255
|
153
|
With-profits
|
187
|
145,813
|
26
|
172
|
132,701
|
26
|
|
170
|
131,600
|
26
|
Insurance margin
|
1,213
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
|
1,072
|
|
|
Margin on revenues
|
1,083
|
|
|
1,138
|
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition costs*
|
(1,133)
|
3,322
|
(34)%
|
(1,241)
|
3,624
|
(34)%
|
|
(1,154)
|
3,411
|
(34)%
|
|
Administration expenses
|
(1,177)
|
257,782
|
(91)
|
(1,115)
|
259,451
|
(86)
|
|
(1,040)
|
244,721
|
(85)
|
|
DAC adjustments
|
154
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
Expected return on shareholder assets
|
103
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
2,204
|
|
|
2,257
|
|
|
|
2,108
|
|
|
Share of related tax charges from joint
ventures and associate15
|
(18)
|
|
|
(16)
|
|
|
|
(16)
|
|
|
Longevity reinsurance and other management actions to improve
solvency
|
63
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
Insurance recoveries of costs associated with review of past
annuity sales
|
166
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Operating profit based on longer-term investment
returns
|
2,415
|
|
|
2,429
|
|
|
|
2,280
|
|
|
*
The ratio of
acquisition costs is calculated as a percentage of APE sales
including with-profits sales. Acquisition costs include only those
relating to
shareholder-backed
business.
We
continue to maintain our preference for higher-quality sources of
income such as insurance margin and fee income. We favour insurance
margin because it is relatively insensitive to the equity and
interest rate cycle and prefer fee income to spread income because
it is more capital-efficient. In line with this approach, on a
constant exchange rate basis, in the first half of 2018, insurance
margin has increased by 13 per cent (up 5 per cent on an actual
exchange rate basis) and fee income by 12 per cent (up 3 per cent
on an actual exchange rate basis), while spread income declined by
16 per cent (down 22 per cent on an actual exchange rate basis).
Administration expenses increased to £1,177 million (2017:
£1,040 million) as the business continues to expand, including
an increase in US asset-based commissions on higher separate
account balances which are treated as an administrative expense in
this analysis.
Asset management profit drivers
Movements in asset management operating profit are influenced
primarily by changes in the scale of these businesses, as measured
by funds managed both on behalf of external institutional and
retail customers and our internal life insurance
operations.
Asset management external funds
under management16,17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018 £m
|
|
2017 £m
|
|
Half year
|
|
Half year
|
|
Actual Exchange Rate
|
|
Actual Exchange Rate
|
|
At 1 January
|
Net flows
|
Market and other movements
|
At 30 June
|
|
At 1 January
|
Net flows
|
Market and other
movements
|
At 30 June
|
UK and Europe
|
163,855
|
3,548
|
(1,913)
|
165,490
|
|
136,763
|
7,179
|
5,176
|
149,118
|
Asia18
|
46,568
|
(863)
|
(3,335)
|
42,370
|
|
38,042
|
2,273
|
4,281
|
44,596
|
Total asset management
|
210,423
|
2,685
|
(5,248)
|
207,860
|
|
174,805
|
9,452
|
9,457
|
193,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total asset management
(including MMF)
|
219,740
|
3,350
|
(5,163)
|
217,927
|
|
182,519
|
9,951
|
9,571
|
202,041
|
Average assets under management in both our
Asia and UK and Europe asset management businesses were higher
compared with the prior period, and reflect positive net flows in
the period in the UK and Europe, and favourable market performance
over the second half of 2017. IFRS operating profit from
M&G Prudential asset
management increased by 10 per
cent to £272 million and by 13 per cent at Eastspring (up 7
per cent on an actual exchange rate basis) to £89
million.
M&G
Prudential’s external assets under management have continued
to benefit from net inflows during the period backed by strong
investment performance. External net flows totalled £3.5
billion (2017: net flows of £7.2 billion), led by
contributions from European investors in the Optimal Income Fund
and our multi-asset fund range, and from institutional clients
investing in illiquid credit and equity infrastructure strategies.
The contribution from positive net flows was partly offset by
negative market movements, resulting in overall external assets
under management at 30 June 2018 of £165.5 billion, up 1 per
cent compared with the start of the year. M&G
Prudential’s total assets under management at 30 June 2018
were £341.9 billion (31 December 2017: £350.7 billion)
with external growth offset by lower internally managed assets
following the £12 billion4 annuity portfolio
reinsurance to Rothesay Life. IFRS operating profit increased 10
per cent to £272 million, consistent with the year-on-year
increase in average assets under management and reflecting a stable
cost-income ratio of 54 per cent. M&G’s full year
cost-income ratio is typically higher than for the first half, as
its cost base is weighted towards the second half of the year (half
year 2017: 53 per cent, full year 2017: 58 per cent).
Eastspring
reported net outflows18 of £0.9
billion as modest retail inflows were more than offset by higher
redemptions in institutional fixed income products.
Eastspring’s total assets under management were stable at
£138.2 billion (31 December 2017: £138.9 billion),
reflecting total net flows (including those from money market funds
and from assets managed for internal life operations) of £3.0
billion, offset by market and other movements. Eastspring’s
cost-income ratio improved to 54 per cent (2017: 55 per
cent).
Other income and expenditure and restructuring costs9
Overall net
central expenditure reduced to £391 million (2017: £407
million) as higher restructuring costs relating to the UK merger
and transformation programme were balanced by a reduction in the
interest payable on core borrowings.
IFRS non-operating items9
IFRS
non-operating items consist of negative short-term fluctuations of
£113 million (2017: £523 million), losses on the disposal
of businesses and other corporate transactions of £570 million
and the amortisation of acquisition accounting adjustments of
£22 million (2017: £29 million) arising principally from
the REALIC business acquired in 2012. Losses on the disposal of
businesses and other corporate transactions include a pre-tax loss
of £513 million arising from the reinsurance of a portfolio of
UK and Europe annuity contracts with Rothesay Life. Further
information on other transactions is given in note D1 of the IFRS
financial statements. Short-term investment fluctuations are
discussed further below.
IFRS Short-term investment fluctuations
IFRS
operating profit is based on longer-term investment return
assumptions. The difference between actual investment returns
recorded in the income statement and the assumed longer-term
returns is reported within short-term fluctuations in investment
returns. In the first half of 2018 the total short-term
fluctuations in investment returns relating to the life operations
were negative £113 million, comprising negative £326
million for Asia, positive £244 million in the US, negative
£122 million in the UK and Europe and positive £91
million in other operations32.
Rising
interest rates in many territories in Asia led to unrealised bond
losses in the period, and widening credit spreads and a rise in
interest rates in the UK led to losses on fixed income assets
supporting the capital of the shareholder-backed annuity business.
In the US, Jackson provides certain guarantees on its annuity
products, the value of which would typically rise when equity
markets fall and long-term interest rates decline. The 46 basis
points rise in the 10 year US Treasury yield has resulted in a
positive impact from the revaluation of the IFRS guarantee
liabilities in the current period.
IFRS effective tax rates
In the
first half of 2018, the effective tax rate on IFRS operating profit
based on longer-term investment returns was 18 per cent (2017: 24
per cent). The lower rate is due mainly to the reduction in the US
corporate income tax rate from 35 per cent to 21 per cent which
took effect from 1 January 2018.
The
effective tax rate on the total IFRS profit was 20 per cent in the
first half of 2018 (2017: 17 per cent). This reflects a higher
effective tax rate in Asia as a result of non-operating investment
losses in the first half of 2018 which do not attract tax relief,
and also a higher effective tax rate in the US as a result of
generating non-operating taxable profits in the first half of 2018,
compared to the non-operating taxable losses generated in the first
half of 2017.
The
main driver of the Group’s effective tax rate overall is the
mix of profits between jurisdictions with higher tax rates (such as
Indonesia and Malaysia), jurisdictions with lower tax rates (such
as Hong Kong and Singapore) and jurisdictions with rates in between
(such as the UK and the US).
Total tax contribution
The
Group continues to make significant tax contributions in the
countries in which it operates, with £1,560 million remitted
to tax authorities in the first half of 2018. This was lower than
the equivalent amount of £1,595 million (on an actual exchange
rate basis) in the first half of 2017. This reduction reflects
a decrease in corporation tax payments, down from £535 million
(on an actual exchange rate basis) to £305 million, partly
offset by increases in payroll taxes, property taxes and taxes
collected from customers. The reduction in US corporation tax
payments reflects the full impact of changes in the US basis for
taxing derivatives introduced in 2015 which transitioned into
effect across the 2016 to 2018 tax returns.
Publication of tax strategy
In May
2018 the Group published its updated tax strategy, which in
addition to complying with mandatory requirements, also included a
number of additional disclosures, including a breakdown of
revenues, profits and taxes for all jurisdictions where more than
£5 million tax was paid. This disclosure was included as a way
of demonstrating that our tax footprint (ie where we pay taxes) is
consistent with our business footprint.
New business performance
Life EEV new business profit and APE new business sales (APE
sales)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual Exchange Rate
|
|
Constant Exchange Rate
|
|
|
2018 £m
|
2017 £m
|
Change %
|
|
2017 £m
|
Change %
|
|
Half year
|
Half year
|
|
|
|
Half year
|
|
|
|
APE sales
|
New business profit
|
APE sales
|
New business profit
|
APE sales
|
New business profit
|
|
APE sales
|
New business profit
|
APE sales
|
New business profit
|
Asia
|
1,736
|
1,122
|
1,943
|
1,092
|
(11)
|
3
|
|
1,811
|
1,009
|
(4)
|
11
|
US
|
816
|
466
|
960
|
436
|
(15)
|
7
|
|
879
|
399
|
(7)
|
17
|
UK and Europe
|
770
|
179
|
721
|
161
|
7
|
11
|
|
721
|
161
|
7
|
11
|
Total Group
|
3,322
|
1,767
|
3,624
|
1,689
|
(8)
|
5
|
|
3,411
|
1,569
|
(3)
|
13
|
Life insurance new business profit
increased 13 per cent (5 per cent on
an actual exchange rate basis) to £1,767 million reflecting
improved economic returns across our businesses. Life insurance new business APE sales decreased by 3
per cent (8 per cent on
an actual exchange rate basis) to £3,322 million.
In
Asia, new business profit
was 11 per cent higher at £1,122 million, benefiting from
product mix, pricing actions and positive momentum in prioritising
regular premium health and protection business. Our strength in
executing this strategy was reflected in a 19 per cent increase in
health and protection new business profit. Both agency and bank
channels delivered double digit growth in new business
profit.
In
Hong Kong, new business profit increased by 14 per cent, on lower
sales volumes, which is a clear indication of the success of our
strategic emphasis on health and protection business alongside a
more positive interest rate environment.
Outside Hong Kong
our sales performance remains broad-based with seven countries
delivering double digit new business profit growth. Of particular
note were Singapore, where new business profit increased 20 per
cent on higher volumes and positive mix effects, and China, where a
15 per cent growth in new business profit was achieved, driven by a
higher weighting of regular premium business and product actions.
Growth in new business profit in Thailand (up 43 per cent), Vietnam
(up 17 per cent), Philippines (up 12 per cent) and Malaysia (up 8
per cent) also reflects our value focus. In Indonesia our agency
dominated distribution continues to experience challenging
conditions, combined with the adverse impact of higher yields,
contributing to a decline of 24 per cent in new business
profit.
In the
US, new business profit
increased by 17 per cent to £466 million reflecting the
combined effects of higher US interest rates and the benefit of US
tax reform. Jackson’s variable annuity APE sales declined 3
per cent compared with the prior period which had benefited from
competitor ‘buy-out’ activity, and increased moderately
excluding this effect. This, alongside lower institutional sales,
led to an overall reduction in APE sales of 7 per
cent.
In our
UK and Europe life business
new business profit increased by 11 per cent, driven by higher
sales and improved economics. Overall APE sales increased 7 per
cent, with PruFund sales 7 per cent higher, led by further growth
in individual pensions (up 13 per cent) and income drawdown
business (up 16 per cent), partly offset by lower bond sales. This
resulted in PruFund net flows of £4.4 billion, leading to an
increase in PruFund assets under management in the period of 12 per
cent to £40.3 billion (31 December 2017: £35.9
billion).
Free surplus
generation2,6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual Exchange Rate
|
|
Constant Exchange Rate
|
|
|
2018 £m
|
2017 £m
|
Change %
|
|
2017 £m
|
Change %
|
|
|
Half year
|
Half year
|
|
|
Half year
|
|
Asia
|
850
|
836
|
2
|
|
782
|
9
|
US
|
773
|
797
|
(3)
|
|
729
|
6
|
UK and Europe
|
824
|
784
|
5
|
|
784
|
5
|
Underlying free surplus generated from in-force life
business
and asset management before restructuring costs
|
2,447
|
2,417
|
1
|
|
2,295
|
7
|
Restructuring costs
|
(44)
|
(6)
|
(633)
|
|
(6)
|
(633)
|
Underlying free surplus generated from in-force life
business
and asset management
|
2,403
|
2,411
|
-
|
|
2,289
|
5
|
Investment in new business
|
(540)
|
(571)
|
5
|
|
(532)
|
(2)
|
Underlying free surplus generated
|
1,863
|
1,840
|
1
|
|
1,757
|
6
|
Market related movements, timing differences
and other movements
|
(1,001)
|
(321)
|
|
|
|
|
Profit attaching to corporate transactions
|
111
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash remitted by business units
|
(1,111)
|
(1,230)
|
|
|
|
|
Total movement in free surplus
|
(138)
|
365
|
|
|
|
|
Free surplus at 30 June
|
7,440
|
6,931
|
|
|
|
|
Free surplus generation is the financial metric we use to measure
the internal cash generation of our business operations and is
based on the capital regimes which apply locally in the various
jurisdictions in which our life businesses operate. For life
insurance operations it represents amounts maturing from the
in-force business during the period, net of amounts reinvested in
writing new business. For asset management it equates to post-tax
IFRS operating profit for the period.
We drive free surplus generation by targeting markets and products
that have low-strain, high-return and fast payback profiles and by
aiming to deliver both good service and value to improve customer
retention. Our ability to generate both high quality growth and
cash is a distinctive feature of Prudential.
In the first half of 2018 underlying free
surplus generation from our in-force life insurance and asset
management business increased by 5 per cent to £2,403 million
(level on an actual exchange rate basis). This reflects our
growing scale and the capital-generative nature of our business
model. In Asia, growth in the in-force life portfolio, combined
with post-tax asset management profits from Eastspring, contributed
to underlying in-force free surplus generation of £850
million, up 9 per cent. In the US, underlying in-force free surplus
generation increased by 6 per cent reflecting growth in the
in-force portfolio. In the UK and Europe, underlying in-force free
surplus generation was 5 per cent higher at £824 million
benefiting from higher M&G Prudential asset management profits
and a £138 million post-tax insurance recovery related to the
costs of reviewing internally vesting annuities sold without advice
after 1 July 2008 for which a provision had previously been
established.
Although new business profit increased by 13 per cent, the amount
of free surplus that was invested in writing new business in the
period increased by only 2 per cent to £540 million (2017:
£532 million), partly reflecting a favourable shift in
business mix.
Underlying free
surplus generated, after investment in new business but before
restructuring costs, increased by 8 per cent to £1,907
million, led by Asia up 14 per cent and the US 18 per cent higher.
Total Group underlying free surplus generation after restructuring
costs increased 6 per cent to £1,863 million.
Market movements (together with timing differences and other
reserve movements) in the period have led to a reduction in free
surplus of £1,001 million. This reflects in part bond losses
from rising interest rates in many markets in Asia, losses on
derivatives held to manage certain guarantees attaching to variable
annuity products in the US and other timing differences. It also
includes a negative £160 million impact from the increase in
capital requirements in the US following changes announced by the
NAIC in June as a result of the comprehensive US tax reform package
enacted in December 2017.
After
financing reinvestment in new business and funding cash remittances
from the business units to Group, the closing value of free surplus
in our life and asset management operations was £7.4 billion
at 30 June 2018.
Business unit
remittances6,19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual Exchange Rate
|
|
|
2018 £m
|
2017 £m
|
|
|
Half year
|
Half year
|
Net cash remitted by business units:
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
391
|
350
|
|
US
|
342
|
475
|
|
UK and Europe
|
341
|
390
|
|
Other UK (including Prudential Capital)
|
37
|
15
|
Net cash remitted by business units
|
1,111
|
1,230
|
Holding company cash at 30 June
|
2,210
|
2,657
|
We continue to manage cash flows across the Group with a view to
achieving a balance between ensuring sufficient remittances are
made to service central requirements (including paying the external
dividend) and maximising value to shareholders through retention
and reinvestment of capital in business opportunities.
Cash
remitted to the corporate centre in the first half of 2018 amounted
to £1,111 million (2017: £1,230 million). Asia’s
net remittance increased to £391 million (2017: £350
million), driven by on-going business growth. Jackson’s
remittance was £342 million (2017: £475 million), and the
UK and Europe remittance was £341 million (2017: £390
million).
Net
cash remitted by the business units was used to meet central costs
of £219 million (2017: £226 million) and pay the 2017
second interim ordinary dividend. Reflecting these and other
movements in the period, total holding company cash at 30 June 2018
was £2,210 million
compared with £2,264 million at the end of 2017.
Post-tax profit -
EEV6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual Exchange Rate
|
|
Constant Exchange Rate
|
|
2018 £m
|
2017 £m
|
Change %
|
|
2017 £m
|
Change %
|
|
Half year
|
Half year
|
|
|
Half year
|
|
Post-tax operating profit based on longer-term investment
returns
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term business
|
1,753
|
1,641
|
7
|
|
1,519
|
15
|
Asset management
|
77
|
73
|
5
|
|
68
|
13
|
Total
|
1,830
|
1,714
|
7
|
|
1,587
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term business
|
1,005
|
888
|
13
|
|
812
|
24
|
Asset management
|
(2)
|
(4)
|
50
|
|
(4)
|
50
|
Total
|
1,003
|
884
|
13
|
|
808
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UK and
Europe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term business
|
771
|
465
|
66
|
|
465
|
66
|
General insurance commission
|
15
|
14
|
7
|
|
14
|
7
|
Total insurance operations
|
786
|
479
|
64
|
|
479
|
64
|
Asset management
|
221
|
201
|
10
|
|
201
|
10
|
Total
|
1,007
|
680
|
48
|
|
680
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income and
expenditure20
|
(340)
|
(381)
|
11
|
|
(375)
|
9
|
Post tax operating profit based on longer-term investment returns
before restructuring costs
|
3,500
|
2,897
|
21
|
|
2,700
|
30
|
Restructuring costs20
|
(57)
|
(27)
|
(111)
|
|
(27)
|
(111)
|
Post-tax operating profit based on longer-term
investment returns
|
3,443
|
2,870
|
20
|
|
2,673
|
29
|
Non-operating items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term fluctuations in investment returns
|
(1,234)
|
739
|
n/a
|
|
707
|
n/a
|
|
Effect of changes in economic assumptions
|
592
|
(50)
|
n/a
|
|
(38)
|
n/a
|
|
Mark to market value on core structural borrowings
|
579
|
(262)
|
n/a
|
|
(262)
|
n/a
|
|
Loss attaching to corporate transactions
|
(412)
|
-
|
n/a
|
|
-
|
n/a
|
Post-tax profit for the period
|
2,968
|
3,297
|
(10)
|
|
3,080
|
(4)
|
EEV Earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual Exchange Rate
|
|
Constant Exchange Rate
|
|
|
2018 pence
|
2017 pence
|
Change %
|
|
2017 pence
|
Change %
|
|
|
Half year
|
Half year
|
|
|
Half year
|
|
Basic earnings per share based on post-tax operating
profit
|
133.8
|
111.9
|
20
|
|
104.2
|
28
|
Basic earnings per share based on post-tax total
profit
|
115.3
|
128.5
|
(10)
|
|
120.1
|
(4)
|
EEV operating profit
On an EEV basis, Group post-tax operating profit based on
longer-term investment returns was 29 per cent higher (20 per cent
on an actual exchange rate basis) at £3,443 million in the
first half of 2018, equating to an overall annualised return on
opening embedded value of 15 per cent. EEV operating profit
includes £3,529 million (2017: £2,796 million) from the
Group’s life businesses, which is discussed further below,
and the post-tax IFRS basis profit of the Group’s asset
management business of £296 million (2017: £265 million)
and other net expenditure of £382 million (2017: £388
million).
EEV operating profit includes new business profit from the
Group’s life businesses, which increased by 13 per cent (5
per cent on an actual exchange rate basis) to £1,767 million
and life in-force profit of £1,762 million, which was 44 per
cent higher. In-force profit growth was driven by underlying growth
in the in-force book, higher interest rates, the benefit of US tax
reform and in the UK increased portfolio optimisation benefits and
insurance recoveries related to our UK life business.
In
Asia, EEV life operating
profit was up 15 per cent to £1,753 million, reflecting growth
in new business profit of 11 per cent to £1,122 million.
In-force profit was 24 per cent higher at £631 million driven
by growth in the in-force book with overall ongoing positive
experience variances.
In the
US, EEV life operating
profit was up 24 per cent to £1,005 million, reflecting a 17
per cent increase in new business profit to £466 million and
an increase in the contribution from in-force profit of 31 per cent
to £539 million. The increase in in-force profit reflects the
favourable impacts of a higher opening in-force balance, higher
interest rates and the benefit of US tax reform.
In the
UK and Europe, EEV life
operating profit increased by 66 per cent to £771 million
(2017: £465 million). The increase reflects an 11 per cent
increase in new business profit to £179 million and an
increase in in-force profit to £592 million (2017: £304
million). The in-force profit includes the post-tax benefit of a
£138 million insurance recovery related to the costs and
potential redress of reviewing internally vesting annuities sold
without advice after 1 July 2008, alongside higher levels of
portfolio optimisation which are expected to moderate in the second
half of 2018.
EEV non-operating items
Negative
short-term fluctuations of £1,234 million reflects bond losses
in Asia following rising interest rates in a number of countries,
together with lower than expected returns on equities and other
investments held by the Group’s with-profits and unit-linked
business in Hong Kong, Singapore and the UK and separate account
business in the US. It also includes the impact of market movements
in the period on interest and equity derivatives held by the US
business to manage market exposures arising from the guarantees
provided on its annuity products.
Offsetting
short-term fluctuations is a £592 million benefit from
economic assumption changes, principally reflecting the benefit of
higher interest rates on the future expected profits from the US
variable annuity business and with-profits businesses in Hong Kong
offset by the negative impact of a higher discount rate for a
number of other products.
The
loss attaching to corporate transactions of £412 million
primarily relates to the reinsurance of the shareholder annuity
portfolio to Rothesay Life. A more detailed explanation of this and
the other corporate transactions occurring in the period are set
out in note 15 of the EEV financial statements.
Capital position, financing and liquidity
Capital position
Analysis of movement in Group
shareholder Solvency II surplus21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018 £bn
|
|
2017 £bn
|
|
|
Half year
|
|
Half year
|
Full year
|
Solvency II surplus at 1 January
|
13.3
|
|
12.5
|
12.5
|
Operating experience
|
1.8
|
|
1.7
|
3.6
|
Non-operating experience (including market movements)
|
-
|
|
-
|
(0.6)
|
UK annuities reinsurance transaction
|
0.1
|
|
-
|
-
|
Other capital movements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated debt redemption
|
-
|
|
-
|
(0.2)
|
|
Foreign currency translation impacts
|
0.1
|
|
(0.5)
|
(0.7)
|
|
Dividends paid
|
(0.8)
|
|
(0.8)
|
(1.2)
|
Model changes
|
(0.1)
|
|
-
|
(0.1)
|
Estimated Solvency II surplus at end of period
|
14.4
|
|
12.9
|
13.3
|
The
high quality and recurring nature of our operating capital
generation and our disciplined approach to managing balance sheet
risk has resulted in the Group’s shareholder Solvency II
capital surplus being estimated at £14.4 billion7,8 at 30 June 2018
(equivalent to a solvency ratio of 209 per cent) compared with
£13.3 billion (202 per cent) at 31 December 2017.
Prudential’s
designation as a G-SII was reaffirmed on 21 November 2016. Although
the Financial Stability Board did not publish a new list of G-SIIs
in 2017, the policy measures set out in the Financial Stability
Board’s 2016 communication on G-SIIs continue to apply to the
Group. As a result of this designation, Prudential is subject to
additional regulatory requirements, including a requirement to
submit enhanced risk management plans (such as a Group-wide
Recovery Plan, a Systemic Risk Management Plan and a Liquidity Risk
Management Plan) to a Crisis Management Group (CMG) comprised of an
international panel of regulators.
Local statutory capital
All
our subsidiaries continue to hold appropriate capital positions on
a local regulatory basis. In the UK, at 30 June 2018, The
Prudential Assurance Company Limited and its
subsidiaries22 had an estimated
Solvency II shareholder surplus of £7.5 billion23 (equivalent to a
solvency ratio of 203 per cent) and a with-profits
surplus24
of £5.5 billion (equivalent to a solvency ratio of 244 per
cent). In June 2018, the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners (NAIC) in the US formally approved changes to risk
based capital factors that reflect the December 2017 US tax reform.
Including the impact of these changes, capital generation in the
first six months of 2018, and payment of a $450 million remittance
to Group, Jackson’s risk based capital ratio as estimated at
30 June 2018, remained above its 2017 year-end position of 409 per
cent.
Debt Portfolio
The
Group continues to maintain a high-quality defensively positioned
debt portfolio. Shareholders’ exposure to credit is
concentrated in the UK annuity portfolio and the US general
account, mainly attributable to Jackson’s fixed annuity
portfolio. The credit exposure is well diversified and 98 per cent
of our UK portfolio and 96 per cent of our US portfolio are
investment grade25. During the first
half of 2018 there were no default losses in the US or the UK
portfolio and reported impairments were minimal in the US
portfolio.
Financing and liquidity
Shareholders’ net core structural borrowings
|
30 June 2018 £m
|
|
30 June 2017 £m
|
|
31 December 2017 £m
|
|
IFRS
basis
|
Mark to market value
|
EEV
basis
|
|
IFRS
basis
|
Mark to
market
value
|
EEV
basis
|
|
IFRS
basis
|
Mark to
market
value
|
EEV
basis
|
Total borrowings of shareholder-financed operations
|
6,367
|
151
|
6,518
|
|
6,614
|
673
|
7,287
|
|
6,280
|
743
|
7,023
|
Less: Holding company cash and
short-term investments
|
(2,210)
|
-
|
(2,210)
|
|
(2,657)
|
-
|
(2,657)
|
|
(2,264)
|
-
|
(2,264)
|
Net core structural borrowings of
shareholder-financed operations
|
4,157
|
151
|
4,308
|
|
3,957
|
673
|
4,630
|
|
4,016
|
743
|
4,759
|
Gearing ratio*
|
21%
|
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
*
Net core
structural borrowings as a proportion of IFRS shareholders’
funds plus net debt, as set out in note II(d) of the Additional
IFRS financial information.
Our
financing and central liquidity position remained strong throughout
the period. Our central cash resources amounted to £2.2
billion at 30 June 2018 (31 December 2017: £2.3
billion).
In
addition to its net core structural borrowings of
shareholder-financed operations set out above, the Group also has
access to funding via the money markets and has in place a global
commercial paper programme. As at 30 June 2018, we had issued
commercial paper under this programme totalling US$1,189
million.
Prudential’s
holding company currently has access to £2.6 billion of
syndicated and bilateral committed revolving credit facilities,
provided by 19 major international banks, expiring in 2022 and
2023. Apart from small drawdowns to test the process, these
facilities have never been drawn, and there were no amounts
outstanding at 30 June 2018. The medium-term note programme, the US
shelf registration programme (platform for issuance of SEC
registered public bonds in the US market), the commercial paper
programme and the committed revolving credit facilities are all
available for general corporate purposes and to support the
liquidity needs of Prudential’s holding company and are
intended to maintain a strong and flexible funding
capacity.
Shareholders' Funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IFRS
|
|
EEV
|
|
2018 £m
|
2017 £m
|
|
2018 £m
|
2017 £m
|
|
Half year
|
Half year
|
|
Full year
|
|
Half year
|
Half year
|
|
Full year
|
Profit after tax for the
period 26
|
1,355
|
1,505
|
|
2,389
|
|
2,967
|
3,297
|
|
8,750
|
Exchange movements, net of related tax
|
69
|
(224)
|
|
(409)
|
|
523
|
(1,045)
|
|
(2,045)
|
Cumulative exchange gain of Korea life business recycled to profit
and loss account
|
-
|
(61)
|
|
(61)
|
|
-
|
-
|
|
-
|
Unrealised gains and losses on Jackson fixed
income securities classified as available for
sale27
|
(908)
|
300
|
|
486
|
|
-
|
-
|
|
-
|
Dividends
|
(840)
|
(786)
|
|
(1,159)
|
|
(840)
|
(786)
|
|
(1,159)
|
Mark to market value movements on Jackson assets backing surplus
and required capital
|
-
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(32)
|
31
|
|
40
|
Other
|
119
|
49
|
|
175
|
|
127
|
55
|
|
144
|
Net (decrease) increase in shareholders’ funds
|
(205)
|
783
|
|
1,421
|
|
2,745
|
1,552
|
|
5,730
|
Shareholders’ funds at beginning of the period
|
16,087
|
14,666
|
|
14,666
|
|
44,698
|
38,968
|
|
38,968
|
Shareholders’ funds at end of the period
|
15,882
|
15,449
|
|
16,087
|
|
47,443
|
40,520
|
|
44,698
|
Shareholders' value per
share 28
|
613p
|
597p
|
|
622p
|
|
1,830p
|
1,567p
|
|
1,728p
|
Return on Shareholders'
funds29
|
25%
|
24%
|
|
25%
|
|
15%
|
15%
|
|
17%
|
Group IFRS shareholders’ funds at 30
June 2018 decreased by 1 per cent13
to £15.9 billion (31
December 2017: £16.1 billion on an actual exchange rate
basis). In the first six months of 2018 the Group generated profits
after tax of £1.4 billion (2017: £1.5 billion), which
were more than offset by dividend payments and unrealised losses on
fixed income securities held by Jackson accounted for through other
comprehensive income. In the first half of the period, UK sterling
weakened relative to the US dollar and various Asian currencies.
With approximately 48 per cent of the Group IFRS net assets (71 per
cent of the Group’s EEV net assets) denominated in
non-sterling currencies, this generated a small positive exchange
rate movement on net assets in the period.
The Group’s EEV basis
shareholders’ funds increased by 6 per
cent13
to £47.4 billion (31
December 2017: £44.7 billion on an actual exchange rate
basis). On a per share basis the Group’s embedded value at 30
June 2018 equated to 1,830 pence, up from 1,728 pence at 31
December 2017.
Corporate transactions
Intention to demerge the
Group’s UK businesses from Prudential plc and sale of
£12.0 billion4
UK annuity
portfolio
The
Group is making progress on its previously announced intention to
demerge its UK and Europe businesses from Prudential plc, resulting
in two separately-listed companies, and the preparatory transfer of
the legal ownership of its Hong Kong insurance subsidiaries from
The Prudential Assurance Company Limited (M&G
Prudential’s UK regulated insurance entity) to Prudential
Corporation Asia Limited.
In
March 2018, M&G Prudential announced the sale of £12.0
billion (as at 31 December 2017) of its shareholder-backed annuity
portfolio to Rothesay Life. Under the terms of the agreement,
M&G Prudential has reinsured these liabilities to Rothesay
Life, which is expected to be followed by a Part VII transfer of
the portfolio by the end of 2019. The reinsurance agreement became
effective on 14 March 2018 and resulted in an IFRS pre-tax loss of
£513 million.
These
transactions above reduced the Group’s EEV by £364
million which primarily reflects the loss of profits on the portion
of annuity liabilities sold.
The
impact on Group Solvency II capital position of the reinsurance
transaction at 30 June 2018 is an increase in surplus of £0.1
billion. Further information on the solvency position of the Group
and The Prudential Assurance Company Limited is set out in note
II(f) of the Additional IFRS financial information.
Prior
to the demerger, the Group expects to rebalance its debt capital
across Prudential and M&G Prudential. This will include the
ultimate holding company of M&G Prudential, when established,
taking on new subordinated debt and Prudential plc redeeming some
of its existing debt. A proportion of the proceeds of the debt that
will ultimately be held by M&G Prudential will be used by
Prudential plc to enable repayment of a portion of Prudential
plc’s existing debt. It is currently expected that the debt
re-balancing will result in M&G Prudential’s parent
company holding up to half of the aggregate of the Group’s
current outstanding core structural borrowings (£6,367 million
at 30 June 2018) and borrowings from short-term securities
programmes33, which together
total £7,576 million at 30 June 2018.
Entrance into Thailand mutual fund market
In
July 2018 Eastspring reached an agreement to initially acquire 65
per cent of TMB Asset Management Co., Ltd. (‘TMBAM’), a
leading asset management company in Thailand, from TMB Bank Public
Company Limited (‘TMB’). Eastspring has an option to
increase its ownership to 100 per cent in the future. As part of
this acquisition, Eastspring has also entered into a distribution
agreement with TMB to provide best-in-class investment solutions to
their customers.
The
acquisition of TMBAM, the fifth-largest asset manager30 in Thailand, with
£10 billion31 of assets under
management which has grown by a market leading 26 per cent compound
annual growth rate over the last three years, reinforces
Prudential’s commitment to the Thai market. The completion of
the transaction is subject to local regulatory
approval.
Dividend
As in
previous years, the first interim dividend for 2018 has been
calculated formulaically as one third of the prior year’s
full year ordinary dividend. The Board has approved a first interim
dividend for 2018 of 15.67 pence per share, which equates to an
increase of 8 per cent over the 2017 first interim
dividend.
The
Group’s dividend policy remains unchanged. The Board will
maintain focus on delivering a growing ordinary dividend. In line
with this policy, Prudential aims to grow the ordinary dividend by
5 per cent per annum. The potential for additional distributions
will continue to be determined after taking into account the
Group’s financial flexibility across a broad range of
financial metrics and an assessment of opportunities to generate
attractive returns by investing in specific areas of the
business.
Notes
1
Increase stated on a constant exchange rate basis
2
For insurance
operations underlying free surplus generated represents amounts
maturing from the in-force business during the period less
investment in new business and excludes non-operating items. For
asset management businesses it equates to post-tax IFRS operating
profit for the period. Restructuring costs are presented separately
from the underlying business unit amount. Further information is
set out in note 10 of the EEV basis results.
3
US Fee income represents asset management fees that vary with the
size of the underlying policyholder funds, primarily separate
account balances arising from variable annuity business, net of
investment management expenses. See note I(a) of Additional IFRS
financial information for basis of preparation.
4
Relates to £12.0 billion of IFRS shareholder annuity
liabilities, valued as at 31 December 2017.
5
Represents M&G
Prudential asset management external funds under management and
internal funds included on the M&G Prudential long-term
insurance business balance sheet.
6
The 2017 comparative results have been re-presented from those
published previously, following reassessment of the Group’s
operating segments as described in note B1.3 of the IFRS financial
statements.
7
Before allowing
for first interim dividend.
8
The Group
shareholder capital position excludes the contribution to Own Funds
and the Solvency Capital Requirement from ring-fenced with-profits
funds and staff pension schemes in surplus. The solvency position
includes management’s calculation of UK transitional measures
reflecting operating and market conditions at each valuation
date.
9
Refer to note B1.1
in IFRS financial statements for the break-down of other income and
expenditure and other non-operating items.
10
Includes Group's
proportionate share of the liabilities and associated flows of the
insurance joint ventures and associate in Asia.
11
Defined as
movements in shareholder-backed policyholder liabilities arising
from premiums (net of charges), surrenders/withdrawals, maturities
and deaths.
12
Includes
unallocated surplus of with-profits business.
13
Comparison to 31
December 2017 on an actual exchange rate basis.
14
For basis of
preparation see note I(a) of Additional IFRS financial
information.
15
Under IFRS, the
Group’s share of results from its investments in joint
ventures and associate accounted for using the equity method is
included in the Group’s profit before tax on a net of related
tax basis. In half year 2018, the Group altered the presentation of
its analysis of Asia operating profit drivers to show these tax
charges separately in order for the contribution from the joint
ventures and associate to be included in the margin analysis on a
consistent basis as the rest of the Asia operations. Half year 2017
comparatives have been re-presented accordingly.
16
Includes
Group’s proportionate share in PPM South Africa and the Asia
asset management joint ventures.
17
For our asset
management business, the level of funds managed on behalf of third
parties, which are not therefore recorded on the balance sheet, is
a driver of profitability. We therefore analyse the movement in the
funds under management each period, focusing between those which
are external to the Group and those held by the insurance business
and included on the Group balance sheet. This is analysed in note
II(b) of the Additional IFRS financial information.
18
Net inflows
exclude Asia Money Market Fund (MMF) inflows of £665 million
(2017: net inflows £449 million on an actual exchange rate
basis). External funds under management exclude Asia MMF balances
of £10,067 million (2017: £8,327 million on an actual
exchange rate basis).
19
Net cash remitted
by business units are included in the Holding company cash flow,
which is disclosed in detail in note II(a) of the Additional IFRS
financial information.
20
Refer to the EEV
basis supplementary information – Post-tax operating profit
based on longer-term investment returns and Post-tax summarised
consolidated income statement for the break-down of other income
and expenditure and other non-operating items.
21
The methodology
and assumptions used in calculating the Solvency II capital results
are set out in note II(f) of Additional IFRS financial
information.
22
The insurance
subsidiaries of The Prudential Assurance Company Limited are
Prudential General Insurance Hong Kong Limited, Prudential Hong
Kong Limited, Prudential International Assurance plc and Prudential
Pensions Limited.
23
The UK shareholder
capital position excludes the contribution to Own Funds and the
Solvency Capital Requirement from ring-fenced with-profits funds
and staff pension schemes in surplus. The estimated solvency
position includes management’s estimate of calculation of UK
transitional measures reflecting operating and market conditions at
each valuation date.
24
The with-profits
Solvency II surplus represents the Own Funds and the Solvency
Capital Requirement of UK ring-fenced funds. The estimated solvency
position includes the impact of recalculated transitionals at the
valuation date.
25
Based on hierarchy of Standard and Poor’s Moody’s and
Fitch, where available and if unavailable, other rating agencies or
internal ratings have been used.
26
Excluding profit
for the year attributable to non-controlling
interests.
27
Net of related
charges to deferred acquisition costs and tax.
28
Closing IFRS
shareholders’ funds divided by issued shares, as set out in
note II(e) of the Additional IFRS financial information. Closing
EEV shareholders’ funds divided by issued shares, as set out
in note F of the Additional EEV financial information.
29
Annualised
operating profit after tax and non-controlling interests, as a
percentage of opening shareholders' funds, as set out in note II(c)
of the Additional IFRS financial information and note E of the
Additional EEV financial information. Half year profits are
annualised by multiplying by two.
30
Source: TMB
Investor factsheet (as of March 2018).
31
Assets under
management as at 31 March 2018.
32
Other operations
include Group Head Office and Asia Regional Head Office costs,
Prudential Capital and Africa.
33
Comprising
£1,209 million of commercial paper and Medium Term
Notes.
Group Chief Risk Officer’s report of the risks facing our
business and how these are managed
Our
Group Risk Framework and risk appetite have allowed us to control
our risk exposure successfully throughout the year. Our governance,
processes and controls enable us to deal with uncertainty
effectively, which is critical to the achievement of our strategy
of helping our customers achieve their long-term financial
goals.
This
section explains the main risks inherent in our business and how we
manage those risks, with the aim of ensuring an appropriate risk
profile is maintained.
Group structure
In
August 2017 the Group announced its intention to combine M&G
and our UK life business to form M&G Prudential, allowing the
scale and capabilities in these businesses to be leveraged more
effectively. In March 2018, the intention to demerge the combined
business unit from the rest of the Group was announced, with the
aim of focusing on meeting customers’ rapidly evolving needs
and to deliver long-term value to investors as two separate
businesses.
The
merger activity ongoing at M&G Prudential and its planned
separation from the rest of the Group requires significant and
complex changes. The Group Risk function is embedded within key
work streams and a clear view exists of the objectives, risks and
dependencies involved in order to execute this change agenda. A
mature and well-embedded risk framework is in place and, during
this period of transition, the Group Risk function has a defined
role in providing oversight, support and risk management, as well
as providing objective challenge to ensure the Group remains within
risk appetite. Looking further ahead, a key objective is that post
demerger there are two strong, standalone risk functions in M&G
Prudential and Prudential plc. The Group will continue to increase
its risk management focus on Prudential Africa as the business
there grows in materiality.
Societal developments
Focus
in western economies is increasingly shifting from the goods and
services businesses deliver to customers towards the way in which
such business is conducted and how this impacts on the wider
society. In undertaking its business, the Group actively considers
the environmental, social and governance (ESG) impact of our
activities. The risks and opportunities arising from these are
broad and may initially seem unconnected. These connections are
being made by Prudential as we manage and maintain the
sustainability of the business for all our stakeholders, and risk
management focus is increasing on the associated transition,
reputational and liability risks. Stakeholder and regulatory
expectations of the Group’s ESG activities also are
increasing. Recent regulatory developments such as the EU General
Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) have underlined that personal
data must be held securely and also that its use is transparent to
the data owner. Risks around the security and use of personal data
are actively managed by the Group, and the recent regulatory
changes in data protection in the US and Europe have been
incorporated into the principles against which the business
requirements are defined.
The world economy
The
global economy has seen steady and broad growth through the second
half of 2017 and first half of 2018, supported by accommodative
monetary conditions around the world and improving economic data.
Looking to the end of the first half of the year, some signs are
appearing of a divergence between the US economy, which has
remained relatively buoyant, and other economies around the world,
which have started to show signs of slowdown. In the UK, the
outcome of negotiations on the final terms of the UK’s
relationship with the EU is currently unknown. In the US, the
Federal Reserve continues its process to normalise interest rates
and monetary policy. However, the economic outlook for the world
remains uncertain. There has been a long period of economic
expansion (relative to recent historical levels) and there are
certain risks to this trend which we are mindful of. These include
the impact of tightening financial conditions and the anticipated
withdrawal of central bank liquidity which may affect emerging
economies and companies with high levels of debt in particular,
which consequently may then have wider impacts. Political tensions
in Europe, geopolitical developments and global trade tensions also
pose risks to global growth.
Financial markets
Asset
valuations are currently quite high, particularly in the US,
supported by some of the highest rates of earnings growth seen in
recent years. Equity market volatility has remained low compared
with historical levels, despite a spike in early February 2018.
Interest rates have broadly increased since the middle of 2016, as
central banks across the world gradually normalise monetary policy
and move away from quantitative easing, although long-term interest
rates have been less responsive which is leading to flattening
yield curves. Credit spreads also remain narrow compared with
historical levels, although some moderate widening has been seen
since the beginning of the year. Financial markets remain
particularly vulnerable to an abrupt change in sentiment or broad
changes in trend, in particular if some of the risks to the global
economy noted above were to materialise.
Political landscape
Events
in recent years indicate that the world is in a period of global
geopolitical transition and increasing uncertainty. Popular
discontent appears to be one of the driving factors of political
change, and the liberal norms and the role of multilateral
rules-based institutions that underpin global order, such as the
UN, NATO and WTO, appear to be evolving. Across the Group’s
key geographies, we are increasingly seeing national protectionism
in trade and economic policies. As a global organisation, we
develop plans to mitigate business risks arising from this shift
and engage with national bodies where we can in order to ensure our
policyholders are not adversely impacted. It is clear, however,
that the full long-term impacts of these changes remain to be
seen.
Regulations
Prudential
operates in highly regulated markets across the globe, and the
nature and focus of regulation and laws remains fluid. A number of
national and international regulatory developments are in progress,
with an increasing focus on systemic risks and macro-prudential
policy. As well as managing the resulting changes and ensuring
compliance that regulations require of us, changes in
administration, particularly in the US, have resulted in
uncertainty on the implementation of some regulatory policy
initiatives that we are planning for, such as those purporting to
introduce fiduciary obligations on distributors of investment
products. Such developments will continue to be monitored at a
national and global level and form part of Prudential’s
engagement with government policy teams and
regulators.
2.
Key internal, regulatory, economic and (geo)political events over
the past 12 months
Q3 2017
|
Q4 2017
|
Q1 2018
|
Q2 2018
|
In
August 2017 the Group’s intention to combine M&G and its
UK life business to form M&G Prudential is announced, allowing
better leveraging of our scale and capabilities.
The UK
Conservative Party begins Q3 with a confidence-and-supply
arrangement with the Democratic Unionist Party, after a snap
general election called by Prime Minister May in June
2017.
Companies and
organisations reassess the traditional conceptions of the nature of
potential cyber threats, after the systemic WannaCry and NotPetya
ransomware attacks which occurred during Q2 2017.
The US
Federal Reserve raises interest rates and announces a programme to
normalise monetary policy.
Tensions in the
South China Sea are elevated. US ‘freedom of operation’
exercises result in a temporary increase in proximity of American
military to disputed islands in the South China Sea.
|
In
December 2017 the UK and EU agree to move negotiations onto the
future trading arrangements after the UK’s exit from the
bloc. This remains unclear, although an agreement on transitional
arrangements was subsequently agreed in March 2018.
The US
Tax and Jobs Act, is signed into law by the US administration in
December 2017 and it comes into force on 1 January
2018.
In
November 2017, the Bank of England raises base interest rates for
the first time since 2007.
In
October 2017 Catalonia’s independence referendum causes
market turmoil in Spanish equities. Madrid takes measures to
strengthen power in the region.
|
In
March 2018 the intention to demerge M&G Prudential from the
rest of the Group is announced. £12 billion of annuity
liabilities in our UK and Europe business are reinsured to Rothesay
Life Plc, which is expected to be followed by a Part VII transfer
of the portfolio by the end of 2019.
US
equity markets decline rapidly, triggering a global sell-off, with
the Dow Jones Industrial Average falling by circa 3,000 points in
just two weeks.
President Xi
Jinping enters a second term in office in China after election by
the National People’s Congress in March 2018.
A
coalition government is formed in Italy between the centre right
League and anti-establishment Five Star Movement, after general
elections in March 2018.
The US
administration proposes initial trade tariff measures (with
additional proposals announced over H1 2018), raising trade
tensions with its key G7 partners and China.
Eastspring becomes
the third Prudential signatory, after M&G and PPMSA, to the UN
Principles for Responsible Investment in February
2018.
|
The
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) goes live in the EU on 25
May 2018, increasing the rights of individuals over the use of
their personal information by companies.
US
President Trump and North Korean Chairman Kim Jong Un meet in
Singapore on 12 June 2018 for a historic summit, where
denuclearisation of the Korean peninsula is discussed.
The US
Department of Labor’s (DoL’s) fiduciary rule is
effectively ended after a decision in the US courts in March 2018.
The deadline for the DoL to appeal lapses in June. Other proposals,
such as the US Securities and Exchanges Commission’s best
interest standard, remain in progress.
The
opposition Pakatan Harapan coalition win power in Malaysia
following general elections held in May 2018.
The
22nd round of talks on the Regional Comprehensive Economic
Partnership (RCEP) are held in Singapore between 28 April and 8 May
2018, the goal being to create the world’s largest economic
bloc.
The
Indonesia President approves regulations on grandfathering foreign
ownership of insurance companies.
|
3.
Managing the risks in implementing our strategy
This section provides an overview of the Group’s strategy,
the significant risks arising from the delivery of this strategy
and the risk management focus for the following 12 months. The
risks outlined below, which are not exhaustive, are discussed in
more detail in sections 5 and 6.
Our strategy
|
Significant risks in the delivery of the strategy
|
Risk management focus for the next 12 months
|
Asia
‘Significant protection gap and investment needs of the
middle class.’
Leading pan-regional franchise.
|
● Persistency
risk
|
● Implementation
of business initiatives to manage persistency risk including review
of distribution channels and incentive structures. Ongoing
experience monitoring.
|
● Morbidity
risk
|
● Implementation
of business initiatives to manage morbidity risk including product
repricing where required. Ongoing experience
monitoring.
|
● Regulatory
risk, including foreign ownership
|
● Proactive
engagement with national governments and regulators.
|
US
‘Transition of “baby-boomers” into
retirement.’
Premier retirement income player.
|
● Financial
risks
|
● Maintaining,
and enhancing where necessary, appropriate risk limits, hedging
strategies and Group oversight that are in place.
|
● Policyholder
behaviour risk
|
● Continued
monitoring of policyholder behaviour experience and review of
assumptions.
|
UK and Europe
‘”Savings gap” and ageing population in need of
returns/income.’
Well-recognised brands with a strong track record of a long-term
conviction-led investment approach.
|
● M&G
Prudential merger and transformation risk
|
● Managing
the merger and transformation risks to the delivery of strategic,
financial and operational objectives.
|
● Longevity
risk
|
● Continued
oversight and experience analysis.
|
● Customer
risk
|
● Ongoing
monitoring of embedded customer outcome indicators.
● Managing
the customer risk implications from: merger and transformation
activity; new product propositions and new regulatory
requirements.
|
Group-wide
We have announced our intention to demerge our UK and Europe
business, M&G Prudential, resulting in two separately listed
companies with distinct investment prospects
|
● Transformation
risks around key change programmes
|
● Managing
the inter-connected execution risks from this transformation
activity under the Group’s transformation risk framework, as
well as providing other risk management support and
review.
● Ensuring
both M&G Prudential and Prudential plc will have in place two
strong standalone risk functions after demerger.
|
● Information
security and data privacy risks
|
● Continuing
the implementation of the Group’s information security risk
management strategy and defence plan.
● Ensuring
full GDPR compliance across the Group.
|
● Group-wide
regulatory risks
|
● Engagement
with regulators and industry groups on macro-prudential regulatory
initiatives, international capital standards, and other initiatives
with Group-wide impacts.
|
● Environmental,
social and governance (ESG) risks
|
● Continue
to develop Group-wide understanding of material ESG factors, and
ensuring ongoing compliance with Group-wide ESG-relevant standards
and policies.
● Engagement
with key stakeholders and industry in development of ESG risk
modelling and metrics.
|
Appropriately
managed risks allow Prudential to take business opportunities and
enable the growth of its business. Effective risk management is
therefore fundamental in the execution of the Group’s
business strategy. Prudential’s approach to risk management
must be both well embedded and rigorous, and, as the economic and
political environment in which we operate changes, it should also
be sufficiently broad and dynamic to respond to these
changes.
Prudential has in
place a system of governance that promotes and embeds a clear
ownership of risk, processes that link risk management to business
objectives, a proactive Board and senior management providing
oversight of risks, mechanisms and methodologies to review, discuss
and communicate risks, and risk policies and standards to ensure
risks are identified, measured, managed, monitored and
reported.
How risk is defined
Prudential defines
‘risk’ as the uncertainty that is faced in implementing
the Group’s strategies and objectives successfully, and
includes all internal or external events, acts or omissions that
have the potential to threaten the success and survival of the
Group. Accordingly, material risks will be retained selectively
when it is considered that there is value in doing so, and where it
is consistent with the Group’s risk appetite and philosophy
towards risk-taking.
How risk is managed
Risk
management is embedded across the Group through the Group Risk
Framework, which details Prudential’s risk governance, risk
management processes and risk appetite. The Framework has been
developed to monitor and manage the risks to our business and is
owned by the Board. The aggregate Group exposure to its key risk
drivers is monitored and managed by the Group Risk function which
is responsible for reviewing, assessing, providing oversight and
reporting on the Group’s risk exposure and solvency position
from the Group economic, regulatory and ratings
perspectives.
In
2018 the Group has continued to update its policies and processes
around new product approvals, management of critical third party
arrangements and oversight of model risks. Our transformation risk
framework is being applied directly to manage programme delivery
risks.
The
following section provides more detail on our risk governance, risk
culture and risk management process.
i.
Risk governance and culture
Prudential’s
risk governance comprises the Board, organisational structures,
reporting relationships, delegation of authority, roles and
responsibilities, and risk policies that the Group Head Office and
the business units establish to make decisions and control their
activities on risk-related matters. It includes individuals,
Group-wide functions and committees involved in overseeing and
managing risk.
The
risk governance structure is led by the Group Risk Committee,
supported by independent non-executives on risk committees of
material subsidiaries. These committees monitor the development of
the Group Risk Framework, which includes risk appetite, limits, and
policies, as well as risk culture.
The
Group Risk Committee reviews the Group Risk Framework and
recommends changes to the Board to ensure that it remains effective
in identifying and managing the risks faced by the Group. A number
of core risk policies and standards support the Framework to ensure
that risks to the Group are identified, assessed, managed and
reported.
Culture is a
strategic priority of the Board, who recognise its importance in
the way that the Group does business. Risk culture is a subset of
Prudential’s broader organisational culture, which shapes the
organisation-wide values that we use to prioritise risk management
behaviours and practices.
An
evaluation of risk culture forms part of the Group Risk Framework
and in particular seeks to identify evidence that:
●
Senior management in business units articulate the need for
effective risk management as a way to realise long-term value and
continuously support this through their actions;
●
Employees understand and care about their role in managing risk
– they are aware of and discuss risk openly as part of the
way they perform their role; and
●
Employees invite open discussion on the approach to the management
of risk.
The
Group Risk Committee also has a key role in providing advice to the
Remuneration Committee on risk management considerations to be
applied in respect of executive remuneration.
Prudential’s
Code of Conduct and Group Governance Manual include a series of
guiding principles that govern the day-to-day conduct of all its
people and any organisations acting on its behalf. This is
supported by specific risk policies which require that the Group
act in a responsible manner. This includes, but is not limited to,
policies on anti-money laundering, financial crime and anti-bribery
and corruption. The Group’s outsourcing and third-party
supply policy ensures that human rights and modern slavery
considerations are embedded across all of its supplier and supply
chain arrangements. Embedded procedures to allow individuals to
speak out safely and anonymously against unethical behaviour and
conduct are also in place.
ii.
The risk management cycle
The
risk management cycle comprises processes to identify, measure and
assess, manage and control, and monitor and report on our
risks.
Risk identification
Group-wide risk
identification takes place throughout the year as the Group’s
businesses undertake a comprehensive bottom-up process to identify,
assess and document its risks. This concludes with an annual
top-down identification of the Group’s key risks, which
considers those risks that have the greatest potential to impact
the Group’s operating results and financial condition and is
used to inform risk reporting to the risk committees and the Board
for the year.
Our
risk identification process also includes the Group’s Own
Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA), as required under Solvency II,
and horizon-scanning performed as part of our emerging risk
management process.
In
accordance with provision C.2.1 of the UK Code, the Directors
perform a robust assessment of the principal risks facing the
Company through the Group-wide risk identification process, Group
ORSA report and the risk assessments done as part of the business
planning review, including how they are managed and
mitigated.
Reverse stress
testing, which requires the Group to ascertain the point of
business model failure, is another tool that helps us to identify
the key risks and scenarios that may have a material impact on the
Group.
The
risk profile is a key output from the risk identification and risk
measurement processes, and is used as a basis for setting
Group-wide limits, management information, assessment of solvency
needs, and determining appropriate stress and scenario testing. The
Group’s annual set of key risks are given enhanced management
and reporting focus.
Risk measurement and assessment
All
identified risks are assessed based on an appropriate methodology
for that risk. All quantifiable risks which are material and
mitigated by holding capital are modelled in the Group’s
internal model, which is used to determine capital requirements
under Solvency II and our own economic capital basis. Governance
arrangements are in place to support the internal model, including
independent validation and processes and controls around model
changes and limitations.
Risk management and control
The
control procedures and systems established within the Group are
designed to manage the risk of failing to meet business objectives
reasonably and are detailed in the Group risk policies. These focus
on aligning the levels of risk-taking with the achievement of
business objectives and can only provide reasonable and not
absolute assurance against material misstatement or
loss.
The
management and control of risks are set out in the Group risk
policies, and form part of the holistic risk management approach
under the Group’s ORSA. These risk policies
define:
●
The Group’s risk appetite in respect of material risks, and
the framework under which the Group’s exposure to those risks
is limited;
●
The processes to enable Group senior management to effect the
measurement and management of the Group material risk profile in a
consistent and coherent way; and
●
The flows of management information required to support the
measurement and management of the Group’s material risks and
to meet the needs of external stakeholders.
The
methods and risk management tools we employ to mitigate each of our
major categories of risks are detailed in the further risk
information section below.
Risk monitoring and reporting
The
identification of the Group’s key risks informs the
management information received by the Group risk committees and
the Board. Risk reporting of key exposures against appetite is also
included, as well as ongoing developments in other key and emerging
risks.
iii.
Risk appetite, limits and triggers
The
extent to which Prudential is willing to take risk in the pursuit
of its business strategy and objective to create shareholder value
is defined by a number of qualitative and quantitative expressions
of risk appetite, operationalised through measures such as limits,
triggers, thresholds and indicators. The Group Risk function is
responsible for reviewing the scope and operation of these risk
appetite measures at least annually to determine that they remain
relevant. The Board approves all changes made to the Group’s
aggregate risk appetite, and has delegated authority to the Group
Risk Committee to approve changes to the system of limits, triggers
and indicators.
Group
risk appetite is set with reference to economic and regulatory
capital, liquidity and earnings volatility which is aimed at
ensuring that an appropriate level of aggregate risk is taken.
Appetite is also defined for the Group’s risks. Further
detail is included in sections 5 and 6, as well as covering risks
to shareholders, including those from participating and third-party
business. Group limits operate within these expressions of risk
appetite to constrain material risks, while triggers and indicators
provide further constraint and defined points for
escalation.
Earnings volatility:
The
objectives of the Group’s appetite and aggregate risk limits
on earnings volatility seek to ensure that variability is
consistent with the expectations of stakeholders; that the Group
has adequate earnings (and cash flows) to service debt and expected
dividends and to withstand unexpected shocks; and that earnings
(and cash flows) are managed properly across geographies and are
consistent with funding strategies. The volatility of earnings is
measured and monitored on IFRS operating profit and EEV operating
profit bases, although IFRS and EEV total profits are also
considered.
Liquidity:
The
objective of the Group’s liquidity risk appetite is to ensure
that the Group is able to generate sufficient cash resources to
meet financial obligations as they fall due in business as usual
and stressed scenarios. Risk appetite with respect to liquidity
risk is measured using a Liquidity Coverage Ratio which considers
the sources of liquidity against liquidity requirements under
stress scenarios.
Capital requirements:
Limits
on capital requirements aim to ensure that the Group meets its
internal economic capital requirements, achieves its desired target
rating to meet its business objectives, and ensures that
supervisory intervention is not required. The two measures used at
the Group level are Solvency II capital requirements and internal
economic capital (ECap) requirements. In addition, capital
requirements are monitored on local statutory bases.
The
Group Risk Committee is responsible for reviewing the risks
inherent in the Group’s business plan and for providing the
Board with input on the risk/reward trade-offs implicit therein.
This review is supported by the Group Risk function, which uses
submissions from our local business units to calculate the
Group’s aggregated position (allowing for diversification
effects between local business units) relative to the aggregate
risk limits.
Broadly, the risks
assumed across the Group can be categorised as those which arise as
a result of our business operations, our investments and those
arising from the nature of our products. Prudential is also exposed
to those broad risks which apply because of the global environment
in which it operates. These risks, where they materialise, may have
a financial impact on the Group, and could also impact on the
performance of its products or the services it provides to our
customers and distributors, which gives rise to potential risks to
its brand, reputation and have conduct risk implications. These
risks are summarised below. The materiality of these risks, whether
material at the level of the Group or its business units, is also
indicated. The Group’s disclosures covering risk factors can
be found at the end of this document.
‘Macro’ – risks
Some
of the risks that the Group is exposed to are necessarily broad
given the external influences which may impact on the business.
These risks include:
Global economic conditions. Changes in
global economic conditions can impact Prudential directly; for
example, by leading to poor investment returns and fund
performance, and increasing the cost of promises (guarantees) that
have been made to our customers. Changes in economic conditions can
also have an indirect impact on the Group; for example, leading to
a decrease in the propensity for people to save and buy
Prudential’s products, as well as changing prevailing
political attitudes towards regulation. This is a risk which is
considered material at the level of the Group.
Geopolitical risk. The geopolitical
environment may have direct or indirect impacts on the Group, and
has seen varying levels of volatility in recent years as seen by
political developments in the UK, the US and the Eurozone.
Uncertainty in these regions, combined with conflict in the Middle
East, elevated tensions in east Asia and the evolving situation in
the Korean peninsula underline that geopolitical risks have
potentially global and wide-ranging impacts; for example, through
increased regulatory and operational risks, and changes to the
economic environment.
Digital disruption. The emergence of
advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence and
blockchain is providing an impetus for companies to rethink their
existing operating models and how they interact with their
customers. Digital disruption is considered from both an external
and internal view. The external view considers the rise of new
technologies and how this may impact on the insurance industry and
Prudential’s competitiveness within it, while the internal
view considers the risks associated with the Group’s internal
developments in meeting digital change challenges and
opportunities. Prudential is embracing the opportunities from new
technologies, and any risks which arise from them are closely
monitored.
Risks from our investments
|
Risks from our products
|
Risks from our business operations
|
Credit risk
Is the
potential for reduced value of Prudential’s investments
driven by the market’s perceptions for potential for defaults
of investment counterparties. The Group’s asset portfolio
also gives rise to invested credit risk. The assets backing the UK
and Jackson annuity businesses means credit risk is considered a
material risk for these business units in particular.
Market risk
Is the
potential for reduced value of Prudential’s investments
resulting from the volatility of asset prices, driven by
fluctuations in equity prices, interest rates, foreign exchange
rates and property prices.
In the
Asia business, the main market risks arise from the value of fees
from its fee-earning products. In the US, Jackson’s fixed and
variable annuity books are exposed to a variety of market risks due
to the assets backing these policies. The UK business’ market
risk exposure arises from the valuation of the shareholder’s
proportion of the with-profits fund’s future profits, which
depends on equity, property and bond values.
M&G Prudential
invests in a broad range of asset classes and its income is subject
to the price volatility of global financial and currency
markets.
Liquidity risk
Is the
risk of not having sufficient liquid assets to meet obligations as
they fall due, and we look at this under both normal and stressed
conditions. This is a risk which is considered material at the
level of the Group.
|
Insurance risks
The
nature of the products offered by Prudential exposes it to
insurance risks, which form a significant part of the overall Group
risk profile.
The
insurance risks that the business is exposed to by virtue of its
products include longevity
risk (policyholders living longer than expected);
mortality risk
(policyholders with life protection dying); morbidity risk (policyholders with
health protection becoming ill) and persistency risk (customers lapsing
their policies, and a type of policyholder behaviour risk). The
medical insurance business in Asia is also exposed to medical inflation risk (the increasing
cost of medical treatments).
The
pricing of Prudential’s products requires it to make a number
of assumptions, and deviations from these may impact its reported
profitability. Across its business units, some insurance risks are
more material than others.
Persistency and
morbidity risks are among the most material insurance risks for the
Asia business given the focus on health protection products in the
region.
For
M&G Prudential the most material insurance risk is longevity
risk, driven by legacy annuity business.
The
Jackson business is most exposed to policyholder behaviour risk,
including persistency, which impacts the profitability of the
variable annuity business and is influenced by market performance
and the value of policy guarantees.
|
Operational risks
The
complexity of the Group and its activities means it faces a
challenging operating environment, resulting from the high volume
of transactions it processes, its people, processes and IT systems,
and the extensive regulations under which it operates. Operational
risk is the risk of loss or unintended gain from inadequate or
failed processes, personnel, systems and external events, and can
arise through business transformation; introducing new products;
new technologies; engaging in third party relationships; and
entering into new markets and geographies. Implementing the
business strategy requires interconnected change initiatives across
the Group, the pace of which introduces further complexity. Such
risks, if they materialise, could result in financial loss and/or
reputational damage.
Operational risk
is considered to be material at the level of the
Group.
Information security and data privacy risks are significant
considerations for Prudential, and include the continually evolving
risk of malicious attack on its systems, network disruption as well
as risks relating to data security, integrity, privacy and misuse.
The size of its IT infrastructure and network, stakeholder
expectations and high profile cyber security and data misuse
incidents across industries means that these risks continue to be
under high focus, and together are considered to be material at the
level of the Group.
Regulatory risk
Prudential
operates under the ever-evolving requirements set out by diverse
regulatory, legal and tax regimes. The increasing shift towards
macro-prudential regulation and the number of regulatory changes
under way across Asia (in particular focusing on consumer
protection) are key areas of focus, while both Jackson and M&G
Prudential operate in highly regulated markets. Regulatory reforms
can have a material impact on Prudential’s
businesses.
|
6.
Further risk information
In
reading the sections below, it is useful to understand that there
are some risks that Prudential’s policyholders assume by
virtue of the nature of their products, and some risks that the
Company and its shareholders assume. Examples of the latter include
those risks arising from assets held directly by and for the
Company or the risk that policyholder funds are exhausted. This
report is focused mainly on risks to the shareholder, but will
include those which arise indirectly through our policyholder
exposures.
6.1
Risks from our investments
The
main drivers of market risk in the Group are:
●
Investment risk, which arises on our holdings of equity and
property investments, the prices of which can change depending on
market conditions;
●
Interest rate risk, which is driven by the valuation of the
Prudential’s assets (particularly the bonds that it invests
in) and liabilities, which are dependent on market interest rates
and exposes it to the risk of those moving in a way that is
detrimental; and
●
Foreign exchange risk, through translation of its profits and
assets and liabilities denominated in various currencies, given the
geographical diversity of the business.
The
main investment risk exposure arises from the portion of the
profits from the UK with-profits fund which the shareholders are
entitled to receive; the value of the future fees from the
fee-earning products in the Asia business; and from the asset
returns backing Jackson’s variable annuities business.
Further detail is provided below.
The
Group’s interest rate risk is driven in the UK business by
the need to match the duration of its assets and liabilities; from
the guarantees of some non unit-linked investment products in Asia;
and the cost of guarantees in Jackson’s fixed, fixed index
and variable annuity business. Further detail is provided
below.
The
Group has appetite for market risk where it arises from
profit-generating insurance activities to the extent that it
remains part of a balanced portfolio of sources of income for
shareholders and is compatible with a robust solvency
position.
The
Group’s market risks are managed and mitigated by the
following:
●
Our market risk policy;
●
Risk appetite statements, limits and triggers;
●
Our asset and liability management programmes;
●
Hedging derivatives, including equity options and futures, interest
rate swaps and swaptions and currency forwards;
●
The monitoring and oversight of market risks through the regular
reporting of management information; and
●
Regular deep dive assessments.
Investment risk
In the
UK business, the main investment risk arises from the assets held
in the with-profits funds through the shareholders’
proportion of the funds’ declared bonuses and policyholder
net investment gains (future transfers). This investment risk is
driven mainly by equities in the funds and some hedging to protect
against a reduction in the value of these future transfers is
performed outside the funds. The
with-profits funds’ Solvency II own funds, estimated at
£9.4 billion as at 30 June 2018, helps to protect
against market fluctuations and
is protected partially against falls in equity markets through an
active hedging programme within the fund.
In Asia, the shareholder exposure to equity price movements results
from unit-linked products, where fee income is linked to the market
value of the funds under management. Further exposure arises from
with-profits businesses where bonuses declared are based broadly on
historical and current rates of return from the Asia
business’ investment portfolios, which include
equities.
In Jackson, investment risk arises from the assets backing customer
policies. For spread-based business, including fixed annuities,
these assets are generally bonds, and shareholder exposure comes
from the minimum returns needed to meet the guaranteed rates that
are offered to policyholders. For variable annuity business, these
assets include both equities and bonds, and the main risk to the
shareholder comes from the guaranteed benefits that can be included
as part of these products. The exposure to this is controlled by
using a derivative hedging programme, as well as through the use of
reinsurance to pass on the risk to third-party
reinsurers.
While
accepting the equity exposure that arises on future fees, the Group
has limited appetite for exposures to equity price movements to
remain unhedged or for volatility within policyholder guarantees
after taking into account any natural offsets and buffers within
the business.
Interest rate risk
Some
products that Prudential offer are sensitive to movements in
interest rates. As part of the Group’s ongoing management of
this risk, a number of mitigating actions to the in-force business
have been taken, as well as re-pricing and restructuring new
business offerings in response to recent relatively low interest
rates. Nevertheless, some sensitivity to interest rate movements is
still retained.
The
Group’s appetite for interest rate risk is limited to where
assets and liabilities can be tightly matched and where liquid
assets or derivatives exist. Appetite for risk is limited where
such liquid assets, derivatives or other offsets in the business to
cover interest rate exposures do not exist.
In the
UK insurance business, interest rate risk arises from the need to
match the cash flows of its annuity obligations with those from its
investments. Under Solvency II rules, interest rate risk also
results from the requirement to include a balance sheet risk
margin. The risk is managed by matching asset and liability
durations as well as continually assessing the need for use of any
derivatives. The with-profits business is also exposed to interest
rate risk through some product guarantees. Such risk is largely
borne by the with-profits fund itself although shareholder support
may be required in extreme circumstances where the fund has
insufficient resources to support the risk.
In
Asia, our exposure to interest rate risk arises from the guarantees
of some non unit-linked investment products. This exposure exists
because of the potential for asset and liability mismatch which,
although it is small and managed appropriately, cannot be
eliminated.
Jackson is
affected by interest rate movements to its fixed annuity, fixed
index annuity and variable annuity book, mainly from the impact on
the cost of guarantees to the shareholder in these products which
may increase when interest rates fall. The level of sales of
variable annuity products with guaranteed living benefits is
actively monitored, and the risk limits we have in place helps to
ensure comfort with the level of interest rate and market risks
incurred as a result. Derivatives are also used to provide some
protection.
Foreign exchange risk
The
geographical diversity of Prudential’s businesses means that
it has some exposure to the risk of foreign exchange rate
fluctuations. The operations in the US and Asia, which represent a
large proportion of operating profit and shareholders’ funds,
generally write policies and invest in assets in local currencies.
Although this limits the effect of exchange rate movements on local
operating results, it can lead to fluctuations in the Group
financial statements when results are reported in UK sterling. This
risk is accepted within our appetite for foreign exchange
risk.
The
Group has no appetite for foreign exchange risk in cases where a
surplus arises in an overseas operation which is to be used to
support Group capital, or where a significant cash payment is due
from an overseas subsidiary to the Group. This currency exposure is
hedged where it is believed to be favourable economically to do so.
Further, the Group generally does not have appetite for significant
direct shareholder exposure to foreign exchange risks in currencies
outside the countries in which it operates, but it does have some
appetite for this on fee income and on non-sterling investments
within the with-profits fund. Where foreign exchange risk arises
outside appetite, currency borrowings, swaps and other derivatives
are used to manage the exposure.
Prudential invests
in bonds that provide a regular, fixed amount of interest income
(fixed income assets) in order to match the payments needed to
policyholders. It also enters into reinsurance and derivative
contracts with third parties to mitigate various types of risk, as
well as holding cash deposits at certain banks. As a result, it is
exposed to credit risk and counterparty risk across its
business.
Credit
risk is the potential for reduction in the value of investments
which results from the perceived level of risk of an investment
issuer being unable to meet its obligations (defaulting).
Counterparty risk is a type of credit risk and relates to the risk
that the counterparty to any contract we enter into being unable to
meet their obligations causing us to suffer loss.
The
Group has some appetite to take credit risk where it arises from
profit-generating insurance activities, to the extent that it
remains part of a balanced portfolio of sources of income for
shareholders and is compatible with a robust solvency
position.
A
number of risk management tools are used to manage and mitigate
this credit risk, including the following:
●
A credit risk policy and dealing and controls policy;
●
Risk appetite statements and limits that have been defined on
issuers, and counterparties;
●
Collateral arrangements for derivative, secured lending reverse
repurchase and reinsurance transactions;
●
The Group Credit Risk Committee’s oversight of credit and
counterparty credit risk and sector and/or name-specific
reviews;
●
Regular assessments; and
●
Close monitoring or restrictions on investments that may be of
concern.
Debt and loan portfolio
Prudential’s
UK business is exposed mainly to credit risk on fixed income assets
in the shareholder-backed portfolio. At 30 June 2018, this
portfolio contained fixed income assets worth £22.1 billion.
M&G Prudential’s debt portfolio reduced by £12.1
billion following the transfer of fixed income assets to Rothesay
Life as part of the reinsurance agreement announced in March 2018.
Credit risk arising from a further £57.6 billion of fixed
income assets is borne largely by the with-profits fund, to which
the shareholder is not exposed directly although under extreme
circumstances shareholder support may be required if the fund is
unable to meet payments as they fall due.
Credit
risk also arises from the debt portfolio in the Asia business, the
value of which was £42.3 billion at 30 June 2018. The majority
(68 per cent) of the portfolio is in unit-linked and with-profits
funds and so exposure of the shareholder to this component is
minimal. The remaining 32 per cent of the debt portfolio is held to
back the shareholder business.
In the
general account of the Jackson business £36.1 billion of fixed
income assets are held to support shareholder liabilities including
those from our fixed annuities, fixed index annuities and life
insurance products.
The
shareholder-owned debt and loan portfolio of the Group’s
other operations was £2.3 billion as at 30 June
2018.
Further details of
the composition and quality of our debt portfolio, and exposure to
loans, can be found in the IFRS financial statements.
Group sovereign debt
Prudential also
invests in bonds issued by national governments. This sovereign
debt represented 20 per cent or £14.4 billion of the
shareholder debt portfolio as at 30 June 2018 (31 December 2017: 19
per cent or £16.5 billion). 6 per cent of this was rated AAA
and 88 per cent was considered investment grade (31 December 2017:
90 per cent investment grade).
The
particular risks associated with holding sovereign debt are
detailed further in our disclosures on risk factors.
The
exposures held by the shareholder-backed business and with-profits
funds in sovereign debt securities at 30 June 2018 are given in
Note C3.2(f) of the Group’s IFRS financial
statements.
Bank debt exposure and counterparty credit risk
Prudential’s
exposure to banks is a key part of its core investment business, as
well as being important for the hedging and other activities
undertaken to manage its various financial risks. Given the
importance of its relationship with its banks, exposure to the
sector is considered a material risk for the Group.
The
exposures held by the shareholder-backed business and with-profits
funds in bank debt securities at 30 June 2018 are given in Note
C3.2(f) of the Group’s IFRS financial
statements.
The
exposure to derivative counterparty and reinsurance counterparty
credit risk is managed using an array of risk management tools,
including a comprehensive system of limits. Where appropriate, Prudential
reduces its exposure, buys credit protection or uses additional
collateral arrangements to manage its levels of counterparty credit
risk.
At 30
June 2018, shareholder exposures by rating and sector1 are shown
below:
●
95 per cent of the shareholder portfolio is investment grade rated.
In particular, 66 per cent of the portfolio is rated A- and above
(or equivalent); and
●
The Group’s
shareholder portfolio is well diversified: no individual sector
makes up more than 15 per cent of the total portfolio (excluding
the financial and sovereign sectors).
Prudential’s
liquidity risk arises from the need to have sufficient liquid
assets to meet policyholder and third-party payments as they fall
due. This incorporates the risk arising from funds composed of
illiquid assets and results from a mismatch between the liquidity
profile of assets and liabilities. Liquidity risk may impact on
market conditions and valuation of assets in a more uncertain way
than for other risks like interest rate or credit risk. It may
arise, for example, where external capital is unavailable at
sustainable cost, increased liquid assets are required to be held
as collateral under derivative transactions or where redemption
requests are made against Prudential external funds.
Prudential has no
appetite for liquidity risk, ie for any business to have
insufficient resources to cover its outgoing cash flows, or for the
Group as a whole to not meet cash flow requirements from its debt
obligations under any plausible scenario.
The
Group has significant internal sources of liquidity, which are
sufficient to meet all of our expected cash requirements for at
least 12 months from the date the financial statements are
approved, without having to resort to external sources of funding.
The Group has a total of £2.6 billion of undrawn committed
facilities that can be made use of, expiring in 2022 and 2023.
Access to further liquidity is available through the debt capital
markets and an extensive commercial paper programme in place, and
Prudential has maintained a consistent presence as an issuer in the
market for the last decade.
A
number of risk management tools are used to manage and mitigate
this liquidity risk, including the following:
●
The Group’s liquidity risk policy;
●
Risk appetite statements, limits and triggers;
●
Regular assessment at Group and business units of Liquidity
Coverage Ratios which are calculated under both base case and
stressed scenarios and are reported to committees and the
Board;
●
The Group’s Liquidity Risk Management Plan, which includes
details of the Group Liquidity Risk Framework as well as gap
analysis of liquidity risks and the adequacy of available liquidity
resources under normal and stressed conditions;
●
Regular stress testing;
●
Our contingency plans and identified sources of
liquidity;
●
The Group’s ability to access the money and debt capital
markets;
●
Regular deep dive assessments; and
●
The Group’s access to external committed credit
facilities.
6.2
Risks from our products
Insurance risk
makes up a significant proportion of Prudential’s overall
risk exposure. The profitability of its businesses depends on a mix
of factors including levels of, and trends in, mortality
(policyholders dying), morbidity (policyholders becoming ill) and
policyholder behaviour (variability in how customers interact with
their policies, including utilisation of withdrawals, take-up of
options and guarantees and persistency, ie lapsing of policies),
and increases in the costs of claims, including the level of
medical expenses increases over and above price inflation (claim
inflation).
The
Group has appetite for retaining insurance risks in order to create
shareholder value in the areas where it believes it has expertise
and controls to manage the risk and can support such risk with its
capital and solvency position.
The
principal drivers of the Group’s insurance risk vary across
its business units. At M&G Prudential, this is predominantly
longevity risk. Across Asia, where a significant volume of health
protection business is written, the most significant insurance
risks are morbidity risk, persistency risk, as well as medical
inflation risk. In Jackson, policyholder behaviour risk is
particularly material, especially in the take up of options and
guarantees on variable annuity business.
The
Group manages longevity risk in various ways. Longevity reinsurance
is a key tool in managing this risk. In March 2018, the
Group’s longevity risk exposure was significantly reduced by
reinsuring £12 billion in UK annuity liabilities to Rothesay
Life, pursuant to a full Part VII transfer of these liabilities
planned for 2019. Although Prudential has withdrawn from selling
new UK annuity business, given its significant annuity portfolio
the assumptions it makes about future rates of improvement in
mortality rates remain key to the measurement of its insurance
liabilities and to its assessment of any reinsurance transactions.
Prudential continues to conduct research into longevity risk using
both experience from its annuity portfolio and industry data.
Although the general consensus in recent years is that people are
living longer, there is considerable volatility in year-on-year
longevity experience, which is why it needs expert judgement in
setting its longevity basis.
Prudential’s
morbidity risk is mitigated by appropriate underwriting when
policies are issued and claims are received. Our morbidity
assumptions reflect our recent experience and expectation of future
trends for each relevant line of business.
In
Asia, Prudential writes significant volumes of health protection
business, and so a key assumption is the rate of medical inflation,
which is often in excess of general price inflation. There is a
risk that the expenses of medical treatment increase more than
expected, so the medical claim cost passed on to Prudential is
higher than anticipated. Medical expense inflation risk is best
mitigated by retaining the right to re-price our products each year
and by having suitable overall claim limits within its policies,
either limits per type of claim or in total across a
policy.
The
Group’s persistency assumptions reflect similarly a
combination of recent past experience for each relevant line of
business and expert judgement, especially where a lack of relevant
and credible experience data exists. Any expected change in future
persistency is also reflected in the assumption. Persistency risk
is mitigated by appropriate training and sales processes and
managed locally post-sale through regular experience monitoring and
the identification of common characteristics of business with high
lapse rates. Where appropriate, allowance is made for the
relationship (either assumed or observed historically) between
persistency and investment returns and any additional risk is
accounted for. Modelling this dynamic policyholder behaviour is
particularly important when assessing the likely take-up rate of
options embedded within certain products. The effect of persistency
on the Group’s financial results can vary but depends mostly
on the value of the product features and market
conditions.
Prudential’s
insurance risks are managed and mitigated using the
following:
●
The Group’s insurance and underwriting risk
policies;
●
The risk appetite statements, limits and triggers;
●
Using longevity, morbidity and persistency assumptions that reflect
recent experience and expectation of future trends, and industry
data and expert judgement where appropriate;
●
Using reinsurance to mitigate longevity and morbidity
risks;
●
Ensuring appropriate medical underwriting when policies are issued
and appropriate claims management practices when claims are
received in order to mitigate morbidity risk;
●
Maintaining the quality of sales processes and using initiatives to
increase customer retention in order to mitigate persistency
risk;
●
Using product re-pricing and other claims management initiatives in
order to mitigate medical expense inflation risk; and
●
Regular deep dive assessments.
6.1
Risks from our business operations
In the
course of doing business, the Group is exposed to non-financial
risks arising from its operations, the business environment
and its strategy. The main risks across these areas are
detailed below.
Operational Risks
Prudential defines
operational risk as the risk of loss (or unintended gain or profit)
arising from inadequate or failed internal processes, personnel or
systems, or from external events. This includes employee error,
model error, system failures, fraud or some other event which
disrupts business processes or has a detrimental impact to
customers. Processes are established for activities across the
scope of our business, including operational activity, regulatory
compliance, and those supporting environmental, social and
governance (ESG) activities more broadly, any of which can expose
us to operational risks.
Prudential has no
appetite for material losses (direct or indirect) suffered as a
result of failing to develop, implement or monitor appropriate
controls to manage operational risks.
A
large volume of complex transactions are processed by the Group
across a number of diverse products, and are subject to a high
number of varying legal, regulatory and tax regimes. A number of
important third-party relationships also exist which provide the
distribution and processing of Prudential’s products,
both as market counterparties and as outsourcing partners.
M&G Prudential outsources several operations, including a
significant part of its back office, customer-facing functions and
a number of IT functions. These third party arrangements help
Prudential to provide a high level and cost-effective service to
our customers, but they also make us reliant on the operational
performance of our outsourcing partners.
The
performance of the Group’s core business activities places
reliance on the IT infrastructure that supports day-to-day
transaction processing. The IT environment must also be secure and
an increasing cyber risk threat needs to be addressed as the
Group’s digital footprint increases – see separate
information security risk section below. The risk that
Prudential’s IT infrastructure does not meet these
requirements is a key area of focus for the Group, particularly the
risk that legacy infrastructure supporting core
activities/processes affects business continuity or impacts on
business growth.
Operational
challenges also exist in keeping pace with regulatory changes. This
requires implementing processes to ensure we are, and remain,
compliant on an ongoing basis, including regular monitoring and
reporting. The high rate of global regulatory change, in an already
complex regulatory landscape, increases the risk of non-compliance
due to a failure to identify, interpret correctly, implement and/or
monitor regulatory compliance. See Global regulatory and political
risk section below. Legislative developments over recent years,
together with enhanced regulatory oversight and increased
capability to issue sanctions, have resulted in a complex
regulatory environment that may lead to breaches of varying
magnitude if the Group’s business-as-usual operations are not
compliant. As well as prudential regulation, the Group focuses on
conduct regulation, including those related to sales practice and
anti-money laundering, bribery and corruption. There is a
particular focus on regulations related to the latter in
newer/emerging markets.
Environmental, social and governance (ESG) and climate change
risks
The
business environment Prudential operates in has become increasingly
complex over the years. The political, environmental, societal,
technological, legal and economic landscape is highly dynamic and
uncertain. Changes and developments on the horizon may result in
emerging risks to the business which are monitored under our
Emerging Risk Framework.
The
Group maintains active engagement with its shareholders,
governments, policymakers and regulators in its key markets, as
well as with international institutions. This introduces
expectations for the Group to act and respond to ESG matters in a
certain manner. The perception that key stakeholders have of
Prudential and its businesses is crucial in forming and maintaining
a robust brand and reputation. As such, the Group’s
operational risk framework explicitly incorporates ESG as a
component of its social and environmental responsibility, brand
management and external communications within its framework. This
is further strengthened by factoring considerations for
reputational impacts when the materiality of operational risks are
assessed.
The
climate risk landscape continues to evolve and is moving up the
agenda of many regulators, governments, non-governmental
organisations and investors. Examples of this include the US
Department of Labor’s decision to change its guidance to
pension fund fiduciaries to allow them to factor ESG issues into
investment decisions; Hong Kong Stock Exchange listing rules
requiring listed companies to provide a high-level discussion of
ESG approaches and activities in external disclosures, and the
Financial Stability Board’s (FSB’s) Task Force for
Climate-related Financial Disclosures.
The
increased regulatory focus on environmental issues not only
reflects existing commitments, for example in the UK under the 2008
Climate Change Act, but also a heightened societal awareness of
climate change as a pressing global concern. Regulatory and
stakeholder interest in environmental matters is expected to
increase as climate change moves higher up governmental agendas.
This increase in focus creates a number of potential near-term
risks. These include:
●
Investment risk in the form of physical risk to assets and
‘transition risk’, ie the risk that an abrupt,
unexpected tightening of carbon emission policies lead to a
disorderly re-pricing of carbon-intensive assets;
●
Liability risk, if the Group is unable to demonstrate sufficiently
that it has acted to mitigate exposure to climate change related
risk; and
●
Reputational risks, where the Group’s actions could affect
external perceptions of our brand and corporate
citizenship.
The
Group has established a Group-wide Responsible Investment Advisory
Committee with designated responsibility to oversee
Prudential’s responsible investment activities as both asset
owners and asset managers.
Physical impacts
of climate change could also arise, driven by specific
climate-related events such as natural disasters. These impacts are
mitigated through the Group’s crisis management and disaster
recovery plans.
Strategic and transformation risks
As
with all risks, strategic risk requires a forward-looking approach
to risk management. A key part of Prudential’s approach are
the risk assessments performed as part of the Group’s annual
strategic planning process, which supports the identification of
potential future threats and the initiatives needed to address
them, as well as competitive opportunities. The impact on the
Group’s businesses and its risk profile is also assessed to
ensure that strategic initiatives are within the Group's overall
risk appetite.
Implementation of
the Group’s strategy and the need to comply with emerging
regulation has resulted in a significant portfolio of
transformation and change initiatives, which may further increase
in the future. In particular the intention to demerge the UK and
Europe business from the rest of the Group has resulted in a
substantial change programme which needs to be managed at the same
time that other material transformation programmes are being
delivered. The scale and the complexity of the transformation programmes
could impact business operations and customers, and has the
potential for reputational damage if these programmes fail to
deliver their objectives. Implementing further strategic
initiatives may amplify these risks.
Other
significant change initiatives are occurring across the Group. The
volume, scale and complexity of these programmes increase the
likelihood and potential impact of risks associated
with:
●
Dependencies between multiple projects;
●
The organisational ability to absorb change being
exceeded;
●
Unrealised business objectives/benefits; and
●
Failures in project design and execution.
Group-wide framework and risk management for operational
risk
The
risks detailed above form key elements of the Group’s
operational risk profile. In order to identify, assess, manage,
control and report effectively on all operational risks across the
business, a Group-wide operational risk framework is in place. The
key components of the framework are:
●
Application of a
risk and control assessment (RCA) process, where operational risk
exposures are identified and assessed as part of a periodical
cycle. The RCA process considers a range of internal and external
factors, including an assessment of the control environment, to
determine the business’s most significant risk exposures on a
prospective basis;
●
An internal
incident capture process, which identifies, quantifies and monitors
remediation conducted through application of action plans for risk
events that have occurred across the business;
●
A scenario
analysis process for the quantification of extreme, yet plausible
manifestations of key operational risks across the business on a
forward-looking basis. This is carried out at least annually and
supports external and internal capital requirements as well as
informing risk activity across the business; and
●
An operational
risk appetite framework that articulates the level of operational
risk exposure the business is willing to tolerate and sets out
escalation processes for breaches of appetite.
Outputs from these
processes and activities performed by individual business units are
monitored by the Group Risk function, which provide an aggregated
view of risk profile across the business to the Group Risk
Committee and Board.
These
core framework components are embedded across the Group via the
Group Operational Risk Policy and Standards documents, which sets
out the key principles and minimum standards for the management of
operational risk across the Group.
The
Group operational risk policy, standards and operational risk
appetite framework sit alongside other risk policies and standards
that individually engage with key operational risks, including
outsourcing and third-party supply, business continuity, technology
and data, and operations processes.
These
policies and standards include subject matter expert-led processes
that are designed to identify, assess, manage and control
operational risks, including the application of:
●
A transformation
risk framework that assesses, manages and reports on the end-to-end
transformation lifecycle, project prioritisation and the risks,
interdependencies and possible conflicts arising from a large
portfolio of transformation activities;
●
Internal and
external review of cyber security capability;
●
Regular updating
and testing of elements of disaster-recovery plans and the Critical
Incident Procedure process;
●
Group and business
unit-level compliance oversight and testing in respect of adherence
with in-force regulations;
●
Regulatory change
teams in place to assist the business in proactively adapting and
complying with regulatory developments;
●
A framework in
place for emerging risk identification and analysis in order to
capture, monitor and allow us to prepare for operational risks that
may crystallise beyond the short-term horizon;
●
Corporate
insurance programmes to limit the financial impact of operational
risks; and
●
Reviews of key
operational risks and challenges within Group and business unit
business plans.
These
activities are fundamental in maintaining an effective system of
internal control, and as such outputs from these also inform core
RCA, incident capture and scenario analysis processes and reporting
on operational risk. Furthermore, they also ensure that operational
risk considerations are embedded in key business decision-making,
including material business approvals and in setting and
challenging the Group’s strategy.
b.
Global regulatory and political risk
Regulatory and
political risks may impact on Prudential’s business or the
way in which it is conducted. This covers a broad range of risks
including changes in government policy and legislation, capital
control measures, new regulations at either national or
international level, and specific regulator interventions or
actions.
Recent
shifts in the focus of some governments toward more protectionist
or restrictive economic and trade policies could impact on the
degree and nature of regulatory changes and Prudential’s
competitive position in some geographic markets. This could take
effect, for example, through increased friction in cross-border
trade, capital controls or measures favouring local enterprises
such as changes to the maximum level of non-domestic ownership by
foreign companies. These developments continue to be monitored by
the Group at a national and global level and these considerations
form part of the Group’s ongoing engagement with government
policy teams and regulators.
National and
regional efforts to curb systemic risk and promote financial
stability are also underway in certain jurisdictions in which
Prudential operates, including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform
and Consumer Protection Act in the US, the work of the FSB on
G-SIIs and the Insurance Capital Standard being developed by the
International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS). There
are also a number of ongoing policy initiatives and regulatory
developments that are having, and will continue to have, an impact
on the way Prudential is supervised. These include addressing
Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) reviews, ongoing engagement with
the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), and the work of the FSB
and standard-setting institutions such as the IAIS. Decisions taken
by regulators, including those related to solvency requirements,
corporate or governance structures, capital allocation and risk
management may have an impact on our business.
There
has, in recent years, been regulatory focus in the UK on insurance
products and market practices which may have adversely impacted
customers, including the FCA’s Legacy Review and Thematic
Review of Annuity Sales Practices. The management of customer risk
remains a key focus of management in the UK business. Merger and
transformation activity, new product propositions and new
regulatory requirements may also have customer risk implications
which are monitored.
The
International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) has
designated Prudential as a G-SII, which means that it has
additional regulatory requirements to comply with, including being
subject to enhanced group-wide supervision and having in place
effective resolution planning, as well as a Systemic Risk
Management Plan, a Recovery Plan and a Liquidity Risk Management
Plan. The IAIS has launched a public interim consultation on an
activities-based approach to systemic risk. Following the feedback
from this, a second consultation with proposals for policy measures
is due to be launched in 2018. Any changes to the designation
methodology are expected to be implemented in 2019.
An
international Insurance Capital Standard (ICS) is also being
developed by the IAIS as part of ComFrame – the common
framework for the supervision of Internationally Active Insurance
Groups (IAIGs). ComFrame will more generally establish a set of
common principles and standards designed to assist supervisors in
addressing risks that arise from insurance groups with operations
in multiple jurisdictions.
As
part of the G-SII regime, the IAIS is also considering the
introduction of enhanced capital requirements in the form of a
Higher Loss Absorbency (HLA) measure (planned to come into force in
2022). The HLA is intended to be based on the ICS, implementation
of which will be conducted in two phases: a five-year monitoring
phase followed by an implementation phase.
In May
2017, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) published
IFRS 17 which will introduce fundamental changes to the statutory
reporting of insurance entities that prepare accounts according to
IFRS from 2021. This is expected to, among other things, include
altering the timing of IFRS profit recognition, and the
implementation of the standard is likely to require changes to the
Group’s IT, actuarial and finance systems.
In
March 2018, the UK and EU agreed the terms of a transition
agreement for the UK’s exit from the bloc, which will last
from the termination of the UK’s membership of the EU (at
11.00pm GMT 29 March 2019) until 31 December 2020 (although a
legally binding text is yet to be agreed). The outcome of
negotiations on the final terms of the UK’s relationship with
the EU remains highly uncertain and the potential for a disorderly
exit from the EU by the UK without a negotiated agreement may
increase volatility in the markets where we operate, creating the
potential for a general downturn in economic activity. Uncertainty
also exists on the future applicability of the Solvency II regime
in the UK after it leaves the EU. At the same time, the European
Commission is currently reviewing some aspects of the Solvency II
legislation, which is expected to continue until 2021 and covers,
among other things, a review of the Long Term Guarantee measures
(on which EIOPA is expected to report later in 2018).
The
Group’s diversification by geography, currency, product and
distribution should reduce some of the potential impact of the
UK’s exit. M&G Prudential, due to the geographical
location of both its businesses and its customers, has most
potential to be affected, although the extent of the impact will
depend in part on the nature of the arrangements that are put in
place between the UK and the EU. Contingency plans were developed
ahead of the referendum by business units and operations that may
be impacted immediately by a vote to withdraw the UK from the EU,
and these plans have been enacted since the referendum result.
Significant work has also since been undertaken to ensure that
Prudential’s business, and in particular its customer base,
is not unduly affected by the decision of the UK to exit from the
EU.
In the
US, various initiatives are underway to introduce fiduciary
obligations for distributors of investment products, which may
reshape the distribution of retirement products. Jackson has
introduced fee-based variable annuity products in response to the
potential introduction of such rules, and we anticipate that the
business’s strong relationships with distributors, history of
product innovation and efficient operations should further mitigate
any impacts.
The US
National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) is
continuing its industry consultation with the aim of reducing the
non-economic volatility in the variable annuity statutory balance
sheet and risk management, which will have an impact on the Jackson
business, which continues to be engaged in the consultation and
testing process. The NAIC also has an on-going review of the C-1
bond factors in the required capital calculation, on which further
information is expected to be provided in due course. Preparations
by Prudential to manage the impact of these reforms will
continue.
On 27
July 2017, the UK’s FCA announced that it will no longer
persuade, or use its powers to compel, panel banks to submit rates
for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. The discontinuation of
LIBOR in its current form or a change to alternative benchmark
rates could, among other things, impact the Group through an
adverse effect on the value of Prudential’s assets and
liabilities which are linked to or which reference LIBOR, a
reduction in market liquidity during any period of transition and
increased legal and conduct risks to the Group arising from changes
required to documentation and its related obligations to its
stakeholders.
In
Asia, regulatory regimes are developing at different speeds, driven
by a combination of global factors and local considerations. New
local capital rules and requirements could be introduced in these
and other regulatory regimes that challenge legal or ownership
structures, current sales practices, or could be applied to sales
made prior to their introduction retrospectively, which could have
a negative impact on Prudential’s business or reported
results.
Risk
management and mitigation of regulatory and political risk at
Prudential includes the following:
●
Risk assessment of the Business Plan which includes consideration
of current strategies;
●
Close monitoring and assessment of our business environment and
strategic risks;
●
The consideration of risk themes in strategic decisions;
and
●
Ongoing engagement with national regulators, government policy
teams and international standard setters.
c.
Information security risk and data privacy
Information
security risk remains an area of heightened focus after a number of
recent high-profile attacks and data losses across industries.
Criminal capability in this area is maturing and industrialising,
with an increased level of understanding of complex financial
transactions which increases the risks to the financial services
industry. The threat landscape is continuously evolving, and the
systemic risk of sophisticated but untargeted attacks is rising,
particularly during times of heightened geopolitical
tensions.
Recent
developments in data protection worldwide (such as the EU General
Data Protection Regulation that came into force in May 2018)
increases the financial and reputational implications for
Prudential of a breach of its (or third-party suppliers’) IT
systems. As well as data protection, increasingly stakeholder
expectations are that companies and organisations use personal
information in a transparent and appropriate way. Given this, both
information security and data privacy are key risks for the Group.
As well as preventative risk management, it is fundamental that
robust critical recovery systems are in place in the event of a
successful attack on the Group’s systems, breach of
information security or failure of its systems in order to retain
its customer relationships and trusted reputation.
The
core objectives of the Group’s Cyber Risk Management Strategy
are: to develop a comprehensive situational awareness of its
business in cyberspace; to pro-actively engage cyber attackers to
minimise harm to its business; and to enable the business to grow
confidently and safely in cyberspace.
The
Group’s Cyber Defence Plan consists of a number of elements,
including developing our ability to deal with incidents; alignment
with our digital transformation strategy; and increasing
information security risk oversight and assurance to the Board.
Progress has been made in all of these across 2017 and 2018.
Protecting our customers remains core to Prudential’s
business, and the successful delivery of the Plan will reinforce
its capabilities to continue doing so in cyberspace as it
transitions to a digital business.
The
Board receives periodic updates on information security risk
management throughout the year. Group functions work with the
business units to address risks locally within the national and
regional context of each business, following the strategic
direction laid out in the Cyber Risk Management Strategy and
managed through the execution of the Cyber Defence
Plan.
Notes
1
Based on hierarchy of Standard and Poor’s Moody’s and
Fitch, where available and if unavailable, other rating agencies or
internal ratings have been used.
Corporate governance
The
Directors confirm that the Company has complied with all the
provisions of the Corporate Governance Code issued by the Hong Kong
Stock Exchange Limited (HK Code) throughout the accounting period,
except that the Company does not comply with provision B.1.2(d) of
the HK Code which requires companies, on a comply or explain basis,
to have a remuneration committee which makes recommendations to a
main board on the remuneration of non-executive directors. This
provision is not compatible with supporting provision D.2.3 of the
UK Corporate Governance Code which recommends the board determines
the remuneration of non-executive directors. Prudential has chosen
to adopt a practice in line with the recommendations of the UK
Corporate Governance Code.
The
Directors also confirm that the financial results contained in this
document have been reviewed by the Group Audit
Committee.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: 08 August 2018
|
PRUDENTIAL PUBLIC
LIMITED COMPANY
|
|
|
|
By:
/s/ Mark FitzPatrick
|
|
|
|
Mark
FitzPatrick
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|