File No. ____________

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                                WASHINGTON, D.C.

                                    FORM U-57

                 NOTIFICATION OF FOREIGN UTILITY COMPANY STATUS

                        Filed Under Section 33(a) of the
             Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, as amended

                                  Tecnored S.A.
                      (Name of the foreign utility company)

                  PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP INCORPORATED
    (Name of filing company, if filed on behalf of a foreign utility company)

Item 1

Notification

Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated  ("PSEG"), a holding company exempt
from the Public  Utility  Holding  Company Act of 1935, as amended (the "Holding
Company Act") pursuant to Section  3(a)(1)  thereof and the corporate  parent of
Public Service Electric and Gas Company ("PSE&G"), a "public-utility company" as
that  term is  defined  in the  Holding  Company  Act,  hereby  files  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission"), pursuant to Section 33 of the
Holding Company Act, this Form U-57 on behalf of Tecnored S.A.(1)  ("Tecnored"),
an owner of electrical generation facilities and provider of electricity-related
services,  for the purpose of notifying  the  Commission  that  Tecnored is, and
hereby claims status as, a "foreign utility company" ("FUCO") within the meaning
of Section 33 of the Holding Company Act.

As described  further below,  Tecnored owns  generation  facilities in Chile and
provides   additional   services  to  its  affiliate   Chilquinta  Energia  S.A.
("Chilquinta"), Chilquinta's subsidiaries, and other third parties.

----------
(1)  Tecnored  is a Chilean  sociedad  anonima.  Inversiones  PSEG Chile  Holdco
Limitada  ("Inversiones")  and Inversiones  Sempra Chile Holdco Limitada ("Chile
Holdco")  each own 50% of the equity  interest  in  Tecnored.  Inversiones  is a
wholly-owned  indirect  subsidiary  of PSEG and Chile  Holdco is a  wholly-owned
indirect subsidiary of Sempra Energy.




Tecnored does not own or derive any part of its income,  directly or indirectly,
from the generation,  transmission,  or distribution of electric energy for sale
or the  distribution  of natural or  manufactured  gas for heat,  light or power
within  the United  States of  America,  and  Tecnored  is not a  public-utility
company operating in the United States of America,  as such terms are defined in
the Holding Company Act.

ITEM 1

Name and Business Address of the Entity Claiming FUCO Status:

      Tecnored S.A.
      Cerro El Plomo 3819
      Parque Industrial de Curauma
      Placilla, Valparaiso, Region V, Chile

Description  of  the  Facilities  Used  for  the  Generation,  Transmission  and
Distribution of Electric Energy for Sale

Tecnored owns an electrical  generation facility in Casablanca,  Region V, Chile
that consists of two natural-gas  fired combustion  engines and two 3.2 megawatt
generators.  Tecnored  sells  the  electrical  output  of this  facility  to its
affiliate  Chilquinta  Energia S.A. and sells the thermal output of the facility
to  Energas  S.A.  Tecnored  also  owns  forty-two  small,   mobile  diesel  and
gasoline-fired  generators,  which it leases to its affiliate Chilquinta Energia
S.A. for emergency use. Thirty-six of these generators can supply a total of 217
kV of electrical energy, and the remaining eight can supply a total of 220 kV of
electrical  energy.  Tecnored also provides other services to Chilquinta Energia
S.A., such as installation, metering and construction-related services.

Ownership of Voting Securities:

50% of the stock of Tecnored is owned by  Inversiones,  a wholly-owned  indirect
subsidiary of PSEG. The remaining 50% of the stock of Tecnored is owned by Chile
Holdco, a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of Sempra Energy.

ITEM 2

Domestic Associate Public-Utility Companies

PSE&G,  Southern California Gas Company  ("SoCalGas"),  San Diego Gas & Electric
Company  ("SDG&E"),  Frontier Energy LLC ("Frontier") and Bangor Gas Company LLC
("Bangor"),  are Tecnored's only domestic associate public-utility companies, as
such terms are defined in Section 2 of the Holding Company Act.

PSE&G is a  wholly-owned  direct  subsidiary  of PSEG, a  publicly-held  holding
company,  exempt by rule under Section 3(a)(1) of the Holding Company Act. PSE&G
has not paid and will not pay for its  affiliate's  interest in, and will itself
have no interest in, Tecnored.




SoCalGas  and SDG&E are  substantially  wholly-owned  indirect  subsidiaries  of
Sempra Energy, and Frontier and Bangor are wholly-owned indirect subsidiaries of
Sempra Energy,  a publicly-held  holding  company,  exempt by order issued under
Section  3(a)(1) of the Holding Company Act. Sempra Energy has not paid and will
not pay for its  affiliates'  interest  in, and will itself have no interest in,
Tecnored.

Sempra Energy is filing  simultaneously  herewith a separate Form U-57 on behalf
of Tecnored.

EXHIBIT A

State Commission Certification - New Jersey

Exhibit A has been  omitted  for the State of New Jersey for  reasons  set forth
below, since the state certification requirement with regard to the State of New
Jersey is deemed  satisfied by Orders issued in 1986,  prior to the enactment of
Section 33(a)(2) of the Holding Company Act, by the Board of Public Utilities of
the State of New Jersey ("BPU"),  the only state commission having  jurisdiction
over the retail gas and  electricity  rates of PSE&G. In support of such claimed
exemption from state certification, PSEG incorporates by reference the BPU Order
of January 17, 1986,  entitled "Order Authorizing  Transfer of Capital Stock and
Approval of Merger",  as amended by the BPU and Order dated  November  13, 1986,
entitled  "Order  Authorizing  Transfer of Capital Stock and Approval of Merger"
also incorporated by reference.(2) PSEG asserts that such BPU Orders satisfy the
requirements of Section 33 (a)(2).

Section 33 (a)(2) requires that every state commission having  jurisdiction over
the  retail  electric  or gas  rates  of a  public-utility  company  that  is an
associate  company or an  affiliate  of an otherwise  exempted  foreign  utility
company must certify to the Securities and Exchange  Commission that it has "the
authority and resources to protect  ratepayers  subject to its  jurisdiction and
that it intends to exercise its authority."

Section  33 (a) (2)  also  provides  that  this  requirement  "shall  be  deemed
satisfied"  if, prior to the enactment of Section 33 (a) (2), the relevant state
commission   had,   "on  the  basis  of   prescribed   conditions   of   general
applicability," determined that the ratepayers of the public utility company

----------
(2) PSEG has previously  relied on and filed paper copies with the Commission of
such BPU Orders as satisfaction of the state certification requirement. See U-57
filings  of  Public  Service   Enterprise  Group   Incorporated  on  behalf  of:
Turbogeneradores  Maracay,  C.A.  filed with the  Commission  on July 31,  1995;
Empresa  Distribuidora  de Energia Sur, S.A., filed with the Commission on April
22,  1997;  Empresa  Distribuidora  de  Energia  Norte,  S.A.,  filed  with  the
Commission  on April 22,  1997;  Companhia  Norte-Nordeste  de  Distribuicao  de
Energia  Electrica  filed with the  Commission  on October  22,  1997;  Turboven
Maracay Company filed with the Commission in October,  1998;  Turboven  Valencia
Company filed with the  Commission on October 15, 1998;  Turboven  Cagua Company
filed with the Commission on October 15, 1998;  Empresa  Distribuidora  La Plata
S.A.  filed with the  Commission  on November 4, 1998;  Chilquinta  Energia S.A.
filed with the  Commission  on June 8, 1999;  AES Parana  S.C.A.  filed with the
Commission  on July 12,  1999,  AES  Parana  Operations  S.R.L.  filed  with the
Commission on July 12, 1999; Luz del Sur S.A.A.  filed  electronically  with the
Commission on September 14, 1999;  Shanghai  Wei-Gang  Energy Company Ltd. filed
with the Commission on May 30, 2000;  Empresa  Distribuidora  de Electricidad de
Entre Rios S.A. , filed electronically with the Commission on December 28, 2000;
Sociedad Austral de Electricidad S.A., filed  electronically with the Commission
on August 30, 2001; and Dhofar Power Company SAOC, filed electronically with the
Commission on June 27, 2003.




are  "adequately   insulated  from  the  effects  of  diversification   and  the
diversification would not impair the ability of the state commission to regulate
effectively the operations of such company."

PSE&G,   an  associate   company  or  affiliate   company  of  Tecnored,   is  a
public-utility company that, among other things, distributes electric energy and
natural gas at retail in the United States. As indicated above, the retail rates
of PSE&G are  regulated by the New Jersey BPU. The BPU Orders  referenced  above
authorize the transfer of PSE&G's issued and outstanding  shares of common stock
to a new holding company to be formed - PSEG.  This Order, as amended,  commonly
referred to as the Holding Company Order, was and is generally applicable to all
of PSEG's  non-utility  activities.  The BPU (at pp. 3-6 of the January 17, 1986
Order) imposed seventeen (17) conditions generally applicable to the new holding
company and its subsidiaries.

The BPU additionally noted (at p. 9) that it can monitor PSE&G's inter-corporate
transactions with affiliates;  assure that utility assets are not transferred to
unregulated  affiliates and that the utility is adequately  compensated  for the
transfer of such  assets;  and assure  adequate  capitalization  by reducing the
earnings of PSE&G until the holding  company makes proper  capital  commitments.
Such Order stated (at p.8) the BPU's conclusion that:

"This Board has ample  statutory  authority  to regulate  all utility  activites
(sic) and, if required by existing facts or  circumstances,  to take  reasonable
and appropriate  action in order to resolve  regulatory  problems and to protect
the public."

The BPU further stated that:

"The Board's traditional regulatory powers will provide all the enforcement that
the Board will need to assure that PSE&G's  utility  operation and its customers
receive first priority, and that diversification by the Holding Company does not
affect the utility or its  customers.  The Board's  regulatory  tools will be at
least as effective when applied to PSE&G as part of a holding company  structure
as they would be if PSE&G were to embark on diversification through wholly-owned
subsidiaries."

The BPU concluded by finding inter alia (at p. 10) that:

      "(2) The proposed  conditions  set out in the joint Position and Agreement
entered into by the Petitioner and Staff are reasonable and appropriate, and, in
conjunction with existing statutes, provide this Board with sufficient means and
authority by which to properly regulate utility operations;

      (3) The proposed  restructuring will have no adverse impact upon the rates
charged to Petitioner's ratepayers, the employees of the utility or upon PSE&G's
ability to render safe, adequate and proper service . . . ."

Accordingly,  the BPU,  the sole state  commission  with  jurisdiction  over the
retail rates of PSE&G  determined,  as set forth in the BPU Orders, on the basis
of prescribed conditions of general applicability,  that the ratepayers of PSE&G
are adequately insulated from the effects of




diversification and that diversification would not impair the ability of the BPU
to effectively regulate the utility operations of PSE&G.

Conclusion

Accordingly,  Tecnored  satisfies  the criteria  set forth in Section  33(a) for
qualification as a foreign utility company.

The  undersigned  company  has duly caused  this  statement  to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                                                 Public Service Enterprise Group
                                                 Incorporated

                                                 By: /s/ James T. Foran
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 James T. Foran
                                                 Associate General Counsel

Date: December 7, 2004