Form 6-K
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 6-K
Report of Foreign Private Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
Commission file number 1- 12874
TEEKAY CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
4th Floor, Belvedere Building
69 Pitts Bay Road
Hamilton, HM 08 Bermuda
(Address of principal executive office)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form
20-F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-F þ Form 40- F o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1).
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7).
Yes o No þ
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
REPORT ON FORM 6-K FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAGE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 2 of 41
ITEM 1 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in thousands of U. S. dollars, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUES |
|
|
532,473 |
|
|
|
810,832 |
|
|
|
1,149,024 |
|
|
|
1,551,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
62,925 |
|
|
|
189,515 |
|
|
|
153,594 |
|
|
|
358,976 |
|
Vessel operating expenses (note 16) |
|
|
140,529 |
|
|
|
160,944 |
|
|
|
289,857 |
|
|
|
309,379 |
|
Time-charter hire expense |
|
|
116,451 |
|
|
|
142,702 |
|
|
|
253,279 |
|
|
|
287,622 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
108,192 |
|
|
|
106,700 |
|
|
|
214,745 |
|
|
|
204,407 |
|
General and administrative (note 16) |
|
|
52,695 |
|
|
|
71,298 |
|
|
|
103,835 |
|
|
|
140,363 |
|
Gain on sale of vessels and equipment net of write-downs (note 13) |
|
|
(11,083 |
) |
|
|
(2,925 |
) |
|
|
(11,201 |
) |
|
|
(3,421 |
) |
Restructuring charge (note 14a) |
|
|
5,003 |
|
|
|
4,617 |
|
|
|
10,561 |
|
|
|
6,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
474,712 |
|
|
|
672,851 |
|
|
|
1,014,670 |
|
|
|
1,303,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
57,761 |
|
|
|
137,981 |
|
|
|
134,354 |
|
|
|
247,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ITEMS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(37,280 |
) |
|
|
(63,253 |
) |
|
|
(81,470 |
) |
|
|
(151,959 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
5,023 |
|
|
|
18,832 |
|
|
|
11,701 |
|
|
|
52,722 |
|
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on non-designated derivative
instruments (note 16) |
|
|
157,485 |
|
|
|
116,263 |
|
|
|
204,730 |
|
|
|
(34,948 |
) |
Equity income (loss) from joint ventures (note 11b) |
|
|
27,380 |
|
|
|
(2,063 |
) |
|
|
38,802 |
|
|
|
(5,672 |
) |
Foreign exchange loss (notes 8 and 16) |
|
|
(25,165 |
) |
|
|
(3,014 |
) |
|
|
(13,853 |
) |
|
|
(36,595 |
) |
Other income (note 14b) |
|
|
3,823 |
|
|
|
6,294 |
|
|
|
5,405 |
|
|
|
10,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before income tax recovery (expense) |
|
|
189,027 |
|
|
|
211,040 |
|
|
|
299,669 |
|
|
|
81,834 |
|
Income tax recovery (expense) (note 18) |
|
|
4,598 |
|
|
|
11,201 |
|
|
|
(1,270 |
) |
|
|
8,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
193,625 |
|
|
|
222,241 |
|
|
|
298,399 |
|
|
|
90,552 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests |
|
|
(34,266 |
) |
|
|
(38,822 |
) |
|
|
(57,535 |
) |
|
|
(12,262 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to stockholders of Teekay Corporation |
|
|
159,359 |
|
|
|
183,419 |
|
|
|
240,864 |
|
|
|
78,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per common share of Teekay Corporation (note 17) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings |
|
|
2.20 |
|
|
|
2.53 |
|
|
|
3.32 |
|
|
|
1.08 |
|
Diluted earnings |
|
|
2.19 |
|
|
|
2.50 |
|
|
|
3.30 |
|
|
|
1.07 |
|
Cash dividends declared |
|
|
0.31625 |
|
|
|
0.27500 |
|
|
|
0.63250 |
|
|
|
0.55000 |
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (note 17) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
72,535,899 |
|
|
|
72,377,684 |
|
|
|
72,526,101 |
|
|
|
72,511,041 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
72,798,023 |
|
|
|
73,279,213 |
|
|
|
72,887,474 |
|
|
|
73,357,190 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Page 3 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
|
As at |
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents (note 8) |
|
|
472,671 |
|
|
|
814,165 |
|
Restricted cash (note 9) |
|
|
35,440 |
|
|
|
35,841 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
189,388 |
|
|
|
300,462 |
|
Vessels held for sale (note 13) |
|
|
34,970 |
|
|
|
69,649 |
|
Net investment in direct financing leases (note 4) |
|
|
33,620 |
|
|
|
22,941 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
99,872 |
|
|
|
117,651 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
30,077 |
|
|
|
33,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
896,038 |
|
|
|
1,394,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash long-term (note 9) |
|
|
610,523 |
|
|
|
614,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessels and equipment (note 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At cost, less accumulated depreciation of $1,516,538 (2008 $1,351,786) |
|
|
5,736,758 |
|
|
|
5,784,597 |
|
Vessels under capital leases, at cost, less accumulated amortization of
$122,966 (2008 $106,975) (note 9) |
|
|
912,978 |
|
|
|
928,795 |
|
Advances on newbuilding contracts (note 11a) |
|
|
231,220 |
|
|
|
553,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total vessels and equipment |
|
|
6,880,956 |
|
|
|
7,267,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment in direct financing leases non-current (note 4) |
|
|
440,701 |
|
|
|
56,567 |
|
Loans to joint ventures |
|
|
22,588 |
|
|
|
28,019 |
|
Derivative instruments (note 16) |
|
|
37,279 |
|
|
|
154,248 |
|
Investment in joint ventures (note 11b) |
|
|
126,315 |
|
|
|
103,956 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
136,488 |
|
|
|
127,940 |
|
Intangible assets net (note 6) |
|
|
246,640 |
|
|
|
264,768 |
|
Goodwill (note 6) |
|
|
203,191 |
|
|
|
203,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
9,600,719 |
|
|
|
10,215,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
53,297 |
|
|
|
59,973 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
240,859 |
|
|
|
315,987 |
|
Current portion of derivative liabilities (note 16) |
|
|
151,810 |
|
|
|
166,725 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt (note 8) |
|
|
204,549 |
|
|
|
245,043 |
|
Current obligation under capital leases (note 9) |
|
|
149,285 |
|
|
|
147,616 |
|
Current portion of in-process revenue contracts (note 6) |
|
|
66,593 |
|
|
|
74,777 |
|
Loan from joint venture partners |
|
|
21,274 |
|
|
|
21,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
887,667 |
|
|
|
1,031,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (note 8) |
|
|
4,274,903 |
|
|
|
4,707,749 |
|
Long-term obligation under capital leases (note 9) |
|
|
668,587 |
|
|
|
669,725 |
|
Derivative instruments (note 16) |
|
|
265,858 |
|
|
|
676,540 |
|
Deferred income taxes (note 18) |
|
|
6,244 |
|
|
|
6,182 |
|
Asset retirement obligation |
|
|
22,238 |
|
|
|
18,977 |
|
In-process revenue contracts (note 6) |
|
|
216,769 |
|
|
|
243,088 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
225,100 |
|
|
|
209,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
6,567,366 |
|
|
|
7,562,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (notes 9, 11 and 16) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock and additional paid-in capital (note 10) |
|
|
649,138 |
|
|
|
642,911 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,702,019 |
|
|
|
1,507,617 |
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
727,391 |
|
|
|
583,938 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (note 15) |
|
|
(45,195 |
) |
|
|
(82,061 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
3,033,353 |
|
|
|
2,652,405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
|
9,600,719 |
|
|
|
10,215,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Page 4 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Cash and cash equivalents provided by (used for) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
298,399 |
|
|
|
90,552 |
|
Non-cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
214,745 |
|
|
|
204,407 |
|
Amortization of in-process revenue contracts |
|
|
(37,769 |
) |
|
|
(34,870 |
) |
Gain on sale of marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,576 |
) |
Gain on sale of vessels and equipment |
|
|
(27,634 |
) |
|
|
(3,421 |
) |
Write-down of intangible assets |
|
|
1,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
Write-down of vessels and equipment |
|
|
16,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on repurchase of bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,310 |
|
Equity (income) loss (net of dividends received) |
|
|
(35,860 |
) |
|
|
5,672 |
|
Income tax expense (recovery) |
|
|
1,270 |
|
|
|
(8,718 |
) |
Employee stock option compensation |
|
|
6,059 |
|
|
|
6,183 |
|
Foreign exchange loss and other |
|
|
7,920 |
|
|
|
16,736 |
|
Unrealized (gains) losses on derivative instruments |
|
|
(271,471 |
) |
|
|
29,472 |
|
Change in non-cash working capital items related to operating activities (note 7) |
|
|
82,343 |
|
|
|
(75,554 |
) |
Expenditures for drydocking |
|
|
(26,243 |
) |
|
|
(28,227 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating cash flow |
|
|
229,268 |
|
|
|
198,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
(297,224 |
) |
|
|
1,284,496 |
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(664 |
) |
|
|
(5,108 |
) |
Scheduled
repayments of long-term debt |
|
|
(137,777 |
) |
|
|
(198,320 |
) |
Prepayments of long-term debt |
|
|
(632,910 |
) |
|
|
(639,321 |
) |
Repayments of capital lease obligations |
|
|
(4,617 |
) |
|
|
(4,495 |
) |
Proceeds from loans from joint venture partner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,041 |
|
Repayment of loans from joint venture partner |
|
|
(4,973 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash |
|
|
5,805 |
|
|
|
(11,503 |
) |
Net proceeds from issuance of Teekay LNG Partners L.P. units (note 5) |
|
|
67,095 |
|
|
|
148,345 |
|
Net proceeds from issuance of Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. units (note 5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,265 |
|
Net proceeds from issuance of Teekay Tankers Ltd. shares (note 5) |
|
|
65,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Common Stock upon exercise of stock options |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
4,009 |
|
Repurchase of Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,512 |
) |
Distribution from subsidiaries to non-controlling interests |
|
|
(53,093 |
) |
|
|
(34,546 |
) |
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(45,861 |
) |
|
|
(40,028 |
) |
Other financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,715 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net financing cash flow |
|
|
(444,055 |
) |
|
|
615,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment |
|
|
(344,888 |
) |
|
|
(410,495 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of vessels and equipment |
|
|
198,837 |
|
|
|
79,224 |
|
Purchases of marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(542 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,058 |
|
Acquisition of additional 30.1% of Teekay Petrojarl ASA (note 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(257,142 |
) |
Investment in joint ventures |
|
|
(7,522 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Advances to joint ventures |
|
|
(1,420 |
) |
|
|
(211,491 |
) |
Investment in direct financing lease assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
Direct financing lease payments received |
|
|
3,251 |
|
|
|
11,298 |
|
Other investing activities |
|
|
25,035 |
|
|
|
19,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investing cash flow |
|
|
(126,707 |
) |
|
|
(758,314 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(341,494 |
) |
|
|
56,260 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period |
|
|
814,165 |
|
|
|
442,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period |
|
|
472,671 |
|
|
|
498,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Page 5 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
193,625 |
|
|
|
222,241 |
|
|
|
298,399 |
|
|
|
90,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities |
|
|
3,531 |
|
|
|
2,068 |
|
|
|
1,090 |
|
|
|
(3,766 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for gain on sale of marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,868 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,575 |
) |
Pension adjustments |
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
1,058 |
|
Unrealized change on qualifying cash flow hedging instruments |
|
|
21,046 |
|
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
20,929 |
|
|
|
6,577 |
|
Realized change on qualifying cash flow hedging instruments |
|
|
5,943 |
|
|
|
(1,039 |
) |
|
|
18,686 |
|
|
|
(4,061 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
30,957 |
|
|
|
(393 |
) |
|
|
41,579 |
|
|
|
(4,767 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
224,582 |
|
|
|
221,848 |
|
|
|
339,978 |
|
|
|
85,785 |
|
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests |
|
|
(37,020 |
) |
|
|
(39,382 |
) |
|
|
(62,246 |
) |
|
|
(13,081 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to stockholders of Teekay
Corporation |
|
|
187,562 |
|
|
|
182,466 |
|
|
|
277,732 |
|
|
|
72,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 6 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with
United States generally accepted accounting principles. They include the accounts of Teekay
Corporation (or Teekay), which is incorporated under the laws of the Republic of The Marshall
Islands, and its wholly-owned or controlled subsidiaries (collectively, the Company). Certain
information and footnote disclosures required by United States generally accepted accounting
principles for complete annual financial statements have been omitted and, therefore, it is
suggested that these interim financial statements be read in conjunction with the Companys audited
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008, included on Form 20-F filed on June 30,
2009. In the opinion of management, these financial statements reflect all adjustments, of a normal
recurring nature, necessary to present fairly, in all material respects, the Companys consolidated
financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The
results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of
those for a full fiscal year.
Certain of the comparative figures have been reclassified to conform with the presentation adopted
in the current period.
The Company evaluated events and transactions occurring after the balance sheet date and through
the day the financial statements were issued. The date of issuance of the financial statements was
October 1, 2009.
Changes in Accounting Policies
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (or FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (or SFAS) No. 160, Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS No. 160). SFAS No. 160 amends Accounting Research
Bulletin (or ARB) 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the non-controlling
(minority) interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. This statement
provides that non-controlling interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the Company be
identified, labeled and presented in the statement of financial position within equity, but
separate from the stockholders equity. SFAS No. 160 states that the amount of consolidated net
income attributable to the stockholders and to the non-controlling interest be clearly identified
on the consolidated statements of income. The statement provides for consistency regarding changes
in stockholders ownership including when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. Any retained
non-controlling equity investment in the former subsidiary will be initially measured at fair
value. On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted SFAS No. 160 prospectively. The Company has applied
the presentation and disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 160 to its consolidated financial statements
retrospectively.
The consolidated net income attributable to the stockholders of Teekay Corporation would be
different in the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 had the previous requirements in
paragraph 15 of ARB 51 continued to have been applied rather than SFAS 160. Under paragraph 15,
losses attributable to the non-controlling interest that exceed its equity capital are charged
against the majority interest, as there is no obligation of the non-controlling interest to cover
such losses. However, if future earnings do materialize, the majority interest should be credited
to the extent of such losses previously absorbed. Pro forma consolidated net income attributable to
stockholders of Teekay Corporation and pro forma earnings per share had ARB 51 been applied are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income attributable to the stockholders of Teekay Corporation |
|
|
164,652 |
|
|
|
247,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
2.27 |
|
|
|
3.41 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
2.26 |
|
|
|
3.39 |
|
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (or SFAS No.
141 (R)). SFAS No. 141 (R) requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities
assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at
their fair values as of that date. This Statement also requires that the acquirer in a business
combination achieved in stages to recognize the identifiable assets and liabilities, as well as the
non-controlling interest in the acquiree, at the full fair values of the assets and liabilities as
if they had occurred on the acquisition date. In addition, SFAS No. 141 (R) requires that all
acquisition related costs be expensed as incurred, rather than capitalized as part of the purchase
price and those restructuring costs that an acquirer expected, but was not obligated to incur, to
be recognized separately from the business combination. SFAS No. 141 (R) applies prospectively to
business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first
annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Companys adoption of SFAS No.
141(R) prospectively from January 1, 2009 did not have a material impact on the consolidated
financial statements.
The Company also adopted Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 08-06 (or EITF 08-06), Equity Method
Investment Accounting Considerations. This Issue addresses the impact that SFAS 141 (R) and SFAS
160 might have on the accounting for equity method investments, including accounting for changes in
value and changes in ownership levels. The adoption of EITF 08-06 did not have a material impact on
the consolidated financial statements.
Page 7 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 157-2 (or FSP 157-2) which delayed the
effective date of SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). For purposes of applying this FSP,
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities would include all assets and liabilities other
than those meeting the definition of a financial asset or financial liability as defined in
paragraph 6 of SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.
This FSP defers the effective date of SFAS No. 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2008, and the interim periods within those fiscal years for items within the scope of this FSP. The
Companys adoption of the provisions of SFAS No. 157 related to those items covered by FSP 157-2
from January 1, 2009 did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements. See Note 12 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (or SFAS No. 161), which requires expanded
disclosures about a companys derivative instruments and hedging activities, including increased
qualitative, and credit-risk disclosures to enable investors to better understand how these
instruments and activities are accounted for; how and why they are used; and their effects on an
entitys financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008,
with early adoption permitted. On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No.
161. See Note 16 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets. This FSP amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension
of assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No.
142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. This FSP is effective for the Company for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is
prohibited. The adoption of FSP 142-3 did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated
financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP 107-1 and Accounting Principles Board Opinion 28-1 (or APB
28-1), which extends the requirements of SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments to interim financial statements of publicly-traded companies. Prior to FSP No. 107-1
and APB 28-1, fair values for these assets and liabilities were only disclosed once a year. FSP No.
FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 require that disclosures provide qualitative and quantitative information on
fair value estimates for all financial instruments not measured on the balance sheet at fair value,
when practicable, with the exception of certain financial instruments listed in SFAS No. 107. FSP
No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 are effective prospectively for interim reporting periods ending after
June 15, 2009. On April 1, 2009, the Company adopted the provisions of FSP No. 107-1 and APB 28-1.
See Note 12 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events (or SFAS No. 165). SFAS No. 165 is
intended to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after
the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. It
requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the
basis for selecting that date, that is, whether that date represents the date the financial
statements were issued or were available to be issued. SFAS No. 165 is for interim and annual
reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 165.
See Note 20 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
2. Segment Reporting
The Company is primarily engaged in the international marine transportation of crude oil and clean
petroleum products through the operation of its tankers, and of liquefied natural gas (or LNG) and
liquefied petroleum gas (or LPG) through the operation of its tankers and LNG and LPG carriers, and
in the offshore processing and storage of crude oil. The Companys revenues are earned in
international markets.
The Company has four operating segments: its shuttle tanker and floating storage and offtake (or
FSO) segment (or Teekay Navion Shuttle Tankers and Offshore), its floating production storage and
offtake (or FPSO) segment (or Teekay Petrojarl), its liquefied gas segment (or Teekay Gas Services)
and its conventional tanker segment (or Teekay Tanker Services). In order to provide investors with
additional information about its conventional tanker segment, the Company has divided this
operating segment into the fixed-rate tanker segment and the spot tanker segment. The Companys
shuttle tanker and FSO segment consists of shuttle tankers and FSO units. The Companys FPSO
segment consists of FPSO units and other vessels used to service its FPSO contracts. The Companys
liquefied gas segment consists of LNG and LPG carriers. The Companys fixed-rate tanker segment
consists of conventional crude oil and product tankers subject to long-term, fixed-rate
time-charter contracts. The Companys spot tanker segment consists of conventional crude oil
tankers and product carriers operating in the spot tanker market or subject to time-charters or
contracts of affreightment that are priced on a spot-market basis or are short-term, fixed-rate
contracts. The Company considers contracts that have an original term of less than three years in
duration to be short-term. Segment results are evaluated based on income from vessel operations.
The accounting policies applied to the reportable segments are the same as those used in the
preparation of the Companys consolidated financial statements.
Page 8 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
The following tables present results for these segments for the three and six months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shuttle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tanker and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquefied |
|
|
Fixed-Rate |
|
|
Spot |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FSO |
|
|
FPSO |
|
|
Gas |
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
|
|
Three Months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
138,324 |
|
|
|
97,572 |
|
|
|
57,265 |
|
|
|
76,011 |
|
|
|
163,301 |
|
|
|
532,473 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
16,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
1,758 |
|
|
|
45,034 |
|
|
|
62,925 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
41,961 |
|
|
|
47,021 |
|
|
|
12,049 |
|
|
|
17,103 |
|
|
|
22,395 |
|
|
|
140,529 |
|
Time charter hire expense |
|
|
25,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,913 |
|
|
|
78,843 |
|
|
|
116,451 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
28,738 |
|
|
|
25,745 |
|
|
|
15,471 |
|
|
|
14,009 |
|
|
|
24,229 |
|
|
|
108,192 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
13,848 |
|
|
|
7,553 |
|
|
|
5,440 |
|
|
|
6,986 |
|
|
|
18,868 |
|
|
|
52,695 |
|
Loss (gain) on sale of vessels and
equipment, net of write-downs |
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,280 |
|
|
|
(15,304 |
) |
|
|
(11,083 |
) |
Restructuring charge |
|
|
2,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
1,083 |
|
|
|
5,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from vessel operations |
|
|
8,438 |
|
|
|
17,253 |
|
|
|
23,309 |
|
|
|
20,608 |
|
|
|
(11,847 |
) |
|
|
57,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shuttle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tanker and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquefied |
|
|
Fixed-Rate |
|
|
Spot |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FSO |
|
|
FPSO |
|
|
Gas |
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
|
|
Three Months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
183,176 |
|
|
|
90,785 |
|
|
|
53,496 |
|
|
|
66,218 |
|
|
|
417,157 |
|
|
|
810,832 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
46,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
948 |
|
|
|
142,091 |
|
|
|
189,515 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
45,417 |
|
|
|
57,418 |
|
|
|
13,125 |
|
|
|
16,387 |
|
|
|
28,597 |
|
|
|
160,944 |
|
Time charter hire expense |
|
|
32,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,445 |
|
|
|
99,015 |
|
|
|
142,702 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
31,207 |
|
|
|
22,565 |
|
|
|
14,209 |
|
|
|
11,289 |
|
|
|
27,430 |
|
|
|
106,700 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
15,739 |
|
|
|
11,509 |
|
|
|
6,070 |
|
|
|
7,263 |
|
|
|
30,717 |
|
|
|
71,298 |
|
(Gain) loss on sale of vessels and
equipment, net of write-downs |
|
|
(3,150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
(2,925 |
) |
Restructuring charge |
|
|
3,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
1,011 |
|
|
|
4,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from vessel operations |
|
|
12,370 |
|
|
|
(707 |
) |
|
|
19,419 |
|
|
|
18,828 |
|
|
|
88,071 |
|
|
|
137,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shuttle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tanker and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquefied |
|
|
Fixed-Rate |
|
|
Spot |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FSO |
|
|
FPSO |
|
|
Gas |
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
|
|
Six Months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Total |
|
Revenues |
|
|
288,189 |
|
|
|
189,498 |
|
|
|
114,848 |
|
|
|
142,603 |
|
|
|
413,886 |
|
|
|
1,149,024 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
34,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
3,062 |
|
|
|
115,699 |
|
|
|
153,594 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
87,745 |
|
|
|
91,450 |
|
|
|
23,836 |
|
|
|
34,912 |
|
|
|
51,914 |
|
|
|
289,857 |
|
Time charter hire expense |
|
|
57,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,903 |
|
|
|
172,503 |
|
|
|
253,279 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
57,991 |
|
|
|
51,525 |
|
|
|
30,068 |
|
|
|
26,300 |
|
|
|
48,862 |
|
|
|
214,746 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
26,977 |
|
|
|
17,339 |
|
|
|
10,598 |
|
|
|
12,667 |
|
|
|
36,254 |
|
|
|
103,835 |
|
Loss (gain) on sale of vessels and equipment, net of
write-downs |
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,280 |
|
|
|
(15,422 |
) |
|
|
(11,201 |
) |
Restructuring charge |
|
|
5,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,212 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
1,546 |
|
|
|
10,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
16,789 |
|
|
|
29,184 |
|
|
|
46,876 |
|
|
|
38,974 |
|
|
|
2,530 |
|
|
|
134,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shuttle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tanker and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquefied |
|
|
Fixed-Rate |
|
|
Spot |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FSO |
|
|
FPSO |
|
|
Gas |
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
|
|
Six Months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
349,435 |
|
|
|
183,314 |
|
|
|
109,628 |
|
|
|
127,033 |
|
|
|
781,837 |
|
|
|
1,551,247 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
84,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
1,628 |
|
|
|
271,821 |
|
|
|
358,976 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
84,340 |
|
|
|
105,455 |
|
|
|
24,748 |
|
|
|
32,757 |
|
|
|
62,079 |
|
|
|
309,379 |
|
Time charter hire expense |
|
|
67,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,165 |
|
|
|
197,177 |
|
|
|
287,622 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
59,278 |
|
|
|
40,568 |
|
|
|
28,404 |
|
|
|
20,962 |
|
|
|
55,195 |
|
|
|
204,407 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
31,735 |
|
|
|
24,036 |
|
|
|
11,555 |
|
|
|
12,553 |
|
|
|
60,484 |
|
|
|
140,363 |
|
Gain on sale of vessels and equipment, net of write-
downs |
|
|
(3,150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(271 |
) |
|
|
(3,421 |
) |
Restructuring charge |
|
|
3,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
1,558 |
|
|
|
1,011 |
|
|
|
6,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
21,700 |
|
|
|
13,255 |
|
|
|
44,098 |
|
|
|
34,410 |
|
|
|
134,341 |
|
|
|
247,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and administrative
expenses (allocated to each segment based on estimated use of corporate resources). |
Page 9 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
A reconciliation of total segment assets to amounts presented in the consolidated balance sheets is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Shuttle tanker and FSO segment |
|
|
1,683,936 |
|
|
|
1,722,432 |
|
FPSO segment |
|
|
1,285,098 |
|
|
|
1,331,325 |
|
Liquefied gas segment |
|
|
2,676,786 |
|
|
|
2,919,194 |
|
Fixed-rate tanker segment |
|
|
1,027,891 |
|
|
|
951,592 |
|
Spot tanker segment |
|
|
2,048,691 |
|
|
|
1,935,537 |
|
Cash and portion of restricted cash |
|
|
472,671 |
|
|
|
821,286 |
|
Accounts receivable and other assets |
|
|
405,646 |
|
|
|
533,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total assets |
|
|
9,600,719 |
|
|
|
10,215,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Acquisition of Additional 35.3% of Teekay Petrojarl ASA
As of October 1, 2006, the Company acquired a 64.7% interest in Petrojarl ASA (subsequently renamed
Teekay Petrojarl ASA, or Teekay Petrojarl). In June and July 2008, the Company acquired the
remaining 35.3% interest (26.5 million common shares) in Teekay Petrojarl at a price between NOK 59
and NOK 62.95 per share. The total purchase price of approximately NOK 1.5 billion ($304.9 million)
for this remaining interest was paid in cash. As a result of these transactions, the Companys owns
100% of Teekay Petrojarl.
Teekay Petrojarls operating results are reflected in the Companys consolidated financial
statements from October 1, 2006, the designated effective date of the Companys acquisition of the
original 64.7% interest in Teekay Petrojarl, which was accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting. The acquisition of the remaining 35.3% interest has also been accounted for using the
purchase method of accounting, based upon estimates of fair value.
4. Net Investment in Direct Financing Leases
The
Company commenced two time-charter contracts with 20-year terms in January and May 2009 and
leases equipment that reduces volatile organic compound emissions (or VOC equipment). The two time
charters and leasing of the VOC equipment are accounted for as direct financing leases. The
following table lists the components of the net investments in direct financing leases:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Total minimum lease payments to be received |
|
|
838,726 |
|
|
|
94,409 |
|
Estimated residual value of leased property (unguaranteed) |
|
|
188,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
Initial direct costs and other |
|
|
1,324 |
|
|
|
674 |
|
Less: Unearned income |
|
|
(553,962 |
) |
|
|
(15,575 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investments in direct financing leases |
|
|
474,321 |
|
|
|
79,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at June 30, 2009, minimum lease payments to be received by the Company in each of the next five
succeeding fiscal years are approximately $31.5 million (remainder of 2009), $59.0 million (2010),
$56.7 million (2011), $52.3 million (2012) and $40.8 million (2013). The VOC equipment lease will
end in 2014 and the time charter leases will both end in 2029.
5. Public Offerings
During June 2009, the Companys subsidiary Teekay Tankers Limited (or Teekay Tankers) completed a
follow-on public offering by issuing an additional 7.0 million shares of its Class A Common Stock
at a price of $9.80 per share, for gross proceeds of $68.6 million. As a result of the above
transactions, the Companys ownership of Teekay Tankers has been reduced from 54.0 percent to 42.2
percent, and the Company recorded an increase to stockholders equity of $1.7 million, which
represents the Companys dilution gain from the issuance of shares. Teekay maintained voting
control of Teekay Tankers and continues to consolidate the subsidiary. Teekay Tankers used the
total net offering proceeds of approximately $65.6 million to acquire a 2003-built Suezmax tanker
from Teekay Corporation for $57.0 million and to repay a portion of its outstanding debt under its
revolving credit facility.
During March 2009, the Companys subsidiary Teekay LNG Partners L.P. (or Teekay LNG) completed a
follow-on public offering by issuing an additional 4.0 million of its common units at a price of
$17.60 per unit, for gross equity proceeds of $71.8 million (including its general partners
proportionate capital contribution). As a result of this, the Companys ownership of Teekay LNG has
been reduced from 57.7 percent to 53.0 percent (including the Companys 2% general partner
interest), and the Company recorded a decrease to stockholders equity of $2.3 million, which
represents the Companys dilution loss from the issuance of units. Teekay LNG used the total net
offering proceeds of approximately $68.5 million to prepay amounts outstanding on two of its
revolving credit facilities.
Page 10 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
In connection with Teekay LNGs initial public offering in May 2005, Teekay entered into an omnibus
agreement with Teekay LNG, Teekay LNGs general partner and others governing, among other things,
when the Company and Teekay LNG may compete with each other and to provide the applicable parties
certain rights of first offer on LNG carriers and Suezmax tankers. In December 2006, the omnibus
agreement was amended in connection with the initial public offering of the Companys subsidiary
Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. (or Teekay Offshore) initial public offering to govern, among other
things, when the Company, Teekay LNG and Teekay Offshore may compete with each other and to provide
the applicable parties certain rights of first offer on LNG carriers, oil tankers, shuttle tankers,
FSO units and FPSO units.
See Note 20(c) of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for the information about a
follow-on public offering by Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. on August 4, 2009.
6. Goodwill, Intangible Assets and In-Process Revenue Contracts
Goodwill
There were no changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2009
from December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shuttle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquefied |
|
|
Fixed-Rate |
|
|
Spot |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tanker and FSO |
|
|
FPSO |
|
|
Gas |
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008 and
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
130,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,631 |
|
|
|
10,811 |
|
|
|
25,841 |
|
|
|
203,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible Assets
As at June 30, 2009, the Companys intangible assets consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
Gross Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Carrying |
|
|
|
Amortization Period |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
(Years) |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Contracts of affreightment |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
124,250 |
|
|
|
(83,487 |
) |
|
|
40,763 |
|
Time-charter contracts |
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
232,602 |
|
|
|
(72,350 |
) |
|
|
160,252 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
58,950 |
|
|
|
(13,325 |
) |
|
|
45,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
415,802 |
|
|
|
(169,162 |
) |
|
|
246,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2008, the Companys intangible assets consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
Gross Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Carrying |
|
|
|
Amortization Period |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
(Years) |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Contracts of affreightment |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
124,251 |
|
|
|
(78,961 |
) |
|
|
45,290 |
|
Time-charter contracts |
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
233,678 |
|
|
|
(60,875 |
) |
|
|
172,803 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
58,950 |
|
|
|
(12,275 |
) |
|
|
46,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
416,879 |
|
|
|
(152,111 |
) |
|
|
264,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate amortization expense of intangible assets for the three and six months ended June 30,
2009 was $8.5 million ($12.0 million 2008) and $17.1 million ($24.9 million 2008),
respectively. Amortization of intangible assets for the next five years is expected to be $17.0
million (remainder of 2009), $27.2 million (2010), $23.5 million (2011), $19.1 million (2012),
$14.2 million (2013), and $145.7 million (thereafter).
In-Process Revenue Contracts
As part of the Companys acquisitions of Teekay Petrojarl in 2006 and 2008 and of 50% of OMI
Corporation (or OMI) in 2007, the Company assumed certain FPSO service contracts and charter-out
contracts with terms that are less favorable than prevailing market terms at the time of
acquisition. The Company has recognized a liability based on the estimated fair value of these
contracts. The Company is amortizing this liability over the remaining term of the contracts on a
weighted basis based on the projected revenue to be earned under the contracts.
Amortization of these in-process revenue contracts for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009
was $18.7 million ($13.7 million 2008) and $37.8 million ($34.9 million 2008), respectively,
and is recorded in revenues. Amortization for the next five years is expected to be $36.1 million
(remainder of 2009), $60.0 million (2010), $47.1 million (2011), $41.3 million (2012), $39.5
million (2013) and $59.4 million (thereafter).
Page 11 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
7. Supplemental Cash Flow Information
The changes in non-cash working capital items related to operating activities for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
111,074 |
|
|
|
(85,501 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
25,080 |
|
|
|
(6,047 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(6,676 |
) |
|
|
4,391 |
|
Accrued and other liabilities |
|
|
(47,135 |
) |
|
|
11,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,343 |
|
|
|
(75,554 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Revolving Credit Facilities |
|
|
2,031,537 |
|
|
|
2,656,658 |
|
Senior Notes (8.875%) due July 15, 2011 |
|
|
194,524 |
|
|
|
194,642 |
|
USD-denominated Term Loans due through 2021 |
|
|
1,827,205 |
|
|
|
1,670,005 |
|
Euro-denominated Term Loans due through 2023 |
|
|
410,139 |
|
|
|
414,144 |
|
USD-denominated Unsecured Demand Loan due to Joint Venture Partners |
|
|
16,047 |
|
|
|
17,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,479,452 |
|
|
|
4,952,792 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
204,549 |
|
|
|
245,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,274,903 |
|
|
|
4,707,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009, the Company had fourteen long-term revolving credit facilities (or the
Revolvers) available, which, as at such date, provided for borrowings of up to $3.6 billion, of
which $1.6 billion was undrawn. Interest payments are based on LIBOR plus margins; at June 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008, the margins ranged between 0.45% and 0.95%, respectively. At June 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008, the three-month LIBOR was 0.60% and 1.43%, respectively. The total amount
available under the Revolvers reduces by $106.2 million (remainder of 2009), $218.0 million (2010),
$803.3 million (2011), $233.8 million (2012), $301.3 million (2013) and $1,9 billion (thereafter).
The Revolvers are collateralized by first-priority mortgages granted on 67 of the Companys
vessels, together with other related security, and include a guarantee from Teekay or its
subsidiaries for all outstanding amounts.
The 8.875% Senior Notes due July 15, 2011 (or the 8.875% Notes) rank equally in right of payment
with all of Teekays existing and future senior unsecured debt and senior to Teekays existing and
future subordinated debt. The 8.875% Notes are not guaranteed by any of Teekays subsidiaries and
effectively rank behind all existing and future secured debt of Teekay and other liabilities,
secured and unsecured, of its subsidiaries. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company
repurchased nil (2008 $19.7 million) principal amount of the 8.875% Notes (see also Note 14).
As of June 30, 2009, the Company had fourteen U.S. Dollar-denominated term loans outstanding, which
totaled $1.8 billion. Certain of the term loans with a total outstanding principal balance of
$485.4 million as at June 30, 2009, bear interest at a weighted-average fixed rate of 5.19%.
Interest payments on the remaining term loans are based on LIBOR plus a margin. At June 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008, the margins ranged between 0.3% and 1.0%. At June 30, 2009, three-month
LIBOR was 0.6% (December 31, 2008 1.43%). The term loan payments are made in quarterly or
semi-annual payments commencing three or six months after delivery of each newbuilding vessel
financed thereby, and twelve of the term loans also have balloon or bullet repayments due at
maturity. The term loans are collateralized by first-priority mortgages on 29 of the Companys
vessels, together with certain other security. In addition, at June 30, 2009, all but $121.5
million (December 31, 2008 $126.1 million) of the outstanding term loans were guaranteed by
Teekay or its subsidiaries.
The Company has two Euro-denominated term loans outstanding, which, as at June 30, 2009 totaled
292.3 million Euros ($410.1 million). The Company repays the loans with funds generated by two
Euro-denominated long-term time-charter contracts. Interest payments on the loans are based on
EURIBOR plus a margin. At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the margins ranged between 0.6% and
0.66% and the one-month EURIBOR at June 30, 2009 was 0.75% (December 31, 2008 2.6%). The
Euro-denominated term loans reduce in monthly payments with varying maturities through 2023 and are
collateralized by first-priority mortgages on two of the Companys vessels, together with certain
other security, and are guaranteed by a subsidiary of Teekay.
Both Euro-denominated term loans are revalued at the end of each period using the then prevailing
Euro/U.S. Dollar exchange rate. Due substantially to this revaluation, the Company recognized
unrealized foreign exchange losses of $25.2 million and $13.9 million (2008 losses of $3.0
million and $36.6 million) during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.
Page 12 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
The Company has two U.S. Dollar-denominated loans outstanding owing to joint venture partners,
which, as at June 30, 2009, totaled $14.9 million and $1.1 million, respectively, including accrued
interest. Interest payments on the first loan, which are based on a fixed interest rate of 4.84%,
commenced in February 2008. This loan is repayable on demand no earlier than February 27, 2027.
Among other matters, the Companys long-term debt agreements generally provide for maintenance of
certain vessel market value-to-loan ratios and minimum consolidated financial covenants. Certain
loan agreements require that a minimum level of free cash be maintained. As at June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, this amount was $100.0 million. Certain of the loan agreements also require that
the Company maintain an aggregate level of free liquidity and undrawn revolving credit lines with
at least six months to maturity, of at least 7.5% of total debt. As at June 30, 2009 and December
31, 2008, this amount was $263.8 million and $293.0 million, respectively. The Company was in
compliance with debt covenants as at June 30, 2009.
9. Capital Leases and Restricted Cash
Capital Leases
Suezmax Tankers. As at June 30, 2009, the Company was a party, as lessee, to capital leases on five
Suezmax tankers. Under the terms of the lease arrangements, the Company is required to purchase
these vessels after the end of their respective lease terms for fixed prices as well as assuming
the existing vessel financing upon the lenders consent. At their inception, the weighted-average
interest rate implicit in these leases was 7.4%. These capital leases are variable-rate capital
leases; however, any change in the lease payments resulting from changes in interest rates is
offset by a corresponding change in the charter hire payments received by the Company. As at June
30, 2009, the remaining commitments under these capital leases, including the purchase obligations,
approximated $214.8 million, including imputed interest of $14.9 million, repayable as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Commitment |
|
Remainder of 2009 |
|
$122.4 million |
2010 |
|
$8.4 million |
2011 |
|
$84.0 million |
RasGas II LNG Carriers. As at June 30, 2009, the Company was a party, as lessee, to 30-year capital
lease arrangements for the three LNG carriers (or the RasGas II LNG Carriers) that operate under
time-charter contracts with Ras Laffan Liquefied Natural Gas Co. Limited (II) (or RasGas II), a
joint venture between Qatar Petroleum and ExxonMobil RasGas Inc., a subsidiary of ExxonMobil
Corporation. All amounts below relating to the RasGas II LNG Carriers capital leases include the
non-controlling interests 30% share.
Under the terms of the RasGas II LNG Carriers capital lease arrangements, the lessor claims tax
depreciation on the capital expenditures it incurred to acquire these vessels. As is typical in
these leasing arrangements, tax and change of law risks are assumed by the lessee.
Payments under the lease arrangements are based on tax and financial assumptions at the
commencement of the leases. If an assumption proves to be incorrect, the lessor is entitled to
increase the lease payments to maintain its agreed after-tax margin. During 2008 the Company has
agreed under the terms of its tax lease indemnification guarantee to increase its capital lease
payments for its three LNG carriers to compensate the lessor for losses suffered as a result of
changes in tax rates. The estimated increase in lease payments is approximately $8.1 million over
the term of the leases, with a carrying value of $8.0 million as at June 30, 2009. The Companys
carrying amount of this tax indemnification is $9.4 million. Both amounts are included as part of
other long-term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The tax
indemnification is for the duration of the lease contract with the third party plus the years it
would take for the lease payments to be statute barred. Although there is no maximum potential
amount of future payments however, the Company may terminate the lease arrangements at any time. If
the lease arrangements terminate, the Company would be required to pay termination sums to the
lessor sufficient to repay the lessors investment in the vessels and to compensate it for the
tax-effect of the terminations, including recapture of any tax depreciation.
At their inception, the weighted-average interest rate implicit in these leases was 5.2%. These
capital leases are variable-rate capital leases. As at June 30, 2009, the commitments under these
capital leases approximated $1.1 billion, including imputed interest of $0.6 billion, repayable as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Commitment |
|
Remainder of 2009 |
|
$12.0 million |
2010 |
|
$24.0 million |
2011 |
|
$24.0 million |
2012 |
|
$24.0 million |
2013 |
|
$24.0 million |
Thereafter |
|
$953.1 million |
Page 13 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
Spanish-Flagged LNG Carrier. As at June 30, 2009, the Company was a party, as lessee, to a capital
lease on one Spanish-flagged LNG carrier, which is structured as a Spanish tax lease. Under the
terms of the Spanish tax lease, the Company will purchase the vessel at the end of the lease term
in 2011. The purchase obligation has been fully funded with restricted cash deposits described
below. At its inception, the implicit interest rate was 5.8%. As at June 30, 2009, the commitments
under this capital lease, including the purchase obligation, approximated 117.4 million Euros
($164.7 million), including imputed interest of 11.7 million Euros ($16.4 million), repayable as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Commitment |
|
Remainder of 2009 |
|
25.7 million Euros ($36.0 million) |
2010 |
|
26.9 million Euros ($37.8 million) |
2011 |
|
64.8 million Euros ($90.9 million) |
FPSO Units. As at June 30, 2009, the Company was a party, as lessee, to capital leases on one FPSO
unit, the Petrojarl Foinaven, and the topside production equipment for another FPSO unit, the
Petrojarl Banff. However, prior to being acquired by Teekay Corporation, Teekay Petrojarl legally
defeased its future charter obligations for these assets by making up-front, lump-sum payments to
unrelated banks, which have assumed Teekay Petrojarls liability for making the remaining periodic
payments due under the long-term charters (or Defeased Rental Payments) and termination payments
under the leases.
The Defeased Rental Payments for the Petrojarl Foinaven were based on assumed Sterling LIBOR of 8%
per annum. If actual interest rates are greater than 8% per annum, the Company receives rental
rebates; if actual interest rates are less than 8% per annum, the Company is required to pay
rentals in excess of the Defeased Rental Payments. For accounting purposes, this contract feature
is an embedded derivative, and has been separated from the underlying lease and is separately
accounted for as a derivative instrument.
As is typical for these types of leasing arrangements, the Company has indemnified the lessors of
the Petrojarl Foinaven for the tax consequence resulting from changes in tax laws or interpretation
of such laws or adverse rulings by authorities and for fluctuations in actual interest rates from
those assumed in the leases.
Restricted Cash
Under the terms of the capital leases for the four LNG carriers described above in this Note 9, the
Company is required to have on deposit with financial institutions an amount of cash that, together
with interest earned on the deposits, will equal the remaining amounts owing under the leases,
including the obligations to purchase the LNG carriers at the end of the lease periods, where
applicable. These cash deposits are restricted to being used for capital lease payments and have
been fully funded with term loans and, for one vessel, a loan from the Companys joint venture
partner (see Note 8).
As at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the amount of restricted cash on deposit for the three
RasGas II LNG Carriers was $481.9 million and $487.4 million, respectively. As at June 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008, the weighted-average interest rates earned on the deposits were 1.2% and
4.8%, respectively.
As at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the amount of restricted cash on deposit for the
Spanish-flagged LNG carrier was 107.3 million Euros ($150.6 million) and 104.7 million Euros
($146.2 million), respectively. As at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the weighted-average
interest rate earned on these deposits was 5.0%.
The Company also maintains restricted cash deposits relating to certain term loans and other
obligations, which cash deposits totaled $13.5 million and $17.0 million as at June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively.
10. Capital Stock
The authorized capital stock of Teekay at June 30, 2009 was 25,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock,
with a par value of $1 per share, and 725,000,000 shares of Common Stock, with a par value of
$0.001 per share. As at June 30, 2009, Teekay had 73,047,006 shares of Common Stock (December 31,
2008 73,011,488) issued and no shares of Preferred Stock issued. As at June 30, 2009, Teekay had
72,547,809 shares of Common Stock outstanding (December 31 2008 72,512,291).
Dividends may be declared and paid out of surplus only, but if there is no surplus, dividends may
be declared or paid out of the net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend is declared
and for the preceding fiscal year. Subject to preferences that may apply to any shares of preferred
stock outstanding at the time, the holders of common stock are entitled to share equally in any
dividends that the board of directors may declare from time to time out of funds legally available
for dividends.
During 2008, Teekay announced that its Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of up to
$200 million of shares of its Common Stock in the open market. As at June 30, 2009, Teekay had not
repurchased any shares of Common Stock pursuant to such authorizations.
11. Commitments and Contingencies
a) Vessels Under Construction
As at June 30, 2009, the Company was committed to the construction of two Suezmax tankers, four LPG
carriers, and four shuttle tankers. One Suezmax tanker was delivered in September 2009 with the
remaining vessels scheduled for delivery between October 2009 and August 2011, at a total cost of
approximately $753.7 million, excluding capitalized interest. As at June 30, 2009, payments made
towards these commitments totaled $208.5 million (excluding $23.2 million of capitalized interest
and other miscellaneous construction costs), and long-term financing arrangements existed for
$545.2 million of the unpaid cost of these vessels. As at June 30, 2009, the remaining payments
required to be made under these newbuilding contracts were $88.8 million (2009), $293.2 million
(2010), and $163.2 million (2011).
Page 14 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
b) Joint Ventures
The Company has a 33% interest in a consortium that will charter four newbuilding 160,400-cubic
meter LNG carriers for a period of 20 years to the Angola LNG Project, which is being developed by
subsidiaries of Chevron Corporation, Sociedade Nacional de Combustiveis de Angola EP, BP Plc, Total
S.A. and ENI SpA. Final award of the charter was made in December 2007. The vessels will be
chartered at fixed rates, with inflation adjustments, commencing in 2011. The remaining members of
the consortium are Mitsui & Co., Ltd. and NYK Bulkship (Europe) Ltd., which hold 34% and 33%
interests in the consortium, respectively. In connection with this award, the consortium has
entered into agreements with Samsung Heavy Industries Co. Ltd. to construct the four LNG carriers
at a total cost of approximately $906.0 million (of which the Companys 33% portion is $299.0
million), excluding capitalized interest. As at June 30, 2009, payments made towards these
commitments by the joint venture company totaled $181.2 million (of which the Companys 33%
contribution was $59.8 million), excluding capitalized interest and other miscellaneous
construction costs. As at June 30, 2009, the remaining payments required to be made under these
contracts were $113.2 million (2010), $475.6 million (2011) and $135.9 million (2012). In
accordance with existing agreements, the Company is required to offer to Teekay LNG its 33%
interest in these vessels and related charter contracts no later than 180 days before the scheduled
delivery dates of the vessels. Deliveries of the vessels are scheduled between August 2011 and
January 2012. The Company has also provided certain guarantees in relation to the performance of
the joint venture company.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company recorded equity income of $17.6
million and $24.0 million, respectively, of its share of the Angola LNG Project earnings. This
amount is included in equity income (loss) from joint ventures in the consolidated statement of
income. Substantially all of the equity income related to unrealized gains on interest rate swaps.
One of the Kenai LNG Carriers, the Arctic Spirit, came off charter from the Marathon Oil
Corporation/ConocoPhillips joint venture on March 31, 2009, and the Company has entered into a
joint development and option agreement with Merrill Lynch Commodities, Inc. (MLCI), giving MLCI the
option to purchase the vessel for conversion to an LNG floating production, storage and offload
unit (FLNG). The agreement provides for a purchase price of $105 million if the Company chooses to
participate in the project (as described below), or $110 million if the Company chooses not to
participate. Under the option agreement, the Arctic Spirit is reserved for MLCI until December 31,
2009 and MLCI may extend the option quarterly through 2010. If MLCI exercises the option and
purchases the vessel from the Company, it is expected that MLCI will convert the vessel to an FLNG
(although it is not required to do so) and charter it under a long-term charter contract to a third
party. The Company has the right to participate up to 50% in the conversion and charter project on
terms that will be determined as the project progresses. The agreement with MLCI also provides that
if the conversion of the Arctic Spirit to an FLNG proceeds, the Company will offer a similar option
for a designee of MLCI to purchase the second Kenai LNG carrier for $125 million when it comes off
charter.
c) Legal Proceedings and Claims
The Company may, from time to time, be involved in legal proceedings and claims that arise in the
ordinary course of business. The Company believes that any adverse outcome of existing claims,
individually or in the aggregate, would not have a material effect on its financial position,
results of operations or cash flows, when taking into
account its insurance coverage and indemnifications from charterers.
d) Other
The Company enters into indemnification agreements with certain officers and directors. In
addition, the Company enters into other indemnification agreements in the ordinary course of
business. The maximum potential amount of future payments required under these indemnification
agreements is unlimited. However, the Company maintains what it believes is appropriate liability
insurance that reduces its exposure and enables the Company to recover future amounts paid up to
the maximum amount of the insurance coverage, less any deductible amounts pursuant to the terms of
the respective policies, the amounts of which are not considered material.
12. Fair Value Measurements
SFAS No. 157 clarifies the definition of fair value, prescribes methods for measuring fair value,
establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to measure fair value and expands
disclosures about the use of fair value measurements. The fair value hierarchy has three levels
based on the reliability of the inputs used to determine fair value as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1.
|
|
Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; |
|
|
|
Level 2.
|
|
Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either
directly or indirectly; and |
|
|
|
Level 3.
|
|
Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the
reporting entity to develop its own assumptions. |
The following tables present the Companys assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value
on a recurring basis and are categorized using the fair value hierarchy.
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash The fair value of the Companys cash and cash
equivalents approximates their carrying amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets.
Vessels held for sale The fair value of the Companys vessels held for sale approximates their
carrying amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Loans to joint ventures The fair value of the Companys loans to joint ventures approximates
their carrying amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
Page 15 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
Loans from joint venture partners The fair value of the Companys loans from joint venture
partners approximates their carrying amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheet.
Long-term debt The fair value of the Companys fixed-rate and variable-rate long-term debt is
either based on quoted market prices or estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based on
current credit spreads available for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities.
Derivative instruments The fair value of the Companys derivative instruments is the estimated
amount that the Company would receive or pay to terminate the agreements at the reporting date,
taking into account, as applicable, current interest rates, foreign exchange rates, bunker fuel
prices, spot tanker market rates for vessels, and the current credit worthiness of both the Company
and the swap counterparties. Given the current volatility in the credit markets, it is reasonably
possible that the amounts recorded as derivative assets and liabilities could vary by material
amounts in the near term.
The estimated fair value of the Companys financial instruments and other non-financial assets
carried at fair value are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
Hierarchy |
|
|
Asset (Liability) |
|
|
Asset (Liability) |
|
|
|
Level |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
1,118,634 |
|
|
|
1,118,634 |
|
Vessels held for sale |
|
Level 2 |
|
|
34,970 |
|
|
|
34,970 |
|
Loans to joint ventures |
|
Level 2 |
|
|
22,588 |
|
|
|
22,588 |
|
Loan from joint venture partners |
|
Level 2 |
|
|
(21,274 |
) |
|
|
(21,274 |
) |
Long-term debt |
|
Level 1 and 2 |
|
|
(4,479,452 |
) |
|
|
(4,076,282 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements (2) |
|
Level 2 |
|
|
(392,262 |
) |
|
|
(392,262 |
) |
Interest rate swap agreements (2) |
|
Level 2 |
|
|
54,958 |
|
|
|
54,958 |
|
Interest rate swaption |
|
Level 2 |
|
|
(8,242 |
) |
|
|
(8,242 |
) |
Foreign currency contracts |
|
Level 2 |
|
|
(26,739 |
) |
|
|
(26,739 |
) |
Bunker fuel swap contracts |
|
Level 2 |
|
|
(354 |
) |
|
|
(354 |
) |
Forward freight agreements |
|
Level 2 |
|
|
1,531 |
|
|
|
1,531 |
|
Foinaven embedded derivative |
|
Level 2 |
|
|
(11,771 |
) |
|
|
(11,771 |
) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Company transacts all of its derivative instruments through investment-grade rated
financial institutions at the time of the transaction and requires no collateral from these
institutions. |
|
(2) |
|
The fair value of the Companys interest rate swap agreements includes $19.2 million of
accrued interest which is recorded in accrued liabilities on the balance sheet. |
The Company has determined that other than Vessels Held for Sale, there are no other non-financial
assets or non-financial liabilities carried at fair value at June 30, 2009. See Note 13(b) of the
notes to the consolidated financial statements.
13. Vessel Sales and Write-downs of Vessels and Equipment
a) Vessel Sales
During January and February 2009, the Company sold a 1993-built Aframax tanker through a
sale-leaseback agreement and a 2009-built product tanker, respectively, which were presented on
the December 31, 2008 balance sheet as vessels held for sale. Both vessels were part of the
Companys spot tanker segment. The Company realized a gain of approximately $17.7 million as a
result of these transactions, of which $17.6 million was deferred and will be amortized over the
four year term of the bareboat charter.
During May 2009, the Company sold a 2007-built product tanker and a 2005-built product tanker.
Both vessels were part of the Companys spot tanker segment. The Company realized a gain of
approximately $29.8 million as a result of these transactions.
b) Vessels and Equipment Write-down
The Companys June 30, 2009 consolidated financial statements include a $16.4 million write-down
for impairment of three older vessels due to lower fair values compared to carrying values. The
Company used recent sale prices of similar age and size of vessels to determine the fair value.
These vessels are presented on the June 30, 2009 balance sheet as vessels held for sale.
Page 16 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
14. Restructuring Charge and Other Income
a) Restructuring Charge
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company incurred $5.0 million and $10.6
million of restructuring costs, respectively. The restructuring costs were primarily comprised of
the reflagging of certain vessels, transfer of certain ship management functions from the Spain office to a
subsidiary of Teekay, global staffing changes, closure of one of the Companys three offices in
Norway, and the reorganization of a business unit. The Company expects to incur approximately $1.0
million of additional restructuring costs relating to these changes in operations. At June 30,
2009, $2.1 million of restructuring liability is recorded in accrued liabilities on the balance
sheet.
b) Other Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Gain on sale of marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,576 |
|
Loss on bond repurchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(712 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,310 |
) |
Volatile organic compound emission plant lease income |
|
|
1,708 |
|
|
|
2,395 |
|
|
|
3,602 |
|
|
|
4,965 |
|
Miscellaneous income |
|
|
2,115 |
|
|
|
2,743 |
|
|
|
1,803 |
|
|
|
2,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
|
3,823 |
|
|
|
6,294 |
|
|
|
5,405 |
|
|
|
10,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
As at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Companys accumulated other comprehensive loss
consisted of the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments |
|
|
(23,821 |
) |
|
|
(58,723 |
) |
Pension adjustments |
|
|
(22,464 |
) |
|
|
(23,338 |
) |
Unrealized gain on marketable securities |
|
|
1,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,195 |
) |
|
|
(82,061 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Company uses derivatives in accordance with its overall risk management policies. The following
summarizes the Companys risk strategies with respect to market risk from foreign currency
fluctuations, changes in interest rates, spot tanker market rates for vessels and bunker fuel
prices.
Foreign Currency Fluctuation Risk
The Company hedges portions of its forecasted expenditures denominated in foreign currencies with
foreign currency forward contracts. Certain of these foreign currency forward contracts are
designated as cash flow hedges of forecasted foreign currency expenditures. Where such instruments
are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes, the effective portion of
the changes in their fair value is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), until
the hedged item is recognized in earnings. At such time, the respective amount in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) is released to earnings and is recorded within operating expenses,
based on the nature of the expense. The ineffective portion of these foreign currency forward
contracts consists of a $1.5 million gain for the six months ended June 30, 2009 has also been
reported as a reduction of operating expenses, based on the nature of the expense.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company recognized the following realized
and unrealized gains (losses) relating to foreign currency forward contracts that are designated as
cash flow hedges for accounting:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Gains (losses) recognized in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
653 |
|
|
|
1,567 |
|
|
|
(10,291 |
) |
|
|
1,777 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
(1,598 |
) |
|
|
918 |
|
|
|
(4,226 |
) |
|
|
1,691 |
|
Foreign exchange (loss) gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(444 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
21,050 |
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
21,991 |
|
|
|
6,577 |
|
Gains (losses) reclassified from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
5,942 |
|
|
|
(993 |
) |
|
|
18,686 |
|
|
|
(4,020 |
) |
Page 17 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) of foreign currency forward contracts that are not
designated for accounting purposes as cash flow hedges, are recognized in earnings and reported in
realized and unrealized gains (losses) on non-designated derivative instruments in the consolidated
statements of income. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company recognized
net realized and unrealized gains on foreign currency forward contracts of $3.9 million and $5.2
million, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company recognized
net realized and unrealized gains on foreign currency forward contracts of $3.1 million and $15.0
million, respectively. Realized and unrealized gains of $0.4 million and $4.7 million,
respectively, relating to foreign currency forwards contracts for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008 were reclassified from general and administrative expenses to realized and unrealized
gains (losses) on non-designated derivative instruments for comparative purposes. Realized and
unrealized gains of $1.4 million and $6.7 million, respectively, relating to foreign currency
forwards contracts for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 were reclassified from vessel
operating expenses to realized and unrealized gains (losses) on non-designated derivative
instruments for comparative purposes. Realized and unrealized gains of $1.2 million and $3.6
million, respectively, relating to foreign currency forwards contracts for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2008 were reclassified from time-charter hire and foreign exchange expenses to
realized and unrealized gains (losses) on non-designated derivative instruments for comparative
purposes.
As at June 30, 2009, the Company was committed to the following foreign currency forward contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value / |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Asset / (Liability) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency |
|
|
Average Forward |
|
|
(in millions of U.S. |
|
|
Expected Maturity |
|
|
|
(millions) |
|
|
Rate(1) |
|
|
Dollars) |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions of U.S. Dollars) |
|
Norwegian Kroner |
|
|
1,440.7 |
|
|
|
6.03 |
|
|
$ |
(15.4) |
|
|
$ |
99.5 |
|
|
$ |
139.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Euro |
|
|
50.4 |
|
|
|
0.68 |
|
|
|
(3.2) |
|
|
|
34.9 |
|
|
|
36.8 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Canadian Dollar |
|
|
71.8 |
|
|
|
1.08 |
|
|
|
(4.6) |
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
37.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
British Pound |
|
|
36.7 |
|
|
|
0.58 |
|
|
|
(3.4) |
|
|
|
32.7 |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Dollar |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.13 |
|
|
|
(0.1) |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(26.7) |
|
|
$ |
196.9 |
|
|
$ |
245.3 |
|
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Average forward rate represents the contracted amount of foreign currency one U.S. Dollar will
buy. |
As at June 30, 2009, the Companys accumulated other comprehensive loss included $23.8 million of
unrealized losses on foreign currency forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges (December
31, 2008 $58.7 million of unrealized losses). As at June 30, 2009, the Company estimated, based
on current foreign exchange rates, that it would reclassify approximately $25.0 million of net
losses on foreign currency forward contracts from accumulated other comprehensive loss to earnings
during the next twelve months.
Interest Rate Risk
The Company enters into interest rate swaps which exchange a receipt of floating interest for a
payment of fixed interest to reduce the Companys exposure to interest rate variability on its
outstanding floating-rate debt. In addition, the Company holds interest rate swaps, which exchange
a payment of floating rate interest for a receipt of fixed interest in order to reduce the
Companys exposure to the variability of interest income on its restricted cash deposits. The
Company has not designated its interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes.
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) relating to the Companys interest rate swaps have been
reported in realized and unrealized gains (losses) on non-designated derivative instruments in the
consolidated statements of income. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company
recognized net realized and unrealized gains of $152.9 million and $195.0 million, respectively,
relating to its interest rate swaps. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the
Company recognized net realized and unrealized gains (losses) of $156.2 million and $(10.6)
million, respectively, relating to its interest rate swaps. The realized and unrealized gains
(losses) of $156.2 million and $(10.6) million, respectively relating to interest rate swaps for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 were reclassified
from interest income and interest expense to realized
and unrealized gain on non-designated derivative instruments for comparative purposes.
As at June 30, 2009, the Company was committed to the following interest rate swap agreements
related to its LIBOR-based debt, restricted cash deposits and EURIBOR-based debt, whereby certain
of the Companys floating-rate debt and restricted cash deposits were swapped with fixed-rate
obligations or fixed-rate deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value / |
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Carrying Amount |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
of Asset (Liability) |
|
|
Remaining Term |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
Index |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
(Years) |
|
|
(%)(1) |
|
LIBOR-Based Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated interest rate swaps (2) |
|
LIBOR |
|
|
465,554 |
|
|
|
(46,725 |
) |
|
|
27.6 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated interest rate swaps |
|
LIBOR |
|
|
2,967,256 |
|
|
|
(271,427 |
) |
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated interest rate swaps (3) |
|
LIBOR |
|
|
658,536 |
|
|
|
(70,654 |
) |
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
LIBOR-Based Restricted Cash Deposit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated interest rate swaps (2) |
|
LIBOR |
|
|
475,352 |
|
|
|
54,958 |
|
|
|
27.6 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
EURIBOR-Based Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro-denominated interest rate swaps (4) (5) |
|
EURIBOR |
|
|
410,138 |
|
|
|
(3,456 |
) |
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
(1) |
|
Excludes the margins the Company pays on its variable-rate debt, which at of June 30, 2009
ranged from 0.3% to 1.0%. |
Page 18 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Principal amount reduces quarterly. |
|
(3) |
|
Inception dates of swaps are 2009 ($158.5 million), 2010 ($300.0 million) and 2011 ($200.0
million). |
|
(4) |
|
Principal amount reduces monthly to 70.1 million Euros ($98.4 million) by the maturity dates
of the swap agreements. |
|
(5) |
|
Principal amount is the U.S. Dollar equivalent of 292.3 million Euros. |
During May 2006, the Company sold to a third party two swaptions for $2.4 million. The Company has
not applied hedge accounting to these instruments and they have been recorded at fair value. These
options, if exercised by the other party, obligate the Company to enter into interest rate swap
agreements whereby certain of the Companys floating-rate debt is swapped with fixed-rate
obligations. One swaption was exercised in 2009. At June 30, 2009, the terms of the remaining
swaption are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
Principal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate |
|
Amount(1) |
|
|
|
Remaining Term |
|
Fixed Interest Rate |
Index |
|
$ |
|
Start Date |
|
(Years) |
|
(%) |
LIBOR
|
|
150,000
|
|
August 31, 2009
|
|
12.0
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Principal amount reduces by $5.0 million semi-annually. See Note 12 of the notes to the
consolidated financial statements for fair value of the interest rate swaption. |
Spot Tanker Market Risk
In order to reduce variability in revenues from fluctuations in certain spot tanker market rates,
from time to time the Company has entered into forward freight agreements (FFAs) and synthetic
time-charters (STCs). FFAs involve contracts to move a theoretical volume of freight at
fixed-rates, thus attempting to reduce the Companys exposure to spot tanker market rates. STCs are
a means of achieving the equivalent of a time-charter for a vessel that trades in the spot tanker
market by taking the short position in a long-term FFA. As at June 30, 2009, the Company had three
STCs which were equivalent to one Suezmax vessel. As at June 30, 2009, the FFAs, which include
STCs, had an aggregate notional value of $3.7 million, which is an aggregate of both long and short
positions, and a net fair value of $1.5 million. The FFAs, which include STCs, expired in September
2009. The Company has not designated these contracts as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes.
Net gains and losses from FFAs and STCs are recorded within realized and unrealized gain (loss) on
non-designated derivative instruments in the consolidated statements of income.
Commodity Price Risk
The Company enters into bunker fuel swap contracts relating to a portion of its bunker fuel
expenditures. The Company has not designated its bunker fuel swap contracts as cash flow hedges for
accounting purposes. As at June 30, 2009, the Company was committed to contracts totalling 4,500
metric tonnes with a weighted-average price of $470.75 per tonne and a fair value liability of $0.4
million. The bunker fuel swap contracts expired between July and September 2009.
The Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the counterparties to the
foreign currency forward contracts, interest rate swap agreements, FFAs and bunker fuel swap
contracts; however, the Company does not anticipate non-performance by any of the counterparties.
In order to minimize counterparty risk, the Company only enters into derivative transactions with
counterparties that are rated A or better by Standard & Poors or Aa3 by Moodys at the time of the
transaction. In addition, to the extent possible and practical, interest rate swaps are entered
into with different counterparties to reduce concentration risk.
17. Earnings Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30 |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to stockholders of Teekay
Corporation |
|
|
159,359 |
|
|
|
183,419 |
|
|
|
240,864 |
|
|
|
78,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares |
|
|
72,535,899 |
|
|
|
72,377,684 |
|
|
|
72,526,101 |
|
|
|
72,511,041 |
|
Dilutive effect of employee stock options and
restricted stock awards |
|
|
262,124 |
|
|
|
901,529 |
|
|
|
361,373 |
|
|
|
846,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock and common stock equivalents |
|
|
72,798,023 |
|
|
|
73,279,213 |
|
|
|
72,887,474 |
|
|
|
73,357,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Basic |
|
|
2.20 |
|
|
|
2.53 |
|
|
|
3.32 |
|
|
|
1.08 |
|
- Diluted |
|
|
2.19 |
|
|
|
2.50 |
|
|
|
3.30 |
|
|
|
1.07 |
|
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the anti-dilutive effect of 2.3 million shares
(2.2 million shares 2008) and 4.6 million shares (2.5 million shares 2008), respectively,
attributable to outstanding stock options was excluded from the calculations of diluted earnings
per share.
Page 19 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
18. Income Tax Recovery (Expense)
The legal jurisdictions in which Teekay and several of its subsidiaries are incorporated do not
impose income taxes upon shipping-related activities. However, among others, the Companys
Australian ship-owing subsidiaries and its Norwegian subsidiaries are subject to income taxes.
The components of the provision for income tax recovery (expense) are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Current |
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
(1,120 |
) |
|
|
(397 |
) |
|
|
(2,473 |
) |
Deferred |
|
|
4,148 |
|
|
|
12,321 |
|
|
|
(873 |
) |
|
|
11,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax recovery (expense) |
|
|
4,598 |
|
|
|
11,201 |
|
|
|
(1,270 |
) |
|
|
8,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162 (or
SFAS No. 168). SFAS No. 168 identifies the source of authoritative generally accepted accounting
principles (or GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and
interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (or SEC) under authority of federal
securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. On the effective date
of this Statement, SFAS No. 168 will supersede all then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting
standards. All other non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the SFAS No.
168 will become non-authoritative. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for
interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company is currently assessing the
potential impact, if any, of this statement on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (or SFAS
No. 167). SFAS No. 167 eliminates FASB Interpretation 46(R)s exceptions to consolidating
qualifying special-purpose entities, contains new criteria for determining the primary beneficiary,
and increases the frequency of required reassessments to determine whether a company is the primary
beneficiary of a variable interest entity. SFAS No. 167 also contains a new requirement that any
term, transaction, or arrangement that does not have a substantive effect on an entitys status as
a variable interest entity, a companys power over a variable interest entity, or a companys
obligation to absorb losses or its right to receive benefits of an entity must be disregarded in
applying FASB Interpretation 46(R)s provisions. The elimination of the qualifying special-purpose
entity concept and its consolidation exceptions means more entities will be subject to
consolidation assessments and reassessments. SFAS No. 167 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2009, and for interim periods within that first period, with earlier adoption
prohibited. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact, if any, of this statement on
its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (or SFAS No. 166). SFAS No. 166 eliminates the concept of a
qualifying special-purpose entity, creates more stringent conditions for reporting a transfer of a
portion of a financial asset as a sale, clarifies other sale-accounting criteria, and changes the
initial measurement of a transferors interest in transferred financial assets. SFAS No. 166 will
be effective for transfers of financial assets in fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009,
and in interim periods within those fiscal years with earlier adoption prohibited. The Company is
currently assessing the potential impacts, if any, on its consolidated financial statements.
20. Subsequent Events
a) |
|
In June 2009, the
Company announced that its Board of Directors had approved the Companys
quarterly cash dividend of $0.31625 per share. This dividend was paid on July 24, 2009 to
shareholders of record as at July 10, 2009.
|
b) |
|
During July 2009, the
Company entered into an agreement to sell a 1992-built Aframax tanker. The
vessel was part of the Companys spot tanker segment and is presented
on the June 30, 2009 balance sheet as vessel held for sale. The vessel
was written-down by $7.1 million to its fair market value on June 30,
2009 and the Company did not realize a gain or a loss as a result of
the sale. The vessel sale is expected to be completed during the
fourth quarter of 2009.
|
c) |
|
On August 4, 2009, Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. (of Teekay Offshore)
completed a public offering of 7.475 million common units (including
975,000 units issued upon the exercise in full of the underwriters
overallotment option) at a price of $14.32 per unit, for total net
proceeds of $104.3 million (including the general partners $2.2
million proportionate capital contribution). As a result, the
Companys ownership of Teekay Offshore was reduced from 50.0 percent
to 40.5 percent (including the Companys 2 percent general partner
interest). The total net proceeds from the offering were used to
reduce amounts outstanding under one Teekay Offshores revolving
credit facilities.
|
d) |
|
In early September 2009, the Company purchased a 2007-built, 40,000 deadweight tonne product
tanker for approximately $35 million. The vessel renamed the Alexander Spirit, commenced a
10-year, fixed-rate time charter to Caltex Australia Petroleum Pty Ltd. on September 3, 2009. |
Page 20 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
June 30, 2009
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 2 MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
Teekay Corporation (Teekay or the Company) is a leading provider of international crude oil and
petroleum product transportation services. Over the past five years, we have undergone a major
transformation from being primarily an owner of ships in the cyclical spot tanker business to being
a growth-oriented asset manager in the Marine Midstream sector. This transformation has included
the expansion into the liquefied natural gas (or LNG) and liquefied petroleum gas (or LPG) shipping
sectors through our publicly-listed subsidiary, Teekay LNG Partners L.P. (Teekay LNG), further
growth of our operations in the offshore production, storage and transportation sector through our
publicly-listed subsidiary, Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. (Teekay Offshore) and through Teekay
Petrojarl ASA (Teekay Petrojarl), and expansion of our conventional tanker business through our
publicly-listed subsidiary, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (Teekay Tankers). With a fleet of 165 vessels,
offices in 16 countries and approximately 6,700 seagoing and shore-based employees, Teekay provides
comprehensive marine services to the worlds leading oil and gas companies, helping them seamlessly
link their upstream energy production to their downstream processing operations. Our goal is to
create the industrys leading asset management company, focused on the Marine Midstream space.
SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS IN 2009
Sale of LNG Vessels to Teekay LNG
In accordance with existing agreements, in April 2008, we sold two 1993-built LNG vessels (the
Kenai LNG Carriers) to Teekay LNG for $230.0 million and chartered them back for ten years with
three five-year option periods. We acquired these vessels in December 2007 from a joint venture
between Marathon Oil Corporation and ConocoPhillips for a total cost of $230.0 million. The
specialized ice-strengthened vessels were purpose-built to carry LNG from Alaskas Kenai LNG plant
to Japan. We believe that these specialized vessels will provide us with the prospect of a new
service offering following the completion of the Kenai project such as delivering partial cargoes
at multiple ports or as a potential project vessel such as serving as a floating offshore
re-gasification or production facility, subject to conversion.
We have time chartered to the Marathon Oil Corporation/Conoco Phillips joint venture one of the
Kenai LNG carriers, the Polar Spirit, until April 2010 with the charterers option to extend the
contract yearly for up to 3 additional years. The other Kenai LNG Carrier, the Arctic Spirit, came
off charter from the Marathon Oil Corporation/ConocoPhillips joint venture on March 31, 2009, and
we have entered into a joint development and option agreement with Merrill Lynch Commodities, Inc.
(MLCI), giving MLCI the option to purchase the vessel for conversion to an LNG floating production,
storage and offload unit (FLNG). The agreement provides for a purchase price of $105 million if we
exercise our option to participate in the project as described below, or $110 million if we choose
not to participate. Under the option agreement, the Arctic Spirit is reserved for MLCI until
December 31, 2009 and MLCI may extend the option quarterly through 2010. If MLCI exercises the
option and purchases the vessel from us, we expect MLCI to convert the vessel to an FLNG (although
it is not required to do so) and charter it under a long-term charter contract to a third party. We
have the right to participate up to 50% in the conversion and charter project on terms that will be
determined as the project progresses. The agreement with MLCI also provides that if the conversion
of the Arctic Spirit to an FLNG proceeds, we will offer a similar option for a designee of MLCI to
purchase the Polar Spirit for $125 million when it comes off charter.
Tangguh LNG
Teekay LNG completed the purchase of our 70 percent interest in two 155,000 cubic meter newbuilding
LNG carriers during August 2009 for approximately $70 million. The Tangguh vessels which commenced
operations in November 2008 and January 2009, will provide transportation services to The Tangguh
Production Sharing Contractors, a consortium led by a subsidiary of BP plc, to service the Tangguh
LNG project in Indonesia. The vessels have been chartered at fixed rates, with inflation
adjustments, for a period of 20 years. An Indonesian joint venture partner owns the remaining 30
percent interest in these vessels.
Public Offering by Teekay LNG Partners L.P.
During March 2009, Teekay LNG completed a public offering of 4.0 million common units at a price of
$17.60 per unit, for gross proceeds of $71.8 million (including the general partners $1.4 million
proportionate capital contribution). As result of the offering, our ownership of Teekay LNG was
reduced from 57.7 percent to 53.0 percent (including our 2 percent general partner interest). The
total net proceeds from the offering of approximately
$68.5 million were used to prepay amounts
outstanding on two of Teekay LNGs revolving credit facilities.
Public Offering by Teekay Tankers Ltd.
During June 2009, Teekay Tankers completed a public offering of 7.0 million shares of Class A
Common Stock at a price of $9.80 per share, for gross proceeds of $68.6 million. As a result of the
offering, our ownership of Teekay Tankers was reduced from 54.0 percent to 42.2 percent. Teekay
Tankers used the total net offering proceeds of approximately $65.6 million to acquire a 2003-built
Suezmax tanker from Teekay for $57.0 million and to repay a portion of its outstanding debt under
its revolving credit facility.
In connection with an existing agreement, Teekay will offer to Teekay Tankers by June 18, 2010 the
opportunity to purchase an additional Suezmax-class oil tanker at fair market value.
Page 21 of 41
Public Offering by Teekay Offshore Partners L.P.
During August 2009, Teekay Offshore completed a public offering of 7.475 million common units
(including 975,000 units issued upon the exercise in full of the underwriters overallotment
option) at a price of $14.32 per unit for net proceeds of $104.3 million. In connection with the
public offering, we contributed $2.2 million to Teekay Offshore to maintain our 2 percent general
partner interest. As a result of the above transactions, our ownership of Teekay Offshore was
reduced from 50.0 percent to 40.5 percent (including our 2 percent general partner interest).
The total net proceeds from the offering were used to reduce amounts outstanding under one of
Teekay Offshores revolving credit facilities.
Sale of FPSO to Teekay Offshore
On September 10, 2009, Teekay Offshore acquired the Petrojarl Varg floating production, storage and
offtake (or FPSO) from Teekay for a purchase price of $320 million. Teekay provided vendor
financing in the amount of $220 million with the remainder financed by Teekay Offshore from its
existing debt facilities. A new $260 million revolving credit facility, which will be secured by the Petrojarl Varg FPSO, is
currently being arranged and is expected to be completed in October 2009. Upon the completion of
the new $260 million revolving credit facility, Teekay Offshore will be required to repay $160
million of the total $220 million in vendor financing owing to Teekay.
The Petrojarl Varg FPSO recently commenced a new four-year fixed-rate contract extension with
Talisman Energy on the Varg oil field in the North Sea, where the FPSO has been operating for over
ten years. Talisman Energy also has options to extend the new contract for up to an additional nine
years. The contract is comprised of a daily base time-charter rate plus an incentive component
based on the operational performance of the FPSO, a tariff component based on the volume of oil
produced and an annual adjustment for cost escalations. There is potential for additional upside
from the tariff component if, as expected, nearby oil fields become operational and are tied into
the Petrojarl Varg.
Long-term Charter to Caltex Australia Petroleum Pty Ltd.
In early September 2009, we purchased a 2007-built, 40,000 deadweight tonne product tanker for
approximately $35 million. The vessel renamed the Alexander Spirit, commenced a 10-year, fixed-rate
time charter to Caltex Australia Petroleum Pty Ltd. on September 3, 2009.
OTHER SIGNIFICANT PROJECTS
Angola LNG Project
We have a 33% interest in a consortium that will charter four newbuilding 160,400-cubic meter LNG
carriers for a period of 20 years to the Angola LNG Project, which is being developed by
subsidiaries of Chevron Corporation, Sociedade Nacional de Combustiveis de Angola EP, BP Plc, Total
S.A., and Eni SpA. Final award of the charter contract was made in December 2007. The vessels will
be chartered at fixed rates, with inflation adjustments, commencing in 2011. Mitsui & Co., Ltd. and
NYK Bulkship (Europe) Ltd., have 34% and 33% interests in the consortium, respectively. In
accordance with existing agreements, we are required to offer to Teekay LNG our 33% interest in
these vessels and related charter contracts no later than 180 days before the scheduled delivery
dates of the vessels. Deliveries of the vessels are scheduled between August 2011 and January 2012.
Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 11(b) Commitments and Contingencies Joint
Ventures.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
We use a variety of financial and operational terms and concepts when analyzing our results of
operations, which can be found in Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects in our
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008. In accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles (or GAAP), we report gross revenues in our income statements and
include voyage expenses among our operating expenses. However, ship-owners base economic decisions
regarding the deployment of their vessels upon anticipated TCE rates, and industry analysts
typically measure bulk shipping freight rates in terms of TCE rates. This is because under
time-charter contracts and FPSO service contracts the customer usually pays the voyage expenses,
while under voyage charters and contracts of affreightment the ship-owner usually pays the voyage
expenses, which typically are added to the hire rate at an approximate cost. Accordingly, the
discussion of revenue below focuses on net revenues and TCE rates of our five reportable segments
where applicable.
We manage our business and analyze and report our results of operations on the basis of five
segments: the shuttle tanker and FSO segment, the FPSO segment, the liquefied gas segment, the
fixed-rate tanker segment and the spot tanker segment. Please read Item 1 Financial Statements:
Note 2 Segment Reporting.
Shuttle Tanker and FSO Segment
Our shuttle tanker and floating storage and offtake (or FSO) segment (which includes our Teekay
Navion Shuttle Tankers and Offshore business unit) includes our shuttle tankers and FSO units. The
shuttle tanker and FSO segment had four shuttle tankers under construction as at June 30, 2009.
Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 11(a) Commitments and Contingencies Vessels
Under Construction. We use these vessels to provide transportation and storage services to oil
companies operating offshore oil field installations. These services are typically provided under
long-term fixed-rate time-charter contracts or contracts of affreightment. Historically, the
utilization of shuttle tankers in the North Sea is higher in the winter months, as favorable
weather conditions in the summer months provide opportunities for repairs and maintenance to our
vessels. Downtime for repairs and maintenance generally reduces oil production and, thus,
transportation requirements.
Page 22 of 41
The following table presents our shuttle tanker and FSO segments operating results and compares
its net revenues (which is a non-GAAP financial measure) to revenues, the most directly comparable
GAAP financial measure. The following table also provides a summary of the changes in
calendar-ship-days by owned and chartered-in vessels for our shuttle tanker and FSO segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except |
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
calendar-ship-days and percentages) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
138,324 |
|
|
|
183,176 |
|
|
|
(24.5 |
) |
|
|
288,189 |
|
|
|
349,435 |
|
|
|
(17.5 |
) |
Voyage expenses |
|
|
16,167 |
|
|
|
46,024 |
|
|
|
(64.9 |
) |
|
|
34,575 |
|
|
|
84,925 |
|
|
|
(59.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
122,157 |
|
|
|
137,152 |
|
|
|
(10.9 |
) |
|
|
253,614 |
|
|
|
264,510 |
|
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
41,961 |
|
|
|
45,417 |
|
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
|
|
87,745 |
|
|
|
84,340 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Time-charter hire expense |
|
|
25,695 |
|
|
|
32,242 |
|
|
|
(20.3 |
) |
|
|
57,873 |
|
|
|
67,280 |
|
|
|
(14.0 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
28,738 |
|
|
|
31,207 |
|
|
|
(7.9 |
) |
|
|
57,991 |
|
|
|
59,278 |
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
13,848 |
|
|
|
15,739 |
|
|
|
(12.0 |
) |
|
|
26,977 |
|
|
|
31,735 |
|
|
|
(15.0 |
) |
(Gain) loss on sale of vessels and
equipment, net of write- downs |
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
(3,150 |
) |
|
|
(129.9 |
) |
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
(3,150 |
) |
|
|
(129.9 |
) |
Restructuring charge |
|
|
2,536 |
|
|
|
3,327 |
|
|
|
(23.8 |
) |
|
|
5,298 |
|
|
|
3,327 |
|
|
|
59.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
8,438 |
|
|
|
12,370 |
|
|
|
(31.8 |
) |
|
|
16,789 |
|
|
|
21,700 |
|
|
|
(22.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-Ship-Days
Owned Vessels |
|
|
2,914 |
|
|
|
2,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,974 |
|
|
|
5,740 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Chartered-in Vessels |
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
897 |
|
|
|
(33.9 |
) |
|
|
1,553 |
|
|
|
1,899 |
|
|
|
(18.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,507 |
|
|
|
3,810 |
|
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
|
|
7,527 |
|
|
|
7,639 |
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and administrative
expenses (allocated to the shuttle tanker and FSO segment based on estimated use of corporate
resources). For further discussion, please read Other Operating Results General and
Administrative Expenses. |
The average fleet size of our shuttle tanker and FSO segment (including vessels chartered-in)
decreased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to the same periods last year,
primarily due to a decline in the number of chartered-in shuttle tankers.
Net Revenues. Net revenues decreased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009
compared to the same periods in 2008, primarily due to:
|
|
|
decreases of $19.8 million and $23.6 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009 due to less revenue days for shuttle tankers servicing contracts of
affreightment and trading in the conventional spot market and lower spot rates achieved in
the conventional spot market, compared to the same periods last year; and |
|
|
|
decreases in net revenues from our FSO units of $2.2 million and $4.0 million,
respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, primarily due to the
strengthening of the U.S. Dollar against the Norwegian Kroner and Australian Dollar; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
increases of $3.0 million and $6.3 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, due to a new time-charter agreement which began in December 2008; |
|
|
|
increases of $2.8 million for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, due to
a decline in bunker prices during the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to the same
periods last year; and |
|
|
|
increases of $1.0 million and $6.5 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, due to a decrease in the number of offhire days resulting from
scheduled and unexpected drydockings, compared to the same periods last year. |
Vessel Operating Expenses. Vessel operating expenses decreased during the three month
period and increased during the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to the same periods in
2008, primarily due to:
|
|
|
decreases of $4.3 million and $5.0 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, from a reduction in salaries for crew and officers primarily due to
the reflagging of five of our vessels from Norwegian flag to Bahamian flag and changing
the nationality mix of its crews, and the strengthening of the US Dollar against the
Norwegian Kroner; |
|
|
|
decreases of $2.0 million and $2.4 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, relating to repairs and maintenance performed for certain vessels;
and |
|
|
|
decreases in FSO vessel operating expenses of $1.1 million and $1.6 million
respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, from the same periods last
year, respectively, primarily due to primarily due to the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar
against the Norwegian Kroner and Australian Dollar compared to the same period last year; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
increases of $4.0 million and $7.1 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, from changes in realized and unrealized losses on our designated
foreign currency forward contracts; |
|
|
|
an increase of $1.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, primarily due to
the purchase of a previously in-chartered shuttle tanker, which was delivered to us in
late March 2008; and |
|
|
|
increases of $0.5 million and $2.4 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, due to an increase in services due to the rising cost of consumables,
lube oil, and freight. |
Page 23 of 41
Time-Charter Hire Expense. Time-charter hire expense decreased for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, compared to the same periods in 2008, primarily due to a net decrease in the
number of vessels chartered-in.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to the same periods in 2008, primarily due to
lower amortization expense relating to our FSO units.
Restructuring Charges. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we incurred restructuring
charges of $3.7 million relating to costs incurred for the reflagging of certain vessels, $0.7
million relating to the closure of one of our offices in Norway and $0.8 million relating to global
staffing changes and the reorganization of a business unit.
FPSO Segment
Our FPSO segment (which includes our Teekay Petrojarl business unit) includes our FPSO units and
other vessels used to service our FPSO contracts. We use these units and vessels to provide
transportation, production, processing and storage services to oil companies operating offshore oil
field installations. These services are typically provided under long-term fixed-rate time-charter
contracts or FPSO service contracts. Historically, the utilization of FPSO units and other vessels
in the North Sea is higher in the winter months, as favorable weather conditions in the summer
months provide opportunities for repairs and maintenance to our vessels and the offshore oil
platforms, which generally reduces oil production.
The following table presents our FPSO segments operating results and also provides a summary of
the changes in calendar-ship-days for our FPSO segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except |
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
calendar-ship-days and percentages) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
97,572 |
|
|
|
90,785 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
189,498 |
|
|
|
183,314 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
47,021 |
|
|
|
57,418 |
|
|
|
(18.1 |
) |
|
|
91,450 |
|
|
|
105,455 |
|
|
|
(13.3 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
25,745 |
|
|
|
22,565 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
51,525 |
|
|
|
40,568 |
|
|
|
27.0 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
7,553 |
|
|
|
11,509 |
|
|
|
(34.4 |
) |
|
|
17,339 |
|
|
|
24,036 |
|
|
|
(27.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) income from vessel operations |
|
|
17,253 |
|
|
|
(707 |
) |
|
|
(2,540.3 |
) |
|
|
29,184 |
|
|
|
13,255 |
|
|
|
120.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-Ship-Days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned Vessels |
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,086 |
|
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,086 |
|
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and administrative
expenses (allocated to the FPSO segment based on estimated use of corporate resources). For
further discussion, please read Other Operating Results General and Administrative Expenses. |
The average fleet size of our FPSO segment remained consistent for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009 compared to the same periods last year.
Revenues. Revenues increased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to
the same periods in 2008, primarily due to:
|
|
|
increases of $5.6 million and $4.4 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, from the amortization of contract value liabilities relating to FPSO
service contracts (as discussed below), which was recognized on the date of the acquisition
by us of a controlling interest in Teekay Petrojarl; and |
|
|
|
increases of $1.2 million and $1.8 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, from the delivery of a new FPSO unit in February 2008 (or the FPSO
Delivery), partially offset by lower revenues in other FPSO units due to lower oil
production compared to the prior periods. |
As part of our acquisition of Teekay Petrojarl, we assumed certain FPSO service contracts that had
terms that were less favorable than prevailing market terms at the time of acquisition. This
contract value liability, which was recognized on the date of acquisition, is being amortized to
revenue over the remaining firm period of the current FPSO contracts on a weighted basis based on
the projected revenue to be earned under the contracts. The amount of amortization relating to
these contracts included in revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 was $17.5
million and $34.6 million, respectively, compared to $11.9 million and $30.2 million, respectively,
for the same periods last year. The increase was primarily due to our purchase of the remaining
interest in Teekay Petrojarl in mid-2008. Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 6 -
Goodwill, Intangible Assets and In-Process Revenue Contracts.
Vessel Operating Expenses. Vessel operating expenses decreased during the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009, compared to the same periods in 2008, primarily due to:
|
|
|
decreases of $10.1 million and $13.2 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009 from decreases in service costs due to the timing of certain projects,
cost saving initiatives, and the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar against the Norwegian
Kroner; and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 from lower insurance
charges. |
Page 24 of 41
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to the same periods in 2008, primarily due to:
|
|
|
increases of $3.2 million and $7.3 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, from the finalization of preliminary estimates of fair value assigned
to certain assets included in our acquisition of Teekay Petrojarl; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $3.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, from the FPSO
Delivery. |
Liquefied Gas Segment
Our liquefied gas segment consists of LNG and LPG carriers primarily subject to long-term,
fixed-rate time-charter contracts. We accepted delivery of two new LNG carriers between November
2008 and January 2009, and one new LPG carrier in April 2009. At June 30, 2009, we had two LPG
carriers under construction, which are scheduled for delivery between October 2009 and March 2010.
In addition, we have four LNG carriers under construction that are scheduled for delivery between
August 2011 and January 2012, and two multigas carriers under construction that are scheduled for
delivery between August and October 2010. Upon delivery, all of these vessels will commence
operation under long-term, fixed-rate time-charters. Please read Item 1 Financial Statements:
Note 11(a) Commitments and Contingencies Vessels Under Construction and Note 11(b) -
Commitments and Contingencies Joint Ventures.
The following table presents our liquefied gas segments operating results and compares its net
revenues (which is a non-GAAP financial measure) to revenues, the most directly comparable GAAP
financial measure. The following table also provides a summary of the changes in calendar-ship-days
by owned vessels and vessels under capital lease for our liquefied gas segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except |
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
calendar-ship-days and percentages) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
57,265 |
|
|
|
53,496 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
114,848 |
|
|
|
109,628 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
(107.5 |
) |
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
(57.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
57,299 |
|
|
|
53,044 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
114,590 |
|
|
|
109,026 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
12,049 |
|
|
|
13,125 |
|
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
|
|
23,836 |
|
|
|
24,748 |
|
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
15,471 |
|
|
|
14,209 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
30,068 |
|
|
|
28,404 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
5,440 |
|
|
|
6,070 |
|
|
|
(10.4 |
) |
|
|
10,598 |
|
|
|
11,555 |
|
|
|
(8.3 |
) |
Restructuring charge |
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
366.1 |
|
|
|
3,212 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
1,353.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
23,309 |
|
|
|
19,419 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
46,876 |
|
|
|
44,098 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-Ship-Days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned Vessels and Vessels under Capital Lease |
|
|
1,304 |
|
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
43.3 |
|
|
|
2,187 |
|
|
|
1,820 |
|
|
|
20.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and administrative
expenses (allocated to the liquefied gas segment based on estimated use of corporate
resources). For further discussion, please read Other Operating Results General and
Administrative Expenses. |
The increase in the average fleet size of our liquefied gas segment was primarily due to the
delivery of two new LNG carriers in November 2008 and January 2009, respectively (collectively the
Tangguh LNG Deliveries) and the delivery of one new LPG carrier in April 2009.
Net Revenues. Net revenues increased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009,
compared to the same periods in 2008, primarily due to:
|
|
|
increases of $6.9 million and $10.5 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, from the Tangguh LNG Deliveries and the new LPG carrier; and |
|
|
|
increases of $1.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, due to the
Polar Spirit being off-hire for 18.5 days during the second quarter of 2008; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
decreases of $3.2 million and $4.8 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, due to the effect on our Euro-denominated revenues from the weakening
of the Euro against the U.S. Dollar during such periods compared to the same periods last
year. |
Vessel Operating Expenses. Vessel operating expenses decreased for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, compared to the same periods in 2008, primarily due to:
|
|
|
decreases of $2.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, relating to
lower crew manning, insurance, and repairs and maintenance costs; and |
|
|
|
decreases of $0.6 million and $1.4 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, due to the effect on our Euro-denominated vessel operating expenses
from the weakening of the Euro against the U.S. Dollar compared to the same periods last
year (a majority of our vessel operating expenses are denominated in Euros, which is
primarily a function of the nationality of our crew; our Euro-denominated revenues
currently generally approximate our Euro-denominated expenses and Euro-denominated loan and
interest payments); |
Page 25 of 41
partially offset by
|
|
|
increases of $1.8 million and $2.7 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, from the Tangguh LNG Deliveries. |
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $1.2 million
and $1.4 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to the
same periods in 2008, primarily due to the Tangguh LNG Deliveries and the new LPG delivery.
Restructuring Charges. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we incurred restructuring
charges of $3.2 million relating to costs incurred for global staffing and office changes.
Fixed-Rate Tanker Segment
Our fixed-rate tanker segment includes conventional crude oil and product tankers on long-term,
fixed-rate time-charters.
The following table presents our fixed-rate tanker segments operating results and compares its net
revenues (which is a non-GAAP financial measure) to revenues, the most directly comparable GAAP
financial measure. The following table also provides a summary of the changes in calendar-ship-days
by owned and chartered-in vessels for our fixed-rate tanker segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except |
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
calendar-ship-days and percentages) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
76,011 |
|
|
|
66,218 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
142,603 |
|
|
|
127,033 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
1,758 |
|
|
|
948 |
|
|
|
85.4 |
|
|
|
3,062 |
|
|
|
1,628 |
|
|
|
88.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
74,253 |
|
|
|
65,270 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
139,541 |
|
|
|
125,405 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
17,103 |
|
|
|
16,387 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
34,912 |
|
|
|
32,757 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
Time-charter hire expense |
|
|
11,913 |
|
|
|
11,445 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
22,903 |
|
|
|
23,165 |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
14,009 |
|
|
|
11,289 |
|
|
|
24.1 |
|
|
|
26,300 |
|
|
|
20,962 |
|
|
|
25.5 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
6,986 |
|
|
|
7,263 |
|
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
12,667 |
|
|
|
12,553 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Loss on sale of vessels and equipment, net of write-
downs |
|
|
3,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charge |
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
510.3 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
1,558 |
|
|
|
(67.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
20,608 |
|
|
|
18,828 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
38,974 |
|
|
|
34,410 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-Ship-Days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned Vessels |
|
|
2,134 |
|
|
|
1,728 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
|
|
4,204 |
|
|
|
3,181 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
Chartered-in Vessels |
|
|
596 |
|
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
1,078 |
|
|
|
1,257 |
|
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2,730 |
|
|
|
2,355 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
5,282 |
|
|
|
4,438 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and administrative
expenses (allocated to the fixed-rate tanker segment based on estimated use of corporate
resources). For further discussion, please read Other Operating Results General and
Administrative Expenses. |
The average fleet size of our fixed-rate tanker segment (including vessels chartered-in) increased
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to the same periods last year, primarily
due to:
|
|
|
the delivery of two new Aframax tankers during January and March 2008 (collectively, the
Aframax Deliveries); |
|
|
|
the transfer of two product tankers from the spot tanker segment in April 2008 upon
commencement of long-term time-charters (the Product Tanker Transfers); |
|
|
|
the transfer of two Suezmax tankers from the spot tanker segment in June 2009 (the
Suezmax Transfers); and |
|
|
|
the transfer of four Aframax tankers, on a net basis, from the spot tanker segment in
2008 upon commencement of long-term time-charters (the Aframax Transfers). |
The Aframax Transfers comprise the transfer of four owned vessels and one chartered-in vessel from
the spot tanker segment, and the transfer of one chartered-in vessel to the spot tanker segment.
The effect of the transaction is to increase the fixed tanker segments net revenues, time-charter
expenses, and vessel operating expenses.
Net Revenues. Net revenues increased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009,
compared to the same periods last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
increases of $6.3 million and $11.4 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, from the Aframax Transfers; |
|
|
|
a relative increase of $1.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009,
because two of our Suezmax tankers were off-hire for 50 days for scheduled drydocking
during the prior periods; |
|
|
|
increases of $0.3 million and $3.9 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, from the Product Tanker Transfers; and |
Page 26 of 41
|
|
|
increases of $0.1 million and $1.3 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, from the Aframax Deliveries; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
decreases of $1.3 million and $3.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30,
2009, due to interest-rate adjustments to the daily charter rates under the time-charter
contracts for five Suezmax tankers (however, under the terms of these capital leases, we
had corresponding decreases in our lease payments, which are reflected as decreases to
interest expense; therefore, these and future interest rate adjustments do not and will not
affect our cash flow or net income (loss)). |
Vessel Operating Expenses. Vessel operating expenses increased for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, compared to the same periods last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
increases of $2.0 million and $3.7 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, from the Aframax Transfers; |
|
|
|
increases of $0.1 million and $1.3 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, from the Product Tanker Transfers; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
decreases of $1.0 million and $1.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30,
2009, relating to lower crew manning, insurance, and repairs and maintenance costs; and |
|
|
|
decreases of $0.4 million and $1.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30,
2009, due to the effect on our Euro-denominated vessel operating expenses from the
weakening of the Euro against the U.S. Dollar during such period compared to the same
periods last year. |
Time-Charter Hire Expense. Time-charter hire expense increased for the three months ended
June 30, 2009, compared to the same period in 2008, primarily due to an increase in the average
time-charter hire rates. Time-charter hire expense decreased for the six months ended June 30,
2009, compared to the same period in 2008, primarily due to a decrease in the number of
in-chartered Aframax vessel days, partially offset by increases in average time-charter hire rates.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to the same periods last year, primarily due to
the Aframax Transfers and the Product Tanker Transfers, and an increase in drydocking expenditures
being amortized.
Loss on Sale of Vessels and Equipment. Loss on sale of vessels and equipment for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2009 primarily relates to a write-down taken on one of our older
fixed-rate vessels.
Restructuring Charges. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we incurred restructuring
charges of $0.5 million relating to costs incurred for global staffing changes and the
reorganization of certain business units.
Spot Tanker Segment
Our spot tanker segment consists of conventional crude oil tankers and product carriers operating
on the spot tanker market or subject to time-charters or contracts of affreightment that are priced
on a spot-market basis or are short-term, fixed-rate contracts. We consider contracts that have an
original term of less than three years in duration to be short term.
We took delivery of three
new Suezmax tankers during first half of 2009. At June 30, 2009, we have two Suezmax tankers under
construction which one Suezmax tanker was delivered in September 2009 and the remaining Suezmax
tanker is scheduled to be delivered in January 2010. These two Suezmax tankers are expected to be
included in this segment. Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 11(a) Commitments and
Contingencies Vessels Under Construction. Our conventional Aframax, Suezmax,
and large and medium product tankers are among the vessels included in the spot tanker segment.
Our spot tanker market operations contribute to the volatility of our revenues, cash flow from
operations and net income (loss). Historically, the tanker industry has been cyclical, experiencing
volatility in profitability and asset values resulting from changes in the supply of, and demand
for, vessel capacity. In addition, spot tanker markets historically have exhibited seasonal
variations in charter rates. Spot tanker markets are typically stronger in the winter months as a
result of increased oil consumption in the northern hemisphere and unpredictable weather patterns
that tend to disrupt vessel scheduling.
Page 27 of 41
The following table presents our spot tanker segments operating results and compares its net
revenues (which is a non-GAAP financial measure) to revenues, the most directly comparable GAAP
financial measure. The following table also provides a summary of the changes in calendar-ship-days
by owned and chartered-in vessels for our spot tanker segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except |
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
calendar-ship-days and percentages) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
163,301 |
|
|
|
417,157 |
|
|
|
(60.9 |
) |
|
|
413,886 |
|
|
|
781,837 |
|
|
|
(47.1 |
) |
Voyage expenses |
|
|
45,034 |
|
|
|
142,091 |
|
|
|
(68.3 |
) |
|
|
115,699 |
|
|
|
271,821 |
|
|
|
(57.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
118,267 |
|
|
|
275,066 |
|
|
|
(57.0 |
) |
|
|
298,187 |
|
|
|
510,016 |
|
|
|
(41.5 |
) |
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
22,395 |
|
|
|
28,597 |
|
|
|
(21.7 |
) |
|
|
51,914 |
|
|
|
62,079 |
|
|
|
(16.4 |
) |
Time-charter hire expense |
|
|
78,843 |
|
|
|
99,015 |
|
|
|
(20.4 |
) |
|
|
172,503 |
|
|
|
197,177 |
|
|
|
(12.5 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
24,229 |
|
|
|
27,430 |
|
|
|
(11.7 |
) |
|
|
48,862 |
|
|
|
55,195 |
|
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
18,868 |
|
|
|
30,717 |
|
|
|
(38.6 |
) |
|
|
36,254 |
|
|
|
60,484 |
|
|
|
(40.1 |
) |
(Gain) loss on sale of vessels and equipment, net of
write-downs |
|
|
(15,304 |
) |
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
(6,901.8 |
) |
|
|
(15,422 |
) |
|
|
(271 |
) |
|
|
5,590.8 |
|
Restructuring charge |
|
|
1,083 |
|
|
|
1,011 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
1,546 |
|
|
|
1,011 |
|
|
|
52.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Income from vessel operations |
|
|
(11,847 |
) |
|
|
88,071 |
|
|
|
(113.5 |
) |
|
|
2,530 |
|
|
|
134,341 |
|
|
|
(98.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-Ship-Days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned Vessels |
|
|
2,920 |
|
|
|
3,326 |
|
|
|
(12.2 |
) |
|
|
6,134 |
|
|
|
6,953 |
|
|
|
(11.8 |
) |
Chartered-in Vessels |
|
|
2,869 |
|
|
|
4,225 |
|
|
|
(32.1 |
) |
|
|
6,089 |
|
|
|
8,468 |
|
|
|
(28.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
5,789 |
|
|
|
7,551 |
|
|
|
(23.3 |
) |
|
|
12,223 |
|
|
|
15,421 |
|
|
|
(20.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and administrative
expenses (allocated to the spot tanker segment based on estimated use of corporate resources).
For further discussion, please read Other Operating Results General and Administrative
Expenses. |
The average fleet size of our spot tanker fleet (including vessels chartered-in) decreased for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to the same periods last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
the transfer of two product tankers in April 2008 to the fixed tanker segment (or the
Spot Product Tanker Transfers); |
|
|
|
the transfer of four Aframax tankers in November 2008 to the fixed tanker segment (or
the Spot Aframax Tanker Transfers); |
|
|
|
the sale of seven product tankers between March 2008 and May 2009 (or the Spot
Product Tanker Sales); |
|
|
|
the sale of one Suezmax tanker in November 2008 (or the Suezmax Tanker Sale); and |
|
|
|
a net decrease in the number of chartered-in vessels, primarily from the sale of our 50%
interest in the Swift Product Tanker Pool in November 2008, which included our interest in
ten in-chartered intermediate product tankers; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
the delivery of five new Suezmax tankers between May 2008 and May 2009 (or the Suezmax
Deliveries); and |
|
|
|
the delivery of one Large product tanker in October 2008. |
In addition, during February 2009 we sold and leased back one older Aframax tanker. This had the
effect of decreasing the number of calendar days for our owned vessels and increasing the number of
calendar-ship-days for our chartered-in vessels.
Tanker Market and TCE Rates
Despite a short-lived increase late in the quarter, average spot rates for crude oil tankers
declined in the second quarter of 2009 reflecting a reduction in global oil demand coupled with
growth in the world tanker fleet. The market was also adversely affected by seasonal factors such
as refinery maintenance and the start of North Sea oil field maintenance. The removal from active
trading of a number of vessels for use as floating oil storage continues to be a factor in
temporarily reducing available tanker supply.
Crude tanker rates have declined further in the third quarter of 2009 to date, to levels
approaching operating cost breakeven, due to weak market fundamentals. Production outages in
Nigeria caused by militant attacks on oil infrastructure and weaker refining fundamentals have put
further downward pressure on tanker rates.
As of September 10, 2009, the International Energy Agency (or IEA) projected global oil demand of 84.4
million barrels per day (or mb/d) in 2009, a 1.9 mb/d (or 2.2 percent) decline from 2008. The IEA
forecasts a recovery in global oil demand during 2010 to 85.7 mb/d, an increase of 1.3 mb/d (or 1.5
percent) over 2009 based on a projected global GDP growth rate of 1.9 percent for the year.
The world tanker fleet grew by approximately 4.9 percent in the first half of 2009, a generally
higher level of fleet growth than in recent years. The tanker orderbook for the remainder of 2009
and 2010 is sizeable but fleet growth could be dampened by the removal of single-hull tankers ahead
of the targeted IMO phase-out timeline, order cancellations as a result of a weaker global
financing market and newbuilding construction delays from newly established shipyards.
TCE rates for the vessels in our spot tanker segment primarily depend on global oil production and
consumption levels, the number of vessels in the worldwide tanker fleet scrapped, the number of
newbuildings delivered and charterers preference for modern tankers. As a result of our exposure
to the spot tanker market, fluctuations in TCE rates affect our revenues and earnings.
Page 28 of 41
The following tables outline the TCE rates earned by the vessels in our spot tanker segment for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TCE |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TCE |
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Rate |
|
Vessel Type |
|
($000s) |
|
|
Days |
|
|
$ |
|
|
($000s) |
|
|
Days |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spot Fleet (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suezmax Tankers |
|
|
17,439 |
|
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
24,459 |
|
|
|
31,162 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
72,134 |
|
Aframax Tankers |
|
|
48,027 |
|
|
|
2,924 |
|
|
|
16,425 |
|
|
|
152,605 |
|
|
|
3,635 |
|
|
|
41,982 |
|
Large/Medium Product Tankers |
|
|
11,151 |
|
|
|
668 |
|
|
|
16,693 |
|
|
|
34,527 |
|
|
|
1,156 |
|
|
|
29,868 |
|
Small Product Tankers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,196 |
|
|
|
887 |
|
|
|
13,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time-Charter Fleet (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suezmax Tankers |
|
|
21,292 |
|
|
|
568 |
|
|
|
37,486 |
|
|
|
22,651 |
|
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
30,609 |
|
Aframax Tankers |
|
|
17,859 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
32,708 |
|
|
|
5,725 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
31,803 |
|
Large/Medium Product Tankers |
|
|
6,028 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
22,748 |
|
|
|
12,135 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
28,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (2) |
|
|
(3,529 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
|
118,267 |
|
|
|
5,684 |
|
|
|
20,807 |
|
|
|
275,066 |
|
|
|
7,461 |
|
|
|
36,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TCE |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TCE |
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Rate |
|
Vessel Type |
|
($000s) |
|
|
Days |
|
|
$ |
|
|
($000s) |
|
|
Days |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spot Fleet (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suezmax Tankers |
|
|
41,778 |
|
|
|
1,319 |
|
|
|
31,674 |
|
|
|
55,508 |
|
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
56,354 |
|
Aframax Tankers |
|
|
136,016 |
|
|
|
6,369 |
|
|
|
21,356 |
|
|
|
282,830 |
|
|
|
7,343 |
|
|
|
38,517 |
|
Large/Medium Product Tankers |
|
|
31,062 |
|
|
|
1,545 |
|
|
|
20,105 |
|
|
|
62,549 |
|
|
|
2,218 |
|
|
|
28,201 |
|
Small Product Tankers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,572 |
|
|
|
1,789 |
|
|
|
13,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time-Charter Fleet (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suezmax Tankers |
|
|
42,333 |
|
|
|
1,154 |
|
|
|
36,684 |
|
|
|
41,446 |
|
|
|
1,408 |
|
|
|
29,436 |
|
Aframax Tankers |
|
|
35,122 |
|
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
|
32,824 |
|
|
|
10,234 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
31,784 |
|
Large/Medium Product Tankers |
|
|
14,484 |
|
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
23,175 |
|
|
|
30,661 |
|
|
|
1,244 |
|
|
|
24,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (2) |
|
|
(2,608 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
|
298,187 |
|
|
|
12,082 |
|
|
|
24,680 |
|
|
|
510,016 |
|
|
|
15,309 |
|
|
|
33,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Spot fleet includes short-term time-charters and fixed-rate contracts of affreightment
less than 1 year and time-charter fleet includes short-term time-charters and fixed-rate
contracts of affreightment between 1-3 years. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes realized gains and losses on forward freight agreements and synthetic
time-charter contracts, the cost of spot in-charter vessels servicing fixed-rate contract
of affreightment cargoes, the amortization of in-process revenue contracts and cost of fuel
while offhire. |
Net Revenues. Net revenues decreased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009,
compared to the same periods in 2008, primarily due to:
|
|
|
decreases of $112.4 million and $113.7 million, respectively, for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009, from decreases in our average TCE rate during the periods
compared to the same periods in 2008; |
|
|
|
decreases of $12.2 million and $24.6 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, from a net decrease in the number of chartered-in small product
tankers primarily due to the sale of our interest in the Swift Tanker Pool in November
2008; |
|
|
|
decreases of $8.2 million and $18.7 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, from the Spot Aframax Transfers; |
|
|
|
decreases of $7.5 million and $18.1 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, from the Spot Product Tanker Sales; and |
|
|
|
decreases of $37.3 million and $68.9 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, from a net decrease in the number of chartered-in vessels, excluding
small product tankers discussed above; |
Page 29 of 41
partially offset by
|
|
|
increases of $10.2 million and $21.0 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, from the Suezmax
Deliveries; and |
|
|
|
increases of $8.7 million and $11.3 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, from a decrease in the number of days our vessels were off-hire due to
regularly scheduled maintenance compared to prior periods. |
Vessel Operating Expenses. Vessel operating expenses decreased for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, compared to the same periods in 2008, primarily due to:
|
|
|
decreases of $2.7 million and $6.2 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, from the Spot Aframax Tanker Transfers; |
|
|
|
decreases of $2.5 million and $5.7 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, from the Spot Product Tanker Sales; and |
|
|
|
decreases of $2.2 million and $3.9 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, from lower crew manning, repairs, maintenance and consumables costs; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
increases of $2.5 million and $4.8 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, from the Suezmax Deliveries; and |
|
|
|
increases of $0.5 million and $1.1 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, from the one new product tanker delivered in October 2008. |
Time-Charter Hire Expense. Time-charter hire expense decreased for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, compared to the same periods in 2008, primarily due to:
|
|
|
decreases of $10.8 million and $21.9 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, from a decrease in the number of chartered-in spot product tankers
from the sale of the Swift Tanker Pool in November 2008, compared to the same periods in
2008; and |
|
|
|
decreases of $9.3 million and $2.4 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, from the decrease in the number of chartered-in Suezmax and Aframax
tankers. |
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to the same periods in 2009, primarily due to:
|
|
|
decreases of $3.1 million and $7.0 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, from the amortization of charter-in contracts; |
|
|
|
decreases of $1.5 million and $3.0 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, from the Spot Aframax Tanker Transfers; |
|
|
|
decreases of $nil and $1.2 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009, from the Spot Product Tanker Transfers; |
|
|
|
decreases of $1.1 million and $2.6 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, from the Spot Product Tanker Sales; and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.3 million, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, from the
Suezmax Tanker Sale; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
increases of $3.8 million and $7.1 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, from the Suezmax Tanker Deliveries and one new product tanker. |
(Gain) Loss on Sale of Vessels and Equipment, net of write-downs. The increase to (gain)
loss on sale of vessels and equipment, net of write-downs for the three and six months ended June
30, 2009 is primarily due to gains realized on the disposal of two LR product tankers during the
three months ended June 30, 2009, partially offset by
write-downs. The write-downs were for impairment of two older vessels
due to lower fair values compared to its carrying values.
Restructuring Charges. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we incurred restructuring
charges of $1.5 million relating to costs incurred for global staffing changes and to the
reorganization of certain business units.
Page 30 of 41
Other Operating Results
The following table compares our other operating results for the three and six months ended June
30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except |
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
percentages) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
(52,695 |
) |
|
|
(71,298 |
) |
|
|
(26.1 |
) |
|
|
(103,835 |
) |
|
|
(140,363 |
) |
|
|
(26.0 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(37,280 |
) |
|
|
(63,253 |
) |
|
|
(41.1 |
) |
|
|
(81,470 |
) |
|
|
(151,959 |
) |
|
|
(46.4 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
5,023 |
|
|
|
18,832 |
|
|
|
(73.3 |
) |
|
|
11,701 |
|
|
|
52,722 |
|
|
|
(77.8 |
) |
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on non-
designated derivative instruments |
|
|
157,485 |
|
|
|
116,263 |
|
|
|
35.5 |
|
|
|
204,730 |
|
|
|
(34,948 |
) |
|
|
(685.8 |
) |
Foreign exchange loss |
|
|
(25,165 |
) |
|
|
(3,014 |
) |
|
|
734.9 |
|
|
|
(13,853 |
) |
|
|
(36,595 |
) |
|
|
(62.1 |
) |
Equity income (loss) from joint ventures |
|
|
27,380 |
|
|
|
(2,063 |
) |
|
|
(1,427.2 |
) |
|
|
38,802 |
|
|
|
(5,672 |
) |
|
|
(784.1 |
) |
Income tax recovery (expense) |
|
|
4,598 |
|
|
|
11,201 |
|
|
|
(59.0 |
) |
|
|
(1,270 |
) |
|
|
8,718 |
|
|
|
(114.6 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
3,823 |
|
|
|
6,294 |
|
|
|
(39.3 |
) |
|
|
5,405 |
|
|
|
10,482 |
|
|
|
(48.4 |
) |
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses decreased for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to the same period in 2008, primarily due to:
|
|
|
decreases of $11.0 million and $20.9 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, in compensation for shore-based employees and other personnel expenses
primarily due to decreases in performance based compensation costs and
headcount; |
|
|
|
decreases of $3.8 million and $7.6 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, from lower travel costs; |
|
|
|
decreases of $2.4 million and $4.8 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, in corporate-related expenses; |
|
|
|
decreases of $2.4 million and $3.8 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, relating to timing of seafarer training initiatives and lower training
activity; |
|
|
|
decreases of $1.4 million and $3.8 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009 relating to the unrealized change in fair value of our foreign currency
forward contracts; and |
|
|
|
decreases of $1.4 million and $2.3 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, relating to the costs associated with our equity-based compensation
and long-term incentive program for management. |
Interest Expense. Interest expense, which excludes realized and unrealized gains and losses
from interest rate swaps, decreased to $37.3 million and $81.5 million for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, respectively, from $63.3 million and $152.0 million, respectively, for the
same periods last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
decreases of $15.1 million and $47.0 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, primarily due to repayments of debt drawn under long-term revolving
credit facilities and term loans and decrease in interest rates relating to long-term debt; |
|
|
|
decreases of $7.2 million and $15.0 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, as the debt relating to Teekay Nakilat (III) was novated to the RasGas
3 Joint Venture on December 31, 2008 (the interest expense on this debt is not reflected in
our 2009 consolidated interest expense as the RasGas 3 Joint Venture is accounted for using
the equity method); |
|
|
|
decreases of $3.6 million and $6.2 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, from the scheduled loan payments on the Catalunya Spirit, and
scheduled capital lease repayments on the Madrid Spirit (the Madrid Spirit is financed
pursuant to a Spanish tax lease arrangement, under which we borrowed under a term loan and
deposited the proceeds into a restricted cash account and entered into a capital lease for
the vessel; as a result, this decrease in interest expense from the capital lease is offset
by a corresponding decrease in the interest income from restricted cash); |
|
|
|
decreases of $0.6 million and $2.3 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, from declining interest rates on our five Suezmax tanker capital lease
obligations; and |
|
|
|
decreases of $1.0 million and $2.1 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, due to the effect on our Euro-denominated debt from the weakening of
the Euro against the U.S. Dollar during such period compared to the same periods last year; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
increases of $1.5 million and $2.1 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, relating to debt to finance the purchase of the Tangguh LNG Carriers
as the interest on this debt was capitalized in the same periods last year. |
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) of $177.2 million and $(16.3) million relating to interest rate
swaps for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 was reclassified from interest expense to
realized and unrealized gain (loss) on non-designated derivative instruments to conform to the
presentation adopted in the current period.
Page 31 of 41
Interest Income. Interest income, which excludes realized and unrealized gains and losses
from interest rate swaps, decreased to $5.0 million and $11.7 million for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, respectively, from $18.8 million and $52.7 million, respectively, for the same
periods last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
decreases of $7.3 million and $15.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30,
2009, relating to interest-bearing advances made by us to the RasGas 3 Joint Venture for
shipyard construction installment payments as the loan was repaid on December 31, 2008 when
the external debt was novated to the RasGas 3 Joint Venture; |
|
|
|
decreases of $2.6 million and $6.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30,
2009, due to decreases in LIBOR rates relating to the restricted cash used to fund capital
lease payments for the RasGas II LNG Carriers (please read Item 1 Financial Statements:
Note 9 Capital Leases and Restricted Cash); |
|
|
|
decreases of $2.4 million and $6.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30,
2009, relating to lower interest rates on our bank account balances compared to the same
periods last year; |
|
|
|
decreases of $0.4 million and $0.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30,
2009, due to the effect on our Euro-denominated deposits from the weakening of the Euro
against the U.S. Dollar during such period compared to the same periods last year; and |
|
|
|
decreases of $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30,
2009, primarily from scheduled capital lease repayments on one of our LNG carriers which
was funded from restricted cash deposits. |
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) of $(21.0) million and $5.7 million relating to interest rate
swaps for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 was reclassified from interest income to
realized and unrealized gain (loss) on non-designated derivative instruments to conform to the
presentation adopted in the current period.
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on non-designated derivative instruments. Net
realized and unrealized gains on non-designated derivatives were $157.5 million and $204.7 million,
respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to net realized and
unrealized gains (losses) on non-designated derivatives of $116.3 million and $(34.9) million,
respectively, for the same periods last year, as detailed in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
(in thousands of U.S. Dollars) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gains (losses) relating to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
(29,528 |
) |
|
|
(11,495 |
) |
|
|
(50,416 |
) |
|
|
(13,211 |
) |
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
|
(2,448 |
) |
|
|
9,464 |
|
|
|
(7,945 |
) |
|
|
23,180 |
|
Bunkers and forward freight agreements (FFAs) |
|
|
4,294 |
|
|
|
(10,461 |
) |
|
|
2,005 |
|
|
|
(15,750 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,682 |
) |
|
|
(12,492 |
) |
|
|
(56,356 |
) |
|
|
(5,781 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) relating to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
182,471 |
|
|
|
167,729 |
|
|
|
245,447 |
|
|
|
2,622 |
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
|
6,416 |
|
|
|
(6,347 |
) |
|
|
13,167 |
|
|
|
(8,226 |
) |
Bunkers, FFAs and other |
|
|
(3,720 |
) |
|
|
(32,627 |
) |
|
|
2,472 |
|
|
|
(23,563 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,167 |
|
|
|
128,755 |
|
|
|
261,086 |
|
|
|
(29,167 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses)
on non-designated derivative instruments |
|
|
157,485 |
|
|
|
116,263 |
|
|
|
204,730 |
|
|
|
(34,948 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Exchange Loss. Foreign currency exchange losses were $25.2 million and $13.9
million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $3.0 million
and $36.6 million, respectively, for the same periods last year. The changes in our foreign
exchange losses are primarily attributable to the revaluation of our Euro-denominated term loans at
the end of each period for financial reporting purposes, and substantially all of the gains or
losses are unrealized. Gains reflect a stronger U.S. Dollar against the Euro on the date of
revaluation. Losses reflect a weaker U.S. Dollar against the Euro on the date of revaluation.
Currently, our Euro-denominated revenues generally approximate our Euro-denominated operating
expenses and our Euro-denominated interest and principal repayments.
Equity Income (Loss) from Joint Ventures. Equity income (loss) from joint ventures was
$27.4 million and $38.8 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009,
compared to $(2.1) million and $(5.7) million, respectively, for the same periods last year. The
income or loss was primarily comprised of our share of the Angola LNG
Project earnings (losses). Substantially all of the equity income (loss) relates to unrealized gains on interest rate swaps of
$25.5 million and $33.3 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009,
compared to $nil for the same periods last year.
Income Tax Recovery (Expense). Income tax recovery (expense) was $4.6 million and $(1.3)
million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $11.2 million and $8.7
million, respectively, for the same periods last year. The decrease to income tax recovery of $6.6
million for the three months ended June 30, 2009, and the increase to income tax expense of $10.0
million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, was primarily due to an increase in
deferred income tax expense relating to unrealized foreign exchange
translation losses and operational income for tax purposes for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009.
Other Income. Other income was $3.8 million and $5.4 million for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009 compared to $6.3 million and $10.5 million, respectively, for the same periods
last year. The decrease for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, was primarily due to a
gain on sale of marketable securities recognized in the same respective periods last year.
Net Income. As a result of the foregoing factors, net income was $193.6 million and $298.4
million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, compared to $222.2 million
and $90.6 million for the same respective periods last year.
Page 32 of 41
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Liquidity and Cash Needs
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, cash flows provided by our
operations and our undrawn credit facilities. Our short-term liquidity requirements are for the
payment of operating expenses, debt servicing costs, dividends, the scheduled repayments of
long-term debt, as well as funding our working capital requirements. As at June 30, 2009, our total
cash and cash equivalents was $472.7 million, compared to $814.2 million as at December 31, 2008.
Our total liquidity, including cash and undrawn credit facilities, was $2.0 billion and $1.9
billion as at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
Our spot tanker market operations contribute to the volatility of our net operating cash flow, and,
thus, our ability to generate sufficient cash flows to meet our short-term liquidity needs.
Historically, the tanker industry has been cyclical, experiencing volatility in profitability and
asset values resulting from changes in the supply of, and demand for, vessel capacity. In addition,
spot tanker markets historically have exhibited seasonal variations in charter rates. Spot tanker
markets are typically stronger in the winter months as a result of increased oil consumption in the
northern hemisphere and unpredictable weather patterns that tend to disrupt vessel scheduling.
As at June 30, 2009, we had $204.5 million of scheduled debt repayments coming due within the
following twelve months. We believe that our working capital is sufficient for our present
short-term liquidity requirements.
Our operations are capital intensive. We finance the purchase of our vessels primarily through a
combination of borrowings from commercial banks or our joint venture partners, the issuance of debt
and equity securities and cash generated from operations. In addition, we may use sale and
lease-back arrangements as a source of long-term liquidity. Occasionally we use our revolving
credit facilities to temporarily finance capital expenditures until longer-term financing is
obtained, at which time we typically use all or a portion of the proceeds from the longer-term
financings to prepay outstanding amounts under the revolving credit facilities. Excluding the two
LPG carriers to be delivered between October 2009 and March 2010 and the two multigas carriers to
be delivered between August 2010 and October 2010, as at
June 30, 2009 (although a $122 million debt facility is
currently being arranged for these vessels), pre-arranged debt
facilities were in place for all of our remaining capital commitments relating to our portion of
newbuildings currently on order. Our pre-arranged new building debt
facilities are in addition to our undrawn credit
facilities. We continue to consider strategic opportunities, including the acquisition of
additional vessels and expansion into new markets. We may choose to pursue such opportunities
through internal growth, joint ventures or business acquisitions. We intend to finance any future
acquisitions through various sources of capital, including internally-generated cash flow, existing
credit facilities, additional debt borrowings, and the issuance of additional debt or equity
securities or any combination thereof.
As at June 30, 2009, our revolving credit facilities provided for borrowings of up to $3.6 billion,
of which $1.6 billion was undrawn. The amount available under these revolving credit facilities
decreases by $106.2 million (remainder of 2009), $218.0 million (2010), $803.3 million (2011),
$233.8 million (2012), $301.3 million (2013) and $1,927.2 million (thereafter). Our revolving
credit facilities are collateralized by first-priority mortgages granted on 67 of our vessels,
together with other related security, and are guaranteed by Teekay or our subsidiaries. Please read
Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 8 Long-Term Debt.
Our unsecured 8.875% Senior Notes are due July 15, 2011. Our outstanding term loans reduce in
monthly, quarterly or semi-annual payments with varying maturities through 2023. Some of our term
loans also have bullet or balloon repayments at maturity and are collateralized by first-priority
mortgages granted on 31 of our vessels, together with other related security, and are generally
guaranteed by Teekay or our subsidiaries.
Among other matters, our long-term debt agreements generally provide for the maintenance of certain
vessel market value-to-loan ratios and minimum consolidated financial covenants and prepayment
privileges, in some cases with penalties. Certain of the loan agreements require that we maintain a
minimum level of free cash. As at June 30, 2009, this amount was $100.0 million. Certain of the
loan agreements also require that we maintain an aggregate level of free liquidity and undrawn
revolving credit lines (with at least six months to maturity) of at least 7.5% of total debt. As at
June 30, 2009, this amount was $263.8 million. We were in compliance with all loan covenants at
June 30, 2009.
We conduct our funding and treasury activities within corporate policies designed to minimize
borrowing costs and maximize investment returns while maintaining the safety of the funds and
appropriate levels of liquidity for our purposes. We hold cash and cash equivalents primarily in
U.S. Dollars, with some balances held in Japanese Yen, Singapore Dollars, Canadian Dollars,
Australian Dollars, British Pounds, Euros and Norwegian Kroner.
We are exposed to market risk from foreign currency fluctuations and changes in interest rates,
spot tanker market rates for vessels and bunker fuel prices. We use forward foreign currency
contracts, interest rate swaps, forward freight agreements and bunker fuel swap contracts to manage
currency, interest rate, spot tanker rates and bunker fuel price risks. With the exception of some
of our forward freight agreements, we do not use these financial instruments for trading or
speculative purposes. Please read Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk.
Page 33 of 41
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes our cash and cash equivalents provided by (used for) operating,
financing and investing activities for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
($000s) |
|
|
($000s) |
|
Net operating cash flows |
|
|
229,268 |
|
|
|
198,966 |
|
Net financing cash flows |
|
|
(444,055 |
) |
|
|
615,608 |
|
Net investing cash flows |
|
|
(126,707 |
) |
|
|
(758,314 |
) |
Operating Cash Flows
Net cash flow from operating activities increased to $229.3 million for the six months ended June
30, 2009, from $199.0 million for the same period in 2008, primarily due to a net increase in
changes to non-cash working capital items, a decrease of operating expenses and a decrease in
expenditures for drydocking, partially offset by a net decrease in net revenues. Net cash flow from
operating activities depends upon the timing and amount of drydocking expenditures, repairs and
maintenance activity, vessel additions and dispositions, foreign currency rates, changes in
interest rates and fluctuations in working capital balances, tanker utilization and spot market
hire rates. The number of vessel drydockings tends to be uneven between years.
Financing Cash Flows
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, our net proceeds from long-term debt net of debt
issuance costs was $298.5 million. Our repayments of long-term debt was $772.6 million during the
same period. The net proceeds from long-term debt were to finance our expenditures for vessels and
equipment, which are explained in more detail below.
During March 2009, our subsidiary Teekay LNG, issued an additional 4.0 million common units in a
public offering for net proceeds of $67.1 million and during June 2009, our subsidiary Teekay
Tankers, issued an additional 7.0 million shares of Class A Common Stock in a public offering for
net proceeds of $65.6 million. Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 5 Public
Offerings. The net proceeds were used for acquisition of a vessel from Teekay, repayment of debt
and general corporate purposes.
Distributions from subsidiaries to non-controlling interests during the six months ended June 30,
2009 were $53.1 million.
Dividends paid during the six months ended June 30, 2009 were $45.9 million, or $0.6325 per share.
We have paid a quarterly dividend since 1995. We increased our quarterly dividend from $0.125 per
share in 2003 to $0.31625 per share in the third quarter of 2008. Subject to financial results and
declaration by our board of directors, we currently intend to continue to declare and pay a regular
quarterly dividend in such amount per share on our common stock.
Investing Cash Flows
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we:
|
|
|
incurred capital expenditures for vessels and equipment of $344.9 million, primarily for
shipyard construction installment payments on our newbuilding Suezmax tankers, shuttle
tankers, LNG and LPG carriers, and a product tanker; |
|
|
|
received proceeds of $166.1 million from the sale of three product tankers; and |
|
|
|
received proceeds of $32.7 million from the sale of an Aframax tanker through a
sale-leaseback agreement. |
Commitments and Contingencies
The following table summarizes our long-term contractual obligations as at June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of |
|
|
2010 and |
|
|
2012 and |
|
|
Beyond |
|
In millions of U.S. Dollars |
|
Total |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar-Denominated Obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (1) |
|
|
4,069.0 |
|
|
|
107.3 |
|
|
|
1,155.1 |
|
|
|
488.6 |
|
|
|
2,318.0 |
|
Chartered-in vessels (operating leases) |
|
|
769.2 |
|
|
|
182.0 |
|
|
|
417.2 |
|
|
|
141.0 |
|
|
|
29.0 |
|
Commitments under capital leases (2) |
|
|
214.8 |
|
|
|
122.4 |
|
|
|
92.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments under capital leases (3) |
|
|
1,061.1 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
953.1 |
|
Commitments under operating leases (4) |
|
|
495.3 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
50.1 |
|
|
|
50.2 |
|
|
|
382.5 |
|
Newbuilding installments (5) |
|
|
545.2 |
|
|
|
88.8 |
|
|
|
456.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligation |
|
|
22.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. Dollar-denominated obligations |
|
|
7,176.8 |
|
|
|
525.0 |
|
|
|
2,219.2 |
|
|
|
727.8 |
|
|
|
3,704.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro-Denominated Obligations: (6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (7) |
|
|
410.1 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
235.5 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
153.8 |
|
Commitments under capital leases (2) (8) |
|
|
164.7 |
|
|
|
36.0 |
|
|
|
128.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Euro-denominated obligations |
|
|
574.8 |
|
|
|
42.0 |
|
|
|
364.2 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
153.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
7,751.6 |
|
|
|
567.0 |
|
|
|
2,583.4 |
|
|
|
742.6 |
|
|
|
3,858.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes expected interest payments of $92.9 million (balance of 2009), $163.0 million (2010
and 2011), $103.3 million (2012 and 2013) and $144.4 million (beyond 2013). Expected interest
payments are based on the existing interest rates (fixed-rate loans) and LIBOR plus margins
that ranged up to 1.0% at June 30, 2009 (variable-rate loans). The expected interest payments
do not reflect the effect of related interest rate swaps that we have used as an economic
hedge of certain of our floating-rate debt. |
Page 34 of 41
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Includes, in addition to lease payments, amounts we are required to pay to purchase certain
leased vessels at the end of the lease terms. We are obligated to purchase five of our
existing Suezmax tankers upon the termination of the related capital leases, which will occur
at various times from late-2009 to 2011. The purchase price will be based on the unamortized
portion of the vessel construction financing costs for the vessels, which we expect to range
from $35.6 million to $39.2 million per vessel. We expect to satisfy the purchase price by
assuming the existing vessel financing, although we may be required to obtain separate debt or
equity financing to complete the purchases if the lenders do not consent to our assuming the
financing obligations. We are also obligated to purchase one of our existing LNG carriers upon
the termination of the related capital leases on December 31, 2011. The purchase obligation
has been fully funded with restricted cash deposits. Please read Item 1 Financial
Statements: Note 9 Capital Leases and Restricted Cash. |
|
(3) |
|
Existing restricted cash deposits of $481.9 million, together with the interest earned on the
deposits, will equal the remaining amounts we owe under the lease arrangements. |
|
(4) |
|
We have corresponding leases whereby we are the lessor and expect to receive $463 million for
these leases from the remainder of 2009 to 2029. |
|
(5) |
|
Represents remaining construction costs (excluding capitalized interest and miscellaneous
construction costs) for four shuttle tankers, two Suezmax tankers, and four LPG carriers.
Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 11(a) Commitments and Contingencies -
Vessels Under Construction. |
|
(6) |
|
Euro-denominated obligations are presented in U.S. Dollars and have been converted using the
prevailing exchange rate as of June 30, 2009. |
|
(7) |
|
Excludes expected interest payments of $5.8 million (balance of 2009), $9.7 million (2010 and
2011), $4.7 million (2012 and 2013) and $14.7 million (beyond 2013). Expected interest
payments are based on EURIBOR plus margins that ranged up to 0.66% at June 30, 2009, as well
as the prevailing U.S. Dollar/Euro exchange rate as of June 30, 2009. The expected interest
payments do not reflect the effect of related interest rate swaps that we have used as an
economic hedge of certain of our floating-rate debt. |
|
(8) |
|
Existing restricted cash deposits of $150.6 million, together with the interest earned on the
deposits, will equal the remaining amounts we owe under the lease arrangements, including our
obligation to purchase the vessels at the end of the lease terms. |
We also have a 33% interest in a consortium that has entered into agreements for the construction
of four LNG carriers. As at June 30, 2009, the remaining commitments on these vessels, excluding
capitalized interest and other miscellaneous construction costs, totaled $906.0 million, of which
our share was $299.0 million. Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 11(b) Commitments
and Contingencies Joint Ventures.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have, a current or
future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or
expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP, which require us to make
estimates in the application of our accounting policies based on our best assumptions, judgments
and opinions. On a regular basis, management reviews the accounting policies, assumptions,
estimates and judgments to ensure that our consolidated financial statements are presented fairly
and in accordance with GAAP. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined
with certainty, actual results could differ from our assumptions and estimates, and such
differences could be material. Accounting estimates and assumptions that we consider to be the most
critical to an understanding of our financial statements because they inherently involve
significant judgments and uncertainties, are described in Item 5. Operating and Financial Review
and Prospects in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Report on Form 6-K for the six months ended June 30, 2009 contains certain forward-looking
statements (as such term is defined in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended) concerning future events and our operations, performance and financial condition,
including, in particular, statements regarding:
|
|
our future growth prospects; |
|
|
tanker market fundamentals, including the balance of supply and demand in the tanker market
and spot tanker charter rates; |
|
|
the sufficiency of working capital for short-term liquidity requirements; |
|
|
future capital expenditure commitments and the financing requirements for such commitments; |
|
|
delivery dates of and financing for newbuildings, and the commencement of service of
newbuildings under long-term time-charter contracts; |
|
|
our compliance with covenants under our credit facilities; |
|
|
our hedging activities relating to foreign exchange, interest rate, bunker fuel prices and
spot market risks; |
|
|
the adequacy of restricted cash deposits to fund capital lease obligations; |
Page 35 of 41
|
|
our ability to capture some of the value from the volatility of the spot tanker market and
from market imbalances by utilizing FFAs and STCs; |
|
|
the effectiveness of our risk management policies and procedures and the ability of the
counter-parties to our derivative contracts to fulfill their contractual obligations; |
|
|
the condition of financial and economic markets, including the recent credit crisis,
interest rate volatility and the availability and cost of capital; and |
|
|
the growth of global oil demand. |
Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, any statement that may predict, forecast,
indicate or imply future results, performance or achievements, and may contain the words believe,
anticipate, expect, estimate, project, will be, will continue, will likely result, or
words or phrases of similar meanings. These statements involve known and unknown risks and are
based upon a number of assumptions and estimates that are inherently subject to significant
uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. Actual results may differ
materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Important factors
that could cause actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited to: changes in
production of oil from offshore oil fields; changes in the demand for offshore oil transportation,
processing and storage services; changes in demand for LNG and LPG; greater or less than
anticipated levels of vessel newbuilding orders or greater or less than anticipated rates of vessel
scrapping; changes in trading patterns; changes in applicable industry laws and regulations and the
timing of implementation of new laws and regulations; potential inability to implement our growth
strategy; competitive factors in the markets in which we operate; potential for early termination
of long-term contracts and our potential inability to renew or replace long-term contracts; loss of
any customer, time-charter or vessel; shipyard production or vessel delivery delays; our potential
inability to raise financing to purchase additional vessels; our exposure to foreign currency
exchange, interest rate and tanker spot market rate fluctuations; conditions in the public equity
markets; and other factors detailed from time to time in our periodic reports filed with the SEC,
including our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008. We do not intend to
release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to
reflect any change in our expectations with respect thereto or any change in events, conditions or
circumstances on which any such statement is based.
Page 36 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
JUNE 30, 2009
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 3 QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to market risk from foreign currency fluctuations and changes in interest rates,
bunker fuel prices and spot tanker market rates for vessels. We use foreign currency forward
contracts, interest rate swaps, bunker fuel swap contracts and forward freight agreements to manage
currency, interest rate, bunker fuel price and spot tanker market rate risks but do not use these
financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes, except as noted below under Spot Tanker
Market Rate Risk. Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 16 Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities.
Foreign Currency Fluctuation Risk
Our primary economic environment is the international shipping market. This market utilizes the
U.S. Dollar as its functional currency. Consequently, a substantial majority of our revenues and
most of our operating costs are in U.S. Dollars. We incur certain voyage expenses, vessel operating
expenses, drydocking and overhead costs in foreign currencies, the most significant of which are
the Singapore Dollar, Canadian Dollar, Australian Dollar, British Pound, Euro and Norwegian Kroner.
We reduce our exposure to this risk by entering into foreign currency forward contracts. In most
cases we hedge a substantial majority of our net foreign currency exposure for the following 12
months. We generally do not hedge our net foreign currency exposure beyond 3 years forward.
As at June 30, 2009, we had the following foreign currency forward contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Maturity Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of 2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
Contract |
|
|
Contract |
|
|
Contract |
|
|
Fair value (1) |
|
|
|
Amount (1) |
|
|
Amount (1) |
|
|
Amount (1) |
|
|
Amount (1) |
|
|
Asset (Liability) |
|
Norwegian Kroner: |
|
$ |
99.5 |
|
|
$ |
139.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
239.0 |
|
|
$ |
(15.4 |
) |
Average contractual exchange rate(2) |
|
|
5.77 |
|
|
|
6.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
Euro: |
|
$ |
34.9 |
|
|
$ |
36.8 |
|
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
$ |
74.0 |
|
|
$ |
(3.2 |
) |
Average contractual exchange rate(2) |
|
|
0.66 |
|
|
|
0.70 |
|
|
|
0.73 |
|
|
|
0.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Dollar: |
|
$ |
28.5 |
|
|
$ |
37.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
66.4 |
|
|
$ |
(4.6 |
) |
Average contractual exchange rate(2) |
|
|
1.05 |
|
|
|
1.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
British Pound: |
|
$ |
32.7 |
|
|
$ |
31.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
63.8 |
|
|
$ |
(3.4 |
) |
Average contractual exchange rate(2) |
|
|
0.54 |
|
|
|
0.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Dollar: |
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
Average contractual exchange rate(2) |
|
|
1.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Contract amounts and fair value amounts in millions of U.S. Dollars. |
|
(2) |
|
Average contractual exchange rate represents the contractual amount of foreign currency one
U.S. Dollar will buy. |
Although the majority of our transactions, assets and liabilities are denominated in U.S. Dollars,
certain of our subsidiaries have foreign currency-denominated liabilities. There is a risk that
currency fluctuations will have a negative effect on the value of our cash flows. We have not
entered into any forward contracts to protect against the translation risk of our foreign
currency-denominated liabilities. As at June 30, 2009, we had Euro-denominated term loans of 292.3
million Euros ($410.1 million) included in long-term debt and Norwegian Kroner-denominated deferred
income taxes of approximately 77.8 million ($12.1 million). We receive Euro-denominated revenue
from certain of our time-charters. These Euro cash receipts generally are sufficient to pay the
principal and interest payments on our Euro-denominated term loans. Consequently, we have not
entered into any foreign currency forward contracts with respect to our Euro-denominated term
loans, although there is no assurance that our exposure to fluctuations in the Euro will not
increase in the future.
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes primarily through our borrowings that require
us to make interest payments based on LIBOR or EURIBOR. Significant increases in interest rates
could adversely affect our operating margins, results of operations and our ability to repay our
debt. We use interest rate swaps to reduce our exposure to market risk from changes in interest
rates. Generally our approach is to hedge a substantial majority of floating-rate debt associated
with our vessels that are operating on long-term fixed-rate contracts. We manage the rest of our
debt based on our outlook for interest rates and other factors.
In order to minimize counterparty risk, we only enter into derivative transactions with
counterparties that are rated A or better by Standard & Poors or Aa3 by Moodys at the time of the
transactions. In addition, to the extent possible and practical, interest rate swaps are entered
into with different counterparties to reduce concentration risk.
Page 37 of 41
The table below provides information about our financial instruments at June 30, 2009, which are
sensitive to changes in interest rates, including our debt and capital lease obligations and
interest rate swaps. For long-term debt and capital lease obligations, the table presents principal
cash flows and related weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity dates. For interest
rate swaps, the table presents notional amounts and weighted-average interest rates by expected
contractual maturity dates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Maturity Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset / |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of 2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Total |
|
|
(Liability) |
|
|
Rate(1) |
|
|
|
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except percentages) |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable Rate ($U.S.) (2) |
|
|
84.3 |
|
|
|
325.4 |
|
|
|
543.2 |
|
|
|
192.8 |
|
|
|
202.6 |
|
|
|
2,025.0 |
|
|
|
3,373.3 |
|
|
|
(3,052.3 |
) |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
Variable Rate (Euro) (3) (4) |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
222.8 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
153.8 |
|
|
|
410.1 |
|
|
|
(356.9 |
) |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-Rate Debt ($U.S.) |
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
45.9 |
|
|
|
240.6 |
|
|
|
46.6 |
|
|
|
46.6 |
|
|
|
293.0 |
|
|
|
695.7 |
|
|
|
(667.1 |
) |
|
|
6.2 |
% |
Average Interest Rate |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Lease Obligations (5) (6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-Rate ($U.S.) (7) |
|
|
115.7 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
80.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199.9 |
|
|
|
(199.9 |
) |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
Average Interest Rate (8) |
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Amount ($U.S.)(6) (9)(10) |
|
|
413.9 |
|
|
|
369.3 |
|
|
|
70.3 |
|
|
|
71.3 |
|
|
|
72.4 |
|
|
|
2,628.6 |
|
|
|
3,625.8 |
|
|
|
(342.1 |
) |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
Average Fixed Pay Rate (2) |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Amount (Euro) (4) (9) |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
222.8 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
153.8 |
|
|
|
410.1 |
|
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
Average Fixed Pay Rate (3) |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Rate refers to the weighted-average effective interest rate for our long-term debt and
capital lease obligations, including the margin we pay on our floating-rate debt and the
average fixed pay rate for our interest rate swap agreements. The average interest rate for
our capital lease obligations is the weighted-average interest rate implicit in our lease
obligations at the inception of the leases. The average fixed pay rate for our interest rate
swaps excludes the margin we pay on our floating-rate debt, which as of June 30, 2009 ranged
from 0.3% to 1.0%. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest payments on U.S. Dollar-denominated debt and interest rate swaps are based on LIBOR. |
|
(3) |
|
Interest payments on Euro-denominated debt and interest rate swaps are based on EURIBOR. |
|
(4) |
|
Euro-denominated amounts have been converted to U.S. Dollars using the prevailing exchange
rate as of June 30, 2009. |
|
(5) |
|
Excludes capital lease obligations (present value of minimum lease payments) of 105.7 million
Euros ($148.3 million) on one of our existing LNG carriers with a weighted-average fixed
interest rate of 5.8%. Under the terms of this fixed-rate lease obligation, we are required to
have on deposit, subject to a weighted-average fixed interest rate of 5.0%, an amount of cash
that, together with the interest earned thereon, will fully fund the amount owing under the
capital lease obligation, including a vessel purchase obligation. As at June 30, 2009, this
amount was 107.3 million Euros ($150.6 million). Consequently, we are not subject to interest
rate risk from these obligations or deposits. |
|
(6) |
|
Under the terms of the capital leases for the three RasGas II LNG Carriers (see Item 1 -
Financial Statements: Note 9 Capital Leases and Restricted Cash), we are required to have on
deposit, subject to a variable rate of interest, an amount of cash that, together with
interest earned on the deposit, will equal the remaining amounts owing under the leases. The
deposits, which as at June 30, 2009 totaled $481.9 million, and the lease obligations, which
as at June 30, 2009 totaled $469.7 million, have been swapped for fixed-rate deposits and
fixed-rate obligations. Consequently, we are not subject to interest rate risk from these
obligations and deposits and, therefore, the lease obligations, cash deposits and related
interest rate swaps have been excluded from the table above. As at June 30, 2009, the contract
amount, fair value and fixed interest rates of these interest rate swaps related to the RasGas
II LNG Carrier capital lease obligations and restricted cash deposits were $465.6 million and
$475.4 million, $(46.7) million and $55.0 million, and 4.9% and 4.8%, respectively. |
|
(7) |
|
The amount of capital lease obligations represents the present value of minimum lease
payments together with our purchase obligation, as applicable (see Item 1 Financial
Statements: Note 9 Capital Leases and Restricted Cash). |
|
(8) |
|
The average interest rate is the weighted-average interest rate implicit in the capital lease
obligations at the inception of the leases. |
|
(9) |
|
The average variable receive rate for our interest rate swaps is set monthly at the 1-month
LIBOR or EURIBOR, quarterly at the 3-month LIBOR or semi-annually at the 6-month LIBOR. |
|
(10) |
|
Includes interest rate swaps of $158.5 million, $300.0 million and $200.0 million that have
commencement dates of 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively. |
Commodity Price Risk
From time to time we use bunker fuel swap contracts as economic hedges to protect against changes
in forecasted bunker fuel costs for certain vessels being time-chartered-out and for vessels
servicing certain contracts of affreightment. As at June 30, 2009, we were committed to contracts
totaling 4,500 metric tonnes with a weighted-average price of $470.75 per tonne and a fair value
liability of $0.4 million. The bunker fuel swap contracts expire between July and September 2009.
Page 38 of 41
Spot Tanker Market Rate Risk
We use forward freight agreements (or FFAs) and synthetic time-charters (or STCs) as economic
hedges to protect against changes in spot tanker market rates earned by some of our vessels in our
spot tanker market segment. FFAs involve contracts to move a theoretical volume of freight at fixed
rates. STCs are a means of achieving the equivalent of a time-charter for a vessel that trades in
the spot tanker market by taking the short position in an FFA. As at June 30, 2009, we had three
STCs, which were equivalent to one Suezmax vessel. As at June 30, 2009, we were committed to STCs,
with an aggregate notional principal amount (including both long and short positions) of $3.7
million and a net positive fair value of $1.5 million. These STCs expired in September 2009.
We use FFAs in non-hedge-related transactions to increase or decrease our exposure to spot tanker
market rates, within strictly defined limits. Historically, we have used a number of different
tools, including the sale/purchase of vessels and the in-charter/out-charter of vessels, to
increase or decreases this exposure. We believe that we can capture some of the value from the
volatility of the spot tanker market and from market imbalances by utilizing FFAs.
Page 39 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
JUNE 30, 2009
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1 Legal Proceedings
None
Item 1A Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 6-K, you should
carefully consider the risk factors discussed in Part I, Item 3. Key Information Risk Factors
in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008, which could materially
affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. There has been no material
changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 20-F.
Item 2 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item 3 Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The Companys 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on September 9, 2009. The following
persons were elected directors for a term of three years by the votes set forth opposite their
names:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes Against or |
|
|
Shares Which |
|
|
Broker |
|
Terms Expiring in 2012 |
|
Votes For |
|
|
Withheld |
|
|
Abstained |
|
|
Non-Votes |
|
Dr. Ian D. Blackburne |
|
|
66,417,286 |
|
|
|
166,941 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
J. Rod Clark |
|
|
66,280,609 |
|
|
|
303,618 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
C. Sean Day |
|
|
65,072,042 |
|
|
|
1,512,185 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
The terms of Directors Peter S. Janson, Eileen A. Mercier, Tore I. Sandvold, Thomas Kuo-Yuen Hsu,
Axel Karlshoej and Bjorn Moller continued after the meeting.
Item 5 Other Information
None
Item 6 Exhibits
None
THIS REPORT ON FORM 6-K IS HEREBY INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THE FOLLOWING REGISTRATION
STATEMENTS OF THE COMPANY.
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM F-3 (FILE NO. 33-97746) FILED WITH THE SEC ON OCTOBER 4,
1995; |
|
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-8 (FILE NO. 333-42434) FILED WITH THE SEC ON JULY 28,
2000; |
|
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-8 (FILE NO. 333-119564) FILED WITH THE SEC ON OCTOBER 6,
2004; AND |
|
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-8 (FILE NO. 333-147683) FILED WITH THE SEC ON NOVEMBER 28,
2007 |
Page 40 of 41
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEEKAY CORPORATION
|
|
Date: October 1, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Vincent Lok
|
|
|
|
Vincent Lok |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
Page 41 of 41