e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal
year ended December 31,
2010
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number
001-34391
LOGMEIN, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
20-1515952
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
500 Unicorn Park Drive
Woburn, Massachusetts
|
|
01801
|
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
(781) 638-9050
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Common Stock, $.01 par value
|
|
NASDAQ Global Market
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
(§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of registrants
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer o
|
|
Accelerated
filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common
equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price
at which the common equity was last sold on the NASDAQ Global
Market on June 30, 2010 was $451,060,864.
As of February 22, 2011, the registrant had
23,931,620 shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value per
share, outstanding.
Portions of the registrants definitive proxy statement to
be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the
2011 annual stockholders meeting to be held on
May 26, 2011 are incorporated by reference into
Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III of this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K.
LOGMEIN,
INC.
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
PART I
|
ITEM 1.
|
|
Business
|
|
|
2
|
|
ITEM 1A.
|
|
Risk Factors
|
|
|
12
|
|
ITEM 1B.
|
|
Unresolved Staff Comments
|
|
|
26
|
|
ITEM 2.
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
26
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
|
Legal Proceedings
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
PART II
|
ITEM 5.
|
|
Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
28
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
|
Selected Financial Data
|
|
|
30
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
|
|
|
32
|
|
ITEM 7A.
|
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
|
|
43
|
|
ITEM 8.
|
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
|
|
|
44
|
|
ITEM 9.
|
|
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
|
|
66
|
|
ITEM 9A(T).
|
|
Controls and Procedures
|
|
|
66
|
|
ITEM 9B.
|
|
Other Information
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
PART III
|
ITEM 10.
|
|
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
|
|
69
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
|
Executive Compensation
|
|
|
69
|
|
ITEM 12.
|
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
and Related Stockholder Matters
|
|
|
69
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
|
|
69
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
|
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
PART IV
|
ITEM 15.
|
|
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURES
|
|
|
70
|
|
1
Forward-Looking
Statements
Matters discussed in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
relating to future events or our future performance, including
any discussion, express or implied, of our anticipated growth,
operating results, future earnings per share, market
opportunity, plans and objectives, are forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933,as amended, and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements
are often identified by the words may,
will, expect, believe,
anticipate, intend, could,
estimate, or continue, and similar
expressions or variations. Such forward-looking statements are
subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that could
cause actual results and the timing of certain events to differ
materially from future results expressed or implied by such
forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or
contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to,
those discussed in the section titled Risk Factors,
set forth in Item 1A of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and elsewhere in this Report. The forward-looking statements in
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
represent our views as of the date of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
We anticipate that subsequent events and developments will cause
our views to change. However, while we may elect to update these
forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we have
no current intention of doing so except to the extent required
by applicable law. You should, therefore, not rely on these
forward-looking statements as representing our views as of any
date subsequent to the date of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
PART I
Overview
LogMeIn provides SaaS-based, on-demand, remote-connectivity,
collaboration and support solutions to small and medium-sized
businesses, or SMBs, IT service providers, mobile carriers, and
consumers. We believe our solutions are used to connect more
Internet-enabled devices worldwide than any other connectivity
service. Businesses and IT service providers use our solutions
to deliver remote, end-user support and to access and manage
computers and other Internet-enabled devices more effectively
and efficiently from a remote location, or remotely. Consumers
and mobile workers use our remote connectivity solutions to
access computer resources remotely and to collaborate with other
users, thereby facilitating their mobility and increasing their
productivity. Our solutions, which are deployed and accessed
from anywhere through a web browser, or on-demand, are secure,
scalable and easy for our customers to try, purchase and use.
In February 2003, we incorporated under the laws of Bermuda. In
August 2004, we completed a domestication in the State of
Delaware under the name 3am Labs, Inc. We changed our name to
LogMeIn, Inc. in March 2006. Our principal executive offices are
located at 500 Unicorn Park Drive, Woburn, Massachusetts 01801,
and our telephone number is
(781) 638-9050.
Our website address is www.LogMeIn.com. We have included
our website address in this report solely as an inactive textual
reference.
In 2004, we introduced LogMeIn Free, a service that allows users
to access computer resources remotely. We believe LogMeIn Free,
LogMeIn
Hamachi2
and join.me, our popular free services, provide on-demand remote
access, or remote-connectivity, to computing resources for more
users than any other on-demand connectivity service, giving us
access to a large and diverse group of users and increasing
awareness of our fee-based, or premium, services. As of
December 31, 2010, our users have connected over 127
million computers and other Internet-enabled devices to a
LogMeIn service.
We complement our free services with nine premium services, some
sold on a subscription basis, including LogMeIn Rescue and
LogMeIn Central, our flagship remote support and management
services, and LogMeIn
Pro2, our
premium remote access service, and others that are sold for a
one-time fee, including LogMeIn Ignition for iPhone, iPad and
Android and RemotelyAnywhere. Sales of our premium services are
generated through
word-of-mouth
referrals, web-based advertising, expiring free trials that we
convert to paid subscriptions and direct marketing to new and
existing customers.
All of our free and premium solutions are delivered as hosted
services, which means that the technology enabling the use of
our solutions primarily resides on our servers and IT hardware,
rather than those of our
2
users. We call the software, hardware and networking technology
used to deliver our solutions Gravity. The Gravity proprietary
platform consists of software applications, customized databases
and web servers. Gravity establishes secure connections over the
Internet between remote computers and other Internet-enabled
devices and manages the direct transmission of data between
remotely connected devices. This robust and scalable platform
connects over 15 million computers to our services each day.
We believe that our sales model of a high volume of new and
renewed subscriptions at low transaction prices increases the
predictability of our revenues compared to perpetual
licensed-based software businesses. During the fiscal years
ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, we generated
revenues of $51.7 million, $74.4 million and
$101.1 million respectively.
Periodic reports, proxy statements and other information are
available to the public, free of charge, on our website,
www.LogMeIn.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after
they have been filed with the SEC and through the SECs
website, www.sec.gov. Such reports, proxy statements and
other information may be obtained by visiting the Public
Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, DC 20549 or by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
Our
Solutions
Our solutions allow our users to remotely access, support and
manage computers and other Internet-enabled devices on demand,
as well as to collaborate with other users. We believe our
solutions benefit users in the following ways:
|
|
|
|
|
Reduced
set-up,
support and management costs. Our services enable
IT staff to administer, monitor and support computers and other
Internet-enabled devices at a remote location. Businesses easily
set up our on-demand services with little or no modification to
the remote locations network or security systems and
without the need for upfront technology or software investment.
In addition, our customers lower their support and management
costs by performing management-related tasks remotely, reducing
or eliminating the costs of
on-site
support and management.
|
|
|
|
Increased mobile worker productivity. Our
remote-access services allow non-technical users to access and
control remote computers and other Internet-enabled devices,
increasing their mobility and allowing them to remain productive
while away from the office.
|
|
|
|
Increased end-user satisfaction. Our customers
rely on our on-demand services to improve the efficiency and
effectiveness of end-user support. Satisfaction with support
services is primarily measured by call-handling time and whether
or not the problem is resolved on the first call. Our services
enable helpdesk technicians to quickly and easily gain control
of a remote users computer. Once connected, the technician
can diagnose and resolve problems while interacting with and
possibly training the end user. By using our solutions to
support remote users, our customers have reported increased user
satisfaction while reducing call handling time by as much as 50%
over phone-only support.
|
|
|
|
Reliable, fast and secure service. Our service
possesses built-in redundancy of servers and other
infrastructure in four data centers, three located in the United
States and one located in Europe. Our proprietary platform
enables our services to connect and manage devices at enhanced
speeds. Our services implement industry-standard security
protocols and authenticate and authorize users of our services
without storing passwords.
|
|
|
|
Easy to try, buy and use. Our services are
simple to install, which allows our prospective customers to use
our services within minutes of registering for a trial. Our
customers can use our services to manage their remote systems
from any Web browser. In addition, our low service-delivery
costs and hosted delivery model allow us to offer each of our
services at competitive prices and to offer flexible payment
options.
|
3
Our
Competitive Strengths
We believe that the following competitive strengths
differentiate us from our competitors and are key to our success:
|
|
|
|
|
Large established user community. As of
December 31, 2010, over 33 million registered users have
connected over 127 million Internet-enabled devices to a LogMeIn
service. These users drive awareness of our services through
personal recommendations, blogs, social media and other online
communication methods and provide us with a significant audience
to which we can market and sell premium services.
|
|
|
|
Efficient customer acquisition model. We
believe our free products and our large installed user base help
to generate
word-of-mouth
referrals, which in turn increases the efficiency of our paid
marketing activities, the large majority of which are focused on
pay-per-click
search engine advertising. Sales of our premium services are
generated through
word-of-mouth
referrals, Web-based advertising, off-line advertising expiring
free trials that we convert to paying customers and marketing to
our existing customer and user base. We believe this direct
approach to acquiring new customers generates an attractive and
predictable return on our sales and marketing expenditures.
|
|
|
|
Technology-enabled cost advantage. Our service
delivery platform, Gravity, establishes secure connections over
the Internet between remote computing devices and manages the
direct transmission of data between them. This patented platform
reduces our bandwidth and other infrastructure requirements,
which we believe makes our services faster and less expensive to
deliver as compared to competing services. We believe this cost
advantage allows us to offer free services and serve a broader
user community than our competitors.
|
|
|
|
On-demand delivery. Delivering our services
on-demand allows us to serve additional customers with little
incremental expense and to deploy new applications and upgrades
quickly and efficiently to our existing customers.
|
|
|
|
High recurring revenue and high transaction
volumes. We sell our services on a monthly or
annual subscription basis, which provides greater levels of
recurring revenues and predictability compared to traditional
perpetual, license-based business models. Approximately 95% of
our subscriptions have a one-year term. We believe that our
sales model of a high volume of new and renewed subscriptions at
low transaction prices increases the predictability of our
revenues compared to perpetual licensed-based software
businesses.
|
Growth
Strategy
Our objective is to extend our position as a leading provider of
on-demand, remote-connectivity solutions. To accomplish this, we
intend to:
|
|
|
|
|
Acquire new customers. We acquire new
customers through
word-of-mouth
referrals from our existing user community and from paid, online
advertising designed to attract visitors to our website. We also
encourage our website visitors to register for free trials of
our premium services. We supplement our online efforts with
email, newsletter and other traditional marketing campaigns and
by participating in trade events and Web-based seminars. To
increase our sales, we plan to continue aggressively marketing
our solutions and encouraging trials of our services while
expanding our sales force.
|
|
|
|
Increase sales to existing customers. We
upsell and cross-sell our broad portfolio of services to our
existing premium subscriber customer base. In the first twelve
months after their initial purchase, these subscribers, on
average, subscribe to additional services worth approximately
40% of their initial purchase. To further penetrate this base,
we plan to continue actively marketing our portfolio of services
through
e-commerce
and by expanding our sales force.
|
|
|
|
Continue to build our user community. We grow
our community of users by marketing our services through paid
advertising that targets prospective customers who are seeking
remote-connectivity solutions and by offering our popular free
services, LogMeIn Free, join.me and LogMeIn
Hamachi2.
This strategy improves the effectiveness of our online
advertising by increasing our response rates when
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
people seeking remote-connectivity solutions conduct online
searches. In addition, our large and growing community of users
drives awareness of our services and increases referrals of
potential customers and users.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expand internationally. We believe there is a
significant opportunity to increase our sales internationally.
We offer solutions in 12 different languages and our solutions
are used in more than 200 countries. We intend to expand our
international sales and marketing staff and increase our
international marketing expenditures to take advantage of this
opportunity.
|
|
|
|
Continue to expand our service portfolio. We
intend to continue to invest in the development of new
on-demand, remote-connectivity solutions for businesses, IT
service providers and consumers.
|
|
|
|
Pursue strategic acquisitions. We plan to
pursue acquisitions that complement our existing business,
represent a strong strategic fit and are consistent with our
overall growth strategy. We may also target future acquisitions
to expand or add functionality and capabilities to our existing
portfolio of services, as well as add new solutions to our
portfolio.
|
Services
and Technology
Our services are accessed on the Web and delivered on-demand via
our service delivery platform, Gravity. Our services generally
fall into one of three categories:
|
|
|
|
|
Remote user access services. These services
allow users to access computers and other Internet-enabled
devices in order to continue working while away from the office
or to access personal systems while away from home. These
services include free remote access offerings and premium
versions that include additional features.
|
|
|
|
Remote support and management services. These
services are used by internal IT departments and by external
service and support organizations to deliver support and
management of IT resources remotely.
|
|
|
|
Remote collaboration. These services are used
by business users and consumers to conduct online meetings and
share documents, images and their desktop with other users to
enable fast, affordable and secure online collaboration.
|
Remote
User Access Services
LogMeIn Free is our free remote access service. It
provides secure access to a remote computer or other
Internet-enabled device. Once installed on a device, a user can
quickly and easily access that devices desktop, files,
applications and network resources.
LogMeIn
Pro2
is our premium remote access service. It can be rapidly
installed without IT expertise. Users typically engage in a
trial prior to purchase.
LogMeIn
Pro2
offers several premium features not available through
LogMeIn Free, including:
|
|
|
|
|
File transfer. Files and folders can be moved
easily between computers using
drag-and-drop
or dual-pane file transfer capabilities.
|
|
|
|
Remote sound. A user can hear on his local
computer
e-mail
notifications, music and podcasts originating from a remote PC.
|
|
|
|
File share. Large files can be distributed by
sending a link that permits remote third parties to download a
file directly from a LogMeIn subscribers computer.
|
|
|
|
Remote to local printing. Files from a remote
PC are automatically printed to a local printer without
downloading drivers or manually configuring printer settings.
|
|
|
|
Desktop sharing. A remote third-party user can
be invited to view or control a LogMeIn users desktop for
online meetings and collaboration.
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
File sync. Files and folders can be
synchronized between remote and local computers.
|
|
|
|
Drive mapping. Drives on a remote PC can be
accessed as if they are local.
|
|
|
|
Wake On Lan. Wake a remote computer that is
sleeping or turn one on that is off right from a web browser.
|
LogMeIn
Hamachi2
is a hosted virtual private network, or VPN, service that sets
up a computer network among remote computers. It typically works
with existing network and firewall configurations and can be
managed from a web browser or the users software. Using
LogMeIn
Hamachi2,
users can securely communicate over the Internet as if their
computers are on the same local area network, allowing for
remote access and virtual networking. LogMeIn
Hamachi2
is offered both as a free service for non-commercial use and as
a paid service for commercial use.
LogMeIn Ignition is a premium service that delivers one
click access to remote computers that subscribe to LogMeIn Free
or LogMeIn
Pro2.
Users can install LogMeIn Ignition on a mobile device, a
computer, or run the application from a universal storage device
in order to directly access their subscribed computer,
eliminating the need for installation of additional software.
LogMeIn Ignition is available for Windows-based PCs, as well as
an Apple iPad, iPhone, iPod touch, and Android-based smartphones
and tablets.
Remote
Support and Management Services
LogMeIn Rescue is a Web-based remote support service used
by helpdesk professionals to support remote computers and
applications and assist computer users via the Internet. LogMeIn
Rescue enables the delivery of interactive support to a remote
computer without having pre-installed software. The end user
grants permission to the help desk technician before the
technician can access, view or control the end users
computer. Using LogMeIn Rescue, support professionals can
communicate with end users through an Internet chat window while
diagnosing and repairing computer problems. If given additional
permission by the computer user, the support professional can
take over keyboard and mouse control of the end users
computer to take necessary support actions and to train the end
user on the use of software and operating system applications.
Upon completion of the session, all LogMeIn software is removed
from the remote computer. LogMeIn Rescue is used by companies of
varying sizes, from one-person support organizations to Fortune
100 companies servicing employees and customers.
LogMeIn Rescue includes the following features:
|
|
|
|
|
Rapid incident resolution. Helpdesk
professionals can gain access to the target PC quickly, often in
under 60 seconds, and can take advantage of our remote control
capabilities to perform support functions available through a
technician console, including: reading critical system
information, deploying scripts, copying files through drag and
drop and rebooting the machine. Includes the ability to quickly
access remote distributed devices, as well as one-click access
to on-lan systems.
|
|
|
|
Seamless end-user experience. LogMeIn Rescue
facilitates an end users receipt of customer support. End
users remain in control of the support session and can initiate
a session in a variety of ways, such as by clicking a link on a
website or in an email or by entering a pin code provided by the
support provider. The end user then sees a chat window, branded
with the support providers logo, and responds to a series
of access and control requests while chatting with the support
provider.
|
|
|
|
Support session and queue management. The
helpdesk professional can use the LogMeIn Technician Console to
manage a queue of support incident requests and up to ten
simultaneous live remote sessions. The support queue can be
shared and current live sessions can be transferred to other
co-workers as needed.
|
|
|
|
Administration Center. The Administration
Center is used to create and assign permissions for groups of
support technicians. It is also used to create support channels
the web-based links
and/or icons
that automatically connect customers to technicians and assign
them to specific groups. Support managers use the Administration
Center to generate reports about individual sessions,
post-session survey data and technician activity.
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated security. LogMeIn Rescue includes
security features designed to safeguard the security and privacy
of both the support provider and the end user. All data
transmission is encrypted using industry-standard encryption
often used by financial institutions. Sessions can be recorded
by the support provider and will create a record of each level
of access permission granted by the end user. Any files
transferred between computers are uniquely identified to
demonstrate that no changes were made to original files.
|
LogMeIn Rescue+Mobile is an add-on of LogMeIn
Rescues web-based remote support service that allows call
center technicians and IT professionals to remotely access and
support smartphones and tablet computers. Mobile users
requesting help will receive a text message from a technician to
download a small software application onto the smartphone. Once
installed, the user enters a code connecting the device to the
technician. After the user grants the technician permission, the
technician can remotely access and control the phone or tablet
from their Rescue+Mobile Technician Console to remotely control
and update the phones configuration settings, access
system information, file transfer and reboot the device.
Customers of this service can support Blackberry, Symbian, iOS
and Android devices.
LogMeIn Central is a web-based management console that
helps business users, IT professionals and other users deploy
and administer LogMeIn
Pro2,
LogMeIn Free and LogMeIn
Hamachi2.
LogMeIn Central is offered as a premium service and includes the
following features:
|
|
|
|
|
User management. LogMeIn Central provides
account holders with the ability to manage additional users for
an account, including user access controls and permissions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software deployment. LogMeIn Central allows
the deployment of LogMeIn host software over the web.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting. LogMeIn Central provides the
ability to report on account, device and session data.
|
|
|
|
Integrated security. LogMeIn Central utilizes
industry-standard encryption and authentication methods. In
addition, LogMeIn Central also supports detailed account audit
logging, including changes to account email addresses, failed
attempts to login and changes to account security settings.
|
|
|
|
Host configuration. LogMeIn Central enables
the configuration of LogMeIn host software, including access
settings, network restrictions and other compliance options.
|
|
|
|
Computer grouping and account
personalization. LogMeIn Central allows users to
organize their devices into specific groups, and personalize the
console to meet specific needs, including the saved searches,
links to resources and customized charting and graphing.
|
|
|
|
One2Many tasks and commands. LogMeIn Central,
when combined with LogMeIn
Pro2 host
software, enables users to push software updates, scripts and
common management tasks to multiple devices simultaneously
ensuring rapid batch updates to dozens, hundreds or even
thousands of devices.
|
When combined with LogMeIn
Pro2 host
software, LogMeIn Central also provides alerting and monitoring,
computer inventory tracking, background login and advanced
reporting and analysis. When combined with LogMeIn
Hamachi2
host software, LogMeIn Central provides additional web-based
management capabilities for VPN connectivity services, such as
hub-and-spoke,
gateway and mesh networking and advanced reporting and analysis.
We also offer a systems administration product called
RemotelyAnywhere. RemotelyAnywhere is used to manage personal
computers and servers from within the IT system of an
enterprise. Unlike our LogMeIn services, RemotelyAnywhere is
licensed to our customers on a perpetual basis, and we offer
maintenance covering upgrades and service supporting this
application.
LogMeIn Backup is a service that subscribers install on
two or more computers to create a backup network and is
generally sold as a complement to the LogMeIn Central or LogMeIn
Pro2
services. LogMeIn Backup is easy to install and provides IT
service providers a simple backup alternative to offer their
customers using storage capacity that they control. Users can
transfer specified files and folders from one computer to
another either manually or automatically in accordance with a
pre-determined schedule. Files can be stored on, and restored
to, any PC that the subscriber chooses, using industry-standard
encryption protocols for the transmission and storage of the
data.
7
Remote
Collaboration Services
join.me and join.me pro are browser-based online
meeting and screen sharing services that give users the ability
to quickly and securely share their computer desktop with up to
250 other people. Both services can be initiated either through
a visit to the
http://join.me
website or through a small downloadable desktop application.
Users start or host a collaboration session by
clicking a share button which generates a
9-digit
numeric code. They then provide this code to other users
(attendees or viewers) who enter it at
the join.me website and click join. Within a few
seconds, the attendees are viewing the hosts screen. Like
LogMeIn Free and LogMeIn
Pro2,
join.me is offered in a
free-to-paid
model where the free service encourages widespread awareness and
word-of-mouth
referrals and the pro version introduces additional
functionality and benefits for a monthly or annual subscription.
join.me free includes the following features:
|
|
|
|
|
Screen sharing. join.me enables users to share
their local computer screen with up to 250 other people for
online meetings or ad hoc collaboration.
|
|
|
|
Chat. A simple text chat option that provides
users with the ability to chat with all meeting participants or
with individual participants.
|
|
|
|
File sharing. join.me allows users to transfer
or share files from one computer to another.
|
|
|
|
Remote control. Allows host users to give
attendees remote control of their screen and computer.
|
|
|
|
Toll-based conference line. join.me offers a
complementary teleconference line uniquely associated with each
meeting or screen sharing session.
|
join.me pro extends these capabilities with a variety of premium
features for a monthly or annual subscription fee, including:
|
|
|
|
|
Personal meeting IDs. Allows meeting hosts to
create and use personalized meeting codes and links for use with
attendees in place of the nine digit numeric codes.
|
|
|
|
Meeting scheduler. Enables hosts to schedule
and invite people to meetings or planned events through an
in-product calendaring and notification system
|
|
|
|
Meeting lock. Allows hosts to lock
or secure their meetings, requiring attendees to ask for
permission to join before seeing the hosts screen.
|
|
|
|
User management. join.me pro gives hosts and
account holders the ability create and manage new host accounts
for co-workers or colleagues.
|
LogMeIn
Gravity Service Delivery Platform
The Gravity proprietary platform consists of software
applications, customized databases and web servers. Gravity
establishes secure connections over the Internet between remote
computers and other Internet-enabled devices and manages the
direct transmission of data between remotely connected devices.
This patented platform reduces our bandwidth and other
infrastructure requirements, which we believe makes our services
faster and less expensive to deliver as compared to competing
services. Gravity consists of proprietary software applications
that run on standard hardware servers and operating systems and
is designed to be scalable and serve our large-scale user
community at low cost.
The infrastructure-related costs of delivering our services
include bandwidth, power, server depreciation and co-location
fees. Gravity transmits data using a combination of methods
working together to relay data via our data centers and to
transmit data over the Internet directly between end-point
devices. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2010,
more than 90% of the data transmitted by our services was
transmitted directly between end-point devices, reducing our
bandwidth and bandwidth-related costs.
Gravity is physically hosted in four separate data centers. We
lease space in co-location hosting facilities operated by third
parties. Three of our Gravity data centers are located in the
United States, and the fourth is
8
located in Europe. During the twelve months ended
December 31, 2010, we averaged 10 million computers
connecting to our Gravity service each day. Our goal is to
maintain sufficient excess capacity such that any one of the
data centers could fail, and the remaining data centers could
handle the load without extensive disruption to our service.
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2010, our
Gravity service was available 100% of the time.
Gravity also implements multiple layers of security. Our service
utilizes industry-standard security protocols for encryption and
authentication. Access to a device through our service requires
system passwords such as the username and password for Windows.
We also add additional layers of security such as single-use
passwords, IP address filtering and IP address lockout. For
security purposes, Gravity does not save end-user passwords for
devices.
Sales and
Marketing
Our sales and marketing efforts are designed to attract
prospects to our website, enroll them in free trials of our
services and convert them to and retain them as paying
customers. We also expend sales and marketing resources to
attract users of our free services. We acquire new customers
through a combination of paid and unpaid sources. We also invest
in public relations to broaden the general awareness of our
services and to highlight the quality and reliability of our
services for specific audiences. We are constantly seeking and
employing new methods to reach more users and to convert them to
paying customers.
Paid
Sources of Demand Generation
Online Advertising. We advertise online
through
pay-per-click
spending with search engines, banner advertising with online
advertising networks and other websites and email newsletters
likely to be frequented by our target consumers, SMBs and IT
professionals.
Tradeshows. We showcase our suite of services
at technology and industry-specific tradeshows. Our
participation in these shows ranges from elaborate presentations
in front of large groups to
one-on-one
discussions and demonstrations at manned booths. In 2010, we
attended 40 trade shows in the United States, Europe and
Australia.
Offline Advertising. Our offline print
advertising is comprised of publications, such as The Metro,
MacLife and VSR Magazine, which are targeted at IT
professionals and consumers. We sponsor advertorials in regional
newspapers, which target IT consumers. Additionally, we have
advertised using more traditional methods, such as radio and
outdoor advertising, in regional markets.
Unpaid
Sources of Demand Generation
Word-of-Mouth
Referrals. We believe that we have developed a
loyal customer and user base, and new customers frequently claim
to have heard about us from a current LogMeIn user. Many of our
users arrive at our website via
word-of-mouth
referrals from existing users of our services.
Direct Advertising Into Our User Community. We
have a large existing community of free users and paying
customers. Users of most of our services, including our most
popular service, LogMeIn Free, come to our website each time
they initiate a new remote access session. We use this
opportunity to promote additional premium services to them.
Other
Marketing Initiatives
Social Media Marketing. We participate in
online communities such as Twitter, Facebook and YouTube for the
purpose of marketing, public relations and customer service.
Through these online collaboration sites, we actively engage our
users, learn about their wants, and foster
word-of-mouth
by creating and responding to content about LogMeIn events,
promotions, product news and user questions.
Web-Based Seminars. We offer free online
seminars to current and prospective customers designed to
educate them about the benefits of remote access, support and
administration, particularly with LogMeIn, and
9
guide them in the use of our services. We often highlight
customer success stories and focus the seminar on business
problems and key market and IT trends.
Public Relations. We engage in targeted public
relations programs, including press releases announcing
important company events and product releases, interviews with
reporters and analysts, both general and industry specific,
attending panel and group discussions and making speeches at
industry events. We also register our services in awards
competitions and encourage bloggers to comment on our products.
Sales
Efforts and Other Initiatives
New Account Sales. Our sales are typically
preceded by a trial of one of our services, and 98% of our
purchase transactions are settled via credit card. Our sales
operations team determines whether or not a trial should be
managed by a telephone-based sales representative or handled via
our
e-commerce
sales process. As of December 31, 2010, we employed 64
telephone-based sales representatives to manage newly generated
trials. In addition, a small sales and business development team
concentrates on sales to larger organizations and the
formulation of strategic technology partnerships that are
intended to generate additional sales.
Renewal Sales. All of our services are sold on
a subscription basis. Approximately 95% of our subscriptions
have a term of one year.
International Sales. We currently have sales
teams located in Europe and Australia focusing on international
sales. In each of the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009
and 2010, we generated approximately 30% of our sales orders
outside of North America. As of December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010, we had long-lived assets of approximately 22%, 38% and
37%, respectively, located outside of the United States.
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010, we spent $31.6 million, $35.8 million and
$45.9 million, respectively, on sales and marketing.
Research
and Development
We have made and intend to continue making significant
investments in research and development in order to continue to
improve the efficiency of our service delivery platform, improve
existing services and bring new services to market. Our primary
engineering organization is based in Budapest, Hungary, where
the first version of our service was developed. Our founding
engineering team has worked together for over 10 years,
designing and running highly large-scale Internet services.
Approximately 43% of our employees, as of December 31,
2010, work in research and development. Research and development
expenses totaled $12.0 million in 2008, $13.1 million
in 2009 and $15.2 million in 2010.
In June 2009, we received approval of a grant from the Hungarian
government which reimburses us for a portion of our Hungarian
research and development related costs for a four year period,
beginning in September 2008. These reimbursements are recorded
as a reduction of research and development expense and totaled
approximately $371,000 in the year ended December 31, 2010.
Competition
The market for remote-access based products and services is
evolving, and we expect to face additional competition in the
future. We believe that the key competitive factors in the
market include:
|
|
|
|
|
service reliability;
|
|
|
|
ease of initial setup and use;
|
|
|
|
fitness for use and the design of features that best meet the
needs of the target customer;
|
|
|
|
the ability to support multiple device types and operating
systems;
|
|
|
|
cost of customer acquisition;
|
|
|
|
product and brand awareness;
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
the ability to reach large fragmented groups of users;
|
|
|
|
cost of service delivery; and
|
|
|
|
pricing flexibility.
|
We believe that our large-scale user base, efficient customer
acquisition model and low service delivery costs enable us to
compete effectively.
Citrixs Online division and Ciscos WebEx division
are our two most significant competitors. Both companies offer a
service that provides hosted remote access, collaboration and
remote access-based services.
Both of these competitors attract new customers through
traditional marketing and sales efforts, while we have focused
first on building a large-scale community of users. Our approach
is differentiated from both Citrix and WebEx because we believe
we reach significantly more users which allows us to attract
paying customers efficiently.
In addition, certain of our solutions, including our free remote
access service, also compete with current or potential services
offered by Microsoft and Apple. Certain of our competitors may
also offer, currently or in the future, lower priced, or free,
products or services that compete with our solutions.
We believe our large user base also gives us an advantage over
smaller competitors and potential new entrants into the market
by making it more expensive for them to gain general market
awareness. We currently compete against several smaller
competitors, including NTRglobal (headquartered in Spain),
TeamViewer (headquartered in Germany) and Bomgar. In addition,
potential customers may look to software-based and free
solutions, including Symantecs pcAnywhere and
Microsofts Remote Desktop, which comes bundled into most
current versions of the Microsoft operating system, and others.
Many of our actual and potential competitors enjoy greater name
recognition, longer operating histories, more varied products
and services and larger marketing budgets, as well as
substantially greater financial, technical and other resources,
than we do. In addition, we may also face future competition
from new market entrants. We believe that our large user base,
efficient customer acquisition model and low service delivery
position us well to compete effectively in the future.
Intellectual
Property
Our intellectual property rights are important to our business.
We rely on a combination of copyright, trade secret, trademark
and other rights in the United States and other jurisdictions,
as well as confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions
to protect our proprietary technology, processes and other
intellectual property. We also have one issued patent and three
patents pending and are in the process of filing additional
patent applications that cover many features of our services.
We enter into confidentiality and other written agreements with
our employees, customers, consultants and partners, and through
these and other written agreements, we attempt to control access
to and distribution of our software, documentation and other
proprietary technology and other information. Despite our
efforts to protect our proprietary rights, third parties may, in
an unauthorized manner, attempt to use, copy or otherwise obtain
and market or distribute our intellectual property rights or
technology or otherwise develop products or services with the
same functionality as our services. In addition,
U.S. patent filings are intended to provide the holder with
a right to exclude others from making, using, selling or
importing in the United States the inventions covered by the
claims of granted patents. If granted, our patents may be
contested, circumvented or invalidated. Moreover, the rights
that may be granted in those pending patents may not provide us
with proprietary protection or competitive advantages, and we
may not be able to prevent third parties from infringing these
patents. Therefore, the exact effect of our pending patents, if
issued, and the other steps we have taken to protect our
intellectual property cannot be predicted with certainty.
11
Although the protection afforded by copyright, trade secret and
trademark law, written agreements and common law may provide
some advantages, we believe that the following factors help us
maintain a competitive advantage:
|
|
|
|
|
the technological skills of our research and development
personnel;
|
|
|
|
frequent enhancements to our services; and
|
|
|
|
continued expansion of our proprietary technology.
|
LogMeIn is a registered trademark in the
United States and in the European Union. We also hold a number
of other trademarks and service marks identifying certain of our
services or features of our services. We also have a number of
trademark applications pending.
Employees
As of December 31, 2010, we had 415 full-time
employees. None of our employees are represented by labor unions
or covered by collective bargaining agreements. We consider our
relationship with our employees to be good.
Segments
We have determined that we have one operating segment. For more
information about our segments, see Note 2 to our
consolidated financial statements, Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies Segment Data.
These are risks and uncertainties that could cause actual
results to differ materially from the results contemplated by
the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report
on
Form 10-K.
Because of these factors, as well as other variables affecting
our operating results, past financial performance should not be
considered as a reliable indicator of future performance and
investors should not use historical trends to anticipate results
or trends in future periods. These risks are not the only ones
we face. Please also see FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
earlier in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
RISKS
RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS
We may
be unable to maintain profitability.
We experienced net losses of $9.1 million for 2007, and
$5.4 million for 2008. In the quarter ended
September 30, 2008, we achieved profitability and reported
net income for the first time. We reported net income of
$8.8 million for 2009 and $21.1 million for 2010. We
cannot predict if we will sustain this profitability or, if we
fail to sustain this profitability, again attain profitability
in the near future or at all. We expect to continue making
significant future expenditures to develop and expand our
business. In addition, as a public company, we incur additional
significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not
incur as a private company. These increased expenditures make it
harder for us to maintain future profitability. Our recent
growth in revenue and customer base may not be sustainable, and
we may not achieve sufficient revenue to achieve or maintain
profitability. We may incur significant losses in the future for
a number of reasons, including due to the other risks described
in this report and we may encounter unforeseen expenses,
difficulties, complications and delays and other unknown events.
Accordingly, we may not be able to maintain profitability, and
we may incur significant losses for the foreseeable future.
Growth
of our business may be adversely affected if businesses, IT
support providers or consumers do not adopt remote access or
remote support solutions more widely.
Our services employ new and emerging technologies for remote
access and remote support. Our target customers may hesitate to
accept the risks inherent in applying and relying on new
technologies or methodologies to supplant traditional methods of
remote connectivity. Our business will not be successful if our
target customers do not accept the use of our remote access and
remote support technologies.
12
Assertions
by a third party that our services infringe its intellectual
property, whether or not correct, could subject us to costly and
time-consuming litigation or expensive licenses.
There is frequent litigation in the software and technology
industries based on allegations of infringement or other
violations of intellectual property rights. We have been, and
may in the future be, subject to third party patent infringement
lawsuits as we face increasing competition and become
increasingly visible. Regardless of the merit of these claims,
they can be time-consuming, result in costly litigation and
diversion of technical and management personnel or require us to
develop a non-infringing technology or enter into license
agreements. There can be no assurance that such licenses will be
available on acceptable terms and conditions, if at all and
although we have previously licensed proprietary technology, we
cannot be certain that the owners rights in such
technology will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented.
For these reasons and because of the potential for high court
awards that are difficult predict, it is not unusual to find
even arguably unmeritorious claims settled for significant
amounts. In addition, many of our service agreements require us
to indemnify our customers from certain third-party intellectual
property infringement claims, which could increase our costs as
a result of defending such claims and may require that we pay
damages if there were an adverse ruling related to any such
claims. These types of claims could harm our relationships with
our customers, deter future customers from subscribing to our
services or expose us to further litigation. Any adverse
determination related to intellectual property claims or
litigation could prevent us from offering all or a portion of
our services to customers due to an injunction or require us to
pay damages or license fees, which could adversely affect our
business, financial condition and operating results.
For information concerning pending patent infringement cases in
which we are involved, please refer to Part I, Item 3
entitled Legal Proceedings and Note 11 of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
We
depend on search engines to attract a significant percentage of
our customers, and if those search engines change their listings
or increase their pricing, it would limit our ability to attract
new customers.
Many of our customers locate our website through search engines,
such as Google. Search engines typically provide two types of
search results, algorithmic and purchased listings, and we rely
on both types.
Algorithmic listings cannot be purchased and are determined and
displayed solely by a set of formulas designed by the search
engine. Search engines revise their algorithms from time to time
in an attempt to optimize search result listings. If the search
engines on which we rely for algorithmic listings modify their
algorithms in a manner that reduces the prominence of our
listing, fewer potential customers may click through to our
website, requiring us to resort to other costly resources to
replace this traffic. Any failure to replace this traffic could
reduce our revenue and increase our costs. In addition, costs
for purchased listings have increased in the past and may
increase in the future, and further increases could have
negative effects on our financial condition.
If we
are unable to attract new customers to our services on a
cost-effective basis, our revenue and results of operations will
be adversely affected.
We must continue to attract a large number of customers on a
cost-effective basis, many of whom have not previously used
on-demand, remote-connectivity solutions. We rely on a variety
of marketing methods to attract new customers to our services,
such as paying providers of online services and search engines
for advertising space and priority placement of our website in
response to Internet searches. Our ability to attract new
customers also depends on the competitiveness of the pricing of
our services. If our current marketing initiatives are not
successful or become unavailable, if the cost of such
initiatives were to significantly increase, or if our
competitors offer similar services at lower prices, we may not
be able to attract new customers on a cost-effective basis and,
as a result, our revenue and results of operations would be
adversely affected.
13
If we
are unable to retain our existing customers, our revenue and
results of operations would be adversely affected.
We sell our services pursuant to agreements that are generally
one year in duration. Our customers have no obligation to renew
their subscriptions after their subscription period expires, and
these subscriptions may not be renewed on the same or on more
profitable terms. As a result, our ability to grow depends in
part on subscription renewals. We may not be able to accurately
predict future trends in customer renewals, and our
customers renewal rates may decline or fluctuate because
of several factors, including their satisfaction or
dissatisfaction with our services, the prices of our services,
the prices of services offered by our competitors or reductions
in our customers spending levels. If our customers do not
renew their subscriptions for our services, renew on less
favorable terms, or do not purchase additional functionality or
subscriptions, our revenue may grow more slowly than expected or
decline, and our profitability and gross margins may be harmed.
If we
fail to convert our free users to paying customers, our revenue
and financial results will be harmed.
A significant portion of our user base utilizes our services
free of charge through our free services or free trials of our
premium services. We seek to convert these free and trial users
to paying customers of our premium services. If our rate of
conversion suffers for any reason, our revenue may decline and
our business may suffer.
We may
expand by acquiring or investing in other companies, which may
divert our managements attention, result in additional
dilution to our stockholders and consume resources that are
necessary to sustain our business.
Our business strategy may include acquiring complementary
services, technologies or businesses. We also may enter into
relationships with other businesses to expand our portfolio of
services or our ability to provide our services in foreign
jurisdictions, which could involve preferred or exclusive
licenses, additional channels of distribution, discount pricing
or investments in other companies. Negotiating these
transactions can be time-consuming, difficult and expensive, and
our ability to close these transactions may often be subject to
conditions or approvals that are beyond our control.
Consequently, these transactions, even if undertaken and
announced, may not close.
An acquisition, investment or new business relationship may
result in unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures. In
particular, we may encounter difficulties assimilating or
integrating the businesses, technologies, products, personnel or
operations of the acquired companies, particularly if the key
personnel of the acquired company choose not to work for us, the
companys software is not easily adapted to work with ours
or we have difficulty retaining the customers of any acquired
business due to changes in management or otherwise. Acquisitions
may also disrupt our business, divert our resources and require
significant management attention that would otherwise be
available for development of our business. Moreover, the
anticipated benefits of any acquisition, investment or business
relationship may not be realized or we may be exposed to unknown
liabilities. For one or more of those transactions, we may:
|
|
|
|
|
issue additional equity securities that would dilute our
stockholders;
|
|
|
|
use cash that we may need in the future to operate our business;
|
|
|
|
incur debt on terms unfavorable to us or that we are unable to
repay;
|
|
|
|
incur large charges or substantial liabilities;
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
encounter difficulties retaining key employees of the acquired
company or integrating diverse software codes or business
cultures; and
|
|
|
|
become subject to adverse tax consequences, substantial
depreciation or deferred compensation charges.
|
Any of these risks could harm our business and operating results.
We use
a limited number of data centers to deliver our services. Any
disruption of service at these facilities could harm our
business.
We host our services and serve all of our customers from four
third-party data center facilities, of which three are located
in the United States and one is located in Europe. We do not
control the operation of these facilities. The owners of our
data center facilities have no obligation to renew their
agreements with us on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.
If we are unable to renew these agreements on commercially
reasonable terms, we may be required to transfer to new data
center facilities, and we may incur significant costs and
possible service interruption in connection with doing so.
Any changes in third-party service levels at our data centers or
any errors, defects, disruptions or other performance problems
with our services could harm our reputation and may damage our
customers businesses. Interruptions in our services might
reduce our revenue, cause us to issue credits to customers,
subject us to potential liability, cause customers to terminate
their subscriptions or harm our renewal rates.
Our data centers are vulnerable to damage or interruption from
human error, intentional bad acts, pandemics, earthquakes,
hurricanes, floods, fires, war, terrorist attacks, power losses,
hardware failures, systems failures, telecommunications failures
and similar events. At least one of our data facilities is
located in an area known for seismic activity, increasing our
susceptibility to the risk that an earthquake could
significantly harm the operations of these facilities. The
occurrence of a natural disaster or an act of terrorism, or
vandalism or other misconduct, a decision to close the
facilities without adequate notice or other unanticipated
problems could result in lengthy interruptions in our services.
If the
security of our customers confidential information stored
in our systems is breached or otherwise subjected to
unauthorized access, our reputation may be harmed, and we may be
exposed to liability and a loss of customers.
Our system stores our customers confidential information,
including credit card information and other critical data. Any
accidental or willful security breaches or other unauthorized
access could expose us to liability for the loss of such
information, time-consuming and expensive litigation and other
possible liabilities as well as negative publicity. Techniques
used to obtain unauthorized access or to sabotage systems change
frequently and generally are difficult to recognize and react
to. We and our third-party data center facilities may be unable
to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate
preventative or reactionary measures.
In addition, many states have enacted laws requiring companies
to notify individuals of data security breaches involving their
personal data. These mandatory disclosures regarding a security
breach often lead to widespread negative publicity, which may
cause our customers to lose confidence in the effectiveness of
our data security measures. Any security breach, whether
successful or not, would harm our reputation, and it could cause
the loss of customers.
Failure
to comply with data protection standards may cause us to lose
the ability to offer our customers a credit card payment option
which would increase our costs of processing customer orders and
make our services less attractive to our customers, the majority
of which purchase our services with a credit card.
Major credit card issuers have adopted data protection standards
and have incorporated these standards into their contracts with
us. If we fail to maintain our compliance with the data
protection and documentation standards adopted by the major
credit card issuers and applicable to us, these issuers could
terminate their agreements with us, and we could lose our
ability to offer our customers a credit card payment option.
Most of our individual and SMB customers purchase our services
online with a credit card, and our business depends
substantially upon our ability to offer the credit card payment
option. Any loss of our ability to offer
15
our customers a credit card payment option would make our
services less attractive to them and hurt our business. Our
administrative costs related to customer payment processing
would also increase significantly if we were not able to accept
credit card payments for our services.
Failure
to effectively and efficiently service SMBs would adversely
affect our ability to increase our revenue.
We market and sell a significant amount of our services to SMBs.
SMBs are challenging to reach, acquire and retain in a
cost-effective manner. To grow our revenue quickly, we must add
new customers, sell additional services to existing customers
and encourage existing customers to renew their subscriptions.
Selling to and retaining SMBs is more difficult than selling to
and retaining large enterprise customers because SMB customers
generally:
|
|
|
|
|
have high failure rates;
|
|
|
|
are price sensitive;
|
|
|
|
are difficult to reach with targeted sales campaigns;
|
|
|
|
have high churn rates in part because of the scale of their
businesses and the ease of switching services; and
|
|
|
|
generate less revenues per customer and per transaction.
|
In addition, SMBs frequently have limited budgets and may choose
to spend funds on items other than our services. Moreover, SMBs
are more likely to be significantly affected by economic
downturns than larger, more established companies, and if these
organizations experience economic hardship, they may be
unwilling or unable to expend resources on IT.
If we are unable to market and sell our services to SMBs with
competitive pricing and in a cost-effective manner, our ability
to grow our revenue quickly and become profitable will be harmed.
We may
not be able to respond to rapid technological changes with new
services, which could have a material adverse effect on our
sales and profitability.
The on-demand, remote-connectivity solutions market is
characterized by rapid technological change, frequent new
service introductions and evolving industry standards. Our
ability to attract new customers and increase revenue from
existing customers will depend in large part on our ability to
enhance and improve our existing services, introduce new
services and sell into new markets. To achieve market acceptance
for our services, we must effectively anticipate and offer
services that meet changing customer demands in a timely manner.
Customers may require features and capabilities that our current
services do not have. If we fail to develop services that
satisfy customer preferences in a timely and cost-effective
manner, our ability to renew our services with existing
customers and our ability to create or increase demand for our
services will be harmed.
We may experience difficulties with software development,
industry standards, design or marketing that could delay or
prevent our development, introduction or implementation of new
services and enhancements. The introduction of new services by
competitors, the emergence of new industry standards or the
development of entirely new technologies to replace existing
service offerings could render our existing or future services
obsolete. If our services become obsolete due to wide-spread
adoption of alternative connectivity technologies such as other
Web-based computing solutions, our ability to generate revenue
may be impaired. In addition, any new markets into which we
attempt to sell our services, including new countries or
regions, may not be receptive.
If we are unable to successfully develop or acquire new
services, enhance our existing services to anticipate and meet
customer preferences or sell our services into new markets, our
revenue and results of operations would be adversely affected.
16
The
market in which we participate is competitive, with low barriers
to entry, and if we do not compete effectively, our operating
results may be harmed.
The markets for remote-connectivity solutions are competitive
and rapidly changing, with relatively low barriers to entry.
With the introduction of new technologies and market entrants,
we expect competition to intensify in the future. In addition,
pricing pressures and increased competition generally could
result in reduced sales, reduced margins or the failure of our
services to achieve or maintain widespread market acceptance.
Often we compete against existing services that our potential
customers have already made significant expenditures to acquire
and implement.
Certain of our competitors offer, or may in the future offer,
lower priced, or free, products or services that compete with
our solutions. This competition may result in reduced prices and
a substantial loss of customers for our solutions or a reduction
in our revenue.
We compete with Citrix Systems, WebEx (a division of Cisco
Systems) and others. Certain of our solutions, including our
free remote access service, also compete with current or
potential services offered by Microsoft and Apple. Many of our
actual and potential competitors enjoy competitive advantages
over us, such as greater name recognition, longer operating
histories, more varied services and larger marketing budgets, as
well as greater financial, technical and other resources. In
addition, many of our competitors have established marketing
relationships and access to larger customer bases, and have
major distribution agreements with consultants, system
integrators and resellers. If we are not able to compete
effectively, our operating results will be harmed.
Industry
consolidation may result in increased competition.
Some of our competitors have made or may make acquisitions or
may enter into partnerships or other strategic relationships to
offer a more comprehensive service than they individually had
offered. In addition, new entrants not currently considered to
be competitors may enter the market through acquisitions,
partnerships or strategic relationships. We expect these trends
to continue as companies attempt to strengthen or maintain their
market positions. Many of the companies driving this trend have
significantly greater financial, technical and other resources
than we do and may be better positioned to acquire and offer
complementary services and technologies. The companies resulting
from such combinations may create more compelling service
offerings and may offer greater pricing flexibility than we can
or may engage in business practices that make it more difficult
for us to compete effectively, including on the basis of price,
sales and marketing programs, technology or service
functionality. These pressures could result in a substantial
loss of customers or a reduction in our revenues.
Original
equipment manufacturers may adopt solutions provided by our
competitors.
Original equipment manufacturers may in the future seek to build
the capability for on-demand, remote-connectivity solutions into
their products. We may compete with our competitors to sell our
services to, or partner with, these manufacturers. Our ability
to attract and partner with these manufacturers will, in large
part, depend on the competitiveness of our services. If we fail
to attract or partner with, or our competitors are successful in
attracting or partnering with, these manufacturers, our revenue
and results of operations would be affected adversely.
Our
quarterly operating results may fluctuate in the future. As a
result, we may fail to meet or exceed the expectations of
research analysts or investors, which could cause our stock
price to decline.
Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate as a result of a
variety of factors, many of which are outside of our control. If
our quarterly operating results or guidance fall below the
expectations of research analysts or investors, the price of our
common stock could decline substantially. Fluctuations in our
quarterly operating results or guidance may be due to a number
of factors, including, but not limited to, those listed below:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to renew existing customers, increase sales to
existing customers and attract new customers;
|
|
|
|
the amount and timing of operating costs and capital
expenditures related to the operation, maintenance and expansion
of our business;
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
service outages or security breaches;
|
|
|
|
whether we meet the service level commitments in our agreements
with our customers;
|
|
|
|
changes in our pricing policies or those of our competitors;
|
|
|
|
the timing and success of new application and service
introductions and upgrades by us or our competitors;
|
|
|
|
changes in sales compensation plans or organizational structure;
|
|
|
|
the timing of costs related to the development or acquisition of
technologies, services or businesses;
|
|
|
|
seasonal variations or other cyclicality in the demand for our
services;
|
|
|
|
general economic, industry and market conditions and those
conditions specific to Internet usage and online businesses;
|
|
|
|
the purchasing and budgeting cycles of our customers;
|
|
|
|
the financial condition of our customers; and
|
|
|
|
geopolitical events such as war, threat of war or terrorist acts.
|
We believe that our quarterly revenue and operating results may
vary significantly in the future and that
period-to-period
comparisons of our operating results may not be meaningful. You
should not rely on past results as an indication of future
performance.
If our
services are used to commit fraud or other similar intentional
or illegal acts, we may incur significant liabilities, our
services may be perceived as not secure and customers may
curtail or stop using our services.
Our services enable direct remote access to third-party computer
systems. We do not control the use or content of information
accessed by our customers through our services. If our services
are used to commit fraud or other bad or illegal acts, such as
posting, distributing or transmitting any software or other
computer files that contain a virus or other harmful component,
interfering or disrupting third-party networks, infringing any
third partys copyright, patent, trademark, trade secret or
other proprietary rights or rights of publicity or privacy,
transmitting any unlawful, harassing, libelous, abusive,
threatening, vulgar or otherwise objectionable material, or
accessing unauthorized third-party data, we may become subject
to claims for defamation, negligence, intellectual property
infringement or other matters. As a result, defending such
claims could be expensive and time-consuming, and we could incur
significant liability to our customers and to individuals or
businesses who were the targets of such acts. As a result, our
business may suffer and our reputation will be damaged.
We
provide minimum service level commitments to some of our
customers, the failure of which to meet could cause us to issue
credits for future services or pay penalties, which could
significantly harm our revenue.
Some of our customer agreements now, and may in the future,
provide minimum service level commitments regarding items such
as uptime, functionality or performance. If we are unable to
meet the stated service level commitments for these customers or
suffer extended periods of unavailability for our service, we
are or may be contractually obligated to provide these customers
with credits for future services or pay other penalties. Our
revenue could be significantly impacted if we are unable to meet
our service level commitments and are required to provide a
significant amount of our services at no cost or pay other
penalties. We do not currently have any reserves on our balance
sheet for these commitments.
18
We
have experienced rapid growth in recent periods. If we fail to
manage our growth effectively, we may be unable to execute our
business plan, maintain high levels of service or address
competitive challenges adequately.
We increased our revenue from $51.7 million in 2008 to
$74.4 million in 2009 and to $101.1 million in 2010.
Our growth has placed, and may continue to place, a significant
strain on our managerial, administrative, operational, financial
and other resources. We intend to further expand our overall
business, customer base, headcount and operations both
domestically and internationally. Creating a global organization
and managing a geographically dispersed workforce will require
substantial management effort and significant additional
investment in our infrastructure. We will be required to
continue to improve our operational, financial and management
controls and our reporting procedures and we may not be able to
do so effectively. As such, we may be unable to manage our
expenses effectively in the future, which may negatively impact
our gross profit or operating expenses in any particular quarter.
If we
do not effectively expand and train our work force, our future
operating results will suffer.
We plan to continue to expand our work force both domestically
and internationally to increase our customer base and revenue.
We believe that there is significant competition for qualified
personnel with the skills and technical knowledge that we
require. Our ability to achieve significant revenue growth will
depend, in large part, on our success in recruiting, training
and retaining sufficient numbers of personnel to support our
growth. New hires require significant training and, in most
cases, take significant time before they achieve full
productivity. Our recent hires and planned hires may not become
as productive as we expect, and we may be unable to hire or
retain sufficient numbers of qualified individuals. If our
recruiting, training and retention efforts are not successful or
do not generate a corresponding increase in revenue, our
business will be harmed.
Our
sales cycles for enterprise customers, currently approximately
10% of our overall sales, can be long, unpredictable and require
considerable time and expense, which may cause our operating
results to fluctuate.
The timing of our revenue from sales to enterprise customers is
difficult to predict. These efforts require us to educate our
customers about the use and benefit of our services, including
the technical capabilities and potential cost savings to an
organization. Enterprise customers typically undertake a
significant evaluation process that has in the past resulted in
a lengthy sales cycle, typically several months. We spend
substantial time, effort and money on our enterprise sales
efforts without any assurance that our efforts will produce any
sales. In addition, service subscriptions are frequently subject
to budget constraints and unplanned administrative, processing
and other delays. If sales expected from a specific customer for
a particular quarter are not realized in that quarter or at all,
our results could fall short of public expectations and our
business, operating results and financial condition could be
adversely affected.
Our
long-term success depends, in part, on our ability to expand the
sales of our services to customers located outside of the United
States, and thus our business is susceptible to risks associated
with international sales and operations.
We currently maintain offices and have sales personnel or
independent consultants outside of the United States and
are expanding our international operations. Our international
expansion efforts may not be successful. In addition, conducting
international operations subjects us to new risks that we have
not generally faced in the United States.
These risks include:
|
|
|
|
|
localization of our services, including translation into foreign
languages and adaptation for local practices and regulatory
requirements;
|
|
|
|
lack of familiarity with and unexpected changes in foreign
regulatory requirements;
|
|
|
|
longer accounts receivable payment cycles and difficulties in
collecting accounts receivable;
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
difficulties in managing and staffing international operations;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in currency exchange rates;
|
|
|
|
potentially adverse tax consequences, including the complexities
of foreign value added or other tax systems and restrictions on
the repatriation of earnings;
|
|
|
|
dependence on certain third parties, including channel partners
with whom we do not have extensive experience;
|
|
|
|
the burdens of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws and
legal standards;
|
|
|
|
increased financial accounting and reporting burdens and
complexities;
|
|
|
|
political, social and economic instability abroad, terrorist
attacks and security concerns in general; and
|
|
|
|
reduced or varied protection for intellectual property rights in
some countries.
|
Operating in international markets also requires significant
management attention and financial resources. The investment and
additional resources required to establish operations and manage
growth in other countries may not produce desired levels of
revenue or profitability.
Our
success depends on our customers continued high-speed
access to the Internet and the continued reliability of the
Internet infrastructure.
Because our services are designed to work over the Internet, our
revenue growth depends on our customers high-speed access
to the Internet, as well as the continued maintenance and
development of the Internet infrastructure. The future delivery
of our services will depend on third-party Internet service
providers to expand high-speed Internet access, to maintain a
reliable network with the necessary speed, data capacity and
security, and to develop complementary products and services,
including high-speed modems, for providing reliable and timely
Internet access and services. The success of our business
depends directly on the continued accessibility, maintenance and
improvement of the Internet as a convenient means of customer
interaction, as well as an efficient medium for the delivery and
distribution of information by businesses to their employees.
All of these factors are out of our control.
To the extent that the Internet continues to experience
increased numbers of users, frequency of use or bandwidth
requirements, the Internet may become congested and be unable to
support the demands placed on it, and its performance or
reliability may decline. Any future Internet outages or delays
could adversely affect our ability to provide services to our
customers.
Our
success depends in large part on our ability to protect and
enforce our intellectual property rights.
We rely on a combination of copyright, service mark, trademark
and trade secret laws, as well as confidentiality procedures and
contractual restrictions, to establish and protect our
proprietary rights, all of which provide only limited
protection. In addition, we have one issued patent and three
patents pending, and we are in the process of filing additional
patents. We cannot assure you that any patents will issue from
our currently pending patent applications in a manner that gives
us the protection that we seek, if at all, or that any future
patents issued to us will not be challenged, invalidated or
circumvented. Any patents that may issue in the future from
pending or future patent applications may not provide
sufficiently broad protection or they may not prove to be
enforceable in actions against alleged infringers. Also, we
cannot assure you that any future service mark or trademark
registrations will be issued for pending or future applications
or that any registered service marks or trademarks will be
enforceable or provide adequate protection of our proprietary
rights.
We endeavor to enter into agreements with our employees and
contractors and agreements with parties with whom we do business
to limit access to and disclosure of our proprietary
information. The steps we have taken, however, may not prevent
unauthorized use or the reverse engineering of our technology.
Moreover, others may independently develop technologies that are
competitive to ours or infringe our intellectual
20
property. Enforcement of our intellectual property rights also
depends on our successful legal actions against these
infringers, but these actions may not be successful, even when
our rights have been infringed.
Furthermore, effective patent, trademark, service mark,
copyright and trade secret protection may not be available in
every country in which our services are available. In addition,
the legal standards relating to the validity, enforceability and
scope of protection of intellectual property rights in
Internet-related industries are uncertain and still evolving.
Our
use of open source software could negatively affect
our ability to sell our services and subject us to possible
litigation.
A portion of the technologies licensed by us incorporate
so-called open source software, and we may
incorporate open source software in the future. Such open source
software is generally licensed by its authors or other third
parties under open source licenses. If we fail to comply with
these licenses, we may be subject to certain conditions,
including requirements that we offer our services that
incorporate the open source software for no cost, that we make
available source code for modifications or derivative works we
create based upon, incorporating or using the open source
software
and/or that
we license such modifications or derivative works under the
terms of the particular open source license. If an author or
other third party that distributes such open source software
were to allege that we had not complied with the conditions of
one or more of these licenses, we could be required to incur
significant legal expenses defending against such allegations
and could be subject to significant damages, enjoined from the
sale of our services that contained the open source software and
required to comply with the foregoing conditions, which could
disrupt the distribution and sale of some of our services.
We
rely on third-party software, including server software and
licenses from third parties to use patented intellectual
property that is required for the development of our services,
which may be difficult to obtain or which could cause errors or
failures of our services.
We rely on software licensed from third parties to offer our
services, including server software from Microsoft and patented
third-party technology. In addition, we may need to obtain
future licenses from third parties to use intellectual property
associated with the development of our services, which might not
be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. Any loss of
the right to use any software required for the development and
maintenance of our services could result in delays in the
provision of our services until equivalent technology is either
developed by us, or, if available, is identified, obtained and
integrated, which could harm our business. Any errors or defects
in third-party software could result in errors or a failure of
our services which could harm our business.
If we
fail to maintain proper and effective internal controls, our
ability to produce accurate and timely financial statements
could be impaired, which could harm our operating results, our
ability to operate our business and investors views of
us.
Ensuring that we have adequate internal financial and accounting
controls and procedures in place so that we can produce accurate
financial statements on a timely basis is a costly and
time-consuming effort. Our internal controls over financial
reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles in the United States of America.
In addition, Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, requires an annual management
assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls over
financial reporting and a report from our independent registered
public accounting firm addressing the effectiveness of our
internal controls over financial reporting. We have documented,
tested and improved, to the extent necessary, our internal
controls over financial reporting for the year ended
December 31, 2010. If in the future we are not able to
comply with the requirements of Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act in a timely manner, or if as part of our
process of documenting and testing our internal controls over
financial reporting, we or our independent registered public
accounting firm identify deficiencies or areas for further
attention and improvement, implementing appropriate changes to
our internal controls may distract our officers and employees,
entail substantial costs to modify our existing processes and
take
21
significant time to complete. These changes may not, however, be
effective in maintaining the adequacy of our internal controls,
and any failure to maintain that adequacy, or consequent
inability to produce accurate financial statements on a timely
basis, could increase our operating costs and harm our business.
In addition, investors perceptions that our internal
controls are inadequate or that we are unable to produce
accurate financial statements on a timely basis may harm our
stock price and make it more difficult for us to effectively
market and sell our services to new and existing customers.
Material
defects or errors in the software we use to deliver our services
could harm our reputation, result in significant costs to us and
impair our ability to sell our services.
The software applications underlying our services are inherently
complex and may contain material defects or errors, particularly
when first introduced or when new versions or enhancements are
released. We have from time to time found defects in our
services, and new errors in our existing services may be
detected in the future. Any defects that cause interruptions to
the availability of our services could result in:
|
|
|
|
|
a reduction in sales or delay in market acceptance of our
services;
|
|
|
|
sales credits or refunds to our customers;
|
|
|
|
loss of existing customers and difficulty in attracting new
customers;
|
|
|
|
diversion of development resources;
|
|
|
|
harm to our reputation; and
|
|
|
|
increased insurance costs.
|
After the release of our services, defects or errors may also be
identified from time to time by our internal team and by our
customers. The costs incurred in correcting any material defects
or errors in our services may be substantial and could harm our
operating results.
Government
regulation of the Internet and
e-commerce
and of the international exchange of certain technologies is
subject to possible unfavorable changes, and our failure to
comply with applicable regulations could harm our business and
operating results.
As Internet commerce continues to evolve, increasing regulation
by federal, state or foreign governments becomes more likely.
For example, we believe increased regulation is likely in the
area of data privacy, and laws and regulations applying to the
solicitation, collection, processing or use of personal or
consumer information could affect our customers ability to
use and share data, potentially reducing demand for our products
and services. In addition, taxation of products and services
provided over the Internet or other charges imposed by
government agencies or by private organizations for accessing
the Internet may also be imposed. Any regulation imposing
greater fees for Internet use or restricting the exchange of
information over the Internet could result in reduced growth or
a decline in the use of the Internet and could diminish the
viability of our Internet-based services, which could harm our
business and operating results.
Our software products contain encryption technologies, certain
types of which are subject to U.S. and foreign export
control regulations and, in some foreign countries, restrictions
on importation
and/or use.
We have submitted our encryption products for technical review
under U.S. export regulations and have received the
necessary approvals. Any failure on our part to comply with
encryption or other applicable export control requirements could
result in financial penalties or other sanctions under the
U.S. export regulations, which could harm our business and
operating results. Foreign regulatory restrictions could impair
our access to technologies that we seek for improving our
products and services and may also limit or reduce the demand
for our products and services outside of the United States.
22
Our
operating results may be harmed if we are required to collect
sales or other related taxes for our subscription services in
jurisdictions where we have not historically done
so.
Primarily due to the nature of our services in certain states
and countries, we do not believe we are required to collect
sales or other related taxes from our customers in certain
states or countries. However, one or more other states or
countries may seek to impose sales or other tax collection
obligations on us, including for past sales by us or our
resellers and other partners. A successful assertion that we
should be collecting sales or other related taxes on our
services could result in substantial tax liabilities for past
sales, discourage customers from purchasing our services or
otherwise harm our business and operating results.
The
loss of key personnel or an inability to attract and retain
additional personnel may impair our ability to grow our
business.
We are highly dependent upon the continued service and
performance of our senior management team and key technical and
sales personnel, including our President and Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Technical Officer.
These officers are not party to an employment agreement with us,
and they may terminate employment with us at any time with no
advance notice. The replacement of these officers likely would
involve significant time and costs, and the loss of these
officers may significantly delay or prevent the achievement of
our business objectives.
We face intense competition for qualified individuals from
numerous technology, software and manufacturing companies. For
example, our competitors may be able attract and retain a more
qualified engineering team by offering more competitive
compensation packages. If we are unable to attract new engineers
and retain our current engineers, we may not be able to develop
and maintain our services at the same levels as our competitors
and we may, therefore, lose potential customers and sales
penetration in certain markets. Our failure to attract and
retain suitably qualified individuals could have an adverse
effect on our ability to implement our business plan and, as a
result, our ability to compete would decrease, our operating
results would suffer and our revenues would decrease.
Adverse
economic conditions or reduced IT spending may adversely impact
our revenues and profitability.
Our business depends on the overall demand for IT and on the
economic health of our current and prospective customers. The
use of our service is often discretionary and may involve a
commitment of capital and other resources. Weak economic
conditions, or a reduction in IT spending even if economic
conditions improve, would likely adversely impact our business,
operating results and financial condition in a number of ways,
including by lengthening sales cycles, lowering prices for our
services and reducing sales.
Our
limited operating history makes it difficult to evaluate our
current business and future prospects.
Our company has been in existence since 2003, and much of our
growth has occurred in recent periods. Our limited operating
history may make it difficult for you to evaluate our current
business and our future prospects. We have encountered and will
continue to encounter risks and difficulties frequently
experienced by growing companies in rapidly changing industries,
including increasing expenses as we continue to grow our
business. If we do not manage these risks successfully, our
business will be harmed.
Our
business is substantially dependent on market demand for, and
acceptance of, the on-demand model for the use of
software.
We derive, and expect to continue to derive, substantially all
of our revenue from the sale of on-demand solutions. As a
result, widespread acceptance and use of the on-demand business
model is critical to our future growth and success. Under the
perpetual or periodic license model for software procurement,
users of the software typically run applications on their
hardware. Because companies are generally predisposed to
maintaining control of their IT systems and infrastructure,
there may be resistance to the concept of accessing the
functionality that software provides as a service through a
third party. If the market for on-demand,
23
software solutions fails to grow or grows more slowly than we
currently anticipate, demand for our services could be
negatively affected.
RISKS
RELATED TO OWNERSHIP OF OUR COMMON STOCK
Our
failure to raise additional capital or generate the cash flows
necessary to expand our operations and invest in our services
could reduce our ability to compete successfully.
We may need to raise additional funds, and we may not be able to
obtain additional debt or equity financing on favorable terms,
if at all. If we raise additional equity financing, our
stockholders may experience significant dilution of their
ownership interests, and the per share value of our common stock
could decline. If we engage in debt financing, we may be
required to accept terms that restrict our ability to incur
additional indebtedness and force us to maintain specified
liquidity or other ratios. If we need additional capital and
cannot raise it on acceptable terms, we may not be able to,
among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
develop or enhance our services;
|
|
|
|
continue to expand our development, sales and marketing
organizations;
|
|
|
|
acquire complementary technologies, products or businesses;
|
|
|
|
expand our operations, in the United States or internationally;
|
|
|
|
hire, train and retain employees; or
|
|
|
|
respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated working
capital requirements.
|
Our
stock price may be volatile, and the market price of our common
stock may drop in the future.
Prior to the completion of our initial public offering, or IPO,
in July 2009, there was no public market for shares of our
common stock. During the period from our IPO until February 28,
2011, our common stock has traded as high as $47.54 and as low
as $15.15. An active, liquid and orderly market for our common
stock may not develop or be sustained, which could depress the
trading price of our common stock. Some of the factors that may
cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate include:
|
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in our quarterly financial results or the quarterly
financial results of companies perceived to be similar to us;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in our recorded revenue, even during periods of
significant sales order activity;
|
|
|
|
changes in estimates of our financial results or recommendations
by securities analysts;
|
|
|
|
failure of any of our services to achieve or maintain market
acceptance;
|
|
|
|
changes in market valuations of similar companies;
|
|
|
|
success of competitive products or services;
|
|
|
|
changes in our capital structure, such as future issuances of
securities or the incurrence of debt;
|
|
|
|
announcements by us or our competitors of significant services,
contracts, acquisitions or strategic alliances;
|
|
|
|
regulatory developments in the United States, foreign countries
or both;
|
|
|
|
litigation involving our company, our general industry or both;
|
|
|
|
additions or departures of key personnel;
|
|
|
|
general perception of the future of the remote-connectivity
market or our services;
|
|
|
|
investors general perception of us; and
|
|
|
|
changes in general economic, industry and market conditions.
|
24
In addition, if the market for technology stocks or the stock
market in general experiences a loss of investor confidence, the
trading price of our common stock could decline for reasons
unrelated to our business, financial condition or results of
operations. If any of the foregoing occurs, it could cause our
stock price to fall and may expose us to class action lawsuits
that, even if unsuccessful, could be costly to defend and a
distraction to management.
A
significant portion of our total outstanding shares may be sold
into the public market in the near future, which could cause the
market price of our common stock to drop significantly, even if
our business is doing well.
If our existing stockholders sell a large number of shares of
our common stock or the public market perceives that such
existing stockholders might sell shares of common stock, the
trading price of our common stock could decline significantly.
If
securities or industry analysts do not publish or cease
publishing research or reports about us, our business or our
market, or if they change their recommendations regarding our
stock adversely, our stock price and trading volume could
decline.
The trading market for our common stock is influenced by the
research and reports that industry or securities analysts
publish about us, our business, our market or our competitors.
If any of the analysts who cover us or may cover us in the
future change their recommendation regarding our stock
adversely, or provide more favorable relative recommendations
about our competitors, our stock price would likely decline. If
any analyst who covers us or may cover us in the future were to
cease coverage of our company or fail to regularly publish
reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial
markets, which in turn could cause our stock price or trading
volume to decline.
Our
management has broad discretion over the use of our existing
cash resources and might not use such funds in ways that
increase the value of our common stock.
Our management will continue to have broad discretion to use our
cash resources. Our management might not apply these cash
resources in ways that increase the value of our common stock.
We do
not expect to declare any dividends in the foreseeable
future.
We do not anticipate declaring any cash dividends to holders of
our common stock in the foreseeable future. Consequently,
stockholders must rely on sales of their common stock after
price appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to
realize any future gains on the value of their shares of our
common stock.
As a
newly public company, we incur significant additional costs
which could harm our operating results.
As a newly public company, we incur significant additional
legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a
private company, including costs associated with public company
reporting requirements.
We also have incurred and will continue to incur costs
associated with current corporate governance requirements,
including requirements under Section 404 and other
provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as well as rules
implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC,
and The NASDAQ Global Market. The expenses incurred by public
companies for reporting and corporate governance purposes have
increased dramatically. We expect these rules and regulations to
substantially increase our legal and financial compliance costs
and to make some activities more time-consuming and costly. We
also expect these new rules and regulations may make it more
difficult and more expensive for us to maintain director and
officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept
reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher
costs to obtain the same or similar coverage previously
available. As a result, it may be more difficult for us to
attract and retain qualified individuals to serve on our board
of directors or as our executive officers.
25
Anti-takeover
provisions contained in our certificate of incorporation and
bylaws, as well as provisions of Delaware law, could impair a
takeover attempt.
Our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and Delaware law
contain provisions that could have the effect of rendering more
difficult or discouraging an acquisition deemed undesirable by
our board of directors. Our corporate governance documents
include provisions:
|
|
|
|
|
authorizing blank check preferred stock, which could be issued
with voting, liquidation, dividend and other rights superior to
our common stock;
|
|
|
|
limiting the liability of, and providing indemnification to, our
directors and officers;
|
|
|
|
limiting the ability of our stockholders to call and bring
business before special meetings and to take action by written
consent in lieu of a meeting;
|
|
|
|
requiring advance notice of stockholder proposals for business
to be conducted at meetings of our stockholders and for
nominations of candidates for election to our board of directors;
|
|
|
|
controlling the procedures for the conduct and scheduling of
board of directors and stockholder meetings;
|
|
|
|
providing the board of directors with the express power to
postpone previously scheduled annual meetings and to cancel
previously scheduled special meetings;
|
|
|
|
limiting the determination of the number of directors on our
board of directors and the filling of vacancies or newly created
seats on the board to our board of directors then in
office; and
|
|
|
|
providing that directors may be removed by stockholders only for
cause.
|
These provisions, alone or together, could delay hostile
takeovers and changes in control of our company or changes in
our management.
As a Delaware corporation, we are also subject to provisions of
Delaware law, including Section 203 of the Delaware General
Corporation law, which prevents some stockholders holding more
than 15% of our outstanding common stock from engaging in
certain business combinations without approval of the holders of
substantially all of our outstanding common stock. Any provision
of our certificate of incorporation or bylaws or Delaware law
that has the effect of delaying or deterring a change in control
could limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a
premium for their shares of our common stock, and could also
affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for our
common stock.
|
|
ITEM 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
None.
Our principal facilities consist of approximately
45,813 square feet of office space located at 500 Unicorn
Park Drive, Woburn, Massachusetts, and approximately
25,200 square feet of space at our development facility
located in Hungary. We also have leased additional office space
in Hungary, The Netherlands, Australia and England. We believe
our facilities are sufficient to support our needs through 2011
and that additional space will be available in the future on
commercially reasonable terms as needed.
We also lease space in four data centers operated by third
parties, of which three are located in the United States
and the fourth is located in Europe.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
On September 8, 2010, 01 Communique Laboratory, Inc., or
01, filed a complaint that named us as a defendant in a lawsuit
in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Virginia (Civil Action No. 1:10cv1007). We received service
of the complaint on September 10, 2010. The complaint
alleges that we
26
have infringed U.S. Patent No. 6,928,479, which
allegedly is owned by 01 and has claims directed to a particular
application or system for providing a private communication
portal from one computer to a second computer. The complaint
seeks damages in an unspecified amount and injunctive relief. As
of February 28, 2011, the case remains in the discovery
phase and both parties have made various motions before the
court. A trial is tentatively scheduled for the second quarter
of 2011. We believe we have strong defenses to the claims and
intend to defend the lawsuit vigorously.
On November 3, 2010, Gemini IP LLC, or Gemini, filed a
complaint that named us as a defendant in a lawsuit in the
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
(Civil Action
No. 4:07-cv-521).
We received service of the complaint on November 10, 2010.
The complaint alleges that we have infringed U.S. Patent
No. 6,117,932, which allegedly is owned by Gemini and has
claims related to a system for operating an IT helpdesk. The
complaint seeks damages in an unspecified amount and injunctive
relief. We believe we have meritorious defenses to the claims
and intend to defend the lawsuit vigorously.
We are from time to time subject to various other legal
proceedings and claims, either asserted or unasserted, which
arise in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of
these other claims cannot be predicted with certainty,
management does not believe that the outcome of any of these
other legal matters will have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated financial statements.
27
PART II
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Certain
Information Regarding the Trading of Our Common Stock
Our common stock began trading under the symbol LOGM
on the NASDAQ Global Market on July 1, 2009. Prior to that
date, there was no established public trading market for our
common stock. The following table sets forth, for the periods
indicated, the high and low sale price per share of our common
stock on the NASDAQ Global Market:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
20.99
|
|
|
$
|
15.15
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
23.50
|
|
|
$
|
16.59
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
21.05
|
|
|
$
|
16.71
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
29.99
|
|
|
$
|
20.02
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
38.62
|
|
|
$
|
24.82
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
47.54
|
|
|
$
|
33.00
|
|
Holders
of Our Common Stock
As of February 22, 2011, there were 20 holders of record of
shares of our common stock.
Dividends
We have never declared or paid dividends on our common stock. We
currently intend to retain any future earnings to finance our
research and development efforts, improvements to our existing
services, the development of our proprietary technologies and
the expansion of our business. We do not intend to declare or
pay cash dividends on our capital stock in the foreseeable
future. Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the
discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon a
number of factors, including our results of operations,
financial condition, future prospects, contractual restrictions,
restrictions imposed by applicable law and other factors our
board of directors deems relevant.
Recent
Sales of Unregistered Securities; Use of Proceeds from
Registered Securities
(a) Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
We did not sell any unregistered securities during the year
ended December 31, 2010.
(b) Use of Proceeds from Public Offerings of Common Stock
On July 7, 2009, we closed our IPO, in which
7,666,667 shares of common stock were sold at a price to
the public of $16.00 per share. We sold 5,750,000 shares of
our common stock in the offering and selling stockholders sold
1,916,667 of the shares of common stock in the offering. The
aggregate offering price for all shares sold in the offering,
including shares sold by us and the selling stockholders, was
$122.7 million. The offer and sale of all of the shares in
the IPO were registered under the Securities Act pursuant to a
registration statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-148620),
which was declared effective by the SEC on June 30, 2009.
J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc. and Barclays Capital, Inc.
served as representatives of the several underwriters in this
offering. We raised approximately $82.9 million in net
proceeds after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions
of $6.4 million and other estimated offering costs of
$2.7 million. No payments were made by us to directors,
officers or persons owning ten percent or more of our common
stock or to their associates, or to our affiliates, other than
payments in the ordinary course of business to officers for
salaries and to non-employee directors as compensation for board
or board committee service, or as a result of sales of shares of
common stock by selling stockholders in the offering. From the
effective date of the registration statement through
December 31, 2010, we have not used any of the net proceeds
of the IPO. We intend to use the net proceeds for
28
general corporate purposes, including financing our growth,
developing new products, acquiring new customers, funding
capital expenditures and, potentially, the acquisition of, or
investment in, businesses, technologies, products or assets that
complement our business. Pending these uses, we have invested
the funds in a registered money market fund and marketable
securities. There has been no material change in the planned use
of proceeds from our IPO as described in our final prospectus
filed with the SEC pursuant to Rule 424(b).
On November 19, 2009, we closed a secondary public offering
of our common stock. On December 16, 2009, we closed the
sale of additional shares of common stock issued in the offering
upon the exercise of the underwriters over-allotment
option. In aggregate, a total of 3,326,609 shares of common
stock were sold at a price to the public of $18.50 per share.
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Barclays Capital Inc.
served as representatives of the several underwriters for the
offering. We sold 99,778 shares of our common stock in the
offering and selling stockholders sold an additional
3,226,831 shares of common stock in the offering. The
aggregate offering price for all shares sold in the offering,
including shares sold by us and the selling stockholders, was
$61.5 million. The offer and sale of all of the shares in
the secondary offering were registered under the Securities Act
pursuant to a registration statement on Form
S-1 (File
No. 333-162936),
which was declared effective by the SEC on November 19,
2009. We raised approximately $1.2 million in net proceeds
after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions of
$0.1 million and other estimated offering costs of
$0.5 million. No payments were made by us to directors,
officers or persons owning ten percent or more of our common
stock or to their associates, or to our affiliates, other than
payments in the ordinary course of business to officers for
salaries and to non-employee directors as compensation for board
or board committee service, or as a result of sales of shares of
common stock by selling stockholders in the offering. From the
effective date of the registration statement through
December 31, 2010, we have not used any of the of the net
proceeds received from our secondary public offering. We intend
to use the net proceeds for general corporate purposes,
including financing our growth, developing new products,
acquiring new customers, funding capital expenditures and,
potentially, the acquisition of, or investment in, businesses,
technologies, products or assets that complement our business.
There has been no material change in the planned use of proceeds
from our secondary public offering as described in our final
prospectus filed with the SEC pursuant to Rule 424(b).
Securities
Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation
Plans
Information regarding our equity compensation plans and the
securities authorized for issuance thereunder is set forth
herein under Part III, Item 12 below.
29
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
You should read the following selected financial data together
with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes
appearing at the end of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and the Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Our historical results for any prior period are not necessarily
indicative of results to be expected in any future period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except for per share data)
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
11,307
|
|
|
$
|
26,998
|
|
|
$
|
51,723
|
|
|
$
|
74,408
|
|
|
$
|
101,057
|
|
Cost of revenue(1)
|
|
|
2,033
|
|
|
|
3,925
|
|
|
|
5,970
|
|
|
|
7,508
|
|
|
|
9,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
9,274
|
|
|
|
23,073
|
|
|
|
45,753
|
|
|
|
66,900
|
|
|
|
91,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development(1)
|
|
|
3,232
|
|
|
|
6,661
|
|
|
|
11,997
|
|
|
|
13,149
|
|
|
|
15,214
|
|
Sales and marketing(1)
|
|
|
10,050
|
|
|
|
19,488
|
|
|
|
31,631
|
|
|
|
35,821
|
|
|
|
45,869
|
|
General and administrative(1)
|
|
|
2,945
|
|
|
|
3,611
|
|
|
|
6,583
|
|
|
|
8,297
|
|
|
|
12,319
|
|
Legal settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,225
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of acquired intangibles(1)
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
16,368
|
|
|
|
32,313
|
|
|
|
51,139
|
|
|
|
57,595
|
|
|
|
73,740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(7,094
|
)
|
|
|
(9,240
|
)
|
|
|
(5,386
|
)
|
|
|
9,305
|
|
|
|
18,193
|
|
Interest, net
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
634
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
(294
|
)
|
|
|
(219
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(6,701
|
)
|
|
|
(9,005
|
)
|
|
|
(5,280
|
)
|
|
|
9,139
|
|
|
|
18,608
|
|
Benefit (provision) for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
(342
|
)
|
|
|
2,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(6,701
|
)
|
|
|
(9,055
|
)
|
|
|
(5,402
|
)
|
|
|
8,797
|
|
|
|
21,099
|
|
Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
(1,790
|
)
|
|
|
(1,919
|
)
|
|
|
(2,348
|
)
|
|
|
(1,311
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(8,491
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,974
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,750
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,486
|
|
|
$
|
21,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(2.47
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.98
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.97
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
$
|
0.91
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(2.47
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.98
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.97
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
3,434
|
|
|
|
3,686
|
|
|
|
3,933
|
|
|
|
12,990
|
|
|
|
23,244
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
3,434
|
|
|
|
3,686
|
|
|
|
3,933
|
|
|
|
14,835
|
|
|
|
24,840
|
|
30
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes stock-based compensation expense and intangible
amortization expense as indicated in the following table: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cost of revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
$
|
261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible amortization
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
537
|
|
|
|
638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
962
|
|
|
|
932
|
|
|
|
1,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
1,304
|
|
|
|
1,399
|
|
|
|
2,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of acquired intangibles:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible amortization
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009(1)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities
|
|
$
|
7,983
|
|
|
$
|
18,676
|
|
|
$
|
22,913
|
|
|
$
|
130,246
|
|
|
$
|
167,424
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
14,656
|
|
|
|
28,302
|
|
|
|
37,415
|
|
|
|
142,859
|
|
|
|
186,677
|
|
Deferred revenue, including long-term portion
|
|
|
7,288
|
|
|
|
16,104
|
|
|
|
28,358
|
|
|
|
34,103
|
|
|
|
42,793
|
|
Long-term debt, including current portion
|
|
|
2,281
|
|
|
|
1,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
11,615
|
|
|
|
23,238
|
|
|
|
35,191
|
|
|
|
44,349
|
|
|
|
56,299
|
|
Redeemable convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
20,596
|
|
|
|
32,495
|
|
|
|
34,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity (deficit)
|
|
|
(17,554
|
)
|
|
|
(27,431
|
)
|
|
|
(32,619
|
)
|
|
|
98,509
|
|
|
|
130,378
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Comparability affected by proceeds received from our 2009 public
offerings. |
31
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our
financial condition and results of operations together with our
consolidated financial statements and the related notes and
other financial information included elsewhere in this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K.
Some of the information contained in this discussion and
analysis or set forth elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
including information with respect to our plans and strategy for
our business and related financing, includes forward-looking
statements that involve risks and uncertainties. You should
review the Risk Factors section of this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for a discussion of important factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially from the results described in or
implied by the forward-looking statements contained in the
following discussion and analysis.
Overview
LogMeIn provides SaaS-based, on-demand, remote-connectivity,
collaboration and support solutions to SMBs, IT service
providers, mobile carriers, and consumers. Businesses and IT
service providers use our solutions to deliver remote, end-user
support and to access and manage computers and other
Internet-enabled devices more effectively and efficiently from a
remote location, or remotely. Consumers and mobile workers use
our remote connectivity solutions to access computer resources
remotely and to collaborate with other users, thereby
facilitating their mobility and increasing their productivity.
SMBs and mobile professionals use our solutions to meet online
and quickly collaborate on projects. Our solutions, which are
deployed and accessed from anywhere through a web browser, or
on-demand, are secure, scalable and easy for our customers to
try, purchase and use.
We offer three free services and nine premium services. Sales of
our premium services are generated through
word-of-mouth
referrals, web-based advertising, expiring free trials that we
convert to paid subscriptions and direct marketing to new and
existing customers.
We derive our revenue principally from subscription fees from
SMBs, IT service providers and consumers. The majority of our
customers subscribe to our services on an annual basis. Our
revenue is driven primarily by the number and type of our
premium services for which our paying customers subscribe. For
the year ended December 31, 2010, we generated revenues of
$101.1 million, compared to $74.4 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009, an increase of approximately 36%.
In addition to selling our services to end users, we entered
into a service and marketing agreement with Intel Corporation in
December 2007 pursuant to which we adapted our service delivery
platform, Gravity, to work with specific technology delivered
with Intel hardware and software products. The agreement
provided that Intel market and sell the services to its
customers. Intel paid us a minimum license and service fee on a
quarterly basis during the term of the agreement, and we shared
with Intel revenue generated by the use of the services by third
parties to the extent it exceeded certain minimum payments. We
began recognizing revenue associated with the Intel service and
marketing agreement in the quarter ended September 30, 2008
upon receipt of customer acceptance. In September 2010, Intel
notified us that it intended to terminate the connectivity
service and marketing agreement effective on December 26,
2010. In accordance with the termination provisions of the
agreement, Intel will not owe us any of the $5.0 million in
fees associated with 2011, the final year of the agreement, but
paid us a one-time termination fee of $2.5 million. During
the year ended December 31, 2010, we recognized
$9.6 million in revenue from this agreement, which includes
the $2.5 million termination fee which was paid in December
2010.
Through December 31, 2010, we have primarily funded our
operations through the sale of redeemable convertible preferred
stock which resulted in proceeds of approximately
$27.8 million and cash flows from operations. We incurred a
net loss of $5.4 million for 2008 and earned net income of
$8.8 million for 2009 and $21.1 million for 2010. We
expect to continue making significant future expenditures to
develop and expand our business.
32
Certain
Trends and Uncertainties
The following represents a summary of certain trends and
uncertainties, which could have a significant impact on our
financial condition and results of operations. This summary is
not intended to be a complete list of potential trends and
uncertainties that could impact our business in the long or
short term. The summary should be considered along with the
factors identified in the section titled Risk
Factors of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
|
|
|
We continue to closely monitor current adverse economic
conditions, particularly as they impact SMBs, IT service
providers and consumers. We are unable to predict the likely
duration and severity of the current adverse economic conditions
in the United States and other countries, but the longer the
duration the greater risks we face in operating our business.
|
|
|
|
We believe that competition will continue to increase. Increased
competition could result from existing competitors or new
competitors that enter the market because of the potential
opportunity. We will continue to closely monitor competitive
activity and respond accordingly. Increased competition could
have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations.
|
|
|
|
We believe that as we continue to grow revenue at expected
rates, our cost of revenue and operating expenses, including
sales and marketing, research and development and general and
administrative expenses will increase in absolute dollar
amounts. For a description of the general trends we anticipate
in various expense categories, see Cost of Revenue and
Operating Expenses below.
|
Sources
of Revenue
We derive our revenue principally from subscription fees from
SMBs, IT service providers, mobile carriers and consumers. Our
revenue is driven primarily by the number and type of our
premium services for which our paying customers subscribe and is
not concentrated within one customer or group of customers. The
majority of our customers subscribe to our services on an annual
basis and pay in advance, typically with a credit card, for
their subscription. A smaller percentage of our customers
subscribe to our services on a monthly basis through either
month-to-month
commitments or annual commitments that are then paid monthly
with a credit card. We initially record a subscription fee as
deferred revenue and then recognize it ratably, on a daily
basis, over the life of the subscription period. Typically, a
subscription automatically renews at the end of a subscription
period unless the customer specifically terminates it prior to
the end of the period.
In addition to our subscription fees, to a lesser extent, we
also generate revenue from license and annual maintenance fees
from the licensing of our RemotelyAnywhere product. We license
RemotelyAnywhere to our customers on a perpetual basis. Because
we do not have vendor specific objective evidence of fair value,
or VSOE, for our maintenance arrangements, we record the initial
license and maintenance fee as deferred revenue and recognize
the fees as revenue ratably, on a daily basis, over the initial
maintenance period. We also initially record maintenance fees
for subsequent maintenance periods as deferred revenue and
recognize revenue ratably, on a daily basis, over the
maintenance period. We also generate revenue from the license of
our Ignition for iPhone, iPad and Android product which is sold
as a perpetual license and is recognized as delivered. Revenue
from RemotelyAnywhere, Ignition for iPhone, iPad and Android
represented approximately 6% of our revenue for the year ended
December 31, 2010.
Employees
We have increased our number of full-time employees to 415 at
December 31, 2010 as compared to 338 at December 31,
2009.
Cost of
Revenue and Operating Expenses
We allocate certain overhead expenses, such as rent and
utilities, to expense categories based on the headcount in or
office space occupied by personnel in that expense category as a
percentage of our total headcount or office space. As a result,
an overhead allocation associated with these costs is reflected
in the cost of revenue and each operating expense category.
33
Cost of Revenue. Cost of revenue consists
primarily of costs associated with our data center operations
and customer support centers, including wages and benefits for
personnel, telecommunication and hosting fees for our services,
equipment maintenance, maintenance and license fees for software
licenses and depreciation. Additionally, amortization expense
associated with the acquired software and technology as well as
internally developed software is included in cost of revenue.
The expenses related to hosting our services and supporting our
free and premium customers is related to the number of customers
who subscribe to our services and the complexity and redundancy
of our services and hosting infrastructure. We expect these
expenses to increase in absolute dollars as we continue to
increase our number of customers over time but, in total, to
remain relatively constant as a percentage of revenue.
Research and Development. Research and
development expenses consist primarily of wages and benefits for
development personnel, professional fees associated with
outsourced development projects, facilities rent and
depreciation associated with assets used in development. We have
focused our research and development efforts on both improving
ease of use and functionality of our existing services, as well
as developing new offerings. The majority of our research and
development employees are located in our development centers in
Hungary. Therefore, a majority of research and development
expense is subject to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates.
During the year ended December 31, 2010, we capitalized
approximately $214,000 of costs related to internally developed
computer software to be sold as a service, which was incurred
during the application development stage. No amounts were
capitalized prior to 2010 as the costs incurred during such
stage have historically been immaterial. As a result, the
majority of research and development costs have been expensed as
incurred. We expect that research and development expenses will
increase in both absolute dollars and as a percentage of revenue
as we continue to enhance and expand our services.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing
expenses consist primarily of online search and advertising
costs, wages, commissions and benefits for sales and marketing
personnel, offline marketing costs such as media advertising and
trade shows, professional fees and credit card processing fees.
Online search and advertising costs consist primarily of
pay-per-click
payments to search engines and other online advertising media
such as banner ads. Offline marketing costs include radio and
print advertisements as well as the costs to create and produce
these advertisements, and tradeshows, including the costs of
space at tradeshows and costs to design and construct tradeshow
booths. Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. In order to
continue to grow our business and awareness of our services, we
expect that we will continue to commit resources to our sales
and marketing efforts. We expect that sales and marketing
expenses will increase in absolute dollars but decrease as a
percentage of revenue over time as our revenue increases.
General and Administrative. General and
administrative expenses consist primarily of wages and benefits
for management, human resources, internal IT support, finance
and accounting personnel, professional fees, insurance and other
corporate expenses. We expect that general and administrative
expenses will increase primarily due to the significant legal
costs associated with our defense against the patent
infringement claims made by 01 Communique. Additionally, general
and administrative expenses will increase as we continue to add
personnel, enhance our internal information systems to align
with the growth of our business and expenses related to audit,
accounting and insurance costs. We expect that our general and
administrative expenses will significantly increase in both
absolute dollars and as a percentage of revenue primarily
related to defending the patent infringement claims.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. The preparation of our financial statements and related
disclosures requires us to make estimates, assumptions and
judgments that affect the reported amount of assets,
liabilities, revenue, costs and expenses, and related
disclosures. We base our estimates and assumptions on historical
experience and other factors that we believe to be reasonable
under the circumstances. We evaluate our estimates and
assumptions on an ongoing basis. Our actual results may differ
from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions.
Our most critical accounting policies are summarized below. See
Note 2 to our financial statements included elsewhere in
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for additional information about these critical accounting
policies, as well as a description of our other significant
accounting policies.
34
Revenue Recognition. We provide our customers
access to our services through subscription arrangements for
which our customers pay us a fee. Our customers enter into a
subscription agreement with us for the use of our software, our
connectivity service and access to our customer support
services, such as telephone and email support. Subscription
periods range from monthly to four years, and they are generally
one year in duration. The software cannot be run on another
entitys hardware, and our customers do not have the right
to take possession of the software and use it on their own or
another entitys hardware. We begin to recognize revenue
when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the fee is
fixed or determinable and collectability is deemed probable. We
recognize the subscription fee as revenue on a daily basis over
the subscription period.
Agreements may include multiple deliverables by us such as
subscription and professional services, including development
services. Agreements with multiple element deliverables are
analyzed to determine if fair value exists for each element on a
stand-alone basis. If the value of each deliverable is
determinable then revenue is recognized separately when or as
the services are delivered, or if applicable, when milestones
associated with the deliverable are achieved and accepted by the
customer. If the fair value of any of the undelivered
performance obligations cannot be determined, the arrangement is
accounted for as a single element and we recognize revenue on a
straight-line basis over the period in which we expect to
complete performance obligations under the agreement.
Our arrangements for the licensing of RemotelyAnywhere permit
our customers to use the software on their hardware and include
one year of maintenance services, which includes the right to
support and upgrades, on a when and if available basis. We do
not have VSOE for our maintenance service arrangements and thus
recognize revenue ratably on a daily basis over the initial
maintenance period, which is generally one year. We also
recognize revenue from the sale of our Ignition for iPhone, iPad
and Android software products which are sold on a perpetual
basis. We recognize revenue when there is persuasive evidence of
an arrangement, the product has been provided to the customer,
the fee is fixed or determinable and collectability is deemed
probable.
Income Taxes. We are subject to federal,
state, and foreign income taxes for jurisdictions in which we
operate, and we use estimates in determining our provision for
these income taxes and deferred tax assets. Deferred tax assets,
related valuation allowances, current tax liabilities and
deferred tax liabilities are determined separately by tax
jurisdiction. In making these determinations, we estimate
deferred tax assets, related valuation allowances, current tax
liabilities and deferred tax liabilities, and we assess
temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of
items for tax and accounting purposes. At December 31,
2010, our deferred tax assets consisted primarily of net
operating losses, research and development credit carryforwards,
and stock option compensation expense. We assess the likelihood
that deferred tax assets will be realized, and we recognize a
valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some
portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. This
assessment requires judgment as to the likelihood and amounts of
future taxable income by tax jurisdiction. As of
December 31, 2009, we provided a full valuation allowance
against our deferred tax assets as we believed the objective and
verifiable evidence of our historical pretax net losses
outweighed the positive evidence of our pre-tax income for the
year ended December 31, 2009 and forecasted future
earnings. During 2010, we reassessed the need for a valuation
allowance against our deferred tax assets and concluded that it
was more likely than not that we would be able to realize
certain of our deferred tax assets primarily as a result of
continued profitability, achieving three years of cumulative
profitability and forecasted future earnings. Accordingly, we
reversed the valuation allowance related to our U.S. and
certain foreign deferred tax assets of $8.6 million during
the year ended December 31, 2010. As of December 31,
2010, we maintained a full valuation allowance against the
deferred tax assets of our Hungarian subsidiary, as this entity
has historical losses and we concluded it was not more likely
than not that these deferred tax assets are realizable. Although
we believe that our tax estimates are reasonable, the ultimate
tax determination involves significant judgment that is subject
to audit by tax authorities in the ordinary course of business.
35
We evaluate our uncertain tax positions based on a determination
of whether and how much of a tax benefit we have taken in our
tax filings or positions is more likely than not to be realized.
Potential interest and penalties associated with any uncertain
tax positions are recorded as a component of income tax expense.
Through December 31, 2010, we have not identified any
material uncertain tax positions for which liabilities would be
required.
Stock-Based Compensation. Share-based awards
are accounted for at fair value, which requires us to recognize
compensation expense for all share-based awards granted,
modified, repurchased or cancelled on or after January 1,
2006. These costs are recognized on a straight-line basis over
the requisite service period for all time-based vested awards.
Determining the appropriate fair value model and calculating the
fair value of stock-based payment awards requires the use of
highly subjective estimates and assumptions, including the
estimated fair value of common stock, expected life of the
stock-based payment awards and stock price volatility. Because
there was no public market for our common stock prior to our
IPO, our Board of Directors determined the fair value of common
stock at each option grant date, taking into account our most
recently available independent valuation of common stock, as
well as a number of objective and subjective factors, including
peer group trading multiples, the amount of preferred stock
liquidation preferences, the illiquid nature of our common stock
and our size and lack of historical profitability. Beginning in
2006 and through our IPO in July 2009, we obtained independent
common stock valuations to assist our Board of Directors in
determining the fair value of our common stock. Determining the
fair value of share-based awards requires the use of highly
subjective assumptions, including the expected term of the award
and expected stock price volatility.
The assumptions used in determining the fair value of
share-based awards represent managements best estimates,
but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the
application of managements judgment. As a result, if
factors change, and we use different assumptions, our
share-based compensation could be materially different in the
future. The risk-free interest rate used for each grant is based
on a U.S. Treasury instrument with a term similar to the
expected term of the share-based award. The expected term of
options has been estimated utilizing the vesting period of the
option, the contractual life of the option and our option
exercise history. Because there was no public market for our
common stock prior to our IPO, we lacked company-specific
historical and implied volatility information. Therefore, we
estimate our expected stock volatility based on that of
publicly-traded peer companies, and we expect to continue to use
this methodology until such time as we have adequate historical
data regarding the volatility of our publicly-traded stock
price. We recognize compensation expense for only the portion of
options that are expected to vest. Accordingly, we have
estimated expected forfeitures of stock options based on our
historical forfeiture rate and we use these rates to develop
future forfeiture rates. If our actual forfeiture rate varies
from our historical rates and estimates, additional adjustments
to compensation expense may be required in future periods. Past
fair value of option grants may not be a reliable indicator of
future fair values as assumptions such as volatility may change
over time.
Loss Contingencies. We are currently involved
in various legal claims and legal proceedings and may be subject
to additional legal claims and proceedings in the future that
arise in the ordinary course of business. We consider the
likelihood of a loss or the incurrence of a liability, as well
as our ability to reasonably estimate the amount of loss, in
determining loss contingencies. An estimated loss contingency is
accrued when we believe that it is both probable that a
liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be
reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required to
determine both probability and the estimated amount. We
regularly evaluate current information available and reflect the
impact of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal
counsel, and updated information to determine whether such
accruals should be adjusted and whether new accruals are
required and update our disclosures accordingly. Litigation is
inherently unpredictable and is subject to significant
uncertainties, some of which are beyond our control. Should any
of these estimates and assumptions change or prove to have been
incorrect, it could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations, financial position and cash flows. See
Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in
Part II, Item 8 for a further discussion of litigation
and contingencies as well as Legal Proceedings in
Part I, Item 3.
36
Results
of Consolidated Operations
The following table sets forth selected consolidated statements
of operations data for each of the periods indicated as a
percentage of total revenue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Legal settlements
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of acquired intangibles
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Interest and other income (expense), net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Benefit (provision) for income taxes
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years
Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
Revenue. Revenue for the year ended
December 31, 2010 was $101.1 million, an increase of
$26.6 million, or 36%, over revenue of $74.4 million
for the year ended December 31, 2009. Of the 36% increase
in revenue, the majority of the increase was due to an increase
in revenue from new customers, as our total number of premium
accounts increased to approximately 585,000 at December 31,
2010 from approximately 300,000 premium accounts at
December 31, 2009, and incremental add-on revenues from our
existing customer base. The increase in revenue was also due to
approximately $3.6 million of incremental revenue from
Intel related to the one-time termination payment and
acceleration of development fees recognized as revenue related
to the early termination of our sales and marketing agreement in
December 2010.
Cost of Revenue. Cost of revenue for the year
ended December 31, 2010 was $9.1 million, an increase
of $1.6 million, or 22%, over cost of revenue of
$7.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. As
a percentage of revenue, cost of revenue was 9% and 10% for the
years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The
increase in absolute dollars resulted primarily from an increase
in both the number of customers using our premium services and
the total number of devices that connected to our services,
including devices owned by free users, which resulted in
increased hosting and customer support costs. Of the increase in
cost of revenue, $0.9 million resulted from increased data
center costs associated with managing our data centers and the
hosting of our services. The increase in data center costs was
due to the expansion of our data center facilities as we added
capacity to our hosting infrastructure. Additionally,
$0.8 million of the increase in cost of revenue was due to
the increased costs in our customer support organization,
primarily as a result of hiring new employees to support our
customer growth.
Research and Development Expenses. Research
and development expenses for the year ended December 31,
2010 were $15.2 million, an increase of $2.1 million,
or 16%, over research and development expenses of
$13.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. As
a percentage of revenue, research and development expenses were
15% and 18% for the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The
37
increase in absolute dollars was primarily due to a
$1.5 million increase in personnel related costs as we
hired additional employees to improve the ease of use and
functionality of our existing services as well as develop new
service offerings. The increase in personnel related costs was
offset by the capitalization of approximately $0.2 million
of costs related to new product development incurred during the
application development stage during the year ended
December 31, 2010. No amounts were capitalized in year
ended December 31, 2009 as the costs incurred in the period
were immaterial. The increase was also due to a
$0.3 million increase in rent costs primarily related to
our new office space in Hungary, a $0.3 million increase in
travel-related costs and a $0.1 million increase in
depreciation expense. These were offset by a $0.2 million
decrease in professional fees.
Sales and Marketing Expenses. Sales and
marketing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2010
were $45.9 million, an increase of $10.0 million, or
28%, over sales and marketing expenses of $35.8 million for
the year ended December 31, 2009. As a percentage of
revenue, sales and marketing expenses were 46% and 48% for the
year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The
increase in absolute dollars was primarily due to a
$6.4 million increase in marketing program costs and a
$2.6 million increase in personnel-related and recruiting
costs from additional employees hired to support our growth in
sales and expand our marketing efforts. The increase was also
due to a $0.4 million increase in credit card processing
fees, a $0.2 million increase in hardware and software
maintenance costs, a $0.2 million increase in
travel-related costs and a $0.1 increase in rent costs primarily
related to the expansion of our corporate headquarters.
General and Administrative Expenses. General
and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31,
2010 were $12.3 million, an increase of $4.0 million,
or 48%, over general and administrative expenses of
$8.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. As
a percentage of revenue, general and administrative expenses
were 12% and 11% for the year ended December 31, 2010 and
2009, respectively. The increase in absolute dollars was
primarily due to a $2.3 million increase in
personnel-related costs as we increased the number of general
and administrative employees to support our overall growth. The
increase was also due to a $0.6 million increase in legal
fees, a $0.4 million increase in audit and accounting
costs, a $0.3 million increase in corporate insurance costs
and a $0.2 million increase in professional fees.
Amortization of Acquired
Intangibles. Amortization of acquired intangibles
for the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was
$0.3 million and related primarily to the value of
intangible assets acquired in our July 2006 acquisition of
Applied Networking, Inc.
Interest and Other Income (Expense),
Net. Interest and other income (expense), net for
the year ended December 31, 2010 was income of
approximately $0.4 million, compared to an expense of
approximately $0.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009. The change was mainly due to an increase
in interest income resulting from an increase in the amount of
funds invested in higher yielding marketable securities as well
as a decrease in foreign currency losses.
Income Taxes. Our effective income tax rate
for the year ended December 31, 2010 was a benefit of 13%
on pre-tax income of $18.6 million. Our effective rate for the
period is lower than the statutory federal income tax rate of
35% due primarily to the $8.6 million reversal during 2010 of
our beginning of the year valuation allowance related to our
domestic and certain foreign deferred tax assets. As of
December 31, 2009 and through the first quarter of 2010, we
provided a full valuation allowance related to our deferred tax
assets as we believed the objective and verifiable evidence of
our historical pre-tax net losses outweighed the existing
positive evidence.
During 2010, we reassessed the need for a valuation allowance
against our deferred tax assets and concluded that it was more
likely than not that we would be able to realize certain of our
deferred tax assets primarily as a result of continued
profitability and forecasted future results. Accordingly, we
reversed our valuation allowance related to our U.S. and certain
foreign deferred tax assets. As of December 31, 2010, we
maintained a full valuation allowance related to the deferred
tax assets of our Hungarian subsidiary.
38
Years
Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
Revenue. Revenue for the year ended
December 31, 2009 was $74.4 million, an increase of
$22.7 million, or 44%, over revenue of $51.7 million
for the year ended December 31, 2008. Of the 44% increase
in revenue, the majority of the increase was due to increases in
revenue from new customers, as our total number of premium
accounts increased to approximately 300,000 at December 31,
2009 from approximately 174,000 premium accounts at
December 31, 2008, incremental add-on revenues from the our
existing customer base and incremental revenue associated with
our Intel agreement.
Cost of Revenue. Cost of revenue for the year
ended December 31, 2009 was $7.5 million, an increase
of $1.5 million, or 26%, over cost of revenue of
$6.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. As
a percentage of revenue, cost of revenue was 10% for the year
ended December 31, 2009 versus 12% for the year ended
December 31, 2008. The decrease in cost of revenue as a
percentage of revenue was primarily the result of more efficient
utilization of our data center and customer support
organizations. The increase in absolute dollars resulted
primarily from an increase in both the number of customers using
our premium services and the total number of devices that
connected to our services, including devices owned by free
users, which resulted in increased hosting and customer support
costs. Of the increase in cost of revenue, $1.0 million
resulted from increased data center costs associated with the
hosting of our services. The increase in data center costs was
due to the expansion of our data center facilities as we added
capacity to our hosting infrastructure. Additionally, $0.7
million of the increase in cost of revenue was due to the
increased costs in our customer support organization we
incurred, primarily as a result of hiring new employees to
support our customer growth.
Research and Development Expenses. Research
and development expenses for the year ended December 31,
2009 were $13.1 million, an increase of $1.2 million,
or 10%, over research and development expenses of
$12.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. As
a percentage of revenue, research and development expenses were
18% and 23% for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The increase in absolute dollars was primarily due
to a $0.4 million increase in personnel-related costs,
including salary and other compensation related costs, as we
increased the number of research and development personnel to
143 at December 31, 2009 from 122 at December 31,
2008. The increase was also due to a $0.3 million increase
in rent costs primarily related to our new office space in
Budapest, Hungary, a $0.2 million increase in telephone
costs, a $0.1 million increase in depreciation expense and
a $0.1 million increase in professional fees.
Sales and Marketing Expenses. Sales and
marketing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009
were $35.8 million, an increase of $4.2 million, or
13%, over sales and marketing expenses of $31.6 million for
the year ended December 31, 2008. As a percentage of
revenue, sales and marketing expenses were 48% and 61% for the
years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The
increase in absolute dollars was primarily due to a
$2.1 million increase in personnel related and recruiting
costs from additional employees hired to support our growth in
sales and expand our marketing efforts. The total number of
sales and marketing personnel increased to 115 at
December 31, 2009 from 101 at December 31, 2008. The
increase was also due to a $0.4 million increase in
marketing program costs, a $0.3 million increase in
professional fees, a $0.3 million increase in telephone
costs, a $0.2 million increase in hardware and software
maintenance costs, a $0.2 million increase in travel
related costs and a $0.5 million increase in other
miscellaneous expenses, primarily consisting of credit card
processing fees.
General and Administrative Expenses. General
and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31,
2009 were $8.3 million, an increase of $1.7 million,
or 26%, over general and administrative expenses of
$6.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. As
a percentage of revenue, general and administrative expenses
were 11% and 13% for the years ended December 31, 2009 and
2008, respectively. The increase in absolute dollars was
primarily due to a $0.9 million increase in
personnel-related costs as we increased the number of general
and administrative employees to support our overall growth. The
increase was also due to a $0.3 million increase in legal
costs and a $0.2 million increase in corporate insurance
costs.
Legal Settlement Expenses. Legal settlement
expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009 were zero, a
decrease of $0.6 million, or 100%, over legal settlement
expenses of $0.6 million for the year ended
39
December 31, 2008. In May 2008, we settled a lawsuit which
began in 2007 related to an alleged patent infringement.
Amortization of Acquired
Intangibles. Amortization of acquired intangibles
for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was
$0.3 million and related to the value of intangible assets
acquired in our July 2006 acquisition of Applied Networking, Inc.
Interest and Other (Income) Expense,
Net. Interest and other (income) expense, net for
the year ended December 31, 2009 was an expense of
$0.2 million, compared to income of $0.1 million, for
the year ended December 31, 2008. The change was mainly due
to a decrease in interest income and an increase in foreign
exchange losses offset by a decrease in interest expense
associated with a note payable related to our acquisition of
Applied Networking, Inc.
Income Taxes. During the year ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, we recorded a deferred tax
provision of approximately $15,000 and $17,000 related to the
different book and tax treatment for goodwill and a provision
for alternative minimum taxes, foreign and state income taxes
totaling $0.3 million and $0.1 million, respectively.
We recorded a federal income tax provision for the year ended
December 31, 2009 and a federal income tax benefit for the
year ended December 31, 2008 which was offset by the change
in the valuation allowance. We assess the likelihood that
deferred tax assets will be realized, and we recognize a
valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some
portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. This
assessment requires judgment as to the likelihood and amounts of
future taxable income by tax jurisdiction. Through
December 31, 2009, we have provided a full valuation
allowance against our deferred tax assets as we believe the
objective and verifiable evidence of our historical pretax net
losses outweighs the positive evidence of our 2009 pre-tax
profit and forecasted future results.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
The following table sets forth the major sources and uses of
cash for each of the periods set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operations
|
|
$
|
10,131
|
|
|
$
|
24,339
|
|
|
$
|
36,469
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(3,775
|
)
|
|
|
(33,165
|
)
|
|
|
(65,003
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(2,101
|
)
|
|
|
86,157
|
|
|
|
5,789
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
(265
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
$
|
4,237
|
|
|
$
|
77,377
|
|
|
$
|
(23,010
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010, our principal source of liquidity was
cash and cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities
totaling $167.4 million.
Cash
Flows From Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was
$36.5 million, $24.3 million, and $10.1 million
for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Net cash inflows from operating activities during the year ended
December 31, 2010 were mainly due to $21.1 million of
net income for the period. Net cash inflows from operating
activities were also due to non-cash operating expenses,
including $3.7 million for depreciation and amortization,
$5.0 million for stock compensation and $0.2 million
for amortization of premium on investments, offset by non-cash
benefits, including a $2.7 million benefit from deferred
income taxes and a $1.1 million income tax benefit from the
exercise of stock options. The net cash inflows from operating
activities were also due to an $8.7 million increase in
deferred revenue associated with the increase in subscription
sales orders and customer growth and a $3.3 million
increase in current liabilities. These were offset by a
$1.1 million increase in prepaid expenses and other current
assets and a $0.7 million increase in accounts receivable.
We expect that our future cash
40
flows from operating activities will be impacted by the
significant legal costs associated with our defense against the
patent infringement claims made by 01 Communique.
Net cash inflows from operating activities during the year ended
December 31, 2009 were mainly due to $8.8 million of
net income for the period, non-cash operating expenses,
including $3.2 million for depreciation and amortization
and $2.9 million for stock compensation, as well as a
$2.8 million increase in current liabilities, a
$5.7 million increase in deferred revenue associated with
the increase in subscription sales orders and customer growth, a
$0.5 million increase in other long-term liabilities and a
$0.4 million decrease in accounts receivable. These were
offset by a $0.2 million increase in prepaid expenses and
other current assets.
Net cash inflows from operating activities during the year ended
December 31, 2008 resulted from a $12.3 million
increase in deferred revenue associated with the increase in
subscription sales orders and customer growth as well as an
increase in current liabilities. These increases and increases
in non-cash operating expenses, including $2.4 million for
depreciation and amortization and $2.8 million for stock
compensation, offset a $5.4 million operating loss for the
period, a $1.5 million increase in accounts receivable and
a $1.0 million increase in prepaid expenses and other
current assets.
Cash
Flows From Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $65.0 million,
$33.2 million and $3.8 million for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Net cash used in investing for the year ended December 31,
2010 was primarily related to the purchase of
$185.3 million of marketable securities offset by proceeds
of $125.0 million from sale or disposal of marketable
securities. We invested an additional $4.2 million in
property and equipment mainly related to the expansion and
upgrade of our data center capacity and also related to the
expansion of our corporate headquarters. We also had
$0.4 million in intangible asset additions related to the
purchase of domain names, trademarks and internally developed
software.
Net cash used in investing activities during the year ended
December 31, 2009 consisted primarily of net cash paid to
purchase marketable securities and property and equipment.
Purchases of equipment resulted from the expansion of our data
centers as well as our new office space in Hungary. The purchase
of marketable securities and property and equipment were offset
by a reduction in restricted cash.
Net cash used in investing activities during the years ended
December 31, 2008 consisted primarily of the purchase of
equipment related to the expansion of our data centers. Net cash
used in investing activities during the year ended
December 31, 2008 was also due to the purchase of equipment
related to the increase in the number of our employees in
connection with the expansion of our office and related
infrastructure, as well as two certificate of deposits that
serve as a security deposit for corporate credit cards and a
security deposit related to a new lease agreement for office
space in Hungary.
Our future capital requirements may vary materially from those
currently planned and will depend on many factors, including,
but not limited to, development of new services, market
acceptance of our services, the expansion of our sales, support,
development and marketing organizations, the establishment of
additional offices in the United States and worldwide and the
expansion of our data center infrastructure necessary to support
our growth. Since our inception, we have experienced increases
in our expenditures consistent with the growth in our operations
and personnel, and we anticipate that our expenditures will
continue to increase in the future. We also intend to make
investments in computer equipment and systems and infrastructure
related to existing and new offices as we move and expand our
facilities, add additional personnel and continue to grow our
business. We are not currently party to any purchase contracts
related to future capital expenditures.
Cash
Flows From Financing Activities
Net cash flows provided by financing activities were
$5.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 were
mainly related to $4.8 million in proceeds received from
the issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options as
well as a $1.1 million income tax benefit from the exercise
of stock options offset by $0.2 million in payments made in
connection with our secondary public offering.
41
Net cash flows provided by financing activities were
$86.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 and
were mainly the result of net proceeds received related to our
IPO and secondary public offering and proceeds received from the
issuance of common stock upon the exercise of stock options.
Net cash flows used in financing activities were
$2.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 and
were mainly associated with the final payment of
$1.3 million associated with a note payable related to our
acquisition of Applied Networking, Inc. and the payment of
approximately $1.0 million associated with fees related to
our IPO partially offset by proceeds received from the issuance
of common stock upon the exercise of stock options.
On July 7, 2009, we closed our IPO raising net proceeds of
approximately $82.9 million after deducting underwriting
discounts and commissions and offering costs. On
December 16, 2009, we closed our secondary public offering
raising net proceeds of approximately $1.2 million after
deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering
costs. While we believe that our current cash and cash
equivalents will be sufficient to meet our working capital and
capital expenditure requirements for at least the next twelve
months, we may elect to raise additional capital through the
sale of additional equity or debt securities or obtain a credit
facility to develop or enhance our services, to fund expansion,
to respond to competitive pressures or to acquire complementary
products, businesses or technologies. If we elect, additional
financing may not be available in amounts or on terms that are
favorable to us, if at all. If we raise additional funds through
the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities, our
existing stockholders could suffer significant dilution, and any
new equity securities we issue could have rights, preferences
and privileges superior to those of holders of our common stock.
During the last three years, inflation and changing prices have
not had a material effect on our business and we do not expect
that inflation or changing prices will materially affect our
business in the foreseeable future.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We do not engage in any off-balance sheet financing activities,
nor do we have any interest in entities referred to as variable
interest entities.
Contractual
Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at
December 31, 2010 and the effect such obligations are
expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future
periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
$
|
6,385,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,576,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,681,000
|
|
|
$
|
128,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Hosting service agreements
|
|
$
|
1,038,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,038,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7,423,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,614,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,681,000
|
|
|
$
|
128,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The commitments under our operating leases shown above consist
primarily of lease payments for our Woburn, Massachusetts
corporate headquarters, our international sales and marketing
offices located in The Netherlands, Australia and England and
our research and development offices in Hungary, and contractual
obligations related to our data centers.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2009, an update was made to Revenue
Recognition Multiple Deliverable Revenue
Arrangements. This update removes the
objective-and-reliable-evidence-of-fair-value
criterion from the separation criteria used to determine whether
an arrangement involving multiple deliverables contains more
than one unit of accounting, replaces references to fair
value with selling price to distinguish from
the fair value measurements required under the
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
guidance, provides a hierarchy that entities must use to
estimate the selling price, eliminates the use of the residual
method for allocation, and expands the ongoing disclosure
requirements. This update is effective beginning January 1,
2011 and can be applied prospectively or retrospectively. The
effect of adoption of this standard will only impact our
financial statement disclosure to comply with the additional
disclosure requirements. We do not expect the implementation of
this guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
42
|
|
Item 7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK.
|
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk. Our results of
operations and cash flows are subject to fluctuations due to
changes in foreign currency exchange rates as a result of the
majority of our research and development expenditures being made
from our Hungarian research and development facilities, and in
our international sales and marketing offices in The
Netherlands, Australia and England. In the year ended
December 31, 2010, approximately 15%, 9%, 3% and 4% of our
operating expenses occurred in our operations in Hungary, The
Netherlands, Australia and England, respectively. In the year
ended December 31, 2009, approximately 17%, 13% and 2% of
our operating expenses occurred in our operations in Hungary,
The Netherlands and Australia, respectively. Additionally,
approximately 50% of our sales outside the United States
are denominated in local currencies and, thus, also subject to
fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
To date, changes in foreign currency exchange rates have not had
a material impact on our operations, and a future change of 20%
or less in foreign currency exchange rates would not materially
affect our operations. At this time we do not, but may in the
future, enter into any foreign currency hedging programs or
instruments that would hedge or help offset such foreign
currency exchange rate risk.
Interest Rate Sensitivity. Interest income is
sensitive to changes in the general level of U.S. interest
rates. However, based on the nature and current level of our
cash and cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities,
which are primarily consisted of cash, money market instruments,
government securities and agency bonds, we believe there is no
material risk of exposure to changes in the fair value of our
cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities as a result
of changes in interest rates.
43
|
|
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
LogMeIn,
Inc.
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page(s)
|
|
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
|
|
|
45
|
|
Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
46
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|
|
47
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Redeemable Convertible Preferred
Stock, Stockholders Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
|
48
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
49
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
50
|
|
44
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of
LogMeIn, Inc.
Woburn, Massachusetts
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
LogMeIn, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of
December 31, 2009 and 2010, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, redeemable convertible preferred
stock, stockholders equity and comprehensive income
(loss), and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2010. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
LogMeIn, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and
2010, and the results of their operations and their cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2010, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2010, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission and our report dated February 28, 2011 expressed
an unqualified opinion on the Companys internal control
over financial reporting.
/s/ Deloitte &
Touche LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
February 28, 2011
45
LogMeIn,
Inc.
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
100,290,001
|
|
|
$
|
77,279,987
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
29,956,204
|
|
|
|
90,144,484
|
|
Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$83,000 and $111,000 as of December 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2010, respectively)
|
|
|
4,149,645
|
|
|
|
4,744,392
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets (including $101,000
and $9,000 of non-trade receivable due from related party at
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2010, respectively)
|
|
|
1,834,244
|
|
|
|
2,905,618
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,315,529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
136,230,094
|
|
|
|
176,390,010
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
4,859,139
|
|
|
|
6,198,487
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
373,184
|
|
|
|
350,481
|
|
Intangibles, net
|
|
|
750,915
|
|
|
|
577,815
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
615,299
|
|
|
|
615,299
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
29,918
|
|
|
|
27,019
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,518,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
142,858,549
|
|
|
$
|
186,677,269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
2,328,223
|
|
|
$
|
2,176,390
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
7,323,176
|
|
|
|
10,829,310
|
|
Deferred revenue, current portion
|
|
|
32,190,539
|
|
|
|
41,763,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
41,841,938
|
|
|
|
54,768,838
|
|
Deferred revenue, net of current portion
|
|
|
1,912,329
|
|
|
|
1,030,017
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
594,931
|
|
|
|
500,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
44,349,198
|
|
|
|
56,299,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value
5,000,000 shares authorized, 0 shares outstanding as
of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value
75,000,000 shares authorized as of December 31, 2009
and December 31, 2010; 22,448,808 and
23,858,514 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2009
and December 31, 2010, respectively
|
|
|
224,488
|
|
|
|
238,585
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
122,465,372
|
|
|
|
133,425,098
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(24,182,960
|
)
|
|
|
(3,084,316
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
2,451
|
|
|
|
(201,109
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
98,509,351
|
|
|
|
130,378,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
142,858,549
|
|
|
$
|
186,677,269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
46
LogMeIn,
Inc.
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Revenue (including $3,036,000, $6,007,000 and $9,580,000 from a
related party during the years ended December 31, 2008,
2009 and 2010, respectively)
|
|
$
|
51,723,453
|
|
|
$
|
74,408,660
|
|
|
$
|
101,057,207
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
5,970,260
|
|
|
|
7,508,376
|
|
|
|
9,124,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
45,753,193
|
|
|
|
66,900,284
|
|
|
|
91,932,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
11,996,947
|
|
|
|
13,148,986
|
|
|
|
15,213,902
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
31,631,080
|
|
|
|
35,820,996
|
|
|
|
45,868,817
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
6,583,317
|
|
|
|
8,297,399
|
|
|
|
12,319,316
|
|
Legal settlements
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of acquired intangibles
|
|
|
327,715
|
|
|
|
327,716
|
|
|
|
337,753
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
51,139,059
|
|
|
|
57,595,097
|
|
|
|
73,739,788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(5,385,866
|
)
|
|
|
9,305,187
|
|
|
|
18,192,774
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
276,439
|
|
|
|
129,485
|
|
|
|
634,657
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(60,094
|
)
|
|
|
(1,766
|
)
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
Other expense
|
|
|
(110,519
|
)
|
|
|
(294,116
|
)
|
|
|
(218,816
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(5,280,040
|
)
|
|
|
9,138,790
|
|
|
|
18,607,615
|
|
(Provision) benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
(122,005
|
)
|
|
|
(341,537
|
)
|
|
|
2,491,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(5,402,045
|
)
|
|
|
8,797,253
|
|
|
|
21,098,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
(2,348,229
|
)
|
|
|
(1,311,225
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(7,750,274
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,486,028
|
|
|
$
|
21,098,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(1.97
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
$
|
0.91
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(1.97
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
3,933,446
|
|
|
|
12,989,943
|
|
|
|
23,244,479
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
3,933,446
|
|
|
|
14,835,314
|
|
|
|
24,839,905
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
47
LogMeIn,
Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A Redeemable
|
|
|
Series B Redeemable
|
|
|
Series B-1 Redeemable
|
|
|
Total Redeemable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible
|
|
|
Convertible
|
|
|
Convertible
|
|
|
Convertible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2008
|
|
|
17,010,413
|
|
|
$
|
11,590,298
|
|
|
|
11,668,703
|
|
|
$
|
10,914,780
|
|
|
|
2,222,223
|
|
|
$
|
9,989,962
|
|
|
|
30,901,339
|
|
|
$
|
32,495,040
|
|
|
|
|
3,891,978
|
|
|
$
|
38,920
|
|
|
$
|
58,380
|
|
|
$
|
(27,578,168
|
)
|
|
$
|
50,233
|
|
|
$
|
(27,430,635
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,300
|
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
109,492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock to
redemption value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
910,669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
714,204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
723,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,348,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,348,229
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,348,229
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,491,405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,491,405
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,402,045
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,402,045
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,402,045
|
)
|
Cumulative translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,246
|
)
|
|
|
(40,246
|
)
|
|
|
(40,246
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5,442,291
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
17,010,413
|
|
|
|
12,500,967
|
|
|
|
11,668,703
|
|
|
|
11,628,984
|
|
|
|
2,222,223
|
|
|
|
10,713,318
|
|
|
|
30,901,339
|
|
|
|
34,843,269
|
|
|
|
|
3,980,278
|
|
|
|
39,803
|
|
|
|
311,048
|
|
|
|
(32,980,213
|
)
|
|
|
9,987
|
|
|
|
(32,619,375
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
258,229
|
|
|
|
2,582
|
|
|
|
514,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
516,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with initial public
offering, net of issuance costs of $2,672,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,750,000
|
|
|
|
57,500
|
|
|
|
82,830,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,887,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with secondary public
offering, net of issuance costs of $508,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,778
|
|
|
|
998
|
|
|
|
1,235,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,236,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock to
redemption value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
509,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
399,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
402,947
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,311,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,311,225
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,311,225
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of redeemable convertible preferred stock to common
stock upon close of initial public offering
|
|
|
(17,010,413
|
)
|
|
|
(13,010,039
|
)
|
|
|
(11,668,703
|
)
|
|
|
(12,028,190
|
)
|
|
|
(2,222,223
|
)
|
|
|
(11,116,265
|
)
|
|
|
(30,901,339
|
)
|
|
|
(36,154,494
|
)
|
|
|
|
12,360,523
|
|
|
|
123,605
|
|
|
|
36,030,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,154,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,855,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,855,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,797,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,797,253
|
|
|
$
|
8,797,253
|
|
Unrealized loss on
available-for-sale
securities, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,691
|
)
|
|
|
(53,691
|
)
|
|
|
(53,691
|
)
|
Cumulative translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,155
|
|
|
|
46,155
|
|
|
|
46,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,789,717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,448,808
|
|
|
|
224,488
|
|
|
|
122,465,372
|
|
|
|
(24,182,960
|
)
|
|
|
2,451
|
|
|
|
98,509,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,409,706
|
|
|
|
14,097
|
|
|
|
4,820,786
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,834,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit from stock options exercises
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,149,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,149,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reversal of accrued offering costs in connection with secondary
public offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,963,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,963,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,098,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,098,644
|
|
|
$
|
21,098,644
|
|
Unrealized gain on
available-for-sale
securities, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,570
|
|
|
|
79,570
|
|
|
|
79,570
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(283,130
|
)
|
|
|
(283,130
|
)
|
|
|
(283,130
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,895,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,858,514
|
|
|
$
|
238,585
|
|
|
$
|
133,425,098
|
|
|
$
|
(3,084,316
|
)
|
|
$
|
(201,109
|
)
|
|
$
|
130,378,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
48
LogMeIn,
Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(5,402,045
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,797,253
|
|
|
$
|
21,098,644
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,403,057
|
|
|
|
3,201,029
|
|
|
|
3,719,721
|
|
Amortization of premium on investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
931
|
|
|
|
239,090
|
|
Provision for bad debts
|
|
|
79,000
|
|
|
|
115,000
|
|
|
|
87,500
|
|
Provision for (benefit from) deferred income taxes
|
|
|
16,669
|
|
|
|
14,696
|
|
|
|
(2,673,141
|
)
|
Income tax benefit from the exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,149,843
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
2,748,925
|
|
|
|
2,921,612
|
|
|
|
4,991,715
|
|
Loss (gain) on disposal of equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
998
|
|
|
|
(1,882
|
)
|
Discount on note payable
|
|
|
57,679
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(1,541,298
|
)
|
|
|
435,971
|
|
|
|
(682,247
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
(1,027,534
|
)
|
|
|
(168,939
|
)
|
|
|
(1,071,375
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(22,359
|
)
|
|
|
(7,559
|
)
|
|
|
2,899
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(1,254,196
|
)
|
|
|
729,687
|
|
|
|
(331,753
|
)
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
1,734,656
|
|
|
|
2,104,029
|
|
|
|
3,643,713
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
12,254,417
|
|
|
|
5,744,457
|
|
|
|
8,690,287
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
83,959
|
|
|
|
449,877
|
|
|
|
(94,775
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
10,130,930
|
|
|
|
24,339,042
|
|
|
|
36,468,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,010,825
|
)
|
|
|
(185,348,800
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale or disposal of marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,000,000
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(3,313,004
|
)
|
|
|
(3,373,180
|
)
|
|
|
(4,243,166
|
)
|
Intangible asset additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(416,062
|
)
|
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash and deposits
|
|
|
(461,959
|
)
|
|
|
218,854
|
|
|
|
5,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(3,774,963
|
)
|
|
|
(33,165,151
|
)
|
|
|
(65,002,910
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock in connection with
initial public offering, net of issuance costs of $1,397,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,162,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock in connection with
secondary public offering, net of issuance costs of $266,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,478,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of issuance costs for proposed initial public offering
of common stock
|
|
|
(961,864
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of issuance costs related to secondary offering of
common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(195,840
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock upon option exercises
|
|
|
110,375
|
|
|
|
516,609
|
|
|
|
4,834,883
|
|
Income tax benefit from the exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,149,843
|
|
Payments on note payable
|
|
|
(1,250,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(2,101,489
|
)
|
|
|
86,156,975
|
|
|
|
5,788,886
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents and
restricted cash
|
|
|
(17,918
|
)
|
|
|
46,154
|
|
|
|
(264,543
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
4,236,560
|
|
|
|
77,377,020
|
|
|
|
(23,010,014
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
18,676,421
|
|
|
|
22,912,981
|
|
|
|
100,290,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
22,912,981
|
|
|
$
|
100,290,001
|
|
|
$
|
77,279,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
205,123
|
|
|
$
|
1,768
|
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
$
|
51,716
|
|
|
$
|
81,922
|
|
|
$
|
612,566
|
|
Noncash investing and financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment included in accounts payable
and accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
219,084
|
|
|
$
|
163,639
|
|
|
$
|
388,501
|
|
Accretion of reedemable convertible preferred stock
|
|
$
|
2,348,229
|
|
|
$
|
1,311,225
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Deferred stock offering costs included in accounts payable and
accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
135,745
|
|
|
$
|
241,972
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Conversion of redeemable preferred stock to common stock
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
36,154,494
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
49
LogMeIn,
Inc.
|
|
1.
|
Nature of
the Business
|
LogMeIn, Inc. (the Company) develops and markets a
suite of remote access, remote support, and collaboration
solutions that provide instant, secure connections between
Internet enabled devices. The Companys product line
includes
Gravitytm,
LogMeIn
Free®,
LogMeIn
Pro2
®,
LogMeIn®
Centraltm,
LogMeIn
Rescue®,
LogMeIn®
Rescue+Mobiletm,
LogMeIn
Backup®,
LogMeIn®
Ignition
SMtm,
LogMeIn
Hamachi2®,
join.metm
and
RemotelyAnywhere®.
The Company is based in Woburn, Massachusetts with wholly-owned
subsidiaries in Hungary, The Netherlands, Australia, England and
Brazil.
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Polices
|
Principles of Consolidation The accompanying
consolidated financial statements include the results of
operations of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All
intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in
consolidation. The Company has prepared the accompanying
consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(GAAP).
Use of Estimates The preparation of
consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and
expenses during the reporting period. By their nature, estimates
are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. Actual results
could differ from those estimates.
Cash Equivalents Cash equivalents consist of
highly liquid investments with an original or remaining maturity
of less than three months at the date of purchase. Cash
equivalents consist of investments in money market funds which
primarily invest in U.S. Treasury obligations. Cash
equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates fair value.
Marketable Securities The Companys
marketable securities are classified as
available-for-sale
and are carried at fair value with the unrealized gains and
losses reported as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income in stockholders equity. Realized
gains and losses and declines in value judged to be other than
temporary are included as a component of earnings based on the
specific identification method. Fair value is determined based
on quoted market prices. At December 31, 2009 and 2010,
marketable securities consisted of U.S. government agency
securities that have remaining maturities within two years and
have an aggregate amortized cost of $30,009,895 and $90,119,605
and an aggregate fair value of $29,956,204 and $90,144,484,
including $0 and $65,136 of unrealized gains and $53,691 and
$40,257 of unrealized losses.
Restricted Cash As of December 31, 2009,
the Company had a certificate of deposit in the amount of $5,118
serving as security for a corporate credit card. In addition,
the Company had a letter of credit of $125,000 at
December 31, 2009 and 2010 from a bank. The letter of
credit was issued in lieu of a security deposit on its Woburn,
Massachusetts office lease. The letter of credit is secured by a
certificate of deposit in the same amount which is held at the
same financial institution. In November 2008, the Company
entered into a new agreement to lease office space in Budapest,
Hungary which required the Company to establish a security
deposit with a bank in the amount of 170,295 Euro (which totaled
$243,066 and $225,481 at December 31, 2009 and 2010,
respectively). Such amounts are classified as long-term
restricted cash in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Accounts Receivable The Company reviews
accounts receivable on a periodic basis to determine if any
receivables will potentially be uncollectible. Estimates are
used to determine the amount of the allowance for doubtful
accounts necessary to reduce accounts receivable to its
estimated net realizable value. The estimates are based on an
analysis of past due receivables and historical bad debt trends.
After the Company has exhausted all collection efforts, the
outstanding receivable is written off against the allowance.
50
Activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Balance, beginning
|
|
$
|
55,316
|
|
|
$
|
69,266
|
|
|
$
|
83,116
|
|
Provision for bad debt
|
|
|
79,000
|
|
|
|
115,000
|
|
|
|
87,500
|
|
Uncollectible accounts written off
|
|
|
65,050
|
|
|
|
101,150
|
|
|
|
59,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, ending
|
|
$
|
69,266
|
|
|
$
|
83,116
|
|
|
$
|
110,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and Equipment Property and equipment
are recorded at cost and depreciated using the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets.
Upon retirement or sale, the cost of the assets disposed of and
the related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the
accounts, and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in the
consolidated statements of operations. Expenditures for
maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred.
Estimated useful lives of assets are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Computer equipment and software
|
|
|
2 3 years
|
|
Office equipment
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
Leasehold Improvements
|
|
|
Shorter of lease term
or estimated useful life
|
|
Goodwill Goodwill is the excess of the
acquisition price over the fair value of the tangible and
identifiable intangible assets acquired related to the Applied
Networking acquisition in July 2006. The Company does not
amortize goodwill, but performs an annual impairment test of
goodwill on the last day of its fiscal year and whenever events
and circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of goodwill
may exceed its fair value. The Company operates as a single
operating segment with one reporting unit and consequently
evaluates goodwill for impairment based on an evaluation of the
fair value of the Company as a whole. Through December 31,
2010, no impairments have occurred.
Long-Lived Assets and Intangible Assets The
Company records intangible assets at their respective estimated
fair values at the date of acquisition. Intangible assets are
being amortized using the straight-line method over their
estimated useful lives, which range from three to five years.
The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of the assets, including intangible assets, may not be
recoverable. When such events occur, the Company compares the
carrying amounts of the assets to their undiscounted expected
future cash flows. If this comparison indicates that there is
impairment, the amount of the impairment is calculated as the
difference between the carrying value and fair value. Through
December 31, 2010, no impairments have occurred.
Revenue Recognition The Company derives
revenue primarily from subscription fees related to its LogMeIn
premium services and from the licensing of its Ignition for
iPhone, iPad and Android software products and RemotelyAnywhere
software and related maintenance.
Revenue from the Companys LogMeIn premium services is
recognized on a daily basis over the subscription term as the
services are delivered, provided that there is persuasive
evidence of an arrangement, the fee is fixed or determinable and
collectability is deemed reasonably assured. Subscription
periods range from monthly to four years, but are generally one
year in duration. The Companys software cannot be run on
another entitys hardware nor do customers have the right
to take possession of the software and use it on their own or
another entitys hardware.
The Company recognizes revenue from the bundled delivery of its
RemotelyAnywhere software product and related maintenance
ratably, on a daily basis, over the term of the maintenance
contract, generally one year, when there is persuasive evidence
of an arrangement, the product has been provided to the
customer, the
51
collection of the fee is probable, and the amount of fees to be
paid by the customer is fixed or determinable. The Company
currently does not have vendor-specific objective evidence for
the fair value of its maintenance arrangements and therefore the
license and maintenance are bundled together. The Company
recognizes revenue from the sale of its Ignition for iPhone,
iPad and Android software product which is sold as a perpetual
license and is recognized when there is persuasive evidence of
an arrangement, the product has been provided to the customer,
the collection of the fee is probable, and the amount of fees to
be paid by the customer is fixed or determinable.
The Companys multi-element arrangements typically include
multiple deliverables by the Company such as subscription and
professional services, including development services.
Agreements with multiple element deliverables are analyzed to
determine if fair value exists for each element on a stand-alone
basis. If the fair value of each deliverable is determinable
then revenue is recognized separately when or as the services
are delivered, or if applicable, when milestones associated with
the deliverable are achieved and accepted by the customer. If
the fair value of any of the undelivered performance obligations
cannot be determined, the arrangement is accounted for as a
single element and the Company recognizes revenue on a
straightline basis over the period in which the Company expects
to complete its performance obligations under the agreement.
Deferred Revenue Deferred revenue primarily
consists of billings and payments received in advance of revenue
recognition. The Company primarily bills and collects payments
from customers for products and services in advance on a monthly
and annual basis. Deferred revenue to be recognized in the next
twelve months is included in current deferred revenue, and the
remaining amounts are included in long-term deferred revenue in
the consolidated balance sheets.
Concentrations of Credit Risk and Significant
Customers The Companys principal credit
risk relates to its cash, cash equivalents, short term
marketable securities, restricted cash, and accounts receivable.
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash are deposited
primarily with financial institutions that management believes
to be of high-credit quality and custody of its marketable
securities is with an accredited financial institution. To
manage accounts receivable credit risk, the Company regularly
evaluates the creditworthiness of its customers and maintains
allowances for potential credit losses. To date, losses
resulting from uncollected receivables have not exceeded
managements expectations.
As of December 31, 2010, one customer accounted for 14% of
accounts receivable and there were no customers that represented
10% or more of revenue for the years ended December 31,
2008, 2009, or 2010. As of December 31, 2009, no customers
accounted for 10% or more of accounts receivable.
Research and Development Research and
development expenditures are expensed as incurred.
In June 2009, the Company received approval of a grant from the
Hungarian government which reimburses it for a portion of its
Hungarian research and development related costs for a four year
period, beginning in September 2008. These reimbursements are
recorded as a reduction of research and development expense and
totaled approximately $200,000 and $371,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2010.
Software Development Costs The Company has
determined that technological feasibility of its software
products that are sold as a perpetual licence is reached shortly
before their introduction to the marketplace. As a result,
development costs incurred after the establishment of
technological feasibility and before their release to the
marketplace have not been material and such costs have been
expensed as incurred.
The Company capitalizes certain direct costs to develop
functionality as well as certain upgrades and enhancements of
its on-demand products that are probable to result in additional
functionality. The costs incurred in the preliminary stages of
development are expensed as incurred. Once an application has
reached the development stage, internal and external costs, if
direct and incremental, are capitalized as part of intangible
assets until the software is substantially complete and ready
for its intended use. Internally developed software costs that
are capitalized are classified as intangible assets and
amortized over a three year period in the expense category to
which the software relates.
Foreign Currency Translation The functional
currency of operations outside the United States of America is
deemed to be the currency of the local country. Accordingly, the
assets and liabilities of the
52
Companys foreign subsidiaries are translated into United
States dollars using the period-end exchange rate, and income
and expense items are translated using the average exchange rate
during the period. Cumulative translation adjustments are
reflected as a separate component of stockholders equity.
Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are charged to
operations. The Company had foreign currency losses of
approximately $111,000, $18,000 and $219,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010.
Stock-Based Compensation Stock-based
compensation is measured based upon the grant date fair value
and recognized as an expense on a straight line basis in the
financial statements over the vesting period of the award for
those awards expected to vest. The Company uses the
Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the grant date
fair value of stock awards. The Company uses the
with-or-without
method to determine when it will realize excess tax benefits
from stock based compensation. Under this method, the Company
will realize these excess tax benefits only after it realizes
the tax benefits of net operating losses from operations.
Income Taxes Deferred income taxes are
provided for the tax effects of temporary differences between
the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial
reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes,
and operating loss carry-forwards and credits using enacted tax
rates expected to be in effect in the years in which the
differences are expected to reverse. At each balance sheet date,
the Company assesses the likelihood that deferred tax assets
will be realized, and recognizes a valuation allowance if it is
more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax
assets will not be realized. This assessment requires judgment
as to the likelihood and amounts of future taxable income by tax
jurisdiction. As of December 31, 2009, the Company provided
a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets as it
believed the objective and verifiable evidence of its historical
pretax net losses outweighed the positive evidence of its
pre-tax income for the year ended December 31, 2009 and
forecasted future results.
During 2010, the Company reassessed the need for a valuation
allowance against its deferred tax assets and concluded that it
was more likely than not that it would be able to realize
certain of its deferred tax assets primarily as a result of
continued profitability and forecasted future results.
Accordingly, the Company reversed its valuation allowance
related to its U.S. and certain foreign deferred tax assets
of $8,570,000 during the year ended December 31, 2010. As
of December 31, 2010, the Company maintained a full
valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets of its
Hungarian subsidiary, as this entity has historical losses and
we concluded it was not more likely than not that these deferred
tax assets are realizable.
The Company evaluates its uncertain tax positions based on a
determination of whether and how much of a tax benefit taken by
the Company in its tax filings or positions is more likely than
not to be realized. Potential interest and penalties associated
with any uncertain tax positions are recorded as a component of
income tax expense. Through December 31, 2010, the Company
has not identified any material uncertain tax positions for
which liabilities would be required.
Advertising Costs The Company expenses
advertising costs as incurred. Advertising expense for the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, was approximately
$11,688,000, $11,717,000, and $17,678,000 respectively, which
consisted primarily of online paid searches, banner advertising,
and other online marketing and is included in sales and
marketing expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations.
Comprehensive Income (Loss) Comprehensive
income (loss) is the change in stockholders equity during
a period relating to transactions and other events and
circumstances from non-owner sources and currently consists of
net income (loss), foreign currency translation adjustments, and
unrealized gains and losses, net of tax on
available-for-sale
securities.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments The
carrying value of the Companys financial instruments,
including cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts
receivable, and accounts payable, approximate their fair values
due to their short maturities.
Segment Data Operating segments are
identified as components of an enterprise about which separate
discrete financial information is available for evaluation by
the chief operating decision-maker, or decision making group, in
making decisions regarding resource allocation and assessing
performance. The Company, which uses consolidated financial
information in determining how to allocate resources and assess
53
performance, has determined that it operates in one segment. The
Company does not disclose geographic information for revenue and
long lived assets as it is impractical to calculate revenue by
geography and aggregate long lived assets located outside the
United States do not exceed 10% of total assets.
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Stockholders Per
Share The Company used the two-class method to
compute net income (loss) per share for and prior to the year
ended December 31, 2009, because the Company had previously
issued securities, other than common stock, that contractually
entitled the holders to participate in dividends and earnings of
the company. The two class method requires earnings available to
common stockholders for the period, after an allocation of
earnings to participating securities, to be allocated between
common and participating securities based upon their respective
rights to receive distributed and undistributed earnings. The
Companys convertible preferred stock was a participating
security as it shared in any dividends paid to common
stockholders. Such participating securities were automatically
converted to common stock upon the Companys IPO in July
2009. Basic net income (loss) attributable to common
stockholders per share was computed after allocation of earnings
to the convertible preferred stock (losses were not allocated)
by using the weighted average number common shares outstanding
for the period.
For periods in which the Company has reported net losses,
diluted net loss per common share is the same as basic net loss
per common share, since the Companys convertible preferred
stock did not participate in losses.
The following potential common shares were excluded from the
computation of diluted net income (loss) per share attributable
to common stockholders because they had an antidilutive impact:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Options to purchase common stock
|
|
|
3,209,650
|
|
|
|
116,900
|
|
|
|
1,098,775
|
|
Conversion of redeemable convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
12,360,523
|
|
|
|
12,360,523
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total options and conversion of redeemable convertible preferred
stock
|
|
|
15,570,173
|
|
|
|
12,477,423
|
|
|
|
1,098,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The redeemable convertible preferred stock was considered
antidilutive for the period prior to the Companys IPO on
July 7, 2009. Subsequent to the conversion it is included
in common stock. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
8,797,253
|
|
Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
(1,311,225
|
)
|
Net income allocated to redeemable convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
(2,466,543
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, attributable to common stock
|
|
$
|
5,019,485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic
|
|
|
12,949,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders, basic
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
7,486,028
|
|
Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
908,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, attributable to dilutive securities
|
|
$
|
8,394,306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
20,711,725
|
|
Add: Options to purchase common shares
|
|
|
1,845,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding, diluted
|
|
|
22,557,096
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders, diluted
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for the year ended December 31, 2009 was
allocated between the periods during which two classes of equity
securities were outstanding and the period during which only a
single class of equity
54
securities was outstanding based on the respective number of
days in each such period. The preferred stock converted into
common stock upon the Companys IPO in July 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
21,098,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic
|
|
|
23,244,479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders, basic
|
|
$
|
0.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
21,098,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
23,244,479
|
|
Add: Options to purchase common shares
|
|
|
1,595,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding, diluted
|
|
|
24,839,905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders, diluted
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantees and Indemnification Obligations As
permitted under Delaware law, the Company has agreements whereby
the Company indemnifies certain of its officers and directors
for certain events or occurrences while the officer or director
is, or was, serving at the Companys request in such
capacity. The term of the indemnification period is for the
officers or directors lifetime. As permitted under
Delaware law, the Company also has similar indemnification
obligations under its certificate of incorporation and by-laws.
The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company
could be required to make under these indemnification agreements
is unlimited; however, the Company has directors and
officers insurance coverage that the Company believes
limits its exposure and enables it to recover a portion of any
future amounts paid.
The Companys agreements with customers generally require
the Company to indemnify the customer against claims in which
the Companys products infringe third-party patents,
copyrights, or trademarks and indemnify against product
liability matters. The term of these indemnification agreements
is generally perpetual. The maximum potential amount of future
payments the Company could be required to make under these
indemnification agreements is unlimited.
Through December 31, 2010, the Company had not experienced
any losses related to these indemnification obligations, and no
claims with respect thereto were outstanding. However, the
Company has pre-existing indemnification obligations that may be
owed to certain of its customers in connection with the
infringement claims brought by Gemini. The Company does not
expect these litigation-related claims to be significant and
does not expect significant claims related to these
indemnification obligations generally and, consequently,
concluded that the fair value of these obligations is
negligible, and no related reserves were established.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements In
October 2009, an update was made to Revenue
Recognition Multiple Deliverable Revenue
Arrangements. This update removes the
objective-and-reliable-evidence-of-fair-value
criterion from the separation criteria used to determine whether
an arrangement involving multiple deliverables contains more
than one unit of accounting, replaces references to fair
value with selling price to distinguish from
the fair value measurements required under the
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
guidance, provides a hierarchy that entities must use to
estimate the selling price, eliminates the use of the residual
method for allocation, and expands the ongoing disclosure
requirements. This update is effective beginning January 1,
2011 and can be applied prospectively or retrospectively. The
effect of adoption of this standard will only impact our
financial statement disclosure to comply with the additional
disclosure requirements. We do not expect the implementation of
this guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
55
Subsequent Events The Company considers
events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date
but before the financial statements are issued to provide
additional evidence related to certain estimates or to identify
matters that require additional disclosure.
|
|
3.
|
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
|
The carrying value of the Companys financial instruments,
including cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts
receivable, and accounts payable, approximate their fair values
due to their short maturities. The Companys financial
assets and liabilities are measured using inputs from the three
levels of the fair value hierarchy. A financial asset or
liabilitys classification within the hierarchy is
determined based on the lowest level input that is significant
to the fair value measurement. The three levels are as follows:
Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or
liabilities in active markets accessible by the Company at the
measurement date.
Level 2: Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets
and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical
or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not
active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for
the asset or liability, and inputs that are derived principally
from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or
other means.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that reflect the
Companys assumptions about the assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
The following table summarizes the basis used to measure certain
of the Companys financial assets that are carried at fair
value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basis of Fair Value Measurements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Items
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents money market funds
|
|
$
|
77,947,705
|
|
|
$
|
77,947,705
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Cash equivalents bank deposits
|
|
$
|
5,003,453
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,003,453
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Marketable securities U.S. government agency
securities
|
|
$
|
29,956,204
|
|
|
$
|
29,956,204
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents money market funds
|
|
$
|
48,074,441
|
|
|
$
|
48,074,441
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Cash equivalents bank deposits
|
|
$
|
5,022,089
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,022,089
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Marketable securities U.S. government agency
securities
|
|
$
|
90,144,484
|
|
|
$
|
90,144,484
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
56
Intangible assets consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useful
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Carrying
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Carrying
|
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademark
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
$
|
635,506
|
|
|
$
|
436,004
|
|
|
$
|
199,502
|
|
|
$
|
635,506
|
|
|
$
|
563,105
|
|
|
$
|
72,401
|
|
Customer base
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
|
1,003,068
|
|
|
|
688,178
|
|
|
|
314,890
|
|
|
|
1,003,068
|
|
|
|
888,791
|
|
|
|
114,277
|
|
Domain names
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202,120
|
|
|
|
10,038
|
|
|
|
192,082
|
|
Software
|
|
|
4 years
|
|
|
|
298,977
|
|
|
|
256,400
|
|
|
|
42,577
|
|
|
|
298,977
|
|
|
|
298,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology
|
|
|
4 years
|
|
|
|
1,361,900
|
|
|
|
1,167,954
|
|
|
|
193,946
|
|
|
|
1,361,900
|
|
|
|
1,361,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internally developed software
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213,942
|
|
|
|
14,887
|
|
|
|
199,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,299,451
|
|
|
$
|
2,548,536
|
|
|
$
|
750,915
|
|
|
$
|
3,715,513
|
|
|
$
|
3,137,698
|
|
|
$
|
577,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company capitalized costs related to internally developed
computer software to be sold as a service incurred during the
application development stage of $213,942 during 2010 and is
amortizing these costs over the expected lives of the related
services. No amounts were capitalized during the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2009 as the costs incurred during
such stage have historically been immaterial. In April 2010, the
Company paid $202,120 to acquire domain names.
The Company is amortizing the intangible assets on a
straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives noted above.
Amortization expense for intangible assets was $742,934 for the
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009 and $589,162 for the
year ended December 31, 2010. Amortization relating to
software, technology and internally developed software is
recorded within cost of revenues and the amortization of
trademark, customer base, and domain names is recorded within
operating expenses. Future estimated amortization expense for
intangible assets is as follows at December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization Expense (Years Ending December 31)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
298,431
|
|
2012
|
|
|
111,753
|
|
2013
|
|
|
96,864
|
|
2014
|
|
|
40,437
|
|
2015
|
|
|
30,330
|
|
|
|
5.
|
Property
and Equipment
|
Property and equipment consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Computer Equipment and software
|
|
$
|
7,493,322
|
|
|
$
|
10,787,862
|
|
Office equipment
|
|
|
1,052,524
|
|
|
|
1,335,671
|
|
Furniture & fixtures
|
|
|
962,978
|
|
|
|
1,276,833
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
904,184
|
|
|
|
1,270,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment
|
|
|
10,413,008
|
|
|
|
14,670,897
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(5,553,869
|
)
|
|
|
(8,472,410
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
4,859,139
|
|
|
$
|
6,198,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
Depreciation expense for property and equipment was $1,660,123,
$2,458,095 and $3,130,559 for the years ended December 31,
2008, 2009 and 2010.
Accrued expenses consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Marketing programs
|
|
$
|
1,242,250
|
|
|
$
|
3,265,692
|
|
Payroll and payroll related
|
|
|
3,185,126
|
|
|
|
4,535,322
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
450,788
|
|
|
|
745,834
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
2,445,012
|
|
|
|
2,282,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
7,323,176
|
|
|
$
|
10,829,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The domestic and foreign components of income (loss) before
provision for income taxes are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
(5,900,148
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,875,833
|
|
|
$
|
15,918,650
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
620,108
|
|
|
|
2,262,957
|
|
|
|
2,688,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income (loss) before provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
(5,280,040
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,138,790
|
|
|
$
|
18,607,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for income taxes is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
163,444
|
|
|
$
|
810,518
|
|
State
|
|
|
19,489
|
|
|
|
90,789
|
|
|
|
423,119
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
85,848
|
|
|
|
72,608
|
|
|
|
154,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
105,337
|
|
|
|
326,841
|
|
|
|
1,387,955
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
14,096
|
|
|
|
13,947
|
|
|
|
(4,391,436
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
2,572
|
|
|
|
749
|
|
|
|
521,472
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,020
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
16,668
|
|
|
|
14,696
|
|
|
|
(3,878,984
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
$
|
122,005
|
|
|
$
|
341,537
|
|
|
$
|
(2,491,029
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
A reconciliation of the Companys effective tax rate to the
statutory federal income tax rate is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Statutory tax rate
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(17.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(27.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(45.9
|
)%
|
Impact of permanent differences
|
|
|
(10.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(5.9
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
Foreign tax rate differential
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(4.1
|
)%
|
Research and development credits
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)%
|
State taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
(13.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has deferred tax assets related to temporary
differences and operating loss carryforwards as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$
|
5,163,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,153,000
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
1,464,000
|
|
|
|
694,000
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
694,000
|
|
|
|
822,000
|
|
Research and development credit carryforwards
|
|
|
664,000
|
|
|
|
1,239,000
|
|
Bad debt reserves
|
|
|
32,000
|
|
|
|
43,000
|
|
Stock compensation associated with non-qualified awards
|
|
|
1,130,000
|
|
|
|
2,117,000
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,898,000
|
|
|
|
594,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
11,045,000
|
|
|
|
6,662,000
|
|
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance
|
|
|
(10,606,000
|
)
|
|
|
(2,036,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
|
439,000
|
|
|
|
4,626,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(439,000
|
)
|
|
|
(645,000
|
)
|
Goodwill amortization
|
|
|
(56,000
|
)
|
|
|
(148,000
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(495,000
|
)
|
|
|
(803,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(56,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,823,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recorded a deferred income tax provision (benefit)
of approximately $17,000, $14,000 and ($3,879,000) for the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 respectively.
At December 31, 2009 and 2010, a deferred tax liability of
$0 and approximately $10,000, respectively, is included in
accrued expenses.
As of December 31, 2009, the Company provided a full
valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets as it was
not more likely than not that any future benefit from deductible
temporary differences and net operating loss and tax credit
carryforwards would be realized. The Company believed the
objective and verifiable evidence of its historical pretax net
losses outweighed the positive evidence of its pre-tax income
for the year ended December 31, 2009 and forecasted future
results. The increase in the valuation allowance for the year
ended December 31, 2008 was $1,942,000 and the decrease in
the valuation allowance for the year ended December 31,
2009 was $976,000.
59
During 2010, the Company reassessed the need for a valuation
allowance against its deferred tax assets and concluded that it
was more likely than not that it would be able to realize
certain of its deferred tax assets primarily as a result of
continued profitability, achievement of three years of
cumulative profitability and forecasted future earnings.
Accordingly, the Company reversed the valuation allowance
related to its U.S. and certain foreign deferred tax assets
of $8,570,000. As of December 31, 2010, the Company
maintained a full valuation allowance related to the deferred
tax assets of its Hungarian subsidiary.
As of December 31, 2010, the Company had federal, state,
and foreign net operating loss carryforwards of approximately
$15,837,000, $14,040,000 and $8,780,000, respectively, which
expire at varying dates through 2030 for federal purposes and
primarily through 2015 for state income tax purposes. The
Companys foreign net operating loss carryforwards are not
subject to expiration. The Company recognized a full valuation
allowance against its Hungarian net operating loss carryfowards.
The domestic net operating loss carryforwards are available to
offset future tax payments, however they are no longer
recognized for book purposes as they have been utilized under
the
with-and-without
method. The domestic net operating loss carryforwards include
approximately $5,760,000 related to operating loss carryforwards
resulting from excess tax benefits related to share based
awards, the tax benefits of which, when recognized, will be
accounted for as a credit to additional paid-in capital when
they reduce taxes payable. The Company added approximately
$3,704,000 of federal, $247,000 of state and $3,148,000 of
foreign net operating loss carryforwards during the year ended
December 31, 2010.
As of December 31, 2010, the Company had federal, state and
foreign research and development credit carryforwards of
approximately $708,000, $387,000 and $1,153,000, respectively,
which are available to offset future federal and state taxes and
expire through 2030. The Companys foreign research and
development credits expire beginning in 2014. The Company has
recognized a full valuation allowance against its foreign
research and development credit carryforwards. The domestic
research and development credits are available to offset future
tax payments, however they are no longer recognized for book
purposes as they have been utilized under the
with-and-without
method.
The Company generally considers all earnings generated outside
of the U.S. to be permanently reinvested offshore.
Therefore, the Company does not accrue U.S. tax for the
repatriation of the foreign earnings it considers to be
permanently reinvested outside the U.S. As of December 31,
2010, the Company has not provided for federal income tax on
approximately $1,055,000 of accumulated undistributed earnings
of its foreign subsidiaries. The deferred tax liability related
to these earnings is not material.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal
jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions. The
Companys income tax returns since inception are open to
examination by federal, state, and foreign tax authorities. The
Company has no amount recorded for any unrecognized tax benefits
as December 31, 2008, 2009 or 2010. The Companys
policy is to record estimated interest and penalties related to
the underpayment of income taxes or unrecognized tax benefits as
a component of its income tax provision. During the years ended
2008, 2009 and 2010, the Company did not recognize any interest
or penalties in its statements of operations and there are no
accruals for interest or penalties at December 31, 2009 and
2010.
The Company has performed an analysis of its ownership changes
as defined by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code and
has determined that an ownership change as defined by
Section 382 occurred in October 2004 and March 2010
resulting in approximately $219,000 and $12,800,000 of NOLs
being subject to limitation. As of December 31, 2010, all
NOLs generated by the Company, including those subject to
limitation, are available for utilization given the
Companys large annual limitation amount. Subsequent
ownership changes as defined by Section 382 could
potentially limit the amount of net operating loss carryforwards
that can be utilized annually to offset future taxable income.
|
|
8.
|
Common
Stock and Stockholders Equity
|
Authorized Shares On June 9, 2009, the
Companys Board of Directors approved a Restated
Certificate of Incorporation to be effective upon the closing of
the Companys IPO. This Restated Certificate of
Incorporation, among other things, increased the Companys
authorized common shares to 75,000,000 and authorized
5,000,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock.
60
Common Stock Reserved As of December 31,
2009 and 2010, the Company has reserved the following number of
shares of common stock for the exercise of stock options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares as of
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Common stock options
|
|
|
3,823,703
|
|
|
|
4,862,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total reserved
|
|
|
3,823,703
|
|
|
|
4,862,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public Offerings On July 7, 2009, the
Company closed its IPO of 7,666,667 shares of common stock
at an offering price of $16.00 per share, of which
5,750,000 shares were sold by the Company and
1,916,667 shares were sold by selling stockholders,
resulting in net proceeds to the Company of approximately
$83,000,000, after deducting underwriting discounts and offering
costs.
On December 16, 2009, the Company closed its Secondary
offering of 3,226,831 shares of common stock at an offering
price of $18.50 per share, of which 99,778 shares were sold
by the Company and 3,127,053 shares were sold by selling
stockholders, resulting in net proceeds to the Company of
$1,236,055, after deducting underwriting discounts and offering
costs.
At the closing of the Companys IPO, all outstanding shares
of redeemable convertible preferred stock were automatically
converted into 12,360,523 shares of common stock.
On June 9, 2009, the Companys Board of Directors
approved the 2009 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2009
Plan) which became effective upon the closing of the IPO.
A total of 800,000 shares of common stock, subject to
increase on an annual basis, are reserved for future issuance
under the 2009 Plan. Shares of common stock reserved for
issuance under the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan that remained
available for issuance at the time of effectiveness of the 2009
Plan and any shares of common stock subject to awards under the
2007 Plan that expire, terminate, or are otherwise forfeited,
canceled, or repurchased by the Company were added to the number
of shares available under the 2009 Plan. The 2009 Plan is
administered by the Board of Directors and Compensation
Committee, which have the authority to designate participants
and determine the number and type of awards to be granted, the
time at which awards are exercisable, the method of payment and
any other terms or conditions of the awards. Options generally
vest over a four-year period and expire ten years from the date
of grant. Certain options provide for accelerated vesting if
there is a change in control. On January 1, 2010, subject
to the provisions of the 2009 Plan, 448,996 shares were
added to the shares available to grant. On May 27, 2010,
the Companys stockholders approved a 2,000,000 share
increase to the shares available to grant under the 2009 Plan
and removed the automatic annual share increase provision from
the 2009 Plan. There were 2,298,678 shares available to grant
under the 2009 Plan as of December 31, 2010.
The Company generally issues previously unissued shares of
common stock for the exercise of stock options. The Company
received $110,375, $516,609 and $4,834,883 in cash from stock
option exercises during the years ended December 31, 2008,
2009 and 2010, respectively.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to
estimate the grant date fair value of stock option grants. The
Company estimates the expected volatility of its common stock at
the date of grant based on the historical volatility of
comparable public companies over the options expected term
given the Companys limited trading history. The Company
estimates expected term based on historical exercise activity
and giving consideration to the contractual term of the options,
vesting schedules, employee turnover, and expectation of
employee exercise behavior. The assumed dividend yield is based
upon the Companys expectation of not paying dividends in
the foreseeable future. The risk-free rate for periods within
the estimated life of the option is based on the
U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term
equal to the expected life at the time of grant. Historical
employee turnover data is used to estimate pre-vesting option
forfeiture rates. The compensation expense is amortized on a
straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the
options, which is generally four years.
61
The Company used the following assumptions to apply the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
0.00%
|
|
0.00%
|
|
0.00%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
2.52% - 3.33%
|
|
1.88% - 2.71%
|
|
1.03% - 2.46%
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
5.54 - 6.25
|
|
5.11 - 6.25
|
|
5.56 - 6.25
|
Volatility
|
|
75% - 80%
|
|
75%
|
|
65% - 75%
|
The following table summarizes stock option activity, including
performance-based options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
of Share
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Outstanding, January 1, 2010
|
|
|
3,046,971
|
|
|
$
|
4.90
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,108,950
|
|
|
|
22.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(1,409,706
|
)
|
|
|
3.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
33,231,299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(181,900
|
)
|
|
|
14.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2010
|
|
|
2,564,315
|
|
|
$
|
12.76
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
$
|
80,983,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
1,246,838
|
|
|
$
|
5.36
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
$
|
48,600,697
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested or expected to vest at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
2,497,057
|
|
|
$
|
12.42
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
$
|
79,555,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value was calculated based on the
positive differences between the estimated fair value of the
Companys common stock on December 31, 2010 of $44.34
per share or at time of exercise, and the exercise price of the
options.
The weighted average grant date fair value of stock options
issued was $8.54, $11.02 and $14.63 per share for the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2009, and 2010, respectively.
The Company recognized stock based compensation expense within
the accompanying consolidated statements of operations as
summarized in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
63,580
|
|
|
$
|
54,068
|
|
|
$
|
260,554
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
418,683
|
|
|
|
536,800
|
|
|
|
638,383
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
962,302
|
|
|
|
931,488
|
|
|
|
1,552,584
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
1,304,360
|
|
|
|
1,399,256
|
|
|
|
2,540,194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,748,925
|
|
|
$
|
2,921,612
|
|
|
$
|
4,991,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010, there was approximately
$13,548,465 of total unrecognized share-based compensation cost,
net of estimated forfeitures, related to unvested stock option
grants which are expected to be recognized over a weighted
average period of 2.8 years. The total unrecognized
share-based compensation cost will be adjusted for future
changes in estimated forfeitures.
Of the total stock options issued subject to the Plans, certain
stock options have performance-based vesting. These
performance-based options granted during 2004 and 2007 were
generally granted
at-the-money,
contingently vest over a period of two to four years depending
upon the nature of the performance goal, and have a contractual
life of ten years.
62
The Company granted 180,000 performance-based options in 2007,
which vested upon the closing of the IPO. The Company recorded
compensation expense of $338,000 in July 2009 related to these
performance-based options.
These performance-based options are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
of Share
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Outstanding, January 1, 2010
|
|
|
642,732
|
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(109,800
|
)
|
|
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,076,682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2010
|
|
|
532,932
|
|
|
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
22,964,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
532,932
|
|
|
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
22,964,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value was calculated based on the
positive differences between the estimated fair value of the
Companys common stock on December 31, 2010 of $44.34
per share, or at time of exercise, and the exercise price of the
options.
On January 1, 2007, the Company established a defined
contribution savings plan under Section 401(k) of the
Internal Revenue Code. The plan is available to all employees
upon employment and allows participants to defer a portion of
their annual compensation on a pre-tax basis. The Company may
contribute to the plan at the discretion of the Board of
Directors. The Company has not made any contributions to the
plan through December 31, 2010.
|
|
11.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Operating Leases The Company has operating
lease agreements for offices in Massachusetts, Hungary, The
Netherlands, Australia and England that expire in 2010 through
2014. The lease agreement for the Massachusetts office requires
a security deposit of $125,000 in the form of a letter of credit
which is collateralized by a certificate of deposit in the same
amount. The lease agreement with the Hungarian office requires a
security deposit in the amount of approximately $225,481
(170,295 Euro) at December 31, 2010. The certificate of
deposit and the security deposit are classified as restricted
cash (see Note 2). The Massachusetts, The Netherlands, and
Budapest, Hungary leases contain termination options which allow
the Company to terminate the leases.
In July 2010, the Company amended its Massachusetts lease in
order to add additional office space to its corporate
headquarters. The term of the new office space began in
September 2010 and extends through February 2013, the
termination date of the original lease. The approximate annual
lease payments for the additional office space are $330,000.
Rent expense under these leases was approximately $1,270,000,
$1,778,000 and $2,300,000 for the years ended December 31,
2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. The Company records rent
expense on a straight-line basis for leases with scheduled
acceleration clauses, free rent periods or tenant improvement
incentives.
The Company also enters into hosting services agreements with
third-party data centers and internet service providers that are
subject to annual renewal. Hosting fees incurred under these
arrangements aggregated approximately $1,398,000, $1,621,000 and
$1,168,000 for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010, respectively.
63
Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating
leases including one year commitments associated with the
Companys hosting services arrangements are approximately
as follows at December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ending December 31
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
3,614,000
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2,536,000
|
|
2013
|
|
|
1,145,000
|
|
2014
|
|
|
128,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
7,423,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Litigation In May 2008, the Company settled a
patent infringement lawsuit for $900,000. In the settlement, the
plaintiff dismissed the action with prejudice and both parties
provided mutual releases from claims arising from or related to
the patent at issue. The Company recorded $600,000 related to
this lawsuit as expense in the year ended December 31, 2008.
On June 2, 2009, PB&J Software, LLC, or PB&J,
filed a complaint that named the Company and four other
companies as defendants in a lawsuit in the U.S. District
Court for the District of Minnesota (Civil Action
No. 09-cv-206-JMR/SRN).
The Company received service of the complaint on July 20,
2009. The complaint alleged that the Company infringed
U.S. Patent No. 7,310,736, which allegedly is owned by
PB&J and has claims directed to a particular application or
system for transferring or storing
back-up
copies of files from one computer to a second computer. On
July 27, 2010, the Company and PB&J entered into a
License Agreement which granted the Company a fully-paid license
covering the patent at issue in the action and mutually released
each party from all claims. The Company paid PB&J a
one-time $65,000 licensing fee. As a result the action was
dismissed by the court in August of 2010.
On September 8, 2010, 01 Communique Laboratory, Inc., or
01, filed a complaint that named the Company and one other
company as defendants in a lawsuit in the U.S. District
Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Civil Action
No. 1:10cv1007). The Company received service of the
complaint on September 10, 2010. The complaint alleges that
the Company has infringed U.S. Patent No. 6,928,479,
which allegedly is owned by 01 and has claims directed to a
particular application or system for providing a private
communication portal from one computer to a second computer. The
complaint seeks damages in an unspecified amount and injunctive
relief. As of February 28, 2011, the case remains in the
discovery phase and both parties have made various motions
before the court. A trial is tentatively scheduled for the
second quarter of 2011. The Company is investigating these
allegations, believes it has strong defenses to the claims and
intends to defend the lawsuit vigorously. At this time, the
Company is unable to reasonably estimate the possible loss or
range of loss associated with this litigation.
On November 3, 2010, Gemini IP LLC, or Gemini, filed a
complaint that named the Company as a defendant in a lawsuit in
the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
(Civil Action
No. 4:07-cv-521).
The Company received service of the complaint on
November 10, 2010. The complaint alleges that the Company
has infringed U.S. Patent No. 6,117,932, which
allegedly is owned by Gemini and has claims related to a system
for operating an IT helpdesk. The complaint seeks damages in an
unspecified amount and injunctive relief. The Company is
investigating these allegations, believes it has meritorious
defenses to the claims and intends to defend the lawsuit
vigorously. At this time, the Company is unable to reasonably
estimate the possible loss or range of loss associated with this
litigation.
The Company is subject to various other legal proceedings and
claims, either asserted or unasserted, which arise in the
ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these other
claims cannot be predicted with certainty, management does not
believe that the outcome of any of these other legal matters
will have a material adverse effect on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
64
In December 2007, the Company entered into a strategic agreement
with Intel Corporation to jointly develop a service that
delivers connectivity to computers built with Intel components.
Under the terms of the multi-year agreement, the Company adapted
its service delivery platform, Gravity, to work with specific
technology delivered with Intel hardware and software products.
The agreement provides that Intel will market and sell the
service to its customers. Intel pays the Company a minimum
license and service fee on a quarterly basis during the
multi-year term of the agreement. The Company began recognizing
revenue associated with the Intel service and marketing
agreement upon receipt of acceptance in the quarter ended
September 30, 2008. In addition, the Company and Intel
share revenue generated by the use of the service by third
parties to the extent it exceeds the minimum payments. In
conjunction with this agreement, Intel Capital purchased
2,222,223 shares of our
Series B-1
redeemable convertible preferred stock for $10,000,004, which
were converted into 888,889 shares of common stock in
connection with the closing of the IPO on July 7, 2009.
In September 2010, Intel notified the Company that it intended
to terminate the connectivity service and marketing agreement
effective on December 26, 2010. In accordance with the
termination provisions of the agreement, Intel paid the Company
a one-time termination fee of $2.5 million in lieu of the
$5 million in annual fees associated with 2011. Intel paid
the Company the $2.5 million termination fee in December 2010.
In June 2009, the Company entered into a license, royalty and
referral agreement with Intel Americas, Inc., pursuant to which
the Company will pay Intel specified royalties with respect to
subscriptions to its products that incorporate the Intel
technology covered by the service and marketing agreement with
Intel Corporation. In addition, in the event Intel refers
customers to the Company under this agreement, the Company will
pay Intel specified fees.
At December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2010, Intel owed
the Company approximately $101,000 and $9,000, respectively,
recorded as a non-trade receivable relating to this agreement.
The Company recognized $6,007,000 and $9,580,000 of net revenue
relating to these agreements for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively. As of
December 31, 2009, the Company had recorded $2,143,000
related to this agreement as deferred revenue of which
$1,071,000 was classified as long term deferred revenue. As of
December 31, 2010, the Company has recorded $0 related to
this agreement as deferred revenue. The Company recorded
expenses relating to referral fees of approximately $33,000 and
$4,000 relating to this agreement for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2010. Approximately $19,000 relating
to the referral fees and $5,000 relating to license fees are
payable to Intel as of December 31, 2009.
|
|
13.
|
Quarterly
Information (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
December 31
|
|
March 31,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2010
|
|
2010
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Operations
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
17,197
|
|
|
$
|
18,007
|
|
|
$
|
18,971
|
|
|
$
|
20,233
|
|
|
$
|
21,325
|
|
|
$
|
23,492
|
|
|
$
|
25,350
|
|
|
$
|
30,890
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
15,453
|
|
|
|
16,154
|
|
|
|
17,061
|
|
|
|
18,232
|
|
|
|
19,105
|
|
|
|
21,228
|
|
|
|
23,106
|
|
|
|
28,494
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
2,265
|
|
|
|
2,507
|
|
|
|
1,997
|
|
|
|
2,536
|
|
|
|
2,825
|
|
|
|
3,902
|
|
|
|
5,048
|
|
|
|
6,418
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
2,133
|
|
|
|
2,340
|
|
|
|
1,850
|
|
|
|
2,474
|
|
|
|
2,736
|
|
|
|
8,981
|
|
|
|
3,995
|
|
|
|
5,387
|
|
Net income per share-basic
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
Net income per share-diluted
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
0.21
|
|
65
|
|
ITEM 9.
|
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
None.
|
|
ITEM 9A.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive
officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness
of our disclosure controls and procedures as of
December 31, 2010. The term disclosure controls and
procedures, as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, means controls and
other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports
that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods
specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls
and procedures include, without limitation, controls and
procedures designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits
under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the
companys management, including its principal executive and
principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes
that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed
and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving
their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment
in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls
and procedures. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure
controls and procedures as of December 31, 2010, our chief
executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as
of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective at the reasonable assurance level.
Managements
Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal
control over financial reporting is defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the
supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial
officer and effected by our board of directors, management and
other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles and includes those
policies and procedures that:
|
|
|
|
|
Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of our assets;
|
|
|
|
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and
that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of our management and
directors; and
|
|
|
|
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our
assets that could have a material effect on our financial
statements.
|
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Under the supervision and with the participation of management,
including our principal executive and financial officers, we
assessed our internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2010, based on criteria for effective internal
control over financial reporting established in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO).
Based on this assessment, our management concluded that we
maintained effective internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2010 based on the specified criteria.
66
The Companys Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
has issued an attestation report on the Companys internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Rule
13a-15(f)
and 15d-(f)
under the Exchange Act) occurred during the quarter ended
December 31, 2010 that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls
over financial reporting.
67
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of
LogMeIn, Inc.
Woburn, Massachusetts
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of
LogMeIn, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of
December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. The Companys management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the Companys internal control over financial
reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
companys principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected
by the companys board of directors, management, and other
personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over
financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or
improper management override of controls, material misstatements
due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a
timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the
effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting
to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2010, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2010 of the Company and our report dated
February 28, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion on those
financial statements.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
February 28, 2011
68
|
|
ITEM 9B.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
None.
PART III
|
|
ITEM 10.
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference
from the information in our proxy statement for the 2011 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the Securities
and Exchange Commission within 120 days of
December 31, 2010.
We have adopted a code of ethics, called the Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics, which applies to our officers, including our
principal executive, financial and accounting officers, and our
directors and employees. We have posted the Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics on our website at
https://secure.logmein.com/US/home.aspx
under the Investors section. We intend to make all
required disclosures concerning any amendments to, or waivers
from, the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics on our website.
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference
from the information in our proxy statement for the 2011 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the Securities
and Exchange Commission within 120 days of
December 31, 2010.
|
|
ITEM 12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference
from the information in our proxy statement for the 2011 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the Securities
and Exchange Commission within 120 days of
December 31, 2010.
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
|
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference
from the information in our proxy statement for the 2011 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the Securities
and Exchange Commission within 120 days of
December 31, 2010.
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
|
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference
from the information in our proxy statement for the 2011 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the Securities
and Exchange Commission within 120 days of
December 31, 2010.
PART IV
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
EXHIBITS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
(a) (1) Financial Statements
See Index to the Consolidated Financial Statements on
page 44 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
which is incorporated into this item by reference.
(a) (2) Financial Statement Schedules
No financial statement schedules have been submitted because
they are not required or are not applicable or because the
information required is included in the consolidated financial
statements or the notes thereto.
(a) (3) Exhibits
See Exhibit Index on page 71 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
which is incorporated into this item by reference.
69
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
LOGMEIN, INC.
Michael K. Simon
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: February 28, 2011
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael
K. Simon
Michael
K. Simon
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
February 28, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James
F. Kelliher
James
F. Kelliher
|
|
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)
|
|
February 28, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Steven
J. Benson
Steven
J. Benson
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael
J. Christenson
Michael
J. Christenson
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Edwin
J. Gillis
Edwin
J. Gillis
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Gregory
W. Hughes
Gregory
W. Hughes
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Irfan
Salim
Irfan
Salim
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2011
|
70
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
3
|
.1(1)
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant
|
|
3
|
.2(1)
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant
|
|
4
|
.1(1)
|
|
Specimen Certificate evidencing shares of common stock
|
|
10
|
.1(1)
|
|
2004 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended
|
|
10
|
.2(1)
|
|
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under the 2004 Equity
Incentive Plan
|
|
10
|
.3(1)
|
|
Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement under the 2004
Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
10
|
.4(1)
|
|
2007 Stock Incentive Plan
|
|
10
|
.5(1)
|
|
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under the 2007 Stock
Incentive Plan
|
|
10
|
.6(1)
|
|
Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement under the 2007 Stock
Incentive Plan
|
|
10
|
.7(1)
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the 2007 Stock
Incentive Plan
|
|
10
|
.9(1)
|
|
Indemnification Agreement, dated as of July 23, 2008,
between the Registrant and Steven Benson
|
|
10
|
.11(1)
|
|
Indemnification Agreement, dated as of July 23, 2008,
between the Registrant and Edwin Gillis
|
|
10
|
.12(1)
|
|
Indemnification Agreement, dated as of July 23, 2008,
between the Registrant and Irfan Salim
|
|
10
|
.13(1)
|
|
Indemnification Agreement, dated as of July 23, 2008,
between the Registrant and Michael Simon
|
|
10
|
.14*
|
|
Indemnification Agreement, dated as of August 10, 2010,
between the Registrant and Michael Christenson
|
|
10
|
.15*
|
|
Indemnification Agreement, dated as of January 19, 2011,
between the Registrant and Greg Hughes
|
|
10
|
.16*
|
|
Form of Director Indemnification Agreement
|
|
10
|
.17(1)
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement, dated as
of December 26, 2007, among the Registrant and the parties
listed therein
|
|
10
|
.18(1)
|
|
Lease, dated July 14, 2004, between Acquiport Unicorn, Inc.
and the Registrant, as amended by the First Amendment to Lease,
dated as of December 14, 2005, as further amended by the
Second Amendment to Lease, dated October 19, 2007
|
|
10
|
.19(2)
|
|
Third Amendment to Lease, July 1, 2010
|
|
10
|
.20(1)
|
|
Connectivity Service and Marketing Agreement, dated as of
December 26, 2007, between Intel Corporation and the
Registrant
|
|
10
|
.21(1)
|
|
Amended and Restated Letter Agreement, dated as of
April 23, 2008, between the Registrant and Michael Simon
|
|
10
|
.22(1)
|
|
Amended and Restated Letter Agreement, dated as of
April 23, 2008, between the Registrant and James Kelliher
|
|
10
|
.23(1)
|
|
Amended and Restated Letter Agreement, dated as of
April 23, 2008, between the Registrant and Martin Anka
|
|
10
|
.24(1)
|
|
Amended and Restated Letter Agreement, dated as of
April 23, 2008, between the Registrant and Kevin Harrison
|
|
10
|
.25(1)
|
|
License, Royalty and Referral Agreement, dated as of
June 8, 2009, between Intel Americas, Inc. and the
Registrant
|
|
10
|
.26*
|
|
Amended and Restated 2009 Stock Incentive Plan
|
|
10
|
.27(1)
|
|
Form of Management Incentive Stock Option Agreement under the
2009 Stock Incentive Plan
|
|
10
|
.28(1)
|
|
Form of Management Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement under the
2009 Stock Incentive Plan
|
|
10
|
.29(1)
|
|
Form of Director Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement under the
2009 Stock Incentive Plan
|
|
10
|
.30(1)
|
|
Form of Employment Offer Letter
|
|
10
|
.31*
|
|
Summary of 2011 Executive Compensation
|
|
21
|
.1*
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
|
|
23
|
.1*
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
31
|
.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
31
|
.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.1*
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.2*
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
Confidential treatment requested as to certain portions, which
portions have been omitted and filed separately with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. |
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Registration
Statement on
Form S-1,
as amended
(Reg 333-148620) |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended July 29, 2010
(001-34391) |
71