UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
[ X ] |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended August 31, 2010
OR
|
|
|
[ ] |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 0-3498
TAYLOR DEVICES, INC. |
(Exact name of
registrant as specified in its
charter) |
|
|
|
| ||
NEW YORK |
16-0797789 | |
(State or other
jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S.
Employer |
|
|
|
90 Taylor Drive, North Tonawanda, New York |
|
14120-0748 |
(Address of principal
executive offices) |
(Zip Code) | |
| ||
716-694-0800 | ||
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
|
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ X ] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [ ] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer [ ] |
|
|
Accelerated filer [ ] | |||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Non-accelerated filer [ ] (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company [ X ] |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [ X ]
As of October 13, 2010, there were outstanding 3,231,671 shares of the registrant's common stock, par value $.025 per share.
1
TAYLOR DEVICES, INC. |
Index to Form 10-Q
PART I |
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
PAGE NO. | |||
Item 1. |
Financial
Statements |
|||
Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of August 31, 2010 and May 31,
2010 |
3 | |||
Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Income for the three months ended August 31, 2010 and August
31, 2009 |
4 | |||
Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended August 31, 2010 and
August 31, 2009 |
5 | |||
Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements |
6 | |||
Item 2. |
Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations |
7 | ||
Item 3. |
Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
13 | ||
Item 4. |
Controls and
Procedures |
13 | ||
PART II |
OTHER
INFORMATION |
|||
Item 1. |
Legal
Proceedings |
14 | ||
Item 1A. |
Risk
Factors |
14 | ||
Item 2. |
Unregistered Sales of
Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
14 | ||
Item 3. |
Defaults Upon Senior
Securities |
14 | ||
Item 4. |
(Removed and
Reserved) |
14 | ||
Item 5. |
Other
Information |
14 | ||
Item 6. |
Exhibits |
15 | ||
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM |
16 | |||
SIGNATURES |
17 |
2
TAYLOR DEVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY |
|
|
. | |
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets |
(Unaudited) |
| ||
|
|
August
31, |
May
31, |
|
Assets |
| |||
Current assets: |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ 2,347,948 |
$ 197,587 |
| |
Accounts receivable, net |
2,357,765 |
5,033,395 |
| |
Inventory |
6,613,689 |
6,474,148 |
| |
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings |
1,040,754 |
1,051,354 |
| |
Other current assets |
1,387,497 |
1,485,015 |
| |
Total current assets |
13,747,653 |
14,241,499 |
| |
| ||||
Maintenance and other inventory, net |
752,234 |
718,749 |
| |
Property and equipment, net |
3,434,677 |
3,497,800 |
| |
Other assets |
143,713 |
142,355 |
| |
|
$ 18,078,277 |
$ 18,600,403 |
| |
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity |
| |||
Current liabilities: |
| |||
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt |
$ 5,485 |
$ 5,485 |
| |
Accounts payable |
1,069,232 |
1,096,289 |
| |
Accrued commissions |
196,774 |
380,448 |
| |
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings |
357,175 |
367,764 |
| |
Other current liabilities |
1,030,445 |
1,548,655 |
| |
Total current liabilities |
2,659,111 |
3,398,641 |
| |
Long-term liabilities |
312,255 |
313,626 |
| |
| ||||
Stockholders' Equity: |
| |||
Common stock and additional paid-in capital |
6,646,043 |
6,611,906 |
| |
Retained earnings |
10,692,152 |
10,507,514 |
| |
17,338,195 |
17,119,420 |
| ||
Treasury stock - at cost |
(2,231,284) |
(2,231,284) |
| |
Total stockholders' equity |
15,106,911 |
14,888,136 |
| |
| ||||
|
|
$ 18,078,277 |
$ 18,600,403 |
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
|
|
| ||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income |
||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||
August 31, |
August 31, | |||||
For the three months ended |
2010 |
2009 | ||||
Sales, net |
$ 4,276,823 |
| ||||
Cost of goods sold |
3,136,086 |
| ||||
Gross profit |
1,140,737 |
| ||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
878,936 |
| ||||
Operating income |
261,801 |
| ||||
Other income (expense), net |
28,337 |
(4,711) | ||||
Income before provision for income taxes |
290,138 |
546,797 | ||||
Provision for income taxes |
105,500 |
| ||||
Net income |
$ 184,638 |
| ||||
Basic and diluted earnings per common share |
$ 0.06 |
$ 0.10 |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
TAYLOR DEVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY |
|
| ||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows |
||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||
August 31, |
August 31, | |||||
For the three months ended |
2010 |
2009 | ||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||
Net income |
$ 184,638 |
$ 320,797 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from |
||||||
operating activities: |
||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
116,503 |
110,556 | ||||
Stock options issued for services |
30,463 |
19,851 | ||||
Changes in other assets and liabilities: |
||||||
Accounts receivable |
2,675,630 |
138,349 | ||||
Inventory |
(173,026) |
210,962 | ||||
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings |
10,600 |
(1,296,269) | ||||
Other current assets |
97,518 |
94,052 | ||||
Accounts payable |
(27,057) |
349,066 | ||||
Accrued commissions |
(183,674) |
138,577 | ||||
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings |
(10,589) |
74,884 | ||||
Other current liabilities |
(518,210) |
456,959 | ||||
Net cash flows from operating activities |
2,202,796 |
617,784 | ||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||
Acquisition of property and equipment |
(53,380) |
(79,281) | ||||
Other investing activities |
(1,358) |
36,581 | ||||
Net cash flows for investing activities |
(54,738) |
(42,700) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||
Net short-term borrowings and repayments on long-term debt |
(1,371) |
(590,475) | ||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net |
3,674 |
3,351 | ||||
Net cash flows from (for) financing activities |
2,303 |
(587,124) | ||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
2,150,361 |
(12,040) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning |
197,587 |
45,297 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents - ending |
$ 2,347,948 |
$ 33,257 |
See notes to condensed
consolidated financial statements.
5
TAYLOR DEVICES, INC. |
1. |
The accompanying
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America for interim financial information and with the
instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of
the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America for complete financial
statements. In the opinion of the Company, the accompanying unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments
(consisting of only normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly
the financial position as of August 31, 2010 and May 31, 2010, the results
of operations for the three months ended August 31, 2010 and August 31,
2009, and cash flows for the three months ended August 31, 2010 and August
31, 2009. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the audited financial statements and notes thereto contained in the
Company's Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended May 31,
2010. There have been no updates or changes to our audited financial
statements for the year ended May 31, 2010. |
2. | The Company has evaluated events
and transactions for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial
statements through October 13, 2010 (the date the financial statements
were issued). |
3. |
There is no provision
nor shall there be any provisions for profit sharing, dividends, or any
other benefits of any nature at any time for this fiscal
year. |
4. |
For the three month
periods ended August 31, 2010 and August 31, 2009, the net income was
divided by 3,230,965 and 3,222,327, respectively, which is net of the
Treasury shares, to calculate the net income per
share. |
5. |
The results of
operations for the three month period ended August 31, 2010 are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full
year. |
6.
|
Effective September 1, 2009, the Company adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") regarding Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP"). The guidance establishes the FASB ASC as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP for SEC registrants. All guidance contained in the FASB ASC carries an equal level of authority. The FASB ASC supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. The FASB now issues new standards in the form of Accounting Standards Updates ("ASUs"). The FASB will not consider ASUs as authoritative in their own right. ASUs will serve only to update the FASB ASC, provide background information about the guidance and provide the basis for conclusions on the changes in the FASB ASC. References made to FASB guidance have been updated for the FASB ASC throughout this document. Effective June 1, 2009, the Company adopted guidance issued by the FASB that requires disclosure about the fair value of financial instruments for interim financial statements of publicly traded companies. The adoption did not have an impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition. Effective June 1, 2008, the Company adopted the FASB ASC "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures" guidance with respect to recurring financial assets and liabilities. Effective June 1, 2009, the Company adopted the FASB ASC "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures" guidance as it relates to nonrecurring fair value measurement requirements for nonfinancial assets and liabilities. The ASC guidance defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP, and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. The adoption of the standard had no impact on our consolidated financial results. Other recently issued ASC guidance has either been implemented or is not significant to the Company. |
6
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a "safe harbor" for forward-looking statements. Information in this Item 2, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," and elsewhere in this 10-Q that does not consist of historical facts, are "forward-looking statements." Statements accompanied or qualified by, or containing, words such as "may," "will," "should," "believes," "expects," "intends," "plans," "projects," "estimates," "predicts," "potential," "outlook," "forecast," "anticipates," "presume," and "assume" constitute forward-looking statements and, as such, are not a guarantee of future performance. The statements involve factors, risks and uncertainties, the impact or occurrence of which can cause actual results to differ materially from the expected results described in such statements. Risks and uncertainties can include, among others, uncertainty regarding how long the worldwide economic recession will continue and whether the recession will deepen; reductions in capital budgets by our customers and potential customers; changing product demand and industry capacity; increased competition and pricing pressures; advances in technology that can reduce the demand for the Company's products; and other factors, many or all of which are beyond the Company's control. Consequently, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as predictive of future results. The Company disclaims any obligation to release publicly any updates or revisions to the forward-looking statements herein to reflect any change in the Company's expectations with regard thereto, or any changes in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based.
Results of Operations
A summary of the period to period changes in the principal items included in the condensed consolidated statements of income is shown below:
Summary comparison of the three months ended August 31, 2010 and August 31, 2009 |
| |||
|
Increase / | |||
|
(Decrease) | |||
|
Sales, net |
$ (737,000) | ||
|
Cost of goods sold |
$ (146,000) | ||
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
$ (301,000) | ||
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
$ (257,000) | ||
|
Provision for income taxes |
$ (121,000) | ||
|
Net income |
$ (136,000) |
Sales under certain fixed-price contracts, requiring substantial performance over several periods prior to commencement of deliveries, are accounted for under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting whereby revenues are recognized based on estimates of completion prepared on a ratio of cost to total estimated cost basis. Costs include all material and direct and indirect charges related to specific contracts.
Adjustments to cost estimates are made periodically and any losses expected to be incurred on contracts in progress are charged to operations in the period such losses are determined. However, any profits expected on contracts in progress are recognized over the life of the contract.
For financial statement presentation purposes, the Company nets progress billings against the total costs incurred on uncompleted contracts. The asset, "costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings," represents revenues recognized in excess of amounts billed. The liability, "billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings," represents billings in excess of revenues recognized.
7
For the three
months ended August 31, 2010 (All
figures discussed are for the three months ended August 31, 2010 as compared to
the three months ended August 31, 2009.)
Three months ended |
Change | |||
August 31, |
August 31, |
Increase / |
Percent
| |
Net Revenue |
$ 4,277,000 |
$ 5,014,000 |
$ (737,000) |
-15% |
Cost of sales |
3,136,000 |
3,282,000 |
(146,000) |
-4% |
Gross profit |
$ 1,141,000 |
$ 1,732,000 |
$ (591,000) |
-34% |
|
|
|
The Company's consolidated results of operations showed a 15% decrease in net revenues and a decrease in net income of 42%. Revenues recorded in the current period for long-term construction projects were 32% lower than the level recorded in the prior year. Revenues recorded in the current period for other-than long-term construction projects (non-projects) were higher by 17% from the level recorded in the prior year. The gross profit as a percentage of net revenues for the current and prior year periods was 27% and 35%. This fluctuation is attributable primarily to a.) three large export projects in the prior year period had higher than average margins, b.) one large project in the prior year with an aerospace / defense customer that had higher margin than average projects for construction customers, and c.) in the current period, there were more Projects sold directly to representatives in two different Asian countries, net of their normal commission. This resulted in lower sales, gross margins and commission expense.
Sales of the Company's products are made to three general groups of customers: industrial, construction and aerospace / defense. A breakdown of sales to the three general groups of customers is as follows:
First Quarter
Fiscal Year 2011 |
First Quarter
Fiscal Year 2010 |
|||||
Industrial | 7% | 6% | ||||
Construction | 49% | 40% | ||||
Aerospace / Defense | 44% | 54% | ||||
At August 31, 2009, we had 110 open sales orders in our backlog with a total sales value of $11.3 million. At August 31, 2010, we have 11% fewer open sales orders in our backlog (98 orders) but the total sales value is $13.5 million or approximately 19% higher than the prior year.
The Company's revenues and net income fluctuate from period to period. The fluctuations in comparing the current period to the prior period are not necessarily representative of future results.
8
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses |
Three months ended |
Change |
August 31, |
August 31, |
Increase / |
Percent |
| ||||
Outside Commissions |
$ 105,000 |
$ 276,000 |
$ (171,000) |
-62% |
| |||
Other SG&A |
774,000 |
904,000 |
(130,000) |
-14% |
| |||
Total SG&A |
$ 879,000 |
$1,180,000 |
$ (301,000) |
-26% |
| |||
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by 26% from the prior year. Outside commission expense decreased by 62% from last year's level. This fluctuation was primarily due to a single, high value, non-project, commissionable sales order recorded in the prior year period as well as three Projects in an Asian country that included higher than average commissions in the prior year period. Additionally, of the 17 Projects in process during the quarter ended August 31, 2010, only three had related outside commissions recorded. This compares with 10 of 17 Projects having related outside commissions recorded in the prior year period. The primary reason for this is, in the current period, there were more Projects sold to representatives in two different Asian countries net of their normal commission. Other selling, general and administrative expenses decreased 14% from last year to this. This decrease is primarily due to a decrease in incentive compensation expense in the current period related to the lower level of operating results and lower level of aerospace sales.
The above factors resulted in operating income of $262,000 for the three months ended August 31, 2010, down 53% from the $552,000 in the same period of the prior year.
Stock Options
The Company has a stock option plan which provides for the granting of nonqualified or incentive stock options to officers, key employees and non-employee directors. Options granted under the plan are exercisable over a ten year term. Options not exercised at the end of the term expire.
The Company expenses stock options using the fair value recognition provisions of the ASC. The Company recognized $30,000 and $20,000 of compensation cost for the three month periods ended August 31, 2010 and August 31, 2009.
The fair value of each stock option grant has been determined using the Black-Scholes model. The model considers assumptions related to exercise price, expected volatility, risk-free interest rate, and the weighted average expected term of the stock option grants. Expected volatility assumptions used in the model were based on volatility of the Company's stock price for the thirty month period ending on the date of grant. The risk-free interest rate is derived from the U.S. treasury yield. The Company used a weighted average expected term. The following assumptions were used in the Black-Scholes model in estimating the fair market value of the Company's stock option grants:
2010
2009
Risk-free interest
rate:
2.75%
4.875%
Expected life of the
options: 2.5
years
2.5
years
Expected share price
volatility:
60.27%
57.57%
Expected
dividends:
zero
zero
These assumptions resulted
in:
Estimated fair-market value per stock option:
$2.00
$1.37
The ultimate value of the options will depend on the future price of the Company's common stock, which cannot be forecast with reasonable accuracy.
9
A summary of changes in the stock options outstanding during the three month period ended August 31, 2010 is presented below:
Weighted-
Number
of
Average
Options
Exercise Price
Options outstanding and exercisable at May 31,
2010:
193,750
$ 5.11
Options
granted:
15,250
$
5.15
Options outstanding and exercisable at August 31,
2010:
209,000
$
5.11
Closing value per share on NASDAQ at August 31, 2010: $ 4.88
Capital Resources, Line of Credit and Long-Term Debt
The Company's primary liquidity is dependent upon the working capital needs. These are mainly inventory, accounts receivable, costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings, accounts payable, accrued commissions, billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings, and debt service. The Company's primary sources of liquidity have been operations and bank financing.
Capital expenditures for the three months ended August 31, 2010 were $53,000 compared to $79,000 in the same period of the prior year. As of August 31, 2010, the Company has no commitments for capital expenditures during the next twelve months.
Effective August 7, 2009, the Company replaced its bank credit facility with a $6,000,000 bank demand line of credit, with interest payable at the Company's option of 30, 60, 90 or 180 day LIBOR rate plus 2.5%, or the bank's prime rate less ..25%. There is an interest rate floor of 3.5%. The line is secured by accounts receivable, equipment, inventory, and general intangibles, and a negative pledge of the Company's real property. This line of credit is subject to the usual terms and conditions applied by the bank, is subject to renewal annually, and is not subject to an express requirement on the bank's part to lend. There is no balance outstanding as of August 31, 2010, or as of May 31, 2010. The outstanding balance on the line of credit fluctuates as the Company's various long-term projects progress. The Company is in compliance with restrictive covenants under the line of credit. In these covenants, the Company agrees to maintain the following minimum levels of the stated item:
Covenant
Minimum per
Covenant Current
Actual When
Measured
Minimum level working
capital
$3,000,000
$11,089,000
Quarterly
Minimum debt service coverage
ratio
1.5:1
n/a
Fiscal Year-end
All of the $6,000,000 unused portion of our line of credit is available without violating any of our debt covenants.
Principal maturities of long-term debt for the remainder of the current fiscal year and the subsequent five years are as follows: 2011 - $4,000; 2012 - $5,000; and 2013 - $4,000.
Inventory and Maintenance Inventory |
August 31, 2010 |
May 31, 2010 |
Increase / (Decrease) |
Raw Materials |
$ 551,000 |
$ 569,000 |
$ (18,000) |
-3% | |||||
Work in process |
5,290,000 |
5,247,000 |
43,000 |
1% | |||||
Finished goods |
773,000 |
658,000 |
115,000 |
17% | |||||
Inventory |
6,614,000 |
91% |
6,474,000 |
90% |
140,000 |
2% | |||
Maintenance and other inventory |
752,000 |
9% |
719,000 |
10% |
33,000 |
5% | |||
Total |
$7,366,000 |
100% |
$7,193,000 |
100% |
$ 173,000 |
2% | |||
|
|
|
|
NOTE: Inventory turnover is annualized for the three month period ended August 31, 2010. |
Inventory, at $6,614,000 as of August 31, 2010, is $140,000 or two percent higher than the prior year-end level of $6,474,000. Of this, approximately 80% is work in process, 12% is finished goods, and 8% is raw materials.
10
Maintenance and other inventory represent stock that is estimated to have a product life cycle in excess of twelve months. This stock represents certain items the Company is required to maintain for service of products sold and items that are generally subject to spontaneous ordering. This inventory is particularly sensitive to technological obsolescence in the near term due to its use in industries characterized by the continuous introduction of new product lines, rapid technological advances and product obsolescence. The maintenance inventory increased slightly since May 31, 2010. Management of the Company has recorded an allowance for potential inventory obsolescence. The provision for potential inventory obsolescence was $45,000 for each of the three month periods ended August 31, 2010 and August 31, 2009. The Company continues to rework slow-moving inventory, where applicable, to convert it to product to be used on customer orders.
Accounts Receivable, Costs and Estimated Earnings in Excess of Billings ("CIEB"), |
||||
and Billings in Excess of Costs and Estimated Earnings ("BIEC") |
August 31,
2010 |
May 31,
2010 |
Increase /(Decrease) | |||||
Accounts receivable |
$ 2,358,000 |
$ 5,033,000 |
$ (2,675,000 |
) |
-53% | ||
CIEB |
1,041,000 |
1,051,000 |
(10,000 |
) |
-1% | ||
Less: BIEC |
357,000 |
368,000 |
(11,000 |
) |
-3% | ||
Net |
$ 3,042,000 |
$ 5,716,000 |
$ (2,674,000 |
) |
-47% |
|
50 |
99 |
The Company combines the totals of accounts receivable, the current asset CIEB, and the current liability, BIEC, to determine how much cash the Company will eventually realize from revenue recorded to date. As the accounts receivable figure rises in relation to the other two figures, the Company can anticipate increased cash receipts within the ensuing 30-60 days.
Accounts receivable of $2,358,000 as of August 31, 2010 includes approximately $342,000 of amounts retained by customers on long-term construction projects ("Project(s)"). It also includes $42,000 of an allowance for doubtful accounts ("Allowance"). The accounts receivable balance as of May 31, 2010 of $5,033,000 included an Allowance of $42,000. The number of an average day's sales outstanding in accounts receivable (DSO) decreased from 99 days at May 31, 2010 to 50 at August 31, 2010. The DSO is a function of 1.) the level of sales for an average day (for example, total sales for the past three months divided by 90 days) and 2.) the level of accounts receivable at the balance sheet date. The level of sales for an average day in the first quarter of the current year is slightly lower than in the fourth quarter of the prior year. This is consistent with the overall decrease in revenue during the current year to date. The level of accounts receivable at the end of the current fiscal quarter is 53% lower than at the end of the prior year. The combination of these two factors caused the DSO to decrease from last year end to this. 78% of the high level of accounts receivable at the end of last year was due from five customers and was collected subsequent to year-end. The Company expects to collect the net accounts receivable balance, including the retainage, during the next twelve months.
As noted above, CIEB represents revenues recognized in excess of amounts billed. Whenever possible, the Company negotiates a provision in sales contracts to allow the Company to bill, and collect from the customer, payments in advance of shipments. Unfortunately, provisions such as this are often not possible. The $1,041,000 balance in this account at August 31, 2010 is only slightly less than the prior year-end. The Company expects to bill the entire amount during the next twelve months. 71% of the CIEB balance as of the end of the last fiscal quarter, May 31, 2010, was billed to those customers in the current fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2010. The remainder will be billed as the projects progress, in accordance with the terms specified in the various contracts.
11
The balances in this
account are comprised of the following components:
August 31, 2010 |
May 31, 2010 | ||
Costs |
$ 1,280,000 |
$ 984,000 | |
Estimated earnings |
217,000 |
223,000 | |
Less: Billings to customers |
456,000 |
156,000 | |
CIEB |
$ 1,041,000 |
$ 1,051,000 | |
Number of Projects in progress |
9 |
7 |
As noted above, BIEC represents billings to customers in excess of revenues recognized. The $357,000 balance in this account at August 31, 2010 is down slightly from the $368,000 balance at the end of the prior year. The balance in this account fluctuates in the same manner and for the same reasons as the account "costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings", discussed above. Final delivery of product under these contracts is expected to occur during the next twelve months.
The year-end balances in this account are comprised of the following components:
August 31, 2010 |
May 31, 2010 |
|||
Billings to customers |
$ 1,205,000 |
$ 1,085,000 |
||
Less: Costs |
752,000 |
673,000 |
||
Less: Estimated earnings |
96,000 |
44,000 |
||
BIEC |
$ 357,000 |
$ 368,000 |
||
Number of projects in progress |
2 |
3 |
Summary of factors affecting the balances in CIEB and BIEC:
August 31, 2010 |
May 31, 2010 | ||
Number of Projects in progress |
11 |
10 | |
Aggregate percent complete |
35% |
37% | |
Average total sales value of Projects in progress |
$606,000 |
$507,000 | |
Percentage of total value invoiced to customer |
25% |
24% |
The Company's backlog of sales orders at August 31, 2010 is $13.5 million, up slightly from the $13 million backlog value at the end of the prior year. $4.3 million of the current backlog is on long-term construction projects already in progress.
Other Balance Sheet Items
Accounts payable, at $1,069,000 as of August 31, 2010, is only slightly less than the prior year-end. Commission expense on applicable sales orders is recognized at the time revenue is recognized. The commission is paid following receipt of payment from the customers. Accrued commissions as of August 31, 2010 are $197,000, down 48% from the $380,000 accrued at the prior year-end. This decrease is primarily due to the collection of accounts receivables (see 53% decrease in accounts receivable balance discussed above) and subsequent payment of the related commissions. The Company expects the current accrued amount to be paid during the next twelve months. Other current liabilities decreased 33% from the prior year-end, to $1,030,000 primarily due to accrued employee compensation at the prior year-end that was paid in the current period. Payments on these liabilities will take place as scheduled within the next twelve months.
Management believes the Company's cash flows from operations and borrowing capacity under the bank line of credit is sufficient to fund ongoing operations, capital improvements and share repurchases for the next twelve months.
12
Smaller reporting companies are not required to provide the information called for by this item.
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
The Company's principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of August 31, 2010 and have concluded that as of the evaluation date, the disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms and that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting.
There have been no changes in the Company's internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's control over financial reporting.
13
ITEM 1 |
Legal Proceedings As previously disclosed, in May 2010 the Company settled the lawsuit brought by the State of New York Workers' Compensation Board. The lawsuit claimed that the Company and 264 other entities, which had participated in the Manufacturing Self-Insurance Trust (the "Trust"), were jointly and severally liable for an alleged deficit in the Trust's assets of approximately $29,000,000. While many of the Trust members settled, others have not. This resulted in the settling members being exposed to cross-claims by the non- settling members By Decision and Order filed October 1, 2010, the New York Supreme Court in Albany County granted the motions of various parties and dismissed all cross-claims asserted against the settling members, including cross-claims asserted by the non-settling members. That Decision and Order is subject to appeal. There are no other legal
proceedings except for routine litigation incidental to the
business. | |||
ITEM 1A |
Risk Factors | |||
Smaller reporting
companies are not required to provide the information called for by this
item. | ||||
ITEM 2 |
Unregistered Sales of
Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | |||
(a) |
The Company sold no
equity securities during the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2010 that
were not registered under the Securities Act. | |||
(b) |
Use of proceeds
following effectiveness of initial registration
statement: | |||
Not
Applicable | ||||
(c) |
Repurchases of Equity Securities None | |||
(d) | Under the terms of the Company's credit arrangements
with its primary lender, the Company is required to maintain net working
capital of at least $3,000,000, as such term is defined in the credit
documents. On August 31, 2010, under such definition the Company's
net working capital was significantly in excess of such limit.
Additional information regarding the Company's line of credit and
restrictive covenants appears under the caption "Capital Resources, Lines
of Credit and Long-Term Debt" in the Management's Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. | |||
ITEM 3 | Defaults Upon Senior Securities None | |||
ITEM 4 | (Removed and Reserved) | |||
ITEM 5 | Other Information | |||
(a) |
Information required to
be disclosed in a Report on Form 8-K, but not
reported |
14
(b) |
Material changes to the procedures by which Security Holders may recommend nominees to the Registrant's Board of Directors None | |||
ITEM 6 | Exhibits | |||
31(i) | Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive
Officer. | |||
31(ii) | Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial
Officer. | |||
32(i) | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive
Officer. | |||
32(ii) | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer. |
15
The Board of Directors and
Stockholders
Taylor Devices, Inc.
We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Taylor Devices, Inc. and Subsidiary as of August 31, 2010, the related condensed consolidated statements of income for the three months ended August 31, 2010 and August 31, 2009 and cash flows for the three months ended August 31, 2010 and August 31, 2009. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have previously audited, in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet as of May 31, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated August 7, 2010, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of May 31, 2010 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the balance sheet from which it has been derived.
Lumsden & McCormick,
LLP
Buffalo, New York
October 13, 2010
16
TAYLOR DEVICES, INC. |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
TAYLOR DEVICES, INC. | |
|
(Registrant) |
Date: |
October 13, 2010 |
/s/Douglas P. Taylor | ||
Douglas P.
Taylor |
Date: |
October 13, 2010 |
/s/Mark V. McDonough | ||
Mark V.
McDonough |
17