form10qsba.htm
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-QSB/A
(Mark
One)
[X]
QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For
the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2007
[
] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For
the Transition Period from _________ to _________
Commission
file number: 001-16237
AIRTRAX,
INC.
(Name of
Small Business Issuer in Its Charter)
New
Jersey
|
|
22-3506376
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS
Employer Identification No.)
|
200
Freeway Drive, Unit One
Blackwood,
New Jersey 08012
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
(856)
232-3000
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
Check
whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [x]
No [ ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
[ ] No
[X]
As of
December 6, 2007, the Company had 26,755,867 shares of its no par value common
stock issued and outstanding.
Transitional
Small Business Disclosure Format (check one):
Yes
[ ] No
[X]
In
conjunction with our independent registered public accounting firm and
professional advisors, we conducted an analysis of our various financial
instruments and agreements involving convertible debt and common stock
financings accompanied by warrants, with a particular focus on the
accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments under Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities (“SFAS 133”), the Emerging Issues Task Force issued
EITF Issue No. 00-19, Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed
to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock (“EITF 00-19”), and
FASB Staff Position No. EITF 00-19-2, “Accounting for Registration
Payment Arrangements” (“EITF 00-19-2”), (collectively, the “Derivative
Accounting Pronouncements”). Accordingly, certain accounting policies we
previously considered to reflect what was deemed to be appropriate at the time
when the financings were previously reported, have been modified by recent
interpretations, including the Derivative Accounting
Pronouncements.
On
November 2, 2007, as a result of this analysis, we noted that our previously
filed financial statements in the annual reports for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2005and 2006 filed on Form 10-KSB, together with the
quarterly reports on Form 10-QSB for the quarters ending March 31, 2005,
June 30, 2005, September 30, 2005, March 31, 2006, June 30, 2006, September 30,
2006, March 31, 2007, June 30, 2007 and September 30, 2007 (collectively, the
“Reports”) could no longer be relied upon. We sent a formal letter request
to the Office of the Chief Accountant (OCA) of the Security and Exchange
Commission (SEC) dated December 17, 2007, petitioning the OCA to waive the
requirement to file separate amended and restated Reports for the periods noted
above, and instead file a comprehensive amended and restated comparative Form
10-KSB for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, along with certain
comprehensive financial information and disclosures for 2004, and comprehensive
amended and restated comparative Form 10-QSBs for the periods ended March 31,
2007, June 30, 2007, and September 30, 2007 along with certain comprehensive
financial information and disclosures for 2005. This waiver was granted by the
OCA on December 27, 2007. This restatement is required to properly reflect our
financial results for certain non-cash, and non-operational related charges or
credits to earnings associated with both embedded and freestanding derivative
liabilities, and the accounting for certain derivatives under the control of the
issuer due to the revised interpretation and implementation of the Derivative
Accounting Pronouncements.
Under
EITF 00-19, warrants are considered free-standing instruments in that they are
legally detachable and separately exercisable. The conversion benefits, which
are embedded in these debt issues, derive value from the relationship between
the stock price and debt conversion price, and are considered embedded
derivatives under the provisions of SFAS 133. The fair values of both the
warrants and conversion benefits are calculated using a Black-Scholes Option
Pricing Model, taking into consideration factors such as the underlying price of
the common stock, the exercise price for warrants or the conversion price for
the conversion benefit, the stock volatility, and the risk-free interest rates
available for comparable time periods.
Free-standing
instruments (warrants), and embedded derivatives (conversion benefits) which are
initially bifurcated or separated from the host financial instrument, are
recorded as separate liabilities, in cases where the security holder has a right
to choose to receive a “net settlement” of cash. The identification of such net
settlement provisions for prior convertible debt issuances with warrants and
conversion privileges resulted in us concluding that such securities should have
been identified as “derivatives”, and therefore warrant and conversion privilege
liabilities must be recorded as separate derivative liability accounts on our
restated balance sheet, and marked to market for each subsequent reporting
period with any non-cash charges or credits attributed to the revised fair value
of the liability being recognized through earnings (after the reversal of
previously incorrectly recorded charges and/or credits to
earnings).
If the
decision to settle the outstanding liability remains with us, the value of the
warrants should be recorded in an equity account. The identification of the
settlement provisions we controlled under certain debt issuances resulted in us
determining that the warrants should be reflected in the restated financial
statements as components of equity, as compared to having been previously
recorded as liabilities with non-cash charges and/or credits to earnings as a
result of being marked to market for each period presented.
The
February 2007 convertible debt issuance includes certain variable conversion
pricing which results in the actual maximum number of potential shares needed to
satisfy the conversion of such debt to be unknown and not quantifiable at the
date of issuance. EITF 00-19-2 specifies that debt issuances with
variable conversion pricing for which there is no established “floor” in the
conversion pricing, and where the maximum number of shares needed to satisfy the
conversion of such debt is not known, should be accounted for as derivative
liabilities and revalued at the end of each reporting period. When a derivative
classified as a liability is exercised, cancelled, or the maximum number of
shares needed to satisfy the conversion of such debt is known, the fair value of
the derivative, as determined at that time, is revalued and transferred to
equity, and is no longer revalued. To the extent that the initial
fair values of the derivative liabilities exceed the net proceeds received, an
immediate charge to the statement of operations is recognized for the excess. As
of September 30, 2007, we recognized in the statement of operations, excess
costs over debt proceeds of $1,401,901 related to the excess of derivative
liabilities over the net proceeds received for the February 2007 debt
issuance. The remainder of the discount from the face value of the
convertible debt resulting from allocating part or all of the proceeds to the
derivative liabilities is amortized over the life of the instrument through
periodic charges to the statements of operations, using the straight line
method, which was the most systematic and rational approach that approximated
the interest method of amortization due to the short two year amortization term
of the debt. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether
such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed
at the end of each reporting period. Derivative liabilities are classified in
the balance sheet as current or non-current based on the classification
previously elected for the host instrument.
EITF 00-19-2
specifies that the contingent obligations to make future payments or otherwise
transfer consideration under a registration payment arrangement, whether issued
as a separate agreement or included as a provision of a financial instrument or
other agreement, should be separately recognized and measured in accordance with
SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies.” EITF 00-19-2 also
requires additional disclosure regarding the nature of any registration payment
arrangements, alternative settlement methods, the maximum potential amount of
consideration and the current carrying amount of the liability, if any. This
EITF is effective January 1, 2007, and has been adopted and implemented by the
Company.
We
also previously sold stock units, which included warrants along with common
stock. In these cases, a portion of the proceeds equal to the value of the
warrants is allocated to the warrants, with the balance allocated to the stock.
In such cases where a net settlement provision for cash exists, the values of
the warrants are treated as liabilities, and the balance is revalued at the end
of each reporting period with any change in value being recognized currently as
a non-cash charge and/or credit to earnings. When a warrant classified as a
liability is exercised or cancelled, the fair value of the warrant, as
determined at the time of exercise or cancellation, is transferred to equity,
and is no longer revalued. A similar adjustment is made for a conversion benefit
classified as a liability when the debt is converted to stock, or
cancelled.
For
the convenience of the reader, this Form 10-QSB/A sets forth the original Form
10-QSB in its entirety. However, this Form 10-QSB/A only amends our financial
statements and the footnotes to our financial statements, along with the
corresponding changes to our Management’s Discussion and Analysis. We also
corrected typographical errors and have revised our controls and procedures
disclosure as a result of these restatements. No other information in the
original Form 10-QSB is amended hereby. In addition, pursuant to the rules of
the SEC, Item 6 of Part II to the Initial Filing has been amended to contain
currently dated certifications from our Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer, as required by Sections 302 and 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The certifications of our Principal Executive
Officer and Principal Financial Officer are attached to this Form 10QSB/A as
Exhibits 31.1, 31.2, 32.1 and 32.2, respectively .
AIRTRAX,
INC.
Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB/A
For
the Periods Ending September 30, 2007 and 2006
Table
of Contents
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item
1. Financial
Statements
|
|
|
|
Balance
Sheets: |
5
|
September 30,
2007 (Unaudited and Restated ) and December 31, 2006 (Audited and
Restated)
|
5
|
|
|
Statements
of Operations:
|
6
|
Three
Months and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 (Unaudited
and Restated)
|
6
|
|
|
Statements of
Cash Flows:
|
7
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 (Unaudited and
Restated)
|
7
|
|
|
Notes
to Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
8
|
September 30,
2007 and 2006 |
8
|
|
|
Item
2. Management
Discussion and Analysis |
23
|
|
|
Item
3. Controls and
Procedures
|
32
|
|
|
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
|
Item
1. Legal
Proceedings |
34
|
|
|
Item
2. Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
34
|
|
|
Item
3. Defaults Upon
Senior Securities |
34
|
|
|
Item
4. Submission of
Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
34
|
|
|
Item
5. Other
Information |
34
|
|
|
Item
6. Exhibits |
34
|
|
|
Signatures |
35
|
PART
I -- FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Airtrax Inc.
Balance Sheets
September 30, 2007 and December 31,
2006
Restated
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Audited )
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
466,129 |
|
|
$ |
327,737 |
|
Accounts
receivable
|
|
|
53,078 |
|
|
|
50,704 |
|
Inventory
|
|
|
1,040,100 |
|
|
|
1,049,457 |
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
|
|
22,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
Vendor
advances
|
|
|
163,268 |
|
|
|
103,628 |
|
Deferred
tax asset
|
|
|
1,212,741 |
|
|
|
919,889 |
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
2,958,109 |
|
|
|
2,451,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
assets
|
|
|
645,512 |
|
|
|
623,136 |
|
Less,
accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(394,566 |
|
|
|
(339,216 |
) |
Net
fixed assets
|
|
|
250,946 |
|
|
|
283,920 |
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
financing costs & other
|
|
|
275,701 |
|
|
|
133,918 |
|
Prepaid
interest
|
|
|
368,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
Patents
– net
|
|
|
136,476 |
|
|
|
148,151 |
|
Total
other assets
|
|
|
780,740 |
|
|
|
282,069 |
|
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
|
|
3,989,795 |
|
|
$ |
3,017,404 |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’
DEFICIENCY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
$ |
373,173 |
|
|
$ |
1,097,361 |
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
|
|
1,077,788 |
|
|
|
437,140 |
|
Shareholder
loans payable
|
|
|
40,713 |
|
|
|
75,713 |
|
Current
portion-convertible debt, net of discount
|
|
|
2,143,828 |
|
|
|
1,830,200 |
|
Derivative
liability-warrants and conversion privileges
|
|
|
2,189,123 |
|
|
|
236,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
5,824,625 |
|
|
|
3,676,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long
term convertible debt, net of discount
|
|
|
1,467,383 |
|
|
|
531,542 |
|
TOTAL
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
7,292,008 |
|
|
|
4,208,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’
deficiency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock – authorized; 5,000,000 shares, no par value, 275,000 issued and
outstanding
|
|
|
12,950 |
|
|
|
12,950 |
|
Common
stock – authorized, 100,000,000 shares; no par value, issued and
outstanding – 25,884,072 and 24,260,352,
respectively
|
|
|
22,372,759 |
|
|
|
21,520,559 |
|
Paid
in capital – options
|
|
|
1,417,660 |
|
|
|
1,407,299 |
|
Paid
in capital – warrants
|
|
|
2,290,939 |
|
|
|
2,315,935 |
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(29,396,521 |
) |
|
|
(26,447,439 |
) |
Total
stockholders’ deficiency
|
|
|
(3,302,213 |
) |
|
|
(1,190,696 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY
|
|
$ |
3,989,795 |
|
|
$ |
3,017,404 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
Three and Nine Month Periods
Ended
September 30, 2007 and
2006
Unaudited and Restated
|
|
Three Month Period Ended
September
30
|
|
|
Nine Month Period Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
269,022 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
523,082 |
|
|
$ |
1,271,277 |
|
Cost
of sales
|
|
|
204,496 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
488,999 |
|
|
|
1,193,815 |
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
64,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,083 |
|
|
|
77,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
and administrative costs
|
|
|
876,732 |
|
|
|
1,233,830 |
|
|
|
2,374,202 |
|
|
|
3,068,523 |
|
Impairment
of Filco advances
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
876,732 |
|
|
|
2,233,830 |
|
|
|
2,374,202 |
|
|
|
5,068,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
loss
|
|
|
(812,206 |
|
|
|
(2,233,830 |
) |
|
|
(2,340,119 |
) |
|
|
(4,991,061 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income <expense>, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(167,083 |
) |
|
|
(58,045 |
) |
|
|
(446,290 |
) |
|
|
(165,320 |
) |
Revaluation
income
|
|
|
691,672 |
|
|
|
331,604 |
|
|
|
2,761,229 |
|
|
|
814,045 |
|
Amortization
of financing costs
|
|
|
(98,178 |
) |
|
|
(88,056 |
) |
|
|
(253,768 |
) |
|
|
(346,824 |
) |
Amortization
of debt discounts
|
|
|
(472,790 |
) |
|
|
(141,375 |
) |
|
|
(1,151,331 |
) |
|
|
(359,200 |
) |
Liquidated
damages
|
|
|
(81,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(443,000 |
) |
|
|
(214,247 |
) |
Settlement
expenses
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(226,485 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(290,801 |
) |
Excess
cost of liabilities over proceeds
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,401,901 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Other
income
|
|
|
9,590 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
33,246 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
Total
other income <expense>, net
|
|
|
(117,789 |
) |
|
|
(182,357 |
) |
|
|
(901,815 |
) |
|
|
(562,262 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss before taxes
|
|
|
(929,995 |
) |
|
|
(2,416,187 |
) |
|
|
(3,241,934 |
) |
|
|
(5,553,323 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
tax benefit (State): Current
|
|
|
141,196 |
|
|
|
196,477 |
|
|
|
292,852 |
|
|
|
545,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss before dividends
|
|
|
(788,799 |
) |
|
|
(2,219,710 |
) |
|
|
(2,949,082 |
) |
|
|
(5,007,596 |
) |
Deemed
dividends on preferred stock
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
303,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss attributable to common stockholders
|
|
|
(788,799 |
) |
|
|
(2,219,710 |
) |
|
|
(2,949,082 |
) |
|
|
(5,310,706 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deficit
attributable to common stockholders
|
|
$ |
(788,799 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,219,710 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,949,082 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,423,206 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss per share - basic and diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
attributable to common stockholders
|
|
$ |
(788,799 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,219,710 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,949,082 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,310,706 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment
for preferred stock dividends accumulated
|
|
|
(17,188 |
) |
|
|
(17,188 |
) |
|
|
(51,563 |
) |
|
|
(51,563 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss attributable to common stockholders
|
|
$ |
(805,987 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,236,898 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,000,645 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,362,269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss per share - basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding
|
|
|
25,294,876 |
|
|
|
20,951,187 |
|
|
|
24,890,142 |
|
|
|
22,694,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
Statements of Cash Flows
For The Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 and
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
$
|
(2,949,082
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,310,706
|
)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
used
in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
56,365
|
|
|
|
46,125
|
|
Amortization
of debt discounts
|
|
|
1,405,099
|
|
|
|
706,024
|
|
Excess
costs of liabilities over proceeds
|
|
|
1,401,901
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment
of Filco advances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
Common
stock issued in settlement of obligations for interest
|
|
|
15,736
|
|
|
|
66,160
|
|
Equity
securities issued for services
|
|
|
597,531
|
|
|
|
1,325,264
|
|
Expense
of settling liquidated damages
|
|
|
442,613
|
|
|
|
316,110
|
|
Deemed
dividend on preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303,110
|
|
Amortization
of prepaid interest
|
|
|
146,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
in accrual of deferred tax benefit
|
|
|
(292,852
|
)
|
|
|
(545,727
|
)
|
Revaluation
of liabilities for warrants and conversion privileges
|
|
|
(2,761,229
|
)
|
|
|
(814,045
|
)
|
Interest
accrual on shareholder loan
|
|
|
(22,793
|
)
|
|
|
9,193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes
in assets liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
in accounts receivable
|
|
|
(2,375
|
)
|
|
|
(98,641
|
)
|
Increase
in vendor advances
|
|
|
(59,640
|
)
|
|
|
(42,128
|
)
|
(Decrease)
increase in accounts payable
|
|
|
(596,424
|
)
|
|
|
219,247
|
|
Increase
in prepaid expense
|
|
|
(22,793
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
(decrease) in accrued liabilities
|
|
|
106,726
|
|
|
|
(65,579
|
)
|
Increase
in inventory
|
|
|
9,357
|
|
|
|
570,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(2,525,317
|
)
|
|
|
(1,315,098
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
of equipment
|
|
|
(22,376
|
)
|
|
|
(12,649
|
)
|
Additions
to patent cost
|
|
|
(1,015
|
)
|
|
|
(6,800
|
)
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(23,391
|
)
|
|
|
(19,449
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from convertible debt
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,219,800
|
|
Proceeds
from the sale of common stock
|
|
|
2,822,100
|
|
|
|
65,500
|
|
Proceeds
from warrant extensions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
117,000
|
|
Proceeds
from bank loan
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
13,900
|
|
Payment
of convertible debt
|
|
|
(100,000
|
)
|
|
|
- |
|
Proceeds
from notes payable to related parties
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
69,813
|
|
Payment
of notes payable to related parties
|
|
|
(35,000
|
)
|
|
|
(170,754
|
)
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
2,687,100
|
|
|
|
1,315,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
|
138,392
|
|
|
|
(19,288
|
)
|
Cash,
beginning of year
|
|
|
327,737
|
|
|
|
19,288
|
|
Cash,
end of year
|
|
$
|
466,129
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
Airtrax,
Inc.
Notes
to the Financial Statements
September
30, 2007
(Unaudited)
NOTE
1–BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND BUSINESS
The
unaudited interim amended and restated financial statements of
Airtrax, Inc. (“the Company”) as of September 30, 2007, and for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006
(restated), have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which
contemplates continuation of the Company as a going concern. At
September 30, 2007, the Company had a working capital deficit of $2,866,516,
and a retained deficit of $29,396,521 .
In prior
periods, the Company was a development stage company, as defined in Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (FASB) No. 7. The Company became an operational
company in 2005. The Company has incurred losses since its inception. Until the
end of 2004, these losses were financed by private placements of equity
securities. During 2005 and 2006, the Company obtained financing almost
exclusively from the issuance of convertible debentures along with other
securities (derivatives). The Company will need to raise additional capital
through the issuance of future debt or equity securities to continue to fund its
operations.
The
Company was formed on April 17, 1997. It has designed a lift truck vehicle using
omni-directional technology obtained under a contract with the United States
Navy Surface Warfare Center in Panama City, Florida. The right to exploit this
technology grew out of a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement with the
Navy. Significant resources have been devoted during prior years to the
construction of a prototype of this omni-directional forklift vehicle. The
Company recognized its first revenues from sales of this product during the year
2005.
In the
opinion of management, the information included in this report contains all
adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a
fair presentation of the results of such periods. The results of
operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full fiscal year
ending December 31, 2007.
Certain
information and disclosures normally included in the notes to financial
statements have been condensed or omitted as permitted by the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, although the Company
believes the disclosure is adequate to make the information presented not
misleading. The accompanying unaudited quarterly financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the amended and restated audited
financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s annual
report on Form 10-KSB/ A for the year ended December 31,
2006.
NOTE
2– RESTATEMENTS
In
conjunction with our independent registered public accounting firm and
professional advisors, the Company conducted an analysis of our various
financial instruments and agreements involving convertible debt and common stock
financings accompanied by warrants, with a particular focus on the
accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments under Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities (“SFAS 133”), the Emerging Issues Task Force issued
EITF Issue No. 00-19, Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed
to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock (“EITF 00-19”), and
FASB Staff Position No. EITF 00-19-2, “Accounting for Registration
Payment Arrangements” (“EITF 00-19-2”), (collectively, the “Derivative
Accounting Pronouncements”). Accordingly, certain accounting policies we
previously considered to reflect what was deemed to be appropriate at the time
when the financings were previously reported, have been modified by recent
interpretations, including the Derivative Accounting
Pronouncements.
On
November 2, 2007, as a result of this analysis, the Company filed a Form 8-K
noting that its previously filed financial statements in the annual reports
for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 filed on Form 10-KSB,
together with the quarterly reports on Form 10-QSB for the quarters
ending March 31, 2005, June 30, 2005, September 30, 2005, March 31, 2006,
June 30, 2006, September 30, 2006, March 31, 2007, June 30, 2007 and September
30, 2007(collectively, the “Reports”) could no longer be relied upon. The
Company sent a formal letter request to the Office of the Chief Accountant (OCA)
of the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) dated December 17,
2007, petitioning the OCA to waive the requirement to file
separate amended and restated Reports for the periods noted above,
and instead, file a comprehensive amended and restated comparative
Form 10-KSB for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, along with certain
comprehensive financial information and disclosures for 2004, and comprehensive
amended and restated comparative Form 10-QSBs for the periods ended
March 31, 2007, June 30, 2007, and September 30, 2007 along with certain
comprehensive financial information and disclosures for 2005. This waiver was
received from the OCA on December 27, 2007.
Airtrax,
Inc.
Notes
to the Financial Statements
September
30, 2007
(Unaudited)
The
February 2007 convertible debt issuance includes certain variable conversion
pricing which results in the actual maximum number of potential shares needed to
satisfy the conversion of such debt to be unknown and not quantifiable at the
date of issuance. EITF 00-19-2 specifies that debt issuances with
variable conversion pricing for which there is no established “floor” in the
conversion pricing, and where the maximum number of shares needed to satisfy the
conversion of such debt is not known, should be accounted for as derivative
liabilities and revalued at the end of each reporting period. When a derivative
classified as a liability is exercised, cancelled, or the maximum number of
shares needed to satisfy the conversion of such debt is known, the fair value of
the derivative, as determined at that time, is revalued and transferred to
equity, and is no longer revalued. To the extent that the initial
fair values of the derivative liabilities exceed the net proceeds received, an
immediate charge to the statement of operations is recognized, for the excess.
As of September 30, 2007, the Company recognized in the statement of operations
excess costs over debt proceeds of $1,401,901 related to the excess of
derivative liabilities over the net proceeds received for the February 2007 debt
issuance. The remainder of the discount from the face value of the
convertible debt resulting from allocating part or all of the proceeds to the
derivative liabilities is amortized over the life of the instrument through
periodic charges to the statements of operations, using the straight line
method, which was the most systematic and rational approach that approximated
the interest method of amortization due to the short two year amortization term
of the debt. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether
such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed
at the end of each reporting period. Derivative liabilities are classified in
the balance sheet as current or non-current based on the classification
previously elected for the host instrument.
The
restatement is required to properly reflect the Company’s financial results for
certain non-cash, and non-operational related charges or credits to earnings
associated with both embedded and freestanding derivative liabilities, and the
accounting for certain derivatives under the control of the issuer, and those
involving variable conversion pricing, due to the revised interpretation and
implementation of the Derivative Accounting Pronouncements.
The
Company has made adjustments to its accounting records in the restated amounts
to more fully comply with requirements of the Derivative Accounting
Pronouncements, and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) dealing with
derivatives. Among these adjustments were reductions in the balances
of derivative liabilities, offset by reductions in the amounts of debt discount,
the amounts of paid in capital-warrants, revaluation income, and common
stock. The adjustments to the common stock were caused by the
elimination of credits to common stock that had resulted principally from the
erroneous recognition of liabilities for conversion privileges upon issuances of
convertible debt. These credits were erroneously transferred to pay
in capital upon debt conversion. Other partial offsets to these
adjustments affected the amounts of amortization expense and paid in
capital-warrants.
The
effects of these changes on the Company’s previously issued unaudited September
30, 2007 and 2006 financial statements and the related disclosures included
elsewhere in the notes to financial statements, along with the comprehensive
disclosures of the restated financial statements as of September 30, 2005, are
as follows:
The
effect on the Company's previously issued September 30,
2007;
The
effect on the Company's previously issued September 30,
2007;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
Sheet as of September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previously
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
(decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
financing fees
|
|
$ |
2,642,050 |
|
|
$ |
(2,366,349 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
275,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$ |
6,356,144 |
|
|
$ |
(2,366,349 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,989,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
portion-convertible debt, net of discounts
|
|
$ |
2,183,297 |
|
|
$ |
(39,469 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
2,143,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
liability-warrants and conversion privileges
|
|
|
1,047,814 |
|
|
|
1,141,309 |
|
|
|
(2 |
)(3) |
|
|
2,189,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
4,722,785 |
|
|
|
1,101,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,824,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long
term-convertible debt, net of discounts
|
|
|
3,734,039 |
|
|
|
(2,266,656 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1,467,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
8,456,824 |
|
|
|
(1,164,816 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,292,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid
in capital-warrants
|
|
|
4,729,407 |
|
|
|
(2,438,468 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
2,290,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
(30,633,456 |
) |
|
|
1,236,935 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(29,396,521 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
stockholders deficiency
|
|
|
(2,100,680 |
) |
|
|
(1,201,533 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,302,213 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Liabilities and stock holders deficiency
|
|
$ |
6,356,144 |
|
|
$ |
(2,366,349 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,989,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Airtrax,
Inc.
Notes
to the Financial Statements
September
30, 2007
(Unaudited)
Statement
of Operations for the Nine Month Period Ended September 30,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previously
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
(decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
and administrative costs
|
|
$ |
(2,817,202 |
) |
|
$ |
443,000 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,374,202 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
loss
|
|
|
(2,783,119 |
) |
|
|
443,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,340,119 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Income and Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revaluation
income
|
|
|
566,862 |
|
|
|
2,194,367 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(2,761,229 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60,224 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization
of defered financing fees
|
|
|
(1,344,875 |
) |
|
|
1,151,331 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(253,768 |
) |
Amortization
of debt discounts
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,151,331 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(1,151,331 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess
discounts expensed
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,401,901 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(1,401,901 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidated
damages
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(443,000 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(443,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
other expense, net
|
|
|
(1,191,057 |
) |
|
|
289,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(901,815 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss before taxes
|
|
$ |
(3,974,176 |
) |
|
$ |
732,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(3,241,934 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
per share-basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement
of Operations for the Three Month Period Ended September 30,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previously
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
(decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
and administrative costs
|
|
$ |
(957,732 |
) |
|
$ |
81,000 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
$ |
(876,732 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
loss
|
|
|
(893,206 |
) |
|
|
81,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(812,206 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Income and Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revaluation
income
|
|
|
181,786 |
|
|
|
509,886 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
691,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,889 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization
of defered financing fees
|
|
|
(524,079 |
) |
|
|
472,790 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(98,178 |
) |
Amortization
of debt discounts
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(472,790 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(472,790 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidated
damages
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(81,000 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(81,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
other expense, net
|
|
|
(499,686 |
) |
|
|
381,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(117,789 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss before taxes
|
|
$ |
(1,392,892 |
) |
|
$ |
462,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(929,995 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
per share-basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement
of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previously
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
(decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
$ |
(3,681,324 |
) |
|
$ |
732,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2,949,082 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
of debt discounts and fees
|
|
|
1,344,875 |
|
|
|
60,224 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
1,405,099 |
|
Excess
discounts expensed during this period
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,401,901 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
1,401,901 |
|
Revaluation
of liabilities for warrants and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(566,862 |
) |
|
|
(2,194,367 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2,761,229 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
|
$ |
(2,525,317 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2,525,317 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Airtrax,
Inc.
Notes
to the Financial Statements
September
30, 2007
(Unaudited)
The
effect on the Company's previously issued September 30,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement
of Operations for the nine months ended September 30,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previously
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
and administrative costs
|
|
$ |
(3,149,144 |
) |
|
$ |
80,621 |
|
|
|
(8 |
)
(13) |
|
$ |
(3,068,523 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
loss
|
|
|
(5,071,682 |
) |
|
|
80,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,991,061 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
of defferred financing fees
|
|
|
(706,024 |
) |
|
|
359,200 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(346,834 |
) |
Amortization
of debt discount and financing costs
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(359,200 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(359,200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidated
damages
|
|
|
(424,427 |
) |
|
|
210,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(214,247 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement
expenses
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(290,801 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(290,801 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
other expense, net
|
|
|
(481,641 |
) |
|
|
(80,621 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(562,262 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss before taxes
|
|
$ |
(5,553,323 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(5,553,323 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
per share-basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
(0.24 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement
of Operations for the three months ended September 30,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previously
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
and administrative costs
|
|
$ |
(1,224,433 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,397 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
)(13) |
|
$ |
(1,233,830 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
loss
|
|
|
(2,224,433 |
) |
|
|
(9,397 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,233,830 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income and expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revaluation
income
|
|
|
90,519 |
|
|
|
241,085 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
331,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
of financing costs
|
|
|
(229,431 |
) |
|
|
141,375 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(88,056 |
) |
Amortization
of debt discounts
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(141,375 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(141,375 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidated
damages
|
|
|
(235,612 |
) |
|
|
235,612 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement
expenses
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(226,485 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(226,485 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
other expense (net)
|
|
|
(432,569 |
) |
|
|
250,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(182,357 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss before taxes
|
|
$ |
(2,657,002 |
) |
|
$ |
240,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2,416,187 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
per share-basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Airtrax,
Inc.
Notes
to the Financial Statements
September
30, 2007
(Unaudited)
Adjustments
were made to record
(1)
|
Issuance
costs of debt obligations have been separately reported on the balance
sheet as deferred financing fees. The value of derivatives and
other securities accompanying debt issuances have been subtracted from the
issuance proceeds and the remaining amounts reported as convertible
debt. The combined total of the issuance costs and the values
of derivatives and other securities accompanying debt issuances are being
amortized over the terms of the issues. The adoption of this
procedure resulted in adjustments to deferred financing costs and the
carrying amounts of the debt
issuances.
|
(2)
|
The
increase in the derivative liability account is principally the result in
a change to a more appropriate Black Scholes model for valuing conversion
privileges.
|
(3)
|
The
warrants that accompanied the February 2007 convertible debt issue were
erroneously recorded in an equity account, rather than as a derivative
liability. Simultaneously with this correction, which increased
the balance of the derivative liability account, the warrants were
revalued, increasing revaluation income and reducing the derivative
liability accounts.
|
(4)
|
The
accumulated deficit is the combined result of a restatement reduction in
the 2006 balance ($504,693) and the current restatement of the results of
operations ($732,242).
|
(5)
|
Amortization
of deferred financing fees has been reclassified to a separate expense
category. In addition, a $60,224 error was corrected in the
calculation of the
amortization.
|
(6)
|
The
initial values of the derivative liabilities stemming from the February
2007 convertible debt issue exceeded the net proceeds received by
$1,401,901. This excess was erroneously not previously
recorded. It has now been
corrected.
|
(7)
|
Correction
of an error in the calculation of amortization of debt discounts and
fees.
|
(8)
|
Operating
expense has been reduced, reflecting a change in the accounting for
conversion privileges. Previously, the value of such privileges
were treated as liabilities and charged to expense. Many of
these privileges are now classified as equity. When debt was
issued to settle liquidated damages, the expense charge was to settlement
charges. These charges were reduced as a result of this change
in accounting.
|
|
(9)
|
Conversion
privileges were previously treated as liabilities and conversion expense
charged. The privileges associated with many of these issues
are now judged to be items of equity and there is no expense
charge.
|
(10)
|
In
the past, issuance cost and debt discounts were written off in the periods
in which they were incurred. This practice has been corrected
so that they are now amortized over the lives of the related
debt.
|
(11)
|
The
derivatives associated with most of the securities issues are now
classified as equity. Previously many of them were classified
as liabilities subject to periodic revaluation. This latter
practice resulted in significant revaluation adjustments. Under
present procedures, such adjustments are limited in
amount.
|
(12)
|
Correction
of an error in reporting the change in accrued
liabilities.
|
(13)
|
Liquidated
damages and settlement expenses have been reclassified from operating
expenses to separately captioned items in other income
(expense).
|
(14)
|
Amortization
of debt discounts and deferred financing fees have been reclassified to
separately captioned items.
|
(15)
|
Correction
of calculation of amortization.
|
(16)
|
Liquidated
damages were settled prior to the third quarter of 2006, but were accrued
in error.
|
Airtrax,
Inc.
Notes
to the Financial Statements
September
30, 2007
(Unaudited)
NOTE
3-SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The
accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared on the accrual
basis of accounting in conformity to generally accepted accounting principles in
the United States.
Use
of Estimates
Preparing
the Company’s financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The
Company considers cash deposits and short term debt securities that can be
redeemed on demand and investments that have original maturities of less than
three months, when purchased, to be cash equivalents.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The
Company’s financial instruments are cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, accounts payable, and notes payable. The recorded values
of these financial instruments approximate their fair values based on their
short-term nature. The recorded values of notes payable approximate
their fair values, as interest approximates market rates.
Concentrations
of Credit Risk
Financial
instruments subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk. The
Company places its cash and temporary cash investments with credit quality
institutions. At times, such investments may be in excess of
applicable government mandated insurance limits. With respect to
accounts receivable, the Company limits credit risk by performing ongoing credit
evaluations. Management does not believe significant risk exists in
connection with the Company’s concentrations of credit at September 30,
2007.
Accounts
Receivable
The
Company provides an allowance for doubtful accounts (when necessary) equal to
the estimated uncollectible amounts. The Company’s estimate is based
on historical collection experience and a review of the current status of trade
accounts receivable. It is reasonably possible that the Company’s
estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts will change. As of
September 30, 2007 and 2006 there were no allowances for doubtful
accounts.
Inventories
Inventory
consists principally of component parts and supplies used to assemble lift truck
vehicles. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (determined on a first
in-first out basis) or market.
Fixed
Assets
Fixed
assets, consisting of office furniture and equipment, demo and shop equipment
along with castings and tools, are recorded at cost. The cost of developing and
constructing the prototype omni-directional helicopter handling vehicle and the
omni-directional lift truck vehicle is expensed as incurred. Expenditures for
major additions and improvements are capitalized and minor replacements,
maintenance, and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. When
property and equipment are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and
accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or
loss is included in the results of operations for the respective
period. Depreciation is provided over the estimated useful lives of
the related assets ranging from 5 to 7 years using the straight-line method
for financial statement purposes.
Airtrax,
Inc.
Notes
to the Financial Statements
September
30, 2007
(Unaudited)
Intangibles
The
Company incurred costs to acquire certain patent rights. These costs are
capitalized and are being amortized over a period of fifteen years on a straight
line basis.
In
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142,
“Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets ,” the Company reviews intangibles for
impairment annually, or more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances
change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the Company's
business enterprise below its carrying value. The impairment test requires us to
estimate the fair value of the Company's overall business enterprise down to the
reporting unit level. The Company performs its annual impairment test in its
fiscal fourth quarter. No impairment charges related to goodwill or other
intangibles were recorded in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and
2006.
The
Company continually evaluates whether events and changes in circumstances
warrant revised estimates of useful lives or recognition of an impairment loss
of our intangibles, which as of September 30, 2007, consist mainly of patents
and licensing agreements. The conditions that would trigger an
impairment assessment of our intangible assets include a significant, sustained
negative trend in our operating results or cash flows, a decrease in demand for
our products, a change in the competitive environment and other industry and
economic factors.
Deferred
Financing Costs
Deferred
financing costs represent legal, commitment; processing, consulting, and other
fees associated with the issuance of the Company’s debt and any unamortized debt
discount related to derivative separation from the debt instrument. Deferred
financing costs are being amortized over the terms of the related
debt.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
Pursuant
to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, “Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets”, the Company continually
monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying
amounts of long-lived assets may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is
recognized when expected cash flows are less than the asset's carrying value.
Accordingly, when indicators of impairment are present, the Company evaluates
the carrying value of such assets in relation to the operating performance and
future undiscounted cash flows of the underlying assets. The Company’s policy is
to record an impairment loss when it is determined that the carrying amount of
the asset may not be recoverable. No impairment charges were recorded in the
nine month periods presented ended September 30, 2007, while impairment reserves
of $2,000,000 were recorded for the nine months ended September 30,
2006.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue
on product sales is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists, such as when a purchase order or contract is received from the customer,
the price is fixed, title to the goods has changed and there is a reasonable
assurance of collection of the sales proceeds. We obtain written purchase
authorizations from our customers for a specified amount of product at a
specified price and consider delivery to have occurred at the time of shipment.
Revenue is recognized at shipment.
Airtrax,
Inc.
Notes
to the Financial Statements
September
30, 2007
(Unaudited)
Revenue
from research and development activities relating to firm fixed-price contracts
is generally recognized as billing occurs. Revenue from research and development
activities relating to cost-plus-fee contracts include costs incurred plus a
portion of estimated fees or profits based on the relationship of costs incurred
to total estimated costs. Contract costs include all direct material and labor
costs and an allocation of allowable indirect costs as defined by each contract,
as periodically adjusted to reflect revised agreed upon rates. These rates are
subject to audit by the other party. Amounts can be billed on a bi-monthly
basis. Billing is based on subjective cost investment factors.
Advertising
Costs
Advertising
costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expense totaled $7,028
and $5,764 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
Accounting
for Income Taxes
As part
of the process of preparing our financial statements, we are required to
estimate our income taxes. This process involves estimating our actual current
tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from
differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences
result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our
consolidated balance sheet. We must then assess the likelihood that our deferred
tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income. If there is not
persuasive evidence that recovery will occur, we would establish a valuation
allowance. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance or increase this
allowance in a period, we must include an expense within the tax provision in
the consolidated statement of operations.
Significant
management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes,
our deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded
against our net deferred tax assets. We have recorded a valuation allowance of
$8,300,000 as of September 30, 2007, due to uncertainties related to our ability
to utilize some of our deferred tax assets, primarily consisting of certain net
operating losses carried forward before they expire and certain accrued
expenses, which are deferred for income tax purposes until paid. The valuation
allowance is based on our estimates of taxable income and the period over which
our deferred tax assets will be recoverable. The net deferred tax asset as of
September 30, 2007 was $1,212,741, net of the valuation allowance.
Accounting
for Derivatives
The
Company’s issuances of convertible debt are accompanied by other financial
instruments. These financial instruments include warrants to purchase stock, and
the right to convert debt to stock at specified rates (“conversion benefits.”).
Pursuant to SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, as amended, and EITF Issue No. 00-19, Accounting for Derivative
Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, A Company’s Own
Stock, the Company has identified certain embedded and freestanding derivative
instruments. Generally, where the ability to physical or “net-share settle” an
embedded conversion option or free standing financial instrument is not deemed
to be within the control of the Company, the embedded conversion option is
required to be bifurcated or separated, and both the freestanding instruments
and bifurcated conversion feature are accounted for as derivative liabilities.
At each reporting date, the Company estimates the fair values of all
derivatives, and changes in the fair value are charged to
operations.
Under
EITF 00-19, warrants are considered free-standing instruments in that they are
legally detachable and separately exercisable. The conversion benefits, which
are embedded in these debt issues, derive value from the relationship between
the stock price and debt conversion price, and are considered embedded
derivatives under the provisions of SFAS 133. The fair values of both the
warrants and conversion benefits are calculated using a Black-Schools Model,
taking into consideration factors such as the underlying price of the common
stock, the exercise price for warrants or the conversion price for the
conversion benefit, the stock volatility, and the risk-free interest rates
available for comparable time periods.
Airtrax,
Inc.
Notes
to the Financial Statements
September
30, 2007
(Unaudited)
Free-standing
instruments (warrants), and embedded derivatives (conversion benefits) which are
initially bifurcated or separated from the host financial instrument, are
recorded as separate liabilities, in cases where the security holder has a right
to choose to receive a “net settlement” of cash. The identification of such net
settlement provisions for prior convertible debt issuances with warrants
resulted in the Company concluding that such warrants should have been
identified as “derivatives”, and therefore the warrant liabilities must be
recorded as a separate derivative liability on the Company’s restated balance
sheet, and marked to market for each subsequent reporting period with any
non-cash charges or credits attributed to the revised fair value of the
liability being recognized through earnings.
If the
decision to settle the outstanding liability remains with the Company, the value
of the warrants should be recorded in an equity account. The identification of
the settlement provisions being controlled by the Company under certain debt
issuances resulted in the Company determining that the warrants should be
reflected in the restated Reports as components of equity, as compared to having
been previously recorded as liabilities with non-cash charges and/or credits to
earnings as a result of being marked to market for each period
presented. As of September 30, 2007 and 2006, the Company recognized
and recorded the value of certain warrants as equity of $2,290,939 and
$2,273,733, respectively, in the accompanying financials.
EITF 00-19-2
specifies that the contingent obligations to make future payments or otherwise
transfer consideration under a registration payment arrangement, whether issued
as a separate agreement or included as a provision of a financial instrument or
other agreement, should be separately recognized and measured in accordance with
SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies.” EITF 00-19-2 also requires
additional disclosure regarding the nature of any registration payment
arrangements, alternative settlement methods, the maximum potential amount of
consideration and the current carrying amount of the liability, if any. The
Company previously adopted the provisions of EITF 00-19-2 for the reporting
period effective January 1, 2007 , and does not estimate that any
additional contingency accruals and/or disclosures would be required to be
included in the Company’s restated Reports other than those items expected to be
reflected in the respective amended and restated Reports.
The
Company also previously sold stock units which included warrants along with
common stock. In these cases, a portion of the proceeds equal to the value of
the warrants is allocated to the warrants (when a net settlement provision
exists for cash), with the balance allocated to the stock. In such cases, the
value of the warrants are treated as liabilities, and the balance is revalued at
the end of each reporting period with any change in value being recognized
currently as a non-cash charge and/or credit to earnings. When a warrant
classified as a liability is exercised or cancelled, the fair value of the
warrant, as determined at the time of exercise or cancellation, is transferred
to equity, and is no longer revalued. A similar adjustment is made for a
conversion benefit classified as a liability when the debt is converted to
stock, or cancelled.
The
February 2007 convertible debt issuance includes certain variable conversion
pricing which results in the actual maximum number of potential shares needed to
satisfy the conversion of such debt to be unknown and not quantifiable at the
date of issuance. EITF 00-19-2 specifies that debt issuances with
variable conversion pricing for which there is no established “floor” in the
conversion pricing, and where the maximum number of shares needed to satisfy the
conversion of such debt is not known, should be accounted for as derivative
liabilities and revalued at the end of each reporting period. When a derivative
classified as a liability is exercised, cancelled, or the maximum number of
shares needed to satisfy the conversion of such debt is known, the fair value of
the derivative, as determined at that time, is revalued and transferred to
equity, and is no longer revalued. To the extent that the initial
fair values of the derivative liabilities exceed the net proceeds received, an
immediate charge to the statement of operations is recognized, for the excess.
As of September 30, 2007, the Company recognized in the statement of operations
excess costs over debt proceeds of $1,401,901 related to the excess of
derivative liabilities over the net proceeds received for the February 2007 debt
issuance. The remainder of the discount from the face value of
the convertible debt resulting from allocating part or all of the proceeds to
the derivative liabilities is amortized over the life of the instrument through
periodic charges to the statements of operations, using the straight line
method, which was the most systematic and rational approach that approximated
the interest method of amortization due to the short two year amortization term
of the debt. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether
such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed
at the end of each reporting period. Derivative liabilities are classified in
the balance sheet as current or non-current based on the classification
previously elected for the host instrument.
Airtrax,
Inc.
Notes
to the Financial Statements
September
30, 2007
(Unaudited)
For
embedded and free standing derivatives valued as of September 30, 2007 and 2006,
the Company has recognized in the statement of operations, revaluation income of
$2,761,229 and $ 814,045, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30,
2007 and 2006. In addition, the Company recognized a derivative liability in the
accompanying balance sheet for conversion privileges and warrants of $2,189,127
in 2007 and $640,452 in 2006.
The
estimated fair values of the derivatives have been calculated based on the
Black-Scholes Model, using the following assumptions as of September
30:
|
|
2007
|
2006
|
|
|
Fair Value of
Stock |
$ .30 |
$
.95
|
|
|
Exercise
Price
|
$ .45
- $1.25 |
$1.56- $1.65 |
|
|
Dividend
Yield |
0% |
0% |
|
|
Risk Free Interest
Rate
|
4. 33% -4. 65% |
4.717 |
|
|
Expected
Volatility |
88.13% |
89.68% |
|
|
Expected
Life-Years |
1.42-4.15
years
|
2.38-2.85
years
|
|
Stock
Based Compensation
Common Stock for
Services
Because
of the significant liquidity issues the Company has faced since our inception,
the Company has issued common stock to third party vendors and others in order
to pay for services rendered. Such issuances are recorded as an
expense in the period in which the services are performed. During the nine month
period ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, the Company issued an aggregate of
586,609 and 673,373 shares, respectively, of common stock to third parties in
exchange for services performed. There were 147,059 shares of common
stock of the Company issued for services in the three month period ended
September 30, 2007.
Stock
Options
Stock
options are awarded to employees as compensation for services. Such awards have
been immediately exercisable. The Company adopted SFAS 123R, “Share Based Payment” and SFAS
148, “Accounting for Stock
Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure” on January 1, 2006. No
stock options were issued, cancelled or exercised in 2007. Pursuant
to the requirements of SFAS 123R, the weighted average fair value of options
granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as determined on the
dates of grant, were $.25.
Warrants
The
Company has issued warrants both as part of “stock units”, and as an integral
part of convertible note issues. The value of the warrants and
conversion options which are classified as liabilities are revalued each
reporting period. These values are determined by a Black-Scholes
Model, consistent with 2006. The Company’s recording of a liability
for these Registration Payment Arrangements (RPA’s) follow the guidelines
in SFAS 5, “Accounting for
Contingencies.” However, the amendment to the original EITF
00-19 will not affect the recording of derivatives as the “RPA’s” were not the
sole determining factor in prior decisions about derivative classification, as
is emphasized in the amended EITF. The following is a schedule of changes in
warrants outstanding through the third quarter of 2007 which included the
issuance of 200,000 warrants on August 26, 2007 with a five year life and an
exercise price of $1.00 completed during the quarter ended September 30, 2007.
Each of these warrants is exercisable over five year periods from dates of
issuance at prices ranging from $0.45-$1.56 per share.
Airtrax,
Inc.
Notes
to the Financial Statements
September
30, 2007
(Unaudited)
The following summaries the 2007 Warrant issuance activity:
|
Balance, December 31,
2006 |
10,383,323
|
|
|
Warrants Issued-February
2007
|
16,595,732
|
|
|
Warrants Issued-Placement
Agent |
715,333
|
|
|
Warrant Issuance-August 26, 2007
|
200,000
|
|
|
Total Warrant Issuances-2007 |
17,511,065
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2007 |
27,894,388
|
|
Basic and Diluted Loss
Per Share
In
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128,
“Earnings Per Share,” and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 98,
both basic and diluted loss per share (“EPS”) are presented on the face of the
income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net loss available to common
stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.
Diluted EPS is computed similarly to basic EPS, except that the denominator is
increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been
outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional
common shares were not anti-dilutive. The Company has excluded all common stock
equivalents arising from outstanding options, warrants, convertible preferred
stock and convertible debt from the calculation of diluted net loss per share
because these securities are anti-dilutive. As of September 30, 2007 and 2006,
the Company had approximately 24,890,142 and 22,694,207 weighted average
number of shares, respectively, outstanding and used in both the Basic and
Diluted EPS calculation.
Segment
Reporting
Management
treats the operations of the Company as one single segment.
Reclassifications
Certain
amounts in the 2006 financial statements have been reclassified to
conform to the 2007 financial statement
presentation.
NOTE
4- 2007 CAPITALIZATION TRANSACTIONS
2007
CONVERTIBLE NOTE FINANCING AND STOCK TRANSACTIONS
On
February 20, 2007, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the
"Purchase Agreement") with certain accredited and/or qualified institutional
investors pursuant to which the Company sold an aggregate of $3,734,040
principal amount secured convertible debentures (the "February 2007 Debentures")
convertible into shares of common stock, no par value ("Common Stock") at a
conversion price equal to $0.45 (the "Conversion Price"). The Debentures were
sold at a discount equal to the amounts of interest that will accrue at a simple
rate of 8% per annum during the term of the debentures. The amount
realized was $3,219,000; this was further reduced by expenses of the sale of
$396,900. In addition, the Company issued to the investors (i)
warrants to purchase 8,297,866 shares of Common Stock (the "Warrants") at an
exercise price equal to $0.54 per share, which represents 100% of the number of
shares issuable upon conversion of the Debentures; (ii) callable warrants to
purchase 4,148,933 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price equal to $0.75
per share, which represents 50% of the number of shares issuable upon conversion
of the Debentures; and (iii) callable warrants to purchase 4,148,933 shares
of Common Stock at an exercise price equal to $1.25 per share, which
represents 50% of the number of shares issuable upon conversion of the
Debentures (collectively, the "Callable Warrants"). In addition to
the expenses of the sale, noted above, 715,333 warrants to purchase common stock
were issued to the placement agent that arranged the financing.
Airtrax,
Inc.
Notes
to the Financial Statements
September
30, 2007
(unaudited)
The
February 2007 Debentures mature on February 20, 2009. The Company
may, in its discretion, redeem the February 2007
Debentures, subject to certain equity conditions being met by the Company as set
forth in the Debentures, at a price equal to 150% of the principal balance,
accrued interest, and all liquidated damages, if any, thereon that are requested
to be redeemed. The Company’s obligations under the Purchase Agreement, the
February 2007 Debentures and the additional definitive agreements with respect
to this transaction are secured by all of the assets of the
Company.
The
Conversion Price of the February 2007 Debentures is subject to the following
adjustments for any failure by the Company to cause the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "SEC") to declare the initial registration statement covering
the shares underlying the Debentures, the Warrants and the Callable Warrants
effective:
·
|
if
the initial registration statement is not declared effective on or before
February 20, 2008, the Conversion Price applicable to an amount of
conversion shares equal to the highest number of shares of Common Stock
which can be sold by the holder pursuant to Rule 144, promulgated under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "144 Amount"), shall be
adjusted to equal the lesser of (i) the then Conversion Price and (ii) 80%
of the average of the 3 lowest closing prices of the Common Stock during
the 10 trading days immediately preceding February 20,
2008;
|
·
|
if
the initial registration statement is not declared effective on or before
April 20, 2008, the Conversion Price applicable to an amount of conversion
shares equal to the 144 Amount shall be adjusted to equal the lesser of
(i) the then Conversion Price and (ii) 80% of the average of the 3 lowest
closing prices of the Common Stock during the 10 Trading Days immediately
preceding April 20, 2008;
|
·
|
if
the initial registration statement is not declared effective on or before
July 20, 2008, the Conversion Price applicable to an amount of conversion
shares equal to the 144 Amount shall be adjusted to equal the lesser of
(i) the then Conversion Price and (ii) 80% of the average of the 3 lowest
closing prices of the Common Stock during the 10 trading days immediately
preceding July 20, 2008;
|
·
|
if
the initial registration statement is not declared effective on or before
October 20, 2008, the Conversion Price applicable to an amount of
conversion shares equal to the 144 Amount shall be adjusted to equal the
lesser of (i) the then Conversion Price and (ii) 80% of the average of the
3 lowest closing prices of the Common Stock during the 10 trading days
immediately preceding October 20, 2008;
and
|
·
|
if
the initial registration statement is not declared effective on or before
February 20, 2009, the Conversion Price applicable to an amount of
conversion shares equal to the 144 Amount shall be adjusted to equal the
lesser of (i) the then Conversion Price and (ii) 80% of the average of the
3 lowest closing prices of the Common Stock during the 10 trading days
immediately preceding February 20,
2009.
|
The
Conversion Price of the February 2007 Debentures and the respective exercise
prices of the Warrants and the Callable Warrants are subject to adjustment in
certain events, including, without limitation, upon the consolidation, merger or
sale of all of substantially all of the assets, a reclassification of our Common
Stock, or any stock splits, combinations or dividends with respect to the Common
Stock.
In
addition, after such time as the SEC declares the registration statement
effective, if (i) the volume weighted average price for each of the 10
consecutive trading days (the "Measurement Period") exceeds $1.50 per share with
respect to the $0.75 Callable Warrants and $2.50 with respect to the $1.25
Callable Warrants, (ii) the daily volume for each trading day in such
Measurement Period exceeds 250,000 shares of Common Stock per trading day, and
(iii) the holder is not in possession of any information that constitutes, or
might constitute, material non-public information, then the Company may, within
one trading day of the end of such Measurement Period, call for cancellation of
all or any portion of the Callable Warrants which have not yet been exercised at
a price equal to $.001 per share.
Airtrax,
Inc.
Notes
to the Financial Statements
September
30, 2007
(unaudited)
Under the
Registration Rights Agreement, the Company entered into with the
investors on February 20, 2007, the Company is obligated to file a registration
statement on Form SB-2 to effect the registration of 130% the Common Stock
issuable upon conversion of the Debentures and exercise of the Warrants, the
Callable Warrants and the selling agent warrants (as described below) on the
earlier of (i) 15 calendar days from the filing of the annual report on Form
10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, or (ii) April 15, 2007 (the
"Filing Date"). The Company is obligated to use its best efforts to
cause the registration statement to be declared effective no later than 90 days
after the Filing Date. If we do not file the registration statement by the
Filing Date, or if the registration statement is not declared effective by the
SEC within the deadline specified in the preceding sentence, the Company shall
pay to the investors, as liquidated damages, an amount equal to 1.25% of the
principal amount of the Debentures on a pro rata basis for each 30-day period of
such registration default. On May 4, 2007, the Company filed the
registration statement, and as a result has an obligation for liquidated
damages.
Further,
the Company paid commissions of $321,900 and issued 715,333 warrants to First
Montauk Securities Corp. (the "Selling Agent"), a NASD member firm, which acted
as Selling Agent for the transaction, each as consideration for services
performed in connection with the purchase and sale of the Debentures, Warrants
and Callable Warrants to the investors pursuant to the Purchase
Agreement. The Selling Agent had no obligation to buy any Debentures,
Warrants or Callable Warrants from us. In addition, the Company agreed to
indemnify the Selling Agent and other persons against specific liabilities under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
The
Company claimed an exemption from the registration requirements of the Act for
the private placement of these securities pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Act
and/or Regulation D promulgated there under since, among other things, the
transaction did not involve a public offering, the Investors were accredited
investors and/or qualified institutional buyers, the Investors had access to
information about the Company and their investment, the Investors took the
securities for investment and not resale, and the Company took
appropriate measures to restrict the transfer of the securities.
OTHER 2007 CAPITALIZATION
TRANSACTIONS
On March
1, 2007, an investor in the convertible debt issue October 2005 converted
$22,500 of the 8% Convertible Notes due October 18, 2007. In
exchange, the Company issued 50,000 shares of common stock. The
conversion price was $0.45 per share.
On April
18, 2007, an investor in the October 2005 convertible debt issue converted
$45,000 of the 8% Convertible Notes due October 18, 2007. In
exchange, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock. The
conversion price was $0.45 per share.
On June
1, 2007, an investor in the June 2005 convertible debt issue converted $246,797
of principal and $15,736 of accrued interest of the 8% Convertible Notes due
June 2007 in exchange, the Company issued 583,407 shares of common
stock. The conversion price was $0.45 per share.
On June
5, 2007, an investor in the October 2005 convertible debt issue converted
$22,500 of the 8% Convertible Notes due October 18, 2007. In
exchange, the Company issued 50,000 shares of common stock. The
conversion price was $0.45 per share.
On July
1, 2007, issued 15,000 shares of common stock for Directors of the
Company.
Airtrax,
Inc.
Notes
to the Financial Statements
September
30, 2007
(unaudited)
On July
7, 2007 issued 147,059 shares of common stock in lieu of $50,000 in service
agreement fees with an investor relations firm.
On August
21, 2007 and September 4, 2007, issued 100,000 and 50,000 shares of common
stock, respectively, of the Company upon conversion of an aggregate of $67,500
of convertible notes related to the October 2005 convertible debt issuance. The
conversion price was $.45 per share. In addition, the remaining October 2005
convertible notes due October 18, 2007, aggregating $1,325,500 plus accrued
interest, was automatically extended to a new maturity date of April 18, 2008 as
a result of the terms of the original agreement which states that the maturity
date of the convertible notes is automatically extended if the trading value of
the Common Stock of the Company is trading at a closing bid of less than $2.00
per share.
On August
26, 2007, 200,000 warrants were issued with a five year life at an exercise
price of $1.00.
On
September 10, 2007, the Company issued 123,371 shares of its common stock in
connection with the terms of the November 2004 equity issuance and the “most
favored nations conversion pricing related to the February 2005 convertible note
issuance. In connection with the November 2004 issuance, the Company may be
obligated to issue up to an additional 1.2 million shares of common stock to
shareholder’s of record who received the shares under the original November 2004
issuance, due to the reduction in the conversion price of certain convertible
debt issued in February 2007. In November 2007, 817,093 shares of
common stock were issued based on the supported claims for certain
shareholders.
The October 2005 convertible
debt issuance contains a provision that automatically extends the term of
the note six months until April 18, 2008 if the Company’s common stock is trading at
a closing bid price of less than $2.00 on the maturity date. The
maturity date was October 18, 2007 and Company’s common stock price on
October 18, 2007 was $0.24. As such,
the October 2005 Note was extended on October 18, 2007 until April 18,
2008.
On January 11, 2008, Peter
Amico, Jr. resigned as a Director of the Company as noted in the Form 8-K filing
with the SEC.
On
January 25, 2008, the Company issued 50,000 shares of common stock to a holder
of the October 2005 debt issuance for $22,500 of principal. The
conversion price was $0.45 per share.
On
January 28, 2008, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock to a
Director as payment of prior board fees.
On
January 31, 2008, the Company issued to the holder of the July 26, 2006
convertible note, 100,000 shares of common stock as consideration for four
months interest that was in arrears.
On Feb
8, 2008, the Company issued 160,000 shares of common stock to eight Directors as
payment of board fees for 2008.
On Feb
8, 2008, the Company issued 1,021,705 shares of common stock to holders of the
October 2005 debt issuance for $395,000 of principal and $64,767 of
accrued interest. The conversion price was $0.45 per share.
NOTE
5- SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOWS INFORMATION:
There
were no taxes paid during the nine month periods ended September 30, 2007 and
September 30, 2006.
Interest
of $ 49,483 and $ 0 was paid during the nine month periods ended September 30,
2007 and September 30, 2006, respectively.
Airtrax,
Inc.
Notes
to the Financial Statements
September
30, 2007
(unaudited)
NOTE
6- GOING CONCERN
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company
will continue as a going concern. As shown in the financial
statements, the Company had a working capital deficiency and an accumulated
deficit as of September 30, 2007 and has experienced continuing
losses. These factors raise substantial doubt about the ability of
the Company to continue as a going concern. The financial statements
do not include adjustments relating to the recoverability of assets and
classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be
unable to continue in operation. The Company’s present plans, the
realization of which cannot be assured, to overcome these difficulties include,
but are not limited to, the continuing effort to raise capital in the public and
private markets.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
Special Note on Forward-Looking Statements.
Certain statements in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of
Operation” below, and elsewhere in this annual report, are not related to
historical results, and are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements present our expectations or forecasts of future events. You can
identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to
historical or current facts. These statements involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of
activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future
results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by
such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements frequently are
accompanied by such words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “expects,”
“plans,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,”
“potential” or “continue,” or the negative of such terms or other words and
terms of similar meaning. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in
the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future
results, levels of activity, performance, achievements, or timeliness of such
results. Moreover, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility
for the accuracy and completeness of such forward-looking statements. We are
under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of
this annual report. Subsequent written and oral forward looking statements
attributable to us or to persons acting in our behalf are expressly qualified in
their entirety by the cautionary statements and risk factors set forth below and
elsewhere in this annual report, and in other reports filed by us with the
SEC.
You
should read the following description of our financial condition and results of
operations in conjunction with the financial statements and accompanying notes
included in this report beginning on page F-1.
Overview
Since
1995, substantially all of our resources and operations have been directed
towards the development of the Omni-Directional wheel, related components,
Omni-Directional Lift Trucks and other Omni-Directional Vehicles. Many of the
components, including the unique shaped wheels, motors, and frames, have
been designed by Airtrax and are specially manufactured for us.
Omni-Directional
means that vehicles designed and built by us can travel in any direction. Our
Omni-directional vehicles are controlled with a joystick. The vehicle will
travel in the direction the joystick is pushed. If the operator pushes the
joystick sideways, the vehicle will travel sideways. If the operator were to
twist the joystick the vehicle will travel in circles. Our omni-directional
vehicles have one motor and one motor controller for each wheel. The
omni-directional movement is caused by coordinating the speed and direction of
each motor with joystick inputs which are routed to a micro-processor, then from
the micro-processor to the motor controllers and finally to the motor
itself.
During
the year ended December 31, 2006 and into 2007, we continued development of the
COBRA and KING COBRA scissor lifts and the Omni-Directional power chair. We
anticipate incurring more costs on these products and plan to begin production
of the first COBRA and the KING COBRA models in 2007. The growth and development
of our business will require a significant amount of additional working capital.
We currently have limited financial resources and based on our current operating
plan, we will need to raise additional capital in order to continue operations.
However, we are in discussions with lenders to raise capital in order to
continue operating. We currently do not have adequate cash to meet our short or
long term objectives. In the event additional capital is raised, it may have a
dilutive effect on our existing stockholders. There can be no assurance that
additional financing will be available at terms that are suitable to
us.
We have
incurred losses and experienced negative operating cash flows since our
inception. For the twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, we had
net losses attributable to common shareholders of approximately $ 6. 2
million and $ 11.7 million, respectively. The net loss in both periods
includes expenses related to the accounting for and the write-down of the
previous advances to Filco of $2.0 million in 2006 and $4.7 million in
2005 . We expect to continue to incur significant
expenses. Our operating expenses have been and are expected to
continue to outpace revenue and result in additional losses in the near term. We
may never be able to reduce these losses, which will require us to seek
additional debt or equity financing. While we are in discussions with several
prospective lenders, we do not currently have commitments for these funds and
there can be no assurance that additional financing will be available, or if
available, will be on acceptable terms.
Results
of Operations for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and
2006
Liquidity
constraints and limited access to additional capital for production in 2005 and
2006 and the unexpected death of our Chief Executive Officer and President,
Peter Amico in August 2006 have limited production and sales of omni-directional
technology. Consequently, management believes that the year-to-year comparisons
described below are not indicative of future year-to-year comparative
results.
In
September 2006, Airtrax was awarded a $415,000 contract to design and build a
customized MP2 Equipment Handling Unit for the Israeli Air Force. The contract
includes an option to build five additional units at $95,000 each upon the
acceptance of the first unit. It is estimated that the follow on orders that
could result from this contract will be four units over the next one to two
years for a total of 10 units delivered. The Critical Design Review
was completed in November 2006, the design was approved and initial deliverables
were provided. As a result, we received a first process
payment of $170,000 on December 12 2006. We completed the
Acceptance Test Procedure in mid April 2007 and received a second payment of
$162,000. We cannot predict whether we will be able to successfully
pass all of the acceptance tests and complete the contract, or that if we do so,
that any subsequent orders will result.
We
believe that the joint cooperation between us and the United States Navy with
the MP2 weapons handler contract, and our contract to design and build a
customized MP2 Equipment Handling Unit for the Israeli Air Force has bolstered
the potential use of our technology within the military.
Revenue
Revenue
for the three-month period ended September 30, 2007 was approximately $269,022,
representing an increase of approximately $269,022 as no revenues were generated
for the three-month period ended September 30, 2006. This increase in
revenue, is primarily, attributed to revenue recorded in connection with the
development of the MP2 Equipment Handling Unit for the Israeli Air
Force.
Cost
of Goods Sold
Our cost
of goods sold for the three-month period ended September 30, 2007 amounted to
approximately $204,496, an increase of the full amount as no costs were recorded
for the three-month period ended September 30, 2006. This increase in
cost of goods sold is primarily attributed to continued development cost in
connection with the MP2 Equipment Handling Unit for the Israeli Air
Force
Operating
and Administrative Expenses
Operating
and administrative expenses, which include administrative salaries, depreciation
and other expenses for the three month period ended September 30, 2007 totaled
$876,732, which represents a decrease of approximately $1,357,098 from
$2,233,830 incurred in the three month period ended September 30,
2006. The decrease is primarily due to the $1,000,000 impairment
charge incurred in the three month period in 2006, and higher general and
administrative expenses recorded in the three months ended September 30,
2006.
Other
Income (Expense) for the three month periods includes interest expense and
interest income along with amortization of financing costs and debt discounts,
liquidated damages, settlement expenses, and revaluation income from conversion
benefits related to accounting for derivative financial
instruments. For the three months ended September 30, 2007, total
other income (expense) was ($117,789) compared to expenses of ($182,357)
for the three months ended September 30, 2006, a decrease in expense of
$64,568. The decrease in the quarter is primarily due to revaluation
income of $691,672 compared to $331,604 for the third quarter of 2006, offset by
increases in interest expense ($167,018) compared to ($58,045) in the prior
year, amortization of financing costs ($98,172) compared with ($88,056) in the
prior year, amortization of debt discounts of ($472,790) compared to ($141,375)
in the same three month period in 2006 and liquidating damages of ($81,000)
during the current quarter compared with no similar expense in the third quarter
of 2006. There were no settlement expenses during the current quarter
compared to ($226,485) incurred in the third quarter of 2006.
Loss
Attributable to Common Shareholders
Loss
attributable to common shareholders for the three-month period ended September
30, 2007 was $788,789 compared with loss of $2,219,710 for the same period in
2006. The decrease in loss of approximately $1,430,921 for the three
months ended September 30, 2007 is due primarily to no revenues being generated
in 2006, the $1,000,000 impairment charge and higher general and administrative
expenses recorded in the three months ended September 30, 2006.
Results
of Operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006
Revenue
Revenue
for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007 was approximately $523,082,
representing a decrease of approximately $748,195 from revenue of $1,271,277
recorded for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006. This
decrease in revenue is primarily attributable to the reduction in sales of our
SIDEWINDER ATX-3000 partially offset by revenue recorded in connection with the
development of the MP2 Equipment Handling Unit for the Israeli Air
Force
Cost
of Goods Sold
Our cost
of goods sold for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007 amounted to
approximately $488,999, or a decrease of approximately $704,816 from $1,193,815
recorded for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006. This decrease in
cost of goods sold is primarily attributed to the reduction in sales of our
SIDEWINDER ATX-3000 offset by continued development cost in connection with the
MP2 Equipment Handling Unit for the Israeli Air Force
Operating
and Administrative Expenses
Operating
and administrative expenses, which include administrative salaries, depreciation
and other expenses for the nine month period ended September 30, 2007 totaled
$2,374,202, which represents a decrease of approximately $2,694,321 from
$5,068,523 incurred in the nine month period ended September 30,
2006. The decrease is primarily due to the $2,000,000 impairment
charge and higher general and administrative expenses recorded in the nine
months ended September 30, 2006.
Other
Income (Expense), Net
Other
income (expense) for the nine month periods include interest expense and
interest income, amortization of financing costs and debt discounts, liquidated
damages, settlement expenses, revaluation income from conversion benefits
related to accounting for derivative financial instruments and excess debt
discount in excess of proceeds. For the nine months ended September
30, 2007, total other income (expense) was ($901,815) compared to ($562,262) for
the nine months ended September 30, 2006, a decrease in expense of
$339,553. The decrease in expense is primarily due to revaluation
income of $2,761,229 compared to $814,045 for the same nine month period in
2006, offset by increases in interest expense ($446,290) compared to ($165,320)
in same nine month period in 2006, amortization of debt discounts of
($1,151,331) compared to ($359,200) in same nine month period in 2006,
liquidating damages of ($443,000) compared to ($214,247) incurred in the same
nine month period in 2006 and excess debt discounts in excess of proceeds of
($1,401,901) incurred in the current nine month period September 30,
2007. Amortization of financing costs for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 were ($253,768) compared to ($346,824) for same nine month
period in 2006. There were no settlement expenses during the current
period compared to ($290,801) incurred in the nine months ended September 30,
2006
Loss
Attributable to Common Shareholders
Loss
attributable to common shareholders for the nine month period ended September
30, 2007 was $2,949,082 compared with loss a of $5,310,706 for the same period
in 2006. The decrease in loss of approximately $2,361,624 for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007 is primarily due to the $2,000,000
impairment charge and higher general and administrative expenses recorded in the
nine months ended September 30, 2006.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Since our
inception, we have financed our operations through the private placement of our
common stock and sales of convertible debt. During the years ended December 31,
2006 and 2005, we raised net of offering costs approximately $1.3 million and
$5.9 million, respectively, from the private placement of our
securities. During February 2007, we raised approximately $3,219,000;
which was further reduced by expenses of the sale of $396,900.
We have
consistently demonstrated our ability to meet our cash requirements through
private placements of our common stock and convertible notes. We have continued
to similarly satisfy those requirements during the twelve months ended December
31, 2006 and the first nine months of 2007. However, there can be no assurances
that we will be successful in raising the required capital to continue our
current operating plan.
During
2000, we were approved by the State of New Jersey for the technology tax
transfer program pursuant to which we have sold our net operating losses and
research and development credits as calculated under state law. For the fiscal
year 2006, we recorded a credit of $437,803 from the sale of our losses and
credits.
We
anticipate that our cash requirements for the foreseeable future will be
significant. In particular, management expects substantial expenditures for
inventory, product production, and advertising with production of its
Omni-Directional lift truck and the start of Cobra and King Cobra
(Scissors-Lift) production.
We will
require additional funds to continue our operations beyond the initial
production run. We anticipate that operating capital in the amount of
approximately $3 to 5 million will be required during the next 12 months to
sufficiently fund operations. We expect to recognize lower per unit
manufacturing and part costs in the future due to volume discounts, as well as
lower per unit shipping costs as we transition from the initial rate to
larger-scale production. While we are in discussions with several prospective
lenders, we do not currently have commitments for additional funds and there can
be no assurance that additional financing will be available, or if available
will be on acceptable terms. If we are unable to obtain sufficient funds during
the next nine months we will further reduce the size of our organization and may
be forced to reduce and/or curtail our production and operations, all of which
could have a material adverse impact on our business prospects.
On
February 20, 2007, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain
accredited and/or qualified institutional investors pursuant to which we sold an
aggregate of $3,734,040 principal amount secured convertible debentures
convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion price equal to $0.45
for an aggregate purchase price of $3,219,000. In addition, we issued to the
investors (i) warrants to purchase 8,297,866 shares of our common stock at an
exercise price equal to $0.54 per share, which represents 100% of the number of
shares issuable upon conversion of the debentures; (ii) callable warrants
to purchase 4,148,933 shares of our common stock at an exercise price equal
to $0.75 per share, which represents 50% of the number of shares issuable upon
conversion of the debentures; and (iii) callable warrants to purchase 4,148,933
shares of our common stock at an exercise price equal to $1.25 per share, which
represents 50% of the number of shares issuable upon conversion of the
debentures.
The
Debentures mature on February 20, 2009. We may in our discretion redeem the
debentures, subject to certain equity conditions being met by us as set forth in
the debentures, at a price equal to 150% of the principal balance, accrued
interest, and all liquidated damages, if any, thereon that are requested to be
redeemed. Our obligations under the securities purchase agreement, the
debentures and the additional definitive agreements with respect to this
transaction are secured by all of our assets.
As a
result of our liquidity issues, we have experienced delays in the repayment of
certain promissory notes upon maturity and payments to vendors and
others. If in the future, the holders of our promissory notes may
demand repayment of principal and accrued interest instead of electing to extend
the due date and if we are unable to repay our debt when due because of our
liquidity issues, we may be forced to refinance these notes on terms less
favorable to us than the existing notes, seek protection under the federal
bankruptcy laws or be forced into an involuntary bankruptcy filing.
As of
September 30, 2007, our working capital deficit was $ 2,866,516
million. Fixed assets, net of accumulated depreciation, as of
September 30, 2007 and 2006, amounted to $250,946 and $283,920,
respectively. Current liabilities as of September 30, 2007 were
$ 5,824,625 million compared with $ 3,676,588 as of September 30,
2006. Current liabilities in 2007 and 2006 include liabilities for
warrants and conversion rights of $ 2,189,123 and $ 236,144 ,
respectively.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements.
We do not
have any off balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a
current or future effect on our financial condition, revenue, results of
operations, liquidity or capital expenditures.
Liquidated
Damages
In
connection with financings we entered into with various investors in November
2004, October 2005, and February 2007, we provided such investors registration
rights. Pursuant to those registration rights, in the event that we
did not file a registration statement by a certain date registering for resale
shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of their securities or have such
registration statement effective by another date, we agreed to pay to such
investors liquidated damages. On May 4, 2007, we filed such registration
statement, and now are able to estimate these damages with reasonable
accuracy. Accordingly, we accrued $362,000 in the first six months of
2007 and $81,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2007. There is
no assurance that this amount will be sufficient, nor based on the timing of
declaring the current registration statement effective, in excess of the amount
required.
Critical
Accounting Policies
The SEC has issued Financial
Reporting Release No. 60, “Cautionary Advice Regarding
Disclosure About Critical Accounting Policies” (“FRR 60”) suggesting companies provide
additional disclosure and commentary on their most critical accounting policies.
In FRR 60, the SEC defined the most critical accounting policies as the ones
that are most important to the portrayal of a company’s financial condition and operating results, and
require management to make its most difficult and subjective judgments, often as
a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain.
Based on this definition, our most critical accounting policies include: revenue recognition,
which affects sales, inventory valuation, which affects our cost of sales and
gross margin; and allowance for doubtful accounts and stock-based compensation,
which affects general and administrative expenses. The methods, estimates and judgments we use in
applying these most critical accounting policies have a significant impact on
the results we report in our consolidated financial
statements.
Use
of Estimates
Preparing
our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities
and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Deferred
Financing Costs
Deferred
financing costs represent legal, commitment; processing, consulting and other
fees associated with the issuance of our debt and are being amortized over the
terms of the related debt.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
Pursuant
to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, “Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets”, we continually monitors
events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of
long-lived assets may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized when
expected cash flows are less than the asset's carrying value. Accordingly, when
indicators of impairment are present, we evaluates the carrying value of such
assets in relation to the operating performance and future undiscounted cash
flows of the underlying assets. Our policy is to record an impairment loss when
it is determined that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable.
No impairment charges were recorded in the nine month periods presented ended
September 30, 2007, and impairment reserves of $2,000,000 were
recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue
on product sales is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists, such as when a purchase order or contract is received from the customer,
the price is fixed, title to the goods has changed and there is a reasonable
assurance of collection of the sales proceeds. We obtain written purchase
authorizations from our customers for a specified amount of product at a
specified price and consider delivery to have occurred at the time of shipment.
Revenue is recognized at shipment.
Revenue
from research and development activities relating to firm fixed-price contracts
is generally recognized as billing occurs. Revenue from research and development
activities relating to cost-plus-fee contracts include costs incurred plus a
portion of estimated fees or profits based on the relationship of costs incurred
to total estimated costs. Contract costs include all direct material and labor
costs and an allocation of allowable indirect costs as defined by each contract,
as periodically adjusted to reflect revised agreed upon rates. These rates are
subject to audit by the other party. Amounts can be billed on a bi-monthly
basis. Billing is based on subjective cost investment factors.
Accounting
for Income Taxes
As part
of the process of preparing our financial statements, we are required to
estimate our income taxes. This process involves estimating our actual current
tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from
differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences
result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our
consolidated balance sheet. We must then assess the likelihood that our deferred
tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income. If there is not
persuasive evidence that recovery will occur, we would establish a valuation
allowance. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance or increase this
allowance in a period, we must include an expense within the tax provision in
the consolidated statement of operations.
Significant
management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes,
our deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded
against our net deferred tax assets. We have recorded a valuation allowance of
$8,300,000 as of September 30, 2007, due to uncertainties related to our ability
to utilize some of our deferred tax assets, primarily consisting of certain net
operating losses carried forward before they expire and certain accrued
expenses, which are deferred for income tax purposes until paid. The valuation
allowance is based on our estimates of taxable income and the period over which
our deferred tax assets will be recoverable. The net deferred tax asset as of
September 30, 2007 was $1,212,741, net of the valuation allowance.
Accounting
for Derivatives
Our
issuances of convertible debt are accompanied by other financial instruments.
These financial instruments include warrants to purchase stock, and the right to
convert debt to stock at specified rates (“conversion benefits.”). Pursuant to
SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as
amended, and EITF Issue No. 00-19, Accounting for Derivative Financial
Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, A Company’s Own Stock, we
have identified certain embedded and freestanding derivative instruments.
Generally, where the ability to physical or “net-share settle” an embedded
conversion option or free standing financial instrument is not deemed to be
within our control, the embedded conversion option is required to be bifurcated
or separated, and both the freestanding instruments and bifurcated conversion
feature are accounted for as derivative liabilities. At each reporting date, we
estimate the fair values of all derivatives, and changes in the fair value are
charged to operations.
Under
EITF 00-19, warrants are considered free-standing instruments in that they are
legally detachable and separately exercisable. The conversion benefits, which
are embedded in these debt issues, derive value from the relationship between
the stock price and debt conversion price, and are considered embedded
derivatives under the provisions of SFAS 133. The fair values of both the
warrants and conversion benefits are calculated using a Black- Scholes
Model, taking into consideration factors such as the underlying price of the
common stock, the exercise price for warrants or the conversion price for the
conversion benefit, the stock volatility, and the risk-free interest rates
available for comparable time periods.
Free-standing
instruments (warrants), and embedded derivatives (conversion benefits) which are
initially bifurcated or separated from the host financial instrument, are
recorded as separate liabilities, in cases where the security holder has a right
to choose to receive a “net settlement” of cash. The identification of such net
settlement provisions for prior convertible debt issuances with warrants
resulted in us concluding that such warrants should have been identified as
“derivatives”, and therefore the warrant liabilities must be recorded as a
separate derivative liability on our restated balance sheet, and marked to
market for each subsequent reporting period with any non-cash charges or credits
attributed to the revised fair value of the liability being recognized through
earnings.
If the
decision to settle the outstanding liability remains with us, the value of the
warrants should be recorded in an equity account. The identification of the
settlement provisions we control under certain debt issuances resulted in us
determining that the warrants should be reflected in the restated Reports as
components of equity, as compared to having been previously recorded as
liabilities with non-cash charges and/or credits to earnings as a result of
being marked to market for each period presented.
EITF 00-19-2
specifies that the contingent obligations to make future payments or otherwise
transfer consideration under a registration payment arrangement, whether issued
as a separate agreement or included as a provision of a financial instrument or
other agreement, should be separately recognized and measured in accordance with
SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies.” EITF 00-19-2 also
requires additional disclosure regarding the nature of any registration payment
arrangements, alternative settlement methods, the maximum potential amount of
consideration and the current carrying amount of the liability, if any. We
previously adopted the provisions of EITF 00-19-2 for the reporting period
beginning January 1, 2007 , and do not estimate that any additional
contingency accruals and/or disclosures would be required to be included in our
restated Reports other than those items expected to be reflected in the
respective amended and restated Reports.
We also
previously sold stock units which included warrants along with common stock. In
these cases, a portion of the proceeds equal to the value of the warrants is
allocated to the warrants (when a net settlement provision exists for cash),
with the balance allocated to the stock. In such cases, the value of the
warrants are treated as liabilities, and the balance is revalued at the end of
each reporting period with any change in value being recognized currently as a
non-cash charge and/or credit to earnings. When a warrant classified as a
liability is exercised or cancelled, the fair value of the warrant, as
determined at the time of exercise or cancellation, is transferred to equity,
and is no longer revalued. A similar adjustment is made for a conversion benefit
classified as a liability when the debt is converted to stock, or
cancelled.
The
February 2007 convertible debt issuance includes certain variable conversion
pricing which results in the actual maximum number of potential shares needed to
satisfy the conversion of such debt to be unknown and not quantifiable at the
date of issuance. EITF 00-19-2 specifies that debt issuances with
variable conversion pricing for which there is no established “floor” in the
conversion pricing, and where the maximum number of shares needed to satisfy the
conversion of such debt is not known, should be accounted for as derivative
liabilities and revalued at the end of each reporting period. When a derivative
classified as a liability is exercised, cancelled, or the maximum number of
shares needed to satisfy the conversion of such debt is known, the fair value of
the derivative, as determined at that time, is revalued and transferred to
equity, and is no longer revalued. To the extent that the initial
fair values of the derivative liabilities exceed the net proceeds received, an
immediate charge to the statement of operations is recognized, for the excess.
As of September 30, 2007, we recognized in the statement of operations excess
costs over debt proceeds of $1,401,901 related to the excess of derivative
liabilities over the net proceeds received for the February 2007 debt
issuance. The remainder of the discount from the face value of the
convertible debt resulting from allocating part or all of the proceeds to the
derivative liabilities is amortized over the life of the instrument through
periodic charges to the statements of operations, using the straight line
method, which was the most systematic and rational approach that approximated
the interest method of amortization due to the short two year amortization term
of the debt. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether
such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed
at the end of each reporting period. Derivative liabilities are classified in
the balance sheet as current or non-current based on the classification
previously elected for the host instrument.
Basic and Diluted Loss
Per Share
In
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128,
“Earnings Per Share,” and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 98, both basic
and diluted loss per share (“EPS”) are presented on the face of the income
statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net loss available to common
stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.
Diluted EPS is computed similarly to basic EPS, except that the denominator is
increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been
outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional
common shares were not anti-dilutive. We have excluded all common stock
equivalents arising from outstanding options, warrants, convertible preferred
stock and convertible debt from the calculation of diluted net loss per share
because these securities are anti-dilutive. As of September 30, 2007 and 2006,
we had approximately 24,890,142 and 22,694,207 weighted average
number of shares, respectively, outstanding and used in both the Basic and
Diluted EPS calculation.
Reclassifications
Certain
amounts in the 2006 consolidated financial statements have been
reclassified to conform to the 2007 consolidated financial statement
presentation.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncement
The
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has recently issued FASB Staff
Position EITF 00-19-2 which modifies the accounting treatment of derivatives
that flow from financings involving embedded derivatives. This Staff Position is
effective for financial statements for periods beginning January 1,
2007. Adoption of this staff position has not caused any change in
the quarter or nine month period ended September 30, 2007 in the way we account
for derivatives. We have reviewed other accounting pronouncements issued
during 2006 and 2007, and have concluded that they will have no
effect on our financial statements.
ITEM
3. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a)
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
The
Company, under the supervision and with the participation of its management,
including the recently appointed principal executive officer and acting
principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and
operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Act”) as of the end of
the period covered by this report (the “Disclosure Controls”). Based upon the
Disclosure Controls evaluation, the recently appointed principal executive
officer and acting principal financial officer have concluded that the Company’s
disclosure controls and procedures were not effective in connection with
preparing this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB due to a material weakness in the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting, mainly its financial
closing, review and analysis process and its ability to maintain adequate
records. The Company determined that a restatement of its financial statements
was necessary due to the issuance of convertible debentures and warrants
(collectively, the “Securities”) in various private placements over the last
three years. This restatement is required to properly reflect the Company’s
financial results for certain non-cash, and non-operational related charges or
credits to earnings associated with both embedded and freestanding derivative
liabilities, and the accounting for certain derivatives under the control of the
issuer due to the revised interpretation and implementation under Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities, the Emerging Issues Task Force issued EITF Issue
No. 00-19, Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and
Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock, and FASB Staff Position
No. EITF 00-19-2, “Accounting for Registration Payment
Arrangements.”
The
Company believes that the issues surrounding the restatement of this report,
mainly the internal controls related to the financial closing, review, and
analysis process and its ability to maintain adequate records has been addressed
and the Company has taken additional steps to avoid the reoccurrence of this
condition by adding an additional qualified person with SEC experience in the
financial reporting and analysis area. The Company has instituted a policy
requiring the controller, at the end of each quarter, to reconcile the
accounting records to the securities issuance report prepared and maintained by
the corporate secretary to ensure that all issuances have been properly recorded
and that appropriate adjustments to previously issued securities are recorded,
if necessary. The Company believes that these additional efforts taken by new
management since the end of 2006 to strengthen the Company’s internal controls
will be effective in future periods.
A
control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only
reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system
are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that
there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered
relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control
systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all
control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been
detected. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control
system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be
detected.
The
Company’s internal control over financial reporting has been modified during the
Company’s most recent fiscal quarter by adding additional resources to address
deficiencies in the financial closing, review and analysis process, and improve
the Company’s record keeping, which has materially improved the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting.
(b)
Changes in internal control over financial reporting.
We regularly
review our system of internal control over financial reporting and make changes
to our processes and systems to improve controls and increase efficiency, while
ensuring that we maintain an effective internal control environment. Changes may
include such activities as implementing new, more efficient systems,
consolidating activities, and migrating processes.
We made
the changes as specified above in our internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal Proceedings.
From time
to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings which
arise in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to
inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may
arise from time to time that may harm our business. We are currently not aware
of any such legal proceedings or claims that we believe will have, individually
or in the aggregate, a material adverse affect on our business, financial
condition or operating results.
Item
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
None.
Item
3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
None.
Item
5. Other Information.
None.
Item
6. Exhibits
31.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 and Rule 15d-14(a),
promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 and Rule 15d 14(a),
promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended
|
32.1
|
Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Executive
Officer)
|
32.2
|
Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Financial
Officer)
|
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
|
AIRTRAX,
INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ ROBERT
M.WATSON |
|
|
|
Robert
M. Watson
|
|
|
|
President,
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
and
Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer) |
|
35