UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

x

 

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

 

For the quarterly period ended May 31, 2008

 

 

 

or

 

 

 

o

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

 

For the transition period from     to     

 

Commission file number: 001-14669

 

HELEN OF TROY LIMITED

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Bermuda

 

74-2692550

(State or other jurisdiction of

 

(I.R.S. Employer

incorporation or organization)

 

Identification No.)

 

 

 

Clarenden House

Church Street

Hamilton, Bermuda

 

 

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

 

 

 

 

1 Helen of Troy Plaza

 

 

El Paso, Texas

 

79912

(Registrant’s United States Mailing Address)

 

(Zip Code)

 

(915) 225-8000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.                                                                         Yes x    No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer o

 

Accelerated filer x

 

Non-accelerated filer o

 

Smaller reporting company o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o    No x

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

 

Class

 

Outstanding at July  3, 2008

Common Shares, $0.10 par value per share

 

30,198,198 shares

 

 



 

HELEN OF TROY LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

INDEX – FORM 10-Q

 

 

 

 

 

Page

PART I.

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 1

Financial Statements

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets
as of May 31, 2008 (Unaudited) and February 29, 2008

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income (Unaudited)
for the Three Months Ended
May 31, 2008 and May 31, 2007

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
for the Three Months Ended
May 31, 2008 and May 31, 2007

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)
for the Three Months Ended
May 31, 2008 and May 31, 2007

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 2

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations

29

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 3

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

41

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 4

Controls and Procedures

46

 

 

 

 

 

PART II.

OTHER INFORMATION

47

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 1

Legal Proceedings

47

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 1A

Risk Factors

 

48

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 2

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

49

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 6

Exhibits

 

50

 

 

 

 

 

 

Signatures

 

 

51

 

2



 

Table of Contents

 

PART I.   FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1.   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

HELEN OF TROY LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except shares and par value)

 

 

May 31,

 

February 29,

 

 

 

2008

 

2008

 

 

 

(unaudited)

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

50,296

 

$

57,851

 

Temporary investments

 

 

63,825

 

Trading securities, at market value

 

38

 

36

 

Receivables - principally trade, less allowance of $4,919 and $1,331

 

114,642

 

105,615

 

Inventories

 

149,724

 

144,867

 

Prepaid expenses

 

7,895

 

6,290

 

Income taxes receivable

 

2,667

 

861

 

Deferred income tax benefits

 

13,513

 

16,419

 

Total current assets

 

338,775

 

395,764

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $46,647 and $44,524

 

90,598

 

91,611

 

Goodwill

 

212,621

 

212,922

 

Trademarks, net of accumulated amortization of $236 and $235

 

154,657

 

161,922

 

License agreements, net of accumulated amortization of $17,618 and $17,343

 

24,201

 

24,972

 

Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $6,927 and $6,432

 

15,141

 

15,544

 

Deferred income tax benefits

 

120

 

 

Long-term investments

 

47,067

 

 

Other assets

 

9,612

 

9,258

 

Total assets

 

$

892,792

 

$

911,993

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Current portion of long-term debt

 

$

3,000

 

$

3,000

 

Accounts payable, principally trade

 

34,203

 

42,763

 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

 

58,759

 

73,697

 

Total current liabilities

 

95,962

 

119,460

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term compensation and other liabilities

 

2,111

 

2,566

 

Long-term income taxes payable

 

8,343

 

9,181

 

Deferred income tax liability

 

 

410

 

Long-term debt, less current portion

 

212,000

 

212,000

 

Total liabilities

 

318,416

 

343,617

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity

 

 

 

 

 

Cumulative preferred shares, non-voting, $1.00 par. Authorized 2,000,000 shares; none issued

 

 

 

Common shares, $0.10 par. Authorized 50,000,000 shares; 30,198,198 and 30,374,703 shares issued and outstanding

 

3,021

 

3,038

 

Additional paid-in-capital

 

101,049

 

100,328

 

Retained earnings

 

475,959

 

473,361

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

(5,653

)

(8,351

)

Total stockholders’ equity

 

574,376

 

568,376

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

892,792

 

$

911,993

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.

 

3



 

Table of Contents

 

HELEN OF TROY LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income (unaudited)

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

 

Three Months Ended May 31,

 

 

 

2008

 

2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

145,003

 

$

140,170

 

Cost of sales

 

81,982

 

80,152

 

Gross profit

 

63,021

 

60,018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general, and administrative expense

 

45,595

 

45,717

 

Operating income before impairment

 

17,426

 

14,301

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impairment charges

 

7,760

 

 

Operating income

 

9,666

 

14,301

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other income (expense):

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

(3,453

)

(4,113

)

Other income, net

 

915

 

1,254

 

Total other income (expense)

 

(2,538

)

(2,859

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings before income taxes

 

7,128

 

11,442

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax expense:

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

579

 

592

 

Deferred

 

991

 

733

 

Net earnings

 

$

5,558

 

$

10,117

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.18

 

$

0.33

 

Diluted

 

$

0.18

 

$

0.32

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares used in computing net earnings per share

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

30,217

 

30,294

 

Diluted

 

31,017

 

32,035

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.

 

4



 

Table of Contents

 

HELEN OF TROY LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)

(in thousands)

 

 

Three Months Ended May 31,

 

 

 

2008

 

2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Net earnings

 

$

5,558

 

$

10,117

 

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash (used) / provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

3,445

 

3,524

 

Provision for doubtful receivables

 

3,588

 

73

 

Share-based compensation

 

269

 

190

 

Unrealized (gain) loss on securities

 

(2

)

55

 

Deferred taxes, net

 

971

 

583

 

Gain on the sale of property, plant and equipment

 

(110

)

 

Impairment charges

 

7,760

 

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisition of business:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

(12,456

)

11,772

 

Inventories

 

(4,715

)

(3,718

)

Prepaid expenses

 

(1,605

)

(4,228

)

Other assets

 

(498

)

(408

)

Accounts payable

 

(8,560

)

(3,298

)

Accrued expenses

 

(10,457

)

(7,843

)

Income taxes payable

 

(1,743

)

(1,909

)

Net cash (used) provided by operating activities

 

(18,555

)

4,910

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Capital, license, trademark, and other intangible expenditures

 

(2,472

)

(1,111

)

Acquisitions of business

 

 

(36,500

)

Purchase of temporary investments

 

 

(57,350

)

Sale of temporary investments

 

15,250

 

82,850

 

Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment

 

973

 

 

Net cash provided (used) by investing activities

 

13,751

 

(12,111

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from exercise of stock options, net

 

116

 

864

 

Common share repurchases

 

(2,886

)

 

Share-based compensation tax benefit

 

19

 

51

 

Net cash (used) provided by financing activities

 

(2,751

)

915

 

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

 

(7,555

)

(6,286

)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

 

57,851

 

35,455

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

 

$

50,296

 

$

29,169

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental cash flow disclosures:

 

 

 

 

 

Interest paid

 

$

3,160

 

$

3,847

 

Income taxes paid (net of refunds)

 

$

2,284

 

$

2,516

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.

 

5



 

Table of Contents

 

HELEN OF TROY LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Condensed Statements Of Comprehensive Income (unaudited)

(in thousands)

 

 

Three Months Ended May 31,

 

 

 

2008

 

2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net earnings, as reported

 

$

5,558

 

$

10,117

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flow hedges - Interest rate swaps

 

3,638

 

1,941

 

Cash flow hedges - Foreign currency

 

56

 

(97

)

Unrealized losses - Auction rate securities

 

(996

)

 

Comprehensive income

 

$

8,256

 

$

11,961

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.

 

6



 

Table of Contents

 

HELEN OF TROY LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

May 31, 2008

 

Note 1 - Basis of Presentation

 

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly our consolidated financial position as of May 31, 2008 and February 29, 2008, and the results of our consolidated operations for the three month periods ended May 31, 2008 and 2007. The same accounting policies are followed in preparing quarterly financial data as are followed in preparing annual data.

 

Due to the seasonal nature of our business, quarterly revenues, expenses, earnings and cash flows are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full fiscal year. While we believe that the disclosures presented are adequate and the consolidated condensed financial statements are not misleading, these statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes included in our latest annual report on Form 10-K, and our other reports on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

 

In this report and these accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements and notes, unless the context suggests otherwise or otherwise indicated, references to “the Company,” “our Company,” “Helen of Troy,” “we,” “us” or “our” refer to Helen of Troy Limited and its subsidiaries.

 

Note 2 – New Accounting Pronouncements

 

New Accounting Standards Currently Adopted

 

Liability Recognition on Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements - In June 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force of the FASB (“EITF”) reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 06-4 (“EITF 06-4”), “Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements,” which requires the application of the provisions of SFAS No. 106 (“SFAS 106”), “Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions” to endorsement split-dollar life insurance arrangements (if, in substance, a postretirement benefit plan exists), or Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 12 (if the arrangement is, in substance, an individual deferred compensation contract). SFAS 106 would require us to recognize a liability for the discounted value of the future premium benefits that we will incur through the death of the underlying insureds.  An endorsement-type arrangement generally exists when the Company owns and controls all incidents of ownership of the underlying policies.  EITF 06-4 became effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007.  We adopted the provisions of EITF 06-4 at the beginning of fiscal 2009.   The Company reviewed an endorsement-type policy agreement it currently maintains and believes that all subject policies fall outside the scope of EITF 06-4 because the agreement will not survive the retirement of the affected employee.  Accordingly, the adoption of EITF 06-4 had no impact on our consolidated condensed financial statements.

 

Liability Recognition on Collateral Assignment Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements - In March 2007, the EITF reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 06-10 (“EITF 06-10”), “Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Collateral Assignment Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements,” which provides guidance to help companies determine whether a liability for the postretirement benefit associated with a collateral assignment split-dollar life insurance arrangement should be recorded in accordance with either SFAS 106 (if, in substance, a postretirement benefit plan exists), or Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 12 (if the arrangement is, in substance, an individual deferred compensation contract). EITF 06-10 also provides guidance on how a company should recognize and measure the asset in a collateral assignment split-dollar life insurance contract. EITF 06-10 became effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007.   We adopted the provisions of EITF 06-10 at the beginning of fiscal 2009.   We have certain policies that fall within the scope of

 

7



 

Table of Contents

 

the new pronouncement, however, the effects of recording the resulting $0.66 million liability as a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings at adoption was not material to our consolidated condensed financial statements.

 

Fair Value Measurements - In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”).  SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.  SFAS 157 applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and does not require any new fair value measurements.  At the beginning of fiscal 2009, we adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 related to financial assets and liabilities. These provisions, which have been applied prospectively, did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.  Certain other provisions of SFAS 157 related to other nonfinancial assets and liabilities will be effective for the Company at the beginning of fiscal 2010, and will be applied prospectively. We are currently determining the effect the provisions of SFAS 157 related to nonfinancial assets and liabilities will have, if any, on our consolidated financial statements.  See Note 15 for current required disclosures related to SFAS 157.

 

Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.159 “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. SFAS 159 also established presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  We adopted the provisions of SFAS 159 at the beginning of fiscal 2009 and did not elect the fair value option established by the standard. As such, the adoption had no impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 

New Accounting Standards Subject to Future Adoption

 

Accounting for Business Combinations - In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS No. 141(R)”), which establishes the principles and requirements for how an acquirer: (1) recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree; (2) recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase; and (3) determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS No. 141(R) replaces SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations.”  SFAS No. 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008, and will have no impact on our transactions recorded to date.

 

Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities - In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.  161 (“SFAS 161”), “Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” which amends SFAS 133 and expands disclosures to include information about the fair value of derivatives, related credit risks and a company’s strategies and objectives for using derivatives.  SFAS 161 is effective for fiscal periods beginning on or after November 15, 2008.  Early adoption is encouraged.  We are currently determining the effect, if any, this pronouncement will have on our financial statements.

 

Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles - in May 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 162 (“SFAS 162”), “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” (“SFAS 162”). SFAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (the GAAP hierarchy). SFAS 162 will become effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU

 

8



 

Table of Contents

 

Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.”   The adoption of SFAS 162 is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

 

Note 3 – Litigation

 

Securities Class Action Litigation An agreement has been reached to settle the consolidated class action lawsuits filed on behalf of purchasers of publicly traded securities of the Company against the Company, Gerald J. Rubin, the Company’s Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Thomas J. Benson, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer. In the consolidated action, the plaintiffs alleged violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The class period stated in the complaint was October 12, 2004 through October 10, 2005.  The lawsuit was brought in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas.

 

On June 19, 2008, the Court held a hearing at which it approved the terms of the settlement, the certification of the class for purposes of the settlement, and the award of attorney’s fees and costs related to the lawsuit.  The order approving the settlement will become final thirty days after June 19, 2008.  Under the settlement, the lawsuit has been dismissed with prejudice in exchange for a cash payment of $4.5 million.  The Company’s insurance carrier will pay the settlement amount and the Company’s remaining legal and related fees associated with defending the lawsuit because the Company has met its self-insured retention obligation.  The Company and the two officers of the Company named in the lawsuit continue to deny any and all allegations of wrongdoing and will receive a full release of all claims.

 

Other Matters - We are involved in various other legal claims and proceedings in the normal course of operations. We believe the outcome of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.

 

Note 4 – Earnings per Share

 

Basic earnings per share is computed based upon the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed based upon the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period plus the effect of dilutive securities.   The number of dilutive securities was 800,003 and 1,740,309 for the three month periods ended May 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.  All dilutive securities during these periods consisted of stock options which were issued under our stock option plans. There were options to purchase common shares that were outstanding but not included in the computation of earnings per share because the exercise prices of such options were greater than the average market prices of our common shares. These options totaled 1,920,908 and 284,379 at May 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

 

Note 5 – Segment Information

 

In the tables that follow, we present two segments: Personal Care and Housewares.  Our Personal Care segment’s products include hair dryers, straighteners, curling irons, hairsetters, women’s shavers, mirrors, hot air brushes, home hair clippers and trimmers, paraffin baths, massage cushions, footbaths, body massagers, brushes, combs, hair accessories, liquid hair styling products, men’s fragrances, men’s deodorants, foot powder, body powder and skin care products.  Our Housewares segment reports the operations of OXO International (“OXO”) whose products include kitchen tools, cutlery, bar and wine accessories, household cleaning tools, food storage containers, tea kettles, trash cans, storage and organization products, hand tools, gardening tools, kitchen mitts and trivets, barbeque tools and rechargeable lighting products.  We use outside manufacturers to produce our goods.  Both our Personal Care and Housewares segments sell their products primarily through mass merchandisers, drug chains, warehouse clubs, catalogs, grocery stores and specialty stores.  In addition, the Personal Care segment sells extensively through beauty supply retailers and wholesalers.

 

9



 

Table of Contents

 

The accounting policies of our segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008.

 

The following tables contain segment information for the periods covered by our consolidated condensed statements of income:

 

THREE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 2008 AND 2007

(in thousands)

 

 

Personal

 

 

 

 

 

May 31, 2008

 

Care

 

Housewares

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

106,531

 

$

38,472

 

$

145,003

 

Operating income

 

7,197

 

2,469

 

9,666

 

Capital, license, trademark and other intangible expenditures

 

616

 

1,856

 

2,472

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

2,239

 

1,206

 

3,445

 

 

 

 

Personal

 

 

 

 

 

May 31, 2007

 

Care

 

Housewares

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

106,812

 

$

33,358

 

$

140,170

 

Operating income

 

8,872

 

5,429

 

14,301

 

Capital, license, trademark and other intangible expenditures

 

314

 

797

 

1,111

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

2,368

 

1,156

 

3,524

 

 

The following tables contain net assets allocable to each segment for the periods covered by our consolidated condensed balance sheets:

 

IDENTIFIABLE NET ASSETS AT  MAY 31, 2008 AND FEBRUARY 29, 2008

(in thousands)

 

 

Personal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Care

 

Housewares

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

May 31, 2008

 

$

536,219

 

$

356,573

 

$

892,792

 

February 29, 2008

 

552,329

 

359,664

 

911,993

 

 

Operating income for each operating segment is computed based on net sales, less cost of goods sold and any selling, general, and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) associated with the segment. The selling, general, and administrative expenses used to compute each segment’s operating income are comprised of SG&A directly associated with the segment, plus overhead expenses that are allocable to the operating segment.

 

Note 6 – Significant Charge against Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

 

On May 2, 2008, Linens Holding Co., the operator of Linens ‘n Things retail chain (“Linens”), filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Our accounts receivable balance with Linens at the date of bankruptcy was $4.17 million.  For the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2008, a bad debt provision charge of $3.88 million was made to SG&A and we established a specific allowance of the same amount to account for the portion of the receivable we now estimate will be uncollectible.  The Linens accounts receivable are unsecured and there is uncertainty as to the amount of the balance that the Company may ultimately recover, if any.  These circumstances, when evaluated with additional information surrounding the bankruptcy that recently became available, led us to believe that these adjustments were appropriate.   Linens is a significant customer of the Company with fiscal 2008 net sales of approximately $1.30 million and $17.30 million, for our Personal Care and Housewares segments, respectively.

 

10



 

Table of Contents

 

Note 7 – Property and Equipment

 

A summary of property and equipment is as follows:

 

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

(in thousands)

 

 

Estimated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Useful Lives

 

May 31,

 

February 29,

 

 

 

(Years)

 

2008

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land

 

 

$

9,073

 

$

9,073

 

Building and improvements

 

10 - 40

 

62,909

 

62,832

 

Computer and other equipment

 

3 - 10

 

42,536

 

42,461

 

Molds and tooling

 

1 - 3

 

8,601

 

8,299

 

Transportation equipment

 

3 - 5

 

2,720

 

3,991

 

Furniture and fixtures

 

5 - 15

 

8,176

 

8,168

 

Construction in process

 

 

3,230

 

1,311

 

 

 

 

 

137,245

 

136,135

 

Less accumulated depreciation

 

 

 

(46,647

)

(44,524

)

Property and equipment, net

 

 

 

$

90,598

 

$

91,611

 

 

During the quarter ended May 31, 2008, we sold a fractional share of a corporate jet for $0.97 million and recognized a pretax gain of $.10 million.

 

Depreciation expense was $2.53 million and $2.57 million for the three month periods ended May 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

 

Note 8 – Intangible Assets

 

We do not record amortization expense on goodwill or other intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives. Amortization expense is recorded for intangible assets with definite useful lives. We also perform an annual impairment review of goodwill and other intangible assets. Any asset deemed to be impaired is to be written down to its fair value.

 

The Company has historically completed its analysis of the carrying value of our goodwill and other intangible assets and our analysis of the remaining useful economic lives of our intangible assets other than goodwill during the first quarter of each fiscal year.  As a result of this year’s analysis, we recorded pretax impairment charges of $7.76 million on certain intangible assets associated with our Personal Care segment.  The charges were recorded in the Company’s income statement for the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2008 as a component of operating income.  The impairment charges reflect the amounts by which the carrying values of the associated assets exceeded their estimated fair values, determined by their estimated future discounted cash flows.

 

We cannot predict the occurrence of certain events that might adversely affect the reported value of goodwill or other intangible assets. Such events may include, but are not limited to, strategic decisions made in response to economic and competitive conditions, the impact of the economic environment on the Company’s customer base, or a material negative change in the Company’s relationships with significant customers.

 

11



 

Table of Contents

 

A summary of the carrying amounts and associated accumulated amortization for all intangible assets by operating segment is as follows:

 

INTANGIBLE ASSETS

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Carrying

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Book

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount at

 

Three Months Ended May 31, 2008

 

 

 

Value at

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated

 

February 29,

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition

 

Accumulated

 

May 31,

 

Type / Description

 

Segment

 

Life

 

2008

 

Additions

 

Impairments

 

Adjustments

 

Amortization

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OXO

 

Housewares

 

Indefinite

 

$

166,131

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

166,131

 

All other goodwill

 

Personal Care

 

Indefinite

 

46,791

 

 

 

(301

)

 

46,490

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

212,922

 

 

 

(301

)

 

212,621

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trademarks:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OXO

 

Housewares

 

Indefinite

 

75,554

 

 

 

 

 

75,554

 

Brut

 

Personal Care

 

Indefinite

 

51,317

 

 

 

 

 

51,317

 

All other - definite lives

 

Personal Care

 

(1)

 

338

 

 

 

 

(236

)

102

 

All other - indefinite lives

 

Personal Care

 

Indefinite

 

34,948

 

 

(7,264

)

 

 

27,684

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

162,157

 

 

(7,264

)

 

(236

)

154,657

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Licenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seabreeze

 

Personal Care

 

Indefinite

 

18,000

 

 

(377

)

 

 

17,623

 

All other licenses

 

Personal Care

 

8 - 25 Years

 

24,315

 

 

(119

)

 

(17,618

)

6,578

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

42,315

 

 

(496

)

 

(17,618

)

24,201

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Patents, customer lists and non-compete agreements

 

Housewares

 

2 - 14 Years

 

19,741

 

92

 

 

 

(6,448

)

13,385

 

 

 

Personal Care

 

3 - 8 Years

 

2,235

 

 

 

 

(479

)

1,756

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21,976

 

92

 

 

 

(6,927

)

15,141

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

$

439,370

 

$

92

 

$

(7,760

)

$

(301

)

$

(24,781

)

$

406,620

 

 

(1) Includes one fully amortized trademark and one trademark with an estimated life of 30 years.

 

The following table summarizes the amortization expense attributable to intangible assets for the three month periods ended May 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, as well as our latest estimate of amortization expense for the fiscal years ending the last day of each February from 2009 through 2014.

 

AMORTIZATION OF INTANGIBLES

(in thousands)

Aggregate Amortization Expense

 

 

 

For the three months ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

May 31, 2008

 

$

771

 

May 31, 2007

 

$

776

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated Amortization Expense

 

 

 

For the fiscal years ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

February 2009

 

$

3,074

 

February 2010

 

$

3,029

 

February 2011

 

$

2,353

 

February 2012

 

$

2,239

 

February 2013

 

$

2,206

 

February 2014

 

$

2,039

 

 

12



 

Table of Contents

 

NOTE 9 - Acquisitions And New Trademark License Agreements

 

Belson Products Acquisition - Effective May 1, 2007, we acquired certain assets of Belson Products (“Belson”), formerly the professional salon division of Applica Consumer Products, Inc. for a cash purchase price of $36.50 million plus the assumption of certain liabilities.  This transaction was accounted for as a purchase of a business and was paid for using available cash on hand.  Belson is a supplier of personal care products to the professional salon industry. Belson markets its professional products to major beauty suppliers and other major distributors under brand names including Belson®, Belson Pro®, Gold ‘N Hot®, Curlmaster®, Premiere®, Profiles®, Comare®, Mega Hot® and Shear Technology®.  Products include electrical hair care appliances, spa products and accessories, professional brushes and combs, and professional styling shears.  Belson products are principally distributed throughout the U.S., as well as Canada and the United Kingdom.

 

Net assets acquired consist principally of accounts receivable, finished goods inventories, goodwill, patents, trademarks, tradenames, product design specifications, production know-how, certain fixed assets, distribution rights and customer lists, a covenant not-to-compete, less certain customer related operating accruals and liabilities. We have completed our analysis of the economic lives of all the assets acquired and determined the appropriate allocation of the initial purchase price based on an independent appraisal. The following schedule presents the net assets of Belson acquired at closing:

 

Belson Products - Net Assets Acquired on May 1, 2007

(in thousands)

Accounts receivable, net

 

$

7,449

 

Inventories

 

8,426

 

Fixed assets

 

139

 

Goodwill

 

11,296

 

Trademarks and other intangible assets

 

11,085

 

Total assets acquired

 

38,395

 

Less: Current liabilities assumed

 

(1,895

)

Net assets acquired

 

$

36,500

 

 

Subsequent to the acquisition, we made certain post-closing adjustments to increase goodwill by $0.13 million.

 

Note 10 – Short Term Debt

 

We entered into a five year revolving Credit Agreement (“Revolving Line of Credit Agreement”), dated as of June 1, 2004, between Helen of Troy L.P., as borrower, and Bank of America, N.A. and other lenders.  Borrowings under the Revolving Line of Credit Agreement accrue interest equal to the higher of the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50 percent or Bank of America’s prime rate. Alternatively, upon timely election by the Company, borrowings accrue interest based on the respective 1, 2, 3, or 6-month LIBOR rate plus a margin of 0.75 percent to 1.25 percent based upon the “Leverage Ratio” at the time of the borrowing. The “Leverage Ratio” is defined by the Revolving Line of Credit Agreement as the ratio of total consolidated indebtedness, including the subject funding on such date to consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) for the period of the four consecutive fiscal quarters most recently ended.  The credit line allows for the issuance of letters of credit up to $10 million. We incur loan commitment fees at a current rate of 0.25 percent per annum on the unused balance of the Revolving Line of Credit Agreement and letter of credit fees at a current rate of 1.0 percent per annum on the face value of the letter of credit.  During the second quarter of fiscal 2008, we permanently reduced the commitment under our Revolving Line of Credit Agreement from $75 million to $50 million, which has resulted in a proportionate decline in the cost of associated commitment fees under the facility.  Outstanding letters of credit reduce the borrowing limit dollar for dollar.  During the first three months of fiscal 2009 and all of fiscal 2008, we did not draw on the Revolving Line of Credit facility.  As of May 31, 2008, there were no revolving loans and $1.45 million of open letters of credit outstanding under this facility.

 

The Revolving Line of Credit Agreement requires the maintenance of certain debt/EBITDA, fixed charge coverage ratios, and other customary covenants. Certain covenants, as of the latest balance sheet date, limit our

 

13



 

Table of Contents

 

total outstanding indebtedness from all sources to no more than 3.5 times the latest twelve months’ trailing EBITDA.  As of May 31, 2008, these covenants effectively limited our ability to incur more than $131.90 million of additional debt from all sources, including draws on our Revolving Line of Credit Agreement.  The agreement is guaranteed, on a joint and several basis, by the parent company, Helen of Troy Limited, and certain subsidiaries.  Additionally, our debt agreements restrict us from incurring liens on any of our properties, except under certain conditions.  Any amounts outstanding under the Revolving Line of Credit Agreement will mature on June 1, 2009. As of May 31, 2008, we were in compliance with the terms of this agreement.

 

Note 11 – Accrued Expenses and Current Liabilities

 

A summary of accrued expenses and other current liabilities is as follows:

 

ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES

(in thousands)

 

 

May 31,

 

February 29,

 

 

 

2008

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued sales returns, discounts and allowances

 

$

24,677

 

$

24,969

 

Accrued compensation

 

4,070

 

11,675

 

Accrued advertising

 

6,247

 

6,917

 

Accrued interest

 

2,241

 

2,092

 

Accrued royalties

 

2,940

 

3,029

 

Accrued professional fees

 

1,083

 

1,273

 

Accrued benefits and payroll taxes

 

1,617

 

1,431

 

Accrued freight

 

1,621

 

1,446

 

Accrued property, sales and other taxes

 

1,557

 

1,196

 

Foreign currency contracts

 

(58

)

(83

)

Interest rate swaps

 

6,937

 

12,449

 

Other

 

5,827

 

7,303

 

Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities

 

$

58,759

 

$

73,697

 

 

Note 12 – Product Warranties

 

The Company’s products are under warranty against defects in material and workmanship for a maximum of two years. We have established accruals to cover future warranty costs of approximately $7.45  million and $7.64 million as of May 31, 2008 and February 29, 2008, respectively. We estimate our warranty accrual using historical trends, which we believe is the most reliable method by which we can estimate our warranty liability.  This liability is included in the line entitled “Accrued sales returns, discounts and allowances” in Note 11.

 

The following table summarizes the activity in the Company’s accrual for the three month period ended May 31, 2008 and fiscal year ended February 29, 2008:

 

ACCRUAL FOR WARRANTY RETURNS

(in thousands)

 

 

May 31,

 

February 29,

 

 

 

2008

 

2008

 

 

 

(Three Months)

 

(Year)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at the beginning of the period

 

$

7,635

 

$

6,450

 

Additions to the accrual

 

4,394

 

22,722

 

Reductions of the accrual - payments and credits issued

 

(4,582

)

(21,537

)

Balance at the end of the period

 

$

7,447

 

$

7,635

 

 

14



 

Table of Contents

 

Note 13 – Income Taxes

 

Hong Kong Income TaxesOn August 24, 2007, the Inland Revenue Department of Hong Kong (the “IRD”) and the Company reached a settlement regarding tax liabilities assessed for fiscal years 1998 through 2003.  Concurrent with these settlement negotiations, we reached an agreement regarding fiscal years 2004 and 2005, for which we had not previously been assessed a tax liability. The amounts due related to the tax settlement for years 1998 through 2003, and the agreement for years 2004 and 2005, were settled with previously acquired tax reserve certificates. We received a cash refund, including interest, of approximately $4.54 million.  During fiscal 2008, in connection with the settlement, we:

 

·                  reversed $5.41 million representing a portion of the tax provision previously established for those years and recorded $0.20 million of interest income related to tax reserve certificates in excess of the settlement amount; and

 

·                  reversed $1.94 million of a tax provision and $0.40 million of estimated penalties established for this jurisdiction for future years ending after fiscal 2005, on the basis of the settlement for previous years.

 

Effective March 2005, we had concluded the conduct of all operating activities in Hong Kong that we believe were the basis of the IRD’s assessments.  The Company established a Macao offshore company (“MOC”) and began similar activities in Macao and China in the third quarter of fiscal 2005.  As a MOC, we have been granted an indefinite tax holiday and pay no taxes.

 

United States Income Taxes - The IRS recently completed its audit of our U.S. consolidated federal tax returns for fiscal years 2003 and 2004.   We previously disclosed that the IRS provided notice of proposed adjustments of $5.95 million to taxes for the years under audit.  In April 2008, we resolved all outstanding tax issues resulting in no adjustments to either year.  As a result of the settlement, in fiscal 2008 we reversed $3.68 million of tax provisions, including interest and penalties, previously established for those years. Of the $3.68 million, $1.36 million was credited to the fiscal year 2008 tax provision and $2.32 million was credited to additional paid-in-capital.  The amount credited to additional paid-in-capital was for the tax effects of prior year stock compensation expense that was deemed to be deductible under the audit, and when originally accrued, was charged against additional paid-in-capital.

 

The IRS is currently examining our U.S. consolidated federal tax return for fiscal year 2005.  On March 31, 2008, the IRS provided notice of a proposed adjustment of $7.75 million to taxes for the year under audit.  The Company is vigorously contesting this adjustment. To date, this is the only adjustment that has been proposed, however, the audit has not yet been concluded.  Although the ultimate outcome of the dispute with the IRS cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes that an adequate provision for taxes has been made in our consolidated condensed financial statements.

 

Income Tax Provisions - We must make certain estimates and judgments in determining income tax expense for financial statement purposes. These estimates and judgments must be used in the calculation of certain tax assets and liabilities because of differences in the timing of recognition of revenue and expense for tax and financial statement purposes.  We must assess the likelihood that we will be able to recover our deferred tax assets.  If recovery is not likely, we must increase our provision for taxes by recording a valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets that we estimate will not ultimately be recoverable. As changes occur in our assessments regarding our ability to recover our deferred tax assets, our tax provision is increased in any period in which we determine that the recovery is not probable.

 

In 1994, we engaged in a corporate restructuring that, among other things, resulted in a greater portion of our income not being subject to taxation in the U.S.  If such income were subject to U.S. federal income taxes, our effective income tax rate would increase materially. The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the “AJCA”), included an anti-inversion provision that denies certain tax benefits to companies that have reincorporated outside the U.S. after March 4, 2003. We completed our reincorporation in 1994; therefore, our transaction is

 

15



 

Table of Contents

 

grandfathered by the AJCA, and we expect to continue to benefit from our current structure.  In addition to future changes in tax laws, our position on various tax matters may be challenged. Our ability to maintain our position that the parent company is not a Controlled Foreign Corporation (as defined under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code) is critical to the tax treatment of our non-U.S. earnings. A Controlled Foreign Corporation is a non-U.S. corporation whose largest U.S. shareholders (i.e., those owning 10 percent or more of its shares) together own more than 50 percent of the shares in such corporation. If a change of ownership were to occur such that the parent company became a Controlled Foreign Corporation, such a change could have a material negative effect on the largest U.S. shareholders and, in turn, on our business.

 

Uncertainty in Income Taxes – The calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations. We recognize liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues in the U.S. and other tax jurisdictions based on our estimate of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. If we ultimately determine that payment of these amounts is not probable, we reverse the liability and recognize a tax benefit during the period in which we determine that the liability is no longer probable. We record an additional charge in our provision for taxes in the period in which we determine that the recorded tax liability is less than we expect the ultimate assessment to be.

 

Effective March 1, 2007, we adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), which provides guidance for the recognition, derecognition and measurement in the financial statements of tax positions taken in previously filed tax returns or tax positions expected to be taken in tax returns. FIN 48 requires an entity to recognize the financial statement impact of a tax position when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination. If the tax position meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, the tax effect is recognized at the largest amount of the benefit that has greater than a fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. FIN 48 also provides guidance for classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. FIN 48 requires that a liability created for unrecognized tax benefits shall be presented as a separate liability and not combined with deferred tax liabilities or assets.

 

As of May 31, 2008, tax years under examination or still subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions, for our most significant subsidiaries were as follows:

 

Jurisdiction

 

Examinations in Process

 

Open Years

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hong Kong

 

- None -

 

2006    -    2008

 

Mexico

 

- None -

 

2003    -    2007

 

United Kingdom

 

2005

 

2006    -    2008

 

United States

 

2005

 

2006    -    2008

 

 

The following table summarizes the net change to unrecognized tax benefits during the first three months of fiscal 2009:

 

UNRECOGNIZED TAX BENEFITS

(in thousands) 

 

 

 

 

 

February 29, 2008

 

$

9,181

 

Changes in tax positions taken during a prior year

 

(838

)

May 31, 2008

 

$

8,343

 

 

When there is uncertainty in a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return, FIN 48 requires a liability to be recorded for the amount of the position that could be challenged and overturned through any combination of audit, appeals or litigation process.  This amount is determined through criteria and a methodology prescribed by FIN 48 and is referred to as an “Unrecognized Tax Benefit.”

 

We believe that it is reasonably possible that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits may materially change during the next twelve months due to certain issues pending settlement with the IRS.  Depending on the outcome

 

16



 

Table of Contents

 

of the settlement negotiations, the Company estimates that the impact on the Company’s ultimate tax liability could range from a $4.86 million decrease to a $7.65 million increase.

 

The Company’s income tax expense and resulting effective tax rate are based upon the respective estimated annual effective tax rates applicable for the respective years adjusted for the effect of items required to be treated as discrete interim period items. The effective tax rates for the three month periods ended May 31, 2008 and 2007 were 22.0 and 11.6 percent, respectively.

 

In any given period, there may be significant transactions or events that are incidental to our core businesses and that by a combination of their nature and jurisdiction, can have a disproportionate impact on our reported effective tax rates.  Without these transactions, the trend in our effective tax rates would follow a more normalized pattern. The following table shows the comparative impact of these items on our pretax earnings, tax expense and our overall effective tax rates, for three month periods ended May 31, 2008 and 2007:

 

 

IMPACT OF SIGNIFICANT ITEMS ON PRETAX EARNINGS, TAX EXPENSE AND EFFECTIVE TAX RATES

(dollars in thousands)

 

 

Three Months Ended May 31,

 

 

 

2008 - Increase (Decrease)

 

2007 - Increase (Decrease)

 

 

 

Pretax

 

Tax

 

Effective

 

Pretax

 

Tax

 

Effective

 

 

 

Earnings

 

Expense

 

Tax rates

 

Earnings

 

Expense

 

Tax rates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impairment charges

 

$

(7,760

)

$

(155

)

9.7

%

$

 

$

 

0.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Charge to allowance for doubtful accounts due to bankruptcy

 

(3,876

)

(1,360

)

-3.2

%

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gain on casualty insurance settlements

 

2,702

 

67

 

-3.3

%

 

 

0.0

%

 

For the three-month period ended May 31, 2008, the net effect of the significant items shown above was to increase our effective tax rate by 3.2 percentage points.

 

In addition to the items shown above, other shifts in our effective tax rates for the periods presented are generally attributable to shifts in the mix of taxable income earned between the various high and low tax rate jurisdictions in which we conduct our business.

 

17



 

Table of Contents

 

Note 14 – Long-Term Debt

 

A summary of long-term debt was as follows:

 

LONG-TERM DEBT

(in thousands)

 

 

Original

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date

 

Interest

 

 

 

May 31,

 

February 29,

 

 

 

Borrowed

 

Rates

 

Matures

 

2008

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$15 million unsecured Senior Note Payable at a fixed interest rate of 7.24%. Interest payable quarterly, principal of $3 million payable annually beginning on July 2008.

 

07/97

 

7.24

%

07/12

 

$

15,000

 

$

15,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$75 million unsecured floating interest rate 5 Year Senior Notes. Interest set and payable quarterly at three-month LIBOR plus 85 basis points. Principal is due at maturity. Notes can be prepaid without penalty. (1)

 

06/04

 

5.89

%

06/09

 

75,000

 

75,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$50 million unsecured floating interest rate 7 Year Senior Notes. Interest set and payable quarterly at three-month LIBOR plus 85 basis points. Principal is due at maturity. Notes can be prepaid without penalty. (1)

 

06/04

 

5.89

%

06/11

 

50,000

 

50,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$75 million unsecured floating interest rate 10 Year Senior Notes. Interest set and payable quarterly at three-month LIBOR plus 90 basis points. Principal is due at maturity. Notes can be prepaid without penalty. (1)

 

06/04

 

6.01

%

06/14

 

75,000

 

75,000

 

Total long-term debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

215,000

 

215,000

 

Less current portion of long-term debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,000

)

(3,000

)

Long-term debt, less current portion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

212,000

 

$

212,000

 

 

(1)  Floating interest rates have been hedged with interest rate swaps to effectively fix interest rates as discussed later in this note.

 

Interest rate hedge agreements (the “swaps”) are in place for our floating interest rate $75 million, 5 year; $50 million, 7 year; and $75 million, 10 year Senior Notes. The swaps are a hedge of the variable LIBOR rates used to reset the floating rates on these Senior Notes.  The swaps effectively fix the interest rates on the 5, 7 and 10 Year Senior Notes at 5.89, 5.89 and 6.01 percent, respectively. Under the swaps, we agree with other parties to exchange quarterly the difference between fixed-rate and floating-rate interest amounts calculated by reference to notional amounts that perfectly match our underlying debt.  Under these swap agreements, we pay the fixed rates and receive the floating rates.  The swaps settle quarterly and terminate upon maturity of the related debt.  The swaps are considered cash flow hedges because they are intended to hedge, and are effective as a hedge, against variable cash flows.

 

All of our long-term debt is unconditionally guaranteed by the parent company, Helen of Troy Limited, and/or certain subsidiaries on a joint and several basis and has customary covenants covering debt/EBITDA ratios, fixed charge coverage ratios, consolidated net worth levels, and other financial requirements. Certain covenants as of the latest balance sheet date, limit our total outstanding indebtedness from all sources to no more than 3.5 times

 

18



 

Table of Contents

 

the latest twelve months trailing EBITDA.  These covenants effectively limited our ability to incur more than $131.90 million of additional debt from all sources, including draws on our Revolving Line of Credit Agreement.  Additionally, our debt agreements restrict us from incurring liens on any of our properties, except under certain conditions.  As of May 31, 2008, we are in compliance with the terms of these agreements.

 

The following table contains a summary of the components of our interest expense for the periods covered by our consolidated condensed statements of income:

 

INTEREST EXPENSE

(in thousands)

 

 

Three Months Ended May 31,

 

 

 

2008

 

2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest and commitment fees

 

$

2,482

 

$

4,098

 

Deferred finance costs

 

144

 

182

 

Interest rate swap settlements

 

827

 

(167

)

Total interest expense

 

$

3,453

 

$

4,113

 

 

Note 15 – Fair Value

 

In the first quarter of fiscal 2009, we adopted SFAS 157, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP, and requires expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements, but rather generally applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. SFAS 157 emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement, and defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. SFAS 157 discusses valuation techniques, such as the market approach (comparable market prices), the income approach (present value of future income or cash flow), and the cost approach (cost to replace the service capacity of an asset or replacement cost). These valuation techniques are based upon observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s market assumptions. SFAS 157 utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to fair value measurement techniques into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels:

 

·                  Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

 

·                  Level 2: Observable inputs other than quoted prices that are directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for similar or identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable.

 

·                  Level 3: Unobservable inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions.

 

The FASB issued FSP 157-2 which delayed the effective date of SFAS 157 for all non-financial assets and liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis, until the beginning of our fiscal 2010 year. The Company’s financial assets and liabilities adjusted to fair value at May 31, 2008 are its commercial paper investments included in cash and cash equivalents, money market accounts, auction rate securities, trading securities, foreign currency contracts and interest rate swaps.  These assets and liabilities are subject to the measurement and disclosure requirements of SFAS 157.  The company adjusts the value of these instruments to fair value each reporting period.  No adjustment to retained earnings resulted from the adoption of SFAS 157.

 

19



 

Table of Contents

 

The fair value hierarchy of our financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value and measured on a recurring basis is as follows:

 

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

Quoted Prices in

 

Significant Other

 

 

 

 

 

Active Markets

 

Observable

 

 

 

Fair Value at

 

for Identical Assets

 

Market Inputs

 

Description

 

May 31, 2008

 

(Level 1)

 

(Level 2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial paper investments

 

$

1,150

 

$

1,150

 

$

 

Money market accounts

 

43,508

 

43,508

 

 

Trading securities

 

38

 

38

 

 

Auction rate securities

 

47,067

 

 

47,067

 

Foreign currency contracts

 

58

 

58

 

 

Total

 

$

91,821

 

$

44,754

 

$

47,067

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swaps

 

$

6,937

 

$

 

$

6,937

 

 

Commercial paper investments and money market accounts are included in cash and cash equivalents on the accompanying consolidated condensed balance sheets and are classified as Level 1 assets.  Trading securities are also classified as Level 1 assets because they consist of certain publicly traded stocks which are stated on our consolidated condensed balance sheets at market value, as determined by the most recent trading price of each security as of the balance sheet date.

 

We hold investments in auction rate securities (“ARS”) collateralized by student loans (with underlying maturities from 20.4 to 39.5 years).  Substantially all such collateral in the aggregate is guaranteed by the U.S. government under the Federal Family Education Loan Program.  Liquidity for these securities was normally dependent on an auction process that resets the applicable interest rate at pre-determined intervals, ranging from 7 to 35 days.  Beginning in February 2008, the auctions for the ARS held by us and others were unsuccessful, requiring us to continue to hold them beyond their typical auction reset dates. Auctions fail when there is insufficient demand.  However, this does not represent a default by the issuer of the security. Upon an auction’s failure, the interest rates reset based on a formula contained in the security.  The rate is generally equal to or higher than the current market rate for similar securities.  The securities will continue to accrue interest and be auctioned until one of the following occurs: the auction succeeds; the issuer calls the securities; or the securities mature.

 

At February 29, 2008, these securities were valued at their original cost and classified as current assets in the consolidated condensed balance sheet under the heading “Temporary investments,” which we believed appropriate based on the circumstances and level of information we had at that time.  Between February 29, 2008 and May 31, 2008, we liquidated $15.25 million of these securities with no gain or loss. Each of the remaining securities in our portfolio has been subject to failed auctions. These failures in the auction process have affected our ability to access these funds in the near term.   We intend to reduce our remaining holding as soon as practicable, but now believe it unlikely that we will be able to liquidate some or all of our holdings over the next twelve months.  Accordingly, at May 31, 2008, we re-classified all remaining ARS as non-current assets held for sale under the heading “Long-term investments” in our consolidated condensed balance sheet and the Company determined that original cost no longer approximates fair value. As a result of the lack of liquidity in the ARS market, in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 we recorded a pre-tax temporary unrealized loss on our ARS of $1.51 million, which is reflected in accumulated other comprehensive loss in our consolidated condensed balance sheet, net of related tax effects of $0.51 million.  The recording of this unrealized loss is not a result of the quality of the underlying collateral.

 

20



 

Table of Contents

 

Our estimate of fair value is currently based upon a survey of recent write-downs reported by a sample of public companies with similar investment holdings in student loan backed auction rate securities.  We believe the survey constitutes a fair value determination derived from indirectly observable market based information and requires classification of our ARS holdings as a long-term investment.

 

We use derivatives for hedging purposes pursuant to SFAS 133, and our derivatives are primarily foreign currency contracts and interest rate swaps. We determine the fair value of our derivative instruments based on Level 2 inputs in the SFAS 157 fair value hierarchy. Level 2 fair value determinations are derived from directly or indirectly observable market based information.

 

Note 16 – Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

 

Our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of May 31, 2008 were:

 

PAYMENTS DUE BY PERIOD - TWELVE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31:

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

2009

 

2010

 

2011

 

2012

 

2013

 

After

 

 

 

Total

 

1 year

 

2 years

 

3 years

 

4 years

 

5 years

 

5 years

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Term debt - fixed rate

 

$

15,000

 

$

3,000

 

$

3,000

 

$

3,000

 

$

3,000

 

$

3,000

 

$

 

Term debt - floating rate (1)

 

200,000

 

 

75,000

 

 

50,000

 

 

75,000

 

Long-term incentive plan payouts

 

2,661

 

1,532

 

970

 

159

 

 

 

 

Interest on floating rate debt (1)

 

41,288

 

11,870

 

7,821

 

7,453

 

4,753

 

4,508

 

4,883

 

Interest on fixed rate debt

 

2,308

 

896

 

679

 

462

 

244

 

27

 

 

Open purchase orders

 

133,453

 

133,453

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minimum royalty payments

 

78,642

 

4,619

 

6,517

 

6,085

 

5,330

 

4,807

 

51,284

 

Advertising and promotional

 

86,543

 

7,176

 

6,100

 

5,597

 

5,747

 

5,499

 

56,424

 

Operating leases

 

12,677

 

2,029

 

1,995

 

1,512

 

1,031

 

988

 

5,122

 

Capital spending commitments

 

908

 

908

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

20

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total contractual obligations (2)

 

$

573,500

 

$

165,503

 

$

102,082

 

$

24,268

 

$

70,105

 

$

18,829

 

$

192,713

 

 

(1)

 

As mentioned above in Note 14, the Company uses interest rate hedge agreements (the “swaps”) in conjunction with its unsecured floating interest rate $75 million, 5 year; $50 million, 7 year; and $75 million, 10 year Senior Notes. The swaps are a hedge of the variable LIBOR rates used to reset the floating rates on these Senior Notes. The swaps effectively fix the interest rates on the 5, 7 and 10 year Senior Notes at 5.89, 5.89 and 6.01 percent, respectively, beginning September 29, 2006. Accordingly, the future interest obligations related to this debt has been estimated using these rates.

 

 

 

(2)

 

In addition to the contractual obligations and commercial commitments in the table above, as of May 31, 2008, we have recorded $5.68 million of net income tax liabilities, including the provision for our uncertain tax positions. While we expect to settle certain of these issues over the near term, we are unable to reliably estimate the timing of future payments related to uncertain tax positions; therefore, we have excluded all tax liabilities from the table above.

 

We lease certain facilities, equipment and vehicles under operating leases, which expire at various dates through fiscal 2018.  Certain leases contain escalation clauses and renewal or purchase options.  Rent expense related to our operating leases was $0.74 million and $0.67 million for the three month periods ended May 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

 

21



 

Table of Contents

 

Note 17 – Financial Instruments and Risk Management

 

Foreign Currency Risk - Our functional currency is the U.S. Dollar. By operating internationally, we are subject to foreign currency risk from transactions denominated in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar (“foreign currencies”). Such transactions include sales, certain inventory purchases and operating expenses. As a result of such transactions, portions of our cash, trade accounts receivable, and trade accounts payable are denominated in foreign currencies. During the three month periods ended May 31, 2008 and 2007, approximately 17 and 15 percent, respectively, of our net sales were in foreign currencies. These sales were primarily denominated in the Canadian Dollar, British Pound, Euro, Brazilian Real and the Mexican Peso. We make most of our inventory purchases from the Far East and use the U.S. Dollar for such purchases.

 

We identify foreign currency risk by regularly monitoring our foreign currency-denominated transactions and balances. Where operating conditions permit, we reduce foreign currency risk by purchasing most of our inventory with U.S. Dollars and by converting cash balances denominated in foreign currencies to U.S. Dollars.

 

We also hedge against foreign currency exchange rate-risk by using a series of forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges to protect against the foreign currency exchange risk inherent in our forecasted transactions denominated in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar. In these transactions, we execute a forward currency contract that will settle at the end of a forecasted period. Because the size and terms of the forward contract are designed so that its fair market value will move in the opposite direction and approximate magnitude of the underlying foreign currency’s forecasted exchange gain or loss during the forecasted period, a hedging relationship is created. To the extent we forecast the expected foreign currency cash flows from the period the forward contract is entered into until the date it will settle with reasonable accuracy, we significantly lower or materially eliminate a particular currency’s exchange risk exposure over the life of the related forward contract.

 

We enter into these type of agreements where we believe we have meaningful exposure to foreign currency exchange risk. It is simply not practical for us to hedge all our exposures, nor are we able to project in any meaningful way the possible effect and interplay of all foreign currency fluctuations on translated amounts or future earnings. This is due to our constantly changing exposure to various currencies, the fact that each foreign currency reacts differently to the U.S. Dollar, and the significant number of currencies involved.

 

For transactions designated as foreign currency cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the change in the fair value (arising from the change in the spot rates from period to period) is deferred in other comprehensive income (loss). These amounts are subsequently recognized in “Selling, general, and administrative expense” in the consolidated statements of income in the same period as the forecasted transactions close out over the remaining balance of their terms. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value (arising from the change in the difference between the spot rate and the forward rate) is recognized in the period it occurred. These amounts are also recognized in “Selling, general, and administrative expense” in the consolidated condensed statements of income. We do not enter into any forward exchange contracts or similar instruments for trading or other speculative purposes.

 

Interest Rate Risk – Fluctuation in interest rates can cause variation in the amount of interest that we can earn on our available cash, cash equivalents and investments and the amount of interest expense we incur on any short-term and long-term borrowings. Interest on our long-term debt outstanding as of May 31, 2008 is both floating and fixed. Fixed rates are in place on $15 million of senior notes at 7.24 percent and floating rates are in place on $200 million of debt which reset as described in Note 14, but have been effectively converted to fixed rate debt using the interest rate swaps described below.

 

We manage our floating rate debt using interest rate swaps (the “swaps”). We have three interest rate swaps that convert an aggregate notional principal of $200 million from floating interest rate payments under our 5, 7 and 10 year Senior Notes to fixed interest rate payments ranging from 5.89 to 6.01 percent. In these transactions, we have three contracts to pay fixed rates of interest on an aggregate notional principal amount of $200 million at rates ranging from 5.04 to 5.11 percent while simultaneously receiving floating rate interest payments set at 2.70

 

22



 

Table of Contents

 

percent as of May 31, 2008 on the same notional amount. The fixed rate side of the swap will not change over the life of the swap. The floating rate payments are reset quarterly based on three month LIBOR. The resets are concurrent with the interest payments made on the underlying debt. Changes in the spread between the fixed rate payment side of the swap and the floating rate receipt side of the swap offset 100 percent of the change in any period of the underlying debt’s floating rate payments. These swaps are used to reduce the Company’s risk of increased interest costs; however, should interest rates continue to drop significantly, we could also lose the benefit that floating rate debt can provide in a declining interest rate environment. The swaps are considered 100 percent effective. Gains and losses related to the swaps, net of related tax effects are reported as a component of “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” in the accompanying consolidated condensed balance sheet and will not be reclassified into earnings until the conclusion of the hedge. A partial net settlement occurs quarterly concurrent with interest payments made on the underlying debt. The settlement is the net difference between the fixed rates payable and the floating rates receivable over the quarter under the swap contracts. The settlement is recognized as a component of  “Interest expense” in the consolidated condensed statements of income.

 

The following table summarizes the various foreign currency contracts and interest rate swap contracts we designated as cash flow hedges that were open at May 31, 2008 and February 29, 2008:

 

CASH FLOW HEDGES

May 31, 2008

Contract 

 

Currency

 

Notional

 

Contract

 

Range of Maturities

 

Spot Rate at
Contract

 

Spot Rate at
May 31,

 

Weighted
Average
Forward Rate

 

Weighted
Average
Forward Rate
at May 31,

 

Market
Value of the
Contract in
U.S. Dollars 

 

Type

 

to Deliver

 

Amount

 

Date

 

From

 

To

 

Date

 

2008

 

at Inception

 

2008

 

(Thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign Currency Contracts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sell

 

Pounds

 

£

5,000,000

 

11/28/2006

 

12/11/2008

 

1/15/2009

 

1.9385

 

1.9805

 

1.9242

 

1.9478

 

$

(118

)

Sell

 

Pounds

 

£

5,000,000

 

4/17/2007

 

2/17/2009

 

8/17/2009

 

2.0000

 

1.9805

 

1.9644

 

1.9293

 

$

176

 

Subtotal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

58

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest Rate Swap Contracts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Swap

 

Dollars

 

$

75,000,000

 

9/28/2006

 

6/29/2009

 

(Pay fixed rate at 5.04%, receive floating 3-month LIBOR rate)

 

$

(1,640

)

Swap

 

Dollars

 

$

50,000,000

 

9/28/2006

 

6/29/2011

 

(Pay fixed rate at 5.04%, receive floating 3-month LIBOR rate)

 

$

(1,891

)

Swap

 

Dollars

 

$

75,000,000

 

9/28/2006

 

6/29/2014

 

(Pay fixed rate at 5.11%, receive floating 3-month LIBOR rate)

 

$

(3,406

)

Subtotal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(6,937

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value of Cash Flow Hedges

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(6,879

)

 

February 29, 2008

Contract 

 

Currency

 

Notional

 

Contract

 

Range of Maturities

 

Spot Rate at
Contract

 

Spot Rate at

 

Weighted
Average
Forward Rate

 

Weighted
Average
Forward Rate
at Feb. 29,

 

Market
Value of the
Contract in
U.S. Dollars 

 

Type

 

to Deliver

 

Amount

 

Date

 

From

 

To

 

Date

 

Feb. 29, 2008

 

at Inception

 

2008

 

(Thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign Currency Contracts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sell

 

Pounds

 

£

5,000,000

 

11/28/2006

 

12/11/2008

 

1/15/2009

 

1.9385

 

1.9885

 

1.9242

 

1.9440

 

$

(99

)

Sell

 

Pounds

 

£

5,000,000

 

4/17/2007

 

2/17/2009

 

8/17/2009

 

2.0000

 

1.9885

 

1.9644

 

1.9281

 

$

182

 

Subtotal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

83

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest Rate Swap Contracts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Swap

 

Dollars

 

$

75,000,000

 

9/28/2006

 

6/29/2009

 

(Pay fixed rate at 5.04%, receive floating 3-month LIBOR rate)

 

$

(2,506

)

Swap

 

Dollars

 

$

50,000,000

 

9/28/2006

 

6/29/2011

 

(Pay fixed rate at 5.04%, receive floating 3-month LIBOR rate)

 

$

(3,462

)

Swap

 

Dollars

 

$

75,000,000

 

9/28/2006

 

6/29/2014

 

(Pay fixed rate at 5.11%, receive floating 3-month LIBOR rate)

 

$

(6,481

)

Subtotal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(12,449

)