Edgar Filing: Ingersoll-Rand plc

Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 001-34400

INGERSOLL-RAND PLC

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Ireland		98-0626632
*(State or other jurisdiction of*		*(I.R.S. Employer*
*incorporation or organization)*		*Identification No.)*

170/175 Lakeview Dr.

Airside Business Park

Swords, Co. Dublin

Ireland

(Address of principal executive offices)

+(353) (0) 18707400

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES ¨ NO x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES x NO ¨

The number of ordinary shares outstanding of Ingersoll-Rand plc as of July 31, 2009 was 319,200,181.

INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY LIMITED

FORM 10-Q

INDEX


PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION			1

	Item 1	-	Financial Statements	1

			Condensed Consolidated Income Statement for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008	1

			Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008	2

			Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008	3

			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	4

	Item 2	-	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	45

	Item 3	-	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	77

	Item 4	-	Controls and Procedures	77

PART II	OTHER INFORMATION			77

	Item 1	-	Legal Proceedings	77

	Item 1A	-	Risk Factors	80

	Item 4	-	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	81

	Item 6	-	Exhibits	83

	SIGNATURES			90

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Financial Statements

INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY LIMITED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT

(Unaudited)


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
*In millions, except per share amounts*	2009			2008			2009			2008
Net revenues	$	3,473.8		$	3,080.8		$	6,406.7		$	5,244.1
Cost of goods sold		(2,540.4	)		(2,196.1	)		(4,746.8	)		(3,737.1	)
Selling and administrative expenses		(682.8	)		(523.1	)		(1,359.4	)		(898.4	)

Operating income		250.6			361.6			300.5			608.6
Interest expense		(81.9	)		(45.6	)		(149.3	)		(73.1	)
Other, net		3.4			32.7			15.8			75.9

Earnings (loss) before income taxes		172.1			348.7			167.0			611.4
Benefit (provision) for income taxes		(32.8	)		(79.7	)		(43.2	)		(126.8	)

Continuing operations		139.3			269.0			123.8			484.6
Discontinued operations, net of tax		(11.7	)		(6.4	)		(18.1	)		(36.5	)

Net earnings (loss)		127.6			262.6			105.7			448.1
Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests		(5.5	)		(6.5	)		(10.4	)		(10.4	)

Net earnings (loss) attributable to Ingersoll-Rand Company Limited	$	122.1		$	256.1		$	95.3		$	437.7

Amounts attributable to Ingersoll-Rand Company Limited common shareholders:
Continuing operations	$	133.8		$	262.5		$	113.4		$	474.2
Discontinued operations		(11.7	)		(6.4	)		(18.1	)		(36.5	)

Net earnings (loss)	$	122.1		$	256.1		$	95.3		$	437.7

Earnings (loss) per share attributable to Ingersoll-Rand Company Limited common shareholders:
Basic:
Continuing operations	$	0.42		$	0.91		$	0.36		$	1.69
Discontinued operations		(0.04	)		(0.02	)		(0.06	)		(0.13	)

Net earnings (loss)	$	0.38		$	0.89		$	0.30		$	1.56

Diluted:
Continuing operations	$	0.41		$	0.90		$	0.35		$	1.67
Discontinued operations		(0.03	)		(0.02	)		(0.06	)		(0.13	)

Net earnings (loss)	$	0.38		$	0.88		$	0.29		$	1.54

Weighted-average shares outstanding
Basic		320.8			287.4			320.6			280.6
Diluted		325.0			291.1			323.4			283.7
Dividends per common share	$	0.18		$	0.18		$	0.36		$	0.36

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY LIMITED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

(Unaudited)


*In millions*	June 30, 2009			December 31, 2008
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	792.9		$	550.2
Accounts and notes receivable		2,274.0			2,512.1
Inventories		1,359.3			1,615.1
Other current assets		647.8			722.3

Total current assets		5,074.0			5,399.7
Property, plant and equipment, net		1,924.6			1,968.5
Goodwill		6,628.6			6,620.1
Intangible assets, net		5,119.9			5,214.1
Other noncurrent assets		1,679.0			1,722.1

Total assets	$	20,426.1		$	20,924.5

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	1,092.4		$	1,046.5
Accrued compensation and benefits		452.9			508.8
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		1,557.8			1,605.7
Short-term borrowings and current maturities of long-term debt		1,267.3			2,350.4

Total current liabilities		4,370.4			5,511.4
Long-term debt		3,454.6			2,773.7
Postemployment and other benefit liabilities		1,884.3			1,865.5
Deferred and noncurrent income taxes		2,127.0			2,184.8
Other noncurrent liabilities		1,752.9			1,827.0

Total liabilities		13,589.2			14,162.4
Shareholders’ equity:
Ingersoll-Rand Company Limited shareholders’ equity:
Class A common shares		319.1			318.8
Capital in excess of par value		2,324.5			2,246.0
Retained earnings		4,527.9			4,547.4
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(435.6	)		(450.8	)

Total Ingersoll-Rand Company Limited shareholders’ equity		6,735.9			6,661.4
Noncontrolling interests		101.0			100.7

Total shareholders’ equity		6,836.9			6,762.1

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	20,426.1		$	20,924.5

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY LIMITED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)


	Six months ended June 30,
*In millions*	2009			2008
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings (loss)	$	105.7		$	448.1
(Income) loss from discontinued operations, net of tax		18.1			36.5
Adjustments to arrive at net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		204.5			127.2
Stock settled share-based compensation		36.6			26.4
Changes in other assets and liabilities, net		524.9			(1,183.9	)
Other, net		10.7			51.3

Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operating activities		900.5			(494.4	)
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operating activities		(21.1	)		(20.0	)

Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures		(113.8	)		(104.7	)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment		14.9			23.0
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired		—			(7,085.5	)
Proceeds from business dispositions, net of cash		—			9.7
Other, net		(0.2	)		(19.1	)

Net cash provided by (used in) continuing investing activities		(99.1	)		(7,176.6	)
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued investing activities		—			—

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of bonds		1,000.0			—
Proceeds from bridge loan		196.0			—
Payments of bridge loan		(950.0	)		—
Commercial paper program (net)		(424.4	)		—
Increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings		7.6			3,901.0
Payments of long-term debt		(203.7	)		(134.5	)

Net change in debt		(374.5	)		3,766.5
Settlement of cross currency swap		(26.9	)		—
Debt issuance costs		(16.0	)		(11.4	)
Dividends paid to common shareholders		(114.9	)		(98.2	)
Acquisition of noncontrolling interest		(1.5	)		—
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		1.1			11.6
Repurchase of common shares by subsidiary		—			(2.0	)
Other, net		(9.1	)		7.6

Net cash provided by (used in) continuing financing activities		(541.8	)		3,674.1
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued financing activities		—			—

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		4.2			68.9

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		242.7			(3,948.0	)
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period		550.2			4,735.3

Cash and cash equivalents - end of period	$	792.9		$	787.3

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY LIMITED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 1 – Description of Company

Ingersoll-Rand Company Limited (IR-Limited), a Bermuda company, and its consolidated subsidiaries (the Company) is a diversified, global company that provides products, services and solutions to enhance the quality and comfort of air in homes and buildings, transport and protect food and perishables, secure homes and commercial properties, and increase industrial productivity and efficiency. The Company’s business segments consist of Air Conditioning Systems and Services, Climate Control Technologies, Industrial Technologies and Security Technologies, each with strong brands and leading positions within their respective markets. The Company generates revenue and cash primarily through the design, manufacture, sale and service of a diverse portfolio of industrial and commercial products that include well-recognized, premium brand names such as Club Car^®, Hussmann^® , Ingersoll-Rand^®, Schlage^®, Thermo King^® and Trane^®.

Note 2 – The Reorganization

On March 5, 2009, the Company’s board of directors approved a reorganization of the Company that would change the jurisdiction of incorporation of our parent company from Bermuda to Ireland (the Reorganization). The first step in the Reorganization was the establishment of IR-Limited’s tax residency in Ireland, which occurred in March 2009.

As the next step, the Company changed the place of incorporation of the parent company of Ingersoll Rand from Bermuda to Ireland pursuant to a scheme of arrangement under Bermuda law (the Scheme of Arrangement). On April 1, 2009, IR-Limited formed Ingersoll-Rand plc, an Irish public limited company (IR-Ireland), as a direct subsidiary. On April 20, 2009, IR-Limited petitioned the Supreme Court of Bermuda to order the calling of a meeting of the Class A common shareholders of IR-Limited to approve the Scheme of Arrangement. On April 23, 2009, the Supreme Court of Bermuda ordered IR-Limited to seek the approval of its Class A common shareholders on the Scheme of Arrangement. On June 3, 2009, IR-Limited received the requisite approval from its Class A common shareholders and, on June 11, 2009, the Supreme Court of Bermuda issued an order (the Sanction Order) approving the Scheme of Arrangement.

On June 30, 2009, IR-Limited filed the Sanction Order with the Bermuda Registrar of Companies and, at 12:01 a.m. on July 1, 2009 (the Transaction Time) the following steps occurred simultaneously:

•

All fractional shares of IR-Limited held of record were cancelled and IR-Limited paid to each holder of fractional shares that were cancelled an amount based on the average of the high and low trading prices of the IR-Limited Class A common shares on the New York Stock Exchange on June 29, 2009.

•

All previously outstanding whole Class A common shares of IR-Limited were cancelled.

•

IR-Limited issued to IR-Ireland 319,166,220 Class A common shares.

•

IR-Ireland issued 319,166,220 ordinary shares to holders of whole IR-Limited Class A common shares that were cancelled as a part of the Scheme of Arrangement.

•

All previously outstanding ordinary shares of IR-Ireland held by IR-Limited and its nominees were acquired by IR-Ireland and cancelled for no consideration.

As a result of the Reorganization, IR-Limited became a wholly-owned subsidiary of IR-Ireland and the Class A common shareholders of IR-Limited became ordinary shareholders of IR-Ireland.

See Note 16 for a discussion of the modifications made to the Company’s equity-based plans. See Notes 10 and 23 for a discussion of certain modifications to the indentures governing the Company’s outstanding notes, medium-term notes and debentures and the documents relating to the Company’s commercial paper program.

Note 3 – Basis of Presentation

In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, which include normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the consolidated unaudited results for the interim periods presented.

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the financial position of IR-Limited, a Bermuda company, and its consolidated subsidiaries at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, and the results of operations and cash flows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, as they relate to periods ended prior to the consummation of the reorganization. The Company has evaluated the financial statements for subsequent events through the date of the filing of this Form 10-Q.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements included in the Ingersoll-Rand Company Limited Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. Certain reclassifications of amounts reported in prior years have been made to conform to the 2009 classification.

On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of ARB No. 51” (SFAS 160). SFAS 160 clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary represents an ownership interest that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. In addition, the statement requires expanded income statement presentation that clearly identifies and distinguishes between the interests of the Company and the interests of the noncontrolling owners of the subsidiary.

As a result, noncontrolling interests are now included as a component of Total shareholders’ equity in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 are now presented as an adjustment from Net earnings (loss) used to arrive at Net earnings (loss) attributable to Ingersoll-Rand Company Limited in the Condensed Consolidated Income Statement. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 160, earnings associated with noncontrolling interests were reported as a component of Other, net.

As discussed in Note 4, the Company acquired Trane Inc. (Trane) at the close of business on June 5, 2008. The results of operations of Trane have been included in the condensed consolidated statement of operations and cash flows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and since June 5, 2008 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008.

Note 4 – Acquisition of Trane Inc.

At the close of business on June 5, 2008 (the Acquisition Date), the Company completed its acquisition of 100% of the outstanding common shares of Trane. Trane, formerly American Standard Companies Inc., provides systems and services that enhance the quality and comfort of the air in homes and buildings around the world. Trane’s systems and services have leading positions in premium commercial, residential, institutional and industrial markets, a reputation for reliability, high quality and product innovation and a powerful distribution network.

The Company paid a combination of (i) 0.23 of an IR-Limited Class A common share and (ii) $36.50 in cash, without interest, for each outstanding share of Trane common stock. The total cost of the acquisition was approximately $9.6 billion, including change in control payments and direct costs of the transaction. The Company financed the cash portion of the acquisition with a combination of cash on hand, commercial paper and a 364-day senior unsecured bridge loan facility.

The components of the purchase price were as follows:


*In billions*
Cash consideration	$	7.3
Stock consideration (Issuance of 45.4 million IR-Limited Class A common shares)		2.0
Estimated fair value of Trane stock options converted to 7.4 million IR-Limited stock options		0.2
Transaction costs		0.1

Total	$	9.6

The Company allocated the purchase price of Trane to the estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed upon acquisition in accordance with SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations” (SFAS No. 141). The following table summarizes the fair values of the Trane assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the Acquisition Date.


*In millions*	June 5, 2008
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	317.5
Accounts and notes receivable		1,194.2
Inventories		970.5
Other current assets		462.0

Total current assets		2,944.2
Property, plant and equipment		1,035.4
Goodwill		5,566.9
Intangible assets		5,576.0
Other noncurrent assets		725.7

Total assets	$	15,848.2

Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	562.9
Accrued compensation and benefits		225.7
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		1,087.3
Short-term borrowings and current maturities of long-term debt		254.3

Total current liabilities		2,130.2
Long-term debt		476.3
Postemployment and other benefit liabilities		313.7
Deferred income taxes		2,297.3
Other noncurrent liabilities		1,012.7
Minority interests		7.7

Total liabilities and minority interests	$	6,237.9

Net assets acquired	$	9,610.3

The following unaudited pro forma information for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 assumes the acquisition of Trane occurred as of the beginning of the respective period presented:


*In millions*	Three months ended		Six months ended
Net revenues	$	4,503.8	$	8,375.5
Earnings from continuing operations attributable to Ingersoll-Rand Company Limited common shareholders	$	208.8	$	377.8

The unaudited pro forma financial information for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 include $64.7 million and $115.1 million, respectively, of additional non-recurring purchase accounting charges associated with the fair value allocation of purchase price to backlog, inventory and in-process research and development costs.

In addition, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company included $44.0 million and $104.8 million, respectively, as an increase to interest expense associated with the borrowings to fund (a) the cash portion of the purchase price and (b) the out-of-pocket transaction costs associated with the acquisition.

The unaudited pro forma information does not purport to be indicative of the results that actually would have been achieved had the operations been combined during the period presented, nor is it intended to be a projection of future results or trends.

Note 5 – Restructuring Activities

Restructuring charges recorded during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:


	Three months ended June 30,					Six months ended June 30,
*In millions*	2009		2008			2009		2008
Air Conditioning Systems and Services	$	11.2	$	2.0		$	11.6	$	2.0
Climate Control Technologies		5.7		(0.9	)		5.6		0.1
Industrial Technologies		9.1		1.6			17.9		4.4
Security Technologies		5.9		1.8			6.2		1.8
Corporate and Other		9.2		2.0			10.7		2.0

Total	$	41.1	$	6.5		$	52.0	$	10.3

Cost of goods sold	$	14.7	$	1.6		$	17.9	$	4.2
Selling and administrative		26.4		4.9			34.1		6.1

Total	$	41.1	$	6.5		$	52.0	$	10.3

The changes in the restructuring reserve were as follows:


*In millions*	December 31, 2008		Additions		Reversals			Cash and non-cash uses			Currency Translation			June 30, 2009
Air Conditioning Systems and Services	$	17.1	$	11.6	$	—		$	(14.4	)	$	0.3		$	14.6
Climate Control Technologies		32.5		7.6		(2.0	)		(30.4	)		(3.3	)		4.4
Industrial Technologies		2.7		17.9		—			(13.6	)		—			7.0
Security Technologies		11.1		8.0		(1.8	)		(6.6	)		(0.1	)		10.6
Corporate and Other		1.1		10.7		—			(3.7	)		—			8.1

Total	$	64.5	$	55.8	$	(3.8	)	$	(68.7	)	$	(3.1	)	$	44.7

In October 2008, the Company announced an enterprise-wide restructuring program necessitated by the severe economic downturn. This program included streamlining the footprint of manufacturing facilities and reducing the general and administrative cost base across all sectors of the company. Projected costs totaled $110 million.

During the first half of 2009, the Company expanded the scope of the restructuring program, with total projected costs now expected to be approximately $140 million. Since the beginning of the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company has incurred $122.7 million associated with the restructuring program. As of June 30, 2009, the Company had $44.7 million accrued for workforce reductions and the consolidation of manufacturing facilities, of which a majority will be paid throughout the remainder of 2009.

During the six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company incurred costs of $10.3 million associated with ongoing restructuring actions. These actions included workforce reductions as well as the consolidation of manufacturing facilities in an effort to increase efficiencies across multiple lines of business.

Note 6 – Inventories

Depending on the business, U.S. inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method or the lower of cost or market using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Non-U.S. inventories are primarily stated at the lower of cost or market using the FIFO method.

The major classes of inventory are as follows:


*In millions*	June 30, 2009			December 31, 2008
Raw materials	$	415.0		$	446.9
Work-in-process		257.5			301.7
Finished goods		785.1			980.0

Sub-total		1,457.6			1,728.6
LIFO reserve		(98.3	)		(113.5	)

Total	$	1,359.3		$	1,615.1

Note 7 – Goodwill

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill are as follows:


*In millions*	Air Conditioning Systems and Services			Climate Control Technologies		Industrial Technologies		Security Technologies		Total
December 31, 2008	$	3,033.9		$	2,577.0	$	369.8	$	639.4	$	6,620.1
Acquisitions and adjustments		37.1			—		—		—		37.1
Translation		(43.5	)		2.8		1.6		10.5		(28.6	)

June 30, 2009	$	3,027.5		$	2,579.8	$	371.4	$	649.9	$	6,628.6

Note 8 – Intangible Assets

The following table sets forth the gross amount and accumulated amortization of the Company’s intangible assets:


*In millions*	June 30, 2009			December 31, 2008
Customer relationships	$	2,351.6		$	2,368.2
Completed technologies/patents		203.3			203.1
Other		188.4			189.6
Trademarks (finite-lived)		109.3			109.3

Total gross finite-lived intangible assets		2,852.6			2,870.2
Accumulated amortization		(455.2	)		(378.5	)

Total net finite-lived intangible assets		2,397.4			2,491.7
Trademarks (indefinite-lived)		2,722.5			2,722.4

Total	$	5,119.9		$	5,214.1

Intangible asset amortization expense was $38.8 million and $42.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, intangible asset amortization was $77.0 million and $49.1 million, respectively.

Note 9 – Accounts Receivable Purchase Agreements

In connection with the acquisition of Trane, the Company acquired Trane’s accounts receivable purchase agreement (the Trane Facility) in the U.S. As part of the Trane Facility, Trane formed a special-purpose entity (SPE) for the sole purpose of buying and selling receivables generated by Trane. Under the Trane Facility, Trane, irrevocably and without recourse, transferred all eligible accounts receivable to the SPE, which, in turn, sold undivided ownership interests in them to a conduit administered by the participating bank. The assets of the SPE were not available to pay the claims of Trane or any of its subsidiaries.

The undivided interests in receivables sold to the conduit as a part of the Trane Facility were removed from the balance sheet since they met the applicable criteria of SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities” (SFAS 140). Trane’s interests in the receivables retained by the Company were recorded at its allocated carrying amount, less an appropriate reserve for doubtful accounts, in the balance sheet as of December 31, 2008. To the extent that the consideration received was less than the allocated carrying value of the receivables sold, losses were recognized at the time of sale.

On March 31, 2009, the Company entered into new accounts receivable purchase agreements (the Expanded IR Facility), to expand the existing accounts receivable purchase agreement. The Expanded IR Facility supersedes the Trane Facility. As of June 30, 2009, there are no interests in the receivables retained by the Company related to the Trane Facility.

Under the Expanded IR Facility, the Company continuously sells, through certain consolidated special purpose vehicles, designated pools of eligible trade receivables to an affiliated master special purpose vehicle (MSPV) which, in turn, sells undivided ownership interests to three conduits administered by unaffiliated financial institutions.

The maximum purchase limit of the three conduits is $325.0 million. The Company pays commitment fees on the aggregate amount of the liquidity commitments of the financial institutions under the facility (which is 102% of the maximum purchase limit) and an additional program fee on the aggregate amounts purchased under the facility by the conduits to the extent funded through the issuance of commercial paper or other securities.

The MSPV is not designed to be a qualifying SPE as defined in SFAS 140, since the MSPV transfers assets representing undivided ownership interests in the accounts receivables it holds to the conduits. The Company has concluded that the MSPV is a variable interest entity (VIE) pursuant to FASB Interpretation (FIN) 46R, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” whereby the Company is deemed the primary beneficiary and subsequently consolidates the MSPV. In accordance with SFAS 140, accounts receivable balances are not removed from the balance sheet until the undivided ownership interests are sold to the conduits. Pursuant to SFAS 140, the remaining trade receivables transferred into the MSPV but not sold to the conduits remain in Accounts and notes receivable, net. The interests in the receivables retained by the Company are exposed to the first risk of loss for any uncollectible amounts in the receivables sold under the facility. The Company provides no other forms of continued financial support related to the undivided interests transferred to the conduits. The Company has reclassified $83.6 million of its net interests in the receivables retained by the Company as of December 31, 2008 from Other current assets to Accounts and notes receivable, net, to conform to the current year presentation. Although the special purpose vehicles are consolidated by the Company, they are separate corporate entities with their assets legally isolated from the Company and thus not available to satisfy claims of the Company.

The following is a summary of receivables sold under the facilities:


*In millions*	June 30, 2009		December 31, 2008
Outstanding balance of receivables sold to SPE	$	721.0	$	149.5
Net balance of interest in the receivables retained		496.7		83.6
Net interests sold to conduits		224.3		62.8

The Company continues to service, administer and collect the receivables on behalf of the MSPV and the conduits and receives a servicing fee of 0.75% per annum on the outstanding balance of the serviced receivables. As the Company estimates that the fee it receives from the conduits, including other ancillary fees received, are adequate compensation for its obligation to service these receivables, the fair value is zero and no servicing assets or liabilities are recognized.

During the first half of 2009, the Company recorded a cash inflow of approximately $161 million within cash flow from operations, which represented the increase in the net interests in the receivables sold to the conduits.

The Company records as a loss on sale the difference between the receivables sold and the net cash proceeds received. The loss on sale recorded for the three and six months ended June 30 were as follows:


	Three months ended				Six months ended
*In millions*	2009		2008		2009		2008
Loss on sale of receivables	$	1.2	$	0.3	$	1.5	$	0.3

Note 10 – Debt and Credit Facilities

Short-term borrowings and current maturities of long-term debt consisted of the following:


*In millions*	June 30, 2009		December 31, 2008
Commercial paper program	$	574.3	$	998.7
Senior unsecured bridge loan facility		—		754.0
Debentures with put feature		343.7		345.7
Current maturities of long-term debt		273.1		200.4
Other short-term borrowings		76.2		51.6

Total	$	1,267.3	$	2,350.4

Senior Unsecured Bridge Loan Facility

In connection with the Trane acquisition, the Company entered into a $3.9 billion senior unsecured bridge loan facility, with a 364-day term. The Company drew down $2.95 billion against the bridge loan facility in June 2008. The proceeds, along with cash on hand and the issuance of $1.5 billion in commercial paper, were used to fund the cash component of the consideration paid for the acquisition as well as to pay for related fees and expenses incurred in connection with the acquisition.

At December 31, 2008, the outstanding balance of the senior unsecured bridge loan facility was $754.0 million, which would have expired in June 2009 per the original term. In the first quarter of 2009, the Company borrowed an additional $196.0 million under the facility increasing the outstanding balance to $950.0 million as of March 31, 2009. In April 2009, we repaid the outstanding balance with our long-term debt issuance described below and terminated the facility.

Debentures with Put Feature

The Company has fixed rate debentures which contain a put feature that allows the holders to exercise on each anniversary of the issuance date. If exercised, the Company is obligated to repay in whole or in part, at the holder’s option, the outstanding principal amount (plus accrued and unpaid interest) of the debentures held by the holder. If these options are not fully exercised, the final maturity dates would range between 2027 and 2028.

In February 2009, holders of these debentures had the option to exercise the put feature on $39.2 million of the outstanding debentures, of which approximately $2.0 million were exercised and repaid in February. In the fourth quarter of 2009, holders of these debentures will have the option to exercise the put feature on approximately $306.5 million of the remaining debentures.

Long-term debt excluding current maturities consisted of the following:


*In millions*	June 30, 2009		December 31, 2008
Senior floating rate notes due 2010	$	250.0	$	250.0
7.625% Senior notes due 2010		—		261.2
4.50% Exchangeable senior notes due 2012		308.3		—
6.000% Senior notes due 2013		599.8		599.8
9.50% Senior notes due 2014		655.0		—
5.50% Senior notes due 2015		199.7		199.6
4.75% Senior notes due 2015		299.3		299.2
6.875% Senior notes due 2018		749.0		749.0
9.00% Debentures due 2021		125.0		125.0
7.20% Debentures due 2010-2025		112.5		120.0
6.48% Debentures due 2025		149.7		149.7
Other loans and notes		6.3		20.2

Total	$	3,454.6	$	2,773.7

The fair value of the Company’s debt was $4,784.2 million at June 30, 2009. The fair value of debt was primarily based upon quoted market values.

Senior Notes Due 2014

In April 2009, the Company issued $655 million of 9.5% Senior Notes through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Ingersoll-Rand Global Holding Company Limited (IR-Global). The notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by IR-Limited. Interest on the fixed rate notes will be paid twice a year in arrears. The Company has the option to redeem them in whole or in part at any time, and from time to time, prior to their stated maturity date at redemption prices set forth in the indenture agreement. The notes are subject to certain customary covenants, however, none of these covenants are considered restrictive to the Company’s operations.

Exchangeable Senior Notes Due 2012

In April 2009, the Company issued $345 million of 4.5% Exchangeable Senior Notes through its wholly-owned subsidiary, IR-Global. The notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by IR-Limited. Interest on the exchangeable notes will be paid twice a year in arrears. Holders may exchange their notes at their option prior to November 15, 2011 in accordance with specified circumstances set forth in the indenture agreement or anytime on or after November 15, 2011 through their scheduled maturity in April 2012. Upon exchange, the notes will be paid in cash up to the aggregate principal amount of the notes to be exchanged, the remainder due on the option feature, if any, will be paid in cash, the Company’s common stock or a combination thereof at the option of the Company. The notes are subject to certain customary covenants, however, none of these covenants are considered restrictive to the Company’s operations.

The Company accounts for the exchangeable notes in accordance with FASB Staff Position (FSP) APB 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlements),” which requires the Company to allocate the proceeds between debt and equity, in a manner that reflects the Company’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. The Company allocated approximately $305 million of the gross proceeds to debt, with the remaining discount of approximately $40 million (approximately $39 million after allocated fees) recorded within equity. Additionally, the Company will amortize the discount into earnings over a three-year period, in accordance with this FSP.

Credit Facilities

At December 31, 2008, the Company’s committed revolving credit facilities totaled $3.0 billion, of which $750 million expired in June 2009, and was not renewed. At June 30, 2009, the Company’s committed revolving credit facilities totaled $2.25 billion, of which $1.25 billion expires in August 2010 and $1.0 billion expires in June 2011. These lines are unused and provide support for the Company’s commercial paper program as well as for other general corporate purposes.

Modifications Relating to the Reorganization

In connection with the Reorganization discussed in Note 2, on July 1, 2009 at 12:01 A.M. (the Transaction Time), IR-Limited completed the transfer of all the outstanding shares of IR-Global to Ingersoll-Rand International Holding Limited (IR-International), another wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of IR-Limited incorporated in Bermuda, whereupon IR-International assumed the obligations of IR-Limited as an issuer or guarantor, as the case may be, under the indentures governing the Company’s outstanding notes, medium-term notes and debentures. IR-Ireland and IR-Limited also fully and unconditionally guarantee the payment obligations of IR-International, IR-Global and Ingersoll-Rand Company (IR-New Jersey), a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of IR-Limited incorporated in New Jersey, as the case may be, as the issuers of debt securities under these indentures. Neither IR-Ireland nor IR-Limited intends to issue guarantees in respect of any indebtedness incurred by Trane. In addition, any securities issued by the Company that were convertible, exchangeable or exercisable into Class A common shares of IR-Limited became convertible, exchangeable or exercisable, as the case may be, into the ordinary shares of IR-Ireland.

On July 1, 2009, IR-Global amended and restated its commercial paper program (the Commercial Paper Program) pursuant to which IR-Global may issue, on a private placement basis, unsecured commercial paper notes up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $2.25 billion. Under the Commercial Paper Program, IR-Global may issue notes from time to time, and the proceeds of the financing will be used for general corporate purposes. Each of IR-Ireland, IR-Limited and IR-International has provided an irrevocable and unconditional guarantee for the notes issued under the Commercial Paper Program.

Pursuant to the terms of the credit facility entered into on August 12, 2005 and our credit facility entered into on June 27, 2008 (the Credit Facilities), at the Transaction Time, IR-Ireland and IR-International became guarantors to such Credit Facilities. In connection therewith, IR-Ireland and IR-International entered into Addendums on July 1, 2009 to become parties to the Credit Facilities.

Note 11 – Financial Instruments

In the normal course of business, the Company uses various financial instruments, including derivative instruments, to manage the risks associated with interest rate, currency rate, commodity price and share-based compensation exposures. These financial instruments are not used for trading or speculative purposes.

On the date a derivative contract is entered into, the Company designates the derivative instrument either as a cash flow hedge of a forecasted transaction, a cash flow hedge of a recognized asset or liability, or as an undesignated derivative. The Company formally documents its hedge relationships, including identification of the derivative instruments and the hedged items, as well as its risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking the hedge transaction. This process includes linking derivative instruments that are designated as hedges to specific assets, liabilities or forecasted transactions.

The Company also assesses both at the inception and at least quarterly thereafter, whether the derivatives used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting the changes in the cash flows of the hedged item. Any ineffective portion of a derivative instrument’s change in fair value is recorded in the income statement in the period of change. If the hedging relationship ceases to be highly effective, or it becomes probable that a forecasted transaction is no longer expected to occur, the hedging relationship will be undesignated and any future gains and losses on the derivative instrument would be recorded in the income statement.

The fair market value of derivative instruments are determined through market-based valuations and may not be representative of the actual gains or losses that will be recorded when these instruments mature due to future fluctuations in the markets in which they are traded.

Currency and Commodity Derivative Instruments

The notional amounts of the Company’s currency derivatives, excluding the cross currency swap described below, were $853.9 million and $920.4 million at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, a deferred loss of $0.8 million and a deferred gain of $7.6 million, net of tax, respectively, was included in Accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) related to the fair value of the Company’s currency derivatives designated as hedges under SFAS 133 (excluding the cross currency swap). The amount expected to be reclassified into earnings over the next twelve months is $0.8 million. The actual amounts that will be reclassified into earnings may vary from this amount as a result of changes in market conditions. Gains and losses associated with the Company’s currency derivatives not designated as hedges are recorded in earnings as changes in fair value occur. At June 30, 2009, the maximum term of the Company’s currency derivatives was 12 months.

As a result of the acquisition of Trane in June 2008, the Company assumed a cross currency swap that fixed, in U.S. dollars, the currency cash flows on the £60.0 million 8.25% senior notes. These senior notes matured on June 1, 2009 along with the cross currency swap. The cross currency swap met the criteria to be accounted for as a foreign currency cash flow hedge, which allowed for deferral of any associated gains or losses within AOCI until settlement. The deferred gain remaining in AOCI related to the cross currency swap was released into earnings upon maturity.

The notional amount of the Company’s commodity derivatives was $6.2 million and $21.3 million at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The Company’s commodity derivatives are not designated as hedges under SFAS 133. Therefore, gains and losses associated with the Company’s commodity derivatives are recorded in earnings as changes in fair value occur.

Other Derivative Instruments

During the third quarter of 2008, the Company entered into interest rate locks for the forecasted issuance of approximately $1.4 billion of Senior Notes due in 2013 and 2018. These interest rate locks met the criteria to be accounted for as cash flow hedges of a forecasted transaction. Consequently, the changes in fair value of the interest rate locks were deferred in AOCI. No further gain or loss will be deferred in AOCI related to these interest rate locks as the contracts were effectively terminated upon issuance of the underlying debt. However, the amount of AOCI associated with these interest rate locks at the time of termination will be recognized into interest expense over the term of the notes. At June 30, 2009 and

December 31, 2008, $13.5 million and $14.4 million, respectively, of deferred losses remained in AOCI related to these interest rate locks. The amount expected to be reclassified into interest expense over the next twelve months is $1.8 million.

In March 2005, the Company entered into interest rate locks for the forecasted issuance of $300 million of Senior Notes due 2015. These interest rate locks met the criteria to be accounted for as cash flow hedges of a forecasted transaction. Consequently, the changes in fair value of the interest rate locks were deferred in AOCI. No further gain or loss will be deferred in AOCI related to these interest rate locks as the contracts were effectively terminated upon issuance of the underlying debt. However, the amount of AOCI associated with these interest rate locks at the time of termination will be recognized into interest expense over the term of the notes. At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, $7.1 million and $7.6 million, respectively, of deferred losses remained in AOCI related to these interest rate locks. The amount expected to be reclassified into interest expense over the next twelve months is $1.1 million.

The following table presents the fair values of derivative instruments included within the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2009:


*In millions*	Asset derivatives		Liability derivatives
Derivatives designated as hedges under SFAS 133:
Currency derivatives	$	1.6	$	2.8
Derivatives not designated as hedges under SFAS 133:
Currency derivatives		19.8		13.8
Commodity derivatives		—		2.3

Total derivatives	$	21.4	$	18.9

Asset and liability derivatives included in the table above are recorded within Other current assets and Accrued expenses and other current liabilities, respectively, on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

The following table represents the amounts associated with derivatives designated as hedges affecting the Condensed Consolidated Income Statement and AOCI for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009:


*In millions*	Amount of gain (loss) deferred in AOCI						Location of gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI and recognized into earnings	Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI and recognized into earnings
*In millions*	3 months ended			6 months ended				3 months ended			6 months ended
Currency derivatives	$	(4.1	)	$	(3.6	)	Other, net	$	2.7		$	7.8
Interest rate locks		—			—		Interest expense		(0.7	)		(1.4	)

Total	$	(4.1	)	$	(3.6	)		$	2.0		$	6.4

The following table represents the amounts associated with derivatives not designated as hedges affecting the Condensed Consolidated Income Statement for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009:


	Location of gain (loss)	Amount of gain (loss)
*In millions*	Location of gain (loss)	3 months ended		6 months ended
Currency derivatives	Other, net	$	43.9	$	31.2
Commodity derivatives	Other, net		0.9		1.1

Total		$	44.8	$	32.3

The gains and losses associated with the Company’s undesignated currency and commodity derivatives are offset in the Condensed Consolidated Income Statement by changes in the fair value of the underlying transactions.

Concentration of Credit Risk

The counterparties to the Company’s forward contracts consist of a number of investment grade major international financial institutions. The Company could be exposed to losses in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties. However, credit ratings and concentration of risk of these financial institutions are monitored on a continuous basis and present no significant credit risk to the Company.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, short-term borrowings and accounts payable are a reasonable estimate of their fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

Note 12 – Pension Plans

The Company has noncontributory pension plans covering substantially all non-Trane U.S. employees and maintains a pension plan for non-collectively bargained U.S. employees of Trane, whereby eligible employees may elect to participate and receive a credit equal to 3% of eligible pay. In addition, the Company maintains a U.S. collectively bargained pension plan for Trane employees. Certain non-U.S. employees in other countries, including Trane employees, are covered by pension plans.

The Company’s pension plans for U.S. non-collectively bargained employees provided benefits on a final average pay formula. The Company’s U.S. collectively bargained pension plans, including those covering employees of Trane, principally provide benefits based on a flat benefit formula. Non-U.S. plans provide benefits based on earnings and years of service. The Company maintains additional other supplemental benefit plans for officers and other key employees.

The components of the Company’s pension related costs for the three and six months ended June 30 are as follows:


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
*In millions*	2009			2008			2009			2008
Service cost	$	17.5		$	13.3		$	35.0		$	24.7
Interest cost		49.2			42.8			97.7			81.3
Expected return on plan assets		(44.4	)		(53.8	)		(88.3	)		(102.9	)
Net amortization of:
Prior service costs		2.1			2.1			4.2			4.2
Transition amount		0.1			0.2			0.2			0.4
Plan net actuarial losses		14.5			2.4			28.8			4.8

Net periodic pension benefit cost		39.0			7.0			77.6			12.5
Net curtailment and settlement (gains) losses		—			—			0.8			1.3

Net periodic pension benefit cost after net curtailment and settlement (gains) losses	$	39.0		$	7.0		$	78.4		$	13.8

Amounts recorded in continuing operations	$	36.2		$	10.6		$	72.8		$	21.1
Amounts recorded in discontinued operations		2.8			(3.6	)		5.6			(7.3	)

Total	$	39.0		$	7.0		$	78.4		$	13.8

The Company made employer contributions of $35.4 million and $11.8 million to its pension plans during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

The curtailment and settlement losses in 2009 and 2008 are associated with lump sum distributions under supplemental benefit plans for officers and other key employees.

Note 13 – Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions

The Company sponsors several postretirement plans that cover certain eligible employees, including certain Trane employees since the acquisition date. These plans provide for health-care benefits, and in some instances, life insurance benefits. Postretirement health plans generally are contributory and contributions are adjusted annually. Life insurance plans for retirees are primarily noncontributory. The Company funds the postretirement benefit costs principally on a pay-as-you-go basis.

The components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the three and six months ended June 30 are as follows:


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
*In millions*	2009			2008			2009			2008
Service cost	$	2.6		$	2.0		$	5.2		$	3.0
Interest cost		14.3			11.1			28.6			20.6
Net amortization of prior service gains		(0.8	)		(0.9	)		(1.7	)		(1.8	)
Net amortization of net actuarial losses		4.2			3.7			8.4			7.4

Net periodic postretirement benefit cost		20.3			15.9			40.5			29.2

Amounts recorded in continuing operations	$	12.2		$	8.5		$	24.3		$	14.4
Amounts recorded in discontinued operations		8.1			7.4			16.2			14.8

Total	$	20.3		$	15.9		$	40.5		$	29.2

Note 14 – Fair Value Measurement

Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” (SFAS 157). SFAS 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value that is based on the inputs market participants use to determine the fair value of an asset or liability and establishes a fair value hierarchy to prioritize those inputs. The fair value hierarchy outlined in SFAS 157 is comprised of three levels that are described below:

•

Level 1 – Inputs based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

•

Level 2 – Inputs other than Level 1 quoted prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

•

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs based on little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets and liabilities.

In conjunction with its adoption of FASB Staff Position SFAS 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157,” the Company delayed its implementation of SFAS 157 provisions on the fair value of goodwill, indefinite-lived intangible assets and nonfinancial long-lived assets until January 1, 2009. In addition, the Company has not elected to utilize the fair value option on any of its financial assets or liabilities in accordance with SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115,” (SFAS 159)

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2009 are as follows:


	Fair value measurements						Total
*In millions*	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		fair value
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	792.9	$	—	$	—	$	792.9
Marketable securities		8.3		—		—		8.3
Derivative instruments		—		21.4		—		21.4
Benefit trust assets		17.9		137.6		—		155.5

Total	$	819.1	$	159.0	$	—	$	978.1

Liabilities:
Derivative instruments	$	—	$	18.9	$	—	$	18.9
Benefit liabilities		18.4		145.4		—		163.8

Total	$	18.4	$	164.3	$	—	$	182.7

The methodologies used by the Company to determine the fair value of its financial assets and liabilities at June 30, 2009 are the same as those used as of December 31, 2008.

Note 15 – Shareholders’ Equity

The reconciliation of Class A common shares is as follows:


*In millions*
December 31, 2008		318.8
Shares issued under incentive plans		0.3

June 30, 2009		319.1

On June 3, 2009, IR-Limited cancelled 52.0 million treasury shares in anticipation of the Reorganization that became effective on July 1, 2009.

The components of shareholders’ equity for the six months ended June 30, 2009 are as follows:


*In millions*	IR-Limited Shareholders’ Equity			Noncontrolling interests			Total Shareholders’ Equity
Balance at December 31, 2008	$	6,661.4		$	100.7		$	6,762.1
Net earnings (loss)		95.3			10.4			105.7
Currency translation		8.4			0.4			8.8
Change in value of marketable securities and derivatives qualifying as cash flow hedges, net of tax		(5.1	)		—			(5.1	)
Pension and OPEB adjustments, net of tax		11.9			—			11.9

Total comprehensive income		110.5			10.8			121.3
Share based compensation		36.5			—			36.5
Issuance of exchangeable notes		38.7	*		—			38.7
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests		(0.1	)		(1.4	)		(1.5	)
Dividends to noncontrolling interests		—			(9.1	)		(9.1	)
Dividends to common shareholders		(114.9	)		—			(114.9	)
Other		3.8			—			3.8

Balance at June 30, 2009	$	6,735.9		$	101.0		$	6,836.9

*	Represents the portion of net proceeds received from the issuance of Senior Exchangeable Notes that is allocated to equity, as described in Note 10.

The components of shareholders’ equity for the six months ended June 30, 2008 are as follows:


*In millions*	IR-Limited Shareholders’ Equity			Noncontrolling interests			Total Shareholders’ Equity
Balance at December 31, 2007	$	7,907.9		$	97.5		$	8,005.4
Net earnings (loss)		437.7			10.4			448.1
Currency translation		240.5			(1.2	)		239.3
Change in value of marketable securities and derivatives qualifying as cash flow hedges, net of tax		1.5			—			1.5
Pension and OPEB adjustments, net of tax		9.0			—			9.0

Total comprehensive income		688.7			9.2			697.9
Shares issued under incentive stock plan		30.3			—			30.3
Share based compensation		27.0			—			27.0
Purchase of treasury shares		(2.0	)		—			(2.0	)
Treasury shares issued		2,035.1			—			2,035.1
Conversion of Trane options		203.7						203.7
Trane’s noncontrolling interests		—			7.7			7.7
Dividends to noncontrolling interests		—			(10.9	)		(10.9	)
Dividends to common shareholders		(98.2	)		—			(98.2	)

Balance at June 30, 2008	$	10,792.5		$	103.5		$	10,896.0

Note 16 – Share-Based Compensation

The Company records share-based compensation under the provisions of SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share Based Payments,” which requires companies to measure all employee share-based compensation awards using a fair value method and recognize compensation expense for an amount equal to the fair value of the share-based payment issued in its consolidated financial statements.

On June 3, 2009, the shareholders of the Company approved the amendment and restatement of the Incentive Stock Plan of 2007, which authorizes the Company to issue stock options and other share-based incentives. As a result, the total number of shares authorized by the shareholders was increased to 27.0 million, of which 14.7 million remains available as of June 30, 2009 for future incentive awards.

Modifications Relating to the Reorganization

In connection with the Reorganization discussed in Note 2, on July 1, 2009, IR-Ireland assumed the existing obligations of IR-Limited under the equity incentive plans and other similar employee award plans of Ingersoll Rand (collectively, the Plans), including all awards issued there under. Furthermore, the Plans have been or will be amended by IR-Limited to provide (1) that ordinary shares of IR-Ireland will be issued, held available or used to measure benefits as appropriate under the Plans, in lieu of the Class A common shares of IR-Limited, including upon exercise of any options or share appreciation rights or upon the vesting of restricted stock units or performance units issued under those Plans; and (2) for the appropriate substitution of IR-Ireland for IR-Limited in those Plans.

Stock Options/Restricted Stock Units

On February 12, 2009, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors approved a change to the Company’s equity grant approach whereby options would no longer be used as the predominant equity vehicle for eligible participants; instead a mix of options and restricted stock units (RSUs) will be utilized. The RSUs will vest ratably over three years and any accrued dividends will be paid in cash at the time of vesting. As a result of this change, eligible participants may receive (i) stock options, (ii) RSUs or (iii) a combination of both stock options and RSUs under the Company’s Incentive Stock Plan of 2007.

The average fair value of the stock options granted for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was estimated to be $5.65 per share and $11.60 per share, respectively, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The following assumptions were used:


	2009		2008
Dividend yield	1.97	%	1.58	%
Volatility	43.18	%	31.50	%
Risk-free rate of return	1.76	%	2.95	%
Expected life	5.1 years		5.4 years

The fair value of each of the Company’s stock option awards is expensed on a straight-line basis over the required service period, which is generally the three-year vesting period of the options. However, for options granted to retirement eligible employees, the Company recognizes expense for the fair value of the options at the grant date. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility from traded options on the Company’s stock. The risk-free rate of return is based on the yield curve of a zero-coupon U.S. Treasury bond on the date the award is granted with a maturity equal to the expected term of the award. Historical data is used to estimate forfeitures within the Company’s valuation model. The Company’s expected life of the stock option awards is derived from historical experience and represents the period of time that awards are expected to be outstanding.

Changes in options outstanding under the plans for the six months ended June 30, 2009 were as follows:


	Shares subject to option		Weighted- average exercise price		Aggregate intrinsic value (millions)		Weighted- average remaining life
December 31, 2008	27,215,227		$	31.11
Granted	4,056,032			16.83
Exercised	(104,759	)		10.26
Cancelled	(1,321,892	)		31.16

Outstanding June 30, 2009	29,844,608		$	29.26	$	57.3	5.5

Exercisable June 30, 2009	21,763,087		$	29.27	$	40.9	4.3

On February 12, 2009, the Company granted annual RSU awards. The fair value of each of the Company’s RSU awards is measured as the grant-date price of the Company’s shares and is expensed on a straight-line basis over the three year vesting period. For RSUs granted to retirement eligible employees, the Company recognizes expense for the fair value of the RSUs at the grant date.

The following table summarizes RSU activity during the six months ended June 30, 2009:


	RSUs		Weighted- average fair value
Outstanding and unvested at December 31, 2008	—		$	—
Granted	921,182			16.85
Vested	(744	)		16.85
Cancelled	(19,949	)		16.85

Outstanding and unvested at June 30, 2009	900,489		$	16.85

SARs

All SARs outstanding as of June 30, 2009 are vested and expire ten years from the date of grant. All SARs exercised are settled with the Company’s Class A common shares.

The following table summarizes the information for currently outstanding SARs for the six months ended June 30, 2009:


	Shares subject to option		Weighted- average exercise price		Aggregate intrinsic value (millions)		Weighted- average remaining life
December 31, 2008	1,073,472		$	34.02
Cancelled	(51,003	)		34.87

Outstanding June 30, 2009	1,022,469		$	33.98	$	0.2	3.9

Exercisable June 30, 2009	1,022,469		$	33.98	$	0.2	3.9

The Company did not grant SARS during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and does not anticipate further granting in the future.

Performance Shares

The Company has a Performance Share Program (PSP) for key employees. The program provides annual awards for the achievement of both pre-established annual financial performance (EPS) and strategic initiatives of the Company. The annual target award level is expressed as a number of the Company’s Class A common shares. All PSP awards are settled in the form of Class A common shares.

On February 12, 2009, the Compensation Committee determined the PSP awards for the performance year 2008. In doing so, primary emphasis was placed on financial objectives in light of the current economic environment. The 2008 PSP awards have a one-year vesting period.

On October 4, 2008, the Compensation Committee approved certain changes to the Company’s long-term incentive compensation programs to be implemented beginning with the 2009 performance year. Under these changes, the performance period under the Company’s PSP Program was changed from one year to three years starting with year 2009 in order to increase the long-term nature of incentive compensation for PSP participants. In addition, these PSP awards are based on the Company’s relative EPS growth as compared to the industrial group of companies in the S&P 500 Index over the three-year performance period. To transition between the previous one-year PSP program and the revised three-year PSP program, there is a one-time PSP award with a two-year performance period for 2009 through 2010, which is based on the Company’s EPS growth relative to the industrial group of companies in the S&P 500 Index and the publicly announced Trane acquisition synergy savings.

Deferred Compensation

The Company allows key employees to defer a portion of their eligible compensation into a number of investment choices, including Class A common share equivalents. Any amounts invested in Class A common share equivalents will be settled in Class A common shares at the time of distribution.

Other Plans

The Company maintains a shareholder-approved Management Incentive Unit Award Plan. Under the plan, participating key employees were awarded incentive units. When dividends are paid on Class A common shares, phantom dividends are awarded to unit holders, one-half of which is paid in cash, the remaining half of which is credited to the participants’ accounts in the form of Class A common share equivalents. The value of the actual incentive units is never paid to participants, and only the fair value of accumulated common share equivalents is paid in cash upon the participants’ retirement. The number of common share equivalents credited to participants’ accounts at June 30, 2009 is 118,653.

The Company has issued stock grants as an incentive plan for certain key employees, with varying vesting periods. All stock grants are settled with the Company’s Class A common shares. At June 30, 2009, there were 277,627 stock grants outstanding, all of which were vested.

Compensation Expense

Share-based compensation expense is included in Selling and administrative expenses. The following table summarizes the expenses recognized for the three and six months ended June 30:


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
*In millions*	2009			2008			2009			2008
Stock options	$	7.9		$	10.4		$	23.0		$	23.7
RSUs		1.7			—			4.5			—
Performance shares		5.0			1.6			9.0			2.4
Deferred compensation		0.2			(0.6	)		0.5			0.6
SARs and other		0.7			0.4			1.2			0.4

Pre-tax expense		15.5			11.8			38.2			27.1
Tax benefit		(5.9	)		(4.5	)		(14.6	)		(10.4	)

After tax expense	$	9.6		$	7.3		$	23.6		$	16.7

Amounts recorded in continuing operations	$	9.6		$	7.3		$	23.6		$	16.7
Amounts recorded in discontinued operations		—			—			—			—

Total	$	9.6		$	7.3		$	23.6		$	16.7

Note 17 – Other, Net

The components of Other, net for the three and six months ended June 30 are as follows:


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
*In millions*	2009			2008			2009			2008
Interest income	$	3.3		$	31.5		$	7.5		$	77.1
Exchange gain (loss), net		(2.7	)		(2.9	)		(1.3	)		(4.5	)
Earnings from equity investments		2.0			1.2			3.5			1.2
Other		0.8			2.9			6.1			2.1

Other, net	$	3.4		$	32.7		$	15.8		$	75.9

Note 18 – Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes involves a significant amount of management judgment regarding interpretation of relevant facts and laws in the jurisdictions in which the Company operates. Future changes in applicable laws, projected levels of taxable income and tax planning could change the effective tax rate and tax balances recorded by the Company. In addition, U.S. and non-U.S. tax authorities periodically review income tax returns filed by the Company and can raise issues regarding its filing positions, timing and amount of income or deductions, and the allocation of income among the jurisdictions in which the Company operates. A significant period of time may elapse between the filing of an income tax return and the ultimate resolution of an issue raised by a revenue authority with respect to that return. In the normal course of business the Company is subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout the world, including such major jurisdictions as Brazil, Canada, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and the United States. In general, the examination of the Company’s material tax returns is completed for the years prior to 2000, with certain matters being resolved through appeals and litigation.

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has completed the examination of the Company’s federal income tax returns through the 2000 tax year and has issued a notice proposing adjustments. The principal proposed adjustment relates to the disallowance of certain capital losses. The Company disputes the IRS position and protests have been filed with the IRS Appeals Division. In order to reduce the potential interest expense associated with this matter, the Company made a payment of $217 million in the third quarter of 2007, which reduced the Company’s total liability for uncertain tax positions by $141 million. Similarly, during the third quarter of 2008, the Company made an additional payment of $55.1 million related to a potential penalty assessment plus accrued interest on this matter. The Company continues negotiating with the IRS on the ultimate settlement of this matter. The issues raised by the IRS associated with this payment are not related to the Company’s reorganization in Bermuda, or the Company’s intercompany debt structure.

On July 20, 2007, the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries received a notice from the IRS containing proposed adjustments to the Company’s tax filings in connection with an audit of the 2001 and 2002 tax years. The IRS did not contest the validity of the Company’s reincorporation in Bermuda. The most significant adjustments proposed by the IRS involve treating the entire intercompany debt incurred in connection with the Company’s reincorporation in Bermuda as equity. As a result of this recharacterization, the IRS has disallowed the deduction of interest paid on the debt and imposed dividend withholding taxes on the payments denominated as interest. These adjustments proposed by the IRS, if upheld in their entirety, would result in additional taxes with respect to 2002 of approximately $190 million plus interest, and would require the Company to record additional charges associated with this matter. At this time, the IRS has not yet begun their examination of the Company’s tax filings for years subsequent to 2002. However, if these adjustments or a portion of these adjustments proposed by the IRS are ultimately sustained, it is likely to also affect subsequent tax years.

The Company strongly disagrees with the view of the IRS and filed a protest with the IRS in the third quarter of 2007. The Company has and intends to continue to vigorously contest these proposed adjustments. The Company, in consultation with its outside advisors, carefully considered many factors in determining the terms of the intercompany debt, including the obligor’s ability to service the debt and the availability of equivalent financing from unrelated parties, two factors prominently cited by the IRS in denying debt treatment. The Company believes that its characterization of that obligation as debt for tax purposes was supported by the relevant facts and legal authorities at the time of its creation. The subsequent financial results of the relevant companies, including the actual cash flow generated by operations and the production of significant additional cash flow from dispositions, have confirmed the ability to service this debt. Although the outcome of this matter cannot be predicted with certainty, based upon an analysis of the strength of its position, the Company believes that it is adequately reserved for this matter. As the Company moves forward to resolve this matter with the IRS, it is reasonably possible that the reserves established may be adjusted within the next 12 months. However, the Company does not expect that the ultimate resolution will have a material adverse impact on its future results of operations or financial position.

The Company believes that it has adequately provided for any reasonably foreseeable resolution of any tax disputes, but will adjust its reserves if events so dictate in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement 109” (FIN 48). To the extent that the ultimate results differ from the original or adjusted estimates of the Company, the effect will be recorded in the provision for income taxes

Total unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were $594.1 million and $589.6 million, respectively.

Note 19 – Divestitures and Discontinued Operations

The components of discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30 are as follows:


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
*In millions*	2009			2008			2009			2008
Revenues	$	—		$	5.6		$	—		$	15.2

Pre-tax earnings (loss) from operations		(17.5	)		(11.8	)		(36.9	)		(23.0	)
Pre-tax gain (loss) on sale		(2.5	)		(1.5	)		2.2			(5.6	)
Tax expense		8.3			6.9			16.6			(7.9	)

Discontinued operations, net of tax	$	(11.7	)	$	(6.4	)	$	(18.1	)	$	(36.5	)

Discontinued operations by business for the three and six months ended June 30 is as follows:


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
*In millions*	2009			2008			2009			2008
Compact Equipment, net of tax	$	(0.2	)	$	1.5		$	(0.7	)	$	(22.9	)
Road Development, net of tax		(0.1	)		(1.8	)		4.5			(1.8	)
Other discontinued operations, net of tax		(11.4	)		(6.1	)		(21.9	)		(11.8	)

Total discontinued operations, net of tax	$	(11.7	)	$	(6.4	)	$	(18.1	)	$	(36.5	)

Compact Equipment Divestiture

On July 29, 2007, the Company agreed to sell its Bobcat, Utility Equipment and Attachments businesses (collectively, Compact Equipment) to Doosan Infracore for gross proceeds of approximately $4.9 billion, subject to post-closing purchase price adjustments. The sale was completed on November 30, 2007. We are currently in the process of resolving the final purchase price adjustments with Doosan Infracore.

Compact Equipment manufactured and sold compact equipment, including skid-steer loaders, compact track loaders, mini-excavators and telescopic tool handlers; portable air compressors, generators and light towers; general-purpose light construction equipment; and attachments. The Company accounted for Compact Equipment as discontinued operations in accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (SFAS 144).

Road Development Divestiture

On February 27, 2007, the Company agreed to sell its Road Development business unit to AB Volvo (publ) for cash proceeds of approximately $1.3 billion. The sale was completed on April 30, 2007.

The Road Development business unit manufactured and sold asphalt paving equipment, compaction equipment, milling machines and construction-related material handling equipment. The Company accounted for the Road Development business unit as discontinued operations in accordance with SFAS 144.

Other Discontinued Operations

The Company also has retained costs from previously sold businesses that mainly include costs related to postretirement benefits, product liability and legal costs (mostly asbestos-related).

Note 20 – Earnings Per Share (EPS)

Basic EPS is calculated by dividing Net earnings (loss) attributable to Ingersoll-Rand Company Limited by the weighted-average number of Class A common shares outstanding for the applicable period. Diluted EPS is calculated after adjusting the denominator of the basic EPS calculation for the effect of all potentially dilutive common shares, which in the Company’s case, includes shares issuable under share-based compensation plans and the effects of the Exchangeable Senior Notes issued in April 2009. The following table summarizes the weighted-average number of Class A common shares outstanding for basic and diluted earnings per share calculations:


	Three months ended June 30,		Six months ended June 30,
*In millions*	2009	2008	2009	2008
Weighted-average number of basic shares	320.8	287.4	320.6	280.6
Shares issuable under incentive stock plans	1.9	3.7	1.6	3.1
Exchangeable Senior Notes	2.3	—	1.2	—

Weighted-average number of diluted shares	325.0	291.1	323.4	283.7

Anti-dilutive shares	24.0	5.6	26.0	7.1

Note 21 – Business Segment Information

The Company classifies its business into four reportable segments based on industry and market focus: Air Conditioning Systems and Services, Climate Control Technologies, Industrial Technologies and Security Technologies.

A summary of operations by reportable segment as of June 30 is as follows:


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
*In millions*	2009			2008			2009			2008
Net revenues
Air Conditioning Systems and Services	$	1,776.2		$	697.9		$	3,175.9		$	697.9
Climate Control Technologies		625.6			911.9			1,128.9			1,710.3
Industrial Technologies		539.7			806.1			1,077.3			1,549.5
Security Technologies		532.3			664.9			1,024.6			1,286.4

Total	$	3,473.8		$	3,080.8		$	6,406.7		$	5,244.1

Operating income
Air Conditioning Systems and Services	$	105.0		$	66.1		$	90.7		$	66.1
Climate Control Technologies		49.5			114.7			52.4			194.9
Industrial Technologies		38.2			104.4			55.4			202.0
Security Technologies		104.9			122.4			181.2			227.3
Unallocated corporate expense		(47.0	)		(46.0	)		(79.2	)		(81.7	)

Total	$	250.6		$	361.6		$	300.5		$	608.6

Note 22 – Commitments and Contingencies

The Company is involved in various litigations, claims and administrative proceedings, including those related to environmental and product liability matters. Amounts recorded for identified contingent liabilities are estimates, which are reviewed periodically and adjusted to reflect additional information when it becomes available. Subject to the uncertainties inherent in estimating future costs for contingent liabilities, management believes that the liability which may result from these legal matters would not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or cash flows of the Company.

Environmental Matters

The Company continues to be dedicated to an environmental program to reduce the utilization and generation of hazardous materials during the manufacturing process and to remediate identified environmental concerns. As to the latter, the Company is currently engaged in site investigations and remediation activities to address environmental cleanup from past operations at current and former manufacturing facilities.

The Company is sometimes a party to environmental lawsuits and claims and has received notices of potential violations of environmental laws and regulations from the Environmental Protection Agency and similar state authorities. It has also been identified as a potentially responsible party (PRP) for cleanup costs associated with off-site waste disposal at federal Superfund and state remediation sites. For all such sites, there are other PRPs and, in most instances, the Company’s involvement is minimal.

In estimating its liability, the Company has assumed it will not bear the entire cost of remediation of any site to the exclusion of other PRPs who may be jointly and severally liable. The ability of other PRPs to participate has been taken into account, based generally on the parties’ financial condition and probable contributions on a per site basis. Additional lawsuits and claims involving environmental matters are likely to arise from time to time in the future.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company spent $2.0 million and $4.7 million, respectively, for environmental remediation expenditures at sites presently or formerly owned or leased by us. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company has recorded reserves for environmental matters of $97.2 million and $100.9 million, respectively. The Company believes that these expenditures will continue and may increase over time. Given the evolving nature of environmental laws, regulations and technology, the ultimate cost of future compliance is uncertain.

Asbestos Matters

Certain wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company are named as defendants in asbestos-related lawsuits in state and federal courts. In virtually all of the suits, a large number of other companies have also been named as defendants. The vast majority of those claims has been filed against either Ingersoll-Rand Company (IR-New Jersey) or Trane and generally allege injury caused by exposure to asbestos contained in certain historical products sold by IR-New Jersey or Trane, primarily pumps, boilers and railroad brake shoes. Neither IR-New Jersey nor Trane was a producer or manufacturer of asbestos, however, some formerly manufactured products utilized asbestos-containing components such as gaskets and packings purchased from third-party suppliers.

Prior to the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company recorded a liability (which it periodically updated) for its actual and anticipated future asbestos settlement costs projected seven years into the future. The Company did not record a liability for future asbestos settlement costs beyond the seven-year period covered by its reserve because such costs previously were not reasonably estimable for the reasons detailed below.

In the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company again reviewed its history and experience with asbestos-related litigation and determined that it had now become possible to make a reasonable estimate of its total liability for pending and unasserted potential future asbestos-related claims. This determination was based upon the Company’s analysis of developments in asbestos litigation, including the substantial and continuing decline in the filing of non-malignancy claims against the Company, the establishment in many jurisdictions of inactive or deferral dockets for such claims, the decreased value of non-malignancy claims because of changes in the legal and judicial treatment of such claims, increasing

focus of the asbestos litigation upon malignancy claims, primarily those involving mesothelioma, a cancer with a known historical and predictable future annual incidence rate, and the Company’s substantial accumulated experience with respect to the resolution of malignancy claims, particularly mesothelioma claims, filed against it.

Accordingly, in the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company retained Dr. Thomas Vasquez of Analysis, Research & Planning Corporation (collectively, “ARPC”) to assist it in calculating an estimate of the Company’s total liability for pending and unasserted future asbestos-related claims. ARPC is a respected expert in performing complex calculations such as this. ARPC has been involved in many asbestos-related valuations of current and future liabilities, and its valuation methodologies have been accepted by numerous courts.

The methodology used by ARPC to project the Company’s total liability for pending and unasserted potential future asbestos-related claims relied upon and included the following factors, among others:

•

ARPC’s interpretation of a widely accepted forecast of the population likely to have been occupationally exposed to asbestos;

•

epidemiological studies estimating the number of people likely to develop asbestos-related diseases such as mesothelioma and lung cancer;

•

the Company’s historical experience with the filing of non-malignancy claims against it and the historical ratio between the numbers of non-malignancy and lung cancer claims filed against the Company;

•

ARPC’s analysis of the number of people likely to file an asbestos-related personal injury claim against the Company based on such epidemiological and historical data and the Company’s most recent three-year claims history;

•

an analysis of the Company’s pending cases, by type of disease claimed;

•

an analysis of the Company’s most recent three-year history to determine the average settlement and resolution value of claims, by type of disease claimed;

•

an adjustment for inflation in the future average settlement value of claims, at a 2.5% annual inflation rate, adjusted downward to 1.5% to take account of the declining value of claims resulting from the aging of the claimant population;

•

an analysis of the period over which the Company has and is likely to resolve asbestos-related claims against it in the future.

Based on these factors, ARPC calculated a total estimated liability of $755 million for the Company to resolve all pending and unasserted potential future claims through 2053, which is ARPC’s reasonable best estimate of the time it will take to resolve asbestos-related claims. This amount is on a pre-tax basis, not discounted for the time-value of money, and excludes the Company’s defense fees (which will continue to be expensed by the Company as they are incurred). After considering ARPC’s analysis and the factors listed above, in the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company increased its recorded liability for asbestos claims by $538 million, from $217 million to $755 million.

In addition, during the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company recorded an $89 million increase in its assets for probable asbestos-related insurance recoveries to $250 million. This represents amounts due to the Company for previously paid and settled claims and the probable reimbursements relating to its estimated liability for pending and future claims. In calculating this amount, the Company used the estimated asbestos liability for pending and projected future claims calculated by ARPC. It also considered the amount of insurance available, gaps in coverage, allocation methodologies, solvency ratings and creditworthiness of the insurers, the amounts already recovered from and the potential for settlements with insurers, and the terms of existing settlement agreements with insurers.

During the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company recorded a non-cash charge to earnings of discontinued operations of $449 million ($277 million after-tax), which is the difference between the amount by which the Company increased its total estimated liability for pending and projected future asbestos-related claims and the amount that the Company expects to recover from insurers with respect to that increased liability.

In connection with our acquisition of Trane, the Company requested ARPC to assist in calculating Trane’s asbestos-related valuations of current and future liabilities. As required by SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations,” the Company is required to record the assumed asbestos obligations and associated insurance-related assets at their fair value at the Acquisition Date. The Company estimates that the assumed asbestos obligation and associated insurance-related assets at the Acquisition Date to be $494 million and $249 million, respectively. These amounts were estimated based on certain assumptions and factors consistent with those described above.

Trane continues to be in litigation against certain carriers whose policies it believes provide coverage for asbestos claims. The insurance carriers named in this suit have challenged Trane’s right to recovery. Trane filed the action in April 1999 in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Middlesex County, against various primary and lower layer excess insurance carriers, seeking coverage for environmental claims (the “NJ Litigation”). The NJ Litigation was later expanded to also seek coverage for asbestos-related liabilities from twenty-one primary and lower layer excess carriers and underwriting syndicates. The environmental claims against most of the insurers in the NJ Litigation have been settled. On September 19, 2005, the court granted Trane’s motion to add claims for insurance coverage for asbestos-related liabilities against 16 additional insurers and 117 new insurance policies to the NJ Litigation. The court also required the parties to submit all contested matters to mediation. Trane engaged in its first mediation session with the NJ Litigation defendants on January 18, 2006 and has engaged in active discussions since that time.

Trane has now settled with a substantial number of its insurers, collectively accounting for approximately 80% of its recorded asbestos-related liability insurance receivable as of January 31, 2009. More specifically, effective August 26, 2008, Trane entered into a coverage-in-place agreement (“August 26 Agreement”) with the following five insurance companies or groups: 1) Hartford; 2) Travelers; 3) Allstate (solely in its capacity as successor-in-interest to Northbrook Excess & Surplus Insurance Company); 4) Dairyland Insurance Company; and 5) AIG. The August 26 Agreement provides for the reimbursement by the insurer signatories of a portion of Trane’s costs for asbestos bodily injury claims under specified terms and conditions and in exchange for certain releases and indemnifications from Trane. In addition, on September 12, 2008, Trane entered into a settlement agreement with Mt.

McKinley Insurance Company and Everest Reinsurance Company, both members of the Everest Re group, resolving all claims in the NJ Litigation involving policies issued by those companies (“Everest Re Agreement”). The Everest Re Agreement contains a number of elements, including policy buy-outs and partial buy-outs in exchange for a cash payment along with coverage-in-place features similar to those contained in the August 26 Agreement, in exchange for certain releases and indemnifications by Trane. More recently, on January 26, 2009, Trane entered into a coverage-in-place agreement with Columbia Casualty Company, Continental Casualty Company, and Continental Insurance Company in its own capacity and as successor-in-interest to Harbor Insurance Company and London Guarantee & Accident Company of New York (“CNA Agreement”). The CNA Agreement provides for the reimbursement by the insurer signatories of a portion of Trane’s costs for indemnification from Trane. Trane remains in settlement negotiations with the insurer defendants in the NJ Litigation not encompassed within the August 26 Agreement, Everest Re Agreement, and the CNA Agreement. Once concluded, we believe the NJ Litigation will resolve coverage issues with respect to approximately 95% of Trane’s recorded insurance receivable in connection with asbestos-related liabilities.

The amounts recorded by the Company for asbestos-related liabilities and insurance-related assets are based on currently available information. The Company’s actual liabilities or insurance recoveries could be significantly higher or lower than those recorded if assumptions used in the Company’s or ARPC’s calculations vary significantly from actual results. Key variables in these assumptions are identified above and include the number and type of new claims to be filed each year, the average cost of resolution of each such new claim, the resolution of coverage issues with insurance carriers, and the solvency risk with respect to the Company’s insurance carriers. Furthermore, predictions with respect to these variables are subject to greater uncertainty as the projection period lengthens. Other factors that may affect the Company’s liability include uncertainties surrounding the litigation process from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and from case to case, reforms that may be made by state and federal courts, and the passage of state or federal tort reform legislation.

The aggregate amount of the stated limits in insurance policies available to the Company for asbestos-related claims acquired over many years and from many different carriers, is substantial. However, limitations in that coverage, primarily due to the considerations described above, are expected to result in the projected total liability to claimants substantially exceeding the probable insurance recovery.

From receipt of its first asbestos claims more than twenty five years ago to December 31, 2008, the Company has resolved (by settlement or dismissal) approximately 253,000 claims arising from the legacy Ingersoll Rand businesses. The total amount of all settlements paid by the Company (excluding insurance recoveries) and by its insurance carriers is approximately $351 million, for an average payment per resolved claim of $1,387. The average payment per claim resolved during the year ended December 31, 2008 was $952. Because claims are frequently filed and settled in large groups, the amount and timing of settlements, as well as the number of open claims, can fluctuate significantly from period to period.

The table below provides additional information regarding asbestos-related claims filed against the legacy Ingersoll Rand businesses, excluding those filed against Trane, reflecting updated information for the last three years.


	2006		2007		2008
Open claims - January 1	102,968		101,709		100,623
New claims filed	6,457		5,398		4,567
Claims settled	(6,558	)	(5,005	)	(3,693	)
Claims dismissed *	(1,158	)	(1,479	)	(38,189	)

Open claims - December 31	101,709		100,623		63,308

The significant increase in dismissals in 2008 is attributed to the dismissal of large numbers of dormant and/or inactive cases in Mississippi and New York. This amount reflects the Company’s emphasis on resolution of higher value malignancy claims, particularly mesothelioma claims, rather than lower value non-malignancy claims, which are more heavily represented in the Company’s historical settlements.

From receipt of the first asbestos claim more than twenty years ago through December 31, 2008, approximately 74,000 (by settlement or dismissal) claims were resolved arising from the legacy Trane business. The Company and its insurance carriers have paid settlements of approximately $125.4 million on these claims, which represents an average payment per resolved claim of $1,694. Because claims are frequently filed and settled in large groups, the amount and timing of settlements, as well as the number of open claims, can fluctuate significantly from period to period.

The table below provides additional information regarding asbestos-related claims filed against the legacy Trane businesses, reflecting updated information for the last three years.


	2006		2007		2008
Open claims - January 1	113,730		104,570		105,023
New claims filed	4,440		3,019		3,626
Claims settled	(848	)	(740	)	(600	)
Claims dismissed	(12,752	)	(1,826	)	(9,710	)

Open claims - December 31	104,570		105,023		98,339

At December 31, 2008, over 90 percent of the open claims against the Company are non-malignancy claims, many of which have been placed on inactive or deferral dockets and the vast majority of which have little or no settlement value against the Company, particularly in light of recent changes in the legal and judicial treatment of such claims.

At June 30, 2009, the Company’s liability for asbestos-related matters and the asset for probable asbestos-related insurance recoveries totaled $1,159.0 million and $405.4 million, respectively, compared to $1,195.2 million and $423.8 million at December 31, 2008.

The (costs) income associated with the settlement and defense of asbestos-related claims after insurance recoveries for the three and six months ended June 30 were as follows:


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
*In millions*	2009			2008			2009			2008
Continuing operations	$	(1.0	)	$	0.6		$	(0.2	)	$	0.6
Discontinued operations		(0.8	)		(4.5	)		(3.8	)		0.1

Total	$	(1.8	)	$	(3.9	)	$	(4.0	)	$	0.7

The Company records certain income and expenses associated with its asbestos liabilities and corresponding insurance recoveries within discontinued operations, as they relate to previously divested businesses, primarily Ingersoll-Dresser Pump, which was sold in 2000. Income and expenses associated with Trane’s asbestos liabilities and corresponding insurance recoveries are recorded within continuing operations.

The European Commission Investigation

In November 2004, Trane was contacted by the European Commission as part of a multi-company investigation into possible infringement of European Union competition law relating to the distribution of bathroom fixtures and fittings in certain European countries. On March 28, 2007, Trane, along with a number of other companies, received a Statement of Objections from the European Commission. The Statement of Objections, an administrative complaint, alleges infringements of European Union competition rules by numerous bathroom fixture and fittings companies, including Trane and certain of its former European subsidiaries engaged in the Bath and Kitchen business. These former subsidiaries were transferred (i) to WABCO on July 31, 2007 as part of a legal reorganization in connection with the spinoff of Trane’s Vehicle Control Systems business and (ii) to Bain Capital Partners LLC on October 31, 2007 in connection with the sale of Trane’s Bath & Kitchen business. Trane and certain of its former European subsidiaries will be jointly and severally liable for any fines that result from the investigation. However, pursuant to an Indemnification and Cooperation Agreement among Trane and certain other parties (Indemnification Agreement), American Standard Europe BVBA (renamed WABCO Europe BVBA) (WABCO Europe), which is a subsidiary of WABCO following the reorganization, will be responsible for, and will indemnify Trane and its subsidiaries (including certain subsidiaries formerly engaged in the Bath and Kitchen business) and their respective affiliates against any fines related to this investigation. Trane and the charged subsidiaries responded to the European Commission on August 1, 2007 and July 31, 2007, respectively. A hearing with the European Commission regarding the response to the Statement of Objections was conducted from November 12-14, 2007, in Brussels. WABCO Europe and other former Trane subsidiaries participated in the hearing. Trane, however, did not participate in the hearing.

In 2006, the European Commission adopted new fining guidelines (2006 Guidelines) and stated its intention to apply these guidelines in all cases in which a Statement of Objections is issued after September 2006. In applying the 2006 Guidelines, the Commission retains considerable discretion in calculating the fine although the European Union regulations provide for a cap on the maximum fine equal to ten percent of Trane’s worldwide revenue attributable to all of its products for the fiscal year prior to the year in which the fine is imposed. If the maximum fine is levied in 2009, the total liability could be approximately $1.1 billion based on Trane’s last full fiscal year of worldwide revenue, subject to a probable reduction for leniency of at least 20 percent provided WABCO Europe, as the leniency applicant, fulfilled all conditions set forth in the European Commission’s leniency notice. WABCO has stated in its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 and Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, that its ability to satisfy its obligations under the Indemnification Agreement is

contingent on its funding capability at the time of the fine, which could be affected by, among other things, its ability to access its then existing credit facilities, its ability to obtain alternative sources of financing, its ability to obtain some payment relief from the European Commission or its ability to obtain a suspension of the payment obligation from the European Court of First Instance.

Oil for Food Program

As previously reported, on November 10, 2004, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued an Order directing that a number of public companies, including the Company, provide information relating to their participation in transactions under the United Nations’ Oil for Food Program. Upon receipt of the Order, the Company undertook a thorough review of its participation in the Oil for Food Program, provided the SEC with information responsive to the Order and provided additional information requested by the SEC. During a March 27, 2007 meeting with the SEC, at which a representative of the Department of Justice (DOJ) was also present, the Company began discussions concerning the resolution of this matter with both the SEC and DOJ. On October 31, 2007, the Company announced it had reached settlements with the SEC and DOJ relating to this matter. Under the terms of the settlements, the Company paid a total of $6.7 million in penalties, interest and disgorgement of profits. The Company has consented to the entry of a civil injunction in the SEC action and has entered into a three-year deferred prosecution agreement (“DPA”) with the DOJ. Under both settlements, the Company has implemented and will continue to implement improvements to its compliance program that are consistent with its longstanding policy against improper payments. In the settlement documents, the Government noted that the Company thoroughly cooperated with the investigation, that the Company had conducted its own complete investigation of the conduct at issue, promptly and thoroughly reported its findings to them, and took prompt remedial measures.

Additionally, we have reported to the DOJ and SEC certain matters involving Trane, including one relating to the Oil for Food Program, and which raise potential issues under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and other applicable anti-corruption laws. With respect to these matters, the Company has conducted a thorough investigation, which began in earnest promptly after our acquisition of Trane in June 2008. We have had preliminary discussions concerning these matters with the SEC and DOJ, to be followed by further discussions in the coming months. Previously, we had reported to the SEC and DOJ potential FCPA issues relating to one of our businesses in China, and we have reported back to them and shared our audit report, which indicated no FCPA violations. With respect to that same business in China, we have recently discussed with the DOJ and SEC another matter which raises potential FCPA issues. We have investigated this matter thoroughly and have had preliminary discussions about it with the SEC and DOJ, to be followed by further discussions in the coming months. These matters (and other matters which may arise or of which we become aware in the future) may be deemed to violate the FCPA and other applicable anti-corruption laws. Such determinations could subject us to, among other things, further enforcement actions by the SEC or the DOJ (if, for example, the DOJ deems us to have violated the DPA), securities litigation and a general loss of investor confidence, any one of which could adversely affect our business prospects and the market value of our stock.

Other

The following table represents the changes in the product warranty liability for the six months ended June 30:


*In millions*	2009			2008
Balance at beginning of period	$	640.7		$	146.9
Reductions for payments		(144.5	)		(57.6	)
Accruals for warranties issued during the current period		126.3			57.3
Changes to accruals related to preexisting warranties		10.7			(1.0	)
Acquisitions		—			483.3
Translation		0.9			3.6

Balance at end of period	$	634.1		$	632.5

Trane has commitments and performance guarantees, including energy savings guarantees, totaling $110.6 million extending from 2009-2028. These guarantees are provided under long-term service and maintenance contracts related to its air conditioning equipment and system controls. Through June 30, 2009, the Company has experienced one insignificant loss under such arrangements and considers the probability of any significant future losses to be remote.

The Company has other contingent liabilities of $4.0 million. These liabilities include performance bonds, guarantees and stand-by letters of credit associated with the prior sale of products by divested businesses.

Note 23 – Guarantor Financial Information

Ingersoll-Rand Company Limited, a Bermuda company (IR-Limited) is the successor to Ingersoll-Rand Company, a New Jersey corporation (IR-New Jersey), following a corporate reorganization that became effective on December 31, 2001. This reorganization was accomplished through a merger of a newly formed subsidiary of IR-Limited. IR-Limited and its subsidiaries continue to conduct the businesses previously conducted by IR-New Jersey and its subsidiaries. This reorganization has been accounted for as a reorganization of entities under common control and accordingly, did not result in any changes to the consolidated amounts of assets, liabilities and shareholders’ equity.

As part of this reorganization, IR-Limited guaranteed all of the issued public debt securities of IR-New Jersey. The subsidiary issuer, IR-New Jersey, is 100% owned by the parent, IR-Limited, the guarantees are full and unconditional, and no other subsidiary of the Company guarantees the securities.

IR-Limited issued Class B common shares to IR-New Jersey in exchange for a $3.6 billion note and shares of certain IR-New Jersey subsidiaries. The note, which is due in 2011, has a fixed rate of interest of 11% per annum payable semi-annually and imposes certain restrictive covenants upon IR-New Jersey. At June 30, 2009, $1.0 billion of the original $3.6 billion note remains outstanding. The Class B common shares are non-voting and pay dividends comparable to the Class A common shares. In 2002, IR-Limited contributed the note to a wholly owned subsidiary, which subsequently transferred portions of the note to several other subsidiaries, all of which are included in the “Other Subsidiaries” below. Accordingly, the subsidiaries of IR-Limited remain creditors of IR-New Jersey.

IR-New Jersey has unconditionally guaranteed payment of the principal, premium, if any, and interest on the Company’s 4.75% Senior Notes due in 2015 in the aggregate principal amount of $300 million. The guarantee is unsecured and provided on an unsubordinated basis. The guarantee ranks equally in right of payment with all of the existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated debt of IR-New Jersey.

The Company has revised the guarantor financial statements for all periods presented in order to reflect Ingersoll-Rand Global Holding Company Limited (IR-Global) as a stand-alone subsidiary. IR-Global issued public debt that is guaranteed by IR-Limited. As part of the process to revise the condensed financial statements, the Company noted errors within the consolidation process of the subsidiaries. Total consolidated results were not impacted by these revisions; however, certain amounts reported within the IR-New Jersey and Other Subsidiary columns have been corrected. The Company determined that these errors were immaterial to the Company’s financial statements. All periods have been revised in the current presentation.

Modifications Relating to the Reorganization

As discussed in Note 2, the Reorganization of the Company from Bermuda to Ireland became effective on July 1, 2009, at which time Ingersoll-Rand plc, an Irish public limited company (IR-Ireland), replaced IR-Limited as the Company’s ultimate parent by means of the Scheme of Arrangement. Concurrently with the completion of the Reorganization, IR-Limited completed the transfer of all outstanding shares of IR-Global to Ingersoll-Rand International Holding Limited, another wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of IR-Limited incorporated in Bermuda (IR-International), whereupon IR-International assumed the obligations of IR-Limited as an issuer or guarantor, as the case may be, under the indentures governing our outstanding notes, medium-term notes and debentures. From the consummation of the Reorganization, IR-Ireland and IR-Limited also fully and unconditionally guarantee the payment obligations of IR-International, IR-Global and IR-New Jersey, as the case may be, as the issuers of the debt securities under these indentures. Neither IR-Ireland nor IR-Limited has issued or intends to issue guarantees in respect of any indebtedness incurred by Trane. In addition, any securities issued by IR-Limited or its subsidiaries that were convertible, exchangeable or exercisable into Class A common shares of IR-Limited became convertible, exchangeable or exercisable, as the case may be, into the ordinary shares of IR-Ireland.

As a result, the guarantor financial statements reflect IR-International as a stand-alone subsidiary as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. IR-International has not been reflected in any period prior to 2009 as it was not created until February 2009. IR-Ireland has not been reflected in any period presented as it did not act as guarantor until July 1, 2009.

The condensed consolidating financial statements present the investments of IR-Limited, IR-Global, IR-International and IR-New Jersey in their subsidiaries using the equity method of accounting. Intercompany investments in the non-voting Class B common shares are accounted for on the cost method and are reduced by intercompany dividends. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the amounts related to the issuance of the Class B shares have been recorded as a reduction of Total shareholders’ equity. The notes payable continue to be reflected as a liability on the balance sheet of IR-New Jersey and are enforceable in accordance with their terms.

The following condensed consolidated financial information for IR-Limited, IR-International, IR-Global, IR-New Jersey, and all their other subsidiaries is included so that separate financial statements of IR-Limited, IR-Global and IR-New Jersey are not required to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Condensed Consolidating Income Statement

For the three months ended June 30, 2009


*In millions*	IR Limited			IR International			IR Global Holding			IR New Jersey			Other Subsidiaries			Consolidating Adjustments			IR Limited Consolidated
Net revenues	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	158.7		$	3,315.1		$	—		$	3,473.8
Cost of goods sold		(0.4	)		—			—			(123.7	)		(2,416.3	)		—			(2,540.4	)
Selling and administrative expenses		(15.8	)		—			(0.4	)		(68.3	)		(598.3	)		—			(682.8	)

Operating income		(16.2	)		—			(0.4	)		(33.3	)		300.5			—			250.6
Equity earnings in affiliates (net of tax)		135.7			0.3			248.5			2.8			(46.3	)		(341.0	)		—
Interest expense		(3.9	)		—			(51.7	)		(13.5	)		(12.8	)		—			(81.9	)
Intercompany interest and fees		11.2			(43.7	)		(19.7	)		(58.0	)		110.2			—			—
Other, net		(4.7	)		0.7			(88.1	)		53.5			(42.3	)		84.3			3.4

Earnings (loss) before income taxes		122.1			(42.7	)		88.6			(48.5	)		309.3			(256.7	)		172.1
Benefit (provision) for income taxes		—			—			—			4.4			(37.2	)		—			(32.8	)

Continuing operations		122.1			(42.7	)		88.6			(44.1	)		272.1			(256.7	)		139.3
Discontinued operations, net of tax		—			—			—			(2.2	)		(9.5	)		—			(11.7	)

Net earnings (loss)		122.1			(42.7	)		88.6			(46.3	)		262.6			(256.7	)		127.6
Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—			—			—			(9.5	)		4.0			(5.5	)

Net earnings (loss) attributable to Ingersoll-Rand Company Limited	$	122.1		$	(42.7	)	$	88.6		$	(46.3	)	$	253.1		$	(252.7	)	$	122.1

Condensed Consolidating Income Statement

For the six months ended June 30, 2009


*In millions*	IR Limited			IR International			IR Global Holding			IR New Jersey			Other Subsidiaries			Consolidating Adjustments			IR Limited Consolidated
Net revenues	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	329.2		$	6,077.5		$	—		$	6,406.7
Cost of goods sold		(0.7	)		—			—			(270.0	)		(4,476.1	)		—			(4,746.8	)
Selling and administrative expenses		(33.4	)		—			(1.0	)		(129.8	)		(1,195.2	)		—			(1,359.4	)

Operating income		(34.1	)		—			(1.0	)		(70.6	)		406.2			—			300.5
Equity earnings in affiliates (net of tax)		146.9			0.7			369.0			(37.7	)		(119.4	)		(359.5	)		—
Interest expense		(7.8	)		—			(89.6	)		(27.0	)		(24.9	)		—			(149.3	)
Intercompany interest and fees		(4.2	)		(56.7	)		(38.6	)		(70.1	)		169.6			—			—
Other, net		(5.8	)		0.6			(87.3	)		87.1			(79.3	)		100.5			15.8

Earnings (loss) before income taxes		95.0			(55.4	)		152.5			(118.3	)		352.2			(259.0	)		167.0
Benefit (provision) for income taxes		—			—			—			5.6			(48.8	)		—			(43.2	)

Continuing operations		95.0			(55.4	)		152.5			(112.7	)		303.4			(259.0	)		123.8
Discontinued operations, net of tax		—			—			—			(6.0	)		(12.1	)		—			(18.1	)

Net earnings (loss)		95.0			(55.4	)		152.5			(118.7	)		291.3			(259.0	)		105.7
Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests		0.3			—			—			(0.7	)		2.1			(12.1	)		(10.4	)

Net earnings (loss) attributable to Ingersoll-Rand Company Limited	$	95.3		$	(55.4	)	$	152.5		$	(119.4	)	$	293.4		$	(271.1	)	$	95.3

Condensed Consolidating Income Statement

For the three months ended June 30, 2008


*In millions*	IR Limited			IR International		IR Global Holding			IR New Jersey			Other Subsidiaries			Consolidating Adjustments			IR Limited Consolidated
Net revenues	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	227.6		$	2,853.2		$	—		$	3,080.8
Cost of goods sold		—			—		—			(158.9	)		(2,037.2	)		—			(2,196.1	)
Selling and administrative expenses		(11.9	)		—		(0.2	)		(81.9	)		(429.1	)		—			(523.1	)

Operating income		(11.9	)		—		(0.2	)		(13.2	)		386.9			—			361.6
Equity earnings in affiliates (net of tax)		278.9			—		310.8			53.6			(6.8	)		(636.5	)		—
Interest expense		(3.9	)		—		(10.7	)		(17.0	)		(14.0	)		—			(45.6	)
Intercompany interest and fees		(22.6	)		—		(44.6	)		(67.6	)		134.8			—			—
Other, net		15.6			—		8.5			1.0			22.3			(14.7	)		32.7

Earnings (loss) before income taxes		256.1			—		263.8			(43.2	)		523.2			(651.2	)		348.7
Benefit (provision) for income taxes		—			—		—			43.4			(123.1	)		—			(79.7	)

Continuing operations		256.1			—		263.8			0.2			400.1			(651.2	)		269.0
Discontinued operations, net of tax		—			—		—			(7.0	)		0.6			—			(6.4	)

Net earnings (loss)		256.1			—		263.8			(6.8	)		400.7			(651.2	)		262.6
Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—		—			—			(21.2	)		14.7			(6.5	)

Net earnings (loss) attributable to Ingersoll-Rand Company Limited	$	256.1		$	—	$	263.8		$	(6.8	)	$	379.5		$	(636.5	)	$	256.1

Condensed Consolidating Income Statement

For the six months ended June 30, 2008


*In millions*	IR Limited			IR International		IR Global Holding			IR New Jersey			Other Subsidiaries			Consolidating Adjustments			IR Limited Consolidated
Net revenues	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	449.5		$	4,794.6		$	—		$	5,244.1
Cost of goods sold		—			—		—			(324.1	)		(3,413.0	)		—			(3,737.1	)
Selling and administrative expenses		(26.4	)		—		(0.2	)		(156.6	)		(715.2	)		—			(898.4	)

Operating income		(26.4	)		—		(0.2	)		(31.2	)		666.4			—			608.6
Equity earnings in affiliates (net of tax)		485.2			—		527.1			103.2			(41.2	)		(1,074.3	)		—
Interest expense		(7.8	)		—		(10.7	)		(33.7	)		(20.9	)		—			(73.1	)
Intercompany interest and fees		(44.6	)		—		(105.6	)		(128.7	)		278.9			—			—
Other, net		31.3			—		26.7			7.5			46.4			(36.0	)		75.9

Earnings (loss) before income taxes		437.7			—		437.3			(82.9	)		929.6			(1,110.3	)		611.4
Benefit (provision) for income taxes		—			—		—			63.8			(190.6	)		—			(126.8	)

Continuing operations		437.7			—		437.3			(19.1	)		739.0			(1,110.3	)		484.6
Discontinued operations, net of tax		—			—		—			(22.1	)		(14.4	)		—			(36.5	)

Net earnings (loss)		437.7			—		437.3			(41.2	)		724.6			(1,110.3	)		448.1
Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—		—			—			(46.4	)		36.0			(10.4	)

Net earnings (loss) attributable to Ingersoll-Rand Company Limited	$	437.7		$	—	$	437.3		$	(41.2	)	$	678.2		$	(1,074.3	)	$	437.7

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet

June 30, 2009


*In millions*	IR Limited			IR International			IR Global Holding		IR New Jersey		Other Subsidiaries		Consolidating Adjustments			IR Limited Consolidated
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	0.1		$	—		$	—	$	178.2	$	614.6	$	—		$	792.9
Accounts and notes receivable, net		—			—			—		195.2		2,078.8		—			2,274.0
Inventories		—			—			—		57.3		1,302.0		—			1,359.3
Other current assets		—			0.5			1.9		172.9		472.5		—			647.8
Accounts and notes receivable affiliates		423.3			3,691.8			2,810.3		3,616.8		40,763.8		(51,306.0	)		—

Total current assets		423.4			3,692.3			2,812.2		4,220.4		45,231.7		(51,306.0	)		5,074.0
Investment in affiliates		10,537.1			631.9			12,696.8		7,454.8		65,385.8		(96,706.4	)		—
Property, plant and equipment, net		—			—			—		158.7		1,765.9		—			1,924.6
Intangible assets, net		—			—			—		72.3		11,676.2		—			11,748.5
Other noncurrent assets		(3.1	)		—			23.4		1,468.7		190.0		—			1,679.0

Total assets	$	10,957.4		$	4,324.2		$	15,532.4	$	13,374.9	$	124,249.6	$	(148,012.4	)	$	20,426.1

Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accruals	$	3.3		$	—		$	55.5	$	186.5	$	2,857.8	$	—		$	3,103.1
Short term borrowings and current maturities of long-term debt		—			—			574.3		351.2		341.8		—			1,267.3
Accounts and note payable affiliates		3,685.3			4,379.6			5,712.6		5,720.6		31,533.4		(51,031.5	)		—

Total current liabilities		3,688.6			4,379.6			6,342.4		6,258.3		34,733.0		(51,031.5	)		4,370.4
Long-term debt		299.3			—			2,562.1		388.2		205.0		—			3,454.6
Note payable affiliate		—			—			—		1,047.4		—		(1,047.4	)		—
Other noncurrent liabilities		132.6			—			129.3		2,175.7		3,453.8		(127.2	)		5,764.2

Total liabilities		4,120.5			4,379.6			9,033.8		9,869.6		38,391.8		(52,206.1	)		13,589.2

Shareholders’ equity:
Total shareholders’ equity		6,836.9			(55.4	)		6,498.6		3,505.3		85,857.8		(95,806.3	)		6,836.9

Total liabilities and equity	$	10,957.4		$	4,324.2		$	15,532.4	$	13,374.9	$	124,249.6	$	(148,012.4	)	$	20,426.1

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet

December 31, 2008


*In millions*	IR Limited			IR International		IR Global Holding		IR New Jersey		Other Subsidiaries		Consolidating Adjustments			IR Limited Consolidated
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	—		$	—	$	1.1	$	8.6	$	540.5	$	—		$	550.2
Accounts and notes receivable, net		—			—		—		224.7		2,287.4		—			2,512.1
Inventories		—			—		—		71.4		1,543.7		—			1,615.1
Other current assets		5.0			—		3.3		166.5		547.5		—			722.3
Accounts and notes receivable affiliates		442.1			—		1,911.5		4,370.0		36,804.4		(43,528.0	)		—

Total current assets		447.1			—		1,915.9		4,841.2		41,723.5		(43,528.0	)		5,399.7
Investment in affiliates		10,185.5			—		12,337.4		7,420.0		65,156.2		(95,099.1	)		—
Property, plant and equipment, net		—			—		—		161.9		1,806.6		—			1,968.5
Intangible assets, net		—			—		—		72.6		11,761.6		—			11,834.2
Other noncurrent assets		(3.0	)		—		12.1		742.3		970.7		—			1,722.1

Total assets	$	10,629.6		$	—	$	14,265.4	$	13,238.0	$	121,418.6	$	(138,627.1	)	$	20,924.5

Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accruals	$	0.5		$	—	$	37.4	$	194.0	$	2,929.1	$	—		$	3,161.0
Short term borrowings and current maturities of long-term debt		—			—		1,752.7		353.2		244.5		—			2,350.4
Accounts and note payable affiliates		3,409.8			—		5,230.6		5,526.5		29,070.7		(43,237.6	)		—

Total current liabilities		3,410.3			—		7,020.7		6,073.7		32,244.3		(43,237.6	)		5,511.4
Long-term debt		299.2			—		1,598.7		395.7		480.1		—			2,773.7
Note payable affiliate		—			—		—		1,047.4		—		(1,047.4	)		—
Other noncurrent liabilities		158.0			—		2.9		2,194.7		3,521.7		—			5,877.3

Total liabilities		3,867.5			—		8,622.3		9,711.5		36,246.1		(44,285.0	)		14,162.4

Shareholders’ equity:
Total shareholders’ equity		6,762.1			—		5,643.1		3,526.5		85,172.5		(94,342.1	)		6,762.1

Total liabilities and equity	$	10,629.6		$	—	$	14,265.4	$	13,238.0	$	121,418.6	$	(138,627.1	)	$	20,924.5

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

For the six months ended June 30, 2009


*In millions*	IR Limited			IR International			IR Global Holding			IR New Jersey			Other Subsidiaries			IR Limited Consolidated
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operating activities	$	(47.7	)	$	0.6		$	(89.6	)	$	(23.7	)	$	1,060.9		$	900.5

Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operating activities		—			—			—			(6.0	)		(15.1	)		(21.1	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures		—			—			—			(13.0	)		(100.8	)		(113.8	)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment		—			—			—			2.2			12.7			14.9
Other, net		—			—			—			—			(0.2	)		(0.2	)

Net cash provided by (used in) continuing investing activities		—			—			—			(10.8	)		(88.3	)		(99.1	)

Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued investing activities		—			—			—			—			—			—
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net change in debt		—			—			(174.0	)		(9.4	)		(191.1	)		(374.5	)
Debt issuance costs		—			—			(16.0	)		—			—			(16.0	)
Net inter-company proceeds (payments)		242.0			(0.6	)		269.1			211.3			(721.8	)		—
Dividends (paid) received		(195.3	)		—			9.4			8.2			62.8			(114.9	)
Acquisition of noncontrolling interest		—			—			—			—			(1.5	)		(1.5	)
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options		1.1			—			—			—			—			1.1
Settlement of cross currency swap		—			—			—			—			(26.9	)		(26.9	)
Other, net		—			—			—			—			(9.1	)		(9.1	)

Net cash provided by (used in) continuing financing activities		47.8			(0.6	)		88.5			210.1			(887.6	)		(541.8	)

Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued financing activities		—			—			—			—			—			—

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		—			—			—			—			4.2			4.2
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		0.1			—			(1.1	)		169.6			74.1			242.7
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period		—			—			1.1			8.6			540.5			550.2

Cash and cash equivalents - end of period	$	0.1		$	—		$	—		$	178.2		$	614.6		$	792.9

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

For the six months ended June 30, 2008


*In millions*	IR Limited			IR International		IR Global Holding			IR New Jersey			Other Subsidiaries			IR Limited Consolidated
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operating activities	$	(2.9	)	$	—	$	15.8		$	(257.3	)	$	(250.0	)	$	(494.4	)

Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operating activities		—			—		—			(0.7	)		(19.3	)		(20.0	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures		—			—		—			(19.4	)		(85.3	)		(104.7	)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment		—			—		—			0.7			22.3			23.0
Acquisitions, net of cash		—			—		—			—			(7,085.5	)		(7,085.5	)
Proceeds from business disposition, net of cash		—			—		—			—			9.7			9.7
Other, net		—			—		—			5.4			(24.5	)		(19.1	)

Net cash provided by (used in) continuing investing activities		—			—		—			(13.3	)		(7,163.3	)		(7,176.6	)

Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued investing activities		—			—		—			—			—			—
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net change in debt		—			—		3,876.8			(8.0	)		(102.3	)		3,766.5
Debt issuance costs		—			—		(11.4	)		—			—			(11.4	)
Net inter-company proceeds (payments)		221.4			—		(5,892.9	)		(142.0	)		5,813.5			—
Dividends (paid) received		(230.6	)		—		35.1			8.2			89.1			(98.2	)
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options		11.6			—		—			—			—			11.6
Repurchase of common shares by subsidiary		—			—		(2.0	)		—			—			(2.0	)
Other, net		—			—		—			18.5			(10.9	)		7.6

Net cash provided by (used in) continuing financing activities		2.4			—		(1,994.4	)		(123.3	)		5,789.4			3,674.1

Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued financing activities		—			—		—			—			—			—

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		—			—		—			—			68.9			68.9
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(0.5	)		—		(1,978.6	)		(394.6	)		(1,574.3	)		(3,948.0	)
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period		0.6			—		1,979.1			545.5			2,210.1			4,735.3

Cash and cash equivalents - end of period	$	0.1		$	—	$	0.5		$	150.9		$	635.8		$	787.3

Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

INGERSOLL-RAND PLC

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause a difference include, but are not limited to, those discussed under Part II, Item 1A - Risk Factors in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and under Part I, Item 1A - Risk Factors in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. The following section is qualified in its entirety by the more detailed information, including our financial statements and the notes thereto, which appears elsewhere in this Quarterly Report.

Overview

Organizational

Ingersoll-Rand plc (IR-Ireland), an Irish public limited company, and its consolidated subsidiaries (we, our, the Company) is a diversified, global company that provides products, services and solutions to enhance the quality and comfort of air in homes and buildings, transport and protect food and perishables, secure homes and commercial properties, and increase industrial productivity and efficiency. Our business segments consist of Air Conditioning Systems and Services, Climate Control Technologies, Industrial Technologies and Security Technologies, each with strong brands and leading positions within their respective markets. We generate revenue and cash primarily through the design, manufacture, sale and service of a diverse portfolio of industrial and commercial products that include well-recognized, premium brand names such as Club Car^®, Hussmann^®, Ingersoll-Rand^®, Schlage^®, Thermo King^® and Trane^® .

We are dedicated to inspiring progress for our customers, shareholders, employees and communities by achieving:

•

Dramatic Growth, by focusing on innovative solutions for our customers;

•

Operational Excellence, by pursuing continuous improvement in all of our operations; and

•

Dual Citizenship, by bringing together the talents of all Ingersoll Rand people to leverage the capabilities of our global enterprise.

To achieve these goals and to become a more diversified company with strong growth prospects, we transformed our enterprise portfolio by divesting cyclical, low-growth and asset-intensive businesses. In addition, our acquisition strategy has helped deliver more consistent revenue and earnings performance across all phases of the economic cycle. Aside from our portfolio transformation, we continue to focus on increasing our recurring revenue stream, which includes revenues from parts, service, used equipment and rentals. We also intend to continuously improve the efficiencies, capabilities, products and services of our high-potential businesses.

Reorganization

On March 5, 2009, our board of directors approved a reorganization of the Company that would change the jurisdiction of incorporation of our parent company from Bermuda to Ireland (the Reorganization). The first step in the Reorganization was the establishment of Ingersoll-Rand Company Limited’s (IR-Limited) tax residency in Ireland, which occurred in March 2009.

As the next step, we changed the place of incorporation of the parent company of Ingersoll Rand from Bermuda to Ireland pursuant to a scheme of arrangement under Bermuda law (the Scheme of Arrangement). On April 1, 2009, IR-Limited formed IR-Ireland, as a direct subsidiary. On April 20, 2009, IR-Limited petitioned the Supreme Court of Bermuda to order the calling of a meeting of the Class A common shareholders of IR-Limited to approve the Scheme of Arrangement. On April 23, 2009, the Supreme Court of Bermuda ordered IR-Limited to seek the approval of its Class A common shareholders on the Scheme of Arrangement. On June 3, 2009, IR-Limited receive the requisite approval from its Class A common shareholders and, on June 11, 2009, the Supreme Court of Bermuda issued an order (the Sanction Order) approving the Scheme of Arrangement.

On June 30, 2009, IR-Limited filed the Sanction Order with the Bermuda Registrar of Companies and, at 12:01 a.m. on July 1, 2009 (the Transaction Time) the following steps occurred simultaneously:

•

All previously outstanding whole Class A common shares of IR-Limited were cancelled.

•

IR-Limited issued to IR-Ireland 319,166,220 Class A common shares.

•

IR-Ireland issued 319,166,220 ordinary shares to holders of whole IR-Limited Class A common shares that were cancelled as a part of the Scheme of Arrangement.

•

All previously outstanding ordinary shares of IR-Ireland held by IR-Limited and its nominees were acquired by IR-Ireland and cancelled for no consideration.

As a result of the Reorganization, IR-Limited became a wholly-owned subsidiary of IR-Ireland and the Class A common shareholders of IR-Limited became ordinary shareholders of IR-Ireland.

At the Transaction Time, IR-Limited completed the transfer of all the outstanding shares of Ingersoll-Rand Global Holding Company Limited (IR-Global) to Ingersoll-Rand International Holding Limited (IR-International), another wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of IR-Limited incorporated in Bermuda, whereupon IR-International assumed the obligations of IR-Limited as an issuer or guarantor, as the case may be, under the indentures governing the Company’s outstanding notes, medium-term notes and debentures. IR-Ireland and IR-Limited also fully and unconditionally guarantee the payment obligations of IR-International, IR-Global and Ingersoll-Rand Company, a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of IR-Limited incorporated in New Jersey (IR-New Jersey), as the case may be, as the issuers of debt securities under these indentures. Neither IR-Ireland nor IR-Limited has issued or intends to issue guarantees in respect of any indebtedness incurred by Trane. In addition, any securities issued by the Company

that were convertible, exchangeable or exercisable into Class A common shares of IR-Limited became convertible, exchangeable or exercisable, as the case may be, into the ordinary shares of IR-Ireland.

Pursuant to the terms of our credit facility entered into on August 12, 2005 and our credit facility entered into on June 27, 2008 (the Credit Facilities), at the Transaction Time, IR-Ireland and IR-International became guarantors to such Credit Facilities. In connection therewith, IR-Ireland and IR-International entered into Addendums on July 1, 2009 to become parties to the Credit Facilities.

In connection with the Transaction, effective as of the Transaction Time, IR-Ireland assumed the existing obligations of IR-Limited under the equity incentive plans and