DEF 14A
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Filed by the
Registrant x
Filed by a Party other than the
Registrant ¨
Check the appropriate box:
|
|
|
|
|
¨ |
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
¨ |
|
Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
x |
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
¨ |
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
¨ |
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
|
HARRIS CORPORATION |
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) |
|
|
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) |
|
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): |
|
|
x |
|
No fee required |
|
|
¨ |
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|
|
1) |
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2) |
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3) |
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which
the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4) |
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5) |
|
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
¨ |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials: |
|
|
¨ |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously.
Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
|
|
|
|
1) |
|
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2) |
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3) |
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4) |
|
Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
HARRIS CORPORATION
1025 West NASA Boulevard
Melbourne, Florida 32919
September 9, 2014
Dear Fellow Shareholder:
On behalf of your Board of Directors, I am pleased to invite you to attend the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Harris Corporation. The meeting will be held at the Harris Customer Briefing Center
located at 1025 West NASA Boulevard in Melbourne, Florida, on Friday, October 24, 2014, starting at 1:00 p.m., local time.
The accompanying Notice of 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement describe the matters to be acted on at the meeting, which include:
|
|
|
election of the 12 nominees for director named in the accompanying Proxy Statement for a one-year term; |
|
|
|
an advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers; |
|
|
|
ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2015; and |
|
|
|
such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof. |
Your Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR the election of its nominees for director, FOR advisory approval of the
compensation of our named executive officers and FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2015. These matters are discussed in greater detail in the
accompanying Proxy Statement.
Following the voting, we will report on our operations and future plans. There also will be an
open discussion period during which your questions and comments will be welcome.
The attendance of shareholders at our annual
meetings has been helpful in maintaining communication and understanding. We hope you will be able to join us. Whether or not you plan to attend, it is important that your shares be represented and voted at the meeting. You can ensure that your
shares are represented and voted at the meeting by submitting your proxy/voting instruction over the Internet or by telephone. If you received paper copies of the proxy materials by mail, you can also submit your proxy/voting instruction by mail by
using the traditional proxy card that was included. Instructions for these convenient ways to vote are set forth on both the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and the proxy/voting instruction card.
|
|
|
|
|
Sincerely,
|
|
|
William M. Brown
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
VOTING YOUR SHARES IS IMPORTANT. PLEASE SUBMIT YOUR PROXY/VOTING INSTRUCTION
OVER THE INTERNET OR BY TELEPHONE.
YOU CAN ALSO COMPLETE, SIGN, DATE AND PROMPTLY RETURN
YOUR PROXY/VOTING INSTRUCTION CARD IF YOU RECEIVED PROXY MATERIALS BY MAIL.
HARRIS CORPORATION
1025 West NASA Boulevard
Melbourne, Florida 32919
Notice of
2014 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders
to be held on October 24, 2014
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY
MATERIALS FOR THE SHAREHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON OCTOBER 24, 2014:
The Proxy Statement and 2014 Annual Report to Shareholders
are available at: harris.com/proxy
TO THE HOLDERS OF COMMON STOCK
OF HARRIS CORPORATION:
NOTICE
IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Harris Corporation will be held at Harris Corporations Customer Briefing Center located at 1025 West NASA Boulevard, Melbourne, Florida, on Friday, October 24, 2014, at 1:00
p.m., local time, for the following purposes:
|
1. |
to elect as directors the 12 nominees named in the accompanying Proxy Statement for a one-year term expiring at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders;
|
|
2. |
to hold an advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in the accompanying Proxy Statement; |
|
3. |
to ratify the appointment by our Audit Committee of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2015; and
|
|
4. |
to consider and act upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof. |
The accompanying Proxy Statement more fully describes these items. We have not received notice of other matters that may be properly
presented at the Annual Meeting.
Only holders of common stock of record at the close of business on August 29, 2014 are
entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof. No ticket is required for admission to the Annual Meeting. For security purposes, however, you may be required to present evidence of your share
ownership and a valid, government-issued photo identification, such as a drivers license or passport, to gain admission to the Annual Meeting. Packages, boxes, handbags, briefcases and other items may be inspected.
We are pleased to be furnishing proxy materials over the Internet for most of our shareholders as permitted by Securities and Exchange
Commission rules. These rules allow us to provide you with the information you need while conserving natural resources and lowering the costs of delivery. Please submit your proxy/voting instruction over the Internet or by telephone by following
the instructions about how to view the proxy materials on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. If you received your proxy materials by mail, you may submit your proxy/voting instruction over the Internet or by telephone or by
completing, signing, dating and promptly mailing your proxy/voting instruction card that was included. If you attend the Annual Meeting, you may vote in person.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Scott T. Mikuen
Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary
Melbourne, Florida
September 9, 2014
IMPORTANT NOTICE
Voting your shares is important. If you do not expect to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders
or if you plan to attend but wish to vote by proxy, please submit your proxy/voting instruction over the Internet or by telephone. If you received printed proxy materials by mail, you can also submit your proxy/voting instruction by completing,
signing, dating and promptly mailing the proxy/voting instruction card that was included and for which a postage-paid return envelope is provided.
HARRIS CORPORATION
2014 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
PROXY STATEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proxy Statement
for
2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
to be held on October 24, 2014
GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
Why am I receiving this
proxy statement?
We are making this proxy statement available to you over the
Internet or delivering paper copies of this proxy statement to you by mail in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors (the Board) of Harris Corporation (which we refer to as Harris,
Company, we, our or us) and the solicitation of voting instructions by the Harris Corporation Retirement Plan Trustee, in each case for use at the 2014 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be held on October 24, 2014, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof.
On September 11, 2014, we will commence mailing the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to most of our shareholders, and we will also commence mailing to some of our shareholders, and
make available electronically over the Internet to all of our shareholders: (1) the Notice of 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and this proxy statement, and (2) a copy of our 2014 Annual Report to Shareholders, which includes our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014 and our audited financial statements. If you receive a paper copy of our proxy materials by mail, a proxy/voting instruction card will be included.
What is a proxy?
A
proxy is your legal designation of another person to vote the shares you own. That other person is called a proxy. If you designate someone as your proxy, the document in which you make that designation is also called a proxy.
What is a proxy statement?
This document is a proxy statement. It is a document that we are required by law to provide to you when we ask you to name a proxy to
vote your shares. We encourage you to read this proxy statement carefully.
Why did I receive a Notice of Internet Availability of
Proxy Materials instead of a paper copy of the proxy materials?
The rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC) permit us to furnish proxy materials over the Internet. As a result, we are mailing to most of our shareholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials instead of a paper copy of our proxy materials. All shareholders
receiving the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials will have the ability to access our proxy materials over the Internet and, if desired, to request to receive a paper copy of our proxy materials by mail. Instructions on how to access
our proxy materials over the Internet or to request a paper copy may be found in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. In addition, the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials contains instructions on how you may elect
to receive future proxy materials electronically on an ongoing basis.
Why didnt I receive a notice in
the mail about the Internet availability of
the proxy materials?
We are providing some of our shareholders, including
shareholders who have previously requested to receive paper copies of our proxy
1
materials, with paper copies of our proxy materials instead of a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials.
In addition, we are providing notice of the availability of our proxy materials by e-mail to those shareholders who have previously elected to receive proxy materials electronically. Those shareholders
should have received an e-mail containing instructions and links to the website where our proxy materials are available and to the proxy voting website.
How can I access the proxy
materials over the Internet?
Your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or proxy/voting instruction card contains instructions on how to (1) view our
proxy materials for the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders over the Internet and (2) elect to receive future proxy materials electronically by e-mail. Our proxy materials are also available on our website at harris.com/proxy.
Electing to receive future proxy materials electronically will help us conserve natural resources and reduce the cost of
delivering our proxy materials. If you elect to receive future proxy materials electronically, you will receive an e-mail containing instructions and links to the website where our proxy materials are available and to the proxy voting website. Your
election to receive proxy materials electronically by e-mail will remain in effect until you terminate it.
How may I obtain a paper
copy of
the proxy materials?
If you receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, you will find instructions about how to obtain a paper copy of our proxy materials on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy
Materials. If you receive notice of the availability of our proxy materials by e-mail, you will find instructions about how to obtain a paper copy of our proxy materials included in that e-mail. Shareholders who do not receive a Notice of Internet
Availability of Proxy Materials or an e-mail regarding the availability of our proxy materials will receive a paper copy of our proxy materials by mail.
What is the purpose of the meeting?
The purpose of the 2014 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders is to obtain shareholder action on the
matters outlined in the notice of meeting included with this proxy statement. These matters include: (1) election of the 12 nominees for director named in this proxy statement for a one-year
term expiring at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders; (2) an advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement; and (3) ratification of the appointment by our Audit Committee
of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2015. This proxy statement provides detailed information about each of these matters. In addition, at the 2014 Annual Meeting, our management will
report on our operations and future plans and respond to questions from shareholders.
What is a record date and
who is entitled to vote at the meeting?
A record date is the date, as of the close of business on which, shareholders of record are entitled to notice of and to vote at a meeting of shareholders. The record date for the 2014 Annual Meeting is
August 29, 2014. The record date was established by our Board as required under the laws of Delaware, our state of incorporation. Thus, owners of record of shares of Harris common stock as of the close of business on August 29, 2014 are
entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the 2014 Annual Meeting and at any adjournments or postponements thereof.
How many
shares can be voted and
what is a quorum?
You are entitled to one vote for each share of Harris common stock that you owned as of the close of business on August 29, 2014, and you may vote all of those shares. Only our common stock has
voting rights. On the record date, there were 104,487,001 shares of our common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the 2014 Annual Meeting and approximately 4,972 holders of record.
A quorum is the minimum number of shares that must be represented in person or by proxy for us to conduct the 2014 Annual Meeting. The
attendance in person or by proxy of holders of a majority of the shares of common stock entitled to vote at the 2014 Annual Meeting, or 52,243,501 shares of our common stock based on the record date of August 29, 2014, will constitute a quorum
to hold the 2014 Annual Meeting. If you grant your proxy over the Internet, by telephone or by your proxy/voting instruction card, your shares will be considered
2
present at the 2014 Annual Meeting and counted toward the quorum.
What
different methods can I
use to vote my shares?
You have a choice of voting your shares:
|
|
|
In person at the Annual Meeting. |
Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to vote your shares over the Internet, by telephone or by mail. Please carefully read the instructions below on how to vote your shares.
Because the instructions vary depending on how you own your shares and the method you use to vote your shares, it is important that you follow the instructions that apply to your particular situation.
If you vote your shares over the Internet or by telephone, you should not return a proxy/voting instruction card.
What is the difference between a
record holder and a beneficial owner holding shares in street name?
You are a record holder if your shares are registered in your name, in which case you either hold a stock certificate or have an account directly with our transfer agent, Computershare
Shareowner Services. Your shares are held in street name if your shares are registered or held in the name of your broker, bank or other nominee, in which case you are considered the beneficial owner of such shares.
How do I vote my shares if I am a
record holder (my shares are registered in my name)?
Voting over the Internet
Voting over the Internet is easy, fast and available 24 hours a day. If you receive a Notice of Internet Availability of
Proxy Materials by mail, you may vote over the Internet by following the instructions on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. If you receive notice of the availability of our proxy materials by e-mail, you may submit your
proxy/voting instruction over the Internet by following the instructions included in that e-mail. If you receive a paper copy of a proxy/voting instruction card by mail, you may submit your proxy/voting instruction over the Internet by following the
instructions on the proxy/voting instruction card. You will be able to confirm that the Internet voting system has properly recorded your vote, which will be counted immediately, and there is no
need to return a proxy/voting instruction card.
Voting by telephone
Voting by telephone is also easy, fast and available 24 hours a day. If you live in the United States or Canada, you may vote by telephone
by calling toll-free 1-800-690-6903. If you receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials by mail, you must have the control number that appears on the notice available when voting. If you receive notice of the availability of our
proxy materials by e-mail, you must have the control number included in that e-mail when voting. If you receive a paper copy of a proxy/voting instruction card by mail, you must have the control number that
appears on the proxy/voting instruction card available when voting. You will be able to confirm that the telephone voting system has properly recorded your vote, which will be counted immediately, and there is no need to return a proxy/voting
instruction card.
Voting by mail
You can save us expense by voting over the Internet or by telephone. Alternatively, if you received a paper copy of a proxy/voting instruction card, you can vote by mail by completing, signing, dating and
promptly mailing your proxy/voting instruction card in the accompanying postage-paid return envelope.
Voting in person at the meeting
If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, you can vote in person. To vote in person at the Annual Meeting, you will need
to bring with you to present at the Annual Meeting evidence of your share ownership and a valid, government-issued photo identification, such as a drivers license or passport.
How do I vote my shares
if
I am a beneficial owner holding
my shares in street name?
Voting over the Internet, by telephone or by mail
If your shares are registered or held in the name of your broker, bank or other nominee (street name), you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other nominee on how to vote your
shares by
3
using the method specified by your broker, bank or other nominee. In addition to voting by mail, a large number of brokerage firms and banks are participating in Internet or telephone voting
programs. These programs provide eligible street name shareholders the opportunity to vote over the Internet or by telephone. Voting forms will provide instructions for shareholders whose brokerage firms or banks are participating in
these programs.
Voting in person at the meeting
If your shares are registered or held in the name of your broker, bank or other nominee and you plan to attend the Annual Meeting to vote in person, you should contact your broker, bank or other nominee
to obtain a brokers proxy and bring it with you to the Annual Meeting, together with a valid, government-issued photo identification, such as a drivers license or passport, and your account statement or other evidence of your share
ownership.
Can I revoke my proxy or change my vote?
If your shares are registered in your name (record holder), you may revoke your proxy or change your vote at any time before your shares are voted at the Annual Meeting. There are several ways
you can do this:
|
|
|
By sending a written notice of revocation to our Secretary at Harris Corporation, 1025 West NASA Boulevard, Melbourne, Florida 32919;
|
|
|
|
By duly signing and delivering a proxy/voting instruction card that bears a later date; |
|
|
|
By subsequently voting over the Internet or by telephone as described above; or |
|
|
|
By attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person by ballot. |
If your shares are held in street name, you may revoke your proxy or change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to
your broker, bank or other nominee.
What are my voting choices and what is the required vote on the matters proposed?
By giving us your proxy, you authorize our management to vote your shares at the 2014 Annual
Meeting or at any adjournments or postponements thereof in the manner you indicate in your voting instructions.
Proposal 1: |
Election of Directors |
With
respect to the proposal to elect the 12 nominees for director named in this proxy statement for a one-year term expiring at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, you may:
|
|
|
Vote For the election of one or more of the nominees for director named in this proxy statement; |
|
|
|
Vote Against the election of one or more of the nominees for director named in this proxy statement; or |
|
|
|
Abstain from voting as to the election of one or more of the nominees for director named in this proxy statement.
|
Pursuant to our By-Laws and Corporate Governance Guidelines, the voting standard for the election of our
directors is a majority voting standard in uncontested elections and a plurality voting standard in contested elections. We have nominated 12 directors for election at the 2014 Annual Meeting, and because we did not receive advance notice under our
By-Laws of any shareholder nominees for director, the 2014 election of directors is an uncontested election. To be elected in an uncontested election under a majority voting standard, a director nominee must receive more For votes than
Against votes. Abstentions and any broker non-votes will have no effect on the election of directors because only votes cast For or Against a nominee will be counted. If an incumbent director nominee does not
receive a greater number of For votes than Against votes, he or she must promptly offer to tender his or her resignation following certification of the vote. Our Corporate Governance Committee shall make a recommendation to
our Board regarding action to be taken with respect to such offer to resign. If our Board does not accept the resignation, the nominee will continue to serve as a director until the next Annual Meeting and until his or her successor shall be duly
elected and qualified, or until his or her prior death, resignation, retirement or removal from office. For additional information regarding the majority voting standard, see Majority Voting for Directors beginning on page 27.
4
Proposal 2: |
An Advisory Vote to Approve the Compensation of our Named Executive Officers |
With respect to the advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement, you may:
|
|
|
Vote For approval of the compensation of our named executive officers; |
|
|
|
Vote Against approval of the compensation of our named executive officers; or |
|
|
|
Abstain from voting on this proposal. |
The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present or represented at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on this proposal will be required to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of
our named executive officers. Abstaining from voting on this proposal will have the effect of a vote against approval of the compensation of our named executive officers. Any broker non-votes will have no effect on the approval of the compensation
of our named executive officers.
The vote on this proposal is advisory, and the result of the vote on this proposal is not
binding on Harris, our Management Development and Compensation Committee or our Board. However, our Management Development and Compensation Committee and our Board will consider the voting results when making future decisions regarding compensation
for our named executive officers.
Proposal 3: |
Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
With respect to the proposal to ratify the appointment by our Audit Committee of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered
public accounting firm for fiscal year 2015, you may:
|
|
|
Vote For ratification; |
|
|
|
Vote Against ratification; or |
|
|
|
Abstain from voting on this proposal. |
The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present or represented at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on this proposal will be required to ratify our Audit Committees appointment of
Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2015. Abstaining from
voting on this proposal will have the effect of a vote against ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm. Because brokers, banks or other nominees are
permitted under New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) rules to vote on this proposal even if such broker, bank or other nominee does not receive voting instructions, we do not expect broker non-votes on this proposal.
How do I vote my shares held in
the Harris Retirement Plan?
If you are a participant in the Harris Corporation Retirement Plan (Retirement Plan) and you own shares of Harris common stock through the Retirement Plan, your voting instruction covers the
shares of Harris common stock you own through the Retirement Plan. You may provide voting instructions for those shares to the trustee of the Retirement Plan over the Internet, by telephone or by mail as described above. If you do not provide voting
instructions for those shares, then as directed by the terms of the Retirement Plan, those shares will be voted by the trustee in the same proportion as the shares for which other participants have timely provided voting instructions.
How do I vote my shares held in
the Harris Dividend Reinvestment Plan?
If you are a participant in the Harris Dividend Reinvestment Plan (DRIP) administered by Computershare Trust Company, N.A., your voting instruction covers the shares of Harris common stock
held in your DRIP account. Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as the DRIP administrator, is the shareholder of record of Harris common stock owned through the DRIP and will not vote those shares unless you provide it with voting instructions, which
you may do over the Internet, by telephone or by mail as described above.
What are the Harris Boards voting
recommendations and what happens if I return an unmarked proxy/voting instruction card?
If you
properly execute and return a proxy/voting instruction card with no votes marked, your shares will be voted as recommended by our Board. Our Boards recommendations are set forth together with the description of each proposal in this proxy
5
statement. In summary, our Board unanimously recommends a vote:
|
|
|
FOR the election of all 12 of the nominees for director named in this proxy statement for a one-year term expiring at the 2015 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders (see Proposal 1); |
|
|
|
FOR approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement (see Proposal
2); and |
|
|
|
FOR the ratification of the appointment by our Audit Committee of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting
firm for fiscal year 2015 (see Proposal 3). |
Could other matters be decided
at the meeting?
At
the date of this proxy statement, our Board did not know of any matters to be raised at the Annual Meeting other than those referred to in this proxy statement and did not intend to bring before the Annual Meeting any matter other than the proposals
described in this proxy statement. With respect to other matters that may properly be brought before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof, your shares will be voted at the discretion of the proxy holders.
How will my shares be voted if I do not
provide instructions to my broker?
It is possible for a proxy to indicate that some
of the shares represented are not being voted with respect to certain proposals. This occurs, for example, when a broker, bank or other nominee does not have discretion under NYSE rules to vote on a matter without instructions from the beneficial
owner of the shares and has not received such instructions. In these cases, non-voted shares will not be considered present and entitled to vote with respect to that matter, although they may be considered present and entitled to vote for other
purposes and will be counted in determining the presence of a quorum. Under NYSE rules, brokers, banks or other nominees have discretionary voting power to vote without receiving voting instructions from the beneficial owner on routine
matters, but not on non-routine matters. Under NYSE rules as currently in effect, routine matters include, among other things, the ratification of the appointment of an independent registered public accounting firm. The
proposal to
ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm is the only proposal set forth in this proxy statement that is considered
routine under NYSE rules. This means that if you hold your shares through a broker, bank or other nominee, and you do not provide voting instructions by the 10th day before the Annual Meeting, your broker, bank or other nominee has the discretion to vote your shares on the
proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2015. Under NYSE rules, the proposal to elect the 12 nominees for director named in this proxy statement and the
proposal to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers are not routine and your broker, bank or other nominee will not have the discretion to vote your shares on such proposals.
What does it mean if I receive more
than one Notice of Internet Availability of
Proxy Materials or more than one
proxy/voting instruction card?
If you receive more than one Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or more than one proxy/voting instruction card, you own shares of Harris common stock in multiple accounts with brokers
and/or our transfer agent. Please vote all of these shares. We recommend that you contact your broker and/or our transfer agent to consolidate as many accounts as possible under the same name and address. Our transfer agent is Computershare
Shareowner Services, which may be reached by telephone at 1-888-261-6777 or over the Internet at www.computershare.com/investor.
Who pays for the solicitation of proxies?
We actively solicit proxy participation by Internet, by telephone, by mail or in person. We will bear the cost of soliciting proxies, including the cost of preparation, assembly, printing and mailing. In
addition to this proxy statement, we request and encourage brokers, custodians, nominees and others to make available or supply proxy materials to our shareholders, and, upon request, we will reimburse them for their expenses. Our officers,
directors and employees may, by letter, telephone or e-mail, or in person, make additional requests for the return of proxies, although we do not reimburse our own officers, directors or employees for soliciting proxies. We also have engaged
Georgeson Inc. to assist in the
6
solicitation of proxies for a fee of $10,000 plus reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses. We also will reimburse brokers and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for forwarding proxy and
solicitation materials to our shareholders in accordance with the fee schedule approved by the NYSE.
Will there be a webcast of the
Annual Meeting of Shareholders?
Our 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be webcast live on October 24, 2014. You may visit the Investor Relations section of our website at harris.com/investors to access the webcast of
the Annual Meeting. The webcast will enable you to listen only. You will not be able to ask questions or vote your shares via the webcast. A replay of the webcast also will be available on our website through November 24, 2014. The information
contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.
Who will tabulate and oversee the vote?
Representatives of Broadridge Investor Communication Solutions, Inc. will tabulate and oversee the vote.
Do I need an admission ticket to
attend the Annual Meeting?
All shareholders are welcome to attend the Annual Meeting. No ticket is required for admission to the Annual Meeting. Because seating is limited, admission to the meeting will be on a first-come,
first-served basis. If you attend, please note that you may be asked to present evidence of your share ownership and a valid, government-issued photo identification, such as a drivers license or passport. For the safety of attendees, all
packages, boxes, handbags, briefcases and other items are subject to inspection.
Where can I find the voting results
of the Annual Meeting?
We intend to announce the preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting and to disclose final results in a current report on Form 8-K, which we will file with the SEC and make available through the
Investor Relations section of our website at harris.com/investors within four business days of the Annual Meeting (or if final results are not available at that time, within four business days of the date on which final results become
available).
7
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Our Restated Certificate of Incorporation provides that our Board shall consist of not
less than eight or more than 13 directors, the exact number of directors to be determined from time to time by our Board. The authorized number of directors is presently fixed at 13. Twelve of our 13 directors are standing for election for a new
one-year term expiring at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Mr. Stephen P. Kaufman, 72, is retiring from our Board effective upon the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is not standing for election for a new one-year term, in
accordance with our director retirement policy.
Based on the recommendation of our Corporate Governance Committee, our Board
has nominated 12 of the 13 incumbent members of our Board (Ms. Katen, Ms. Kenne and Messrs. Brown, Chiarelli, Dattilo, Growcock, Hay, Joshi, Rickard, Stoffel, Swienton and Tookes) for a new one-year term expiring at the 2015 Annual Meeting
of Shareholders. In accordance with our Restated Certificate of Incorporation, a director holds office until the Annual Meeting of Shareholders for the year in which that directors term expires, and until that directors successor is
elected and qualified, subject, however, to his or her prior death, resignation, retirement or removal from office. Vacancies may be filled by the remaining directors.
Proxies will be voted for the election of each of Ms. Katen, Ms. Kenne and Messrs. Brown, Chiarelli, Dattilo, Growcock, Hay, Joshi, Rickard, Stoffel, Swienton and Tookes to serve for a one-year
term
expiring at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, unless otherwise specified in the proxy/voting instruction card or Internet or telephone voting instructions. Proxies cannot be voted for more
than the 12 nominees for director named in this proxy statement. Each of the nominees has consented to stand for election. If any nominee becomes unavailable for election, which is not currently anticipated by us, proxies instructing a vote for that
nominee may be voted for a substitute nominee selected by our Board or, in lieu thereof, our Board may determine to leave the vacancy temporarily unfilled or reduce the number of directors in accordance with our By-Laws.
None of our directors (including each of the nominees) is related to any other director or nominee or to any executive officer of Harris
or its subsidiaries, by blood, marriage or adoption.
Biographical summaries of the nominees, as well as information on their
experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that our Board has determined support their nomination and service as a director of Harris, appear on subsequent pages. Data with respect to the number of shares of our common stock beneficially
owned by each of our directors as of August 29, 2014 is set forth in the table on page 32.
Under NYSE rules,
brokers, banks or other nominees are prohibited from voting for or against director nominees without receiving voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares. We, therefore, urge you to vote your shares.
8
NOMINEES FOR ELECTION
William M. Brown, 51, is our Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Brown joined Harris in November 2011 as President and Chief Executive Officer and was appointed Chairman in April 2014. Prior
to joining Harris, Mr. Brown was Senior Vice President, Corporate Strategy and Development, of United Technologies Corporation (UTC). Earlier, he served five years as President of UTCs Fire & Security Division. In
all, Mr. Brown spent 14 years with UTC, holding U.S. and international roles at various divisions, including Carrier Corporations Asia Pacific Operations and the Carrier Transicold division. Before joining UTC in 1997, he worked for
McKinsey & Company as a senior engagement manager. He began his career as a project engineer at Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
Mr. Brown has been a member of our Board since December 2011.
Mr. Brown serves on the
board of directors of the Fire Department of NYC Foundation and the board of trustees of Florida Polytechnic University. He is a member of the National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee and is an appointee of the United States-Brazil
CEO Forum.
Qualifications Statement: Our Board nominated Mr. Brown for election as a director based upon
his current role as our Chief Executive Officer and the terms of his employment agreement (failure to nominate him would constitute constructive termination), as well as his extensive leadership and management skills.
Mr. Browns prior service as a senior executive of UTC, a large international public company, including as President of UTCs Fire & Security Division and his management and leadership positions at UTCs Carrier
Corporation, including as President of its Asia Pacific Operations, provide him with extensive knowledge of complex strategic, operational, management and financial issues faced by a large company with international operations. This experience
brings our Board important knowledge and expertise related to strategic planning, global supply chain and procurement, productivity and lean manufacturing initiatives, international sales, marketing and operations, domestic and international mergers
and acquisitions, regulatory challenges, and enterprise risk management. His more recent role as UTCs Senior Vice President, Corporate Strategy and Development and his prior role as a consultant also provide him with additional experience and
knowledge related to global strategic planning, mergers and acquisitions, economic analysis and operational improvement projects. His engineering and finance education and experience provide him with knowledge relevant to many of our businesses and
our overall capital structure and financial processes.
Peter W. Chiarelli, General U.S. Army (Ret.), 64, retired in March 2012 from the U.S. Army, where he most recently served as Vice Chief of Staff, the Armys second-highest-ranking officer, with responsibility for
oversight of the day-to-day operations of the Army and for leading the Armys budget planning and execution and its efforts to modernize its equipment, procedures and formations. During his nearly 40 years of service with the U.S. Army,
Mr. Chiarelli held several other senior officer positions, including Senior Military Assistant, Secretary of Defense, serving as principal military advisor to the Secretary of Defense; Commander of the Multi-National Corps Iraq, serving
as the senior tactical commander of U.S. and Coalition troops in Iraq; Division Commander, Fort Hood, Texas and Baghdad, Iraq; U.S. Army Chief of Operations, Training and Mobilization; and Executive Officer, Supreme Allied Commander, Europe, serving
as principal military assistant and advisor to the Supreme Allied Commander, Europe. He also commanded troops at all levels from platoon to Multi-National Corps. Since his retirement from the U.S. Army, Mr. Chiarelli has served as Chief
Executive Officer of One Mind, a non-profit organization bringing together healthcare providers, researchers and academics to cure brain disorders.
Mr. Chiarelli has been a member of our Board since August 2012 and is a member of our Business Conduct and Corporate Responsibility Committee.
Qualifications Statement: Mr. Chiarelli had a distinguished career in the U.S. Army prior to joining our Board in August 2012. His vast U.S. and global military
leadership experience provides him with an understanding of and appreciation for the complexities of both the U.S. and international militaries, defense communities and defense industries, which brings our Board important knowledge and expertise in
these areas and makes him a valuable strategic advisor to our U.S. Government businesses. Mr. Chiarellis responsibility as a senior U.S. Army officer also provides him with experience addressing complex operational and strategic issues,
managing significant operating budgets and handling legislative and public affairs, and with an extensive background in military operations and national security, which adds to our Boards skills and furthers our Boards knowledge and
expertise in these areas. Mr. Chiarellis recent experience serving as Chief Executive Officer of a healthcare-oriented non-profit organization, together with his healthcare-related leadership experience in the U.S. Army, furthers our
Boards appreciation and understanding of medical research, the healthcare industry and military healthcare.
9
Thomas A. Dattilo, 63, is Chairman and Senior Advisor to Portfolio Group, a privately-held provider of
outsourced financial services to automobile dealerships specializing in aftermarket extended warranty and vehicle service contract programs. He has served as Portfolio Groups Chairman and Senior Advisor since January 2013. He is also an
advisor and consultant to various private investment firms. He served as a Senior Advisor for Cerberus Operations and Advisory Company, LLC, a unit of Cerberus Capital Management, a private investment firm, from 2007 until 2009. Prior to joining
Cerberus, Mr. Dattilo was most recently Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Cooper Tire & Rubber Company, which specializes in the design, manufacture and sale of passenger car and truck tires. He joined Cooper in
January 1999 as President and Chief Operating Officer and served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer from 2000 through 2006. Prior to joining Cooper, he held senior positions with Dana Corporation. His last position with Dana was
President of its sealing products group.
Mr. Dattilo has been a member of our Board since August 2001. He is Chairperson of
our Management Development and Compensation Committee and a member of our Audit Committee, and currently serves as our Lead Independent Director. He served as our Chairman from January 1, 2012 through April 24, 2014.
Mr. Dattilo also is a director of Solera Holdings, Inc. (since January 2013) and of Haworth, Inc. (since 2010). He is past Chairman of the Rubber
Manufacturers Association and past Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Manufacturers Alliance for Productivity and Innovation. Mr. Dattilo served as a director of Cooper Tire & Rubber Company from 1999 to 2006 and Alberto-Culver
Company from 2006 to May 2011.
Qualifications Statement: Mr. Dattilos prior service as a senior
executive of large, publicly traded companies, including as a former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Cooper Tire & Rubber Company and as an executive of a manufacturing company, provides him with extensive knowledge of
complex operational, management, financial, strategic and governance issues faced by a large global public company. This experience brings our Board important knowledge and expertise related to global supply chain and distribution, mergers and
acquisitions, lean manufacturing and related initiatives, international operations, human resources and talent management, accounting and internal controls, and investor relations. His more recent experience as an advisor to private investment firms
also provides him with additional experience and knowledge related to strategic planning, capital raising, mergers and acquisitions, and economic analysis. Based on his senior executive experience and his service on other public company boards,
Mr. Dattilo brings to our Board a strong understanding of public company governance and executive compensation.
Terry D. Growcock, 68, is retired Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of The Manitowoc Company,
Inc., a diversified industrial manufacturer of cranes and foodservice equipment and a provider of ship building and ship repair services. He joined Manitowoc in 1994 as Executive Vice President and General Manager of Manitowoc Ice. He became
President of Manitowoc Foodservice Group in 1995 and served in that capacity until his promotion to President, Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors of The Manitowoc Company, Inc. in 1998. He was named Chairman of the Board
of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Manitowoc in October 2002. Mr. Growcock retired as Chief Executive Officer of Manitowoc in May 2007 and as Chairman of the Board in December 2008.
Mr. Growcock has been a member of our Board since August 2005 and is Chairperson of our Business Conduct and Corporate Responsibility
Committee and a member of our Management Development and Compensation Committee.
Mr. Growcock also is a director of Carlisle Companies
Incorporated (since 2008) and Harsco Corporation (since 2008) and an advisory member of the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University. Mr. Growcock served as a director of The Manitowoc Company, Inc. from 1998 to 2008.
Qualifications Statement: Mr. Growcocks prior service as a senior executive of The Manitowoc Company, Inc.,
including as former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and as an executive in several of Manitowocs business units, provides him with extensive knowledge of complex operational, management, financial and governance issues faced by
a large industrial manufacturing company with international operations. This experience brings our Board important knowledge and expertise related to domestic and international merger and acquisition transactions, joint ventures and strategic
alliances, international sales, marketing and operations, global procurement, lean manufacturing and related initiatives, human resources and talent management, global compliance, and strategic planning. He also has experience with government
projects and with the government procurement process as well as international trade. Mr. Growcock also has gained a strong understanding of public company governance and executive compensation through his senior executive experience and his
service on several public company boards.
10
Lewis Hay III, 58, currently acts as an Operating Advisor for Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, LLC, a private
equity investment firm. Mr. Hay served as Executive Chairman of NextEra Energy, Inc. (formerly FPL Group, Inc.), one of the nations leading electricity-related services companies and the largest renewable energy generator in North America from
July 2012 until he retired in December 2013. At NextEra Energy, he served as Chief Executive Officer from June 2001 to July 2012, Chairman from January 2002 to July 2012 and President from June 2001 to December 2006. He also served as Chief
Executive Officer of Florida Power & Light Company from January 2002 to July 2008. He joined NextEra Energy in 1999 as Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer and served as President of NextEra Energy Resources, LLC (formerly FPL
Energy, LLC) from March 2000 until December 2001.
Mr. Hay has been a member of our Board since February 2002 and is a member
of our Corporate Governance Committee and our Management Development and Compensation Committee.
Mr. Hay is a director of Capital One
Financial Corporation (since 2003) and WellPoint, Inc. (since July 2013). Mr. Hay served as director of NextEra Energy from 2001 to 2013. Mr. Hay is former director and Chairman of both the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations and the
Edison Electric Institute. He is a member of the Business Board of Advisors at Carnegie Mellon Universitys Tepper School of Business. Mr. Hay is a former member of the Business Roundtable and the Florida Council of 100. He also served on
the Presidents Council on Jobs and Competitiveness from 2011 to 2013.
Qualifications
Statement: Mr. Hays service as a senior executive of a large, publicly traded company, including as NextEra Energy, Inc.s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and previously as its Chief Financial Officer,
and his prior experience as a chief financial officer of another large company, as well as his nine years of experience as a strategy consultant, provide him with extensive knowledge of complex strategic, operational, management, regulatory,
financial and governance issues faced by a large public company. This experience brings our Board important knowledge and expertise related to strategic planning, capital raising, financial planning, enterprise risk management, accounting and
internal controls, mergers and acquisitions, and investor relations. His science and engineering education and training have provided him with knowledge and experience relevant to some of our businesses. Mr. Hay also brings to us a strong
understanding of executive compensation and public company governance as he serves on the boards of several publicly traded companies.
Vyomesh I. Joshi, 60, retired in April 2012 as Executive Vice President, Imaging and Printing Group of
Hewlett-Packard Company (HP), a company engaged in personal computing and access devices, imaging and printing-related products and services and information technology software and solutions. Mr. Joshi joined HP in 1980 as a research and
development engineer and went on to hold a series of management positions with increasing responsibility, including serving as Executive Vice President of HPs Imaging and Printing Group from 2002 to 2012. During his career, he oversaw some of
HPs most successful global commercial enterprises.
Mr. Joshi has been a member of our Board since September 2013.
Mr. Joshi also is a director of Wipro Limited (since 2012) and served as a director of Yahoo! Inc. from 2005 to 2012. He also is a member of
the Deans Advisory Council at The Rady School of Management at the University of California, San Diego.
Qualifications
Statement: Mr. Joshis prior service as a senior executive of HP, including as Executive Vice President, Imaging and Printing Group, and his more than 30 years of experience focused on strategy and technology,
provide him with extensive knowledge of complex strategic, research and development, operational, management and financial issues faced by a large publicly traded, technology-driven company with global operations. This experience brings to our Board
important knowledge and expertise related to strategic planning, technology innovation, research and development, new product introductions, global manufacturing and operations, supply chain and distribution, joint ventures and strategic alliances,
and human resources and talent management. His scientific and engineering education and training have provided him with knowledge and experience relevant to some of our businesses. Mr. Joshi also has gained an understanding of public company
governance and operations through his service on other public company boards.
11
Karen Katen, 65, is a Senior Advisor to Essex Woodlands, a healthcare growth equity and venture capital firm.
She joined Essex Woodlands in October 2007. Ms. Katen retired in March 2007 as Vice Chairman of Pfizer Inc., a research-based, global pharmaceutical company. Ms. Katen joined Pfizer in 1974 and held a series of management positions with
increasing responsibility, including serving as President of Pfizer Global Pharmaceuticals and Executive Vice President of Pfizer from 2001 to 2005 and President of Pfizer Human Health, the companys principal operating group, from 2005 to
2007. She has also served as Chairman of the Pfizer Foundation, a charitable foundation affiliated with Pfizer.
Ms. Katen has
been a member of our Board since December 1994 and is a member of our Business Conduct and Corporate Responsibility Committee and our Corporate Governance Committee.
Ms. Katen also is a director of The Home Depot, Inc. (since 2007), Air Liquide (since 2008) and Catamaran Corporation (since December 2012), a member of the Global Advisory Board of Takeda
Pharmaceutical Company Limited and the Chairperson of the RAND Corporations Health Board of Advisors. Ms. Katen is a trustee for the University of Chicago and is a council member of the Booth Graduate School of Business at the University
of Chicago. Ms. Katen served as a director of General Motors Corporation from 1997 to 2009. Ms. Katen also is a director at the New York Botanical Garden.
Qualifications Statement: Ms. Katens prior service as a senior executive officer of Pfizer Inc., including as Vice Chairman, as President of Pfizers
principal operating group and as an executive in other operations, provides her with extensive knowledge of complex strategic, operational, management, regulatory, research and development, financial and governance issues faced by a large public
company with international operations. This experience brings our Board important knowledge and expertise related to strategic planning, supply chain, marketing, research and development, new product introductions, operations, human resources,
international trade, regulatory challenges, enterprise risk management, mergers and acquisitions, and investor relations. In addition, Ms. Katen brings to our Board a wide range of experience as a board member of some of the largest U.S.-based
companies, including extensive experience with governance matters.
Leslie F. Kenne, Lieutenant General USAF (Ret.), 66, retired in September 2003 from the U.S. Air Force, where
she had a 32-year military career and had most recently been Deputy Chief of Staff for Warfighting Integration at Air Force headquarters in Washington, D.C. Previously, she commanded the Electronic Systems
Center at Hanscom Air Force Base in Massachusetts. She also directed a number of major procurement programs, including the F-16 and Joint Strike Fighter programs. Since her retirement from the U.S. Air Force, Ms. Kenne is a private independent
consultant for various defense companies and/or agencies.
Ms. Kenne has been a member of our Board since April 2004 and is a
member of our Business Conduct and Corporate Responsibility Committee and our Finance Committee.
Ms. Kenne also is a director of Unisys
Corporation (since 2006) and Oshkosh Corporation (since 2010). Ms. Kenne served as a director of EDO Corporation from 2004 to 2007.
Qualifications Statement: Ms. Kenne had a distinguished career in the U.S. Air Force prior to joining our Board in
2004. Her responsibility as a senior Air Force officer provides her with experience managing significant operating budgets and addressing complex operational and strategic issues and with first-hand experience on large government projects and the
government procurement process. Ms. Kennes experience also provides her with an appreciation for the complexities of both the U.S. military and the defense industry, which brings to our Board important knowledge and expertise in these
areas and makes her a valuable strategic advisor to our U.S. Government businesses. Her experience also brings to our Board important knowledge and expertise regarding program development, resourcing and other aspects of managing major U.S.
Department of Defense programs, as well as operations and systems engineering. Ms. Kennes recent experience serving as a compliance monitor for large organizations brings to our Board an in-depth appreciation and understanding of business
conduct and compliance matters that are particularly relevant to a U.S. Government contractor. Ms. Kenne also has gained an understanding of public company governance and operations through her service on several public company boards.
12
David B. Rickard, 67, retired from CVS Caremark Corporation, a retail pharmacy chain and provider of healthcare
services and pharmacy benefits management, in December 2009. Prior to his retirement, Mr. Rickard was the Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer. He held this position since joining CVS in September
1999. Prior to joining CVS, he was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of RJR Nabisco Holdings Corporation from March 1997 to August 1999. Previously, he was Executive Vice President of International Distillers and Vintners Americas.
Mr. Rickard has been a member of our Board since October 2001 and is Chairperson of our Audit Committee and a member of
our Finance Committee.
Mr. Rickard also is a director of Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (since 2007) and Dollar General Corporation
(since 2010), and chairs the Audit Committee of each of these boards. He is also a former member of the Financial Accounting Standards Advisory Council (extended term).
Qualifications Statement: Mr. Rickards prior service as the Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Administrative Officer of CVS Caremark Corporation and his more
than 37 years of experience in various businesses add important experience to our Board in terms of corporate finance, strategic planning, banking relationships, operations, complex information technology and other systems, acquisition evaluation
and integration, enterprise risk management and investor relations. His finance education and experience also have provided him with knowledge and expertise particularly relevant to our capital structure and related credit and finance matters. His
experience with complex financial and accounting functions, including service as a chief financial officer for complex organizations and as the chairman of the audit committees of two other publicly traded companies, contributes perspectives on the
functioning of audit committees and internal control-related matters that are beneficial to our Board and Audit Committee. Based on this experience, our Board has determined that Mr. Rickard is an Audit Committee financial expert. Based on his
senior executive experience and his service on other public company boards, Mr. Rickard also brings to us an understanding of public company governance.
Dr. James C. Stoffel, 68, is a General Partner of Trillium International, a private equity company. He
was an executive at Eastman Kodak Company, a film and digital imaging company, until April 2005, having served as Senior Vice President, Chief Technical Officer since 2000, and Director of Research and Development, after joining the firm in 1997 as
Vice President, Director Electronic Imaging Products Research and Development. Prior to joining Kodak, he was with Xerox Corporation for more than 20 years, serving as Vice President of Corporate Research and Technology, Vice President and General
Manager of the Advanced Imaging Business Unit, Vice President and Chief Engineer, as well as other executive positions.
Dr. Stoffel has been a member of our Board since August 2003 and is a member of our Business Conduct and Corporate Responsibility
Committee and our Corporate Governance Committee.
Dr. Stoffel also is a director of Aviat Networks, Inc. (since 2007) and currently
serves as Aviats Lead Independent Director. He also serves on the Presidents Advisory Council at the University of Notre Dame and is Chairman of the advisory board of Applied Science and Technology Research Institute, Hong Kong.
Qualifications Statement: Dr. Stoffels prior service as a senior executive of large, publicly traded,
technology-driven companies, including as a Chief Technical Officer and Director of Research and Development at Eastman Kodak Company, and his more than 30 years of experience focused on technology development, provide him with an extensive
knowledge of complex technical research and development projects and management, financial and governance issues faced by a large public company with international operations. This experience brings to our Board important knowledge and expertise
related to research and development, technology innovation, new product introductions, strategic planning, manufacturing, operations and corporate finance. His more recent experience as an advisor to, and general partner in, a private equity firm
provides him additional experience and knowledge related to strategic planning, capital raising, mergers and acquisitions, and economic analysis. His scientific and engineering education and training have provided him with knowledge and experience
relevant to many of our businesses. Dr. Stoffel also has gained an understanding of public company governance and executive compensation through his service on public company boards, including as a lead independent director.
13
Gregory T. Swienton, 64, is retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Ryder System, Inc., a logistics and
transportation services company. He joined Ryder in June 1999 as President and Chief Operating Officer, and was named Chief Executive Officer in November 2000 and Chairman in May 2002. He retired as Chief Executive Officer of Ryder in December 2012
and as Chairman in May 2013. Prior to joining Ryder, he was Senior Vice President-Growth Initiatives of Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation (BNSF). He held senior positions with BNSF and the former Burlington Northern Railroad from
1994 to 1999, and various executive and management positions with DHL Worldwide Express from 1982 to 1994.
Mr. Swienton has
been a member of our Board since February 2000 and is Chairperson of our Finance Committee and a member of our Audit Committee.
Mr. Swienton also is a director of Lennox International Inc. (since 2010). Mr. Swienton served as a director of Ryder System, Inc. from June
1999 to May 2013.
Qualifications Statement: Mr. Swientons service as a senior executive of large,
publicly traded companies, including as Ryder System, Inc.s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and previously as its President and Chief Operating Officer, and his more than 40 years of experience in large, global businesses, including
long-term overseas assignments, provide him with extensive knowledge of complex strategic, operational, financial, management and governance issues faced by a large public company. This experience brings our Board important knowledge and expertise
in terms of supply chain, logistics, domestic and international operations, business development, corporate finance, banking, human resources and talent management, accounting and internal controls, safety management, enterprise risk management,
complex information technology and investor relations. His finance education and experience also have provided him with knowledge and expertise particularly relevant to our capital structure and related credit and finance matters.
Hansel E. Tookes II, 66, retired from Raytheon Company, a company engaged in defense and government electronics,
space and airborne systems, information technology, technical services and business and special mission aircraft, in December 2002. He joined Raytheon in September 1999 as President and Chief Operating Officer of its Raytheon Aircraft Company
subsidiary, a commercial, military and regional aircraft manufacturing company. He was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Raytheon Aircraft Company in January 2000 and Chairman in August 2000. He became President of Raytheon International in May
2001. Prior to joining Raytheon in 1999, he served United Technologies Corporation as President of its Pratt & Whitney Large Military Engines Group since 1996. He joined United Technologies Corporation in 1980 and held a variety of senior
leadership positions. Mr. Tookes was a Lieutenant Commander and pilot in the U.S. Navy and later served as a commercial pilot with United Airlines.
Mr. Tookes has been a member of our Board since April 2005 and is Chairperson of our Corporate Governance Committee and a member of our Management Development and Compensation Committee.
Mr. Tookes also is a director of Corning Incorporated (since 2001), NextEra Energy, Inc. (since 2005) and Ryder System, Inc. (since 2002).
Qualifications Statement: Mr. Tookes prior service as a senior executive of large international
public aerospace and defense companies, including as Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer of Raytheon Aircraft Company and his prior management and leadership positions at Pratt & Whitney, add important experience
to our Board in terms of operations, manufacturing, regulatory issues, performance excellence, global compliance, business development, technology-driven business environments, accounting and internal controls, and enterprise risk management. He
also has extensive experience on large aerospace and defense government projects and with the government procurement process, including experience with major U.S. Department of Defense programs, which brings our Board important knowledge and
experience in these areas and makes him a valuable strategic advisor to our U.S. Government businesses. His science, engineering and business education and training also have provided him with knowledge and experience relevant to many of our
businesses. In addition, he brings to our Board significant and broad public company governance experience, including service on several other public company boards.
14
Recommendation Regarding Proposal 1
To be elected in an uncontested election of directors, a nominee must receive more For votes than Against votes.
Abstentions and any broker non-votes will have no effect on the election of directors because only votes cast For or Against a nominee will be counted.
Our Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote FOR the election
of each of the nominees in this uncontested election of directors. If not otherwise specified, proxies will be voted FOR the election of each of the nominees as recommended by our Board.
15
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS
Board of Directors
Our business, property and affairs are managed under the direction of our Board. Members of our Board are kept informed of our business through discussions with our Chief Executive Officer (sometimes
referred to herein as CEO) and other officers, by reviewing materials provided to them or requested by them, by visiting our offices and plants and by participating in meetings of our Board and its committees.
Corporate Governance Guidelines
Our Board has long been focused on and committed to responsible and effective corporate governance. Our Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that trace their history to 1960 and have evolved
and been revised over time. Our Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for overseeing the Corporate Governance Guidelines and reporting and making recommendations to our Board concerning corporate governance matters. Our Board regularly
reviews our Corporate Governance Guidelines and updates them periodically in response to changing regulatory requirements and evolving governance practices. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines address matters including:
|
|
|
Designation and responsibilities of Lead Independent Director |
|
|
|
Selection of Board nominees |
|
|
|
Board membership criteria |
|
|
|
Majority voting for directors |
|
|
|
Director retirement policy |
|
|
|
Stock ownership guidelines |
|
|
|
Prohibitions on hedging and pledging transactions |
|
|
|
Prohibition on margin accounts |
|
|
|
Executive sessions of independent directors |
|
|
|
Board committees and membership |
|
|
|
Board and director responsibilities |
|
|
|
Director orientation and continuing education |
|
|
|
CEO performance evaluation |
|
|
|
Board and committee self-evaluations
|
A copy of our Corporate Governance Guidelines is available on the Corporate Governance
section of our website at harris.com/corporate_governance/.
Director Independence
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require us to have a board of directors with at least two-thirds of independent directors. Our Board
is, and has been for many years, comprised of at least two-thirds of independent directors. Our Board has adopted Director Independence Standards to assist in the evaluation of the independence of each of our directors. Our Board assesses the
independence of our directors and examines the nature and extent of any relationships between us and our directors, their families and their affiliates. A copy of our Director Independence Standards is available on the Corporate Governance section
of our website at harris.com/corporate_governance/.
For a director to be considered independent, our Board must
affirmatively determine that a director does not have any direct or indirect material relationship with us, other than as a director. A director will not be considered independent if, within the preceding three years:
|
|
|
The director was an employee, or an immediate family member of the director was employed as an executive officer, of Harris; or
|
|
|
|
The director, or an immediate family member of the director, received more than $120,000 during any 12-month period in direct compensation from Harris,
other than director and committee fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service (provided that such compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service with Harris); except that compensation received by an
immediate family member of the director for services as a non-executive employee of Harris need not be considered in determining independence under this test; or |
|
|
|
The director was a partner with or employed by a present or former internal or external auditor of Harris, or an immediate family member of the
director is a current partner of such a firm, or the director has an immediate family member who is a current employee of such a firm and personally worked on the Harris audit within the last three years; or
|
16
|
|
|
The director, or an immediate family member of the director, was employed as an executive officer of another company where any of Harris present
executives at the same time served on that companys compensation committee; or |
|
|
|
The director currently is an executive officer of or employed by another company, or an immediate family member of the director currently is employed
as an executive officer of such other company, that has made payments to, or received payments from, Harris for property or services (not including charitable contributions) in an amount which, in any single fiscal year, exceeds the greater of
(a) $1 million or (b) 2% of such other companys consolidated gross revenues. |
Our Board has
determined that the following relationships will not be considered to be material relationships that would impair a directors independence:
|
|
|
If a director of Harris is an executive officer or an employee, or an immediate family member of a director of Harris is an executive officer, of
another company that makes payments to, or receives payments from, Harris for property or services in an amount which, in any single fiscal year, does not exceed the greater of (a) $1 million or (b) 2% of the consolidated gross annual
revenues of such other company, as applicable; or |
|
|
|
If a director of Harris or an immediate family member of a director of Harris is an executive officer of another company that is indebted to Harris, or
to which Harris is indebted, and the total amount of the borrower companys indebtedness to the other company is less than 2% of the consolidated assets of the company wherein the director or immediate family member serves as an executive
officer; or |
|
|
|
If a director of Harris is an executive officer of another company in which Harris owns an equity interest, and the amount of the equity interest is
less than 5% of the total equity of such other company; or |
|
|
|
If a director of Harris, or the spouse of a director of Harris, serves as a director, officer or trustee of a charitable organization, and within the
preceding three years, Harris
|
|
|
discretionary contributions to the organization in any single fiscal year are less than the greater of (a) $1 million or (b) 2% of that organizations consolidated gross annual
revenues; or |
|
|
|
If a director or a directors immediate family members own Harris shares. |
Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board undertook a review of director independence in August 2014, which included a
review of the responses of the directors to questions regarding each directors commercial, industrial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable and family relationships, and discussions with the directors. Based upon the NYSE listing
standards and our Director Independence Standards, our Board has affirmatively determined in its business judgment that all of our directors (including each nominee for election), with the exception of Mr. Brown, our Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer, are independent and have no direct or indirect material relationship with Harris, other than as a director, that will impair the directors independence.
Related Person Transaction Policy
Our Board has adopted a written policy and procedures for the review, approval and ratification of transactions among Harris and our directors, executive officers and their related interests. This policy
supplements the conflicts of interest policies set forth in our Code of Conduct and our other internal policies and procedures. Under the policy, all related person transactions (as defined in the policy) are to be reviewed by our Corporate
Governance Committee. Our Corporate Governance Committee may approve or ratify related person transactions if, in its business judgment, it determines that the transaction is in, or is not inconsistent with, the best interests of Harris and our
shareholders. This may include situations where we provide or receive products or services to or from related persons on an arms-length basis on terms comparable to those provided to or received from unrelated third parties. Any director who
participates in or is the subject of an existing or potential related person transaction may not participate in the approval or ratification decision-making process of our Corporate Governance Committee.
17
Under the policy, and consistent with SEC rules, a related person transaction is any
transaction, arrangement or relationship in which Harris was, is or will be a participant, where the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and in which a related person had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. A related person
includes any of our directors, nominees for director or executive officers, any person who is known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of any class of our common stock, an immediate family member of any person described above and any firm,
corporation or other entity controlled by any person described above. The policy requires that each director and executive officer annually complete a questionnaire to identify their related interests and persons, and to notify us of changes in that
information. Before entering into a proposed related person transaction, the related person or involved business area of Harris is requested to notify our Secretary of the facts and circumstances of the potential transaction. If the Secretary
determines that the proposed transaction is a related person transaction, it shall be submitted to our Corporate Governance Committee for review and consideration. A related person transaction entered into without our Corporate Governance
Committees prior approval will not violate this policy or be unenforceable, so long as the transaction is brought to our Corporate Governance Committee promptly after it is entered into or after it becomes apparent that the transaction is
covered by this policy and is ratified by our Corporate Governance Committee.
Based on its holdings as reported on a Schedule
13G/A filed with the SEC, BlackRock, Inc. beneficially owned more than 5% of our common stock as of August 29, 2014. BlackRock, Inc. and certain of its affiliates provided asset management services in fiscal 2014 for our Retirement Plan, for
which participants paid or will pay approximately $831,000.
Based on its holdings as reported on a Schedule 13G/A filed with
the SEC, T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. beneficially owned more than 5% of our common stock as of August 29, 2014. T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and certain of its affiliates provided asset management services in fiscal 2014 for our Retirement
Plan, for which participants paid or will pay approximately $1,291,000.
Based on its holdings as reported on a Schedule 13G
filed with the SEC, Allianz Global Investors U.S. Holdings LLC and/or certain of its direct or indirect subsidiaries, affiliates or investment advisors
beneficially owned more than 5% of our common stock as of August 29, 2014. Allianz Global Investors U.S. Holdings LLC and certain of its affiliates provided asset management services in fiscal
2014 for our Retirement Plan, for which participants paid or will pay approximately $931,400.
The agreements with each of
BlackRock, Inc., T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and Allianz Global Investors U.S. Holdings LLC were negotiated on an arms-length basis and the ownership of our common stock plays no role in the business relations between us and BlackRock,
Inc., T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. or Allianz Global Investors U.S. Holdings LLC. In addition, we believe that the agreements represent standard terms and conditions for asset management services. In accordance with our related persons transaction
policy, our Corporate Governance Committee reviewed, ratified and approved such services.
Board Leadership Structure and
Lead Independent Director
Board Leadership Structure. Our Boards leadership is currently structured as follows: a combined position of Chairman of the Board (Chairman) and CEO; a
Lead Independent Director with well-defined duties that support our Boards oversight responsibilities; a robust standing committee structure comprised solely of independent directors; and engaged and independent Board members who conduct
candid and constructive discussions and deliberations. Our Board elects a Chairman from among the directors. Our Board combines or separates the positions of Chairman and CEO based on what its members believe best serves the needs of Harris and our
shareholders at any particular time based on the then-existing facts and circumstances. Although our Board has generally combined the positions of Chairman and CEO and designated a Lead Independent Director, our Board determined to separate the
positions of Chairman and CEO in connection with the CEO transition to Mr. Brown in November 2011 and appointed Mr. Dattilo as non-executive Chairman, effective January 1, 2012, to provide the Board with independent leadership during
the CEO transition and enable Mr. Brown as incoming CEO to concentrate on our business operations. In April 2014, our Board determined to adopt its current structure by re-combining the positions of Chairman and CEO and electing Mr. Brown
as Chairman and CEO, and designating Mr. Dattilo as Lead Independent
18
Director. Our Board believes that adopting its current leadership structure provides independent board leadership and oversight while also benefiting from having Mr. Brown also serve as
Chairman following his transition as incoming CEO, during which he demonstrated the strong leadership and vision necessary to drive Harris strategies and achieve Harris objectives. Our independent directors believe Mr. Browns
in-depth knowledge of our businesses and their challenges and opportunities, as well as his extensive understanding of our day-to-day operations and his ability to provide insight and direction on important strategic initiatives, make him well
positioned to chair regular Board meetings and to bring key business and stakeholder issues to our Boards attention. The independence of our Board, together with the Lead Independent Director structure, the ability of independent directors to
participate in the agenda-setting process for our Board and committee meetings, regularly scheduled executive sessions of independent directors and our directors access to management, provide appropriate opportunities for oversight, discussion
and evaluation of Harris decisions and direction. The actions by our Board in changing its leadership structure in connection with the CEO transition process, without a mandated separation of the Chairman and CEO positions or a requirement for
an independent Chairman, evidence our Boards proactive commitment to strong corporate governance and appropriate independent oversight of management. Our Board believes it is fundamentally wrong, however, to permanently and inflexibly separate
or combine the positions of Chairman and CEO and remove our Boards ability to evaluate and change the structure of our Chairman and CEO positions, as and when appropriate, to best serve the needs of Harris and our shareholders based on the
then-existing facts and circumstances. Our Board believes that its members possess considerable experience and unique knowledge of the challenges and opportunities Harris faces, and therefore, are in the best position to evaluate the needs of Harris
and how best to organize the capabilities of our directors and senior management to meet those needs.
Lead Independent
Director. At all times while our Chairman is not independent, our independent directors, by the affirmative vote of a majority of all independent directors, will designate one of our independent Board members to serve as
Lead
Independent Director. The responsibilities and authority of our Lead Independent Director include:
|
|
|
Presiding at all meetings of our Board at which our Chairman is not present, including executive sessions of our independent directors;
|
|
|
|
Serving as liaison between our Chairman and our independent directors; |
|
|
|
Approving the information sent to our Board and the meeting agendas for our Board; |
|
|
|
Approving meeting schedules for the Board to assure there is sufficient time for discussion of all agenda items; |
|
|
|
Calling meetings of our independent directors; |
|
|
|
If requested by major shareholders, ensuring that he or she is available for consultation and direct communication consistent with our policies
regarding shareholder communications; |
|
|
|
Providing timely feedback from executive sessions of our independent directors to our CEO or other members of senior management;
|
|
|
|
Together with the Chairperson of our Management Development and Compensation Committee (or the Chairperson of the Corporate Governance Committee if the
same individual is serving as Lead Independent Director and Chairperson of the Management Development and Compensation Committee), playing a key role in the annual CEO evaluation process; |
|
|
|
Together with the Chairperson of our Corporate Governance Committee (or the Chairperson of the Management Development and Compensation Committee if the
same individual is serving as Lead Independent Director and Chairperson of the Corporate Governance Committee), playing a key role in our Boards annual self-evaluation process and related matters; |
|
|
|
When appropriate, assisting with the recruitment of director candidates; |
|
|
|
When appropriate, serving as the spokesperson for the Board, it being understood that the CEO is the primary spokesperson for us and our Board; and
|
19
|
|
|
Such other responsibilities and authority as our Board may determine from time to time. |
The designation of a Lead Independent Director is not intended to inhibit communications among our directors or between any of them and
our Chairman. Our Lead Independent Director will serve a two-year term. Unless our independent directors shall determine otherwise due to particular circumstances, no independent director will serve as Lead Independent Director for more than two
consecutive two-year terms. Our Lead Independent Director may be removed from the position by the affirmative vote of a majority of all independent directors.
The position of Lead Independent Director is currently held by Mr. Dattilo, as noted above.
Board Meetings and Attendance
General. In fiscal 2014,
our Board held 6 meetings, and the committees of our Board held a total of 28 meetings. Each director attended at least 80% of the meetings of our Board and committees on which he or she served. All of the directors taken together attended an
average of 98% of such meetings of our Board and committees on which they served. In addition to meetings at our corporate headquarters, our Board periodically holds meetings at other facilities and locations.
Attendance at Annual Meetings of Shareholders. We typically schedule a Board meeting in conjunction with our
Annual Meeting of Shareholders. In the absence of unavoidable conflict, all Board members are expected to attend each Annual Meeting of Shareholders. All 13 of our Board members attended our 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Executive Sessions of Independent Directors
Our Board and its standing committees meet throughout the year on a set schedule and also hold special meetings and may act by written consent from time to time as appropriate. Executive sessions of
independent directors are provided for in the agenda for each regularly scheduled Board meeting. Our Lead Independent Director chairs these executive sessions of independent directors. Executive sessions of independent directors are also provided
for in the agenda for each regularly scheduled standing committee meeting (other than quarterly earnings review meetings of our Audit Committee).
Board Committees and Committee Charters
Our Board currently has 5 standing committees to assist in the discharge of its responsibilities. These committees are our Audit
Committee, our Business Conduct and Corporate Responsibility Committee, our Corporate Governance Committee, our Finance Committee and our Management Development and Compensation Committee. The committees regularly report their activities and actions
to our full Board, generally at the next Board meeting following the committee meeting. Our Board has adopted a written charter for each committee, copies of which are available on the Corporate Governance section of our website at
harris.com/corporate_governance/. The charter of each of our Audit Committee, Corporate Governance Committee and Management Development and Compensation Committee complies with the NYSE corporate governance requirements. There are no NYSE
requirements with respect to the charter of each of our Business Conduct and Corporate Responsibility Committee or Finance Committee. Copies of all such charters and our Corporate Governance Guidelines also are available to shareholders free of
charge upon written request to our Secretary at Harris Corporation, 1025 West NASA Boulevard, Melbourne, Florida 32919. The principal functions of each standing committee are summarized below.
Audit Committee
Our Audit
Committee oversees our independent registered public accounting firm and accounting and internal control matters. Our Audit Committee also assists our Board in fulfilling its responsibilities to oversee, among other things:
|
|
|
The integrity of our financial statements; |
|
|
|
Our compliance with relevant legal and regulatory requirements; |
|
|
|
Our independent registered public accounting firms qualifications and independence; and |
|
|
|
The performance of our independent registered public accounting firm and our internal audit function. |
The purposes and responsibilities of our Audit Committee also include:
|
|
|
Directly appointing, compensating, retaining, terminating and overseeing the work of our independent registered public accounting firm;
|
20
|
|
|
Pre-approving, or adopting appropriate procedures to pre-approve, all audit services, internal control-related services and non-audit services to be
provided by our independent registered public accounting firm; |
|
|
|
Reviewing and discussing with our independent registered public accounting firm, internal audit department and our management (i) any major issues
regarding accounting principles and financial statement presentations, including any significant changes in the selection or application of accounting principles, (ii) any major issues concerning the adequacy of our internal controls and any
special steps adopted in light of any material control deficiencies, and (iii) the effect of regulatory and accounting initiatives or actions applicable to us, as well as off-balance sheet structures on our financial statements;
|
|
|
|
Discussing guidelines and policies governing the process by which our management assesses and manages exposure to risk, including key credit risks,
liquidity risks, market risks, financial risks and operational risks; |
|
|
|
Reviewing and discussing our earnings press releases, including the use of pro forma or adjusted non-GAAP results, and the
types of financial information and earnings guidance we provide to analysts and rating agencies; and |
|
|
|
Reviewing and discussing with our independent registered public accounting firm, internal audit department and our management quarterly and year-end
operating results, reviewing our interim financial statements prior to their inclusion in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and recommending to our Board the inclusion of our annual financial statements in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K. |
A more detailed description of our Audit Committees
purposes and responsibilities is contained in its charter.
Our Board has determined in its business judgment that each member
of our Audit Committee is independent within the meaning of the NYSE listing standards, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related SEC rules and our Director Independence Standards.
Our Board also has determined in its business judgment that each of the members of our
Audit Committee satisfies the financial literacy requirements of the NYSE and has accounting or related financial management expertise and that David B. Rickard, Chairperson of our Audit Committee, satisfies the audit
committee financial expert criteria, as that term is defined by SEC rules, and is independent of Harris.
Our Audit
Committee held 9 meetings in fiscal 2014, including meeting regularly with Ernst & Young LLP and our internal auditors, both privately and with management present.
Business Conduct and Corporate Responsibility Committee
The purposes and
responsibilities of our Business Conduct and Corporate Responsibility Committee include:
|
|
|
Oversight and monitoring of our business conduct program and compliance with sound ethical business practices and legal requirements in connection with
our business; |
|
|
|
Oversight and monitoring of our policies, procedures and programs with respect to environmental, health and safety matters;
|
|
|
|
Reviewing and monitoring our support of charitable, civic, educational and philanthropic contributions and activities; and
|
|
|
|
Reviewing and acting on, as appropriate, strategic issues and trends relating to corporate citizenship and responsibility, including social, political
and public policy issues that may have an impact on our operations, financial performance or public image. |
A
more detailed description of our Business Conduct and Corporate Responsibility Committees purposes and responsibilities is contained in its charter.
Our Board has determined in its business judgment that each member of our Business Conduct and Corporate Responsibility Committee is independent within the meaning of the NYSE listing standards and our
Director Independence Standards. Our Business Conduct and Corporate Responsibility Committee held 2 meetings in fiscal 2014.
21
Corporate Governance Committee
The purposes and responsibilities of our Corporate Governance Committee include:
|
|
|
Identifying individuals believed to be qualified to become Board members consistent with criteria approved by our Board, and recommending nominees to
stand for election at annual meetings of shareholders or to fill vacancies; |
|
|
|
Adopting a policy and procedure for consideration of candidates for director recommended by our shareholders; |
|
|
|
Developing and recommending to the Board our Corporate Governance Guidelines and monitoring trends and evolving practices in corporate governance;
|
|
|
|
Developing, reviewing and recommending director compensation and benefit plans; |
|
|
|
Reviewing and making recommendations to our Board concerning the structure, size, composition and operation of our Board and its committees;
|
|
|
|
Recommending committees of our Board and committee assignments; |
|
|
|
In consultation with each committee chairperson and our Lead Independent Director, if one has been designated, setting meeting schedules for our Board
and recommending meeting schedules for our Boards committees; |
|
|
|
Reviewing and approving related person transactions in accordance with relevant policies; |
|
|
|
Reviewing and making recommendations to our Board regarding shareholder proposals; |
|
|
|
Facilitating our Boards annual evaluation of its performance and effectiveness; and |
|
|
|
Retaining (after considering the independence and any conflicts of interest of director compensation consultants) and terminating director compensation
consultants, including approving such consultants fees and other retention terms. |
A more detailed
description of our Corporate Governance Committees purposes and responsibilities is contained in its charter and our Corporate Governance Guidelines.
For additional information regarding the role of our Corporate Governance Committee and our
director compensation process and procedures, including the role of compensation consultants relating to director compensation, see the Director Compensation and Benefits section of this proxy statement beginning on page 27.
Our Board has determined in its business judgment that each member of our Corporate Governance Committee is independent within
the meaning of the NYSE listing standards and our Director Independence Standards. Our Corporate Governance Committee held 5 meetings in fiscal 2014.
Finance Committee
Our Finance
Committee is authorized to review periodically our financial position, capital structure, working capital, capital transactions, debt ratings, and bank and lender relationships, and the financial and investment aspects of our benefit plans,
including our Retirement Plan. Our Finance Committee annually reviews and approves our capital asset plan and capital expenditures and also reviews our dividend policy and share repurchase policy and makes recommendations to our Board relating to
such policies. A more detailed description of our Finance Committees purposes and responsibilities is contained in its charter. Our Board has determined in its business judgment that each member of our Finance Committee is independent within
the meaning of the NYSE listing standards and our Director Independence Standards. Our Finance Committee held 2 meetings in fiscal 2014.
Management
Development and Compensation Committee
The purposes and responsibilities of our Management Development and Compensation
Committee include:
|
|
|
Reviewing plans for our management training, development, organizational structure and succession, and recommending to our Board for its approval
individuals for election as executive officers and other corporate officers; |
|
|
|
Overseeing and reviewing our overall compensation philosophy and establishing the compensation and benefits of our executive officers;
|
|
|
|
Reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of our
|
22
|
|
CEO, evaluating our CEOs performance in light of those goals and objectives, and together with all independent directors of our Board, determining and approving our CEOs annual
salary, cash and equity incentives and other benefits based on this evaluation; |
|
|
|
Reviewing and approving the annual salary, cash and equity incentives and other benefits of our other executive officers; |
|
|
|
Reviewing and approving the use and the terms of employment, separation, severance and change in control agreements and any special arrangements in the
event of termination of employment, death or retirement of executive officers (together, in the case of our CEO, with all independent directors of our Board); |
|
|
|
Administering our equity-based compensation plans; |
|
|
|
Reviewing and discussing the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section in this proxy statement with our management and making a
recommendation to our Board on the inclusion of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section in this proxy statement; and |
|
|
|
Retaining (after considering the independence and any conflicts of interest of compensation consultants) and terminating compensation consultants,
including approving such consultants fees and other retention terms. |
A more detailed description of
our Management Development and Compensation Committees purposes and responsibilities is contained in its charter.
Our
Management Development and Compensation Committee has delegated to our CEO the authority to make equity grants to employees who are not executive officers, subject to an annual maximum number of shares and options that may be granted, and annually
reviews these awards.
For additional information regarding the role of our Management Development and Compensation Committee
and our executive compensation process and procedures, including the role of executive officers and compensation consultants in recommending the amount or form of executive compensation, see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis
section of this proxy statement beginning on page 33.
Our Board has determined in its business judgment that each member of our Management
Development and Compensation Committee is independent within the meaning of the NYSE listing standards, SEC rules and our Director Independence Standards. Our Management Development and Compensation Committee held 7 meetings in fiscal 2014.
The Boards Role in Risk Oversight
The responsibility for the day-to-day management of risk lies with our management, and our management continually monitors the material risks facing Harris, including strategic risk, financial risk,
operational risk, and legal and compliance risk. We have in place an enterprise risk management (ERM) process that, among other things, is designed to identify material risks across Harris with input from each business unit and function.
Under our ERM process, which is coordinated through a cross-functional management committee, various material business risks are regularly identified, assessed and prioritized. The top risks to Harris, and any mitigation plans associated with those
risks, are reported to our Board. In addition, in order to ensure dissemination of information about identified risks to management and throughout Harris, our management ERM committee regularly provides reports to our senior executives. Our ERM
process has been reviewed by our Board and is the subject of oversight and regular review by our Audit Committee. We also manage risk through numerous controls and processes embedded in our operations, and such controls and processes are reviewed
from time to time with our Board and/or its relevant committees.
Risk considerations also are raised in the context of a range
of matters that are reported by management to our Board or one of its committees for review. For example, elements of risk are discussed by our full Board in presentations concerning Company-wide and business unit annual operating plans, three-year
strategic plans, merger and acquisition opportunities, market environment updates, regular operations updates and other strategic discussions. Elements of risk related to financial reporting, internal audit, internal control over financial
reporting, auditor independence and related areas of accounting, taxation, law and regulation are regularly reviewed by our Audit Committee. Elements of risk related to various aspects of U.S. and international regulatory compliance, business
conduct, social responsibility,
23
environmental matters and export/import controls are regularly reviewed by our Business Conduct and Corporate Responsibility Committee. Elements of risk related to governance issues are regularly
reviewed by our Corporate Governance Committee. Elements of risk related to liquidity, financial arrangements, capital structure and our ability to access the capital markets are regularly reviewed by
our Finance Committee. Our Finance Committee also reviews risks related to our retirement plans and their related investments. Elements of risk related to compensation policies and practices and
talent management and succession planning are regularly reviewed by our Management Development and Compensation Committee. Each committee also regularly provides reports to our full Board.
Committee Membership
The current composition of the 5 standing committees of our Board of Directors is as follows:
Committees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Audit |
|
|
Business Conduct and Corporate Responsibility |
|
|
Corporate
Governance |
|
|
Finance |
|
|
Management Development and Compensation |
|
William M. Brown |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter W. Chiarelli |
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas A. Dattilo |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
* |
Terry D. Growcock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
Lewis Hay III |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
Vyomesh I. Joshi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Karen Katen |
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen P. Kaufman |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
Leslie F. Kenne |
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
David B. Rickard |
|
|
X |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
James C. Stoffel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory T. Swienton |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
* |
|
|
|
|
Hansel E. Tookes II |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
Director Retirement
We do not impose term limits for directors. It is our policy that a director who would be age 72 or older at the time of election shall not stand for re-election. A director also is expected to offer to
tender automatically his or her resignation in the event of retirement or other significant change in employment position or employer, and our Board then will determine whether such directors continued Board membership under the new
circumstances is in the best interests of Harris and our shareholders, free from conflicts of interest and otherwise appropriate. Mr. Kaufman, 72, is retiring from our Board effective upon the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is not
standing for election for a new one-year term, in accordance with our policy.
Communications with Members of our
Board of Directors
General. Shareholders and other interested persons who wish to communicate with a member or members of our
Board, including our Chairman, our Lead Independent Director, if one has been designated, the chairperson of any standing committee of our Board or the independent directors as a group, may do so by sending an e-mail message to the intended
recipient(s) c/o Secretary at corporate.secretary@harris.com. Shareholders and others also may write to the intended recipient(s), c/o Secretary, Harris Corporation, 1025 West NASA Boulevard, Melbourne, Florida 32919. Our Secretary will
review each such communication, and if it is related to the duties and responsibilities of our Board
24
and its committees, it will be forwarded to the appropriate recipient(s). Our Board has instructed our Secretary not to forward communications the Secretary deems unduly hostile, threatening,
illegal or similarly inappropriate (such as surveys, spam, junk mail, resumes, service or product inquiries or complaints, solicitations or advertisements). Our Secretary will periodically provide our Board a summary of all communications received
that were not forwarded to the intended recipient(s) (other than surveys, spam, junk mail, resumes, service or product inquiries or complaints, solicitations or advertisements) and will make those communications available to any director upon
request. Our Chairman, our Lead Independent Director, if one has been designated, or other director in receipt of a communication for which he or she was the intended recipient will determine whether it will be sent to our full Board or a committee.
If a communication is determined to be a complaint or concern pertaining to accounting, internal control or auditing matters, it will be handled in accordance with the procedures discussed below under Accounting, Internal Control, Auditing and
Certain Other Matters.
Accounting, Internal Control, Auditing and Certain Other
Matters. Our Audit Committee has established procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints and concerns regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, financial reporting or
disclosure matters, and other matters relating to actual or alleged violations or potential violations of any law, rule or regulation relating to securities or to fraud against shareholders. Any of our employees may communicate concerns about any of
these matters to such employees supervisor, manager or ethics advisor, or to the Vice President, Internal Audit and Compliance or the Director of Business Conduct or certain other individuals, or on a confidential and anonymous basis by way of
e-mail or our toll-free hotline numbers listed on our website and in our Code of Conduct. Other persons with such complaints or concerns may contact our Vice President, Internal Audit and Compliance or Director of Business Conduct at 1025 West NASA
Boulevard, Melbourne, Florida 32919. Upon receipt of a complaint or concern, a determination will be made whether it pertains to accounting, internal control, auditing, financial reporting or disclosure matters, and if it does, it will be handled in
accordance with the procedures established by our Audit Committee. A copy of these
procedures is available on the Corporate Governance section of our website at harris.com/corporate_governance/.
Code of Conduct
All Harris directors and employees, including our CEO, Chief
Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and other senior officers, are required to abide by the Harris Code of Conduct, originally adopted as the Harris Standards of Business Conduct in 1987, to help ensure that our business is conducted in
a consistently ethical and legal manner. Our Code of Conduct forms the foundation of a comprehensive business conduct program that includes compliance with all laws and corporate policies and procedures, an open relationship among employees that
contributes to good business conduct, and an abiding belief that we should conduct all business dealings with integrity, honesty and responsibility. Our Code of Conduct policies cover many topics, including:
|
|
|
Preventing bribery and corruption |
|
|
|
International business practices |
|
|
|
Gifts, entertainment and hospitality |
|
|
|
Antitrust and competition |
|
|
|
Political activities and lobbying |
|
|
|
Environmental, health and safety |
|
|
|
Export and import control |
Employees are required to report any conduct they believe in good faith to be a violation of our Code of Conduct or policies.
Our Code of Conduct is posted on our website at harris.com/about/business-conduct.aspx and also is available free of charge by written request to our Director of Business Conduct, Harris
Corporation, 1025 West NASA Boulevard, Melbourne, Florida 32919. Any amendment to, or waiver from, our Code of Conduct that is required to be disclosed to shareholders will be posted on our website within four business days following such amendment
or waiver.
25
Director Nomination Process and Criteria,
and Board Diversity
Our Board is responsible for approving nominees to stand for election as directors. Our Corporate Governance Committee assists our Board
in this process and identifies individuals it believes to be qualified to become Board members and recommends nominees.
It is
a long-standing policy of our Board to consider director nominees recommended by shareholders. A shareholder who wishes to recommend a nominee for our Corporate Governance Committees consideration must include at least the following
information about the proposed nominee: name, age, business or residence address, principal occupation or employment, and the written consent of the nominee to be named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected. The
required information should be sent to our Secretary at 1025 West NASA Boulevard, Melbourne, Florida 32919. Our Secretary will forward properly submitted shareholder-recommended nominations to the Chairperson of our Corporate Governance Committee
for consideration at a future Corporate Governance Committee meeting. Individuals recommended by shareholders in accordance with these procedures will be evaluated and considered by our Corporate Governance Committee in the same manner as it
evaluates other proposed nominees.
In addition to recommending nominees for consideration to our Corporate Governance
Committee, shareholders also may directly propose nominees for consideration at an annual meeting of our shareholders. The requirements and procedures to be followed by shareholders for directly nominating directors are discussed beginning on page
84 under Shareholder Proposals for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Our Corporate Governance Committee
also has a process for considering, reviewing and evaluating incumbent directors as potential nominees for re-election. Pursuant to this process, prior to the annual meeting, each current director discusses participation on our Board and its
committees and other relevant matters with our Chairman or Lead Independent Director, if one has been designated. Each current director is also requested to discuss any concerns or issues regarding continued membership on our Board with the
Chairperson of our Corporate Governance Committee. In addition, our Corporate Governance Committee reviews each current directors
experience, qualifications, attributes, skills, tenure, contributions, other directorships, meeting attendance record, any changes in employment status and other information it deems helpful in
considering and evaluating the director for nomination.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines contain Board membership criteria
that apply to all nominees for a position on our Board. Our Board, based on the recommendation of our Corporate Governance Committee (which will be based on the criteria set forth below, regardless of whether the nominee is recommended by
shareholders or is identified by our Corporate Governance Committee or otherwise), will select nominees considering the following criteria:
|
|
|
Demonstrated ability and sound judgment that usually will be based on broad experience; |
|
|
|
Personal qualities and characteristics, accomplishments and reputation in the business community, professional integrity, educational background,
business experience and related experience; |
|
|
|
Willingness to objectively appraise management performance; |
|
|
|
Current knowledge and contacts in the businesses in which we participate and in our industry or other industries relevant to our businesses, giving due
consideration to potential conflicts of interest; |
|
|
|
Ability and willingness to commit adequate time to Board and committee matters, including attendance at Board, committee and annual shareholder
meetings; |
|
|
|
The number of other boards on which the individual serves; |
|
|
|
Compatibility of the individuals experience, qualifications, attributes, skills and personality with those of other directors and potential
directors in building a Board that is effective, collegial and responsive to the needs of Harris and the interests of our shareholders; and |
|
|
|
Diversity of viewpoints, background, experience, gender, race, ethnicity and similar demographics. |
Our Board values diversity as a factor in selecting nominees to serve on our Board. Although we have adopted no specific policy on
diversity, our Corporate Governance Committee considers the Board membership criteria in selecting nominees for
26
directors, including diversity of viewpoints, background, experience, gender, race, ethnicity and similar demographics. Such considerations may also include personal characteristics,
functional background, executive or professional experience, and international experience. As a general matter, our Board considers diversity in the context of our Board as a whole and takes into account the personal characteristics and experience
of current and prospective directors to facilitate Board deliberations and decisions that reflect a broad range of perspectives.
Our Corporate Governance Committee has as a general matter retained a third-party search firm to assist in identifying and evaluating
potential nominees, and all of our current independent directors have been identified and/or evaluated using this process.
Majority
Voting for Directors
Pursuant to our By-Laws and Corporate Governance Guidelines, the voting standard applicable for the
election of our directors in uncontested elections is a majority voting standard. An uncontested election of directors is an election in which the number of properly nominated nominees does not exceed the number of director positions to be filled.
In contested director elections, the plurality voting standard will apply, which means the nominees receiving the greatest numbers of votes will be elected to serve as directors.
To be elected in an uncontested election under the majority voting standard, a director nominee must receive more For votes
than Against votes. Abstentions and any broker non-votes will have no effect in an uncontested election of directors because only votes cast For or Against a nominee will be counted. If an incumbent director
nominee does not receive a greater number of For votes than Against votes, he or she must promptly offer to tender his or her resignation following certification of the vote. Our Corporate Governance Committee shall consider
the resignation offer and shall recommend to our Board the action to be taken. Our Board shall take action within 90 days following certification of the vote, unless such action would cause us to fail to comply with NYSE independence or other legal
requirements, in which event our Board shall take action as promptly as practicable while continuing to meet such requirements. Our Board also will promptly publicly disclose its decision and the
reasons therefor. If our Board does not accept the resignation, the nominee will continue to serve as a director until the next annual meeting and until his or her successor shall be duly elected
and qualified, or until his or her prior death, retirement, resignation or removal from office. If our Board accepts the resignation, then our Board, in its sole discretion, may fill any resulting vacancy or may choose not to fill the vacancy and to
decrease the size of our Board.
The election of directors at the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is an uncontested
election and thus the majority voting standard applies.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS
Our Board compensation program is intended to attract and retain directors with demonstrated ability, integrity, judgment and experience
to fulfill their responsibility to oversee management and to develop and oversee the implementation of strategies aimed at creating sustainable, long-term value for our shareholders. The program is also intended to recognize the time commitments and
potential liability associated with serving on the board of a public company.
The form and amount of director compensation is
periodically reviewed and assessed by our Corporate Governance Committee. Our Corporate Governance Committee reviews our compensation comparison group data and broad survey data concerning director compensation practices, levels and trends for
companies comparable to us in revenue, businesses and complexity, which data is requested by or on behalf of our Corporate Governance Committee from compensation consultants, including Pearl Meyer & Partners. Changes to director
compensation, if any, are recommended by our Corporate Governance Committee to our Board for action. Employee directors are not separately compensated for service as a director.
Retainer and Attendance Fees
Directors who are not employees of Harris currently receive the following fees, as applicable, for their service on our Board:
|
|
|
$55,000 annual cash retainer, payable on a quarterly basis, for service as a member of our Board; |
|
|
|
$150,000 annual cash retainer, payable on a quarterly basis, for service as non-executive Chairman of the Board;
|
27
|
|
|
$25,000 annual cash retainer, payable on a quarterly basis, for service as Lead Independent Director; |
|
|
|
$20,000 annual cash retainer, payable on a quarterly basis, for service as Chairperson of our Audit Committee; |
|
|
|
$15,000 annual cash retainer, payable on a quarterly basis, for service as Chairperson of each committee of our Board other than our Audit Committee;
and |
|
|
|
$2,000 cash attendance fee for each meeting or telephonic meeting of our Board or of each committee of our Board or for attendance at any other meeting
or event for or on our behalf. |
Each cash retainer payable for a quarter is pro-rated, based on period of
service, if a director does not serve on our Board or as Chairperson of a committee or as non-executive Chairman of the Board or as Lead Independent Director for the entire quarter. Independent directors may not receive, directly or indirectly, any
consulting, advisory or other compensatory fees from us.
Equity Awards and Deferred Compensation
We maintain the Harris Corporation 2005 Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated and as further amended (the
Directors Deferred Compensation Plan), an unfunded, non-qualified deferred compensation plan for the benefit of our non-employee directors. Under the Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, quarterly on
January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1 of each year, we credit each non-employee directors account with a number of Harris stock equivalent units (each unit is equivalent in value to one share of our common
stock) having an aggregate fair market value equal to $31,250 (for an annual rate of $125,000), which amount may be changed from time to time by our Board. The number of Harris stock equivalent units credited to a non-employee directors
account for a quarter is pro-rated, based on period of service, if the director does not serve on our Board for the entire quarter.
In addition, under the Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, prior to the commencement of a calendar year, each non-employee director may make an irrevocable election to defer all or a portion of
his or her cash director compensation for the subsequent year or years. The Directors Deferred Compensation Plan replaced the Harris Corporation 1997 Directors
Deferred Compensation and Annual Stock Unit Award Plan (the 1997 Directors Plan). Effective December 31, 2004, no further deferrals of director compensation were permitted
and no further annual awards of Harris stock equivalent units were made under the 1997 Directors Plan.
Amounts deferred
at the election of a non-employee director under such plans are deemed to be invested, at the non-employee directors discretion, in investment alternatives that mirror those available under our Retirement Plan or in Harris stock equivalent
units based on the fair market value of Harris common stock on the date the deferral is credited to the non-employee directors plan account. A non-employee director may not transfer or reallocate deferred amounts invested in other investments
into Harris stock equivalent units, but may reallocate (provided director minimum stock ownership guidelines are satisfied) deferred amounts invested in Harris stock equivalent units into any other investment alternatives. Each Harris stock
equivalent unit is credited with dividend equivalents equal to the dividends paid on our common stock, which are deemed reinvested in additional Harris stock equivalent units on the dividend payment date. Amounts invested in Harris stock equivalent
units shall be appropriately adjusted in the event of any stock dividend or split, recapitalization, merger, spin-off, extraordinary dividends or other similar events.
A non-employee director may elect to receive deferred amounts either in a cash lump sum on a date certain within five years after his or her resignation or retirement, or in annual substantially equal
cash installments over a designated number of years beginning on a date certain within five years after his or her resignation or retirement, provided that all amounts are fully paid within 10 years of resignation or retirement.
Within 90 days following a non-employee directors death, a lump sum cash payment equal to the then-remaining balance in his or her
account will be made to his or her beneficiary.
Within 90 days following a change in control (as defined in the director
deferred compensation plans) and to the extent permitted by Federal tax laws, each non-employee director (or former non-employee director) will receive a lump sum cash payment equal to the then-remaining balance in his or her account. If payment
within 90 days following a change in control is not permitted by Federal tax laws, then payment will be made at the time and in the form that
28
payment would have been made if a change in control had not occurred.
Amounts credited to non-employee directors accounts under the director deferred compensation plans may be partially or fully
funded by a grantor trust, also known as a rabbi trust. Upon a change in control, we are required to fund such rabbi trust in an amount equal to the amounts credited to the directors accounts, as well as anticipated
trust and trustee fees and expenses. In all cases, the assets in such trust are subject to the claims of our creditors, and directors are treated as our unsecured general creditors.
Reimbursement, Insurance and Charitable Gift Matching
We pay or reimburse each non-employee director for travel and out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at Board and committee meetings and other meetings on our behalf and for the
costs and expenses of attending director education programs. Spouses or guests are invited
occasionally to accompany directors to Board-related events, for which we pay or reimburse travel and related expenses. In addition, we provide each non-employee director with accidental death
and dismemberment insurance in the amount of up to $200,000 and business travel insurance of up to an additional $200,000 in the event that he or she is involved in an accident while traveling on business relating to our affairs. We pay the premiums
for such insurance, and the premiums for coverage for all non-employee directors during fiscal 2014 was $133. We also provide liability insurance coverage for all of our directors and officers.
Non-employee directors may participate in the Harris Foundation charitable gift matching program available to all employees, under which
the Harris Foundation matches contributions to eligible post-secondary educational institutions and charitable organizations up to an annual maximum of $10,000 per director and per employee.
Fiscal 2014 Compensation of
Non-Employee Directors
The following table sets forth information regarding compensation paid to each of our non-employee
directors for fiscal 2014. We currently do not have a non-equity incentive plan or pension plan for directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash
$(1) |
|
|
Stock
Awards
$(2) |
|
|
Option
Awards
$(3) |
|
|
Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
$(4) |
|
|
All Other
Compensation
$(5) |
|
|
Total
$ |
|
Peter W. Chiarelli |
|
$ |
95,000 |
|
|
$ |
125,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
220,000 |
|
Thomas A. Dattilo |
|
$ |
243,167 |
|
|
$ |
125,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
368,167 |
|
Terry D. Growcock |
|
$ |
95,000 |
|
|
$ |
125,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
9,989 |
|
|
$ |
229,989 |
|
Lewis Hay III |
|
$ |
96,000 |
|
|
$ |
125,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
10,000 |
|
|
$ |
231,000 |
|
Vyomesh I. Joshi |
|
$ |
81,833 |
|
|
$ |
104,167 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
186,000 |
|
Karen Katen |
|
$ |
79,000 |
|
|
$ |
125,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
204,000 |
|
Stephen P. Kaufman |
|
$ |
89,000 |
|
|
$ |
125,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
10,000 |
|
|
$ |
224,000 |
|
Leslie F. Kenne |
|
$ |
86,000 |
|
|
$ |
125,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
211,000 |
|
David B. Rickard |
|
$ |
111,000 |
|
|
$ |
125,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
236,000 |
|
Dr. James C.
Stoffel |
|
$ |
102,000 |
|
|
$ |
125,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
227,000 |
|
Gregory T. Swienton |
|
$ |
104,000 |
|
|
$ |
125,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
229,000 |
|
Hansel E. Tookes II |
|
$ |
103,000 |
|
|
$ |
125,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
228,000 |
|
(1) |
Amounts shown in the Fees Earned or Paid in Cash column reflect total cash compensation earned by each director in fiscal 2014 for Board,
committee, committee Chairperson, non-executive Chairman of the Board and Lead Independent Director retainers and meeting attendance fees, and include amounts that may have been deferred at the directors election and credited to such
directors account under our Directors Deferred Compensation Plan as described above. |
29
(2) |
Amounts shown under the Stock Awards column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards
Boards Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation Stock Compensation (ASC 718), with respect to the Harris stock equivalent units awarded to each director in fiscal 2014 and credited to such directors
account under our Directors Deferred Compensation Plan as described above. Under ASC 718, the fair value of these awards is determined as of the grant date using the closing market price of Harris common stock on the grant date. The grant date
fair value of each of these awards credited on each of October 1, 2013 (pro-rated in the case of Mr. Joshi to reflect his Board membership effective September 1, 2013), January 1, 2014, April 1, 2014 and July 1, 2014
was $31,250. These amounts reflect our accounting for these awards and do not necessarily correspond to the actual values that may be realized by the directors. |
|
As of June 27, 2014, our non-employee directors had the following aggregate number of Harris stock equivalent units accumulated in their deferred accounts for all
years of service as a director, from deferrals of cash compensation and awards of Harris stock equivalent units, including additional Harris stock equivalent units credited as a result of dividend equivalents earned with respect to such Harris stock
equivalent units: Peter W. Chiarelli 4,086 units; Thomas A. Dattilo 39,144 units; Terry D. Growcock 24,292 units; Lewis Hay III 36,895 units; Vyomesh I. Joshi 1,467 units; Karen Katen 80,475 units;
Stephen P. Kaufman 19,090 units; Leslie F. Kenne 25,726 units; David B. Rickard 63,477 units; Dr. James C. Stoffel 28,253 units; Gregory T. Swienton 73,358 units; and Hansel E. Tookes II
24,596 units. |
(3) |
The use of stock options as an element of compensation for our non-employee directors was discontinued in December 2004. Options previously awarded to our non-employee
directors are nonqualified for tax purposes, were priced using the closing market price of our common stock on the grant date, became fully vested in accordance with their terms on or prior to October 22, 2007 and expire no later than 10 years
after the grant date. As of June 27, 2014, David B. Rickard held 4,228 stock options. |
(4) |
There were no above-market or preferential earnings in our director deferred compensation plans. |
(5) |
As noted above, non-employee directors may participate in our charitable gift matching program up to an annual maximum of $10,000 per director. Although our
directors participate on the same basis as our employees, SEC rules require disclosure of the amount of a directors participation in a charitable matching program. The amounts shown for Messrs. Growcock, Hay and Kaufman represent the amount of
charitable gift matching payments made during fiscal 2014 with respect to our non-employee directors. |
Stock Ownership Guidelines for
Non-Employee Directors
To further align the interests of members of our Board and shareholders, our Board has adopted stock ownership guidelines for our non-employee directors. Our non-employee directors are expected to own,
within five years after election or appointment to our Board, Harris stock or stock equivalent units having a minimum value of $500,000. As of September 1, 2014, all of our non-employee directors met the stock ownership guidelines or were on
track to achieve such ownership within the applicable compliance timeframe.
Indemnification
We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and Board-elected officers, including the executive officers
named in the Summary Compensation Table on
page 55. These agreements require us to indemnify these directors and officers with respect to their activities as a director, officer or employee of Harris, or when serving at our request
as a director, officer or in any other capacity for another corporation, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys fees, judgments, fines, penalties and amounts paid in settlement) actually and reasonably
incurred by them in connection with any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or other proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, to which they were, are or are threatened to be made parties as a result of their
service to us.
Under the indemnification agreements, each director or officer will continue to be so indemnified with
respect to his or her service to or for us, even after ceasing to occupy a position as an officer, director, employee or agent of Harris.
30
OUR LARGEST SHAREHOLDERS
SEC rules require disclosure regarding any persons known to us to be a beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock. The following
table sets forth the beneficial ownership of our common stock, as of August 29, 2014, by each person who has reported to the SEC beneficial ownership of more than 5% of our common stock, based on the reports filed by these persons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |
|
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership |
|
|
Percent of Class |
|
The Vanguard Group |
|
|
8,768,692 |
(1) |
|
|
8.20 |
%(1) |
100 Vanguard Boulevard
Malvern, PA 19355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. |
|
|
6,422,570 |
(2) |
|
|
6.0 |
%(2) |
100 E. Pratt Street
Baltimore, MD 21202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock, Inc. |
|
|
6,013,579 |
(3) |
|
|
5.6 |
%(3) |
40 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allianz Global Investors U.S. Holdings LLC |
|
|
5,862,318 |
(4) |
|
|
5.5 |
%(4) |
680 Newport Center Drive, Suite 250
Newport Beach, CA 92660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Beneficial and percentage ownership information is based on information contained in Amendment No. 2 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 11, 2014
by The Vanguard Group. The schedule indicates that, as of December 31, 2013, The Vanguard Group had sole voting power over 178,803 shares, shared voting power over 0 shares, sole dispositive power over 8,604,489 shares and shared dispositive
power over 164,203 shares. |
(2) |
Beneficial and percentage ownership information is based on information contained in Amendment No. 2 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 12, 2014
by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. The schedule indicates that, as of December 31, 2013, T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. had sole voting power over 1,708,680 shares, shared voting power over 0 shares, sole dispositive power over 6,422,570 shares
and shared dispositive power over 0 shares. |
(3) |
Beneficial and percentage ownership information is based on information contained in Amendment No. 5 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 29, 2014 by
BlackRock, Inc. The schedule indicates that, as of December 31, 2013, BlackRock, Inc. had sole voting power over 5,045,153 shares, shared voting power over 0 shares, sole dispositive power over 6,013,579 shares and shared dispositive power over
0 shares. |
(4) |
Beneficial and percentage ownership information is based on information contained in Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 12, 2014 by Allianz Global
Investors U.S. Holdings LLC (Allianz). The schedule indicates the following in respect of Allianz and its direct or indirect subsidiaries, affiliates or investment advisers: (i) Allianz had no sole or shared voting power and no sole or
shared dispositive power over any shares; (ii) Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC had sole voting power over 1,836,360 shares, shared voting power over 0 shares, sole dispositive power over 1,836,360 shares and shared dispositive power over 0 shares;
(iii) NFJ Investment Group LLC had sole voting power over 3,954,529 shares, shared voting power over 0 shares, sole dispositive power over 3,979,529 shares and shared dispositive power over 0 shares; and (iv) Allianz Global Investors Europe GmbH had
sole voting power over 37,906 shares, shared voting power over 0 shares, sole dispositive power over 46,429 shares and shared dispositive power over 0 shares. The schedule further indicates the following with respect to the 5,862,318 shares reported
in the schedule: the shares are held by investment advisory clients or in discretionary accounts for which Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC, NFJ Investment Group or Allianz Global Investors Europe GmbH is the investment adviser; the shares may be
deemed to beneficially owned by such investment advisers or Allianz; and each such investment adviser and Allianz disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares, except to that extent of its pecuniary interest therein. |
31
SHARES HELD BY OUR DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of shares and equivalent units of our common stock, as of August 29, 2014,
by: (a) each member of our Board, including the nominees for election at the 2014 Annual Meeting; (b) our CEO and each other named executive officer; and (c) all of our then-serving directors and executive officers as a group. Except
as otherwise noted, the named individual had sole voting and investment power with respect to the securities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Shares Beneficially Owned |
|
|
Stock Equivalent
Units(4) |
|
|
Shares Owned(1) |
|
|
Shares
Under Exercisable Options(2) |
|
|
Total
Shares Beneficially Owned(3) |
|
|
Percentage of Shares |
|
|
DIRECTORS AND NOMINEES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter W. Chiarelli |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,086 |
|
Thomas A. Dattilo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,144 |
|
Terry D. Growcock |
|
|
1,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,021 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
24,292 |
|
Lewis Hay III |
|
|
4,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,228 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
36,895 |
|
Vyomesh I. Joshi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,467 |
|
Karen Katen |
|
|
18,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,456 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
80,475 |
|
Stephen P. Kaufman |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
19,090 |
|
Leslie F. Kenne |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,726 |
|
David B. Rickard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,228 |
|
|
|
4,228 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
63,477 |
|
James C. Stoffel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,253 |
|
Gregory T. Swienton |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,358 |
|
Hansel E. Tookes II |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
24,596 |
|
NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William M. Brown** |
|
|
91,059 |
|
|
|
424,736 |
|
|
|
515,795 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
118,800 |
|
Miguel A. Lopez |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,500 |
|
Robert L. Duffy |
|
|
2,225 |
|
|
|
47,068 |
|
|
|
49,293 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
25,533 |
|
Sheldon J. Fox |
|
|
27,349 |
|
|
|
127,492 |
|
|
|
154,841 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
31,059 |
|
Dana A. Mehnert |
|
|
42,285 |
|
|
|
181,001 |
|
|
|
223,286 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
57,990 |
|
Gary L. McArthur |
|
|
9,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,447 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
34,642 |
|
All Directors and Executive Officers, as a group (20 persons)(5) |
|
|
246,979 |
|
|
|
968,128 |
|
|
|
1,215,107 |
|
|
|
1.16 |
% |
|
|
775,626 |
|
** |
Also serves as a director and Chairman of our Board. |
(1) |
Includes shares over which the individual or his or her immediate family members hold or share voting and/or investment power and excludes shares listed under the
Shares Under Exercisable Options and Stock Equivalent Units columns. For our named executive officers and other executive officers, includes shares owned through our Retirement Plan. |
(2) |
Includes shares underlying options granted by us that are exercisable as of August 29, 2014, and shares underlying options that become exercisable within 60 days
thereafter. |
(3) |
Represents the total of shares listed under the Shares Owned and Shares Under Exercisable Options columns. |
(4) |
For our non-employee directors, this column represents stock equivalent units credited under our 1997 Directors Plan and our Directors Deferred Compensation
Plan discussed above under Director Compensation and Benefits. Stock equivalent units deferred under our 1997 Directors Plan and our Directors Deferred Compensation Plan are settled in cash following a directors
resignation, retirement or death, may not be voted and may be reallocated into other investment alternatives, as discussed above under Director Compensation and Benefits. For our named executive officers and other executive officers,
this column includes amounts deferred in the form of stock equivalent units under our Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP), which are settled in cash following, or under certain circumstances prior to, retirement. Stock
equivalent units deferred under the SERP may not be voted and may be reallocated into other investment alternatives. For our named executive officers and other executive officers, this column also includes performance share units and restricted
stock units that have been granted and for which the performance period or restricted period has not ended and which have not vested and are subject to adjustment, including as follows for our named executive officers: Mr. Brown 115,300
performance share units and 3,500 restricted stock units; Mr. Lopez 8,000 performance share units and 12,500 restricted stock units; Mr. Duffy 24,100 performance share units and 1,433 restricted stock units; Mr. Fox
30,600 performance share units; Mr. Mehnert 31,600 performance share units and 25,000 restricted stock units; and Mr. McArthur 9,642 performance share units and 25,000 restricted stock units. Amounts in this
column are not included in the Total Shares Beneficially Owned column. |
(5) |
No directors or executive officers have pledged any shares of our common stock, nor are any such persons permitted to make any such pledge under our policies.
|
32
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Overview
The
Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement is intended to help shareholders understand our overall executive compensation program, objectives, framework and elements and discusses and analyzes the basis for the
compensation paid with respect to fiscal 2014 to our named executive officers shown in the Summary Compensation Table on page 55 and in the other tables and narrative discussion that follow. The focus of this Compensation Discussion and Analysis is
to provide background and information that is relevant regarding the decisions of our Management Development and Compensation Committee (our Compensation Committee) and Board about compensation for such named executive officers. Our
named executive officers for fiscal 2014 were:
|
|
|
William M. Brown, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer; |
|
|
|
Miguel A. Lopez, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; |
|
|
|
Robert L. Duffy, Senior Vice President, Human Resources and Administration; |
|
|
|
Sheldon J. Fox, Group President, Government Communications Systems; |
|
|
|
Dana A. Mehnert, Group President, RF Communications; and |
|
|
|
Gary L. McArthur, former Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Mr. McArthur left Harris effective February 28, 2014).
|
In this proxy statement, we refer to Messrs. Lopez, Duffy, Fox, Mehnert and McArthur as our other
named executive officers.
Executive Summary
Overall Objective and Guiding Principles of Our Executive Compensation Program
The overall objective of our executive compensation program is to encourage and reward the creation of sustainable, long-term shareholder
value. The following guiding principles provide a framework for our executive compensation program:
|
|
|
Alignment with Shareholders Interests We believe executives interests are more directly aligned with our
shareholders interests when compensation programs emphasize an appropriate balance of both short- and long-term financial performance, are impacted by our stock price performance and require meaningful ownership of our stock.
|
|
|
|
Competitiveness We believe an executives total compensation should be competitive at the target performance level in
order to attract qualified executives, motivate performance and retain, develop and reward executives with the abilities and skills needed to build long-term shareholder value. |
|
|
|
Motivate Achievement of Financial Goals and Strategic Objectives We believe an effective way to create long-term shareholder
value is to make a significant portion of an executives overall compensation dependent on the achievement of our short- and long-term financial goals and strategic objectives and on the value of our stock. |
|
|
|
Align Realized Pay with Performance We believe that although an executives total compensation should be tied to
achievement of financial goals and strategic objectives and should be competitive at the target performance level, performance that exceeds target should be appropriately rewarded. We also believe there should be downside risk of below-target
compensation if our financial performance is below target and if we do not achieve our financial goals and strategic objectives. |
Key Aspects of Our Executive Compensation Program
Our executive
compensation and governance practices reflect the overall objective and guiding principles of our executive compensation program, and the following summarizes key aspects of what we do and what we dont do in order to encourage
33
and reward the creation of sustainable, long-term shareholder value:
What We
Do
|
|
|
Our executive compensation decisions are made by the independent members of our Board or by our Compensation Committee, which is made up exclusively of
independent members; |
|
|
|
Our Compensation Committee has retained an independent executive compensation consulting firm to provide objective analysis, advice and information and
to provide no other services to us; |
|
|
|
Our Compensation Committee periodically reviews the composition of our compensation comparison group and makes changes it determines are appropriate;
|
|
|
|
We address each element of our executive compensation program in the context of competitive practices. We generally target an executive officers
target direct annual compensation (the total of base salary, target annual cash incentives and target long-term equity incentive compensation) to be within 10% below to 10% above the median for comparable positions at companies in our compensation
comparison group, with realized compensation dependent on our performance; |
|
|
|
We make a significant portion of each executives overall compensation dependent on our performance as measured against pre-determined short- and
long-term financial performance measures and targets. We believe our financial performance targets are challenging yet achievable; |
|
|
|
We have designed our incentive programs to drive annual operating performance as well as sustained profitable growth over the longer term. Our Annual
Incentive Plan is aligned with our annual operating plans key measures of annual financial performance such as revenue, operating income and free cash flow, and the related targets. Our long-term incentive compensation uses a balanced
portfolio of compensation elements, including stock options, performance share units and in more limited circumstances, restricted stock
|
|
|
units, and our long-term incentive compensation financial measures and targets are aligned with our long-term strategic plan; |
|
|
|
We provide a significant portion of each executives overall compensation opportunity in the form of equity to establish a strong relationship
between an executives compensation and our stock price performance; |
|
|
|
We have further aligned performance share unit award payouts with our stock price performance by including a relative total shareholder return
adjustment metric; |
|
|
|
We have meaningful stock ownership guidelines that maintain alignment of executives interests with those of our shareholders;
|
|
|
|
We review and evaluate plans for our management development and succession; |
|
|
|
We pay cash severance payments under executive change in control severance agreements only on a double trigger basis (i.e., only on both a
change in control and a qualifying termination of employment); and |
|
|
|
We have a clawback policy that entitles us to recover cash and equity incentive payments from executives in the event of a restatement of
our financial statements as a result of errors, omissions or fraud. |
What We Dont Do
|
|
|
We do not provide excessive perquisites, and in recent years, have eliminated virtually all executive perquisites; |
|
|
|
We do not permit repricing or back-dating of options; |
|
|
|
We do not provide excise tax gross-ups under executive change in control severance agreements; |
|
|
|
We do not pay dividend equivalents on performance share unit awards unless the performance share unit award ultimately is earned at the end of the
performance period; |
|
|
|
We do not permit executives (or directors or other employees) to engage in short sales with respect to Harris stock or enter into hedging,
|
34
|
|
puts, calls or other derivative transactions with respect to our securities; and |
|
|
|
We do not permit executives (or directors) to hold or purchase Harris stock on margin or in a margin account or otherwise pledge Harris stock as
collateral for margin accounts, loans or any other purpose. |
Business Environment
Harris is an international communications and information technology company serving government
and commercial markets in more than 125 countries. We are dedicated to developing best-in-class assured
communications® products, systems and services for global markets, including RF communications, integrated
network solutions and government communications systems. We serve both domestic and international customers with products, systems and services that have defense and civil government applications, as well as commercial applications, with our largest
customers being agencies of the U.S. Government. In fiscal 2014, our sales to U.S. Government customers, including the Department of Defense and intelligence and civilian agencies, as well as foreign military sales funded through the
U.S. Government, whether directly or through prime contractors, were 67% of our total sales. We have approximately 14,000 employees, including 6,000 engineers and scientists. Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
While opportunities for growth in many of our businesses continued to be impacted by constrained U.S. Government budgets,
fiscal 2014 was another year of solid overall financial results for us. Despite a challenging business environment, we continued to invest in our future while delivering shareholder value.
Our key fiscal 2014 financial results include:
|
|
|
Revenue of $5.01 billion, a modest decrease from $5.11 billion in fiscal 2013; |
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations per diluted common share of $5.00, compared with $4.16 in fiscal 2013 (we incurred charges of
$126.7 million, or $.74 per diluted common share, related to Company-wide restructuring and other actions in fiscal 2013); |
|
|
|
A significant increase in our Company-sponsored research and development $264 million in fiscal 2014 compared with $254 million in fiscal 2013
(including an $18 million write-off of capitalized software in our Integrated Network Solutions segment) and $219 million in fiscal 2012; |
|
|
|
Free cash flow of $647.9 million ($849.2 million of operating cash flow less $201.3 million of net capital expenditures), a slight decrease from $654.8
million in fiscal 2013 ($833.0 million of operating cash flow less $178.2 million of net capital expenditures). We believe free cash flow, which we use to measure operating performance and for some management compensation purposes, is useful to
investors in understanding period-over-period operating results and analyzing trends in our business; |
|
|
|
We used $300 million of cash to repurchase 4,560,802 shares of our common stock in fiscal 2014; and |
|
|
|
We increased our quarterly cash dividend from $.37 per share to $.42 per share in the first quarter of fiscal 2014, resulting in an annualized cash
dividend rate of $1.68 per share, and paid $180 million in total dividends to our shareholders in fiscal 2014. Further, effective for the first quarter of fiscal 2015, our Board increased our quarterly cash dividend rate from $.42 per share to
$.47 per share, resulting in an annualized cash dividend rate of $1.88 per share. |
35
Summary of Fiscal 2014 Compensation Actions
The following summarizes the named executive officer compensation actions taken by our Compensation Committee and independent directors of
our Board for fiscal 2014:
|
|
|
We increased base salaries for our named executive officers as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2013 Base Salary |
|
|
% Increase |
|
|
Fiscal 2014 Base Salary |
|
|
Reason for Increase |
Mr. Brown |
|
$ |
900,000 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
$ |
925,000 |
|
|
Merit |
Mr. Duffy |
|
$ |
400,000 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
$ |
440,000 |
|
|
Merit and Market Adjustment |
Mr. Fox |
|
$ |
415,000 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
$ |
440,000 |
|
|
Merit and Market Adjustment |
Mr. Mehnert |
|
$ |
485,000 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
$ |
494,700 |
|
|
Merit |
Mr. McArthur |
|
$ |
575,000 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
$ |
585,000 |
|
|
Merit |
|
|
|
We increased the annual cash incentive targets under our annual incentive plan for our named executive officers as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2013 Cash Incentive Target |
|
|
% Increase |
|
|
Fiscal 2014 Cash Incentive Target |
|
|
Reason for
Increase |
Mr. Brown |
|
$ |
1,080,000 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
$ |
1,100,000 |
|
|
Merit |
Mr. Duffy |
|
$ |
260,000 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
% |
|
$ |
309,000 |
|
|
Merit and Market Adjustment |
Mr. Fox |
|
$ |
300,000 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
$ |
318,000 |
|
|
Merit and Market Adjustment |
Mr. Mehnert |
|
$ |
330,000 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
$ |
337,000 |
|
|
Merit |
Mr. McArthur |
|
$ |
410,000 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
$ |
417,000 |
|
|
Merit |
|
|
|
We established a relatively high percentage for the performance-based, at-risk (tied to our performance) portion of fiscal 2014 total target direct
compensation (consisting of base salary, annual cash incentive target, performance share units and stock options, but excluding retention, make-whole or transition compensation or other benefits): 85% for Mr. Brown and
75% for our other named executive officers on average; |
|
|
|
We entered into an offer letter agreement with Mr. Lopez in the third quarter of fiscal 2014 to become our Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer, which included a one-time initial equity grant; |
|
|
|
We eliminated the provisions for tax gross-ups for excise taxes under executive change in control severance agreements with the few remaining corporate
officers whose agreements included those provisions; |
|
|
|
We amended our corporate governance guidelines and insider trading policy to formally prohibit our executives and directors from purchasing Harris
stock on margin,
|
|
|
holding Harris stock in a margin account or otherwise pledging Harris stock as collateral for margin accounts, loans or any other purpose; |
|
|
|
We paid out an above-target fiscal 2014 annual cash incentive to each of Messrs. Brown, Lopez and Duffy because our consolidated free cash flow
performance was above the consolidated free cash flow performance target set early in our fiscal year. The payouts for Messrs. Brown and Duffy were also increased based upon achievement of individual objectives. We paid out an above-target
fiscal 2014 annual cash incentive to Mr. Fox because our Government Communications Systems segment financial performance was above the segment revenue, operating income and free cash flow performance targets set early in our fiscal year and
because our consolidated free cash flow performance was above the consolidated free cash flow performance target set early in our fiscal year. The payout for Mr. Fox was also increased based upon achievement of his individual objectives. We paid out
a below- |
36
|
|
target fiscal 2014 annual cash incentive to Mr. Mehnert because our RF Communications segment financial performance was below the segment revenue, operating income and free cash flow
performance targets set early in our fiscal year; |
|
|
|
We paid out a below-target performance share unit award for the three-year performance period of fiscal 2012-2014 to each of Messrs. Fox, Mehnert and
McArthur: at 80.7% of target for Messrs. Fox and Mehnert and at 67.4% of target for Mr. McArthur. These payouts were below target because our three-year cumulative operating income performance was below our target set early in such period; and
|
|
|
|
We paid out an above-target performance share unit award to Mr. Brown for the three-year performance period of fiscal 2012-2014 (a portion of
which was granted to Mr. Brown as part of his transition-related compensation under his employment agreement): at 117.6% of target because our average annual return on invested capital (ROIC) performance exceeded our target set
early in such period and because our total shareholder return for such period was in the second quintile of our fiscal 2012-2014 performance share unit award total shareholder return peer group (the Standard & Poors 500 Industrials
Sector and Information Technology Sector, excluding the semiconductor and semiconductor equipment industries, such peer group hereinafter referred to as our Fiscal 2012-2014 TSR Peer Group), resulting in a 15% upward adjustment in the
payout calculation. |
Our Executive Compensation Process
The philosophy, objectives, elements, policies and practices of compensation for our executive officers are set by our Compensation
Committee. In approving compensation levels and targets, individual objectives and financial performance measure targets for our named executive officers, our Compensation Committee reviews the relationship between our executive compensation program
and the achievement of our financial goals and strategic objectives, with an emphasis on creating a pay for profitable growth environment.
Our Compensation Committee has the authority to retain compensation consultants and other advisors
to assist in fulfilling its duties and responsibilities. In recent years, our Compensation Committee has directly retained Pearl Meyer & Partners, a nationally recognized independent
executive compensation consulting firm, to provide objective analysis, plan design recommendations, advice and information, including competitive market data, to our Compensation Committee related to our CEO compensation and the compensation of our
other executive officers. Pearl Meyer & Partners performs services at the direction and under the supervision of our Compensation Committee and does not provide any other services for, or receive other fees from, Harris. Our Compensation
Committee has the sole authority to modify or approve Pearl Meyers & Partners compensation, determine the nature and scope of its services, evaluate its performance, terminate the engagement and engage a replacement or additional
consultant at any time. Our Compensation Committee has also assessed the independence of Pearl Meyer & Partners and whether its work raised any conflicts of interest, taking into consideration the independence factors set forth in the NYSE
listing standards and SEC rules. Based on that assessment, our Compensation Committee determined that Pearl Meyer & Partners was independent and that its work did not raise any conflicts of interest.
Our Compensation Committee considers recommendations from our CEO in making decisions regarding our executive compensation program and
the compensation of our other executive officers. As part of the annual compensation planning process, our CEO recommends targets for our incentive compensation programs. Following an annual performance review process, which includes an assessment
of each executive officers performance of individual objectives, our CEO recommends specific compensation for our executive officers, including base salary adjustments and cash incentive and equity awards. Our CEO also presents to our
Compensation Committee his evaluation of each such executive officers contributions during the previous year, including strengths and development needs, and reviews succession plans for each of the executive positions.
After input from our CEO, as well as from Pearl Meyer & Partners, and following the assessment of compensation trends and
competitive market data, our Compensation Committee determines what changes, if any, should be made to the executive compensation program and sets the level of
37
compensation for our executive officers, other than our CEO. As part of this process, our Compensation Committee reviews each executive officers
three-year compensation history, including base salary, annual cash incentive and equity awards, and also reviews the types and levels of other benefits, such as change in control severance agreements. In the
case of our CEO, the review and final compensation decisions are made by the independent directors of our Board.
In setting
the levels of compensation early in the fiscal year, our Compensation Committee also establishes the short- and long-term financial measures, weighting and targets for performance-based, at-risk elements of compensation. For our CEO, such measures,
weighting and targets are established by the independent directors of our Board. The specific financial measures, weighting and targets are intended to encourage and reward the creation of sustainable, long-term value for our shareholders and are
aligned with our Board-approved annual operating plan and long-term strategic plan.
At the end of each fiscal year, the
independent directors of our Board meet in executive session without our CEO or other members of management present under the leadership of the Chairperson of our Compensation Committee to conduct a performance review of our CEO. During such review,
the independent directors evaluate our CEOs achievement of agreed-upon objectives established early in the fiscal year, our overall performance, our CEOs personal self-evaluation of his performance over the past fiscal year and our
CEOs other accomplishments. Also at the end of each fiscal year, our Compensation Committee receives a specific compensation recommendation from our CEO for our other executive officers, which recommendation is based on an assessment of each
executives performance, achievement of objectives established early in the fiscal year for the executive and his or her business unit or organization within our Company, contribution to our performance and other accomplishments.
Although compensation levels may differ among our named executive officers based on competitive factors and the role, responsibilities
and performance of each named executive officer, there are no material differences in our compensation policies or the manner in which total target direct compensation is determined for any of our named executive officers. The material elements of
our
executive compensation program applicable to our named executive officers also apply to our other executive officers.
Information regarding consideration of elements of our risk related to our compensation policies and practices is set forth below in the Relationship Between Compensation Plans and Risk
section of this proxy statement beginning on page 53.
Consideration of Advisory Say-on-Pay
and Say-on-Frequency Voting Results
At our 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, we presented our shareholders with a proposal to approve on an advisory basis the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in our 2013 proxy
statement. Approximately 94% of the shares voted on this proposal were cast in support of our 2013 executive compensation and related disclosures. Our Compensation Committee viewed the results of this vote as general broad shareholder support for
our executive compensation program. Our Compensation Committee did not make changes to our executive compensation program or policies as a result of the advisory vote. Our Compensation Committee and Board will continue to consider the outcome of
shareholder advisory votes on executive compensation when making future decisions relating to the compensation of our named executive officers and our executive compensation program and policies.
At our 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, our shareholders strongly supported a frequency of every year for holding future
advisory votes to approve the compensation of our named executive officers, consistent with the recommendation of our Board. As a result, our Board decided to hold annual Say-on-Pay votes and we are presenting a separate proposal to our
shareholders to approve on an advisory basis the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement. See Proposal 2 beginning on page 78 of this proxy statement.
Competitive Considerations
Each element of our executive compensation program is addressed in the context of competitive practices. In general, our Compensation Committee sets total target direct compensation for our CEO and other
executives to be within 10% below to 10% above the median of total target direct compensation for comparable positions at companies in our
38
compensation comparison group. Although our Compensation Committee reviews survey data, it uses discretion in setting an executives compensation after considering experience, position,
tenure and contributions. For fiscal 2014, our Human Resources Department performed a comprehensive assessment and benchmarking of the competitive compensation positioning of our CEO and other executive officers and the mix and elements of such
compensation. While the primary focus of such assessment and benchmarking was our compensation comparison group, such analysis and benchmarking also included other broad compensation surveys to provide additional data points for our Compensation
Committee. For fiscal 2014, the Compensation Committee also engaged Pearl Meyer & Partners to assess the composition of our compensation comparison group and to review, assess and validate our Human Resources Departments assessment
and benchmarking of the median pay levels for our CEO and other executive officers, the competitive position of the compensation for our CEO and other executive officers and the mix and elements of such compensation. The compensation comparison
group used for our CEO and other executive officers consists of companies with one or more of the following attributes: business operations and business models in the markets in which we participate; similar revenue and market capitalization; and
businesses that compete with us for executive talent. For fiscal 2014, the compensation comparison group consisted of the following 16 companies:
|
|
Alliant Techsystems Inc. |
|
|
L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
Motorola Solutions, Inc. |
|
|
Rockwell Automation, Inc. |
|
|
Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. |
Our Compensation
Committee periodically reviews the composition of the comparison group used for assessing the compensation for our CEO and other executive officers and makes changes it determines are appropriate based on changes to the attributes of each such
company and whether it continues to make its compensation data available. Pearl Meyer & Partners, our CEO and management provide input to our Compensation Committee as to changes to the attributes of companies in the compensation
comparison group. For fiscal 2014, our Compensation Committee did not make any changes to the compensation comparison group used in fiscal 2013.
CEO Employment Agreement
On October 8, 2011, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Brown pursuant to which he became our President and Chief Executive Officer effective November 1, 2011.
Mr. Browns compensation arrangement under his employment agreement was the result of arms-length negotiation. In negotiating such arrangement our Compensation Committee received information, analysis and advice from Pearl
Meyer & Partners, from independent legal counsel and from the national executive search firm retained by our Boards CEO Search Committee. In developing the compensation arrangement for Mr. Brown, our Compensation Committee and
Board also considered the same executive compensation objectives and competitive positioning used for our other executives and also took into consideration the substantial amount of long-term compensation that he would forfeit to join us. As a
result, Mr. Browns compensation arrangement addressed both ongoing compensation as well as transition compensation. Elements of Mr. Browns ongoing compensation provided under his employment
agreement that continued in fiscal 2014 included: (i) base salary; (ii) annual cash incentive opportunity under our Annual Incentive Plan; (iii) eligibility for grants of equity-based long-term incentives, which for each of fiscal
2013 and 2014, were required to have a target value of at least 375% of his then-current base salary; and (iv) eligibility to participate in our retirement and employee welfare and benefit plans in accordance with their terms.
A description of the material terms of Mr. Browns employment agreement, including payments and benefits to be provided to
Mr. Brown in the event his employment is terminated by us without cause or by Mr. Brown as a result of a constructive termination is set forth in the Potential Payments Upon Termination or a Change in
Control section of this proxy statement beginning on page 67. We also entered into an Executive Change in Control Severance Agreement with Mr. Brown, which is described in the Executive Change in Control Severance
Agreements section of this proxy statement beginning on page 69.
39
Fiscal 2014 Appointment of Miguel A. Lopez as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
On February 4, 2014, we entered into an offer letter agreement with Mr. Lopez pursuant to which he became our
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer effective February 10, 2014. Mr. Lopezs compensation arrangement under his offer letter agreement was the result of arms-length negotiation. In developing the compensation
arrangement for Mr. Lopez, our Compensation Committee considered the same executive compensation objectives and competitive positioning used for our other executives. Mr. Lopezs compensation arrangement addressed both
ongoing compensation as well as transition compensation.
Mr. Lopezs offer letter
agreement provides for the following compensation and benefits: (i) base salary at the annual rate of $525,000; (ii) a fiscal 2014 annual cash incentive under our Annual Incentive Plan with a target value of 75% of his base salary at not
less than a pro-rated at target payment; (iii) a grant of 12,500 restricted stock units (which units will vest on the third anniversary of the grant date); (iv) relocation benefits to assist with his move to our headquarters
area in Melbourne, Florida; and (v) eligibility to participate in our Retirement Plan, Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, Performance Reward Plan and health and welfare benefit plans in accordance with their terms, on the same basis as
such plans are generally made available to our senior executives. For more information regarding the elements of Mr. Lopezs ongoing compensation and transition compensation, see the Summary Compensation Table on
page 55 and the related footnotes.
We also entered into an Executive Change in Control Severance Agreement with
Mr. Lopez. A
description of the material terms of Mr. Lopezs offer letter agreement and Executive Change in Control Severance Agreement is set forth in the Potential Payments Upon Termination
or a Change in Control section of this proxy statement beginning on page 67.
Elements of Our Executive Compensation
Program
During fiscal 2014, the compensation program for our executive officers consisted of the following elements:
|
|
|
annual cash incentive award compensation; |
|
|
|
equity-based long-term incentives, including stock options, performance share units and in certain limited instances, restricted stock units;
|
|
|
|
health, welfare and other personal benefits; and |
|
|
|
change in control, severance, retirement and other post-employment pay and benefits. |
Our Compensation Committee believes that the elements of our executive compensation program more directly align the interests of our
executives and shareholders, are competitive, motivate achievement of our short- and long-term financial goals and strategic objectives and align realized pay with performance, in furtherance of our overall objective of encouraging and rewarding the
creation of sustainable, long-term shareholder value. We do not have a formal policy relating to the mix among the various elements of our compensation program. However, we believe the greater an executives responsibility level and ability to
influence results, the greater the portion of the executives overall compensation that should be performance-based, at-risk compensation.
40
Named Executive Officer Fiscal 2014 Target Direct Compensation Mix
The following charts set forth, for Mr. Brown and for our other named executive officers on average, respectively, the percentage of
fiscal 2014 total target direct compensation represented by each major element of target direct compensation, indicating the percentage of fiscal 2014 total target direct compensation that was at risk in the form of performance-based cash incentive
and equity awards. Total target direct compensation does not include retirement benefits, severance benefits or health, welfare or other personal benefits. For Mr. Lopez, total target direct compensation does not include his one-time
transition-related restricted stock unit grant or his other transition or relocation benefits. The percentages are based on fiscal 2014 base salary (annualized), annual cash incentive awards for achievement of financial goals at target and the
target value of equity awards at the time of approval. A description of the valuation and how each major element is determined is discussed below.
Base Salary and How Base Salary is Determined
General Considerations
We provide executives with a base salary for services rendered during the year. Our Compensation Committee reviews executive base
salaries on an annual basis as well as any time there is a substantial change in an executives responsibilities or in market conditions. Our Compensation Committee generally targets an executive officers base salary to be within 10%
below to 10% above the median of the market for base salaries for comparable positions at companies in our compensation comparison group. However, the specific base salary for an executive also is influenced by the executives experience,
position, changes in responsibilities, tenure and
contributions, and individual performance, and by current market conditions and our outlook. Base salary reflects a fixed portion of the overall compensation package and generally is the base
amount from which other compensation elements are determined, such as target annual cash incentive awards and target value of long-term equity incentive awards at the time of approval. Base salary represents a relatively small percentage of total
target direct compensation. In general, executive officers with higher levels of responsibility and ability to influence results have a lower percentage of compensation fixed as base salary and a higher percentage of performance-based, at-risk
compensation.
41
2014 Base Salary for Named Executive Officers
In August 2013, our Compensation Committee conducted its annual base salary review for our CEO and other named executive officers then
employed by us. Our Compensation Committee, and in the case of our CEO, the independent directors of our Board, approved increases for fiscal 2014 base salaries for our CEO and other named executive officers then employed by us from fiscal 2013 base
salaries as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2013 Base Salary |
|
|
% Increase |
|
|
Fiscal
2014 Base Salary |
|
Mr. Brown |
|
$ |
900,000 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
$ |
925,000 |
|
Mr. Duffy |
|
$ |
400,000 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
$ |
440,000 |
|
Mr. Fox |
|
$ |
415,000 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
$ |
440,000 |
|
Mr. Mehnert |
|
$ |
485,000 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
$ |
494,700 |
|
Mr. McArthur |
|
$ |
575,000 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
$ |
585,000 |
|
For Messrs. Brown, Mehnert and McArthur, the increase was for merit. For Messrs. Duffy and Fox, the
increase was for merit and a market adjustment.
Base salary increases were effective August 24, 2013. Fiscal 2014 base
salary for Mr. Lopez of $525,000 was established pursuant to the terms of his offer letter agreement discussed elsewhere in this proxy statement. Information regarding base salaries for fiscal 2014 is set forth in the Summary Compensation Table
on page 55 under the Salary column.
Annual Cash Incentive Pay and How Annual
Cash Incentive Pay is Determined
Annual Incentive Plan
Under the Harris Corporation Annual Incentive Plan, which was approved by our shareholders in October 2010, early in each fiscal year our Compensation Committee sets an annual cash incentive compensation
target for each executive officer other than our CEO and recommends to the independent directors of our Board the target to set for our CEO. Our Compensation Committee and the independent directors of our Board, as applicable, also establish
specific financial performance measures and targets early in each fiscal year, including the relative weighting and thresholds, as well as individual performance objectives for each executive officer, against which performance is measured and
payouts are determined under our Annual Incentive Plan. In certain instances, financial performance targets and our actual results are adjusted by our Compensation Committee, and in the case of our CEO, by the independent directors of our
Board, to take into account items that occur during the fiscal year that are determined not to be reflective of normal, ongoing business operations. Our Compensation Committee believes the annual
cash incentive motivates our executives to focus on achieving or exceeding the fiscal year financial performance targets and individual objectives.
|
|
|
Determination of Participant Incentive Compensation Targets We set annual cash incentive compensation targets for our named executive
officers early in each fiscal year using our compensation comparison group data as a reference point where available for a comparable position, or broad survey data. Annual cash incentive awards provide executives the potential to achieve
above-target payouts if our financial performance is above target. However, there is downside risk of below-target payouts if our financial performance is below target. Payouts can range from 0% to 200% of annual cash incentive compensation targets
depending on our financial performance and named executive officer performance against individual objectives. |
|
|
|
Financial Performance Measures, Targets and Weighting For Messrs. Brown, Lopez, Duffy and McArthur, the financial performance measures
for annual cash incentives for fiscal 2014 were Harris consolidated revenue, operating income and free cash flow (defined as cash flow from operations less net capital expenditures), weighted 30%, 40% and 30%, respectively. For Messrs. Fox and
Mehnert, the financial performance measures for annual cash incentives for fiscal 2014 were (a) for 80% of the overall annual cash incentive award their respective operating segments revenue, operating income and free cash flow,
weighted 30%, 40% and 30%, respectively; and (b) for 20% of the overall annual cash incentive award Harris consolidated revenue, operating income and free cash flow, weighted 30%, 40% and 30%, respectively. As a general
principle, we seek to establish financial performance targets that are aligned with our annual operating plan and are challenging yet achievable. Targets are set at levels we believe require significant effort on the part of the executives, yet also
represent a reasonable expectation of performance based on prior-year performance, existing business conditions, the markets in which we participate and our outlook.
|
42
For each financial performance measure, we make no payout for performance below the
threshold. For fiscal 2014, the threshold for each of the revenue, operating income and free cash flow performance measures was 80% of target financial performance. Payout percentages resulting from results as a percentage of target for each
performance measure were based on the following table, which was established early in fiscal 2014:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Target Financial
Performance |
|
Revenue Payout % |
|
|
Operating Income Payout
% |
|
|
Free Cash Flow Payout % |
|
Below 80% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
80% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
95% |
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
90 |
% |
100% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
105% |
|
|
110 |
% |
|
|
110 |
% |
|
|
110 |
% |
120% and above |
|
|
200 |
% |
|
|
200 |
% |
|
|
200 |
% |
2014 Annual Cash Incentive Awards for Named Executive Officers
In August 2013, our Compensation Committee reviewed the annual cash incentive targets for our CEO and other named executive officers then
employed by us. Our Compensation Committee, and in the case of our CEO, the independent directors of our Board, approved increases for fiscal 2014 annual cash incentive targets for our CEO and other named executive officers then employed by us from
fiscal 2013 targets as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2013 Cash Incentive Target |
|
|
% Increase |
|
|
Fiscal 2014 Cash Incentive Target |
|
Mr. Brown |
|
$ |
1,080,000 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
$ |
1,100,000 |
|
Mr. Duffy |
|
$ |
260,000 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
% |
|
$ |
309,000 |
|
Mr. Fox |
|
$ |
300,000 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
$ |
318,000 |
|
Mr. Mehnert |
|
$ |
330,000 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
$ |
337,000 |
|
Mr. McArthur |
|
$ |
410,000 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
$ |
417,000 |
|
For Messrs. Brown, Mehnert and McArthur, the increase was for merit. For Messrs. Duffy and Fox, the
increase was for merit and a market adjustment.
Mr. Lopezs annual cash incentive target for fiscal 2014 was
established pursuant to the terms of his offer letter agreement which provided his fiscal 2014 annual cash incentive target would be 75% of his $525,000 base salary and his fiscal 2014 annual cash incentive payout would not be less than target,
pro-rated for the portion of fiscal 2014 that he was not employed by us.
Fiscal 2014 approved financial performance measures
and weighting, targets, GAAP results, resulting payout as a percentage of financial target and the weighted financial performance measure achievement under our Annual Incentive Plan were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Performance
Measures and Weighting |
|
Fiscal 2014 Financial Targets (in millions) |
|
|
GAAP
Results
(in millions) |
|
|
Resulting
Payout% |
|
|
Weighted
Financial
Measure
Achievement
Under Annual Incentive Plan % |
|
Harris Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127.0 |
% |
Revenue 30%: |
|
$ |
5,156 |
|
|
$ |
5,012.0 |
|
|
|
94.4 |
% |
|
Operating Income
40%: |
|
$ |
897 |
|
|
$ |
881.9 |
|
|
|
96.6 |
% |
|
Free
Cash Flow 30%: |
|
$ |
520 |
|
|
$ |
647.9 |
|
|
|
200.0 |
% |
|
RF Communications |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82.1 |
% |
Revenue 30%: |
|
$ |
2,055 |
|
|
$ |
1,828.0 |
|
|
|
74.0 |
% |
|
Operating Income
40%: |
|
$ |
616 |
|
|
$ |
561.5 |
|
|
|
79.9 |
% |
|
Free
Cash Flow 30%: |
|
$ |
426 |
|
|
$ |
410.7 |
|
|
|
93.0 |
% |
|
Government Communications Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134.3 |
% |
Revenue 30%: |
|
$ |
1,777 |
|
|
$ |
1,801.2 |
|
|
|
102.8 |
% |
|
Operating Income
40%: |
|
$ |
266 |
|
|
$ |
276.9 |
|
|
|
108.6 |
% |
|
Free
Cash Flow 30%: |
|
$ |
112 |
|
|
$ |
160.3 |
|
|
|
200.0 |
% |
|
43
These financial performance measures and targets represent internal measurements of
performance, and although the calculations are based on our financial results calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP), our actual GAAP results may be adjusted by our Compensation
Committee, and in the case of our CEO, by the independent directors of our Board, to take into account items that occurred during a fiscal year that are determined not to be reflective of normal, ongoing business operations. Our Compensation
Committee has adopted guidelines in making specific decisions for these purposes on which items to include or exclude from our financial results, including that any adjustment must be objectively measurable under GAAP. For fiscal 2014, no
adjustments were made to our actual results.
Fiscal 2014 approved weighted financial measure achievement under our Annual
Incentive Plan, named executive officer Annual Incentive Plan compensation targets, approved payouts and approved payouts as a percentage of incentive compensation target for our named executive officers were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Named
Executive
Officer |
|
Organization
Financial
Performance
Measures |
|
Weighted
Financial
Measure
Achievement
Under Annual Incentive Plan |
|
|
Participants Annual Incentive
Plan
Target |
|
|
Actual Annual Incentive Plan Payout |
|
|
Actual Payout as a % of Target |
|
William M. Brown |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer |
|
Harris |
|
|
127.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,100,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,513,000 |
|
|
|
137.5 |
% |
Miguel A. Lopez* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer |
|
Harris |
|
|
127.0 |
% |
|
$ |
149,231 |
|
|
$ |
190,000 |
|
|
|
127.3 |
% |
Robert L. Duffy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Human
Resources and Administration |
|
Harris |
|
|
127.0 |
% |
|
$ |
309,000 |
|
|
$ |
425,000 |
|
|
|
137.5 |
% |
Sheldon J. Fox |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group President, Government
Communications Systems |
|
GCS 80%
Harris 20% |
|
|
132.8 |
% |
|
$ |
318,000 |
|
|
$ |
460,000 |
|
|
|
144.7 |
% |
Dana A. Mehnert |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group President, RF
Communications |
|
RF 80%
Harris 20% |
|
|
91.1 |
% |
|
$ |
337,000 |
|
|
$ |
307,000 |
|
|
|
91.1 |
% |
Gary L. McArthur** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Former Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer |
|
Harris |
|
|
127.0 |
% |
|
$ |
417,000 |
|
|
$ |
417,000 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
* |
Mr. Lopezs offer letter agreement provided that his annual incentive payout for fiscal 2014 would not be less than target, pro-rated for the portion of
fiscal 2014 that he was not employed by us. The amount shown as his Annual Incentive Plan target is his pro-rated target. |
** |
Mr. McArthur left Harris effective February 28, 2014. His Annual Incentive Plan target was initially set at $417,000. Mr. McArthurs separation
agreement provided we will pay him an amount equal to his annual incentive compensation for fiscal 2014 at target and not pro-rated for the portion of fiscal 2014 that he was not employed by us. |
Payouts under our Annual Incentive Plan were subject to an upward or downward adjustment
for individual performance of the pre-established individual objectives as well as the individuals contribution to our overall results. Pursuant to the terms of our Annual Incentive Plan, annual cash incentive payouts for participants may not
exceed 200% of the participants annual cash incentive target. For fiscal 2014, payouts under our Annual Incentive Plan for our other named executive officers, excluding Mr. McArthur, as calculated based on the weighted financial measure
achievement under our Annual Incentive Plan, were adjusted from
0% to 8.9% higher based on achievement of individual objectives and contribution to our overall results. The adjustments for our other named executive officers were approved by our Compensation
Committee based on our CEOs recommendation as a result of his assessment of individual performance of the pre-established individual objectives.
The payouts under our Annual Incentive Plan for fiscal 2014 are also set forth in the note to the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table on page 55.
44
Broad-Based Performance Reward Plan
We maintain broad-based annual cash incentive plans, available to most of our U.S.-based employees. Our executive officers participate in
our broad-based Performance Reward Plan starting after the officer has been credited with one year of company service. Pursuant to our Performance Reward Plan in effect in fiscal 2014, for corporate headquarters employees and corporate officers
(including our executive officers), we will make a cash payment to each such employee from 0% up to a maximum of 4% of such employees eligible compensation based on our performance against financial targets set early in fiscal 2014. For
amounts of such employees eligible compensation above the Social Security wage base, the payment is increased up to an additional 4% of such eligible compensation above the Social Security wage base. For fiscal 2014 the target payout was 2% of
such employees eligible compensation if we achieved operating income of $897 million. We achieved operating income of $881.9 million for fiscal 2014, and as a result, a payout of 1.92% of such employees eligible compensation plus an
additional 1.92% of such eligible compensation above the Social Security wage base was approved for fiscal 2014 under our Performance Reward Plan. The amounts earned by our named executive officers under our Performance Reward Plan for fiscal 2014
are set forth in the note to the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table on page 55.
Long-Term Compensation
Equity Incentives and How Long-Term
Compensation is Determined
We provide long-term incentive compensation to our
executive officers through a combination of stock options and performance share unit awards. As part of long-term compensation, as discussed below, we also may grant restricted stock unit awards primarily to facilitate recruitment, retention and
succession planning. The long-term compensation elements of our executive compensation program are designed to motivate our executives to focus on achievement of our long-term financial goals and strategic objectives. Our Compensation Committee
awards different types of equity compensation because it believes that each type incentivizes and rewards shareholder value creation in a different way. Although the value of all forms of equity-based compensation is directly impacted by both
increases and decreases in the price of our common stock,
performance share unit grants motivate our executives to achieve our multi-year financial and operating goals because the number of shares ultimately earned depends on the level of our
performance against internal and external financial measures, generally over a three-year period. Under such grants, each new fiscal year begins a new three-year performance cycle for which our Compensation Committee establishes financial
performance measures and targets and long-term incentive compensation targets. Stock option grants motivate our executives to increase shareholder value because the options only have value to the extent the price of our common stock on the date of
exercise exceeds the stock price on the grant date, and thus compensation is realized only if our stock price increases over the term of the award and the option is exercised by the executive. Equity awards also are intended to retain executives,
encourage share ownership and maintain a direct link between our executive compensation program and the value and appreciation in value of our stock.
Equity Compensation Mix
In determining the appropriate mix of
equity compensation elements, our Compensation Committee, and with respect to our CEO, the independent directors of our Board, considers the mix of such elements for our compensation comparison group, the retention value of each element and other
factors important to us, including tax and accounting treatment, and the recommendation of Pearl Meyer & Partners, our Compensation Committees independent compensation consultant. The total value of long-term incentive compensation
for each of our executive officers is typically set by reference to a multiple of such executive officers base salary, which multiple is assessed using our compensation comparison group. For fiscal 2014, our Compensation Committee, and with
respect to our CEO, the independent directors of our Board, targeted that 50% of the value of long-term equity incentive compensation (excluding restricted stock units and other retention-based awards) at the time of award would be allocated as
stock options and 50% of the value would be allocated as performance share units. This is the same long-term equity incentive compensation target mix approved by our Compensation Committee the past several fiscal years. The number of stock options
and performance share units granted to the named executive officers in fiscal 2014 was determined based on the 60-day
45
average closing market price of our common stock ending August 1, 2013 (prior to the grant date), which valuation methodology differs from the grant date fair value method required for the
calculation of amounts presented for fiscal 2014 in the Stock Awards and Option Awards columns of the Summary Compensation Table on page 55.
Stock Options
Stock options granted to our named executive officers
and other employees during fiscal 2014 were made pursuant to our Harris Corporation 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective August 27, 2010), which our shareholders initially approved in October 2005 and re-approved in
October 2010. Stock option grants made in fiscal 2014 have the following terms:
|
|
|
An exercise price equal to or greater than the closing price of our stock on the grant date; |
|
|
|
Vest in equal installments of one-third each on the first, second and third anniversary of the grant date; |
|
|
|
Expire 10 years from the grant date; and |
|
|
|
Accelerated vesting upon a change in control or other events as discussed below. |
A listing of the stock options granted to our named executive officers in fiscal 2014 and information relating to the terms and conditions
of such stock options appears in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2014 Table on page 59 and the related notes. For additional information relating to the terms and conditions of stock options, see the notes to the Outstanding Equity Awards
at 2014 Fiscal Year End Table on page 61.
Without prior approval of our shareholders, stock options granted by us may not be
repriced, replaced, regranted through cancellation or modified by us if the effect thereof would be to reduce the exercise price of such stock options, other than in connection with a change in our capitalization, including spin-offs.
Performance Share Unit Awards
Fiscal 2014 Grants for Fiscal 2014-2016 Performance Period
Financial performance measures for performance share units granted in fiscal 2014 covering the three-year performance period of fiscal
2014-2016 include the achievement of targets, weighted equally, for three-year cumulative operating income for the fiscal 2014-2016 performance period and average annual ROIC for each fiscal year
of such period, subject to possible adjustment upward or downward by as much as 33% based on our quintile ranking for our total shareholder return performance over the fiscal 2014-2016 performance period compared with companies in the
Standard & Poors 500. The actual performance share unit award payout with respect to fiscal 2014 grants will be made in shares of our common stock and can range from 0% to 200% of the target number of performance share units awarded.
Our Compensation Committee believes that the operating income, ROIC and total shareholder return measures motivate financial performance that management can influence directly, should improve earnings and capital management over the long term and
create long-term shareholder value. For additional information relating to the terms and conditions of performance share units, see the notes to the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2014 Table on page 59 and the notes to the Outstanding
Equity Awards at 2014 Fiscal Year End Table on page 61.
For fiscal 2014, our Compensation Committee, and with respect to
Mr. Brown, the independent directors of our Board, approved the grant of performance share units to our named executive officers as set forth in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2014 Table on page 59 and related notes.
Payouts for Fiscal 2012-2014 Performance Period Awards Granted in Fiscal 2012
In fiscal 2012, our Compensation Committee, and with respect to Mr. Brown, the independent directors of our Board, granted
performance share units covering the three-year performance period of fiscal 2012-2014 to executive officers then employed by us, including Messrs. Brown, Fox, Mehnert and McArthur. Financial performance measures for awards granted in fiscal 2012
for the fiscal 2012-2014 performance period were three-year cumulative operating income and average annual ROIC for each fiscal year of such period. Such measures were equally weighted and subject to possible adjustment upward or downward by as much
as 33% based on our quintile ranking for total shareholder return performance over the fiscal 2012-2014 performance period compared with our Fiscal 2012-2014 TSR Peer Group.
46
For each financial performance measure, we make no payout for performance below the
threshold. For the fiscal 2012-2014 performance period, the threshold for three-year cumulative operating income was 80% of target and the threshold for average annual ROIC was 9%. Payout percentages resulting from adjusted results as a percentage
of target for each performance measure were based on the following table, which was established early in the fiscal 2012-2014 performance period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-Year Cumulative
Operating Income |
|
Average Annual ROIC |
|
% of Target |
|
Payout % |
|
ROIC |
|
Payout % |
|
<80% |
|
0% |
|
<9% |
|
|
0% |
|
80% |
|
50% |
|
9% |
|
|
50% |
|
90% |
|
75% |
|
11% |
|
|
70% |
|
100% |
|
100% |
|
12% |
|
|
80% |
|
110% |
|
125% |
|
14% |
|
|
100% |
|
³120% |
|
150% |
|
16% |
|
|
120% |
|
|
|
|
|
³19% |
|
|
150% |
|
For the fiscal 2012-2014 performance period, the possible total shareholder return performance
adjustment to the calculation for the performance share unit award payout, based on achievement of financial performance measure targets, was dependent on the quintile ranking of our total shareholder return compared with our Fiscal
2012-
2014 TSR Peer Group, based on the following table, which was established early in the fiscal 2012-2014 performance period:
|
|
|
Total Shareholder Return Payout
Adjustment |
Quintile |
|
Payout Adjustment |
Top |
|
+33% |
2nd |
|
+15% |
3rd |
|
0% |
4th |
|
-15% |
Bottom |
|
-33% |
Our total shareholder return for the three-year performance period of fiscal 2012-2014 was in the second
quintile of our Fiscal 2012-2014 TSR Peer Group and resulted in an upward payout adjustment of 15%.
In determining the
performance share unit award payouts for the fiscal 2012-2014 performance period, the financial performance targets and our actual results were adjusted by our Compensation Committee as set forth in the notes to the table below. These adjustments
were made in accordance with the same guidelines for adjusting annual cash incentive compensation award targets and actual results adopted by our Compensation Committee as discussed above.
For performance share
unit awards granted in fiscal 2012 for the fiscal 2012-2014 performance period, approved financial performance measures and weighting, initial targets, adjusted targets, GAAP results, adjusted results, adjusted results as a percentage of adjusted
targets, resulting payout percentages, total shareholder return adjustments, resulting total shareholder return adjusted payout percentages and weighted adjusted payout percentages were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Performance
Measures
and
Weighting |
|
Initial
Target |
|
Adjusted
Target* |
|
GAAP Result |
|
Named Executive
Officer |
|
Adjusted
Result** |
|
Adjusted
Result
as % of
Adjusted
Target |
|
|
Resulting
Payout
% |
|
|
Total
Shareholder
Return
Adjustment |
|
|
Total
Shareholder
Return
Adjusted
Payout % |
|
Cumulative Operating Income 50% |
|
$3,635.5 million |
|
$3,385.0 million |
|
$2,635.3 million |
|
Mr. Brown |
|
$2,770.2 million |
|
|
81.8 |
% |
|
|
54.6 |
% |
|
|
+15 |
% |
|
|
62.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Messrs. Fox and Mehnert |
|
$2,562.8 million |
|
|
75.7 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Mr. McArthur |
|
$2,105.3 million |
|
|
62.2 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Average Annual ROIC 50% |
|
14.0% |
|
14.0% |
|
18.8% |
|
Mr. Brown |
|
19.2% |
|
|
137.0 |
% |
|
|
150.0 |
% |
|
|
+15 |
% |
|
|
172.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Messrs. Fox and Mehnert |
|
18.0% |
|
|
128.8 |
% |
|
|
140.3 |
% |
|
|
+15 |
% |
|
|
161.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Mr. McArthur |
|
15.7% |
|
|
112.3 |
% |
|
|
117.3 |
% |
|
|
+15 |
% |
|
|
134.9 |
% |
Approved
Weighted Adjusted Payout % |
|
Mr. Brown |
|
|
|
117.6 |
% |
|
Messrs. Fox and Mehnert |
|
|
|
80.7 |
% |
|
Mr. McArthur |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67.4 |
% |
* |
Our cumulative operating income target set early in fiscal 2012 was decreased by the operating income for fiscal 2013 and 2014 of $250.5 million originally included in
the target for operations discontinued in fiscal 2012 (our Broadcast Communications business and Cyber Integrated Solutions operation). |
** |
For Mr. Brown, our GAAP cumulative operating income on a continuing operations basis, for purposes of such results and calculating our average
annual ROIC results, was increased by (a) adding $95.9 million of operating income to equal the operating income target for fiscal 2012 because the strategy and events related to our fiscal 2012 results largely occurred prior to
Mr. Browns joining us, consistent with our rationale for the annual cash incentive payout we approved for Mr. Brown for fiscal 2012 under our Annual Incentive Plan and
|
47
|
for the payout to Mr. Brown for performance share units granted to him in fiscal 2012 for the fiscal 2012-2013 performance period, and (b) excluding charges of $39.1 million in fiscal
2013 in connection with Company-wide restructuring and other actions; and for purposes of calculating our average annual ROIC results, our invested capital for fiscal 2012 excluded the $394 million impact of impairments related to discontinued
operations. |
For Messrs. Fox and Mehnert, our GAAP cumulative operating income on a continuing operations basis,
for purposes of such results and calculating our average annual ROIC results, was (a) increased by excluding charges of $58.2 million in fiscal 2012 for integration and other costs associated with acquisitions; (b) decreased by
including the fiscal 2012 operating loss of $627.2 million for discontinued operations; (c) increased by excluding the $457.5 million impact of impairments in fiscal 2012 related to discontinued operations; and (d) increased by excluding
charges of $39.1 million in fiscal 2013 in connection with Company-wide restructuring and other actions; and for purposes of calculating our average annual ROIC results, our invested capital for fiscal 2012 excluded the $394 million impact of
impairments related to discontinued operations. The discontinued operations were formerly part of our Integrated Network Solutions segment and unrelated to our Government Communications Systems and RF Communications segments, Messrs. Fox and
Mehnerts respective operating segments.
For Mr. McArthur, our GAAP cumulative operating income on a continuing
operations basis, for purposes of such results and calculating our average annual ROIC results, was: (a) increased by excluding charges of $58.2 million in fiscal 2012 for integration and other costs associated with acquisitions;
(b) decreased by including the fiscal 2012 operating loss of $627.2 million for discontinued operations; and (c) increased by excluding charges of $39.1 million in fiscal 2013 in connection with Company-wide restructuring and other
actions.
The following table shows the performance share unit awards granted in fiscal 2012 for the fiscal 2012-2014
performance period and the fiscal 2014 payout in respect of such performance share unit awards as approved by the independent members of our Board for Mr. Brown and by our Compensation Committee for Messrs. Fox, Mehnert and McArthur:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Named Executive Officer |
|
Performance Share Units Granted |
|
|
Weighted
Total Shareholder Return Adjusted Payout % |
|
|
Shares Paid Out |
|
William M. Brown Chairman, President
and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
82,910 |
|
|
|
117.6 |
% |
|
|
97,502 |
|
Sheldon J. Fox Group President,
Government Communications Systems |
|
|
8,400 |
|
|
|
80.7 |
% |
|
|
6,779 |
|
Dana A. Mehnert Group President, RF
Communications |
|
|
12,400 |
|
|
|
80.7 |
% |
|
|
10,007 |
|
Gary L. McArthur Former Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
14,434 |
* |
|
|
67.4 |
% |
|
|
9,729 |
|
* |
Mr. McArthur left Harris effective February 28, 2014. The number of performance share units granted gives effect to pro-ration for the portion of the fiscal
2012-2014 performance period that he was not employed by us. |
See the Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal 2014 Table on page 64 and related
notes for additional information regarding these payouts for Messrs. Brown, Fox, Mehnert and McArthur.
Restricted Stock and Restricted
Stock Units
As part of long-term incentive compensation, we also may grant shares of restricted stock or restricted
stock units primarily to facilitate retention and succession planning and as a recruitment mechanism to replace the value of equity awards that may have been forfeited as a result of leaving a former employer. The restrictions typically expire at
the end of a three-year period. The restrictions provide that the shares or units may not be sold or otherwise transferred, and the shares or units will be immediately forfeited in the event of the recipients termination of employment for any
reason other than involuntary termination, death, disability or retirement.
In fiscal 2014, the independent members of our Board approved the grant of 3,500
restricted stock units to Mr. Brown in recognition of his performance, and our Compensation Committee approved the grant of 12,500 restricted stock units to Mr. Lopez pursuant to the terms of his offer letter agreement. For further
information related to restricted stock units granted to our named executive officers, see the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2014 Table on page 59 and related notes and the Outstanding Equity Awards at 2014 Fiscal Year End Table on page 61
and related notes.
Recovery of Executive Compensation
(Clawback)
Our executive compensation program permits us to recover
all or a portion of any performance-based compensation, both cash and equity, if our financial statements are restated as a result of errors, omissions or fraud. The amount that may be recovered shall be
48
the amount by which the affected compensation exceeded the amount that would have been payable had the financial statements been initially filed as restated, or any greater or lesser amount that
our Compensation Committee or the independent members of our Board shall determine. In no case shall the amount to be recovered by us be less than the amount required to be repaid or recovered as a matter of law. Recovery of such amounts by us would
be in addition to any actions imposed by law, enforcement agencies, regulators or other authorities. We will review the terms of our recovery policy in light of the requirements under the Dodd-Frank Act and will make any necessary changes to be in
compliance with those requirements once final regulations have been issued.
Treatment of Incentive Awards Upon
Change in Control
Under our Annual Incentive Plan and equity incentive plans, upon a change in control and irrespective of employment status:
|
|
|
Annual cash incentive awards are fully earned and to be paid out promptly following the change in control or, in certain instances, following the end
of the fiscal year, in each case at not less than the target level; |
|
|
|
All unvested options immediately vest and become exercisable until their regularly scheduled expiration date; |
|
|
|
All performance share units are deemed fully earned and fully vested immediately and will be paid at the end of the applicable performance period at
not less than the target level, subject to accelerated payout or forfeiture in certain circumstances; |
|
|
|
All restricted shares immediately vest; and |
|
|
|
All restricted stock units immediately vest and are to be paid as soon as practicable but not later than 60 days following the change in control, or in
certain events, promptly following the expiration of the initial restriction period. |
Information regarding
severance payments and obligations to our named executive officers for termination of employment following a change in control is set forth below in the Change in Control Severance Agreements section of this Compensation Discussion and
Analysis and the Potential Payments
Upon Termination or a Change in Control section of this proxy statement beginning on page 67.
Post-Employment Compensation
Severance Arrangements
As a general matter, most of our employees are employees at-will and only a limited number of our executive officers have
contracts requiring us to pay amounts to them upon termination of employment. Mr. Browns employment and payments upon termination of employment are governed by his employment agreement discussed elsewhere in this proxy statement. Pursuant
to Mr. Lopezs offer letter agreement, if his employment is terminated within 24 months of his start date by us without cause (as defined in the offer letter agreement) or by Mr. Lopez as a result of
constructive termination (as defined in the offer letter agreement), subject to his execution and delivery of a general release of claims against us, he is entitled to receive a severance payment equal to the product of (i) two and
(ii) the aggregate of his then-current annual base salary and annual cash incentive compensation under the Annual Incentive Plan at target.
While Messrs. Duffy, Fox and Mehnert do not have severance agreements, we have a long-standing practice of providing severance compensation for terminating an executives employment without cause.
The specific amount will be based on the relevant circumstances, including the reason for termination, length of employment and other factors.
We also have a severance plan for all full-time, U.S.-based employees who are terminated as a result of a reduction in force. Amounts payable under this plan are based on length of service.
Employment Agreement with our CEO
As discussed above, we are party to an employment agreement with Mr. Brown. The agreement provides for his continued employment as our President and Chief Executive Officer and provides for certain
benefits if Mr. Browns employment is terminated by us without cause or by Mr. Brown as a result of a constructive termination (as defined in the agreement). Obligations in the event of a termination following
a change in control will be governed by Mr. Browns change in control severance agreement. Our Compensation Committee and the independent directors of our Board approved Mr. Browns
49
employment agreement in the belief that such agreement was critical to Mr. Browns decision to accept employment with us and assists in retaining Mr. Browns valued service.
In addition, his employment agreement also binds Mr. Brown to certain non-compete and non-solicitation undertakings that are valuable to us.
Change in Control Severance Agreements
Each of our Board-elected
corporate officers, including our named executive officers currently employed by us, is party to a change in control severance agreement with us. We believe that these agreements align the interests of our officers and shareholders during the period
of an actual or rumored change in control and also are necessary in some cases to attract and retain executives. Under these agreements, an executive is provided with severance benefits in the event the executives employment is terminated
without cause, or by the executive for good reason, within two years following a change in control. These agreements are designed with a double trigger, so that benefits are provided only if there is both a change
in control and a termination of employment. Such severance benefits are designed to preserve the focus and productivity of our executive officers, avoid disruption and prevent attrition during a period of uncertainty. We also believe these
agreements facilitate the objectiveness of an executives assessment of a potential transaction that may be in our shareholders best interests notwithstanding the potential negative impact of a transaction on an executives future
employment.
If triggered, the lump-sum severance benefit payable under the change in control severance agreement equals the
sum of: (a) the executives unpaid base salary through the date of termination, a pro-rated annual bonus (as determined under the change in control severance agreement), any unpaid accrued vacation pay and, to the extent permitted under
Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Internal Revenue Code), any other benefits or awards that have been earned or become payable pursuant to the terms of any compensation plan but which have not been
paid to the executive; and (b) two times the executives highest annual rate of base salary during the 12-month period prior to the date of termination plus two times the greatest of the executives highest annual bonus in the three
fiscal years prior to the change in control, the executives target bonus for the year during which the
change in control occurs or the executives target bonus for the year in which the executives employment is terminated. Change in control severance agreements entered into with
executive officers following April 22, 2010, including the agreements entered into with Messrs. Brown, Lopez and Duffy, do not provide for any tax gross-ups for excise taxes to the executive in the event that payout of any benefits is
subject to excise taxes imposed by the IRS under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code. In addition, during fiscal 2014 we eliminated the provision for tax gross-ups for excise taxes under change in control severance agreements with the few
remaining corporate officers whose agreements included those provisions, including Messrs. Fox and Mehnert. As a result, we no longer provide tax gross-ups for excise taxes in any of our change in control severance agreements. Our Compensation
Committee has determined, in its business judgment, that the substantive terms of these change in control severance agreements are competitive and reasonable.
A description of the material terms of the change in control severance agreements, Mr. Browns employment agreement and Mr. Lopezs offer letter agreement, as well as a summary of
potential payments upon termination or a change in control for our named executive officers, is set forth in the Potential Payments Upon Termination or a Change in Control section of this proxy statement beginning on page 67.
Retirement Programs
Retirement Plan
We
maintain a Retirement Plan, which is a tax-qualified, defined contribution retirement plan available to most of our U.S.-based employees, including our named executive officers. Subject to applicable Internal Revenue Code limits, employees may
generally contribute up to 25% of eligible compensation, with our named executive officers and certain other highly compensated employees limited to contributing 12% of eligible compensation. After one year of service we will make a matching
contribution of up to 6% of eligible compensation.
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
To the extent contributions to our Retirement Plan are subject to certain limitations under the Internal Revenue Code, certain of our
salaried
50
employees, including our named executive officers, may elect to participate in our nonqualified SERP, which is an unfunded, non-qualified defined contribution plan. In addition, our Compensation
Committee may, in its discretion, provide for the deferral of other compensation under our SERP, including equity awards.
The
value of our contributions credited to our named executive officers accounts under our Retirement Plan and SERP is set forth in the Summary Compensation Table on page 55 under the All Other Compensation column and related notes.
Additional information regarding our SERP and credits to accounts under our SERP is set forth in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation section of this proxy statement beginning on page 65.
Health, Welfare and Other Benefits
We maintain health, welfare and other benefit programs for our U.S.-based employees, including medical and prescription coverage, dental and vision programs, short-term disability insurance, basic life
insurance, supplemental life insurance, dependent life insurance, accidental death and dismemberment insurance and business travel insurance as well as customary paid time-off, leave of absence and other similar policies. Our executive officers are
eligible to participate in these programs on the same basis as our other salaried employees. We also offer a long-term disability plan to our U.S.-based employees. The plan is fully insured and provides a benefit of 60% of eligible compensation
before offsets for Social Security and certain other Company- or government- provided disability or other benefits. Eligible compensation for purposes of the long-term disability plan is currently limited to $400,000 per year. For executives with
annual eligible compensation in excess of $400,000, we provide a Company-paid supplemental long-term disability benefit of 50% of eligible compensation above $400,000 up to $800,000, for a maximum annual supplemental disability benefit of up to
$200,000. We also provide liability insurance coverage to our officers and offer our executive officers the ability to participate in a group excess liability umbrella policy at the executives cost.
Perquisites
We
have eliminated virtually all perquisites for executives. Currently, we provide eligibility for annual physical examinations for Board-elected
officers. We believe this practice is in the best interest of our Company because the health of an executive officer is critical to his or her performance. For our CEO, we also provide limited
personal use of Company-owned aircraft. In very limited instances as approved by our CEO, we may also provide limited personal use of Company-owned aircraft for other executives. We do not provide tax reimbursement or gross-up payments with respect
to any perquisites provided to executive officers. Tax gross-up payments made pursuant to a plan, policy or arrangement applicable to a broad base of management employees, such as a relocation or tax equalization policy, are permitted.
In consideration of the time demands on our CEO and to minimize and more effectively utilize his travel time, our Compensation Committee
has authorized the personal use of Company-owned aircraft by our CEO and his family and guests. Such personal use is subject to limits on the number of hours which are set by our Compensation Committee and reviewed annually. In fiscal 2014,
Mr. Browns personal use of Company-owned aircraft was below the limits set by our Compensation Committee. Our CEO is responsible for paying the tax on income imputed for such personal use of aircraft.
Perquisites provided in fiscal 2014, namely annual physical examinations and limited personal use of Company-owned aircraft, represent a
small portion of the total compensation of each named executive officer. The dollar values ascribed to these perquisites in fiscal 2014 are set forth in the Summary Compensation Table on page 55 under the All Other Compensation column
and related notes.
Policies Relating to Our Common Stock
Stock Ownership Guidelines
To further promote ownership of shares
by management and to more closely align management and shareholder interests, our Compensation Committee has established stock ownership guidelines for our Board-elected officers. Executives are expected to own Harris stock having a minimum value,
denominated as a multiple of their annual base salaries, which can be accumulated over a five-year period from the date of hire or promotion into a covered position. Our Compensation Committee annually reviews the stock ownership guidelines,
including reviewing the stock ownership guidelines of our compensation comparison group.
51
The current stock ownership guidelines are as follows:
|
|
|
CEO five times base salary; |
|
|
|
Senior Corporate Officers and Group Presidents (including the other named executive officers) three times base salary; and
|
|
|
|
Other corporate officers two times base salary. |
Shares that count toward the stock ownership guidelines include shares owned outright or jointly by the executive, shares credited in our
Retirement Plan, share equivalents represented by amounts deferred in the Harris stock fund account of our SERP, and restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards (on an after-tax basis). Stock options and unearned performance share units do not
count for the purpose of measuring compliance with the ownership guidelines. Executives age 62 or older are not subject to the guidelines. An annual review is conducted by our Compensation Committee to assess compliance with the guidelines. As of
September 1, 2014, our named executive officers currently employed by us met their applicable ownership guidelines, or were on track to achieve their ownership guidelines within the applicable compliance timeframe.
Our Equity-Based Compensation Award Practices
As described above, our annual cycle for grants to executive officers of stock option and other equity awards typically occurs at the same time as decisions relating to base salary increases and annual
cash incentive awards. This occurs early in the fiscal year, typically in late August, following the release of our financial results for the preceding fiscal year and the completion of the audit of our financial statements. The dates for the
meetings at which such grants are typically made are set well in advance of such meetings, typically one year or more. We typically make annual equity grants to our other eligible employees on the same date as the grants to executive officers. Our
Compensation Committee may also make grants of equity awards to executive officers at other times during the year due to special circumstances, such as new hires or promotions or for retention or recognition. We have not repriced options and if our
stock price declined after the grant date, we have not replaced options. The exercise price of stock options is the closing market price of our common stock on the grant date or, if the grant is
made on a weekend or holiday, the closing market price of our common stock on the prior business day. Our Compensation Committee or Board also has the discretion to set the exercise price of
stock options higher than the closing market price of our common stock on the grant date.
Pursuant to our policy on equity
grant practices previously adopted by our Compensation Committee, the grant date of equity awards made outside of the annual grant cycle, whether for new hires, promotions, retention or recognition, shall be the first trading day of the month
following the new hire date or promotion, retention or recognition, provided if such trading day is during a quiet period under our insider trading policy, the grant will be made on the first trading day following the end of such period.
We do not time equity grants to take advantage of information, either positive or negative, about Harris that has not been publicly disclosed.
As permitted by the terms of our 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, our Board has delegated to our CEO the authority to make equity grants to employees who are not executive officers. Such grants are subject to
our equity grant policy. The maximum number of shares and options that can be awarded pursuant to this delegation is set by our Compensation Committee, which reviews these awards annually.
Insider Trading Policy and Policy Against Hedging and Pledging
Our
insider trading policy prohibits directors, employees and certain of their family members from purchasing or selling any type of security, whether issued by us or another company, while such person is aware of material non-public information
relating to the issuer of the security (except pursuant to an approved 10b-5 trading plan) or from providing such material non-public information to any person who may trade while aware of such information. This policy also prohibits directors and
employees from engaging in short sales with respect to our securities, and from entering into hedging, puts, calls or other derivative transactions with respect to our securities. Our policies also prohibit directors and executives from
purchasing Harris stock on margin, holding Harris stock in a margin account or otherwise pledging our stock as collateral for margin accounts, loans or any other purpose. Use of cashless exercise procedures to exercise stock options
granted by us is permitted by this policy if such exercise complies with our insider trading and other relevant policies. None of our directors or executive
52
officers pledged our stock during fiscal 2014. We also have procedures that require trades by directors and executive officers to be pre-cleared by our General Counsel or his staff.
Tax and Accounting Considerations
Tax Deductibility of Executive Compensation
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally prohibits a public company from deducting compensation paid in any year in excess of $1 million to the companys CEO or any of the
companys three other most highly compensated executive officers (other than the chief financial officer) as of the end of the year. Certain compensation is specifically exempt from the deduction limit to the extent it is
performance-based. In evaluating whether to structure executive compensation components as performance-based and thus, exempt from the deduction limit, our Compensation Committee considers the net cost to us, and its ability to
effectively administer executive compensation in the long-term interest of shareholders. Stock option grants and performance share or performance share unit awards made to executive officers under our equity incentive plans, and cash payments under
our Annual Incentive Plan, are structured generally to be deductible under Section 162(m). Our Compensation Committee believes, however, that it is important to preserve flexibility in administering compensation programs in a manner designed to
promote corporate goals. Accordingly, our Compensation Committee from time to time has approved elements of compensation that were consistent with the objectives of our executive compensation program, but that may not be fully deductible. For
example, sign-on bonuses and grants of restricted stock or restricted stock units are not performance-based under Section 162(m) and, in certain instances, deductibility of such compensation may be limited.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code requires that nonqualified deferred compensation be deferred and paid under plans or arrangements that satisfy the requirements of the law with
respect to the timing of deferral elections, timing of payments and certain other matters. If such requirements are not complied with, amounts that are deferred under compensation arrangements that are subject to Section 409A will be currently
includable in income to the employee and subject to an excise tax to be
assessed on the employee. In general, it is our intention to design and administer our compensation and benefits plans and arrangements for all of our employees so that they are either exempt
from, or satisfy the requirements of, Section 409A.
Accounting for Share-Based Compensation
Before we grant share-based compensation awards, we consider the accounting impact of the award as structured and other scenarios in order
to analyze the expected impact of the award.
MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The following Report of our Management Development and Compensation Committee does not constitute soliciting material
and the Report should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other previous or future filings by Harris under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that
Harris specifically incorporates this Report by reference therein.
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed
with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement. Based on its review and discussion, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board, and the Board has approved, that this Compensation
Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement for the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and incorporated by reference in Harris Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014.
Submitted on September 2, 2014 by the
Management Development
and Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors.
Thomas A. Dattilo, Chairperson
Terry D. Growcock
Lewis Hay III
Hansel E. Tookes II
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COMPENSATION
PLANS AND RISK
In fiscal 2011, our Compensation Committee and management, with the assistance of Aon Hewitt Associates LLC, conducted a review of our compensation strategy, plans, programs, policies and practices,
including executive compensation and
53
major broad-based compensation programs in which salaried and hourly employees at various levels of our organization participate. The goal of this review was to assess whether any of our
compensation strategy, plans, programs, policies or practices, either individually or in the aggregate, would encourage executives or employees to undertake unnecessary or excessive risks that were reasonably likely to have a material adverse impact
on Harris.
We reviewed our variable pay, sales commission and other compensation plans and considered the number of
participants in each plan, the participants levels within the organization, the target and maximum payment potential and the performance criteria under each plan, and the type of plan. Management and our Compensation Committee also applied a
risk assessment to those plans that were identified as having the potential to deliver a material amount of compensation, which were the annual and long-term incentive plans that are described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis
section of this proxy statement. In fiscal 2012, 2013 and 2014, our Compensation Committee and management, with the assistance of Aon Hewitt, again conducted a review of such compensation strategy, plans, programs, policies and practices, with a
focus on those that changed since fiscal 2011. Management and our Compensation Committee again concluded that our executive compensation strategy, plans, programs, policies and practices do not pose material risk due to a variety of mitigating
factors. These factors include:
|
|
|
An emphasis on long-term compensation that utilizes a balanced portfolio of compensation elements, such as cash and equity and delivers rewards based
on sustained performance over time; |
|
|
|
Our Compensation Committees power to set short- and long-term performance objectives
|
|
|
for our incentive plans, which we believe are appropriately correlated with shareholder value and which use multiple financial metrics to measure performance; |
|
|
|
Our performance share awards and performance share unit awards focus on cumulative operating income and average annual ROIC over overlapping three-year
performance periods. This creates a focus on driving sustained performance over multiple performance periods, which mitigates the potential for executives to take excessive risks to drive one-time, short-term performance spikes in any one
performance period; |
|
|
|
The use of equity awards with vesting periods to foster retention and align our executives interests with those of our shareholders;
|
|
|
|
Capping the potential payouts under both short- and long-term incentive plans to eliminate the potential for any windfalls;
|
|
|
|
A clawback policy that allows us to recover all or a portion of any performance-based compensation if our financial statements are restated
as a result of errors, omissions or fraud; |
|
|
|
Share ownership guidelines; and |
|
|
|
A broad array of competitive benefit programs that offer employees and executives an opportunity to build meaningful retirement assets and benefit
protections throughout their careers. |
As a result of this review, both management and our Compensation
Committee concluded that our compensation strategy, plans, programs, policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Harris.
54
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table summarizes the compensation paid to, or accrued on behalf of, our named executive officers for the fiscal years ended
June 27, 2014, June 28, 2013 and June 29, 2012. Our named executive officers are our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer, our three other most highly compensated executive officers serving at the end of the
fiscal year ended June 27, 2014 and Gary L. McArthur, our former Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. The Summary Compensation Table and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2014 Table on page 59 should be viewed
together for a more complete representation of both the annual and long-term incentive compensation elements of our executive compensation program.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Principal Position |
|
Year |
|
|
Salary $
(1) |
|
|
Bonus $
(2) |
|
|
Stock
Awards $
(3) |
|
|
Option
Awards $
(4) |
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensation $ (5) |
|
|
Change
in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
$ |
|
|
All
Other Compensation $ (6) |
|
|
Total
$ |
|
William M. Brown |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
$ |
921,154 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
2,547,275 |
|
|
$ |
2,203,452 |
|
|
$ |
1,604,252 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
571,249 |
|
|
$ |
7,847,382 |
|
Chairman, President and |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
$ |
884,615 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
2,186,745 |
|
|
$ |
1,876,491 |
|
|
$ |
1,018,346 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
440,362 |
|
|
$ |
6,406,559 |
|
Chief
Executive Officer |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
$ |
535,385 |
|
|
$ |
4,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,621,824 |
|
|
$ |
3,374,074 |
|
|
$ |
800,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
434,997 |
|
|
$ |
14,266,280 |
|
Miguel A. Lopez (7) |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
$ |
201,923 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
922,375 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
190,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
127,814 |
|
|
$ |
1,442,112 |
|
Sr. Vice President and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert L. Duffy (8) |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
$ |
433,846 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
529,016 |
|
|
$ |
495,436 |
|
|
$ |
454,556 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
264,275 |
|
|
$ |
2,177,129 |
|
Sr. Vice President, Human |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
$ |
376,923 |
|
|
$ |
205,000 |
|
|
$ |
589,002 |
|
|
$ |
506,049 |
|
|
$ |
276,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
197,246 |
|
|
$ |
2,150,220 |
|
Resources & Administration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheldon J. Fox (9) |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
$ |
436,154 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
677,616 |
|
|
$ |
634,158 |
|
|
$ |
492,192 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
81,482 |
|
|
$ |
2,321,602 |
|
Group President, Government |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communications Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dana A. Mehnert |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
$ |
493,208 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
677,616 |
|
|
$ |
634,158 |
|
|
$ |
335,531 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
90,603 |
|
|
$ |
2,231,116 |
|
Group President, RF |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
$ |
482,692 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
645,975 |
|
|
$ |
553,854 |
|
|
$ |
283,323 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
71,794 |
|
|
$ |
2,037,638 |
|
Communications |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
$ |
463,077 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,337,976 |
|
|
$ |
434,486 |
|
|
$ |
347,038 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
47,102 |
|
|
$ |
2,629,679 |
|
Gary L. McArthur (10) |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
$ |
358,462 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,293,621 |
|
|
$ |
826,140 |
|
|
$ |
32,764 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,287,034 |
|
|
$ |
3,798,021 |
|
Former Sr. Vice President |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
$ |
573,461 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
832,590 |
|
|
$ |
712,984 |
|
|
$ |
398,241 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
65,295 |
|
|
$ |
2,582,571 |
|
and Chief Financial
Officer |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
$ |
562,692 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,534,980 |
|
|
$ |
567,299 |
|
|
$ |
213,789 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
46,992 |
|
|
$ |
2,925,752 |
|
(1) |
The Salary column reflects the base salary for each of our named executive officers for the fiscal year. The amounts shown include any portion of base
salary deferred and contributed by our named executive officers to our Retirement Plan or our SERP. See the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table on page 66 and related notes for information regarding contributions by our named executive officers
to our SERP. |
(2) |
The amount shown under the Bonus column (a) for fiscal 2013 for Mr. Duffy represents a one-time cash sign-on bonus paid under the terms of his
offer letter agreement; and (b) for fiscal 2012 for Mr. Brown represents a one-time cash make-whole, sign-on bonus paid under the terms of his employment agreement intended to replace a portion of the compensation he forfeited from his
prior employer in order to join us. |
(3) |
Amounts shown under the Stock Awards column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with ASC 718 for fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012,
respectively, with respect to performance share units and restricted stock units granted to our named executive officers. Amounts reflect our accounting for these awards and do not necessarily correspond to the actual values that may be realized by
our named executive officers. The fair value of performance share units granted in fiscal 2014 and 2013 was calculated in accordance with ASC 718 based on a multifactor Monte Carlo valuation model that simulates our stock price and total
shareholder return relative to the other companies in our applicable total shareholder return peer group. The fair value of performance share units granted in fiscal 2012 and restricted stock units granted in fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 was
determined as of the grant date using the closing market price of our common stock on the grant date (or date of modification). The fiscal 2014 amount for Mr. McArthur also reflects the incremental fair value of $413,909 as a result of the
modification to his outstanding restricted stock unit award as provided in his separation agreement, computed as of the February 28, 2014 modification date in accordance with ASC 718. |
|
The assumptions used for the valuations are set forth in Note 14 to our audited consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the respective fiscal year end. Pursuant to SEC rules, we disregarded the estimates of forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. The valuations reflect the following discounts per share, because dividends are not paid on performance
share units during the performance period: (a) $5.35 per share for the fiscal 2014 performance share units granted to our named executive officers in August 2013; (b) $3.97 per share for the fiscal 2013 performance share units granted to
our named executive officers in August 2012; (c) $3.70 per share for the fiscal 2012 performance share units granted to our named executive officers in August 2011 (other than Mr. Brown, in the case of the fiscal 2012 performance share
units granted to Mr. Brown); and (d) $2.35 per share for the fiscal 2012 performance share units granted to Mr. Brown that vested in fiscal 2013 and $3.70 per share for the fiscal 2012 performance share units granted to Mr. Brown
that vested in fiscal 2014. The grant date fair values of performance share units included in this column were |
55
|
computed based on the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date of such awards, which is at target. See the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2014 Table on page 59
and related notes and the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement for information with respect to stock awards made in fiscal 2014 and the Outstanding Equity Awards at 2014 Fiscal Year End Table on page 61
and related notes for information with respect to stock awards made prior to fiscal 2014. |
|
The respective grant date fair values of the performance share units granted in fiscal 2014, 2013 or 2012, as applicable, assuming at such grant date the maximum
payment of 200% of target, are as follows: Mr. Brown $4,695,760, $4,373,490 and $9,243,648; Mr. Duffy $1,058,032 and $813,450; Mr. Fox $1,355,232; Mr. Mehnert $1,355,232, $1,291,950 and $842,952; and
Mr. McArthur $1,759,424, $1,665,180 and $1,101,276 . |
|
Each performance share unit earned at the end of the applicable multi-year performance period and paid out receives accrued dividend equivalents in an amount equal to
the cash dividends or other distributions, if any, which are paid with respect to issued and outstanding shares of our common stock during the performance period. Payment of such dividend equivalents will be made in cash at the time of the actual
payout of performance share units ultimately earned as determined after completion of the performance period. Dividends declared with respect to issued and outstanding shares of our common stock were $1.68, $1.48 and $1.22 per share in fiscal 2014,
2013 and 2012, respectively. The dollar value of dividend equivalents on vested performance share units will be included in the All Other Compensation column. |
(4) |
Amounts shown under the Option Awards column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with ASC 718 for fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012,
respectively, with respect to stock options granted to our named executive officers. Amounts reflect our accounting for these stock option grants and do not necessarily correspond to the actual values that may be realized by our named executive
officers. The grant date fair value of each stock option grant was calculated at the grant date using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model. The grant date fair values per share of our common stock underlying each option were as follows:
(a) $12.39 per share for fiscal 2014 option grants to Messrs. Brown, Duffy, Fox, Mehnert and McArthur in August 2013; (b) $10.33 per share for fiscal 2013 option grants to Messrs. Brown, Mehnert and McArthur in August 2012; (c) $9.34
per share for the initial fiscal 2013 option grant to Mr. Duffy on August 2, 2012 for 17,000 shares following his July 23, 2012 start date and $10.33 per share for the fiscal 2013 option grant to Mr. Duffy on August 24, 2012
for 33,600 shares; (d) $9.49 per share for fiscal 2012 option grants to Messrs. Mehnert and McArthur in August 2011; and (e) $9.20 per share for the fiscal 2012 option grant to Mr. Brown on his November 1, 2011 start date. The
assumptions used for the valuations are set forth in Note 14 to our audited consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the respective fiscal year end. Pursuant to SEC rules, we disregarded the estimates of forfeitures
related to service-based vesting conditions. See the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2014 Table on page 59 and related notes and the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement for information with respect
to stock options granted in fiscal 2014 and the Outstanding Equity Awards at 2014 Fiscal Year End Table on page 61 and related notes for information with respect to stock options granted prior to fiscal 2014. |
(5) |
Amounts shown under the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column reflect payouts of (a) cash amounts earned under our Annual Incentive Plan for
services performed in fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and (b) cash amounts earned under our Performance Reward Plan in fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Payouts were determined by our independent directors, in the case of
Mr. Brown, and our Compensation Committee, in the case of our other named executive officers, in August 2014, August 2013 and August 2012, respectively, and paid shortly thereafter. The amounts shown include any portion of such
payments deferred and contributed by our named executive officers to our Retirement Plan or our SERP. See the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table on page 66 and related notes for information regarding contributions by our named executive
officers to our SERP. The amounts shown for fiscal 2014 are comprised of the following amounts: Mr. Brown $1,513,000 under our Annual Incentive Plan and $91,252 under our Performance Reward Plan; Mr. Lopez $190,000 under
our Annual Incentive Plan; Mr. Duffy $425,000 under our Annual Incentive Plan and $29,556 under our Performance Reward Plan; Mr. Fox $460,000 under our Annual Incentive Plan and $32,192 under our Performance Reward Plan;
Mr. Mehnert $307,000 under our Annual Incentive Plan and $28,531 under our Performance Reward Plan; and Mr. McArthur $32,764 under our Performance Reward Plan. For additional information about our Annual Incentive Plan and
Performance Reward Plan and these payouts, see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2014 Table on page 59 and related notes. |
|
The amounts shown for fiscal 2013 are comprised of the following amounts: Mr. Brown $956,000 under our Annual Incentive Plan and $62,346 under our
Performance Reward Plan; Mr. Duffy $276,000 under our Annual Incentive Plan; Mr. Mehnert $256,000 under our Annual Incentive Plan and $27,323 under our Performance Reward Plan; and Mr. McArthur $363,000 under our
Annual Incentive Plan and $35,241 under our Performance Reward Plan. |
|
The amounts shown for fiscal 2012 are comprised of the following amounts: Mr. Brown $800,000 under our Annual Incentive Plan; Mr. Mehnert
$318,000 under our Annual Incentive Plan and $29,038 under our Performance Reward Plan; and Mr. McArthur $186,000 under our Annual Incentive Plan and $27,789 under our Performance Reward Plan. |
56
(6) |
The following table describes the components of the All Other Compensation column for fiscal 2014: |
Fiscal 2014 All Other Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Insurance
Premiums
(a) |
|
|
Company
Contributions
to Retirement
Plan
(b) |
|
|
Company
Credits
to SERP
(nonqualified) (c) |
|
|
Perquisites
and Other
Personal
Benefits
(d) |
|
|
Tax
Reimbursement
Payments
(e) |
|
|
Dividend Equivalents on Vested Stock Awards (f) |
|
|
Other
(g) |
|
|
Total |
|
William M. Brown |
|
$ |
4,484 |
|
|
$ |
8,538 |
|
|
$ |
104,033 |
|
|
$ |
54,436 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
399,758 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
571,249 |
|
Miguel A. Lopez |
|
$ |
848 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
119,961 |
|
|
$ |
7,005 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
127,814 |
|
Robert L. Duffy |
|
$ |
1,658 |
|
|
$ |
8,361 |
|
|
$ |
32,291 |
|
|
$ |
171,666 |
|
|
$ |
50,299 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
264,275 |
|
Sheldon J. Fox |
|
$ |
1,678 |
|
|
$ |
8,362 |
|
|
$ |
41,750 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
29,692 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
81,482 |
|
Dana A. Mehnert |
|
$ |
1,842 |
|
|
$ |
8,367 |
|
|
$ |
36,563 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
43,831 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
90,603 |
|
Gary L. McArthur |
|
$ |
1,664 |
|
|
$ |
5,400 |
|
|
$ |
45,965 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
42,613 |
|
|
$ |
1,191,392 |
|
|
$ |
1,287,034 |
|
(a) |
Amounts shown reflect the dollar value of the premiums paid by us on life insurance for our named executive officers under our broad-based group basic life insurance
benefit. |
(b) |
Amounts shown reflect Harris contributions under our Retirement Plan, which is a tax-qualified, defined contribution plan. Mr. Lopez did not receive a contribution
because he had not yet met the one-year service requirement. |
(c) |
Amounts shown reflect Harris credits under our SERP, which is an unfunded, nonqualified defined contribution retirement plan. For additional information regarding our
SERP, see the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table on page 66 and related notes. Mr. Lopez did not receive a credit because he had not yet met the one-year service requirement. |
(d) |
Perquisites and other personal benefits for Messrs. Fox, Mehnert and McArthur are not reported for fiscal 2014 because the total incremental cost to us per individual
was less than $10,000. Perquisites and other personal benefits provided to Mr. Brown for fiscal 2014 consisted of personal use of Harris-owned aircraft. Perquisites and other personal benefits provided to Mr. Lopez for fiscal 2014
consisted of: (i) payment or reimbursement of relocation, commuting and related temporary living expenses and allowance of $110,032; and (ii) payment of $9,929 for legal services related to the negotiation of his offer letter agreement.
Perquisites and other personal benefits provided to Mr. Duffy for fiscal 2014 consisted of payment or reimbursement of relocation and related expenses. |
|
The incremental cost to Harris of personal use of Harris-owned aircraft is calculated based on the average variable operating costs to Harris. Variable operating costs
include fuel, maintenance, weather-monitoring, on-board catering, trip-related hangar/parking, landing/ramp fees and other miscellaneous variable costs. The total annual variable costs are divided by the annual number of miles the Harris aircraft
flew to derive an average variable cost per mile. This average variable cost per mile is then multiplied by the miles flown for personal use to derive the incremental cost. The methodology excludes fixed costs that do not change based on usage, such
as pilots and other employees salaries, purchase costs of the aircraft and non-trip related hangar expenses. The taxable benefit associated with personal use of Harris-owned aircraft is imputed to our named executive officers at
Standard Industry Level rates and named executive officers do not receive any gross-up for payment of taxes for such imputed income. The amount related to the loss of tax deduction to us due to the personal use of Harris-owned aircraft
under the Internal Revenue Code is not included. |
|
As noted above, we also offer an additional long-term disability benefit to employees with eligible compensation in excess of $400,000. No premiums are payable by us
for this benefit and there is no incremental cost reflected for our named executive officers. |
|
Additionally, as noted above, we also offer our executives the ability to participate in a group excess liability umbrella policy. No premiums are payable by us for
this benefit and there is no incremental cost reflected for our named executive officers. |
|
Certain Harris-related events may include meetings and receptions with our customers, executive management or Board attended by the named executive officer and a spouse
or guest. If the Harris-owned aircraft is used and a spouse or guest travels with the named executive officer, no amounts are included because there is no incremental cost to Harris. We also have Harris-purchased tickets to athletic or other events
generally for business purposes. In limited instances, executives, including our named executive officers, may have personal use of Harris-purchased event tickets. No amounts are included because there is no incremental cost to Harris of such
personal use. For a discussion of perquisites and other personal benefits provided to our named executive officers, see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement. |
(e) |
Amounts shown represent reimbursement for taxes on imputed income associated with the relocation-related benefits provided to Messrs. Lopez and Duffy. This
reimbursement is in accordance with our relocation policies for salaried employees. |
(f) |
Amounts shown reflect the dollar value of dividend equivalents paid in cash to Messrs. Brown, Fox, Mehnert and McArthur with respect to performance share units
ultimately earned for the fiscal 2012-2014 three-year performance period. The value of such dividend equivalents was not factored into the grant date fair value of such performance share units. |
(g) |
For Mr. McArthur, the Other column includes separation-related payments comprised of: (i) an amount equal to his annual base salary of $585,000;
(ii) an amount equal to his annual incentive compensation for fiscal 2014 at target of $417,000 (in lieu of a pro-rated payout subject to our financial results and Mr. McArthurs individual performance against established goals);
(iii) $112,500 for unused accrued vacation time; (iv) $33,750 for services performed from his last day as our Chief Financial Officer through his February 28, 2014 separation date; (v) $25,000 to cover incidental expenses related to his
separation; and (vi) the payment by us of up to $18,142 for premium costs for the continuation of medical, dental and vision care plans for a period of up to 12 months following his separation date. Additional information regarding the terms of
Mr. McArthurs separation agreement is set forth in the Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control section of this proxy statement, beginning on page 67. |
57
(7) |
Mr. Lopez joined us on February 10, 2014. Mr. Lopezs fiscal 2014 compensation included transition compensation. His fiscal 2014
transition-related compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table included (i) an initial grant of 12,500 restricted stock units with a grant date fair value of $922,375 included in the Stock Awards column; and
(ii) payment or reimbursement of relocation, commuting and related temporary living expenses and allowance of $110,032, reimbursement for legal services related to the negotiation of his offer letter agreement of $9,929 and reimbursement for
taxes on imputed income associated with his relocation-related benefits of $7,005, all of which is included in the All Other Compensation column. The total amount of Mr. Lopezs fiscal 2014 transition-related compensation as
reported in the Summary Compensation Table is $1,049,341. |
(8) |
Mr. Duffy joined us on July 23, 2012. Mr. Duffys fiscal 2013 compensation included ongoing and transition compensation. His
fiscal 2013 transition-related compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table included (i) a one-time cash sign-on bonus of $205,000 included in the Bonus column; (ii) an initial grant of 4,300 restricted stock units
with a grant date fair value of $182,277 included in the Stock Awards column; (iii) an initial option grant for 17,000 shares with a grant date fair value of $158,857 included in the Option Awards column; and
(iv) payment or reimbursement of relocation, commuting and related temporary living expenses and an allowance for miscellaneous relocation-related expenses of $180,192 and reimbursement for taxes on imputed income associated with his
relocation-related benefits of $15,593 included in the All Other Compensation column. The total amount of Mr. Duffys fiscal 2013 transition-related compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table is $741,919.
|
(9) |
Mr. Fox was not a named executive officer in fiscal 2013 or fiscal 2012. |
(10) |
Mr. McArthur left Harris effective February 28, 2014. In fiscal 2014, we granted Mr. McArthur: 66,700 stock options with a grant date fair value of
$826,140 included in the Option Awards column and 14,800 performance share units with a grant date fair value of $879,712 included in the Stock Awards column. In connection with his separation, Mr. McArthur forfeited all
of such options and performance share units. In connection with Mr. McArthurs separation, we modified Mr. McArthurs outstanding restricted stock units granted on November 1, 2011 to enable them to remain outstanding and
eligible to vest as if he had remained employed by us to November 1, 2014, rather than being paid out on a pro-rated basis. This modification enabled an additional 5,607 restricted stock units to vest and resulted in incremental fair value
under ASC 718 of $413,909. Amounts reflect our accounting for these awards and do not correspond to the actual values that may be realized by Mr. McArthur. |
Salary and Bonus as a Proportion of Fiscal 2014 Total Compensation
Using the amounts
shown under the Salary and Bonus and Total columns in the Summary Compensation Table, the salary and bonus of each of our named executive officers as a proportion of such named executive officers fiscal 2014
total compensation was as follows: Mr. Brown-11.74%; Mr. Lopez-14.00%; Mr. Duffy-19.93%; Mr. Fox-18.79%; Mr. Mehnert-22.11%; and Mr. McArthur-9.44%.
58
GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS IN FISCAL 2014
The following table provides information about cash (non-equity) and equity incentive compensation plan-based awards granted to our named
executive officers in fiscal 2014, including: (1) the grant date of equity awards; (2) the range of cash payouts that were possible in respect of awards under our Annual Incentive Plan and our Performance Reward Plan; (3) the range of
performance share units that may be earned in respect of the performance share units granted; (4) the number of shares underlying, and exercise price of, stock option grants; and (5) the grant date fair value of the grants of performance
share units, restricted stock units and stock options computed under ASC 718.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Type of
Award |
|
Grant
Date |
|
|
Approval
Date |
|
|
Estimated
Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards (1) |
|
|
Estimated Future
Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (2) |
|
|
All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of Shares of Stock or
Units
(#) (3) |
|
|
All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of Securities Underlying
Options
(#) (4) |
|
|
Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Share)
(5) |
|
|
Grant
Date
Fair
Value of
Stock and Option Awards
($) (6) |
|
|
|
|
|
Threshold ($) |
|
|
Target ($) |
|
|
Maximum ($) |
|
|
Threshold (#) |
|
|
Target (#) |
|
|
Maximum (#) |
|
|
|
|
|
William M. Brown |
|
Annual Incentive Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
165,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,100,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Reward Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20,663 |
|
|
$ |
78,726 |
|
|
$ |
245,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance share units |
|
|
8/23/13 |
|
|
|
8/23/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,616 |
|
|
|
39,500 |
|
|
|
79,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,347,880 |
|
|
|
Restricted stock units |
|
|
8/23/13 |
|
|
|
8/23/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
199,395 |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
8/23/13 |
|
|
|
8/23/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177,900 |
|
|
$ |
56.97 |
|
|
$ |
2,203,452 |
|
Miguel A. Lopez |
|
Annual Incentive Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
22,385 |
|
|
$ |
149,231 |
|
|
$ |
298,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock units |
|
|
3/3/14 |
|
|
|
2/3/14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
922,375 |
|
Robert L. Duffy |
|
Annual Incentive Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
46,350 |
|
|
$ |
309,000 |
|
|
$ |
618,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Reward Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,821 |
|
|
|
26,148 |
|
|
$ |
77,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance share units |
|
|
8/23/13 |
|
|
|
8/22/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,491 |
|
|
|
8,900 |
|
|
|
17,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
529,016 |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
8/23/13 |
|
|
|
8/22/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
$ |
56.97 |
|
|
$ |
495,436 |
|
Sheldon J. Fox |
|
Annual Incentive Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,540 |
|
|
$ |
318,000 |
|
|
$ |
636,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Reward Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,854 |
|
|
$ |
28,046 |
|
|
$ |
81,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance share units |
|
|
8/23/13 |
|
|
|
8/22/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,910 |
|
|
|
11,400 |
|
|
|
22,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
677,616 |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
8/23/13 |
|
|
|
8/22/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,200 |
|
|
$ |
56.97 |
|
|
$ |
634,158 |
|
Dana A. Mehnert |
|
Annual Incentive Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,110 |
|
|
$ |
337,000 |
|
|
$ |
674,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Reward Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,959 |
|
|
$ |
30,944 |
|
|
$ |
88,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance share units |
|
|
8/23/13 |
|
|
|
8/22/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,910 |
|
|
|
11,400 |
|
|
|
22,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
677,616 |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
8/23/13 |
|
|
|
8/22/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,200 |
|
|
$ |
56.97 |
|
|
$ |
634,158 |
|
Gary L. McArthur (7) |
|
Annual Incentive Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
62,550 |
|
|
$ |
417,000 |
|
|
$ |
834,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Reward Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,814 |
|
|
$ |
37,806 |
|
|
$ |
108,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance share units |
|
|
8/23/13 |
|
|
|
8/22/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,479 |
|
|
|
14,800 |
|
|
|
29,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
879,712 |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
8/23/13 |
|
|
|
8/22/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,700 |
|
|
$ |
56.97 |
|
|
$ |
826,140 |
|
|
|
Restricted stock units |
|
|
2/28/14 |
|
|
|
2/3/14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
413,909 |
|
(1) |
The Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards column shows the range of cash payouts that were possible in respect of awards under
our Annual Incentive Plan and our Performance Reward Plan in respect of fiscal 2014 performance (for performance below threshold, no amount is paid). Amounts actually earned for fiscal 2014 were determined by our independent directors, in the case
of Mr. Brown, and our Compensation Committee, in the case of our other named executive officers, in August 2014 and paid shortly thereafter and are reported under the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column in the Summary
Compensation Table on page 55. For additional information related to our Annual Incentive Plan and our Performance Reward Plan, including performance measures, targets and weighting, see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section
of this proxy statement. |
(2) |
The Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards column shows the range of performance share units that may be earned in respect of
performance share units granted under our 2005 Equity Incentive Plan in fiscal 2014 for the three-year performance period of fiscal 2014-2016. The number of shares that may be earned by each named executive officer (other than Mr. McArthur)
will range from 0% to a maximum of 200% of the target number of performance share units and will be based on the extent of weighted achievement of targets for cumulative operating income for the performance period and average annual ROIC for the
same period, subject to possible adjustment based on our total shareholder return compared with companies in the Standard & Poors 500. In connection with his separation, Mr. McArthur forfeited all performance share units granted
to him in fiscal 2014. For additional information related to the performance measures, targets and weighting, see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement. Cash dividend equivalents are not paid during the
performance period on performance share units. The performance share units granted in fiscal 2014 provide that each performance share unit earned and paid out will receive accrued dividend equivalents in an amount per share equal to the cash
dividends or other distributions, if any, which are paid with respect to an issued and outstanding share of our common stock during the performance period, and that payment of such dividend equivalents will be made in cash at the time of the actual
payout of performance share units ultimately earned as determined after completion of the performance period. For performance share units granted in fiscal 2014, an executive officer must remain employed with us through the last day of the
performance period to earn an award, although, subject to a minimum holding period ending on the last day of the first fiscal year of the three-year performance period, a pro-rata portion of the award will be earned if employment terminates as a
result of death, disability or retirement after age 55 with 10 or more years of full-time service, or involuntary termination of the executive other than for misconduct. See the Potential Payments Upon Termination or a Change in Control
section of this proxy statement beginning on page 67 for the treatment of performance share units in these situations and upon a change in control. |
(3) |
The All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units column shows restricted stock units granted in fiscal 2014 to Messrs. Brown
and Lopez, and for Mr. McArthur, shows the incremental number of restricted stock units that were permitted to vest as a result of the modification of the terms and conditions of the restricted stock units granted to him in November 2011. Dividend
equivalents are paid on these restricted stock units in an amount equal to dividends paid on our common stock. In the case of death or disability, subject to a |
59
|
minimum one-year holding period, or upon a change in control, restricted stock units granted in fiscal 2014 will immediately vest. Subject to a minimum one-year holding period, in the case of
retirement after age 55 with 10 or more years of full-time service, or involuntary termination of employment other than for misconduct, restricted stock units granted in fiscal 2014 will vest and be pro-rated. For additional information related to
the terms and conditions of the restricted stock units granted by us, see the Outstanding Equity Awards at 2014 Fiscal Year End Table on page 61 and related notes. |
(4) |
The All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options column shows the number of shares of our common stock underlying stock options granted
in fiscal 2014. These options vest in equal installments of one-third each on the first, second and third anniversary of the grant date. In the case of death or disability, subject to a minimum one-year holding period, or in the case of a change in
control, options granted in fiscal 2014 will immediately vest and become exercisable. These stock options expire no later than 10 years from the grant date. For additional information related to the terms and conditions of the stock options granted
by us, see the Outstanding Equity Awards at 2014 Fiscal Year End Table on page 61 and related notes. In connection with his separation, Mr. McArthur forfeited all stock options granted to him in fiscal 2014. |
(5) |
The Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards column shows the exercise price per share for the stock options at the time of grant, which was the closing
market price per share of our common stock on the grant date or, if the grant is made on a weekend or holiday, the closing market price of our common stock on the prior business day. |
(6) |
The Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards column shows the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with ASC 718 of the performance
share units (at target), restricted stock units and stock options granted in fiscal 2014. In accordance with SEC rules, the amounts in this column reflect the grant date fair value without reduction for estimates of forfeitures related to
service-based vesting conditions. The grant date fair value of each stock option grant was calculated at the grant date using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model. The grant date fair value per share of our common stock underlying each
option granted to our named executive officers in fiscal 2014 was $12.39 per share. |
|
The grant date fair value of performance share units shown in this column is computed based on the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date
of such awards, which is at target. The grant date fair value of performance share units granted in fiscal 2014 was calculated in accordance with ASC 718 based on a multifactor Monte Carlo valuation model that simulates our stock price and total
shareholder return relative to the other companies in the Standard & Poors 500. The grant date fair value of performance share units granted to our named executive officers in fiscal 2014 based on such Monte Carlo simulation was
$64.79 less a discount of $5.35 per share, because dividends are not paid on performance share units during the performance period, for a grant date fair value of $59.44 per share. The grant date fair value of restricted stock units granted in
fiscal 2014 to Messrs. Brown and Lopez was determined as of the grant date using the closing market price of our common stock on the grant date. The assumptions used for the valuations are set forth in Note 14 to our audited consolidated financial
statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014. These amounts reflect our accounting for these grants and do not necessarily correspond to the actual values that may be realized by our named executive
officers. In accordance with SEC requirements, the amounts disclosed for Mr. McArthur are the grant date fair values of the performance share units and stock options granted to him in fiscal 2014, even though he forfeited such performance share
units and stock options in connection with his separation from Harris effective February 28, 2014. |
(7) |
For Mr. McArthur, the amounts shown under the Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards column reflect the initial range of
possible cash payouts to Mr. McArthur under our Annual Incentive Plan and our Performance Reward Plan in respect of fiscal 2014 performance. Under his separation agreement, Mr. McArthur is entitled to receive a cash payment of his annual
incentive compensation at target of $417,000 (in lieu of a pro-rated payout subject to our financial results and Mr. McArthurs individual performance against established goals). |
|
Under his separation agreement, the terms and conditions of the restricted stock units granted to Mr. McArthur on November 1, 2011 were modified to permit
them to remain outstanding and eligible to vest as if he had remained employed by us to the November 1, 2014 vesting date, rather than being paid out on a pro-rated basis. The amount shown for the grant with a date of February 28, 2014
reflects the effective date of the modification of such restricted stock unit award and the amounts shown under the Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards column also reflects incremental fair value, computed as of the
modification date (February 28, 2014) in accordance with ASC 718, with respect to such modified restricted stock unit award. |
60
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 2014 FISCAL YEAR END
The following table provides information regarding outstanding unexercised stock options and unvested stock awards held by each of our
named executive officers as of June 27, 2014. Each grant of outstanding unexercised stock options or unvested stock awards is shown separately for each named executive officer. The vesting schedule for each grant of outstanding unexercised
stock options is shown in the footnotes following this table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Option Awards |
|
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
Option
Grant
Date
(1) |
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable |
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
(2) |
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards: Number of Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#) |
|
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($) |
|
|
Option
Expiration
Date |
|
|
Number of Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have Not
Vested
(#) (3) |
|
|
Market
Value of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
($) (4) |
|
|
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights That Have Not Vested
(#) (5) |
|
|
Market or Payout Value of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
($) (6) |
|
William M. Brown |
|
|
11/1/2011 |
|
|
|
244,369 |
|
|
|
122,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$36.66 |
|
|
|
11/1/2021 |
|
|
|
33,183 |
|
|
|
$2,521,244 |
|
|
|
91,400 |
|
|
|
$6,944,572 |
|
|
|
|
8/25/2012 |
|
|
|
60,534 |
|
|
|
121,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$46.53 |
|
|
|
8/25/2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,000 |
|
|
|
6,002,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/23/2013 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
177,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$56.97 |
|
|
|
8/23/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,400 |
|
|
|
$12,946,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304,903 |
|
|
|
421,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miguel A. Lopez |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
$949,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert L. Duffy |
|
|
8/2/2012 |
|
|
|
5,667 |
|
|
|
11,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$42.39 |
|
|
|
8/2/2022 |
|
|
|
2,866 |
|
|
|
$217,759 |
|
|
|
17,000 |
|
|
|
$1,291,660 |
|
|
|
|
8/24/2012 |
|
|
|
11,200 |
|
|
|
22,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$46.53 |
|
|
|
8/24/2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,800 |
|
|
|
1,352,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/23/2013 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$56.97 |
|
|
|
8/23/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,800 |
|
|
|
$2,644,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,867 |
|
|
|
73,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheldon J. Fox |
|
|
8/22/2008 |
|
|
|
11,891 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$48.96 |
|
|
|
8/22/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,000 |
|
|
|
$1,747,540 |
|
|
|
|
8/28/2009 |
|
|
|
17,700 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$35.04 |
|
|
|
8/28/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,800 |
|
|
|
1,732,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/27/2010 |
|
|
|
19,400 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$42.87 |
|
|
|
8/27/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,800 |
|
|
|
$3,479,884 |
|
|
|
|
8/26/2011 |
|
|
|
20,600 |
|
|
|
10,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$37.69 |
|
|
|
8/26/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/24/2012 |
|
|
|
15,267 |
|
|
|
30,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$46.53 |
|
|
|
8/24/2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/23/2013 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
51,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$56.97 |
|
|
|
8/23/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,858 |
|
|
|
92,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dana A. Mehnert |
|
|
8/24/2007 |
|
|
|
11,891 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$55.78 |
|
|
|
8/24/2014 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
$1,899,500 |
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
$2,051,460 |
|
|
|
|
8/22/2008 |
|
|
|
21,879 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$48.96 |
|
|
|
8/22/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,800 |
|
|
|
1,732,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/28/2009 |
|
|
|
48,700 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$35.04 |
|
|
|
8/28/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,800 |
|
|
|
$3,783,804 |
|
|
|
|
8/27/2010 |
|
|
|
33,700 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$42.87 |
|
|
|
8/27/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/26/2011 |
|
|
|
30,534 |
|
|
|
15,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$37.69 |
|
|
|
8/26/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/24/2012 |
|
|
|
17,867 |
|
|
|
35,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$46.53 |
|
|
|
8/24/2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/23/2013 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
51,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$56.97 |
|
|
|
8/23/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164,571 |
|
|
|
102,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary L. McArthur |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
$1,899,500 |
|
|
|
19,284 |
|
|
|
$1,465,198 |
|
(1) |
All options granted are nonqualified stock options. The exercise price at the time of grant for all stock option grants is the closing market price of
a share of our common stock on the grant date except that the grant made to Mr. Brown by the independent directors of the Board on August 25, 2012 was an annual grant made on a Saturday using the closing market price on the prior business
day in accordance with the terms of our equity incentive plan. The exercise price may be paid in cash and/or shares of our common stock, or an option holder may use broker assisted cashless exercise procedures. In the event of death
while employed, subject to a minimum one-year vesting period in the case of options granted after June 29, 2013, unvested options shall immediately become fully vested and all options shall be exercisable for up to 12 months following the date
of death but not later than the regularly scheduled expiration date. In the event of disability while employed, options granted prior to July 4, 2009 shall continue to vest in accordance with the vesting schedule and be exercisable until the
regularly scheduled expiration date and options granted on or after July 4, 2009 but prior to June 29, 2013 shall immediately fully vest and be exercisable until the regularly scheduled expiration date and, subject to a minimum one-year
vesting period in the case of options granted after June 29, 2013, immediately fully vest and shall be exercisable until the regularly scheduled expiration date. In the event of retirement after age 62 with 10 or more years of full-time
service, subject to a minimum one-year vesting period in the case of options granted after June 29, 2013, options shall continue to vest in accordance with the vesting schedule and be exercisable until the regularly scheduled expiration date.
In the event of retirement before age 62, but after age 55 with 10 or more years of full-time service, subject to a minimum one-year vesting period in the case of options granted after June 29, 2013, options shall cease vesting and options
exercisable at the time of such retirement will continue to be exercisable until the regularly scheduled expiration date, but unvested options are forfeited. In the event of termination of employment of an option holder by us other than for
misconduct, unvested options are forfeited and, subject to a minimum one-year vesting period in the case of options granted after June 29, 2013, vested options may be exercised until the sooner of 90 days following such involuntary
termination or the regularly scheduled expiration date. If an option holders employment is terminated by us for misconduct, all vested and unvested options are automatically forfeited. In the event of resignation or voluntary termination of
employment by the option holder, unvested options are automatically forfeited and, subject to a minimum one-year vesting period in the case of options granted after June 29, 2013, vested options may be exercised until the sooner of
|
61
|
30 days following such resignation or voluntary termination or the regularly scheduled expiration date. In the event of a change in control, outstanding unvested options immediately vest and
become exercisable until the regularly scheduled expiration date. As described in the Potential Payments Upon Termination or a Change in Control Employment Agreement William M. Brown section of this proxy statement, a
portion of the options granted to Mr. Brown on November 1, 2011 will continue to vest following a termination of his employment by us without cause or by Mr. Brown for constructive termination and a portion will fully vest.
|
(2) |
The following table details the regular vesting schedule for all unvested stock option grants for each named executive officer. In general, options granted on or after
August 27, 2004, but prior to August 28, 2009, expire seven years from the grant date and options granted on or after August 28, 2009 expire 10 years from the grant date. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Grant Date |
|
|
Option Vesting Date |
|
|
Number of Shares Underlying Options |
|
William M. Brown |
|
|
11/1/2011 |
|
|
|
11/1/2014 |
|
|
|
122,183 |
|
|
|
|
8/25/2012 |
|
|
|
8/25/2014 |
|
|
|
60,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/25/2015 |
|
|
|
60,533 |
|
|
|
|
8/23/2013 |
|
|
|
8/23/2014 |
|
|
|
59,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/23/2015 |
|
|
|
59,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/23/2016 |
|
|
|
59,300 |
|
Robert L. Duffy |
|
|
8/2/2012 |
|
|
|
8/2/2014 |
|
|
|
5,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/2/2015 |
|
|
|
5,666 |
|
|
|
|
8/24/2012 |
|
|
|
8/24/2014 |
|
|
|
11,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/24/2015 |
|
|
|
11,200 |
|
|
|
|
8/23/2013 |
|
|
|
8/23/2014 |
|
|
|
13,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/23/2015 |
|
|
|
13,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/23/2016 |
|
|
|
13,333 |
|
Sheldon J. Fox |
|
|
8/26/2011 |
|
|
|
8/26/2014 |
|
|
|
10,300 |
|
|
|
|
8/24/2012 |
|
|
|
8/24/2014 |
|
|
|
15,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/24/2015 |
|
|
|
15,266 |
|
|
|
|
8/23/2013 |
|
|
|
8/23/2014 |
|
|
|
17,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/23/2015 |
|
|
|
17,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/23/2016 |
|
|
|
17,066 |
|
Dana A. Mehnert |
|
|
8/26/2011 |
|
|
|
8/26/2014 |
|
|
|
15,266 |
|
|
|
|
8/24/2012 |
|
|
|
8/24/2014 |
|
|
|
17,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/24/2015 |
|
|
|
17,866 |
|
|
|
|
8/23/2013 |
|
|
|
8/23/2014 |
|
|
|
17,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/23/2015 |
|
|
|
17,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/23/2016 |
|
|
|
17,066 |
|
(3) |
These are restricted stock units and, in the case of Mr. Brown, consist of (a) 29,683 performance share units earned in fiscal 2013 for the fiscal 2012-2013
performance period, but which did not vest until July 1, 2014, and (b) 3,500 restricted stock units granted on August 23, 2013 that will vest on August 23, 2016 if Mr. Brown is employed by us on such date. We granted
Mr. Lopez 12,500 restricted stock units on March 3, 2014 that will vest on March 3, 2017 if Mr. Lopez is employed by us on such date. We granted Mr. Duffy 4,300 restricted stock units on August 2, 2012 of which
one-third (1,434) vested on August 2, 2013, one-third (1,433) vested on August 2, 2014 and the remaining one-third (1,433) will vest on August 2, 2015 if Mr. Duffy is employed by us on such date. We granted
Mr. Mehnert 25,000 restricted stock units on November 1, 2011 that will vest on November 1, 2014 if Mr. Mehnert is employed by us on such date. We granted Mr. McArthur 25,000 restricted stock units on November 1,
2011 that will vest on November 1, 2014 as set forth in his separation agreement. During the restricted period of restricted stock units, the holder may not vote, sell, exchange, assign, transfer, pledge or otherwise dispose of such units.
Dividend equivalents are paid on restricted stock units in an amount equal to the dividends paid on our common stock. In the event of involuntary termination other than for misconduct or retirement after age 55 with 10 or more years of full-time
service prior to full vesting, subject to a minimum one-year holding period in the case of restricted stock units granted after June 29, 2013, awards of restricted stock units will be pro-rated based on the period worked during the restricted
period and (a) for restricted stock units granted prior to June 30, 2012, paid out at the end of the relevant restricted period, and (b) for restricted stock units granted after June 30, 2012, paid out promptly (but subject to
any delay required by Federal tax law). In the event of death or disability prior to full vesting, subject to a minimum one-year holding period in the case of restricted stock units granted after June 29, 2013, restricted stock units will
immediately vest. Upon a change in control, restricted stock units will immediately vest and will be paid as soon as reasonably practicable, but not later than 60 days following the change in control, or in certain events, promptly following the
expiration of the initial restriction period. |
(4) |
The market value shown was determined by multiplying the number of units that have not vested by the $75.98 closing market price per share of our common stock on
June 27, 2014, the last trading day of our fiscal 2014. |
62
(5) |
These are performance share units granted in (a) fiscal 2013 for the three-year performance period of fiscal 2013-2015 and (b) fiscal 2014 for the three-year
performance period of fiscal 2014-2016. For Mr. McArthur, these are performance share units granted in fiscal 2013, pro-rated to reflect his forfeiture of a portion of the number of units originally granted to him in fiscal 2013 as a result of his
separation from Harris. Mr. McArthur forfeited all performance share units granted to him in fiscal 2014 as a result of his separation from Harris. For all of our named executive officers, the numbers of performance share units and related values as
of June 27, 2014 represent the maximum possible payouts of the performance share units (200% of the target award), rather than payouts of the performance share units at target, in accordance with SEC rules requiring reporting of these amounts in
this manner because our performance exceeded target during the last completed fiscal year or years over which performance is measured. Actual results may cause our named executive officers to earn from 0% to 200% of the target award for such
performance share units. The performance share units granted in fiscal 2013 and 2014 provide that each performance share unit earned and paid out will receive accrued dividend equivalents in an amount per share equal to the cash dividends or other
distributions, if any, which are paid with respect to an issued and outstanding share of our common stock during the performance period, and that payment of such dividend equivalents will be made at the time of the actual payout of performance share
units ultimately earned as determined after completion of the performance period. In the event of involuntary termination other than for misconduct, retirement after age 55 with 10 or more years of full-time service prior to vesting, or death or
disability, subject to a minimum holding period ending on the last day of the first fiscal year of the three-year performance period in the case of performance share units granted after June 29, 2013, awards of performance share units will be
pro-rated based on the period worked during the performance period, with such units paid at the end of the performance period based on our performance. Upon a change in control, performance share units are deemed fully earned and vested immediately
and will be paid at the end of the three-year performance period at not less than the target level, subject to accelerated payout or forfeiture in certain circumstances. For more information regarding performance share units, see the Grants of
Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2014 Table on page 59 and related notes and the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement. This Outstanding Equity Awards at 2014 Fiscal Year End Table does not include the
performance share units granted to Messrs. Brown, Fox, Mehnert and McArthur in fiscal 2012 for the three-year performance period of fiscal 2012-2014, because these performance share units became fully vested at the end of the performance period on
June 27, 2014 and consequently are included in the Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal 2014 Table on page 64 under the Stock Awards column. |
(6) |
The market value shown was determined by multiplying the number of unearned performance share units (at maximum) by the $75.98 closing market price per share of our
common stock on June 27, 2014, the last trading day of our fiscal 2014. |
63
OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED IN FISCAL 2014
The following table provides information for each of our named executive officers regarding (1) stock option exercises during fiscal
2014, including the number of shares acquired on exercise and the value realized, and (2) the number of shares acquired on the vesting of stock awards during or in respect of fiscal 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards |
|
|
Stock Awards |
|
Name |
|
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) (1) |
|
|
Value Realized on Exercise ($) (1) |
|
|
Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting (#) (2) |
|
|
Value Realized on Vesting ($) (2) |
|
William M. Brown |
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
97,502 |
(3) |
|
$ |
7,408,202 |
|
Miguel A. Lopez |
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Robert L. Duffy |
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
1,434 |
(4) |
|
$ |
81,910 |
|
Sheldon J. Fox |
|
|
9,724 |
|
|
$ |
144,356 |
|
|
|
6,779 |
(3) |
|
$ |
515,068 |
|
Dana A. Mehnert |
|
|
6,183 |
|
|
$ |
94,235 |
|
|
|
10,007 |
(3) |
|
$ |
760,332 |
|
Gary L. McArthur |
|
|
240,913 |
|
|
$ |
6,313,270 |
|
|
|
11,529 |
(5) |
|
$ |
841,845 |
|
(1) |
The value realized on the exercise of stock options was determined by multiplying the number of options exercised by the difference between the average selling price of
the shares of our common stock sold on the date of exercise and the exercise price. The value realized was determined without considering any taxes that were owed upon exercise. |
(2) |
The value realized on the vesting of performance share units was determined by multiplying the number of performance share units that vested by the $75.98 closing
market price of our common stock on June 27, 2014, the last trading day of our fiscal 2014. The value realized on the vesting of restricted stock units was determined by multiplying the number of restricted stock units that vested by the
closing market price of our common stock on the date of vesting, as described further in the notes below. Upon the vesting and release of performance share units or restricted stock units, shares are surrendered to satisfy income tax withholding
requirements. The amounts shown and value realized do not give effect to the surrender of shares to cover such tax withholding obligations. The number of performance share units earned and vested in fiscal 2014 for the three-year performance period
of fiscal 2012-2014 as a percentage of the target number of such performance share units originally granted in fiscal 2012 was 117.6% for Mr. Brown, 80.7% for Messrs. Fox and Mehnert and 67.4% for Mr. McArthur. For additional information
with respect to payouts to Messrs. Brown, Fox, Mehnert and McArthur for performance share units for the three-year performance period of fiscal 2012-2014, see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement.
|
(3) |
Shares earned and vested in fiscal 2014 in respect of performance share units granted in fiscal 2012 for the three-year performance period of fiscal 2012-2014, as
described further in note (2) above. |
(4) |
The value realized on the vesting of restricted stock units was determined by multiplying the 1,434 restricted stock units by the $57.12 closing market price of our
common stock on August 2, 2013. |
(5) |
Shares earned and vested in fiscal 2014 in respect of the pro-rated 14,434 performance share units granted in fiscal 2012 for the three-year performance period of
fiscal 2012-2014 of which 9,729 performance share units vested in fiscal 2014, as described further in note (2) above, and 1,800 restricted stock units granted on August 26, 2011 that vested on August 26, 2013. The value realized on the
vesting of restricted stock units was determined by multiplying the 1,800 restricted stock units by the $57.02 closing market price of our common stock on August 26, 2013. |
64
NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED
COMPENSATION
Retirement
Plan
Our Retirement Plan is a tax-qualified, 401(k) defined contribution retirement plan available to our U.S.-based
employees. Under our Retirement Plan, participants may contribute from 1% to 25% of eligible compensation, the most significant components of which are base salary and annual incentive payments, with contributions by named executive officers and
certain other highly compensated employees limited to 12% of eligible compensation. Following one year of service, we match up to the first 6% of eligible compensation that is contributed by a participant. In addition, in our discretion, we may make
a profit sharing contribution to our Retirement Plan, but in recent years we have not done so. Instead, participants have received incentive payments under our Performance Reward Plan, which were in cash unless participants were eligible to defer
and elected to defer either half or all of such payments to our Retirement Plan, subject to Internal Revenue Code limitations. The Internal Revenue Code caps certain contributions to a participants Retirement Plan account. The Internal Revenue
Code also caps the amount of compensation that may be considered when determining benefits under our Retirement Plan.
Participants in our Retirement Plan are immediately vested in contributions they make and are fully vested in the remainder of their
account (including Harris contributions) upon termination of employment on or after the attainment of age 55 or due to their disability or death. Participants also become fully vested when they have provided four years of service to us (Harris
contributions generally are subject to four-year graduated vesting).
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
To the extent contributions to our Retirement Plan are limited by the Internal Revenue Code, certain of our salaried employees, including
our named executive officers, are eligible to participate in our SERP, provided the employee timely elects to participate. The SERP is an unfunded, nonqualified defined contribution retirement plan intended to make up the difference between the
amount actually allocated to a participants account under our Retirement Plan and the amount that, in the absence of certain Internal Revenue Code limits, would have been allocated to the participants account. In addition, our
Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, provide for the deferral of other compensation to executive officers under our SERP, including equity awards.
Deferred compensation generally will be paid or commence to be paid to a participant in January of the calendar year following the later
of the year in which such participant reaches age 55 and the year in which such participants employment is terminated. Participants select the form in which payment will be made, typically a lump sum or annual payments over a three-, five-,
seven-, ten- or fifteen-year period. Deferred amounts generally may not be withdrawn prior to their payment date, except to meet an unforeseeable financial emergency, as defined under Federal tax law, or in the event of a change in
control of Harris that satisfies certain requirements of Federal tax law. Payments to specified employees, as defined under Federal tax law, are delayed at least six months after termination of employment (this six-month delay generally
does not apply to amounts deferred prior to 2005).
The vesting provisions of our SERP are generally the same as the vesting
provisions of our Retirement Plan. Participants in our SERP are immediately vested in contributions they make and are fully vested in the remainder of their account upon termination of employment on or after the attainment of age 55 or due to their
disability or death. Participants also become fully vested when they have provided four years of service to us.
Earnings on
amounts credited to a participants account in our SERP are based upon participant selections among investment choices, which mirror the investment choices available to participants in our Retirement Plan. Participants may elect that a portion
of their account be deemed invested in the Harris stock fund. Amounts deemed invested in the Harris stock fund are credited with dividend equivalents equal to the dividends paid on our common stock, which are deemed reinvested in the Harris stock
fund. No above-market or preferential earnings are paid or guaranteed on investment choices.
Amounts credited to a
participants account in our SERP may be partially or fully funded by a grantor trust, also known as a rabbi trust, and are required to be so funded upon a change in control. The assets in such trust are subject to the claims of our
creditors, and participants are treated as our unsecured general creditors.
65
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table
The following table summarizes the amounts credited, earnings or losses and account balances for our named executive officers under our
SERP, which is our only defined contribution or other plan that provides retirement benefits to our current executive officers on a basis that is not tax-qualified. For additional information related to our SERP, see the Nonqualified Deferred
Compensation section of this proxy statement beginning on page 65.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Executive
Contributions
in Last
Fiscal Year
($) (1) |
|
|
Registrant
Contributions
in Last
Fiscal Year
($) (2) |
|
|
Aggregate
Earnings
in Last
Fiscal Year ($) (3) |
|
|
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($) |
|
|
Aggregate
Balance
at Last
Fiscal Year End ($) (4) |
|
William M. Brown |
|
$ |
268,524 |
|
|
$ |
104,033 |
|
|
$ |
91,211 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
618,645 |
|
Miguel A. Lopez (5) |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Robert L. Duffy |
|
$ |
67,497 |
|
|
$ |
32,291 |
|
|
$ |
15,198 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
123,319 |
|
Sheldon J. Fox |
|
$ |
97,377 |
|
|
$ |
41,750 |
|
|
$ |
157,902 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
830,844 |
|
Dana A. Mehnert |
|
$ |
72,360 |
|
|
$ |
36,563 |
|
|
$ |
387,414 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,972,500 |
|
Gary L. McArthur |
|
$ |
119,642 |
|
|
$ |
45,965 |
|
|
$ |
441,993 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
2,595,888 |
|
(1) |
The amounts in this column represent contributions to our SERP of salary, annual cash incentives or other eligible compensation that have been deferred and credited
during fiscal 2014. The portion representing deferral of base salary is included in the Summary Compensation Table on page 55 in the Salary column for fiscal 2014. The portion representing deferral of annual cash incentives relates to
deferred Annual Incentive Plan payments and Performance Reward Plan payments for fiscal 2013 performance, the amount of which is included in the Summary Compensation Table on page 55 in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column
for fiscal 2013. Any contributions by our named executive officers to our SERP of deferred Annual Incentive Plan payments for fiscal 2014 performance will be contributions in fiscal 2015. |
(2) |
The amounts in this column represent contributions by us to our SERP that were credited during fiscal 2014. These amounts are included in the Summary Compensation Table
on page 55 in the All Other Compensation column. |
(3) |
None of the earnings in this column are included in the Summary Compensation Table on page 55 because no preferential or above-market amounts are paid on balances in
our SERP. |
(4) |
The amounts in this column include amounts reported as compensation for such named executive officer in the Summary Compensation Table for fiscal 2013 and 2012 as
follows: Mr. Brown $141,384; Mr. Duffy $8,500; Mr. Mehnert $317,705; and Mr. McArthur $340,467. |
(5) |
Mr. Lopez did not receive a credit because he had not yet met the one-year service requirement. |
66
POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR A CHANGE IN CONTROL
This section of the proxy statement sets forth information regarding compensation and benefits that each of our named
executive officers would receive in the event of a change in control without termination of employment or in the event of termination of employment under several different circumstances, including: (1) termination by us for cause; (2) a
voluntary termination (resignation) by the named executive officer; (3) termination by the named executive officer for good reason (constructive involuntary termination); (4) involuntary termination by us without cause; (5) death;
(6) disability; or (7) termination by us without cause or by the named executive officer for good reason following a change in control.
Employment Agreement William M. Brown
In October 2011, our Board approved, and Harris and Mr. Brown entered into, an employment agreement providing for
Mr. Browns employment as our Chief Executive Officer and President. Mr. Browns employment agreement provides for an employment term that commenced on November 1, 2011 and ends on October 31, 2016. Beginning on
November 1, 2016, the employment term will automatically extend for successive one-year periods unless we or Mr. Brown provide prior written notice that the employment term will not be so extended. We have agreed to provide Mr. Brown
with certain benefits in the event of termination of Mr. Browns employment by us without cause or by Mr. Brown for a constructive termination (as such terms are defined in the agreement).
Under Mr. Browns employment agreement, cause generally means:
|
|
|
A substantial and continual failure or refusal by Mr. Brown to perform his material duties under the employment agreement (other than any failure
resulting from illness or disability); |
|
|
|
A willful breach by Mr. Brown of any material provision of the employment agreement; |
|
|
|
Any reckless or willful misconduct (including action or failures to act) by Mr. Brown that causes material harm to our business or reputation;
|
|
|
|
Any unexcused, repeated or prolonged absence from work (other than as a result of, or in connection with, sickness, injury or disability) during a
period of 90 consecutive days; |
|
|
|
A conviction for the commission of a felony (including entry of a nolo contendere plea) or an indictment for the commission of a felony under the
Federal securities laws; |
|
|
|
Embezzlement or willful misappropriation of our property; |
|
|
|
A willful and substantial violation of a material Harris policy by Mr. Brown that is generally applicable to all employees or all of our officers
(including our Code of Conduct); or |
|
|
|
A failure to cooperate in an internal investigation after being instructed by our Board to cooperate. |
Constructive termination generally means, without Mr. Browns consent:
|
|
|
A reduction in his annual base salary or current annual cash incentive target award, other than a reduction also applicable in a substantially similar
manner and proportion to our other senior executive officers; |
|
|
|
The removal of Mr. Brown from his position as Chief Executive Officer or President; |
|
|
|
The assignment to Mr. Brown of duties or responsibilities that are materially inconsistent with Mr. Browns positions with us;
|
|
|
|
Any requirement by us that Mr. Brown relocate his principal place of employment to a location other than our principal headquarters;
|
|
|
|
Our failure to nominate Mr. Brown for reelection to the Board upon expiration of his term at any annual meeting of our shareholders during the
term of his employment; |
|
|
|
Our failure to obtain an assumption of the employment agreement by a successor of Harris; |
|
|
|
Our delivery of a notice not to renew Mr. Browns employment term pursuant to the employment agreement; or
|
67
|
|
|
Our termination of the indemnification agreement we have entered into with Mr. Brown without entering into a replacement or successor agreement,
or making other appropriate indemnification arrangements in favor of Mr. Brown, on terms reasonably acceptable to Mr. Brown and no less favorable to him than to our other senior executives. |
If Mr. Browns employment is terminated by us without cause (other than by reason of death or disability) or by Mr. Brown
as a result of a constructive termination, he will be entitled to compensation that has accrued but not yet been paid, and subject to his execution and delivery of a release of claims against us, Mr. Brown will be entitled to receive from us:
(1) a pro-rated annual cash incentive bonus for the fiscal year of termination based upon the achievement of performance objectives; (2) severance payments, paid in substantially equal monthly installments over a 24-month period, in an
aggregate amount equal to two times the sum of (a) his then-current base salary and (b) his target annual cash incentive compensation for the year of termination; (3) COBRA continuation medical benefits for a period of 18 months
following the termination date; and (4) with respect to Mr. Browns equity awards, (a) the stock options forming part of Mr. Browns transition-related equity awards will become fully vested and exercisable
immediately prior to the date of termination and will remain outstanding for the one-year period following termination, but in no event beyond the normal expiration period, (b) each other time-based vesting stock options will continue to vest
in accordance with its ordinary vesting schedule for the two-year period following the date of termination, at which time any remaining unvested portion of the stock options will be forfeited, and to the extent vested, will remain outstanding for
the 27-month period following the termination date, but in no event beyond the normal expiration period, and (c) each other equity award will be treated in the manner set forth in the applicable plan and award agreement.
If Mr. Browns employment is terminated by us for cause or due to Mr. Browns death or disability, or upon
Mr. Browns retirement or resignation, then Mr. Brown (or his estate or legal representative, as appropriate) will be entitled to receive from us (1) his accrued but unpaid base salary and unpaid vacation time through the date of
termination, (2) his earned but unpaid annual cash incentive bonus under our
Annual Incentive Plan (or any successor plan) for the prior fiscal year, (3) reimbursement of reasonable business expenses incurred prior to the date of termination, and (4) other or
additional compensation benefits, if any, in accordance with the terms of our applicable plans or employee benefit programs for terminated employees. If Mr. Browns employment is terminated due to death or disability, then Mr. Brown
(or his estate or legal representative, as appropriate) will also be entitled to receive from us the vesting of any equity-based awards then held by Mr. Brown, if and to the extent provided in the applicable plan and award agreements. We may,
at our option, terminate Mr. Browns employment in the event of his disability.
Mr. Browns employment
agreement also provides that he may not for a two-year period following termination of his employment for any reason, without our prior written consent, directly or indirectly, (1) hold a 5% or greater equity, voting or profit participation
interest in, or associate with, an enterprise that competes with us or (2) solicit any customer or any employee to leave us. Mr. Browns employment agreement also contains a non-disparagement clause applicable during the term of his
employment and for a period of two years thereafter.
If there is a change in control of Harris and Mr. Browns
employment terminates under circumstances provided under his change in control severance agreement discussed below under Executive Change in Control Severance Agreements, then Mr. Brown will be entitled to the compensation and
benefits provided under such change in control severance agreement in lieu of any compensation or benefits receivable under his employment agreement.
Offer Letter Miguel A. Lopez
In February 2014, we entered into an offer
letter agreement with Mr. Lopez, pursuant to which, he is entitled to participate in our executive compensation plans and programs. In addition, if his employment is terminated within 24 months of his start date by us other than for cause (as
defined in the offer letter agreement) or by Mr. Lopez as a result of constructive termination (as defined in the offer letter agreement), subject to his execution and delivery of a general release of claims against us, he will be
entitled to receive a severance payment equal to the product of (1) two and (2) the aggregate of his
68
then-current annual base salary and annual cash incentive compensation under our Annual Incentive Plan at target. Payment obligations to Mr. Lopez following a change in control are governed
by his change in control severance agreement discussed below under Executive Change in Control Severance Agreements.
Separation Agreement with Gary L. McArthur
On February 12, 2014, we entered into a separation agreement with Mr. McArthur, our former Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Under the separation agreement, which was approved
by our Compensation Committee, we and Mr. McArthur agreed that:
|
|
|
For purposes of Mr. McArthurs post-separation benefits, his separation would be treated as an involuntary separation as of February 28,
2014; |
|
|
|
We would pay Mr. McArthur a cash payment equal to his annual base salary of $585,000; |
|
|
|
We will pay the premiums for Mr. McArthurs continued coverage under our medical, dental and vision care plans for a period of up to twelve
months following his separation date; |
|
|
|
We will pay Mr. McArthur $112,500 for unused accrued vacation time as of his separation date, $33,750 for services performed from his last day as
our Chief Financial Officer through his February 28, 2014 separation date and $25,000 to cover incidental expenses in connection with his separation and will provide up to 12 months of executive outplacement services; |
|
|
|
We will pay Mr. McArthur a fiscal 2014 payout under our Annual Incentive Plan equal to his full fiscal 2014 annual incentive compensation target
of $417,000 (in lieu of a pro-rated payout subject to our financial results and Mr. McArthurs individual performance against established goals); and |
|
|
|
The vesting and exercisability of the outstanding stock options and the vesting and payout of outstanding performance share unit awards and outstanding
restricted stock unit awards held by Mr. McArthur, and any forfeitures related thereto, would be governed by the applicable equity incentive plan and terms and conditions thereunder in effect at
|
|
|
the time of grant of the applicable equity award, except that, notwithstanding such terms and conditions, Mr. McArthurs outstanding restricted stock unit award granted on
November 1, 2011 would remain outstanding and eligible to vest as if he had remained employed by us on November 1, 2014, rather than being paid out on a pro-rated basis. |
These payments and the other benefits provided are subject to the terms and conditions of the separation agreement, which include a
release of all claims against us by Mr. McArthur, confidentiality restrictions, a one-year non-solicitation restriction, a one-year non-competition restriction and other restrictive covenants. Additional information regarding the terms of
Mr. McArthurs separation agreement is set forth in the table and related footnotes on page 77.
Executive Change in Control
Severance
Agreements
To provide continuity of management and ensure dedication of our executives in the event of a threatened or actual change in control, our Board has approved change in control severance agreements for our
Board-elected or appointed officers. Under these agreements, our Board-elected or appointed officers, including the named executive officers currently employed by us, are provided severance benefits in the event (1) an executive terminates his
employment for good reason within two years of a change in control, or (2) we terminate the executives employment within two years of a change in control for any reason other than for cause (all terms as defined in the change in control
severance agreement).
Under the change in control severance agreements entered into with our named executive officers, a
change in control generally means the occurrence of any one of the following events:
|
|
|
Any person becomes the beneficial owner of 20% or more of the combined voting power of our outstanding common stock; |
|
|
|
A change in the majority of our Board not approved by two-thirds of our incumbent directors; |
|
|
|
The consummation of a merger, consolidation or reorganization, unless immediately following such transaction: (1) more than 60%
|
69
|
|
of the total voting power resulting from the transaction is represented by shares that were our voting securities immediately prior to the transaction; (2) no person becomes the beneficial
owner of 20% or more of the total voting power of our outstanding voting securities as a result of the transaction; and (3) at least a majority of the members of the board of directors of the company resulting from the transaction were our
incumbent directors at the time of our Boards approval of the execution of the initial agreement providing for the transaction; |
|
|
|
Our shareholders approve a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution of Harris; or |
|
|
|
We consummate a sale or disposition of all or substantially all of our assets. |
Also, under these agreements, good reason generally means:
|
|
|
A reduction in the executives annual base salary or current annual incentive target award; |
|
|
|
The assignment of duties or responsibilities that are inconsistent in any material adverse respect with the executives position with us
immediately prior to a change in control; |
|
|
|
A material adverse change in the executives reporting responsibilities, titles or offices with us as in effect immediately prior to a change in
control; |
|
|
|
Any requirement that the executive: (1) be based more than 50 miles from the facility where the executive was located at the time of the change in
control or (2) travel on Harris business to an extent substantially greater than the travel obligations of the executive immediately prior to the change in control; or |
|
|
|
Failure by us to continue in effect any employee benefit or compensation plans or provide the executive with employee benefits as in effect for the
executive immediately prior to a change in control. |
In addition, the term cause generally means
a material breach by the executive of the duties and responsibilities of the executives position or the conviction of, or plea to, a felony involving willful misconduct that is materially injurious to us.
If triggered, the lump-sum cash severance benefit payable under the change in control
severance agreement equals the sum of: (1) the executives unpaid base salary through the date of termination, a pro-rated annual bonus (as determined under the change in control severance agreement), any unpaid accrued vacation pay, and,
to the extent permitted under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, any other benefits or awards that have been earned or became payable but that have not yet been paid to the executive; and (2) two times the executives highest
annual rate of base salary during the 12-month period prior to the date of termination plus two times the greatest of the executives highest annual bonus in the three years prior to the change in control, the executives target bonus for
the year during which the change in control occurred or the executives target bonus for the year in which the executives employment is terminated. In addition, for the two years following the date of termination, but in no event later
than age 65, the executive receives the same level of medical, dental, accident, disability, life insurance and any similar benefits as are in effect on the date of termination (or the highest level of coverage provided to active executives
immediately prior to the change in control, if more favorable). The executive also receives reimbursement for any relocation expense related to the pursuit of other business opportunities incurred within two years following the date of termination,
for recruitment or placement services of up to $4,000 and for professional financial or tax planning services of up to $5,000 per year for the calendar year in which the termination occurs and the next calendar year.
The change in control severance agreements with our corporate officers, including the named executive officers, do not provide for a tax
gross-up of excise taxes. In addition, we will reimburse the executive for any legal fees and costs with respect to any dispute arising under the change in control severance agreement. Not later than the date on which a change in control occurs, we
are required to contribute to an irrevocable rabbi trust in cash or other liquid assets, an amount equal to the total payments expected to be paid under the change in control severance agreement plus the amount of trust administration
and trustee fees reasonably expected to be incurred. This required funding recognizes that in certain situations payments under the change in control severance agreement will be required to be deferred for up to six months following the triggering
event to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.
70
Payments and Benefits Upon
Any Termination
Our
salaried employees, including our named executive officers, are entitled to receive certain elements of compensation on a non-discretionary basis upon termination of employment for any reason. Subject to the exceptions noted below, these include:
(1) accrued salary and pay for unused vacation; (2) distributions of vested plan balances under our Retirement Plan or SERP; and (3) earned but unpaid bonuses. The amounts shown in the Tables of Potential Payments Upon
Termination or Change in Control section of this proxy statement beginning on page 73 do not include these elements of compensation or benefits. For a description of our SERP and the account balances credited to our named executive officers in
our SERP as of June 27, 2014, see the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table on page 66.
Termination for Cause
A named executive officer whose employment is terminated by us for cause is not entitled to any compensation or benefits other than those
paid to all of our salaried employees upon any termination of employment as described above. In addition, as noted under Recovery of Executive Compensation (Clawback) in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis
section of this proxy statement, depending on the circumstances giving rise to such termination, we may be entitled to recover all or a portion of any performance-based compensation if our financial statements are restated as a result of errors,
omissions or fraud. Annual incentive awards, vested and unvested options, performance share units and restricted stock units are automatically forfeited following a termination for cause or misconduct.
Involuntary Termination Without Cause
In the case of termination of employment by us without cause, Messrs. Duffy, Fox and Mehnert are not contractually entitled to any compensation or benefits other than those that are paid to all salaried
employees upon any termination of employment as described above. However, as discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement, we have a long-standing practice of providing reasonable severance
compensation for involuntary termination of an executives employment without cause. The specific
amount may be based upon the relevant circumstances, including the reason for termination, length of employment and other factors. Following an involuntary termination by us without cause,
subject to being employed a minimum of 180 days during the year, annual incentive awards will be paid pro-rata after the end of the relevant fiscal year based on the period worked during such fiscal year. Following an involuntary termination by us
other than for misconduct, subject to a minimum one-year holding period in the case of grants made after June 29, 2013, unvested options are forfeited and vested options may be exercised until the sooner of 90 days following such termination or
the regularly scheduled expiration date, performance share units will be paid out pro-rata after the end of the relevant performance period based on our performance and the period worked during such performance period and restricted stock units will
be pro-rated based upon the period worked during the restricted period and, if granted prior to June 30, 2012, paid out promptly following the end of the relevant restriction period or, if granted on or after June 30, 2012, will be paid out promptly
following involuntary termination (but subject to any delay required by Federal tax laws).
Compensation and benefits payable
to Mr. Brown in the case of termination of employment by us without cause are described above under the description of his employment agreement. In the case of termination of employment by us without cause, Mr. Lopez is entitled to receive
severance as described above under the description of his offer letter agreement.
Voluntary Termination
A named executive officer who voluntarily terminates employment or resigns other than due to retirement or for good reason is not entitled
to any compensation or benefits other than those that are paid to all of our salaried employees upon any termination of employment as described above. Annual incentive awards and unvested options, restricted stock units and performance share units
are automatically forfeited following a voluntary termination. Subject to a minimum one-year vesting period in the case of grants made after June 29, 2013, vested options may be exercised until the sooner of 30 days following a voluntary termination
or the regularly scheduled expiration date.
71
Death
In the event of termination of employment as a result of death, the beneficiaries of named executive officers are eligible for benefits under the death benefit programs generally available to our
U.S.-based employees, including basic group life insurance paid by us and supplemental group life insurance elected and paid for by employees. In the event of termination of employment as a result of death:
|
|
|
Account balances in our Retirement Plan and SERP become fully vested; |
|
|
|
Subject to being employed a minimum of 180 days during the year, annual incentive awards are paid pro-rata based on the period worked during the fiscal
year and are paid following the fiscal year end based on our performance; |
|
|
|
Subject to a minimum one-year holding period in the case of restricted stock units granted after June 29, 2013, restricted stock units immediately
fully vest; |
|
|
|
Subject to a minimum holding period ending on the last day of the first fiscal year of the three-year performance period in the case of performance
share units granted after June 29, 2013, performance share units are paid pro-rata based on the period worked during the performance period and are paid at the end of the performance period based on our performance; and
|
|
|
|
Subject to a minimum one-year vesting period in the case of options granted after June 29, 2013, options immediately fully vest and shall be
exercisable by the beneficiaries for up to 12 months following the date of death but not later than the regularly scheduled expiration date. |
Disability
In the event of termination of employment as a result of disability,
named executive officers are eligible for benefits under the disability programs generally available to our U.S.-based employees. These include a long-term disability income benefit and, in most cases, continuation of health and life insurance
coverage applicable to active employees for specified periods, while disabled. In the event of termination of employment as a result of disability:
|
|
|
Account balances in our Retirement Plan and SERP become fully vested;
|
|
|
|
Subject to being employed a minimum of 180 days during the year, annual incentive awards are paid pro-rata based on the period worked during the fiscal
year and are paid following the fiscal year end based on our performance; |
|
|
|
Subject to a minimum one-year holding period in the case of restricted stock units granted after June 29, 2013, restricted stock units immediately
fully vest; |
|
|
|
Subject to a minimum holding period ending on the last day of the first fiscal year of the three-year performance period in the case of performance
share units granted after June 29, 2013, performance share units are paid pro-rata based on the period worked during the performance period and are paid at the end of the performance period based on our performance; and
|
|
|
|
Subject to a minimum one-year vesting period in the case of options granted after June 29, 2013, options immediately fully vest and shall be
exercisable until the regularly scheduled expiration date. |
Retirement
As of June 27, 2014, none of our named executive officers currently employed by us was retirement-eligible for purposes of our
Retirement Plan, SERP, Annual Incentive Plan, Performance Reward Plan or our equity incentive plans. In the event of termination of employment as a result of retirement, a named executive officer would receive retirement benefits generally available
to our salaried employees. These include the benefits under our Retirement Plan, SERP and, in certain cases, retiree medical, dental and vision coverage. In the event of termination of employment as a result of retirement:
|
|
|
Account balances in our Retirement Plan and SERP become fully vested; |
|
|
|
Subject to being employed a minimum of 180 days during the year, annual incentive awards are paid pro-rata based on the period worked during the fiscal
year and are paid following the fiscal year end based on our performance; |
|
|
|
After age 62 with 10 or more years of full-time service, subject to a minimum one-year vesting period in the case of options granted after
June 29, 2013, options continue to vest in |
72
|
|
accordance with their vesting schedule and continue to be exercisable until the regularly scheduled expiration date; |
|
|
|
Before age 62, but after age 55 with 10 or more years of full-time service, subject to a minimum one-year vesting period in the case of options granted
after June 29, 2013, options cease vesting and options exercisable at the time of such retirement continue to be exercisable until the regularly scheduled expiration date, but unvested options are forfeited; |
|
|
|
After age 55 with 10 or more years of full-time service, restricted stock units will be pro-rated based on the period worked during the restriction
period and, if granted prior to June 30, 2012, paid out after the end of the relevant restriction period or, if granted on or after June 30, 2012, paid out promptly following retirement (but subject to satisfaction of a minimum one-year holding
period for restricted stock units granted after June 29, 2013 and any delay required by Federal tax law); and |
|
|
|
After age 55 with 10 or more years of full-time service, subject to a minimum holding period ending on the last day of the first fiscal year of the
three-year performance period in the case of performance share units granted after June 29, 2013, performance share units are paid pro-rata based on the period worked during the performance period and are paid at the end of the performance
period based on our performance. |
Change in Control
Each of our named executive officers currently employed by us has entered into a double trigger change in control severance
agreement with us providing for benefits only upon both a change in control and the subsequent termination of employment of or by the executive in accordance with the terms of the agreement. For additional information regarding the terms of such
agreements, see Executive Change in Control Severance Agreements beginning on page 69. In addition, upon a change in control and irrespective of employment status:
|
|
|
Annual cash incentive awards under the Annual Incentive Plan are fully earned and
|
|
|
paid out promptly following the change in control or, in certain instances, following the end of the fiscal year, in each case at not less than the target level; |
|
|
|
All options immediately vest and become exercisable until the regularly scheduled expiration date; |
|
|
|
All restricted stock units immediately vest and will be paid as soon as practicable, but not later than 60 days following the change in control, or in
certain events, promptly following the expiration of the initial restriction period; and |
|
|
|
All performance share units are deemed fully earned and fully vested immediately and will be paid at the end of the performance period at not less than
the target level, subject to accelerated payout or forfeiture in certain circumstances. |
Tables of Potential
Payments Upon
Termination or Change in Control
The following tables set forth the details, on an executive-by-executive basis, of the estimated incremental compensation and benefits that would be provided to each of our named executive officers
currently employed by us in the event that such executives employment with us is terminated for any reason, including termination by us for cause, voluntary termination (resignation), termination by the executive for good reason or for
constructive termination, involuntary termination by us without cause, death, disability or termination by us without cause or by the executive for good reason following a change in control. The tables also set forth the amount of incremental
potential payments to each of our named executive officers in the event of a change in control without a termination of employment. These amounts are estimates of the amounts that would be paid to the named executive officer upon such termination of
employment or change in control. The actual amounts to be paid can only be determined at the time of a named executive officers termination of employment or a change in control. The amounts included in the tables are also based on the
following:
|
|
|
The applicable provisions in the agreements and other arrangements between the named executive officer and us, which are
|
73
|
|
summarized in the Potential Payments Upon Termination or a Change in Control section of this proxy statement beginning on page 67; |
|
|
|
We have assumed that the termination event occurred as of June 27, 2014, the last day of our fiscal 2014; |
|
|
|
We have assumed that the value of our common stock was $75.98 per share based on the closing market price on June 27, 2014, the last trading day
of our fiscal 2014, and that all unvested in-the-money options that were not automatically forfeited vested and were exercised on such day; |
|
|
|
Cash severance includes multiples of salary and annual incentive, and does not include paid or unpaid salary or annual incentive compensation or cash
incentives earned for fiscal 2014 because a named executive officer is entitled to annual incentive compensation if employed on June 27, 2014; |
|
|
|
The value of accelerated performance share units is based on the target number of performance share units previously granted and does not include
performance share units for the performance period ended June 27, 2014, which performance share units for such performance period are set forth in the Option
|
|
|
Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal 2014 Table on page 64 of this proxy statement; |
|
|
|
We have not included the value of any options that were vested prior to June 27, 2014; |
|
|
|
We have not included any payment of the aggregate balance shown in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table on page 66 of this proxy statement;
|
|
|
|
We have included the estimated value of continuation of health and welfare benefits, where applicable; and |
|
|
|
For a termination by us without cause or by the named executive officer for good reason following a change in control, the Other Benefits
line includes $4,000 for placement services, $10,000 ($5,000 per year for two years) for financial or tax planning services, $300,000 for estimated relocation assistance and an estimate of reimbursement for taxes associated with relocation
assistance, in each case pursuant to the change in control severance agreement. |
Mr. McArthur left
Harris effective February 28, 2014. The table for Mr. McArthur sets forth the details of the estimated compensation and benefits paid or payable to Mr. McArthur as a result of his separation from Harris.
74
William M. Brown
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Benefits and
Payment Upon Termination |
|
Termination by
Harris for Cause |
|
|
Voluntary Termination/
Resignation |
|
|
Termination By Executive
for Constructive Termination |
|
|
Involuntary Termination
by Harris without Cause |
|
|
Death |
|
|
Disability |
|
|
Change
in Control without Termination |
|
|
Termination by Harris
without Cause/by Executive for Good Reason Following a Change in Control |
|
Cash Severance |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
4,050,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,050,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
2,147,632 |
** |
Value of Accelerated or Continued Vesting of Unvested Options |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
10,624,215 |
* |
|
$ |
10,624,215 |
* |
|
$ |
8,369,629 |
|
|
$ |
8,369,629 |
|
|
$ |
11,751,508 |
|
|
$ |
11,751,508 |
|
Value of Accelerated Vesting of Unvested Restricted Stock Units*** |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
2,350,965 |
|
|
$ |
2,350,965 |
|
|
$ |
2,377,015 |
|
|
$ |
2,377,015 |
|
|
$ |
2,642,945 |
|
|
$ |
2,642,945 |
|
Value of Accelerated or Continued Vesting of Unvested Performance Share Units |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
3,411,430 |
* |
|
$ |
3,411,430 |
* |
|
$ |
3,411,430 |
|
|
$ |
3,411,430 |
|
|
$ |
6,684,268 |
|
|
$ |
6,684,268 |
|
Health and Welfare Benefits |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
37,739 |
|
|
$ |
37,739 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
50,319 |
|
Other Benefits |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
533,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
20,474,349 |
|
|
$ |
20,474,349 |
|
|
$ |
14,158,074 |
|
|
$ |
14,158,074 |
|
|
$ |
21,078,721 |
|
|
$ |
23,810,358 |
|
* |
Under the terms of Mr. Browns employment agreement, if his employment is terminated by us without cause or by Mr. Brown for constructive termination,
(a) each time-based vesting stock option held by Mr. Brown that is part of his transition equity award immediately vests and each time-based vesting stock option held by Mr. Brown that is not part of his
transition equity award will continue to vest in accordance with its ordinary vesting schedule for the two-year period following the date of termination, and (b) the performance share units are subject to vesting based on attainment
of performance goals and pro-ration. The amounts shown represent the value of such unvested options and unvested performance share units that would vest during such 24-month period or be pro-rated based on the $75.98 closing market price of our
common stock on June 27, 2014, the last trading day of our fiscal 2014. |
** |
The cash severance amount has been reduced by $2,728,368 due to the impact of the best-net provision included in Mr. Browns change in control
severance agreement. |
*** |
Includes the value of 29,683 performance share units earned in fiscal 2013 for the fiscal 2012-2013 performance period, but which did not vest until July 1, 2014, and
the dividend equivalents in respect of such shares. |
Miguel A. Lopez
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Benefits and
Payment Upon Termination |
|
Termination by
Harris for Cause |
|
|
Voluntary Termination/
Resignation |
|
|
Termination By Executive
for Constructive Termination |
|
|
Involuntary Termination
by Harris without Cause |
|
|
Death |
|
|
Disability |
|
|
Change in Control without Termination |
|
|
Termination by Harris
without Cause/by Executive for Good Reason Following a Change in Control |
|
Cash Severance |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,837,500 |
* |
|
$ |
1,837,500 |
* |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,837,500 |
|
Value of Accelerated Vesting of Unvested Restricted Stock Units |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
949,750 |
|
|
$ |
949,750 |
|
Health and Welfare Benefits |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
41,726 |
|
Other Benefits |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
533,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,837,500 |
|
|
$ |
1,837,500 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
949,750 |
|
|
$ |
3,362,662 |
|
* |
In February 2014, we entered into an offer letter agreement with Mr. Lopez pursuant to which he is entitled to a severance payment equal to the product of (i) two and
(ii) the aggregate of his then-current annual base salary and annual cash incentive compensation under our Annual Incentive Plan at target if his employment is terminated within 24 months of his start date by us without cause or by Mr.
Lopez as a result of constructive termination. |
75
Robert L. Duffy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Benefits and
Payment Upon Termination |
|
Termination by Harris for Cause |
|
|
Voluntary Termination/ Resignation |
|
|
Termination By Executive for Constructive Termination |
|
|
Involuntary Termination
by Harris without Cause |
|
|
Death |
|
|
Disability |
|
|
Change in Control without Termination |
|
|
Termination by Harris
without Cause/by Executive for Good Reason Following a Change in Control |
|
Cash Severance |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
749,000 |
* |
|
$ |
749,000 |
* |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
788,986 |
** |
Value of Accelerated Vesting of Unvested Options |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,040,355 |
|
|
$ |
1,040,355 |
|
|
$ |
1,800,755 |
|
|
$ |
1,800,755 |
|
Value of Accelerated Vesting of Unvested Restricted Stock Units |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
138,013 |
|
|
$ |
138,013 |
|
|
$ |
217,759 |
|
|
$ |
217,759 |
|
|
$ |
217,759 |
|
|
$ |
217,759 |
|
Value of Accelerated Vesting of Unvested Performance Share Units |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
674,277 |
|
|
$ |
674,277 |
|
|
$ |
674,277 |
|
|
$ |
674,277 |
|
|
$ |
1,363,864 |
|
|
$ |
1,363,864 |
|
Health and Welfare Benefits |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
28,013 |
|
Other Benefits |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
533,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,561,290 |
|
|
$ |
1,561,290 |
|
|
$ |
1,932,391 |
|
|
$ |
1,932,391 |
|
|
$ |
3,382,378 |
|
|
$ |
4,733,063 |
|
* |
In July 2012, we entered into an offer letter agreement with Mr. Duffy pursuant to which he is entitled to a severance payment equal to one year of his
then-current base salary and annual incentive compensation at target if we terminate his employment within 24 months of his start date, other than for cause or performance reasons. |
** |
The cash severance amount has been reduced by $941,014 due to the impact of the best-net provision included in Mr. Duffys change in control
severance agreement. |
Sheldon J. Fox
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Benefits and
Payment Upon Termination |
|
Termination by Harris for Cause |
|
|
Voluntary Termination/ Resignation |
|
|
Termination By Executive for Good Reason |
|
|
Involuntary Termination by Harris without Cause |
|
|
Death |
|
|
Disability |
|
|
Change in Control without Termination |
|
|
Termination by Harris without Cause/by Executive for Good Reason Following
a Change in Control |
|
Cash Severance |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,800,000 |
|
Value of Accelerated Vesting of Unvested Options |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,293,584 |
|
|
$ |
1,293,584 |
|
|
$ |
2,266,896 |
|
|
$ |
2,266,896 |
|
Value of Accelerated Vesting of Unvested Performance Share Units |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
895,841 |
|
|
$ |
895,841 |
|
|
$ |
895,841 |
|
|
$ |
895,841 |
|
|
$ |
1,795,434 |
|
|
$ |
1,795,434 |
|
Health and Welfare Benefits |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
40,841 |
|
Other Benefits |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
533,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
895,841 |
|
|
$ |
895,841 |
|
|
$ |
2,189,425 |
|
|
$ |
2,189,425 |
|
|
$ |
4,062,330 |
|
|
$ |
6,436,857 |
|
Dana A. Mehnert
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Benefits and
Payment Upon Termination |
|
Termination by Harris for Cause |
|
|
Voluntary Termination/ Resignation |
|
|
Termination By Executive
for Good Reason |
|
|
Involuntary Termination
by Harris without Cause |
|
|
Death |
|
|
Disability |
|
|
Change in Control without Termination |
|
|
Termination by Harris without Cause/by Executive for Good Reason Following
a Change in Control |
|
Cash Severance |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
680,779 |
* |
Value of Accelerated Vesting of Unvested Options |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,636,872 |
|
|
$ |
1,636,872 |
|
|
$ |
2,610,184 |
|
|
$ |
2,610,184 |
|
Value of Accelerated Vesting of Unvested Restricted Stock Units |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,679,394 |
|
|
$ |
1,679,394 |
|
|
$ |
1,899,500 |
|
|
$ |
1,899,500 |
|
|
$ |
1,899,500 |
|
|
$ |
1,899,500 |
|
Value of Accelerated Vesting of Unvested Performance Share Units |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,000,879 |
|
|
$ |
1,000,879 |
|
|
$ |
1,000,879 |
|
|
$ |
1,000,879 |
|
|
$ |
1,953,714 |
|
|
$ |
1,953,714 |
|
Health and Welfare Benefits |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
46,724 |
|
Other Benefits |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
533,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
2,680,273 |
|
|
$ |
2,680,273 |
|
|
$ |
4,537,251 |
|
|
$ |
4,537,251 |
|
|
$ |
6,463,398 |
|
|
$ |
7,724,587 |
|
* |
Includes $30,000 in respect of the difference in Mr. Mehnerts fiscal 2014 Annual Incentive Plan target and his actual fiscal 2014 Annual Incentive Plan
payout. The cash severance amount has been reduced by $1,012,621 due to the impact of the best-net provision included in Mr. Mehnerts change in control severance agreement. |
76
Gary L. McArthur
The following table sets forth the details of the estimated compensation and benefits paid or payable to Mr. McArthur as a result of his separation from Harris effective February 28, 2014. For
further information regarding the compensation and the benefits paid or payable to Mr. McArthur in connection with his separation, see Separation Agreement with Gary L. McArthur on page 69. We have not included any payment of the
aggregate balance shown in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table on page 66 of this proxy statement.
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits and Payments
in Connection with Separation |
|
|
|
Cash Payments (1) |
|
$ |
1,173,250 |
|
Restricted Stock Units (2) |
|
$ |
1,899,500 |
|
Performance Share Units (3) |
|
$ |
1,471,809 |
|
Health and Welfare Benefits (4) |
|
$ |
18,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
$ |
4,562,701 |
|
(1) |
Includes separation-related cash payments comprised of: (i) an amount equal to his annual base salary of $585,000; (ii) an amount equal to his annual incentive
compensation for fiscal 2014 at target of $417,000 (in lieu of a pro-rated payout subject to our financial results and Mr. McArthurs individual performance against established goals); (iii) $112,500 for unused accrued vacation time;
(iv) $33,750 for services performed from his last day as our Chief Financial Officer through his February 28, 2014 separation date; and (v) $25,000 to cover incidental expenses related to his separation. For further information regarding
such cash amounts, see the Summary Compensation Table on page 55 and related notes. |
(2) |
Pursuant to the terms of the separation agreement entered into with Mr. McArthur, the terms and conditions of the 25,000 restricted stock units previously granted to
Mr. McArthur on November 1, 2011 were modified to permit them to remain outstanding and eligible to vest as if he had remained employed by us to the November 1, 2014 vesting date, rather than being paid out on a pro-rated basis. The amount
shown was determined by multiplying the number of such restricted stock units by the $75.98 closing price of our common stock on June 27, 2014, the last trading day of our fiscal 2014. However, of such 25,000 restricted stock units, only 5,607
represent the incremental number of restricted stock units that will vest as a result of such modification. |
(3) |
The terms and conditions of performance share units previously granted to Mr. McArthur for each three-year performance period of fiscal 2012-2014 and fiscal
2013-2015 permit them to remain outstanding and eligible to vest, based on the attainment of applicable performance metrics, and subject to pro-ration for the performance period occurring through his separation date, if earned. The amount shown is
based on (i) the 9,729 performance share units vested in fiscal 2014 that were granted in fiscal 2012 for the three-year performance period of fiscal 2012-2014 (which are included in the Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal 2014 Table on page
64 under the Stock Awards column) and (ii) the 9,642 pro-rated target number of performance share units previously granted to Mr. McArthur in fiscal 2013 for the three-year performance period of fiscal 2013-2015 that can be earned,
multiplied by the $75.98 closing market price of our common stock on June 27, 2014, the last trading day of our fiscal 2014. |
(4) |
Pursuant to Mr. McArthurs separation agreement, we agreed to pay Mr. McArthurs premiums due under our medical, dental and vision care plans for up to 12
months following his separation date. The amount shown is the value of such premiums. |
77
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our
directors and executive officers, as well as persons who own more than 10% of our outstanding shares of common stock, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of our securities with the SEC. We have procedures in place to assist our
directors and
executive officers in preparing and filing these reports on a timely basis.
Based solely on a review of the forms furnished to us, or written representations from certain persons that no Forms 5 were required, we believe that all required forms have been timely filed for fiscal
2014.
PROPOSAL 2: AN ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION
OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (which were added by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act enacted in July 2010), and the related rules of the SEC, we are providing our shareholders with the opportunity to vote, on a non-binding, advisory
basis, to approve the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC (including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section, the Summary
Compensation Table and other related tables and accompanying footnotes and narratives).
As described in the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement beginning on page 33, the overall objective of our executive compensation program is to encourage and reward the creation of sustainable, long-term shareholder value.
As set forth more fully under Overall Objective and Guiding Principles of Our Executive Compensation Program on
page 33 of this proxy statement, the guiding principles of our executive compensation program include the following:
|
|
|
Compensation programs must directly align the interests of our executives with those of our shareholders. |
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits must be competitive within the market to attract, motivate and retain executives that drive our desired business results.
|
|
|
|
To motivate achievement of our financial goals and strategic objectives, a significant portion of compensation will be at-risk and based on our
financial performance and the executives personal performance.
|
In furtherance of this objective and guiding principles, our executive compensation
program includes a number of features intended to reflect sound practices and ensure that our program reinforces pay-for-performance and the creation of long-term shareholder value. These features are described in more detail in the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement and include the following:
|
|
|
Our executive compensation decisions are made by the independent members of our Board or by our Management Development and Compensation Committee,
which is made up exclusively of independent members. |
|
|
|
Our Management Development and Compensation Committee has retained an independent executive compensation consulting firm to provide objective analysis,
advice and information and to provide no other services to us. |
|
|
|
Our Management Development and Compensation Committee periodically reviews the composition of our compensation comparison group and makes changes it
determines are appropriate. |
|
|
|
Each element of our executive compensation program is addressed in the context of competitive practices. |
|
|
|
We make a significant portion of each executives overall compensation dependent on our performance as measured against pre-determined short- and
long-term financial goals such as revenue, operating income, free cash flow and ROIC targets and other financial metrics. In fiscal 2014, nearly 85% of total target direct compensation of our CEO was tied to Company and individual
|
78
|
|
performance. We believe our performance targets are challenging yet achievable. |
|
|
|
We have established a strong relationship between an executives compensation and our stock price performance because a significant portion of an
executives overall compensation is in the form of equity. |
|
|
|
We maintain meaningful stock ownership guidelines that maintain alignment of executives interests with those of our shareholders.
|
|
|
|
Our equity plans prohibit option repricing and backdating. |
|
|
|
We have eliminated virtually all executive perquisites. |
|
|
|
We have a clawback policy that entitles us to recover cash and equity incentive payments from executives following a restatement of our
financial statements as a result of errors, omissions or fraud. |
|
|
|
We pay cash severance payments under executive change in control severance agreements only on a double trigger basis (i.e., only upon both
a change in control and a qualifying termination of employment). |
|
|
|
We do not provide excise tax gross-ups under change in control severance agreements. |
|
|
|
We do not permit executives (or directors or other employees) to engage in short sales with respect to Harris stock or enter into hedging, puts, calls
or other derivative transactions with respect to our securities. |
|
|
|
We do not permit executives (or directors) to hold or purchase Harris stock on margin or in a margin account or otherwise pledge Harris stock as
collateral for margin accounts, loans or any other purpose. |
We believe that the features of our executive
compensation program align with our pay-for-performance philosophy and further align the interests of our executive officers with the long-term interests of our shareholders, while appropriately balancing risk and reward.
Our Board recommends that our shareholders approve the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement
by voting in favor of the following resolution:
RESOLVED, the compensation of the named executive officers as disclosed
in the Companys proxy statement pursuant to the compensation
disclosure rules of the SEC, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and other related tables and accompanying footnotes and narratives, is hereby
APPROVED.
The vote on this proposal is not intended to address any specific element of compensation; rather, the vote
relates to the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC. The vote is advisory, which means that the vote is non-binding on us, our Board and our
Management Development and Compensation Committee. However, our Board and our Management Development and Compensation Committee, which is responsible for designing and administering our executive officer compensation program, values the opinions
expressed by our shareholders and will consider the outcome of the advisory vote in connection with future named executive officer compensation decisions.
We currently hold our advisory vote to approve the compensation of our executive officers (Say-on-Pay vote) annually. Shareholders will have an opportunity to cast an advisory vote on the
frequency of Say-on-Pay votes at least every six years. The next advisory vote on the frequency of the Say-On-Pay vote will occur no later than our 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Vote Required and Related Matters
The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present or represented at the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and entitled to vote on this proposal will be required to approve, on an advisory basis,
the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement. Abstentions will have the effect of a vote against approval of the compensation of our named executive officers. Any broker non-votes will have no effect on the
approval of the compensation of our named executive officers.
Recommendation Regarding Proposal 2
Our Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote FOR approval of the compensation of our named executive
officers as disclosed in this proxy statement. If not otherwise specified, proxies will be voted FOR approval of this proposal.
79
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The following Report of our Audit Committee does not constitute soliciting material
and the Report should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other previous or future filings by Harris under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent Harris
specifically incorporates this Report by reference therein.
The role of the Audit Committee is, among other things, to
assist the Board in its oversight of:
|
|
|
The integrity of the financial statements of Harris; |
|
|
|
Harris compliance with applicable related legal and regulatory requirements; |
|
|
|
The independence and qualifications of Harris independent registered public accounting firm; and |
|
|
|
The performance of Harris independent registered public accounting firm and internal audit function. |
The Board has determined that, in its business judgment, all members of the Audit Committee are independent within the meaning of the
listing standards of the NYSE, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related rules of the SEC and Harris Director Independence Standards.
Harris management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of Harris financial statements and the effectiveness of Harris system of internal control over financial
reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. Management and the Internal Audit department are responsible for maintaining and evaluating appropriate accounting and financial reporting practices and internal controls and procedures designed to
ensure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. Harris independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2014, Ernst & Young LLP (E&Y), is responsible for auditing Harris
consolidated financial statements and expressing an opinion as to whether such financial statements are presented fairly, in all material respects, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. E&Y also is
responsible for auditing the effectiveness of Harris internal control over financial reporting. Representatives of E&Y attended all regularly
scheduled meetings of the Audit Committee during fiscal 2014. The Audit Committee has met and held discussions with management, the head of Internal Audit and E&Y. The Audit Committee
discussed with the internal auditors and E&Y the overall scope of, and plans for, their respective audits and the identification of audit risks. The Audit Committee also met with E&Y, the head of Internal Audit, the Principal Accounting
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, with and without management present, to discuss the results of its examinations, the reasonableness of significant judgments, the evaluations of Harris internal control over financial reporting and the
overall quality of Harris financial reporting. Management has represented to the Audit Committee that Harris consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
In the performance of its oversight function, the Audit Committee has:
|
|
|
Reviewed and discussed with management and E&Y Harris internal control over financial reporting, including a review of managements
report on its assessment and E&Ys audit of the effectiveness of Harris internal control over financial reporting and any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses; |
|
|
|
Considered, reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management and E&Y, including a discussion of the quality of the
accounting principles, the reasonableness thereof, significant adjustments, if any, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements, as well as critical accounting policies and other financial accounting and reporting principles and
practices; |
|
|
|
Discussed with E&Y the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, Communication with Audit Committees,
as amended, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T; |
|
|
|
Received, reviewed and discussed the written disclosures and the letter from E&Y required by applicable requirements of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board regarding E&Ys communications with the
|
80
|
|
Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed E&Ys independence with E&Y; |
|
|
|
Reviewed the services provided by E&Y other than its audit services and considered whether the provision of such other services by E&Y is
compatible with maintaining its independence, discussed with E&Y its independence, and concluded that E&Y is independent from Harris and its management; and |
|
|
|
Reviewed the contents of SEC-required certification statements from the CEO and Chief Financial Officer and also discussed and reviewed the process and
internal controls for providing reasonable assurances that the financial statements included in the Harris Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014 are true in all important respects, and that the report contains
all appropriate material information of which they are aware.
|
In reliance upon the reports, reviews and discussions described in this Report, the Audit
Committee has recommended to the Board, and the Board has approved, that the audited financial statements be included in Harris Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014, for filing with the SEC. The Audit
Committee also has appointed, and has requested shareholder ratification of the appointment of, E&Y as Harris independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending July 3, 2015.
Submitted on August 22, 2014 by the Audit
Committee of the Board of Directors.
David B. Rickard, Chairperson
Thomas A. Dattilo
Stephen P. Kaufman
Gregory T. Swienton
81
PROPOSAL 3: RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF
INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Fees Paid to Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
E&Y served as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014. In addition to the engagement to audit our financial statements and internal control over
financial reporting and to review the financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, E&Y also was engaged by us during fiscal 2013 to perform certain audit-related services.
The following table presents fees for professional audit services rendered by E&Y for the audit of our annual financial statements
for the fiscal years ended June 27, 2014 and June 28, 2013 and fees for other services rendered by E&Y during those periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2014 |
|
|
Fiscal 2013 |
|
Audit Fees |
|
$ |
5,552,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,604,000 |
|
Audit-Related Fees |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
921,000 |
|
Tax Fees |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
All Other Fees |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,552,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,525,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit Fees. Audit fees include fees associated with the annual audit and
the audit of internal control over financial reporting, as well as reviews of our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, SEC registration statements and other filings, accounting and reporting consultations and statutory audits required internationally for
certain of our subsidiaries.
Audit-Related Fees. Services within audit-related fees for fiscal
2013 include the audit of our Retirement Plans financial statements and associated filings, fees for audits in connection with dispositions and audits related to controls over the processing of data on customer-facing information systems.
Tax Fees. No tax-related services were rendered or fees billed for fiscal 2014 or fiscal 2013.
All Other Fees. For fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2013, no professional services were rendered or
fees billed for services not included within Audit Fees or Audit-Related Fees.
E&Y did not perform any professional services related to financial information
systems design and implementation for us in fiscal 2014 or fiscal 2013.
The Audit Committee has determined in its business
judgment that the provision of the services described above is compatible with maintaining E&Ys independence.
Pre-Approval
of Audit
and Non-Audit Services
Under our Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy and Procedures, as adopted by our Audit Committee, our Audit Committee must pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by our independent
registered public accounting firm to ensure that the provision of such services does not impair the firms independence. The policy utilizes a framework of both general pre-approval for certain specified services and specific pre-approval for
all other services.
Early in each fiscal year, our Audit Committee reviews and, as it deems appropriate, pre-approves the
audit services, audit-related services and tax services, if any, together with specific details regarding such services anticipated to be required for such fiscal year including, when available, estimated fees. Our Audit Committee periodically
reviews the services provided to date and actual fees against the estimates, and such fee amounts may be updated to the extent appropriate at the regularly scheduled meetings of our Audit Committee. Additional pre-approval is required before actual
fees for any service can exceed the originally pre-approved amount. Our Audit Committee may also revise the list of pre-approved services and related fees from time to time. All of the services described above under the captions Audit
Fees and Audit-Related Fees were pre-approved in accordance with this policy.
If we seek to engage our
independent registered public accounting firm for other services that are not considered subject to general pre-approval as described above, then our Audit Committee must approve such specific engagement as well as the estimated fees. Such
engagement will be presented to our Audit Committee for pre-approval at its next regularly scheduled meeting. If the timing of the
82
project requires an expedited decision, then we may ask the Chairperson of our Audit Committee to pre-approve such engagement. Any such pre-approval by the Chairperson is then presented to our
full Audit Committee for ratification at the next Audit Committee meeting. In any event, pre-approval of any engagement by our Audit Committee or the Chairperson of our Audit Committee is required before our independent registered public accounting
firm may commence any engagement. Additional pre-approval is required before any fees can exceed approved fees for any such specifically approved services.
Appointment of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm for Fiscal 2015
Our Audit Committee has appointed E&Y to audit our books and accounts and internal control over financial reporting for the fiscal
year ending July 3, 2015.
Although applicable law does not require shareholder ratification of the appointment, our Board
believes that obtaining shareholder ratification of the appointment is a sound corporate governance practice. If our shareholders do not ratify the appointment of E&Y, our Audit Committee will reconsider whether to retain E&Y and may retain
E&Y or hire another firm without resubmitting the matter to shareholders for approval. We expect that a representative of E&Y will be present at the 2014 Annual Meeting to respond to appropriate questions from shareholders and to make a
statement if he or she desires to do so.
As provided in our Audit Committees charter and as discussed above, our Audit
Committee is responsible for directly appointing, retaining, terminating and overseeing our independent registered public accounting firm. Although we have a very long-standing relationship with E&Y, our
Audit Committee frequently evaluates the independence and effectiveness of our independent registered public accounting firm and its personnel, and the cost and quality of its audit and
audit-related services. In accordance with sound corporate governance practices and in order to ensure that our Audit Committee and our shareholders are receiving the best and most cost-effective audit services available, our Audit Committee
periodically considers issuing a request for proposal from E&Y and other large nationally recognized accounting firms with regard to our audit engagement. A determination to use a request for proposal process could result in a firm other than
E&Y providing audit engagement services to us in later years. Our Audit Committee retains the discretion at any time to appoint a different independent registered public accounting firm.
Vote Required and Related Matters
The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present or represented at the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and entitled to vote on this proposal will be required to ratify our Audit
Committees appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm. Abstentions will have the effect of a vote against ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm. Any broker non-votes will
have no effect on the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm.
Recommendation Regarding
Proposal 3
Our Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote FOR ratification of our Audit
Committees appointment of E&Y as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending July 3, 2015. If not otherwise specified, proxies will be voted FOR approval of this proposal.
83
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 2015 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
Pursuant to applicable requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
in order to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement and form of proxy/voting instruction for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, we must receive any proposals that shareholders wish to present no later than May 14, 2015. Such
proposals will need to be in writing and comply with SEC regulations regarding the inclusion of shareholder proposals in Harris-sponsored proxy materials.
In addition, our By-Laws provide that, for any shareholder proposal or director nomination to be properly presented at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, but not for inclusion in our proxy statement
and form of proxy/voting instruction, the shareholder proposal or director nomination must comply with the requirements set forth in our By-Laws and we must receive notice of the matter not less than 90 nor more than 120 days prior to
October 24, 2015. Thus, to be timely, notice of a shareholder proposal or director nomination for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must be received by our Secretary no earlier than June 26, 2015 and no later than July 27, 2015.
However, if the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is not scheduled to be held within a period that commences on September 24, 2015 and ends on November 23, 2015, and instead, such meeting is scheduled to be held on a date outside that
period, notice of a shareholder proposal or director nomination, to be timely, must be received by our Secretary by the later of 90 days prior to such other meeting date or 10 days following the date such other meeting date is first publicly
announced or disclosed.
Notwithstanding the foregoing notice deadlines under our By-Laws, in the event that the number of
directors to be elected to our Board of Directors at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is increased and either all of the nominees for director at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or the size of the increased Board of Directors is not
publicly announced or disclosed by us by July 16, 2015, notice will be considered timely, but only with respect to nominees for any new positions created by such increase, if the notice is delivered to our Secretary no later than 10 days
following the first date all of such nominees or the size of the increased Board of Directors is publicly announced or disclosed.
Further, any proxy granted with respect to the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders will
confer discretionary authority to vote with respect to a shareholder proposal or director nomination if notice of such proposal or nomination is not received by our Secretary within the applicable timeframe provided above.
Each notice of a shareholder proposal or director nomination must contain all of the information required by our By-Laws, including:
|
|
|
Whether the shareholder is providing the notice at the request of a beneficial holder of our stock; |
|
|
|
Whether the shareholder, any beneficial holder on whose behalf the notice is being delivered or any nominee has any agreement, arrangement or
understanding with, or has received any financial assistance, funding or other consideration from any other person with respect to the investment by the shareholder or such beneficial holder in us or the matter the notice relates to, and the details
thereof; |
|
|
|
The name and address of the shareholder, any beneficial holder on whose behalf the notice is being delivered, any nominees listed in the notice and any
persons with whom such agreement, arrangement or understanding exists or from whom such assistance has been obtained, each an Interested Person, or collectively, Interested Persons; |
|
|
|
A description of all equity securities and debt instruments of us or any of our subsidiaries beneficially owned by all Interested Persons;
|
|
|
|
Whether and the extent to which any hedging, derivative or other transaction is in place or has been entered into by or for the benefit of any
Interested Person with respect to us or our subsidiaries, the effect or intent of which is to increase or decrease the economic risk or voting power of such Interested Person; |
|
|
|
A representation that the shareholder is a holder of record of our stock that would be entitled to vote at the meeting and intends to appear in person
or by proxy at the meeting to propose the matter set forth in the notice; |
|
|
|
The information regarding each nominee required by paragraphs (a), (e) and (f) of
|
84
|
|
Item 401 of Regulation S-K adopted by the SEC; |
|
|
|
Each nominees signed consent to serve as a director of Harris if elected; and |
|
|
|
Information as to whether each nominee is eligible for consideration as an independent director under the relevant standards contemplated by
Item 407(a) of Regulation S-K. |
The above is a summary of
the material requirements for shareholder proposals and director nominations set forth in our By-Laws and we refer you to our By-Laws for more detailed information.
A copy of our By-Laws is available on the Corporate Governance section of our website at
harris.com/corporate_governance/. You also may obtain a copy of our By-Laws upon written request to our Secretary at the address below.
A nomination or proposal that does not supply adequate information about the nominee or proposal and the shareholder making the
nomination or proposal, or that does not comply with our By-Laws, will be disregarded. You should address all nominations or proposals to:
Secretary
Harris Corporation
1025 West NASA Boulevard
Melbourne, Florida 32919
DISCRETIONARY VOTING ON OTHER MATTERS
Except for the matters described in this proxy statement, our Board of Directors is not
aware of any matter that will or may be properly presented at the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The deadline under our By-Laws for any shareholder proposal not discussed in this proxy statement to be properly presented at the 2014 Annual
Meeting of
Shareholders has passed. If any other matter is properly brought before the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the persons named as proxies in our proxy materials intend to vote the shares for
which we have received proxies in accordance with their best judgment.
MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS
Annual Report on Form 10-K
Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended June 27, 2014 has been filed with the
SEC. Upon request, we will furnish to shareholders without charge a copy of the Annual Report on Form 10-K. Shareholders may obtain a copy by:
|
|
|
Writing to our Secretary at: |
Harris Corporation
1025 West NASA Boulevard
Melbourne, Florida 32919; or
|
|
|
Calling (321) 727-9100. |
A copy also is available on the Investor Relations section of our website at harris.com/ar.
Shareholder List
A list of our shareholders of record as of the record date of August 29, 2014 will be available for examination for any purpose germane to the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders during normal
business hours at 1025 West NASA Boulevard, Melbourne, Florida, at least 10 calendar days prior to, and also at, the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Scott T.
Mikuen
Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and
Secretary
Melbourne, Florida
September 9, 2014
85
|
|
|
HARRIS CORPORATION
1025 WEST NASA BOULEVARD MELBOURNE, FL
32919 |
|
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. PLEASE VOTE TODAY.
VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com
Use the Internet to submit your proxy/voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on October 23, 2014. Have
your proxy/voting instruction card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic proxy/voting instruction form.
ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS
If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by Harris in printing and mailing proxy materials, you can elect to receive all future proxy statements,
proxy/voting instruction cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To elect electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive
or access proxy materials electronically in future years. VOTE BY PHONE -
1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to submit your proxy/voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on October 23, 2014. Have your
proxy/voting instruction card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
NOTE: Your Internet or phone voting instructions authorize the named proxies and/or provide the Plan Trustee with instructions to vote these shares in
the same manner as if you marked, signed, dated and returned your proxy/voting instruction card.
VOTE BY MAIL (ONLY IF NOT VOTING BY INTERNET OR PHONE) Mark,
sign and date your proxy/voting instruction card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. |
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS
BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
M78023-Z63859-P55259
KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
|
|
|
|
|
|
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
THIS PROXY/VOTING INSTRUCTION CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HARRIS CORPORATION PROXY/VOTING INSTRUCTION CARD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR each
nominee listed in Proposal 1 and FOR Proposals 2 and 3: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Election of Directors for a One-Year Term Expiring at 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominees: |
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1a. William M. Brown
|
|
¨ |
|
¨ |
|
¨ |
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1b. Peter W. Chiarelli
|
|
¨ |
|
¨ |
|
¨ |
|
|
|
1h. Leslie F. Kenne
|
|
¨ |
|
¨ |
|
¨ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1c. Thomas A. Dattilo
|
|
¨ |
|
¨ |
|
¨ |
|
|
|
1i. David B. Rickard
|
|
¨ |
|
¨ |
|
¨ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1d. Terry D. Growcock
|
|
¨ |
|
¨ |
|
¨ |
|
|
|
1j. Dr. James C. Stoffel
|
|
¨ |
|
¨ |
|
¨ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1e. Lewis Hay III
|
|
¨ |
|
¨ |
|
¨ |
|
|
|
1k. Gregory T. Swienton
|
|
¨ |
|
¨ |
|
¨ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1f. Vyomesh I. Joshi
|
|
¨ |
|
¨ |
|
¨ |
|
|
|
1l. Hansel E. Tookes II
|
|
¨ |
|
¨ |
|
¨ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1g. Karen Katen
|
|
¨ |
|
¨ |
|
¨ |
|
|
|
2. Advisory Vote to Approve the Compensation of Named Executive Officers as Disclosed in Proxy
Statement |
|
¨ |
|
¨ |
|
¨ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Ratification of Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
for Fiscal Year 2015 |
|
¨ |
|
¨ |
|
¨ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
For address changes and/or comments, please check this box
and write them on the back where indicated. |
|
¨ |
|
|
|
NOTE: If this proxy/voting instruction card is
properly executed, then the undersigneds shares will be voted in the manner instructed herein, or if no instruction is provided, then either as the Board of Directors recommends or, if the undersigned is a participant in the Harris Corporation
Retirement Plan, as may otherwise be provided in the Plan. The named proxies also are authorized, in their discretion, to consider and act upon such other business as may properly come before the 2014 Annual Meeting or any adjournments or
postponements thereof. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon.
When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee, guardian or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate
or partnership name by authorized officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature (Joint Owners) |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. PLEASE VOTE TODAY.
(See reverse side for information on how to submit your proxy/voting instructions by Internet, by phone or by mail.)
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be Held on October 24, 2014:
The Notice of 2014 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and Annual Report for Fiscal Year Ended
June 27, 2014 are available at www.proxyvote.com.
M78024-Z63859-P55259
HARRIS CORPORATION
Annual Meeting of Shareholders
October 24, 2014 1:00 PM
This proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors of
Harris Corporation and the Harris Corporation Retirement Plan Trustee.
You are receiving this proxy/voting instruction card because you are a registered shareholder and/or a participant in the
Harris Corporation Retirement Plan. This proxy/voting instruction card revokes all prior proxies/voting instructions given by you. If you are voting by mail with this proxy/voting instruction card, please mark your choices and sign and date on the
reverse side exactly as your name or names appear there. If shares are held in the name of joint holders, each should sign. If you are signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee, guardian or other fiduciary, please give your full title as
such.
If the undersigned is a registered shareholder, the undersigned hereby appoints WILLIAM M. BROWN, MIGUEL A. LOPEZ
and SCOTT T. MIKUEN, and each of them, with power to act without the others and with full power of substitution, as proxies and attorneys-in-fact, and hereby authorizes them to represent and vote, as instructed on the reverse side of this
proxy/voting instruction card, all the shares of Harris Corporation common stock which the undersigned is entitled to vote and, in their discretion, to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of
Harris Corporation to be held on October 24, 2014 or at any adjournments or postponements thereof, with all powers which the undersigned would possess if present at the Annual Meeting. If this proxy/voting instruction card has been properly
executed but the undersigned has provided no voting instructions, then the undersigneds shares will be voted FOR the election of the Board of Directors nominees and FOR Proposals 2 and 3.
If the undersigned is a participant in the Harris Corporation Retirement Plan, the undersigned hereby instructs the Plan
Trustee to vote, as instructed on the reverse side of this proxy/voting instruction card, the shares allocable to the undersigneds Harris Corporation Stock Fund Account at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Harris Corporation to be held on
October 24, 2014 or any adjournments or postponements thereof. If the undersigned does not provide voting instructions, the Plan Trustee will vote such shares in the same proportion as the shares for which other participants have timely provided
voting instructions.
|
Address Changes/Comments:
|
|
|
(If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)
Continued and to be marked, signed and dated on reverse side