UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-00266
Tri-Continental Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
225 Franklin Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02110
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Scott R. Plummer
5228 Ameriprise Financial Center
Minneapolis, MN 55474
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (800) 345-6611
Date of fiscal year end: December 31
Date of reporting period: December 31, 2014
Form N-CSR is to be used by management investment companies to file reports with the Commission not later than 10 days after the transmission to stockholders of any report that is required to be transmitted to stockholders under Rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30e-1). The Commission may use the information provided on Form N-CSR in its regulatory, disclosure review, inspection, and policymaking roles.
A registrant is required to disclose the information specified by Form N-CSR, and the Commission will make this information public. A registrant is not required to respond to the collection of information contained in Form N-CSR unless the Form displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. Please direct comments concerning the accuracy of the information collection burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing the burden to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549-0609. The OMB has reviewed this collection of information under the clearance requirements of 44 U.S.C. § 3507.
Item 1. | Reports to Stockholders. |
Annual Report December 31, 2014 |
Tri-Continental Corporation
|
Tri-Continental Corporation |
Letter to Stockholders
Dear Stockholders,
We are pleased to present the annual stockholder report for Tri-Continental Corporation (the Fund). The report includes the Funds investment results, a discussion with the Funds portfolio managers, a portfolio of investments and financial statements as of December 31, 2014.
The Funds Common Stock gained 11.09%, based on net asset value, and 11.11%, based on market price, for the 12 months ended December 31, 2014. During the same 12-month period, the S&P 500 Index returned 13.69% and the Funds Blended Index returned 11.44%.
During 2014, the Fund paid four distributions, in accordance with its earned distribution policy, that aggregated to $0.7505 per share of Common Stock of the Fund. Distributions are based upon amounts distributed by underlying portfolio companies owned by the Fund. The Fund has paid dividends on its common stock for 70 consecutive years.
On April 13, 2015, the Fund will hold its 85th Annual Meeting of Stockholders in Minneapolis, MN.
Information about the Fund, including daily pricing, current performance, Fund holdings, stockholder reports, the most current prospectus for the Fund, distributions and other information can be found at columbiamanagement.com under the Closed-End Funds tab.
On behalf of the Board, we would like to thank you for your continued support of Tri-Continental Corporation.
Best Regards,
William P. Carmichael
Chairman of the Board
Annual Reoprt 2014
Tri-Continental Corporation |
Annual Report 2014
Tri-Continental Corporation |
Performance Summary
> | Tri-Continental Corporation (the Fund) Common Stock gained 11.09%, based on net asset value, and 11.11%, based on market price, for the 12 months ended December 31, 2014. |
> | During the same 12-month period, the S&P 500 Index returned 13.69%, and the Funds Blended Index (described below) returned 11.44%. |
> | Security selection helped the Funds quantitative portfolio generate higher returns than the S&P 500 Index. Within the Funds flexible capital and income segment, exposure to convertibles and to the high yield market was a drag on performance. |
Average Annual Total Returns (%) (for period ended December 31, 2014) |
| |||||||||||||
Inception | 1 Year | 5 Years | 10 Years | |||||||||||
Market Price |
01/05/29 | 11.11 | 16.66 | 6.14 | ||||||||||
Net Asset Value |
01/05/29 | 11.09 | 15.95 | 5.78 | ||||||||||
S&P 500 Index |
13.69 | 15.45 | 7.67 | |||||||||||
Blended Index |
11.44 | 13.51 | 7.48 |
The performance information shown represents past performance and is not a guarantee of future results. The investment return and principal value of your investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance information shown. You may obtain performance information current to the most recent month-end by visiting columbiamanagement.com.
Returns reflect changes in market price or net asset value, as applicable, and assume reinvestment of distributions. Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that investors may pay on distributions or the sale of shares.
The S&P 500 Index, an unmanaged index, measures the performance of 500 widely held, large-capitalization U.S. stocks and is frequently used as a general measure of market performance.
The Blended Index, a weighted custom composite established by the Investment Manager, consists of a 50% weighting in the S&P 500 Index, a 16.68% weighting in the Russell 1000 Value Index, a 16.66% weighting in the Barclays U.S. Corporate Investment Grade & High Yield Index and a 16.66% weighting in the Barclays U.S. Convertible Composite Index.
Indices are not available for investment, are not professionally managed and do not reflect sales charges, fees, brokerage commissions, taxes or other expenses of investing. Securities in the Fund may not match those in an index.
Price Per Share |
||||||||
December 31, 2014 | September 30, 2014 | June 30, 2014 | March 31, 2014 | |||||
Market price ($) |
21.41 | 20.87 | 20.98 | 20.08 | ||||
Net asset value ($) |
24.76 | 24.19 | 24.40 | 23.43 |
Distributions Paid Per Common Share(a) | ||
Payable date |
Per share amount ($) | |
March 25, 2014 |
0.1725 | |
June 24, 2014 |
0.1850 | |
September 23, 2014 |
0.1925 | |
December 23, 2014 |
0.2005 |
(a) | Preferred Stockholders were paid dividends totaling $2.50 per share. |
The net asset value of the Funds shares may not always correspond to the market price of such shares. Common stock of many closed-end funds frequently trade at a discount from their net asset value. The Fund is subject to stock market risk, which is the risk that stock prices overall will decline over short or long periods, adversely affecting the value of an investment in the Fund.
2 | Annual Report 2014 |
Tri-Continental Corporation |
Manager Discussion of Fund Performance
Annual Report 2014 | 3 |
Tri-Continental Corporation |
Manager Discussion of Fund Performance (continued)
4 | Annual Report 2014 |
Tri-Continental Corporation |
Manager Discussion of Fund Performance (continued)
bruised by double-digit losses. Within convertibles, energy and information technology detracted from returns. The convertibles of Energy XXI and Endeavor International lost significant ground. Goodrich Petroleum and Alpha Natural Resources bonds led the decline among fixed-income holdings, among which energy was also the weakest sector.
Portfolio Changes
During the year, the stock selection models in our quantitative segment led us to add a number of new positions to the portfolio, most notably Merck, 3M, Lockheed Martin and Capital One. We added to positions in Merck, Lockheed Martin and Capital One after our initial investments earlier in the year. Notable among the positions we eliminated were Boeing, Verizon Communications, Prudential Financial and Medtronic.
Within the flexible capital and income segment, the equity allocation was slightly above a one-third weighting and its bond allocation was slightly below a one-third weighting while the allocation to convertible securities was approximately neutral. There were no significant positioning changes during the period. Most notably, we eliminated Chevron and GlaxoSmithKline from the equity allocation, sold PPL Electric Utilities and MGM Resorts International convertibles and sold Stanley Black & Decker bonds.
Investment Approach
In the quantitative segment, our strategy is based on individual quantitative stock selection models. As a result, we do not rely on macroeconomic scenarios or market outlooks to make security selections. We do not try to predict when equities (as an asset class) will perform well or when they will perform poorly. Instead, we keep the Fund substantially invested at all times, with security selection driven by quantitative models.
Within the flexible capital and income segment, we believe that investors have focused on top-down comparisons of asset classes rather than bottom-up comparisons of specific securities. As long as this trend persists, we believe we have opportunities to exploit inefficiencies in the financial markets. Through individual security research, we seek to identify attractive income and growth opportunities, regardless of what asset class or corporate capital structure it comes from. The Fund maintains significant investment flexibility to own and potentially benefit from these attractive securities.
Annual Report 2014 | 5 |
Tri-Continental Corporation |
December 31, 2014
(Percentages represent value of investments compared to net assets)
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement.
6 | Annual Report 2014 |
Tri-Continental Corporation |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
December 31, 2014
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement.
Annual Report 2014 | 7 |
Tri-Continental Corporation |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
December 31, 2014
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement.
8 | Annual Report 2014 |
Tri-Continental Corporation |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
December 31, 2014
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement.
Annual Report 2014 | 9 |
Tri-Continental Corporation |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
December 31, 2014
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement.
10 | Annual Report 2014 |
Tri-Continental Corporation |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
December 31, 2014
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement.
Annual Report 2014 | 11 |
Tri-Continental Corporation |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
December 31, 2014
Investments in Derivatives
Futures Contracts Outstanding at December 31, 2014
At December 31, 2014, securities totaling $501,445 were pledged as collateral to cover initial margin requirements on open futures contracts.
Long Futures Contracts Outstanding
Contract Description | Number of Contracts |
Trading Currency |
Notional Market Value ($) |
Expiration Date | Unrealized Appreciation ($) |
Unrealized Depreciation ($) |
||||||||||||||||||
S&P 500 |
12 | USD | 6,157,200 | 03/2015 | 24,846 | |
Notes to Portfolio of Investments
(a) | Non-income producing. |
(b) | This security, or a portion of this security, has been pledged as collateral in connection with open futures contracts. These values are denoted within the Investments in Derivatives section of the Portfolio of Investments. |
(c) | Security exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933. This security may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At December 31, 2014, the value of these securities amounted to $166,656,554 or 10.76% of net assets. |
(d) | Variable rate security. |
(e) | Represents securities that have defaulted on payment of interest. The Fund has stopped accruing interest on these securities. At December 31, 2014, the value of these securities amounted to $2,179,587, which represents 0.14% of net assets. |
(f) | The rate shown is the seven-day current annualized yield at December 31, 2014. |
(g) | As defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, an affiliated company is one in which the Fund owns 5% or more of the companys outstanding voting securities, or a company which is under common ownership or control with the Fund. Holdings and transactions in these affiliated companies during the year ended December 31, 2014, are as follows: |
Issuer | Beginning Cost ($) |
Purchase Cost ($) |
Proceeds From Sales ($) |
Ending Cost ($) |
Dividends Affiliated Issuers ($) |
Value ($) | ||||||||||||||||||
Columbia Short-Term Cash Fund |
4,586,660 | 75,759,819 | (74,307,293 | ) | 6,039,186 | 4,290 | 6,039,186 |
Abbreviation Legend
ADR | American Depositary Receipt | |
PIK | Payment-in-Kind |
Currency Legend
USD | US Dollar |
Fair Value Measurements
Generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) require disclosure regarding the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value and any changes in valuation inputs or techniques. In addition, investments shall be disclosed by major category.
The Fund categorizes its fair value measurements according to a three-level hierarchy that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by prioritizing that the most observable input be used when available. Observable inputs are those that market participants would use in pricing an investment based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity. Unobservable inputs are those that reflect the Funds assumptions about the information market participants would use in pricing an investment. An investments level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is deemed significant to the asset or liabilitys fair value measurement. The input levels are not necessarily an indication of the risk or liquidity associated with investments at that level. For example, certain U.S. government securities are generally high quality and liquid, however, they are reflected as Level 2 because the inputs used to determine fair value may not always be quoted prices in an active market.
Fair value inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
> | Level 1 Valuations based on quoted prices for investments in active markets that the Fund has the ability to access at the measurement date (including NAV for open-end mutual funds). Valuation adjustments are not applied to Level 1 investments. |
> | Level 2 Valuations based on other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.). |
> | Level 3 Valuations based on significant unobservable inputs (including the Funds own assumptions and judgment in determining the fair value of investments). |
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement.
12 | Annual Report 2014 |
Tri-Continental Corporation |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
December 31, 2014
Fair Value Measurements (continued)
Inputs that are used in determining fair value of an investment may include price information, credit data, volatility statistics, and other factors. These inputs can be either observable or unobservable. The availability of observable inputs can vary between investments, and is affected by various factors such as the type of investment, and the volume and level of activity for that investment or similar investments in the marketplace. The inputs will be considered by the Investment Manager, along with any other relevant factors in the calculation of an investments fair value. The Fund uses prices and inputs that are current as of the measurement date, which may include periods of market dislocations. During these periods, the availability of prices and inputs may be reduced for many investments. This condition could cause an investment to be reclassified between the various levels within the hierarchy.
Foreign equity securities actively traded in markets where there is a significant delay in the local close relative to the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) are classified as Level 2. The values of these securities may include an adjustment to reflect the impact of significant market movements following the close of local trading, as described in Note 2 to the financial statements Security Valuation.
Investments falling into the Level 3 category are primarily supported by quoted prices from brokers and dealers participating in the market for those investments. However, these may be classified as Level 3 investments due to lack of market transparency and corroboration to support these quoted prices. Additionally, valuation models may be used as the pricing source for any remaining investments classified as Level 3. These models may rely on one or more significant unobservable inputs and/or significant assumptions by the Investment Manager. Inputs used in valuations may include, but are not limited to, financial statement analysis, capital account balances, discount rates and estimated cash flows, and comparable company data.
Under the direction of the Funds Board of Trustees (the Board), the Investment Managers Valuation Committee (the Committee) is responsible for overseeing the valuation procedures approved by the Board. The Committee consists of voting and non-voting members from various groups within the Investment Managers organization, including operations and accounting, trading and investments, compliance, risk management and legal.
The Committee meets at least monthly to review and approve valuation matters, which may include a description of specific valuation determinations, data regarding pricing information received from approved pricing vendors and brokers and the results of Board-approved valuation control policies and procedures (the Policies). The Policies address, among other things, instances when market quotations are or are not readily available, including recommendations of third party pricing vendors and a determination of appropriate pricing methodologies; events that require specific valuation determinations and assessment of fair value techniques; securities with a potential for stale pricing, including those that are illiquid, restricted, or in default; and the effectiveness of third party pricing vendors, including periodic reviews of vendors. The Committee meets more frequently, as needed, to discuss additional valuation matters, which may include the need to review back-testing results, review time-sensitive information or approve related valuation actions. The Committee reports to the Board, with members of the Committee meeting with the Board at each of its regularly scheduled meetings to discuss valuation matters and actions during the period, similar to those described earlier.
For investments categorized as Level 3, the Committee monitors information similar to that described above, which may include: (i) data specific to the issuer or comparable issuers, (ii) general market or specific sector news and (iii) quoted prices and specific or similar security transactions. The Committee considers this data and any changes from prior periods in order to assess the reasonableness of observable and unobservable inputs, any assumptions or internal models used to value those securities and changes in fair value. This data is also used to corroborate, when available, information received from approved pricing vendors and brokers. Various factors impact the frequency of monitoring this information (which may occur as often as daily). However, the Committee may determine that changes to inputs, assumptions and models are not required as a result of the monitoring procedures performed.
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement.
Annual Report 2014 | 13 |
Tri-Continental Corporation |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
December 31, 2014
Fair Value Measurements (continued)
The following table is a summary of the inputs used to value the Funds investments at December 31, 2014:
Description | Level 1 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets ($) |
Level 2 Other Significant Observable Inputs ($) |
Level 3 Significant Unobservable Inputs ($) |
Total ($) | ||||||||||||
Equity Securities |
||||||||||||||||
Common Stocks |
||||||||||||||||
Consumer Discretionary |
108,719,088 | | | 108,719,088 | ||||||||||||
Consumer Staples |
95,378,293 | | | 95,378,293 | ||||||||||||
Energy |
89,298,231 | | | 89,298,231 | ||||||||||||
Financials |
201,565,643 | | | 201,565,643 | ||||||||||||
Health Care |
127,119,469 | | | 127,119,469 | ||||||||||||
Industrials |
109,531,162 | | | 109,531,162 | ||||||||||||
Information Technology |
205,739,585 | | | 205,739,585 | ||||||||||||
Materials |
37,430,825 | 333,342 | | 37,764,167 | ||||||||||||
Telecommunication Services |
35,063,828 | | | 35,063,828 | ||||||||||||
Utilities |
47,038,471 | | | 47,038,471 | ||||||||||||
Convertible Preferred Stocks |
||||||||||||||||
Consumer Discretionary |
8,062,500 | | | 8,062,500 | ||||||||||||
Consumer Staples |
7,551,000 | 11,942,065 | | 19,493,065 | ||||||||||||
Energy |
| 16,203,765 | | 16,203,765 | ||||||||||||
Financials |
38,728,591 | 11,575,850 | | 50,304,441 | ||||||||||||
Health Care |
3,780,000 | | | 3,780,000 | ||||||||||||
Industrials |
7,972,900 | | | 7,972,900 | ||||||||||||
Materials |
7,567,500 | | | 7,567,500 | ||||||||||||
Telecommunication Services |
3,825,878 | | | 3,825,878 | ||||||||||||
Utilities |
| 16,922,499 | | 16,922,499 | ||||||||||||
Total Equity Securities |
1,134,372,964 | 56,977,521 | | 1,191,350,485 | ||||||||||||
Bonds |
||||||||||||||||
Corporate Bonds & Notes |
| 201,334,824 | | 201,334,824 | ||||||||||||
Convertible Bonds |
| 126,626,758 | | 126,626,758 | ||||||||||||
Preferred Debt |
4,290,000 | | | 4,290,000 | ||||||||||||
Total Bonds |
4,290,000 | 327,961,582 | | 332,251,582 | ||||||||||||
Mutual Funds |
||||||||||||||||
Money Market Funds |
18,401,628 | | | 18,401,628 | ||||||||||||
Total Mutual Funds |
18,401,628 | | | 18,401,628 | ||||||||||||
Investments in Securities |
1,157,064,592 | 384,939,103 | | 1,542,003,695 | ||||||||||||
Derivatives |
||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||
Futures Contracts |
24,846 | | | 24,846 | ||||||||||||
Total |
1,157,089,438 | 384,939,103 | | 1,542,028,541 | ||||||||||||
See the Portfolio of Investments for all investment classifications not indicated in the table.
The Funds assets assigned to the Level 2 input category are generally valued using the market approach, in which a securitys value is determined through reference to prices and information from market transactions for similar or identical assets. These assets include certain foreign securities for which a third party statistical pricing service may be employed for purposes of fair market valuation. The model utilized by such third party statistical pricing service takes into account a securitys correlation to available market data including, but not limited to, intraday index, ADR, and ETF movements.
There were no transfers of financial assets between levels during the period.
Derivative instruments are valued at unrealized appreciation (depreciation).
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement.
14 | Annual Report 2014 |
Tri-Continental Corporation |
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
December 31, 2014
Assets |
||||
Investments, at value |
||||
Unaffiliated issuers (identified cost $1,374,851,165) |
$1,535,964,509 | |||
Affiliated issuers (identified cost $6,039,186) |
6,039,186 | |||
|
||||
Total investments (identified cost $1,380,890,351) |
1,542,003,695 | |||
Receivable for: |
||||
Investments sold |
9,271,404 | |||
Common Stock |
18,137 | |||
Dividends |
2,362,039 | |||
Interest |
4,304,058 | |||
Variation margin |
12,893 | |||
Prepaid expenses |
85,462 | |||
Other assets |
43,681 | |||
|
||||
Total assets |
1,558,101,369 | |||
|
||||
Liabilities |
||||
Payable for: |
||||
Investments purchased |
7,565,893 | |||
Common Stock payable |
547,797 | |||
Preferred Stock dividends |
470,463 | |||
Variation margin |
85,050 | |||
Investment management fees |
15,193 | |||
Stockholder servicing and transfer agent fees |
5,070 | |||
Administration fees |
2,345 | |||
Compensation of board members |
71,911 | |||
Stockholders meeting fees |
1,102 | |||
Other expenses |
414,593 | |||
|
||||
Total liabilities |
9,179,417 | |||
|
||||
Net assets |
1,548,921,952 | |||
Preferred stock |
37,637,000 | |||
|
||||
Net assets for Common Stock |
$1,511,284,952 | |||
|
||||
Net asset value per share of outstanding Common Stock |
$24.76 | |||
|
||||
Market price per share of Common Stock |
$21.41 | |||
|
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement.
Annual Report 2014 | 15 |
Tri-Continental Corporation |
Statement of Capital Stock and Surplus
December 31, 2014
Capital Stock |
||||
$2.50 Cumulative Preferred Stock, $50 par value, assets coverage per share $2,058 |
||||
Shares issued and outstanding 752,740 |
$37,637,000 | |||
Common Stock, $0.50 par value: |
||||
Shares issued and outstanding 61,038,489 |
30,519,245 | |||
Surplus |
||||
Capital surplus |
1,606,317,087 | |||
Excess of distributions over net investment income |
(364,539 | ) | ||
Accumulated net realized loss |
(286,325,031 | ) | ||
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: |
||||
Investments unaffiliated issuers |
161,113,344 | |||
Futures contracts |
24,846 | |||
|
||||
Net assets |
$1,548,921,952 | |||
|
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement.
16 | Annual Report 2014 |
Tri-Continental Corporation |
Year Ended December 31, 2014
Net investment income |
||||
Income: |
||||
Dividends unaffiliated issuers |
$34,399,245 | |||
Dividends affiliated issuers |
4,290 | |||
Interest |
17,585,836 | |||
Foreign taxes withheld |
(44,311 | ) | ||
|
||||
Total income |
51,945,060 | |||
|
||||
Expenses: |
||||
Investment management fees |
5,368,533 | |||
Stockholder servicing and transfer agent fees |
391,621 | |||
Administration fees |
831,131 | |||
Compensation of board members |
58,553 | |||
Stockholders meeting fees |
73,964 | |||
Custodian fees |
20,089 | |||
Printing and postage fees |
65,353 | |||
Professional fees |
67,489 | |||
Other |
294,828 | |||
|
||||
Total expenses |
7,171,561 | |||
|
||||
Net investment income(a) |
44,773,499 | |||
|
||||
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) net |
||||
Net realized gain (loss) on: |
||||
Investments |
178,974,665 | |||
Foreign currency translations |
160 | |||
Futures contracts |
278,915 | |||
|
||||
Net realized gain |
179,253,740 | |||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: |
||||
Investments |
(77,903,000 | ) | ||
Futures contracts |
(83,788 | ) | ||
|
||||
Net change in unrealized depreciation |
(77,986,788 | ) | ||
|
||||
Net realized and unrealized gain |
101,266,952 | |||
|
||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations |
$146,040,451 | |||
|
(a) | Net investment income for Common Stock is $42,891,649, which is net of Preferred Stock dividends of $1,881,850. |
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement.
Annual Report 2014 | 17 |
Tri-Continental Corporation |
Statement of Changes in Net Assets
Year Ended December 31, 2014 |
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
|||||||
Operations |
||||||||
Net investment income |
$44,773,499 | $43,026,975 | ||||||
Net realized gain |
179,253,740 | 138,948,724 | ||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) |
(77,986,788 | ) | 131,421,550 | |||||
|
||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations |
146,040,451 | 313,397,249 | ||||||
|
||||||||
Distributions to Stockholders |
||||||||
Net investment income |
||||||||
Preferred Stock |
(1,881,850 | ) | (1,881,850 | ) | ||||
Common Stock |
(46,034,377 | ) | (42,214,926 | ) | ||||
|
||||||||
Total Distributions to Stockholders |
(47,916,227 | ) | (44,096,776 | ) | ||||
|
||||||||
Decrease in net assets from capital stock activity |
(22,572,792 | ) | (16,852,169 | ) | ||||
|
||||||||
Total increase in net assets |
75,551,432 | 252,448,304 | ||||||
Net assets at beginning of year |
1,473,370,520 | 1,220,922,216 | ||||||
|
||||||||
Net assets at end of year |
$1,548,921,952 | $1,473,370,520 | ||||||
|
||||||||
Undistributed (excess of distributions over) net investment income |
$(364,539 | ) | $676,386 | |||||
|
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement.
18 | Annual Report 2014 |
Tri-Continental Corporation |
Statement of Changes in Net Assets (continued)
Year Ended December 31, 2014 |
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
|||||||||||||||
Shares | Dollars ($) | Shares | Dollars ($) | |||||||||||||
Capital stock activity |
||||||||||||||||
Common Stock issued at market price in distributions |
650,551 | 13,424,167 | 698,558 | 12,700,935 | ||||||||||||
Common Stock issued for investment plan purchases |
130,468 | 2,696,661 | 94,934 | 1,723,896 | ||||||||||||
Common Stock purchased from investment plan participants |
(992,890 | ) | (20,411,667 | ) | (1,118,982 | ) | (20,483,855 | ) | ||||||||
Common Stock purchased in the open market |
(885,692 | ) | (18,281,953 | ) | (591,396 | ) | (10,793,145 | ) | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Total net decrease |
(1,097,563 | ) | (22,572,792 | ) | (916,886 | ) | (16,852,169 | ) | ||||||||
|
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement.
Annual Report 2014 | 19 |
Tri-Continental Corporation |
Per share operating performance data is designed to allow investors to trace the operating performance, on a per Common Stock share basis, from the beginning net asset value to the ending net asset value, so that investors can understand what effect the individual items have on their investment, assuming it was held throughout the period. Generally, the per share amounts are derived by converting the actual dollar amounts incurred for each item, as disclosed in the financial statements, to their equivalent per Common Stock share amounts, using average Common Stock shares outstanding during the period.
Total return measures the Funds performance assuming that investors purchased shares of the Fund at the market price or net asset value as of the beginning of the period, invested all distributions paid, as provided for in the Funds Prospectus and Automatic Dividend Investment and Cash Purchase Plan, and then sold their shares at the closing market price or net asset value per share on the last day of the period. The computations do not reflect any sales charges or transaction costs on your investment or taxes investors may incur on distributions or on the sale of shares of the Fund, and are not annualized for periods of less than one year.
The portfolio turnover rate is calculated without regard to purchase and sales transactions of short-term instruments and certain derivatives, if any, and are not annualized for periods of less than one year. If such transactions were included, the Funds portfolio turnover may be higher.
The ratios of expenses and net investment income to average net assets for Common Stock for the periods presented do not reflect the effect of dividends paid to Preferred Stockholders.
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Per share data |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period |
$23.11 | $18.77 | $16.77 | $15.96 | $13.73 | |||||||||||||||
Income from investment operations |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income |
0.73 | 0.69 | 0.63 | 0.33 | 0.30 | |||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain |
1.70 | 4.36 | 2.00 | 0.79 | 2.28 | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations |
2.43 | 5.05 | 2.63 | 1.12 | 2.58 | |||||||||||||||
Less distributions to Stockholders from: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income |
||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred Stock |
(0.03 | ) | (0.03 | ) | (0.03 | ) | (0.03 | ) | (0.03 | ) | ||||||||||
Common Stock |
(0.75 | ) | (0.68 | ) | (0.60 | ) | (0.28 | ) | (0.25 | ) | ||||||||||
Total distributions to Stockholders |
(0.78 | ) | (0.71 | ) | (0.63 | ) | (0.31 | ) | (0.28 | ) | ||||||||||
Capital stock transactions at market price |
| | | | (0.07 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period |
$24.76 | $23.11 | $18.77 | $16.77 | $15.96 | |||||||||||||||
Adjusted net asset value, end of period(a) |
$24.68 | $23.04 | $18.71 | $16.72 | $15.90 | |||||||||||||||
Market price, end of period |
$21.41 | $19.98 | $16.00 | $14.23 | $13.76 | |||||||||||||||
Total return |
||||||||||||||||||||
Based upon net asset value |
11.09 | % | 27.76 | % | 16.24 | % | 7.15 | % | 18.58 | % | ||||||||||
Based upon market price |
11.11 | % | 29.58 | % | 16.77 | % | 5.46 | % | 21.85 | % | ||||||||||
Ratios to average net assets(b) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses to average net assets for Common Stock |
0.49 | % | 0.50 | % | 0.52 | % | 0.59 | % | 0.60 | % | ||||||||||
Net investment income to average net assets for Common Stock |
2.91 | % | 3.12 | % | 3.28 | % | 1.80 | % | 1.84 | % | ||||||||||
Supplemental data |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (000s): |
||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock |
$1,511,285 | $1,435,734 | $1,183,285 | $1,078,160 | $1,061,251 | |||||||||||||||
Preferred Stock |
37,637 | 37,637 | 37,637 | 37,637 | 37,637 | |||||||||||||||
Total net assets |
$1,548,922 | $1,473,371 | $1,220,922 | $1,115,797 | $1,098,888 | |||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover |
76 | % | 62 | % | 68 | % | 97 | % | 86 | % | ||||||||||
Notes to Financial Highlights
(a) | Assumes the exercise of outstanding warrants. |
(b) | In addition to the fees and expenses that the Fund bears directly, the Fund indirectly bears a pro rata share of the fees and expenses of any other funds in which it invests. Such indirect expenses are not included in the Funds reported expense ratios. |
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement.
20 | Annual Report 2014 |
Tri-Continental Corporation |
December 31, 2014
Annual Report 2014 | 21 |
Tri-Continental Corporation |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
December 31, 2014
22 | Annual Report 2014 |
Tri-Continental Corporation |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
December 31, 2014
Annual Report 2014 | 23 |
Tri-Continental Corporation |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
December 31, 2014
24 | Annual Report 2014 |
Tri-Continental Corporation |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
December 31, 2014
Annual Report 2014 | 25 |
Tri-Continental Corporation |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
December 31, 2014
26 | Annual Report 2014 |
Tri-Continental Corporation |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
December 31, 2014
Annual Report 2014 | 27 |
Tri-Continental Corporation |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
December 31, 2014
28 | Annual Report 2014 |
Tri-Continental Corporation |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Tri-Continental Corporation
In our opinion, the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the portfolio of investments, and the related statements of operations and of changes in net assets and the financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Tri-Continental Corporation (the Fund) at December 31, 2014, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended and the financial highlights for each of the three years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements and financial highlights (hereafter referred to as financial statements) are the responsibility of the Funds management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits, which included confirmation of securities at December 31, 2014 by correspondence with the custodian, brokers and transfer agent, and the application of alternative auditing procedures where such confirmations had not been received, provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. The financial highlights of the Fund for the periods ended on or prior to December 31, 2011 were audited by another independent registered public accounting firm whose report dated February 22, 2012 expressed an unqualified opinion on those highlights.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
February 23, 2015
Annual Report 2014 | 29 |
Tri-Continental Corporation |
Federal Income Tax Information
(Unaudited)
The Fund hereby designates the following tax attributes for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.
Tax Designations
Qualified Dividend Income |
65.22 | % | ||
Dividends Received Deduction |
61.58 | % |
Qualified Dividend Income. For taxable, non-corporate shareholders, the percentage of ordinary income dividends paid during the fiscal year that represents qualified dividend income subject to reduced tax rates.
Dividends Received Deduction. The percentage of ordinary income dividends paid during the fiscal year that qualifies for the corporate dividends received deduction.
30 | Annual Report 2014 |
Tri-Continental Corporation |
Stockholders elect the Board that oversees the Funds operations. The Board appoints officers who are responsible for day-to-day business decisions based on policies set by the Board. The following table provides basic biographical information about the Funds Board members, including their principal occupations during the past five years, although specific titles for individuals may have varied over the period. Under current Board policy, members may serve through the end of the calendar year in which he or she reaches the mandatory retirement age established by the Board or the fifteenth anniversary of the first Board meeting they attended as a member of the Board.
Independent Trustees | ||||||||
Name, Year of Birth |
Position Held With Fund and Length of Service |
Principal Occupation During Past Five Years | Number of Funds in the Fund Family Overseen by Board Member |
Other Present or Past Directorships/ Trusteeships (Within Past 5 Years) | ||||
Kathleen Blatz 901 S. Marquette Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55402 1954 |
Board member since November 2008 | Attorney; specializing in arbitration and mediation; Chief Justice, Minnesota Supreme Court, 1998-2006; Associate Justice, Minnesota Supreme Court, 1996-1998; Fourth Judicial District Court Judge, Hennepin Country, 1994-1996; Attorney in private practice and public service, 1984-1993; State Representative, Minnesota House of Representatives, 1979-1993, which included service on the Tax and Financial Institutions and Insurance Committees | 132 | Trustee, BlueCross BlueShield of Minnesota (Chair of the Business Development Committee) since 2009; Chair of the Robina Foundation since August 2013 | ||||
Pamela G. Carlton 901 S. Marquette Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55402 1954 |
Board member since November 2008 | President, Springboard- Partners in Cross Cultural Leadership (consulting company) since 2003; Managing Director of US Equity Research, JP Morgan Chase, 1999-2003; Director of US Equity Research, Chase Asset Management, 1996- 1999; Co-Director Latin America Research, 1993-1996, COO Global Research, 1992-1996, Co-Director of US Research, 1991-1992, Investment Banker, Morgan Stanley, 1982-1991 | 132 | None | ||||
William P. Carmichael 901 S. Marquette Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55402 1943 |
Board member and Chair of the Board since January 2014 | Retired; Co-founder, The Succession Fund (provides exit strategies to owners of privately held companies) 1998-2007; Adjunct Professor of Finance, Kelley School of Business, Indiana University, 1993-2007; Senior Vice President, Sara Lee Corporation, 1991-1993; Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Beatrice Foods Company, 1984-1990; Vice President, Esmark, Inc, 1973-1984.; Associate, Price Waterhouse, 1968-1972 | 132 | Director, Cobra Electronics Corporation (electronic equipment manufacturer), 1994-August 2014; The Finish Line (athletic shoes and apparel) since July 2003; Director, International Textile Corp. since 2012; former Director, McMoRan Exploration Company (oil and gas exploration and development) 2010-2013; former Trustee, BofA Funds Series Trust (11 funds) 2009-2011; Director, Spectrum Brands, Inc. (consumer products), 2002-2009; Director, Simmons Company (bedding), 2004-2010 | ||||
Patricia M. Flynn 901 S. Marquette Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55402 1950 |
Board member since November 2008 | Trustee Professor of Economics and Management, Bentley University since 1976 (also teaches and conducts research on corporate governance); Dean, McCallum Graduate School of Business, Bentley University, 1992-2002 | 132 | None | ||||
Catherine James Paglia 901 S. Marquette Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55402 1952 |
Board member since November 2008 | Director, Enterprise Asset Management, Inc. (private real estate and asset management company) since September 1998; Managing Director and Partner, Interlaken Capital, Inc., 1989-1997; Managing Director, Morgan Stanley, 1982-1989; Vice President, Investment Banking, 1980-1982, Associate, Investment Banking, 1976-1980, Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. | 132 | Director, Valmont Industries, Inc. (irrigation systems manufacturer) since 2012; Trustee, Carleton College (on the Investment Committee); Trustee, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (on the Investment Committee) |
Annual Report 2014 | 31 |
Tri-Continental Corporation |
Directors and Officers (continued)
Independent Trustees (continued) | ||||||||
Name, Year of Birth |
Position Held With Fund and Length of Service |
Principal Occupation During Past Five Years | Number of Funds in the Fund Family Overseen by Board Member |
Other Present or Past Directorships/ Trusteeships (Within Past 5 Years) | ||||
Leroy C. Richie 901 S. Marquette Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55402 1941 |
Board member since 2000 | Counsel, Lewis & Munday, P.C. (law firm) since 2004; Vice President and General Counsel, Automotive Legal Affairs, Chrysler Corporation, 1993-1997 | 132 | Lead Outside Director, Digital Ally, Inc. (digital imaging) since September 2005; Director, Infinity, Inc. (oil and gas exploration and production) since 1994; Director, OGE Energy Corp. (energy and energy services) since November 2007 | ||||
Alison Taunton-Rigby 901 S. Marquette Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55402 1944 |
Board member since November 2008 | Managing Director, Forester Biotech (consulting) since 2001; Chief Executive Officer and Director, RiboNovix, Inc., (biotechnology) 2003-2010; President and Chief Executive Officer of CMT Inc., 2001-2003; Aquila Biopharmaceuticals Inc., 1996-2000; Cambridge Biotech Corporation, 1995-1996, Mitotix Inc., 1993-1994 | 132 | Director, Healthways, Inc. (health and well-being solutions) since 2005; Director, ICI Mutual Insurance Company, RRG since 2011; Director, Abt Associates (government contractor) since 2001; Director, Boston Childrens Hospital since 2002 |
Interested Trustee Affiliated with Investment Manager* | ||||||||
Name, Address, Year of Birth |
Position Held With Funds and Length of Service |
Principal Occupation During Past Five Years | Number of Funds in the Fund Family Overseen by Board Member |
Other Present or Trusteeships (Within Past 5 Years) | ||||
William F. Truscott 53600 Ameriprise Financial Center Minneapolis, MN 55474 1960 |
Board member since 11/01 for RiverSource Funds and since 6/11 for Nations Funds; Senior Vice President since 2002 for RiverSource Funds and since 5/10 for Nations Funds | Chairman of the Board and President, Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC since May 2010 and February 2012, respectively (previously President and Chief Investment Officer, 2001-April 2010); Chief Executive Officer, Global Asset Management, Ameriprise Financial, Inc. since September 2012 (previously Chief Executive Officer, U.S. Asset Management & President, Annuities, May 2010-September 2012 and President U.S. Asset Management and Chief Investment Officer, 2005-April 2010); Director and Chief Executive Officer, Columbia Management Investment Distributors, Inc. since May 2010 and February 2012, respectively (previously Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, 2006-April 2010); Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, RiverSource Distributors, Inc. since 2006; Director, Threadneedle Asset Management Holdings, SARL since 2014; President and Chief Executive Officer, Ameriprise Certificate Company, 2006-August 2012. | 191 | Former Director, Ameriprise Certificate Company, 2006-January 2013 |
* | Interested person (as defined under the 1940 Act) by reason of being an officer, director, security holder and/or employee of the Investment Manager or Ameriprise Financial. |
The Statement of Additional Information has additional information about the Funds Board members and is available, without charge, upon request by calling 800.345.6611; contacting your financial intermediary; or visiting columbiamanagement.com.
32 | Annual Report 2014 |
Tri-Continental Corporation |
Directors and Officers (continued)
The Board has appointed officers who are responsible for day-to-day business decisions based on policies it has established. The officers serve at the pleasure of the Board. In addition to Mr. Truscott, who is Senior Vice President, the Funds other officers are:
Fund Officers | ||||
Name, Address and Year of Birth |
Position and Year First Appointed to Position for any Fund in the Columbia Funds Complex or a Predecessor Thereof |
Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years | ||
Christopher O. Petersen 5228 Ameriprise Financial Center Minneapolis, MN 55474 Born 1970 |
President and Principal Executive Officer (2015) | Vice President and Lead Chief Counsel, Ameriprise Financial, Inc. since January 2015 (previously, Vice President and Chief Counsel January 2010-December 2014; and Vice President and Group Counsel or Lead Counsel 2004-January 2010); officer of Columbia Funds and affiliated funds since 2007. | ||
Michael G. Clarke 225 Franklin Street Boston, MA 02110 Born 1969 |
Treasurer (2011) and Chief Financial Officer (2009) | Vice President Mutual Fund Administration, Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC, since May 2010; Managing Director of Fund Administration, Columbia Management Advisors, LLC, September 2004-April 2010; senior officer of Columbia Funds and affiliated funds since 2002. | ||
Paul B. Goucher 100 Park Avenue New York, NY 10017 Born 1968 |
Senior Vice President (2011), Chief Legal Officer (2015) and Assistant Secretary (2008) | Vice President and Lead Chief Counsel, Ameriprise Financial, Inc. since November 2008 and January 2013, respectively (previously Chief Counsel, January 2010-January 2013 and Group Counsel, November 2008-January 2010). | ||
Thomas P. McGuire 225 Franklin Street Boston, MA 02110 Born 1972 |
Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer (2012) | Vice President Asset Management Compliance, Ameriprise Financial, Inc., since May 2010; Chief Compliance Officer, Ameriprise Certificate Company since September 2010; Compliance Executive, Bank of America, 2005-April 2010. | ||
Colin Moore 225 Franklin Street Boston, MA 02110 Born 1958 |
Senior Vice President (2010) | Executive Vice President and Global Chief Investment Officer, Ameriprise Financial, Inc., since July 2013; Director and Global Chief Investment Officer, Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC since May 2010; Manager, Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer, Columbia Management Advisors, LLC, 2007-April 2010. | ||
Michael E. DeFao 225 Franklin Street Boston, MA 02110 Born 1968 |
Vice President (2011) and Assistant Secretary (2010) | Vice President and Chief Counsel, Ameriprise Financial, Inc. since May 2010; Associate General Counsel, Bank of America, 2005-April 2010. | ||
Joseph F. DiMaria 225 Franklin Street Boston, MA 02110 Born 1968 |
Vice President (2011), Assistant Treasurer (2012) and Chief Accounting Officer (2008) | Vice President Mutual Fund Treasurer, Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC since May 2010; Director of Fund Administration, Columbia Management Advisors, LLC, 2006-April 2010. | ||
Amy Johnson 5228 Ameriprise Financial Center Minneapolis, MN 55474 Born 1965 |
Vice President (2006) | Managing Director and Chief Operating Officer, Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC since May 2010 (previously Chief Administrative Officer, 2009-April 2010, and Vice President Asset Management and Trust Company Services, 2006-2009). | ||
Lyn Kephart-Strong 5228 Ameriprise Financial Center Minneapolis, MN 55474 Born 1960 |
Vice President (2015) | President, Columbia Management Investment Services Corp. since October 2014; Vice President & Resolution Officer, Ameriprise Trust Company since August 2009; President, RiverSource Service Corporation 2004-2010. | ||
Ryan C. Larrenaga 225 Franklin Street Boston, MA 02110 Born 1970 |
Vice President and Secretary (2015) | Vice President and Group Counsel, Ameriprise Financial, Inc. since August 2011 (previously, Counsel from May 2010 to August 2011); Assistant General Counsel, Bank of America, 2005-April 2010; officer of Columbia Funds and affiliated funds since 2005. |
Annual Report 2014 | 33 |
Tri-Continental Corporation |
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
34 | Annual Report 2014 |
Tri-Continental Corporation |
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
Annual Report 2014 | 35 |
Tri-Continental Corporation |
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
36 | Annual Report 2014 |
Tri-Continental Corporation |
Important Information About This Report
The Fund mails one stockholder report to each stockholder address. If you would like more than one report, please call stockholder services at 800.345.6611 and additional reports will be sent to you.
The policy of the Board is to vote the proxies of the companies in which the Fund holds investments consistent with the procedures as stated in the Statement of Additional Information (SAI). You may obtain a copy of the SAI without charge by calling 800.345.6611; contacting your financial intermediary; visiting columbiamanagement.com; or searching the website of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) at sec.gov. Information regarding how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities is filed with the SEC by August 31 for the most recent 12-month period ending June 30 of that year, and is available without charge by visiting columbiamanagement.com; or searching the website of the SEC at sec.gov.
The Fund files a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. Each funds Form N-Q is available on the SECs website at sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SECs Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 800.SEC.0330. Each funds complete schedule of portfolio holdings, as filed on Form N-Q, can also be obtained without charge, upon request, by calling 800.345.6611.
Annual Report 2014 | 37 |
Tri-Continental Corporation
P.O. Box 8081
Boston, MA 02266-8081
columbiamanagement.com
You should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the Fund carefully before investing. A prospectus containing information about the Fund (including its investment objectives, risks, charges, expenses and other information about the Fund) may be obtained by contacting your financial advisor or Columbia Management Investment Services Corp. at 800.345.6611. The prospectus should be read carefully before investing in the Fund. Tri-Continental is managed by Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC. This material is distributed by Columbia Management Investment Distributors, Inc., member FINRA.
© 2015 Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC. All rights reserved.
ANN240_12_E01_(02/15)
Item 2. | Code of Ethics. |
(a) | The registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the registrants principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, regardless of whether these individuals are employed by the registrant or a third party. |
(b) | During the period covered by this report, there were not any amendments to a provision of the code of ethics adopted in 2(a) above. |
(c) | During the period covered by this report, there were no waivers, including any implicit waivers, from a provision of the code of ethics described in 2(a) above that relates to one or more of the items set forth in paragraph (b) of this items instructions. |
Item 3. | Audit Committee Financial Expert. |
The registrants Board of Trustees has determined that Pamela G. Carlton and Alison Taunton-Rigby, each of whom are members of the registrants Board of Trustees and Audit Committee, each qualify as an audit committee financial expert. Ms. Carlton and Ms. Taunton-Rigby are each independent trustees, as defined in paragraph (a)(2) of this items instructions.
Item 4. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services. |
Fee information below is disclosed for the one series of the registrant whose report to stockholders is included in this annual filing.
(a) Audit Fees. Aggregate Audit Fees billed by the principal accountant for professional services rendered during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are approximately as follows:
2014 | 2013 | |
$37,000 | $37,000 |
Audit Fees include amounts related to the audit of the registrants annual financial statements or services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years.
(b) Audit-Related Fees. Aggregate Audit-Related Fees billed to the registrant by the principal accountant for professional services rendered during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are approximately as follows:
2014 | 2013 | |
$400 | $400 |
Audit-Related Fees include amounts for assurance and related services by the principal accountant that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the registrants financial statements and are not reported in Audit Fees above. In both fiscal years 2014 and 2013, Audit-Related Fees consist of agreed-upon procedures performed for semi-annual shareholder reports.
During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, there were no Audit-Related Fees billed by the registrants principal accountant to the registrants investment adviser (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser) and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant for an engagement that related directly to the operations and financial reporting of the registrant.
(c) Tax Fees. Aggregate Tax Fees billed by the principal accountant to the registrant for professional services rendered during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are approximately as follows:
2014 | 2013 | |
$3,700 | $5,800 |
Tax Fees include amounts for the review of annual tax returns, the review of required shareholder distribution calculations and typically include amounts for professional services by the principal accountant for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.
During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, there were no Tax Fees billed by the registrants principal accountant to the registrants investment adviser (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser) and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant for an engagement that related directly to the operations and financial reporting of the registrant.
(d) All Other Fees. Aggregate All Other Fees billed by the principal accountant to the registrant for professional services rendered during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are approximately as follows:
2014 | 2013 | |
$0 | $0 |
All Other Fees include amounts for products and services provided by the principal accountant, other than the services reported in paragraphs (a) through (c) above.
Aggregate All Other Fees billed by the registrants principal accountant to the registrants investment adviser (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser) and
any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant for an engagement that related directly to the operations and financial reporting of the registrant during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are approximately as follows:
2014 | 2013 | |
$325,000 | $135,000 |
In both fiscal years 2014 and 2013, All Other Fees primarily consist of fees billed for internal control examinations of the registrants transfer agent and investment advisor.
(e)(1) Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
The registrants Audit Committee is required to pre-approve the engagement of the registrants independent auditors to provide audit and non-audit services to the registrant and non-audit services to its investment adviser (excluding any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is sub-contracted or overseen by another investment adviser (the Adviser) or any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the Adviser that provides ongoing services to the Fund (a Control Affiliate) if the engagement relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the registrant.
The Audit Committee has adopted a Policy for Engagement of Independent Auditors for Audit and Non-Audit Services (the Policy). The Policy sets forth the understanding of the Audit Committee regarding the engagement of the registrants independent accountants to provide (i) audit and permissible audit-related, tax and other services to the registrant (Fund Services); (ii) non-audit services to the registrants Adviser and any Control Affiliates, that relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of a Fund (Fund-related Adviser Services); and (iii) certain other audit and non-audit services to the registrants Adviser and its Control Affiliates. A service will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee if it is to be provided by the Funds independent auditor; provided, however, that pre-approval of non-audit services to the Fund, the Adviser or Control Affiliates may be waived if certain de minimis requirements set forth in the SECs rules are met.
Under the Policy, the Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to any pre-designated member or members who are independent board members. The member(s) to whom such authority is delegated must report, for informational purposes only, any pre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its next regular meeting. The Audit Committees responsibilities with respect to the pre-approval of services performed by the independent auditor may not be delegated to management.
On an annual basis, at a regularly scheduled Audit Committee meeting, the Funds Treasurer or other Fund officer shall submit to the Audit Committee a schedule of the types of Fund Services and Fund-related Adviser Services that are subject to specific pre-approval. This schedule will provide a description of each type of service that is subject to specific pre-approval, along with total projected fees for each service. The pre-
approval will generally cover a one-year period. The Audit Committee will review and approve the types of services and the projected fees for the next one-year period and may add to, or subtract from, the list of pre-approved services from time to time, based on subsequent determinations. This specific approval acknowledges that the Audit Committee is in agreement with the specific types of services that the independent auditor will be permitted to perform and the projected fees for each service.
The Funds Treasurer or other Fund officer shall report to the Audit Committee at each of its regular meetings regarding all Fund Services or Fund-related Adviser Services provided since the last such report was rendered, including a description of the services, by category, with forecasted fees for the annual reporting period, proposed changes requiring specific pre-approval and a description of services provided by the independent auditor, by category, with actual fees during the current reporting period.
*****
(e)(2) 100% of the services performed for items (b) through (d) above during 2014 and 2013 were pre-approved by the registrants Audit Committee.
(f) Not applicable.
(g) The aggregate non-audit fees billed by the registrants accountant for services rendered to the registrant, and rendered to the registrants investment adviser (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are approximately as follows:
2014 | 2013 | |
$329,100 | $141,200 |
(h) The registrants Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has considered whether the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to the registrants adviser (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant that were not pre-approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X, is compatible with maintaining the principal accountants independence.
Item 5. | Audit Committee of Listed Registrants. |
(a) | The registrant has a separately-designated standing audit committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)58)(A) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(58)(A). Pamela G. Carlton, Alison Taunton-Rigby and Patricia M. Flynn are each independent trustees and collectively constitute the entire Audit Committee. |
(b) | Not applicable. |
Item 6. | Investments |
(a) | The registrants Schedule I Investments in securities of unaffiliated issuers (as set forth in 17 CFR 210.12-12) is included in Item 1 of this Form N-CSR. |
(b) | Not applicable. |
Item 7. | Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies. |
Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures
General Guidelines, Policies and Procedures
The following description of the Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures apply to the closed-end management companies in the Columbia Family of Funds that are governed by the same Board of Directors (the Funds).
The Funds uphold a long tradition of supporting sound and principled corporate governance. In furtherance thereof, the Funds Board of Directors (the Board), which consist of a majority of independent Board members, determine policies and votes proxies. The Funds Investment Manager and Administrator, Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC (Columbia Management), provides support to the Board in connection with the proxy voting process.
General Guidelines
The Board supports proxy proposals that it believes are tied to the interests of shareholders and votes against proxy proposals that appear to entrench management. For example:
Election of Directors
| The Board generally votes in favor of proposals for an independent chairman or, if the chairman is not independent, in favor of a lead independent director. |
| The Board generally supports annual election of all directors and proposals to eliminate classes of directors. |
| In a routine election of directors, the Board will generally vote with the recommendations of the companys nominating committee because the Board believes that nominating committees of independent directors are in the best position to know what qualifications are required of directors to form an effective board. However, the Board will generally vote against a nominee who has been assigned to the audit, compensation, or nominating committee if the nominee is not independent of management based on established criteria. The Board will generally also withhold support for any director who fails to attend 75% of meetings or has other activities |
that appear to interfere with his or her ability to commit sufficient attention to the company and, in general, will vote against nominees who are determined to have exhibited poor governance such as involvement in options backdating, financial restatements or material weaknesses in control, approving egregious compensation or have consistently disregarded the interests of shareholders. |
| The Board generally supports proposals requiring director nominees to receive a majority of affirmative votes cast in order to be elected to the board, and in the absence of majority voting, generally will support cumulative voting. |
| Votes in a contested election of directors are evaluated on a case-by-case basis. |
Defense Mechanisms
The Board generally supports proposals eliminating provisions requiring supermajority approval of certain actions. The Board generally supports proposals to opt out of control share acquisition statutes and proposals restricting a companys ability to make greenmail payments. The Board reviews management proposals submitting shareholder rights plans (poison pills) to shareholders on a case-by-case basis.
Auditors
The Board values the independence of auditors based on established criteria. The Board supports a reasonable review of matters that may raise concerns regarding an auditors service that may cause the Board to vote against a companys recommendation for auditor, including, for example, auditor involvement in significant financial restatements, options backdating, conflicts of interest, material weaknesses in control or situations where independence has been compromised.
Management Compensation Issues
The Board expects company management to give thoughtful consideration to providing competitive compensation and incentives, which are reflective of company performance, and are incentives directly tied to the interest of shareholders. The Board generally votes for plans if they are reasonable and consistent with industry and country standards and against plans that it believes dilute shareholder value substantially.
The Board generally favors minimum holding periods of stock obtained by senior management pursuant to equity compensation plans and will vote against compensation plans for executives that it deems excessive.
Social and Environmental Policy Issues
In general, proposals relating to social and environmental policies issues will be reviewed and, if the matter may bear on the long-term value creation or sustainability of the company, the Fund will cast a vote on the proposal. Otherwise, the Funds will generally abstain from voting.
Additional details can be found in the Funds Proxy Voting Guidelines.
Policy and Procedures
The policy of the Board is to vote all proxies of the companies in which a Fund holds investments. Because of the volume and complexity of the proxy voting process, including inherent inefficiencies in the process that are outside the control of the Board or the Proxy Team (defined below), not all proxies may be voted. The Board has implemented policies and procedures that have been reasonably designed to vote proxies and to address any conflicts between interests of a Funds shareholders and those of
Columbia Management or other affiliated persons. In exercising its proxy voting responsibilities, the Board may rely upon the research or recommendations of one or more third party service providers.
The administration of the proxy voting process is handled by the Columbia Management Proxy Administration Team (Proxy Team). In exercising its responsibilities, the Proxy Team may rely upon the research or recommendations of one or more third party service providers. The Proxy Team assists the Board in identifying situations where its guidelines do not clearly require a vote in a particular manner and assists in researching matters and making voting recommendations. The Proxy Team may recommend that a proxy be voted in a manner contrary to the Boards guidelines. In making recommendations to the Board about voting on a proposal, the Proxy Team relies on Columbia Management investment personnel (or the investment personnel of a Funds subadviser(s)) and information obtained from independent research firms. The Proxy Team makes the recommendation in writing. The Board Chair or other Board members who are independent from the Investment Manager will consider the recommendation and decide how to vote the proxy proposal or establish a protocol for voting the proposal.
On an annual basis, or more frequently as determined necessary, the Board reviews recommendations to revise the existing guidelines or add new guidelines. Recommendations are based on, among other things, industry trends and the frequency that similar proposals appear on company ballots.
The Board considers managements recommendations as set out in the companys proxy statement. In each instance in which a Fund votes against managements recommendation (except when withholding votes from a nominated director or proposals on foreign company ballots), the Board generally sends a letter to senior management of the company explaining the basis for its vote. This permits both the companys management and the Board to have an opportunity to gain better insight into issues presented by the proxy proposal(s).
Voting in Countries Outside the United States (Non-U.S. Countries)
Voting proxies for companies not domiciled in the United States may involve greater effort and cost due to the variety of regulatory schemes and corporate practices. For example, certain non-U.S. countries require trading of securities to be blocked prior to a vote, which means that the securities to be voted may not be traded within a specified number of days before the shareholder meeting. The Board typically will not vote securities in non-U.S. countries that require securities to be blocked as the need for liquidity of the securities in the Funds will typically outweigh the benefit of voting. There may be additional costs associated with voting in non-U.S. countries such that the Board may determine that the cost of voting outweighs the potential benefit.
Securities on Loan
The Funds from time to time engage in lending securities held in certain funds to third parties in order to generate additional income. The Board will generally refrain from recalling securities on loan based upon its determination that the costs and lost revenue to the Funds, combined with the administrative effects of recalling the securities, generally outweigh the benefit of voting the proxy. While in general, neither the Board nor Columbia Management assesses the economic impact and benefits of voting loaned securities on a case-by-case basis, situations may arise where the Board requests that loaned securities be recalled in order to vote a proxy. However, the Board has established a guideline to direct Columbia Management to endeavor to recall a loaned security if (i) a proposal relating to a merger or acquisition, a material restructuring or reorganization, a proxy contest or a shareholder rights plan is expected to be on the ballot or (ii) the prior years evaluation of the issuers pay-for-performance practices has raised concerns, based
upon its determination that, in these situations, the benefits of voting such proxies generally outweigh the costs or lost revenue to the Funds, or any potential adverse administrative effects to the Funds, of not recalling such securities.
Investment in Affiliated Funds
Certain Funds may invest in shares of other funds managed by Columbia Management (referred to in this context as underlying funds) and may own substantial portions of these underlying funds. In general, the proxy policy of the Funds is to ensure that direct public shareholders of underlying funds control the outcome of any shareholder vote. To help manage this potential conflict of interest, the policy of the Funds is to vote proxies of the underlying funds in the same proportion as the vote of the direct public shareholders; provided, however, that if there are no direct public shareholders of an underlying fund or if direct public shareholders represent only a minority interest in an underlying fund, the Fund may cast votes in accordance with instructions from the independent members of the Board.
Obtain a Proxy Voting Record
Each year the Trust files its proxy voting records with the SEC and makes them available by August 31 for the 12-month period ending June 30 of that year. The records can be obtained without charge through columbiamanagement.com or searching the website of the SEC at www.sec.gov.
Item 8. | Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies. |
Portfolio Managers
Portfolio Manager |
Title |
Role with the Corporation |
Managed the Corporation Since | |||
Brian Condon, CFA |
Portfolio Manager and Head of Quantitative Strategies | Co-Portfolio Manager | 2010 | |||
Peter Albanese |
Senior Portfolio Manager | Co-Portfolio Manager | August 2014 | |||
Yan Jin |
Senior Portfolio Manager | Co-Portfolio Manager | 2012 | |||
David King, CFA |
Senior Portfolio Manager | Co-Portfolio Manager | 2011 |
Mr. Condon joined the Investment Manager in May 2010 when it acquired the long-term asset management business of Columbia Management Group, where he was a portfolio manager since 1999. Mr. Condon began his investment career in 1993 and earned a B.A. from Bryant University and an M.S. in finance from Bentley University.
Mr. Albanese joined the Investment Manager in August 2014. Prior to joining the Investment Manager, Mr. Albanese was a Managing Director and Senior Portfolio Manager at Robeco Investment Management. Mr. Albanese began his investment career in 1991 and earned a B.S. from Stony Brook University and an M.B.A. from the Stern School of Business at New York University.
Mr. Jin joined the Investment Manager in May 2010 when it acquired the long-term asset management business of Columbia Management Group, where he worked as an investment professional since 2002. Mr. Jin began his investment career in 1998 and earned a M.A. in economics from North Carolina State University.
Mr. King joined the Investment Manager in May 2010 when it acquired the long-term asset management business of Columbia Management Group, where he worked as an investment professional since March 2010. Previously, Mr. King was employed by Putnam Investments from 1983 to 2008, where he was a senior portfolio manager. Mr. King began his investment career in 1983 and earned a B.S. from the University of New Hampshire and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.
Other Accounts Managed by the Portfolio Managers:
Fund |
Portfolio Manager |
Other Accounts Managed | Performance Based Accounts |
Ownership of Fund Shares | ||||||||
Number and type of account |
Approximate Total Net Assets (excluding the fund) |
|||||||||||
For fiscal period ending December 31 | ||||||||||||
Tri-Continental Corporation |
Brian Condon | 12 RICs 2 PIVs 24 other accounts |
$ $ $ |
9.44billion 147.29 million 5.02 billion |
|
None | $100,001-$500,000 | |||||
David King | 6 RICs 6 other accounts |
$ $ |
2.05 billion 19.44 million |
|
None | Over $1 million | ||||||
Yan Jin | 6 RICs 4 other accounts |
$ $ |
2.05 billion 1.34 million |
|
None | $50,001- $100,000 | ||||||
Peter Albanese | 6 RICs 2 PIVs 18 other accounts |
$ $ $ |
9.35 billion 147.29 million 4.86 billion |
|
None | None |
Potential Conflicts of Interest:
Like other investment professionals with multiple clients, a Funds portfolio manager(s) may face certain potential conflicts of interest in connection with managing both the Fund and other accounts at the same time. The Investment Manager and the Funds have adopted compliance policies and procedures that attempt to address certain of the potential conflicts that portfolio managers face in this regard. Certain of these conflicts of interest are summarized below.
The management of accounts with different advisory fee rates and/or fee structures, including accounts that pay advisory fees based on account performance (performance fee accounts), may raise potential conflicts of interest for a portfolio manager by creating an incentive to favor higher fee accounts.
Potential conflicts of interest also may arise when a portfolio manager has personal investments in other accounts that may create an incentive to favor those accounts. As a general matter and subject to the Investment Managers Code of Ethics and certain limited exceptions, the Investment Managers investment professionals do not have the opportunity to invest in client accounts, other than the funds.
A portfolio manager who is responsible for managing multiple funds and/or accounts may devote unequal time and attention to the management of those Funds and/or accounts. The effects of this potential conflict may be more pronounced where Funds and/or accounts managed by a particular portfolio manager have different investment strategies.
A portfolio manager may be able to select or influence the selection of the broker/dealers that are used to execute securities transactions for the Funds. A portfolio managers decision as to the selection of broker/dealers could produce disproportionate costs and benefits among the Funds and the other accounts the portfolio manager manages.
A potential conflict of interest may arise when a portfolio manager buys or sells the same securities for a Fund and other accounts. On occasions when a portfolio manager considers the purchase or sale of a security to be in the best interests of a Fund as well as other accounts, the Investment Managers trading desk may, to the extent consistent with applicable laws and regulations, aggregate the securities to be sold or bought in order to obtain the best execution and lower brokerage commissions, if any. Aggregation of trades may create the potential for unfairness to a Fund or another account if a portfolio manager favors one account over another in allocating the securities bought or sold. In addition, although the Investment Manager has entered into a personnel sharing arrangement with Threadneedle, the Investment Manager and Threadneedle maintain separate trading operations for their clients. By maintaining separate trading operations in this manner, the Funds may forego certain opportunities including the aggregation of trades across certain accounts managed by Threadneedle. This could result in the Funds competing in the market with one or more accounts managed by Threadneedle for similar trades. In addition, it is possible that the separate trading desks of the Investment Manager and Threadneedle may be on opposite sides of a trade execution for a Fund at the same time.
Cross trades, in which a portfolio manager sells a particular security held by a Fund to another account (potentially saving transaction costs for both accounts), could involve a potential conflict of interest if, for example, a portfolio manager is permitted to sell a security from one account to another account at a higher price than an independent third party would pay. The Investment Manager and the Funds have adopted compliance procedures that provide that any transactions between a Fund and another account managed by the Investment Manager are to be made at a current market price, consistent with applicable laws and regulations.
Another potential conflict of interest may arise based on the different investment objectives and strategies of a Fund and other accounts managed by its portfolio manager(s). Depending on another accounts objectives and other factors, a portfolio manager may give advice to and make decisions for a Fund that may differ from advice given, or the timing or nature of decisions made, with respect to another account. A portfolio managers investment decisions are the product of many factors in addition to basic suitability for the particular account involved. Thus, a portfolio manager may buy or sell a particular security for certain accounts, and not for a Fund, even though it could have been bought or sold for the Fund at the same time. A portfolio manager also may buy a particular security for one or more accounts when one or more other accounts are selling the security (including short sales). There may be circumstances when a portfolio managers purchases or sales of portfolio securities for one or more accounts may have an adverse effect on other accounts, including the Funds.
A Funds portfolio manager(s) also may have other potential conflicts of interest in managing the Fund, and the description above is not a complete description of every conflict that could exist in managing the Fund and other accounts. Many of the potential
conflicts of interest to which the Investment Managers portfolio managers are subject are essentially the same or similar to the potential conflicts of interest related to the Investment Management activities of the Investment Manager and its affiliates.
Structure of Compensation:
Direct compensation is typically comprised of a base salary, and an annual incentive award that is paid either in the form of a cash bonus if the size of the award is under a specified threshold, or, if the size of the award is over a specified threshold, the award is paid in a combination of a cash bonus, an equity incentive award, and deferred compensation. Equity incentive awards are made in the form of Ameriprise Financial restricted stock, or for more senior employees both Ameriprise Financial restricted stock and stock options. The investment return credited on deferred compensation is based on the performance of specified Columbia Mutual funds, in most cases including the mutual funds the portfolio manager manages.
Base salary is typically determined based on market data relevant to the employees position, as well as other factors including internal equity. Base salaries are reviewed annually, and increases are typically given as promotional increases, internal equity adjustments, or market adjustments.
Annual incentive awards are variable and are based on (1) an evaluation of the employees investment performance and (2) the results of a peer and/or management review of the employee, which takes into account skills and attributes such as team participation, investment process, communication, and professionalism. Scorecards are used to measure performance of Mutual Funds and other accounts managed by the employee versus benchmarks and peer groups. Performance versus benchmark and peer group is generally weighted for the rolling one, three, and five year periods. One year performance is weighted 10%, three year performance is weighted 60%, and five year performance is weighted 30%. Relative asset size is a key determinant for fund weighting on a scorecard. Typically, weighting would be proportional to actual assets. Consideration may also be given to performance in managing client assets in sectors and industries assigned to the employee as part of his/her investment team responsibilities, where applicable. For leaders who also have group management responsibilities, another factor in their evaluation is an assessment of the groups overall investment performance.
Equity incentive awards are designed to align participants interests with those of the shareholders of Ameriprise Financial. Equity incentive awards vest over multiple years, so they help retain employees.
Deferred compensation awards are designed to align participants interests with the investors in the mutual funds and other accounts they manage. The value of the deferral account is based on the performance of Columbia mutual funds. Employees have the option of selecting from various Columbia mutual funds for their mutual fund deferral account, however portfolio managers must allocate a minimum of 25% of their incentive awarded through the deferral program to the Columbia mutual fund(s) they manage. Mutual fund deferrals vest over multiple years, so they help retain employees.
In addition to the annual incentive award described above, top performing portfolio managers may also receive additional equity awards with extended vesting terms.
Exceptions to this general approach to bonuses exist for certain teams and individuals.
Funding for the bonus pool is determined by management and depends on, among other factors,
the levels of compensation generally in the investment management industry taking into account investment performance (based on market compensation data) and both Ameriprise Financial and Columbia Management profitability for the year, which is largely determined by assets under management.
For all employees the benefit programs generally are the same, and are competitive within the Financial Services Industry. Employees participate in a wide variety of plans, including options in Medical, Dental, Vision, Health Care and Dependent Spending Accounts, Life Insurance, Long Term Disability Insurance, 401(k), and a cash balance pension plan.
Item 9. | Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers. |
Period |
Total Number of Shares Purchased |
Average Price Paid Per Share |
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs(1) |
Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs(1) |
||||||||||||
07-01-14 to 07-31-14 |
173,023 | $ | 21.12 | 173,023 | 1,999,992 | |||||||||||
08-01-14 to 08-31-14 |
169,229 | $ | 21.02 | 169,229 | 1,830,763 | |||||||||||
09-01-14 to 09-30-14 |
91,946 | $ | 21.23 | 91,946 | 1,738,817 | |||||||||||
10-01-14 to 10-31-14 |
136,192 | $ | 20.36 | 136,192 | 1,602,625 | |||||||||||
11-01-14 to 11-30-14 |
186,200 | $ | 21.44 | 186,200 | 1,416,425 | |||||||||||
12-01-14 to 12-31-14 |
188,203 | $ | 21.33 | 188,203 | 1,228,222 |
(1) | The registrant has a stock repurchase program. For 2014, the registrant was authorized to repurchase up to 5% of its outstanding Common Stock directly from stockholders and in the open market, provided that, with respect to shares repurchased in the open market the excess of the net asset value of a share of Common Stock over its market price (the discount) is greater than 10%. |
Item 10. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. |
There were no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the registrants board of directors.
Item 11. | Controls and Procedures. |
(a) | The registrants principal executive officer and principal financial officers, based on their evaluation of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing of this report, have concluded that such controls and procedures are adequately designed to ensure that material information required to be disclosed by the registrant in Form N-CSR is accumulated and communicated to the registrants management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. |
(b) | There was no change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Item 12. | Exhibits. |
(a)(1) Code of ethics required to be disclosed under Item 2 of Form N-CSR attached hereto as Exhibit 99.CODE ETH.
(a)(2) Certifications pursuant to Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30a-2(a)) attached hereto as Exhibit 99.CERT.
(a)(3) None.
(b) Certification pursuant to Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30a-2(b)) attached hereto as Exhibit 99.906CERT.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
(registrant) | Tri-Continental Corporation |
By (Signature and Title) | /s/ Christopher O. Petersen |
|||
Christopher O. Petersen, President and Principal Executive Officer |
Date | February 23, 2015 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By (Signature and Title) | /s/ Christopher O. Petersen |
|||
Christopher O. Petersen, President and Principal Executive Officer |
Date | February 23, 2015 |
By (Signature and Title) | /s/ Michael G. Clarke |
|||
Michael G. Clarke, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |
Date | February 23, 2015 |