UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ☒ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:
☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement |
☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
☒ | Definitive Proxy Statement |
☐ | Definitive Additional Materials |
☐ | Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
Nielsen Holdings plc
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
☒ |
No fee required. | |||
☐ |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. | |||
(1) |
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
| |||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
| |||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
| |||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
| |||
(5) | Total fee paid:
| |||
☐ |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | |||
☐ |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. | |||
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid:
| |||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
| |||
(3) | Filing Party:
| |||
(4) | Date Filed:
|
(incorporated and registered in England and Wales with registered no. 09422989)
Registered Office:
Nielsen House
John Smith Drive
Oxford
Oxfordshire
OX4 2WB
United Kingdom
April 9, 2019
Dear Fellow Shareholders,
On behalf of the Board of Directors (the Board), I cordially invite you to attend the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of Nielsen Holdings plc (the Company or Nielsen) to be held at 9:00 a.m. (Eastern Time) on Tuesday, May 21, 2019 (the Annual Meeting). The Annual Meeting will be held online at nielsen.onlineshareholdermeeting.com or, to attend in person, please come to 50 Danbury Road, Wilton, CT 06897.
I am excited to have joined Nielsen at such a pivotal time in the Companys history. The strength of Nielsens franchise and its central importance as a provider of independent measurement to the media and consumer packaged goods industries is clear. Independent third party measurement is an essential element to a fully functioning marketplace and Nielsen has been an objective arbiter for our clients for more than 95 years. We are well-positioned to build on our strengths. As we look to the future, our measurement and analytics will be increasingly valuable to advertisers, advertising agencies, and publishers as they seek to understand and monetize their audiences, and as fast-moving consumer goods manufacturers and retailers seek to understand how they connect with end consumers before, during, and after the purchase.
We combine big data sets with finely tuned and precise opt-in panels to produce the highest quality measurement data and analytics for our clients. This is a significant competitive advantage in this age of privacy, where we hear calls for truth and transparency all over the landscape. As the end markets in media and fast moving consumer goods are changing, our clients needs are also changing and so is their use of data and technology. Nielsen is also evolving, but we have the opportunity to accelerate our transformation to serve dynamic industry needs.
This is our vision for 2019 transforming Nielsen into a truly product-driven, technology-based organization, able to make faster, bolder decisions. In doing so, we expect to increase our value to clients and their decisions, which will drive our performance and shareholder value.
Specifically, we are focused on expanding our digital platform and becoming even more embedded with our clients, aligning on a single cloud-based architecture for each business and retiring legacy systems. We will also leverage artificial intelligence and machine learning to get the most out of our data our biggest asset and use it to improve measurement and predictive models to drive better decisions.
Since joining Nielsen, Ive had a chance to meet with our talent across the Company. From senior leadership to product and commercial leads, we have a great team in place focused on instilling greater operating discipline and accountability. With world class data science and data integration capabilities, we are focusing our best talent on the most important projects to drive speed and scale. On a parallel path, Ive recently taken on the role of Chief Diversity Officer to strengthen diversity and inclusion across the organization. Inclusion is integral to our strategy and my goal is to be a change agent within our teams.
As our Board continues to work on the strategic review, evaluating potential opportunities to determine the best path forward, we are focused on maximizing value for the Company and all of our shareholders. I am honored to lead this Company into the future.
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT LTR
|
In accordance with the UK Companies Act 2006, the formal notice of the Annual Meeting is set out on the pages following the Summary of Proxy Statement Information.
Our proxy materials are first being distributed or made available to shareholders on or about April 9, 2019.
Thank you for your continued support.
Sincerely,
David Kenny
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Diversity Officer
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT LTR2
|
LETTER FROM OUR EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS
Dear Shareholders,
On behalf of the Nielsen Board, thank you for your investment in Nielsen. It has been an important and consequential year for Nielsen, with the announcement of a review of strategic alternatives for the Company and its businesses and the appointment of a new senior management team. We believe that our new leadership team has already had a positive impact on the Company and we look forward to sharing with you the results of the strategic review when it is completed. Please be assured that all our decisions are made in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.
Strategic Review
In September 2018, we announced an expanded strategic review to include a review of the entire Company and its businesses. This includes an assessment of a range of potential strategic alternatives, including continuing to operate as a public, independent company, a separation of our Buy business, which we now refer to as Nielsen Global Connect, from the Watch business, which we now refer to as Nielsen Global Media, or a sale of the entire Company. The Board, with the assistance of our advisors and management team, has been deeply involved in this comprehensive strategic review. We have been meeting frequently to oversee this review and are moving forward with urgency. We will share the results of our review with you as soon as possible.
Leadership Transition
In July 2018, we announced that Mitch Barns, our Chief Executive Officer, would retire by the end of 2018. At that time, we also announced that I would assume the role of Executive Chairman. The Board conducted a comprehensive search for a new Chief Executive Officer, which resulted in the appointment of David Kenny in December 2018. In addition, the Board appointed Dave Anderson as our new Chief Financial Officer in September 2018, later also naming him as Chief Operating Officer. This followed the departure of our former Chief Financial Officer. We are delighted to have both David and Dave on board. Together theyve brought great energy, vision and focus to the Company. In January 2019, the Board appointed George Callard as the Companys new Chief Legal Officer. These new senior executives, together with the leaders of our Global Media and Global Connect businesses, are working expeditiously to execute on our strategy and 2019 plan, regardless of the outcome of the strategic review.
Company Strategy
The Board and the Companys new senior management team are working closely together to establish a solid operational foundation to drive greater revenue growth, profitability and increased shareholder value. The Board fully supports the leadership teams focus for 2019 on transforming the Company into a product-driven, technology organization, making faster, bolder decisions. We will remain actively involved in overseeing the Companys long-term path to value creation.
Shareholder Engagement and Outreach
The Board and management believe that remaining connected and accountable to our shareholders is central to Nielsens success. Constructive dialogue and regular communication with you promotes transparency and accountability and informs our strategic initiatives and policy development. In 2018, I continued to speak with investors on behalf of the Board. Together with the management team, we engaged with investors that represent nearly 65% of our shareholder base on a range of topics, including our strategic review; our strategy and financial performance; our senior management succession; executive compensation; and a variety of corporate governance matters. We are always happy to hear from our investors, as you are key to Nielsens long-term success.
In closing, I want to thank you again for your support and assure you that your Board and the Companys new senior management team are working to represent your interests and make the right decisions for Nielsen and all of our shareholders.
James A. Attwood, Jr.
Executive Chairman
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT LTR3
|
This summary highlights certain information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. You should read the complete proxy statement and annexes before voting.
2018 PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS
We are dedicated to driving shareholder value by posting solid operating performance. The Companys long-term business performance and progress against strategic initiatives form the context in which pay decisions are made. 2018 was a challenging year for Nielsen. We were disappointed in our 2018 financial results, which fell short of the objectives set at the beginning of the year. We set revised objectives for the second half of the year and delivered on our key operational metrics for the second half of the year, positioning ourselves for 2019.
During 2018:
| We announced a broad review of strategic alternatives for the Company and its businesses. |
| We initiated work to reorganize into two new segments, Nielsen Global Media and Nielsen Global Connect, which better reflect our platforms and vision for 2019, setting the stage for improved performance in the future. |
| In our Global Media segment, through our Total Audience Measurement framework, we have built a solid foundation using standard, comparable, de-duplicated, cross-platform measurement; we continued to work towards becoming the currency for digital viewing; and we continued to invest in new products, partnerships and acquisitions. |
| In our Global Connect segment, we are executing on Total Consumer Measurement; we continue to grow the number of clients using at least one component of Nielsen Connect; our retailer initiatives had good traction; clients continued to prioritize investments in Emerging Markets given strong tailwinds such as population growth, a rising middle class, and urbanization; and our U.S. Connect business continues to drive progress by building stronger, differentiated offerings. |
Further information about our 2018 performance can be found on pages 33-35.
COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS
| Our executive compensation program is designed to incent and reward our leadership team for delivering sustained financial performance and long-term shareholder value. |
| A significant portion of named executive officer (NEO) compensation is at risk, dependent on the achievement of challenging annual and long-term performance goals and/or the performance of our share price. |
| Nielsens executive compensation philosophy includes a stated emphasis on variable, at-risk compensation. Nielsens performance in 2018 was reflected in the following pay outcomes: |
➤ | Payouts to NEOs under Nielsens Annual Incentive Plan for 2018 were zero. |
➤ | Payouts to NEOs and other participants in Nielsens performance restricted share unit (PRSU) award program for the 2016 2018 cycle that matured on December 31, 2018 were zero. |
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT SUMM1
|
SUMMARY OF PROXY STATEMENT INFORMATION |
➤ | The interim performance evaluation for Nielsens 2017 2019 PRSU cycle is tracking to pay out at zero. PRSUs represent the single largest component by value of NEO compensation. |
➤ | Without his severance pay, Mr. Barns reported total compensation in the Summary Compensation Table would have decreased nearly 50% from his 2017 reported total compensation. |
| Looking to 2019, we have adjusted the performance metrics in both our long-term and short-term incentive plans to more closely align with driving incremental value for our shareholders. |
Further information about our compensation can be found on pages 30-71.
STRATEGIC REVIEW AND MANAGEMENT TRANSITION
In the second half of 2018, the Board initiated a comprehensive strategic review of the entire Company and its businesses. This review process, which is being conducted with the assistance of financial and legal advisors, includes an assessment of a broad range of potential strategic alternatives including continuing to operate as a public, independent company, a separation of the Companys Connect or Media segment, or a sale of the Company.
Also in the second half of 2018, the Board conducted a search for a new Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, spearheaded by Mr. Attwood, who assumed the title of Executive Chairman on an interim basis to lead the Boards executive search processes as well as its strategic review of the Company and its businesses. The search processes culminated in the appointment of David Kenny as Chief Executive Officer in December 2018 and Dave Anderson as Chief Financial Officer in September 2018. The Board also appointed George Callard as the Companys new Chief Legal Officer in January 2019.
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT SUMM2
|
SUMMARY OF PROXY STATEMENT INFORMATION |
BOARD HIGHLIGHTS
Following the election and re-election of the Board nominees at our Annual Meeting, the Board will have the following characteristics:
BOARD EXPERTISE AND SKILLS
Our directors are keenly focused on building a board that supports Nielsens strategic goals and evolving business priorities. In that regard, in addition to the areas of experience set forth below, the qualities that are of paramount importance for our director nominees include: a proven record of success and business judgment, innovative and strategic thinking, a commitment to corporate responsibility, appreciation of multiple cultures and perspectives, and adequate time to devote to their responsibilities.
CEO/Executive Experience | Business and Operating Experience | Media and Marketing Experience
|
Innovation, Technology and Digital Experience | Global and Emerging Markets Experience | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer Goods and Retail Experience |
Audit and Financial Literacy
|
Research, Analytics, Artificial Intelligence and Data Science Experience |
Financial, M&A and Private Equity Investment Experience | Public Company Board and Governance Experience | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT SUMM3
|
SUMMARY OF PROXY STATEMENT INFORMATION |
GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS
Director Independence
8 out of 9 of our director nominees are independent
All Board committees are fully independent
|
Board Accountability
All directors are elected annually
Shareholders representing at least 5% of our share capital have the right to call special meetings, remove and appoint directors
Simple majority vote standard for uncontested director elections
| |||
Board Leadership
Independent Executive Chairman
|
Board Refreshment
Ongoing Board succession planning
Average tenure of director nominees is 5 years
5 new independent directors elected since 2013
| |||
Board Oversight
Ongoing focus on strategic matters, including through standalone strategy sessions
Active leadership of the Companys strategic review
Directly engaged in management and operations to facilitate effective CEO and CFO transition in 2018
Robust oversight of risk management
Active engagement in talent management, leadership development and CEO succession planning
Regular executive sessions without management present
|
Director Engagement
Board held 17 meetings in 2018 with all directors attending at least 88% of Board meetings
Committees held 19 meetings in 2018 with all directors attending at least 86% of applicable meetings
Governance guidelines restrict the number of other board memberships
In connection with the nomination process, directors other responsibilities/obligations considered
| |||
Share Ownership
Five times their annual cash fees (with a transition period for new directors)
Directors may not hedge their common stock
No director has shares of common stock subject to a pledge
All equity currently granted as director compensation must be held for the directors entire tenure on the Board
|
Director Access
Board and Independent Executive Chairman actively engage with shareholders and solicit different shareholder viewpoints
Directors may contact any employee directly and receive access to any aspect of the business or activities undertaken or proposed by management
Board and its committees may engage independent advisors in their sole discretion
Shareholders may contact any of the committee chairpersons and the independent directors as a group
|
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT SUMM4
|
SUMMARY OF PROXY STATEMENT INFORMATION |
NOMINEES FOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS
James A. Attwood, Jr.
|
Guerrino De Luca |
Karen M. Hoguet | ||||||||||||
![]() |
Age: 60
Director since: 2006 |
![]() |
Age: 66
Director since: 2017 |
![]() |
Age: 62
Director since: 2010 | |||||||||
Executive Chairman Committees: Nomination and Corporate Governance
|
Committees: Compensation |
Committees: Audit (Chairperson) | ||||||||||||
David Kenny
|
Harish Manwani |
Robert C. Pozen | ||||||||||||
![]() |
Age: 57
Director since: 2018 |
![]() |
Age: 65
Director since: 2015 |
![]() |
Age: 72
Director since: 2010 | |||||||||
Committees: None |
Committees: Compensation (Chairperson) |
Committees: Compensation; Nomination and Corporate Governance (Chairperson)
| ||||||||||||
David Rawlinson
|
Javier G. Teruel |
Lauren Zalaznick | ||||||||||||
![]() |
Age: 43
Director since: 2017 |
![]() |
Age: 68
Director since: 2010 |
![]() |
Age: 56
Director since: 2016 | |||||||||
Audit |
Committees: Audit |
Committees: Compensation; Nomination and Corporate Governance
|
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT SUMM5
|
NIELSEN HOLDINGS PLC
NOTICE OF THE 2019 ANNUAL MEETING
WHEN: May 21, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. (Eastern Time)
WHERE: Online via live webcast at nielsen.onlineshareholdermeeting.com or in person at 50 Danbury Road, Wilton, CT 06897. Check-in both online and in person will begin at 8:30 a.m. (Eastern Time), and you should allow ample time for check-in procedures. Whether you attend the meeting online or in person, you will be able to ask questions and vote during the meeting.
RECORD DATE: March 22, 2019
ITEMS OF BUSINESS:
At the Annual Meeting, you will be asked to consider and vote on the resolutions set forth under Proposals 1 to 7 in the Proposals to be Voted Upon section below as well as such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. Explanations of the proposed resolutions together with the relevant information for each resolution are given on pages 1 to 78 and Annexes A, B, C and D of this proxy statement.
The Companys UK annual report and accounts for the year ended December 31, 2018, which consist of the UK statutory accounts, the UK statutory directors report, the UK statutory directors compensation report, the UK statutory strategic report and the UK statutory auditors report (the UK Annual Report and Accounts), has been made available to shareholders together with the other proxy materials. There will be an opportunity at the Annual Meeting for shareholders to ask questions or make comments on the UK Annual Report and Accounts and the other proxy materials.
For additional information about our Annual Meeting, shareholders rights, proxy voting and access to proxy materials, see the General Information and Frequently Asked Questions About the Annual Meeting section on pages 87 to 92 of this proxy statement.
Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, it is important that your shares be represented and voted at the meeting. You may vote your shares by proxy on the Internet, by telephone or by completing, signing and promptly returning the proxy card (if you received one) prior to the meeting or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting online or in person.
PROPOSALS TO BE VOTED UPON1
The Board considers that all the proposals to be put to the Annual Meeting are in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders as a whole.
Proposal
|
Board Recommendation
| |||||
Proposal No. 1
|
Election of Directors2
|
![]()
|
for each nominee | |||
Proposal No. 2
|
Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
![]()
|
||||
Proposal No. 3
|
Reappointment of UK Statutory Auditor
|
![]()
|
||||
Proposal No. 4
|
Authorization of the Audit Committee to Determine UK Statutory Auditor Compensation
|
![]()
|
||||
Proposal No. 5
|
Non-Binding, Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation
|
![]()
|
||||
Proposal No. 6
|
Non-Binding, Advisory Vote on Directors Compensation Report
|
![]()
|
||||
Proposal No. 7
|
Approval of the Nielsen 2019 Stock Incentive Plan
|
![]()
|
1 | All resolutions above will be proposed as ordinary resolutions. |
2 | A separate resolution will be proposed for each director. |
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT NOT1
|
NOTICE OF ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS |
Notes:
1. | In accordance with the Companys articles of association, all resolutions will be taken on a poll. Voting on a poll means that each share represented in person or by proxy will be counted in the vote. All resolutions will be proposed as ordinary resolutions, which under applicable law means that each resolution must be passed by a simple majority of the total voting rights of shareholders who vote on such resolution, whether in person or by proxy. Explanatory notes regarding each of the proposals (and related resolutions) are set out in the relevant sections of the accompanying proxy materials relating to such proposals. |
2. | The results of the polls taken on the resolutions at the Annual Meeting and any other information required by the UK Companies Act 2006 will be made available on the Companys website as soon as reasonably practicable following the Annual Meeting and for a period of two years thereafter. |
3. | To be entitled to attend and vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof, shareholders must be registered in the register of members of the Company at the close of business in New York on March 22, 2019 (the Record Date). Changes to the Register of Members after the relevant deadline shall be disregarded in determining the rights of any person to attend and vote at the meeting. If you hold shares through a broker, bank or other nominee, you can attend the Annual Meeting and vote by following the instructions you receive from your bank, broker or other nominee. |
4. | Shareholders are entitled to appoint a proxy to exercise all or any of their rights to attend and to speak and vote on their behalf at the Annual Meeting. A shareholder may appoint more than one proxy in relation to the Annual Meeting provided that each proxy is appointed to exercise the rights attached to a different share or shares held by that shareholder. A corporate shareholder may appoint one or more corporate representatives to attend and to speak and vote on its behalf at the Annual Meeting. A proxy need not be a shareholder of the Company. |
5. | If you are a shareholder of record or hold shares through a broker, bank or other nominee and are voting by proxy through the Internet or by telephone, your vote must be received by 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on May 20, 2019 to be counted. If you are a shareholder of record or hold shares through a broker, bank or other nominee and are voting by mail, your vote must be received by 9:00 a.m. (Eastern Time) on May 17, 2019 to be counted. A shareholder who has returned a proxy instruction is not prevented from attending the Annual Meeting either online or in person and voting if he/she wishes to do so, but please note that only your vote last cast will count. If you hold shares through Nielsens 401(k) plan, the plan trustee, Fidelity Management Trust Company, will vote according to the instructions received from you provided that your instructions are received by 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on May 16, 2019. Your instructions cannot be changed or revoked after that time, and the shares you hold through the 401(k) plan cannot be voted online at the Annual Meeting. |
6. | Unless you hold shares through Nielsens 401(k) plan, you may revoke a previously delivered proxy at any time prior to the Annual Meeting. You may vote online if you attend the Annual Meeting online, or in person if you attend the physical meeting, thereby cancelling any previous proxy. |
7. | Shareholders meeting the threshold requirements set out in the UK Companies Act 2006 have the right to require the Company to publish on the Companys website a statement setting out any matter relating to: (i) the audit of the Companys accounts (including the auditors report and the conduct of the audit) that are to be presented before the Annual Meeting; or (ii) any circumstance connected with the auditor of the Company ceasing to hold office since the previous annual general meeting at which annual accounts and reports were presented in accordance with the UK Companies Act 2006. The Company may not require the shareholders requesting any such website publication to pay its expenses in complying with the UK Companies Act 2006. When the Company is required to place a statement on a website under the UK Companies Act 2006, it must forward the statement to the Companys auditor not later than the time when it makes the statement available on its website. The business which may be dealt with at the Annual Meeting includes any statement that the Company has been required under the UK Companies Act 2006 to publish on a website. |
8. | Pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules, the Companys proxy statement (including this Notice of Annual General Meeting of Shareholders), the Companys US annual report for the year ended December 31, 2018 (including the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018), the Companys UK Annual Report and Accounts and related information prepared in connection with the Annual Meeting are available at: www.proxyvote.com and www.nielsen.com/investors. You will need the 16-digit control number included on your Notice or proxy card in order to access the proxy materials on www.proxyvote.com. These proxy materials will be available free of charge. |
9. | You may not use any electronic address provided in this Notice of Annual General Meeting of Shareholders or any related documentation to communicate with the Company for any purposes other than as expressly stated. |
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT NOT2
|
NOTICE OF ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS |
PROXY VOTING METHODS
Shareholders holding shares of Nielsen on the Record Date may vote their shares by proxy through the Internet, by telephone or by mail or by attending the Annual Meeting online or in person. For shares held through a bank, broker or other nominee, shareholders may vote by submitting voting instructions to the bank, broker or other nominee. To reduce our administrative and postage costs, we ask that shareholders vote through the Internet or by telephone, both of which are available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Shareholders may revoke their proxies at the times and in the manners described in the Notes section of this Notice of Annual General Meeting of Shareholders and the General Information and Frequently Asked Questions About the Annual Meeting section on pages 87-92 of this proxy statement.
If you are a shareholder of record or hold shares through a broker, bank or other nominee and are voting by proxy through the Internet or by telephone, your vote must be received by 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on May 20, 2019 to be counted. If you are a shareholder of record or hold shares through a broker, bank or other nominee and are voting by mail, your vote must be received by 9:00 a.m. (Eastern Time) on May 17, 2019 to be counted.
If you hold shares through Nielsens 401(k) plan, the plan trustee, Fidelity Management Trust Company, will vote according to the instructions received from you provided that your instructions are received by 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on May 16, 2019. Your instructions cannot be changed or revoked after that time, and the shares you hold through the 401(k) plan cannot be voted at the Annual Meeting.
TO VOTE BY PROXY:
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Go to the website
www.proxyvote.com 24 hours a day, seven days a week (before the meeting) or nielsen.onlineshareholdermeeting
You will need the 16-digit control number included on your Notice or proxy card in order to vote online.
|
From a touch-tone phone,
dial
You will need the 16-digit control number included on your Notice or proxy card in order to vote by telephone. |
Mark your selections on your proxy card (if you received one).
Date and sign your name exactly as it appears on your proxy card.
Mail the proxy card in the postage-paid envelope that is provided to you. |
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. THANK YOU FOR VOTING.
April 9, 2019
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Emily Epstein
Company Secretary
Registered Office: Nielsen House, John Smith Drive, Oxford, OX4 2WB, United Kingdom
Registered in England and Wales No. 09422989
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT NOT3
|
Acting upon the recommendation of its Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee, our Board has nominated the persons identified herein for election or re-election as directors. Directors will hold office until the end of the next annual general meeting of shareholders and the election and qualification of their successors or until their earlier resignation, removal, disqualification or death.
It is intended that the proxies delivered pursuant to this solicitation will be voted in favor of the election or re-election of these nominees, except in cases of proxies bearing contrary instructions. In the event that these nominees should become unavailable for election or re-election due to any presently unforeseen reason, the persons named in the proxy will have the right to use their discretion to vote for a substitute.
ONGOING BOARD SUCCESSION PLANNING
Our Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee seeks to ensure that our Board as a whole possesses the objectivity and the mix of skills and experiences to provide effective oversight and guidance to management to execute on the Companys long-term strategy. The Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee assesses potential candidates based on their history of achievement, the breadth of their experiences, whether they bring specific skills or expertise in areas that the Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee has identified, and whether they possess personal attributes that will contribute to the effective functioning of the Board.
Ongoing Board refreshment provides fresh perspectives while leveraging the institutional knowledge and historical perspective of our longer-tenured directors. The Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee also considers succession planning for roles such as Board and committee chairpersons for purposes of continuity and to maintain relevant expertise and depth of experience.
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 1
|
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS |
Our Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee uses the following process to identify and add new directors to the Board:
Our Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee is authorized to use an independent search firm to help identify, evaluate and conduct due diligence on potential director candidates. Using an independent search firm helps the Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee ensure that it is conducting a broad search and helps it to consider a diverse slate of candidates with the qualifications and expertise that are needed to provide effective oversight of management and assist in long-term value creation.
Diversity Policy
The charter of our Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee requires the Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee to consider all factors it deems appropriate, which may include age, gender, nationality and ethnic and racial background in nominating directors and to review and make recommendations, as the Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee deems appropriate, regarding the composition and size of the Board to ensure the Board has the requisite expertise and its membership consists of persons with sufficiently diverse and independent backgrounds. Over time, the Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board as a
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 2
|
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS |
whole will assess the effectiveness of this policy and determine, how, if at all, our implementation of the policy, or the policy itself, should be changed.
Nomination Process
In considering whether to recommend nomination or re-nomination of each of our directors for election at the Annual Meeting, our Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee reviews the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills of our current directors to determine the extent to which those qualities continue to enable our Board to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively in light of our evolving business. In determining to nominate the directors named herein for election at the Annual Meeting, the Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee has focused on our current directors valuable contributions in recent years, the criteria set forth in Board Expertise and Skills in the Summary of Proxy Statement Information and the information discussed in the biographies set forth below under Nominees for Election to the Board of Directors. In addition, the Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee considered each directors additional responsibilities and affiliations and the extent to which they could continue to contribute to the success of our Board.
In accordance with our articles of association, shareholders may request that director nominees submitted by such shareholders be included in the agenda of our Annual Meeting through the process described under Shareholder Proposals for the 2020 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders. The Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee considers shareholder recommendations for director candidates and evaluates such candidates with the same standards as it does for other Board candidates. The Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee will advise the Board whether to recommend shareholders to vote for or against such shareholder nominated candidates.
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 3
|
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS |
NOMINEES FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The following information describes the names, ages as of March 31, 2019, and biographical information of each nominee. Beneficial ownership of equity securities of the nominees is shown under Ownership of Securities.
James A. Attwood, Jr.
|
Director since 2006
|
Age 60
| ||||
Nielsen Committees: Nomination and Corporate Governance |
Other public company directorships: |
|||||
Current: Syniverse Holdings, Inc. CoreSite Realty Corporation |
Past 5 years: Getty Images, Inc. |
|||||
Key Experience and Qualifications
Financial expertise (mathematics and statistics)
Media/telecommunications/technology expertise and deep management experience at The Carlyle Group
Public company board experience
Private equity investment expertise in the media industry
Mr. Attwood has served on Nielsens Board since 2006 and has served as Chairman of the Board since January 1, 2016. He served as Lead Independent Director of the Board from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015. Beginning on July 26, 2018, Mr. Attwood assumed the title of Executive Chairman on an interim basis to lead the Boards search process to identify a new Chief Executive Officer as well as to oversee the Boards strategic review. As Executive Chairman, Mr. Attwood remains an independent member of Nielsens Board. He is not a Nielsen employee and has no day-to-day responsibilities for the Companys business. Mr. Attwood is a Managing Director of The Carlyle Group and the former Head of the Global Telecommunications, Media, and Technology Group. Prior to joining The Carlyle Group in 2000, Mr. Attwood was with Verizon Communications, Inc. and GTE Corporation. Prior to GTE Corporation, he was with Goldman, Sachs & Co. | ||||||
Guerrino De Luca
|
Director since 2017
|
Age 66
| ||||
Committees: Compensation |
Other public company directorships: |
|||||
Current: Logitech International S.A. |
Past 5 years: None |
|||||
Key Experience and Qualifications
Chief Executive Officer experience and public company board experience at Logitech International S.A.
Consumer insights, technology, innovation, strategy and marketing experience
Global markets and general management experience
Mr. De Luca has served as the Chairman of the Board of Logitech International S.A. since January 2008. Mr. De Luca joined Logitech International S.A. in 1998 and served as its President and Chief Executive Officer from February 1998 to December 2007 and as acting President and Chief Executive Officer from July 2011 to December 2012. Prior to joining Logitech International S.A., Mr. De Luca served as Executive Vice President of Worldwide Marketing for Apple Computer, Inc. |
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 4
|
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS |
Karen M. Hoguet
|
Director since 2010
|
Age 62
| ||||
Committees: Audit (Chairperson)
|
Other public company directorships: |
|||||
Current: None |
Past 5 years: The Chubb Corporation |
|||||
Key Experience and Qualifications
Audit and risk oversight experience
Senior management and public company experience at Macys, Inc.
Retail and commercial experience
Ms. Hoguet served as the Chief Financial Officer of Macys, Inc. from October 1997 until July of 2018 when she became a strategic advisor to the Chief Executive Officer until her retirement on February 1, 2019. Ms. Hoguet serves on the Board of Directors of Hebrew Union College and UCHealth. | ||||||
David Kenny
|
Director since 2018
|
Age 57
| ||||
Committees: None |
Other public company directorships: |
|||||
Current: Best Buy Co., Inc. |
Past 5 years: None |
|||||
Key Experience and Qualifications
Data science and Artificial Intelligence
Retail, marketing and media expertise
Innovation, technology and digital experience
Chief Executive Officer and public company board experience
Mr. Kenny has been the Chief Executive Officer of Nielsen since December 3, 2018. Prior to that time, Mr. Kenny served as Senior Vice President of Cognitive Solutions at IBM, joining IBM in January 2016, after its acquisition of The Weather Companys Product and Technology Business. Previously, from January 2012 until 2016, Mr. Kenny served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The Weather Company. Prior to The Weather Company, Mr. Kenny was President of Akamai, the cloud service provider, and the co-founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the digital marketing agency Digitas, which was a Nasdaq listed company before its sale to Publicis Groupe in 2007. Mr. Kenny began his career as a consultant at Bain & Company, where he rose to the Partner level. Mr. Kenny serves on the Board of Directors of Teach for America. |
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 5
|
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS |
Harish Manwani
|
Director since 2015
|
Age 65
| ||||
Committees: Compensation
|
Other public company directorships: |
|||||
Current: Qualcomm Incorporated Whirlpool Corporation Gilead Sciences, Inc. |
Past 5 years: Pearson plc Hindustan Unilever Limited |
|||||
Key Experience and Qualifications
Global and emerging markets operating experience at Unilever, plc
Consumer packaged goods experience
Executive management and board experience at public companies
Wide ranging international and general experience in managing a global business
Mr. Manwani has been a Senior Operating Partner/Global Executive Advisor for the Blackstone Group since February 2015. He retired from Unilever plc, a leading global consumer products company, at the end of 2014, where he served as the global Chief Operating Officer since September 2011. Mr. Manwani joined Hindustan Unilever Limited (a majority-owned subsidiary of Unilever) in 1976. Through his career, he held positions of increasing responsibility at Unilever which gave him wide ranging international and general management experience. Mr. Manwani is also a member of the Board of Tata Sons Private Limited and the Chairman of the Executive Board of the Indian School of Business. | ||||||
Robert C. Pozen
|
Director since 2010
|
Age 72
| ||||
Committees: Compensation; Nomination and Corporate Governance (Chairperson)
|
Other public company directorships: |
|||||
Current: None |
Past 5 years: Medtronic Public Limited Company |
|||||
Key Experience and Qualifications
Governance and public policy expertise
Financial and financial reporting expertise
Public company board experience
From July 1, 2010 through December 31, 2011, Mr. Pozen was Chairman Emeritus of MFS Investment Management. Prior to that, he was Chairman of MFS Investment Management since February 2004. He previously was Secretary of Economic Affairs for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in 2003. Mr. Pozen was also the John Olin Visiting Professor, Harvard Law School from 2002 to 2004 and the Chairman of the SEC Advisory Committee on Improvements to Financial Reporting from 2007 to 2008. From 1987 through 2001, Mr. Pozen worked for Fidelity Investments in various jobs, serving as President of Fidelity Management and Research Co. from 1997 through 2001. He is currently a director of AMC, a subsidiary of the International Finance Corporation, a senior lecturer at MIT Sloan School of Management, a non-resident fellow of the Brookings Institution, a member of the Advisory Board of Perella Weinberg Partners and Chairman of the Leadership Council of the Tax Policy Committee. |
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 6
|
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS |
David Rawlinson
|
Director since 2017
|
Age 43
| ||||
Committees: Audit |
Other public company directorships: |
|||||
Current: MonotaRO Co., Ltd. |
Past 5 years: None |
|||||
Key Experience and Qualifications
Digital, innovation and technology experience
E-commerce commercial, brand and marketing experience
Global operating experience
Mr. Rawlinson is the SVP & President of the Online Business of W.W. Grainger, Inc., where he also previously served as the Vice President for Operations for the Online Business. From July 2012 until August 2015, he was Graingers Vice President, Deputy General Counsel and Corporate Secretary. From November 2009 until July 2012, Mr. Rawlinson was Vice President, General Counsel and Director of Corporate Responsibility of a division of ITT Exelis, formerly ITT Corporation. Prior to ITT Exelis, Mr. Rawlinson served as a White House Fellow and in appointed positions for the George W. Bush and Obama Administrations. In the Bush Administration, he was a leader of the outgoing transition. In the Obama Administration, he served as Senior Advisor for Economic Policy at the White House National Economic Council. | ||||||
Javier G. Teruel
|
Director since 2010
|
Age 68
| ||||
Committees: Audit |
Other public company directorships: |
|||||
Current: Starbucks Corporation J.C. Penney Company, Inc. |
Past 5 years: None |
|||||
Key Experience and Qualifications
Consumer packaged goods experience
Global operating experience, including as Vice Chairman of Colgate-Palmolive Company
Public company board experience
Mr. Teruel is a Partner of Spectron Desarrollo, SC, an investment management and consulting firm; Chairman of Alta Growth Capital, a private equity firm; and a majority owner of Mexican investment firm, Desarrollo Empresarial Sebara SA de CV. Previously, Mr. Teruel served as Vice Chairman of Colgate-Palmolive Company, from July 2004 to April 2007. Prior to being appointed Vice Chairman, he served in positions of increasing importance at Colgate since 1971, including as Executive Vice President responsible for Asia, Central Europe, Africa and Hills Pet Nutrition, as Vice President of Body Care in Global Business Development in New York, as President and General Manager of Colgate-Mexico, as President of Colgate-Europe, and as Chief Growth Officer responsible for the companys growth functions. |
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 7
|
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS |
Lauren Zalaznick
|
Director since 2016
|
Age 56
| ||||
Committees: Compensation; Nomination and |
Other public company directorships: |
|||||
Current: GoPro, Inc. RTL Group |
Past 5 years: None |
|||||
Key Experience and Qualifications
Media expertise, including at NBCUniversal Media, LLC
Digital, innovation and technology experience
Commercial, management and marketing expertise
Deep consumer insights expertise
Ms. Zalaznick is currently a senior strategic advisor to leading media and digital companies. From 2004 through December 2013, Ms. Zalaznick held various roles of increasing responsibility within NBCUniversal Media, LLC. In 2010 she became Chairman, Entertainment & Digital Networks and Integrated Media. In that capacity she had responsibility for the cable entertainment networks Bravo Media, Oxygen Media, and The Style Network; the Telemundo Spanish language broadcast network; and she ran the companys digital portfolio. She was promoted to Executive Vice President at Comcast NBCUniversal until departing the company at the end of 2013. Ms. Zalaznick is currently a member of the Board of Directors of Critical Content. She is a senior advisor to The Boston Consulting Group, TMT practice, and to leading content and tech start-ups, including Refinery29, Atlas Obscura, Fatherly.com and Gimlet Media. |
The nominees for election to the Board of Directors named above are hereby proposed for appointment and reappointment by the shareholders.
![]() |
The Board of Directors recommends that shareholders vote FOR the election of each of the nominees named above. |
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 8
|
Pursuant to our articles of association and in accordance with the UK Companies Act 2006, our directors are responsible for the management of the Companys business, for which purpose they may exercise all the powers of the Company.
Our Board conducts its business through meetings of the Board and three standing committees: Audit, Compensation and Nomination and Corporate Governance. In accordance with the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) rules and the rules promulgated under each of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Sarbanes-Oxley Act) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), a majority of our Board consists of independent directors, and our Audit, Compensation and Nomination and Corporate Governance Committees are fully independent.
Each director owes a duty to the Company to properly perform the duties assigned to him or her and to act in the best interest of the Company. Under English law, this requires each director to act in a way he or she considers, in good faith, would be most likely to promote the success of the Company for the benefit of its shareholders as a whole, and in doing so have regard (among other matters) for the likely consequences of any decision in the long-term, the interests of the Companys employees, the Companys business relationships with suppliers, customers and others, the impact of the Companys operations on the community and the environment and the need to act fairly amongst shareholders. The Companys directors are expected to be appointed for one year and may be re-elected at the next Annual Meeting.
DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE AND INDEPENDENCE DETERMINATIONS
Under the NYSE rules and our Corporate Governance Guidelines, a director is not independent unless the Board affirmatively determines that he or she does not have a direct or indirect material relationship with the Company or any of its subsidiaries. Heightened independence standards apply to members of the Audit and Compensation Committees.
The NYSE independence definition includes a series of objective tests, such as that the director is not an employee of the Company and has not engaged in various types of business dealings with the Company. The Board is also responsible for determining affirmatively, as to each independent director, that no relationships exist which, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. In making these determinations, the Board will broadly consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including information provided by the directors and the Company with regard to each directors business and personal activities as they may relate to the Company and the Companys management. As the concern is independence from management and pursuant to the view articulated by the NYSE, ownership of a significant amount of stock, by itself, is not a bar to an independence finding.
The Board undertook its annual review of director independence and affirmatively determined that, except for Mr. Kenny, each of our directors is independent under Section 303A.02 of the NYSE listing rules and under our Corporate Governance Guidelines for purposes of board service. In addition, the Board affirmatively determined that the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee members are fully independent under the SEC and NYSE independence standards specifically applicable to such committees.
In making the director independence determinations, the Board considered the following:
| Mr. Teruel indirectly holds approximately 6% of the capital stock of a private entity in which Nielsen invested $3.25 million, which at the time of investment represented approximately 15.6% of such entitys capital stock. Nielsen has a board seat on, and a commercial arrangement with, this entity. |
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 9
|
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CERTAIN GOVERNANCE MATTERS |
Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board must select its chairperson from its members in any way it considers in the best interest of the Company. Beginning on July 26, 2018, Mr. Attwood assumed the title of Executive Chairman on an interim basis to lead the Boards search process to identify a new Chief Executive Officer as well as to oversee the Boards strategic review. As Executive Chairman, Mr. Attwood remains an independent member of Nielsens Board. He is not a Nielsen employee and has no day-to-day responsibilities for the Companys business. From January 1, 2016 to July 26, 2018, Mr. Attwood served as the Boards non-executive, independent Chairperson. In light of Mr. Attwoods independence from the Company, the Company does not currently have a Lead Independent Director. As noted further below, each Board committee also has a non-executive, independent chairperson. Our Board believes our leadership structure best encourages the free and open dialogue of competing views and provides for strong checks and balances.
Our Board has established the following committees: an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee. The current composition and responsibilities of each committee are described below. Members serve on these committees until they no longer serve on the Board or until otherwise determined by our Board.
Name of Independent Director
|
Audit Committee
|
Compensation Committee
|
Nomination and Corporate
| |||
James A. Attwood, Jr.
|
| |||||
Guerrino De Luca
|
|
|||||
Karen M. Hoguet
|
Chairperson
|
|||||
Harish Manwani
|
Chairperson
|
|||||
Robert C. Pozen
|
|
Chairperson
| ||||
David Rawlinson
|
|
|||||
Javier G. Teruel
|
|
|||||
Lauren Zalaznick
|
|
|
Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, all directors are expected to make every effort to attend all meetings of the Board and meetings of the committees of which they are members. All directors are also welcome to attend meetings and review materials of those committees of which they are not members. During 2018, the Board held 17 meetings and 19 committee meetings. Each director attended 88% or more in the aggregate of 2018 Board meetings and 86% or more of the total number of 2018 meetings of those committees on which each such director served and that were held during the period that such director served. All non-executive directors are encouraged (but not required) to attend the Annual Meeting and each extraordinary general meeting of shareholders. Six of our current directors who served at the time of our 2018 Annual Meeting, attended this meeting.
During the second half of 2018 and into 2019, the Board, with the assistance of our advisors and management team, has been deeply involved in a broadened comprehensive strategic review of the entire Company and its businesses, which we announced in September 2018. The Board, as well as a subset of independent directors, has been meeting regularly to receive updates and to provide input into the process.
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 10
|
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CERTAIN GOVERNANCE MATTERS |
COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Members: Karen M. Hoguet (Chairperson) David Rawlinson Javier G. Teruel
Independence: All members are independent.
Audit Committee Financial Expert: All members qualify as audit committee financial experts and meet NYSE financial literacy and expertise requirements.
Meetings in Fiscal Year 2018: 7 |
|
Audit Committee
Key Responsibilities:
External auditor. Appointing our external auditors, subject to shareholder vote as may be required under English law, overseeing the external auditors qualifications, independence and performance, discussing relevant matters with the external auditors and providing preapproval of audit and permitted non-audit services to be provided by the external auditors and related fees;
Financial reporting. Supervising and monitoring our financial reporting and reviewing with management and the external auditor Nielsens annual and quarterly financial statements;
Internal audit function. Overseeing our internal audit process and our internal audit function;
Internal controls, risk management and compliance programs. Overseeing our system of internal controls, our enterprise risk management program (including cyber security) and our compliance with relevant legislation and regulations; and
Information security, technology and privacy & data protection. Evaluating updates received at least quarterly from the Companys Chief Information Officer regarding the Companys information, technology and data protection security systems, its preparedness in preventing, detecting and responding to breaches, and any incidents and related response efforts, to then report to the Board. | ||||
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 11
|
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CERTAIN GOVERNANCE MATTERS |
Members: Harish Manwani (Chairperson) Guerrino De Luca Robert C. Pozen Lauren Zalaznick
Independence: All members are independent.
Meetings in Fiscal Year 2018: 7 |
Compensation Committee
Key Responsibilities:
Executive compensation. Setting, reviewing and evaluating compensation, and related performance and objectives, of our senior management team;
Incentive and equity-based compensation plans. Reviewing and approving, or making recommendations to our Board with respect to, our incentive and equity-based compensation plans and equity-based awards;
Compensation-related disclosure. Overseeing compliance with our compensation-related disclosure obligations under applicable laws;
Director compensation. Assisting our Board in determining the individual compensation for our directors within the framework permitted by the general compensation policy approved by our shareholders (the Directors Compensation Policy); and
Talent development/employee engagement. Overseeing leadership development and employee experience, including recruitment, development, advancement and retention.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation: None of the current members of the Compensation Committee is a former or current officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. No Compensation Committee member has any relationship required to be disclosed under this caption under the rules of the SEC. | |||||
Members Robert C. Pozen (Chairperson) James A. Attwood, Jr. Lauren Zalaznick
Independence: All members are independent.
Meetings in Fiscal Year 2018: 5 |
Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee
Key Responsibilities:
Director nomination. Determining selection criteria and appointment procedures for our Board and committee members and making recommendations regarding nominations and committee appointments to the full Board;
Board composition. Periodically assessing the scope and composition of our Board and its committees;
Succession planning. Developing and overseeing succession planning and talent management for CEO, other senior leadership positions and directors;
Corporate governance. Advising the Board on corporate governance matters and overseeing the Companys corporate responsibility and sustainability strategy; and
Board and Committee evaluations. Developing and overseeing the evaluation process for our Board and its committees. | |||||
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 12
|
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CERTAIN GOVERNANCE MATTERS |
BOARD AND COMMITTEE EVALUATIONS
Our Board recognizes that a thorough, constructive evaluation process enhances our Boards effectiveness and is an essential element of good corporate governance. Accordingly, our Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee develops and oversees the evaluation process to ensure that the full Board and each committee conducts an assessment of its performance and functioning and solicits feedback for enhancement and improvement.
This year, our Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee engaged an independent third party, experienced in corporate governance matters, to interview each director to obtain his or her assessment of the effectiveness of the Board and its committees. The interview process is expected to begin in April 2019. The Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee Chairperson will instruct the third party on the particular criteria to be covered in the assessment, such as conduct of the meetings and committees, leadership and process. Each director will be asked to identify any opportunities the Board can focus on to enhance its effectiveness. In addition, the third party will seek input from each director as to the performance of the other Board members. The third party organizes the director feedback and is expected to review it with the Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board in July. The Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee Chairperson is expected to lead a discussion to determine which areas the Board would like to focus on during the coming year to enhance its effectiveness. Finally, the Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee Chairperson will engage the Board in a follow-up discussion to gauge the Boards satisfaction with the progress made in addressing any focus areas that were identified by the Board in its evaluation.
OUR BOARDS COMMITMENT TO SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
Why We Engage
Our Board and management team recognize the benefits of regular engagement with our shareholders in order to remain attuned to their different perspectives on the matters affecting Nielsen.
Robust dialogue and engagement efforts allow our Board and management the opportunity to:
| consider the viewpoints of our shareholders and the issues that are important to them in connection with their oversight of management and the Company; |
| discuss developments in our business and provide transparency and insight about our strategy and performance; and |
| assess issues, existing or emerging, that may affect our business, corporate responsibility and governance practices. |
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 13
|
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CERTAIN GOVERNANCE MATTERS |
How We Engage
![]() |
Outcomes from Investor Feedback
Some tangible examples of the results of our shareholder outreach activities include:
In response to shareholder demand, we provided shareholders with greater, ongoing access to the Board. Our Executive Chairman regularly engaged with top shareholders particularly in the second half of 2018, via in-person meetings or conference calls.
With the goal of greater transparency and improved communications, we benchmarked best practices and requested feedback from our key stakeholders in the investment community. As a result of our review, we will begin to incorporate organic constant currency revenue growth and Adjusted EPS into our reporting framework in 2019. These metrics will help to provide more clarity into the normalized revenue and earnings power of the organization.
We provide regular shareholder feedback to the Board on various topics, including the strategic review and capital allocation. |
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 14
|
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CERTAIN GOVERNANCE MATTERS |
Any interested party who would like to communicate with, or otherwise make his or her concerns known directly to, the Executive Chairman of the Board or the Chairperson of any of the Audit Committee, Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee and Compensation Committee or to other directors, including the non-management or independent directors, individually or as a group, may do so by addressing such communications or concerns to the Company Secretary at companysecretary@nielsen.com or 40 Danbury Road, Wilton, Connecticut 06897. Such communications may be done confidentially or anonymously. The Company Secretary will forward communications received to the appropriate party as necessary and appropriate. Additional contact information is available on our website, www.nielsen.com/investors, under Contact Us.
GLOBAL RESPONSIBILITY AND SUSTAINABILITY
Nielsen is committed to strengthening the communities and markets in which we live and operate our business, recognizing how important this is to a sustainable future. This commitment is supported and expressed at all levels of our organization. The Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee oversees the Companys strategy and initiatives to evaluate and measure our performance with respect to the advancement of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues. Highlights of our new and continuing efforts in 2018 include:
Responsibility & Sustainability Strategy and Reporting:
| We remain focused on connecting our business with relevant ESG issues through responsible policies and practices, evaluating and measuring performance on these issues, and external reporting and transparency. Regularly reporting our progress to stakeholders supports proactive and useful engagement opportunities to drive continuous improvement and positive change for our company, our people and our world. |
| In 2018, we published our second Nielsen Global Responsibility Report, which captures our performance and progress on our long-term, ESG-focused initiatives. The report covers 2016 and 2017, and contains our forward-looking strategy and goals as a company; it also clearly outlines how Nielsens ESG issues connect to our most critical business issues, including diversity and inclusion, data privacy, security and integrity. Our Global Responsibility Report allows us to openly share our ESG approach and performance with our stakeholdersour employees, investors, clients, suppliers, and othersand to show our commitment to continuing our progress over the long-term. |
| In 2018, Nielsen was included in both the FTSE4Good index and the Dow Jones Sustainability (DJSI) North America index for the second year in a row; we were also included in the DJSI World Index for the first time. We were also honored to be recognized as the industry leader for media companies on JUST Capitals 2018 JUST 100 for the second year, advancing more than 50 spots to #40 on the list from the prior year. Finally, Bloomberg included Nielsen as part of its 2019 Gender-Equality Index (GEI); the GEI recognizes the 230 global corporate leaders in advancing women through measurement and transparency. |
| In recognition of the business imperative to more strategically engage our clients on meeting their own sustainability goals, we published new, thought leadership and complementary content about consumer preferences regarding the sustainability attributes of the products they purchase. We continue to empower our clients sustainability journeys through leveraging Nielsen data and assets. |
Nielsen Green:
| We remain focused on creating more sustainable outcomes by leveraging operational efficiencies and harnessing the power of our employees contributions. We continue to actively manage our impact on the environment in part through Green Teams, our employee engagement program. In 2018, 20,000 employees participated in Earth Week activities over five days in 55 locations around the world. Our associates also volunteered over 2,000 hours across more than 80 projects in celebration of our first annual World Cleanup Day. |
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 15
|
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CERTAIN GOVERNANCE MATTERS |
| We remain committed to fully calculating and managing our carbon emissions. To that end, in 2018, we have expanded our data collection and reporting to include all Nielsen sites globally. In addition, we onboarded a new data management platform that allows for more accurate and efficient representation of our global footprint and other ongoing measurements. We have also expanded our GHG emissions reporting to include Scope 3 (business travel), and we continue to explore the relevance and applicability of all 15 Scope 3 categories. |
| In recognition of both the reality of climate change and the opportunities for increased efficiency and effectiveness that it presents, we completed our first global climate risk assessment in early 2018 to identify Nielsens climate-related physical and transitional risks. By investigating physical risks, we aimed to uncover how business assets integral to our operations, such as our facilities, may be affected by extreme weather events (e.g., super storms, hurricanes, etc.) and changing climate patterns (e.g., increasing drought, heat waves, sea-level rise, etc.). By looking at transitional risks, we aimed to identify the potential financial implications associated with regulatory pressures related to climate change (e.g., carbon taxes, emission caps, investing in new technology, etc.) as well as potential reputational risks. |
Supply Chain Sustainability:
| We recognize that our institutional spend with suppliers around the world comes with risks and impacts that are of concern to our company and our stakeholdersrisks relating to climate change, energy use, human rights, conflict minerals and data privacy and security, among others. Like the immense purchasing power of individual consumers, as a global company, our institutional spend of over $2 billion can be a demand signal in the marketplace. Our Supply Chain Sustainability program had a productive third year in our goal to establish a best-practice program with these responsibilities and opportunities in mind. |
| At the end of 2018, we identified or added more than 400 impact sourcing jobs in our supply chain, representing a 20% increase compared to 2017. We continue to move toward our goal of 500 impact sourcing jobs in our supply chain by 2020. |
| Meaningful supplier engagement is the primary means by which we collaborate with suppliers to meet our programs sustainability goals. We do this through measurement and disclosure, continuous improvement and capacity building. In 2018 we added a contractual provision to our Supplier Code of Conduct requiring sustainability assessments from suppliers meeting spend, criticality and/or risk exposure criteria. In 2018, we engaged close to 200 of our key suppliers across North America, Europe, Latin America, Asia and the Middle East and exceeded our goal of assessing 100 of our key suppliers with a third party supplier assessment covering ESG issues. In 2017, we engaged over 150 of our key suppliers on ESG issues, covering 40% of our spend, up from 60 suppliers and a third of our spend in 2016. We observed an average ESG score increase of 17% in our lowest scoring supplier sustainability assessments, exceeding our goal of an average 10% score increase. We also began measuring product/service level impacts in 2017. We defined over 40 baseline key performance indicators on our most material purchasing categories in 2017, and in 2018, published the baselines and will publish our primary targets to improve them. |
| In 2017 and 2018, we raised awareness of our program internally within Nielsen with presentations to over 100 corporate buyers outside of our centralized Global Procurement team. Externally, our program leaders spoke to combined audiences of 3,500 about our supply chain sustainability program, and its alignment with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, including a presentation at the United Nations. |
| As part of our commitment to create industry-wide impact, we actively participated as a corporate member with the Responsible Business Alliance, the Responsible Minerals Initiative, the Global Impact Sourcing Coalition (as a Founding Member), and the Sustainable Purchasing Leadership Council. |
Nielsen Cares:
| Nielsen Cares mobilizes our data, expertise and associates to positively impact the communities in which we live and work around the world. Nielsen Cares programs, in operation since 2010, aim to commit Nielsen resources and time to social causes where we can make a difference, focused on the priority areas of Education, Hunger & Nutrition, Technology, and Diversity & Inclusion. Our employees share skills, time, data, and insights through our volunteering and our in-kind giving programs. |
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 16
|
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CERTAIN GOVERNANCE MATTERS |
| In 2018, more than 25,000 employees participated on Nielsen Global Impact Day through 1,450 volunteer events in 91 countries. |
| To carry out our Nielsen Cares programs around the world, we maintain and support a global council of approximately 20 Nielsen Cares leaders, representing all geographic markets and multiple functional areas across the company. In coordination with this leadership council, we also have local Nielsen Cares leaders on-site at nearly 150 locations around the world. These leaders work to identify local engagement opportunities with organizations and develop projects for associates to connect with their communities and with each other. |
| All Nielsen associates have 24 hours of dedicated volunteer time to use annually to volunteer in their communities around the world. Since 2016, our employees have logged more than 260,000 volunteer hours, tracking towards our goal to volunteer at least 300,000 hours by 2020. In 2018, 92% of our employees said that volunteering has a positive influence on their employee experience. |
| In 2018, Nielsen forged a year-long collaboration agreement with All Hands and HeartsSmart Response, a volunteer-driven disaster relief organization. In November, 20 Nielsen associates traveled to Yabucoa, Puerto Rico, for a week of repairing homes, roofing and sanitizing in the continued clean-up from Hurricane Maria. |
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 17
|
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CERTAIN GOVERNANCE MATTERS |
Data for Good:
| Data is the foundation of our work and we believe it can be leveraged to advance social good. Weve committed to enhancing the use of data to increase impact in reducing discrimination, easing global hunger, promoting STEM education and building stronger leadership in the social sector. |
| Since 2012, Nielsen has pledged to donate at least $10 million each year of our data, products and services through pro bono work and skills-based volunteering with nonprofits in our priority cause areas. Nielsen donated a record $21.2 million of data, products and services in 2018, again surpassing our $10 million annual commitment of data, products and services. This is part of a larger goal to contribute a cumulative $50 million in-kind from 2016 to the end of 2020. |
| We license the use of select Nielsen market research data to the Kilts Center at the University of Chicagos Booth School of Business. Through this arrangement, eligible academic researchers can apply to access a warehouse of Nielsen data to advance their academic and social research. |
Nielsen Foundation:
| The Nielsen Foundation, a private foundation funded by Nielsen, began grantmaking to nonprofit organizations in 2016. The Nielsen Foundation seeks to enhance use of data by the social sector to reduce discrimination, ease global hunger, promote effective education, and build strong leadership. |
| In 2018, the Nielsen Foundation distributed $1.67 million in grants. One of the Foundations grant programs is Data for Good. In 2018, $304,299 in Data for Good grants were distributed to four organizations. |
| The Nielsen Foundation also launched two signature programs in 2018: the TechDiversity Accelerator and Discover Data. The TechDiversity Accelerator, in collaboration with Tampa Bay Wave, is a program specifically dedicated to fostering the growth of diverse startups in the central Florida region and across the country. Discover Data, an education initiative in collaboration with Discovery Education and The Afterschool Alliance, provides resources to students ages 11 to 14 that create excitement about the power of data analysis, as well as volunteer guides to visit classrooms in person or virtually. |
Educating our directors about Nielsen and our industry is an ongoing process that begins when a director joins our Board. All new directors take part in a comprehensive orientation about Nielsen which includes meetings with senior leaders to discuss our businesses and strategy as well as our control functions, including finance, operations and legal. We also conduct in-depth training sessions on the work of our committees for both new directors and those directors who are newly appointed to a committee. For a new member of the audit committee, this may include training with our independent registered public accounting firm.
We encourage our directors to participate in external continuing director education programs and provide reimbursement for expenses associated with this participation. Continuing director education is also provided during Board meetings and other Board discussions as part of the formal meetings and as stand-alone information sessions outside of meetings. Among other topics, during 2018, in connection with our strategic review, we conducted several deep dive education sessions on the latest developments and trends in our Connect and Media businesses. Our Board also regularly reviews developments in corporate governance to continue enhancing our Boards effectiveness.
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 18
|
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CERTAIN GOVERNANCE MATTERS |
The Board is responsible for overseeing Nielsens risk and enterprise risk management practices and seeks to foster a risk-aware culture while encouraging appropriate and balanced risk-taking in pursuit of Company objectives. The Board exercises its oversight both directly and through its three committees, each of which has been delegated oversight responsibilities for specific risks. Each committee keeps the Board informed of its oversight efforts through regular reporting to the full Board by the committee chairpersons.
Management is accountable for day-to-day risk management efforts. The Board and committees risk oversight and managements ownership of risk are foundational components of our Enterprise Risk Management program. This program is designed to provide comprehensive, integrated oversight and management of risk and to facilitate transparent identification and reporting of key business issues to senior management and the Board and its committees. The following are the key risk oversight and management responsibilities of our Board, committees and management:
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 19
|
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CERTAIN GOVERNANCE MATTERS |
One of the Boards primary responsibilities is to ensure that Nielsen has the appropriate talent to accomplish our business strategies today and in the future. The Board plans for CEO succession by establishing selection criteria and identifying and evaluating potential internal candidates. In July 2018, Mr. Attwood assumed the title of Executive Chairman on an interim basis to, among other responsibilities, lead the Boards search process to identify a new Chief Executive Officer. The Board was able to successfully implement its CEO succession plan, with Mr. Kenny joining the Company in December 2018. |
|
Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, to ensure free and open discussion and communication, our independent directors meet in executive session, with no members of management present, at every regularly scheduled Board meeting. Our Executive Chairman leads these meetings which enable our independent directors to discuss matters such as strategy, CEO and senior management performance and compensation, succession planning and board composition and effectiveness. During 2018, our independent directors met seventeen times in executive session.
COMMITTEE CHARTERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES
Our commitment to corporate governance is reflected in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which describe the Boards views on a wide range of governance topics. These Corporate Governance Guidelines are reviewed from time to time by the Board to ensure that they effectively comply with all applicable laws, regulations and stock exchange requirements, in addition to our articles of association. Additionally, the Board has adopted a written charter for each of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our committee charters and other corporate governance information are available on our website at www.nielsen.com/investors under Governance Documents.
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 20
|
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CERTAIN GOVERNANCE MATTERS |
CODE OF CONDUCT AND PROCEDURES FOR REPORTING CONCERNS ABOUT MISCONDUCT
We maintain a Code of Conduct, which is applicable to all of our directors, officers and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. The Code of Conduct, which was updated in 2018, sets forth our policies and expectations on a number of topics, including conflicts of interest, compliance with laws and ethical conduct. The Company will promptly disclose to our shareholders, if required by applicable laws or stock exchange requirements, any amendments to or waivers from the Code of Conduct applicable to our directors or officers by posting such information on our website at www.nielsen.com/investors rather than by filing a Current Report on Form 8-K.
The Code of Conduct may be found on our website at www.nielsen.com/investors under Corporate Governance Governance Documents.
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 21
|
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CERTAIN GOVERNANCE MATTERS |
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY
Set forth below is the name, age as of March 31, 2019 and biographical information of each of our current executive officers, other than Mr. Kenny, whose information is presented under Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors Nominees for Election to the Board of Directors.
David J. Anderson
|
Age 69
| |||
|
Previous Business Experience:
Prior to joining Nielsen, Mr. Anderson was the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from December 2016 to August 2017. Prior to that, Mr. Anderson served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Honeywell International from 2003 to 2014. Prior to joining Honeywell, Mr. Anderson was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of ITT Industries, as well as Newport News Shipbuilding. Previously, he held senior financial positions with RJR Nabisco and the Quaker Oats Company.
Public Company Directorship:
Mr. Anderson serves on the board of directors of American Electric Power Company, Inc. | |||
George D. Callard
|
Age 55
| |||
|
Previous Business Experience:
Prior to joining Nielsen, Mr. Callard served as President of Weather Group, LLC from July 2018 to January 2019. From 2016 to 2018, Mr. Callard served as Chief Administrative Officer & General Counsel at Weather Group, LLC. From 2013 to 2015, he served as EVP, General Counsel & Head of Government Affairs for The Weather Company, parent company of The Weather Channel. Previously, Mr. Callard served as vice president of legal and business affairs at NBCU and had two tenures with AT&T (SBC & Ameritech). Earlier in his career, he served as counsel and assistant secretary and as senior counsel at the law firm Cinnamon Mueller and associate counsel for Multimedia Cablevision. | |||
Nancy Phillips
|
Age 51
| |||
|
Previous Business Experience:
Prior to joining Nielsen, Ms. Phillips was Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer at Broadcom Corporation from September 2014 until April 2016. From February 2010 to June 2014, Ms. Phillips held the position of SVP Human Resources for the Imaging and Printing Group at Hewlett-Packard Company, most recently as Senior Vice President, Human Resources, Enterprise Services. Prior to joining Hewlett-Packard Company, from April 2008 to February 2010, Ms. Phillips was employed by Fifth Third Bancorp as Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer. Prior to that, Ms. Phillips spent 11 years at General Electric Company, holding various human resources positions. Ms. Phillips started as an attorney-at-law and began her career in legal practice from 1993-1997.
|
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 22
|
The Audit Committee has selected Ernst & Young LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2019.
Although ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP is not required by U.S. federal laws, the Board is submitting the selection of Ernst & Young LLP to our shareholders for ratification because we value our shareholders views on the Companys independent registered public accounting firm. If our shareholders fail to ratify the selection, it will be considered as notice to the Board and the Audit Committee to consider the selection of a different firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interest of the Company and our shareholders.
A representative of Ernst & Young LLP is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting to answer appropriate questions and will have the opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires to do so.
In connection with the audit of the Companys annual financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018, we entered into an agreement with Ernst & Young LLP which sets forth the terms by which Ernst & Young LLP performed audit services for the Company.
The following table presents fees for professional services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP and its affiliates for the audit of our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and for other services rendered by them in those years:
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||
2018
|
2017
|
|||||||
Audit fees1 |
$
|
8,586,600
|
|
$
|
8,468,200
|
| ||
Audit-related fees2 |
|
2,205,700
|
|
|
508,500
|
| ||
Tax fees3 |
|
172,400
|
|
|
323,000
|
| ||
All other fees4 |
|
9,000
|
|
|
9,000
|
| ||
Total |
$
|
10,973,700
|
|
$
|
9,308,700
|
|
1 | Fees for audit services billed or expected to be billed in relation to the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 consisted of the following: audit of the Companys annual financial statements, reviews of the Companys quarterly financial statements, and statutory and regulatory audits. |
2 | Fees for audit-related services in the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 included fees related to carve-out audits related to the Companys strategic review, the audits of employee benefit plans, accounting consultations and other attest services. |
3 | Fees for tax services billed in the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 consisted of tax compliance and tax planning and advice. |
4 | All other fees in the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 included certain other fees. |
The Audit Committee considered whether providing the non-audit services shown in this table was compatible with maintaining Ernst & Young LLPs independence and concluded that it was compatible.
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 23
|
RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM |
AUDIT COMMITTEE PRE-APPROVAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
Subject to shareholder approval as may be required under the laws of England and Wales, the Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment and termination of the independent registered public accounting firm engaged for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or performing other audit, review or attest services for the Company. Each year the Audit Committee reviews the qualifications, performance and independence of our independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with regulatory requirements and guidelines.
In addition, and also subject to shareholder approval as may be required under the laws of England and Wales, the Audit Committee is responsible for the compensation, retention and oversight of its independent registered public accounting firm, including the resolution of disagreements between management and such firm regarding financial reporting. In exercising this responsibility, the Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and permitted non-audit services provided by such firm. The Audit Committee has delegated to its Chairperson the authority to review and pre-approve any such engagement or relationship, which may be proposed in between its regular meetings. Any such pre-approval is subsequently considered and ratified by the Audit Committee at the next regularly scheduled meeting. All of the services covered under Audit and Non-Audit Fees were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
The Audit Committee may form and delegate to subcommittees consisting of one or more of its members, when appropriate, the authority to pre-approve services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm so long as the pre-approvals are presented to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.
![]() |
The Board of Directors recommends that shareholders vote FOR the ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2019. |
The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a charter adopted by the Board of Directors. The Audit Committee reviews and assesses the adequacy of this charter annually and it was last amended in February of 2019. Additionally, a brief description of the primary responsibilities of the Audit Committee is included in this proxy statement under The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters Committee Membership and Responsibilities Audit Committee.
In the performance of its oversight function, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements of the Company with management and with the independent registered public accounting firm. Discussions included, among other things:
| the acceptability and quality of the accounting principles; |
| the reasonableness of significant accounting judgments and critical accounting policies and estimates; |
| the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements; and |
| the adequacy and effectiveness of Nielsens financial reporting procedures, disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, including managements assessment and report on internal control over financial reporting. |
Management represented to the Audit Committee that the Companys consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Audit Committee also discussed with management and Ernst & Young LLP the process used to support certifications by the Companys CEO and CFO that are required by the SEC and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to accompany the Companys periodic filings with the SEC and the process used to support managements annual report on the Companys internal controls over financial reporting.
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 24
|
RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM |
The Audit Committee also discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by applicable Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) standards (Including significant accounting policies, alternative accounting treatments and estimates, judgments and uncertainties). In addition, the Audit Committee received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent registered public accounting firms communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm their independence.
Based upon the review and discussions described in the preceding paragraph, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements of the Company be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 filed with the SEC.
Submitted by the Audit Committee of the Companys Board of Directors:
Karen M. Hoguet (Chairperson)
David Rawlinson
Javier G. Teruel
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 25
|
The Audit Committee has selected Ernst & Young LLP to serve as the Companys UK statutory auditor who will audit the Companys UK Annual Report and Accounts to be prepared in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards, as adopted by the European Union (IFRS), for the year ending December 31, 2019. As required by the law of England and Wales, shareholder approval must be obtained for the selection of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as the Companys UK statutory auditor and to hold office from the completion of the Annual Meeting until the end of the next annual general meeting of shareholders at which the Companys UK statutory accounts will be presented.
Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP will attend the Annual Meeting to answer appropriate questions for the year ended December 31, 2019. They will also have the opportunity to address the Annual Meeting if they desire to do so.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting is required to pass this resolution to reappoint Ernst & Young LLP as the Companys UK statutory auditor until the next annual general meeting of shareholders.
![]() |
The Board of Directors recommends that the shareholders vote FOR the reappointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Companys UK statutory auditor who will audit the Companys UK Annual Report and Accounts for the year ending December 31, 2019. |
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 26
|
As required under the laws of England and Wales, the compensation of Ernst & Young LLP as the Companys UK statutory auditor must be fixed by the shareholders or in such manner as the shareholders may determine. Subject to Ernst & Young LLP being reappointed as the Companys UK statutory auditor pursuant to Proposal No. 3, it is therefore proposed that the Audit Committee be authorized to determine their compensation. Pursuant to Nielsens Audit Committee Charter, the Board has delegated this authority to the Audit Committee.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting is required to approve this proposal.
![]() |
The Board of Directors recommends that the shareholders vote FOR the authorization of the Audit Committee to determine the compensation of Ernst & Young LLP in its capacity as the Companys UK statutory auditor. |
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 27
|
In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act and the related rules of the SEC, at the 2018 annual general meeting of shareholders, we submitted to our shareholders a non-binding, advisory vote on executive compensation, as well as a non-binding, advisory vote on the frequency with which shareholders believed we should submit the non-binding, advisory vote on executive compensation. A majority of the shareholders voted that the non-binding, advisory vote on executive compensation should occur every year. We are including in the proxy materials a separate advisory resolution regarding the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed pursuant to the SEC rules. While the results of this vote are non-binding and advisory in nature, the Board intends to carefully consider them when considering our executive compensation program.
The language of the resolution is as follows:
RESOLVED, THAT THE COMPENSATION PAID TO THE COMPANYS NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AS DISCLOSED IN THE PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO THE SEC RULES, INCLUDING THE COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS, COMPENSATION TABLES AND ANY RELATED NARRATIVE DISCUSSION, IS HEREBY APPROVED.
In considering their vote, shareholders may wish to review with care the information on the Companys compensation policies and decisions regarding the named executive officers presented in Executive Compensation Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
In particular, as discussed in Executive Compensation Compensation Discussion and Analysis, shareholders should note the following:
| Our executive compensation program is designed to incent and reward our leadership team for delivering sustained financial performance and long-term shareholder value. |
| A significant portion of each named executive officers compensation is at risk, dependent on the achievement of challenging annual and long-term performance goals and/or the performance of our share price. |
| 2018 was a challenging year for Nielsen. We were disappointed in our 2018 financial results, which fell short of the objectives set at the beginning of the year. Our variable performance-based compensation plans operated as intended. |
| Payouts to NEOs under Nielsens Annual Incentive Plan for 2018 were zero. |
| Payouts to NEOs and other participants in Nielsens PRSU award program for the 2016 2018 cycle that matured on December 31, 2018 were zero. |
| The interim performance evaluation for Nielsens 2017 2019 PRSU cycle is tracking to pay out at zero. PRSUs represent the single largest component by value of NEO compensation. For further information, see Executive Compensation Compensation Discussion and Analysis Summary of Other NEO Pay Decisions 2016 LTPP Payouts and Executive Compensation Compensation Discussion and Analysis How Pay Decisions are Made Annual Incentive Plan 2018 Results. |
| There was significant turnover at the executive level in 2018: Mr. Barns, our former Chief Executive Officer, retired from the Company at the end of 2018 and was replaced by Mr. Kenny. Mr. Jackson, our former Chief Financial Officer, resigned in September 2018 and was replaced by Mr. Anderson. Mr. Dale, our former Chief Legal Officer, resigned in early 2019 and was replaced by Mr. Callard. Certain of the compensation actions described in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis reflect one-time new hire or separation arrangements. For more information, see Executive Compensation Compensation Discussion and Analysis New CEO and CFO Compensation Arrangements. Mr. Barns separation constituted a termination without cause under Nielsens severance policy, and Mr. Barns therefore received severance compensation which is reflected in the Summary Compensation Table but will be delivered as pay continuation through 2020. See Severance Payments and Benefits Terms of Mr. Barns separation from the Company, for more detail. |
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 28
|
NON-BINDING, ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
| Without his severance pay, Mr. Barns reported total compensation in the Summary Compensation Table would have decreased nearly 50% from 2017 reported pay. |
| Given business difficulties and in light of the turnover at the executive level, in September the Compensation Committee decided to launch a targeted special pay program aimed at retaining critical leaders responsible for strategy development, delivering the revised 2018 financial targets and continuing the transformation of the Company over the next three years. As described further under Executive Compensation Compensation Discussion and Analysis Summary of Other NEO Pay Decisions, select senior leaders, including certain of the NEOs, received one-time equity-based retention awards. The awards were designed to provide meaningful retention value and reward superior stock price performance. For each participant, half of the award value is denominated in performance stock options (PSOs) subject to a challenging stock price growth hurdle of 25% increase from the date of grant. The remaining award value is denominated in service-based restricted stock units (RSUs) for their retention value, as well as, alignment with stock price performance. Both components vest ratably over 3 years except that PSOs will only become exercisable if the stock price goal is achieved for 21 or more consecutive days within the three year period. |
| We increased the proportion of the long-term incentive awards that are subject to quantitative performance measures from 50% to 60% and, to bring added emphasis on growth we added revenue metrics to our annual incentive plan and long-term performance plan. For further information, see Executive Compensation Compensation Discussion and Analysis How Pay Decisions are Made Annual Incentive Plan 2019 Changes and Executive Compensation Compensation Discussion and Analysis How Pay Decisions are Made Long Term Incentives (LTI) and Executive Compensation Compensation Discussion and Analysis How Pay Decisions are Made Long-Term Incentives (LTI) Performance Restricted Stock Units Awarded Under the Long-Term Performance Plan (LTPP) 2019 Changes. |
![]() |
The Board of Directors recommends that shareholders vote FOR approval of the compensation of the Companys named executive officers. |
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 29
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Executive Summary
Business Highlights
2018 was a challenging year for Nielsen. We set revised objectives for the second half of the year based on updated business conditions and revised guidance for revenue, EBITDA margin and free cash flow. The Board also initiated a comprehensive strategic review of the entire Company and its businesses. We finished the year by either meeting or exceeding our revised operating expectations.
Implications for Compensation
Nielsens executive compensation philosophy includes a stated emphasis on variable, at-risk compensation. Nielsens performance in 2018 was reflected in executive pay outcomes in the following ways:
| Without his severance pay, Mr. Barns reported total compensation in the Summary Compensation Table would have decreased nearly 50% from 2017 reported pay. |
| Payouts to NEOs under Nielsens Annual Incentive Plan (AIP) for 2018 were zero. |
| Payouts to NEOs and other participants in Nielsens performance restricted share unit (PRSU) award program for the 2016 2018 cycle that matured on December 31, 2018 were zero. |
| The interim performance evaluation for Nielsens 2017 2019 PRSU cycle is tracking to pay out at zero. PRSUs represent the single largest component by value of NEO compensation. Below is a table of recent and projected future payouts under our LTPP Plan. Our variable pay programs continue to operate as intended. |
2015
|
2016
|
Projected 2017
|
||||||||||
Payout Percentage | 59.15 | % | 0 | % | 0 | %1 |
1 | Current projection of all performance metrics under the plan is below threshold |
Leadership Transitions
There was significant turnover at the executive level in 2018: Mr. Barns, our former Chief Executive Officer, retired from the Company at the end of 2018 and was replaced by Mr. Kenny. Mr. Jackson, our former Chief Financial Officer, resigned in September 2018 and was replaced by Mr. Anderson. Mr. Dale, our former Chief Legal Officer, resigned in early 2019 and was replaced by Mr. Callard. Certain of the compensation actions described in this CD&A reflect one-time new hire or separation arrangements. Mr. Barns separation constituted a termination without cause under Nielsens severance policy, and Mr. Barns therefore received severance compensation, which will be delivered as pay continuation through 2020. See Severance Payments and Benefits Terms of Mr. Barns separation from the Company.
Compensation Highlights for 2018
Given 2018s business difficulties and in light of the turnover at the executive level, in September the Compensation Committee decided to launch a targeted special pay program aimed at retaining critical leaders responsible for strategy development, delivering the revised 2018 financial targets and continuing the transformation of the Company over the next three years. As described further under Summary of Other NEO Pay Decisions below, select senior leaders, including certain of the NEOs, received one-time equity-based retention awards. The awards were designed to provide meaningful retention value and reward superior stock price performance. For each NEO participant, half of the award value is denominated in performance stock options (PSOs) subject to a challenging stock price growth hurdle of 25%. The remaining award value is denominated in service-based restricted stock units (RSUs) for their retention value, as well as, alignment with stock price performance. Both components vest ratably over three years except that PSOs will only become exercisable if the stock price goal is achieved for 21 or more consecutive days within the three-year period.
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 31
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Messrs. Kenny and Anderson were hired in 2018. Their respective compensation packages are described in detail under New CEO and CFO Compensation Arrangements below. In each case, their annual compensation arrangements were designed to be competitive with the median of the external market benchmarks selected, taking each executives seniority and strong track record of success into account. Each executive received certain one-time inducement or make-whole awards in connection with his hiring.
In 2018, the Compensation Committee decided to increase the proportion of Long-Term Incentives (LTI) subject to quantifiable performance from 50% to 60% which became effective with the February 2018 PRSU award. In addition, three-year revenue compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) was added as a performance metric, weighted at 25%. Free cash flow, weighted at 50%, and total shareholder return, weighted at 25% were the other performance metrics for 2018.
Business Overview
With a presence in 100+ countries, Nielsens mission is to collect, create, inform and activate data for clients across the media and fast moving consumer goods industries. Our purpose is to make the markets we serve smarter and more efficient, helping clients make more informed business decisions. Nielsens services are organized into two renamed business segments: Nielsen Global Media and Nielsen Global Connect.
Nielsen Global Media brings together all of our most powerful assets across Discovery, Measurement, Planning, Activation and Optimization both in the US and internationally. Our broad range of services give media companies, advertising agencies and advertisers the most complete view available of what consumers watch, listen to, share, post, and engage with across many different platforms and devices. Built on our data of record, our analytics solutions enable media companies to segment their audiences with depth, precision and efficiency, so they can highlight the right audience for advertisers goals. Our analytics also help advertising agencies design, implement and evaluate campaigns that deliver on clients business goals. Our vision is to be the trusted single source of truth helping buyers and sellers of consumer influence transact in a trusted and scalable way.
Nielsen Global Connect is focused on building a comprehensive view of the entire shopper journey across in-store and eCommerce purchases. We offer the best-in-class measurement, predictive tools, and activation through differentiated products that connect manufacturers and retailers. Our business is independent, third-party measurement. We dont create content and we dont buy or sell ad placements. What we care about is producing rigorous, independent, accurate data on which our clients can depend.
In both the Media and Connect segments, we employ data scientists, economists, engineers, technologists, psychologists, neuroscientists, field auditors and more, all of whom have a passion for collecting comprehensive, accurate data and turning it into positive business results for clients.
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 32
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Business Performance
For 2018:
| Revenues down 0.9% over prior year (-0.7% on a constant currency1 basis) |
| Adjusted EBITDA1, 2 down 8.6% over prior year (-7.9% on a constant currency basis) |
| Normalized free cash flow1 down 37.2% over prior year |
1 | Please see Annex C for additional information and a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA, free cash flow, normalized free cash flow and measures on a constant currency basis to financial measures derived in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). |
2 | The Company adopted FASB ASU 2017-07 effective January 1, 2018 and reclassified $11 million and $13 million from selling, general and administrative expenses to other income / (expense), net in its consolidated statement of operations for the twelve months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. |
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 33
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Total Shareholder Return1
The chart below shows the value of a $100 investment in Nielsen stock over a three-year period beginning December 31, 2015 and ending December 31, 2018. We have compared our performance to the S&P 500 and to a market cap-weighted composite of the peer group we use to measure relative total shareholder return under our Long-Term Performance Plan (LTPP) as described under How Pay Decisions are Made Long-Term Incentives (LTI) Performance Restricted Stock Units Awarded Under the Long-Term Performance Plan (LTPP).
NIELSEN HOLDINGS plcTHREE-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURN
1 | We define total shareholder return as the change in stock price over the three-year period ended December 31, 2018, assuming monthly reinvestment of dividends. |
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 34
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Business Performance Highlights for 2018:
| Strategic Review: We announced a broad review of strategic alternatives for the Company and its businesses. |
| Updated Guidance: Given first half of fiscal year 2018 performance, we updated second half guidance. We met or exceeded our revised operating expectations and positioned ourselves for 2019. |
| Growth: Through our internal R&D, acquisitions, and our incubator in Israel, we continue to invest in new growth opportunities. To expand our e-commerce offerings we signed an exclusive agreement with Rakuten, allowing us to have the most comprehensive, multi-sourced e-commerce measurement solution for the U.S. market. Our acquisition of Ebiquitys ad intelligence business will allow us to combine our Global Ad Intel solution and create a more powerful offering. |
Media Segment Highlights for 2018:
| We are focused on building one end-to-end platform that brings together all of our most powerful assets across Discovery, Measurement, Planning, Activation and Optimization in the U.S. and more than 60 other markets around the world. |
| We continue to build a solid foundation using standard, comparable, de-duplicated, cross-platform measurement through our Total Audience Measurement framework. In 2018, we signed new contracts with two of our largest, most strategic media clients, securing our position as their trusted partner. |
| We advanced our Total Ad Ratings solution to provide comprehensive cross-platform coverage with the inclusion of Over-the-Top and mobile audiences, and offering the industry its first and only persons-level and de-duplicated measurement of ads across devices. |
| We worked towards becoming the currency for digital viewing by expanding Digital Ad Ratings to 32 global markets. Furthermore, Digital Ad Ratings is used by the top 7 agency holding companies and accepted by the top 25 advertisers. |
| Our Digital Content Ratings have seen momentum among both TV and digital publishers. Our ability to include video viewing from Hulu, Facebook, and YouTube has been positively received by the industry. |
Connect Segment Highlights for 2018:
| We are executing on Total Consumer Measurement, focusing on expanding coverage and granularity across all channels that matter to clients. |
| We continue to grow the number of clients using at least one component of Nielsen Connect. We ended the year with 306 clients using at least one component of Nielsen Connect, including apps through our Connect Partner Network. Tyson recently became the first client to switch to Nielsen Connect as their system of record. |
| Our retailer initiatives had good traction, especially the Walmart and Sams Club supplier collaboration programs with 850 manufacturing clients signed up, many of which are small and mid-tier manufacturers. |
| Clients continue to prioritize investments in Emerging Markets given strong tailwinds such as population growth, a rising middle class, and urbanization and we continue to focus on enhancing our measurement offerings in Emerging Markets, including greater coverage of the important traditional trade channel. |
| Weve been successful in adding new retail cooperators in Developed Markets. |
| Our U.S. Connect business continues to focus on building stronger, differentiated offerings that can serve large multinational clients as well as small and mid-tier clients and our go-forward strategy is focused on helping clients drive growth by leveraging data as an enterprise asset. |
Executive Compensation Overview
Nielsens executive compensation program is designed to motivate and reward our leadership team to deliver sustainable growth and financial performance while delivering long-term shareholder value.
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 35
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Key considerations in 2018 were:
2018 Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation
Each year, our shareholders vote on an advisory resolution to approve the pay of our NEOs. In 2018, approximately 84% of the votes cast at our annual general meeting of shareholders affirmed our executive compensation program. The Company engages in a comprehensive outreach program to our shareholders to discuss and solicit feedback on topics including Company performance, executive compensation and how we disclose information in our proxy statement. These meetings are led by the Executive Chairman of the Board and result in valuable feedback from shareholders.
Following our annual general meeting of shareholders in May 2018, we conducted additional outreach to shareholders to obtain specific feedback on the say on pay voting results. In consideration of shareholder feedback we adjusted the percent of long-term incentives subject to performance conditions from 50% to 60% for our CEO and other NEOs. In 2018, the incentive plans were strongly aligned with performance outcomes and operated as intended. The 2016 LTPP grants which matured on December 31, 2018 paid out at zero percent due to relative total shareholder return and Free Cash Flow metrics not meeting the required threshold performance levels as described under -Summary of Other NEO Pay Decisions PSRU Payouts Under the 2016 LTPP. The 2018 AIP also paid out at zero as the Company did not meet the required performance thresholds for Adjusted EBITDA and Revenue.
Pay for Performance
Nielsen has a strong culture of pay for performance which serves to align Company goals and performance with pay outcomes for the Companys executives. Nielsen conducts quantitative assessments of business financial performance and also evaluates individual contributions towards key business objectives in order to differentiate rewards. NEOs participate in the same performance assessment process applicable to all managerial employees, including an annual performance appraisal and semi-annual individual peer rankings of performance and leadership impact.
Total Company Performance
Our NEOs participate in the same annual cash incentive plan applicable to all managerial employees, which in 2018 was funded based on Company AIP Adjusted EBITDA performance and annual revenue growth as described under How Pay Decisions are Made Annual Incentive Plan.
Pay Competitively
Providing competitive pay opportunities is a hallmark of Nielsens compensation programs. The Compensation Committee reviews each NEOs compensation annually and considers several factors when making pay decisions:
1. | Total direct compensation, which consists of base salary, annual cash incentives and long-term incentives, is benchmarked against executives serving in similar roles within a peer group of companies selected for their business relevance and size appropriateness to Nielsen; |
2. | Total direct compensation is targeted around the median of our peer group, but sustained strong individual performance and leadership impact may result in above median pay opportunities; |
3. | The mix of base salary, annual incentive and long-term incentives is reviewed to ensure a significant portion of NEO pay is at risk based on the achievement of performance objectives or the performance of our share price and to ensure the right focus on short-term and long-term performance, with an emphasis on the latter; and |
4. | Other factors reviewed include changes in role or responsibilities, Company financial performance, and individual performance. |
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 36
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Variable Pay is At Risk
Nielsens compensation programs are designed so that a significant portion of each NEOs compensation is at risk; meaning that the compensation is dependent on the achievement of challenging annual and long-term performance goals and/or the performance of our share price as laid out in the charts and tables below. At risk compensation is composed of annual cash incentive awards and equity-based awards and does not include fixed pay such as base salary. Long-term pay has historically been delivered exclusively in the form of equity to align the interests of the NEOs with the creation of value for our shareholders. In 2018, long-term pay consisted solely of equity-based awards.
The chart below illustrates the elements of annual total direct compensation at target for Mr. Kenny, our CEO since December 2018. The next chart shows the elements of annual total direct compensation at target for Mr. Barns, our CEO through December 2, 2018. The final chart below illustrates the target elements of total direct compensation for other NEOs in 2018. See Summary Compensation Table for actual amounts earned by all NEOs in 2018. In all cases, the design of Nielsens compensation programs aligns closely with our peer group.
CEO Kenny COMPENSATION STRUCTURE 20181
Elements of Total Direct Compensation
|
2018
|
|||||
Proportion of pay subject to specific quantitive performance criteria
|
|
60%
|
| |||
Proportion of pay at risk
|
|
87%
|
| |||
Proportion of pay delivered in the form of equity
|
|
68%
|
|
1 | Reflects 2018 annual total direct compensation at target for Mr. Kenny had he worked a full year. Excludes the make-whole and new hire inducement awards granted or paid in connection with Mr. Kennys hiring, which are included in the Summary Compensation Table. See New CEO and CFO Compensation Arrangements below. |
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 37
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
CEO Barns COMPENSATION STRUCTURE 20181
Elements of Total Direct Compensation
|
2018
|
|||||
Proportion of pay subject to specific quantitive performance criteria
|
|
62%
|
| |||
Proportion of pay at risk
|
|
91%
|
| |||
Proportion of pay delivered in the form of equity
|
|
73%
|
|
1 | Reflects 2018 annual total direct compensation at target for Mr. Barns |
OTHER NEOs COMPENSATION STRUCTURE 20181
Elements of Total Direct Compensation
|
2018
|
|||||
Proportion of pay subject to specific quantitive performance criteria
|
|
56%
|
| |||
Proportion of pay at risk
|
|
78%
|
| |||
Proportion of pay delivered in the form of equity
|
|
56%
|
|
1 | Reflects 2018 annual total direct compensation at target for Messrs. Anderson, Jackson, Tavolieri and Dale and Ms. Phillips. |
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 38
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Executive Compensation Elements
Element
|
Purpose
|
Key Characteristics
| ||||
Base Salary | Attract and retain top talent | The Compensation Committee considers a variety of factors including: (1) our pay for performance philosophy, (2) peer group market benchmark compensation data, (3) the NEOs individual performance and contributions to the success of the business in the prior year, (4) Company performance, (5) current pay mix, and (6) role changes
| ||||
AIP | Motivate NEOs to accomplish short-term business performance goals that contribute to long-term business objectives | AIP award values are determined each year by reference to (1) our pay for performance philosophy, (2) peer group benchmarking and general market survey data, (3) the NEOs individual performance and contributions to the success of the business in the prior year, (4) Company performance, (5) current pay mix, (6) role changes, and (7) prior year award Adjusted EBITDA and revenue were the performance metrics weighted 75% and 25% respectively. AIP Adjusted EBITDA and revenue metrics operate independently; however revenue only funds if AIP Adjusted EBITDA meets threshold performance.
| ||||
Long-Term Incentive (LTI) | Deliver long-term sustainable performance and align executive rewards with long-term returns delivered to shareholders | LTI award values are determined each year by reference to (1) our pay for performance philosophy, (2) peer group benchmarking and general market survey data, (3) the NEOs individual performance and contributions to the success of the business in the prior year, (4) Company performance, (5) current pay mix, (6) role changes, and (7) prior year award
| ||||
PRSUs under LTPP |
Alignment with long-term shareholder return | Subject to performance against three-year cumulative performance metrics, free cash flow, revenue compounded annual growth rate (revenue CAGR) and relative total shareholder return, with assigned weighting of 50%, 25% and 25%, respectively Represents 60% of the annual grant-date LTI value
| ||||
RSUs |
Alignment with shareholder return and retention | Service-based equity is delivered in RSUs Three or four-year service-vesting Represents approximately 40% of LTI value
| ||||
PSOs |
Alignment with long-term shareholder return | Special awards subject to the achievement of a Nielsen stock price appreciation goal of 25% for a period of 21 consecutive trading days at any time in the three-year period. Premium PSOs have a $40 per share exercise price
| ||||
Health and Welfare Plans, Perquisites |
Promote overall wellbeing and avoid distractions caused by unforeseen health/financial issues
|
Health and Welfare plans generally available to other employees De minimis financial planning and wellness services allowances |
New CEO and CFO Compensation Arrangements
CEO
Mr. Kenny was appointed CEO effective December 3, 2018.
In 2018, the Compensation Committee approved Mr. Kennys compensation package. The package was constructed to attract a candidate of Mr. Kennys leadership caliber and proven entrepreneurial and digital technology experience in a highly competitive recruitment market. His target compensation of $10,225,000 was positioned at the median of our market benchmarks and is comprised of:
Compensation Element
|
2019
|
|||
Base Salary
|
$
|
1,300,000
|
| |
Annual Incentive
|
$
|
1,925,000
|
| |
Long-Term Incentives1
|
$
|
7,000,000
|
|
1 | Mr. Kennys regular annual long-term incentive is comprised of 60% ($4,200,000) PRSUs and 40% ($2,800,000) service-based RSUs. PRSUs will be earned based on Nielsen achieving approved cumulative financial performance targets over the three-year period commencing January 1, 2019 provided Mr. Kenny is an active employee on the vesting date. RSUs will vest in four equal annual installments commencing on the first anniversary of the grant date provided Mr. Kenny is an active employee on the vesting date. |
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 39
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Mr. Kenny received the following compensation awards connected with his hiring:
Compensation Element
|
$ Value
|
Form
|
Description
| |||
Make Whole Compensation | $1,500,000 | Lump Sum Cash | Payable promptly following Mr. Kennys start date to compensate Mr. Kenny for the loss of the 2018 annual incentive payout from prior employer. If Mr. Kenny resigns voluntarily without Good Reason or is terminated for Cause within one year of receiving the payment, Mr. Kenny must repay the amount in full.
| |||
$2,500,000 | Lump Sum Cash | Payable in February 2019 to compensate Mr. Kenny for the loss of a cash retention award from prior employer, subject to continued employment through the applicable payment date.
| ||||
$13,742,766 | 487,505 RSUs | To replace approximately 84% of the outstanding PRSUs and RSUs from prior employer; this award will vest in three equal annual installments on December 31, 2019, 2020, and 2021, subject to continued employment through the applicable vesting date.
| ||||
Total Make Whole Compensation | $17,742,766 | 77% Equity-based and 23% Cash | ||||
New Hire Inducement | $1,466,901 | 367,031 Performance Stock Options | Option to purchase shares of Company common stock (Performance Options), with a seven-year term and an exercise price equal to the closing price of Company common stock on the first day of Mr. Kennys employment with the Company, vesting ratably on December 3, 2019, 2020 and 2021, subject to (1) continued employment through the applicable vesting date, and (2) the shares of Company common stock having a closing market price of at least $32.24, a 25% performance improvement over the price at the time of his offer, for at least 21 consecutive trading days prior to December 31, 2021.
| |||
$1,400,010 | 54,285 RSUs | Cliff vesting on December 3, 2021, subject to continued employment through the vesting date.
| ||||
$1,620,000 | 750,000 Premium Priced Stock Options | Option to purchase shares of Company common stock, with a seven-year term and a $40 per share exercise price, representing a share price appreciation of over 41% over the price on his first day, vesting ratably on December 3, 2019, 2020 and 2021, subject to continued employment through the applicable vesting date.
| ||||
Total New Hire Inducement | $4,486,911 | 100% Equity-based | ||||
Regular Annual Long-Term Incentive |
$4,200,000 | PRSUs | PRSUs will be earned based on Nielsen achieving approved cumulative financial performance targets over the three-year period commencing January 1, 2019 provided Mr. Kenny is an active employee on the vesting date.
| |||
(first award made in February 2019) | $2,800,000 | RSUs | RSUs will vest in four equal annual installments commencing on the first anniversary of the grant date provided Mr. Kenny is an active employee on the vesting date.
| |||
Total Long-Term Incentive | $7,000,000 | 100% Equity-based |
In addition, Mr. Kennys offer included the reimbursement of legal fees incurred in accepting the position up to $40,000 and the reimbursement of expenses incurred in financial planning of up to $15,000 and a health examination reimbursement of up to $2,500.
CFO
Mr. Anderson was appointed CFO effective September 10, 2018.
His target annual compensation of $3,850,000 was positioned at the median of our market benchmarks and was comprised of:
Compensation Element
|
2019
|
|||
Base Salary
|
$
|
800,000
|
| |
Annual Incentive
|
$
|
800,000
|
| |
Long-Term Incentives1
|
$
|
2,250,000
|
|
1 | Mr. Andersons long-term incentive is comprised of 60% ($1,350,000) Performance RSUs and 40% ($900,000) service-based RSUs. PRSUs will be earned based on Nielsen achieving approved cumulative financial performance targets over the three-year period commencing January 1, 2019 provided Mr. Anderson is an active employee on the vesting date. RSUs will vest in four equal annual installments commencing on the first anniversary of the grant date provided Mr. Anderson is an active employee on the vesting date. |
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 40
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Mr. Anderson received the following compensation awards connected with his hiring:
Compensation Element
|
$ Value
|
Form
|
Description
| |||
New Hire Inducement | $1,125,000 | 321,429 Performance Stock Options | Option to purchase shares of Company common stock (Performance Options), with a seven-year term and an exercise price equal to the closing price of Company common stock on the first day of Mr. Andersons employment with the Company, vesting ratably on October 26, 2019, 2020 and 2021, subject to (1) continued employment through the applicable vesting date, and (2) the shares of Company common stock having a closing market price of at least $30.75 for at least 21 consecutive trading days prior to October 26, 2021.
| |||
$1,125,000 | 45,732 RSUs | Vesting in three equal annual installments on October 26, 2019, 2020, and 2021, subject to continued employment through the applicable vesting date.
| ||||
$400,000 | Lump Sum Cash | Payable in March 2019.
| ||||
Total New Hire Inducement | $2,650,000 | 85% Equity-based and 15% Cash | ||||
Regular Annual Long-Term Incentive |
$1,350,000 | PRSUs | PRSUs will be earned based on Nielsen achieving approved cumulative financial performance targets over the three-year period commencing January 1, 2019 provided Mr. Anderson is an active employee on the vesting date.
| |||
(first award made in February 2019) | $900,000 | RSUs | RSUs will vest in four equal annual installments commencing on the first anniversary of the grant date provided Mr. Anderson is an active employee on the vesting date.
| |||
Total Long-Term Incentive | $2,250,000 | 100% Equity-based |
In addition, Mr. Andersons offer included the reimbursement of expenses incurred in financial planning of up to $15,000 and a health examination reimbursement of up to $2,500.
Summary of Other NEO Pay Decisions
Nielsen has a strong pay for performance culture which serves to align Company goals and performance with pay outcomes for executives. Below are the highlights of NEO pay for 2018:
| Mr. Tavolieri was the only NEO to receive a base salary and AIP target adjustment due to a significant expansion of his role. No other NEOs received pay adjustments as part of their regular compensation package in 2018. |
| AIP financial performance targets were not met resulting in a zero percent payout for all eligible NEOs. |
| PRSU threshold performance was not met resulting in zero payouts for awards that matured on December 31, 2018. |
| In light of the business difficulties and turnover at the executive level, in September, the Compensation Committee determined that it was important to stabilize the organization during this volatile period by ensuring the retention of critical leaders responsible for strategy development, delivering the revised 2018 financial targets and continuing the transformation of the Company over the coming three years. As a result, the Compensation Committee made special one-time equity based retention awards to three NEOs (Messrs. Dale and Tavolieri and Ms. Phillips). |
Mitch Barns
Mr. Barns served as our CEO from January 1, 2014 through December 2, 2018 and separated from the Company on December 31, 2018. Following its annual review of Mr. Barns 2018 compensation at the end of 2017, the Compensation Committee made no changes to his base salary and annual incentive target, but increased his long-term incentive target from $7,500,000 to $8,000,000 in order to further enhance pay for performance and better align Mr. Barns total direct compensation with the median compensation level for CEOs in our executive
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 41
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
compensation peer group described under Compensation Practices and Governance Benchmarking. Details of Mr. Barns compensation are set out in the tables below.
2017 Actual
|
2018 Target1
|
2018 Actual1
|
% Change from 2017
| |||||||||||
Base Salary
|
$
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
$
|
1,000,000
|
|
0%
| ||||
Annual Incentive
|
$
|
1,700,000
|
|
$
|
2,000,000
|
|
$
|
|
2
|
-100%
| ||||
Long-Term Incentive
|
$
|
7,500,000
|
|
$
|
8,000,000
|
|
$
|
4,800,000
|
|
-36%
| ||||
One-Time Retention Long-Term Incentive
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
In 2018, Mr. Barns was granted the following long-term incentive equity awards:
Grant Date
|
Grant Type1
|
# Units
|
Value2
|
Performance Period
| ||||||||||
February 21, 2018
|
|
PRSUs
|
|
|
147,601
|
|
|
$4,800,000
|
|
2018 - 2020
|
1 | 40% of Mr. Barns annual LTI target, typically granted in October, was not granted due to Mr. Barns pending departure from the Company. |
2 | This is the value intended to be granted by the Compensation Committee based on the closing price of our common stock on the grant date. Actual accounting grant date fair values reported in Tables and Narrative Disclosure will differ slightly. For the PRSUs, the amount reflected above assumes target level achievement. Per the terms of Mr. Barns exit agreement, one-third of the awarded units were forfeited. |
Jamere Jackson
Mr. Jackson served as Chief Financial Officer from March 10, 2014 to September 10, 2018. Following its annual review of Mr. Jacksons compensation, the Compensation Committee made no changes in 2018. Details of Mr. Jacksons compensation are set out in the tables below.
2017 Actual
|
2018 Target1
|
2018 Actual1
|
% Change from 2017
| |||||||||||
Base Salary
|
$
|
750,000
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
$
|
533,654
|
|
-29%
| ||||
Annual Incentive
|
$
|
680,000
|
|
$
|
800,000
|
|
$
|
|
2
|
-100%
| ||||
Long-Term Incentive
|
$
|
2,550,000
|
|
$
|
2,550,000
|
|
$
|
1,530,000
|
2
|
-40%
| ||||
One-Time Retention Long-Term Incentive
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
1 | The amount under 2018 Target represents the amount intended to be granted to, earned by and paid to the executive. The amount under 2018 Actual represents the amount actually granted to, earned by and paid to the executive. The amount for Long-Term Incentive is the value of the grant based on the closing price of our common stock on NYSE on the grant date. The value reported in the Summary Compensation Table may differ slightly, as that represents the accounting grant date fair value. Mr. Jackson forfeited his 2018 long-term incentive award due to his voluntary resignation. As to the PRSU portion of the Long-Term Incentive, the amount included above assumes target level achievement. |
2 | No annual incentive award was made to Mr. Jackson for 2018 due to his voluntary resignation. In addition, Mr. Jackson was not awarded the $1,020,000 RSU LTI grant otherwise due in October, due to his departure from the Company. |
In 2018, Mr. Jackson was granted the following long-term incentive equity awards (which were subsequently forfeited due to his voluntary resignation):
Grant Date
|
Grant Type
|
# RSUs/Options
|
Value1
|
Performance Period
|
||||||||||||
February 21, 20182
|
|
PRSUs
|
|
|
47,048
|
|
|
$1,530,000
|
|
|
2018 - 2020
|
|
1 | This is the value intended to be granted by the Compensation Committee based on the closing price of our common stock on the grant date. Actual accounting grant date values reported in Tables and Narrative Disclosure will differ slightly. As to the PRSUs, the amount reflected above assumes target level achievement. |
2 | Mr. Jackson forfeited this award due to his voluntary resignation. |
Giovanni Tavolieri
Mr. Tavolieri has served as Chief Technology and Operations Officer since August 1, 2017. In 2018, Mr. Tavolieris responsibilities increased significantly when he assumed leadership for our US Buy business. Following its annual review of Mr. Tavolieris compensation and in light of his increased responsibilities, the Compensation Committee increased his base salary and annual incentive target by $50,000 each. In addition, Mr. Tavolieri was awarded a one-time special retention award of $2,600,000 as part of the targeted special pay program approved by the
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 42
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Compensation Committee aimed at retaining critical leaders responsible for strategy development, delivering the revised 2018 financial targets and continuing the transformation of the Company over the coming three years. Details of Mr. Tavolieris compensation are set out in the tables below.
2017 Actual
|
2018 Target1
|
2018 Actual1
|
% Change from 2017
| |||||||||||
Base Salary
|
$
|
466,827
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
$
|
582,500
|
|
25%
| ||||
Annual Incentive
|
$
|
545,000
|
|
$
|
600,000
|
|
$
|
|
2
|
-100%
| ||||
Long-Term Incentive
|
|
1,300,020
|
|
|
1,300,000
|
|
|
1,300,000
|
|
0%
| ||||
One-Time Long-Term Retention Incentive
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
$
|
2,600,000
|
3
|
1 | The amount under 2018 Target represents the amount intended to be granted to, earned by and paid to the executive. The amount under 2018 Actual represents the amount actually granted to, earned by and paid to the executive. The amount for Long-Term Incentive is the value of the grant based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the grant date. The value reported in the Summary Compensation Table may differ slightly, as that represents the accounting grant date fair value. For the PRSU portion of the Long-Term Incentive, the amount included above assumes target level achievement. |
2 | Based on the Companys performance no annual incentive award was made to Mr. Tavolieri in 2018. |
3 | One-time long-term retention equity award was 50% RSUs and 50% PSOs with total value of $2,600,000. |
In 2018, Mr. Tavolieri was granted the following long-term incentive equity awards:
Grant Date
|
Grant Type
|
# RSUs/Options
|
Value1
|
Performance Period
| ||||||||||
February 21, 2018
|
|
PRSUs
|
|
|
23,985
|
|
$
|
780,000
|
|
2018 - 2020
| ||||
October 26, 20182
|
|
RSUs
|
|
|
21,138
|
|
$
|
520,000
|
|
N/A
| ||||
October 26, 20183
|
|
RSUs
|
|
|
52,846
|
|
$
|
1,300,000
|
5
|
N/A
| ||||
October 26, 20184
|
|
PSO
|
|
|
371,429
|
|
$
|
1,300,000
|
5
|
ends 10/26/2021
|
1 | This is the value intended to be granted by the Compensation Committee based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the grant date. Actual accounting grant date values reported in Tables and Narrative Disclosure will differ slightly. As to the PRSUs, the amount reflected above assumes target level achievement. |
2 | Vesting of these awards will occur in four equal annual installments beginning on October 26, 2019 and ending October 26, 2022. |
3 | Vesting of these awards will occur in three equal annual installments beginning on October 26, 2019 and ending October 26, 2021. |
4 | Vesting of these awards will occur in three equal annual installments beginning on October 26, 2019 and ending October 26, 2021, subject to achieving the stock performance target of $30.75 for 21 consecutive days on the NYSE. |
5 | One-time long-term retention incentive awards that were part of the special pay program aimed at retaining critical leaders. |
Eric J. Dale
Mr. Dale served as Chief Legal Officer from August 1, 2015 to January 22, 2019. Following its annual review of Mr. Dales compensation, the Compensation Committee made no changes in 2018. Mr. Dale was awarded a one-time special retention award of $2,400,000 as part of the targeted special pay program approved by the Compensation Committee aimed at retaining critical leaders responsible for strategy development, delivering the revised 2018 financial targets and continuing the transformation of the Company over the next three years. The full value of this award was forfeited upon Mr. Dales voluntary resignation from the Company. Details of Mr. Dales compensation are set forth in the tables below.
2017 Actual
|
2018 Target1
|
2018 Actual1
|
% Change from 2017
| |||||||||||
Base Salary | $
|
750,000
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
$
|
750,000
|
|
0%
| ||||
Annual Incentive | $
|
675,000
|
|
$
|
750,000
|
|
$
|
|
2
|
-100%
| ||||
Long-Term Incentive | $
|
1,200,000
|
|
$
|
1,200,000
|
|
$
|
2,399,983
|
3
|
100%
| ||||
One-Time Long-Term Retention Incentive |
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
$
|
2,400,000
|
3,4
|
1 | The amount under 2018 Target represents the amount intended to be granted to, earned by and paid to the executive. The amount under 2018 Actual represents the amount actually granted to, earned by and paid to the executive. The amount for Long-Term Incentive is the value of the grant based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the grant date. The value reported in the Summary Compensation Table may differ slightly, as that represents the accounting grant date fair value. For the PRSU portion of the Long-Term Incentive, the amount included above assumes target level achievement. |
2 | Based on the Companys financial performance no annual incentive award was made to Mr. Dale in 2018. |
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 43
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
3 | Awards were forfeited upon Mr. Dales voluntary resignation. |
4 | One-time long-term retention equity award was 50% RSUs and 50% PSOs with a total value $2,400,000. This was forfeited upon his voluntary resignation. |
In 2018, Mr. Dale was granted the following long-term incentive equity. Due to his voluntary resignation, he will forfeit all grants:
Grant Date | Grant Type
|
# RSUs/Options
|
Value1
|
Performance Period
| ||||||||||
February 21, 2018 |
|
PRSUs
|
|
|
22,140
|
|
$
|
720,000
|
|
2018 - 2020
| ||||
October 26, 20182 |
|
RSUs
|
|
|
19,512
|
|
$
|
480,000
|
|
N/A
| ||||
October 26, 20182 |
|
RSUs
|
|
|
48,780
|
|
$
|
1,200,000
|
3
|
N/A
| ||||
October 26, 20182 |
|
PSO
|
|
|
342,857
|
|
$
|
1,200,000
|
3
|
ends 10/26/2021 |
1 | This is the value intended to be granted by the Compensation Committee based on the closing price of our common stock on the grant date. Actual accounting grant date values reported in Tables and Narrative Disclosure will differ slightly. For the PRSUs, the amount reflected above assumes target level achievement. |
2 | Due to Mr. Dales resignation on February 1, 2019, he forfeited all PRSUs, RSUs and PSOs subject to these grants. |
3 | One-time long-term retention incentive awards that were part of the special pay program aimed at retaining critical leaders. |
Nancy Phillips
Ms. Phillips has served as Chief Human Resources Officer since January 9, 2017. Following its annual review of Ms. Phillips compensation, the Compensation Committee made no changes in 2018. Ms. Phillips was awarded a one-time special retention award of $2,600,000 as part of the targeted special pay program approved by the Compensation Committee aimed at retaining critical leaders responsible for strategy development, delivering the revised 2018 financial targets and continuing the transformation of the Company over the coming three years. Details of Ms. Phillips compensation are summarized in the tables below:
2017 Actual
|
2018 Target1
|
2018 Actual1
|
% Change from 2017
| |||||||||||
Base Salary | $
|
480,769
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
$ | 500,000 | 4% | |||||
Annual Incentive | $
|
450,000
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
$
|
|
2
|
-100%
| ||||
Long-Term Incentive |
|
1,300,000
|
|
|
1,300,000
|
|
|
1,300,000
|
|
0%
| ||||
One-Time Long-Term Retention Incentive |
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
$
|
2,600,000
|
3
|
1 | The amount under 2018 Target represents the amount intended to be granted to, earned by and paid to the executive. The amount under 2017 Actual represents the amount actually granted to, earned by and paid to the executive. The amount for Long-Term Incentive is the value of the grant based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the grant date. The value reported in the Summary Compensation Table may differ slightly, as that represents the accounting grant date fair value. For the PRSU portion of the Long-Term Incentive, the amount included above assumes target level achievement. |
2 | Based on the Companys financial performance no annual incentive award was made to Ms. Phillips in 2018. |
3 | One-time long-term retention equity award was 50% RSUs and 50% PSOs with a total value of $2,600,000. |
In 2018, Ms. Phillips was granted the following long-term incentive equity awards:
Grant Date | Grant Type
|
# RSUs/Options
|
Value1
|
Performance Period
| ||||||||
February 21, 2018 | PRSUs
|
|
23,985
|
|
$
|
780,000
|
|
2018 - 2020
| ||||
October 26, 20182 | RSUs
|
|
21,138
|
|
$
|
520,000
|
|
N/A
| ||||
October 26, 20183 | RSUs
|
|
52,846
|
|
$
|
1,300,000
|
5
|
N/A
| ||||
October 26, 20184 | PSO
|
|
371,429
|
|
$
|
1,300,000
|
5
|
ends 10/21/2021
|
1 | This is the value intended to be granted by the Compensation Committee based on the closing price of our common stock on the grant date. Actual accounting grant date fair values reported in Tables and Narrative Disclosure will differ slightly. As to the PRSUs, the amount reflected above assumes target level achievement. |
2 | Vesting of these awards will occur in four equal annual installments beginning on October 26, 2019 and ending October 26, 2022. |
3 | Vesting of these awards will occur in three equal annual installments beginning on October 26, 2019 and ending October 26, 2021. |
4 | Vesting of these awards will occur in three equal annual installments beginning on October 26, 2019 and ending October 26, 2021, subject to achieving the stock performance target of $30.75 for 21 consecutive days on the NYSE. |
5 | One-time long-term retention incentive awards that were part of the special pay program aimed at retaining critical leaders. |
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 44
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
PRSU Payouts Under the 2016 LTPP
The performance period for our 2016 LTPP ended on December 31, 2018. PRSU grants under this plan were made in February 2016 and their grant date fair value was disclosed in our 2017 proxy statement. In February 2019, the Compensation Committee determined that the PRSUs granted under this plan did not meet threshold performance levels and approved the vesting of zero shares for all participants as outlined in the table below.
2016 LTPP Performance
Plan Metrics Jan 1, 2016 Dec 31, 2018
|
Final Results Based on Performance from Jan 1, 2016 Dec 31, 2018
| |||||||||||
Elements
|
Performance Target for 100% Payout |
Result
|
Weight
|
Payout Percentage
| ||||||||
Free Cash Flow1
|
$2.85 billion
|
$2.734 billion
|
60%
|
0%
| ||||||||
Relative Total Shareholder Return2
|
50th Percentile
|
5th Percentile
|
40%
|
0%
| ||||||||
Total Shares
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
100%
|
0%
|
1 | The free cash flow LTPP performance measure is the sum of free cash flow as reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for each of the fiscal years in the performance period, adjusted to eliminate foreign currency exchange translation impacts. The elimination of foreign currency exchange translation impacts for the 2016-2018 performance period reduced LTPP free cash flow performance results by $5 million. Please see Annex C for additional information on free cash flow in accordance with United States GAAP. |
2 | The relative total shareholder return LTPP performance measure is the change in our stock price over the three-year performance period, assuming monthly reinvestment of dividends, compared to that of a peer group of companies. |
2016 LTPP Payouts
Name1 | Target PRSUs Awarded
|
Payout Percentage |
Vested and Delivered in Shares
|
|||||||
Mitch Barns |
|
73,146
|
|
0%
|
|
|
| |||
Jamere Jackson |
|
26,646
|
|
0%
|
|
|
| |||
Giovanni Tavolieri |
|
6,270
|
|
0%
|
|
|
| |||
Eric Dale |
|
12,540
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
1 | Mr. Kenny was hired on December 3, 2018, Mr. Anderson was hired on September 10, 2018 and Ms. Phillips was hired on January 9 2017, and therefore were not participants in the 2016 LTPP. |
Below is a table of recent and projected future payouts under our LTPP Plan. Our variable pay programs continue to operate as intended.
2015 | 2016 | Projected 2017 | ||||||||
Payout Percentage | 59.15 | % | 0% | 0%1 |
1 | Current projection of all performance metrics under the plan is below threshold |
Realizable Pay
A significant portion of executive pay is at risk and depends on business performance and market conditions. The actual pay earned during the year either as cash or through vesting of previously granted equity awards is referred to as realizable pay. Realizable pay is different from the amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table, which uses the accounting grant date fair value for equity awards.
We define realizable pay for any given year as the sum of:
| cash earned as base salary in that year; |
| cash annual incentives and other bonuses earned in that year; |
| intrinsic value (share price minus exercise price) of stock option awards vesting in that year using the closing price of our common stock as reported on the NYSE on the last trading day of that year; |
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 45
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
| market value of equity awards vesting in that year using the closing price of our common stock as reported on the NYSE on the last trading day of that year; and |
| value of financial planning reimbursements and executive wellness reimbursements as outlined under the All Other Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table. |
The table below presents the realizable pay for each of our NEOs for 2017 and 2018 and shows the total amount of compensation reported for each of our NEOs in the Summary Compensation Table for 2018.
Realizable Pay | Total Compensation in Summary Compensation Table |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
2017
|
2018
|
Percentage Increase/(Decrease) |
20181
|
Percent Variance to 2018 Realizable Pay2
|
||||||||||||||||||||
David Kenny |
|
N/A
|
|
$
|
75,000
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
$
|
19,804,677
|
|
|
26,306%
|
| |||||||||
Mitch Barns | $
|
5,509,179
|
|
$
|
3,224,215
|
3
|
|
(41%)
|
|
$
|
10,785,368
|
4
|
|
235%
|
| |||||||||
David Anderson |
|
N/A
|
|
|
640,000
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
$
|
2,896,470
|
|
|
1,107%
|
| |||||||||
Jamere Jackson5 | $
|
3,431,015
|
|
|
2,147,572
|
|
|
(37%)
|
|
$
|
2,181,543
|
|
|
2%
|
| |||||||||
Giovanni Tavolieri |
|
N/A
|
|
$
|
857,187
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
$
|
4,375,478
|
|
|
410%
|
| |||||||||
Eric J. Dale | $
|
1,602,817
|
|
$
|
1,147,635
|
|
|
(28%)
|
|
$
|
4,271,880
|
|
|
272%
|
| |||||||||
Nancy Phillips | $
|
943,591
|
|
$
|
624,488
|
|
|
(34%)
|
|
$
|
4,318,093
|
|
|
591%
|
|
1 | Portion of amount in Summary Compensation Table represented by one-time new hire awards for Messrs. Kenny (99.6%) and Anderson (91.5%) and one-time special retention awards for Messrs. Tavolieri (56.2%) and Dale (59.4%) and Ms. Phillips (60.2%). Mr. Dale forfeited the special retention award upon his voluntary resignation from the Company. |
2 | In all cases, the realized pay in 2018 is significantly lower than the values disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table. |
3 | Excludes severance accruals for Mr. Barns. |
4 | Includes the full value of severance accruals for Mr. Barns. |
5 | The Summary Compensation Table value includes a special payment Mr. Jackson received to cover the loss of his unvested SERP benefit at his prior employer. See Tables and Narrative Disclosure Summary Compensation Table, footnote 1. Mr. Jackson repaid this sum upon his resignation from the Company. |
NEO Compensation Practices
What We Do
|
What We Dont Do
| |
✓ Emphasize long-term equity in prospective pay increases
✓ Use share ownership guidelines to require all executive officers and non-employee directors to hold a significant amount of Nielsen stock. See Compensation Practices and Governance Share Ownership Guidelines.
✓ Specify maximum payout thresholds on all individual awards granted under our AIP
✓ Recoup both short-term and long-term incentive awards in the event of financial restatement as a result of intentional misconduct on the part of the executive, and where the award would have been lower as a result of the restatement. This Clawback Policy is shown under Compensation Practices and Governance Other Policies and Guidelines Clawback Policy.
✓ Include double trigger provisions for all plans that contemplate a change in control |
|
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 46
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
2018 Pay Decisions and Performance
Total Company Financial Performance
Metric | Target
|
Result
| ||
Adjusted EBITDA growth % over prior year at constant currency1 | 1%
|
-7.9%
| ||
Revenue growth at constant currency1 | 3.0%
|
-0.7%
| ||
Free Cash Flow | $800MM
|
$542MM
|
1 | We calculate constant currency percentages by converting our prior-period local currency financial results using the current period foreign currency exchange rates and comparing these adjusted amounts to our current period reported results. |
How Pay Decisions are Made
Annual Base Salaries
Base salary is the only fixed component of our executive officers compensation. The Compensation Committee considers benchmark compensation information for executives serving in similar positions at peer companies and general market survey data supplied by its compensation consultant, Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (Meridian), to help ensure that base salaries of the Companys NEOs are competitive in the marketplace and are serving their purpose to attract and retain top talent.
The Compensation Committee considers salary increases for the Companys executive officers generally in 24-36+ month intervals unless there is a change in role or circumstances that warrant consideration.
Executive officers are not involved in determining their own compensation.
Annual Incentive Plan
The purpose of the AIP is to motivate executives to accomplish short-term business performance goals that contribute to long-term business objectives. The Compensation Committee approves the applicable performance measures and performance targets under the plan at the beginning of each year. At the beginning of the fiscal year following the end of the performance period the Companys and the executives actual achievement under the performance measures and performance targets is reviewed and assessed, and the Compensation Committee approves the cash amounts payable to such executives. The NEOs participate in the same incentive plan as the Companys senior managers.
In determining the target opportunity for each NEO, the Compensation Committee considered benchmark compensation information for executives serving in similar positions at peer companies and general market survey data provided by Meridian; executives total direct compensation mix; changes in role and job responsibilities; and Company financial performance and individual performance.
Under the AIP, the maximum potential annual incentive payout for the NEOs is 200% of their annual incentive target.
Annual Incentive Plan Payout Formula
| The amount at which the AIP funds and that is available for payouts is derived formulaically based on AIP Adjusted EBITDA and revenue growth against a target and is expressed as a funding percentage; see Performance Payout Formula table below. |
| To assess Adjusted EBITDA performance for annual incentive funding, we recalculate Adjusted EBITDA as defined in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the corresponding performance period to eliminate the impact of foreign currency on the years result by using a standard exchange rate established at the beginning of the performance period. We refer to this performance measure under the AIP as AIP Adjusted EBITDA. |
| Initial individual payouts are determined by applying the funding percentage to the individuals target award opportunity. |
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 47
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
| Final individual payouts are determined after a full assessment of: |
| Each individuals contribution to overall Company performance; see 2018 Pay Decisions and Performance Total Company Financial Performance; |
| Other quantitative objectives; and |
| A qualitative assessment to take into account, as appropriate, degree of difficulty, extraordinary market circumstances, and leadership impact. |
| Based on the full assessment, individual payouts may be adjusted up or down from the initial payout to ensure that total performance is reflected in the final payouts. |
| Aggregate payouts under the AIP cannot exceed the amount of the funded plan pool. |
| Both AIP Adjusted EBITDA and revenue metrics operate independently; however revenue only funds if AIP Adjusted EBITDA meets threshold performance. |
Performance targets are aggressive and achievable
| The Compensation Committee believes that AIP Adjusted EBITDA and revenue growth are highly correlated to the creation of value for our shareholders and are an effective measure of the NEOs contributions to short-term Company performance. |
The AIP Adjusted EBITDA and revenue performance targets are the Board-approved operating plan targets
| In establishing the AIP Adjusted EBITDA and revenue growth targets, the Compensation Committee considered the Companys historical performance against prior year targets and concluded that the process had been effective in establishing targets that were both aggressive and achievable. It noted that, over the prior five years, both AIP Adjusted EBITDA and revenue had grown at challenging annual growth rates and, in each year, had been assessed as either on target or closely approaching target. |
Funding formula and individual payouts
The formula correlates levels of AIP Adjusted EBITDA and revenue performance, as defined above, to funding/initial payout percentages. This formula was weighted 75% to AIP Adjusted EBITDA, and 25% to revenue performance. A 100% funding percentage is achieved if performance for both metrics meets the performance targets as approved by the Compensation Committee at the beginning of the plan year. If performance falls below the Minimum threshold, no payouts are awarded. Funding and payouts are capped at 200%. |
Performance Payout Formula
AIP Adjusted EBITDA
|
Revenue
|
|||||||||||||||
Performance Milestones
|
Growth vs Prior Year (Index %)
|
Funding/ Initial Payout %1
|
Growth vs Prior Year (Index %)
|
Funding/ Initial Payout %1
|
||||||||||||
Maximum
|
|
109%
|
|
|
200%
|
|
|
106%
|
|
|
200%
|
| ||||
Exceptional
|
|
105%
|
|
|
150%
|
|
|
105%
|
|
|
167%
|
| ||||
Target
|
|
101%
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
103%
|
|
|
100%
|
| ||||
Minimum
|
|
94%
|
|
|
50%
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
50%
|
| ||||
< Minimum
|
|
<94%
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
<100%
|
|
|
0%
|
|
1 | The AIP funding percentage and initial payout percentage are determined using linear interpolation if actual performance falls between any two performance levels. |
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 48
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
2018 Results
In February 2019, the Compensation Committee evaluated performance under the 2018 AIP. The Compensation Committee determined that the Companys AIP Adjusted EBITDA growth index and revenue growth achieved in 2018 under the AIP did not meet threshold performance yielding an AIP funding percentage of zero percent for all eligible NEOs.
2019 Changes
The Compensation Committee regularly reviews incentive pay metrics to make sure those are aligned with the companys strategies and financial goals as well as relevant metrics to drive management performance around those goals. As a result of the most recent updated analysis, the Compensation Committee made the following changes to performance metrics and weightings for 2019. Revenue and Adjusted EBITDA margin performance will each represent 35% of the pool. Both Adjusted EBITDA margin and revenue must meet threshold performance for either metric to fund. Free cash flow performance will fund 30% of the pool. Each of the performance targets are the Board-approved operating plan targets for 2019. These changes are meant to better align the annual performance targets with variables that are tied to the companys growth, profitability, and cash generation.
Long-Term Incentives (LTI)
The purpose of long-term incentive awards is to focus executives on long-term sustainable performance and to align executive rewards with long-term returns delivered to shareholders. Currently, all long-term incentives are delivered as equity-based awards.
LTI MIX 60% IS SUBJECT TO QUANTIFIABLE LONG-TERM PERFORMANCE
Equity-based awards are made to executives, other employees and directors pursuant to the Amended and Restated Nielsen 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (as amended, the 2010 Plan). Our goal is to provide at least 50% of the NEOs total direct compensation pay mix in long-term equity, progressing to 60% over time, and to have approximately 60% of the LTI subject to quantifiable long-term performance metrics, which are granted as PRSUs.
Our practice is to grant the service-based portion of LTI as RSUs to align with market practice in the digital marketplace in which we compete for top talent and in recognition of its belief that RSUs incent executives to improve performance through share price appreciation, as well as, provide a powerful retention effect.
Prior to finalizing award sizes, the Compensation Committee considers:
| current Company financial performance and individual performance; |
| general industry market benchmarks and peer group data provided by its compensation consultant, Meridian; |
| executives total direct compensation mix and prior year award values; and |
| changes in role and job responsibilities. |
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 49
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Given 2018s business difficulties and in light of the turnover at the executive level, in September the Compensation Committee decided to launch a targeted special pay program aimed at retaining critical leaders responsible for strategy development, delivering the revised 2018 financial targets and continuing the transformation of the Company over the coming three years. As described further under Summary of Other NEO Pay Decisions above, select senior leaders, including certain of the NEOs, received equity-based special one-time retention awards. The awards were designed to provide meaningful retention value and reward superior stock price performance. For each participant, half of the award value is denominated in PSOs subject to a challenging stock price growth hurdle of 25%. The remaining award value is denominated in service-based RSUs for their retention value as well as alignment with stock price performance. Both components vest ratably over 3 years except that PSOs will only become exercisable if the stock price goal is achieved for 21 or more consecutive days within the three-year period.
Performance Restricted Stock Units Awarded Under the Long-Term Performance Plan (LTPP)
2018 Plan
LTPP participants are awarded a target number of PRSUs that are earned subject to the Companys performance against three cumulative three-year performance metrics. In addition to free cash flow and relative total shareholder return (TSR), the Compensation Committee added three-year revenue CAGR as a performance metric for the 2018 LTPP to reinforce the importance of driving long-term revenue growth. For the 2018 plan, 50% of the total LTI award opportunity will be based on free cash flow performance against target, 25% will be based on relative total shareholder return and 25% will be based on three-year revenue CAGR.
The performance period for the 2018 grant commenced on January 1, 2018 and ends on December 31, 2020. Grants are denominated in RSUs and settled in Nielsen shares. Based on the performance at the end of the three-year period, executives may earn less or more than the target PRSUs granted. Relative total shareholder return below the 30th percentile of our peer group, revenue CAGR below 3% or free cash flow performance below 85% of the free cash flow target will result in zero percent payout for that metric. Payouts for each metric are calculated independently of each other. The maximum payout for each metric is 200%. In the case of absolute negative total shareholder return of the Company over the performance period, payments under the relative total shareholder return component of the plan are capped at 100% of target.
The table below summarizes the LTPP performance-payout matrix for the 2018 cycle.
Plan Design1
|
||||||||||||
Metric
|
Weight
|
Threshold
|
Target
|
Maximum
| ||||||||
Free Cash Flow
|
|
50%
|
|
Performance
|
85%
|
100%
|
120%
| |||||
Payout
|
50%
|
100%
|
200%
| |||||||||
Relative TSR
|
|
25%
|
|
Performance
|
30th Percentile
|
50th Percentile
|
75th Percentile
| |||||
Payout
|
50%
|
100%
|
200%
| |||||||||
Revenue
|
|
25%
|
|
Performance
|
3% CAGR
|
4% CAGR
|
4.5% CAGR
| |||||
Payout
|
50%
|
100%
|
200%
|
1 | The performance metrics operate independently. |
Relative Total Shareholder Return Peer Group
Each year, the Compensation Committee reviews the peer group in order to determine the appropriate peer companies used to measure our relative total shareholder return for grants made that year under the LTPP. The peer group for determining achievement under relative total shareholder return is distinct from the peer group used to evaluate grants made that year and set compensation levels discussed under Compensation Practices and Governance Benchmarking. In their review of the peer group used to measure relative total shareholder return, the Compensation Committee considers the following:
| companies in businesses similar to Nielsen and/or representative of the markets it serves; |
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 50
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
| companies with similar economic profiles to Nielsen; and |
| companies with historical stock price correlation to Nielsens stock price. |
Based on this review, the Compensation Committee made no changes to the 2017 relative total shareholder return peer group for 2018 (except GfK SE was removed because that company was no longer publicly traded).
2018 LTPP Peer Group
|
||
Accenture plc
|
MSCI Inc.
| |
Dun & Bradstreet Corporation
|
Omnicom Group, Inc.
| |
Equifax Inc.
|
Publicis Groupe (ADR)
| |
Experian plc
|
RELX (NV)
| |
FactSet Research Systems Inc.
|
S&P Global, Inc.
| |
Gartner Inc
|
Thomson Reuters Corporation
| |
IHS Markit Ltd.
|
Verisk Analytics, Inc.
| |
The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.
|
Wolters Kluwer (NV/ADR)
| |
IQVIA Holdings Inc. (formerly Quintiles IMS Holdings Inc.)
|
WPP plc (ADR)
| |
Moodys Corporation
|
2019 Changes
The Compensation Committee made the following changes to the 2019 performance plan. The performance metrics will include three-year revenue compound annual growth (no change versus 2018) and adjusted earnings per share (EPS) (new in 2019 and as defined in Annex C). The weightings of the metrics will be 50% on revenue growth and 50% on adjusted EPS. Relative TSR performance, which had been a metric in the past, will become a modifier to the initial payout factor established through revenue growth and EPS performance. In making these changes, the Compensation Committee considered various inputs, including key measures that will drive long-term value and consideration of relative shareholder value. The Relative TSR peer group will remain the same for the 2019 PRSU plan except that Dun & Bradstreet Corporation has been removed from the peer group because that company is no longer publicly traded.
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 51
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Compensation Practices and Governance
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee regularly reviews the philosophy and goals of the executive compensation program and assesses the effectiveness of compensation practices and processes. The Compensation Committee sets performance goals and assesses performance against these goals. The Compensation Committee considers the recommendations, the peer group benchmark compensation information and general market survey data provided by its independent consultant as well as the judgment of the CEO on the performance of his direct reports. The CEO does not participate in the Compensation Committee discussion regarding his own compensation. The Compensation Committee makes its decisions based on its assessment of both Nielsen and individual performance against goals, as well as on its judgment as to what is in the best interests of Nielsen and its shareholders.
The responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are described more fully in its charter, which is available on the Corporate Governance page of our website at www.nielsen.com/investors under Corporate Governance: Governance Documents: Compensation Committee Charter. In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Compensation Committee is entitled to delegate any or all of its responsibilities to subcommittees of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee may delegate to one or more officers of the Company the authority to make grants and awards of cash or options or other equity securities to any non-Section 16 officer of the Company under the Companys incentive-compensation or other equity-based plans as the Compensation Committee deems appropriate and in accordance with the terms of such plan; so long as such delegation is in compliance with the relevant plan and subject to the laws of England and Wales and the Companys articles of association.
Independent Compensation Consultant
The Compensation Committee retains Meridian as its compensation consultant. Meridian has provided peer group benchmark compensation information, general market survey data and perspective on executive and independent director compensation and related governance. Meridian and its affiliates did not provide any services to Nielsen or its affiliates in 2018 other than executive and director compensation consulting to the Compensation Committee. Discussions between Meridian and Nielsen management are limited to those discussions necessary to complete work on behalf of the Compensation Committee.
The Compensation Committee determined that Meridian and its lead consultant for Nielsen satisfy the independence factors described in the NYSE listing rules. The Compensation Committee also determined that the work performed by Meridian in 2018 did not raise any conflict of interest.
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 52
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Benchmarking
The Compensation Committee uses the executive compensation of a peer group of companies, selected for their business relevance and size appropriateness to Nielsen, as one of many considerations when making executive compensation pay decisions. To account for differences in Nielsens size compared to market benchmarks, the market data are statistically adjusted as necessary to allow for valid comparisons to similarly-sized companies. The peer group information may also be supplemented by general industry survey data selected by Meridian to provide reasonable benchmarks for a Company of Nielsens size and business type. After a review by the Compensation Committee, no changes were made to the peer group for 2018.
2018 Peer Group
|
||
Adobe Systems Incorporated
|
The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.
| |
Alliance Data Systems Corporation
|
IQVIA Holdings Inc.
| |
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
|
Moodys Corporation
| |
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation
|
Omnicom Group, Inc
| |
Equifax Inc.
|
S&P Global, Inc.
| |
Experian plc
|
salesforce.com Inc.
| |
Fiserv, Inc.
|
Thomson Reuters Corporation
| |
IHS Markit Ltd.
|
Verisk Analytics, Inc.
|
Consideration of Risk
The Compensation Committee conducted a risk assessment of Nielsens 2018 pay practices, which included the review of a report from Meridian. As a result of this assessment, the Compensation Committee concluded that it believes that Nielsens pay programs are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Nielsen, its business and its value. Specifically, the Compensation Committee noted the following:
| Good balance of fixed and at-risk compensation, including a good balance of performance in LTI plans. |
| Overlapping vesting periods that expose management, including the CEO, to consequences of their decision-making for the period during which the business risks are likely to materialize. |
| Adjusted EBITDA and revenue performance, Company-wide financial metrics, funds annual incentives. |
| Payouts under the AIP and LTPP are capped at 200% of a recipients target award opportunity. |
| A small number of associates receive commission and sales incentive payments. Nielsen management completed an annual review of their commission and sales incentives to ensure that they do not provide employees with an incentive to take unexpected or higher levels of risk. |
| Nielsen introduced a share purchase plan in 2016, which provides employees with the opportunity to purchase shares through payroll deduction. The purchase of shares aligns the interests of employees with the interests of shareholders and increases employee focus on longer-term performance. As of December 2018, the program has been rolled out to ~55% of global associates. |
| Nielsen has continued to expand the equity eligible population. Increasing ownership creates better alignment with investors and helps to discourage employees from taking risky decisions that could be detrimental to Nielsen over the long run. |
| Executive compensation is benchmarked annually. |
| Compensation Committee retains an independent consultant. |
| Significant share ownership requirements for executives and independent directors. |
| Nielsen has a compensation clawback policy and anti-hedging policy. |
| Pledging of shares subject to share ownership requirements is prohibited. |
| Nielsen has a robust code of conduct and whistleblower policy. |
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 53
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Share Ownership Guidelines
To ensure strong alignment of executive interests with the long-term interests of shareholders, executives are required to accumulate and maintain a meaningful level of share ownership in the Company.
The table below presents the guidelines and actual share ownership as of December 31, 2018 for each of our NEOs.
Name
|
Guideline
|
Guideline Shares1
|
Share Ownership2 | |||||||||
Mr. Kenny
|
|
6 x salary
|
|
|
334,300
|
|
|
541,790
|
| |||
Mr. Anderson3
|
|
3 x salary
|
|
|
102,900
|
|
|
46,323
|
| |||
Mr. Tavolieri
|
|
3 x salary
|
|
|
77,200
|
|
|
118,971
|
| |||
Mr. Dale
|
|
3 x salary
|
|
|
96,400
|
|
|
101,403
|
| |||
Ms. Phillips
|
|
1 x salary
|
|
|
21,400
|
|
|
92,428
|
|
1 | The guideline shares were reset using $23.33, the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2018. |
2 | Eligible shares include beneficially-owned shares held directly or indirectly, jointly-owned shares and unvested RSUs. |
3 | Mr. Anderson is expected to meet his ownership guidelines by 2020; he may not sell or dispose of shares for cash unless the share ownership guidelines are satisfied. |
Other Policies and Guidelines
Perquisites
We provide our NEOs with limited perquisites, reflected in the All Other Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table and described in the footnotes. NEOs may claim financial planning and executive wellness expenses capped each year at $15,000 and $2,500, respectively. In very limited circumstances, we may permit NEOs and their family members to access our contractual arrangement for private aircraft for their personal use. None of the NEOs used the aircraft for personal use in 2018. In certain circumstances, where necessary for business purposes, we also provide reimbursement for relocation expenses.
Severance
We believe that severance protections play a valuable role in attracting and retaining key executive officers. The terms of our policy are described in further detail under Tables and Narrative Disclosure Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.
Change in Control
Equity awards made in 2011 or later, under the 2010 Plan do not vest automatically solely in the event of a change in control. The treatment of unvested equity awards upon a change in control is described in further detail under Tables and Narrative Disclosure Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.
Clawback Policy
Our clawback policy requires the CEO and his executive direct reports, in all appropriate cases, to repay or forfeit any bonus, short-term incentive award or amount, or long-term incentive award or amount awarded to the executive, and any non-vested equity-based awards previously granted to the executive if:
| The amount of the incentive compensation was calculated based upon the achievement of certain financial results that were subsequently the subject of a restatement or the correction of a material error; |
| The executive engaged in intentional misconduct that caused or partially caused the need for the restatement or caused or partially caused the material error; and |
| The amount of the incentive compensation that would have been awarded to the executive, had the financial results been properly reported, would have been lower than the amount actually awarded. |
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 54
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Hedging Prohibition
As part of our securities trading policy, all employees, including our NEOs, and non-employee directors are prohibited from engaging in short-selling of our securities, trading activity designed to profit from fluctuations in the price of our securities or in hedging transactions involving our securities (including forward contracts, swaps, exchange funds, puts, calls, options).
Other Benefits
The CEO and other NEOs are eligible to participate in the health and welfare, defined contribution 401(k), and deferred compensation plans made available, per eligibility requirements, to all employees.
Tax Implications
The Compensation Committee takes into account the various tax and accounting implications of compensation. When determining amounts of equity grants to executives and employees, the Compensation Committee also examines the accounting cost associated with the grants.
Certain of the Companys incentive compensation programs are intended to allow the Company to make awards to executive officers that are deductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code as qualifying performance-based compensation, which provision otherwise sets limits on the tax deductibility of compensation paid to a companys most highly compensated executive officers. Commencing with the Companys 2018 fiscal year, the performance-based compensation exception to the deductibility limitations under Section 162(m) no longer applies (other than with respect to certain grandfathered performance-based awards granted prior to November 2, 2017), and the deduction limitation under Section 162(m) generally applies to compensation paid to any of our then current or former named executive officers. The Compensation Committee may continue to seek ways to limit the impact of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. However, the Compensation Committee believes that the tax deduction limitation should not compromise the Companys ability to establish and implement compensation and incentive programs that support the compensation objectives discussed above. Accordingly, achieving these objectives and maintaining required flexibility in this regard is expected to result in compensation that is not deductible for federal income tax purposes.
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based upon this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and incorporated by reference into the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 (or any amendment thereto).
Submitted by the Compensation Committee of the Companys Board of Directors:
Harish Manwani (Chairperson)
Guerrino De Luca
Robert C. Pozen
Lauren Zalaznick
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 55
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
TABLES AND NARRATIVE DISCLOSURE
Summary Compensation Table
The following table presents information regarding compensation to our NEOs for the periods indicated.
Name and Principal Position |
Year | Salary ($) |
Bonus1 ($) |
Stock Awards2 ($) |
Option Awards3 ($) |
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) |
Change in Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings4 ($) |
All Other Compensation5 ($) |
Total ($) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(a) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e) | (f) | (g) | (h) | (i) | (j) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David Kenny Chief Executive Officer |
2018 | 75,000 | 1,500,000 | 15,142,776 | 3,086,901 | | | | 19,804,677 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mitch Barns Chief Executive Officer |
2018 | 1,000,000 | | 4,124,341 | | | (5,923 | ) | 5,666,950 | 10,785,368 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 1,000,000 | | 7,467,431 | | 1,700,000 | 11,553 | 23,210 | 10,202,194 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | 1,000,000 | | 5,737,698 | 1,657,089 | 1,700,000 | 3,186 | 24,516 | 10,122,489 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David Anderson Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer |
2018 | 240,000 | 400,000 | 1,125,007 | 1,125,002 | | | 6,462 | 2,896,470 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jamere Jackson Chief Financial Officer |
2018 | 533,654 | 325,000 | 1,314,639 | | | | 8,250 | 2,181,543 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 750,000 | 325,000 | 2,538,946 | | 680,000 | | 8,100 | 4,302,046 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | 741,154 | 325,000 | 2,124,905 | 607,602 | 680,000 | | 7,950 | 4,486,610 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Giovanni Tavolieri Chief Product and Technology Officer for Nielsen Global Connect |
2018 | 582,500 | | 2,490,207 | 1,300,002 | | | 2,769 | 4,375,478 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Eric J. Dale Chief Legal Officer |
2018 | 750,000 | | 2,298,630 | 1,200,000 | | | 23,250 | 4,271,880 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 750,000 | | 1,194,774 | | 675,000 | | 23,100 | 2,642,874 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | 750,000 | | 1,069,441 | 331,416 | 675,000 | | 22,950 | 2,848,807 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nancy Phillips Chief HR Officer |
2018 | 500,000 | | 2,490,207 | 1,300,002 | | | 27,885 | 4,318,093 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 480,769 | | 1,294,370 | | 450,000 | | 285,091 | 2,510,230 |
1 | Bonus |
For Mr. Kenny, the $1,500,000 amount shown was paid in December 2018 to compensate for the loss of the 2018 annual incentive payout from his former employer. If Mr. Kenny resigns voluntarily without Good Reason or is terminated for Cause within one-year of receiving the payment, Mr. Kenny must repay the amount in full. See New CEO and CFO Compensation Arrangements above. |
For Mr. Anderson, the $400,000 amount shown in 2018 is a guaranteed bonus that was paid on March 8, 2019. |
For Mr. Jackson, the $325,000 amount shown in years 2016, 2017 and 2018 is the amount of the annual installments he received of a $1,300,000 payment (over 4 years) which is paid in connection with his hire date of March 10, 2014 and meant to compensate him for the loss of his unvested SERP benefit from his previous employer. Mr. Jackson is required to repay each payment in full if his employment terminates within one year following its receipt unless such termination is by the Company without cause or is by Mr. Jackson for good reason. The 2018 payment was repaid upon Mr. Jacksons voluntary termination without good reason in September 2018. |
2 | Stock Awards |
Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of the equity-based awards granted to each NEO calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation Stock Compensation (the FASB ASC Topic 718). For a discussion of the assumptions and methodologies used to value the awards reported in column (e), please see Note 12 Stock-Based Compensation to our audited consolidated financial statements, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. All numbers exclude estimates of forfeitures. No awards were subject to re-pricing or material modifications. Further, in accordance with the SECs rules, dividend equivalents that accrued on the executives RSUs and PRSUs granted in 2018 are not reported above because dividends were factored into the grant date fair value of these awards. |
Values for awards made in 2018: |
PRSUs Target amounts granted on February 21, 2018 under the LTPP, based on the probable outcome of the relevant performance conditions Messrs. Barns $4,124,341, Jackson $1,314,639, Tavolieri $670,201, Dale $618,647 and Ms. Phillips $670,201. The maximum awards at the date of grant are as follows: Messrs. Barns $7,302,559, Jackson $2,327,700, Tavolieri $1,186,658, Dale $1,095,377 and Ms. Phillips $1,186,658. Upon termination, Mr. Barns forfeited one-third of the potential value of the 2018 PRSU award. |
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 56
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Regular Annual RSUs Amounts were awarded to the NEOs on October 26, 2018 as follows: Messrs. Tavolieri $519,995 and Dale $479,995 and Ms. Phillips $519,995. |
Retention RSUs Amounts were awarded to the NEOs on October 26, 2018 as follows: Messrs. Tavolieri $1,300,012 and Dale $1,199,988 and Ms. Phillips $1,300,012. Mr. Dale forfeited this award upon his voluntary termination from the Company. |
Make-whole RSUs RSUs were granted to Mr. Kenny on December 3, 2018 $13,742,766. |
New hire inducement RSUs RSUs were granted to Mr. Anderson on October 26, 2018 $ 1,125,007 and to Mr. Kenny on December 3, 2018 $1,400,010. |
Of the PRSUs granted in 2018 that vest according to free cash flow, the grant date fair value was computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 based upon the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date. Assuming the highest level of performance achievement as of the grant date, the grant date fair value of the PRSUs that vest according to free cash flow would have been: Mr. Barns $4,237,625; Mr. Jackson $1,350,748; Mr. Tavolieri $688,609; Mr. Dale $635,639; and Ms. Phillips $688,609. Of the PRSUs granted in 2018 that vest according to CAGR, the grant date fair value was computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 based upon the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date. Assuming the highest level of performance achievement as of the grant date, the grant date fair value of the PRSUs that vest according to CAGR would have been: Mr. Barns $2,118,812; Mr. Jackson $675,374; Mr. Tavolieri $344,305; Mr. Dale $317,820; and Ms. Phillips $344,305. As the PRSUs granted in 2018 that vest according to relative shareholder return are subject to market conditions as defined under FASB ASC Topic 718 and were not subject to performance conditions as defined under FASB ASC Topic 718, they had no maximum grant date fair values that differed from the grant date fair values presented in the table. |
3 | Option Awards |
Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of stock options awarded to each NEO calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For a discussion of the assumptions and methodologies used to value the awards reported in column (f), please see Note 13 Stock-Based Compensation to our audited consolidated financial statements, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. All numbers exclude estimates of forfeitures. No awards were subject to repricing or material modifications. |
Retention Performance Stock Options: Amounts were awarded to the NEOs on October 26, 2018 as follows: Messrs. Tavolieri $1,300,002 and Dale $1,200,000 and Ms. Phillips $1,300,002. Mr. Dale forfeited this award upon his voluntary termination from the Company. |
New Hire Performance Stock Options: PSOs were granted to Mr. Anderson on October 26, 2018 $ 1,125,002 and to Mr. Kenny on December 3, 2018 $1,466,901. |
Premium Performance Stock Options: Awards were granted on December 3, 2018 to Mr. Kenny $1,620,000. |
4 | Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings |
The amount indicated for Mr. Barns represents the actuarial change in pension value during 2018 relating to the Nielsen qualified plan and non-qualified excess plan. See Pension Benefits for 2018. |
5 | All Other Compensation (2018 values) |
Mr. Barns: financial planning expenses: $15,000; executive wellness expenses: $2,500; retirement plan contributions: $8,250; Health Savings Account Plan contributions: $1,200; and severance accruals: $5,640,000. |
Mr. Anderson: retirement plan contributions: $6,462. |
Mr. Jackson: retirement plan contributions: $8,250. |
Mr. Tavolieri: retirement plan contributions: $2,769. |
Mr. Dale: financial planning expenses: $15,000 and retirement plan contributions: $8,250. |
Ms. Phillips: financial planning expenses: $15,000; relocation expenses: $4,635; and retirement plan contributions: $8,250. |
|
2019 PROXY STATEMENT 57
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2018
The following table presents information regarding grants to our NEOs during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards1 |
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name (a) |
Grant Date (b) |
Threshold ($) (c) |
Target ($) (d) |
Maximum ($) (e) |
Threshold3 (#) (c) |
Target4 (#) (d) |
Maximum5 (#) (e) |
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stocks or Units (#) (i) |
All Other Options Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#) (j) |
Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh) (k) |
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards6 ($) (l) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David Kenny | | | | | | | | | $ | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/3/2018 | | | | | | | 487,505 | 7 | | $ | | 13,742,766 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/3/2018 | | | | | | | 54,285 | 7 | | $ | | 1,400,010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/3/2018 | | | | | 367,031 | 7 | | | | $ | 32.24 | 1,466,901 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/3/2018 | | | | |