You are cordially invited to attend the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Sirona Dental Systems, Inc. (the “Company”), to be held on Wednesday, February 19, 2014 beginning at 11:00 a.m. at the offices of Kirkland & Ellis LLP, 300 North LaSalle, Chicago, Illinois 60654.

Information about the meeting and the various matters on which the stockholders will vote is included in the Notice of Meeting and Proxy Statement which follow. Also included is a proxy card and postage-paid return envelope. Please sign, date and mail the enclosed proxy card in the return envelope provided, or submit your proxy to vote your shares via the Internet or by telephone by following the instructions provided on the proxy card, as promptly as possible, whether or not you plan to attend the meeting. A copy of the Company’s 2013 Annual Report is also enclosed for your review.

I look forward to greeting you personally at the meeting.

Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Sirona Dental Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) will be held on Wednesday, February 19, 2014 beginning at 11:00 a.m., at the offices of Kirkland & Ellis LLP, 300 North LaSalle, Chicago, Illinois 60654, for the following purposes:

The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” for proposals (1), (2), (3) and (4) above. Only holders of record of Common Stock as of the close of business on December 23, 2013 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting and any adjournments thereof.

If you attend the meeting in person, please proceed to the security desk at the front of the building and be prepared to show at least one form of photo identification.

In accordance with Delaware law, a list of the holders of Common Stock entitled to vote at the 2013 Annual Meeting will be available for examination by any stockholder for any purpose germane to the Annual Meeting, during ordinary business hours, for at least 10 days prior to the Annual Meeting, at the offices of the Company, located at 30-30 47th Avenue, Suite 500, Long Island City, New York 11101, and will be available at the 2013 Annual Meeting during the whole time of the meeting and may be examined by any stockholder who is present.

We are sending you our proxy materials in connection with the solicitation of the enclosed proxy by the Board of Directors of Sirona Dental Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) for use at the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and at any adjournments thereof.

The Annual Meeting will be held on February 19, 2014, at 11:00 a.m., at the offices of Kirkland & Ellis LLP, 300 North LaSalle, Chicago, Illinois 60654 to consider the matters set forth in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders. This Proxy Statement and the form of proxy enclosed are being mailed to stockholders with the Company’s Annual Report to Stockholders commencing on or about January 27, 2014.

Only stockholders of record of the Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company (the “Common Stock”) at the close of business on December 23, 2013 will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. As of that date, a total of 55,153,641 shares of Common Stock were outstanding, each such share being entitled to one vote. Shares of Common Stock owned by the Company are not entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. There is no cumulative voting.

The presence, at the commencement of the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy of the holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Company will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. If, however, a quorum is not present or represented at the Annual Meeting, the stockholders entitled to vote thereat, present in person or by proxy, may adjourn the Annual Meeting, without notice other than announcement at the Annual Meeting, until a quorum shall be present or represented.

Shares owned by the Company do not count for quorum purposes and are not entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. In order to assure the presence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting, please submit a proxy to vote your shares in accordance with the instructions described above, even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present for purposes of establishing a quorum. A “broker non-vote” occurs when a broker or other nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the broker or nominee does not have discretionary voting power and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner.

If you own shares through a broker, the registered holder of those shares is the broker or its nominee. Such shares are often referred to as held in “street name,” and you, as the beneficial owner of those shares, do not appear in our stock register. For street name shares, there is a two-step process for distributing our

proxy materials and tabulating votes. Brokers inform us how many of their clients own Common Stock in street name, and the broker forwards our proxy materials to those beneficial owners. If you receive our proxy materials, including a voting instruction card, from your broker, you should vote your shares by following the procedures specified on the voting instruction card. Shortly before the Annual Meeting, your broker will tabulate the votes it has received and submit a proxy card to us reflecting the aggregate votes of the street name holders. If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting and vote your street name shares in person, you should contact your broker to obtain a broker’s proxy card and bring it to the Annual Meeting.

If you are the registered holder of shares, you are the record holder of those shares, and you should vote your shares as described below under “How Record Holders Vote.”

If you are the registered holder of your shares, you can vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting or you may submit a proxy to vote your shares. We recommend that you submit a proxy to vote your shares even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. You can always attend the Annual Meeting and revoke your proxy by voting in person. Attendance at the meeting, of itself, will not revoke a previously granted proxy.

There are three ways to vote by proxy:

By giving us your proxy, you are authorizing the individual named on our proxy card, the proxy, to vote your shares in the manner you indicate. You may submit a proxy to (i) vote for the election of all of our director nominees, (ii) withhold authority to vote for all of our director nominees, or (iii) vote for the election of one or more of our director nominees and withhold authority to vote for the other nominee(s), by so indicating on your proxy. You may submit a proxy to vote “FOR” or “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” from voting on the ratification of the appointment of KPMG as the Company’s independent auditor for fiscal year ending September 30, 2014, the approval of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as described in this Proxy Statement under “Other Information for the Annual Meeting of Sirona Dental Systems, Inc.’s Stockholders — Compensation of Executive Officers” and the adoption of amendments to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate of Incorporation”) to declassify the Board of Directors of the Company.

If you submit a proxy without indicating your instructions, your shares will be voted as follows:

A stockholder may revoke a proxy at any time prior to its exercise (i) by giving to the Company’s Corporate Secretary a written notice of revocation of the proxy’s authority, (ii) by submitting a duly elected proxy bearing a later date or (iii) by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.

The nominees for director for three-year terms will be elected, provided that they receive the affirmative vote of a plurality of the shares of Common Stock present at the Annual Meeting, whether in person or by proxy. This means that, if a quorum is present, the four nominees receiving the greatest number of votes will be elected to serve as directors. As a result, withholding authority to vote for a nominee, or abstentions, and broker non-votes with respect to the election of directors will not affect the outcome of the election of directors.

The affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal is required to approve the ratification of the selection of our independent auditors and to approve the advisory proposal on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers’. An abstention with respect to either of these proposals will be treated as being present and entitled to vote on that proposal and, therefore, will have the effect of votes against the proposal. Brokers do not have discretionary authority to vote uninstructed shares on the advisory proposal on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. Because that proposal must be approved by a majority of the shares of Common Stock present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the matter, broker non-votes as to that proposal will have no effect on whether the proposal is approved.

The affirmative vote of the holders of at least 75% of the shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote on the proposal to adopt the amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation to declassify the Company’s Board of Directors is required to approve that proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes with respect to the proposal to adopt the amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation to declassify the Company’s Board of Directors will have the effect of votes against the proposal.

As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Board of Directors of the Company does not know of any business that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting other than the matters described in this Proxy Statement. If any other matters are properly brought before the Annual Meeting, the person named in the enclosed form of proxy will vote the proxies in accordance with such person’s best judgment.

The Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) is currently composed of seven members divided into three classes. The members of each class are elected to serve three-year terms with the term of office of each class ending in successive years. Mr. William K Hood, Mr. Thomas Jetter, Mr. Harry M. Jansen Kraemer, Jr. and Mr. Jeffrey T. Slovin are the directors in the class whose term expires at the Annual Meeting. The Board of Directors has approved the nomination of Mr. William K Hood, Mr. Thomas Jetter, Mr. Harry M. Jansen Kraemer, Jr. and Mr. Jeffrey T. Slovin for re-election, and each of these four nominees has indicated a willingness to serve. The members of the two other classes of directors will continue in office for their existing terms. Following the Annual Meeting, the Board will be composed of seven members divided into the three classes. As explained in further detail in Proposal 4, the Board of Directors is proposing to amend our Certificate of Incorporation to declassify the Board of Directors. If Proposal 4 is approved by the Company’s stockholders, at each annual meeting of stockholders commencing with the 2014 Annual Meeting, the class of directors whose terms expire at such meeting will be elected for one-year terms. At the 2017 Annual Meeting and at each annual meeting of stockholders thereafter, all directors shall be elected to hold office for a one-year term expiring at the next annual meeting of stockholders. A plurality of the shares of Common Stock present and voting at the Annual Meeting is necessary to elect the nominees for director. With regards to uncontested elections, our Board has adopted a policy that in the event a nominee receives a greater number of “WITHHELD” votes than votes “FOR” his or her election, such nominee shall tender his or her written resignation to the Board of Directors, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee shall then make a recommendation to the Board of Directors as to whether to accept or reject the resignation. The Board of Directors will act on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation and publicly disclose its decision and the reasons for it within 90 days from the date that the election results are certified.

The person named as proxy in the enclosed form of proxy will vote the proxies received by them for the election of Mr. William K Hood, Mr. Thomas Jetter, Mr. Harry M. Jansen Kraemer, Jr. and Mr. Jeffrey T. Slovin unless otherwise directed. In the event that any of the nominees become unavailable for election at the Annual Meeting, the person named as proxy in the enclosed form of proxy may vote for a substitute nominee in their discretion as recommended by the Board.

Information concerning the nominees and incumbent directors whose terms will continue after the Annual Meeting is set forth below.

During fiscal 2013, the Board held six meetings. At all Board meetings our independent directors meet separately without management present. All of the then current members of our Board attended the 2012 annual meeting of stockholders. The Company has no policy regarding director attendance at its Annual Meeting. A majority of the Board, consisting of Messrs. Beecken, Hood, Jetter, Kowaloff, Kraemer and Sullivan are “independent directors”, as such term is defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) of the NASDAQ Listing Rules. The following table provides membership information as of September 30, 2013 for the Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance committees of our Board:

Below is a description of the Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance committees of our Board and information regarding committee meetings held in fiscal 2013.

The primary function of the Audit Committee is to serve as an independent and objective party to oversee our accounting and financial reporting processes and internal control system; to pre-approve all auditing and non-auditing services to be provided by our independent auditor; to review and oversee the audit efforts of our independent auditor; and to provide an open avenue of communication among the independent auditor, financial and senior management and our Board. The Audit Committee has responsibility and authority, among other matters, to review with our management any financial information filed with the SEC or disseminated to the public; to establish and maintain procedures for receiving and treating complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls and auditing matters, and for the confidential anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding these matters; to appoint, determine funding for and oversee our independent auditor; to review, in consultation with the independent auditor and our accounting personnel, the integrity of our financial reporting processes; and to review in advance any proposed transaction between us and any related party. A copy of our Audit Committee Charter can be found on our corporate website at www.sirona.com. The Audit Committee met eight times during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013.

NASDAQ Listing Rules related to compensation committees. In particular, under the amended and restated Compensation Committee Charter, the Compensation Committee (i) has the authority, in its sole discretion, to retain or obtain the advice of a compensation consultant, legal counsel or other adviser, (ii) is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of any compensation consultant, legal counsel and other adviser, (iii) will receive appropriate funding, as determined by the Compensation Committee, for payment of reasonable compensation to a compensation consultant, legal counsel or any other adviser; and (iv) will select, or receive advice from, a compensation consultant, legal counsel or other adviser, other than in-house legal counsel, only after taking into consideration factors related to the independence of such compensation consultant, legal counsel or other adviser, as required by the NASDAQ Listing Rules. A copy of our amended and restated Compensation Committee Charter can be found on our corporate website at www.sirona.com. The Compensation Committee met eight times during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013.

Since October 2007, the Compensation Committee has retained independent compensation consultant Pearl Meyer & Partners (“PM&P”) to provide advice and recommendations with respect to the competitiveness of compensation for our named executive officer group and our non-employee directors. Other than as described above, PM&P performs no other services for the Company or Company’s management.

Dental Systems, Inc., 30-30 47th Avenue, Suite 500 Long Island City, NY 11101 and should not include self-nominations. A copy of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter can be found on our corporate website at www.sirona.com. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met five times in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013.

The Board of Directors adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines, a copy of which is available on our Internet website at www.sirona.com. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines address topics such as (i) the role and responsibilities of the Board of Directors, (ii) the definition of independence, (iii) the selection of Board of Director nominees, (iv) Board membership criteria, (v) Board leadership, (vi) Board meetings, (vii) committees, (viii) director compensation, (ix) orientation and continuing education of directors, (x) management development and succession planning, (xi) attendance of directors at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, (xii) directors’ access to management and independent advisors, (xiii) evaluation of the Board of Directors and committees and (xiv) submission of director resignations. The Corporate Governance Guidelines were revised in fiscal 2013 with the following changes: we included a director resignation policy which states that any nominee for director in an uncontested election who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” such election is required to tender his or her resignation to the Board of Directors, and we added the position of senior independent director, who will be appointed annually by the independent directors, and who is responsible for presiding at all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is not present, including executive sessions of the independent directors.

The Board of Directors also adopted new Stock Ownership Guidelines to ensure that the interests of the executive officers and directors are aligned with those of stockholders. The individual stock ownership guideline level for each executive officer is equal to the number of shares equivalent to: (i) six (6) times the annual base salary for the Chief Executive Officer; or (ii) one (1) times the annual base salary of any executive officer other than the Chief Executive Officer. The individual stock ownership guideline level for each director is equal to the number of shares equivalent to five (5) times the annual cash retainer payable to such director. A copy of the Stock Ownership Guidelines is available on our Internet website at www.sirona.com.

On June 2, 2004, by resolution of our Board, we adopted a code of ethics governing the conduct of our personnel, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. A copy of the current code of ethics is available on our website at www.sirona.com. In addition, a free copy of the code may be obtained by stockholders upon request by contacting Jonathan Friedman, General Counsel of the Company, at (718) 482-2011.

In the event that any amendment is made to the code of ethics, and such amendment is applicable to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, we shall disclose the nature of any such amendment on our website within four business days following the date of the amendment. In the event that we grant a waiver, including an implicit waiver, from a provision of the code of ethics, to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, we shall disclose the nature of any such waiver, including the name of the person to whom the waiver is granted and the date of such waiver, on our website within four business days following the date of the waiver. Our website address is www.sirona.com.

Historically, we have not adopted a formal process for stockholder communications with our Board. Nevertheless, every effort has been made to ensure that the views of stockholders are heard by our Board or

individual directors, as applicable, and that appropriate responses are provided to stockholders in a timely manner. We believe our responsiveness to stockholder communications to our Board has been excellent, and to date, we have not considered it necessary to adopt a formal process. Nevertheless, during the upcoming year the Board will continue to monitor whether it would be appropriate to adopt a formal process for stockholder communications with the Board.

In executing its responsibilities, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed our audited financial statements with our management. The Audit Committee has also discussed with the Company’s independent auditor the overall scope and plans for their audits of the Company. Furthermore, the Audit Committee has discussed with our independent auditor the matters required to be discussed by SAS 61, as amended. In addition, the Audit Committee has received written disclosures and a letter from our independent auditor delineating all relationships between them and us, consistent with the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent auditor’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with them matters pertaining to their independence. The Audit Committee also considered whether the additional services unrelated to audit services performed by KPMG during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013 were compatible with maintaining their independence in performing their audit services. In addition, the Audit Committee met with the independent auditor, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of the Company’s internal controls, and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting.

Based upon the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to our Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013 for filing with the SEC. The Audit Committee and Board of Directors have also recommended the selection of KPMG as our independent auditor for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2014.

Our Board is committed to adopting governance policies and practices that promote the most effective and ethical management of the Company. In addition, the Board believes that it is important to retain flexibility to determine the Company’s optimal leadership structure and to choose the best qualified person(s) to serve in the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. Consequently, after our former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Fischer, retired in February 2013, the Board determined that the designation of an independent, Non-Executive Chairman represented the optimal leadership structure for the Company. The directors believe that this role provides the Board with independent leadership and allows Mr. Slovin, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, to concentrate on the Company’s business operations. Therefore, Mr. Jetter, who served as a director since April 2010, was appointed to the role of Non-Executive Chairman of the Board following our last Annual Meeting on February 20, 2013. Moreover, during this past fiscal year, we added the position of ‘senior independent director’. This director will be appointed annually by the independent directors at the board of directors meeting immediately following the Company’s annual meeting and will be responsible for presiding at all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is not present, including executive sessions of the independent directors.

We recognize that different board leadership structures may be appropriate for companies in different situations and believe that no one structure is suitable for all companies. Because the leadership structure that is appropriate for a company can also change over time, we intend to review our leadership structure annually to determine if it is the most appropriate one for the Company.

Our Board is responsible for overseeing the Company’s risk management process. The Board focuses on the Company’s general risk management strategy, the most significant risks facing the Company, and ensures that appropriate risk mitigation strategies are implemented by management. The Board is also apprised of particular risk management matters in connection with its general oversight and approval of corporate matters.

The Board has delegated to the Audit Committee oversight of the Company’s risk management process. Among its duties, the Audit Committee (a) reviews with management Company policies with respect to risk assessment and management of risks that may be material to the Company, including the risk of fraud, (b) reviews the integrity of the Company’s financial reporting processes, both internal and external, including reviewing management’s report on its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of the end of each fiscal year, (c) reviews the Company’s major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures and (d) the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee is also responsible for reviewing major legislative and regulatory developments that could materially impact the Company’s contingent liabilities and risks. Our other Board committees also consider and address risk as they perform their respective committee responsibilities. All committees report to the full Board as appropriate, including when a matter rises to the level of a material or enterprise level risk.

The Company’s management is responsible for day-to-day risk management. Our Internal Audit area serves as the primary monitoring and testing function for company-wide policies and procedures, and manages the day-to-day oversight of the risk management strategy for the ongoing business of the Company. This oversight includes identifying, evaluating, and addressing potential risks that may exist at the enterprise, strategic, financial, operational, and compliance and reporting levels.

We believe the division of risk management responsibilities described above is an effective approach for addressing the risks facing the Company and that our Board leadership structure supports this approach.

The Audit Committee of our Board has selected KPMG as independent auditor for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2014 and has further directed that management submit the selection of independent auditor for ratification by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting. A proposal to ratify the appointment of KPMG will be presented at the Annual Meeting. Representatives of KPMG are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, and will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to answer questions from stockholders. KPMG was the Company’s independent auditor during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013.

Neither our By-laws nor other governing documents or law require stockholder ratification of the selection of KPMG as our independent auditor. However, the Board of Directors is submitting the selection of KPMG to the stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If the stockholders fail to ratify the selection, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether or not to retain that firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a different independent auditor at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of us and our stockholders.

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be required to ratify the selection of KPMG.

The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered for the Company by KPMG, the Company’s independent auditor, for the years ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were:

“Audit Fees” include time billed to the Company for professional services and expenses relating to the audit and review of the financial statements of the respective years. For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, audit fees included fees for professional services and expenses relating to the reviews of our quarterly financial statements for the quarters ended December 31, 2011 through June 30, 2013 on Form 10-Q and the audit of our annual financial statements and effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for each of fiscal years 2013 and 2012.

“Audit-Related Fees” include fees billed to the Company in the respective fiscal year for professional services and expenses related to reviews of proxy, Form 8-K, Form S-8 and Form S-3 filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, debt covenant compliance attestations, and electronic and other filings of local statutory financial statements.

“Tax Fees” include time billed to the Company for professional services and expenses principally related to tax planning, tax consulting and tax compliance.

“All Other Fees” include time billed to the Company for professional services and expenses primarily related to accounting and tax due diligences performed in connection with business acquisition activities.

All fees are agreed to in Euros. Total fees billed amounted to €1,213.5 and €1,059.7 (in thousands) in fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012, respectively (or $1,638.1 and $1,369.4, in thousands, using an exchange rate of 1.3499 and 1.2922 in fiscal 2013 and 2012, respectively).

No other professional services were rendered or fees were billed by KPMG for the years ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.

The Audit Committee has adopted a policy and procedures for the pre-approval of audit and non-audit services rendered by our independent auditor KPMG. The policy generally pre-approves specified services in the defined categories of audit services, audit-related services and tax services up to specified amounts. Pre-approval may also be given as part of our Audit Committee’s approval of the scope of the engagement of the independent auditor or on an individual explicit case-by-case basis before the independent auditor is engaged to provide each service. The pre-approval of services may be delegated to one or more of our Audit Committee members, but the decision must be reported to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. All audit-related services for fiscal 2013 and 2012 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

The Audit Committee has determined that the rendering of the services, other than the audit services, by KPMG, is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence.

The Board of Directors believes that the Company’s compensation policies and procedures are centered on a pay-for-performance culture and are strongly aligned with the long-term interests of stockholders. You are urged to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement for additional details on the Company’s executive compensation, including the Company’s philosophy and objectives and the 2013 compensation of the named executive officers.

Congress enacted legislation requiring a non-binding advisory “say-on-pay” vote on executive compensation beginning in 2011. In light of the results of the stockholder’s non-binding advisory vote at the Annual Meeting of the Stockholders for the fiscal year ended in 2010 (the “2010 Annual Meeting”) with respect to the frequency with which stockholders will vote for the approval of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, the Company currently intends to hold an annual non-binding advisory vote on such named executive officer compensation. This proposal gives you as a stockholder the opportunity to endorse or not endorse our executive pay program through the following resolution:

“Resolved, that the stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement.”

As an advisory vote, this proposal is non-binding. However, the Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee value the opinions of stockholders and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions for the named executive officers.

Currently, our Certificate of Incorporation divides the members of our Board into three classes. One class of directors is elected at each annual meeting of stockholders to hold office for a term beginning on the date of the election and ending on the date of the third annual meeting of stockholders following the date of the election.

At our 2012 annual meeting of stockholders, our stockholders supported and approved a non-binding stockholder proposal to elect each director annually. In response to such support, and based on the evaluation by the Board of our corporate governance practices and the best interests of the Company and its stockholders, we are asking our stockholders to approve amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation to declassify the Board and to establish annual election of directors. The Board unanimously approved and declared advisable the proposed amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation, and recommends that our stockholders adopt the proposed amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation.

The proposed amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation would modify Article SEVENTH of the Certificate of Incorporation to declassify the Board of Directors.

If this Proposal 4 is approved by the Company’s stockholders at the Annual Meeting, our Certificate of Incorporation will be amended to provide that the classification of the Board will be phased out beginning with the 2014 annual meeting of stockholders. During the phase-out period, the director nominees for election at the 2014 annual meeting of stockholders will be elected to serve for one-year terms expiring at the 2015 annual meeting of stockholders , the director nominees for election at the 2015 annual meeting of stockholders will be elected to serve for one-year terms expiring at the 2016 annual meeting of stockholders and the director nominees for election at the 2016 annual meeting of stockholders will be elected to serve for one-year terms expiring at the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders. Beginning with the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders, the Board will no longer be classified, and all director nominees will be elected for one-year terms.

If this Proposal 4 is not approved by the Company’s stockholders, the proposed amendments to our Certificate of Incorporation will not become effective, and the Board will remain classified, with directors in each class serving a term ending on the date of the third annual meeting of stockholders following the date of their election. The complete text of the proposed amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation is included in Appendix A to this proxy statement. The foregoing summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the amendments. You are urged to read the proposed amendments in their entirety.

The approval of the proposed amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation requires the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 75% of the shares of our Common Stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote on the proposal.

The following table sets forth, as of December 23, 2013, certain information regarding the ownership of the Common Stock of the Company by (1) each of our named executive officers and directors; (2) all of our executive officers and directors as a group; and (3) persons who are beneficial owners of more than five percent of our Common Stock:

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our Common Stock and other of our equity securities. Specific due dates for these reports have been established, and we are required to disclose any failure to file by these dates during fiscal 2013. Our officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are required by the SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

To our knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to us and representations that no other reports were required, during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners were complied with.

The following table sets forth the following information, as of September 30, 2013, with respect to compensation plans (including individual compensation arrangements) under which equity securities of the Company are authorized for issuance: the number of securities to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights; the weighted-average exercise price of such options, warrants and rights; and, other than the securities to be issues upon the exercise of such options, warrants and rights, the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under the plan:

All non-employee directors received director fees in fiscal 2013. Directors who are also our paid employees are not separately compensated for any services they provide as directors.

On May 14, 2013, Messrs. Beecken, Hood, Jetter, Kowaloff, Kraemer and Sullivan received an award of 2,106 RSUs pursuant to the Company’s 2006 Plan. The RSUs vest in three equal annual installments beginning on May 14, 2014. The compensation earned by our non-employee directors for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013 is summarized as follows:

Fiscal 2013 Performance Highlights:

Fiscal 2013 Executive Compensation and Governance Highlights:

Consistent with the desire of the shareholders (per the Say-on-Frequency vote in early 2011), Sirona has adopted the practice of conducting an annual non-binding advisory vote on NEO compensation. The Compensation Committee has and will continue to monitor the results of the annual advisory Say-on-Pay proposal and incorporate such results as one of many factors considered in connection with the discharge of its responsibilities, although no such factor is assigned a quantitative weighting. Despite receiving near universal support for the Company’s fiscal 2012 compensation program, Sirona, in keeping with evolving corporate governance best practices, implemented certain changes to the Company’s compensation program (see Fiscal 2013 Executive Compensation and Governance Highlights).

Since October 2007, the Compensation Committee has retained PM&P to provide advice and recommendations with respect to the competitiveness of Sirona’s executive and director compensation programs. The Compensation Committee directly engaged PM&P to conduct competitive market assessments for Sirona’s NEO group in fiscal 2008, 2011 2012 and 2013. In the first quarter of fiscal 2013, PM&P provided advice/guidance to the Compensation Committee with respect to the Company’s CEO succession plan. Additionally, PM&P was also engaged to provide competitive market assessments of Sirona’s Non-Employee Director Compensation program in fiscal 2008 and 2011. PM&P has never performed any services other than executive and director compensation consulting for the Company, and performed its services only on behalf of and at the direction of the Compensation Committee.

The Compensation Committee believes that there was no conflict of interest between the compensation consultant and the Compensation Committee during the year ended September 30, 2013. In reaching this conclusion, the Compensation Committee has analyzed whether the work of PM&P as a compensation consultant has raised any conflict of interest, taking into consideration the following factors: (i) the provision of other services to the Company by PM&P; (ii) the amount of fees from the Company paid to PM&P as a percentage of PM&P’s total revenue; (iii) the policies and procedures of PM&P that are designed to prevent conflicts of interest; (iv) any business or personal relationship of PM&P or the individual compensation advisors employed by PM&P with an executive officer of the Company; (v) any business or personal relationship of the individual compensation advisors with any member of the Compensation Committee; and (vi) any stock of the Company owned by PM&P or the individual compensation advisors employed by PM&P.

To achieve these compensation objectives, the Compensation Committee has developed a compensation program for the NEOs generally consisting of base salary, annual cash bonus and long-term incentive compensation in the form of stock options, restricted shares/units and/or performance-contingent shares.

Target compensation levels for the NEOs approximate the market as follows:

Base salary levels are positioned just above market median to account for Sirona’s greater product complexity and broader geographic reach. However, as mentioned above, compensation is primarily driven by incentive awards tied to Sirona’s performance. As in past years, the Compensation Committee continues to believe that the Company’s growth targets justify positioning target incentive compensation (short- and long-term) at above-median levels.

The resulting target total compensation pay mix for the President and CEO, Jeffrey T. Slovin, is:

The average total compensation pay mix for the other NEOs is structured to be:

The Compensation Committee believes that placing heavier weight on long-term incentives helps ensure strong alignment with creating long-term value for shareholders.

Compensation levels for our named executive officers are determined based on a number of factors, including a review of the compensation levels in the marketplace for similar positions. The Peer Group was generally consistent with the Peer Group established in 2007, but updated to take into account changes within the industries and the Company’s business. The current peer group (“Peer Group”) consists of the following companies:

The Compensation Committee generally reviews base salary levels on an annual basis and determines if increases are warranted to align with prevailing market levels. For Fiscal 2013, Mr. Slovin’s base salary increase reflects his promotion to Chief Executive Officer, while increases for Ms. Blank, Mr. Petersohn and Mr. Friedman were made to better align with the market 55th percentile. Mr. Berthan was hired as a Vice President of the Company on September 1, 2012 and subsequently promoted to Executive Vice President as of November 16, 2012. He did not receive a base salary increase as a result of his promotion.

The Compensation Committee believes that annual bonuses can serve an important function by adding a fiscal performance-based incentive to an executive’s compensation package. To that end, the Company maintains two bonus programs for the NEOs: Executive Bonus Plan (“Executive Plan”) and Employee Profit Sharing Bonus Plan. The Executive Plan covers the President and CEO (Mr. Slovin), CFO (for fiscal 2013, Ms. Blank) and the EVP, Sales (Mr. Petersohn), while the Employee Profit Sharing Bonus Plan covers the EVP (Mr. Berthan) and General Counsel and Secretary (Mr. Friedman).

The purpose of the Executive Plan is to provide to senior executive officers selected by the Compensation Committee cash bonus compensation that is (1) performance based and (2) competitive at target performance with the cash bonuses paid to similarly situated senior executives. The Executive Plan replaced the 2008 Executive Bonus Plan (the “2008 Plan”) which had previously replaced the cash bonus compensation component of total compensation used in prior years for the participants of the 2008 Plan. The Compensation Committee annually determines target performance metrics based upon budgetary estimates of financial performance approved by the Board of Directors in the first quarter of each fiscal year. The target bonus amount of each participant is a percentage of such participant’s annual base salary. The Compensation Committee also determines the percentage of target bonus payable to each participant at performance levels above and below target performance for each of the metrics described below on an annual basis. In fiscal 2013, cash bonuses were targeted at the 65th percentile of the Company’s Peer Group. While the Compensation Committee retains discretion to target annual cash bonuses other than in reference to the Peer Group, it did not exercise that discretion in fiscal 2013.

The financial performance metrics used to measure and reward performance under the Executive Plan has two major components: a Revenue Metric and an Earnings Metric.

(a)   Revenue Metric:   The Revenue Metric is the Company’s fiscal year revenue, as reported in its financials. The Revenue Metric is given a weighting of 25% in calculating each participant’s bonus. In the event that the actual fiscal year Revenue Metric achieves target, each participant will receive 25% of his or her target bonus. Each participant will receive greater or less than the 25% of target bonus to the extent the Revenue Metric exceeds or is less than the revenue target. Payout range is zero to 2x target (i.e., 0% to 50% of target annual bonus).

(b)   Earnings Metric:   The Earnings Metric consists solely of an Adjusted EBITDA Metric. The Adjusted EBITDA Metric has been determined by the Committee to be fiscal year net income as reported by the Company in its financials, plus (i) net interest expense, (ii) provision for income taxes, (iii) depreciation and amortization, (iv) option expenses, (v) foreign exchange effect from Patterson exclusivity fee revaluation, (vi) refinancing expenses, (vii) foreign exchange effect from intra-group loans, (viii) non-cash gain/loss on foreign exchange derivatives, (ix) release of the Patterson exclusivity fee (x) and other special items set forth by the Compensation Committee (historically, special items have been: write-off of IPR&D and expenses related to refinancing or secondary offerings by Luxco) less a gain from a patent infringement settlement. The Earnings Metric is given an overall weight of 75%. If the fiscal year Adjusted EBITDA Metric achieves target, each participant will receive 75% of his or her target bonus. Each participant will receive greater or less than the 75% of target bonus to the extent the Adjusted EBITDA Metric exceeds or is less than the adjusted EBITDA target. Payout range is zero to 2x target (i.e., 0% to 150% of target annual bonus).

The bonus awards for all participants in the Executive Plan are calculated with the same method: Fiscal year cash bonus = bonus earned due to actual fiscal year Revenue Metric performance + bonus earned due to actual fiscal year Adjusted EBITDA Metric performance. There are no elements of individual performance considered in determining any award.

The Compensation Committee determined for fiscal 2013 that the target bonus amounts were:

Consistent with Sirona’s compensation philosophy, target bonus amounts are within +/-15% of the market 65​th percentile.

Pursuant to the foregoing, each of the covered executives earned the following:

There are no payments under the Executive Plan to any person upon termination of employment (for any reason) or upon a change in control of the Company, however, participants may be eligible for such payments under their employment or other agreements with the Company. Please see “Employment Agreements” below.

Mr. Berthan and Mr. Friedman were both eligible to receive cash bonuses under the Employee Profit Sharing Bonus Plan for fiscal 2013. The Chief Executive Officer, in collaboration with the Compensation Committee, annually determines target performance metrics based upon budgetary estimates in the first quarter of each fiscal year.

For fiscal 2013, Mr. Berthan’s bonus was guaranteed at €140,000, per his employment agreement. Under normal course, €100,000 of his target bonus will be determined in accordance with Sirona’s bonus plan while the remaining €40,000 will be based on performance criteria determined on an annual basis. Additionally, Mr. Berthan has the ability to earn above target with the maximum award capped at €195,000.

Mr. Friedman’s bonus is based on two major components: (i) the Company’s Earnings Per Share (“EPS”) performance, weighted at 50% and (ii) certain qualitative targets relating to the individual projects, weighted at 50%. If target EPS of $3.43 was achieved for the 2013 fiscal year, Mr. Friedman would receive 50% of his target bonus. He would receive greater or less than the target bonus to the extent EPS exceeded or was less than target, subject to a threshold of 66.7% of the target and a cap of 133.3% of the target.

In the event that the actual fiscal year qualitative targets relating to the individual project targets achieved target Mr. Friedman would receive 50% of his target bonus and he would receive greater or less than the 50% of target bonus to the extent the qualitative achievements exceeded or was less than the target, subject to a threshold of 20% and a flattened bonus curve after 120% target achievement.

For fiscal 2013, Mr. Friedman’s target bonus was $129,600 (40% of base salary). Fiscal 2013 performance resulted in an EPS level just under target ($3.41 vs. target of $3.43) and Mr. Friedman’s performance against qualitative goals was just above target. Therefore, the earned bonus payout is equal to 100% of target or $129,600.

The selected performance metrics focus on top-line growth, bottom-line performance and cash management providing a more balanced approach to shareholder value creation. In addition to the change in performance metrics, the fiscal 2014 Executive Plan will be expanded to unite all NEOs under one common corporate short-term performance program.

As discussed above, the Compensation Committee targets long-term incentive compensation at the 65​th percentile of the Peer Group. Additionally, the Compensation Committee has determined that granting long-term incentives on an annual basis, rather than on a periodic basis, is more aligned with market practice and is in the best interest of shareholders.

In furtherance of Sirona’s desire to award the appropriate mix of stock options, time-vested restricted stock/units and performance-based shares to its NEOs, the Compensation Committee has granted a combination of time-vested restricted stock units and stock options for fiscal 2013. The Compensation Committee determined that this shift is more aligned with market practice and increases the focus on performance. The mix of stock options (46%) and restricted stock units (54%) provide an appropriate balance between performance, desire for shareholder alignment and retention. Stock options are inherently

performance-oriented and aligned with shareholder interest because stock price appreciation above the exercise price is required before an executive realizes any value. Unlike stock options, a restricted stock unit award has some value regardless of stock price volatility thereby enhancing retention during times of stock price volatility. Moreover, retention is further enhanced by requiring the first tranche (1/3rd) of restricted stock units to vest two years following the grant date and annually thereafter (as opposed to stock options which vest 25% one year following the grant date and 25% each year thereafter). However, in addition to being a retention vehicle, restricted stock units also align with shareholder interests since their value appreciates as the value of the Company’s common stock increases.

As Sirona and its marketplace continue to evolve, the Compensation Committee will continue to balance shareholder alignment with the motivational impact of the current equity award mix for the NEOs. To that end, Sirona’s fiscal 2014 equity awards (granted on November 26, 2013) consist of time-vested restricted stock units, stock options and performance-based shares. The Compensation Committee decided to introduce a performance-based share instrument focused on relative and absolute performance metrics into the equity mix to enhance the compensation programs linkage between pay and performance. Equity mix reflects:

The Company does not publicly disclose specific long-term incentive plan targets on a prospective basis due to potential competitive harm. Revealing specific objectives prospectively would provide competitors and other third parties with insights into our confidential planning process and strategies, thereby causing competitive harm.

In March 2008, the Compensation Committee, after review of the competitive market assessment conducted by PM&P, determined that Ms. Blank and Mr. Slovin should receive payments of up to 24 months annual base salary and two times target bonus in the year of termination in the event that any of them were terminated without cause or if any of them terminated their employment for good reason. The Compensation Committee also decided that equity awards held in the Company by Ms. Blank and Mr. Slovin would be accelerated in the event of a change in control. Mr. Slovin’s employment agreement already provided for such acceleration of equity awards held by him.

On December 2, 2008, the Compensation Committee approved amendments to employment agreements of Ms. Blank and Mr. Slovin for the purposes of providing the revised severance and change in control benefits described in the paragraph above. Additionally, Mr. Slovin’s employment agreement was further amended to reflect his promotion to Chief Executive Officer. For further detail see terms set forth under the section “Employment Agreements” below.

In connection with Mr. Fischer’s retirement following the Annual Meeting, Mr. Fischer and the Company executed a Transition Agreement. The details of the Transition Agreement, including severance payments that will be made to Mr. Fischer, are set forth under the section “Employment Agreements” below.

In connection with Ms. Blank’s resignation on October 14, 2013, Ms. Blank and the Company entered into a Separation Agreement in August 2013. The details of the Separation Agreement are set forth under the section “Employment Agreements” below.

Executive pension plans are common in European companies but are declining in the United States. In March 2008, the Compensation Committee, after review of the competitive market assessment conducted by PM&P, decided that Mr. Fischer and Ms. Blank should be enrolled in a defined contribution retirement savings plan because they are not eligible to participate in the Company’s 401(k) plan. The Compensation Committee believes that such a retirement savings plan provides a competitive benefit to our Europe-based named executive officers. While such benefit was authorized by the Compensation Committee in fiscal 2008, the retirement saving plan became available to our Europe-based named executive officers during fiscal 2009. For a description of this plan, see “Nonqualified Defined Contribution and other Nonqualified Deferred Compensation.” The Compensation Committee also determined that the Company should provide payments on behalf of some named executive officers for private health care insurance coverage. In fiscal 2013, payments of €3,646 ($4,784 at an average exchange rate of 1.31210 for fiscal 2013), €3,000 ($3,936 at an average exchange rate of 1.31210 for fiscal 2013) and $33,077 were made on behalf of Mr. Fischer, Ms. Blank and Mr. Slovin, respectively. The Compensation Committee also decided in March 2008, after review of the competitive market assessment conducted by PM&P, to continue the Company’s current practice of providing limited auto, housing and tax advisory services to its named executive officers. These perquisites facilitate the performance of our named executive officers’ managerial duties and provide for competitive total compensation when compared to the total compensation of the Peer Group.

The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 includes potential limitations on tax deductions for compensation in excess of $1,000,000 paid to our executive officers. The Compensation Committee has analyzed the impact of this provision of the tax law on our compensation policies, has determined that historically the effect of this provision on the taxes paid by us has not and would not have been significant and has decided for the present not to modify our compensation policies based on such provision. In the event that a material amount of compensation might potentially not be deductible, it will consider what actions, if any, should be taken to seek to make such compensation deductible without compromising its ability to motivate and reward excellent performance.

In fiscal 2010, the Company entered into agreements with Messrs. Slovin, Fischer and Ms. Blank providing for tax equalization. These payments were in recognition of the fact that these executives are required to spend an increased percentage of their time outside their respective home countries and were designed to make the executives whole on an after-tax basis.

In connection with his September 2010 appointment to President of the Company, Mr. Slovin agreed to be relocated to Bensheim, Germany for two years. During the period of relocation, the Company agreed to make Mr. Slovin whole on an after-tax basis for German employment income and other applicable taxes on his remuneration in excess of the tax that he would owe if his income was subject only to federal, state and local taxation applicable to Mr. Slovin prior to his relocation. This tax equalization payment is calculated by the Company’s outside accounting firm and paid with the monthly payroll. On October 1, 2012, the Company entered into a Letter Amendment to Mr. Slovin’s existing Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, providing that Mr. Slovin’s relocation to Bensheim, Germany will be extended until March 31, 2013. On May 7, 2013, the Company entered into an amendment to Mr. Slovin’s existing Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, providing that Mr. Slovin’s relocation to Germany is to be extended for a period to be determined within the sole discretion of Mr. Slovin. Furthermore, in the event that the Company’s housing, car lease, insurance, maintenance or tuition payments are deemed to be income to Mr. Slovin, Mr. Slovin will receive additional payments to make him whole on an after-tax basis.

On November 15, 2010, the Compensation Committee approved supplement agreements to the service agreements of each of Mr. Fischer and Ms. Blank for the purposes of providing that each of Mr. Fischer and Ms. Blank’s yearly salary and bonus under the service agreement will be paid by the Company pro rata to the days he/she has worked for the Company compared to total days to be worked under the service agreement, with the remaining portion of the yearly salary and bonus to be paid by Sirona Dental GmbH.

In order to facilitate the payment mechanism, the Company will pay Mr. Fischer and Ms. Blank a fixed amount on a monthly basis in the amount of 20% of the total salary, with the remaining 80% to be paid by Sirona Dental GmbH. Within 30 days following the end of the calendar year, the Company and Sirona Dental GmbH will each compensate the other for the difference between the portion of salary actually paid and the pro rata portion to be paid for such calendar year.

The supplement agreements further provide that Mr. Fischer and Ms. Blank will be subject to tax equalization, by which he/she will remain neutral, subject to certain conditions and limitation, from a tax perspective with respect to (i) compensation received from the Company and/or Sirona Dental GmbH, including any U.S. tax on salary, bonuses, share based compensation (including effects in case of exercises) and (ii) the indirect investment of each of Mr. Fischer and Ms. Blank in the Company, subject to certain limits. Mr. Fischer and Ms. Blank will pay the same amount of income taxes as he/she would have paid had he/she performed all of his/her duties in Austria and did not perform the duties in the U.S. and been subject to a salary split mentioned above. These supplemental agreements were effective for fiscal 2013 for Mr. Fischer until his retirement and Ms. Blank until her resignation.

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis provided above. Based on its review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for its 2013 fiscal year.

From the members of the Compensation Committee of Sirona Dental Systems, Inc.:

Pursuant to section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act, the Company is providing stockholders with the opportunity to cast an advisory (non-binding) vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. As an advisory vote, this proposal is non-binding. However, the Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee value the opinions of stockholders and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions for the named executive officers. In light of the results of the stockholder’s non-binding advisory vote at the 2010 Annual Meeting with respect to the frequency with which stockholders will vote for the approval of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, the Company currently intends to hold an annual non-binding advisory vote on such named executive officer compensation.

The following table provides summary information concerning compensation paid or accrued by the Company to or on behalf of named executive officers for services rendered during fiscal 2013, fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011.