DEF 14A
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant To Section 14(a) Of The
Securities Exchange Act Of 1934
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨
Check the appropriate box:
| |
¨ | Preliminary Proxy Statement |
| |
¨ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
| |
þ | Definitive Proxy Statement |
| |
¨ | Definitive Additional Materials |
| |
¨ | Soliciting Material under Rule 14a-12 |
The New Home Company Inc.
(Name of the Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
| |
¨ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
| |
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
| |
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
| |
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
| |
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
| |
¨ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
| |
¨ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
| |
(1) | Amount Previously Paid: |
| |
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
April 6, 2016
Dear Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of The New Home Company Inc. (the “Company”) to be held on May 24, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. local time, at the Renaissance Aliso Viejo Hotel, located at 50 Enterprise, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656.
At the annual meeting you will be asked to: (i) re-elect each of Wayne Stelmar, Sam Bakhshandehpour, Michael Berchtold and Gregory P. Lindstrom as Class II directors to serve for a three-year term expiring at our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders; (ii) approve The New Home Company Inc. 2016 Incentive Award Plan; (iii) ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accountants for 2016; and (iv) transact such other business as may properly come before the annual meeting. The accompanying Notice of Meeting and proxy statement describe these matters. We urge you to read this information carefully.
Our Board of Directors unanimously believes that the election of its four nominees to serve as our directors, the approval of the 2016 Incentive Award Plan and the ratification of our Audit Committee’s selection of independent registered public accountants are in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders, and, accordingly, recommends a vote “FOR” the election of each of Wayne Stelmar, Sam Bakhshandehpour, Michael Berchtold and Gregory P. Lindstrom, a vote “FOR” the approval of The New Home Company Inc. 2016 Incentive Award Plan and a vote “FOR” the ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accountants for 2016.
Your vote is important and it is important that your shares be represented and voted whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting in person. You may vote on the Internet, or if you are receiving a paper copy of the proxy statement, by telephone or by completing and mailing a proxy card. Voting over the Internet, by telephone or by written proxy will ensure your shares are represented at the annual meeting.
Thank you for your continued interest in and support of our Company.
|
|
Sincerely, |
|
/s/ H. Lawrence Webb |
|
H. Lawrence Webb |
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of our Board of Directors |
85 Enterprise, Suite 450
Aliso Viejo, California 92656
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 24, 2016
To our stockholders:
The 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of The New Home Company Inc. (the “Company”) will be held on May 24, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. local time, at the Renaissance Aliso Viejo Hotel, located at 50 Enterprise, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 (the “Annual Meeting”) for the following purposes:
|
| | | | |
| 1. | To re-elect each of Wayne Stelmar, Sam Bakhshandehpour, Michael Berchtold and Gregory P. Lindstrom to the Company’s Board of Directors (the or our “Board”) for a three-year term expiring at the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified or until earlier resignation or removal. All four individuals so nominated and named in the proxy statement are currently members of the Company’s Board.
| |
| 2. | To approve The New Home Company Inc. 2016 Incentive Award Plan. | |
| | | |
| 3. | To ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accountants for the year ending December 31, 2016. | |
| |
| 4. | To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any continuation, adjournment or postponement thereof. | |
The proxy statement accompanying this notice describes each of these items of business in more detail.
Our Board has fixed the close of business on March 31, 2016 as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting and only record holders of common stock at the close of business on that day will be entitled to vote. In order to constitute a quorum for the conduct of business at the Annual Meeting, holders of a majority of all outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Company must be present in person or represented by proxy.
Your vote is very important. It is important that your shares be represented and voted whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to submit your proxy as soon as possible using one of the following methods: (i) by granting your proxy electronically via the Internet by following the instructions on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or voting instruction form previously mailed to you; or (ii) if you are receiving a paper copy of the proxy statement, by signing, dating and returning by mail the proxy card or instruction form provided to you or following the voting instructions on the proxy card or voting instruction form, as applicable.
|
|
By order of the Board, |
/s/ Miek D. Harbur |
Miek D. Harbur, Secretary |
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be Held on May 24, 2016. The Notice of Annual Meeting, the Proxy Statement, our 2015 Annual Report and a sample proxy card are available at www.proxyvote.com.
THE NEW HOME COMPANY INC.
85 Enterprise, Suite 450
Aliso Viejo, California 92656
PROXY STATEMENT
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 24, 2016
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
| |
| |
INFORMATION CONCERNING VOTING AND SOLICITATION | |
| |
PROPOSAL 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS | |
PROPOSAL 2 – APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY’S 2016 INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN | |
| |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | |
| |
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS | |
| |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | |
| |
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS | |
| |
PROPOSAL 3 – RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS | |
| |
AUDIT MATTERS | |
| |
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS | |
| |
OTHER MATTERS | |
THE NEW HOME COMPANY INC.
PROXY STATEMENT
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held on May 24, 2016
INFORMATION CONCERNING VOTING AND SOLICITATION
General
Your proxy is solicited on behalf of the board of directors (our “Board”) of The New Home Company Inc., a Delaware corporation, for use at our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held May 24, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. local time, at the Renaissance Aliso Viejo Hotel, located at 50 Enterprise, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656, or at any continuation, postponement or adjournment thereof (the “Annual Meeting”), for the purposes discussed in this proxy statement and in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting and any business properly brought before the Annual Meeting. Proxies are solicited to give all stockholders of record an opportunity to vote on matters properly presented at the Annual Meeting.
We have elected to provide access to our proxy materials over the Internet. Accordingly, we are sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) to our stockholders of record, while brokers and other nominees who hold shares on behalf of beneficial owners will be sending their own similar notice. All stockholders will have the ability to access the proxy materials on the website referred to in the Notice or request to receive a printed set of the proxy materials. Instructions on how to request a printed copy by mail or electronically may be found on the Notice and on the website referred to in the Notice, including an option to request paper copies on an ongoing basis. On or about April 6, 2016, we intend to make this proxy statement available on the Internet, and on or before April 14, 2016, we intend to mail the Notice to all stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. We intend to mail this proxy statement, together with a proxy card to those stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting who have properly requested paper copies of such materials, within three business days of such request. Pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1943, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), stockholders may present proper proposals for inclusion in the proxy statement and for consideration at our next Annual Meeting of stockholders. To be eligible for inclusion in the 2017 proxy statement, your proposal must be received by us no later than December 7, 2016 and must otherwise comply with Rule 14a-8.
On January 30, 2014, The New Home Company LLC (“TNHC LLC”) converted into a Delaware corporation and was renamed The New Home Company Inc., which we refer to as our formation transaction. As used in this proxy statement, unless the context otherwise requires or indicates, references to “the Company,” “our Company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” (1) for periods prior to the completion of our formation transactions, refer to TNHC LLC and its subsidiaries and affiliates, and (2) following the completion of our formation transactions, refer to The New Home Company Inc. and its subsidiaries.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be Held on May 24, 2016
The Notice of Annual Meeting, this proxy statement, our 2015 Annual Report and a sample proxy card are available at www.proxyvote.com. You are encouraged to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials before voting.
Who Can Vote
You are entitled to vote if you were a stockholder of record of our common stock as of the close of business on March 31, 2016. At the close of business on March 31, 2016, 20,708,973 shares of our common stock were outstanding and entitled to vote. You are entitled to one vote for each share of common stock held on all matters to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting. Your shares may be voted at the Annual Meeting only if you are present in person or represented by a valid proxy.
Voting of Shares
Any stockholder as of the record date may vote by attending the annual meeting and voting in person, or by submitting a proxy. The method of voting by proxy differs (1) depending on whether you are viewing this proxy statement on the Internet or receiving a paper copy, and (2) for shares held as a record holder and shares held in “street name.”
Record Holders. If you hold your shares of common stock as a record holder and you are viewing this proxy statement on the Internet, you may vote by submitting a proxy over the Internet by following the instructions on the website referred to in the notice previously mailed to you. You may request paper copies of the proxy statement and proxy card by following the instructions on the notice. If you hold your shares of common stock as a record holder and you are reviewing a paper copy of this proxy statement, you may vote your shares by completing, dating and signing the proxy card that was included with the proxy statement and promptly returning it in the pre-addressed, postage paid envelope provided to you, or by submitting a proxy over the Internet or by telephone by following the instructions on the proxy card.
Street Name. If you hold your shares of common stock in street name, which means your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or nominee, you will receive a notice from your broker, bank or other nominee that includes instructions on how to vote your shares. Your broker, bank or nominee will allow you to deliver your voting instructions over the Internet and may also permit you to vote by telephone. In addition, you may request paper copies of the proxy statement and proxy card from your broker by following the instructions on the Notice provided by your broker.
The Internet and telephone voting facilities will close at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 23, 2016. If you vote through the Internet, you should be aware that you may incur costs to access the Internet, such as usage charges from telephone companies or Internet service providers and that these costs must be borne by you. If you vote by Internet or telephone, then you need not return a written proxy card by mail.
YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT. You should submit your proxy even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. If you properly give your proxy and submit it to us in time to vote, one of the individuals named as your proxy will vote your shares as you have directed.
All shares entitled to vote and represented by properly submitted proxies (including those submitted electronically, telephonically and in writing) received before the polls are closed at the Annual Meeting, and not revoked or superseded, will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions indicated on those proxies. If, as a record holder, you do not indicate your voting directions on your signed proxy, your shares will be voted according to the recommendation of our Board, as follows:
• “FOR” the election of Wayne Stelmar, Sam Bakhshandehpour, Michael Berchtold and Gregory P. Lindstrom to the Board for a three-year term expiring at our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders,
• “FOR” the approval of The New Home Company Inc. 2016 Incentive Award Plan,
and
• “FOR” the ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accountants for the year ending December 31, 2016.
The proxy gives each of H. Lawrence Webb and John M. Stephens discretionary authority to vote your shares in accordance with his best judgment with respect to all additional matters that might come before the Annual Meeting and any continuation, postponement or adjournment of the Annual Meeting. If you hold your shares in street name and do not give direction to your broker on how to vote your shares, your broker does not have authority to vote on the election of the nominees. Your broker does have discretion to vote on the ratification of the selection of the independent auditors.
Revocation of Proxy
If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy at any time before your proxy is voted at the Annual Meeting by taking any of the following actions:
| |
• | delivering to our secretary a signed written notice of revocation, bearing a date later than the date of the proxy, stating that the proxy is revoked; |
| |
• | signing and delivering a new paper proxy, relating to the same shares and bearing a later date than the original proxy; |
| |
• | authorizing another proxy by telephone or over the Internet (your most recent telephone or Internet authorization will be used); or |
| |
• | attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. |
Attendance at the Annual Meeting will not, by itself, revoke a proxy. Written notices of revocation and other communications with respect to the revocation of the Company proxies should be addressed to the mailing address of our principal executive offices:
The New Home Company Inc.
85 Enterprise, Suite 450
Aliso Viejo, California 92656
Attn: Secretary
If your shares are held in “street name,” you may change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee. You must contact your broker, bank or other nominee to find out how to do so. See regarding how to vote in person if your shares are held in street name.
Attending the Annual Meeting
Stockholders who wish to attend the Annual Meeting will be required to present: (1) verification of ownership of our common stock, such as a bank or brokerage firm account statement, (2) a valid government-issued picture identification, such as a driver’s license or passport, and (3) the admission ticket, which is the Notice or, if you are receiving a proxy card, is attached to the proxy card, to gain admittance to the Annual Meeting. Directions to the Annual Meeting are available at www.proxyvote.com.
No cameras, recording equipment, electronic devices, large bags, briefcases or packages will be permitted in the Annual Meeting.
Voting in Person
If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting and wish to vote in person, you will be given a ballot at the Annual Meeting. Please note, however, that if your shares are held in “street name,” which means your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee, and you wish to vote at the Annual Meeting, you must bring to the Annual Meeting a legal proxy from the record holder of the shares, which is the broker or other nominee, authorizing you to vote at the Annual Meeting.
Quorum and Votes Required
At the close of business on March 31, 2016, 20,708,973 shares of our common stock were outstanding and entitled to vote. All votes will be tabulated by the inspector of election appointed for the Annual Meeting, who will separately tabulate affirmative and negative votes and abstentions.
Quorum. A majority in voting power of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote, present in person or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting. Shares of common stock held by persons attending the Annual Meeting but not voting, shares represented by proxies that reflect abstentions as to a particular proposal and broker “non-votes” will be counted as present for purposes of determining a quorum.
Broker Non-Votes and Abstentions. Brokers or other nominees who hold shares of common stock in “street name” for a beneficial owner of those shares typically have the authority to vote in their discretion on “routine” proposals when they have not received instructions from beneficial owners. However, without specific instruction from the beneficial owner, brokers are not allowed to exercise their voting discretion with respect to the election of directors or for the approval of matters which are considered to be “non-routine.” These non-voted shares are referred to as “broker non-votes.” Only Proposal 3 (ratifying the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm) is considered a routine matter. Proposal 1 (election of directors) and Proposal 2 (approval of Incentive Award Plan) are not considered routine matters, and without your instruction, your broker cannot vote your shares. Broker non-votes are not considered as having voted for purposes of determining the outcome of a vote. Abstentions may be specified for all proposals except the election of directors. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted for purposes of determining a quorum. Stockholder approval of each proposal requires the following votes:
|
| |
• | Proposal 1 - Election of Directors. Directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast. Thus, the four nominees receiving the greatest votes will be elected. Abstentions will not be counted in determining which nominees received a majority of votes cast since abstentions do not represent votes cast for or against a candidate. Brokers do not have discretionary authority to vote on the election of directors. Broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of the election of directors because brokers are not able to cast their votes on this proposal. |
• | Proposal 2 – Approval of Incentive Award Plan. The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote is required for the approval of The New Home Company Inc. 2016 Incentive Award Plan. Abstentions will have the same effect as voting against this proposal because they represent shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote. Brokers do not have discretionary authority to vote on the approval of equity incentive plans. Broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of the election of directors because brokers are not able to cast their votes on this proposal.
|
• | Proposal 3 - Ratification of the Selection of Our Independent Auditors. The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote is required for the ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditors. Abstentions will have the same effect as voting against this proposal because they represent shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote. Brokers have discretionary authority to vote on the ratification of our independent auditors, thus broker non-votes are generally not expected to result from the vote on this proposal. |
Solicitation of Proxies
Our Board is soliciting proxies for the Annual Meeting from our stockholders. We will bear the entire cost of soliciting proxies from our stockholders. In addition to the solicitation by mail, the Company, our officers, employees and agents may solicit proxies by telephone, by facsimile, by email or in person. We do not expect to use a proxy solicitor to assist in the solicitation of proxies. Copies of solicitation materials will be furnished to banks, brokers, fiduciaries and custodians holding shares of our common stock in their names that are beneficially owned by our stockholders, so they may forward the solicitation materials to the beneficial owners and secure those beneficial owners’ voting instructions. We may reimburse persons representing beneficial owners for their costs of forwarding the solicitation materials to the beneficial owners.
Stockholder List
A list of stockholders entitled to vote at the annual meeting will be available for examination by any stockholder for any purpose germane to the Annual Meeting during ordinary business hours at our corporate headquarters offices located at 85 Enterprise, Suite 450, Aliso Viejo, California 92656 for the ten days prior to the annual meeting, and also at the Annual Meeting.
Explanatory Note
The Company closed its initial public offering on February 5, 2014. We are an “emerging growth company” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”). For as long as we are an emerging growth company, we will not be required to provide an auditor's attestation report on management's assessment of the effectiveness of our system of internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. In addition, because we are an emerging growth company, we are not required to include a Compensation Discussion and Analysis section in this proxy statement and have elected to comply with the scaled-down executive compensation disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies.
We could be an emerging growth company for up to five years from the date of our initial public offering, or until the earliest of (i) the last day of the first fiscal year in which our annual gross revenues exceed $1 billion, (ii) the date that we become a “large accelerated filer” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under Exchange Act, which would occur at the end of the fiscal year during which the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter, or (iii) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt during the preceding three year period.
PROPOSAL 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Board Structure and Nominees
Our Board currently consists of 11 directors. The directors are divided into three classes; Class I, Class II, and Class III. Each director serves a term of three years. At each Annual Meeting, the term of one class expires. The class of directors with a term expiring at this Annual Meeting, Class II, consists of four directors.
On February 5, 2014, in connection with our initial public offering, we entered into an investor rights agreement (the “Investor Rights Agreement”) with IHP Capital Partners VI, LLC, WATT/TNHC LLC and TCN/TNHC LP (the “Institutional Investors”) and each of H. Lawrence Webb, Wayne Stelmar, Joseph Davis and Thomas Redwitz. Pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement, each Institutional Investor has the right to designate one individual for nomination and election to our Board for as long as such Institutional Investor owns 4% or more of our then-outstanding common stock (excluding shares of common stock that are subject to issuance upon the exercise or exchange of rights of conversion or any options, warrants or other rights to acquire shares). Each Institutional Investor also agrees to vote all shares of our common stock that it owns in favor of Messrs. Webb, Stelmar or Berchtold (or, if at that time nominated as a director, Messrs. Davis or Redwitz) in any election in which Messrs. Webb, Stelmar or Berchtold (or, as the case may be, Messrs. Davis or Redwitz) is a nominee, and each of Messrs. Webb, Stelmar, Davis and Redwitz agree to vote all shares of our common stock that he owns in favor of each nominee designated by an Institutional Investor in any election of directors in which such a designee is a nominee. For more information on the Institutional Investors’ director nomination and other rights pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement, see “Corporate Governance—Investor Rights Agreement.”
Based upon the recommendation of our Nominating and Governance Committee, our Board has nominated Wayne Stelmar, Sam Bakhshandehpour, Michael Berchtold and Gregory P. Lindstrom for election as Class II directors to the Board at the Annual Meeting. If elected, each director nominee would serve a three-year term expiring at the close of our 2019 Annual Meeting, or until their successors are duly elected. Messrs. Stelmar, Bakhshandehpour, Berchtold and Lindstrom currently serve on our Board. Biographical information on each of the nominees is furnished below under “Director Biographical Information.”
Set forth below is information as of the record date regarding each nominee and each person whose term of office as a director will continue after the Annual Meeting. Dates of service prior to January 30, 2014 relate to service on the board of managers of TNHC LLC.
|
| | | | | |
Name | Age | Position | Class | Director Since | Term Expires |
H. Lawrence Webb(1) | 67 | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board | III | 2010 | 2017 |
Wayne Stelmar(1) | 61 | Chief Investment Officer and Director | II | 2010 | 2016 |
David Berman | 68 | Director | I | 2014 | 2018 |
Douglas C. Neff(1) | 67 | Director | I | 2014 | 2018 |
Nadine Watt | 47 | Director | I | 2014 | 2018 |
Sam Bakhshandehpour(2)(3) | 40 | Director | II | 2014 | 2016 |
Michael Berchtold(1) | 52 | Director | II | 2014 | 2016 |
Gregory P. Lindstrom(3)(4) | 62 | Director | II | 2014 | 2016 |
Paul Heeschen(4) | 58 | Director | III | 2014 | 2017 |
Cathey S. Lowe(2)(4) | 62 | Director | III | 2014 | 2017 |
William A. Witte(2)(3) | 64 | Director | III | 2014 | 2017 |
(1) Current member of our Executive Committee
(2) Current member of our Audit Committee
(3) Current member of our Compensation Committee
(4) Current member of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Board Recommendation
OUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE FOUR NAMED DIRECTOR NOMINEES.
Director Biographical Information
The following biographical information is furnished with regard to our directors (including nominees) as of
March 31, 2016.
Nominees for Election at the Annual Meeting to Serve for a Three-Year Term Expiring at the 2019 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders
Wayne Stelmar. Mr. Stelmar has served as our Chief Investment Officer since June 2015, as Chief Financial Officer and Secretary from January 2014 to June 2015 and as a member of our Board effective upon the completion of our initial public offering. Prior to that, he was a member of our board of managers since 2010. In 1998, when Watt Residential Partners and John Laing Homes merged, Mr. Stelmar became CFO of John Laing Homes and served in that capacity until February 2009. Prior to joining John Laing Homes, Mr. Stelmar served as CFO of Watt Residential Partners. He joined the Watt Group Inc. in 1988. He has also worked with accounting firms Kenneth Leventhal & Company (later, E&Y Kenneth Leventhal Real Estate Group) and Grant Thornton where he began his career in 1977. Mr. Stelmar is a CPA (inactive) and holds a California real estate broker’s license. Mr. Stelmar received his Bachelor of Science in Accounting from California State University, Northridge. The Board has concluded Mr. Stelmar should serve as a director based on his depth of executive and financial management experience within the real estate industry and his contributions to our formation and growth.
Sam Bakhshandehpour. Mr. Bakhshandehpour was appointed as a member of our Board effective upon the completion of our initial public offering. Mr. Bakhshandehpour serves as President and Managing Partner of Silverstone Capital Management, LLC where he leads origination and execution of all hotel and hospitality-related principal investments and transactions. From 2012 to 2015, Mr. Bakhshandehpour served as President, Chief Executive Officer and Board Member of sbe Entertainment, where he was responsible for the Company's global strategic growth and operations across the Hotel, Restaurant and Entertainment Divisions. From 2000 to 2012, Mr. Bakhshandehpour served in various positions at J.P. Morgan Securities, including as Head of Real Estate, Lodging & Gaming Investment Banking practice on the West Coast and the Gaming Investment Banking Practice globally, focused on mergers & acquisitions and capital raising for gaming & lodging companies, as well as real estate investment trusts, homebuilders and real estate private equity funds. Mr. Bakhshandehpour holds a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration from Georgetown University with a double major in Finance and International Business and minor in Psychology. The Board has concluded Mr. Bakhshandehpour should serve as a director based on his current executive leadership role at Silverstone Capital Management, LLC and his extensive background in investment banking within the real estate industry.
Michael J. Berchtold. Mr. Berchtold was appointed as a member of our Board effective upon the completion of our initial public offering. Since 2013, Mr. Berchtold has served as Chief Executive Officer of Berchtold Capital Partners. Mr. Berchtold worked for Morgan Stanley from 1987 to 2007 in a variety of investment banking roles in New York, Los Angeles, Tokyo, Singapore and Hong Kong. For more than 15 years, Mr. Berchtold was based in Asia where he served as Morgan Stanley’s Head of Investment Banking for Asia Pacific for seven years and as President of Asia Pacific for four years. Mr. Berchtold has served on the Board of Visitors of the UCLA Anderson School of Management since 2007 and also serves on the Advisory Board of the UCLA Anderson Center for Global Management. Mr. Berchtold received his Bachelor of Arts in History from the University of California, Los Angeles and his Master of Business Administration from the Anderson School of Management at the University of California, Los Angeles. The Board has concluded Mr. Berchtold should serve as a director based on his two decades of investment banking experience, which enables Mr. Berchtold to contribute significant strategic advice to the Board.
Gregory P. Lindstrom. Mr. Lindstrom was appointed as a member of our Board effective upon the completion of our initial public offering. From 2007 to 2011, Mr. Lindstrom served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Board Secretary of The Irvine Company, a California real estate development, investment and operating company. In these positions, Mr. Lindstrom was a member of the four-person Office of the Chairman responsible for all administrative functions of the company, including the legal department. From 1978 to 2008, Mr. Lindstrom was a partner at Latham & Watkins LLP, where, at various times, he served as managing partner of the San Francisco and Orange County offices and as a member of the firm’s Executive Committee. Currently, Mr. Lindstrom is a full-time Alternative Dispute Resolution professional specializing in the resolution of complex business disputes. Mr. Lindstrom received his Bachelor of Arts from the University of California Los Angeles and his J.D. from the University of Chicago. The Board has concluded Mr. Lindstrom should
serve on the Board based on his executive and legal background in the real estate development and investment industry and his management experience in a large, global law firm.
Directors Continuing in Office Until the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
H. Lawrence Webb. Mr. Webb has served as our Chief Executive Officer since January 2014 and as Chairman of our Board effective upon the completion of our initial public offering. Prior to that, he was a member of our board of managers since 2010. Between 1995 and 2008, Mr. Webb was Chief Executive Officer of John Laing Homes. Prior to joining John Laing Homes, Mr. Webb was Division President for Orange, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties for Kaufman & Broad, as well as Orange County President of Greystone Homes. From 2008 to 2009, Mr. Webb served as Co-Chief Restructuring Officer for LandSource. Mr. Webb received his Bachelor of Arts in History from the State University of New York at Cortland and his Master of City and Regional Planning from Harvard University. As our Chief Executive Officer and one of our founders, the Board has concluded Mr. Webb should serve as a director based on his extensive knowledge of our business and operations, and his depth of experience in the homebuilding industry.
Paul Heeschen. Mr. Heeschen was appointed as a member of our Board effective upon the completion of our initial public offering. Mr. Heeschen serves as a General Partner of Sequoia Enterprises, LP, D.C.H. LP and Redwood Enterprises VII LP. For the past 22 years, he has been a Principal of Heeschen & Associates, a private investment firm. Mr. Heeschen served as an Executive Chairman of Diedrich Coffee Inc. from February 2010 to May 2010 and Director from January 1996 to May 2010. He served as Non-Executive Chairman of Diedrich Coffee, Inc. from February 2001 to January 2010. Mr. Heeschen has been a Director at PCM, Inc., a NASDAQ-listed company, since February 2006. He is a trustee of the Palm Trust. Mr. Heeschen received his Bachelor of Science in Accounting from University of Southern California. The Board has concluded Mr. Heeschen should serve as a director based on his financing and investment experience and prior executive leadership roles at public and private companies.
Cathey S. Lowe. Ms. Lowe was appointed as a member of our Board effective upon the completion of our initial public offering. Ms. Lowe is a finance professional and, since 2009, is the owner of Cathey Lowe Consulting, LLC, a consulting company that provides financial support to chief executive officers who do not require a full-time chief financial officer or to chief financial officers who lack staffing depth or expertise. Prior to founding Cathey Lowe Consulting, LLC, from 2002 to 2007, Ms. Lowe was the Senior Vice President of Finance and Corporate Treasurer for the Ryland Group Inc., a national homebuilder and mortgage company headquartered in Calabasas, California, where she was responsible for identifying and developing the appropriate capital structure for the company. Additionally, she was the Investor Relations Officer and represented the Ryland Group on Wall Street with shareholders, analysts, rating agencies, the stock exchange and the financial media. She also managed the Land Committee and its evaluation and approval process of new land opportunities for Ryland’s homebuilding operations. Prior to joining Ryland, Ms. Lowe worked for Atlantic Richfield Company in Dallas and Los Angeles in various finance and accounting functions for more than 20 years. Ms. Lowe is a CPA. She received her Bachelor of Business Administration in Accounting from the University of Houston, her Master of Science in Organizational Behavior from the University of Texas at Dallas and her Master of Business Administration in Finance from the Anderson School of Management at the University of California, Los Angeles. The Board has concluded Ms. Lowe should serve as a director based on her executive background in finance, both within and outside the real estate industry, which enables her to contribute valuable financial expertise and oversight to our Board.
William A. Witte. Mr. Witte was appointed as a member of our Board effective upon the completion of our initial public offering. Mr. Witte is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Related California, an urban and multifamily housing development company in California. Prior to joining The Related Companies in 1989, Mr. Witte served as Deputy Mayor for Housing and Neighborhoods for San Francisco under Mayor Art Agnos, where he oversaw all housing, development and redevelopment activities for the City. From 1981 to 1988, Mr. Witte served as Director of Housing and Economic Development for San Francisco under Mayor Dianne Feinstein. He also served as an appointed Commissioner of the San Francisco Housing Authority from 1989 to 1990. Mr. Witte is a member of the Board of Overseers of the Graduate School of Design at the University of Pennsylvania and a member of the National Real Estate Advisory Council of the Enterprise Foundation. Mr. Witte received his Bachelor of Arts in Urban Studies and his Master in City Planning, both from the University of Pennsylvania. The Board has concluded Mr. Witte should serve as a director based on his depth of experience leading a successful real estate development company and his familiarity with local governmental approaches to housing and development.
Directors Continuing in Office Until the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
David Berman. Mr. Berman was appointed as a member of our Board effective upon the completion of our initial public offering. Mr. Berman is Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of Tricon Capital Group Inc., the company he co-founded in 1988 and listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange. From 1985 to 1988, Mr. Berman served as Executive Vice President of Lakeview Estates Limited, where he was responsible for land development and single-family homebuilding. Prior to 1985, Mr. Berman served as Vice President for real estate acquisitions and equity lending at First City Development Corporation and as Vice President for real estate lending at what is now Citibank Canada. Mr. Berman received his Bachelor of Science and his Master of Business Administration from the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, South Africa.
Douglas C. Neff. Mr. Neff was appointed as a member of our Board effective upon the completion of our initial public offering. Mr. Neff has been the President of IHP Capital Partners since 1992. Mr. Neff also serves as Chairman of IHP Capital Partners’ Investment Committee and has primary responsibility for the company’s operations. From 1986 until the founding of IHP Capital Partners in 1992, Mr. Neff was a Partner of The O’Donnell Group, a regional developer, owner and manager of commercial and industrial real estate. Prior to 1986, Mr. Neff was Treasurer of The Irvine Company and a Vice President in the Real Estate Industries Group at Wells Fargo Bank in San Francisco. Mr. Neff received his Bachelor of Arts in American Studies from Amherst College and his Master of Business Administration from the University of Chicago. With three decades of executive and operational experience in the real estate industry, the Board has concluded Mr. Neff should serve as a director.
Nadine Watt. Ms. Watt was appointed as a member of our Board effective upon the completion of our initial public offering. Ms. Watt is President of Watt Companies, where she oversees all commercial investment activities, including acquisitions, development and asset management, for the company’s 6 million square-foot portfolio of properties. She also oversees Watt Companies’ oil and gas operations. Since 2000, Ms. Watt has served in various capacities in the Watt group of companies, including leading a strategic reorganization of Watt Companies in 2011. Ms. Watt is a member of the University of Southern California Marshall School of Business’ Board of Leaders, a board member of the California Science Center, the Brentwood School and 1st Century Bank, a NASDAQ-listed company. She is the chair of the Los Angeles Business Council and also serves on the executive committee for the Los Angeles Real Estate and Construction Council for the City of Hope. Ms. Watt received her Bachelor of Science in Foreign Service from the Georgetown University School of Foreign Service and her Master of Arts from the School of Cinematic Arts at the University of Southern California. The Board has concluded Ms. Watt should serve as a director based on her executive leadership experience in real estate acquisitions and development.
Family Relationships and Other Information
There are no family relationships between any of our directors or executive officers.
As indicated above and under “Corporate Governance-Executive Officers” below, Messrs. Webb, Stelmar and Redwitz previously served as executives of John Laing Homes. WL Homes LLC (doing business as John Laing Homes) and certain affiliated entities filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware for bankruptcy protection from creditors in 2009.
PROPOSAL 2
APPROVAL OF 2016 INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN
The information provided in this Proposal 2 is intended to assist our stockholders in deciding how to cast their votes on The New Home Company Inc. 2016 Incentive Award Plan (the “2016 Plan”), which will allow the Board to grant performance-based cash incentive awards and stock-based long-term incentive compensation on the terms set forth in the 2016 Plan and generally described herein. The Board adopted the 2016 Plan on February 23, 2016 subject to stockholder approval at the annual meeting.
Prior to adopting the 2016 Plan, we only maintained one equity incentive award plan, The New Home Company Inc. 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”), which we adopted in connection with our initial public offering in 2014. As originally adopted, the 2014 Plan permitted the issuance of up to 1,644,875 shares. As of December 31, 2015 there were 409,221 shares remaining available for future grants under the 2014 Plan. Following the grant of annual equity awards on February 29, 2016, 627 shares remained available. The per share market value of our stock on March 31, 2016 was $12.27.
The Board believes that the effective use of stock-based long-term incentive compensation has been integral to the Company’s success in the past and the effective use of those awards, along with performance-based cash incentive awards, is vital to its ability to achieve continued strong performance in the future. The Board believes that grants of equity awards will help create long-term participation in the Company and, thereby, assist us in attracting, retaining, motivating and rewarding our employees, directors and consultants. The use of long-term equity grants allows the Board to align the incentives of those individuals with the interests of its stockholders, linking compensation to Company performance. Accordingly, the Board believes that approval of the 2016 Plan is in the best interests of the Company and the Board recommends that stockholders vote for approval of the 2016 Plan.
If the 2016 Plan is approved by stockholders at the Annual Meeting, the Company will be able to grant awards under the 2016 Plan. In addition, the Company may continue to grant awards under the 2014 Plan until the share limit under the 2014 Plan has been exhausted or, if earlier, upon expiration of the 2014 Plan. The adoption and approval of the 2016 Plan will not affect the number of shares available for issuance under the 2014 Plan and will not otherwise modify or amend the terms of the 2014 Plan.
The 2016 Plan authorizes the issuance of a total of 800,000 shares. In addition, subject to certain limitations, shares covered by awards granted under the 2016 Plan which expire or are cancelled without having been exercised in full or that are forfeited or repurchased will be added to the shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance under the 2016 Plan. For additional information about the shares which may be added to the shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance under the 2016 Plan, see the discussion below under the heading “Description of the 2016 Plan — Share Counting Provisions.”
The Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) limits the deductions a publicly-held company can claim for compensation in excess of $1 million paid in a given year to its CEO and certain of its other most highly-compensated executive officers (other than its chief financial officer) (these officers are generally referred to as the “covered employees”). “Performance-based” compensation that meets certain requirements is not counted against the $1 million deductibility cap. Although we have not adopted a policy that all compensation paid to our executive officers must be deductible, the 2016 Plan is intended to allow us to provide performance-based compensation that will be tax deductible by us without regard to the limits of Section 162(m) of the code (“Section 162(m)”). Therefore, for purposes of Section 162(m), we are asking our stockholders to approve (such approval, the “162(m) Approval”) the material terms of the 2016 Plan that require approval under Section 162(m), including the maximum amount of compensation that can be paid to any employee, the employees eligible to receive compensation that qualifies as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) (i.e., the grant of awards to our covered employees) and the list of performance criteria that may be used for purposes of granting awards that are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under the Code, as described below under the heading “Description of the 2016 Plan — Performance-Based Awards,” in the event we choose to seek to structure compensation in a manner that will satisfy the performance-based compensation exception to Section 162(m). Should we choose to do so, stockholder approval of these material terms would preserve our ability to satisfy this exception and deduct compensation associated with future performance-based awards to certain executives.
Note that if our shareholders approve the 2016 Plan, stock options and stock appreciation rights that may be granted under the 2016 Plan generally should qualify as performance-based compensation. Other awards that we may grant under the 2016 Plan may qualify as performance-based compensation if the payment, retention or vesting of the award is subject to the achievement during a performance period of performance goals selected by the Administrator as defined below. The
Administrator retains the discretion to set the level of performance for a given performance measure under a performance-based award. For such awards to qualify as performance-based compensation, they must be in amounts that are within the individual award limits set forth in the 2016 Plan and stockholders must approve the material terms of the performance goals every five years. Such approval does not guarantee that incentive compensation that we pay to our covered employees will qualify as performance-based compensation for purposes of Section 162(m), but will permit the Administrator to seek to structure incentive compensation to meet the performance-based compensation requirements if it chooses to do so.
Regardless of whether the 2016 Plan is approved, we expect that under a special transition rule applicable to public companies, Section 162(m) will not apply to certain awards granted under the 2014 Plan until the earliest to occur of (1) our annual stockholders’ meeting at which members of our Board are to be elected that occurs in 2018; (2) a material modification of the 2014 Plan; (3) an exhaustion of the share supply under the 2014 Plan; or (4) the expiration of the 2014 Plan.
Key Features in the 2016 Plan
The 2016 Plan provides the Board, or a committee or subcommittee of the Board, with the flexibility to effectively use the shares under the plan to provide incentives to our personnel. The 2016 Plan contains provisions we believe are consistent with best practices in equity compensation and which we believe further protect our stockholders’ interests, which include:
| |
• | Shares tendered by participants to satisfy the exercise price of an option or tax withholding obligation with respect to any award will not be “added back” to the shares available for issuance under the 2016 Plan. Shares subject to a stock appreciation right that are not issued in connection with the stock settlement of the stock appreciation right on exercise, and shares purchased on the open market with the cash proceeds from the exercise of options are also not added back to the shares available for issuance under the 2016 Plan. |
| |
• | A grant-date fair value limit of $300,000 per year will apply to awards to non-employee directors. Additional annual award limits will also apply for other participants. For additional information, see the discussion below under “Description of the 2016 Plan — Award Limits.” |
| |
• | Dividends and dividend equivalents may not be paid on awards subject to performance-based vesting conditions unless and until such conditions are met. |
| |
• | The 2016 Plan does not have a single-trigger accelerated vesting provision for change in control and does not provide for excise tax gross ups. |
| |
• | Awards may not be repriced, replaced or re-granted through cancellation or modification without stockholder approval if the effect would be to reduce the exercise price for the shares under the award. Cash buyouts of underwater awards are not permitted. |
| |
• | With certain limited exceptions, awards or portions of an award granted under the 2016 Plan may vest earlier than the first anniversary of the award’s grant date. |
Background of Reasons for and the Determination of Shares Under the 2016 Plan
In its determination to approve the 2016 Plan, the Board was primarily motivated by a desire to ensure the Company has an available pool of shares from which to grant long-term equity incentive awards, which we believe is a primary incentive and retention mechanism for its employees, directors and consultants. In determining the number of shares to reserve under the 2016 Plan, the Board reviewed the compensation committee’s recommendations, which were based on an analysis prepared by and recommendations of Semler Brossy Consulting Group (“SBCG”), the compensation committee’s independent compensation consultant. This analysis focused on the total potential dilution from outstanding and future potential equity awards (“overhang”) both in absolute terms and relative to homebuilding peers.
We have historically sought to maintain our overhang rate attributable to equity compensation awards within reasonable levels. Key considerations for the compensation committee in recommending the 2016 Plan included:
| |
• | At the time of our initial public offering, the stockholders reserved 10% of our common shares outstanding for equity incentive awards in the 2014 Plan. |
| |
• | At the end of fiscal year 2015, our overhang rate attributable to the number of shares subject to equity compensation awards outstanding at the end of the fiscal year (and excluding the shares remaining available for future issuance under the 2014 Plan), was approximately 5.6% and as of the end of the first quarter in 2016, it was 6.4%. |
| |
• | The remaining reserve under the 2014 Plan as of December 31, 2015 was 409,221 shares or 2.0% of common shares outstanding, resulting in total overhang of 7.6% as of fiscal year end. Following the grant of annual equity awards in February 2016, 627 shares remained available. Total overhang as of the end of the first quarter in 2016 was 6.4%. |
| |
• | If approved, the issuance of the shares to be reserved under the 2016 Plan (including the shares already available for future grants under the 2014 Plan) would dilute the holdings of stockholders by approximately an additional 3.9% of common shares outstanding and total overhang (including outstanding awards) would be 10.3% of common shares outstanding. |
| |
• | This brings the total potential dilution back to near the original 10% level approved at the time of the IPO and compares to the peer median (as reported by the compensation committee’s consultant) of 9.8% |
Other factors that stockholders may consider in evaluating the proposal to approve the 2016 Plan include:
| |
• | In connection with the closing of our IPO, 872,683 stock options and 107,318 restricted stock units were awarded to our executives, directors and employees in order to provide them with a meaningful stake in the future success of the Company and align the interests of our employees and directors with our public stockholders. The annual dilution or ‘burn-rate’ for 2014 was 6.2% of weighted average commons shares outstanding for the year. This was a one-time award associated with our initial public offering and we do not anticipate repeating an award of this magnitude again in the future. |
| |
• | In fiscal year 2015, we granted equity awards covering a total of 294,355 shares, all of which were granted as full value restricted stock units (and none were granted as options). The burn-rate for 2015 was 1.8% of weighted average common shares outstanding. |
| |
• | As of the end of the first quarter of 2016, we had granted equity awards covering a total of 409,509 shares, all of which were granted as full value restricted stock units (and none were granted as options). We anticipate that this will be the majority of shares awarded for 2016. This is equivalent to an estimated annual burn-rate for 2016 of 2.0%. |
| |
• | If we exhaust the share reserve under our 2014 Plan without approval of the 2016 Plan, we would lose an important compensation tool aligned with stockholder interests to attract, motivate and retain highly qualified talent. |
| |
• | If the 2016 Plan is approved, we estimate that the shares reserved for issuance under the 2016 Plan would be sufficient for approximately two to three years of awards, assuming we grant awards consistent with our projections and noting that future circumstances may require us to change our equity grant practices. Based on the foregoing, we expect that we would require an additional increase to the share reserve under the 2016 Plan in 2018 or 2019 (primarily dependent on award levels/amounts and hiring activity during the next few years), noting again that the share reserve under the 2016 Plan could last for a longer or shorter period of time, depending on our future equity grant practices, which we cannot predict with any degree of certainty at this time. |
In light of the factors described above, and the fact that the ability to continue to grant equity compensation is vital to our ability to continue to attract and retain employees in the competitive labor markets in which we compete, the Board has determined that the size of the share reserve under the 2016 Plan is reasonable and appropriate at this time.
Description of the 2016 Plan
The following sets forth a description of the material features and terms of the 2016 Plan. The following summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the 2016 Plan, which is attached hereto as Appendix A.
Administration. The 2016 Plan will be administered by the Compensation Committee (or by the Board or another Board committee as may be determined by the Board from time to time). The administrator of the 2016 Plan (the “Administrator”) has the authority to interpret the 2016 Plan, determine the types and number of awards, the number of shares to be awarded, to approve all awards made under the 2016 Plan, and carry out other functions as set forth in the 2016 Plan.
Eligibility. Employees, consultants and non-employee directors of the Company or any of its subsidiaries (as defined in the 2016 Plan) are eligible to participate in the 2016 Plan. The Administrator determines the type and size of the award and sets the terms, conditions, restrictions and limitations applicable to the award, within the confines of the 2016 Plan’s terms. Based on historic compensation practices, approximately 40 employees and nine non-employee directors are eligible to receive awards; however, this number is subject to change as the number of individuals in our business is adjusted to meet our operational requirements.
Award Limits. The maximum aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be subject to awards granted under the 2016 Plan is 800,000 shares plus, subject to certain limitations, shares covered by awards granted under the 2016 Plan that are forfeited, expire or lapse, or are repurchased for or paid in cash. If the 2016 Plan is approved, future grants may continue to be made under the 2014 Plan until the earlier of expiration of the plan or we exhaust the share limit under the 2014 Plan. For additional information about the shares which may be added to the shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance under the 2016 Plan, see the discussion below under the heading “Description of the 2016 Plan — Share Counting Provisions.” The 2016 Plan also includes annual limits on awards that may be granted to any individual participant. For participants other than non-employee directors, if the award is denominated in shares of Common Stock, the maximum aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be granted to any one person is 500,000 per year. If the award is payable in cash and not denominated in shares of Common Stock, the maximum aggregate amount of cash that may be paid to any one person is $5,000,000 per year. The maximum aggregate grant date fair value of awards granted to a non-employee director under the 2016 Plan is $300,000 per year.
Share Counting Provisions. In general, when awards granted under the 2016 Plan expire, lapse, are forfeited or are paid in cash, the shares reserved for those awards are returned or added, as applicable, to the share reserve and available for future issuance under the 2016 Plan. However, the 2016 Plan does not allow the share pool available for incentive grants to be recharged or replenished with shares that:
| |
• | are tendered or withheld to satisfy the exercise price of an option; |
| |
• | are tendered or withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations for any award; |
| |
• | are subject to a stock appreciation right but are not issued in connection with the stock settlement of the stock appreciation right; or |
| |
• | the Company purchases on the open market with cash proceeds from the exercise of options. |
Types of Awards. The 2016 Plan authorizes the grant of the following types of incentive awards to eligible individuals: incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards, dividend equivalents, stock appreciation rights, and other stock or cash based awards; any of which may be awarded in accordance with the terms of the 2016 Plan. Awards to eligible individuals will be subject to the terms of an individual award agreement between the Company and the individual.
Stock Options. Stock options may be granted under the 2016 Plan, including both incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options, which provide the holder a right to purchase shares of Common Stock at a specified exercise price. The exercise price per share for each stock option will be set by the Administrator, but may not be less than the fair market value on the date of the grant. The Administrator will determine the time period for exercise of each award, including the time period for exercise following a termination of service by the recipient, subject to a 10-year limitation.
Incentive Stock Options. Incentive stock options may be granted only to employees of the Company. No person who qualifies as a greater-than-10% stockholder of the Company may be granted an incentive stock option, unless such incentive
stock option conforms to the applicable provisions of Section 422 of the Code. The maximum number of shares that can be granted as incentive stock options is 800,000.
Non-Qualified Stock Options. Non-qualified stock options may be granted only to employees, directors and/or consultants of the Company. With the consent of the holder, the Administrator is authorized to modify any incentive stock option granted under the 2016 Plan to disqualify the option from treatment as an incentive stock option under Section 422 of the Code.
Restricted Stock. The Administrator may make awards of restricted stock to eligible individuals in such amounts and at purchase prices to be established by the Administrator in connection with each award. Such awards will be subject to restrictions and other terms and conditions as are established by the Administrator. Upon issuance of restricted stock, recipients generally have the rights of a stockholder with respect to such shares, subject to the limitations and restrictions established by the Administrator in the award program or the individual award agreement. Such rights generally include the right to receive dividends and other distributions in relation to the award; however, no dividends are payable with respect to restricted stock with performance-based vesting unless and until the performance conditions have been satisfied. Except as otherwise determined by the Administrator, restricted stock awards will lapse and immediately be surrendered to the Company without payment of consideration if the recipient terminates service to the Company before the restrictions on the award have expired.
Restricted Stock Units. The 2016 Plan authorizes awards of restricted stock units to eligible individuals in amounts and at purchase prices and upon such other terms and conditions as are established by the Administrator for each award. Restricted stock unit awards entitle recipients to acquire shares of the Company’s stock in the future under certain conditions. Holders of restricted stock units generally have no rights of ownership or as stockholders in relation to the award, unless and until the restrictions lapse and the restricted stock unit award vests in accordance with the terms of the grant and actual shares are issued in settlement of the award. If the Administrator provides, restricted stock units can be granted in tandem with dividend equivalents, which are described below, however, no dividend equivalents are payable with respect to restricted stock units with performance-based vesting unless and until the performance conditions have been satisfied.
Dividend Equivalents. Dividend equivalents may be granted by the Administrator based on the dividends declared on Common Stock of the Company between the date of the award and the date that the award vests, is exercised, distributed or expires. Dividend equivalents are converted to cash or additional shares of stock based on terms and limitations established by the Administrator. In addition, dividend equivalents with respect to an award with performance-based vesting that are based on dividends paid prior to the vesting of such award will only be paid out to the holder to the extent that the performance-based vesting conditions are subsequently satisfied and the award vests.
Stock Appreciation Rights. The Administrator is authorized to grant stock appreciation rights to eligible recipients in its discretion, on such terms and conditions as it may determine, consistent with the 2016 Plan. A stock appreciation right entitles the holder to exercise the stock appreciation right to acquire shares of the Company’s stock upon exercise within a specified time period from the date of the grant. Subject to the provisions of the stock appreciation right award agreement, the recipient may receive from the Company an amount determined by multiplying the difference between the exercise price per share of the stock appreciation right and the fair market value of the share on the date of exercise by the number of shares of Common Stock subject to the award. The Administrator will determine the time period for exercise of each award, including the time period for exercise following a termination of service by the recipient, subject to a ten year limitation.
Other Stock or Cash Based Awards. The Administrator is authorized to make other stock or cash based awards to any eligible individual under the 2016 Plan. Such stock or cash based awards may be made in lieu of base salary, cash incentives, fees or other cash compensation otherwise payable to the recipient. Subject to the provisions of the 2016 Plan, the number or value of shares to be awarded, conditions and criteria for vesting, and the vesting schedule, will be set by the Administrator.
Performance-Based Awards. The Administrator will determine whether specific awards are intended to constitute “qualified performance-based compensation,” or “QPBC,” within the meaning of Section 162(m) and even if stockholders approve the material terms of the 2016 Plan for purposes of the QPBC exception, the Administrator may determine to pay compensation that is not QPBC under Section 162(m) and that is not deductible by reason thereof. To qualify as QPBC, the applicable performance criteria will be selected from the list below in accordance with the requirements of Section 162(m). Section 162(m) imposes a $1 million cap on the compensation deduction that the Company may take in respect of compensation paid to our Chief Executive Officer and certain of our other most highly compensated executive officers (other than our Chief Financial Officer). However, compensation that qualifies as QPBC is excluded from the calculation of the $1 million cap.
In order to constitute QPBC under Section 162(m), in addition to certain other requirements, the relevant amounts must be payable only upon the attainment of pre-established, objective performance goals set by our Administrator and linked to stockholder-approved performance criteria. For purposes of the 2016 Plan, one or more of the following performance criteria will be used in setting performance goals applicable to QPBC, either for the entire Company or a subsidiary, division, business unit or an individual, and may be used in setting performance goals applicable to other performance awards: (i) the attainment by a share of a specified Fair Market Value (as defined in the 2016 Plan) for a specified period of time; (ii) book value per share; (iii) earnings per share; (iv) return on assets; (v) return on equity; (vi) return on investments; (vii) return on invested capital; (viii) total stockholder return; (ix) earnings or net income of the Company before or after taxes and/or interest; (x) earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization; (xi) revenues; (xii) market share; (xiii) cash flow or cost reduction; (xiv) interest expense after taxes; (xv) economic value created; (xvi) improvements in capital structure; (xvii) gross margin; (xviii) operating margin; (xix) net cash provided by operations; (xx) strategic business criteria, consisting of one or more objectives based on meeting specified market penetration, geographic business expansion goals, cost targets, customer satisfaction, reductions in errors and omissions, reductions in lost business, management of employment practices and employee benefits, supervision of litigation and information technology, quality and quality audit scores, efficiency, working capital, goals relating to acquisitions or divestitures, land management, net sales or closings, inventory control, inventory, land or lot improvement or reduction, implementation or completion of critical projects, economic value; (xxi) adjusted earnings or loss per share; (xxii) employee satisfaction; (xxiii) certain financial ratios (including those measuring liquidity, activity, profitability or leverage); (xxiv) debt levels, covenants, ratios or reductions; (xxv) financing and other capital raising transactions; (xxvi) year-end cash; (xxvii) investment sourcing activity; (xxviii) marketing initiatives or (xxix) any combination of the foregoing, any of which may be measured either in absolute terms or as compared to any incremental increase or decrease or as compared to results of a peer group or to market performance indicators. The 2016 Plan also permits the Administrator to provide for objectively determinable adjustments to the applicable performance criteria in setting performance goals for QPBC awards. To allow the Company to qualify awards as QPBC, we are seeking stockholder approval of the 2016 Plan and the performance criteria listed above.
Prohibition on Re-Pricing and Cash Buyouts. Under the 2016 Plan, the Administrator may not, without the approval of the stockholders of the Company, authorize the re-pricing of any outstanding option or stock appreciation right to reduce its exercise price per share, or cancel any option or stock appreciation right in exchange for cash or another award when the exercise price per share exceeds the Fair Market Value (as that term is defined in the 2016 Plan) of the underlying shares.
Change in Control. In general, notwithstanding a Change in Control event (as that term is defined in the 2016 Plan), each outstanding award will continue in effect or be assumed or an equivalent award substituted by the successor corporation. No single-trigger vesting acceleration applies under the 2016 Plan in connection with a change in control. However, in the event the successor corporation refuses to assume or substitute for the award, such award will become fully vested and, if applicable, exercisable immediately prior to the consummation of the transaction and all forfeiture restrictions to lapse, and so notify the holder.
Certain Transactions. The Administrator has broad discretion to equitably adjust the provisions of the 2016 Plan, as well as the terms and conditions of existing and future awards, to prevent the dilution or enlargement of intended benefits and facilitate necessary or desirable changes in the event of certain transactions and events affecting our Common Stock, such as stock dividends, stock splits, combinations or exchanges of shares, mergers, consolidations or other distributions (other than normal cash dividends) of Company assets to stockholders. In addition, in the event of certain non-reciprocal transactions with our stockholders known as “equity restructurings,” the Administrator will make equitable adjustments to outstanding awards.
Minimum Vesting. The 2016 Plan contains a minimum vesting requirement, subject to limited exceptions, that awards made pursuant to the 2016 Plan may not vest earlier than the date that is one year following the grant date of the award. The limited exceptions allow (i) the issuance of awards in an aggregate of up to 5% of the shares available to be granted without minimum vesting provisions, and (ii) the plan administrator to waive the one-year vesting restrictions upon the participant's termination of service due to death, disability or retirement or in connection with a change in control. Annual grants to non-employee directors may also be exempt from the minimum vesting requirement if the director is not reelected at a subsequent annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders.
Termination of or Changes to the 2016 Plan. The Board has the authority to amend, suspend, or discontinue the 2016 Plan subject to any stockholder approval that is required by applicable law or listing agency rules. The Administrator may amend outstanding awards in any manner that would be permitted for a new award, provided that any amendment that is adverse to a participant requires the participant’s consent. No award may be granted under the 2016 Plan after ten years from the earlier of (i) the date the Board adopted the 2016 Plan or (ii) the date the Company’s stockholders approved the 2016
Plan. The applicable provisions of the 2016 Plan and the Committee’s authority will continue with respect to any awards then outstanding.
Claw-backs. All awards made under the 2016 Plan are subject to any claw-back policy implemented by the Company, including any claw-back policy adopted to comply with the requirements of applicable law (including the Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and any rules or regulations promulgated thereunder).
Tax Consequences
The following summary is based on an analysis of the Code as currently in effect, existing laws, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, regulations and proposed regulations, all of which are subject to change. Moreover, the following is only a summary of United States federal income tax consequences. Actual tax consequences to participants may be either more or less favorable than those described below depending on the participants’ particular circumstances accordingly, each participant should consult the participant’s tax adviser regarding the federal, state, local, and other tax consequences of the grant or exercise of an award or the disposition of stock acquired the 2016 Plan. The 2016 Plan is not qualified under the provisions of Section 401(a) of the Code and is not subject to any of the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. Our ability to realize the benefit of any tax deductions described below depends on our generation of taxable income as well as the requirement of reasonableness, the provisions of Section 162(m) and the satisfaction of our tax reporting obligations.
Non-Qualified Stock Options. If an optionee is granted a NSO under the 2016 Plan, the optionee should not have taxable income on the grant of the option. Generally, the optionee should recognize ordinary income at the time of exercise in an amount equal to the fair market value of the shares acquired on the date of exercise, less the exercise price paid for the shares. The optionee’s basis in the common stock for purposes of determining gain or loss on a subsequent sale or disposition of such shares generally will be the fair market value of our common stock on the date the optionee exercises such option. Any subsequent gain or loss will be taxable as a long-term or short-term capital gain or loss. We generally should be entitled to a federal income tax deduction at the time and for the same amount as the optionee recognizes ordinary income.
Incentive Stock Options. A participant receiving ISOs should not recognize taxable income upon grant. Additionally, if applicable holding period requirements are met, the participant should not recognize taxable income at the time of exercise. However, the excess of the fair market value of the shares of our common stock received over the option exercise price is an item of tax preference income potentially subject to the alternative minimum tax. If stock acquired upon exercise of an ISO is held for a minimum of two years from the date of grant and one year from the date of exercise and otherwise satisfies the ISO requirements, the gain or loss (in an amount equal to the difference between the fair market value on the date of disposition and the exercise price) upon disposition of the stock will be treated as a long-term capital gain or loss, and we will not be entitled to any deduction. If the holding period requirements are not met, the ISO will be treated as one that does not meet the requirements of the Code for ISOs and the participant will recognize ordinary income at the time of the disposition equal to the excess of the amount realized over the exercise price, but not more than the excess of the fair market value of the shares on the date the ISO is exercised over the exercise price, with any remaining gain or loss being treated as capital gain or capital loss. We are not entitled to a tax deduction upon either the exercise of an ISO or upon disposition of the shares acquired pursuant to such exercise, except to the extent that the participant recognizes ordinary income on disposition of the shares.
Other Awards. The current federal income tax consequences of other awards authorized under the 2016 Plan generally follow certain basic patterns: SARs are taxed and deductible in substantially the same manner as NSOs; nontransferable restricted stock subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture results in income recognition equal to the excess of the fair market value over the price paid, if any, only at the time the restrictions lapse (unless the recipient elects to accelerate recognition as of the date of grant through a Section 83(b) election); restricted stock units, dividend equivalents, cash awards and other stock awards are generally subject to tax at the time of payment.
Limitations on the Employer’s Compensation Deduction. Section 162(m) limits the deduction certain employers may take for otherwise deductible compensation payable to certain executive officers of the employer to the extent the compensation paid to such an officer for the year exceeds $1 million, unless the compensation qualifies as “performance-based” within the meaning of Section 162(m).
Excess Parachute Payments. Section 280G of the Code limits the deduction that the employer may take for otherwise deductible compensation payable to certain individuals if the compensation constitutes an “excess parachute payment.” Excess parachute payments arise from payments made to disqualified individuals that are in the nature of compensation and are contingent on changes in ownership or control of the employer or certain affiliates. Accelerated vesting or payment of
awards under the 2016 Plan upon a change in ownership or control of the employer or its affiliates could result in excess parachute payments. In addition to the deduction limitation applicable to the employer, a disqualified individual receiving an excess parachute payment is subject to a 20% excise tax on the amount thereof. The 2016 Plan does not provide for any excise tax gross-ups.
Application of Section 409A of the Code. Section 409A of the Code imposes an additional 20% tax and interest on an individual receiving non-qualified deferred compensation under a plan that fails to satisfy certain requirements. For purposes of Section 409A, “non -qualified deferred compensation” includes equity-based incentive programs, including some stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock unit programs. Generally speaking, Section 409A does not apply to incentive stock options, non-discounted non-qualified stock options and appreciation rights if no deferral is provided beyond exercise, or restricted stock.
The awards made pursuant to the 2016 Plan are expected to be designed in a manner intended to comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code to the extent the awards granted under the 2016 Plan are not exempt from coverage. However, if the 2016 Plan fails to comply with Section 409A in operation, a participant could be subject to the additional taxes and interest.
State and local tax consequences may in some cases differ from the federal tax consequences. The foregoing summary of the income tax consequences in respect of the 2016 Plan is for general information only. Interested parties should consult their own advisors as to specific tax consequences of their awards.
The 2016 Plan is not subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and is not intended to be qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code.
New Plan Benefits
No awards will be granted pursuant to the 2016 Plan unless and until it is approved by the Company’s stockholders. In addition, awards under the 2016 Plan are subject to the discretion of the Administrator, and the amount of awards or benefits to be received by any individual under the 2016 Plan is therefore not determinable.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” PROPOSAL 2.
UNLESS YOU GIVE CONTRARY INSTRUCTIONS, THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY YOUR RETURNED EXECUTED PROXY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF PROPOSAL 2.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Executive Officers
Set forth below is information regarding each of our executive officers as of March 31, 2016.
|
| | |
Name | Age | Position |
H. Lawrence Webb | 67 | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of our Board |
Wayne Stelmar | 61 | Chief Investment Officer and Director |
Tom Redwitz | 61 | Chief Operating Officer |
John M. Stephens | 47 | Chief Financial Officer |
H. Lawrence Webb is our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of our Board. For Mr. Webb’s biographical information, see “Proposal 1 - Election of Directors—Directors Continuing in Office Until the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.”
Wayne Stelmar is our Chief Investment Officer. He also serves as a Director on our Board. For Mr. Stelmar’s biographical information, see above “Proposal 1 - Election of Directors—Nominees for Election at the Annual Meeting to Serve for a Three-Year Term Expiring at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.”
Tom Redwitz. Mr. Redwitz serves as Chief Operating Officer and served as President of our Southern California subsidiary through March 2014. He was a member of our board of managers from 2010 until the consummation of the formation transactions. From 2002 to 2009, Mr. Redwitz served as the President of Laing Luxury Homes, a division of John Laing Homes. Mr. Redwitz is a licensed architect and general contractor. He also served as Division President while at Taylor Woodrow from 1996 to 2002 and worked nearly 10 years as an executive for The Irvine Company. Mr. Redwitz received his Associated Bachelor in Architecture from the University of California, Berkeley. Mr. Redwitz currently serves on the Board of Directors of The Caritas Corporation, a non-profit entity focused on providing affordable housing.
John M. Stephens. Mr. Stephens has served as Chief Financial Officer since June 2015. Prior to joining us, Mr. Stephens served as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of M.D.C. Holdings Inc. from February 2012 to May 2015. He previously was with Standard Pacific Corp., one of the country’s largest homebuilders, serving as Chief Financial Officer from February 2009 through June 2011, Senior Vice President from May 2007 through June 2011, Corporate Controller from November 1996 through February 2009 and Treasurer from May 2001 until October 2002 and from November 2009 through June 2011. Mr. Stephens brings significant and relevant public company financial experience and expertise due to his previous roles at public company homebuilders. Prior to Standard Pacific, Mr. Stephens was an audit manager with the international accounting firm Arthur Andersen LLP.
Composition of our Board of Directors
Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation provides that, subject to the rights and preferences of any series of outstanding preferred stock, the authorized number of directors shall consist of at least three directors, with the exact number set by our Board. Our Board has set the current authorized directors at 11 members, and our Board currently consists of 11 directors. The directors are divided into three classes; Class I, Class II, and Class III. Each director serves a term of three years. At each Annual Meeting, the term of one class expires. The class of directors with a term expiring at this Annual Meeting, Class II, consists of four directors.
Our Board has adopted corporate governance guidelines to set forth its agreements concerning overall governance practices. These guidelines can be found in the “Investors” section of our website at http://www.NWHM.com. In addition, these guidelines are available in print to any stockholder who requests a copy. Please direct all requests to The New Home Company Inc., Attention: Secretary, 85 Enterprise, Suite 450, Aliso Viejo, California 92656.
Investor Rights Agreement
On February 5, 2014, in connection with our initial public offering, we entered into the Investor Rights Agreement with the Institutional Investors and each of Messrs. Webb, Stelmar, Davis and Redwitz. Pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement, each Institutional Investor has the right to designate one individual for nomination and election to our Board for as long as such Institutional Investor owns 4% or more of our then-outstanding common stock (excluding shares of common stock that are subject to issuance upon the exercise or exchange of rights of conversion or any options, warrants or other rights to acquire shares). In addition, if any such designee of an Institutional Investor ceases to serve as a director during his or her term, the vacancy shall be filled by an individual designed by that Institutional Investor.
Each Institutional Investor also agrees to vote all shares of our common stock that it owns in favor of Messrs. Webb, Stelmar or Berchtold (or, if at that time nominated as a director, Messrs. Davis or Redwitz) in any election in which Messrs. Webb, Stelmar or Berchtold (or, as the case may be, Messrs. Davis or Redwitz) is a nominee, and each of Messrs. Webb, Stelmar, Davis and Redwitz agree to vote all shares of our common stock that he owns in favor of each nominee designated by an Institutional Investor in any election of directors in which such designee is a nominee.
The Investor Rights Agreement terminates with respect to each Institutional Investor when such Institutional Investor ceases to own 4% of our common stock based on the number of shares outstanding immediately following our initial public offering.
Board Leadership Structure, Executive Sessions
Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer roles have been combined since January 2014 when we converted from a limited liability company into a corporation in connection with our initial public offering. After carefully considering the benefits and risks of separating the roles of the Chairman of our Board and Chief Executive Officer, our Board determined that it is in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders to have our Chief Executive Officer lead our Board as Chairman. This combined role facilitates centralized coherent leadership that maximizes the effectiveness of our Board given its size and breadth of industry experience. The combined role approach also enhances accountability among senior management and directors and aligns the strategy and goals of the Board with management.
We do not currently have a lead independent director. Generally, the Chair of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee presides over the quarterly executive sessions of non-employee members of the Board.
The Board recognizes the importance of regularly evaluating our particular circumstances to determine if our leadership structure continues to serve the best interests of us and our stockholders. To this end, the Board engages in a regular assessment of whether the then current leadership structure remains the most appropriate for us. Our corporate governance guidelines permit the Board to fill the positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer with one individual or two different individuals and also allow the Board to appoint a lead independent director. As a result, the Board has the flexibility to alter its leadership structure in the future to adapt to changing circumstances as and when needed.
Board Independence
Our Board has determined that six of our directors, Messrs. Bakhshandehpour, Lindstrom, Witte, Heeschen and Mmes. Watt and Lowe, constituting a majority, satisfy the listing standards for independence of the New York Stock Exchange and Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act, as well as our own corporate governance guidelines.
Board Meetings
Our Board held seven meetings during 2015, and all directors attended at least 75% of the combined total of (i) all Board meetings and (ii) all meetings of committees of our Board of which the director was a member. The Chairman of our Board or his designee, taking into account suggestions from other Board members, establishes the agenda for each Board meeting and distributes it in advance to each member of our Board. Each Board member is free to suggest the inclusion of items on the agenda. The independent directors of our Board regularly meet in executive session without management or other employees present. Although we have no policy with regard to Board attendance at our annual meetings of stockholders, our directors are invited and generally expected to attend the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders. Nine of our Board members attended our 2015 annual meeting of the stockholders in person or via teleconference.
Board Committees
Our Board maintains a standing Audit Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (our “Nominating Committee”), Compensation Committee and Executive Committee. To view the charter of each of our Audit Committee, our Nominating Committee, and our Compensation Committee, please visit the “Investors” section of our website at http://www.NWHM.com. In addition, the charters for each of those committees are available in print to any stockholder who requests a copy. Please direct all requests to The New Home Company Inc., Attention: Secretary, 85 Enterprise, Suite 450, Aliso Viejo, California 92656. Our Board has determined that each of the members of our Audit Committee, our Nominating Committee and our Compensation Committee is independent in accordance with the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) rules, the requirements of SEC and our corporate governance guidelines. The membership of all of our standing Board committees as of the record date is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Director | Audit | | Nominating and Corporate Governance | | Compensation | | Executive |
H. Lawrence Webb | | | | | | | C |
Wayne Stelmar | | | | | | | X |
Sam Bakhshandehpour | X | | | | X | | |
Michael J. Berchtold | | | | | | | X |
Paul Heeschen | | | X | | | | |
Gregory P Lindstrom | | | C | | X | | |
Cathey S. Lowe | C | | X | | | | |
Douglas C. Neff | | | | | | | X |
William A. Witte | X | | | | C | | |
_______
Audit Committee
We have a standing Audit Committee. Our Audit Committee is comprised of three independent directors, Cathey S. Lowe (Chair), Sam Bakhshandehpour and William A. Witte. Each of these members is “financially literate” under the applicable NYSE listing standards and under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Our Board has also determined that Ms. Lowe qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as such term is defined by the rules of the SEC. Our Audit Committee met four times during 2015. The purpose of our Audit Committee, pursuant to its written charter, is, among other matters, to assist our Board in its oversight of (1) the Company’s financial reporting, (2) the Company’s auditing and internal control activities, (3) compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, (4) the qualifications and independence of the Company’s external auditor, (5) the performance of the Company’s and external auditor’s internal auditing function and (6) the Company’s overall risk exposure and management. Our Audit Committee is also responsible for preparing the Audit Committee Report to be included in our annual proxy statements.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
We have a standing Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “Nominating Committee”). Our Nominating Committee is comprised of Gregory P. Lindstrom (Chair), Cathey S. Lowe and Paul Heeschen. Our Nominating Committee met twice during 2015. The purpose of our Nominating Committee is to identify qualified candidates to become Board members, select nominees for election as directors, select candidates to fill any vacancies on our Board and oversee the evaluation of our Board and review the Company’s policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management. Our Nominating Committee works with our Board as a whole on an annual basis to determine the appropriate skills and characteristics required of Board members in the context of the current make-up of our Board and its committees.
Our Nominating Committee is responsible for reviewing with our Board, on an annual basis the appropriate characteristics, skills and experience required for our Board as a whole and its individual members. In evaluating the suitability of individual candidates (both new candidates and current Board members), the independent director members of our Nominating Committee, in recommending candidates for election, and our Board, in approving (and, in the case of vacancies, appointing) such candidates, takes into account many factors, including: personal and professional integrity, ethics and values, experience in corporate management, experience in our industry and with relevant social policy concerns, diversity, experience as a Board member of another publicly held company, academic expertise in an area of our operations, and practical and mature business judgment. Our Board evaluates each individual in the context of our Board as a whole, with the objective of assembling a group that can best perpetuate the success of the business and represent stockholder interests through the exercise of sound judgment using its diversity of experience in these various areas. In determining whether to recommend a director for re-election, the independent director members of our Nominating Committee may consider the director’s past attendance at meetings and participation in and contributions to the activities of our Board. While the Company values diversity and the Board considers diversity in its evaluation process, it has not adopted a specific policy regarding Board diversity.
Our Nominating Committee also considers recommendations for nominees that are timely submitted by stockholders if such recommendations are delivered in the manner prescribed by the advance notice provisions contained in our bylaws. In addition to satisfying the timing, ownership and other requirements specified in our bylaws, a stockholder’s notice must set forth as to each person whom the stockholder proposes to recommend all information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of directors in an election contest, or is otherwise required, pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act and our bylaws (including, but not limited to, such person’s written consent to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected). Properly communicated stockholder recommendations will be considered in the same manner as recommendations received from other sources.
Compensation Committee
We have a standing Compensation Committee. Our Compensation Committee is comprised of William A. Witte (Chair), Sam Bakhshandehpour and Gregory P. Lindstrom. Our Board has determined that all of the members of our Compensation Committee are “independent” within the meaning of our director independence standards and the NYSE director independence standards (including those applicable to Compensation Committee members). Our Compensation Committee met once in 2015. Our Compensation Committee reviews and establishes the compensation of our senior executives, including our Chief Executive Officer, on an annual basis, has direct access to third party compensation consultants and legal counsel, and administers our equity based plans, including the review and grant of equity awards to eligible employees and consultants under our equity based plans. The Compensation Committee also annually reviews the compensation of directors for service on the Board and its committees and recommends changes in compensation to the Board as appropriate. Our Compensation Committee may delegate any or all of its responsibilities to a subcommittee of the Committee to the extent permitted by applicable law.
Our Compensation Committee reviews and approves or recommends all compensation for all executive officers and all officers as such term is defined in Rule 16a-1, promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), directors and all such categories of other employees of the Company or its subsidiaries as our Board determines from time to time. For compensation decisions relating to our CEO, our Compensation Committee reviews and approves corporate goals and objectives relating to the compensation of the CEO, evaluates the performance of the CEO in light of those goals and objectives and, based upon this evaluation (either alone or, if directed by the Board, in conjunction with a majority of the independent directors of the Board), sets the CEO’s compensation.
Our Compensation Committee is committed to staying apprised of current issues and emerging trends, and ensuring that our executive compensation program remains aligned with best practice. To this end, our Compensation Committee has directly selected and retained the services of SBCG to assist it in evaluating executive compensation matters. During 2015, SBCG only provided services to our Compensation Committee and such services were related exclusively to executive or non-employee director compensation. SBCG reports directly and exclusively to our Compensation Committee with respect to executive and non-employee director compensation matters. Specifically, SBCG provided our Compensation Committee and Board with compensation data related to executives at public homebuilders and general advice on compensation matters, including the determination of salaries and equity awards for our named executive officers, as well as other officers and our non-employee directors.
Each year our Compensation Committee reviews the independence of its compensation consultants and other advisors. In performing its analysis, our Compensation Committee considers the factors set forth in SEC rules and NYSE listing standards. After review and consultation with SBCG, our Compensation Committee determined that SBCG is independent and there is no conflict of interest resulting from retaining SBCG currently or during the year ended December 31, 2015.
For further information on our executive officers’ compensation, please see “Executive Compensation.”
Executive Committee
We have a standing Executive Committee. Our Executive Committee is comprised of H. Lawrence Webb (Chair), Wayne Stelmar, Michael J. Berchtold and Douglas C. Neff. Our Executive Committee evaluates, reviews and determines whether or not to approve certain real estate- and borrowing-related transactions on behalf of our Board.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of our executive officers serves, or has in the past fiscal year served, as a member of the Board or Compensation Committee, or other committee serving an equivalent function, of any entity that has one or more executive officers who serve as members of our Board or our Compensation Committee. None of the members of our Compensation Committee is, or has ever been, an officer or employee of our company.
Risk Oversight
One of the key functions of our Board is informed oversight of our risk management process. The involvement of our full Board in determining our business strategy is a key part of its assessment of management’s risk tolerance and also a determination of what constitutes an appropriate level of risk for the Company. Our Board administers oversight for the risk management process function directly, with support from its standing committees, each of which will address risks specific to its area of oversight. For example, our Audit Committee considers and discusses our major financial risk exposures and the steps our management takes to monitor and control these exposures, including guidelines and policies to govern the process by which risk assessment and management is undertaken. Our Nominating Committee provides oversight with respect to corporate governance, evaluates the independence of our directors and the effectiveness of our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and also oversees management’s succession planning.
Communication with our Board
Interested persons, including stockholders, may communicate with our Board, including the non-employee directors, by sending a letter to The New Home Company Inc., Attention: Secretary, 85 Enterprise, Suite 450, Aliso Viejo, California 92656. Our Secretary will submit all correspondence to the Chairman and to any specific director to whom the
correspondence is directed.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
Our Board has adopted a code of business conduct and ethics that applies to all of our employees, executive officers and directors. Our code of business conduct and ethics can be found in the “Investors” section on our website at http://www.NWHM.com. In addition, our code of business conduct and ethics is available in print to any stockholder who requests a copy. Please direct all requests to The New Home Company Inc., Attention: Secretary, 85 Enterprise, Suite 450, Aliso Viejo, California 92656. We intend to disclose future amendments to certain provisions of our code of business conduct and ethics, or waivers of such provisions, applicable to our directors and executive officers, at the same location on our website identified above.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CERTAIN
BENEFICIAL OWNERS
The following table shows ownership of our common stock as of March 31, 2016, based on 20,708,973 shares of common stock outstanding on that date, by (i) each current director and nominee; (ii) our named executive officers; (iii) all of our current directors and executive officers as a group; and (iv) each person known to us to own beneficially more than five percent of our capital stock. Except to the extent indicated in the footnotes to the following table, the person or entity listed has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares that are deemed beneficially owned by such person or entity, subject to community property laws, where applicable. Previously, H. Lawrence Webb, Wayne Stelmar, Joseph Davis, Thomas Redwitz and each Institutional Investor (each a “Group Member” and collectively, the “Group Members”) entered into the Investor Rights Agreement, pursuant to which the parties thereto may be deemed to be members of a “group” within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Unless otherwise noted, the address of the persons or entities shown in the table below is 85 Enterprise, Suite 450, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656.
|
| | |
Name | Total Shares Beneficially Owned (1) | Percentage of Outstanding Common Stock (%) |
Named Executive Officers | | |
H. Lawrence Webb(2)(5) | 1,101,062 | 5.3% |
Wayne Stelmar(3)(5) | 743,387 | 3.6% |
Tom Redwitz(4)(5) | 465,037 | 2.2% |
| | |
Non-Employee Directors and Nominees | | |
Sam Bakhshandehpour | 11,560 | * |
Michael Berchtold | 34,260 | * |
David Berman(6) | 9,260 | * |
Paul Heeschen | 18,260 | * |
Gregory P. Lindstrom | 14,260 | * |
Cathey S. Lowe | 10,260 | * |
Douglas C. Neff(7) | 2,425,878 | 11.7% |
Nadine Watt(8) | 9,260 | * |
William A. Witte | 59,260 | * |
| | |
All current executive officers and directors (including nominees) as a group (13 persons) | 4,901,744 | 23.7% |
| | |
More than 5% Stockholders | | |
IHP Capital Partners VI, LLC(7) | 2,421,659 | 11.7% |
TCN/TNHC LP(6) | 1,916,327 | 9.3% |
Watt/TNHC LLC(8) | 662,743 | 3.2% |
First Manhattan Co(9) | 1,742,211 | 8.4% |
Covalent Partners LLC(10) | 1,458,441 | 7.0% |
Second Curve Capital, LLC(11) | 1,358,301 | 6.6% |
FMR LLC(12) | 1,323,685 | 6.4% |
Wellington Management Group LLP(13) | 1,296,095 | 6.3% |
_________________
* Less than 1%.
| |
(1) | As of March 31, 2016, none of our non-employee directors or named executive officers has the right to acquire any shares (a) issuable upon the settlement of restricted stock units, or RSUs, which are scheduled to vest within 60 days of March 31, 2016, or (b) underlying vested but unexercised options or options which will vest and become exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2016. |
| |
(2) | 27,272 shares of which are held directly by Mr. Webb and 1,073,790 shares of which are held by a family trust, of which Mr. Webb is a trustee. |
| |
(3) | 21,715 shares of which are held directly by Mr. Stelmar and 721,672 shares of which are held by a family trust, of which Mr. Stelmar is a trustee. |
| |
(4) | 21,715 shares of which are held directly by Mr. Redwitz and 443,322 shares of which are held by a family trust, of which Mr. Redwitz is a trustee. |
| |
(5) | Each of Messrs. Webb, Stelmar and Redwitz are parties to the Investor Rights Agreement, as a result of which, together with the other Group Members, they may be deemed to have shared voting power over an additional 6,892,182, 7,249,857 and 7,528,207 shares of our common stock, respectively. Each of Messrs. Webb, Stelmar and Redwitz disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by the other Group Members. |
| |
(6) | Mr. Berman has sole voting and dispositive power over 9,260 shares of our common stock. Based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 16, 2016, TCN/TNHC LP (“TCG LP”) has sole voting and dispositive power over 1,916,327 shares of our common stock. The general partner of TCG LP is TCN/TNHC GP LLC, whose sole member is Tricon Housing Partners US II Equity Holdings LP, whose general partner is Tricon Housing Partners US II GP LLC, whose sole member is Tricon USA Inc., whose sole shareholder is Tricon Holdings USA LLC, whose sole member is Tricon Holdings Canada Inc., whose sole shareholder is Tricon Capital Group Inc. (“Tricon Capital” and collectively with TCG LP and the aforementioned Tricon entities, “Tricon”). Mr. Berman is Executive Chairman of Tricon Capital but disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares of our common stock owned by Tricon. Additionally, as a result of the Investor Rights Agreement, Tricon, together with the other Group Members, may be deemed to have shared voting power over an additional 6,076,917 shares. Tricon disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by the other Group Members. The address of Tricon is 1067 Yonge Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada A6 M4W 2L2. |
| |
(7) | Mr. Neff has sole voting and dispositive power over 9,260 shares of our common stock. Based solely on a Schedule13D filed with the SEC on December 21, 2015, IHP Capital Partners VI, LLC (“IHP VI”) has sole voting and dispositive power over 2,421,659 shares of our common stock, which includes 5,041 shares of restricted stock that vested in 2015 but does not include 4,219 shares of restricted stock that vested in early 2016, in each case held in Mr. Neff’s name for the benefit of IHP VI. Mr. Neff is President of IHP Capital Partners, which is an affiliate of IHP Capital Partners VI L.P. IHP Capital Partners VI L.P. has voting and dispositive power over the shares of our common stock held by IHP VI (collectively, IHP VI and IHP Capital Partners are “IHP”). Mr. Neff may be deemed to indirectly beneficially own the shares held by IHP, but disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares except to the extent of any pecuniary interest therein. Additionally, as a result of the Investor Rights Agreement, IHP, together with the other Group Members, may be deemed to have shared voting power over an additional 5,571,585 shares. IHP disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by the other Group Members. The address of IHP is 100 Bayview Circle, Suite 2000, Newport Beach, CA 92660. |
| |
(8) | Ms. Watt has sole voting and dispositive power over 9,260 shares of our common stock. Based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 16, 2016, Watt/TNHC LLC (“Watt”) has sole voting and dispositive power over 662,743 shares of our common stock. Ms. Watt is President of Watt Companies, which is an affiliate of Watt Residential LLC, the entity that has voting and dispositive power over the shares of our common stock held by Watt/TNHC LLC. Ms. Watt disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares of our common stock owned by Watt/TNHC LLC. Additionally, as a result of the Investor Rights Agreement, Watt, together with the other Group Members, may be deemed to have shared voting power over an additional 7,330,501 shares. Watt disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by the other Group Members. The address of Watt is 2716 Ocean Boulevard, Suite 2025, Santa Monica, CA 90405. |
| |
(9) | Based solely on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 12, 2016, First Manhattan Co., an investment adviser registered under Section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, has shared voting power over 1,459,380 shares of our common stock, shared dispositive power over 1,492,211 shares of our common stock, and sole voting and dispositive power over 250,000 shares of our common stock. The address of First Manhattan Co is 399 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10022. |
| |
(10) | Based solely on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 12, 2016, Covalent Partners LLC (“CP LLC”), an investment adviser registered under Section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, has shared voting power and shared dispositive power over 1,458,441 shares of our common stock. CP LLC serves as investment advisor to Covalent Capital Partners Master Fund, L.P. (the “Master Fund”) and Covalent Housing Co-Investment Opportunity Master Fund, L.P. (the “Housing Master Fund”). The Master Fund and Housing Master Fund directly hold shares of our common stock for the benefit of the investors in the Master Fund and Housing Master Fund, respectively. Covalent Capital Partners GP, LLC (“CCP GP”) is the general partner of the Master Fund and Housing Master Fund. Mr. Robert L. Hockett is the majority member of each of CCP GP and CP LLC and therefore a majority indirect owner of the Master Fund and Housing Master Fund. By virtue of these relationships, CCP GP |
and Mr. Hockett may be deemed to beneficially own the common stock held by the Master Fund and Housing Master Fund; however, CCP GP and Mr. Hockett do not admit to be deemed to be the beneficial owners of the common stock held by the Master Fund and Housing Master Fund. The address of Covalent Partners LLC is 930 Winter Street, Suite 2800, Waltham, MA 02451.
| |
(11) | Based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 27, 2016, each of Second Curve Capital, LLC and Thomas K. Brown have shared voting power and shared dispositive power over 1,358,301 shares of our common stock, which are beneficially owned by Second Curve Capital, LLC and Thomas K. Brown. Second Curve Capital, LLC is an investment adviser registered under Section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Based on information provided on this Schedule 13G/A, these shares of our common stock, which are beneficially owned by Second Curve Capital, LLC and Thomas K. Brown, are owned by advisory clients of Second Curve Capital, LLC, none of which owns more than five percent of our common stock. The address of Second Curve Capital, LLC and Thomas K. Brown is 350 5th Avenue, Suite 4730, New York, NY 10118. |
| |
(12) | Based solely on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 12, 2016, FMR LLC and Abigail P. Johnson each has sole dispositive power over 1,323,685 shares of our common stock. FMR LLC is an investment adviser registered under Section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Abigail P. Johnson is a Director, the Vice Chairman, the Chief Executive Officer and the President of FMR LLC. According to this Schedule 13G, various persons have the right to receive or power to direct to receipt of dividends from, or the proceeds from the sale of these shares of our common stock and no one other person’s interest in these shares of our common stock is more than five percent of our total outstanding shares of common stock. Members of the Johnson family, including Abigail P. Johnson, are the predominant owners, directly or through trusts, of Series B voting common shares of FMR LLC, representing 49% of the voting power of FMR LLC. The Johnson family group and all other Series B shareholders have entered into a shareholders’ voting agreement under which all Series B voting common shares will be voted in accordance with the majority vote of Series B voting common shares. Accordingly, through their ownership of voting common shares and the execution of the shareholders’ voting agreement, members of the Johnson family may be deemed, under the Investment Company Act of 1940, to form a controlling group with respect to FMR LLC. Neither FMR LLC nor Abigail P. Johnson has the sole power to vote or direct the voting of the shares owned directly by the various investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act (“Fidelity Funds”) advised by Fidelity Management & Research Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of FMR LLC, which power resides with the Fidelity Funds’ Boards of Trustees. Fidelity Management & Research Company carries out the voting of the shares under written guidelines established by the Fidelity Funds’ Boards of Trustees. The address of FMR LLC and Abigail P. Johnson is 245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210. |
| |
(13) | Based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 11, 2016, Wellington Management Group LLP, Wellington Group Holdings LLP and Wellington Investment Advisors Holdings LLP each have shared voting power over 930,555 shares of our common stock and shared dispositive power over 1,296,095 shares of our common stock. Wellington Management Company LLP, an investment adviser registered under Section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, has shared voting power over 807,896 shares of our common stock and shared dispositive power over 1,072,106 shares of our common stock. The shares of our common stock referenced in this Schedule 13G/A filed by Wellington Management Group LLP, as parent holding company of certain holding companies and the Wellington Investment Advisers, are owned of record by clients of the Wellington Investment Advisers. Wellington Investment Advisors Holdings LLP controls directly, or indirectly through Wellington Management Global Holdings, Ltd., the Wellington Investment Advisers. Wellington Investment Advisors Holdings LLP is owned by Wellington Group Holdings LLP. Wellington Group Holdings LLP is owned by Wellington Management Group LLP. The address for Wellington Management Group LLP is 280 Congress Street, Boston, MA 02210. |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary Compensation Table
The following table shows, for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, information regarding the compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to our named executive officers, which for 2015 consisted of:
• H. Lawrence Webb, our Chief Executive Officer,
• Wayne Stelmar, our former Chief Financial Officer and current Chief Investment Officer, and
• Thomas Redwitz, our Chief Operating Officer.
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary(1) | Bonus(2) |
Stock Awards(3) | Option Awards |
Non-equity Incentive Plan Compensation(4) | All Other Compensation | Total |
H. Lawrence Webb Chief Executive Officer | 2015 | $519,231 |
$155,000 | $631,151 | -- |
$320,000 | -- |
$1,625,382 |
| 2014 | $480,385 | -- | -- | $933,815 | -- | -- | $1,414,199 |
Wayne Stelmar Chief Investment Officer and former Chief Financial Officer(5) | 2015 | $467,308 |
$54,000 | $504,409 | -- |
$216,000 | -- | $1,241,717 |
| 2014 | $436,923 | -- | -- | $747,050 | -- | -- | $1,183,973 |
Thomas Redwitz Chief Operating Officer | 2015 | $467,308 |
$54,000 | $504,409 | -- |
$216,000 | -- |
$1,241,717 |
| 2014 | $436,923 | -- | -- | $747,050 | -- | -- | $1,183,973 |
___
| |
(1) | Amounts paid in 2015 reflect a payroll "leap year" in which there were 27 pay periods. |
| |
(2) | Amounts reflect discretionary bonuses paid to our named executive officers for 2015 performance. |
| |
(3) | Amounts reflect the grant date fair value of the restricted stock units, or RSUs, granted to the named executive officers, as computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, or ASC Topic 718. We provide information regarding the assumptions used to calculate the value of all equity awards made to executive officers in Note 12, Stock-Based Compensation, to our consolidated audited financial statements included in our Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 26, 2016. |
| |
(4) | Amounts shown in this column represent cash bonus awards granted to our named executive officers for performance during 2015 pursuant to our 2015 annual bonus program under our Executive Incentive Compensation Plan. |
| |
(5) | Mr. Stelmar was previously our Chief Financial Officer. In connection with the resignation of Joe Davis as our previous Chief Investment Officer, Mr. Stelmar resigned from his position as Chief Financial Officer of the Company and was reappointed by the Board as Chief Investment Officer on June 26, 2015. John M. Stephens joined the Company as our Chief Financial Officer on June 26, 2015. |
Narrative to Summary Compensation Table
Components of Compensation
The individual components of our executive compensation program consist primarily of (i) base salary, (ii) annual cash-based bonus opportunities, (iii) long-term equity incentives and (iv) retirement savings opportunities and limited other employee benefits.
2015 Salaries
Effective upon the completion of our initial public offering in February 2014, we entered into amended and restated employment agreements with each of our named executive officers, pursuant to which the annual base salaries for Messrs. Webb, Stelmar and Redwitz were established at $500,000, $450,000 and $450,000, respectively. The terms of the employment agreements entered into by Messrs. Webb, Stelmar and Redwitz are described in more detail below under “—Employment Agreements.”
We did not make any changes to the executives’ base salaries in 2015.
2015 Bonuses
In 2014, in an effort to be fiscally conservative, no cash-based bonuses were paid out to our named executive officers for 2014.
In 2015, each of the named executive officers participated in an annual bonus compensation program under our Executive Incentive Compensation Plan.
Under the bonus program, each named executive officer was eligible to receive a cash bonus based on achievement of a pre-established goal of pretax income for 2015. In order for the executives to be eligible to receive a bonus for 2015 performance, our company had to achieve at least 75% of the target performance goal.
The 2015 target bonuses for Messrs. Webb, Stelmar and Redwitz were 80%, 60% and 60%, respectively, of the executive’s 2015 annual base salary. Each was eligible to receive a bonus ranging from 75% to 200% of the executive’s target bonus, based on actual achievement of 75% to 200% of the performance goal.
In 2015, we achieved approximately 80% of the target performance goal, resulting in the payment of 80% of each executive’s target bonus. However, because the named executive officers did not receive a bonus for 2014 and in consideration of the Compensation Committee’s evaluation of the overall performance and trajectory of the Company, the Compensation Committee, in consultation with its Compensation consultant, determined to award to each named executive officer a bonus equal to his 2015 target bonus. Furthermore, the Compensation Committee, based on consultation with its independent compensation consultant, concluded that Mr. Webb, as the Company’s chief executive officer, was paid compensation below market in 2015 and therefore determined to award Mr. Webb with an additional $75,000 bonus.
The following table sets forth the aggregate 2015 bonuses paid to each named executive officer:
|
| | | |
Named Executive Officer | 2015 Bonus |
H. Lawrence Webb |
| $475,000 |
|
Wayne Stelmar |
| $270,000 |
|
Thomas Redwitz |
| $270,000 |
|
Equity Compensation
In May 2015, the Compensation Committee approved RSU grants to each of our named executive officers as follows: Mr. Webb (43,952) and each of Messrs. Stelmar and Redwitz (35,126), which were subject to cliff vesting as to 100% of the shares underlying the RSUs on March 3, 2016, subject to the grantee’s continuous employment with the Company. The Compensation Committee applied this vesting period in order to offset the lack of cash bonuses paid to any of the named executive officers for 2014. In addition, the terms of the RSU awards provided for (i) pro-rated vesting upon the executive's retirement and (ii) full vesting immediately prior to a change in control (as defined under the 2014 Plan), subject to the executive's continued employment until the change in control.
In determining the RSU awards granted in 2015, consideration was given to the form and amount of awards typically granted to executives at other public homebuilders. SBCG provided our Compensation Committee and Board with compensation information for public homebuilders, compensation data related to executives at public homebuilders which the Compensation Committee considered in making awards.
Employment Agreements
Effective upon the completion of our initial public offering, we entered into amended and restated employment agreements with each of Messrs. Webb, Stelmar and Redwitz. In connection with the resignation of Joe Davis, our former Chief Investment Officer, in June 2015 Mr. Stelmar resigned as Chief Financial Officer and his employment agreement was amended to appoint him as Chief Investment Officer. The employment agreements with Messrs. Webb, Stelmar and Redwitz each have an initial term expiring on the third anniversary of the effective date of the employment agreement. Each employment agreement provides for automatic one-year extensions after the expiration of the initial term, unless either party provides the other with at least 180 days’ prior written notice of non-renewal.
The employment agreements provide for, among other things:
|
| | | | |
• | an annual base salary of $500,000, $450,000, and $450,000, respectively, for Messrs. Webb, Stelmar, and Redwitz, subject to increases approved from time to time; |
• | eligibility for annual cash performance bonuses based on the satisfaction of performance goals to be established by our Compensation Committee; |
• | subject to the approval of our Compensation Committee, eligibility for equity-based compensation awards on the same terms and conditions as other senior executive officers; and |
• | participation in any employee benefit plans and programs that are maintained from time to time for our other officers. |
The employment agreements contain customary employee non-solicitation provisions that apply during the term of the agreements and for two years after the termination of the executive’s employment. The employment agreements also contain standard confidentiality provisions that apply during the term of the agreements and after the termination of the executive’s employment.
The employment agreements also provide for limited payments in the event of qualified terminations or resignations of our named executive officers. See “—Executive Compensation Arrangements Upon Certain Departures” below.
Other Elements of Compensation
We maintain a 401(k) retirement savings plan for our employees, including our named executive officers, who satisfy certain eligibility requirements. Currently, we match contributions made by participants in the 401(k) plan up to a specified percentage of the employee contributions, and these matching contributions vest rateably depending on length of service with the Company.
All of our full-time employees, including our named executive officers, are eligible to participate in our health and welfare plans, including: medical, dental and vision benefits; medical and dependent care flexible spending and health savings accounts; short-term and long-term disability insurance; and life insurance. We believe these health and welfare benefits are necessary and appropriate to provide a competitive compensation package to our named executive officers and employees generally.
We do not provide perquisites to any of our named executive officers that exceed $10,000 in the aggregate. Certain members of management (at the director level and above), including named executive officers, are eligible for up to $1,800 in reimbursements annually for mobile phone usage as well as a car allowance, including toll road reimbursements, for up to $7,200 annually.
We do not maintain any defined benefit pension plans or nonqualified deferred compensation plans.
No Tax Gross-Ups
We do not make gross-up payments to cover our named executive officers’ personal income taxes that may pertain to any of the compensation paid or provided by us.
Executive Compensation Arrangements Upon Certain Departures
Under the employment agreements with our named executive officers, we pay the following amounts upon qualifying departures from service with us. We may terminate the employment of a named executive officer at any time with or without cause, and the executive may terminate his employment with or without good reason.
Termination for cause or resignation without good reason.
If we terminate a named executive officer’s employment for cause, or if the named executive officer resigns without good reason, the named executive officer will be entitled to receive any earned but unpaid annual base salary, any earned but unpaid prior-year bonus, reimbursement of expenses incurred prior to the date of termination, accrued vacation and any other paid-time-off and any benefits that have been earned and accrued prior to the date of termination (referred to as the “Earned Benefits”).
Termination without cause or resignation for good reason or due to disability or death.
If we terminate a named executive officer’s employment without cause or if the named executive officer terminates his employment for good reason or due to disability or death, the named executive officer will be entitled to receive the Earned Benefits. In addition we will reimburse the employer-subsidized portion of the premium under our health and dental plans for a period of 24 months, in the case of Mr. Webb, or 12 months, in the case of Messrs. Stelmar and Redwitz (or until such earlier date on which they obtain substantially similar coverage).
If we terminate a named executive officer’s employment without cause or if the named executive officer terminates his employment for good reason, the named executive officer will also be entitled to receive a lump sum cash payment in an amount equal to one times or, in the case of Mr. Webb, two times the sum of (1) the named executive officer’s annual base salary, plus (2) the highest annual bonus paid to the named executive officer during the previous three calendar years. These severance benefits will be payable only if the named executive officer signs and does not revoke a waiver and release of any claims against us.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
The following tables sets forth summary information regarding the outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers at December 31, 2015:
|
| | | | | | |
| | |
| | | | | | |
| Option Awards | Stock Awards |
Name | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable(1) | Option Exercise Price | Option Expiration Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(2) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(3) |
H. Lawrence Webb | -0- | 227,273 | $11.00 | 01/30/2024 | 43,952 | $569,618 |
Wayne Stelmar | -0- | 181,818 | $11.00 | 01/30/2024 | 35,126 | $455,233 |
Thomas Redwitz | -0- | 181,818 | $11.00 | 01/30/2024 | 35,126 | $455,233 |
___
(1) Each of the options in the above table cliff vest as to 100% of the shares underlying the option on January 30, 2017.
(2) These RSU awards vested in full on March 3, 2016.
| |
(3) | Based on the $12.96 per share closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2015 (the last trading day of fiscal 2015). |
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table provides information as of December 31, 2015, about compensation plans under which shares of our common stock may be issued to employees, consultants or non-employee directors of our Board upon exercise of options, vesting of RSUs, or under any other rights under all of our existing equity compensation plans.
|
| | | | | |
Plan Category | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a) | | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b) | | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) |
Plans approved by stockholders | 1,148,684 | | $11.00 | | 409,221 |
Plans not approved by stockholders | - | | - | | - |
| | | | | |
Total | 1,148,684 | | $11.00 | | 409,221 |
| |
(a) | Represents an aggregate of 840,298 options outstanding under the “2014 Plan” plus an aggregate of 308,386 outstanding RSUs under our 2014 Plan. |
| |
(b) | Represents the weighted-average exercise price of the 840,298 outstanding options under our 2014 Plan. |
| |
(c) | Represents the number of securities remaining available for issuance under our 2014 Plan. |
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
Non-Employee Director Compensation Philosophy and Program
Our Compensation Committee is responsible for the periodic review of compensation and benefits paid to non-employee directors, and the determination of the compensation of all non-employee directors is approved by our Board, following consultation with SBCG. We believe that compensation for non-employee directors should be competitive and should align the interests of our directors with our stockholders’ interests through the payment of a portion of director compensation in RSUs.
Under our non-employee director compensation program for 2015, our non-employee directors received the following cash and equity compensation:
|
| |
Annual Cash Retainer | $40,000 |
Annual Equity Grant | $60,000 in value of RSUs |
Committee Cash Retainers | |
Audit | $13,500 (Chair); $8,500 (Other Members) |
Compensation | $9,000 (Chair); $6,000 (Other Members) |
Nominating | $9,000 (Chair); $6,000 (Other Members) |
We have adopted a revised non-employee director compensation program beginning with the Company’s 2016 fiscal year. Under this revised program, the non-employee directors are eligible to receive the following cash and equity compensation:
|
| |
Annual Cash Retainer | $45,000 |
Annual Equity Grant | $60,000 in value of RSUs |
Committee Cash Retainers | |
Audit | $20,000 (Chair); $8,500 (Other Members) |
Compensation | $15,000 (Chair); $6,000 (Other Members) |
Nominating | $15,000 (Chair); $6,000 (Other Members) |
Executive | $15,000 |
We also reimburse our non-employee directors for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the performance of their duties as directors, including without limitation travel expenses in connection with their attendance in-person at Board and committee meetings. Directors who are employees do not receive any compensation for their services as directors.
Director Stock Ownership Guidelines
Under stock ownership guidelines established in connection with our initial public offering and further amended in March 2015, each non-employee director must hold 100% of all shares received from the vesting, delivery or exercise of equity awards granted by us until the non-employee director owns shares of our common stock equal in value to $120,000 (based on the average price of our common stock for the most recently completed fiscal year), which represents three times the annual cash retainer payable to our non-employee directors as in effect immediately following our initial public offering. Each non-employee director is expected to achieve his or her threshold ownership requirement within three years of joining the Board.
Non-Employee Director Compensation Table
The table below summarizes the compensation received by our non-employee directors for the year ended December 31, 2015. All of our non-employee directors were appointed to the Board effective upon the closing of our initial public offering.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non-Employee Director | | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash | | Restricted Stock Units (1)(2) | | All Other Compensation | | Total |
David Berman | | $40,000 | | $59,994 | | - | | $99,994 |
Douglas C. Neff | | $40,000 | | $59,994 | | - | | $99,994 |
Nadine Watt | | $40,000 | | $59,994 | | - | | $99,994 |
Sam Bakhshandehpour | | $54,500 | | $59,994 | | - | | $114,494 |
Michael Berchtold | | $40,000 | | $59,994 | | - | | $99,994 |
Gregory P. Lindstrom | | $55,000 | | $59,994 | | - | | $114,994 |
Paul Heeschen | | $46,000 | | $59,994 | | - | | $105,994 |
Cathey S. Lowe | | $59,500 | | $59,994 | | - | | $119,494 |
William A. Witte | | $57,500 | | $59,994 | | - | | $117,494 |
| |
(1) | The amounts shown equal the grant date fair value of the RSUs computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Each non-employee director received an award of 4,219 RSUs on March 3, 2015 under our 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan and each subject to vesting in full on the first anniversary of their respective grant date. We provide information regarding the assumptions used to calculate the value of all equity awards made to executive officers in Note 12, Stock-Based Compensation, to our consolidated audited financial statements included in our Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 26, 2016. The grant date fair market value of each RSU granted on March 3, 2015 was $14.22. |
(2) | The following table sets forth the outstanding equity awards held by each of our non-employee directors as of December 31, 2015. |
| | | | Director | | RSUs Outstanding at Dec. 31, 2015 | |
| | | | David Berman | | 4,219 | | | |
| | | | Douglas C. Neff | | 4,219 | | | |
| | | | Nadine Watt | | 4,219 | | | |
| | | | Sam Bakhshandehpour | | 4,219 | | | |
| | | | Michael Berchtold | | 4,219 | | | |
| | | | Gregory P. Lindstrom | | 4,219 | | | |
| | | | Paul Heeschen | | 4,219 | | | |
| | | | Cathey S. Lowe | | 4,219 | | | |
| | | | William A. Witte | | 4,219 | | | |
PROPOSAL 3
RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
The Audit Committee of our Board has selected Ernst & Young LLP (“Ernst & Young”) as our independent registered public accountants for the year ending December 31, 2016, and has further directed that management submit the selection of independent registered public accountants for ratification by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting. A representative of Ernst & Young is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she so desires and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Stockholder ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young as our independent registered public accountants is not required by our bylaws or otherwise. However, our Board is submitting the selection of Ernst & Young to the stockholders for ratification as a matter of corporate practice. If the stockholders fail to ratify the selection, our Audit Committee will reconsider whether or not to retain that firm. Even if the selection is ratified, our Audit Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of a different independent accounting firm at any time during the year if our Audit Committee determines that such a change would be in our and our stockholders’ best interests.
Board Recommendation
OUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF ERNST & YOUNG AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2016.
Audit and Related Fees
Ernst & Young provided audit, audit-related and tax services to us during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | |
Type of Fees | 2015 | | 2014 |
Audit Fees | $ | 519,750 |
| | $ | 340,000 |
|
Audit-Related Fees | $ | 346,000 |
| | $ | 366,000 |
|
Tax Fees | $ | 130,528 |
| | $ | 169,750 |
|
All Other Fees | $ | 2,910 |
| | $ | — |
|
Total | $ | 999,188 |
| | $ | 875,750 |
|
Audit Fees
These are fees for professional services performed by Ernst & Young LLP for the audit of our annual financial statements, consents and comfort letters and services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements, including work performed in connection with the Company’s initial public offering and follow-on offering.
Audit-Related Fees
These are fees for and related to the audit of our unconsolidated joint ventures, which fees are paid for entirely by our unconsolidated joint ventures.
Tax Fees
These are fees for professional services performed by Ernst & Young LLP with respect to tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. This includes the preparation of our and our consolidated subsidiaries’ original and amended tax returns, refund claims, payment planning, tax audit assistance and tax work stemming from “Audit-Related” items. This also includes fees for preparation of original and amended tax returns, payment planning and tax audit assistance for our unconsolidated joint ventures, which fees are paid for by our unconsolidated joint ventures.
All Other Fees
These are fees for other permissible work performed by Ernst & Young LLP that does not meet the above category descriptions and includes fees and expenses related to an online subscription to Ernst & Young's internal accounting literature database.
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
Under its charter, our Audit Committee, or the Chairman of our Audit Committee, must pre-approve all engagements of our independent registered public accounting firm. Our Audit Committee approved all audit and non-audit services in 2015 and 2014.
Audit Committee Report
Following is the report of the Audit Committee with respect to The New Home Company’s audited consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015 and the notes thereto. The material in this report is not “soliciting material,” is not deemed “filed” with the SEC, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Responsibilities. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the board of directors. Each member of the Audit Committee is “independent,” as required by the applicable listing standards of NYSE and the rules of the SEC. The primary role of the Audit Committee is to oversee our financial reporting process on behalf of the board of directors. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, is responsible for performing an audit of our financial statements and expressing an opinion as to the conformity of such financial statements with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Review with Management. The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed our audited financial statements (including the quality of our accounting principles) with management. Our management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of our financial statements.
Review and Discussions with Independent Accountants. The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed our audited financial statements (including the quality of the Company’s accounting principles) with Ernst & Young LLP. The Audit Committee has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP the Company's independent registered public accounting firm, the matters required to be discussed by applicable standards of the Public Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”). Further, the Audit Committee reviewed Ernst & Young LLP’s Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K related to its audit of the consolidated financial statements.
The Audit Committee has also received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from Ernst & Young LLP regarding the auditors’ independence required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP its independence from us.
Conclusion. Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the board of directors that our audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Cathey Lowe (Chairperson)
Sam Bakhshandehpour
William Witte
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS
Related Person Transaction Policy
The Board has adopted a written Related Person Transaction Policy (the “Policy”). The purpose of the Policy is to ensure that all transactions between related persons and us, including our subsidiaries, are properly identified, reported, reviewed and approved, and disclosed in accordance with applicable law. All related person transactions entered into or proposed to be entered into must be disclosed to and approved by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee reviews related person transactions to ensure a conflict of interest does not exist and/or that the transaction is being conducted at a fair and appropriate price, and that information necessary to disclose such related person transaction is properly documented. If the proposed transaction involves a related person who is a member of the Audit Committee, the transaction must be approved by a majority of the disinterested members of the Audit Committee.
The Audit Committee has excluded each of the following related party transactions under the Policy: (i) transactions in which all employees of the Company may participate, including payments made pursuant to reimbursement policies and (ii) compensation for services rendered to us as an employee or director thereof, whether cash or equity related.
Under the Policy, a related person means (i) an executive officer or director of us, or a nominee for election as a director; (ii) any person who is known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our securities, (c) any immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons or shares the same household as such person, or (d) any entity that is wholly owned by or controlled by any of the foregoing persons. A “related person transaction” is a transaction or series of transactions in which we participate (whether or not we are a party) and in which a related person has a direct or indirect material interest.
Transactions With Related Persons
Investor Rights Agreement
On February 5, 2014, we entered into the Investor Rights Agreement with Messrs. Webb, Stelmar, Davis and Redwitz and the Institutional Investors. For more information on this agreement, see “Corporate Governance—Investor Rights Agreement.”
Registration Rights
We have entered into a registration rights agreement with Messrs. Webb, Stelmar, Davis and Redwitz and the Institutional Investors with respect to the shares of our common stock that they received as part of our formation transactions. We refer to these shares collectively as the “registrable shares.” Pursuant to the registration rights agreement, we have granted the parties and their direct and indirect transferees shelf registration rights requiring us to file a shelf registration statement and to maintain the effectiveness of such registration statement so as to allow sales thereunder from time to time, and, in certain circumstances, the right to “piggy-back” the registrable shares in registration statements we might file in connection with certain future public offerings. Our obligation to cause any registration statements filed pursuant to the registration rights agreement to be declared effective or remain effective is on a reasonable best efforts basis.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, any registration is subject to cutback provisions, and we are permitted to suspend the use, from time to time, of the prospectus that is part of the registration statement (and therefore suspend sales under the registration statement) for certain periods, referred to as “blackout periods.”
Joint Ventures
We have entered into agreements with our unconsolidated joint ventures to provide management services related to the underlying projects. Pursuant to management agreements for each project, we receive a management fee based on each project’s revenues. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we earned $12.4 million in management fees, $0.7 million of which were included in “due from affiliates” in our consolidated balance sheets.
The Company has provided credit enhancements in connection with joint venture borrowings in the form of loan-to-value (“LTV”) maintenance agreements in order to secure performance under the loans and maintain certain LTV ratios. The Company has entered into agreements with its partners in each of the unconsolidated joint ventures whereby the Company and its partners are apportioned liability under the LTV maintenance agreements according to their respective capital interest. In addition, the agreements provide the Company, to the extent its partner has an unpaid liability under such credit enhancements, the right to receive distributions from the unconsolidated joint venture that would otherwise be made to the partner. Due to the nature of the loans, the outstanding balance at any given time is subject to a number of factors including
the status of site improvements, the mix of horizontal and vertical development underway, the timing of phase build outs, and the period necessary to complete the escrow process for homebuyers. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, $74.1 million and $61.4 million, respectively, was outstanding under the loans and credit enhanced by the Company through LTV maintenance agreements. Under the terms of the joint venture agreements, the Company's proportionate share of LTV maintenance agreement liabilities was 30.3% and 12.6%, respectively, as of December 31, 2015 and 2014. In connection with providing credit enhancements, the Company recognized $0, $18,927 and $113,562 in guaranty fee income during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
As of December 31, 2015, the Company had investments in certain unconsolidated joint ventures totaling $18.1 million where our joint venture partner is an affiliate of a member of our Board, as discussed below.
David Berman, one of our non-employee directors, is Executive Chairman of Tricon Capital Group Inc., an affiliate of TCN/TNHC LP (“Tricon”). Tricon owns approximately 9.3% of our common stock. Various affiliates of Tricon serve as limited partners of our joint ventures, including Villa Metro, Avanti and Bedford Ranch, with Tricon holding 90%, 90% and 95% of the capital interest, respectively, in such ventures. Our equity in these ventures was $0.4 million, $2.9 million and $4.5 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2015.
Douglas Neff, one of our non-employee directors, is President of IHP Capital Partners, the general partner of the manager of IHP Capital Partners VI, LLC (“IHP”). IHP owns approximately 11.7% of our common stock. An affiliate of IHP is our 63% partner in TNHC Meridian Investors, which in turn has a 32% capital interest in the TNHC Newport joint venture. Under the terms of the TNHC Meridian Investors joint venture agreement, after the return of certain preference amounts, capital contributions and cost overruns/profit shortfalls to the joint venture partners, we are entitled to receive distributions from the joint venture equal to our economic interest. As of December 31, 2015, our equity in TNHC Meridian Investors was $2.3 million. An affiliate of IHP also has a 65% interest in TNHC Russell Ranch, one of our other joint ventures, in which our equity as of December 31, 2015 was approximately $8.0 million. In connection with IHP’s relationship with the two above-referenced joint ventures, the unconsolidated joint ventures pay IHP management fees an amount equal to approximately $375,000. Additionally, the joint ventures, in which IHP is a member, make payments to the Company for services, generally for overhead allowances pursuant to the underlying joint venture agreements, in the two foregoing joint ventures.
TL Fab
TL Fab LP, an entity in which Paul Heeschen, one of our non-employee directors, owns an indirect majority equity interest (but is not an employee), was engaged by us and some of our unconsolidated joint ventures as a trade contractor to provide metal fabrication services during 2015 and currently. We incurred approximately $119,000 and our unconsolidated joint ventures incurred approximately $798,000, respectively, for these services for the year ended December 31, 2015. We and certain of our unconsolidated joint ventures are likely to continue to engage TL Fab for additional services in 2016 as long as their bids are competitive.
Neff Employment
John Neff, the son of one of our non-employee directors, Douglas C. Neff, is employed by the Company as a Land Acquisition Manager. During the year ended December 31, 2015, John Neff received approximately $136,000 from the Company in total compensation, including base salary, bonus and other compensation, in exchange for his services.
OTHER MATTERS
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers, directors and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC and the NYSE. Executive officers, directors and greater than ten percent stockholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms furnished to us and the written representations from certain of the reporting persons that no other reports were required, we believe that all executive officers, directors and greater than ten percent beneficial owners during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 complied with the reporting requirements of Section 16(a), except that, due to administrative oversight, (i) on February 17, 2015, Mr. Neff filed an amendment to a previously filed Form 3 to correct the number of securities originally reported, (ii) on April 1, 2015, each of Messrs. Andrew Jarvis and Kevin Carson filed a late Form 4 with respect to one transaction each, (iii) on August 5, 2015, Mr. Redwitz filed a late Form 4 with respect to two transactions.
Stockholder Proposals and Nominations
Proposals Pursuant to Rule 14a-8. Pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, stockholders may present proper proposals for inclusion in the proxy statement and for consideration at our next Annual Meeting of stockholders. To be eligible for inclusion in the 2017 proxy statement, your proposal must be received by us no later than December 7, 2016 and must otherwise comply with Rule 14a-8. While our Board will consider stockholder proposals, we reserve the right to omit from the proxy statement stockholder proposals that we are not required to include under the Exchange Act, including Rule 14a-8.
Proposals and Nominations Pursuant to Our Bylaws. Under our bylaws, in order to nominate a director or bring any other business before the stockholders at the 2017 Annual Meeting that will not be included in our proxy statement, you must notify us in writing and such notice must be received by us prior to the close of business at the principal executive offices of the Company, The New Home Company, c/o Secretary, 85 Enterprise, Suite 450, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656, no earlier than December 7, 2016 and no later than January 6, 2017, unless our 2017 Annual Meeting is more than 30 days before or after the anniversary of our 2016 Annual Meeting, in which case the notice must be delivered not more than 120 days before, and no later than the 90th day prior to the 2017 Annual Meeting or, the 10th day following the day on which public disclosure of the date of the 2016 Annual Meeting was first made. For proposals not made in accordance with Rule 14a-8, you must comply with specific procedures set forth in our bylaws and the nomination or proposal must contain the specific information required by our bylaws. You may write to our Secretary at 85 Enterprise, Suite 450, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 to deliver the notices discussed above and to request a copy of the relevant bylaw provisions regarding the requirements for making stockholder proposals and nominating director candidates pursuant to our bylaws.
Householding of Proxy Materials
The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries (such as banks and brokers) to satisfy the delivery requirements for proxy statements and annual reports with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the same address by delivering a single proxy statement addressed to those stockholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially means extra convenience for stockholders and cost savings for companies.
This year, we will not be householding our proxy materials but we expect to begin doing so in 2017.
Where You Can Find More Information
The Company files annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We make available free of charge on or through our Internet website, in the “Investors” section of our website at http://www.NWHM.com., our reports and other information filed with or furnished to the SEC and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. The SEC's Internet website, www.sec.gov, also contains reports, proxy statements and other information about issuers, like us, who file electronically with the SEC.
WE WILL PROVIDE, WITHOUT CHARGE, ON THE WRITTEN REQUEST OF ANY STOCKHOLDER, A COPY OF OUR 2015 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K, WITHOUT EXHIBITS, INCLUDING THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES REQUIRED TO BE FILED WITH THE SEC PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-1. STOCKHOLDERS SHOULD DIRECT SUCH REQUESTS TO THE COMPANY’S SECRETARY AT 85 ENTERPRISE, SUITE 450, ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656, OR BY EMAIL AT INVESTORRELATIONS@THENEWHOMECOMPANY.COM.
Incorporation by Reference
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of our previous filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which might incorporate future filings made by us under those statutes, the Audit Committee Report will not be incorporated by reference into any of those prior filings, nor will any such report be incorporated by reference into any future filings made by us under those statutes. In addition, references to our website in this proxy statement are not intended to function as hyperlinks and information on our website, other than our proxy statement, notice and form of proxy, is not part of the proxy soliciting material and is not incorporated herein by reference.
Forward-Looking Statements
This proxy statement contains “forward-looking statements” (as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995). These statements are based on our current expectations and involve risks and uncertainties, which may cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the statements. The forward-looking statements may include statements regarding actions to be taken by us. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Forward-looking statements should be evaluated together with the many uncertainties that affect our business, particularly those mentioned in the risk factors in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 and in our subsequent periodic reports on Form 10-Q and our current reports on Form 8-K.
Other Business
As of the date of this proxy statement, our Board knows of no other business that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting. If other proper matters are presented at the Annual Meeting, however, it is the intention of the proxy holders named in the Company’s form of proxy to vote the proxies held by them in accordance with their
best judgment.
|
|
|
|
|
By Order of our Board |
|
/s/ Miek Harbur |
Miek Harbur |
Corporate Secretary |
|
Aliso Viejo, CA
April 6, 2016
Appendix A
THE NEW HOME COMPANY INC.
2016 INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN
1.Purpose.
The Plan’s purpose is to enhance the Company’s ability to attract, retain and motivate persons who make (or are expected to make) important contributions to the Company by providing these individuals with equity ownership opportunities. Capitalized terms used in the Plan are defined in Section 11.
2. Eligibility.
Service Providers are eligible to be granted Awards under the Plan, subject to the limitations described herein.
3. Administration and Delegation.
(a) Administration. The Plan is administered by the Administrator. The Administrator has authority to determine which Service Providers receive Awards, grant Awards and set Award terms and conditions, subject to the conditions and limitations in the Plan. The Administrator also has the authority to take all actions and make all determinations under the Plan, to interpret the Plan and Award Agreements and to adopt, amend and repeal Plan administrative rules, guidelines and practices as it deems advisable. The Administrator may correct defects and ambiguities, supply omissions and reconcile inconsistencies in the Plan or any Award or Award Agreement as it deems necessary or appropriate to administer the Plan and any Awards. The Administrator’s determinations under the Plan are in its sole discretion and will be final and binding on all persons having or claiming any interest in the Plan or any Award.
(b) Appointment of Committees. To the extent Applicable Laws permit, the Board may delegate any or all of its powers under the Plan to one or more Committees. The Board may abolish any Committee or re-vest in itself any previously delegated authority at any time.
4. Stock Available for Awards.
(a) Number of Shares. Subject to adjustment under Section 8 and the terms of this Section 4, Awards may be made under the Plan covering up to the Overall Share Limit. Shares issued under the Plan may consist of authorized but unissued Shares, Shares purchased on the open market or treasury Shares.
(b) Share Recycling. Except as provided in subsection (c) below, if all or any part of an Award expires, lapses or is terminated, exchanged for cash, surrendered, repurchased, canceled without having been fully exercised or forfeited, in any case, in a manner that results in the Company acquiring Shares covered by the Award for less than Fair Market Value or not issuing any Shares covered by the Award, the unused Shares covered by the Award will, as applicable, become or again be available for Award grants under the Plan.
(c) Limitation on Share Recycling. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, the following Shares shall not be added to the Shares authorized for grant under this Section 4(a) and shall not be available for future grants of Awards:
(i) Shares tendered by a Participant or withheld by the Company in payment of the exercise price of an Option;
(ii) Shares tendered by the Participant or withheld by the Company to satisfy any tax withholding obligation with respect to an Award;
(iii) Shares subject to a Stock Appreciation Right that are not issued in connection with the stock settlement of the Stock Appreciation Right on exercise thereof; and
(iv) Shares purchased on the open market with the cash proceeds from the exercise of Options.
(d) Incentive Stock Option Limitations. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, no more than 800,000 Shares may be issued pursuant to the exercise of Incentive Stock Options, and no Shares may again be optioned, granted or awarded if it would cause an Incentive Stock Option not to qualify as an Incentive Stock Option.
(e) Substitute Awards. In connection with an entity’s merger or consolidation with the Company or the Company’s acquisition of an entity’s property or stock, the Administrator may grant Awards in substitution for any options or other stock or stock-based awards granted before such merger or consolidation by such entity or its affiliate. Substitute Awards may be granted on such terms as the Administrator deems appropriate, notwithstanding limitations on Awards in the Plan. Substitute Awards will not count against the Overall Share Limit, except that Shares acquired by exercise of substitute Incentive Stock Options will count against the maximum number of Shares that may be issued pursuant to the exercise of Incentive Stock Options under the Plan.
(f) Individual Award Limitations. Notwithstanding any provision in the Plan to the contrary, and subject to adjustment as provided in Section 8, the maximum aggregate number of Shares with respect to one or more Awards denominated in Shares that may be granted to any one person during any fiscal year of the Company shall be 500,000 and the maximum aggregate amount of cash that may be paid in cash to any one person during any fiscal year of the Company with respect to one or more Awards payable in cash and not denominated in Shares shall be $5,000,000.
(g) Non-Employee Director Award Limit. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in the Plan, the maximum aggregate grant date fair value of Awards granted to a non-employee Director as compensation for services as a non-employee Director during any fiscal year of the Company may not exceed $300,000. The Administrator may make exceptions to this limit for individual non-employee directors in extraordinary circumstances, as the Administrator may determine in its discretion, provided that the non-employee director receiving such additional compensation may not participate in the decision to award such compensation or in other compensation decisions involving non-employee Directors.
5. Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights.
(a) General. The Administrator may grant Options or Stock Appreciation Rights to Service Providers subject to the limitations in the Plan, including Section 5(f) with respect to Incentive Stock Options. The Administrator will determine the number of Shares covered by each Option and Stock Appreciation Right, the exercise price of each Option and Stock Appreciation Right and the conditions and limitations applicable to the exercise of each Option and Stock Appreciation Right. A Stock Appreciation Right shall entitle the Participant (or other person entitled to exercise the Stock Appreciation Right pursuant to the Plan) to exercise all or a specified portion of the Stock Appreciation Right (to the extent then exercisable pursuant to its terms) and to receive from the Company an amount determined by multiplying the difference obtained by subtracting the exercise price per share of the Stock Appreciation Right from the Fair Market Value on the date of exercise of the Stock Appreciation Right by the number of Shares with respect to which the Stock Appreciation Right shall have been exercised, subject to any limitations of the Plan or as the Administrator may impose.
(b) Exercise Price. The Administrator will establish each Option’s and Stock Appreciation Right’s exercise price and specify the exercise price in the Award Agreement. The exercise price will not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value on the grant date of the Option or Stock Appreciation Right.
(c) Duration of Options. Each Option or Stock Appreciation Right will be exercisable at such times and as specified in the Award Agreement, provided that the term of an Option or Stock Appreciation Right will not exceed ten years.
(d) Exercise; Notification of Disposition. Options and Stock Appreciation Rights may be exercised by delivering to the Company a written notice of exercise, in a form the Administrator approves (which may be electronic), signed by the person authorized to exercise the Option or Stock Appreciation Right, together with, as applicable, payment in full (i) as specified in Section 5(e)for the number of Shares for which the Award is exercised and (ii) as specified in Section 9(e) for any applicable withholding taxes. Unless the Administrator otherwise determines, an Option or Stock Appreciation Right may not be exercised for a fraction of a Share.
(e) Payment Upon Exercise. The exercise price of an Option must be paid in cash or by check payable to the order of the Company or, subject to Section 10(h), any Company insider trading policy (including blackout periods) and Applicable Laws, by:
(i) if there is a public market for Shares at the time of exercise, unless the Administrator otherwise determines, (A) delivery (including telephonically to the extent permitted by the Company) of an irrevocable and unconditional undertaking by a broker acceptable to the Company to deliver promptly to the Company sufficient funds to pay the exercise price, or (B) the Participant’s delivery to the Company of a copy of irrevocable and unconditional instructions to a broker acceptable to the Company to deliver promptly to the Company cash or a check sufficient to pay the exercise price;
(ii) delivery (either by actual delivery or attestation) of Shares owned by the Participant valued at their Fair Market Value, provided (A) such payment method is then permitted under Applicable Laws, (B) such Shares, if acquired directly from the Company, were owned by the Participant for a minimum time period that the Company may establish and (C) such Shares are not subject to repurchase, forfeiture, unfulfilled vesting or other similar requirements;
(iii) surrendering Shares then issuable upon the Option’s exercise valued at their Fair Market Value on the exercise date;
(iv) to the extent permitted by the Administrator, delivery of a promissory note or any other property that the Administrator determines is good and valuable consideration; or
(v) any combination of the above permitted payment forms (including cash or check).
(f) Additional Terms of Incentive Stock Options. The Administrator may grant Options intended to qualify as Incentive Stock Options only to employees of the Company, any of its present or future “parent corporations” or “subsidiary corporations” as defined in Sections 424(e) or (f) of the Code, respectively, and any other entities the employees of which are eligible to receive Incentive Stock Options under the Code. No person qualifying as a Greater Than 10% Stockholder may be granted an Incentive Stock Option, unless such Incentive Stock Option conforms to Section 422 of the Code. If an Incentive Stock Option is granted to a Greater Than 10% Stockholder, the exercise price will not be less than 110% of the Fair Market Value on the Option’s grant date, and the term of the Option will not exceed five years. The Administrator may modify an Incentive Stock Option with the holder’s consent to disqualify such Option as an Incentive Stock Option. All Options intended to qualify as Incentive Stock Options will be subject to and construed consistently with Section 422 of the Code. By accepting an Incentive Stock Option, the Participant agrees to give prompt notice to the Company of dispositions or other transfers (other than in connection with a Change in Control) of Shares acquired from the Option made within (i) two years from the grant date of the Option or (ii) one year after the transfer of such Shares to the Participant, specifying the date of the disposition or other transfer and the amount the Participant realized, in cash, other property, assumption of indebtedness or other consideration, in such disposition or other transfer. Neither the Company nor the Administrator will be liable to a Participant, or any other party, (i) if an Option (or any part thereof) intended to
qualify as an Incentive Stock Option fails to qualify as an Incentive Stock Option or (ii) for the Administrator’s actions or omissions that cause an Option not to qualify as an Incentive Stock Option, including the conversion of an Incentive Stock Option to a Non-Qualified Stock Option or the grant of an Option intended as an Incentive Stock Option that fails to qualify as an Incentive Stock Option. Any Option that is intended to qualify as an Incentive Stock Option, but fails to qualify for any reason, including the portion of any Option becoming exercisable with respect to Shares having a fair market value exceeding the $100,000 limitation under Treasury Regulation Section 1.422-4, will be a Non-Qualified Stock Option.
6. Restricted Stock; Restricted Stock Units.
(a) General. The Administrator may grant Restricted Stock, or the right to purchase Restricted Stock, to any Service Provider, subject to the Company’s right to repurchase all or part of such shares at their issue price or other stated or formula price from the Participant (or to require forfeiture of such shares if issued at no cost) if conditions the Administrator specifies in the Award Agreement are not satisfied before the end of the applicable restriction period or periods that the Administrator establishes for such Award. In addition, the Administrator may grant to Service Providers Restricted Stock Units, which may be subject to vesting and forfeiture conditions during applicable restriction period or periods, as set forth in an Award Agreement. The Administrator will determine and set forth in the Award Agreement the terms and conditions for each Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Unit Award, subject to the conditions and limitations contained in the Plan.
(b) Restricted Stock.
(i) Dividends. Participants holding shares of Restricted Stock will be entitled to all ordinary cash dividends paid with respect to such shares, unless the Administrator provides otherwise in the Award Agreement. In addition, unless the Administrator provides otherwise, if any dividends or distributions are paid in Shares, or consist of a dividend or distribution to holders of Common Stock of property other than an ordinary cash dividend, the Shares or other property will be subject to the same restrictions on transferability and forfeitability as the shares of Restricted Stock with respect to which they were paid. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, with respect to any award of Restricted Stock with performance-based vesting, dividends which are paid prior to vesting shall only be paid out to the Participant holding such Restricted Stock to the extent that the performance-based vesting conditions are subsequently satisfied. All such dividend payments will be made no later than March 15 of the calendar year following the calendar year in which the right to the dividend payment becomes nonforfeitable.
(ii) Stock Certificates. The Company may require that the Participant deposit in escrow with the Company (or its designee) any stock certificates issued in respect of shares of Restricted Stock, together with a stock power endorsed in blank.
(c) Restricted Stock Units.
(i) Settlement. When a Restricted Stock Unit vests, the Participant will be entitled to receive from the Company one Share, an amount of cash or other property equal to the Fair Market Value of one Share on the settlement date or a combination of both, as the Administrator determines and as provided in the Award Agreement. The Administrator may provide that settlement of Restricted Stock Units will occur upon or as soon as reasonably practicable after the Restricted Stock Units vest or will instead be deferred, on a mandatory basis or at the Participant’s election, in a manner intended to comply with Section 409A.
(ii) Stockholder Rights. A Participant will have no rights of a stockholder with respect to Shares subject to any Restricted Stock Unit unless and until the Shares are delivered in settlement of the Restricted Stock Unit.
7. Other Stock or Cash Based Awards; Dividend Equivalents.
(a) Other Stock or Cash Based Awards may be granted to Participants, including Awards entitling Participants to receive Shares to be delivered in the future and including annual or other period or long-term cash bonus awards (whether based on specified Performance Criteria or otherwise), in each case subject to the conditions and limitations in the Plan. Such Other Stock or Cash Based Awards will also be available as a payment form in the settlement of other Awards, as standalone payments and as payment in lieu of compensation to which a Participant is otherwise entitled. Other Stock or Cash Based Awards may be paid in Shares, cash or other property, as the Administrator determines. Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Administrator will determine the terms and conditions of each Other Stock or Cash Based Award, including any purchase price, performance goal (which may be based on the Performance Criteria), transfer restrictions, and vesting conditions, which will be set forth in the applicable Award Agreement.
(b) Dividend Equivalents. If the Administrator provides, a grant of Restricted Stock Units or an Other Stock Award may provide a Participant with the right to receive Dividend Equivalents. Dividend Equivalents may be paid currently or credited to an account for the Participant, settled in cash or Shares and subject to the same restrictions on transferability and forfeitability as the Award with respect to which the Dividend Equivalents are paid and subject to other terms and conditions as set forth in the Award Agreement. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, Dividend Equivalents with respect to an Award with performance-based vesting that are based on dividends paid prior to the satisfaction of the applicable performance conditions shall only be paid out to the Participant to the extent that the performance-based vesting conditions are subsequently satisfied. All such Dividend Equivalent payments will be made no later than March 15 of the calendar year following the calendar year in which the right to the Dividend Equivalent payment becomes nonforfeitable, unless determined otherwise by the Administrator.
8. Adjustments for Changes in Common Stock and Certain Other Events.
(a) In connection with any Equity Restructuring, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Section 8, the Administrator will equitably adjust each outstanding Award as it deems appropriate to effect the Equity Restructuring, which may include adjusting the number and type of securities subject to each outstanding Award and/or the Award’s exercise price or grant price (if applicable), granting new Awards to Participants, and making a cash payment to Participants. The adjustments provided under this Section 8(a) will be nondiscretionary and final and binding on the affected Participant and the Company; provided that the Administrator will determine whether an adjustment is equitable.
(b) In the event that the Administrator determines that any dividend or other distribution (whether in the form of cash, Shares, other securities, or other property), reorganization, merger, consolidation, combination, repurchase, recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution, or sale, transfer, exchange or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company, or sale or exchange of Common Stock or other securities of the Company, issuance of warrants or other rights to purchase Common Stock or other securities of the Company, or other similar corporate transaction or event, as determined by the Administrator, affects the Common Stock such that an adjustment is determined by the Administrator to be appropriate in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended by the Company to be made available under the Plan or with respect to any Award, then the Administrator may, in such manner as it may deem equitable, adjust any or all of:
(i) the number and kind of Shares (or other securities or property) with respect to which Awards may be granted or awarded (including, but not limited to, adjustments of the limitations in Section 4 hereof on the maximum number and kind of shares which may be issued and specifically including for the avoidance of doubt adjustments to the individual award limitation set forth in Section 4(f));
(ii) the number and kind of Shares (or other securities or property) subject to outstanding Awards;
(iii) the grant or exercise price with respect to any Award; and
(iv) the terms and conditions of any Awards (including, without limitation, any applicable financial or other performance “targets” specified in an Award Agreement).
(c) In the event of any transaction or event described in Section 8(b) hereof (including without limitation any Change in Control) or any unusual or nonrecurring transaction or event affecting the Company or the financial statements of the Company, or any change in any Applicable Laws or accounting principles, the Administrator, on such terms and conditions as it deems appropriate, either by the terms of the Award or by action taken prior to the occurrence of such transaction or event and either automatically or upon the Participant’s request, is hereby authorized to take any one or more of the following actions whenever the Administrator determines that such action is appropriate in order to (x) prevent dilution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended by the Company to be made available under the Plan or with respect to any Award granted or issued under the Plan, (y) to facilitate such transaction or event or (z) give effect to such changes in Applicable Laws or accounting principles:
(i) To provide for the cancellation of any such Award in exchange for either an amount of cash or other property with a value equal to the amount that could have been obtained upon the exercise or settlement of the vested portion of such Award or realization of the Participant’s rights under the vested portion of such Award, as applicable; provided that, if the amount that could have been obtained upon the exercise or settlement of the vested portion of such Award or realization of the Participant’s rights, in any case, is equal to or less than zero, then the vested portion of such Award may be terminated without payment;
(ii) To provide that such Award shall vest and, to the extent applicable, be exercisable as to all shares covered thereby, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Plan or the provisions of such Award;
(iii) To provide that such Award be assumed by the successor or survivor corporation, or a parent or subsidiary thereof, or shall be substituted for by awards covering the stock of the successor or survivor corporation, or a parent or subsidiary thereof, with appropriate adjustments as to the number and kind of shares and applicable exercise or purchase price, in all cases, as determined by the Administrator;
(iv) To make adjustments in the number and type of Shares (or other securities or property) subject to outstanding Awards, and/or in the terms and conditions of (including the grant or exercise price), and the criteria included in, outstanding Awards;
(v) To replace such Award with other rights or property selected by the Administrator; and/or
(vi) To provide that the Award will terminate and cannot vest, be exercised or become payable after the applicable event.
(d) Notwithstanding Section 8(b) or 8(c) above, if a Change in Control occurs and a Participant’s then-outstanding Awards are not continued, converted, assumed, or replaced with a substantially similar award by (i) the Company, or (ii) a successor entity or its parent or subsidiary (an “Assumption”), then immediately before the Change in Control such Awards will become fully vested, exercisable and payable, as applicable, and all forfeiture, repurchase and other restrictions on such Awards will lapse. Such Awards will be canceled upon the Change in Control in exchange for the right to receive the Change in Control consideration payable to other holders of Common Stock, which (A) may be on such terms and conditions generally applicable to holders of Common Stock under the Change in Control documents (including any escrow, earn-out or other deferred consideration provisions) or such other terms and conditions as the Administrator may provide, and (B) is determined based on the number of Shares subject to such Awards and net of any applicable exercise price; provided that if any Awards constitute “nonqualified deferred compensation” not payable upon the Change in Control without the imposition of taxes under Section 409A, the timing of such payments will be governed by the Award Agreement (subject to any deferred consideration provisions under the Change in Control documents); and provided, further, that if the amount to which a Participant would be entitled upon the settlement or exercise of such Award upon the Change in Control is zero or less, then
such Award may be terminated without payment. The Administrator shall determine whether an Assumption of an Award has occurred in connection with a Change in Control.
(e) In the event of any pending stock dividend, stock split, combination or exchange of shares, merger, consolidation or other distribution (other than normal cash dividends) of Company assets to stockholders, or any other extraordinary transaction or change affecting the Shares or the share price of Common Stock, including any Equity Restructuring or any securities offering or other similar transaction, for administrative convenience, the Administrator may refuse to permit the exercise of any Award for up to 60 days before or after such transaction.
(f) Except as expressly provided in the Plan or the Administrator’s action under the Plan, no Participant will have any rights due to any subdivision or consolidation of Shares of any class, dividend payment, increase or decrease in the number of Shares of any class or dissolution, liquidation, merger, or consolidation of the Company or other corporation. Except as expressly provided with respect to an Equity Restructuring under Section 8(a) above or the Administrator’s action under the Plan, no issuance by the Company of shares of any class, or securities convertible into shares of any class, will affect, and no adjustment will be made regarding, the number of Shares subject to an Award or the Award’s grant or exercise price. The existence of the Plan, any Award Agreements and the Awards granted hereunder will not affect or restrict in any way the Company’s right or power to make or authorize (i) any adjustment, recapitalization, reorganization or other change in the Company’s capital structure or its business, (ii) any merger, consolidation dissolution or liquidation of the Company or sale of Company assets or (iii) any sale or issuance of securities, including securities with rights superior to those of the Shares or securities convertible into or exchangeable for Shares. The Administrator may treat Participants and Awards (or portions thereof) differently under this Section 8.
(g) No action shall be taken under this Section 8 which shall cause an Award to fail to comply with Section 409A of the Code or the Treasury Regulations thereunder, to the extent applicable to such Award.
9. General Provisions Applicable to Awards.
(a) Transferability. Except as the Administrator may determine or provide in an Award Agreement or otherwise, in accordance with Applicable Laws (and subject to the applicable requirements for Shares underlying Awards to be registered on Form S-8 under the Securities Act), Awards may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered, either voluntarily or by operation of law, except by will or the laws of descent and distribution, or, subject to the Administrator’s consent, pursuant to a DRO, and, during the life of the Participant, will be exercisable only by the Participant. References to a Participant, to the extent relevant in the context, will include references to a Participant’s authorized transferee that the Administrator specifically approves under Applicable Laws.
(b) Documentation. Each Award will be evidenced in an Award Agreement, as the Administrator determines. Each Award may contain terms and conditions in addition to those set forth in the Plan.
(c) Discretion. Except as the Plan otherwise provides, each Award may be made alone or in addition or in relation to any other Award. The terms of each Award to a Participant need not be identical, and the Administrator need not treat Participants or Awards (or portions thereof) uniformly.
(d) Termination of Status. The Administrator will determine how the disability, death, retirement, authorized leave of absence or any other change or purported change in a Participant’s Service Provider status affects an Award and the extent to which, and the period during which, the Participant, the Participant’s legal representative, conservator, guardian or Designated Beneficiary may exercise rights under the Award, if applicable.
(e) Withholding. Each Participant must pay the Company, or make provision satisfactory to the Administrator for payment of, any taxes required by law to be withheld in connection with such Participant’s Awards by the date of the event creating the tax liability. Except as the Company otherwise determines, all such payments will be made in cash or by check, payable to the order of the Company. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
Participants may satisfy such tax obligations (i) in whole or in part by delivery of Shares, including Shares retained from the Award creating the tax obligation, valued at their Fair Market Value, and (ii) if there is a public market for Shares at the time the tax obligations are satisfied (A) delivery (including telephonically to the extent permitted by the Company) of an irrevocable and unconditional undertaking by a broker acceptable to the Company to deliver promptly to the Company sufficient funds to satisfy the tax obligations, or (B) delivery by the Participant to the Company of a copy of irrevocable and unconditional instructions to a broker acceptable to the Company to deliver promptly to the Company cash or a check sufficient to satisfy the tax withholding. If any tax withholding obligation will be satisfied under clause (i) of the immediately preceding sentence by the Company’s retention of Shares from the Award creating the tax obligation and there is a public market for Shares at the time the tax obligation is satisfied, the Company may elect to instruct any brokerage firm determined acceptable to the Company for such purpose to sell on the applicable Participant’s behalf some or all of the Shares retained and to remit the proceeds of the sale to the Company or its designee, and each Participant’s acceptance of an Award under the Plan will constitute the Participant’s authorization to the Company and instruction and authorization to such brokerage firm to complete the transactions described in this sentence. The Company may, to the extent Applicable Laws permit, deduct an amount sufficient to satisfy such tax obligations from any payment of any kind otherwise due to a Participant.
(f) Amendment of Award. The Administrator may amend, modify or terminate any outstanding Award, including by substituting another Award of the same or a different type, changing the exercise or settlement date, and converting an Incentive Stock Option to a Non-Qualified Stock Option. The Participant’s consent to such action will be required unless (i) the Administrator determines that the action, taking into account any related action, would not materially and adversely affect the Participant, or (ii) the change is permitted under Section 8 or pursuant to 10(f).
(g) Conditions on Delivery of Stock. The Company will not be obligated to deliver any Shares under the Plan or remove restrictions from Shares previously delivered under the Plan until (i) all Award conditions have been met or removed to the Company’s satisfaction, (ii) as determined by the Company, all other legal matters regarding the issuance and delivery of such Shares have been satisfied, including any applicable securities laws and stock exchange or stock market rules and regulations, and (iii) the Participant has executed and delivered to the Company such representations or agreements as the Administrator deems necessary or appropriate to satisfy any Applicable Laws. The Company’s inability to obtain authority from any regulatory body having jurisdiction, which the Administrator determines is necessary to the lawful issuance and sale of any securities, will relieve the Company of any liability for failing to issue or sell such Shares as to which such requisite authority has not been obtained.
(h) Acceleration. The Administrator may at any time provide that any Award will become immediately vested and fully or partially exercisable, free of some or all restrictions or conditions, or otherwise fully or partially realizable.
(i) Prohibition on Repricing. Subject to Section 8, the Administrator shall not, without the approval of the stockholders of the Company, (i) authorize the amendment of any outstanding Option or Stock Appreciation Right to reduce its price per share, or (ii) cancel any Option or Stock Appreciation Right in exchange for cash or another Award when the Option or Stock Appreciation Right price per share exceeds the Fair Market Value of the underlying Shares. Subject to Section 8, the Administrator shall have the authority, without the approval of the stockholders of the Company, to amend any outstanding Award to increase the price per share or to cancel and replace an Award with the grant of an Award having a price per share that is greater than or equal to the price per share of the original Award.
(j) Cash Settlement. Without limiting the generality of any other provision of the Plan, the Administrator may provide, in an Award Agreement or subsequent to the grant of an Award, in its discretion, that any Award may be settled in cash, Shares or a combination thereof.
(k) Vesting Limitations. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, Awards (including each tranche of an Award) issued pursuant to the Plan shall have a minimum vesting period of one year;
provided, however, that, notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) the Administrator may provide that such one-year vesting restrictions may lapse or be waived (A) upon the Participant’s Termination of Service due to death, retirement or disability and/or in connection with a Change in Control and/or (B) for annual Awards granted to non-employee Directors pursuant to an applicable Company non-employee director compensation policy, if the applicable Director is not reelected at a subsequent annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders, such Award may vest at such annual meeting at which such Director is not reelected and (ii) Awards (including each tranche of an Award) that result in the issuance of an aggregate of up to 5% of the Overall Share Limit may be granted to any one or more Participants without respect to such minimum vesting requirement.
10. Miscellaneous.
(a) No Right to Employment or Other Status. No person will have any claim or right to be granted an Award, and the grant of an Award will not be construed as giving a Participant the right to continued employment or any other relationship with the Company. The Company expressly reserves the right at any time to dismiss or otherwise terminate its relationship with a Participant free from any liability or claim under the Plan or any Award, except as expressly provided in an Award Agreement.
(b) No Rights as Stockholder; Certificates. Subject to the Award Agreement, no Participant or Designated Beneficiary will have any rights as a stockholder with respect to any Shares to be distributed under an Award until becoming the record holder of such Shares. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, unless the Administrator otherwise determines or Applicable Laws require, the Company will not be required to deliver to any Participant certificates evidencing Shares issued in connection with any Award and instead such Shares may be recorded in the books of the Company (or, as applicable, its transfer agent or stock plan administrator). The Company may place legends on stock certificates issued under the Plan that the Administrator deems necessary or appropriate to comply with Applicable Laws.
(c) Effective Date and Term of Plan. The Plan will become effective on the date it is adopted by the Board, subject to approval by the Company’s stockholders. No Awards may be granted under the Plan after ten years from the earlier of (i) the date the Board adopted the Plan or (ii) the date the Company’s stockholders approved the Plan, but Awards previously granted may extend beyond that date in accordance with the Plan.
(d) Amendment of Plan. Subject to Section 9(i), the Administrator may amend, suspend or terminate the Plan at any time; provided that no amendment, other than an increase to the Overall Share Limit, may materially and adversely affect any Award outstanding at the time of such amendment without the affected Participant’s consent. Awards outstanding at the time of any Plan suspension or termination will continue to be governed by the Plan and the Award Agreement, as in effect before such suspension or termination. The Board will obtain stockholder approval of any Plan amendment to the extent necessary to comply with Applicable Laws.
(e) Provisions for Foreign Participants. The Administrator may modify Awards granted to Participants who are foreign nationals or employed outside the United States or establish subplans or procedures under the Plan to address differences in laws, rules, regulations or customs of such foreign jurisdictions with respect to tax, securities, currency, employee benefit or other matters.
(f) Section 409A.
(i) General. The Company intends that all Awards be structured to comply with, or be exempt from, Section 409A, such that no adverse tax consequences, interest, or penalties under Section 409A apply. Notwithstanding anything in the Plan or any Award Agreement to the contrary, the Administrator may, without a Participant’s consent, amend this Plan or Awards, adopt policies and procedures, or take any other actions (including amendments, policies, procedures and retroactive actions) as are necessary or appropriate to preserve the intended tax treatment of Awards, including any such actions intended to (A) exempt this Plan or any Award from Section 409A, or (B) comply with Section 409A, including regulations, guidance, compliance programs and other interpretative authority that may be issued after an
Award’s grant date. The Company makes no representations or warranties as to an Award’s tax treatment under Section 409A or otherwise. The Company will have no obligation under this Section 10(f) or otherwise to avoid the taxes, penalties or interest under Section 409A with respect to any Award and will have no liability to any Participant or any other person if any Award, compensation or other benefits under the Plan are determined to constitute noncompliant, “nonqualified deferred compensation” subject to taxes, penalties or interest under Section 409A.
(ii) Separation from Service. If an Award constitutes “nonqualified deferred compensation” under Section 409A, any payment or settlement of such Award upon a termination of a Participant’s Service Provider relationship will, to the extent necessary to avoid taxes under Section 409A, be made only upon the Participant’s “separation from service” (within the meaning of Section 409A), whether such “separation from service” occurs upon or after the termination of the Participant’s Service Provider relationship. For purposes of this Plan or any Award Agreement relating to any such payments or benefits, references to a “termination,” “termination of employment” or like terms means a “separation from service.”
(iii) Payments to Specified Employees. Notwithstanding any contrary provision in the Plan or any Award Agreement, any payment(s) of “nonqualified deferred compensation” required to be made under an Award to a “specified employee” (as defined under Section 409A and as the Administrator determines) due to his or her “separation from service” will, to the extent necessary to avoid taxes under Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Code, be delayed for the six-month period immediately following such “separation from service” (or, if earlier, until the specified employee’s death) and will instead be paid (as set forth in the Award Agreement) on the day immediately following such six-month period or as soon as administratively practicable thereafter (without interest). Any payments of “nonqualified deferred compensation” under such Award payable more than six months following the Participant’s “separation from service” will be paid at the time or times the payments are otherwise scheduled to be made.
(g) Limitations on Liability. Notwithstanding any other provisions of the Plan, no individual acting as a director, officer, other employee or agent of the Company will be liable to any Participant, former Participant, spouse, beneficiary, or any other person for any claim, loss, liability, or expense incurred in connection with the Plan or any Award, and such individual will not be personally liable with respect to the Plan because of any contract or other instrument executed in his or her capacity as an Administrator, director, officer, other employee or agent of the Company. The Company will indemnify and hold harmless each director, officer, other employee and agent of the Company that has been or will be granted or delegated any duty or power relating to the Plan’s administration or interpretation, against any cost or expense (including attorneys’ fees) or liability (including any sum paid in settlement of a claim with the Administrator’s approval) arising from any act or omission concerning this Plan unless arising from such person’s own fraud or bad faith.
(h) Lock-Up Period. The Company may, at the request of any underwriter representative or otherwise, in connection with registering the offering of any Company securities under the Securities Act, prohibit Participants from, directly or indirectly, selling or otherwise transferring any Shares or other Company securities during a period of up to 180 days following the effective date of a Company registration statement filed under the Securities Act, or such longer period as determined by the underwriter.
(i) Data Privacy. As a condition for receiving any Award, each Participant explicitly and unambiguously consents to the collection, use and transfer, in electronic or other form, of personal data as described in this paragraph by and among the Company and its Subsidiaries and affiliates exclusively for implementing, administering and managing the Participant’s participation in the Plan. The Company and its Subsidiaries and affiliates may hold certain personal information about a Participant, including the Participant’s name, address and telephone number; birthdate; social security, insurance number or other identification number; salary; nationality; job title(s); any Shares held in the Company or its Subsidiaries and affiliates; and Award details, to implement, manage and administer the Plan and Awards (the “Data”). The Company and its Subsidiaries and affiliates may transfer the Data amongst themselves as necessary to implement, administer and manage a Participant’s participation
in the Plan, and the Company and its Subsidiaries and affiliates may transfer the Data to third parties assisting the Company with Plan implementation, administration and management. These recipients may be located in the Participant’s country, or elsewhere, and the Participant’s country may have different data privacy laws and protections than the recipients’ country. By accepting an Award, each Participant authorizes such recipients to receive, possess, use, retain and transfer the Data, in electronic or other form, to implement, administer and manage the Participant’s participation in the Plan, including any required Data transfer to a broker or other third party with whom the Company or the Participant may elect to deposit any Shares. The Data related to a Participant will be held only as long as necessary to implement, administer, and manage the Participant’s participation in the Plan. A Participant may, at any time, view the Data that the Company holds regarding such Participant, request additional information about the storage and processing of the Data regarding such Participant, recommend any necessary corrections to the Data regarding the Participant or refuse or withdraw the consents in this Section 10(i) in writing, without cost, by contacting the local human resources representative. The Company may cancel Participant’s ability to participate in the Plan and, in the Administrator’s discretion, the Participant may forfeit any outstanding Awards if the Participant refuses or withdraws the consents in this Section 10(i). For more information on the consequences of refusing or withdrawing consent, Participants may contact their local human resources representative.
(j) Severability. If any portion of the Plan or any action taken under it is held illegal or invalid for any reason, the illegality or invalidity will not affect the remaining parts of the Plan, and the Plan will be construed and enforced as if the illegal or invalid provisions had been excluded, and the illegal or invalid action will be null and void.
(k) Governing Documents. If any contradiction occurs between the Plan and any Award Agreement or other written agreement between a Participant and the Company (or any Subsidiary) that the Administrator has approved, the Plan will govern, unless it is expressly specified in such Award Agreement or other written document that a specific provision of the Plan will not apply.
(l) Governing Law. The Plan and all Awards will be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Delaware, disregarding any state’s choice-of-law principles requiring the application of a jurisdiction’s laws other than the Commonwealth of Delaware.
(m) Claw-back Provisions. All Awards (including any proceeds, gains or other economic benefit the Participant actually or constructively receives upon receipt or exercise of any Award or the receipt or resale of any Shares underlying the Award) will be subject to any Company claw-back policy implemented to the comply with Applicable Laws, including any claw-back policy adopted to comply with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and any rules or regulations promulgated thereunder, as set forth in such claw-back policy or the Award Agreement.
(n) Titles and Headings. The titles and headings of the Sections in the Plan are for convenience of reference only and, if any conflict, the Plan’s text, rather than such titles or headings, will control.
(o) Conformity to Securities Laws. Participant acknowledges that the Plan is intended to conform to the extent necessary with Applicable Laws. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Plan and all Awards will be administered only in conformance with Applicable Laws. To the extent Applicable Laws permit, the Plan and all Award Agreements will be deemed amended as necessary to conform to Applicable Laws.
(p) Relationship to Other Benefits. No payment under the Plan will be taken into account in determining any benefits under any pension, retirement, savings, profit sharing, group insurance, welfare or other benefit plan of the Company or any Subsidiary except as expressly provided in writing in such other plan or an agreement thereunder.
(q) Section 162(m). The Committee, in its sole discretion, may determine at the time an Award is granted or at any time thereafter whether such Award is intended to qualify as “performance based compensation” within the meaning of Code Section 162(m) (“Performance-Based Compensation”). For the avoidance of doubt,
nothing herein shall require the Committee to structure any awards in a manner intended to constitute Performance-Based Compensation and the Administrator shall be free, in its sole discretion, to grant Awards that are not intended to be Performance-Based Compensation. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan and except as otherwise determined by the Administrator, any Award which is granted to an Eligible Individual and is intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation shall be subject to any additional limitations set forth in Section 162(m) of the Code or any regulations or rulings issued thereunder that are requirements for qualification as Performance-Based Compensation, and the Plan and the applicable program and Award Agreement shall be deemed amended to the extent necessary to conform to such requirements. In addition, Awards of Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units and Other Stock or Cash Based Awards that are intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation shall be subject to the following provisions, which shall control over any conflicting provision in the Plan or any Award Agreement:
(i) To the extent necessary to comply with the requirements of Section 162(m)(4)(C) of the Code, no later than 90 days following the commencement of any Performance Period or any designated fiscal period or period of service (or such earlier time as may be required under Section 162(m) of the Code), the Committee shall, in writing, (A) designate the Participant to receive such Award (B) select the Performance Criteria applicable to the performance period, (C) establish the Performance Goals, and amounts of such Awards, as applicable, which may be earned for such Performance Period based on the Performance Criteria, and (D) specify the relationship between Performance Criteria and the Performance Goals and the amounts of such Awards, as applicable, to be earned by each covered employee for such Performance Period.
(ii) Following the completion of each Performance Period, the Committee shall certify in writing whether and the extent to which the applicable Performance Goals have been achieved for such Performance Period. In determining the amount earned under such Awards, the Committee shall have the right to reduce or eliminate (but not to increase) the amount payable at a given level of performance to take into account additional factors that the Committee may deem relevant, including the assessment of individual or corporate performance for the Performance Period.
(iii) Unless otherwise specified by the Committee at the time of grant, the Performance Criteria with respect to an Award intended to be Performance-Based Compensation payable to a Covered Employee shall be determined on the basis of Applicable Accounting Standards.
(iv) No adjustment or action described in Section 8 or in any other provision of the Plan shall be authorized to the extent that such adjustment or action would cause such Award to fail to so qualify as Performance-Based Compensation, unless the Administrator determines that the Award should not so qualify.
11. Definitions. As used in the Plan, the following words and phrases will have the following meanings:
(a) “Administrator” means the Board or a Committee to the extent that the Board’s powers or authority under the Plan have been delegated to such Committee.
(b) “Applicable Accounting Standards” means the U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, International Financial Reporting Standards or other accounting principles or standards applicable to the Company’s financial statements under U.S. federal securities laws.
(c) “Applicable Laws” means the requirements relating to the administration of equity incentive plans under U.S. federal and state securities, tax and other applicable laws, rules and regulations, the applicable rules of any stock exchange or quotation system on which the Common Stock is listed or quoted and the applicable laws and rules of any foreign country or other jurisdiction where Awards are granted.
(d) “Award” means, individually or collectively, a grant under the Plan of Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units or Other Stock or Cash Based Awards.
(e) “Award Agreement” means a written agreement evidencing an Award, which may be electronic, that contains such terms and conditions as the Administrator determines, consistent with and subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan.
(f) “Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company.
(g) “Change in Control” means (i) the Company’s merger or consolidation with or into any other corporation, entity or person, (ii) a sale, lease, exchange or other transfer in one transaction or a series of related transactions of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets, (iii) any other transaction, including the Company’s sale of new shares of its capital stock or a transfer of existing shares of its capital stock, which causes a third party not affiliated with the Company or its stockholders (or a group of third parties not affiliated with the Company or its stockholders) immediately before such transaction to acquire or hold capital stock of the Company representing 50% of the Company’s outstanding voting power immediately following such transaction, or (iv) during any 12-month period, individuals who, at the beginning of such period, constitute the Board together with any new Director(s) whose election by the Board or nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders was approved by a vote of at least 50% of the Directors then still in office who either were Directors at the beginning of the 12-month period or whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved, cease for any reason to constitute a majority thereof; provided that the following events will not constitute a “Change in Control”: (A) a transaction (other than a sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets) in which the holders of the Company’s voting securities immediately before the merger or consolidation hold, directly or indirectly, at least 50% of the voting securities in the successor corporation or its parent immediately after the merger or consolidation; (B) a sale, lease, exchange or other transaction in one transaction or a series of related transactions of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets to a Company affiliate; (C) a reincorporation of the Company solely to change its jurisdiction; or (D) a transaction primarily undertaken to create a holding company that will be owned in substantially the same proportion by the persons who held the Company’s securities immediately before such transaction. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a Change in Control would trigger a payment or settlement event for any Award that constitutes “nonqualified deferred compensation,” the transaction or event constituting the Change in Control must also constitute a “change in control event” (as defined in Treasury Regulation §1.409A-3(i)(5)) to trigger the payment or settlement event for such Award, to the extent required by Section 409A.
(h) “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the regulations issued thereunder.
(i) “Committee” means one or more committees or subcommittees comprised of one or more Company directors or executive officers, to the extent Applicable Laws permit. To the extent required to comply with the provisions of Rule 16b-3, it is intended that each member of the Committee will be, at the time the Committee takes any action with respect to an Award that is subject to Rule 16b-3, a “non-employee director” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3; however, a Committee member’s failure to qualify as a “non-employee director” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 will not invalidate any Award granted by the Committee that is otherwise validly granted under the Plan. To the extent an Award is intended to qualify as “performance based compensation” within the meaning of Code Section 162(m), it is intended that each member of the Committee will be an “outside director” within the meaning of Code Section 162(m).
(j) “Common Stock” means the common stock of the Company.
(k) “Company” means The New Home Company Inc., a Delaware corporation, or any successor.
(l) “Consultant” means any person, including any adviser, engaged by the Company or its parent or Subsidiary to render services to such entity if the consultant or adviser: (i) renders bona fide services to the Company; (ii) renders services not in connection with the offer or sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction and does not directly or indirectly promote or maintain a market for the Company’s securities; and (iii) is a natural person.
(m) “Designated Beneficiary” means the beneficiary or beneficiaries the Participant designates, in a manner the Administrator determines, to receive amounts due or exercise the Participant’s rights if the Participant dies or becomes incapacitated. Without a Participant’s effective designation, “Designated Beneficiary” will mean the Participant’s estate.
(n) “Director” means a Board member.
(o) “Dividend Equivalents” means a right granted to a Participant under Section 7(b) to receive the equivalent value (in cash or Shares) of dividends paid on Shares.
(p) “DRO” means a domestic relations order as defined by the Code or Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, or the rules thereunder.
(q) “Employee” means any employee of the Company or its Subsidiaries.
(r) “Equity Restructuring” means, as the Administrator determines, a nonreciprocal transaction between the Company and its stockholders, such as a stock dividend, stock split, spin-off or recapitalization through a large, nonrecurring cash dividend, affecting the Shares (or other Company securities) or the share price of Common Stock (or other Company securities) and causing a change in the per share value of the Common Stock underlying outstanding Awards.
(s) “Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
(t) “Fair Market Value” means, as of any date, the value of Common Stock determined as follows: (i) if the Common Stock is listed on any established stock exchange, the closing sales price for such Common Stock as quoted on such exchange for such date, or if no sale occurred on such date, the first market trading day immediately before such date during which a sale occurred, as reported in The Wall Street Journal or another source the Administrator deems reliable; (ii) if the Common Stock is not traded on a stock exchange but is quoted on a national market or other quotation system, the closing sales price on such date, or if no sales occurred on such date, then on the date immediately before such date on which sales prices are reported, as reported in The Wall Street Journal or another source the Administrator deems reliable; or (iii) without an established market for the Common Stock, the Administrator will determine the Fair Market Value in its discretion.
(u) “Greater Than 10% Stockholder” means an individual then owning (within the meaning of Section 424(d) of the Code) more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or its Subsidiary or parent corporation, as defined in Section 424(e) and (f) of the Code, respectively.
(v) “Incentive Stock Option” means an Option intended to qualify as an “incentive stock option” as defined in Section 422 of the Code.
(w) “Non-Qualified Stock Option” means an Option, or portion thereof, not intended or not qualifying as an Incentive Stock Option.
(x) “Option” means an option to purchase Shares.
(y) “Other Stock or Cash Based Awards” means cash awards, awards of Shares, and other awards valued wholly or partially by referring to, or are otherwise denominated in, based on or linked to, Shares or other property.
(z) “Overall Share Limit” means 800,000 Shares.
(aa) “Participant” means a Service Provider who has been granted an Award.
(bb) “Performance Criteria” means mean the criteria (and adjustments) that the Administrator may select for an Award to establish performance goals for a performance period, which may include the individual criteria listed below. For Awards of Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units and Other Stock or Cash Based Awards that are intended to qualify as “performance based compensation” within the meaning of Code Section 162(m), the Performance Criteria shall be determined as follows:
(i) The Performance Criteria used to establish Performance Goals are limited to the following: (A) the attainment by a Share of a specified Fair Market Value for a specified period of time; (B) book value per Share; (C) earnings per Share; (D) return on assets; (E) return on equity; (F) return on investments; (G) return on invested capital; (H) total stockholder return; (I) earnings or net income of the Company before or after taxes and/or interest; (J) earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization; (K) revenues; (L) market share; (M) cash flow or cost reduction; (N) interest expense after taxes; (O) economic value created; (P) improvements in capital structure; (Q) gross margin; (R) operating margin; (S) net cash provided by operations; (T) strategic business criteria, consisting of one or more objectives based on meeting specified market penetration, geographic business expansion goals, cost targets, customer satisfaction, reductions in errors and omissions, reductions in lost business, management of employment practices and employee benefits, supervision of litigation and information technology, quality and quality audit scores, efficiency, working capital, goals relating to acquisitions or divestitures, land management, net sales or closings, inventory control, inventory, land or lot improvement or reduction, implementation or completion of critical projects, economic value; (U) adjusted earnings or loss per share; (V) employee satisfaction; (X) certain financial ratios (including those measuring liquidity, activity, profitability or leverage); (W) debt levels, covenants, ratios or reductions; (Y) financing and other capital raising transactions; (Z) year-end cash; (AA) investment sourcing activity; (BB) marketing initiatives or (CC) any combination of the foregoing, any of which may be measured either in absolute terms or as compared to any incremental increase or decrease or as compared to results of a peer group or to market performance indicators.
(ii) The Administrator may, in its sole discretion, but within the time prescribed by, and otherwise in compliance with, Section 162(m) of the Code, provide that one or more objectively determinable adjustments shall be made to one or more of the Performance Goals. Such adjustments may include one or more of the following: (A) items related to a change in accounting principle; (B) items relating to financing activities; (C) expenses for restructuring or productivity initiatives; (D) other non-operating items; (E) items related to acquisitions; (F) items attributable to the business operations of any entity acquired by the Company during the Performance Period; (G) items related to the disposal of a business or segment of a business; (H) items related to discontinued operations that do not qualify as a segment of a business under Applicable Accounting Standards; (I) items attributable to any stock dividend, stock split, combination or exchange of stock occurring during the Performance Period; (J) any other items of significant income or expense which are determined to be appropriate adjustments; (K) items relating to unusual or extraordinary corporate transactions, events or developments; (L) items related to amortization of acquired intangible assets; (M) items that are outside the scope of the Company’s core, on-going business activities; (N) items related to acquired in-process research and development; (O) items relating to changes in tax laws; (P) items relating to major licensing or partnership arrangements; (Q) items relating to asset impairment charges or other non-cash charges; (R) items relating to gains or losses for litigation, arbitration and contractual settlements; (S) items attributable to expenses incurred in connection with a reduction in force or early retirement initiative; or (T) items relating to any other unusual or nonrecurring events or changes in Applicable Law, accounting principles or business conditions. For all Awards intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation, such determinations shall be made within the time prescribed by, and otherwise in compliance with, Section 162(m) of the Code.
(cc) “Performance Goals” shall mean, for a Performance Period, one or more goals established by the Administrator for the Performance Period based upon one or more Performance Criteria. Depending on the Performance Criteria used to establish such Performance Goals, Performance Goals may be expressed in terms of
overall Company performance or the performance of a Subsidiary, division, operating or business unit, or an individual.
(dd) “Performance Period” shall mean one or more periods of time, which may be of varying and overlapping durations, as the Administrator may select, over which the attainment of one or more Performance Goals will be measured for the purpose of determining a Holder’s right to, and the payment of, an Award.
(ee) “Plan” means this 2016 Incentive Award Plan.
(ff) “Publicly Listed Company” means that the Company or its successor (i) is required to file periodic reports under Section 12 of the Exchange Act and (ii) the Common Stock is listed on one or more National Securities Exchanges (within the meaning of the Exchange Act) or is quoted on NASDAQ or a successor quotation system.
(gg) “Restricted Stock” means Shares awarded to a Participant under Section 6 subject to certain vesting conditions and other restrictions.
(hh) “Restricted Stock Unit” means an unfunded, unsecured right to receive, on the applicable settlement date, one Share or an amount in cash or other consideration determined by the Administrator to be of equal value as of such payment date, subject to certain vesting conditions and other restrictions.
(ii) “Rule 16b-3” means Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act.
(jj) “Section 409A” means Section 409A of the Code and all regulations, guidance, compliance programs and other interpretative authority thereunder.
(kk) “Securities Act” means the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
(ll) “Service Provider” means an Employee, Consultant or Director.
(mm) “Shares” means shares of Common Stock.
(nn) “Stock Appreciation Right” means a stock appreciation right granted under Section 5.
(oo) “Subsidiary” means any entity (other than the Company), whether domestic or foreign, in an unbroken chain of entities beginning with the Company if each of the entities other than the last entity in the unbroken chain beneficially owns, at the time of the determination, securities or interests representing at least 50% of the total combined voting power of all classes of securities or interests in one of the other entities in such chain.
(pp) “Termination of Service” means the date the Participant ceases to be a Service Provider.
* * *