Edgar Filing: HEICO CORP

HEI 10.31.2012 10K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K



ý	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
	THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

	For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2012 or

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
	THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the transition period from ___________________to__________________

Commission file number 1-4604

HEICO CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Florida	65-0341002
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

3000 Taft Street, Hollywood, Florida	33021
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (954) 987-4000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:



	Title of each class		Name of each exchange on which registered

	Common Stock, $.01 par value per share		New York Stock Exchange
	Class A Common Stock, $.01 par value per share		New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Rights to Purchase Series B Junior Participating Preferred Stock

Rights to Purchase Series C Junior Participating Preferred Stock

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ý Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $1,718,978,000 based on the closing price of HEICO Common Stock and Class A Common Stock as of April 30, 2012 as reported by the New York Stock Exchange.

The number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock as of December 17, 2012:



Common Stock, $.01 par value	21,396,373 shares
Class A Common Stock, $.01 par value	31,624,278 shares

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant's definitive proxy statement for the 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Index

HEICO CORPORATION

INDEX TO ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K



			Page
PART I
	Item 1.	Business	1
	Executive Officers of the Registrant		13
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	14
	Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	22
	Item 2.	Properties	22
	Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	23
	Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	23

PART II
	Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	24
	Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	29
	Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	31
	Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	52
	Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	53
	Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	103
	Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	103
	Item 9B.	Other Information	106

PART III
	Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	107
	Item 11.	Executive Compensation	107
	Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	108
	Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	108
	Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	108

PART IV
	Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	109

SIGNATURES			114

Index

PART I

Item 1. BUSINESS

The Company

HEICO Corporation through its subsidiaries (collectively, “HEICO,” “we,” “us,” “our” or the “Company”) believes it is the world’s largest manufacturer of Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”)-approved jet engine and aircraft component replacement parts, other than the original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) and their subcontractors. HEICO also believes it is a leading manufacturer of various types of electronic equipment for the aviation, defense, space, industrial, medical, telecommunications and electronics industries.

The Company was originally organized in 1957 as a holding company known as HEICO Corporation. As part of a reorganization completed in 1993, the original holding company (formerly known as HEICO Corporation) was renamed as HEICO Aerospace Corporation and a new holding corporation known as HEICO Corporation was created. The reorganization did not result in any change in the business of the Company, its consolidated assets or liabilities or the relative interests of its shareholders.

Our business is comprised of two operating segments:

The Flight Support Group. Our Flight Support Group (“FSG”), consisting of HEICO Aerospace Holdings Corp. (“HEICO Aerospace”) and HEICO Flight Support Corp. and their collective subsidiaries, accounted for 63%, 70% and 67% of our net sales in fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Flight Support Group uses proprietary technology to design and manufacture jet engine and aircraft component replacement parts for sale at lower prices than those manufactured by OEMs. These parts are approved by the FAA and are the functional equivalent of parts sold by OEMs. In addition, the Flight Support Group repairs, overhauls and distributes jet engine and aircraft components, avionics and instruments for domestic and foreign commercial air carriers and aircraft repair companies as well as military and business aircraft operators; and manufactures thermal insulation products and other component parts primarily for aerospace, defense, industrial and commercial applications.

The Electronic Technologies Group. Our Electronic Technologies Group (“ETG”), consisting of HEICO Electronic Technologies Corp. and its subsidiaries, accounted for 37%, 30% and 33% of our net sales in fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Through our Electronic Technologies Group, which derived approximately 51%, 56% and 57% of its sales in fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, from the sale of products and services to U.S. and foreign military agencies, prime defense contractors and both commercial and defense satellite and spacecraft manufacturers, we design, manufacture and sell various types of electronic, microwave and electro-optical products, including infrared simulation and test equipment, laser rangefinder receivers, electrical power supplies, back-up power supplies, power conversion products, underwater locator beacons, electromagnetic interference and radio frequency interference shielding, high power capacitor charging power supplies, amplifiers, traveling wave

Index

tube amplifiers, photodetectors, amplifier modules, microwave power modules, flash lamp drivers, laser diode drivers, arc lamp power supplies, custom power supply designs, cable assemblies, high voltage power supplies, high voltage interconnection devices and wire, high voltage energy generators, high frequency power delivery systems, three-dimensional microelectronic and stacked memory products, harsh environment electronic connectors and other interconnect products, RF and microwave amplifiers, transmitters and receivers, wireless cabin control systems, solid state power distribution and management systems, fuel level sensing systems and high-speed interface products that link devices such as telemetry receivers, digital cameras, high resolution scanners, simulation systems and test systems to almost any computer.

HEICO has continuously operated in the aerospace industry for more than 50 years. Since assuming control in 1990, our current management has achieved significant sales and profit growth through a broadened line of product offerings, an expanded customer base, increased research and development expenditures and the completion of a number of acquisitions. As a result of internal growth and acquisitions, our net sales from continuing operations have grown from $26.2 million in fiscal 1990 to $897.3 million in fiscal 2012, a compound annual growth rate of approximately 17%. During the same period, we improved our net income from $2.0 million to $85.1 million, representing a compound annual growth rate of approximately 19%.

Disciplined Acquisition Strategy

Acquisitions have been an important element of our growth strategy over the past twenty-two years, supplementing our organic growth. Since 1990, we have completed more than 45 acquisitions complementing the niche segments within which we operate of the aviation, defense, space, medical, telecommunications and electronics industries. We typically target acquisition opportunities that allow us to broaden our product offerings, services and technologies while expanding our customer base and geographic presence. Even though we have historically pursued an active acquisition policy, our disciplined acquisition strategy involves limiting acquisition candidates to businesses that we believe will continue to grow, offer strong earnings and cash flow potential, and are available at fair prices. See Note 2, Acquisitions, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding our recent acquisitions.

Flight Support Group

The Flight Support Group, headquartered in Hollywood, Florida, serves a broad spectrum of the aviation industry, including (i) commercial airlines and air cargo carriers; (ii) repair and overhaul facilities; (iii) OEMs; and (iv) U.S. and foreign governments.

The Flight Support Group competes with the leading industry OEMs and, to a lesser extent, with a number of smaller, independent parts distributors. Historically, the three principal jet engine OEMs, General Electric (including CFM International), Pratt & Whitney and Rolls Royce, have been the sole source of substantially all jet engine replacement parts for their jet engines. Other OEMs have been the sole source of replacement parts for their aircraft

Index

component parts. While we believe that we currently supply less than 2% of the market for jet engine and aircraft component replacement parts, we have in recent years been adding new products to our line at a rate of approximately 300 to 500 Parts Manufacturer Approvals (“PMA” or “PMAs”) per year. We currently offer to our customers over 6,000 parts for which PMAs have been received from the FAA.

Jet engine and aircraft component replacement parts can be categorized by their ongoing ability to be repaired and returned to service. The general categories in which we participate are as follows: (i) rotable; (ii) repairable; and (iii) expendable. A rotable is a part which is removed periodically as dictated by an operator’s maintenance procedures or on an as needed basis and is typically repaired or overhauled and re-used an indefinite number of times. An important subset of rotables is “life limited” parts. A life limited rotable has a designated number of allowable flight hours and/or cycles (one take-off and landing generally constitutes one cycle) after which it is rendered unusable. A repairable is similar to a rotable except that it can only be repaired a limited number of times before it must be discarded. An expendable is generally a part which is used and not thereafter repaired for further use.

Jet engine and aircraft component replacement parts are classified within the industry as (i) factory-new; (ii) new surplus; (iii) overhauled; (iv) repairable; and (v) as removed. A factory-new or new surplus part is one that has never been installed or used. Factory-new parts are purchased from FAA-approved manufacturers (such as HEICO or OEMs) or their authorized distributors. New surplus parts are purchased from excess stock of airlines, repair facilities or other redistributors. An overhauled part is one that has been completely repaired and inspected by a licensed repair facility such as ours. An aircraft spare part is classified as “repairable” if it can be repaired by a licensed repair facility under applicable regulations. A part may also be classified as “repairable” if it can be removed by the operator from an aircraft or jet engine while operating under an approved maintenance program and is airworthy and meets any manufacturer or time and cycle restrictions applicable to the part. A “factory-new,” “new surplus” or “overhauled” part designation indicates that the part can be immediately utilized on an aircraft. A part in “as removed” or “repairable” condition requires inspection and possibly functional testing, repair or overhaul by a licensed facility prior to being returned to service in an aircraft.

Factory-New Jet Engine and Aircraft Component Replacement Parts. The Flight Support Group engages in the research and development, design, manufacture and sale of FAA-approved replacement parts that are sold to domestic and foreign commercial air carriers and aircraft repair and overhaul companies. Our principal competitors are aircraft engine and aircraft component manufacturers. The Flight Support Group’s factory-new replacement parts include various jet engine and aircraft component replacement parts. A key element of our growth strategy is the continued design and development of an increasing number of PMA replacement parts in order to further penetrate our existing customer base and obtain new customers. We select the jet engine and aircraft component replacement parts to design and manufacture through a selection process which analyzes industry information to determine which replacement parts are suitable candidates.

Index

Repair and Overhaul Services. The Flight Support Group provides repair and overhaul services on selected jet engine and aircraft component parts, as well as on avionics, instruments, composites and flight surfaces of commercial aircraft operated by domestic and foreign commercial airlines. The Flight Support Group also provides repair and overhaul services including avionics and navigation systems as well as subcomponents and other instruments utilized on military aircraft operated by the United States government and foreign military agencies and for aircraft repair and overhaul companies. Our repair and overhaul operations require a high level of expertise, advanced technology and sophisticated equipment. Services include the repair, refurbishment and overhaul of numerous accessories and parts mounted on gas turbine engines and airframes. Components overhauled include fuel pumps, generators, fuel controls, pneumatic valves, starters and actuators, turbo compressors and constant speed drives, hydraulic pumps, valves and actuators, composite flight controls, electro-mechanical equipment and auxiliary power unit accessories. Some of the repair and overhaul services provided by the Flight Support Group are proprietary repairs approved by an FAA-qualified designated engineering representative (“DER”). Such FAA-approved repairs (DER-approved repairs) typically create cost savings or provide engineering flexibility. The Flight Support Group also provides commercial airlines, regional operators, asset management companies and Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul (“MRO”) providers with high quality and cost effective niche accessory component exchange services as an alternative to OEMs’ spares services.

Distribution. The Flight Support Group distributes FAA-approved parts including hydraulic, pneumatic, mechanical and electro-mechanical components for the commercial, regional and general aviation markets. The Flight Support Group also is a leading supplier, distributor, and integrator of military aircraft parts and support services primarily to foreign military organizations allied with the United States.

Manufacture of Specialty Aircraft/Defense Related Parts and Subcontracting for OEMs. The Flight Support Group manufactures thermal insulation blankets and parts primarily for aerospace, defense and commercial applications. The Flight Support Group also manufactures specialty components for sale as a subcontractor for aerospace and industrial original equipment manufacturers and the United States government.

FAA Approvals and Product Design. Non-OEM manufacturers of jet engine and aircraft component replacement parts must receive a PMA from the FAA to sell the replacement part. The PMA approval process includes the submission of sample parts, drawings and testing data to one of the FAA’s Aircraft Certification Offices where the submitted data are analyzed. We believe that an applicant’s ability to successfully complete the PMA process is limited by several factors, including (i) the agency’s confidence level in the applicant; (ii) the complexity of the part; (iii) the volume of PMAs being filed; and (iv) the resources available to the FAA. We also believe that companies such as HEICO that have demonstrated their manufacturing capabilities and established favorable track records with the FAA generally receive a faster turnaround time in the processing of PMA applications. Finally, we believe that the PMA process creates a significant barrier to entry in this market niche through both its technical demands and its limits on the rate at which competitors can bring products to market.

Index

As part of our growth strategy, we have continued to increase our research and development activities. Research and development expenditures by the Flight Support Group, which were approximately $.3 million in fiscal 1991, increased to approximately $12.7 million in fiscal 2012, $12.9 million in fiscal 2011 and $11.8 million in fiscal 2010. We believe that our Flight Support Group’s research and development capabilities are a significant component of our historical success and an integral part of our growth strategy. In recent years, the FAA granted us PMAs for approximately 300 to 500 new parts and approximately 100 to 200 DER-approved repairs per year; however, no assurance can be given that the FAA will continue to grant PMAs or DER-approved repairs or that we will achieve acceptable levels of net sales and gross profits on such parts in the future.

We benefit from our proprietary rights relating to certain design, engineering and manufacturing processes and repair and overhaul procedures. Customers often rely on us to provide initial and additional components, as well as to redesign, re-engineer, replace or repair and provide overhaul services on such aircraft components at every stage of their useful lives. In addition, for some products, our unique manufacturing capabilities are required by the customer’s specifications or designs, thereby necessitating reliance on us for production of such designed products.

We have no material patents for the proprietary techniques, including software and manufacturing expertise, we have developed to manufacture jet engine and aircraft component replacement parts and instead, we primarily rely on trade secret protection. Although our proprietary techniques and software and manufacturing expertise are subject to misappropriation or obsolescence, we believe that we take appropriate measures to prevent misappropriation or obsolescence from occurring by developing new techniques and improving existing methods and processes, which we will continue on an ongoing basis as dictated by the technological needs of our business.

We believe that, based on our competitive pricing, reputation for high quality, short lead time requirements, strong relationships with domestic and foreign commercial air carriers and repair stations (companies that overhaul aircraft engines and/or components), and successful track record of receiving PMAs and DER-approved repairs from the FAA, we are uniquely positioned to continue to increase the products and services offered and gain market share.

Electronic Technologies Group

Our Electronic Technologies Group’s strategy is to design and produce mission-critical subcomponents for smaller, niche markets, but which are utilized in larger systems – systems like targeting, tracking, identification, simulation, testing, communications, lighting, surgical, medical imaging, baggage scanning, telecom and computer systems. These systems are, in turn, often located on another platform, such as aircraft, satellites, ships, spacecrafts, land vehicles, handheld devices and other platforms.

Electro-Optical Infrared Simulation and Test Equipment. The Electronic Technologies Group believes it is a leading international designer and manufacturer of niche state-of-the-art

Index

simulation, testing and calibration equipment used in the development of missile seeking technology, airborne targeting and reconnaissance systems, shipboard targeting and reconnaissance systems, space-based sensors as well as ground vehicle-based systems. These products include infrared scene projector equipment, such as our MIRAGE IR Scene Simulator, high precision blackbody sources, software and integrated calibration systems.

Simulation equipment allows the U.S. government and allied foreign military to save money on missile testing as it allows infrared-based missiles to be tested on a multi-axis, rotating table instead of requiring the launch of a complete missile. In addition, several large military prime contractors have elected to purchase such equipment from us instead of maintaining internal staff to do so because we can offer a more cost-effective solution. Our customers include major U.S. Department of Defense weapons laboratories and defense prime contractors.

Electro-Optical Laser Products. The Electronic Technologies Group believes it is a leading designer and maker of Laser Rangefinder Receivers and other photodetectors used in airborne, vehicular and handheld targeting systems manufactured by major prime military contractors. Most of our Rangefinder Receiver product offering consists of complex and patented products which detect reflected light from laser targeting systems and allow the systems to confirm target accuracy and calculate target distances prior to discharging a weapon system. Some of these products are also used in laser eye surgery systems for tracking ocular movement.

Electro-Optical, Microwave and Other Power Equipment. The Electronic Technologies Group produces power supplies, amplifiers and flash lamp drivers used in laser systems for military, medical and other applications that are sometimes utilized with our rangefinder receivers. We also produce emergency back-up power supplies and batteries used on commercial aircraft and business jets for services such as emergency exit lighting, emergency fuel shut-off, power door assists, cockpit voice recorders and flight computers. With the acquisition of the Moritz product line in April 2012, we also design and manufacture next generation wireless cabin control systems, solid state power distribution and management systems and fuel level sensing systems for business jets and for general aviation, as well as for the military/defense market segments. We offer custom or standard designs that solve challenging OEM requirements and meet stringent safety and emissions requirements. Our power electronics products include capacitor charger power supplies, laser diode drivers, arc lamp power supplies and custom power supply designs.

Our microwave products are used in both commercial and military satellites, spacecrafts and in electronic warfare systems. These products, which include isolators, bias tees, circulators, latching ferrite switches and waveguide adapters, are used in satellites and spacecrafts to control or direct energy according to operator needs. As satellites are frequently used as sensors for stand-off warfare, we believe this product line further supports our goal of increasing our activity in the stand-off market. We believe we are a leading supplier of the niche products which we design and manufacture for this market, a market that includes commercial satellites. Our customers for these products include satellite and spacecraft manufacturers.

Index

Electromagnetic and Radio Interference Shielding. The Electronic Technologies Group designs and manufactures shielding used to prevent electromagnetic energy and radio frequencies from interfering with other devices, such as computers, telecommunication devices, avionics, weapons systems and other electronic equipment. Our products include a patented line of shielding applied directly to circuit boards and a line of gasket-type shielding applied to computers and other electronic equipment. Our customers consist essentially of medical, electronics, telecommunications and defense equipment producers.

High-Speed Interface Products. The Electronic Technologies Group designs and manufactures advanced high-technology, high-speed interface products utilized in homeland security, defense, medical research, astronomical and other applications across numerous industries.

High Voltage Interconnection Devices. The Electronic Technologies Group designs and manufactures high and very high voltage interconnection devices, cable assemblies and wire for the medical equipment, defense and other industrial markets. Among others, our products are utilized in aircraft missile defense, fighter pilot helmet displays, avionic systems, medical applications, wireless communications, and industrial applications including high voltage test equipment and underwater monitoring systems.

High Voltage Advanced Power Electronics. The Electronic Technologies Group designs and manufactures a patented line of high voltage energy generators for medical, baggage inspection and industrial imaging systems, and offers a patented line of high frequency power delivery systems for the commercial sign industry. We also produce high voltage power supplies found in satellite communications, CT scanners and in medical and industrial x-ray systems.

Power Conversion Products. The Electronic Technologies Group designs and provides innovative power conversion products principally serving the high-reliability military, space and commercial avionics end-markets. These high density, low profile and lightweight DC-to-DC converters and electromagnetic interference filters, which include thick film hermetically sealed hybrids, military commercial-off-the-shelf and custom designed and assembled products, have become the primary specified components of their kind on a generation of complex military, space and avionics equipment.

Underwater Locator Beacons. The Electronic Technologies Group designs and manufactures Underwater Locator Beacons (“ULBs”) used to locate aircraft Cockpit Voice Recorders and Flight Data Recorders, marine ship Voyage Recorders and various other devices which have been submerged under water. ULBs are required equipment on all U.S. FAA and European Aviation Safety Agency (“EASA”) approved Flight Data and Cockpit Voice Recorders used in aircraft and on similar systems utilized on large marine shipping vessels.

Traveling Wave Tube Amplifiers (“TWTAs”) and Microwave Power Modules (“MPMs”). The Electronic Technologies Group designs and manufactures TWTAs and MPMs predominately used in radar, electronic warfare, on-board jamming and countermeasure systems in aircraft, ships and detection platforms deployed by U.S. and allied non-U.S. military forces.

Index

Three-Dimensional Microelectronic and Stacked Memory Products. The Electronic Technologies Group designs, manufactures and markets three-dimensional microelectronic and stacked memory products including memories, Point of Load (“POL”) voltage converters and peripherals, industrial memories, and complex System-In-Package (“SiP”) solutions. The products’ patented designs provide high reliability memory and circuitry in a unique and stacked form which saves space and weight. These products are principally integrated into larger subsystems equipping satellites and spacecraft and are also utilized in medical equipment.

Harsh environment connectivity products and custom molded cable assemblies. With the acquisition of Switchcraft, Inc. in November 2011, the Electronic Technologies Group designs and manufactures high performance, high reliability and harsh environment electronic connectors and other interconnect products. These products include connectors, jacks and plugs, cables, patch panels and switches utilized in aviation, broadcast/audio, defense, industrial, medical and other equipment.

RF and microwave amplifiers, transmitters and receivers. With the acquisition of Ramona Research, Inc. in March 2012, the Electronic Technologies Group designs and manufactures RF and microwave amplifiers, transmitters and receivers primarily used to support military communications on unmanned aerial systems, other aircraft, helicopters and ground-based data/communications systems.

As part of our growth strategy, we have continued to increase our research and development activities. Research and development expenditures by the Electronic Technologies Group were $17.7 million in fiscal 2012, $12.5 million in fiscal 2011 and $10.9 million in fiscal 2010. We believe that our Electronic Technologies Group’s research and development capabilities are a significant component of our historical success and an integral part of our growth strategy.

Financial Information About Operating Segments and Geographic Areas

See Note 15, Operating Segments, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for financial information by operating segment and by geographic areas.

Distribution, Sales, Marketing and Customers

Each of our operating segments independently conducts distribution, sales and marketing efforts directed at their respective customers and industries and, in some cases, collaborates with other operating divisions and subsidiaries within its group for cross-marketing efforts. Sales and marketing efforts are conducted primarily by in-house personnel and, to a lesser extent, by independent manufacturers’ representatives. Generally, the in-house sales personnel receive a base salary plus commission and manufacturers’ representatives receive a commission on sales.

Index

We believe that direct relationships are crucial to establishing and maintaining a strong customer base and, accordingly, our senior management is actively involved in our marketing activities, particularly with established customers. We are also a member of various trade and business organizations related to the commercial aviation industry, such as the Aerospace Industries Association, which we refer to as AIA, the leading trade association representing the nation’s manufacturers of commercial, military and business aircraft, aircraft engines and related components and equipment. Due in large part to our established industry presence, we enjoy strong customer relations, name recognition and repeat business.

We sell our products to a broad customer base consisting of domestic and foreign commercial and cargo airlines, repair and overhaul facilities, other aftermarket suppliers of aircraft engine and airframe materials, OEMs, domestic and foreign military units, electronic manufacturing services companies, manufacturers for the defense industry as well as medical, telecommunications, scientific, and industrial companies. No one customer accounted for sales of 10% or more of total consolidated sales from continuing operations during any of the last three fiscal years. Net sales to our five largest customers accounted for approximately 15%, 17% and 18% of total net sales in fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Competition

The aerospace product and service industry is characterized by intense competition. Some of our competitors have substantially greater name recognition, inventories, complementary product and service offerings, financial, marketing and other resources than we do. As a result, such competitors may be able to respond more quickly to customer requirements than we can. Moreover, smaller competitors may be in a position to offer more attractive pricing as a result of lower labor costs and other factors.

Our jet engine and aircraft component replacement parts business competes primarily with aircraft engine and aircraft component manufacturers. The competition is principally based on price and service to the extent that our parts are interchangeable. With respect to other aerospace products and services sold by the Flight Support Group, we compete with both the leading jet engine OEMs and a large number of machining, fabrication and repair companies, some of which have greater financial and other resources than we do. Competition is based mainly on price, product performance, service and technical capability.

Competition for the repair and overhaul of jet engine and aircraft components comes from three principal sources: OEMs, major commercial airlines and other independent service companies. Some of these competitors have greater financial and other resources than we do. Some major commercial airlines own and operate their own service centers and sell repair and overhaul services to other aircraft operators. Foreign airlines that provide repair and overhaul services typically provide these services for their own aircraft components and for third parties. OEMs also maintain service centers that provide repair and overhaul services for the components they manufacture. Other independent service organizations also compete for the repair and overhaul business of other users of aircraft components. We believe that the principal competitive factors in the repair and overhaul market are quality, turnaround time, overall customer service and price.

Index

Our Electronic Technologies Group competes with several large and small domestic and foreign competitors, some of which have greater financial and other resources than we do. The markets for our electronic products are niche markets with several competitors with competition based mainly on design, technology, quality, price, service and customer satisfaction.

Raw Materials

We purchase a variety of raw materials, primarily consisting of high temperature alloy sheet metal and castings, forgings, pre-plated metals and electrical components from various vendors. The materials used by our operations are generally available from a number of sources and in sufficient quantities to meet current requirements subject to normal lead times. We will be subject to rules promulgated by the Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act regarding the use of certain materials (tantalum, tin, gold and tungsten), known as conflict minerals, which are mined from the Democratic Republic of the Congo and adjoining countries. These rules may impose additional costs and may introduce new risks related to our ability to verify the origin of any conflict minerals used in our products.

Backlog

Our total backlog of unshipped orders was $252 million as of October 31, 2012 compared to $224 million as of October 31, 2011. The Flight Support Group’s backlog of unshipped orders was $80 million as of October 31, 2012 as compared to $75 million as of October 31, 2011. This backlog excludes forecasted shipments for certain contracts of the Flight Support Group pursuant to which customers provide only estimated annual usage and not firm purchase orders. Our backlogs within the Flight Support Group are typically short-lead in nature with many product orders being received within the month of shipment. The increase in the Flight Support Group’s backlog is principally related to increased orders associated with one of our businesses that is a supplier, distributor, and integrator of military aircraft parts and support services primarily to foreign military organizations allied with the United States. The Electronic Technologies Group’s backlog of unshipped orders was $172 million as of October 31, 2012 as compared to $149 million as of October 31, 2011. The increase in the Electronic Technologies Group’s backlog is principally related to backlogs of the businesses acquired in fiscal 2012.

Government Regulation

The FAA regulates the manufacture, repair and operation of all aircraft and aircraft parts operated in the United States. Its regulations are designed to ensure that all aircraft and aviation equipment are continuously maintained in proper condition to ensure safe operation of the aircraft. Similar rules apply in other countries. All aircraft must be maintained under a continuous condition monitoring program and must periodically undergo thorough inspection and maintenance. The inspection, maintenance and repair procedures for the various types of aircraft and equipment are prescribed by regulatory authorities and can be performed only by certified repair facilities utilizing certified technicians. Certification and conformance is required prior to installation of a part on an aircraft. Aircraft operators must maintain logs

Index

concerning the utilization and condition of aircraft engines, life-limited engine parts and airframes. In addition, the FAA requires that various maintenance routines be performed on aircraft engines, some engine parts, and airframes at regular intervals based on cycles or flight time. Engine maintenance must also be performed upon the occurrence of certain events, such as foreign object damage in an aircraft engine or the replacement of life-limited engine parts. Such maintenance usually requires that an aircraft engine be taken out of service. Our operations may in the future be subject to new and more stringent regulatory requirements. In that regard, we closely monitor the FAA and industry trade groups in an attempt to understand how possible future regulations might impact us. Our businesses which sell defense products directly to the United States Government or for use in systems delivered to the United States Government can be subject to various laws and regulations governing pricing and other factors.

There has been no material adverse effect to our consolidated financial statements as a result of these government regulations.

Environmental Regulation

Our operations are subject to extensive, and frequently changing, federal, state and local environmental laws and substantial related regulation by government agencies, including the Environmental Protection Agency. Among other matters, these regulatory authorities impose requirements that regulate the operation, handling, transportation and disposal of hazardous materials; protect the health and safety of workers; and require us to obtain and maintain licenses and permits in connection with our operations. This extensive regulatory framework imposes significant compliance burdens and risks on us. Notwithstanding these burdens, we believe that we are in material compliance with all federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations governing our operations.

There has been no material adverse effect to our consolidated financial statements as a result of these environmental regulations.

Other Regulation

We are also subject to a variety of other regulations including work-related and community safety laws. The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 mandates general requirements for safe workplaces for all employees and established the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) in the Department of Labor. In particular, OSHA provides special procedures and measures for the handling of some hazardous and toxic substances. In addition, specific safety standards have been promulgated for workplaces engaged in the treatment, disposal or storage of hazardous waste. Requirements under state law, in some circumstances, may mandate additional measures for facilities handling materials specified as extremely dangerous. We believe that our operations are in material compliance with OSHA’s health and safety requirements.

Index

Insurance

We are a named insured under policies which include the following coverage: (i) product liability, including grounding; (ii) personal property, inventory and business income at our facilities; (iii) general liability coverage; (iv) employee benefit liability; (v) international liability and automobile liability; (vi) umbrella liability coverage; and (vii) various other activities or items subject to certain limits and deductibles. We believe that our insurance coverage is adequate to insure against the various liability risks of our business.

Employees

As of October 31, 2012, we had approximately 3,100 full-time and part-time employees including approximately 1,600 in the Flight Support Group and approximately 1,500 in the Electronic Technologies Group. None of our employees are represented by a union. Our management believes that we have good relations with our employees.

Available Information

Our Internet website address is http://www.heico.com. We make available free of charge, through the Investors section of our website, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These materials are also available free of charge on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. The information on or obtainable through our website is not incorporated into this annual report on Form 10-K.

We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller and other persons performing similar functions. Our Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers and Other Officers is part of our Code of Business Conduct, which is located on our website at http://www.heico.com. Any amendments to or waivers from a provision of this code of ethics will be posted on the website. Also located on the website are our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Finance/Audit Committee Charter, Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee Charter, and Compensation Committee Charter.

Copies of the above referenced materials will be made available, free of charge, upon written request to the Corporate Secretary at the Company’s headquarters.

Index

Executive Officers of the Registrant

Our executive officers are elected by the Board of Directors and serve at the discretion of the Board. The following table sets forth the names, ages of, and positions and offices held by our executive officers as of December 17, 2012:



Name	Age	Position(s)	Director Since
Laurans A. Mendelson	74	Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer	1989
Eric A. Mendelson	47	Co-President and Director; President and Chief Executive Officer of HEICO Aerospace Holdings Corp. and HEICO Flight Support Corp.	1992
Victor H. Mendelson	45	Co-President and Director; President and Chief Executive Officer of HEICO Electronic Technologies Corp.	1996
Thomas S. Irwin	66	Senior Executive Vice President	—
Carlos L. Macau, Jr.	45	Executive Vice President - Chief Financial Officer	—
William S. Harlow	64	Vice President of Corporate Development	—
Steven M. Walker	48	Chief Accounting Officer and Assistant Treasurer	—

Laurans A. Mendelson has served as our Chairman of the Board since December 1990. He has also served as our Chief Executive Officer since February 1990 and served as our President from September 1991 through September 2009. Mr. Mendelson serves on the Board of Governors of Aerospace Industries Association (“AIA”) in Washington D.C., of which HEICO is a member. He is also former Chairman of the Board of Trustees, former Chairman of the Executive Committee and a current member of the Society of Mount Sinai Founders of Mount Sinai Medical Center in Miami Beach, Florida. In addition, Mr. Mendelson is a Trustee Emeritus of Columbia University in The City of New York, where he previously served as Trustee and Chairman of the Trustees’ Audit Committee. Mr. Mendelson is a Certified Public Accountant. Laurans Mendelson is the father of Eric Mendelson and Victor Mendelson.

Eric A. Mendelson has served as our Co-President since October 2009 and served as our Executive Vice President from 2001 through September 2009. He also has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of HEICO Aerospace Holdings Corp., a subsidiary of ours, since its formation in 1997, President of HEICO Aerospace Corporation since 1993 and President and Chief Executive Officer of HEICO Flight Support Corp. since its formation in 2012. Mr. Mendelson is a co-founder, and, since 1987, has been Managing Director of Mendelson International Corporation, a private investment company which is a shareholder of HEICO. In addition, Mr. Mendelson is a member of the Advisory Board of Trustees of Mount Sinai Medical Center in Miami Beach, Florida and Vice Chair of the Board of Trustees of Ransom Everglades School in Coconut Grove, Florida, as well as a member of the Board of Directors of the Columbia College Alumni Association. Eric Mendelson is the son of Laurans Mendelson and the brother of Victor Mendelson.

Victor H. Mendelson has served as our Co-President since October 2009 and served as our Executive Vice President from 2001 through September 2009. He also has served as

Index

President and Chief Executive Officer of HEICO Electronic Technologies Corp., a subsidiary of ours, since its formation in September 1996. He served as our General Counsel from 1993 to 2008 and our Vice President from 1996 to 2001. In addition, Mr. Mendelson was the Chief Operating Officer of our former MediTek Health Corporation subsidiary from 1995 until its profitable sale in 1996. Mr. Mendelson is a co-founder, and, since 1987, has been President of Mendelson International Corporation, a private investment company which is a shareholder of HEICO. He is Vice Chair of the Board of Visitors of Columbia College in New York City, a Trustee of St. Thomas University in Miami Gardens, Florida and is Immediate Past President of the Board of Directors of the Florida Grand Opera. Victor Mendelson is the son of Laurans Mendelson and the brother of Eric Mendelson.

Thomas S. Irwin has served as our Senior Executive Vice President since June 2012; our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from September 1991 through May 2012; Senior Vice President from 1986 to 1991; and our Vice President and Treasurer from 1982 to 1986. Mr. Irwin is a Certified Public Accountant. He is a Trustee of the Greater Hollywood Chamber of Commerce and a member of the Board of Directors of the Greater Fort Lauderdale Alliance/Broward County.

Carlos L. Macau, Jr. has served as our Executive Vice President - Chief Financial Officer since June 2012. Mr. Macau joined HEICO from the international public accounting firm of Deloitte & Touche LLP where he worked from 2000-2012 as an Audit Partner. Mr. Macau has 22 years of financial and accounting experience serving a number of public and private manufacturing and service clients in a broad range of industries. His client responsibilities included serving as HEICO's lead client services partner for five years (2006-2010). Mr. Macau is a Certified Public Accountant and a member of the American and Florida Institutes of Certified Public Accountants.

William S. Harlow has served as our Vice President of Corporate Development since 2001 and served as Director of Corporate Development from 1995 to 2001.

Steven M. Walker has served as our Chief Accounting Officer since June 2012 and served as our Corporate Controller from 2002 through May 2012. He has also served as our Assistant Treasurer since 2002. Mr. Walker is a Certified Public Accountant.

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

Our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows can be impacted by a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control, including those set forth below and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, any one of which may cause our actual results to differ materially from anticipated results:

Our success is highly dependent on the performance of the aviation industry, which could be impacted by lower demand for commercial air travel or airline fleet changes causing lower demand for our goods and services.

Index

General global industry and economic conditions that affect the aviation industry also affect our business. We are subject to macroeconomic cycles and when recessions occur, we may experience reduced orders, payment delays, supply chain disruptions or other factors as a result of the economic challenges faced by our customers, prospective customers and suppliers. Further, the aviation industry has historically been subject to downward cycles from time to time which reduce the overall demand for jet engine and aircraft component replacement parts and repair and overhaul services, and such downward cycles result in lower sales and greater credit risk. Demand for commercial air travel can be influenced by airline industry profitability, world trade policies, government-to-government relations, terrorism, disease outbreaks, environmental constraints imposed upon aircraft operations, technological changes, price and other competitive factors. These global industry and economic conditions may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to governmental regulation and our failure to comply with these regulations could cause the government to withdraw or revoke our authorizations and approvals to do business and could subject us to penalties and sanctions that could harm our business.

Governmental agencies throughout the world, including the FAA, highly regulate the manufacture, repair and overhaul of aircraft parts and accessories. We include, with the replacement parts that we sell to our customers, documentation certifying that each part complies with applicable regulatory requirements and meets applicable standards of airworthiness established by the FAA or the equivalent regulatory agencies in other countries. In addition, our repair and overhaul operations are subject to certification pursuant to regulations established by the FAA. Specific regulations vary from country to country, although compliance with FAA requirements generally satisfies regulatory requirements in other countries. The revocation or suspension of any of our material authorizations or approvals would have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. New and more stringent government regulations, if adopted and enacted, could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, some sales to foreign countries of the equipment manufactured by our Electronic Technologies Group require approval or licensing from the U.S. government. Denial of export licenses could reduce our sales to those countries and could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission promulgated final rules regarding disclosure of the use of certain minerals (tantalum, tin, gold and tungsten), known as conflict minerals, which are mined from the Democratic Republic of the Congo and adjoining countries, as well as procedures regarding a manufacturer's efforts to prevent the sourcing of such minerals and metals produced from those minerals. These new requirements will require due diligence efforts for the 2013 calendar year, with initial disclosure requirements effective in May 2014. The new rule could affect sourcing at competitive prices and availability in sufficient quantities of such minerals used in our manufacturing processes for certain products. The number of suppliers who provide conflict-free minerals may be limited. In addition, there may be costs associated with complying with the disclosure requirements, such as costs related to determining the source of certain

Index

minerals used in our products, as well as costs of possible changes to products, processes, or sources of supply as a consequence of such verification activities.

The retirement of commercial aircraft could reduce our revenues.

Our Flight Support Group designs and manufactures jet engine and aircraft component replacement parts and also repairs, overhauls and distributes jet engine and aircraft components. If aircraft or engines for which we offer replacement parts or supply repair and overhaul services are retired and there are fewer aircraft that require these parts or services, our revenues may decline.

Reductions in defense, space or homeland security spending by U.S. and/or foreign customers could reduce our revenues.

In fiscal 2012, approximately 51% of the sales of our Electronic Technologies Group were derived from the sale of defense, commercial and defense satellite and spacecraft components and homeland security products. A decline in defense, space or homeland security budgets or additional restrictions imposed by the U.S. government on sales of products or services to foreign military agencies could lower sales of our products and services.

We are subject to the risks associated with sales to foreign customers, which could harm our business.

We market our products and services in approximately 100 countries, with 33% of our consolidated net sales in fiscal 2012 derived from sales to foreign customers. We expect that sales to foreign customers will continue to account for a significant portion of our revenues in the foreseeable future. As a result, we are subject to risks of doing business internationally, including the following:


•	Changes in regulatory requirements;


•	Fluctuations in currency exchange rates;


•	Volatility in foreign political and economic environments;


•	Uncertainty of the ability of foreign customers to finance purchases;


•	Uncertainties and restrictions concerning the availability of funding credit or guarantees;


•	Imposition of taxes, export controls, tariffs, embargoes and other trade restrictions; and


•	Compliance with a variety of international laws, as well as U.S. laws affecting the activities of U.S. companies abroad such as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

While the impact of these factors is difficult to predict, any one or more of these factors may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Intense competition from existing and new competitors may harm our business.

We face significant competition in each of our businesses.

Index

Flight Support Group


•	For jet engine and aircraft component replacement parts, we compete with the industry’s leading jet engine and aircraft component OEMs, particularly Pratt & Whitney and General Electric.


•	For the overhaul and repair of jet engine and aircraft components as well as avionics and navigation systems, we compete with:


-	major commercial airlines, many of which operate their own maintenance and

overhaul units;


-	OEMs, which manufacture, repair and overhaul their own parts; and


-	other independent service companies.

Electronic Technologies Group


•	For the design and manufacture of various types of electronic and electro-optical equipment as well as high voltage interconnection devices and high speed interface products, we compete in a fragmented marketplace with a number of companies, some of which are well capitalized.

The aviation aftermarket supply industry is highly fragmented, has several highly visible leading companies, and is characterized by intense competition. Some of our OEM competitors have greater name recognition than HEICO, as well as complementary lines of business and financial, marketing and other resources that HEICO does not have. In addition, OEMs, aircraft maintenance providers, leasing companies and FAA-certificated repair facilities may attempt to bundle their services and product offerings in the supply industry, thereby significantly increasing industry competition. Moreover, our smaller competitors may be able to offer more attractive pricing of parts as a result of lower labor costs or other factors. A variety of potential actions by any of our competitors, including a reduction of product prices or the establishment by competitors of long-term relationships with new or existing customers, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Competition typically intensifies during cyclical downturns in the aviation industry, when supply may exceed demand. We may not be able to continue to compete effectively against present or future competitors, and competitive pressures may have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our success is dependent on the development and manufacture of new products, equipment and services. Our inability to develop, manufacture and introduce new products and services at profitable pricing levels could reduce our sales or sales growth.

The aviation, defense, space, medical, telecommunication and electronic industries are constantly undergoing development and change and, accordingly, new products, equipment and methods of repair and overhaul service are likely to be introduced in the future. In addition to manufacturing electronic and electro-optical equipment and selected aerospace and defense components for OEMs and the U.S. government and repairing jet engine and aircraft

Index

components, we re-design sophisticated aircraft replacement parts originally developed by OEMs so that we can offer the replacement parts for sale at substantially lower prices than those manufactured by the OEMs. Consequently, we devote substantial resources to research and product development. Technological development poses a number of challenges and risks, including the following:


•	We may not be able to successfully protect the proprietary interests we have in various aircraft parts, electronic and electro-optical equipment and our repair processes;


•	As OEMs continue to develop and improve jet engines and aircraft components, we may not be able to re-design and manufacture replacement parts that perform as well as those offered by OEMs or we may not be able to profitably sell our replacement parts at lower prices than the OEMs;


•	We may need to expend significant capital to:


-	purchase new equipment and machines,


-	train employees in new methods of production and service, and


-	fund the research and development of new products; and


•	Development by our competitors of patents or methodologies that preclude us from the design and manufacture of aircraft replacement parts or electrical and electro-optical equipment could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, we may not be able to successfully develop new products, equipment or methods of repair and overhaul service, and the failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may not be able to effectively execute our acquisition strategy, which could slow our growth.

A key element of our strategy is growth through the acquisition of additional companies. Our acquisition strategy is affected by and poses a number of challenges and risks, including the following:


•	Availability of suitable acquisition candidates;


•	Availability of capital;


•	Diversion of management’s attention;


•	Effective integration of the operations and personnel of acquired companies;


•	Potential write downs of acquired intangible assets;


•	Potential loss of key employees of acquired companies;


•	Use of a significant portion of our available cash;


•	Significant dilution to our shareholders for acquisitions made utilizing our securities; and


•	Consummation of acquisitions on satisfactory terms.

Index

We may not be able to successfully execute our acquisition strategy, and the failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The inability to obtain certain components and raw materials from suppliers could harm our business.

Our business is affected by the availability and price of the raw materials and component parts that we use to manufacture our products. Our ability to manage inventory and meet delivery requirements may be constrained by our suppliers’ ability to adjust delivery of long-lead time products during times of volatile demand. The supply chains for our business could also be disrupted by external events such as natural disasters, extreme weather events, labor disputes, governmental actions and legislative or regulatory changes. As a result, our suppliers may fail to perform according to specifications when required and we may be unable to identify alternate suppliers or to otherwise mitigate the consequences of their non-performance. Transitions to new suppliers may result in significant costs and delays, including those related to the required recertification of parts obtained from new suppliers with our customers and/or regulatory agencies. Our inability to fill our supply needs could jeopardize our ability to fulfill obligations under customer contracts, which could result in reduced revenues and profits, contract penalties or terminations, and damage to customer relationships. Further, increased costs of such raw materials or components could reduce our profits if we were unable to pass along such price increases to our customers.

Product specification costs and requirements could cause an increase to our costs to complete contracts.

The costs to meet customer specifications and requirements could result in us having to spend more to design or manufacture products and this could reduce our profit margins on current contracts or those we obtain in the future.

We may incur product liability claims that are not fully insured.

Our jet engine and aircraft component replacement parts and repair and overhaul services expose our business to potential liabilities for personal injury or death as a result of the failure of an aircraft component that we have designed, manufactured or serviced. The commercial aviation industry occasionally has catastrophic losses that may exceed policy limits. An uninsured or partially insured claim, or a claim for which third-party indemnification is not available, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, insurance coverage costs may become even more expensive in the future. Our customers typically require us to maintain substantial insurance coverage and our inability to obtain insurance coverage at commercially reasonable rates could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Index

We may incur environmental liabilities and these liabilities may not be covered by insurance.

Our operations and facilities are subject to a number of federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations, which govern, among other things, the discharge of hazardous materials into the air and water as well as the handling, storage and disposal of hazardous materials. Pursuant to various environmental laws, a current or previous owner or operator of real property may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous materials. Environmental laws typically impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of hazardous materials. Although management believes that our operations and facilities are in material compliance with environmental laws and regulations, future changes in them or interpretations thereof or the nature of our operations may require us to make significant additional capital expenditures to ensure compliance in the future.

We do not maintain specific environmental liability insurance and the expenses related to these environmental liabilities, if we are required to pay them, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may incur damages or disruption to our business caused by natural disasters and other factors that may not be covered by insurance.

Several of our facilities, as a result of their locations, could be subject to a catastrophic loss caused by hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, fire, power loss, telecommunication and information systems failure or similar events. Our corporate headquarters and facilities located in Florida are particularly susceptible to hurricanes, storms, tornadoes or other natural disasters that could disrupt our operations, delay production and shipments, and result in large expenses to repair or replace the facility or facilities. Should insurance or other risk transfer mechanisms, such as our existing disaster recovery and business continuity plans, be insufficient to recover all costs, we could experience a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Tax changes could affect our effective tax rate and future profitability.

We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, multiple state jurisdictions and certain jurisdictions outside the U.S. In fiscal 2012, our effective tax rate was 33.8% of our income before income taxes and noncontrolling interests. Our future effective tax rate may be adversely affected by a number of factors, including the following:


•	Changes in available tax credits or tax deductions;


•	Changes in tax laws or the interpretation of such tax laws and changes in generally accepted accounting principles;


•	The amount of income attributable to noncontrolling interests;


•	Changes in the mix of earnings in jurisdictions with differing statutory tax rates;


•	Adjustments to estimated taxes upon finalization of various tax returns;


•	Resolution of issues arising from tax audits with various tax authorities; and

Index


•	Changes in statutory tax rates in any of the various jurisdictions where we file tax returns.

Any significant increase in our future effective tax rates could have a material adverse effect on net income for future periods.

We may not have the administrative, operational or financial resources to continue to grow the company.

We have experienced rapid growth in recent periods and intend to continue to pursue an aggressive growth strategy, both through acquisitions and internal expansion of products and services. Our growth to date has placed, and could continue to place, significant demands on our administrative, operational and financial resources. We may not be able to grow effectively or manage our growth successfully, and the failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are dependent on key personnel and the loss of these key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our success.

Our success substantially depends on the performance, contributions and expertise of our senior management team led by Laurans A. Mendelson, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Eric A. Mendelson, our Co-President; and Victor H. Mendelson, our Co-President. Technical employees are also critical to our research and product development, as well as our ability to continue to re-design sophisticated products of OEMs in order to sell competing replacement parts at substantially lower prices than those manufactured by the OEMs. The loss of the services of any of our executive officers or other key employees or our inability to continue to attract or retain the necessary personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our executive officers and directors have significant influence over our management and direction.

As of December 17, 2012, collectively our executive officers and entities controlled by them, our 401(k) Plan and members of the Board of Directors beneficially owned approximately 21% of our outstanding Common Stock and approximately 6% of our outstanding Class A Common Stock. Accordingly, they will be able to substantially influence the election of the Board of Directors and control our business, policies and affairs, including our position with respect to proposed business combinations and attempted takeovers.

Index

Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

Item 2. PROPERTIES

We own or lease a number of facilities, which are utilized by our Flight Support Group (“FSG”), Electronic Technologies Group (“ETG”) and corporate offices. As of October 31, 2012, all of the facilities listed below were in good operating condition, well maintained and in regular use. We believe that our existing facilities are sufficient to meet our operational needs for the foreseeable future. Summary information on the facilities utilized within the FSG, ETG and our corporate offices to support their principal operating activities is as follows:

Flight Support Group



	Square Footage
Location	Leased	Owned	Description
United States facilities (10 states)	472,000	177,000	Manufacturing, engineering and distribution facilities, and corporate headquarters
United States facilities (7 states)	181,000	127,000	Repair and overhaul facilities
International facilities (3 countries) - India, United Kingdom and Singapore	9,000	—	Manufacturing, engineering and distribution facilities

Electronic Technologies Group



	Square Footage
Location	Leased	Owned	Description
United States facilities (10 states)	271,000	296,000	Manufacturing and engineering facilities
International facilities (4 countries) - Canada, France, United Kingdom and Korea	56,000	35,000	Manufacturing and engineering facilities

Corporate



	Square Footage
Location	Leased	Owned ⁽¹⁾	Description
United States facilities (1 state)	—	7,000	Administrative offices


(1)	Represents the square footage of our corporate offices in Miami, Florida. The square footage of our corporate headquarters in Hollywood, Florida is included within the square footage under the caption “United States facilities (10 states)” under Flight Support Group.

Index

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are involved in various legal actions arising in the normal course of business. Based upon the Company’s and our legal counsel’s evaluations of any claims or assessments, management is of the opinion that the outcome of these matters will not have a material effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

None.

Index

PART II


Item 5.	MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

Our Class A Common Stock and Common Stock are listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbols “HEI.A” and “HEI,” respectively. The following tables set forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low share prices for our Class A Common Stock and our Common Stock as reported on the NYSE, as well as the amount of cash dividends paid per share during such periods.

In March of 2012 and 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a 5-for-4 stock split on both classes of the Company’s common stock. The stock splits were effected as of April 25, 2012 and April 26, 2011, respectively, in the form of a 25% stock dividend distributed to shareholders of record as of April 13, 2012 and April 15, 2011, respectively. All applicable share and per share information has been adjusted retrospectively to give effect to the 5-for-4 stock splits.



Class A Common Stock

	High		Low		Cash Dividends Per Share
Fiscal 2011:
First Quarter		$27.42		$22.50		$.038
Second Quarter	29.36		23.92		—
Third Quarter	33.38		26.64		.048
Fourth Quarter	32.58		22.45		—

Fiscal 2012:
First Quarter		$33.60		$28.40		$.048
Second Quarter	33.70		30.92		—
Third Quarter	33.50		28.72		.060
Fourth Quarter	32.22		28.61		—

As of December 17, 2012, there were 453 holders of record of our Class A Common Stock.

Index



Common Stock

	High		Low		Cash Dividends Per Share
Fiscal 2011:
First Quarter		$37.76		$30.71		$.038
Second Quarter	40.82		33.55		—
Third Quarter	46.38		35.81		.048
Fourth Quarter	47.56		32.04		—

Fiscal 2012:
First Quarter		$49.58		$41.86		$.048
Second Quarter	47.97		39.31		—
Third Quarter	43.28		35.24		.060
Fourth Quarter	39.74		34.01		—

As of December 17, 2012, there were 474 holders of record of our Common Stock.

Index

Performance Graphs

The following graph and table compare the total return on $100 invested in HEICO Common Stock and HEICO Class A Common Stock with the total return of $100 invested in the NYSE Composite Index and the Dow Jones U.S. Aerospace Index for the five-year period from October 31, 2007 through October 31, 2012. The NYSE Composite Index measures the performance of all common stocks listed on the NYSE. The Dow Jones U.S. Aerospace Index is comprised of large companies which make aircraft, major weapons, radar and other defense equipment and systems as well as providers of satellites and spacecrafts used for defense purposes. The total returns include the reinvestment of cash dividends.

Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Total Return



	Cumulative Total Return as of October 31,
	2007		2008		2009		2010		2011		2012
HEICO Common Stock		$100.00		$70.84		$70.24		$115.28		$165.43		$140.47
HEICO Class A Common Stock	100.00		64.99		71.74		108.34		143.78		139.85
NYSE Composite Index	100.00		58.78		65.36		72.86		73.35		79.73
Dow Jones U.S. Aerospace Index	100.00		60.22		67.74		92.60		99.43		106.92

Index

The following graph and table compare the total return on $100 invested in HEICO Common Stock since October 31, 1990 using the same indices shown on the five-year performance graph above. October 31, 1990 was the end of the first fiscal year following the date the current executive management team assumed leadership of the Company. No Class A Common Stock was outstanding as of October 31, 1990. As with the five-year performance graph, the total returns include the reinvestment of cash dividends.

Comparison of Twenty Two-Year Cumulative Total Return



	Cumulative Total Return as of October 31,
	1990		1991		1992		1993		1994		1995
HEICO Common Stock		$100.00		$141.49		$158.35		$173.88		$123.41		$263.25
NYSE Composite Index	100.00		130.31		138.76		156.09		155.68		186.32
Dow Jones U.S. Aerospace Index	100.00		130.67		122.00		158.36		176.11		252.00



	1996		1997		1998		1999		2000		2001
HEICO Common Stock		$430.02		$1,008.31		$1,448.99		$1,051.61		$809.50		$1,045.86
NYSE Composite Index	225.37		289.55		326.98		376.40		400.81		328.78
Dow Jones U.S. Aerospace Index	341.65		376.36		378.66		295.99		418.32		333.32



	2002		2003		2004		2005		2006		2007
HEICO Common Stock		$670.39		$1,067.42		$1,366.57		$1,674.40		$2,846.48		$4,208.54
NYSE Composite Index	284.59		339.15		380.91		423.05		499.42		586.87
Dow Jones U.S. Aerospace Index	343.88		393.19		478.49		579.77		757.97		1,000.84



	2008		2009		2010		2011		2012
HEICO Common Stock		$2,872.01		$2,984.13		$4,722.20		$6,557.88		$5,900.20
NYSE Composite Index	344.96		383.57		427.61		430.46		467.91
Dow Jones U.S. Aerospace Index	602.66		678.00		926.75		995.11		1,070.15

Index

Dividend Policy

We have historically paid semi-annual cash dividends on both our Class A Common Stock and Common Stock. In July 2012, we paid our 68^th consecutive semi-annual cash dividend since 1979. The cash dividend of $.06 per share represents a 25% increase over the prior semi-annual per share amount of $.048. Effective with this increase, the current annual cash dividend is $.12. On November 27, 2012, our Board of Directors declared an acceleration of HEICO's regular semi-annual $.06 per share cash dividend as well as a special and extraordinary $1.14 per share cash dividend on both classes of our common stock. Based on strong enthusiasm from our shareholders for the special and extraordinary cash dividend, our Board of Directors announced on December 6, 2012, a $1.00 increase per share so that the total special and extraordinary dividend will now be $2.14 per share on both classes of our common stock. The dividends will be paid in one payment on or before December 31, 2012 to shareholders of record on December 17, 2012. The dividends, which aggregate approximately $117 million and will be funded from borrowings under our revolving credit facility, were declared in view of impending tax increases expected to take effect in calendar 2013. Accordingly, we are paying in December 2012 the $.06 per share dividend we would ordinarily have paid in January 2013. In light of tax considerations, our Board of Directors will continue to review our dividend policy and will regularly evaluate whether dividends should be paid in cash or stock, as well as what amounts should be paid. Our ability to pay dividends could be affected by future business performance, liquidity, capital needs, alternative investment opportunities and loan covenants under our revolving credit facility. See Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources, for additional information.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

There were no purchases of our equity securities during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

There were no unregistered sales of our equity securities during fiscal 2012.

Index

Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA



	Year ended October 31, ⁽¹⁾
	2012			2011			2010			2009			2008

	(in thousands, except per share data)
Operating Data:
Net sales		$897,347			$764,891			$617,020			$538,296			$582,347
Gross profit	327,436			274,441			222,347			181,011			210,495
Selling, general and administrative expenses	164,142			136,010			113,174			92,756			104,707
Operating income	163,294			138,431		⁽⁴⁾	109,173		⁽⁶⁾	88,255			105,788			⁽⁸⁾
Interest expense	2,432			142			508			615			2,314
Other income (expense)	313			64			390			205			(637		)
Net income attributable to HEICO	85,147		⁽³⁾	72,820		⁽⁴⁾⁽⁵⁾	54,938		⁽⁶⁾	44,626		⁽⁷⁾	48,511			⁽⁸⁾

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding ⁽²⁾
Basic	52,689			52,040			51,301			51,181			51,385
Diluted	53,299			53,127			52,767			52,781			53,210

Per Share Data: ⁽²⁾
Net income per share attributable to HEICO shareholders:
Basic		$1.62	⁽³⁾		$1.40	⁽⁴⁾⁽⁵⁾		$1.07	⁽⁶⁾		$0.87	⁽⁷⁾		$0.94		⁽⁸⁾
Diluted	1.60		⁽³⁾	1.37		⁽⁴⁾⁽⁵⁾	1.04		⁽⁶⁾	0.85		⁽⁷⁾	0.91			⁽⁸⁾
Cash dividends per share ⁽²⁾	.108			.086			.069			.061			.051

Balance Sheet Data (as of October 31):
Cash and cash equivalents		$21,451			$17,500			$6,543			$7,167			$12,562
Total assets	1,192,846			941,069			781,643			732,910			676,542
Total debt (including current portion)	131,820			40,158			14,221			55,431			37,601
Redeemable noncontrolling interests	67,166			65,430			55,048			56,937			48,736
Total shareholders’ equity	719,759			620,154			554,826			490,658			453,002

__________________


(1)	Results include the results of acquisitions from each respective effective date. See Note 2, Acquisitions, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.


(2)	All share and per share information has been adjusted retrospectively to reflect the 5-for-4 stock splits effected in April 2012, 2011 and 2010.


(3)	Includes the aggregate tax benefit principally from higher research and development tax credits, net of expenses, recognized upon the filing of HEICO's fiscal 2011 U.S. federal and state tax returns during fiscal 2012, which increased net income attributable to HEICO by approximately $.9 million, or $.02 per basic and diluted share.

(4)

Operating income was reduced by a net aggregate of $3.8 million due to $5.0 million in impairment losses related to the write-down of certain intangible assets within the Electronic Technologies Group (“ETG”) to their estimated fair values, partially offset by a $1.2 million reduction in the value of contingent consideration related to a prior year acquisition. Approximately $4.5 million of the impairment losses and the reduction in value of contingent consideration were recorded as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses, while the remaining impairment losses of $.5 million were recorded as a component of cost of goods sold, which decreased net income attributable to HEICO by $2.4 million, or $.05 per basic and diluted share, in aggregate.

Index

(5)

Includes the aggregate tax benefit principally from state income apportionment updates and higher research and development tax credits recognized upon the filing of HEICO’s fiscal 2010 U.S. federal and state tax returns and amendments of certain prior year state tax returns as well as the benefit of an income tax credit, net of expenses, for ten months’ of fiscal 2010 qualified research and development activities recognized in fiscal 2011 upon the retroactive extension in December 2010 of Section 41, “Credit for Increasing Research Activities,” of the Internal Revenue Code, which increased net income attributable to HEICO by $2.8 million, or $.05 per basic and diluted share, in aggregate.


(6)	Operating income was reduced by an aggregate of $1.4 million in impairment losses related to the write-down of certain intangible assets within the ETG to their estimated fair values. The impairment losses were recorded as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses and decreased net income attributable to HEICO by $.9 million, or $.02 per basic and diluted share.

(7)

Includes a benefit related to a settlement with the Internal Revenue Service concerning the income tax credit claimed by the Company on its U.S. federal filings for qualified research and development activities incurred during fiscal years 2002 through 2005 as well as an aggregate reduction to the related liability for unrecognized tax benefits for fiscal years 2006 through 2008, which increased net income attributable to HEICO by approximately $1.2 million, or $.02 per basic and diluted share.


(8)	Operating income was reduced by an aggregate of $1.8 million in impairment losses related to the write-down of certain intangible assets within the ETG to their estimated fair values. The impairment losses were recorded as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses and decreased net income attributable to HEICO by $1.1 million, or $.02 per basic and diluted share.

Index


Item 7.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

Our business is comprised of two operating segments, the Flight Support Group (“FSG”) and the Electronic Technologies Group (“ETG”).

The Flight Support Group consists of HEICO Aerospace Holdings Corp. (“HEICO Aerospace”) and HEICO Flight Support Corp. and their collective subsidiaries, which primarily:

•

Designs, Manufactures, Repairs, Overhauls and Distributes Jet Engine and Aircraft Component Replacement Parts. The Flight Support Group designs, manufactures, repairs, overhauls and distributes jet engine and aircraft component replacement parts. The parts and services are approved by the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”). The Flight Support Group also manufactures and sells specialty parts as a subcontractor for aerospace and industrial original equipment manufacturers and the United States government. Additionally, the Flight Support Group is a leading supplier, distributor, and integrator of military aircraft parts and support services primarily to foreign military organizations allied with the United States.

The Electronic Technologies Group consists of HEICO Electronic Technologies Corp. (“HEICO Electronic”) and its subsidiaries, which primarily:

•

Designs and Manufactures Electronic, Microwave and Electro-Optical Equipment, High-Speed Interface Products, High Voltage Interconnection Devices and High Voltage Advanced Power Electronics. The Electronic Technologies Group designs, manufactures and sells various types of electronic, microwave and electro-optical equipment and components, including power supplies, laser rangefinder receivers, infrared simulation, calibration and testing equipment; power conversion products serving the high-reliability military, space and commercial avionics end-markets; underwater locator beacons used to locate data and voice recorders utilized on aircraft and marine vessels; electromagnetic interference shielding for commercial and military aircraft operators, traveling wave tube amplifiers and microwave power modules used in radar, electronic warfare, on-board jamming and countermeasure systems, electronics companies and telecommunication equipment suppliers; advanced high-technology interface products that link devices such as telemetry receivers, digital cameras, high resolution scanners, simulation systems and test systems to computers; high voltage energy generators interconnection devices, cable assemblies and wire for the medical equipment, defense and other industrial markets; high frequency power delivery systems for the commercial sign industry; high voltage power supplies found in satellite communications, CT scanners and in medical and industrial x-ray systems; three-dimensional microelectronic and stacked memory products that are principally integrated into larger subsystems equipping satellites and spacecraft; harsh environment connectivity products and custom molded cable assemblies; RF and microwave amplifiers, transmitters and receivers used to support military communications

Index

on unmanned aerial systems, other aircraft, helicopters and ground-based data/communications systems and wireless cabin control systems, solid state power distribution and management systems and fuel level sensing systems for business jets and for general aviation, as well as for the military/defense market segments.

Our results of operations during each of the past three fiscal years have been affected by a number of transactions. This discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included herein. All applicable share and per share information has been adjusted retrospectively to reflect the 5-for-4 stock splits effected in April 2012, 2011 and 2010. See Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Stock Splits, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding these stock splits. For further information regarding the acquisitions discussed below, see Note 2, Acquisitions, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Acquisitions are included in our results of operations from the effective dates of acquisition.

In February 2010, we acquired, through HEICO Electronic, substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of dB Control Corp. dB Control Corp. produces high-power devices used in both defense and commercial applications.

In December 2010, we acquired, through HEICO Aerospace, 80.1% of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Blue Aerospace LLC (“Blue Aerospace”). Blue Aerospace is a supplier, distributor, and integrator of military aircraft parts and support services primarily to foreign military organizations allied with the United States. The remaining 19.9% interest continues to be owned by certain members of Blue Aerospace’s management team.

In September 2011, we acquired, through HEICO Electronic, all of the outstanding capital stock of 3D Plus SA (“3D Plus”). 3D Plus is a leading designer and manufacturer of three-dimensional microelectronic and stacked memory products used predominately in satellites and also utilized in medical equipment.

On November 22, 2011, we acquired, through HEICO Electronic, Switchcraft, Inc. (“Switchcraft”) through the purchase of all of the stock of Switchcraft's parent company, Switchcraft Holdco, Inc., for approximately $142.7 million, net of cash acquired. Switchcraft is a leading designer and manufacturer of high performance, high reliability and harsh environment electronic connectors and other interconnect products.

In March 2012, we acquired, through HEICO Electronic, the business and substantially all of the assets of Ramona Research, Inc. (“Ramona Research”). Ramona Research designs and manufactures RF and microwave amplifiers, transmitters and receivers primarily used to support military communications on unmanned aerial systems, other aircraft, helicopters and ground-based data/communications systems.

Index

In April 2012, we acquired, through HEICO Electronic, certain aerospace assets of Moritz Aerospace, Inc. (“Moritz Aerospace”) in an aerospace product line acquisition. The Moritz Aerospace product line designs and manufactures next generation wireless cabin control systems, solid state power distribution and management systems and fuel level sensing systems for business jets and for general aviation, as well as for the military/defense market segments. The purchase price of this acquisition was paid using cash provided by operating activities.

In August 2012, we acquired, through HEICO Flight Support Corp., 84% of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of CSI Aerospace, Inc. (“CSI Aerospace”). CSI Aerospace is a leading repair and overhaul provider of specialized components for airlines, military and other aerospace related organizations. The remaining 16% interest continues to be owned by certain members of CSI Aerospace's management team.

In October 2012, we acquired, through HEICO Flight Support Corp., 80.1% of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Action Research Corporation (“Action Research”). Action Research is an FAA-Approved Repair Station that has developed unique proprietary repairs that extend the lives of certain engine and airframe components. The remaining 19.9% interest continues to be owned by an existing member of Action Research's management team. The purchase price of this acquisition was paid using cash provided by operating activities.

Unless otherwise noted, the purchase price of each of the above referenced acquisitions was paid in cash principally using proceeds from our revolving credit facility. The aggregate cost paid in cash for acquisitions, including additional purchase consideration payments, was $197.3 million, $94.7 million and $39.1 million in fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

In February 2011, we acquired, through HEICO Aerospace, an additional 8% equity interest in one of our subsidiaries, which increased our ownership interest to 80%. In February 2012, we acquired an additional 6.7% equity interest in the subsidiary, which increased our ownership interest to 86.7%. On December 19, 2012, we acquired the remaining 13.3% equity interest in the subsidiary.

Critical Accounting Policies

We believe that the following are our most critical accounting policies, some of which require management to make judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue from the sale of products and the rendering of services is recognized when title and risk of loss passes to the customer, which is generally at the time of shipment. Revenue from certain fixed price contracts for which costs can be dependably estimated is recognized on the percentage-of-completion method, measured by the percentage of costs incurred to date to estimated total costs for each contract. This method is used because management considers costs incurred to be the best available measure of progress on these contracts. Variations in actual labor performance, changes to estimated profitability and final contract settlements may result in

Index

revisions to cost estimates. Revisions in cost estimates as contracts progress have the effect of increasing or decreasing profits in the period of revision. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are made in the period in which such losses are determined. The percentage of our net sales recognized under the percentage-of-completion method was approximately 1%, 1% and 2% in fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Changes in estimates pertaining to percentage-of-completion contracts did not have a material or significant effect on net income or net income per share in fiscal 2012, 2011 or 2010.

For fixed price contracts in which costs cannot be dependably estimated, revenue is recognized on the completed-contract method. A contract is considered complete when all significant costs have been incurred or the item has been accepted by the customer. Progress billings and customer advances received on fixed price contracts accounted for under the completed-contract method are classified as a reduction to contract costs that are included in inventories, if any, and any remaining amount is included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities.

Valuation of Accounts Receivable

The valuation of accounts receivable requires that we set up an allowance for estimated uncollectible accounts and record a corresponding charge to bad debt expense. We estimate uncollectible receivables based on such factors as our prior experience, our appraisal of a customer’s ability to pay, age of receivables outstanding and economic conditions within and outside of the aviation, defense, space, medical, telecommunications and electronics industries. Actual bad debt expense could differ from estimates made.

Valuation of Inventory

Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost being determined on the first-in, first-out or the average cost basis. Losses, if any, are recognized fully in the period when identified.

We periodically evaluate the carrying value of inventory, giving consideration to factors such as its physical condition, sales patterns and expected future demand in order to estimate the amount necessary to write down any slow moving, obsolete or damaged inventory. These estimates could vary significantly from actual amounts based upon future economic conditions, customer inventory levels, or competitive factors that were not foreseen or did not exist when the estimated write-downs were made.

In accordance with industry practice, all inventories are classified as a current asset including portions with long production cycles, some of which may not be realized within one year.

Index

Business Combinations

We adopted new accounting guidance for business combinations effective prospectively for acquisitions consummated on or after November 1, 2009 (the beginning of fiscal 2010). Under the new guidance, any contingent consideration is recognized as a liability at fair value as of the acquisition date with subsequent fair value adjustments recorded in operations. Acquisition costs are generally expensed as incurred under the new guidance. For acquisitions consummated prior to fiscal 2010, contingent consideration is accounted for as an additional cost of the respective acquired entity and recorded as additional goodwill when paid. As of October 31, 2012, we have no remaining obligation to pay additional purchase consideration for acquisitions consummated prior to fiscal 2010.

We allocate the purchase price of acquired entities to the underlying tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities and any noncontrolling interests assumed based on their estimated fair values, with any excess recorded as goodwill. Determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires management’s judgment and often involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including assumptions with respect to future cash inflows and outflows, discount rates, asset lives and market multiples, among other items. We determine the fair values of such assets, principally intangible assets, generally in consultation with third-party valuation advisors.

Valuation of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

We test goodwill for impairment annually as of October 31, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of goodwill may not be fully recoverable. In evaluating the recoverability of goodwill, we compare the fair value of each of our reporting units to its carrying value to determine potential impairment. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the implied fair value of that reporting unit’s goodwill is to be calculated and an impairment loss is recognized in the amount by which the carrying value of the reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, if any. The fair values of our reporting units were determined using a weighted average of a market approach and an income approach. Under the market approach, fair values are estimated using published market multiples for comparable companies. We calculate fair values under the income approach by taking estimated future cash flows that are based on internal projections and other assumptions deemed reasonable by management and discounting them using an estimated weighted average cost of capital. Based on the annual goodwill impairment test as of October 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, we determined there was no impairment of our goodwill. The fair value of each of our reporting units as of October 31, 2012 significantly exceeded its carrying value.

We test each non-amortizing intangible asset (principally trade names) for impairment annually as of October 31, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. During fiscal 2012, we adopted new accounting guidance which permits an entity the option to perform a qualitative evaluation about the likelihood that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired in order to determine whether it should calculate the fair value of the asset. Accordingly, in performing our fiscal 2012 annual review we first

Index

assessed qualitative factors for certain trade names to determine whether it was more likely than not that the asset's fair value was less than its carrying amount and if necessary, performed a quantitative analysis comparing the asset's current fair value to its carrying amount. To derive the fair value of our trade names, we utilize an income approach, which relies upon management's assumptions of royalty rates, projected revenues and discount rates. We also test each amortizing intangible asset for impairment if events or circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. The test consists of determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through undiscounted expected future cash flows. If the total of the undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of those assets, we recognize an impairment loss based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets. The determination of fair value requires us to make a number of estimates, assumptions and judgments of such factors as projected revenues and earnings and discount rates. Based on the intangible impairment tests conducted, we did not recognize any impairment losses in fiscal 2012; however, we recognized pre-tax impairment losses related to the write-down of certain customer relationships of $4.3 million and $1.1 million during fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively, the write-down of certain trade names of $.2 million and $.3 million during fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively, and the write-down of certain intellectual property of $.5 million during fiscal 2011, within the ETG to their estimated fair values. The impairment losses pertaining to certain customer relationships and trade names were recorded as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and the impairment losses pertaining to intellectual property were recorded as a component of costs of goods sold.

Assumptions utilized to determine fair value in the goodwill and intangible assets impairment tests are highly judgmental. If there is a material change in such assumptions or if there is a material change in the conditions or circumstances influencing fair value, we could be required to recognize a material impairment charge. See Item 1A., Risk Factors, for a list of factors of which any may cause our actual results to differ materially from anticipated results.

Index

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth the results of our operations, net sales and operating income by segment and the percentage of net sales represented by the respective items in our Consolidated Statements of Operations (in thousands):



	Year ended October 31,
	2012			2011			2010

Net sales		$897,347			$764,891			$617,020
Cost of sales	569,911			490,450			394,673
Selling, general and administrative expenses	164,142			136,010			113,174
Total operating costs and expenses	734,053			626,460			507,847
Operating income		$163,294			$138,431			$109,173

Net sales by segment:
Flight Support Group		$570,325			$539,563			$412,337
Electronic Technologies Group	331,598			227,771			205,648
Intersegment sales	(4,576		)	(2,443		)	(965		)
		$897,347			$764,891			$617,020
Operating income by segment:
Flight Support Group		$103,943			$95,001			$67,896
Electronic Technologies Group	77,438			59,465			56,126
Other, primarily corporate	(18,087		)	(16,035		)	(14,849		)
		$163,294			$138,431			$109,173

Net sales	100.0		%	100.0		%	100.0		%
Gross profit	36.5		%	35.9		%	36.0		%
Selling, general and administrative expenses	18.3		%	17.8		%	18.3		%
Operating income	18.2		%	18.1		%	17.7		%
Interest expense	.3		%	—			.1		%
Other income	—			—			.1		%
Income tax expense	6.1		%	5.6		%	5.9		%
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	2.4		%	3.0		%	2.8		%
Net income attributable to HEICO	9.5		%	9.5		%	8.9		%

Comparison of Fiscal 2012 to Fiscal 2011

Net Sales

Our net sales in fiscal 2012 increased by 17% to a record $897.3 million, as compared to net sales of $764.9 million in fiscal 2011. The increase in net sales reflects an increase of $103.8 million (a 46% increase) to a record $331.6 million in net sales within the ETG as well as an

Index

increase of $30.8 million (a 6% increase) to a record $570.3 million in net sales within the FSG.

The net sales increase in the ETG reflects additional net sales of approximately $87.4 million from the acquisitions of 3D Plus in September 2011, Switchcraft in November 2011, Ramona Research in March 2012 and Moritz Aerospace in April 2012, as well as organic growth of approximately 7%. The organic growth in the ETG principally reflects an increase in demand and market penetration for certain defense, space, electronic, aerospace and medical products, resulting in a $6.2 million, $3.5 million, $2.6 million, $2.1 million and $1.8 million increase in net sales from these product lines, respectively. Despite global economic uncertainty, we expect stable demand and modest organic growth for the majority of ETG's products, however the threat of United States defense and spending reductions could result in modest decreases to our organic growth in these product offerings in fiscal 2013. The net sales increase in the FSG reflects organic growth of approximately 4%, as well as additional net sales of approximately $9.1 million from the acquisitions of Blue Aerospace in December 2010, CSI Aerospace in August 2012 and Action Research in October 2012. The FSG’s organic growth reflects increased market penetration from both new and existing product offerings for certain of the FSG’s aerospace products and services resulting in an increase of $11.3 million in net sales of which approximately 70% and 30% were attributed to the aftermarket replacement parts product lines and repair and overhaul services product lines, respectively. Industry trends of modest growth in worldwide revenue passenger miles and the stability of the global aircraft fleet are anticipated to create stable demand and modest organic growth within our aftermarket replacement parts product lines for fiscal 2013. Additionally, the organic growth in the FSG reflects an increase of $10.3 million in net sales within our specialty product lines primarily attributed to the sales of industrial products used in heavy-duty and off-road vehicles as a result of increased market penetration. Despite global economic uncertainty, we expect stable demand and modest organic growth within our specialty product lines for fiscal 2013. Sales price changes were not a significant contributing factor to the ETG and FSG net sales growth in fiscal 2012.

Our net sales in fiscal 2012 and 2011 by market approximated 53% and 60%, respectively, from the commercial aviation industry, 26% and 24%, respectively, from the defense and space industries, and 21% and 16%, respectively, from other industrial markets including medical, electronics and telecommunications.

Gross Profit and Operating Expenses

Our consolidated gross profit margin improved to 36.5% in fiscal 2012 as compared to 35.9% in fiscal 2011, principally reflecting a .7% increase in the FSG's gross profit margin, partially offset by a 2.5% decrease in the ETG's gross profit margin. The increase in the FSG's gross profit margin is primarily attributed to the previously mentioned increased sales of higher gross profit margin products within our aftermarket replacement parts and repair and overhaul services product lines. The decrease in the ETG's gross profit margin principally reflects a 1.9% impact from lower gross profit margins realized by Switchcraft and 3D Plus in fiscal 2012. The lower gross profit margins realized by these acquired businesses are principally attributed to amortization expense of certain acquired intangible assets and inventory purchase accounting adjustments aggregating approximately $4.0 million. Additionally, the decrease in the ETG's gross profit margin reflects a lower margin product mix of certain of our defense, space and

Index

medical products in fiscal 2012. Total new product research and development expenses included within our consolidated cost of sales increased from approximately $25.4 million in fiscal 2011 to approximately $30.4 million in fiscal 2012, principally to further enhance growth opportunities and market penetration.

Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses were $164.1 million and $136.0 million in fiscal 2012 and 2011, respectively. The increase in SG&A expenses reflects an increase of $17.7 million in general and administrative expenses and $10.4 million in selling expenses, of which $16.3 million in general and administrative expenses and $7.6 million in selling expenses were attributed to the acquired businesses. SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales increased from 17.8% in fiscal 2011 to 18.3% in fiscal 2012 principally reflecting an increase in amortization expense of intangible assets from the acquired businesses.

Operating Income

Operating income for fiscal 2012 increased by 18% to a record $163.3 million as compared to operating income of $138.4 million for fiscal 2011. The increase in operating income reflects an $18.0 million increase (a 30% increase) to a record $77.4 million in operating income of the ETG for fiscal 2012, up from $59.5 million in fiscal 2011 and an $8.9 million increase (a 9% increase) in operating income of the FSG to a record $103.9 million for fiscal 2012, up from $95.0 million for fiscal 2011, partially offset by a $2.0 million increase in corporate expenses. The increase in the operating income of the ETG is principally due to the acquired businesses and the previously mentioned increased sales volumes. The increase in the operating income of the FSG principally reflects the previously mentioned increased sales volumes and improved gross profit margin.

As a percentage of net sales, our consolidated operating income increased to 18.2% for fiscal 2012, up from 18.1% for fiscal 2011. The increase in consolidated operating income as a percentage of net sales reflects an increase in the FSG's operating income as a percentage of net sales from 17.6% for fiscal 2011 to 18.2% for fiscal 2012, partially offset by a decrease in the ETG’s operating income as a percentage of net sales from 26.1% in fiscal 2011 to 23.4% in fiscal 2012. The increase in operating income as a percentage of net sales for the FSG principally reflects the previously mentioned higher gross profit margin. The decrease in operating income as a percentage of net sales for the ETG principally reflects a 3.9% impact from lower operating margins realized by Switchcraft and 3D Plus. The lower operating margins realized by Switchcraft and 3D Plus are principally attributed to amortization expense associated with intangible assets and inventory purchase accounting adjustments aggregating approximately $10.6 million during fiscal 2012.

Interest Expense

Interest expense increased to $2.4 million for fiscal 2012 from $.1 million for fiscal 2011. The increase was principally due to a higher weighted average balance outstanding under our revolving credit facility in fiscal 2012 associated with the recent acquisitions.

Index

Other Income

Other income in fiscal 2012 and 2011 was not material.

Income Tax Expense

The Company's effective tax rate increased to 33.8% for fiscal 2012 from 31.0% for fiscal 2011. The change in the effective tax rate is primarily attributed to the retroactive extension of Section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code, “Credit for Increasing Research Activities,” to cover the period from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2011, which resulted in the recognition of an income tax credit for qualified research and development activities for the last ten months of fiscal 2010 in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 and reduced the recognition of such income tax credit to just the first two months of qualifying research and development activities in fiscal 2012. In addition, the Company purchased certain noncontrolling interests during fiscal 2011 and 2012 that contributed to the comparative increase in the effective tax rate for fiscal 2012. Further, the increase also reflects a higher effective state income tax rate principally because the prior year includes a benefit from state income apportionment updates recognized upon the filing of the Company's fiscal 2010 state tax returns and the amendment of certain prior year state tax returns in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 and the current year includes the effect of a fiscal 2012 acquisition and changes in certain state tax laws which impacted state apportionment factors.

For a detailed analysis of the provision for income taxes, see Note 6, Income Taxes, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests relates to the 20% noncontrolling interest held by Lufthansa Technik AG in the FSG and the noncontrolling interests held by others in certain subsidiaries of the FSG and ETG. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests was $21.5 million in fiscal 2012 compared to $22.6 million in fiscal 2011. The decrease in fiscal 2012 principally reflects our purchases of certain noncontrolling interests during fiscal 2011 and 2012 resulting in lower allocations of net income to noncontrolling interests. Additionally, the decrease is attributed to lower earnings of certain ETG and FSG subsidiaries, partially offset by higher earnings of the FSG in which the 20% noncontrolling interest is held.

Net Income Attributable to HEICO

Net income attributable to HEICO was a record $85.1 million, or $1.60 per diluted share, in fiscal 2012 compared to $72.8 million, or $1.37 per diluted share, in fiscal 2011 principally reflecting the increased operating income referenced above.

Index

Outlook

The general overall economic uncertainty may moderate growth in our commercial aviation markets. We expect overall stable markets for the majority of products of the ETG, however the threat of United States defense and space spending reductions could result in modest decreases to our organic growth in these product offerings. During fiscal 2013, we will continue our focus on developing new products and services, further market penetration, additional acquisition opportunities and maintaining our financial strength. Overall, we are targeting growth in fiscal 2013 full year net sales and net income over fiscal 2012 levels.

Comparison of Fiscal 2011 to Fiscal 2010

Net Sales

Our net sales in fiscal 2011 increased by 24% to a record $764.9 million, as compared to net sales of $617.0 million in fiscal 2010. The increase in net sales reflects an increase of $127.2 million (a 31% increase) to a record $539.6 million in net sales within the FSG as well as an increase of $22.1 million (an 11% increase) to a record $227.8 million in net sales within the ETG. The net sales increase in the FSG reflects organic growth of approximately 21%, as well as additional net sales of approximately $37.4 million contributed by the acquisition of Blue Aerospace in December 2010. The organic growth in the FSG principally reflects increased demand for certain of the FSG's aerospace products and services attributed to new product offerings and increased airline capacity resulting in a $41.9 million increase in net sales within the FSG's aftermarket replacement parts product lines and a $23.6 million increase in net sales within the FSG's repair and overhaul services product lines. The increase in airline capacity is principally attributed to overall improved global economic conditions as compared to fiscal 2010. Additionally, the FSG's organic growth in fiscal 2011 reflects an increase of $24.4 million in net sales within our specialty product lines, primarily attributed to the sales of industrial products used in heavy-duty and off-road vehicles as a result of market penetration and increased demand. The net sales increase in the ETG principally reflects organic growth of approximately 10%. The organic growth in the ETG is primarily attributed to an increase in market penetration and demand for certain defense, aerospace and medical products, resulting in a $13.3 million, $5.5 million and $4.0 million increase in net sales from these product lines, respectively. Sales price changes were not a significant contributing factor to the FSG and ETG net sales growth in fiscal 2011.

Our net sales in fiscal 2011 and 2010 by market approximated 60% and 62%, respectively, from the commercial aviation industry, 24% and 23%, respectively, from the defense and space industries, and 16% and 15%, respectively, from other industrial markets including medical, electronics and telecommunications.

Gross Profit and Operating Expenses

Our consolidated gross profit margin was 35.9% in fiscal 2011 as compared to 36.0% in fiscal 2010, principally reflecting a .7% increase in the FSG's gross profit margin, partially offset

Index

by a .5% decrease in the ETG's gross profit margin. The increase in the FSG's gross profit margin principally reflects a .5% decrease in new product research and development expenses as a percentage of net sales. The FSG's new product research and development spending increased from $11.8 million in fiscal 2010 to $12.9 million in fiscal 2011, but decreased as a percentage of net sales due to the aforementioned net sales increase. The higher sales of the FSG's aftermarket replacement parts, which generally have higher gross profit margins than the other FSG products lines, also contributed to an increase in the FSG's gross profit margin. The decrease in the ETG's gross profit margin is principally attributed to a $.4 million increase over the prior year in impairment charges related to the write down of certain intellectual property intangible assets to their estimated fair values and a .2% increase in new product research and development expenses as a percentage of net sales. The ETG's new product research and development spending increased from $10.9 million in fiscal 2010 to $12.5 million in fiscal 2011. New product research and development expenses included within our consolidated cost of sales increased from approximately $22.7 million in fiscal 2010 to approximately $25.4 million in fiscal 2011, principally to further enhance growth opportunities and market penetration within both of our operating segments.

SG&A expenses were $136.0 million and $113.2 million in fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in SG&A expenses was mainly due to a $9.6 million increase in G&A employment-related expenses and a $5.3 million increase in other G&A expenses as well as higher selling expenses of $7.9 million, each of which is associated with the growth in net sales discussed above and the acquired businesses, which accounted for $5.5 million of the aggregate SG&A expense increase. The increase in G&A employment-related expenses is inclusive of a $6.3 million increase in performance awards based on the improved consolidated operating results. The increase in other G&A expenses also reflects a $3.1 million increase over the prior year in impairment charges related to the write-down of certain customer relationships and trade name intangible assets to their estimated fair values, partially offset by a $1.2 million reduction in the value of contingent consideration related to a prior year acquisition. SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased from 18.3% in fiscal 2010 to 17.8% in fiscal 2011. The decrease as a percentage of net sales principally reflects the impact of higher net sales volumes on the fixed portion of SG&A expenses and controlled corporate spending relative to our net sales growth.

Operating Income

Operating income in fiscal 2011 increased by 27% to a record $138.4 million as compared to operating income of $109.2 million in fiscal 2010. The increase in operating income reflects a $27.1 million increase (a 40% increase) in operating income of the FSG to a record $95.0 million in fiscal 2011 from $67.9 million in fiscal 2010 and a $3.4 million increase (a 6% increase) to a record $59.5 million in operating income of the ETG in fiscal 2011, up from $56.1 million in fiscal 2010, partially offset by a $1.2 million increase in corporate expenses. The increase in operating income of the FSG principally reflects the previously mentioned increased sales volumes and favorable product mix and efficiencies realized from the overall increased sales volumes as well as the fiscal 2011 acquisition. The increase in ETG's operating income principally reflects the previously mentioned increased sales volumes.

Index

As a percentage of net sales, our consolidated operating income increased to 18.1% in fiscal 2011 compared to 17.7% in fiscal 2010. The increase in consolidated operating income as a percentage of net sales principally reflects an increase in the FSG's operating income as a percentage of net sales to 17.6% in fiscal 2011 from 16.5% in fiscal 2010, partially offset by a decrease in the ETG's operating income as a percentage of net sales from 27.3% in fiscal 2010 to 26.1% in fiscal 2011. The increase in operating income as a percentage of net sales for the FSG reflects the higher sales volumes and improved gross profit margins as discussed above. The decrease in operating income as a percentage of net sales for the ETG principally reflects the aforementioned increase of $3.5 million over the prior year in impairment losses related to the write-down of certain intangible assets to their estimated fair values, partially offset by a $1.2 million reduction in the value of contingent consideration related to a prior year acquisition.

Interest Expense

Interest expense in fiscal 2011 and 2010 was not material.

Other Income

Other income in fiscal 2011 and 2010 was not material.

Income Tax Expense

Our effective tax rate for fiscal 2011 decreased to 31.0% from 33.7% in fiscal 2010. The effective tax rate for fiscal 2011 reflects the aggregate benefit from tax related items, which increased net income attributable to HEICO by approximately $2.8 million, or $.05 per diluted share, net of expenses, principally from higher research and development tax credits ($1.7 million), state income apportionment updates ($.9 million) and other prior year tax return to accrual adjustments ($.2 million). During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we recognized the benefit of an income tax credit for qualified research and development activities resulting from the retroactive extension in December 2010 of Section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code, “Credit for Increasing Research Activities,” to cover the period from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2011 and recognized such tax credit for the last ten months of fiscal 2010 in the first quarter of fiscal 2011, which, net of expenses, increased net income attributable to HEICO by approximately $.8 million in fiscal 2011. During the third quarter of fiscal 2011, the finalization of a study of qualifying fiscal 2010 research and development activities used to prepare our fiscal 2010 U.S. federal and state income tax returns and reduction in the liability for gross unrecognized research and development related tax positions due to both lapses of statutes of limitations and the conclusion of a foreign research and development tax credit audit resulted in an aggregate increase in net income attributable to HEICO of approximately $.8 million, net of expenses, in fiscal 2011. During the third quarter of fiscal 2011, we filed our fiscal 2010 state tax returns and amended certain prior year state tax returns reflecting a change to the applicable methodology for apportioning income to certain states, which resulted in an increase in net income attributable to HEICO of approximately $.9 million, net of expenses, in fiscal 2011.

Index

For a detailed analysis of the provision for income taxes, see Note 6, Income Taxes, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests relates to the 20% noncontrolling interest held by Lufthansa Technik AG in the FSG and the noncontrolling interests held by others in certain subsidiaries of the FSG and ETG. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests was $22.6 million in fiscal 2011 compared to $17.4 million in fiscal 2010. The increase in net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal 2010 is principally related to higher earnings of the FSG in which the 20% noncontrolling interest is held as well as the 19.9% noncontrolling interest in the earnings contributed by Blue Aerospace, which was acquired in the first quarter of fiscal 2011.

Net Income Attributable to HEICO

Net income attributable to HEICO was a record $72.8 million, or $1.37 per diluted share, in fiscal 2011 compared to $54.9 million, or $1.04 per diluted share, in fiscal 2010 principally reflecting the increased operating income referenced above.

Inflation

We have generally experienced increases in our costs of labor, materials and services consistent with overall rates of inflation. The impact of such increases on net income attributable to HEICO has been generally minimized by efforts to lower costs through manufacturing efficiencies and cost reductions.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our capitalization was as follows (in thousands):



	As of October 31,
	2012	2011
Cash and cash equivalents	$21,451	$17,500
Total debt (including current portion)	131,820	40,158
Shareholders’ equity	719,759	620,154
Total capitalization (debt plus equity)	851,579	660,312
Total debt to total capitalization	15%	6%

In addition to cash and cash equivalents of $21.5 million, we had approximately $541 million of unused availability under the terms of our revolving credit facility as of October 31, 2012. Our principal uses of cash include acquisitions, capital expenditures, cash dividends and working capital needs. Capital expenditures in fiscal 2013 are anticipated to approximate $18 -

Index

$20 million. We finance our activities primarily from our operating activities and financing activities, including borrowings under long-term credit agreements.

Recent Developments

On November 27, 2012, our Board of Directors declared an acceleration of HEICO's regular semi-annual $.06 per share cash dividend as well as a special and extraordinary $1.14 per share cash dividend on both classes of our common stock. Based on strong enthusiasm from our shareholders for the special and extraordinary cash dividend, our Board of Directors announced on December 6, 2012, a $1.00 increase per share so that the total special and extraordinary dividend will now be $2.14 per share on both classes of our common stock. The dividends will be paid in one payment on or before December 31, 2012 to shareholders of record on December 17, 2012. The dividends, which aggregate approximately $117 million and will be funded from borrowings under our revolving credit facility, were declared in view of impending tax increases expected to take effect in calendar 2013. Accordingly, we are paying in December 2012 the $.06 per share dividend we would ordinarily have paid in January 2013. In light of tax considerations, our Board of Directors will continue to review our dividend policy and will regularly evaluate whether dividends should be paid in cash or stock, as well as what amounts should be paid.

On December 11, 2012, we entered into an amendment to extend the maturity date of our revolving credit facility by one year to December 2017. We also amended certain covenants contained within the revolving credit facility agreement to accommodate payment of the aforementioned special and extraordinary cash dividend.

Based on our current outlook, we believe that our net cash provided by operating activities and available borrowings under our revolving credit facility will be sufficient to fund cash requirements for at least the next twelve months.

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities was $138.6 million for fiscal 2012, principally reflecting net income from consolidated operations of $106.7 million, depreciation and amortization of $30.7 million and stock option compensation expense of $3.9 million, partially offset by an increase in net operating assets (current assets used in operating activities net of current liabilities) of $3.1 million. The increase in net operating assets of $3.1 million primarily reflects a build in inventory levels to meet customer demand and increased accounts receivable related to higher net sales in fiscal 2012, partially offset by the timing of certain payments pertaining to fiscal 2012 accruals and payables. Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $13.1 million from $125.5 million in fiscal 2011. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities is principally due to a $12.1 million increase in depreciation and amortization expense principally related to the fiscal 2012 and 2011 acquisitions and an $11.2 million increase in net income from consolidated operations, partially offset by a $7.3 million increase in net operating assets and a $5.0 million decrease in impairment losses of certain intangible assets.

Index

Net cash provided by operating activities was $125.5 million in fiscal 2011, principally reflecting net income from consolidated operations of $95.5 million, depreciation and amortization of $18.5 million, impairment losses of certain intangible assets aggregating $5.0 million, a decrease in net operating assets of $4.1 million, and stock option compensation expense of $2.6 million. Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $23.8 million from $101.7 million in fiscal 2010. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities is principally due to a $23.1 million increase in net income from consolidated operations.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $101.7 million in fiscal 2010, principally reflecting net income from consolidated operations of $72.4 million, depreciation and amortization of $17.6 million, a decrease in net operating assets of $6.6 million, a deferred income tax provision of $1.8 million, impairment losses of certain intangible assets aggregating $1.4 million and stock option compensation expense of $1.4 million. The decrease in net operating assets of $6.6 million primarily reflects higher accrued expenses associated with performance based awards and decreased inventory levels due to continuing efforts to manage inventory levels, while meeting customer delivery requirements, partially offset by increased accounts receivable related to higher net sales in fiscal 2010.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities during the three-year fiscal period ended October 31, 2012 primarily relates to several acquisitions, including payments of additional contingent purchase consideration, totaling $197.3 million in fiscal 2012, $94.7 million in fiscal 2011, and $39.1 million in fiscal 2010. Further details on acquisitions may be found at the beginning of this Item 7 under the caption “Overview” and Note 2, Acquisitions, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Capital expenditures aggregated $33.6 million over the last three fiscal years, primarily reflecting the expansion, replacement and betterment of existing production facilities and capabilities, which were generally funded using cash provided by operating activities.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $78.4 million in fiscal 2012 and net cash used in financing activities was $10.7 million in fiscal 2011 and $54.2 million in fiscal 2010. During the three-year fiscal period ended October 31, 2012, we borrowed an aggregate $300.0 million under our revolving credit facility principally to fund acquisitions, including $191.0 million in fiscal 2012, $72.0 million in fiscal 2011, and $37.0 million in fiscal 2010. Further details on acquisitions may be found at the beginning of this Item 7 under the caption “Overview” and Note 2, Acquisitions, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statement. Repayments on the revolving credit facility aggregated $228.0 million over the last three fiscal years, including $100.0 million in fiscal 2012, $50.0 million in fiscal 2011, and $78.0 million in fiscal 2010. For the three-year fiscal period ended October 31, 2012, we made distributions to noncontrolling interest owners aggregating $34.3 million, acquired certain noncontrolling interests aggregating $15.7 million, redeemed common stock related to stock option exercises aggregating $15.3 million, paid cash dividends aggregating $13.7 million, and paid revolving

Index

credit facility issuance costs of $3.0 million. For the three-year fiscal period ended October 31, 2012, we received proceeds from stock option exercises aggregating $4.8 million. Net cash provided by financing activities also includes the presentation of an excess tax benefit from stock option exercises aggregating $19.1 million for the three-year fiscal period ended October 31, 2012.

In December 2011, we entered into a $670 million Revolving Credit Agreement (“New Credit Facility”) with a bank syndicate. In December 2012, we extended the maturity date of the New Credit Facility by one year to December 2017. Under certain circumstances, the maturity of the New Credit Facility may be further extended for an additional one-year period. The New Credit Facility also includes a feature that will allow us to increase the New Credit Facility by $130 million, at our option, to become an $800 million facility through increased commitments from existing lenders or the addition of new lenders. The New Credit Facility may be used for our working capital and general corporate needs, including capital expenditures and to finance acquisitions. The New Credit Facility replaced the $300 million Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Facility Agreement.

Advances under the New Credit Facility accrue interest at our choice of the “Base Rate” or the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus applicable margins (based on the Company’s ratio of total funded debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, noncontrolling interests and non-cash charges, or “leverage ratio”). The Base Rate is the highest of (i) the Prime Rate; (ii) the Federal Funds rate plus .50% per annum; and (iii) the Adjusted LIBO Rate determined on a daily basis for an Interest Period of one month plus 1.00% per annum, as such capitalized terms are defined in the New Credit Facility. The applicable margins for LIBOR-based borrowings range from .75% to 2.25%. The applicable margins for Base Rate borrowings range from 0% to 1.25%. A fee is charged on the amount of the unused commitment ranging from .125% to .35% (depending on our leverage ratio). The New Credit Facility also includes a $50 million sublimit for borrowings made in foreign currencies, letters of credit and swingline borrowings. Outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest and other amounts payable under the New Credit Facility may be accelerated upon an event of default, as such events are described in the New Credit Facility. The New Credit Facility is unsecured and contains covenants that restrict the amount of certain payments, including dividends, and require, among other things, the maintenance of a total leverage ratio, a senior leverage ratio and a fixed charge coverage ratio. In the event our leverage ratio exceeds a specified level, the New Credit Facility would become secured by the capital stock owned in substantially all of our subsidiaries. As of October 31, 2012, our leverage ratios were significantly below and our fixed charge coverage ratios were significantly above such specified levels and we were in compliance with all financial and nonfinancial covenants. See Note 5, Long-Term Debt, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding the revolving credit facility.

Index

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of October 31, 2012 (in thousands):



			Payments due by fiscal period
	Total		2013		2014 - 2015		2016 - 2017		Thereafter
Long-term debt obligations ⁽¹⁾		$127,583		$21		$194		$127,368		$—
Capital lease obligations ⁽²⁾	5,100		793		1,242		929		2,136
Operating lease obligations ⁽³⁾	35,101		7,320		12,736		9,639		5,406
Purchase obligations ^{(4) (5) (6)}	29,666		12,214		12,271		5,181		—
Other long-term liabilities ^{(7) (8)}	204		57		66		38		43
Total contractual obligations		$197,654		$20,405		$26,509		$143,155		$7,585

__________________

(1)

Excludes interest charges on borrowings and the fee on the amount of any unused commitment that we may be obligated to pay under our revolving credit facility as such amounts vary. Also excludes interest charges associated with notes payable as such amounts are not material. See Note 5, Long-Term Debt, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and “Liquidity and Capital Resources,” above for additional information regarding our long-term debt obligations. As discussed in "Liquidity and Capital Resources," we entered into an amendment to extend the maturity date of our revolving credit facility by one year to December 2017.


(2)	Inclusive of $.9 million in interest charges. See Note 5, Long-Term Debt, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding our capital lease obligations.


(3)	See Note 16, Commitments and Contingencies – Lease Commitments, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding our operating lease obligations.

(4)

The noncontrolling interest holders of certain subsidiaries have rights (“Put Rights”) that may be exercised on varying dates causing us to purchase their equity interests through fiscal 2022. The Put Rights provide that cash consideration be paid for their noncontrolling interests (“Redemption Amount”). As of October 31, 2012, management’s estimate of the aggregate Redemption Amount of all Put Rights that we would be required to pay is approximately $67 million, which is reflected within redeemable noncontrolling interests in our Consolidated Balance Sheet. Of this amount, $7.7 million and $8.3 million are included in the table as amounts payable in fiscal 2013 and 2014, respectively, pursuant to the past exercise of such Put Rights by the noncontrolling interest holder of one of our subsidiaries. On December 17, 2012, the Company and the noncontrolling interest holder agreed to accelerate these remaining Redemption Amounts, which were paid on December 19, 2012. All other Redemption Amounts have been excluded from the table as the timing of such payments is contingent upon the exercise of the Put Rights.

(5)

Also includes contingent consideration aggregating $10.9 million related to a fiscal 2012 acquisition should the acquired entity meet certain earnings objectives during each of the first five years following the acquisition. Also includes $1.2 million of accrued additional purchase consideration related to certain fiscal 2012 acquisitions expected to be paid in fiscal 2013. See Note 2, Acquisitions, and Note 7, Fair Value Measurements, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.


(6)	Also includes an aggregate $1.6 million of commitments principally for capital expenditures. All purchase obligations of inventory and supplies in the ordinary course of business (i.e., with deliveries scheduled within the next year) are excluded from the table.

Index

(7)

Represents payments aggregating $.4 million under our Directors Retirement Plan, for which benefits are presently being paid and excludes $.2 million of payments for which benefit payments have not yet commenced. Our Directors Retirement Plan’s projected benefit obligation of $.3 million is accrued within other long-term liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of October 31, 2012. See Note 10, Retirement Plans, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (the plan is unfunded and we pay benefits directly). The amounts in the table do not include liabilities related to the Leadership Compensation Plan or our other deferred compensation arrangement as they are each fully supported by assets held within irrevocable trusts. See Note 3, Selected Financial Statement Information – Other Long-Term Assets and Liabilities, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information about these two deferred compensation plans.

(8)

The amounts in the table do not include approximately $2.3 million of our liability for unrecognized tax benefits due to the uncertainty with respect to the timing of future cash flows associated with these unrecognized tax benefits as we are unable to make reasonably reliable estimates of the timing of any cash settlements. See Note 6, Income Taxes, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information about our liability for unrecognized tax benefits.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Guarantees

We have arranged for a standby letter of credit for $1.5 million to meet the security requirement of our insurance company for potential workers’ compensation claims, which is supported by our revolving credit facility.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures About Fair Value Measurements,” which requires additional disclosures regarding transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and more detailed information of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. We adopted ASU 2010-06 as of the beginning of fiscal 2010, except the additional Level 3 disclosures, which were adopted in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. ASU 2010-06 affects financial statement disclosures only and we will make the required additional disclosures as applicable.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs,” which amends current fair value measurement and disclosure guidance to converge with International Financial Reporting Standards and provides increased transparency around valuation inputs and investment categorization. ASU 2011-04 also requires new disclosures about qualitative and quantitative information regarding the unobservable inputs used in a fair value measurement that is categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. We adopted ASU 2011-04 in the second quarter of fiscal 2012, resulting in only expanded fair value disclosures and no impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

Index

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, “Presentation of Comprehensive Income,” which requires the presentation of total comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate, but consecutive statements. ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of shareholders' equity. ASU 2011-05 must be applied retroactively and is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2011, or in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 for us. We are currently evaluating which presentation option we will elect, but the adoption of these provisions will have no effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, “Testing Goodwill for Impairment,” which is intended to reduce the complexity and cost of performing a quantitative test for impairment of goodwill by permitting an entity the option to perform a qualitative evaluation about the likelihood of goodwill impairment in order to determine whether it should calculate the fair value of a reporting unit. The update also improves previous guidance by expanding upon the examples of events and circumstances that an entity should consider between annual impairment tests in determining whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. ASU 2011-08 is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, or in fiscal 2013 for our annual impairment test. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, “Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment,” which is intended to reduce the complexity and cost of performing a quantitative test for impairment of indefinite-lived intangible assets by permitting an entity the option to perform a qualitative evaluation about the likelihood that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired in order to determine whether it should calculate the fair value of the asset. The update also improves previous guidance by expanding upon the examples of events and circumstances that an entity should consider between annual impairment tests in determining whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying amount. We adopted ASU 2012-02 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012. The adoption of this guidance did not impact our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

Index

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements in this report constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements contained herein that are not clearly historical in nature may be forward-looking and the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “estimate” and similar expressions are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statements contained herein, in press releases, written statements or other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission or in communications and discussions with investors and analysts in the normal course of business through meetings, phone calls and conference calls, concerning our operations, economic performance and financial condition are subject to risks, uncertainties and contingencies. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events. All forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control, which may cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from anticipated results, performance or achievements. Also, forward-looking statements are based upon management’s estimates of fair values and of future costs, using currently available information. Therefore, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in those statements. Factors that could cause such differences include:


•	Lower demand for commercial air travel or airline fleet changes, which could cause lower demand for our goods and services;


•	Product specification costs and requirements, which could cause an increase to our costs to complete contracts;


•	Governmental and regulatory demands, export policies and restrictions, reductions in defense, space or homeland security spending by U.S. and/or foreign customers or competition from existing and new competitors, which could reduce our sales;


•	Our ability to introduce new products and product pricing levels, which could reduce our sales or sales growth; and


•	Our ability to make acquisitions and achieve operating synergies from acquired businesses, customer credit risk, interest and income tax rates and economic conditions within and outside of the aviation, defense, space, medical, telecommunications and electronics industries, which could negatively impact our costs and revenues.

For further information on these and other factors that potentially could materially affect our financial results, see Item 1A, Risk Factors. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except to the extent required by applicable law.

Index

Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The primary market risk to which we have exposure is interest rate risk, mainly related to our revolving credit facility, which has variable interest rates. Interest rate risk associated with our variable rate debt is the potential increase in interest expense from an increase in interest rates. Based on our aggregate outstanding variable rate debt balance of $127 million as of October 31, 2012, a hypothetical 10% increase in interest rates would not have a material effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

We maintain a portion of our cash and cash equivalents in financial instruments with original maturities of three months or less. These financial instruments are subject to interest rate risk and will decline in value if interest rates increase. Due to the short duration of these financial instruments, a hypothetical 10% increase in interest rates as of October 31, 2012 would not have a material effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

We are also exposed to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on the United States dollar value of our foreign currency denominated transactions, which are principally in Euros, Canadian dollars and British pounds sterling. A hypothetical 10% weakening in the exchange rate of the Euro, Canadian dollar or British pound sterling to the United States dollar as of October 31, 2012 would not have a material effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

Index

Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

HEICO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



		Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		54

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of October 31, 2012 and 2011		55

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended October 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010		56

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income for the years ended October 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010		57

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended October 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010		59

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		60

Financial Statement Schedule II, Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the years ended October 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010		113

Index

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

HEICO Corporation

Hollywood, Florida

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of HEICO Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of October 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2012. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of HEICO Corporation and subsidiaries as of October 31, 2012 and 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2012, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2012, based on the criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated December 20, 2012 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Certified Public Accountants

Miami, Florida

December 20, 2012

Index

HEICO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except per share data)



	As of October 31,
	2012			2011
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$21,451			$17,500
Accounts receivable, net	122,214			106,414
Inventories, net	189,704			164,967
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	6,997			5,471
Deferred income taxes	27,545			22,286
Total current assets	367,911			316,638

Property, plant and equipment, net	80,518			67,074
Goodwill	542,114			443,402
Intangible assets, net	154,324			78,157
Deferred income taxes	2,492			2,374
Other assets	45,487			33,424
Total assets		$1,192,846			$941,069

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current maturities of long-term debt		$626			$335
Trade accounts payable	50,083			43,547
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	76,241			76,376
Income taxes payable	4,564			3,132
Total current liabilities	131,514			123,390

Long-term debt, net of current maturities	131,194			39,823
Deferred income taxes	90,436			58,899
Other long-term liabilities	52,777			33,373
Total liabilities	405,921			255,485

Commitments and contingencies (Notes 2 and 16)

Redeemable noncontrolling interests (Note 12)	67,166			65,430

Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred Stock, $.01 par value per share; 10,000 shares authorized; 300 shares designated as Series B Junior Participating Preferred Stock and 300 shares designated as Series C Junior Participating Preferred Stock; none issued	—			—
Common Stock, $.01 par value per share; 75,000 shares authorized; 21,346 and 21,318 shares issued and outstanding	213			171
Class A Common Stock, $.01 par value per share; 75,000 shares authorized; 31,517 and 31,278 shares issued and outstanding	315			250
Capital in excess of par value	244,632			226,120
Deferred compensation obligation	823			522
HEICO stock held by irrevocable trust	(823		)	(522		)
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income	(3,572		)	3,033
Retained earnings	375,085			299,497
Total HEICO shareholders’ equity	616,673			529,071
Noncontrolling interests	103,086			91,083
Total shareholders’ equity	719,759			620,154
Total liabilities and equity		$1,192,846			$941,069

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Index

HEICO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share data)



	Year ended October 31,
	2012			2011			2010

Net sales		$897,347			$764,891			$617,020

Operating costs and expenses:
Cost of sales	569,911			490,450			394,673
Selling, general and administrative expenses	164,142			136,010			113,174

Total operating costs and expenses	734,053			626,460			507,847

Operating income	163,294			138,431			109,173

Interest expense	(2,432		)	(142		)	(508		)
Other income	313			64			390

Income before income taxes and noncontrolling interests	161,175			138,353			109,055

Income tax expense	54,500			42,900			36,700

Net income from consolidated operations	106,675			95,453			72,355

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	21,528			22,633			17,417

Net income attributable to HEICO		$85,147			$72,820			$54,938

Net income per share attributable to HEICO shareholders (Note 13):
Basic		$1.62			$1.40			$1.07
Diluted		$1.60			$1.37			$1.04

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic	52,689			52,040			51,301
Diluted	53,299			53,127			52,767

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Index

HEICO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(in thousands, except per share data)



			HEICO Shareholders' Equity
	Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests		Common Stock		Class A Common Stock		Capital in Excess of Par Value			Deferred Compensation Obligation		HEICO Stock Held by Irrevocable Trust			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Retained Earnings			Noncontrolling Interests		Total Shareholders' Equity
Balances as of October 31, 2011		$65,430		$171		$250		$226,120			$522		($522	)		$3,033			$299,497			$91,083		$620,154
Comprehensive income:
Net income	9,526		—		—		—			—		—			—			85,147			12,002		97,149
Foreign currency translation	—		—		—		—			—		—			(6,457		)	—			—		(6,457		)
Total comprehensive income	9,526		—		—		—			—		—			(6,457		)	85,147			12,002		90,692
Cash dividends ($.108 per share)	—		—		—		—			—		—			—			(5,689		)	—		(5,689		)
Five-for-four common stock split	—		42		63		(105		)	—		—			—			(16		)	—		(16		)
Issuance of common stock for HEICO Savings and Investment Plan	—		—		—		982			—		—			—			—			—		982
Tax benefit from stock option exercises	—		—		—		13,164			—		—			—			—			—		13,164
Stock option compensation expense	—		—		—		3,948			—		—			—			—			—		3,948
Proceeds from stock option exercises	—		—		2		831			—		—			—			—			—		833
Redemptions of common stock related to stock option exercises	—