PTC 9-30-14 10-K
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended: September 30, 2014
Commission File Number: 0-18059
PTC Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| | |
Massachusetts | | 04-2866152 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
140 Kendrick Street, Needham, MA 02494
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(781) 370-5000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
| | |
Title of each class | | Name of each exchange on which registered |
Common Stock, $.01 par value per share | | NASDAQ Global Select Market |
Securities registered pursuant
to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YES þ NO ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. YES ¨ NO þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
| | | |
Large Accelerated Filer þ | Accelerated Filer o | Non-accelerated Filer o | Smaller Reporting Company o |
| | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). YES ¨ NO þ
The aggregate market value of our voting stock held by non-affiliates was approximately $4,086,107,841 on March 29, 2014 based on the last reported sale price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on March 28, 2014. There were 118,617,712 shares of our common stock outstanding on that day and 115,995,195 shares of our common stock outstanding on November 24, 2014.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement in connection with the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (2015 Proxy Statement) are incorporated by reference into Part III.
PTC Inc.
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014
Table of Contents
|
| | |
| | Page |
| | |
Item 1. | | |
Item 1A. | | |
Item 1B. | | |
Item 2. | | |
Item 3. | | |
Item 4. | | |
| | |
Item 5. | | |
Item 6. | | |
Item 7. | | |
Item 7A. | | |
Item 8. | | |
Item 9. | | |
Item 9A. | | |
Item 9B. | | |
| | |
Item 10. | | |
Item 11. | | |
Item 12. | | |
Item 13. | | |
Item 14. | | |
| | |
Item 15. | | |
| |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
Forward-Looking Statements
Statements in this Annual Report about our anticipated financial results and growth, as well as about the development of our products and markets, are forward-looking statements that are based on our current plans and assumptions. Important information about factors that may cause our actual results to differ materially from these statements is discussed in Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and generally throughout this Annual Report.
Unless otherwise indicated, all references to a year reflect our fiscal year that ends on September 30.
PART I
PTC Inc. develops and delivers technology solutions, comprised of software and services, that transform the way our customers create, operate and service their products for a smart, connected world. Our solutions help our customers in discrete manufacturing organizations optimize the activities within individual business functions, including engineering, software development, supply chain management, manufacturing and service, and coordinate these processes across the enterprise to enable product and service advantage.
Our solutions and software products address the challenges our customers face in the following areas:
Computer-Aided Design (CAD)
Effective and collaborative product design across the globe.
Product Lifecycle Management (PLM)
Efficient and consistent management of product development from concept to retirement across functional processes and distributed teams.
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM)
Management of global software development from concept to delivery.
Service Lifecycle Management (SLM)
Planning and delivery of service, and analysis of product intelligence at the point of service.
Internet of Things (IoT)
Enabling connectivity and development of software applications for smart, connected products.
2014 Business Developments
Acquisitions
Consistent with our vision to help our customers create, operate and service smart, connected products, in 2014 we acquired ThingWorx, Inc. and Axeda Corporation. ThingWorx is a small but highly-innovative creator of an award-winning platform to build and run applications designed to leverage the Internet of Things. Axeda is a developer of solutions to securely connect machines and sensors to the cloud. ThingWorx and Axeda are complementary solutions that expand our SLM and IoT portfolios. We are excited about the opportunities that may be created as our customers and others develop smart, connected products and otherwise seek to leverage the Internet of Things and we are making significant investments through acquistions and otherwise in this area to pursue these opportunities.
Additionally, in 2014, we acquired Atego Group Limited. Atego developed a Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) solution for safety-critical applications and product line engineering. This technology drives process standardization, allowing distributed teams to collaboratively develop and manage models of complex systems and enhances our ALM and PLM solutions.
Expanded Share Repurchase Authorization and Expanded Credit Facility
Consistent with our intent to increase stockholder value, in August 2014 we announced a capital allocation strategy that over time is expected to return approximately 40% of free cash flow to shareholders while still enabling us to invest in organic and new growth opportunities. As part of this strategy, our Board of Directors authorized us to repurchase up to $600 million of our common stock through September 30, 2017. Under this authorization, we borrowed $125 million under our credit
facility to repurchase shares of our common stock in the fourth quarter of 2014 under an accelerated share repurchase (ASR) agreement.
Additionally, in September 2014, we entered into a new $1.5 billion credit facility with a syndicate of existing and additional lenders consisting of a $500 million term loan and a $1 billion revolving loan facility. The new facility, which replaced our previous $1 billion credit facility, matures on September 15, 2019.
Our Markets
The markets we serve present different growth opportunities for us. We see the biggest opportunity for market growth in our SLM and IoT solutions, followed by Extended PLM, which includes PLM and ALM solutions. CAD, which is more highly penetrated, likely presents a lower market growth opportunity over time.
Our Principal Products and Services
We generate revenue through the sale of software licenses, support (which includes technical support and software updates when and if available), and services (which include consulting and implementation, training and cloud services). We report revenue by line of business (license, service and support), by geographic region, and by product (CAD, Extended PLM and SLM & IoT).
CAD
Our CAD products enable users to create conceptual and detailed designs, analyze designs, perform engineering calculations and leverage the information created downsteam utilizing 2D, 3D, parametric and direct modeling. Our principal CAD products are described below.
PTC Creo® is an interoperable suite of product design software that provides a scalable set of packages for design engineers that are optimized to meet a variety of specialized needs. PTC Creo provides capabilities for design flexibility, advanced assembly design, piping and cabling design, advanced surfacing, comprehensive virtual prototyping and other essential design functions.
PTC Mathcad® is industry-leading software for solving, analyzing and sharing vital engineering calculations. PTC Mathcad combines the ease and familiarity of an engineering notebook with the powerful features of a dedicated engineering calculations application.
Extended PLM
Extended PLM includes our PLM and ALM products.
PLM: Our PLM products address common challenges that companies, particularly manufacturing companies, face over the life of the product, from concept to retirement. These software products help customers manage product configuration information through each stage of the product lifecycle, and communicate and collaborate across the entire enterprise including product development, manufacturing and the supply chain, including sourcing and procurement.
Our principal PLM products are described below.
PTC Windchill® is a production-proven suite of PLM software that offers complete lifecycle intelligence - from design to service. PTC Windchill offers a single repository for all product information. As such, there is a “single source of truth” for all product-related content such as CAD models, documents, technical illustrations, embedded software, calculations and requirement specifications for all phases of the product lifecycle to help companies streamline enterprise-wide communication and make informed decisions.
Additionally, our PTC Windchill product family includes supply chain management (SCM) solutions that allow manufacturers, distributors and retailers to collaborate across product development, and the supply chain, including sourcing and procurement, to identify an optimal set of parts, materials and suppliers. This functionality provides automated cost modeling and visibility into supply chain risk information to balance cost and quality, and to ensure that products meet compliance requirements and performance targets.
PTC Creo® View™ enables enterprise-wide visualization, verification, annotation and automated comparison of a wide variety of product development data formats, including CAD (2D and 3D), ECAD, and documents. PTC Creo View provides access to designs and related data without requiring the original authoring tool.
ALM: Our ALM products are designed for discrete manufacturers where coordination and collaboration between
software and hardware teams is critical to understand product release readiness, support variant complexity, automate development processes, ensure complete lifecycle traceability and manage change. Our ALM products enable companies to accelerate innovation of software intensive products.
Our principal ALM product suite is PTC Integrity™ which includes solutions recently added with our acquisition of the Atego business.
PTC Integrity enables users to manage system models, software configurations, test plans and defects. With PTC Integrity, engineering teams can improve productivity and quality, streamline compliance, and gain complete product visibility, ultimately driving more innovative products into the market.
Our Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) solution connects requirements engineering, architecture modeling, physical product definition, and system verification functions. Our solution allows multi-functional teams to work in concert while modeling the interdependencies of mechanical, electrical, and software engineering components. In doing so, it drives efficiencies and process standardization, allowing distributed teams to collaboratively build digital models of complex systems, while managing system variability and enabling reuse.
SLM & IoT
Our SLM and IoT products help manufacturers and their service providers to improve service efficiency and quality, enable connectivity, and optimize data intelligence. These include capabilities to support product service and maintenance requirements, service information delivery, service parts planning and optimization, service knowledge management, field service ticketing and scheduling, warranty and contract management, and service analytics. Additionally, with our recent acquisitions of ThingWorx and Axeda, we have expanded our solutions to enable connectivity and the development of applications to gather and analyze product data, which in turn helps our customers design, operate and service smart, connected products.
Our principal SLM & IoT products are described below.
PTC Axeda® which includes the recently acquired Axeda Remote Service Management suite of applications and our core SLM products (primarily PTC Servigistics® and PTC Arbortext®) which are being re-branded under the Axeda name. Our comprehensive software suite integrates service planning, delivery and analysis to optimize service outcomes and enable a systematic approach to service lifecycle management, providing a single view of service throughout the service network for continuous product and service improvement to ensure customer satisfaction.
Our software suite includes tools for manufacturers to create, illustrate, manage and publish technical and service parts information to improve the operation, maintenance, service and upgrade of equipment throughout its lifecycle. These products are available in stand-alone configurations as well as integrated with PTC Windchill Service Information Manager and PTC Creo Illustrate to deliver dynamic, product-centric service and parts information.
The PTC Axeda Remote Service Management suite of applications enables customers to remotely monitor, manage, service, and control wired and wireless connected products and assets. These applications reduce service costs and field service visits, improve product uptime and enable new managed service offerings and service sales growth.
ThingWorx® is an IoT platform designed to build and run IoT applications, and enable customers to transform their products and services, innovate, and unlock new business models. ThingWorx reduces the time, cost, and risk required to connect, manage, and develop innovative applications for smart, connected products such as predictive maintenance, system monitoring, and usage-based product design requirements. Our ThingWorx solutions include tools recently added through our acquisition of Axeda, including cloud-based tools that allow customers to easily and securely connect products and devices to the cloud, and intelligently process, transform, organize and store product and sensor data.
PTC Global Support
We offer global support plans for our software products. Participating customers receive updates that we make generally available to our support customers and also have direct access to our global technical support team of certified engineers for issue resolution. We also provide self-service support tools that allow our customers access to extensive technical support information.
PTC Global Services
We offer consulting, implementation and training services through our Global Services Organization, with over 1,400 professionals worldwide, as well as through third-party resellers and other strategic partners. Our services create value by helping customers improve product development performance through technology enabled process improvement and multiple deployment paths.
We also offer cloud services, whereby our customers receive secure hosting and 24/7 application management.
Geographic and Segment Information
We have two reportable segments: Software Products, which includes license and related support revenue for all our products except computer-based training products, and Services, which includes consulting, implementation, training, cloud services and license and support revenue for computer-based training products. Financial information about our segments and international and domestic operations may be found in Note N Segment Information of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in this Annual Report which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Research and Development
We invest heavily in research and development to improve the quality and expand the functionality of our products. Approximately one third of our employees are dedicated to research and development initiatives, conducted primarily in the United States, India and Israel.
Our research and development expenses were $226.5 million in 2014, $221.9 million in 2013 and $215.0 million in 2012. Additional information about our research and development expenditures may be found in Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Results of Operations-Costs and Expenses-Research and Development.”
Sales and Marketing
We derive most of our revenue from products and services sold directly by our sales force to end-user customers. Approximately 20% to 25% of our products and services are sold through third-party resellers and other strategic partners. Our sales force focuses on large accounts, while our reseller channel provides a cost-effective means of covering the small- and medium-size business market. Our strategic services partners provide service offerings to help customers implement our product offerings. We have a separate sales force for SLM & IoT solutions.
Competition
We compete with technology providers who target discrete manufacturers in the following markets: product lifecycle management (PLM), application lifecycle management (ALM), CAD (computer aided design, manufacturing and engineering) service lifecycle management (SLM) and the Internet of Things (IoT). We compete with a number of companies that offer solutions that address one or more specific functional areas covered by our solutions, including Dassault Systèmes SA and Siemens AG for traditional CAD solutions, PLM solutions, manufacturing planning solutions and visualization and digital mock-up solutions; Oracle Corporation and SAP AG for PLM solutions and SLM solutions; and IBM Corporation and Hewlett Packard for ALM solutions. We believe our products are more specifically targeted toward the business process challenges of manufacturing companies and offer broader and deeper functionality for those processes than ERP-based solutions. We also compete in the CAD market with design products such as Autodesk, Inc.'s Inventor, Siemens AG's Solid Edge and Dassault Systemes SA's SolidWorks for sales to smaller manufacturing customers.
Proprietary Rights
Our software products and related technical know-how, along with our trademarks, including our company names, product names and logos, are proprietary. We protect our intellectual property rights in these items by relying on copyrights, trademarks, patents and common law safeguards, including trade secret protection. The nature and extent of such legal protection depends in part on the type of intellectual property right and the relevant jurisdiction. In the U.S., we are generally able to maintain our trademark registrations for as long as the trademarks are in use and to maintain our patents for up to 20 years from the earliest effective filing date. We also use license management and other anti-piracy technology measures, as well as contractual restrictions, to curtail the unauthorized use and distribution of our products.
Our proprietary rights are subject to risks and uncertainties described under Item 1A. “Risk Factors” below. You should read that discussion, which is incorporated into this section by reference.
Backlog
We generally ship our products within 30 days after receipt of a customer order. A high percentage of our license revenue historically has been generated in the third month of each fiscal quarter, and this revenue tends to be concentrated in the latter part of that month. Accordingly, orders may exist at the end of a quarter that have not been shipped and not been recognized as revenue. We do not believe that our backlog at any particular point in time is material or indicative of future sales levels.
Employees
As of September 30, 2014, we had 6,444 employees, including 2,156 in product development; 2,109 in customer support, training and consulting; 1,481 in sales and marketing; and 698 in general and administration and product distribution. Of these employees, 2,411 were located in the United States and 4,033 were located outside the United States.
Website Access to Reports and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
We make available free of charge on our website at www.ptc.com the following reports as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filing them with, or furnishing them to, the SEC: our Annual Reports on Form 10-K; our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q; our Current Reports on Form 8-K; and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our Proxy Statements for our Annual Meetings and Section 16 trading reports on SEC Forms 3, 4 and 5 also are available on our website. The reference to our website is not intended to incorporate information on our website into this Annual Report by reference.
Our Code of Ethics for Senior Executive Officers is also available on our website. Additional information about this code and amendments and waivers thereto can be found below in Part III, Item 10 of this Annual Report.
Executive Officers
Information about our executive officers is incorporated by reference from Part III, Item 10 of this Annual Report.
Corporate Information
PTC was incorporated in Massachusetts in 1985 and is headquartered in Needham, Massachusetts.
The following are important factors we have identified that could affect our future results. You should consider them carefully when evaluating your investment in our shares or any forward-looking statements made by us, including those contained in this Annual Report, because these factors could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or the performance projected in forward-looking statements. The risks described below are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.
I. Operational Considerations
Our operating results fluctuate from quarter to quarter making future operating results difficult to predict; failure to meet market expectations could cause our stock price to decline.
Our quarterly operating results historically have fluctuated and are likely to continue to fluctuate depending on a number of factors, including:
| |
• | a high percentage of our revenue historically has been generated in the third month of each fiscal quarter and any failure to receive, complete or process orders at the end of any quarter could cause us to fall short of our revenue targets; |
| |
• | a significant percentage of our revenue comes from transactions with large customers, which tend to have long lead times that are less predictable; |
| |
• | our operating expenses are largely fixed in the short term and are based on expected revenues and any failure to achieve our revenue targets could cause us to fall short of our earnings targets as well; |
| |
• | our mix of license and service revenues can vary from quarter to quarter, creating variability in our operating margins; |
| |
• | because a significant portion of our revenue comes from outside the U.S. and a significant portion of our expense structure is located internationally, shifts in foreign currency exchange rates could adversely affect our reported results; and |
| |
• | we may incur significant expenses in a quarter in connection with corporate development initiatives, restructuring efforts or our investigation, defense or settlement of legal actions that would increase our operating expenses and reduce our earnings for the quarter in which those expenses are incurred. |
Moreover, we recently began offering customers the option of purchasing software licenses as a subscription. Under the subscription model, significantly less license revenue is likely to be recognized at the time of sale than if the license had been
purchased under our historical perpetual model. In developing our earnings guidance and targets, we have modeled a certain level of subscription license purchases, however, if a greater percentage of our customers elect to purchase licenses as subscriptions than we have assumed, it will have an adverse impact on revenue, operating margin, cash flow and EPS growth relative to our earnings guidance and targets.
Accordingly, our quarterly results are difficult to predict prior to the end of the quarter and we may be unable to confirm or adjust expectations with respect to our operating results for a particular quarter until that quarter has closed. Any failure to meet our quarterly revenue or earnings targets could adversely impact the market price of our stock.
Our long range financial targets are predicated on revenue growth and operating margin improvements that we may fail to achieve, which could reduce our expected earnings and cause us to fail to meet the expectations of analysts or investors and cause our stock price to decline.
We are projecting revenue growth and operating margin improvements in our long range plan through 2018. Our revenue projections include our expectations regarding revenue growth from sales of our CAD, Extended PLM (EPLM), SLM and IoT products and acquired products. We see the strongest growth potential in the IoT and SLM markets, with more modest growth expectations for CAD (which comprised 43% of our revenue in 2014 and the market for which is mature) and EPLM. We believe we can grow at or modestly faster than the markets in which we participate based on our technology leadership position in these markets. We may not achieve planned revenue growth if the markets we serve do not grow at expected rates, if we are not able to deliver solutions desired by customers and potential customers, and/or if acquired businesses do not generate the revenue growth that we expect.
We are projecting operating margin improvements predicated on operating leverage as revenue increases, improved operating efficiencies, particularly within our sales organization and service margin improvements. Services margins are significantly lower than license and support margins. Future projected improvements in our operating margin as a percent of revenue are based in part on our ability to improve services margins by reducing the amount of direct services that we perform through expansion of our service partner program, and improving the profitability of services that we perform. If our services revenue increases as a percentage of total revenue and/or if we are unable to improve our services margins, our overall operating margin may not increase to the levels we expect or may decrease. Additionally, if we do not achieve lower sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of revenue through productivity initiatives, we may not achieve our operating margin targets. If operating margins do not improve, our earnings could be adversely affected and our stock price could decline.
Global economic weakness may adversely affect our business.
The economies of markets outside the U.S. in which we operate, particularly Europe, Japan and China, are projected to grow at slower rates than the U.S., if at all. Because approximately 60% of our revenue comes from outside the U.S., weak conditions in those markets could adversely affect our business as customers in those markets may reduce or defer purchases of our products and services. If the conditions in those markets do not improve or if they, or the U.S. economy, deteriorates, our business could be further adversely affected.
We depend on sales within the discrete manufacturing sector and our business could be adversely affected if manufacturing activity does not grow or if it contracts.
A large amount of our revenue is related to sales to customers in the discrete manufacturing sector. If this economic sector does not grow, or if it contracts, our customers in this sector may reduce or defer purchases of our products and services, which could adversely affect our business. We expect that the manufacturing sector will be weak in Europe and China in 2015, which could reduce our sales in these areas in 2015 and adversely impact our operating results for 2015.
A significant portion of our revenue is generated from support contracts; decreases in support renewal rates, or a decrease in the number of new licenses we sell, would negatively impact our future support revenue and operating results.
A substantial portion of our revenue is derived from support contracts. These contracts are generally renewed on an annual basis and typically have a high rate of customer renewal. In addition to the recurring revenue base associated with these contracts, a majority of customers purchasing new perpetual licenses also purchase related annual support contracts. If the rate of renewal for these contracts, or the sale of new licenses decreases, our support revenue growth and profitability will be adversely affected.
We face significant competition, which may reduce our profits and limit or reduce our market share.
The market for product development solutions and IoT solutions is rapidly changing and very competitive and there has been a trend in industry consolidation among technology companies. This competition could result in price reductions for our products and services, reduced margins, loss of customers and loss of market share. Our primary competition comes from:
| |
• | larger companies that offer competitive solutions; |
| |
• | larger, more well-known enterprise software providers who have extended, or may seek to extend, the functionality of their products to encompass PLM or who may develop and/or purchase PLM technology; and |
| |
• | other vendors of various competitive point solutions. |
A breach of security in our products or computer systems could compromise the integrity of our products, harm our reputation, create additional liability and adversely impact our financial results.
We have implemented and continue to implement measures intended to maintain the security and integrity of our products, source code and computer systems. The potential consequences of a security breach or system disruption (particularly through cyber-attack or cyber-intrusion, including by computer hackers, foreign governments and cyber terrorists) have increased in scope as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. A significant breach of the security and/or integrity of our products or systems could prevent our products from functioning properly or could enable access to sensitive, proprietary or confidential information, including that of our customers, without authorization. This could require us to incur significant costs of remediation, harm our reputation, cause customers to stop buying our products, and cause us to face lawsuits and potential liability, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
We must continually modify and enhance our products to keep pace with changing technology and to address our customers’ needs and expectations, and any failure to do so could reduce demand for our products.
Our ability to remain competitive will depend on our ability to enhance our current offerings and develop new products and services that keep pace with technological developments and meet evolving customer requirements. In addition, our solutions must meet customer expectations to be successful. If our solutions fail to meet customer expectations, customers may discontinue adoption of our solutions, resulting in a loss of potential additional sales, and we may be unable to retain existing customers or attract new customers.
Our financial condition could be adversely affected if significant errors or defects are found in our software.
Sophisticated software can sometimes contain errors, defects or other performance problems. If errors or defects are discovered in our current or future products, we may need to expend significant financial, technical and management resources, or divert some of our development resources, in order to resolve or work around those defects, and we may not be able to correct them in a timely manner or provide an adequate response to our customers.
Errors, defects or other performance problems in our products could cause us to delay new product releases or customer deployments. Any such delays could cause delays in our ability to realize revenue from the licensing and shipment of new or enhanced products and give our competitors a greater opportunity to market competing products. Such difficulties could also cause us to lose customers. Technical problems or the loss of customers could also damage our business reputation and cause us to lose new business opportunities.
Businesses we acquire may not generate the revenue and earnings we anticipated and may otherwise adversely affect our business.
We have acquired, and intend to continue to acquire, new businesses and technologies. If we fail to successfully integrate and manage the businesses and technologies we acquire, or if an acquisition does not further our business strategy as we expect, our operating results may be adversely affected.
Moreover, business combinations also involve a number of risks and uncertainties that can adversely affect our operations and operating results, including:
| |
• | difficulties managing an acquired company’s technologies or lines of business or entering new markets where we have limited or no prior experience or where competitors may have stronger market positions; |
| |
• | unanticipated operating difficulties in connection with the acquired entities, including potential declines in revenue of the acquired entity; |
| |
• | failure to achieve the expected return on our investments which could adversely affect our business or operating results and potentially cause impairment to assets that we recorded as a part of an acquisition including intangible assets and goodwill; |
| |
• | diversion of management and employee attention; |
| |
• | assumption of unanticipated legal or financial liabilities; |
| |
• | significant increases in our interest expense, leverage and debt service requirements if we incur additional debt to pay for an acquisition; and |
| |
• | if we were to issue a significant amount of equity securities in connection with future acquisitions, existing stockholders may be diluted and earnings per share may decrease. |
Our sales and operations are globally dispersed, which exposes us to additional operating and compliance risks.
We sell and deliver software and services, and maintain support operations, in a large number of countries whose laws and practices differ from one another. The Americas accounted for 41%, Europe for 39% and Asia-Pacific for 20% of our revenue in 2014. Managing these geographically dispersed operations requires significant attention and resources to ensure compliance with laws. Accordingly, while we strive to maintain a comprehensive compliance program, we cannot guarantee that an employee, agent or business partner will not act in violation of our policies or U.S. or other applicable laws. Such violations can lead to civil and/or criminal prosecutions, substantial fines and the revocation of our rights to continue certain operations and also cause business and reputation loss. For example, as discussed in Risk Factors II. Other Considerations, we are currently cooperating to provide information to the SEC and Department of Justice in connection with an investigation concerning certain payments and expenses by certain business partners and employees in China that raise questions of compliance with laws, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and/or compliance with our business policies.
At times we provide extended payment terms to our customers, which may be a factor in our customers’ purchasing decisions, and our revenues could be adversely affected if we ceased making these terms available.
We have provided extended payment terms to certain customers in connection with transactions we have completed with them. Providing extended payment terms may positively influence our customers’ purchasing decisions but may reduce our cash flows in the short-term. If we reduce the amount of extended payment terms we provide to customers, customers might reduce or defer the amount they spend on our products from the amount they might otherwise have spent if extended payment terms were available to them. If this were to occur, our revenue or revenue growth could be lower than in prior periods and/or lower than we expect.
We may be unable to adequately protect our proprietary rights.
Our software products and trademarks, including our company names, product names and logos, are proprietary. We protect our intellectual property rights in these items by relying on copyrights, trademarks, patents and common law safeguards, including trade secret protection, as well as restrictions on disclosures and transferability contained in our agreements with other parties. Despite these measures, the laws of all relevant jurisdictions may not afford adequate protection to our products and other intellectual property. In addition, we frequently encounter attempts by individuals and companies to pirate our software. If our measures to protect our intellectual property rights fail, others may be able to use those rights, which could reduce our competitiveness and revenues.
Intellectual property infringement claims could be asserted against us, which could be expensive to defend and could result in limitations on our use of the claimed intellectual property.
The software industry is characterized by frequent litigation regarding copyright, patent and other intellectual property rights. If a lawsuit of this type is filed, it could result in significant expense to us and divert the efforts of our technical and management personnel. We cannot be sure that we would prevail against any such asserted claims. If we did not prevail, we could be prevented from using the claimed intellectual property or be required to enter into royalty or licensing agreements, which might not be available on terms acceptable to us. In addition to possible claims with respect to our proprietary products, some of our products contain technology developed by and licensed from third parties and we may likewise be susceptible to infringement claims with respect to these third-party technologies.
Our current research and development efforts may not generate revenue for several years, if at all.
Developing and localizing software products is expensive, and the investment in product development often involves a long return on investment cycle. We have made and expect to continue to make significant investments in research and development and related product opportunities that could adversely affect our operating results if not offset by revenue increases. We believe that we must continue to dedicate a significant amount of resources to our research and development efforts to maintain our competitive position.
We may have exposure to additional tax liabilities and our effective tax rate may increase or fluctuate, which could increase our income tax expense and reduce our net income.
As a multinational organization, we are subject to income taxes as well as non-income based taxes in the U.S. and in various foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide income tax provision and other tax liabilities. In the ordinary course of a global business, there are many intercompany transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. Our tax returns are subject to review by various taxing authorities. Although we believe that our tax estimates are reasonable, the final determination of tax audits or tax disputes could be different from what is reflected in our historical income tax provisions and accruals.
Our effective tax rate can be adversely affected by several factors, many of which are outside of our control, including:
| |
• | changes in tax laws, regulations, and interpretations in multiple jurisdictions in which we operate; |
| |
• | assessments, and any related tax interest or penalties, by taxing authorities; |
| |
• | changes in the relative proportions of revenues and income before taxes in the various jurisdictions in which we operate that have differing statutory tax rates; |
| |
• | changes to the financial accounting rules for income taxes; |
| |
• | unanticipated changes in tax rates; and |
| |
• | changes to a valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets, if any. |
Because we have substantial cash requirements in the United States and a significant portion of our cash is generated and held outside of the United States, if our cash available in the United States and the cash available under our credit facility is insufficient to meet our operating expenses and debt repayment obligations in the United States, we may be required to raise cash in ways that could negatively affect our financial condition, results of operations and the market price of our common stock.
We have significant operations outside the United States. As of September 30, 2014, approximately 75% of our cash and cash equivalents balance was held by subsidiaries outside the United States, with the remainder of the balance held by the U.S. parent or its subsidiaries in the United States. We believe that the combination of our existing United States cash and cash equivalents, future United States operating cash flows and cash available under our credit facility, are sufficient to meet our ongoing United States operating expenses and debt repayment obligations. However, if these sources of cash are insufficient to meet our future financial obligations in the United States, we will be required to seek other available funding sources or means to repatriate cash to the United States, which could negatively impact our results of operations, financial position and the market price of our common stock.
Our sales to government clients subject us to risks of funding approvals.
We derive revenues from contracts with the U.S. government, state and local governments and their respective agencies. There is increased pressure for governments and their agencies to reduce spending. Many of our federal government contracts contain fiscal funding clauses whereby ongoing funding of the contracts is subject to approval of appropriations by the U.S. Congress. Similarly, our contracts at the state and local levels are subject to government funding authorizations. If additional funding for these contracts is not approved, it could reduce revenue we have recognized and reduce future revenue from such contracts.
II. Other Considerations
We have been investigating certain matters in China, which matters and related remedial actions could have an adverse effect on our business and our results.
We have been cooperating to provide information to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Department of Justice concerning payments and expenses by certain of our business partners in China and/or by employees of our Chinese subsidiary that raise questions concerning compliance with laws, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Our internal review is ongoing and we continue to respond to requests for information from these agencies, including a subpoena issued to the company by the SEC. We cannot predict when or how this matter may be resolved. Resolution of this matter could include fines and penalties; however we are unable to estimate an amount that could be associated with any resolution and, accordingly, we have not recorded a liability for this matter. If resolution of this matter includes substantial fines or penalties, this could materially impact our results for the period in which the associated liability is recorded or such amounts are paid. Further, any settlement or other resolution of this matter could have collateral effects on our business in China, the United States and elsewhere.
We terminated certain employees and business partners in China in connection with this matter, which may have an adverse impact on our level of sales in China. Revenue from China has historically represented 5% to 7% of our total revenue.
We are required to comply with certain financial and operating covenants under our credit facility and to make scheduled debt payments as they become due; any failure to comply with those covenants or to make scheduled payments could cause amounts borrowed under the facility to become immediately due and payable or prevent us from borrowing under the facility.
Our credit facility, which consists of a $500 million term loan and a $1 billion revolving loan (and may be increased by an additional $250 million (in the form of revolving loans or term loans, or a combination thereof) if the existing or additional lenders are willing to make such increased commitments) matures on September 15, 2019, at which time any amounts outstanding will be due and payable in full. As of September 30, 2014, we had $612 million outstanding under the credit facility. We may wish to borrow additional amounts under the facility in the future to support our operations, including for strategic acquisitions and share repurchases.
We are required to comply with specified financial and operating covenants and to make scheduled repayments of our term loan, which limit our ability to operate our business as we otherwise might operate it. Our failure to comply with any of these covenants or to meet any payment obligations under the facility could result in an event of default which, if not cured or waived, would result in any amounts outstanding, including any accrued interest and unpaid fees, becoming immediately due and payable. We might not have sufficient working capital or liquidity to satisfy any repayment obligations in the event of an acceleration of those obligations. In addition, if we are not in compliance with the financial and operating covenants at the time we wish to borrow funds, we will be unable to borrow funds. At September 30, 2014, we had $408 million available to borrow under the revolving loan portion of our credit facility, the availability of which is limited based on financial covenants in the facility.
We may be unable to meet our goal of returning 40% of free cash flow to shareholders through share repurchases, which could decrease your expected return on investment in PTC stock.
In August 2014, we announced a new capital allocation strategy, a component of which is a long-term goal of returning approximately 40% of free cash flow (cash flow from operations less capital expenditures) to shareholders through share repurchases. Meeting this goal requires PTC to generate consistent free cash flow in the years ahead in an amount sufficient to enable us to continue investing in organic and inorganic growth as well as to return a significant portion of the cash generated to stockholders. We may not meet this goal if we do not generate the free cash flow we expect or if we use our available cash to satisfy other priorities. In addition, our cash flow fluctuates over the course of the year and over multiple years, so, although our goal is to return 40% of free cash flow to shareholders, that is an average over a longer term and the number of shares repurchased and amount of free cash flow returned in any given period will vary and may be more or less than 40% in any such period. Finally, the number of shares repurchased for a given amount of cash will vary based on PTC’s stock price, so the number of shares repurchased will not be a consistent or predictable number or percentage of outstanding stock.
Our stock price has been volatile, which may make it harder to resell your shares at a time and at a price that is favorable to you.
Market prices for securities of software companies are generally volatile and are subject to significant fluctuations unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of these companies. The trading prices and valuations of these stocks, and of ours, may not be predictable. Negative changes in the public’s perception of the prospects of software companies, or of PTC or the markets we serve, could depress our stock price regardless of our operating results.
Also, a large percentage of our common stock is held by institutional investors. Purchases and sales of our common stock by these institutional investors could have a significant impact on the market price of the stock. For more information about those investors, please see our proxy statement with respect to our most recent annual meeting of stockholders and Schedules 13D and 13G filed with the SEC with respect to our common stock.
| |
ITEM 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments |
None.
We currently lease 117 offices used in operations in the United States and internationally, predominately as sales and/or support offices and for research and development work. Of our total of approximately 1,422,000 square feet of leased facilities used in operations, approximately 609,000 square feet are located in the U.S., including 321,000 square feet at our headquarters facility located in Needham, Massachusetts, and approximately 220,000 square feet are located in India, where a significant amount of our research and development is conducted. We believe that our facilities are adequate for our present and foreseeable needs.
We are subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. We currently believe that resolving these matters will not have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. However, the results of legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty. Should any of these legal matters be resolved against us, the operating results for a particular reporting period could be adversely affected.
| |
ITEM 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures |
Not applicable.
PART II
| |
ITEM 5. | Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
Information with respect to the market for our common stock is located in Selected Consolidated Financial Data beginning on page F-38 of this Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference.
On September 30, 2014, the close of our fiscal year, our common stock was held by 1,404 shareholders of record. As of November 24, 2014, our common stock was held by 1,392 shareholders of record.
We do not pay cash dividends on our common stock and we retain earnings for use in our business or to repurchase our shares. Although we review our dividend policy periodically, our review may not cause us to pay any dividends in the future. Further, our credit facility requires us to maintain specified leverage and fixed-charge ratios that limit the amount of dividends that we could pay.
The table below shows the shares of our common stock we repurchased in the fourth quarter of 2014.
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Period (1) | Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased | Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit) | Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | Approximate Dollar Value of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs | |
June 29 - July 26, 2014 | — |
| — |
| — |
| $84,885 | (2) |
July 27 - August 23, 2014 | 2,300,210 |
| $ | 38.04 |
| 2,300,210 |
| $475,000,000 | (2)(3) |
August 24 - September 30, 2014 | — |
| — |
| — |
| $475,000,000 | (2) |
Total | 2,300,210 |
| $ | 38.04 |
| 2,300,210 |
| $475,000,000 | (2) |
(1) Periods are our fiscal months within the fiscal quarter.
(2) In September 2013, our Board authorized us to repurchase up to $100 million worth of our shares in the period October 1, 2013 through September 30, 2014, which repurchase program we announced on November 6, 2013. In August 2014, our Board authorized us to repurchase up to $600 million worth of our shares in the period August 4, 2014 through September 30, 2017, which repurchase program we announced on August 4, 2014.
| |
(3) | In August 2014, we made a payment of $125 million to repurchase shares pursuant to an accelerated share repurchase agreement (“ASR”) with a major financial institution (“ Bank”) of which 2,300,210 shares were repurchased in August at the market price of $38.04 per share, totaling $87.5 million. The remaining $37.5 million represents the amount held back by the Bank pending final settlement of the ASR. Upon settlement of the ASR, the total shares repurchased by us will equal up to $125 million divided by a share price equal to the average daily volume weighted-average price of our |
common stock during the term of the ASR program less a fixed per share discount. Final settlement of the ASR will occur no later than February 17, 2015 at the Bank’s discretion.
See Note J Stockholders’ Equity of "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" included in this Annual Report.
| |
ITEM 6. | Selected Financial Data |
Our five-year summary of selected financial data and quarterly financial data for the past two years is located on page F-38 of this Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference.
| |
ITEM 7. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Forward-Looking Statements
Statements in this Annual Report about anticipated financial results and growth, as well as about the development of our products and markets, are forward-looking statements that are based on our current plans and assumptions. Important information about the bases for these plans and assumptions and factors that may cause our actual results to differ materially from these statements is contained below and in Item 1A. “Risk Factors” of this Annual Report.
Unless otherwise indicated, all references to a year reflect our fiscal year that ends on September 30.
Executive Overview
In 2014 we made significant investments in the Internet of Things (IoT) space with our acquisitions of ThingWorx and Axeda, which we believe has established us as a leader in the fast-growing market for smart, connected products. Our IoT solutions, combined with strong product offerings in our core CAD, PLM, ALM, and SLM markets, positions us to deliver new customer opportunities and accelerate growth in 2015 and beyond. From a financial perspective, in 2014 we achieved 5% revenue growth and 13% earnings per share (EPS) growth (20% non-GAAP EPS growth) and we continued to deliver on our margin expansion strategy. We achieved operating margins of 14.5% (25% on a non-GAAP basis) compared to 10% in 2013 (22% on a non-GAAP basis). The improvement in operating margin reflects continued vigilance on cost controls and cost savings from restructuring actions, increased sales productivity, improvements in services gross margins, and lower restructuring charges. These favorable effects on operating margin were partially offset by incremental costs from acquired businesses, investments we are making in our IoT business, and annual merit salary increases for employees.
We delivered GAAP EPS of $1.34 for 2014, up from $1.19 for 2013, and non-GAAP EPS of $2.17, up from $1.81 in 2013. Our GAAP results reflect tax benefits of $18 million in 2014 and $37 million in 2013 related to the reversal of a portion of the valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets in the U.S. and a foreign jurisdiction as a result of accounting for acquisitions, and an $8 million tax benefit in 2013 associated with accounting for our U.S. pension plan. Non-GAAP measures are reconciled to GAAP results under Results of Operations - Non-GAAP Measures below.
For 2014, total revenue was up 5% year over year. On an organic basis, excluding revenue of $23 million from businesses acquired in 2014 and the fourth quarter of 2013, total revenue was up 3% year over year. Total license revenue for 2014 was $370 million, an increase of 7% year over year. On an organic basis (excluding license revenue of $8 million from acquired businesses), total license revenue was up 5% year over year. Our revenue in 2014 was adversely impacted by volatility in the global manufacturing industry. From a geographic perspective, organic license revenue in the Americas and Europe in 2014 was strong, with double digit growth over 2013 in Europe, following declines in both regions from 2012 to 2013. We saw declines in Japan license revenue in 2014, following double digit growth in 2013, due in part to unfavorable movements in the Yen and higher large deals in Japan in 2013. We saw double digit year-over-year declines in license revenue in the Pacific Rim following modest growth in 2013. We believe results in the Pacific Rim, including China, were impacted by adverse macroeconomic conditions in that region. Our service revenue in 2014 was flat year over year, down 3% on an organic basis, which is in part due to expansion of our service partner program, under which certain service opportunities are referred to partners. Our support revenue in 2014 was up 6% year over year, up 5% on an organic basis.
We generated $305 million of cash from operations in 2014, up 36% from $225 million in 2013, and we borrowed $354 million under our credit facility to fund acquisitions and stock repurchases. We used $324 million of cash to acquire ThingWorx, Atego and Axeda and $225 million to repurchase stock. At September 30, 2014, the balance outstanding under our credit facility was $612 million and we had $408 million available to borrow under the revolving loan portion of our credit facility, the availability of which is limited based on financial covenants in the facility. We ended 2014 with $294 million of cash, up from $242 million at the end 2013.
Acquisitions
As discussed above, we acquired ThingWorx, Inc. in the second quarter of 2014 for approximately $112 million and Axeda Corporation in the fourth quarter of 2014 for approximately $166 million. ThingWorx is a small but highly-innovative creator of an award-winning platform to build and run applications designed to leverage the IoT. Axeda is a developer of solutions to securely connect machines and sensors to the cloud. Axeda had historical annualized revenue of approximately $25 million.
As part of our strategy to supplement and expand our other businesses, we also acquired Atego Group Limited, a European-based developer of model-based systems and software engineering applications for approximately $46 million in cash on June 30, 2014. Atego enhances our portfolio of ALM and PLM solutions and strengthens our commitment to supporting our customers' systems engineering initiatives. Atego had historical annualized revenue of approximately $20 million. In the aggregate, these 2014 acquisitions contributed $10 million to our 2014 revenue.
Expanded Share Repurchase Authorization and Expanded Credit Facility
On August 4, 2014, we announced a capital allocation strategy that over time is expected to return approximately 40% of free cash flow to shareholders while still enabling us to invest in organic and new growth opportunities. As part of this strategy, our Board of Directors has authorized us to repurchase up to $600 million of our common shares through September 30, 2017. Under this authorization, we borrowed $125 million under our credit facility to repurchase shares of our common stock in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 under an accelerated share repurchase (ASR) agreement.
Additionally, in the fourth quarter of 2014, we entered into a new $1.5 billion credit facility with a syndicate of existing and new banks consisting of a $500 million term loan and a $1 billion revolving loan facility. The new facility, which replaced our previous $1.0 billion credit facility, matures on September 15, 2019.
Restructuring of Our Workforce
In the fourth quarter of 2014, in support of integrating businesses acquired in the past year and the continued evolution of our business model, we committed to a plan to restructure our workforce and recorded a restructuring charge of $27 million attributable to termination benefits associated with 283 employees which will primarily be paid in fiscal 2015. We expect that the annualized cost savings of the restructuring actions will be approximately $30 million, which effect is contemplated in our financial targets for fiscal 2015.
Future Expectations, Strategies and Risks
The slowdown in the global manufacturing industry, uncertainty about the economic environment and volatility in foreign currency exchange rates are headwinds for revenue growth in fiscal 2015. While we saw indications of improvements in global manufacturing economic conditions in 2014, recent economic indicators raise renewed concerns about the economic climate, particularly in Europe, China and Japan. Because of this level of uncertainty, and current unfavorable Euro and Yen to U.S. Dollar exchange rates relative to 2014, we expect only modest revenue growth in 2015. We expect an increase in non-GAAP operating margin to 26% through a combination of: (1) increasing our non-GAAP professional services gross margin toward our longer-term goal of 20% by 2018; (2) further expanding our professional services partner ecosystem to reduce professional services revenue as a percentage of total revenue; (3) enhancing sales force productivity and efficiency; (4) implementing solutions that require shorter sales cycles and less professional services; (5) continued vigilance on cost control; and (6) driving revenue growth across our existing markets while capitalizing on new opportunities, such as the trend toward smart, connected products and the Internet of Things.
For 2015, we expect year-over-year revenue to grow 0% to 2%. This revenue goal includes perpetual license & subscription solutions revenue growth of 4% to 10%, support revenue growth of approximately 1%, and a decline in professional services revenue of approximately 6%. Our 2015 earnings goals are to achieve non-GAAP operating margin expansion of 100 basis points, from 25% in 2014 to 26% in 2015 (expansion of GAAP operating margins from approximately 14% in 2014 to 16% in 2015) and non-GAAP earnings per share of $2.33 to $2.40 (GAAP earnings per share of $1.33 to $1.40). If economic conditions do not improve or deteriorate further, or if foreign currency exchange rates relative to the U.S. Dollar differ significantly from our current assumed rates, our results could differ materially from our targets. Our targets assume rates of $1.25 USD to one Euro and 115 Yen to one USD.
Our 2015 targets exclude settlement losses related to the termination of our U.S. pension plan. While we expect to complete the termination process by September 30, 2015, the amount of the losses and timing of the charge is subject to the timing of regulatory approvals and the projected benefit obligations and assets in the plan measured as of the dates the settlements occur. We currently estimate the pre-tax settlement losses to be approximately $65 million.
Also, our results have been impacted, and we expect will continue to be impacted, by our ability to close large transactions. The amount of revenue, particularly license revenue, attributable to large transactions, and the number of such transactions, may vary significantly from quarter to quarter based on customer purchasing decisions and macroeconomic conditions. Our growth rates have become increasingly dependent on adoption of our solutions by large direct customers. Such transactions tend to be larger in size and may have long lead times as they often follow a lengthy product selection and evaluation process. This may cause volatility in our results.
A majority of our software license sales to date have been perpetual licenses, where customers own the software license and revenue is recognized at the time of sale. Due to evolving customer preferences as well as acquisitions we have made in the IoT and cloud services space, a small but growing percentage of our business consists of ratably recognized subscriptions. Under a subscription, customers do not own the software but pay a periodic fee for the right to use our software, including access to technical support. While we expect a significant majority of our customer base to continue to purchase our software solutions under a perpetual licensing arrangement, we are also offering subscription pricing as an option for most products starting in 2015. Through 2014 we reported revenue by three lines of business: (1) license; (2) service; and (3) support. Beginning in the first quarter of 2015 we plan to report revenue as follows: (1) perpetual license & subscription solutions (which includes subscription revenue and cloud services); (2) support; and (3) professional services. Previously, cloud services revenue was reported in services revenue. The revenue targets below reflect this revised reporting structure. If a greater percentage of our customers elect our subscription offering than our base case assumption, it will have an adverse impact on revenue, operating margin, cash flow and EPS growth relative to our targets above.
Impact of an Investigation in China
We have been cooperating to provide information to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Department of Justice concerning payments and expenses by certain of our business partners in China and/or by employees of our Chinese subsidiary that raise questions concerning compliance with laws, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Our internal review is ongoing and we continue to respond to requests for information from these agencies, including a subpoena issued to the company by the SEC. We cannot predict when or how this matter may be resolved. Resolution of this matter could include fines and penalties; however we are unable to estimate an amount that could be associated with any resolution and, accordingly, we have not recorded a liability for this matter. If resolution of this matter includes substantial fines or penalties, this could materially impact our results for the period in which the associated liability is recorded or such amounts are paid. Further, any settlement or other resolution of this matter could have collateral effects on our business in China, the United States and elsewhere.
We terminated certain employees and business partners in China in connection with this matter, which may have an adverse impact on our level of sales in China. Revenue from China has historically represented 5% to 7% of our total revenue.
Revenue, Operating Margin, Earnings per Share and Cash Flow
The following table shows the financial measures that we consider the most significant indicators of the performance of our business. In addition to providing operating income, operating margin, and diluted earnings per share as calculated under generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), it shows non-GAAP operating income, operating margin, and diluted earnings per share for the reported periods. These non-GAAP measures exclude fair value adjustments related to acquired deferred revenue, acquired deferred costs, stock-based compensation expense, amortization of acquired intangible assets expense, acquisition-related and pension plan termination costs, restructuring charges, certain identified gains or charges included in non-operating other income (expense) and the related tax effects of the preceding items, as well as the tax items identified. These non-GAAP measures provide investors another view of our operating results that is aligned with management budgets and with performance criteria in our incentive compensation plans. Management uses, and investors should use, non-GAAP measures in conjunction with our GAAP results. We discuss the non-GAAP measures in detail under Non-GAAP Measures below.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | Percent Change 2013 to 2014 | | 2012 | | Percent Change 2012 to 2013 |
Actual | | Constant Currency | | Actual | | Constant Currency |
| (Dollar amounts in millions, except per share data) |
License revenue | $ | 369.7 |
| | $ | 344.2 |
| | 7 | % | | 7 | % | | $ | 348.4 |
| | (1 | )% | | 1 | % |
Service revenue | 295.0 |
| | 294.7 |
| | — | % | | — | % | | 295.3 |
| | — | % | | 1 | % |
Support revenue | 692.3 |
| | 654.7 |
| | 6 | % | | 6 | % | | 611.9 |
| | 7 | % | | 9 | % |
Total revenue | 1,357.0 |
| | 1,293.5 |
| | 5 | % | | 5 | % | | 1,255.7 |
| | 3 | % | | 4 | % |
Cost of license | 31.7 |
| | 33.0 |
| | | | | | 30.6 |
| | | | |
Cost of service | 256.9 |
| | 259.0 |
| | | | | | 265.5 |
| | | | |
Cost of support | 85.1 |
| | 81.1 |
| | | | | | 76.1 |
| | | | |
Total cost of revenue | 373.7 |
| | 373.0 |
| | | | | | 372.1 |
| | | | |
Gross margin | 983.3 |
| | 920.5 |
| | | | | | 883.6 |
| | | | |
Operating expenses | 786.7 |
| | 793.2 |
| | | | | | 755.5 |
| | | | |
Total costs and expenses (1) | 1,160.4 |
| | 1,166.2 |
| | — | % | | — | % | | 1,127.6 |
| | 3 | % | | 4 | % |
Operating income (1) | $ | 196.6 |
| | $ | 127.3 |
| | 54 | % | | 52 | % | | $ | 128.1 |
| | (1 | )% | | 7 | % |
Non-GAAP operating income (1) | $ | 340.3 |
| | $ | 286.3 |
| | 19 | % | | 18 | % | | $ | 246.8 |
| | 16 | % | | 20 | % |
Operating margin (1) | 14.5 | % | | 9.8 | % | | | | | | 10.2 | % | | | | |
Non-GAAP operating margin (1) | 25.1 | % | | 22.1 | % | | | | | | 19.6 | % | | | | |
GAAP diluted earnings (loss) per share (2) | $ | 1.34 |
| | $ | 1.19 |
| | | | | | $ | (0.30 | ) | | | | |
Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share (2) | $ | 2.17 |
| | $ | 1.81 |
| | | | | | $ | 1.51 |
| | | | |
Cash flow from operations | $ | 304.6 |
| | $ | 224.7 |
| | | | | | $ | 218.0 |
| | | | |
| |
(1) | Costs and expenses in 2014 included $28.4 million of restructuring charges and $13.1 million of acquisition-related and pension plan termination costs. Costs and expenses in 2013 included $52.2 million of restructuring charges and $9.9 million of acquisition-related costs. Costs and expenses in 2012 included $24.9 million of restructuring charges and $3.8 million of acquisition-related costs. These restructuring and acquisition-related and pension plan termination costs have been excluded from non-GAAP operating income, operating margin and diluted EPS. |
| |
(2) | Income taxes for non-GAAP diluted earnings per share reflect the tax effects of non-GAAP adjustments which are calculated by applying the applicable tax rate by jurisdiction to the non-GAAP adjustments described in Non-GAAP Measures, and also exclude the following non-operating income and tax items: GAAP diluted earnings per share in 2014 includes (i) tax benefits of $18.1 million related to the release of a portion of the valuation allowance as a result of deferred tax liabilities established for acquisitions recorded in 2014 and (ii) a tax charge of $3.5 million to establish valuation allowances against net deferred tax assets in two foreign jurisdictions. GAAP diluted earnings per share in 2013 includes (i) tax benefits of $36.7 million related to the release of a portion of the valuation allowance as a result of deferred tax liabilities established for acquisitions recorded in 2013, (ii) tax benefits of $3.2 million relating to the final resolution of a long standing tax litigation matter and completion of an international jurisdiction tax audit, (iii) a tax benefit of $7.9 million related to the release of a portion of the valuation allowance in the U.S. as a result of a pension gain (decrease in unrecognized actuarial loss) recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income, and (iv) a tax benefit of $2.6 million relating to a tax audit in a foreign jurisdiction of an acquired company. GAAP diluted earnings per share in 2013 also includes a gain on investment of $0.6 million and a legal settlement gain of $5.1 million. The GAAP loss per share in 2012 includes (i) a net tax charge of $124.5 million recorded in the fourth quarter to establish a valuation allowance against our U.S. net deferred tax assets, (ii) $5.4 million, net primarily related to foreign tax credits which would be fully realized on a non-GAAP basis, (iii) $3.3 million primarily related to acquired legal entity integration activities, and (iv) $1.4 million related to the impact from a reduction in the statutory tax rate in Japan on deferred tax assets from a litigation settlement. |
Results of Operations
Acquisitions
In 2014, we acquired ThingWorx (on December 30), Atego (on June 30) and Axeda (on August 11). These acquisitions added $9.8 million ($11.0 million on a non-GAAP basis) to our 2014 revenue. In 2013, we completed the acquisitions of Servigistics, Enigma and NetIDEAS. Servigistics (acquired on October 2, 2012), Enigma and NetIDEAS (both acquired in the fourth quarter of 2013) added $94.9 million ($97.9 million on a non-GAAP basis) to our 2013 revenue, substantially all of which is included in SLM revenue.
Impact of Foreign Currency Exchange on Results of Operations
Approximately two thirds of our revenue and half of our expenses are transacted in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Currency translation affects our reported results because we report our results of operations in U.S. Dollars. Changes in currency exchange rates, particularly for the Yen and the Euro, compared to the prior year increased revenue and decreased expenses in 2014, with lower revenue and expenses in Japan offset by higher revenue and expenses in Europe, and reduced both revenue and expenses in 2013. If actual reported results were converted into U.S. dollars based on the corresponding prior year’s foreign currency exchange rates, 2014 and 2013 revenue would have been lower by $2.1 million and higher by $18.2 million, respectively, and expenses would have been higher by $0.9 million and $8.8 million, respectively. The net impact on year-over-year results would have been a decrease in operating income of $3.0 million in 2014 and an increase in operating income of $9.4 million in 2013. The results of operations, revenue by line of business and revenue by geographic region in the tables that follow present both actual percentage changes year over year and percentage changes on a constant currency basis.
Revenue
Revenue is reported below by line of business (license, service and support), by solution area (CAD, Extended PLM (EPLM) and SLM & IoT) and by geographic region (Americas, Europe, Pacific Rim and Japan).
Results include combined revenue from direct sales and our channel.
The tables below reflect total revenue, which is organic revenue plus revenue from acquired businesses. The references to organic revenue in 2014 and comparisons to 2013 in the discussion below exclude revenue from our 2014 acquisitions of Axeda, Atego and ThingWorx and our acquisitions of Enigma and NetIDEAS in the fourth quarter of 2013. Organic revenue in 2013 and comparisons to 2012 in the discussion below exclude revenue from our 2013 acquisitions of Servigistics, Enigma and NetIDEAS. As Servigistics was acquired at the beginning of 2013, it is not excluded from organic revenue in 2014.
Revenue by Line of Business
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended September 30, |
| 2014 | | Percent Change 2013 to 2014 | | 2013 | | Percent Change 2012 to 2013 | | 2012 |
| $ Amount | | % of Total Revenue | | Actual | | Constant Currency | | $ Amount | | % of Total Revenue | | Actual | | Constant Currency | | $ Amount | | % of Total Revenue |
| (Dollar amounts in millions) |
License revenue | $ | 369.7 |
| | 27 | % | | 7 | % | | 7 | % | | $ | 344.2 |
| | 27 | % | | (1 | )% | | 1 | % | | $ | 348.4 |
| | 28 | % |
Service revenue | 295.0 |
| | 22 | % | | — | % | | — | % | | 294.7 |
| | 23 | % | | — | % | | 1 | % | | 295.3 |
| | 23 | % |
Support revenue | 692.3 |
| | 51 | % | | 6 | % | | 6 | % | | 654.7 |
| | 50 | % | | 7 | % | | 9 | % | | 611.9 |
| | 49 | % |
Total revenue | $ | 1,357.0 |
| | 100 | % | | 5 | % | | 5 | % | | $ | 1,293.5 |
| | 100 | % | | 3 | % | | 4 | % | | $ | 1,255.7 |
| | 100 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue by Solution | Year ended September 30, |
| | | Percent Change | | | | Percent Change | | |
| 2014 | | Actual | | Constant Currency | | 2013 | | Actual | | Constant Currency | | 2012 |
| (Dollar amounts in millions) |
CAD | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
License revenue | $ | 169.4 |
| | 13 | % | | 13 | % | | $ | 150.4 |
| | (5 | )% | | (4 | )% | | $ | 159.0 |
|
Service revenue | 24.2 |
| | 1 | % | | 1 | % | | 24.0 |
| | (21 | )% | | (19 | )% | | 30.4 |
|
Support revenue | 387.9 |
| | 3 | % | | 3 | % | | 378.1 |
| | (2 | )% | | — | % | | 384.0 |
|
Total revenue | $ | 581.5 |
| | 5 | % | | 5 | % | | $ | 552.5 |
| | (4 | )% | | (2 | )% | | $ | 573.5 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Extended PLM (EPLM) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
License revenue | $ | 162.3 |
| | 8 | % | | 8 | % | | $ | 149.8 |
| | (13 | )% | | (11 | )% | | $ | 171.3 |
|
Service revenue | 203.6 |
| | (1 | )% | | (1 | )% | | 204.7 |
| | (12 | )% | | (11 | )% | | 233.0 |
|
Support revenue | 233.4 |
| | 8 | % | | 7 | % | | 216.6 |
| | 8 | % | | 9 | % | | 200.0 |
|
Total revenue | $ | 599.3 |
| | 5 | % | | 5 | % | | $ | 571.1 |
| | (6 | )% | | (4 | )% | | $ | 604.3 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SLM & IoT | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
License revenue | $ | 38.0 |
| | (14 | )% | | (14 | )% | | $ | 44.1 |
| | 145 | % | | 147 | % | | $ | 18.0 |
|
Service revenue | 67.2 |
| | 2 | % | | 2 | % | | 66.0 |
| | 107 | % | | 108 | % | | 31.9 |
|
Support revenue | 70.9 |
| | 18 | % | | 18 | % | | 60.0 |
| | 115 | % | | 116 | % | | 28.0 |
|
Total revenue | $ | 176.1 |
| | 4 | % | | 4 | % | | $ | 170.0 |
| | 118 | % | | 120 | % | | $ | 77.9 |
|
License Revenue
The amount of license revenue attributable to large transactions, and the number of such transactions, may vary significantly from period to period and by geographic region. We had six transactions with license revenue in excess of $5 million in 2014 (four in the Americas and two in Europe), three in 2013 (two in Japan and one in the Americas) and four in 2012 (two in the Americas and two in Europe).
2014 compared to 2013
In 2014, compared to the year-ago period, license revenue was up 7% and organic license revenue grew 5%. License revenue in 2014 from Axeda, Atego, ThingWorx, Enigma and NetIDEAS was $8.1 million.
License revenue was strongest in Europe with 29% year-over-year growth (26% on a constant currency basis) and our CAD and EPLM businesses, offsetting year-over-year declines in the Pacific Rim region, which was down 17%, and the SLM business. CAD license revenue of $169 million represented our strongest year since 2011 - driven by double digit year-over-year growth in Creo modules and upgrades, training software, and certain heritage products. We expect more subdued growth in CAD revenue in 2015. EPLM license revenue of $162 million grew 8% year over year on a reported and constant currency basis, and 7% on an organic constant currency basis. SCM saw strong double digit license growth, PLM license sales increased by 5%, and the increase in ALM was comparable to the overall performance of EPLM on an organic constant currency basis. SLM license revenue declined 22% year over year on a reported and constant currency basis, and 27% on an organic constant currency basis. SLM license revenue in 2014 was affected by a slower-than-expected rebuild of our pipeline after a strong 2013. Looking ahead to 2015, we believe our SLM business can reach double digit license growth.
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates favorably impacted license revenue by $0.6 million in 2014 compared to 2013.
2013 compared to 2012
The decline in license revenue in 2013 reflected year-over-year declines of 2% in the Americas and 12% in Europe. These declines were partially offset by growth in Japan of 32% (58% on a constant currency basis) and an increase in the Pacific Rim of 3%. Results reflected softness in Europe resulting in lower license revenue from large license transactions, particularly sales of EPLM products which we attribute to macroeconomic conditions in that region.
Organic license revenue in 2013 was down 9% on a year-over-year basis. License revenue from businesses acquired in 2013, which was the primary contributor to growth in SLM license revenue in 2013, was $26.8 million.
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates unfavorably impacted license revenue by $6.1 million in 2013 compared to 2012.
Service Revenue
Consulting and training services engagements typically result from sales of new licenses, particularly of our EPLM and SLM solutions. Expanding our service partner program, under which service engagements are referred to third party service providers, is part of our overall margin expansion strategy. Additionally, over time, we anticipate implementing solutions that require less services. As a result, we do not expect that the amount of services we deliver will increase proportionately with license revenue increases. Consulting and cloud services revenue has represented approximately 85% of total service revenue and training revenue has represented approximately 15% of total services revenue.
2014 compared to 2013
Year over year, service revenue in 2014 was flat, down 3% on an organic basis. In 2014, our consulting service revenue was flat year over year (down 4% on an organic basis). Year over year, training revenue was up 2% ($0.8 million) in 2014.
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates favorably impacted service revenue by $0.9 million in 2014 compared to 2013.
2013 compared to 2012
Year over year, service revenue for 2013 was down overall and on an organic basis. Organic service revenue was down 13% ($37.7 million); service revenue from businesses acquired in 2013 was $37.0 million, which was the primary contributor to growth in SLM service revenue in 2013. Year over year, our organic consulting service revenue was down 14% from 2013 to 2012. Year over year, our organic training business was down 6%. We attribute the declines in organic total service revenue and consulting service revenue to lower license revenue and to success in expanding our service partner program.
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates unfavorably impacted service revenue by $2.7 million in 2013 compared to 2012.
Support Revenue
Support revenue is comprised of contracts to maintain new and/or previously purchased software. We saw steady growth in support revenue in 2013 and 2014.
2014 compared to 2013
Excluding seats added with our 2014 acquisitions, total seats under maintenance were up 8% as of the end of 2014 compared to the end of 2013, with CAD and EPLM support seats up 1% and 8%, respectively. Total support revenue increased 6% ($37.6 million) in 2014 compared to 2013, with organic support revenue up 5% ($32.5 million). Support revenue from businesses acquired in 2014 and the fourth quarter of 2013 was $5.6 million.
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates favorably impacted support revenue by $0.6 million in 2014 compared to 2013.
2013 compared to 2012
Organic support revenue increased 2% ($11.6 million) in 2013 compared to 2012. Support revenue from businesses acquired in 2013 was $31.1 million,which was the primary contributor to growth in SLM support revenue in 2013.
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates unfavorably impacted support revenue by $9.4 million in 2013 compared to 2012.
Revenue from Individual Customers
We enter into customer contracts that may result in revenue being recognized over multiple reporting periods. Accordingly, revenue recognized in a current period may be attributable to contracts entered into during the current period or in prior periods. License and/or service revenue of $1 million or more recognized from individual customers in a single quarter during the fiscal year from contracts entered into during that quarter and/or a prior quarter is shown in the table below. The amount of revenue, particularly license revenue, attributable to such large transactions, and the number of such transactions, may vary significantly from quarter to quarter based on customer purchasing decisions, the completion of large services engagements commenced in previous quarters and macroeconomic conditions.
Revenue from large transactions in 2014, compared to 2013, was higher in the Americas and Europe. We believe that the results in the Americas and Europe reflect more favorable economic conditions in those regions. Revenue from large transactions in 2013, compared to 2012, was higher in Japan and the Pacific Rim and lower in the Americas and Europe. The license revenue portion of this measure was 55% in 2014, compared to 48% in 2013 and 44% in 2012.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2014 | | Percent Change 2013 to 2014 | | 2013 | | Percent Change 2012 to 2013 | | 2012 |
| (Dollar amounts in millions) |
License and/or service revenue of $1 million or more recognized from individual customers in a quarter | $ | 313.2 |
| | 15 | % | | $ | 271.2 |
| | (1 | )% | | $ | 274.3 |
|
% of total license and service revenue | 47 | % | | | | 42 | % | | | | 43 | % |
Revenue by Geographic Region
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2014 | | | | Percent Change | | 2013 | | | | Percent Change | | 2012 | |
% of Total Revenue | | Actual | | Constant Currency | | % of Total Revenue | | Actual | | Constant Currency | | % of Total Revenue |
| (Dollar amounts in millions) | |
Revenue by region: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Americas | $ | 558.7 |
| | 41 | % | | 7 | % | | 7 | % | | $ | 522.8 |
| | 40 | % | | 9 | % | | 9 | % | | $ | 479.9 |
| 38 | % |
Europe | $ | 528.1 |
| | 39 | % | | 10 | % | | 7 | % | | $ | 479.9 |
| | 37 | % | | — | % | | (1 | )% | | $ | 480.3 |
| 38 | % |
Pacific Rim | $ | 148.2 |
| | 11 | % | | (8 | )% | | (9 | )% | | $ | 161.6 |
| | 13 | % | | — | % | | — | % | | $ | 160.8 |
| 13 | % |
Japan | $ | 122.1 |
| | 9 | % | | (6 | )% | | 4 | % | | $ | 129.3 |
| | 10 | % | | (4 | )% | | 12 | % | | $ | 134.6 |
| 11 | % |
A significant percentage of our annual revenue comes from large customers in the broader manufacturing space. As a result, license revenue growth in our core CAD and EPLM products historically has correlated to growth in broader measures of the global manufacturing economy including GDP, industrial production and manufacturing PMI. Current indicators suggest the US manufacturing economy is in the early stages of recovery, though the pace and timing remain uncertain. Nearly 60% of our annual revenue is outside the US, where manufacturing indicators appear to be weaker. GDP and PMI data in the Eurozone and Japan suggest manufacturing economies in those regions are slowing, while manufacturing activity in China remains subdued versus earlier levels. For 2015, our financial targets assume a slower rate of growth in the manufacturing economies of Europe, Japan, and the Pacific Rim relative to the U.S.
Americas
2014 compared to 2013
Revenue in the Americas increased $35.9 million in 2014 compared to 2013, consisting of an increase in license revenue of 8% ($9.5 million), an increase in support revenue of 7% ($18.9 million) and an increase in service revenue of 6% ($7.5 million). Organic revenue was up 4% ($21.3 million) in 2014; total revenue in the Americas from businesses that we acquired in 2014 and the fourth quarter of 2013 was $16.7 million.
2013 compared to 2012
Revenue in the Americas increased $42.9 million in 2013 compared to 2012, consisting of an increase in service revenue of 11% ($12.7 million) and an increase in support revenue of 14% ($32.4 million), partially offset by a decrease in license revenue of 2% ($2.2 million). Organic revenue was down 5% ($25.4 million) in 2013; total revenue in the Americas from businesses that we acquired in 2013 was $68.3 million.
Europe
2014 compared to 2013
Revenue in Europe increased $48.2 million in 2014 compared to 2013 consisting of an increase in license revenue of 29% ($30.2 million), up 26% on a constant currency basis, and an increase in support revenue of 8% ($21.4 million), up 5% on a constant currency basis, partially offset by a decrease in service revenue of 3% ($3.5 million), down 6% on a constant currency basis. Organic total revenue and license revenue were up 9% and 28%, respectively, in 2014; total revenue in Europe from businesses that we acquired in 2014 and the fourth quarter of 2013 was $4.7 million. Although we saw signs of economic
improvement in Europe in 2014, more recent macroeconomic indicators in this region are unfavorable and we expect performance in this region to decline in 2015 relative to 2014.
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates, particularly the Euro, favorably impacted revenue in Europe by $15.7 million in 2014 as compared to 2013.
2013 compared to 2012
Revenue in Europe decreased $0.4 million in 2013 compared to 2012, consisting of a decrease in license revenue of 12% ($13.7 million) and a decrease in service revenue of 2% ($1.8 million), partially offset by an increase in support revenue of 6% ($15.1 million). Organic total revenue and license revenue were down 3% and 18%, respectively, in 2013; total revenue in Europe from businesses that we acquired in 2013 was $15.1 million.
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates, particularly the Euro, favorably impacted revenue in Europe by $2.9 million in 2013 as compared to 2012.
Pacific Rim
2014 compared to 2013
Revenue in the Pacific Rim decreased $13.4 million in 2014 compared to 2013, consisting of a decrease in license revenue of 17% ($13.2 million) and a decrease in service revenue of 11% ($3.6 million), partially offset by an increase in support revenue of 7% ($3.4 million). Organic revenue was down 9% in 2014; total revenue in the Pacific Rim from businesses that we acquired in 2014 and the fourth quarter of 2013 was $1.4 million.
Revenue from China has historically represented 5% to 7% of our total revenue. In 2014, compared to 2013, revenue in China decreased 12% and represented 5% of total revenue.
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates favorably impacted revenue in the Pacific Rim by $0.6 million in 2014 compared to 2013.
2013 compared to 2012
Revenue in the Pacific Rim increased $0.8 million in 2013 compared to 2012, consisting of an increase in support revenue of 8% ($3.8 million) and an increase in license revenue of 3% ($2.2 million), partially offset by a decrease in service revenue of 14% ($5.2 million). Organic revenue was down 1% in 2013; total revenue from businesses that we acquired in 2013 in the Pacific Rim was $1.8 million.
In 2013, compared to 2012, revenue in China decreased 3% and represented 6% of total revenue.
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates favorably impacted revenue in the Pacific Rim by $0.9 million in 2013 compared to 2012.
Japan
2014 compared to 2013
Revenue in Japan decreased $7.2 million in 2014 compared to 2013 due primarily to unfavorable currency movements. The decrease in revenue in Japan in 2014 compared to 2013 included a decrease in support revenue of 8% ($6.1 million), a decrease in license revenue of 3% ($1.1 million) and a decrease in service revenue of 1% ($0.1 million). On a constant currency basis, license revenue increased 4%, services revenue increased 10% and support revenue increased 3%.
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates unfavorably impacted revenue in Japan by $12.8 million in 2014 as compared to 2013.
2013 compared to 2012
Revenue in Japan decreased $5.3 million in 2013 compared to 2012 due primarily to unfavorable currency movements partially offset by higher revenue from large transactions. The decrease in revenue in Japan in 2013 compared to 2012 included an increase in license revenue of 32% ($9.6 million), offset by a decrease in service revenue of 28% ($6.4 million), and a decrease in support revenue of 10% ($8.6 million). Organic total revenue and license revenue were down 11% and up 19%, respectively, in 2013; total revenue and license revenue in Japan from businesses that we acquired in 2013 was $9.6 million and $3.9 million, respectively. On a constant currency basis, license revenue increased 58%, support revenue increased 3% and services revenue decreased 14%.
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates unfavorably impacted revenue in Japan by $21.6 million in 2013 as compared to 2012.
Gross Margin
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2014 | | Percent Change | | 2013 | | Percent Change | | 2012 |
| (Dollar amounts in millions) |
Gross margin | $ | 983.3 |
| | 7 | % | | $ | 920.5 |
| | 4 | % | | $ | 883.6 |
|
Non-GAAP gross margin | 1,013.0 |
| | 6 | % | | 951.6 |
| | 4 | % | | 910.8 |
|
Gross margin as a % of revenue: | | | | | | | | | |
License | 91 | % | | | | 90 | % | | | | 91 | % |
Service | 13 | % | | | | 12 | % | | | | 10 | % |
Support | 88 | % | | | | 88 | % | | | | 88 | % |
Gross margin as a % of total revenue | 72 | % | | | | 71 | % | | | | 70 | % |
Non-GAAP gross margin as a % of total non-GAAP revenue | 75 | % | | | | 73 | % | | | | 72 | % |
Gross margin as a percentage of total revenue in 2014 compared to the year-ago period reflects higher license and services margins. The increases in our GAAP service gross margin since 2012 were due in part to improved consulting margin. Service margins have improved due to cost reductions, improved efficiencies and a reduction in the amount of direct services that we perform through expansion of our service partner program. Service margin in 2014 reflects improvements in the first half of the year offset by a decrease in the second half due in part to excess capacity, which we addressed with our restructuring actions in the fourth quarter. Additionally, we are making investments in select strategic customer engagements, which we expect to continue to unfavorably impact service margins in the first half of 2015. Service revenue comprised 22% of our total revenue in 2014 compared to 23% in 2013 and 24% in 2012.
Gross margin as a percentage of total revenue in 2013 compared to the year-ago period reflects higher service margins, partially offset by lower license margins primarily attributable to lower license revenue and higher amortization of acquired purchased software.
Costs and Expenses
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2014 | | Percent Change | | | 2013 | | Percent Change | | | 2012 |
| (Dollar amounts in millions) |
Cost of license revenue | $ | 31.7 |
| | (4 | )% | | | $ | 33.0 |
| | 8 | % | | | $ | 30.6 |
|
Cost of service revenue | 256.9 |
| | (1 | )% | | | 259.0 |
| | (2 | )% | | | 265.5 |
|
Cost of support revenue | 85.1 |
| | 5 | % | | | 81.1 |
| | 7 | % | | | 76.1 |
|
Sales and marketing | 357.4 |
| | (1 | )% | | | 360.6 |
| | (5 | )% | | | 377.8 |
|
Research and development | 226.5 |
| | 2 | % | | | 221.9 |
| | 3 | % | | | 215.0 |
|
General and administrative | 142.2 |
| | 8 | % | | | 131.9 |
| | 12 | % | | | 117.5 |
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets | 32.1 |
| | 21 | % | | | 26.5 |
| | 30 | % | | | 20.3 |
|
Restructuring charges | 28.4 |
| | (46 | )% | | | 52.2 |
| | 109 | % | | | 24.9 |
|
Total costs and expenses | $ | 1,160.4 |
| | — | % | (1) | | $ | 1,166.2 |
| | 3 | % | (1) | | $ | 1,127.6 |
|
Total headcount at end of period | 6,444 |
| (2) | 7 | % | | | 6,000 |
| | 2 | % | | | 5,897 |
|
| |
(1) | On a constant currency basis from the prior period, total costs and expenses were flat from 2013 to 2014 and increased 4% from 2012 to 2013. |
| |
(2) | Headcount at September 30, 2014 included approximately 250 employees with termination dates after September 30, 2014 that were included in our fourth quarter of 2014 restructuring actions. |
2014 compared to 2013
Costs and expenses in 2014, compared to 2013, decreased primarily as a result of:
| |
• | restructuring charges, which were $23.8 million lower in 2014; and |
| |
• | cost savings resulting from restructuring actions in 2013. |
These cost decreases were offset by:
| |
• | costs from acquired businesses (approximately 300 employees); |
| |
• | investments we are making in the Internet of Things solutions area of our business; |
| |
• | company-wide merit pay increases totaling approximately $12 million on an annualized basis, which were effective February 1, 2014; |
| |
• | increased amortization of acquired intangible assets, which was $5.2 million higher in 2014; and |
| |
• | increased acquisition-related and pension plan termination costs, which were $3.2 million higher. |
2013 compared to 2012
Costs and expenses in 2013 compared to 2012 increased primarily as a result of the following:
| |
• | restructuring charges of $52.2 million in 2013 compared to $24.9 million in 2012, primarily for severance and other related costs associated with the termination of approximately 550 employees; |
| |
• | an increase in employee headcount as a result of our acquisitions in 2013 (an aggregate of approximately 485 employees); |
| |
• | company-wide merit pay increases effective on February 1, 2012 (approximately $11 million on an annualized basis), which resulted in an increase in salary expense across all functional organizations; |
| |
• | acquisition-related costs (included in general and administrative) of $9.9 million, which were $6.0 million higher than 2012; and |
| |
• | increased amortization of acquired intangible assets, primarily related to our acquisition of Servigistics. |
These cost increases were partially offset by cost savings associated with restructuring actions in 2012 and 2013 and the impact of foreign currency movements which favorably impacted costs and expenses by $8.8 million in 2013.
Cost of License Revenue
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2014 | | Percent Change | | 2013 | | Percent Change | | 2012 |
| (Dollar amounts in millions) |
Cost of license revenue | $ | 31.7 |
| | (4 | )% | | $ | 33.0 |
| | 8 | % | | $ | 30.6 |
|
% of total revenue | 2 | % | | | | 3 | % | | | | 2 | % |
% of total license revenue | 9 | % | | | | 10 | % | | | | 9 | % |
Our cost of license revenue primarily consists of amortization of acquired purchased software intangible assets, fixed and variable costs associated with reproducing and distributing software and documentation and royalties paid to third parties for technology embedded in or licensed with our software products. Cost of license revenue as a percent of license revenue can vary depending on product mix sold, the effect of fixed and variable royalties, and the level of amortization of acquired software intangible assets. Amortization of acquired purchased software totaled $17.7 million, $18.6 million, and $15.8 million in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Cost of Service Revenue
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2014 | | Percent Change | | 2013 | | Percent Change | | 2012 |
| (Dollar amounts in millions) |
Cost of service revenue | $ | 256.9 |
| | (1 | )% | | $ | 259.0 |
| | (2 | )% | | $ | 265.5 |
|
% of total revenue | 19 | % | | | | 20 | % | | | | 21 | % |
% of total service revenue | 87 | % | | | | 88 | % | | | | 90 | % |
Service headcount at end of period | 1,450 |
| | 6 | % | | 1,367 |
| | 4 | % | | 1,315 |
|
Our cost of service revenue includes costs such as salaries, benefits, and computer equipment and facilities for our training and consulting personnel, and third-party subcontractor fees.
In 2014 compared to 2013, total compensation, benefit costs and travel expenses were higher by 3% ($5.3 million). Service headcount at the end of 2014 included approximately 60 employees added from 2014 acquisitions. The cost of third-party consulting services was $6.9 million lower in 2014, compared to 2013. The decrease in the use of subcontracted third-
party consultants is a result of our strategy to have our strategic services partners perform services for customers directly, which has contributed to improving services margins.
In 2013, compared to 2012, total compensation, benefit costs and travel expenses were 1% ($1.1 million) higher primarily due to higher average headcount year over year and the impact of annual salary increases. Service headcount at the end of 2013 included approximately 130 employees added from acquisitions. The cost of third-party consulting services was $11.8 million lower in 2013 compared to 2012.
Cost of Support Revenue
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2014 | | Percent Change | | 2013 | | Percent Change | | 2012 |
| (Dollar amounts in millions) |
Cost of support revenue | $ | 85.1 |
| | 5 | % | | $ | 81.1 |
| | 7 | % | | $ | 76.1 |
|
% of total revenue | 6 | % | | | | 6 | % | | | | 6 | % |
% of total support revenue | 12 | % | | | | 12 | % | | | | 12 | % |
Support headcount at end of period | 659 |
| | 4 | % | | 634 |
| | 16 | % | | 545 |
|
Our cost of support revenue includes costs such as salaries, benefits, and computer equipment and facilities associated with customer support and the release of support updates (including related royalty costs).
In 2014 compared to 2013, total compensation, benefit costs and travel expenses were higher by 5% ($2.8 million). Support headcount at the end of 2014 included approximately 30 employees added from 2014 acquisitions.
In 2013, compared to 2012, total compensation, benefit costs and travel expenses were 8% ($4.3 million) higher primarily due to increased headcount. Support headcount at the end of 2013 included approximately 60 employees added from 2013 acquisitions.
Sales and Marketing
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2014 | | Percent Change | | 2013 | | Percent Change | | 2012 |
| (Dollar amounts in millions) |
Sales and marketing expenses | $ | 357.4 |
| | (1 | )% | | $ | 360.6 |
| | (5 | )% | | $ | 377.8 |
|
% of total revenue | 26 | % | | | | 28 | % | | | | 30 | % |
Sales and marketing headcount at end of period | 1,481 |
| | 9 | % | | 1,362 |
| | (10 | )% | | 1,508 |
|
Our sales and marketing expenses primarily include salaries and benefits, sales commissions, advertising and marketing programs, travel and facility costs.
In 2014, compared to 2013, our compensation, benefit costs and travel expenses were flat, which reflects higher commission and salary expense offset by lower benefit costs. Sales and marketing headcount at the end of 2014 included approximately 70 employees added from 2014 acquisitions. In 2014, compared to 2013, total depreciation and telecommunication costs decreased by $2.5 million.
Our compensation, benefit costs and travel expenses were lower by an aggregate of 5% ($15.8 million) in 2013 compared to 2012, primarily due to lower headcount. Sales and marketing headcount at the end of the 2013 included approximately 30 employees added from 2013 acquisitions.
Research and Development
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2014 | | Percent Change | | 2013 | | Percent Change | | 2012 |
| (Dollar amounts in millions) |
Research and development expenses | $ | 226.5 |
| | 2 | % | | $ | 221.9 |
| | 3 | % | | $ | 215.0 |
|
% of total revenue | 17 | % | | | | 17 | % | | | | 17 | % |
Research and development headcount at end of period | 2,156 |
| | 8 | % | | 2,001 |
| | 3 | % | | 1,938 |
|
Our research and development expenses consist principally of salaries and benefits, costs of computer equipment and facility expenses. Major research and development activities include developing new releases of our software.
Total compensation, benefit costs and travel expenses were higher by 3% ($5.9 million) in 2014, compared to 2013. Headcount in 2014, excluding employees added from 2014 acquisitions, includes a higher mix of research and development headcount in lower cost geographic regions as compared to 2013. Additionally, research and development headcount at the end of 2014 included approximately 100 employees added from companies acquired since the end of 2013, primarily added in the fourth quarter of 2014. Total depreciation and telecommunication costs in 2014 decreased by $1.8 million, compared to 2013.
Total compensation, benefit costs and travel expenses were higher by 4% ($6.0 million) in 2013, compared to 2012. Research and development headcount at the end of 2013 included approximately 160 employees added from 2013 acquisitions.
General and Administrative
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2014 | | Percent Change | | 2013 | | Percent Change | | 2012 |
| (Dollar amounts in millions) |
General and administrative | $ | 142.2 |
| | 8 | % | | $ | 131.9 |
| | 12 | % | | $ | 117.5 |
|
% of total revenue | 10 | % | | | | 10 | % | | | | 9 | % |
General and administrative headcount at end of period | 686 |
| | 10 | % | | 626 |
| | 8 | % | | 578 |
|
Our general and administrative expenses include the costs of our corporate, finance, information technology, human resources, legal and administrative functions, as well as acquisition-related charges, bad debt expense and outside professional services, including accounting and legal fees. Acquisition-related costs include direct costs of acquisitions and expenses related to acquisition integration activities, including transaction fees, due diligence costs, retention bonuses and severance, and professional fees including legal and accounting costs related to the acquisition. In addition, subsequent adjustments to our initial estimated amount of contingent consideration associated with specific acquisitions are included in acquisition-related charges. Acquisition-related and pension plan termination costs were $13.1 million, $9.9 million and $3.8 million in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The increase in overall general and administrative costs in 2014, compared to 2013, was due in part to total compensation, benefit costs and travel costs which were 3% ($2.7 million) higher. General and administrative headcount at the end of 2014 included approximately 30 employees added from 2014 acquisitions. Additionally, in 2014, compared to 2013 costs for outside professional services including legal, tax, audit and consulting services were higher by $7.0 million. Cost increases in 2014 were partially offset by certain business taxes in a foreign jurisdiction which were lower by $1.0 million in 2014, compared to 2013.
Total compensation, benefit costs and travel costs were 5% ($4.0 million) higher in 2013 compared to 2012 due to higher headcount.
Amortization of Acquired Intangible Assets
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2014 | | Percent Change | | 2013 | | Percent Change | | 2012 |
| (Dollar amounts in millions) |
Amortization of acquired intangible assets | $ | 32.1 |
| | 21 | % | | $ | 26.5 |
| | 30 | % | | $ | 20.3 |
|
% of total revenue | 2 | % | | | | 2 | % | | | | 2 | % |
Amortization of acquired intangible assets reflects the amortization of acquired non-product related intangible assets, primarily customer and trademark-related intangible assets, recorded in connection with completed acquisitions. The increase in amortization of acquired intangible assets in 2014 includes our acquisitions of Axeda and Atego in the fourth quarter of 2014, our acquisition of ThingWorx in the second quarter of 2014 and our acquisitions of Enigma and NetIDEAS in the fourth quarter of 2013.
The increase in amortization of acquired intangible assets in 2013 was primarily due to our acquisition of Servigistics.
Restructuring Charges
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
| (Dollar amounts in millions) |
Restructuring charges | $ | 28.4 |
| | $ | 52.2 |
| | $ | 24.9 |
|
% of total revenue | 2 | % | | 4 | % | | 2 | % |
In September 2014, in support of integrating businesses acquired in the past year and the continued evolution of our business model, we committed to a plan to restructure our workforce and recorded a restructuring charge of $26.8 million attributable to termination benefits associated with 283 employees which will primarily be paid in fiscal 2015. We expect that the annualized cost savings of the restructuring actions will be approximately $30 million, which effect is contemplated in our financial targets for fiscal 2015. In addition, in 2014 we recorded restructuring charges of $1.6 million, primarily associated with the completion of the restructuring actions initiated in the fourth quarter of 2013.
In 2013, to improve profitability, we implemented restructuring actions and recorded restructuring charges of $52.2 million, including $50.9 million for severance and related costs associated with approximately 550 employees and $1.3 million related to facility consolidations. These restructuring actions were substantially completed in 2013 and resulted in $16 million per quarter reduction in operating expenses (which was reflected in our results for 2014).
To reduce costs and to realign our business, in 2012, we implemented a restructuring of our business and recorded restructuring charges of $24.9 million, primarily for severance and related costs associated with approximately 210 employees. We realized approximately $13 million of operating expense savings from these reductions in 2012.
In 2014, 2013 and 2012, we made cash payments related to restructuring charges of $20.6 million, $37.2 million and $20.9 million, respectively. At September 30, 2014, accrued expenses for unpaid restructuring charges totaled $26.4 million, which we expect to pay within the next twelve months.
Non-Operating Income (Expense)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
| (Dollar amounts in millions) |
Foreign currency losses, net | $ | (4.5 | ) | | $ | (2.0 | ) | | $ | (5.9 | ) |
Interest income | 3.1 |
| | 2.9 |
| | 2.9 |
|
Interest expense | (8.2 | ) | | (7.0 | ) | | (4.7 | ) |
Other income (expense), net | (1.0 | ) | | 5.0 |
| | 0.3 |
|
| $ | (10.5 | ) | | $ | (1.1 | ) | | $ | (7.4 | ) |
Foreign Currency Net Losses: Foreign currency net losses include costs of hedging contracts, certain realized and unrealized foreign currency transaction gains or losses, and foreign exchange gains or losses resulting from the required period-end currency re-measurement of the assets and liabilities of our subsidiaries that use the U.S. dollar as their functional currency. Because a large portion of our revenue and expenses is transacted in foreign currencies, we engage in hedging transactions involving the use of foreign currency forward contracts to reduce our exposure to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. Foreign currency losses in 2012 included $0.8 million related to MKS legal entity mergers.
Interest Income: Interest income represents earnings on the investment of our available cash balances and interest on financing provided to customers as described in Note B Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" in this Annual Report.
Interest Expense: Interest expense is primarily related to interest on borrowings under our credit facility. The increase in interest expense in 2014 and 2013, compared to the respective prior year, is due to higher average amounts outstanding under our credit facility in those years. We had $612 million outstanding under the credit facility at September 30, 2014, compared to $258 million at September 30, 2013 and $370 million at September 30, 2012, which included $230 million in proceeds drawn from our credit facility in the fourth quarter of 2012 to finance the Servigistics acquisition (which closed on October 2, 2012). The balance outstanding at September 30, 2014 reflects amounts borrowed in 2014 for our acquisitions of ThingWorx and Axeda, and $125 million borrowed in the fourth quarter of 2014 to finance our accelerated share repurchase transaction. The average interest rate on amounts outstanding under the credit facility was 1.6% in 2014, 1.7% in 2013 and 1.8% in 2012.
Other Income (Expense), Net: The change in other income (expense), net in 2014 and 2013, compared to 2012, was due primarily to a legal settlement gain of $5.1 million recorded in 2013.
Income Taxes
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended September 30, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
| (in millions) |
Pre-tax income | $ | 186.1 |
| | $ | 126.2 |
| | $ | 120.7 |
|
Tax (benefit) provision | 25.9 |
| | (17.5 | ) | | 156.1 |
|
Effective income tax rate | 14 | % | | (14 | )% | | 129 | % |
In 2014, our effective tax rate was lower than the 35% statutory federal income tax rate due to our corporate structure in which our foreign taxes are at a net effective tax rate lower than the U.S. rate and the reversal of a portion of our valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets described below. Other factors impacting the rate include foreign withholding taxes of $5.1 million and the establishment of a valuation allowance totaling $3.5 million in two foreign subsidiaries.
In 2013, our effective tax rate was lower than the 35% statutory federal income tax rate due, in large part, to the reversal of a portion of the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets (primarily the U.S.). We recorded benefits of $36.7 million resulting from 2013 acquisitions, as described below, and a benefit of $7.9 million related to the release of a valuation allowance as a result of a pension gain recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income in equity. Additionally, our 2013 tax provision reflects a $2.0 million provision related to a research and development (R&D) cost sharing prepayment by a foreign subsidiary to the U.S. A similar prepayment was made in 2012, resulting in a $7.8 million provision in that year. This impact was offset by a corresponding increase in our valuation allowance in the U.S. Other factors impacting the rate include our corporate structure in which our foreign taxes are at an effective tax rate lower than the U.S. rate, foreign withholding taxes of $6.0 million and non-cash tax benefits of $5.3 million recorded as a result of the conclusion of tax audits in several foreign jurisdictions.
Acquisitions in 2014 and 2013 were accounted for as business combinations. Assets acquired, including the fair value of acquired tangible assets, intangible assets and assumed liabilities were recorded, and we recorded net deferred tax liabilities of $21.6 million and $38.7 million in 2014 and 2013, respectively, primarily related to the tax effect of the acquired intangible assets that are not deductible for income tax purposes. These deferred tax liabilities reduced our net deferred tax asset balance and resulted in a tax benefit of $18.1 million and $36.7 million in 2014 and 2013, respectively, to decrease our valuation allowance in jurisdictions where we have recorded a valuation allowance. As these decreases in the valuation allowance are not part of the accounting for business combinations (the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed), they were recorded as an income tax benefit.
In 2012, our effective tax rate was higher than the 35% statutory federal income tax rate due primarily to the recording of a $124.5 million charge to the income tax provision related to the establishment of a valuation allowance on U.S. net deferred tax assets as described below. This increase was offset in part as a result of our corporate structure in which our foreign taxes are at an effective tax rate lower than the U.S. rate. Our 2012 provision included a non-cash charge of $4.2 million related to the restructuring of our Canadian operations that resulted in a change in the tax status of the foreign legal entity and a non-cash charge of $1.4 million related to the impact of a Japanese legislative change on our Japan entity's deferred tax assets. These charges were excluded from our non-GAAP earnings per share (see Non-GAAP Measures below). Additionally, our 2012 tax provision reflects a $7.8 million provision related to a research and development cost sharing prepayment by a foreign subsidiary to the U.S. A comparable prepayment was made in 2011.
In the fourth quarter of 2012, we recorded a $124.5 million non-cash charge to the income tax provision to establish a valuation allowance against substantially all of our U.S. net deferred tax assets. We weighed all available evidence, both positive and negative, and concluded that it was more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50 percent) that substantially all of our U.S. deferred tax assets will not be realized. The realization of deferred tax assets, including carryforwards and deductible temporary differences, depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income of the same character during the carryback or carryforward period. We considered all sources of taxable income available to realize the deferred tax assets, including the future reversal of existing temporary differences, future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards, taxable income in prior carryback years and tax-planning strategies.
On September 30, 2014, we executed a business realignment in which intellectual property was transferred between two wholly-owned foreign subsidiaries. The realignment allows us to more efficiently manage the distribution of our products to European customers. There was no impact to the tax provision for this transaction in 2014. However, we expect this realignment to result in an annual tax benefit of approximately $15 million to $20 million for the next several years, declining annually thereafter through 2021.
In the normal course of business, PTC and its subsidiaries are examined by various taxing authorities, including the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in the United States. We regularly assess the likelihood of additional assessments by tax
authorities and provide for these matters as appropriate. We are currently under audit by tax authorities in several jurisdictions. Audits by tax authorities typically involve examination of the deductibility of certain permanent items, limitations on net operating losses and tax credits. Although we believe our tax estimates are appropriate, the final determination of tax audits and any related litigation could result in material changes in our estimates.
Our future effective income tax rate may be materially impacted by the amount of income taxes associated with our foreign earnings, which are taxed at rates different from the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate, as well as the timing and extent of the realization of deferred tax assets and changes in the tax law. Further, our tax rate may fluctuate within a fiscal year, including from quarter to quarter, due to items arising from discrete events, including settlements of tax audits and assessments, the resolution or identification of tax position uncertainties, and acquisitions of other companies.
Non-GAAP Measures
The non-GAAP measures presented in the above discussion of our results of operations and the respective most directly comparable GAAP measures are:
| |
• | non-GAAP revenue—GAAP revenue |
| |
• | non-GAAP gross margin—GAAP gross margin |
| |
• | non-GAAP operating income—GAAP operating income |
| |
• | non-GAAP operating margin—GAAP operating margin |
| |
• | non-GAAP net income—GAAP net income (loss) |
| |
• | non-GAAP diluted earnings per share—GAAP diluted earnings (loss) per share |
The non-GAAP measures exclude fair value adjustments related to acquired deferred revenue, acquired deferred costs, stock-based compensation expense, amortization of acquired intangible assets expense, acquisition-related charges, restructuring charges, pension plan termination-related costs, identified discrete items included in non-operating other income (expense), net and the related tax effects of the preceding items, and any other identified tax items. These items are normally included in the comparable measures calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP.
Fair value of acquired deferred revenue is a purchase accounting adjustment recorded to reduce acquired deferred revenue to the fair value of the remaining obligation.
Stock-based compensation expense is non-cash expense relating to stock-based awards issued to executive officers, employees and outside directors, consisting of restricted stock, stock options and restricted stock units.
Amortization of acquired intangible assets expense is a non-cash expense that is impacted by the timing and magnitude of our acquisitions. We believe the assessment of our operations excluding these costs is relevant to our assessment of internal operations and comparisons to the performance of other companies in our industry.
Charges included in general and administrative expenses include acquisition-related charges and pension plan termination-related costs. Acquisition-related charges include direct costs of potential and completed acquisitions and expenses related to acquisition integration activities, including transaction fees, due diligence costs, severance and professional fees. In addition, subsequent adjustments to our initial estimated amount of contingent consideration associated with specific acquisitions are included within acquisition-related charges. These costs are not considered part of our normal operations as the occurrence and amount will vary depending on the timing and size of acquisitions. In the second quarter of 2014, we began the process of terminating a U.S. pension plan. Costs associated with the termination are not considered part of our ongoing operations.
Restructuring charges include excess facility restructuring charges and severance costs resulting from reductions of personnel driven by modifications to our business strategy and not as part of our normal operations. These costs may vary in size based on our restructuring plan.
We use these non-GAAP measures, and we believe that they assist our investors, to make period-to-period comparisons of our operational performance because they provide a view of our operating results without items that are not, in our view, indicative of our core operating results. We believe that these non-GAAP measures help illustrate underlying trends in our business, and we use the measures to establish budgets and operational goals, communicated internally and externally, for managing our business and evaluating our performance. We believe that providing non-GAAP measures affords investors a view of our operating results that may be more easily compared to the results of peer companies. In addition, compensation of our executives is based in part on the performance of our business based on these non-GAAP measures.
The items excluded from the non-GAAP measures often have a material impact on our financial results and such items often recur. Accordingly, the non-GAAP measures included in this Annual Report should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for or superior to, the comparable measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.
The following tables reconcile each of these non-GAAP measures to its most closely comparable GAAP measure on our financial statements.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended September 30, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
| (Dollar amounts in millions) |
GAAP revenue | $ | 1,357.0 |
| | $ | 1,293.5 |
| | $ | 1,255.7 |
|
Fair value of acquired deferred revenue | 1.2 |
| | 3.0 |
| | 2.5 |
|
Non-GAAP revenue | $ | 1,358.2 |
| | $ | 1,296.5 |
| | $ | 1,258.2 |
|
| | | | | |
GAAP gross margin | $ | 983.3 |
| | $ | 920.5 |
| | $ | 883.6 |
|
Fair value of acquired deferred revenue | 1.2 |
| | 3.0 |
| | 2.5 |
|
Fair value adjustment to acquired deferred costs | (0.1 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
Stock-based compensation | 10.4 |
| | 9.5 |
| | 8.9 |
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets included in cost of revenue | 18.1 |
| | 18.6 |
| | 15.8 |
|
Non-GAAP gross margin | $ | 1,013.0 |
| | $ | 951.6 |
| | $ | 910.8 |
|
| | | | | |
GAAP operating income | $ | 196.6 |
| | $ | 127.3 |
| | $ | 128.1 |
|
Fair value of acquired deferred revenue | 1.2 |
| | 3.0 |
| | 2.5 |
|
Fair value adjustment to acquired deferred costs | (0.2 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
Stock-based compensation | 50.9 |
| | 48.8 |
| | 51.3 |
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets | 50.2 |
| | 45.1 |
| | 36.1 |
|
Charges included in general and administrative expenses (1) | 13.1 |
| | 9.9 |
| | 3.8 |
|
Restructuring charges | 28.4 |
| | 52.2 |
| | 24.9 |
|
Non-GAAP operating income | $ | 340.3 |
| | $ | 286.3 |
| | $ | 246.8 |
|
| | | | | |
GAAP net income (loss) | $ | 160.2 |
| | $ | 143.8 |
| | $ | (35.4 | ) |
Fair value of acquired deferred revenue | 1.2 |
| | 3.0 |
| | 2.5 |
|
Fair value adjustment to acquired deferred costs | (0.2 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
Stock-based compensation | 50.9 |
| | 48.8 |
| | 51.3 |
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets | 50.2 |
| | 45.1 |
| | 36.1 |
|
Charges included in general and administrative expenses (1) | 13.1 |
| | 9.9 |
| | 3.8 |
|
Restructuring charges | 28.4 |
| | 52.2 |
| | 24.9 |
|
Non-operating (gain) loss (2) | — |
| | (5.7 | ) | | 0.8 |
|
Income tax adjustments (3) | (43.5 | ) | | (77.8 | ) | | 98.8 |
|
Non-GAAP net income | $ | 260.4 |
| | $ | 219.2 |
| | $ | 182.9 |
|
GAAP diluted earnings (loss) per share (4) | $ | 1.34 |
| | $ | 1.19 |
| | $ | (0.30 | ) |
Stock-based compensation | 0.42 |
| | 0.40 |
| | 0.42 |
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets | 0.42 |
| | 0.37 |
| | 0.30 |
|
Restructuring charges | 0.24 |
| | 0.43 |
| | 0.21 |
|
Charges included in general and administrative expenses (1) | 0.11 |
| | 0.08 |
| | 0.03 |
|
Non-operating (gain) loss | — |
| | (0.05 | ) | | 0.01 |
|
Income tax adjustments (3) | (0.36 | ) | | (0.64 | ) | | 0.82 |
|
All other items identified above | 0.01 |
| | 0.03 |
| | 0.02 |
|
Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share (5) | $ | 2.17 |
| | $ | 1.81 |
| | $ | 1.51 |
|
Operating margin impact of non-GAAP adjustments: | | | | | |
GAAP operating margin | 14.5 | % | | 9.8 | % | | 10.2 | % |
Fair value of acquired deferred revenue | 0.1 | % | | 0.2 | % | | 0.2 | % |
Stock-based compensation | 3.8 | % | | 3.8 | % | | 4.1 | % |
Amortization of acquired intangible assets | 3.7 | % | | 3.5 | % | | 2.9 | % |
Charges included in general and administrative expenses | 1.0 | % | | 0.8 | % | | 0.3 | % |
Restructuring charges | 2.1 | % | | 4.0 | % | | 2.0 | % |
Non-GAAP operating margin | 25.1 | % | | 22.1 | % | | 19.6 | % |
| |
(1) | Represents acquisition-related charges and costs of $0.4 million in 2014 related to terminating a U.S. pension plan. |
| |
(2) | Non-operating gain (loss) adjustments: In 2013, we recorded a $0.6 million gain on an investment related to an acquisition and a legal settlement gain of $5.1 million. In 2012, we recorded $0.8 million of foreign currency losses related to MKS legal entity mergers. |
| |
(3) | Income tax adjustments reflect the tax effects of non-GAAP adjustments which are calculated by applying the applicable tax rate by jurisdiction to the non-GAAP adjustments listed above, and also include any identified tax items. In the fourth quarter of 2012, a valuation allowance was established against our U.S. net deferred tax assets and in the fourth quarter of 2014 a valuation allowance was established against net deferred tax assets in two foreign jurisdictions. As the U.S. is profitable on a non-GAAP basis, the non-GAAP tax provision is being calculated assuming there is no U.S. valuation allowance. Additionally, the following identified tax items have been excluded from the non-GAAP tax results. GAAP diluted earnings per share in 2014 includes (i) tax benefits of $18.1 million related to the release of a portion of the valuation allowance as a result of deferred tax liabilities established for acquisitions recorded in 2014 and (ii) a tax charge of $3.5 million to establish a valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets in two foreign jurisdictions. GAAP diluted earnings per share in 2013 includes (i) tax benefits of $36.7 million related to the release of a portion of the valuation allowance as a result of deferred tax liabilities established for acquisitions recorded in 2013, (ii) tax benefits of $3.2 million relating to the final resolution of a long standing tax litigation matter and completion of an international jurisdiction tax audit, (iii) a tax benefit of $7.9 million related to the release of a portion of the valuation allowance in the U.S. as a result of a pension gain (decrease in unrecognized actuarial loss) recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and (iv) a tax benefit of $2.6 million relating to a tax audit in a foreign jurisdiction of an acquired company. The GAAP loss per share in 2012 includes (i) a net tax charge of $124.5 million recorded in the fourth quarter to establish a valuation allowance against our U.S. net deferred tax asset, (ii) $5.4 million, net primarily related to foreign tax credits which would be fully realized on a non-GAAP basis, (iii) $3.3 million primarily related to acquired legal entity integration activities, and (iv) $1.4 million related to the impact from a reduction in the statutory tax rate in Japan on deferred tax assets from a litigation settlement. |
| |
(4) | GAAP weighted average shares outstanding for 2012 of 118.7 million shares excludes the effect of stock-based compensation awards due to a GAAP net loss in 2012. |
| |
(5) | Diluted earnings per share impact of non-GAAP adjustments is calculated by dividing the dollar amount of the non-GAAP adjustment by the diluted weighted average shares outstanding for the respective year. Non-GAAP weighted average shares for 2012 of 121.0 million shares includes the dilutive effect of stock-based compensation awards of 2.3 million shares due to non-GAAP net income in 2012. |
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We have prepared our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In preparing our financial statements, we make estimates, assumptions and judgments that can have a significant impact on our reported revenues, results of operations, and net income, as well as on the value of certain assets and liabilities on our balance sheet. These estimates, assumptions and judgments are necessary because future events and their effects on our results and the value of our assets cannot be determined with certainty, and are made based on our historical experience and on other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates may change as new events occur or additional information is obtained, and we may periodically be faced with uncertainties, the outcomes of which are not within our control and may not be known for a prolonged period of time.
The accounting policies, methods and estimates used to prepare our financial statements are described generally in Note B Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" in this Annual Report. The most important accounting judgments and estimates that we made in preparing the financial statements involved:
| |
• | accounting for income taxes; |
| |
• | valuation of assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations; |
| |
• | accounting for pensions; and |
A critical accounting policy is one that is both material to the presentation of our financial statements and requires us to make subjective or complex judgments that could have a material effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Critical accounting policies require us to make assumptions about matters that are uncertain at the time of the estimate, and different estimates that we could have used, or changes in the estimates that are reasonably likely to occur, may have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations. Because the use of estimates is inherent in the financial reporting process, actual results could differ from those estimates.
Accounting policies, guidelines and interpretations related to our critical accounting policies and estimates are generally subject to numerous sources of authoritative guidance and are often reexamined by accounting standards rule makers and regulators. These rule makers and/or regulators may promulgate interpretations, guidance or regulations that may result in changes to our accounting policies, which could have a material impact on our financial position and results of operations.
Revenue Recognition
We exercise judgment and use estimates in connection with determining the amounts of software license and services revenues to be recognized in each accounting period.
Our primary judgments involve the following:
| |
• | determining whether collection is probable; |
| |
• | assessing whether the fee is fixed or determinable; |
| |
• | determining whether service arrangements, including modifications and customization of the underlying software, are not essential to the functionality of the licensed software and thus would result in the revenue for license and service elements of an agreement being recorded separately; and |
| |
• | determining the fair value of services and support elements included in multiple-element arrangements, which is the basis for allocating and deferring revenue for such services and support. |
We derive revenues from three primary sources: (1) software licenses, (2) support and (3) services.
We recognize revenue when: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (2) delivery has occurred (generally, FOB shipping point or electronic distribution), (3) the fee is fixed or determinable, and (4) collection is probable.
Our software is distributed primarily through our direct sales force. In addition, we have an indirect distribution channel through alliances with resellers. Revenue arrangements with resellers are recognized on a sell-through basis; that is, when we deliver the product to the end-user customer. We record consideration given to a reseller as a reduction of revenue to the extent we have recorded revenue from the reseller. We do not offer contractual rights of return, stock balancing, or price protection to our resellers, and actual product returns from them have been insignificant to date. As a result, we do not maintain reserves for reseller product returns.
At the time of each sale transaction, we must make an assessment of the collectability of the amount due from the customer. Revenue is only recognized at that time if management deems that collection is probable. In making this assessment, we consider customer credit-worthiness and historical payment experience. At that same time, we assess whether fees are fixed or determinable and free of contingencies or significant uncertainties. In assessing whether the fee is fixed or determinable, we consider the payment terms of the transaction, including transactions with payment terms that extend beyond our customary payment terms, and our collection experience in similar transactions without making concessions, among other factors. We have periodically provided financing to credit-worthy customers with payment terms up to 24 months. If the fee is determined not to be fixed or determinable, revenue is recognized only as payments become due from the customer, provided that all other revenue recognition criteria are met. Our software license arrangements generally do not include customer acceptance provisions. However, if an arrangement includes an acceptance provision, we record revenue only upon the earlier of (1) receipt of written acceptance from the customer or (2) expiration of the acceptance period.
Our software arrangements often include implementation and consulting services that are sold under consulting engagement contracts or as part of the software license arrangement. When we determine that such services are not essential to the functionality of the licensed software, we record revenue separately for the license and service elements of these arrangements, provided that appropriate evidence of fair value exists for the undelivered services (see discussion below). Generally, we consider that a service is not essential to the functionality of the software based on various factors, including if the services may be provided by independent third parties experienced in providing such consulting and implementation in coordination with dedicated customer personnel and whether the services result in significant modification or customization of the software functionality. When consulting services qualify for separate accounting, consulting revenues under time and materials billing arrangements are recognized as the services are performed. Consulting revenues under fixed-priced contracts are generally recognized as the services are performed using a proportionate performance model with hours or costs as the input method of attribution. When we provide consulting services considered essential to the functionality of the software, the arrangement does not qualify for separate accounting of the license and service elements, and the license revenue is recognized together with the consulting services using the percentage-of-completion method of contract accounting. Under such arrangements, consideration is recognized as the services are performed as measured by an observable input. In these circumstances, we separate license revenue from service revenue for income statement presentation by allocating vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value of the consulting services as service revenue and the residual portion as license revenue. Under the percentage-of-completion method, we estimate the stage of completion of contracts with fixed or
“not to exceed” fees based on hours or costs incurred to date as compared with estimated total project hours or costs at completion. Adjustments to estimates to complete are made in the periods in which facts resulting in a change become known. When total cost estimates exceed revenues, we accrue for the estimated losses when identified. The use of the proportionate performance and percentage-of-completion methods of accounting require significant judgment relative to estimating total contract costs or hours (hours being a proxy for costs), including assumptions relative to the length of time to complete the project, the nature and complexity of the work to be performed and anticipated changes in salaries and other costs.
We generally use the residual method to recognize revenue from software arrangements that include one or more elements to be delivered at a future date when evidence of the fair value of all undelivered elements exists, and the elements of the arrangement qualify for separate accounting as described above. Under the residual method, the fair value of the undelivered elements (i.e., support and services) based on VSOE is deferred and the remaining portion of the total arrangement fee is allocated to the delivered elements (i.e., software license). If evidence of the fair value of one or more of the undelivered elements does not exist, all revenues are deferred and recognized when delivery of all of those elements has occurred or when fair values can be established. We determine VSOE of the fair value of services and support revenue based upon our recent pricing for those elements when sold separately. For certain transactions, VSOE of the fair value of support revenue is determined based on a substantive support renewal clause within a customer contract. Our current pricing practices are influenced primarily by product type, purchase volume, sales channel and customer location. We review services and support sold separately on a periodic basis and update, when appropriate, our VSOE of fair value for such elements to ensure that it reflects our recent pricing experience.
Generally, our contracts are accounted for individually. However, when contracts are closely interrelated and dependent on each other, it may be necessary to account for two or more contracts as one to reflect the substance of the group of contracts.
For subscription-based licenses, license revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the arrangement. In limited circumstances, where the right to use the software license is contingent upon current payments of support, fees for software license and support are recognized ratably over the initial support term.
Support contracts generally include rights to unspecified upgrades (when and if available), telephone and internet-based support, updates and bug fixes. Support revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the support contract on a straight-line basis.
Reimbursements of out-of-pocket expenditures incurred in connection with providing consulting services are included in service revenue, with the offsetting expense recorded in cost of service revenue.
Training services include on-site and classroom training. Training revenues are recognized as the related training services are provided.
Accounting for Income Taxes
As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to calculate our income tax expense based on taxable income by jurisdiction. There are many transactions and calculations about which the ultimate tax outcome is uncertain; as a result, our calculations involve estimates by management. Some of these uncertainties arise as a consequence of revenue-sharing, cost-reimbursement and transfer pricing arrangements among related entities and the differing tax treatment of revenue and cost items across various jurisdictions. If we were compelled to revise or to account differently for our arrangements, that revision could affect our tax liability.
The income tax accounting process also involves estimating our actual current tax liability, together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our consolidated balance sheets. We must then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and, to the extent we believe that it is more likely than not that all or a portion of our deferred tax assets will not be realized, we must establish a valuation allowance as a charge to income tax expense.
As of September 30, 2014, we have a valuation allowance of $144.0 million against net deferred tax assets in the U.S. and a valuation allowance of $33.5 million against net deferred tax assets in certain foreign jurisdictions. In the fourth quarter of 2012, we recorded a $124.5 million non-cash charge to the income tax provision to establish a valuation allowance against substantially all of our U.S. net deferred tax assets. We weighed all available evidence, both positive and negative, and concluded that it was more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50 percent) that substantially all of our U.S. deferred tax assets will not be realized. The realization of deferred tax assets, including carryforwards and deductible temporary differences, depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income of the same character during the carryback or carryforward period. We considered all sources of taxable income available to realize the deferred tax assets, including the future reversal of existing
temporary differences, future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards, taxable income in prior carryback years and tax-planning strategies.
The valuation allowance recorded against net deferred tax assets of certain foreign jurisdictions is established primarily for our net operating loss carryforwards, the majority of which do not expire. There are limitations imposed on the utilization of such net operating losses that could further restrict the recognition of any tax benefits.
We have not provided for U.S. income taxes or foreign withholding taxes on foreign unrepatriated earnings as it is our current intention to permanently reinvest these earnings outside the U.S. unless it can be done with no significant tax cost. If we decide to change this assertion in the future to repatriate any additional non-U.S. earnings, we may be required to establish a deferred tax liability on such earnings.
In the normal course of business, PTC and its subsidiaries are examined by various taxing authorities, including the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in the United States. We regularly assess the likelihood of additional assessments by tax authorities and provide for these matters as appropriate. We are currently under audit by tax authorities in several jurisdictions. Audits by tax authorities typically involve examination of the deductibility of certain permanent items, limitations on net operating losses and tax credits. Although we believe our tax estimates are appropriate, the final determination of tax audits and any related litigation could result in material changes in our estimates.
Valuation of Assets and Liabilities Acquired in Business Combinations
In accordance with business combination accounting, we allocate the purchase price of acquired companies to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. Determining these fair values requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to intangible assets.
Our identifiable intangible assets acquired consist of developed technology, core technology, tradenames, customer lists and contracts, and software support agreements and related relationships. Developed technology consists of products that have reached technological feasibility. Core technology represents a combination of processes, inventions and trade secrets related to the design and development of acquired products. Customer lists and contracts and software support agreements and related relationships represent the underlying relationships and agreements with customers of the acquired company’s installed base. We have generally valued intangible assets using a discounted cash flow model. Critical estimates in valuing certain of the intangible assets include but are not limited to:
| |
• | future expected cash flows from software license sales, customer support agreements, customer contracts and related customer relationships and acquired developed technologies and trademarks and trade names; |
| |
• | expected costs to develop the in-process research and development into commercially viable products and estimating cash flows from the projects when completed; |
| |
• | the acquired company’s brand awareness and market position, as well as assumptions about the period of time the acquired brand will continue to be used by the combined company; and |
| |
• | discount rates used to determine the present value of estimated future cash flows. |
In addition, we estimate the useful lives of our intangible assets based upon the expected period over which we anticipate generating economic benefits from the related intangible asset.
Net tangible assets consist of the fair values of tangible assets less the fair values of assumed liabilities and obligations. Except for deferred revenues, net tangible assets were generally valued by us at the respective carrying amounts recorded by the acquired company, if we believed that their carrying values approximated their fair values at the acquisition date. The values assigned to deferred revenue reflect an amount equivalent to the estimated cost plus an appropriate profit margin to perform the services related to the acquired company’s software support contracts.
In addition, uncertain tax positions and tax related valuation allowances assumed in connection with a business combination are initially estimated as of the acquisition date and we reevaluate these items quarterly with any adjustments to our preliminary estimates being recorded to goodwill provided that we are within the measurement period (up to one year from the acquisition date) and we continue to collect information in order to determine their estimated values. Subsequent to the measurement period or our final determination of the estimated value of uncertain tax positions or tax related valuation allowances, whichever comes first, changes to these uncertain tax positions and tax related valuation allowances will affect our provision for income taxes in our consolidated statement of operations.
Our estimates of fair value are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable at that time, but which are inherently uncertain and unpredictable. Assumptions may be incomplete or inaccurate, and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur, which may affect the accuracy or validity of such assumptions, estimates or actual results.
When events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a finite-lived intangible asset may not be recoverable, we perform an assessment of the asset for potential impairment. This assessment is based on projected undiscounted future cash flows over the asset’s remaining life. If the carrying value of the asset exceeds its undiscounted cash flows, we record an impairment loss equal to the excess of the carrying value over the fair value of the asset, determined using projected discounted future cash flows of the asset.
Valuation of Goodwill
Our goodwill totaled $1,012.5 million and $769.1 million as of September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. We have two operating segments: (1) Software Products and (2) Services. We assess goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level. Our reporting units are determined based on the components of our operating segments that constitute a business for which discrete financial information is available and for which operating results are regularly reviewed by segment management. Our reporting units are consistent with our operating segments. As of September 30, 2014 and 2013, goodwill and acquired intangible assets in the aggregate attributable to our software products reportable segment was $1,283.0 million and $979.3 million, respectively, and attributable to our services reportable segment was $66.4 million and $62.9 million, respectively. We test goodwill for impairment in the third quarter of our fiscal year, or on an interim basis if an event occurs or circumstances change that would, more likely than not, reduce the fair value of a reporting segment below its carrying value. Factors we consider important (on an overall company basis and reportable segment basis, as applicable) that could trigger an impairment review include significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results, significant changes in our use of the acquired assets or a significant change in the strategy for our business, significant negative industry or economic trends, a significant decline in our stock price for a sustained period, or a reduction of our market capitalization relative to net book value.
We completed our annual goodwill impairment review as of June 28, 2014 and concluded that no impairment charge was required as of that date. To conduct our test of goodwill, the fair value of each reporting unit is compared to its carrying value. If the reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, we record an impairment loss equal to the difference between the carrying value of goodwill and its implied fair value. We estimate the fair values of our reporting units using discounted cash flow valuation models. Those models require estimates of future revenues, profits, capital expenditures, working capital, terminal values based on revenue multiples, and discount rates for each reporting unit. We estimate these amounts by evaluating historical trends, current budgets, operating plans and industry data. The estimated fair value of each reporting unit was more than double its carrying value as of June 28, 2014.
Accounting for Pensions
We sponsor several U.S. and international pension plans. We make assumptions that are used in calculating the expense and liability of these plans. These key assumptions include the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets and the discount rate used to determine the present value of benefit obligations. In selecting the expected long-term rate of return on assets, we consider the average future rate of earnings expected on the funds invested to provide for the benefits under the pension plan. This includes considering the plans' asset allocations and the expected returns likely to be earned over the life of the plans. The discount rate reflects the estimated rate at which an amount that is invested in a portfolio of high-quality debt instruments would provide the future cash flows necessary to pay benefits when they come due. The actuarial assumptions used by us may differ materially from actual results due to changing market and economic conditions or longer or shorter life spans of the participants. Our actual results could differ materially from those we estimated, which could require us to record a greater amount of pension expense in future years and/or require higher than expected cash contributions.
We maintain a U.S. defined benefit pension plan (the Plan) that covers certain persons who were employees of Computervision Corporation (acquired by us in 1998). Benefits under the Plan were frozen in 1990. In the second quarter of 2014, we began the process of terminating the Plan, which will include settling Plan liabilities by offering lump sum distributions to plan participants and purchasing annuity contracts to cover vested benefits. We expect to complete the termination process by September 30, 2015.
As of September 30, 2014, we have valued the projected benefit obligations for our U.S. Plan based on the present value of estimated costs to settle the liabilities through a combination of lump sum payments to beneficiaries and purchasing annuities from an insurance company. This reflects an estimate of how many participants we expect will accept a lump sum offering, and an estimate of lump sum pay-outs for those participants based on the current lump sum rates approved by the IRS. Liabilities expected to be settled through the purchase of annuity contracts have been estimated based on future benefit payments, discounted based on current interest rates that correspond to the liability pay-outs, adjusted to reflect a premium that would be assessed by the insurer. We expect to settle the liabilities by the end of fiscal 2015. As the liabilities are settled, losses (currently estimated to be approximately $65 million) will be recognized up to the amount of unamortized losses in accumulated other comprehensive income, based on the projected benefit obligations measured as of the dates the settlements occur. Prior to settling the liabilities, we will contribute such additional amounts (currently estimated to be approximately $25
million) as may be necessary to fully fund the Plan. Such contributions are expected to be made concurrent with settling the liabilities but may be made earlier at our discretion.
As of September 30, 2014 and 2013, the U.S. discount rate was determined using a bond-matching tool. Under this tool, discount rates are derived by identifying a theoretical settlement portfolio of high quality bonds sufficient to provide for the pension plan's projected benefit payments. A single rate is then determined that results in a discounted value of the plan's benefit payments that equates to the market value of the selected bonds. In determining our U.S. pension cost for 2014, 2013 and 2012, we used a discount rate of 4.90%, 4.00% and 4.50%, respectively, and an expected return on plan assets of 7.25% for all three years.
Certain of our international subsidiaries (principally Germany) also sponsor pension plans. Accounting and reporting for these plans requires the use of country-specific assumptions for discount rates and expected rates of return on assets. We apply a consistent methodology in determining the key assumptions that, in addition to future experience assumptions such as mortality rates, are used by our actuaries to determine our liability and expense for each of these plans. The discount rate for Germany was selected with reference to a spot-rate yield curve based on the yields of Aa-rated Euro-denominated corporate bonds. In addition, our actuarial consultants determine the expense and liabilities of the plan using other assumptions for future experience, such as mortality rates. In determining our pension cost for 2014, 2013 and 2012, we used weighted average discount rates of 3.3%, 3.4% and 4.8%, respectively, and weighted average expected returns on plan assets of 5.7%, 5.4% and 5.4%, respectively. In 2014, 2013 and 2012, our actual return on plan assets for all plans was $15.9 million, $13.6 million and $16.5 million, respectively. If actual returns are below our expected rates of return, it will impact the amount and timing of future contributions and expense for these plans. We expect lower rates of return in 2015 because we transferred U.S. plan assets from equities to fixed income securities in 2014 in contemplation of terminating the plan and distributing assets from the plan.
As of September 30, 2014 and 2013, our plans in total were underfunded, representing the difference between our projected benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets, by $61.2 million and $50.1 million, respectively. The projected benefit obligation as of September 30, 2014 was determined using a discount rate of 3.8% for the U.S. plan and a weighted average discount rate of 2.4% for our international plans. The most sensitive assumptions used in calculating the expense and liability of our pension plans are the discount rate and the expected return on plan assets. Total GAAP net periodic pension cost was $3.3 million in 2014 and we expect it to be approximately $8 million in 2015. The increase in GAAP pension cost in 2015 is due primarily to lower expected returns on U.S. plan assets as described above. A 50 basis point change to our discount rate and expected return on plan assets assumptions would have changed our pension expense for the year ended September 30, 2014 by approximately $1 million. A 50 basis point decrease in our discount rate assumptions would increase our projected benefit obligation as of September 30, 2014 by approximately $16 million.
Legal Contingencies
We are periodically subject to various legal claims and involved in various legal proceedings. We routinely review the status of each significant matter and assess our potential financial exposure. If the potential loss from any matter is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated, we record a liability for the estimated loss. Significant judgment is required in both the determination of probability and the determination as to whether the amount of an exposure is reasonably estimable. Because of inherent uncertainties related to these legal matters, we base our loss accruals on the best information available at the time. Further, estimates of this nature are highly subjective, and the final outcome of these matters could vary significantly from the amounts that have been included in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements. As additional information becomes available, we reassess our potential liability and may revise our estimates. Such revisions could have a material impact on future quarterly or annual results of operations.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| September 30, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
| (in thousands) |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 293,654 |
| | $ | 241,913 |
| | $ | 489,543 |
|
Activity for the year included the following: | | | | | |
Cash provided by operating activities | $ | 304,552 |
| | $ | 224,683 |
| | $ | 217,975 |
|
Cash used by investing activities | (348,800 | ) | | (274,450 | ) | | (31,633 | ) |
Cash provided (used) by financing activities | 105,353 |
| | (196,524 | ) | | 134,663 |
|
We invest our cash with highly rated financial institutions and in diversified domestic and international money market mutual funds. The portfolio is invested in short-term instruments to ensure cash is available to meet requirements as needed. At September 30, 2014, cash and cash equivalents totaled $293.7 million, up from $241.9 million at September 30, 2013, reflecting $304.6 million in operating cash flow, $353.8 million of net amounts borrowed under our credit facility ($110 million borrowed in the first quarter of 2014 for our acquisition of ThingWorx, $295 million borrowed in the fourth quarter for our acquisition of Axeda and our accelerated share repurchase transaction, net of amounts repaid in the second and third quarters of 2014), partially offset by $323.5 million used for our acquisitions of Axeda, Atego and ThingWorx and $224.9 million used to repurchase common shares outstanding.
Cash provided by operating activities
Cash provided by operating activities was $304.6 million in 2014, compared to $224.7 million in 2013 and $218.0 million in 2012. Cash provided by operations was higher due to higher earnings (pre-tax income was $186.1 million in 2014 compared to $126.2 million in 2013 and $120.7 million in 2012), lower restructuring payments ($20.6 million in 2014, compared to $37.2 million in 2013 and $20.9 million in 2012) and lower income tax payments. Cash paid for income taxes was $25.5 million, $35.4 million and $53.0 million in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Accounts receivable days sales outstanding was 58 days as of September 30, 2014 compared to 60 days as of September 30, 2013 and 61 days as of September 30, 2012. We periodically provide financing with payment terms up to 24 months to credit-worthy customers. Other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets include non-current receivables from customers related to extended payment term contracts totaling $13.5 million and $17.0 million at September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. We periodically transfer future payments under customer contracts to third-party financial institutions on a non-recourse basis. We sold $24.5 million of receivables in 2014 compared to $17.0 million in 2013 and $14.3 million in 2012.
Cash used by investing activities
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended September 30, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
| (in thousands) |
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired | $ | (323,525 | ) | | $ | (245,843 | ) | | $ | (220 | ) |
Additions to property and equipment | (25,275 | ) | | (29,328 | ) | | (31,413 | ) |
Other | — |
| | 721 |
| | — |
|
| $ | (348,800 | ) | | $ | (274,450 | ) | | $ | (31,633 | ) |
In in the fourth quarter 2014, we acquired Axeda and Atego for $165.9 million and $46.1 million, respectively, net of cash acquired, and in the second quarter of 2014, we acquired ThingWorx for $111.5 million, net of cash acquired. In the first quarter of 2013, we acquired Servigistics, Inc. for $220.8 million, net of cash acquired and, in the fourth quarter of 2013, we acquired NetIDEAS and Enigma Information Systems LTD, for an aggregate of $25.0 million, net of cash acquired.
Our expenditures for property and equipment consist primarily of computer equipment, software, office equipment and facility improvements.
Cash provided (used) by financing activities
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended September 30, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
| (in thousands) |
Borrowings under credit facility | $ | 1,386,250 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 230,000 |
|
Repayments of borrowings under credit facility | (1,032,500 | ) | | (111,875 | ) | | (60,000 | ) |
Repurchases of common stock | (224,915 | ) | | (74,871 | ) | | (34,953 | ) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock | 877 |
| | 4,884 |
| | 21,210 |
|
Payments of withholding taxes in connection with vesting of stock-based awards | (26,857 | ) | | (14,996 | ) | | (20,967 | ) |
Excess tax benefits from stock-based awards | 10,428 |
| | 334 |
| | 1,324 |
|
Credit facility origination costs | (7,930 | ) | | — |
| | (1,951 | ) |
| $ | 105,353 |
| | $ | (196,524 | ) | | $ | 134,663 |
|
In both the second and fourth quarters of 2014, we refinanced our credit facility as described in Credit Facility below. We incurred $7.9 million and $1.9 million of origination costs in 2014 and 2012, respectively, in connection with entering into and amending the new and previous credit facilities. In 2014, we borrowed $280 million to finance acquisitions and $125 million to repurchase shares under an accelerated share repurchase transaction. In 2012, we borrowed $230 million to finance our acquisition of Servigistics. Proceeds from issuance of common stock reflects stock option exercises. Stock option exercises totaled 0.1 million shares in 2014, 0.5 million shares in 2013 and 2.3 million shares in 2012. As of September 30, 2014, stock options outstanding had gross exercise prices totaling approximately $0.1 million. Accordingly, assuming no additional stock options are granted, future proceeds from option exercises will be immaterial.
Share Repurchase Authorization
Our Articles of Organization authorize us to issue up to 500 million shares of our common stock. Our Board of Directors has periodically authorized the repurchase of shares of our common stock. We were authorized to repurchase up to $100 million worth of shares with cash from operations for each of our fiscal years 2014, 2013 and 2012. Additionally, on August 4, 2014, our Board of Directors authorized us to repurchase up to an additional $600 million of our common stock through September 30, 2017. We intend to use cash from operations and borrowings under our credit facility to make such repurchases. Pursuant to this repurchase authorization, in the fourth quarter we entered into the $125 million accelerated share repurchase agreement described below. We repurchased 5.1 million shares at a cost of $224.9 million in 2014 (including $37.5 million held by the bank pending final settlement of the ASR described below), 3.1 million shares at a cost of $74.9 million in 2013 and 1.6 million shares at a cost of $35.0 million in 2012. All shares of our common stock repurchased are automatically restored to the status of authorized and unissued.
On August 14, 2014, we entered into an accelerated share repurchase (“ASR”) agreement with a major financial institution (“Bank”). The ASR allows us to buy a large number of shares immediately at a purchase price determined by an average market price over a period of time. Under the ASR, we agreed to purchase $125.0 million of our common stock, in total, with an initial delivery of 2,300,210 shares (“Initial Shares”) of our common stock to us by the Bank. The Initial Shares represent the number of shares at the current market price equal to 70% of the total fixed purchase price of $125.0 million. The repurchased shares were retired and returned to an unissued status. The remainder of the total purchase price of $37.5 million reflects the value of the stock held by the Bank pending final settlement and, accordingly, was recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in capital. Final settlement of the ASR will occur no later than February 17, 2015 at the Bank’s discretion. Upon settlement of the ASR, the total shares repurchased by us will be determined based on a share price equal to the daily volume weighted-average price (“VWAP”) of our common stock during the term of the ASR program, less a fixed per share discount amount. At settlement, the Bank will deliver additional shares to us in the event total shares are greater than the 2,300,210 shares initially delivered, and we will issue additional shares or cash to the Bank, at our option, in the event total shares are less than the shares initially delivered. As of September 30, 2014, based on the VWAP of our common stock for the period August 14, 2014 through September 30, 2014, settlement of the ASR would have resulted in 982,419 additional shares delivered by the Bank to us.
Credit Facility
In September 2014, we entered into a multi-currency credit facility with a syndicate of sixteen banks for which JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. acts as Administrative Agent. The credit facility replaced a credit facility with the same banks entered into in January 2014. We expect to use the credit facility for general corporate purposes, including acquisitions of businesses, share repurchases and working capital requirements. As of September 30, 2014, the fair value of our credit facility approximates our book value.
The credit facility consists of a $500 million term loan and a $1 billion revolving loan commitment, and may be increased by an additional $250 million (in the form of revolving loans or term loans, or a combination thereof) if the existing or additional lenders are willing to make such increased commitments. The revolving loan commitment does not require amortization of principal. The term loan requires prepayment of principal at the end of each calendar quarter. The revolving loan and term loan may be repaid in whole or in part prior to the scheduled maturity dates at our option without penalty or premium. The credit facility matures on September 15, 2019, when all remaining amounts outstanding will be due and payable in full. We are required to make principal payments under the term loan of $25 million, $50 million, $50 million, $75 million and $300 million in 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively.
PTC is the sole borrower under the credit facility. The obligations under the credit facility are guaranteed by PTC’s material domestic subsidiaries and 65% of the voting equity interests of PTC’s material first-tier foreign subsidiaries are pledged as collateral for the obligations.
As of September 30, 2014, we had $611.9 million outstanding under the credit facility comprised of the $500 million term loan and a $111.9 million revolving loan.
The credit facility limits PTC’s and its subsidiaries’ ability to, among other things: incur additional indebtedness; incur liens or guarantee obligations; pay dividends (other than to PTC) and make other distributions; make investments and enter into joint ventures; dispose of assets; and engage in transactions with affiliates, except on an arms-length basis. Under the credit facility, PTC and its material domestic subsidiaries may not invest cash or property in, or loan to, PTC’s foreign subsidiaries in aggregate amounts exceeding $75 million for any purpose and an additional $150 million for acquisitions of businesses. In addition, under the credit facility, PTC and its subsidiaries must maintain the following financial ratios:
| |
• | a leverage ratio, defined as consolidated funded indebtedness to consolidated trailing four quarters EBITDA, of no greater than 3.00 to 1.00 at any time; and |
| |
• | a fixed charge coverage ratio, defined as the ratio of consolidated trailing four quarters EBITDA less consolidated capital expenditures to consolidated fixed charges, of no less than 3.50 to 1.00 at any time. |
As of September 30, 2014, our leverage ratio was 1.82 to 1.00, our fixed charge coverage ratio was 17.70 to 1.00 and we were in compliance with all financial and operating covenants of the credit facility. As of September 30, 2014, we had approximately $408 million available to borrow under the credit facility within our covenant limits. On November 17, 2014, we borrowed an additional $35 million under our credit facility for short-term cash requirements, including the payment of fiscal 2014 incentive compensation.
Any failure to comply with the financial or operating covenants of the credit facility would prevent PTC from being able to borrow additional funds, and would constitute a default, permitting the lenders to, among other things, accelerate the amounts outstanding, including all accrued interest and unpaid fees, under the credit facility and to terminate the credit facility. A change in control of PTC, as defined in the agreement, also constitutes an event of default, permitting the lenders to accelerate the indebtedness and terminate the credit facility.
For a description of additional terms and conditions of the credit facility, including limitations on our ability to undertake certain actions, see Note H Debt in “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in this Annual Report.
Expectations for Fiscal 2015
We believe that existing cash and cash equivalents, together with cash generated from operations, and amounts available under our credit facility will be sufficient to meet our working capital and capital expenditure requirements through at least the next twelve months and to meet our known long-term capital requirements. In 2015, we expect to repurchase $125 million of our stock and repay $100 million of borrowings under our credit facility.
We evaluate possible strategic transactions on an ongoing basis and at any given time may be engaged in discussions or negotiations with respect to possible strategic transactions. Our expected uses of cash could change, our cash position could be reduced and we may incur additional debt obligations to the extent we complete additional acquisitions.
As described in Note M Pension Plans in "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" in this Annual Report, we have begun the process of terminating our U.S. pension plan. We expect to contribute an additional $25 million to the plan in 2015 to complete the termination. Additionally, we expect to make voluntary contributions to a non-U.S. plan of $20 million in 2015, $10 million of which was contributed in October 2014.
At September 30, 2014, we had cash and cash equivalents of $72.9 million in the United States, $76.0 million in Europe, $99.1 million in the Pacific Rim (including India), $21.2 million in Japan and $24.4 million in other non-U.S. countries. As of September 30, 2014, we had an outstanding intercompany loan receivable of $29.6 million. This amount can be repaid with cash generated by our foreign subsidiaries and repatriated to the U.S. without future tax cost. Additionally, we are evaluating several feasible strategies that can be employed to repatriate foreign earnings, at minimal tax cost.
Contractual Obligations
At September 30, 2014, our contractual obligations were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Payments due by period |
Contractual Obligations | Total | | Less than 1 year | | 1-3 years | | 3-5 years | | More than 5 years |
| (in millions) |
Credit facility (1) | $ | 663.6 |
| | $ | 36.9 |
| | $ | 121.9 |
| | $ | 504.8 |
| | $ | — |
|
Operating leases (2) | 172.6 |
| | 40.2 |
| | 56.3 |
| | 36.8 |
| | 39.2 |
|
Purchase obligations (3) | 36.2 |
| | 25.4 |
| | 10.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Pension liabilities (4) | 61.2 |
| | 42.1 |
| | 1.7 |
| | 1.7 |
| | 15.7 |
|
Unrecognized tax benefits (5) | 15.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Total | $ | 948.5 |
| | $ | 144.6 |
|
| $ | 190.7 |
|
| $ | 543.3 |
|
| $ | 54.9 |
|
| |
(1) | Credit facility amounts above include required principal repayments and interest and commitment fees based on the balance outstanding as of September 30, 2014 and the interest rate in effect as of September 30, 2014, 1.625%. |
| |
(2) | The future minimum lease payments above include minimum future lease payments for excess facilities under noncancelable operating leases. These leases qualify for operating lease accounting treatment and, as such, are not included on our balance sheet. See Note I Commitments and Contingencies of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in this Annual Report for additional information regarding our operating leases. |
| |
(3) | Purchase obligations represent minimum commitments due to third parties, including royalty contracts, research and development contracts, telecommunication contracts, information technology maintenance contracts in support of internal-use software and hardware and other marketing and consulting contracts. Contracts for which our commitment is variable, based on volumes, with no fixed minimum quantities, and contracts that can be canceled without payment penalties have been excluded. The purchase obligations included above are in addition to amounts included in current liabilities and prepaid expenses recorded on our September 30, 2014 consolidated balance sheet. |
| |
(4) | These obligations relate to our U.S. and international pension plans. These liabilities are not subject to fixed payment terms. Payments have been estimated based on the plans’ current funded status, planned employer contributions and actuarial assumptions. In addition, we may, at our discretion, make additional voluntary contributions to the plans. See Note M Pension Plans of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in this Annual Report for further discussion. |
| |
(5) | As of September 30, 2014, we had recorded total unrecognized tax benefits of $15.0 million. This liability is not subject to fixed payment terms and the amount and timing of payments, if any, which we will make related to this liability, are not known. See Note G Income Taxes of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in this Annual Report for additional information. |
As of September 30, 2014, we had letters of credit and bank guarantees outstanding of approximately $3.6 million (of which $0.9 million was collateralized), primarily related to our corporate headquarters lease in Needham, Massachusetts.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have not created, and are not party to, any special-purpose or off-balance sheet entities for the purpose of raising capital, incurring debt or operating parts of our business that are not consolidated (to the extent of our ownership interest therein) into our financial statements. We have not entered into any transactions with unconsolidated entities whereby we have subordinated retained interests, derivative instruments or other contingent arrangements that expose us to material continuing risks, contingent liabilities, or any other obligation under a variable interest in an unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, market risk or credit risk support to us.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Revenue Recognition
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Topic 606 (ASU 2014-09), to supersede nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that is expected to be received for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, it is possible more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than required under existing U.S. GAAP including identifying performance obligations in the contract, estimating the amount of variable consideration to include in the transaction price and allocating the transaction price to each separate performance obligation. ASU 2014-09 is effective for us in our first quarter of fiscal 2018 using either of two methods: (i) retrospective to each prior reporting period presented with the option to elect certain practical expedients as defined within ASU 2014-09; or (ii) retrospective with the cumulative effect of
initially applying ASU 2014-09 recognized at the date of initial application and providing certain additional disclosures as defined per ASU 2014-09. We are currently evaluating the impact of our pending adoption of ASU 2014-09 on our consolidated financial statements.
Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists
In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11, Income Taxes (Topic 740)—Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists. ASU 2013-11 generally requires that an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, shall be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward. ASU 2013-11 is effective for us in our first quarter of fiscal 2015. We are currently evaluating the impact of our pending adoption of ASU 2013-11 on our consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We face exposure to financial market risks, including adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates and changes in interest rates. These exposures may change over time as business practices evolve and could have a material adverse impact on our financial results.
Foreign currency exchange risk
Our earnings and cash flows are subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Our most significant foreign currency exposures relate to Western European countries, Japan, China and Canada. We enter into foreign currency forward contracts to manage our exposure to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates that arise from receivables and payables denominated in foreign currencies. We do not enter into or hold foreign currency derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes nor do we enter into derivative financial instruments to hedge future cash flow or forecast transactions.
Our non-U.S. revenues generally are transacted through our non-U.S. subsidiaries and typically are denominated in their local currency. In addition, expenses that are incurred by our non-U.S. subsidiaries typically are denominated in their local currency. In 2014, 2013 and 2012, approximately two-thirds of our revenue and half of our expenses were transacted in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Currency translation affects our reported results because we report our results of operations in U.S. Dollars. Historically, our most significant currency risk has been changes in the Euro and Japanese Yen relative to the U.S. Dollar. Based on 2014 revenue and expense levels (excluding restructuring charges), a $0.10 change in the USD to European exchange rates and a 10 Yen change in the Yen to USD exchange rate would impact operating income by approximately $12 million and $7 million, respectively.
Our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations arises in part from intercompany transactions, with most intercompany transactions occurring between a U.S. dollar functional currency entity and a foreign currency denominated entity. Intercompany transactions typically are denominated in the local currency of the non-U.S. dollar functional currency subsidiary in order to centralize foreign currency risk. Also, both PTC (the parent company) and our non-U.S. subsidiaries may transact business with our customers and vendors in a currency other than their functional currency (transaction risk). In addition, we are exposed to foreign exchange rate fluctuations as the financial results and balances of our non-U.S. subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars (translation risk). If sales to customers outside of the United States increase, our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates will increase.
Our foreign currency risk management strategy is principally designed to mitigate the future potential financial impact of changes in the U.S. dollar value of balances denominated in foreign currency, resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Our foreign currency hedging program uses forward contracts to manage the foreign currency exposures that exist as part of our ongoing business operations. The contracts primarily are denominated in Canadian Dollars and European currencies, and have maturities of less than three months.
Generally, we do not designate foreign currency forward contracts as hedges for accounting purposes, and changes in the fair value of these instruments are recognized immediately in earnings. Because we enter into forward contracts only as an economic hedge, any gain or loss on the underlying foreign-denominated balance would be offset by the loss or gain on the forward contract. Gains and losses on forward contracts and foreign denominated receivables and payables are included in foreign currency net losses.
As of September 30, 2014 and 2013, we had outstanding forward contracts with notional amounts equivalent to the following:
|
| | | | | | | |
| September 30, |
Currency Hedged | 2014 | | 2013 |
| (in thousands) |
Canadian/U.S. Dollar | $ | 25,583 |
| | $ | 41,852 |
|
Euro/U.S. Dollar | 61,751 |
| | 50,902 |
|
British Pound/Euro | 14,259 |
| | — |
|
Israeli Sheqel/U.S. Dollar | 6,144 |
| | 3,413 |
|
Japanese Yen/U.S. Dollar | — |
| | 6,496 |
|
Swiss Franc/U.S. Dollar | 1,200 |
| | 9,678 |
|
All other | 8,051 |
| | 12,093 |
|
Total | $ | 116,988 |
| | $ | 124,434 |
|
Debt
As of September 30, 2014, we had $611.9 million outstanding under our variable-rate credit facility comprised of a $500 million term loan and a $111.9 million revolving loan. Loans under the credit facility bear interest at variable rates which reset every 30 to 180 days depending on the rate and period selected by the Company. These loans are subject to interest rate risk as interest rates will be adjusted at each rollover date to the extent such amounts are not repaid. As of September 30, 2014, the annual rates on the term and revolving loan loans were 1.625% (both of which will reset on December 17, 2014). If there was a hypothetical 100 basis point change in interest rates, the annual net impact to earnings and cash flows would be $6.1 million. This hypothetical change in cash flows and earnings has been calculated based on the borrowings outstanding at September 30, 2014 and a 100 basis point per annum change in interest rate applied over a one-year period.
Cash and cash equivalents
As of September 30, 2014, cash equivalents were invested in highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased. We invest our cash with highly rated financial institutions in North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific and in diversified domestic and international money market mutual funds. At September 30, 2014, we had cash and cash equivalents of $72.9 million in the United States, $76.0 million in Europe, $99.1 million in the Pacific Rim (including India), $21.2 million in Japan and $24.4 million in other non-U.S. countries. Given the short maturities and investment grade quality of the portfolio holdings at September 30, 2014, a hypothetical 10% change in interest rates would not materially affect the fair value of our cash and cash equivalents.
Our invested cash is subject to interest rate fluctuations and, for non-U.S. operations, foreign currency risk. In a declining interest rate environment, we would experience a decrease in interest income. The opposite holds true in a rising interest rate environment. Over the past several years, the U.S. Federal Reserve Board, European Central Bank and Bank of England have changed certain benchmark interest rates, which have led to declines and increases in market interest rates. These changes in market interest rates have resulted in fluctuations in interest income earned on our cash and cash equivalents. Interest income will continue to fluctuate based on changes in market interest rates and levels of cash available for investment. Our consolidated cash balances were impacted unfavorably by $9.4 million and $1.3 million in 2014 and 2013, respectively, and favorably by $0.7 million in 2012 due to changes in foreign currencies relative to the U.S. dollar, particularly the Euro and the Japanese Yen.
ITEM 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The consolidated financial statements and notes to the consolidated financial statements are attached as APPENDIX A.
ITEM 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
ITEM 9A.Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management maintains disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that
information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is processed, recorded, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively), as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
As required by SEC Rule 15d-15(b), we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report. Based on this evaluation, we concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of September 30, 2014.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:
| |
• | Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; |
| |
• | Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and |
| |
• | Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. |
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2014 using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (1992). Based on this assessment and those criteria, our management concluded that, as of September 30, 2014, our internal control over financial reporting was effective.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2014 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which appears under Item 8.
Change in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2014 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.