FWP
Filed Pursuant To Rule 433
Registration No. 333-153150
March 4, 2009
Full year and fourth quarter 2008
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
|
|
Gold demand, in tonnage terms, remained strong in Q4 2008 although it was
unable to sustain the record highs seen in Q3. Total identifiable demand was
up 214.7 tonnes (26%) on the levels of Q4 2007. In $US value terms, this
represented a 27% rise to $26.5bn. Extreme levels of economic uncertainty
continued to underpin investment flows, but this was partly offset by weaker
jewellery and industrial demand. |
|
|
Total identifiable demand during 2008 was up 4% on the levels of the previous
year. A very strong second half of the year, which was underpinned by high
levels of net investment, more than offset any weakness in the first half. |
|
|
The gold price averaged $US794.76 during Q4, broadly on par with Q4 2007.
Over the year as a whole, the gold price averaged $US871.96, up 25% from
$US695.39 in 2007. |
|
|
The biggest source of growth in demand for gold, both last quarter and during
the year as a whole, was investment. Identifiable investment demand reached
399.0 tonnes in Q4, up from 141.4 tonnes in Q4 2007, a rise of 182%. Demand in
2008 was 64% higher than in 2007, equivalent to an additional inflow of
$US15.2bn. Taking into account implied investment, which includes the more
speculative side of the gold market, total investment was $US10.1bn higher
than in 2007. |
|
|
Partly offsetting the surge in investment demand in Q4 was a fall in
jewellery off-take, with tonnage down 6% on the levels of a year earlier. In
$US value terms, the fall was slightly smaller at 4%. Over the course of the
year as a whole, jewellery demand rose 11% in $US value terms, an encouraging
result given the severity of the economic downturn. |
|
|
On the investment side, the main driver of flows was net retail investment,
which rose 396% from 61.4 tonnes in Q4 2007 to 304.2 tonnes in Q4 2008. Over
the year as a whole, the growth rate was 87%. Bar and coin shortages were
reported across many parts of the globe, although the most dramatic surge was
in Europe, where bar and coin demand increased from just 9.0 tonnes in Q4 2007
to 113.7 tonnes in Q4 2008. |
|
|
ETF holdings broke new records during the quarter. Although the net quarterly
inflow was down on the levels of the previous quarter, the growth rate on Q4
2007 was a strong 18%. |
|
|
The worsening in economic conditions continued to impact negatively on
jewellery demand in Q4. Several countries experienced record highs in the gold
price in local currency terms, including India and Turkey, which added to the
negative sentiment. |
Table of contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
Most regions experienced a decline in jewellery demand in tonnage terms relative to Q4 2007.
Among the exceptions were India, Egypt and Greater China. Tonnage in India increased by 107%,
although this growth rate was boosted by a very weak Q4 2007. China, Hong Kong, Taiwan and
Egypt enjoyed growth in jewellery demand of 10%, 12%, 2% and 4% respectively. |
|
|
Industrial and dental demand declined 10% relative to year-earlier levels. The electronics
sector, in particular, has been hit hard by the slowing in the global economy. |
|
|
Gold supply in Q4 was up 5% relative to year-earlier levels and year-on-year, declined 1%.
Lower net central bank sales were partly offset by slightly higher mine production, reduced
levels of producer de-hedging and sharply higher levels of scrap. Net central bank sales in
2008 totalled 279 tonnes, down from 485 tonnes in 2007. |
Outlook
The extreme uncertainty that currently surrounds the
global economy is unlikely to abate and should
continue to underpin net investment demand,
particularly demand for bars and coins. However, we
expect this to be partly offset by ongoing weakness in
both industrial and jewellery demand.
The extent of the weakness in jewellery demand partly
depends on the gold price. While western markets are
expected to continue to struggle, dips in the gold
price could trigger bouts of buying in some
non-western markets, similar to what was seen in both
Q3 and Q4. This buying is likely to be centred in
those countries where the investment element of the
jewellery sector is strongest.
The constraints surrounding mine output are unlikely
to ease, and in fact, have the potential to worsen as
credit conditions continue to cause problems for some
miners and explorers. Furthermore, net selling by the
central bank sector should remain at relatively low
levels. However, as we saw in Q4, much will depend on
the direction of the gold price and the scrap
response. Continued high levels of the gold price
could see scrap levels increase further.
Source: GFMS, WGC
The figures used in this report
The supply and demand data in this report are based on tonnage figures compiled independently for
the WGC by GFMS Ltd. Any information from alternative sources is clearly indicated. Value figures
for demand and supply are calculated by WGC from the GFMS data.
We are sometimes asked why we comment on value figures for demand as well as tonnage instead of
just relying on tonnage figures, as is more common in most commodity markets. There are two main
reasons for this. First, over 85% of demand is discretionary spending either on a consumer product
(jewellery) or as an investment. In both these markets it is customary to comment on value figures.
Second, since demand (as statistically defined) has to equal supply, changes in demand can simply
reflect growth or contraction in the supply of gold to the market and are thus a poor guide to
consumers or investors appetite for gold. Commenting on both value and on tonnage provides a more
holistic picture. For global or regional value figures, the US dollar is used as the measure. Apart
from the fact that it is the worlds major currency, most of golds main markets are in countries
whose currencies are either linked, tightly or loosely, to the dollar or where exchange rates
against the dollar do not normally change greatly from year to year, other than in line with
inflation differentials. The use of the US dollar is thus appropriate.
Not all investment flows can be measured and those that cannot be are proxied by the statistical
residual from the supply and demand balance, known as inferred investment; this contains stock
movements and other elements but it is usually dominated by those investment flows not susceptible
to statistical capture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FEBRUARY 2009
|
|
2
|
|
|
DEMAND
Table 1: Identifiable gold demand1 (tonnes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% ch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% ch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 vs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q408 vs |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
20082 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Q407 |
|
|
Q108 |
|
Q208 |
|
Q308 |
|
Q4082 |
|
|
Q407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jewellery Consumption |
|
|
|
2284.8 |
|
|
|
2400.6 |
|
|
|
2137.5 |
|
|
|
|
-11 |
|
|
|
|
570.3 |
|
|
|
|
443.0 |
|
|
|
504.0 |
|
|
|
651.6 |
|
|
|
538.9 |
|
|
|
|
-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial & Dental |
|
|
|
459.4 |
|
|
|
461.2 |
|
|
|
430.4 |
|
|
|
|
-7 |
|
|
|
|
110.1 |
|
|
|
|
111.1 |
|
|
|
112.2 |
|
|
|
108.4 |
|
|
|
98.6 |
|
|
|
|
-10 |
|
Electronics |
|
|
|
307.9 |
|
|
|
310.6 |
|
|
|
289.7 |
|
|
|
|
-7 |
|
|
|
|
74.9 |
|
|
|
|
75.9 |
|
|
|
76.5 |
|
|
|
73.3 |
|
|
|
63.9 |
|
|
|
|
-15 |
|
Other Industrial |
|
|
|
90.8 |
|
|
|
92.8 |
|
|
|
86.7 |
|
|
|
|
-7 |
|
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
|
|
21.2 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
|
|
|
22.0 |
|
|
|
21.5 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Dentistry |
|
|
|
60.7 |
|
|
|
57.8 |
|
|
|
54.0 |
|
|
|
|
-7 |
|
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
|
-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable Investment |
|
|
|
664.7 |
|
|
|
663.7 |
|
|
|
1090.7 |
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
141.4 |
|
|
|
|
153.7 |
|
|
|
139.4 |
|
|
|
398.6 |
|
|
|
399.0 |
|
|
|
|
182 |
|
Net Retail Investment |
|
|
|
404.5 |
|
|
|
410.3 |
|
|
|
769.3 |
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
61.4 |
|
|
|
|
81.0 |
|
|
|
135.4 |
|
|
|
248.6 |
|
|
|
304.2 |
|
|
|
|
396 |
|
Bar Hoarding |
|
|
|
235.3 |
|
|
|
236.3 |
|
|
|
378.2 |
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
30.2 |
|
|
|
|
46.6 |
|
|
|
88.4 |
|
|
|
116.6 |
|
|
|
126.6 |
|
|
|
|
318 |
|
Official Coins |
|
|
|
128.9 |
|
|
|
137.0 |
|
|
|
197.7 |
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
22.4 |
|
|
|
|
29.5 |
|
|
|
36.6 |
|
|
|
63.8 |
|
|
|
67.9 |
|
|
|
|
203 |
|
Medals/Imitation Coins |
|
|
|
59.4 |
|
|
|
72.6 |
|
|
|
60.5 |
|
|
|
|
-17 |
|
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
21.2 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
Other Identified Retail Invest.3 |
|
|
|
-19.0 |
|
|
|
-35.6 |
|
|
|
132.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
-4.8 |
|
|
|
-2.0 |
|
|
|
47.0 |
|
|
|
92.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ETFs & Similar Products4 |
|
|
|
260.2 |
|
|
|
253.3 |
|
|
|
321.4 |
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
80.0 |
|
|
|
|
72.7 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
150.0 |
|
|
|
94.7 |
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Identifiable Demand |
|
|
|
3408.9 |
|
|
|
3525.5 |
|
|
|
3658.6 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
821.8 |
|
|
|
|
707.8 |
|
|
|
755.6 |
|
|
|
1158.6 |
|
|
|
1036.5 |
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
London pm fix, $US/oz |
|
|
|
603.77 |
|
|
|
695.39 |
|
|
|
871.96 |
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
786.25 |
|
|
|
|
924.83 |
|
|
|
896.29 |
|
|
|
871.60 |
|
|
|
794.76 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: GFMS. 1. Identifiable end-use consumption excluding central banks. 2. Provisional. 3.
Other retail excludes bar and primary coin offtake; it represents mainly activity in North
America and Western Europe. 4. Exchange Traded Funds and similar products including: Gold Bullion
Securities, Gold Bullion Securities (Australia), SPDR Gold Shares (formerly streetTRACKS Gold
Shares), NewGold Gold Debentures, iShares Comex Gold Trust, ZKB Gold ETF, GOLDIST, ETF Securities,
XETRA-GOLD, Central Fund of Canada and Central Gold Trust.
Table 2: Identifiable gold demand1 ($USm)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% ch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% ch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 vs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q408 vs |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
20082 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Q407 |
|
|
Q108 |
|
Q208 |
|
Q308 |
|
Q4082 |
|
|
Q407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jewellery Consumption |
|
|
|
44,510 |
|
|
|
53,605 |
|
|
|
59,727 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
14,416 |
|
|
|
|
13,173 |
|
|
|
14,524 |
|
|
|
18,259 |
|
|
|
13,770 |
|
|
|
|
-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial & Dental |
|
|
|
8,929 |
|
|
|
10,298 |
|
|
|
12,095 |
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
2,784 |
|
|
|
|
3,303 |
|
|
|
3,233 |
|
|
|
3,039 |
|
|
|
2,520 |
|
|
|
|
-9 |
|
Electronics |
|
|
|
5,985 |
|
|
|
6,939 |
|
|
|
8,150 |
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
1,892 |
|
|
|
|
2,257 |
|
|
|
2,205 |
|
|
|
2,055 |
|
|
|
1,633 |
|
|
|
|
-14 |
|
Other Industrial |
|
|
|
1,765 |
|
|
|
2,069 |
|
|
|
2,431 |
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
551 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Dentistry |
|
|
|
1,179 |
|
|
|
1,290 |
|
|
|
1,514 |
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
|
-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable Investment |
|
|
|
12,820 |
|
|
|
14,796 |
|
|
|
29,952 |
|
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
3,574 |
|
|
|
|
4,571 |
|
|
|
4,017 |
|
|
|
11,170 |
|
|
|
10,194 |
|
|
|
|
185 |
|
Net Retail Investment |
|
|
|
7,878 |
|
|
|
9,017 |
|
|
|
21,052 |
|
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
1,551 |
|
|
|
|
2,409 |
|
|
|
3,902 |
|
|
|
6,967 |
|
|
|
7,774 |
|
|
|
|
401 |
|
Bar Hoarding |
|
|
|
4,591 |
|
|
|
5,171 |
|
|
|
10,435 |
|
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
765 |
|
|
|
|
1,385 |
|
|
|
2,548 |
|
|
|
3,269 |
|
|
|
3,234 |
|
|
|
|
323 |
|
Official Coins |
|
|
|
2,505 |
|
|
|
3,020 |
|
|
|
5,453 |
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
|
877 |
|
|
|
1,054 |
|
|
|
1,787 |
|
|
|
1,734 |
|
|
|
|
206 |
|
Medals/Imitation Coins |
|
|
|
1,158 |
|
|
|
1,586 |
|
|
|
1,680 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
|
107 |
|
Other Identified Retail Invest.3 |
|
|
|
-376 |
|
|
|
-759 |
|
|
|
3,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
-142 |
|
|
|
-57 |
|
|
|
1,316 |
|
|
|
2,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ETFs & Similar Products4 |
|
|
|
4,943 |
|
|
|
5,778 |
|
|
|
8,900 |
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
2,023 |
|
|
|
|
2,161 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
4,203 |
|
|
|
2,421 |
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Identifiable Demand |
|
|
|
66,259 |
|
|
|
78,699 |
|
|
|
101,774 |
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
20,774 |
|
|
|
|
21,047 |
|
|
|
21,774 |
|
|
|
32,468 |
|
|
|
26,485 |
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: WGC calculations based on data from GFMS. 1. Identifiable end-use consumption excluding
central banks. This table was formerly called End-use gold demand. 2. Provisional. 3. Other
retail excludes bar and primary coin offtake; it represents mainly activity in North America and
Western Europe. 4. Exchange Traded Funds and similar products including: Gold Bullion Securities,
Gold Bullion Securities (Australia), SPDR Gold Shares (formerly streetTRACKS Gold Shares), NewGold
Gold Debentures, iShares Comex Gold Trust, ZKB Gold ETF, GOLDIST, ETF Securities, XETRA-GOLD,
Central Fund of Canada and Central Gold Trust.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FEBRUARY 2009
|
|
3
|
|
|
Jewellery
Gold jewellery demand declined during the fourth quarter
as the global economic crisis began to bite and prices
continued to fluctuate around relatively high levels.
Total tonnage off-take, at 538.9 tonnes, was down 6% on Q4
2007, while the year-on-year decline was a more marked
11%. Meanwhile, the $US value measure of demand reveals
that Q4 demand of $US13.8bn was 4% below year-earlier
levels, with the result that 2008 annual demand at
$US59.7bn was 11% higher than 2007 levels.
The main factor affecting jewellery demand was the
difficult economic environment that has taken hold in most
countries. Consumers are facing issues such as rising
unemployment and falling house prices and stock markets
and are focusing their spending decisions on necessities.
Once again however, it is worthy of comment that the value
measure of jewellery demand confirms that spending on gold
jewellery remains relatively robust. Although the severity
of the economic climate took its toll in the fourth
quarter, for calendar 2008 the primary value of gold
jewellery demand increased by $US6.1bn.
Movements in the price of gold were also a key factor in
quashing demand. Although the gold price dipped sharply in
October, it soon recovered lost ground and this higher
price level, together with a rise in volatility,
discouraged purchases in many of the more price-sensitive
markets. In contrast however, some markets, e.g. mainland
China, Russia and the Middle East, benefited from elevated
levels of investment-related demand for gold jewellery, as
the intrinsic value of gold lent a stronger investment
perspective to jewellery purchases.
A country-by-country breakdown of Q4 and calendar 2008
(tables 5 and 6) reveals that by no means did jewellery
demand suffer a blanket decline across all markets. A
number of countries were notable for their resilience,
particularly Egypt, mainland China and Russia, although
the rises in jewellery off-take in these markets were
insufficient to fully offset the weakness seen in, most
notably, the USA, Europe and Turkey.
India, the largest market for gold jewellery, experienced
a strong resurgence during the fourth quarter, with demand
more than double year-earlier levels as a sharp drop in
the gold price coincided with the key gold-buying Diwali
festival. However, the comparison is distorted somewhat by
the fact that demand in Q4 2007, a time when prices were
rocketing, was particularly weak. For the year as a whole,
demand declined by 15%, largely on the back of the
relatively high and volatile gold price, although in local
currency terms the value of annual demand was 12% higher
than 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FEBRUARY 2009
|
|
4
|
|
|
With the exception of Egypt, the Middle East region was similarly affected by the high and unstable
gold price that characterised much of 2008, as well as the burgeoning global economic crisis that
gathered pace during the year. As with other regions, a rise in investment off-take in reaction to
these developments to some extent counteracted the fall-off in jewellery demand. Saudi Arabia, the
UAE and the Other Gulf group of countries all experienced a decline in Q4 jewellery demand of more
than 10% as high prices and lower tourist numbers discouraged jewellery purchases. Egypt was alone
in recording a positive result for both Q4 and calendar 2008 jewellery demand, up 4% and 10%
respectively as the jewellery sector appeared to benefit from investment-related demand.
Jewellery demand in Turkey in Q4 was slightly less than half the levels of a year earlier, due
largely to a sharp depreciation in the value of the New Turkish Lira, which drove the local
currency price of gold to record highs and triggered a surge in scrap gold coming back into the
market. Another highly price-sensitive market, Turkey has been one of the main casualties of the
activity in the gold price throughout the year, with demand down 19% year-on-year. Demand as
measured by local currency value was considerably more resilient however, up 2%.
The Greater China region provided one of the positive stories for gold jewellery demand in 2008,
particularly mainland China where purchases of 24-carat gold accelerated, again emphasising the
investment aspect of gold jewellery buying. Tonnage off-take rose by 10% and 8% in Q4 2008 and
calendar 2008 respectively, the latter equivalent to a 24% year-on-year increase in RMB spending on
2007. Demand in Hong Kong benefited from the peak wedding season, which pushed up demand by 12%
during Q4, although the year-on-year rise was a more muted 3% as consumers exercised caution at a
time of deteriorating economic conditions. In Taiwan, a 2% rise in Q4 tonnage off-take was
insufficient to offset the weakness seen earlier in the year and 2008 demand fell 17%.
Elsewhere in Asia, Q4 jewellery demand suffered as concerns over the economic climate weighed on
sentiment. Japan, Indonesia and Vietnam all experienced declines in the region of 10-15%. The
calendar year comparison was slightly more positive, with Japan and Vietnam 8% lower while
Indonesia managed a 1% increase.
Jewellery demand in western markets was particularly subdued. Tonnage off-take in the US posted
declines of more than 30% for both Q4 and calendar 2008 as worsening economic conditions
discouraged purchases of luxury items. Tellingly, the US market experienced one of the larger
surges in investment demand as the
factors suppressing jewellery purchases served to highlight the investment appeal of gold.
Demand in the UK was particularly weak, falling by 31% in Q4 relative to year-earlier levels as the
economic downturn intensified. In £ value terms, spending was 9% lower in Q4 2008 than a year
earlier, although the full year comparison is more or less flat, with spending decreasing by a
marginal 2% to £550mn. In Italy, jewellery off-take was down by around 15% in both Q4 and 2008
comparisons as the onset of recession stifled demand. The value measure of gold was relatively
stable, recording a marginal 1% increase over 2007 to 968mn.
Russian consumers maintained their year-earlier levels of demand in Q4 2008 and tonnage was broadly
flat at around 28.6 tonnes. On a yearly basis, the volume of demand was 12% higher than in 2007 as
the Russian economy was relatively resilient to the global economic downturn for much of the year.
In $US value terms, annual demand posted an impressive 41% rise.
The key factors affecting gold jewellery demand in 2008 the adverse economic environment and
volatile prices are likely to remain dominant themes in the months ahead. The intensifying global
slowdown has implications for investment demand for gold, which in turn is likely to have some
bearing on the price level. However, the jewellery sector should continue to be cushioned by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FEBRUARY 2009
|
|
5
|
|
|
an over-spill of investment demand, and any significant dips in the price level are expected to
release some pent up demand.
Industrial and dental
Gold demand for industrial and dental applications fell 10% to 98.6 tonnes in Q4 2008 relative to
year-earlier levels. Electronics demand was profoundly affected by the global economic slowdown and
subsequent lack of confidence across the supply chain, slipping 15%. Elsewhere, the other
industrial and decorative sector recorded a modest 2% increase on the back of a significant rise in
Indian off-take, while gold used in dental applications continued its secular decline, falling 7%.
Looking more closely at the electronics sector reveals an industry that, for the most part, is
currently undergoing a crisis on the back of steadily deteriorating economic conditions. The
decline of 15% relative to year-earlier levels took tonnage to its lowest level since Q4 2004.
Waning consumer spending resulted in sharp declines in both production and exports from the worlds
largest producers. Indeed, Japan, which dominates this sector, was the hardest hit, declining 20%.
Almost all of the gains seen in Japan since 2005 have now been eroded, with the full year decline
of 11% a true reflection of the economic environment. Similarly, South Korea, the United States and
Taiwan all registered double-digit declines relative to Q4 2007 as exports and domestic consumption
fell heavily. In an attempt to keep up with the nosedive in demand, manufacturers across all
regions slashed inventories, cut production and introduced massive layoffs across the sector in
scenes not witnessed since the dot com bubble burst in 2001.
Memory (DRAM) chip manufacturers continued to register large losses. Oversupply and rapidly
declining electronics demand have pushed chip prices to levels that are often lower than their
production costs. The rapid expansion of this sector in recent years has come at a significant cost
to the industry, with the glut of low priced inventory leading to an oversupply and stagnation of
the demand pipeline. The top eight DRAM makers globally have lost almost $US8 billion since 2007
and, according to market researcher iSuppli Corp, this is expected to exceed $US11 billion by the
end of 2009. Indeed, market reports suggest that the first quarter of 2009 is unlikely to see any
noticeable improvement as worsening economic conditions and future uncertainty continue to rein in
consumers appetite for spending.
Demand from the other industrial and decorative segment was relatively stable in Q4, increasing by
less than 2% relative to year-earlier levels. The modest rise, overwhelmingly due to a sharp 35%
increase in Indian off-take, offset declines across most other countries in this sector.
Importantly, the significant rise in Indian
demand reflects an extremely low off-take number in Q4 2007 (when the gold price first breached
$US900) rather than any indication of a recovery in this sector, with Q4 volumes down by 9%
relative to Q3. To this end, there has been some level of acceptance of higher price levels,
although volatility remains a clear obstacle in encouraging consumer activity. Elsewhere, global
economic weakness and the subsequent slowdown in consumer spending were the primary reasons for a
fall in demand, with China, South Korea and the United States all recording double-digit declines.
In contrast, Italy recorded a 6% rise relative to year-earlier levels as a result of increased GPC
(gold potassium cyanide) production, much of which is used in the electro-forming of jewellery (a
process geared to producing low weight jewellery items) and in the plating of accessories.
Lastly, gold used in dental applications is estimated to have declined 7% relative to Q4 2007 as
ongoing substitution to more affordable and cosmetically pleasing applications continued to limit
the use of the precious metal. Modest falls in off-take were recorded across most countries, with
Japan and Switzerland leading the decline. Off-take for calendar 2008 slipped 7% relative to 2007,
taking it to probably the lowest level since the start of the GFMS series in 1968.
Investment
Total identifiable investment in gold (excluding inferred investment) during Q4 2008 totalled
399.0 tonnes, broadly matching the high levels reached in Q3. Once again, the inflows were driven
by golds safe haven qualities as investors sought refuge from the extreme uncertainty surrounding
the global economy and financial sector. Relative to Q4 2007, identifiable investment was up an
impressive 182% and over the year as a whole, the growth rate was 64%. In $US value terms, this
represented more than a doubling from $14.8bn to $30.0bn an increase of $15.2bn.
Net retail investment drove the result, rising from 61.4 tonnes in Q4 2007 to 304.2 tonnes in Q4
2008 (an astonishing 243 tonnes or 396%) and accounting for 94% of the tonnage increase in
identifiable investment. Net investment in Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) and similar products also
made a notable contribution to the increase in investor inflows, up 18% or 15 tonnes.
All components of net retail investment recorded extremely strong growth. Bar hoarding, which
largely covers the non-western markets, increased from 30.2 tonnes in Q4 2007 to 126.6 tonnes in Q4
2008, a rise of 318%. Official coins also enjoyed impressive growth, more than tripling from 22.4
tonnes to 67.9 tonnes. However, the highlight of the quarter was the 92.3 tonne improvement in
other identified retail investment to 92.6 tonnes from just 0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FEBRUARY 2009
|
|
6
|
|
|
Table 3: Investment demand (tonnes except where specified)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% ch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% ch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 vs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q408 vs |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Q407 |
|
|
Q108 |
|
Q208 |
|
Q308 |
|
Q4081 |
|
|
Q407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable Investment |
|
|
|
664.7 |
|
|
|
663.7 |
|
|
|
1090.7 |
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
141.4 |
|
|
|
|
153.7 |
|
|
|
139.4 |
|
|
|
398.6 |
|
|
|
399.0 |
|
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Retail Investment |
|
|
|
404.5 |
|
|
|
410.3 |
|
|
|
769.3 |
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
61.4 |
|
|
|
|
81.0 |
|
|
|
135.4 |
|
|
|
248.6 |
|
|
|
304.2 |
|
|
|
|
396 |
|
Bar Hoarding |
|
|
|
235.3 |
|
|
|
236.3 |
|
|
|
378.2 |
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
30.2 |
|
|
|
|
46.6 |
|
|
|
88.4 |
|
|
|
116.6 |
|
|
|
126.6 |
|
|
|
|
318 |
|
Official Coin |
|
|
|
128.9 |
|
|
|
137.0 |
|
|
|
197.7 |
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
22.4 |
|
|
|
|
29.5 |
|
|
|
36.6 |
|
|
|
63.8 |
|
|
|
67.9 |
|
|
|
|
203 |
|
Medals/Imitation Coin |
|
|
|
59.4 |
|
|
|
72.6 |
|
|
|
60.5 |
|
|
|
|
-17 |
|
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
21.2 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
Other Identified Retail Invest.2 |
|
|
|
-19.0 |
|
|
|
-35.6 |
|
|
|
132.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
-4.8 |
|
|
|
-2.0 |
|
|
|
47.0 |
|
|
|
92.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ETFs & Similar Products3 |
|
|
|
260.2 |
|
|
|
253.3 |
|
|
|
321.4 |
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
80.0 |
|
|
|
|
72.7 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
150.0 |
|
|
|
94.7 |
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inferred Investment4 |
|
|
|
165.2 |
|
|
|
-37.7 |
|
|
|
-190.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192.3 |
|
|
|
|
104.3 |
|
|
|
53.0 |
|
|
|
-354.7 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
|
-96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment |
|
|
|
829.9 |
|
|
|
626.0 |
|
|
|
900.2 |
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
333.7 |
|
|
|
|
258.0 |
|
|
|
192.4 |
|
|
|
43.9 |
|
|
|
405.9 |
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment, $USm |
|
|
|
16,135 |
|
|
|
14,727 |
|
|
|
24,816 |
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
8,435 |
|
|
|
|
7,671 |
|
|
|
5,544 |
|
|
|
1,230 |
|
|
|
10,372 |
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: GFMS. Data in this table are consistent with those published by GFMS but adapted to WGCs
presentation and take account of the additional demand data now available. The inferred
investment figure differs from the implied net (dis)investment figure in GFMS supply and demand
table as it excludes ETFs and similar and other retail investment. 1. Provisional. 2. Other
retail excludes bar and primary coin offtake; it represents mainly activity in North America and
Western Europe. 3. Exchange Traded Funds and similar products including: Gold Bullion Securities,
Gold Bullion Securities (Australia), SPDR Gold Shares (formerly streetTRACKS Gold Shares), NewGold
Gold Debentures, iShares Comex Gold Trust, ZKB Gold ETF, GOLDIST, ETF Securities, XETRA-GOLD,
Central Fund of Canada and Central Gold Trust. 4. This is the residual from combining all the other
data in the table. It includes institutional investment other than ETFs & similar, stock movements
and other elements as well as any residual error. In previous editions of GDT it was referred to as
the balance.
tonnes. This category reflects the impact of western investor activity in the secondary retail
investment market, predominantly Europe and North America i.e. it includes western demand for bars
and secondary demand for official coins.
These dramatic retail investment inflows reflect the extreme uncertainty that surrounds the global
economy and financial system. In an environment where investors are more concerned about the loss
of capital than they are about the return on capital, the absence of default risk or counterparty
risk has been a key attraction for gold.
Tables 5 and 6 on pages 11 and 13 respectively highlight the regions where these retail investor
inflows occurred. The biggest contribution in tonnage terms came from Europe, with demand surging
from just 9.0 tonnes in Q4 2007 to 113.7 tonnes in Q4 2008. The growth was driven by Germany,
Switzerland and Austria, which contributed a significant proportion of the rise in the other Europe
category. Notably, France stayed in net positive territory for the second consecutive quarter Q3
2008 represented the first positive net inflow since the early 1980s. The US was another strong
area of growth among western markets, rising to 34.8 tonnes from 7.3 tonnes a year earlier. These
countries are all captured in the other identified retail investment category.
In the bar hoarding category (mainly non-western markets), Japan and Thailand led the way, although
China and India also experienced significant tonnage increases. Several other countries, in
particular Saudi Arabia and Egypt, experienced extremely strong growth rates although the volume
increases were relatively small in absolute terms. Notably, Japans 20 tonne inflow in Q4 2008 was
the first positive quarterly inflow in three years and represented a marked turnaround from the 20
tonne net outflow seen a year earlier.
It is therefore clear that growth in net retail investment was geographically widespread. In fact,
only two countries failed to record positive growth Hong Kong and Turkey. While the volume
decline in Hong Kong was extremely small, the decline in Turkey was more notable, falling to just 1
tonne from 4.6 tonnes a year earlier. The sharp depreciation in the New Turkish Lira, which
coincided with a rise in the $US gold price, was the main reason behind the weakness.
The other component of identifiable investment demand, ETFs and similar products, experienced a net
inflow of 94.7 tonnes in Q4. While this is well below the 150.0 tonnes seen the previous quarter,
it
nevertheless represents a significant 18% increase on the levels of a year earlier. Of the gold
ETFs that we monitor, holdings repeatedly broke new records during the quarter, and continued to do
so during January.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FEBRUARY 2009
|
|
7
|
|
|
Januarys rise in ETF holdings was notable as it occurred during a time of US dollar strength and
commodity price weakness. Golds negative correlation with the US dollar is well known and the
weakening of this relationship reflects the magnitude of the safe haven effect. New records in ETF
holdings were reached in the second half of January even as the gold price rose above $US900/ oz.
A significant change relative to Q3 2008 was the move from a significant net outflow in the
inferred investment category to a small net inflow. Inferred investment is the balancing item in
the supply and demand table, and includes the more speculative side of institutional flows (other than
ETFs) and changes in inventories. The significant outflow during Q3 reflected several key factors:
the rise in the US dollar and unwinding of long gold/short dollar positions; the decline in
commodity indices and a liquidation of commodity index tracking vehicles; and the effects of
selling by leveraged institutions as they were forced to raise cash in the face of margin calls and
massive redemptions. Gold provided access to much needed funds during this period. While these
liquidations continued into the early part of Q4, they abated during November. In fact, the second
half of Q4 was characterised by the return of net buying in the more speculative side of investor
activity.
The December quarter was notable for an aversion to risk by investors. This supported firstly a
move from the more speculative side of the gold market into ETFs and secondly, a shift from both
into physical bars and coins.
Combining identifiable investment (largely investors with a medium and long term focus) with
inferred investment (largely investors with a more speculative focus) gives us total investment
flows. In Q4 2008, total investment was up 22% on the levels of Q4 2007. For the year as a whole,
total investment was up 44%, equivalent to a 69% rise in $US value terms from $14.7bn to $24.8bn.
These investment flows help explain why the gold price rose 25% from an average of $US695/ oz in
2007 to $US872 in 2008.
Notably, the annual increase in identifiable investment (which excludes speculative flows) exceeded
that of total investment (which includes them). It is also clear that while those speculative flows
were reasonably volatile on a quarter-to quarter basis, the main source of total investment flows
during the quarter were, in fact, investors with a medium to longer term focus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FEBRUARY 2009
|
|
8
|
|
|
SUPPLY
Table 4: Gold supply and demand (WGC presentation)
Note: jewellery data in this table refer to fabrication not consumption and quarterly data differ
from the data in Tables 1 and 2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% ch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% ch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 vs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q408 vs |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Q407 |
|
|
Q108 |
|
Q208 |
|
Q308 |
|
Q4081 |
|
|
Q407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mine Production |
|
|
|
2,486 |
|
|
|
2,473 |
|
|
|
2,407 |
|
|
|
|
-3 |
|
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Net Producer Hedging |
|
|
|
-410 |
|
|
|
-447 |
|
|
|
-363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-74 |
|
|
|
|
-128 |
|
|
|
-126 |
|
|
|
-63 |
|
|
|
-46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Mine Supply |
|
|
|
2,076 |
|
|
|
2,026 |
|
|
|
2,044 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
588 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
Official Sector Sales2 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
|
-42 |
|
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
-27 |
|
Old Gold Scrap |
|
|
|
1,129 |
|
|
|
977 |
|
|
|
1,146 |
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
Total Supply |
|
|
|
3,574 |
|
|
|
3,488 |
|
|
|
3,468 |
|
|
|
|
-1 |
|
|
|
|
931 |
|
|
|
|
841 |
|
|
|
824 |
|
|
|
824 |
|
|
|
980 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fabrication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jewellery |
|
|
|
2,285 |
|
|
|
2,401 |
|
|
|
2,138 |
|
|
|
|
-11 |
|
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
|
-3 |
|
Industrial & Dental |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
|
-7 |
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
-10 |
|
Sub-Total Above Fabrication |
|
|
|
2,744 |
|
|
|
2,862 |
|
|
|
2,568 |
|
|
|
|
-10 |
|
|
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
|
-4 |
|
Bar & Coin Retail Investment3 |
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
|
247 |
|
Other Retail Investment |
|
|
|
-19 |
|
|
|
-36 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
-5 |
|
|
|
-2 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ETFs & similar |
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
Total Demand |
|
|
|
3,409 |
|
|
|
3,526 |
|
|
|
3,659 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
|
736 |
|
|
|
771 |
|
|
|
1,179 |
|
|
|
973 |
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inferred Investment4 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
-38 |
|
|
|
-191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
-355 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
-96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
London PM Fix ($US/oz) |
|
|
|
603.77 |
|
|
|
695.39 |
|
|
|
871.96 |
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
786.25 |
|
|
|
|
924.83 |
|
|
|
896.29 |
|
|
|
871.60 |
|
|
|
794.76 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: GFMS. Data in this table are consistent with those published by GFMS but adapted to the
WGCs presentation and take account of the additional demand data now available. The inferred
investment figure differs from the implied net (dis)investment figure in GFMS supply and demand
table as it excludes ETFs and similar and other retail investment. 1. Provisional. 2. Excluding
any delta hedging of central bank options. 3. Equal to net retail investment from Table 1 less the
other identified retail investment category. 4. This is the residual from combining all the other
data in the table. It includes institutional investment other than ETFs & similar, stock movements
and other elements as well as any residual error. In previous editions of GDT it was referred to as
the balance.
At 980 tonnes, total supply in Q4 was up 19% on the
previous quarter and 5% on year-earlier levels. The main
driver of the rise relative to Q3 2008 was higher scrap,
however the increase relative to year-earlier levels
represented a broader set of influences, including higher
scrap levels, lower levels of producer de-hedging and
slightly higher mine production, largely offset by lower
central bank sales.
Mine output in Q4 is provisionally estimated to have been
broadly stable relative to year-earlier levels. The
year-on-year decline was 3%. Output was constrained
largely by sharp declines in South Africa and Australia.
South Africa continued to feel the effects of accidents
and power issues that plagued the industry throughout most
of the year. Gold Fields Kloof mine encountered several
closures during the year due to accidents and safety
issues.
South Africas ongoing problems have seen it slip further
down the global rankings provisional 2008 estimates
show that South Africa ranked third behind China and the
US, having been at the top of the table in 2006 and second
in 2007.
In Australia, the closure earlier this year of the
Thunderbox and Mount Magnet mines continued to impact
negatively on production levels. Furthermore, several new
projects delivered disappointing results during 2008 and
some small miners encountered financial problems due to
operational difficulties and funding issues, including
Monarch Gold Mining Company and View Resources. Both
companies entered into voluntary administration during the
year.
Offsetting the reduced mine supply in South Africa and
Australia during the quarter were increases in production
in Russia and Indonesia. Grasberg, Indonesias largest
mine, benefited from mining in a higher ore grade section.
The main contributors in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FEBRUARY 2009
|
|
9
|
|
|
Russia were the Olimpiada and Kupol mines. Olimpiada is
owned by the countrys largest miner, Polyus Gold. The
mine has started to experience the benefits of its
expansion project,
which transferred its key production to sulfide ores and
substantially extended the life of the mine. Around the
middle of last year, Kinross opened its Kupol mine in the
far east of Russia.
De-hedging levels, which have had a dampening impact on
total supply for some years, are continuing to reduce.
De-hedging levels during Q4 totalled just 46 tonnes. The
de-hedging process is now largely complete and the major
miners appear to have almost no interest in undertaking
new hedging.
Central bank activity was subdued during Q4. Net sales
totalled 71 tonnes, up from a very low 42 tonnes in Q3,
but down on 97 tonnes in Q4 2008. For the year as a whole,
central bank sales totalled 279 tonnes, down a significant
42% on 485 tonnes in 2007. Of the selling that took place
during the quarter, most was done by signatories to the
Central Bank Gold Agreement (CBGA), including France and
the Netherlands. The current agreement is now well into
its final year and expires at the end of September.
Outside the CBGA, the Philippine central bank bought a
small quantity of gold.
Scrap supply, at 320 tonnes, was 52% above the 211 tonnes
seen the previous quarter and 15% above Q4 2007 levels.
The rise in scrap was largely a price response the gold
price reached record highs during the quarter in Euro
terms, Rupee terms and New Turkish Lira terms. Turkey, in
particular, contributed strongly to the rise in scrap
levels, with the higher $US price of gold coinciding with
a significant depreciation in the local currency and
significant concerns about the local economy gold has
been sold, in difficult times, to raise much needed funds.
In western markets, some distress selling was evident due
to the harsh economic conditions. There has been a
significant pick-up in advertising aimed at consumers in
need of cash.
The outlook for supply generally remains subdued. Central
bank sales are expected to stay at relatively low levels
and mine production continues to face significant
constraints, including lower grades and funding issues.
These funding restrictions are also affecting the
exploration sector, which will cap mine output for many
years to come. Offsetting the constrained outlook for mine
output is the fact that the process of de-hedging is
coming to an end. More uncertain is the outlook for scrap,
which is largely price dependent. Continued high levels of
the gold price, given the current economic pressures that
consumers are facing, could see scrap levels rise further.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FEBRUARY 2009
|
|
10
|
|
|
CONSUMER DEMAND1 TRENDS IN INDIVIDUAL COUNTRIES
Table 5: Consumer demand in selected countries: 2007 and 2008 (tonnes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
20081 |
|
|
% ch 2008 vs 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net retail |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net retail |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net retail |
|
|
|
|
|
Jewellery |
|
invest. |
|
Total |
|
|
Jewellery |
|
invest. |
|
Total |
|
|
Jewellery |
|
invest. |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
India |
|
|
|
551.7 |
|
|
|
217.5 |
|
|
|
769.2 |
|
|
|
|
469.7 |
|
|
|
190.5 |
|
|
|
660.2 |
|
|
|
|
-15 |
|
|
|
-12 |
|
|
|
-14 |
|
Greater China |
|
|
|
331.1 |
|
|
|
34.0 |
|
|
|
365.1 |
|
|
|
|
353.5 |
|
|
|
78.6 |
|
|
|
432.1 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
China |
|
|
|
302.2 |
|
|
|
25.6 |
|
|
|
327.8 |
|
|
|
|
326.7 |
|
|
|
68.9 |
|
|
|
395.6 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Hong Kong |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
-2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Taiwan |
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
|
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
20.8 |
|
|
|
|
-17 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
-6 |
|
Japan |
|
|
|
30.6 |
|
|
|
-56.3 |
|
|
|
-25.7 |
|
|
|
|
28.2 |
|
|
|
-39.4 |
|
|
|
-11.2 |
|
|
|
|
-8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indonesia |
|
|
|
55.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
55.5 |
|
|
|
|
55.9 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
58.7 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
834 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Vietnam |
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
56.1 |
|
|
|
77.5 |
|
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
96.2 |
|
|
|
115.8 |
|
|
|
|
-8 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
Middle East |
|
|
|
325.5 |
|
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
345.6 |
|
|
|
|
311.4 |
|
|
|
28.2 |
|
|
|
339.6 |
|
|
|
|
-4 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
-2 |
|
Saudi Arabia |
|
|
|
117.9 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
126.9 |
|
|
|
|
108.9 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
122.4 |
|
|
|
|
-8 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
-4 |
|
Egypt |
|
|
|
67.8 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
68.5 |
|
|
|
|
74.3 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
76.8 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
UAE |
|
|
|
99.8 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
107.3 |
|
|
|
|
93.4 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
102.9 |
|
|
|
|
-6 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
-4 |
|
Other Gulf |
|
|
|
40.0 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
42.9 |
|
|
|
|
34.8 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
37.5 |
|
|
|
|
-13 |
|
|
|
-9 |
|
|
|
-13 |
|
Turkey |
|
|
|
188.1 |
|
|
|
61.1 |
|
|
|
249.3 |
|
|
|
|
153.2 |
|
|
|
57.1 |
|
|
|
210.3 |
|
|
|
|
-19 |
|
|
|
-7 |
|
|
|
-16 |
|
Russia2 |
|
|
|
85.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85.7 |
|
|
|
|
96.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96.1 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
USA |
|
|
|
257.9 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
274.5 |
|
|
|
|
179.1 |
|
|
|
77.8 |
|
|
|
256.9 |
|
|
|
|
-31 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
-6 |
|
Italy2 |
|
|
|
59.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59.1 |
|
|
|
|
50.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50.8 |
|
|
|
|
-14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-14 |
|
UK2 |
|
|
|
50.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50.1 |
|
|
|
|
36.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.2 |
|
|
|
|
-28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-28 |
|
Europe ex CIS3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173.8 |
|
|
|
173.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1718 |
|
|
|
1718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Above |
|
|
|
1956.3 |
|
|
|
359.1 |
|
|
|
2315.4 |
|
|
|
|
1753.6 |
|
|
|
665.6 |
|
|
|
2419.2 |
|
|
|
|
-10 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
444.3 |
|
|
|
51.3 |
|
|
|
495.6 |
|
|
|
|
384.0 |
|
|
|
103.7 |
|
|
|
487.7 |
|
|
|
|
-14 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
World Total |
|
|
|
2400.6 |
|
|
|
410.3 |
|
|
|
2810.9 |
|
|
|
|
2137.5 |
|
|
|
769.3 |
|
|
|
2906.8 |
|
|
|
|
-11 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: GFMS. 1. Provisional. 2. Jewellery only. 3. Net retail investment only.
India
Total tonnage off-take in India in Q4 2008 was up a strong
84% on year-earlier levels, led by a spectacular 107% rise
in jewellery demand. However, as shown in the graph on the
following page, this growth rate was strongly influenced
by a very weak Q4 2007. Year-end totals were markedly
different, with tonnage off-take down 14% on calendar
2007, although this still represented a rise of 13% in
Rupee terms.
The opening months of 2008 witnessed a sharp drop-off in
Indian consumer demand as the gold price soared above
$US1000/oz. While heightened levels of gold price
volatility continued to impact on demand in H2 2008, any
negative effect was more than offset by the extreme global
economic and financial conditions, which prompted heavy
investment-related buying on dips in the gold price. The
first buying surge occurred early in the third quarter as
the gold price fell towards $US700/oz, with both jewellery
and bar
and coin demand benefiting. However, demand ebbed again
later in that quarter as the gold price rose back towards
$US900/oz.
Q4 was once again influenced by intra-quarter price
volatility. Octobers fall in the gold price from levels
above $US900/oz (which coincided with a record high in
Rupee terms of Rp43,373) to $US712/oz occurred during the
Diwali festival, a key gold buying occasion in India.
Consumers, who had been hoarding cash due to extreme
financial conditions, took the opportunity to move back
into gold, resulting in acute shortages of the metal.
Inventory levels among both manufacturers and retailers
contracted significantly, and manufacturers order books
climbed. Some jewellers reported all-time highs in demand,
particularly in the northern and western regions.
By November, gold price volatility had increased and the
Rupee gold price resumed its climb, prompting local
consumers once again to take a wait-and-see approach.
Furthermore, buying by
1 Consumer demand is gold bought by individuals i.e. as
jewellery and net retail
investment. Unless otherwise specified all data in this section refer to tonnage figures and growth
rates are comparisons with the same period of the previous year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FEBRUARY 2009
|
|
11
|
|
|
non-residents, who traditionally come home in December for
their annual vacation, was negatively affected by the
extreme uncertainty surrounding the financial sector and
global economy.
As with the jewellery sector, the growth rate in net
retail investment relative to Q4 2007 was very strong
(47%). Similarly, the result was boosted by a weak Q4
2007, although this 2007 effect was not as significant.
Conditions were opportune for the roll-out of gold coins
into Indian post offices, a joint initiative between India
Post and World Gold Council 8,500 coins were sold in the
first 15 days. The roll-out coincided with the ongoing
festive season.
The outlook for Q1 2009 depends to some extent on the gold
price. The rise to $US900/oz during January brought new
record highs in Rupee terms. This had a significant
negative effect on demand, and is also likely to trigger
higher levels of scrap recycling. Furthermore, the current
quarter has a fewer number of wedding days relative to Q1
2008. However, the combination of golds safe haven appeal
and extreme uncertainty surrounding other asset classes
should see consumers continue to take advantage of any
dips in the price the investment motive to buy gold in
the region remains strong.
Greater China
Gold demand in greater China during Q4 was extremely
resilient to the global turmoil. Total off-take in the
region was up 21% on Q4 2007 levels, and up 18%
year-on-year. The strength in both the quarterly and
annual results was driven by mainland China, recording
growth of just over 20% relative to both the December
quarter 2007 and calendar 2007. In fact, Chinas annual
increase in total tonnage (68 tonnes) easily exceeded that
of any other country the next closest were Vietnam and
Thailand, both with an increase of around 38 tonnes. In
$US value terms, annual demand in mainland China was 51%
above the levels of 2007.
Investment demand was the main contributor to the strong
growth in total off-take, although jewellery demand showed
considerable resilience to the worsening in economic
conditions. However, there were considerable variations in
spending and investment patterns within the three
countries in that region.
Mainland China, as with most other parts of the world, has
been affected by the global economic crisis. As at late
December, the Shanghai composite index was down 70% from
its peak in 2007, exports have started to decline, and
housing activity has slowed significantly. Investors have
been looking for alternative destinations to park their
savings. Golds safe haven status was a significant
drawing point retail investment demand dominated the
increase in total tonnage in the region. Rates of
growth in excess of 150% were recorded in net retail
investment for both
Q4 2008 relative to Q4 2007 and calendar 2008 relative to
calendar 2007. In local currency terms, the annual
increase was more than 200%.
Chinese jewellery demand also captured some of the
benefits of the investor flight to safety, rising 10% in
tonnage terms relative to Q4 2007. The investor motive was
evident in the strength of 24 carat sales, which
contrasted to the decline in sales of 18 carat K-gold.
Total gold off-take in 2008 was up 21% on 2007, and up a
very strong 38% in local currency terms.
Taiwan also benefited from strong investor buying. Retail
investment demand in Q4 was up 25% relative to
year-earlier levels, and for the year as a whole, recorded
a rise of 18%. The pull-back in the gold price below
$US800/oz underpinned demand, although a flight to safety
was the underlying motive. Investors are suffering from
the poor performance of stock markets and mutual funds. In
order to pick up some of the overflow from excess demand
for gold passbook accounts, which reached record highs in
Q4, the Bank of Taiwan developed a new product called a
gold savings plan, also known as a gold piggy bank.
This new product, aimed at retirees with bank term
deposits, was launched on December 18th and has received
strong initial levels of interest.
Softer jewellery demand partly offset the stronger
investment demand, however. Tonnage jewellery demand in Q4
was up
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FEBRUARY 2009
|
|
12
|
|
|
Table 6: Consumer demand trends in selected countries: Q4 2008 (tonnes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q4 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q4 20081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% ch Q4 2008 vs Q4 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net retail |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net retail |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net retail |
|
|
|
|
|
Jewellery |
|
invest. |
|
Total |
|
|
Jewellery |
|
invest. |
|
Total |
|
|
Jewellery |
|
invest. |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
India |
|
|
|
49.4 |
|
|
|
30.7 |
|
|
|
80.1 |
|
|
|
|
102.1 |
|
|
|
45.1 |
|
|
|
147.2 |
|
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
Greater China |
|
|
|
83.8 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
93.0 |
|
|
|
|
92.0 |
|
|
|
20.7 |
|
|
|
112.7 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
China |
|
|
|
77.3 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
84.3 |
|
|
|
|
85.1 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
103.1 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Hong Kong |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
-9 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Taiwan |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Japan |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
-20.0 |
|
|
|
-12.4 |
|
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
26.5 |
|
|
|
|
-15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indonesia |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
|
-13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-10 |
|
Vietnam |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
21.3 |
|
|
|
|
-10 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Middle East |
|
|
|
66.0 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
70.2 |
|
|
|
|
61.1 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
71.2 |
|
|
|
|
-7 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Saudi Arabia |
|
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
24.7 |
|
|
|
|
-11 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Egypt |
|
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
UAE |
|
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
21.0 |
|
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
|
|
-11 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
-7 |
|
Other Gulf |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
|
-14 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
-13 |
|
Turkey |
|
|
|
38.0 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
42.6 |
|
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
|
-57 |
|
|
|
-78 |
|
|
|
-59 |
|
Russia2 |
|
|
|
28.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.7 |
|
|
|
|
28.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.6 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA |
|
|
|
100.6 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
107.9 |
|
|
|
|
65.5 |
|
|
|
34.8 |
|
|
|
100.3 |
|
|
|
|
-35 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
-7 |
|
Italy2 |
|
|
|
29.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.0 |
|
|
|
|
24.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.4 |
|
|
|
|
-16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-16 |
|
UK2 |
|
|
|
25.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.7 |
|
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
|
-31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-31 |
|
Europe ex CIS3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113.7 |
|
|
|
113.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1170 |
|
|
|
1170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Above |
|
|
|
445.3 |
|
|
|
58.3 |
|
|
|
503.6 |
|
|
|
|
429.1 |
|
|
|
262.1 |
|
|
|
691.2 |
|
|
|
|
-4 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
125.0 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
128.0 |
|
|
|
|
109.8 |
|
|
|
42.1 |
|
|
|
151.9 |
|
|
|
|
-12 |
|
|
|
1297 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
World Total |
|
|
|
570.3 |
|
|
|
61.4 |
|
|
|
631.6 |
|
|
|
|
538.9 |
|
|
|
304.2 |
|
|
|
843.1 |
|
|
|
|
-6 |
|
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: GFMS. 1. Provisional. 2. Jewellery only. 3. Net retail investment only.
slightly compared to year-earlier levels, but calendar
2008 was down 17% on calendar 2007, although in $US terms,
this still represented a rise of 4%. Economic conditions
weighed on sentiment, and this was cushioned only partly
by the fact that 2008 was a good year for weddings both
2007 and 2009 are so-called widow-years.
Total tonnage for Q4 (jewellery and net retail investment
combined) increased 11% on year-earlier levels, while the
result for calendar 2008 represented a 6% decline. Wedding
demand proved reasonably buoyant, helping offset lower
jewellery spending in other areas.
Demand trends in Hong Kong contrasted somewhat to those in
both Taiwan and mainland China, the most significant point
of difference being the absence of a surge in retail
investment demand. Q4 net retail investment demand was
down 9% relative to Q4 2007 and for the year as a whole,
edged down by 2%. In contrast, jewellery demand in Q4 was
up a relatively healthy 12% in tonnage terms relative to
Q4 2007, although the growth rate for the year as a whole
was a more modest 3%. This is unusual because the global
trends in Q4 leaned firmly towards stronger
growth in investment demand than jewellery demand. While
gold benefited from both the weakness in other investment
vehicles and its appeal as a safe haven, the buying was
relatively sporadic. Positive influences included spending
by tourists from mainland China during National Day Golden
Week and the peak wedding season.
The 2008 year saw the cross-listing of the SPDR Gold
Shares Exchange Traded Fund on the Hong Kong Stock
Exchange. The successful launch on July 31 saw 208,540
shares traded on the first day, and the average daily
volume in Q4 2008 was 15,836 shares.
The worsening economic environment and uncertainty
surrounding other assets should continue to override any
concerns over the high gold price in Q1 2009 and underpin
investment demand in the region. In mainland China, where
the jewellery sector is dominated by 24 carat gold, an
underlying investment motive is likely provide ongoing
support for jewellery demand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FEBRUARY 2009
|
|
13
|
|
|
Other East Asia
Total tonnage off-take in Japan was positive in Q4 for the
first time in 3 years. The biggest contributor was net
retail investment, which recorded a net inflow of 20.0
tonnes, a complete reversal on Q4 2007s outflow of 20.0
tonnes. Total off-take remained negative for the year as a
whole at -11.2 tonnes.
During Q4, the Yen broke through the key psychological
level of 100 Yen to the dollar and fell to 90 Yen (the yen
strengthened while the dollar weakened). The Yen has been
the funding currency of the so-called Yen carry trade -
investors had borrowed Yen, sold it outright and placed
the proceeds in high-yielding currencies or the commodity
sector. The unwinding of these carry trades by
institutional investors, who have become more risk averse,
triggered the heavy Yen buying that drove the local
currency higher. Retail investors also reversed their US
dollar long positions. This surge in the Yen hit the
corporate
profits of the Japanese leading companies such as SONY,
Toyota and Canon which, in turn, drove down share prices.
The weakness in the local stock market and reduced
attractiveness of Yen carry trades heightened the
attractiveness of gold, being an asset that has been
resilient to the global turmoil as well as providing
security for increasingly risk averse investors.
The rise in the Yen also resulted in a decline in the
price of gold in local currency terms and Japanese
investors, who tend to be keen bargain hunters, were eager
to advantage of the opportunity.
Investors shunned complicated structured products and
sought the simplicity of gold bars and coins. Demand for
ETFs benefited from the decline in equity markets, with
the SPDR Gold Shares product enjoying a steady increase in
turnover since its June 30 launch. Even the futures
merchants embarked upon heavy promotion of physical gold
products as the TOCOM futures contracts, perceived to be
risky, lost their attraction. Cost averaging, where
investors drip feed fixed amounts on a regular basis, were
promoted by financial advisors, and this was reflected in
the amounts flowing into GAP accounts.
In the jewellery sector, demand was affected by the
slowing local economy and weak consumer sentiment. Q4
Jewellery demand in tonnage terms declined 15% relative to
year-earlier levels.
Total tonnage off-take in Vietnam in Q4 was up 14% on
year-earlier levels. As was the case in many countries,
jewellery demand weakened (down 10% in tonnage terms
relative to Q4 2007), reflecting the negative effect of
the depressed economic environment and the rising gold
price. Investment demand in 2008, however, was almost
double the levels of 2007 and up 24% on the levels of Q4
2007.
Gold imports into Vietnam soared in the first half of this
year ahead of the suspension of official gold imports by
the government in late June. This was done to stem a
deterioration in the trade deficit. After a sharp slowdown
in gold imports in
Q3, a recovery occurred in Q4, with the fall in the gold
price around late October being an important trigger. Gold
bars continue to be unofficially imported from
neighbouring countries, in particular Thailand. Gold
imports in Thailand surged during the quarter and a large
part of this is believed to have been destined for
Vietnam. Gold is not just a key form of investment in
Vietnam; it is also a form of currency (being commonly
used for real estate transactions) and an alternative to a
traditional bank account. High inflation and a falling
currency means that locals have little confidence in the
local currency (the Dong). Last year, the inflation rate
reached highs not seen in a decade.
Total tonnage in Indonesia in Q4 was down 10% on the
levels of Q4 2007, driven by weaker jewellery consumption,
which declined 13%. Total tonnage during 2008 was up 6% on
the levels of 2007.
The jewellery sector started the quarter on a positive
note, but consumption levels slipped towards the end of
November as the gold price rose back above $US800/oz. This
weakness continued into December, with concerns
surrounding the local and global economy also weighing on
sentiment. Net retail investment, as in most other parts
of the Asian region, recorded strong growth in Q4,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FEBRUARY 2009
|
|
14
|
|
|
although the absolute volumes were small and the figure was tempered by a wave of dishoarding
towards the end of the quarter as consumers took profits.
Thailand is another country where investment demand soared, from a net outflow of 8.0 tonnes in Q4
2007 to a net inflow of 21.5 tonnes in Q4 2008. Similar to many other parts of the region, the
turnaround was underpinned by safe haven buying.
Investment demand in Q1 2009 in the region is expected to remain underpinned by golds safe haven
appeal. However, given the economic environment, jewellery demand is likely to struggle while the
gold price remains above $US800/oz.
Middle East and Turkey
Middle East
Total gold demand in the Middle East in Q4 was up 1% on the levels of Q4 2007. Around 90% of total
consumer off-take in the region is in the form of jewellery, and weakness in this sector (down 7%)
largely offset extremely strong growth in net retail investment (139%). The surge in investment
demand was reasonably widespread across the region 300% relative to Q4 2007 in Saudi Arabia, 67%
in Egypt, 38% in the UAE and 2% in the Other Gulf countries. In contrast, Saudi Arabia, the UAE and
the Other Gulf countries each recorded declines in jewellery demand of just over 10% relative to
year-earlier levels, although Egypt showed continued resilience (as it did the previous quarter)
with a 4% rise.
During 2008 as whole, total off-take in the region was down a modest 2%. The resilience of Egypt,
where demand rose 12%, largely offset weakness in the UAE (-4%), Saudi Arabia (-4%) and the Other
Gulf countries (-13%). The annual figures reflected strong growth in investment demand everywhere
except in the Other Gulf countries, but Egypt was the only country in the region to record positive
growth in jewellery demand.
In the UAE, jewellery demand in Q4 was down 11% on the levels of a year earlier. Net retail
investment was up 38%, equivalent to a rise of around 0.6 tonnes. Demand during Octobers Diwali
festival was particularly strong with the help of a lower, more stable gold price during that time.
Notably, demand for gold coins also increased during the festival. The rise in off-take was
sufficient to result in stock shortages, and low production-cost 22 carat gold jewellery such as
bangles and chains absorbed the benefits of the excess demand. These shortages were also apparent
during Dubais shopping festival, which started in mid-January. However, jewellery demand has struggled to sustain any surges in momentum. The significant
slowing in the global economy has resulted in fewer tourists, which contribute strongly to Dubais
jewellery trade.
Jewellery demand in Egypt over recent quarters has been noticeable for its stability and
resilience. Q4 2008 was up 4% in tonnage terms on the levels of a year earlier; over the year as a
whole the growth rate was 10%. As with India and other parts of the Middle East, Egypt has
traditionally been a price sensitive market. The stability in jewellery demand over recent quarters
is therefore somewhat unusual and appears to reflect the flow-on benefits of the surge in investor
interest.
Weakness in the housing market and other investments, combined with a flight to safety, had a
positive impact on demand for bars and coins in Egypt during the fourth quarter. Net retail
investor demand was up 67% on year-earlier levels, with the growth rate for the 12 months to
December an impressive 247%. However, the rise in tonnage terms was relatively modest from 0.7
tonnes in 2007 to 2.5 tonnes in 2008.
Saudi Arabia was also notable for a surge in investor demand. The increase from just 1.7 tonnes in
Q4 2007 to 6.8 tonnes in Q4 2008 represents a tripling in investment off-take. This
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FEBRUARY 2009
|
|
15
|
|
|
strength has continued into the 1st quarter 2009. Although the tonnage increase relative to Q4 2007
may appear modest, it was nevertheless sufficient to more than offset an 11% reduction in jewellery
demand. Total tonnage off-take in Saudi Arabia was up 13% on the levels of Q4 2007. The western
region managed a flat performance with the Hajj pilgrimage season providing a cushion relative to
the weakness that was evident in other parts of the country, particularly the eastern and central
regions.
The outlook for 2009 remains mixed. Investment demand is likely to be underpinned by the extreme
levels of uncertainty surrounding the global economy and other assets. However, jewellery demand is
caught between the conflicting pressures of a slowing economy and the positive, flow-on effects of
strong investment demand and a shortage of bars and coins. Being a price sensitive market, the
recent rise in the gold price is likely to have a dampening effect, although dips in the price
would likewise trigger some recovery, particularly given the current financial and economic
environment.
Turkey
Turkey is a price sensitive market and, over recent months, demand has been negatively affected by
the combination of gold price volatility, a sharp fall in the local currency and economic
uncertainty. The global financial and economic crisis triggered concerns about the potential local
implications and drove a depreciation in the New Turkish Lira of around 20% during the quarter.
This pushed the gold price sharply higher in local currency terms. The high levels of the gold price, in turn, were a
strong sell signal and triggered a sharp rise in gold scrap coming back to the market. Levels of
scrap surpassed those seen in Q1 2008 to reach record highs. With the local share market having
fallen significantly, gold was one of the few investment assets that could be sold at an attractive
price to provide access to funds.
Total gold off-take in Q4 was down a significant 59% on the levels of a year earlier. For the 2008
year as a whole, off-take was 16% lower in tonnage terms but 6% higher in both $US terms and local
currency terms. Jewellery demand rose 2% in local currency terms, while investment demand rose 17%.
Both jewellery and investment demand in Turkey suffered during Q4. The rate of decline relative to
Q4 2007 in both sectors was the worst of any of the countries shown in Table 5, with jewellery
demand down 57% and investment down 78%. While Q4 is a seasonal soft patch for tourism, jewellery
sales to tourists were down more than usual, with the global economic situation affecting tourist
numbers. Local spending was also very weak, largely due to the impact of the very high gold price
in local currency terms the combined result of the currencys significant depreciation and a rise
in the $US price of gold. The high gold price in local currency terms also impacted strongly on net
retail investment, its abrupt decline contrasting significantly with a strongly rising trend in
most other countries. Following on from a very buoyant Q3, investors reacted strongly to a sharply
higher gold price in local currency terms and the increased economic uncertainty.
Q4 traditionally marks a seasonal soft patch for the Turkish gold market, but the most recent
quarter was unusually weak, with imports largely drying up and scrap levels increasing markedly.
Turkey is a price sensitive market and typically the return of stability in the gold price is
sufficient to generate a positive demand response. However, given the downward pressure on the
local currency combined with the extreme uncertainty surrounding the global economic environment,
it is unclear whether a stabilizing in the $US gold price would be sufficient to trigger a recovery
in Turkish gold demand.
USA
A further deterioration in economic conditions spelled mixed fortunes for gold demand in the US
market as plunging jewellery consumption more than offset soaring investment demand. Total volume
of gold off-take in 2008 fell by 6% year-on-year, although in value terms annual demand of $US7.2bn
represented a rise of 17% over 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FEBRUARY 2009
|
|
16
|
|
|
Although the average gold price for Q4 2008, at $US794.76/oz, was only marginally above the average
for Q4 2007 ($US786.25/oz), domestic conditions have deteriorated to such an extent that consumers
signally failed to respond. Rising unemployment, falling values of stock and property markets and
plummeting consumer confidence produced a very weak quarter for jewellery demand. Q4 2008 jewellery
demand was 35% below the year-earlier quarter, while the 2008 annual total represented a 31%
decline year-on-year, and, at 179.1 tonnes, is the lowest figure on record. That 2008 was a very
difficult year for gold jewellery demand has been reflected in figures cited by the Jewelers Board
of Trade, who stated that in the first 11 months of 2008, 1069 jewellery-related businesses either
ceased operations or were declared bankrupt.
Against this negative trade backdrop, however, gold has fortunately remained in the headlines of
both consumer and financial media, which served to reinforce both the enduring intrinsic value of
gold and its historic role as a store of value. The U.S. consumer recognizes the investment appeal
of gold and this is evident in the very different picture of investment off-take. Both the Q4 and
calendar 2008 comparisons of demand for gold bars and coins show a rise of around 370% on
year-earlier levels. Fourth quarter demand of 34.8 tonnes resulted in an annual demand figure of
77.8 tonnes, the highest annual total since 1999 when investment demand was boosted by the threat
of the so-called millennium bug. At a time of crisis in the global banking sector and falling
values of stock markets and other investments, investors appear to want the certainty of owning
gold.
Amid the continuing financial crisis and economic downturn, the outlook is for a continued
divergence in the two elements of consumer demand for gold, with jewellery suffering as consumers
reduce their spending and focus on essential needs, while investors continue to respond to the
safe-haven motive for holding gold.
Europe
Jewellery demand in Europe continued to suffer as a result of the dismal economic and retail
environment. With Q3 GDP growth now confirmed as negative in both the UK and Italy, conditions in
the jewellery market deteriorated accordingly. The UK market again suffered the largest decline,
with Q4 off-take falling 31% below year-earlier levels. Meanwhile, the 2008 annual total was 28%
lower than calendar 2007. However, jewellery demand expressed in terms of local currency value was
more or less flat relative to 2007 (-2%), despite a marked increase in the average Sterling price
of gold in 2008. It is encouraging that UK consumers, although purchasing lower volumes, maintained
steady spending levels on gold jewellery despite the harsh economic climate.
Italys market experienced a similarly difficult quarter, with demand sliding by around 15% from
year-earlier levels for both the quarter and the calendar year. In local currency terms however,
the value of gold jewellery demand was marginally higher, up 1% compared with 2007 at 968mn.
Demand has been noticeably curtailed in the medium-high market segment, with jewellery items priced
between 2000 and 3000 suffering a sharp drop-off. Furthermore, there is evidence of branded gold
jewellery producers enforcing stricter conditions on retailers in an attempt to weather the
downturn in the market. The prospect of an extended period of recession, coupled with relatively
elevated gold prices, does not bode well for the market over the coming quarters, although
forecasts of a sudden decline in inflation may mitigate this negative impact, as falling prices
would ease the pressure on consumers disposable incomes.
Russia again proved to be relatively resilient during the fourth quarter, bucking the regional
trend of declining jewellery demand. Demand was steady compared with Q4 2007, while the 2008 annual
total was 12% higher year-on-year. In terms of $US value, this equates to a very strong 41% rise to
$US2.7bn. The negative impact of changes in the import licensing regime which should result in
higher value added tax on jewellery imports has, so far, not been as significant as initially
expected. Imports are increasingly being channelled through unofficial routes, in particular
through the Baltic countries and Turkey. The Russian economy is by no means exempt from the global
downturn, and the fall in oil prices will inevitably have a dampening effect. Inflation has surged,
and it seems that Russian consumers are at least partly driven by the investment motive for holding
gold when making purchases of gold jewellery.
In a repeat of the third quarter, investment demand experienced a markedly different quarter from
that of jewellery across Europe. Purchases of gold bars and coins rocketed, with several markets
experiencing shortages as supply was insufficient to meet the surge in demand. Regional investment
demand surged to 113.7 tonnes in the fourth quarter alone, resulting in record annual demand of
173.8 tonnes. Expressed in local currency terms, 2008 annual European retail investment demand was
valued at 3.3bn compared with 0.16bn in 2007.
Following the reversal witnessed in the previous quarter, when French investors became net
purchasers of gold for the first time in around 25 years, France once again recorded a positive
level of investment off-take in the fourth quarter. Demand for retail gold investment products
reached a fairly healthy 5.4 tonnes but, although net disinvestment was relatively low during the
first half
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FEBRUARY 2009
|
|
17
|
|
|
HISTORICAL DATA FOR IDENTIFIABLE GOLD DEMAND
Table 7: Historical data for identifiable gold demand1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tonnes |
|
$bn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Retail |
|
ETFs & |
|
Industrial & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Retail |
|
ETFs & |
|
Industrial & |
|
|
|
|
|
Jewellery |
|
Invest. |
|
Similar |
|
Dental |
|
Total |
|
|
Jewellery |
|
Invest. |
|
Similar |
|
Dental |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2000 |
|
|
|
3,204 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
3,821 |
|
|
|
|
28.75 |
|
|
|
1.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.05 |
|
|
|
34.28 |
|
2001 |
|
|
|
3,008 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
3,727 |
|
|
|
|
26.21 |
|
|
|
3.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.16 |
|
|
|
32.47 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
2,660 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
3,361 |
|
|
|
|
26.48 |
|
|
|
3.38 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
3.56 |
|
|
|
33.45 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
2,482 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
3,197 |
|
|
|
|
28.99 |
|
|
|
3.41 |
|
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
4.46 |
|
|
|
37.32 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
2,614 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
3,507 |
|
|
|
|
34.53 |
|
|
|
4.46 |
|
|
|
1.83 |
|
|
|
5.44 |
|
|
|
46.26 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
2,709 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
3,737 |
|
|
|
|
38.69 |
|
|
|
5.49 |
|
|
|
3.03 |
|
|
|
6.17 |
|
|
|
53.38 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2,285 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
3,409 |
|
|
|
|
44.51 |
|
|
|
7.88 |
|
|
|
4.94 |
|
|
|
8.93 |
|
|
|
66.26 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2,401 |
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
3,525 |
|
|
|
|
53.60 |
|
|
|
9.02 |
|
|
|
5.78 |
|
|
|
10.30 |
|
|
|
79.70 |
|
20082 | |
|
|
2,138 |
|
|
|
769 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
3,659 |
|
|
|
|
59.73 |
|
|
|
21.05 |
|
|
|
8.90 |
|
|
|
12.09 |
|
|
|
101.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q105 |
|
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
|
9.39 |
|
|
|
1.66 |
|
|
|
1.22 |
|
|
|
1.46 |
|
|
|
13.73 |
|
Q205 |
|
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
-2 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
960 |
|
|
|
|
10.17 |
|
|
|
1.52 |
|
|
|
-0.02 |
|
|
|
1.52 |
|
|
|
13.19 |
|
Q305 |
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
845 |
|
|
|
|
8.66 |
|
|
|
1.23 |
|
|
|
0.53 |
|
|
|
1.53 |
|
|
|
11.95 |
|
Q405 |
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
932 |
|
|
|
|
10.47 |
|
|
|
1.08 |
|
|
|
1.30 |
|
|
|
1.66 |
|
|
|
14.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q106 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
|
8.75 |
|
|
|
1.60 |
|
|
|
2.01 |
|
|
|
2.00 |
|
|
|
14.36 |
|
Q206 |
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
788 |
|
|
|
|
10.68 |
|
|
|
1.90 |
|
|
|
0.99 |
|
|
|
2.33 |
|
|
|
15.90 |
|
Q306 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
801 |
|
|
|
|
11.13 |
|
|
|
2.18 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
2.32 |
|
|
|
16.01 |
|
Q406 |
|
|
|
707 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
1,014 |
|
|
|
|
13.94 |
|
|
|
2.20 |
|
|
|
1.56 |
|
|
|
2.29 |
|
|
|
19.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q107 |
|
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
|
11.81 |
|
|
|
2.35 |
|
|
|
0.76 |
|
|
|
2.43 |
|
|
|
17.35 |
|
Q207 |
|
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
-3 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
908 |
|
|
|
|
14.21 |
|
|
|
2.77 |
|
|
|
-0.05 |
|
|
|
2.53 |
|
|
|
19.46 |
|
Q307 |
|
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
965 |
|
|
|
|
13.17 |
|
|
|
2.34 |
|
|
|
3.05 |
|
|
|
2.55 |
|
|
|
21.11 |
|
Q407 |
|
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
822 |
|
|
|
|
14.42 |
|
|
|
1.55 |
|
|
|
2.02 |
|
|
|
2.78 |
|
|
|
20.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q108 |
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
708 |
|
|
|
|
13.17 |
|
|
|
2.41 |
|
|
|
2.16 |
|
|
|
3.30 |
|
|
|
21.04 |
|
Q208 |
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
|
14.52 |
|
|
|
3.90 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
3.23 |
|
|
|
21.77 |
|
Q308 |
|
|
|
652 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
1,159 |
|
|
|
|
18.26 |
|
|
|
6.97 |
|
|
|
4.20 |
|
|
|
3.04 |
|
|
|
32.47 |
|
Q4082 |
|
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
1037 |
|
|
|
|
13.77 |
|
|
|
7.77 |
|
|
|
2.42 |
|
|
|
2.52 |
|
|
|
26.48 |
|
Source: Tonnage data are GFMS; Value data are WGC calculations based on GFMS data.
1. See footnotes to Table 1 for definitions and notes. 2. Provisional
of 2008, this was not quite sufficient to result in a positive annual total and investment for the
year as a whole came in at -0.2 tonnes.
Investment demand in both Germany and Switzerland recorded rises of exceptional magnitude as
investors responded to the decline in global economic fortunes by hoarding gold bars and coins at
levels not previously recorded. For Q4 alone, demand reached 40.0 tonnes in Germany and 42.3 tonnes
in Switzerland compared with year-earlier demand of 7.0 and 4.5 tonnes
respectively. The economic woes affecting much of the globe, together with reduced confidence in
the traditional banking system and the declining value of stock market investments have all served
to emphasise the arguments for holding gold as an investment. While it seems unlikely that this
level of momentum can be sustained for a prolonged period of time and we might expect investment
demand to begin tailing off in 2009, this will depend on the global environment and developments in
the gold price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FEBRUARY 2009
|
|
18
|
|
|
FOCUS ON 2008: THE YEAR IN REVIEW
The 2008 year was one of extreme uncertainty. As the year progressed, a US recession became a
reality, and during the second half of the year, many other parts of the world started to follow
suit. The response from asset markets was severe. The oil price rose to highs of near $US150 per
barrel but by year end, had plunged to four year lows of below $US40 per barrel. Equity markets
around the world plunged, house prices fell and the prospect of negative equity was a real one for
more than just a few homeowners. In the US and UK during the latter part of the year, lay-offs were
being announced every week, often thousands at a time. However, as far as gold was concerned, the
key event that comes to mind was the prospect of bank defaults. Although governments have gone to
great lengths to reassure people that their life savings are secure, is a government guarantee
really a guarantee? In fact, significantly increasing public debt levels have also led to increased
sovereign risk.
The fall in the gold price from its March 2008 peak of $US1011/oz towards levels of around
$US700/oz six months later was generally met with pessimism. Most analysts, at that stage, were
forecasting a further decline. Slower global economic growth was widely expected to result in a
significant contraction in both spending on gold jewellery and in industrial demand. Some of the
more optimistic analysts (or pessimistic depending on ones point of view) believed that golds
safe haven status would provide increasing levels of support as global economic conditions
deteriorated. In hindsight, the strength of the fear factor and the benefits for the gold price
have caught most by surprise.
Several key characteristics of gold were highlighted during the year. First, there is a store of
value motive that makes gold jewellery resilient to a slowdown in economic conditions and this is
apparent from the 2008 data. While the hardest hit industrialised countries suffered a significant
reduction in spending on jewellery during 2008, from a global perspective, the response was
relatively modest. In Q4, demand in tonnage terms was down just 6% on year-earlier levels, and for
the year as a whole, the decline was 11%. In $US value terms, this represented a rise of 11% an
encouraging result in the current adverse retail environment, where most other discretionary
expenditure categories declined significantly. Gold jewellery, particularly high carat jewellery,
is often viewed as a form of investment and has an intrinsic value that will not naturally
depreciate over time due to wear and tear as with most other high end luxury consumer items.
The second characteristic of gold that came to the fore during 2008 is the diversity of the motives
behind demand flows. It was widely believed that because the more fundamental sources of demand (jewellery and industrial demand)
would suffer under the pressure of the global economic downturn, concerned investors would start to
move away from gold, as happened with other commodities. In fact, an important balancing effect
occurred between industrial and jewellery demand on the one hand and investment demand on the
other.
In 2007, jewellery tonnage accounted for 68.1% of total identifiable demand, industrial and dental
demand accounted for 13.1% and identifiable investment demand 18.8%. It seemed like an
insurmountable task to expect investment demand to be sufficient to offset weaker demand in the
other two areas. Yet it did easily. Identifiable investment demand during 2008 was 434.1 tonnes
higher than the levels of 2007 up 66%. Investment demands share of the golden pie increased to
29.6% while jewellerys share reduced to 58.1%. The increased flows into identifiable investment
totalled a substantial $US15bn, with net retail investment (essentially net investment in bars and
coins) accounting for $US12bn of this.
The other important role that gold played during 2008 was that of an asset of last resort. One of
the key reasons that major central banks around the world own gold is to ensure access to emergency
funds in times of crisis gold is a form of insurance policy. There were leveraged institutions
who owned gold during 2008, and when other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FEBRUARY 2009
|
|
19
|
|
|
assets plunged in value and investors started to bail, these institutions were able to sell their
gold to raise much needed funds. This selling was placing downward pressure on the gold price,
raising some questions within the media regarding golds role as a safe haven. In fact, what we saw
during that time was evidence of these insurance policies at work. The gold price subsequently
bounced as other investors caught onto this attractive aspect of gold.
The retail investor flows that were experienced during the second half of 2008 were a global
phenomenon. Net retail investment increased from 16.6 tonnes in 2007 to 77.8 tonnes in 2008 in the
US, from 25.6 tonnes to 68.9 tonnes in mainland China, from 4.7 tonnes to 46.7 tonnes in Thailand
and from 56.1 tonnes to 96.2 tonnes in Vietnam. Each one of these stories is dramatic in its own
right. However, they all pale in comparison to the story in Europe, where net retail demand surged
from just 9.6 tonnes in 2007 to 173.8 in 2008. In Q4, net demand in Switzerland and Germany both
exceeded that in the US.
Does the safe haven status that gold has been attributed with have real underpinnings or is it
merely a perception? Firstly, gold has no default risk and no counterparty risk, which is clearly a
major drawing point in a world where corporate default risk, banking default risk and sovereign
default risk have all increased. Another key factor that sets gold apart from other assets, and in
particular from other hard assets, including commodities, is its history as a means of exchange, as
a currency and as the centre of the global monetary system. Although gold is still a commodity and
an investment asset, its safe haven status means that it tends to move independently of other key
asset classes and other commodities, most specifically during times of crisis. This makes gold an
effective portfolio diversifier.
What happens when current extreme levels of uncertainty start to reduce and the global economy
shows signs of a turnaround?
|
|
By all indications, such an improvement is still a long way off. Nevertheless, it will happen
eventually and with it, one motivator for owning gold will reduce. At the same time, however, the
outlook for jewellery demand will improve, providing the counter-balancing effect mentioned
earlier. |
|
|
|
It is very unlikely that the bars and coins that have been bought in the recent wave of buying
will suddenly reverse direction, although the wave may lose momentum. Owners of bars and coins have
traditionally been buy-and-hold investors, not speculators, reflecting the premium being paid and
issues such as physical delivery and storage. Likewise, ETF holdings do not tend to be volatile due
to the significant influence of retail rather than institutional investors. The more speculative
side of the gold market is transacted through the futures, derivates and OTC markets, where risk
appetites have noticeably reduced. |
|
|
|
Global allocations to gold still constitute a tiny proportion of the total investment pool. |
The years 2003-2007 were characterised by a benign global economic environment, easy and cheap
access to funds and a significant appetite for risk. It would be naïve to expect investors to
permanently shy away from risk; bubbles will always occur. However, at the margin, there are
investors and institutions who are revisiting key issues such as portfolio diversification and
tail-risk. An insurance policy is relevant at all times, not just during times of crisis. It would
only take a small proportion of institutions to allocate a small part of their holdings to have a
significant effect on demand for gold. The road for gold will not always be a smooth one, but it
would not come as a surprise if investment demand, over time, accounts for a growing proportion of
total demand for the yellow metal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FEBRUARY 2009
|
|
20
|
|
|
Notes and definitions
All statistics (except where specified) are in weights of fine gold.
|
|
|
|
|
Tonne
|
|
=
|
|
1,000 kg or 32,151 troy oz of fine gold. |
N/A
|
|
=
|
|
not available |
------
|
|
=
|
|
not applicable |
Mine production. Formal and informal output.
Net producer hedging. The change in the physical market impact of mining companies gold loans,
forwards and options positions.
Official sector sales. Gross sales less gross purchases by central
banks and other official institutions. Swaps and the effect of delta hedging are excluded.
Old gold scrap. Gold sourced from old fabricated products which has been recovered and refined back
into bars.
Jewellery. All newly-made carat jewellery and gold watches, whether plain gold or combined with
other materials. It excludes second-hand jewellery, other metals plated with gold, coins and bars
used as jewellery and purchases funded by the trading in of existing jewellery.
Retail investment. For the three bar, coin and medallions categories this comprises individuals
purchases of coins and bars defined according to the standard adopted by the European Union for
investment gold. Medallions of at least 99% purity, wires and lumps sold in small quantities are
also included. In practice this includes the initial sale of many coins destined ultimately to be
considered as numismatic rather than bullion. It excludes second hand coins and is measured as net
purchases.
Other retail investment refers to Western Europe and North America. It includes net investment in
physical bullion as defined by the EU (other than new coins which are included in the two coin
categories), individuals paper transactions with a direct physical counterpart plus Over The
Counter activity and changes in metal account holdings where measurable and retail targeted.
Consumer demand. The sum of jewellery and retail investment purchases for a country ie the
amount of gold acquired directly by individuals.
Industrial demand. The first transformation of raw gold into intermediate or final products
destined for industrial use such as gold potassium cyanide, gold bonding wire, sputtering targets.
This includes gold destined for plating jewellery.
Dental. The first transformation of raw gold
into intermediate or final products destined for dental applications such as dental alloys.
Tourist purchases and luggage trade. Purchases by foreign visitors which are normally for their
own use or for gifts are included in demand in the country of purchase. Bulk purchases by foreign
visitors (luggage trade) which appear to be intended for resale in the visitors country of
origin or a third country are attributed to the country in which they are resold.
Revisions to data. All data may be subject to revision in the light of new information.
Historical data
Data covering a longer time period will be available on Bloomberg from February 18th; alternatively
contact GFMS Ltd (+44 (0)20 7478 1777; gold@gfms.co.uk).
Sources, copyright and disclaimers
© 2009 World Gold Council and GFMS Ltd. All rights reserved. This document is World Gold Council
(WGC) commentary and analysis based on gold supply and demand statistics compiled by GFMS Ltd for
WGC along with some additional data. See individual tables for specific source information.
No organisation or individual is permitted to disseminate the statistics relating to gold supply
and demand in this report without the written agreement of both copyright owners. However, the use
of these statistics is permitted for review and commentary (including media commentary), subject to
the two pre-conditions that follow. The first pre-condition is that only limited data extracts be
used. The second precondition is that all use of these statistics is accompanied by a clear
acknowledgement of GFMS and, where appropriate, WGC, as their source. Brief extracts from the
commentary and other WGC material are permitted provided WGC is cited as the source.
Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information in this document,
neither WGC nor GFMS Ltd can guarantee such accuracy. Furthermore, the material contained herewith
has no regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any
specific recipient or organisation. It is published solely for informational purposes and is not to
be construed as a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell gold, any gold-related products,
commodities, securities or related financial instruments. No representation or warranty, either
express or implied, is provided in relation to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the
information contained herein. The WGC and GFMS Ltd do not accept responsibility for any losses or
damages arising directly, or indirectly, from the use of this document.
Issued by:
World Gold Council
55 Old Broad Street
London
EC2M 1RX
United Kingdom
www.gold.org
Tel: +44 (0)20 7826 4700
Fax: +44 (0)20 7826 4799
For further information, contact:
Matt Graydon, Head of External Relations
World Gold Council
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7826 4716
E-mail: matt.graydon@gold.org
Rozanna Wozniak, Investment Research
Manager, World Gold Council
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7826 4758
E-mail: rozanna.wozniak@gold.org
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FEBRUARY 2009
|
|
21
|
|
|
SPDR® GOLD TRUST has filed a registration statement (including a prospectus) with the
SEC for the offering to which this communication relates. Before you invest, you should read the
prospectus in that registration statement and other documents the issuer has filed with the SEC for
more complete information about the Trust and this offering. You may get these documents for free
by visiting EDGAR on the SEC Web site at www.sec.gov. Alternatively, the Trust or any Authorized
Participant will arrange to send you the prospectus if you request it by calling toll free at
1-866-320-4053 or contacting State Street Global Markets, LLC, One Lincoln Street, Attn: SPDR®
Gold, 30th Floor, Boston, MA 02111.