e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
Commission File Number: 000-34084
POPULAR,
INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Puerto Rico
|
|
66-0667416 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification Number) |
|
|
|
Popular Center Building |
|
|
209 Muñoz Rivera Avenue, Hato Rey |
|
|
San Juan, Puerto Rico
|
|
00918 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
(787) 765-9800
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
NOT APPLICABLE
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
o Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and a smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Small reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
o Yes þ No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date: Common Stock $0.01 par value 639,540,105 shares outstanding as of
November 5, 2009.
Forward-Looking Information
The information included in this Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements
may relate to Popular, Inc.s (the Corporation) financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives,
future performance and business, including, but not limited to, statements with respect to the
adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, market risk and the impact of interest rate changes,
capital markets conditions, capital adequacy and liquidity, and the effect of legal proceedings and
new accounting standards on the Corporations financial condition and results of operations. All
statements contained herein that are not clearly historical in nature are forward-looking, and the
words anticipate, believe, continues, expect, estimate, intend, project and similar
expressions and future or conditional verbs such as will, would, should, could, might,
can, may, or similar expressions are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements.
These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties,
estimates and assumptions by management that are difficult to predict. Various factors, some of
which are beyond the Corporations control, could cause actual results to differ materially from
those expressed in, or implied by, such forward-looking statements.
Various factors, some of which are beyond Populars control, could cause actual results to differ
materially from those expressed in, or implied by, such forward-looking statements. Factors that
might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
the rate of growth in the economy and employment levels, as well as general business and
economic conditions; |
|
|
|
changes in interest rates, as well as the magnitude of such changes; |
|
|
|
the fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government and its agencies; |
|
|
|
changes in federal bank regulatory and supervisory policies, including required levels
of capital; |
|
|
|
the relative strength or weakness of the consumer and commercial credit sectors and of
the real estate markets in Puerto Rico and the other markets in which borrowers are
located; |
|
|
|
the performance of the stock and bond markets; |
|
|
|
competition in the financial services industry; |
|
|
|
possible legislative, tax or regulatory changes; and |
|
|
|
difficulties in combining the operations of acquired entities. |
Investors should refer to the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2008 as well as Part II, Item 1A of this Form 10-Q for a discussion of such factors and
certain risks and uncertainties to which the Corporation is subject.
Moreover, the outcome of legal proceedings, as discussed in Part II, Item I. Legal Proceedings,
is inherently uncertain and depends on judicial interpretations of law and the findings of
regulators, judges and juries.
All forward-looking statements included in this document are based upon information available to
the Corporation as of the date of this document, and other than as required by law, including the
requirements of applicable securities laws, we assume no obligation to update or revise any such
forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events or circumstances after
the date of such statements.
3
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
POPULAR, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands, except share information) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
606,861 |
|
|
$ |
784,987 |
|
|
$ |
1,183,997 |
|
|
Money market investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
140,635 |
|
|
|
214,990 |
|
|
|
173,330 |
|
Securities purchased under agreements to resell |
|
|
325,178 |
|
|
|
304,228 |
|
|
|
121,613 |
|
Time deposits with other banks |
|
|
633,010 |
|
|
|
275,436 |
|
|
|
14,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,098,823 |
|
|
|
794,654 |
|
|
|
309,497 |
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pledged securities with creditors right to repledge |
|
|
2,432,720 |
|
|
|
3,031,137 |
|
|
|
3,256,348 |
|
Other investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
4,560,571 |
|
|
|
4,893,350 |
|
|
|
4,312,394 |
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost (fair value as of September 30,
2009 - $210,913; December 31, 2008 - $290,134; September 30, 2008 -
$716,430) |
|
|
212,950 |
|
|
|
294,747 |
|
|
|
719,832 |
|
Other investment securities, at lower of cost or realizable value (realizable value as of
September 30, 2009 - $176,286; December 31, 2008 -
$255,830; September 30, 2008 - $273,836) |
|
|
174,943 |
|
|
|
217,667 |
|
|
|
229,158 |
|
Trading account securities, at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pledged securities with creditors right to repledge |
|
|
386,478 |
|
|
|
562,795 |
|
|
|
390,181 |
|
Other trading securities |
|
|
59,890 |
|
|
|
83,108 |
|
|
|
54,217 |
|
Loans held-for-sale measured at lower of cost or fair value |
|
|
75,447 |
|
|
|
536,058 |
|
|
|
245,134 |
|
|
Loans held-in-portfolio |
|
|
24,512,966 |
|
|
|
25,857,237 |
|
|
|
26,519,805 |
|
Less Unearned income |
|
|
116,897 |
|
|
|
124,364 |
|
|
|
183,770 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
1,207,401 |
|
|
|
882,807 |
|
|
|
726,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
23,188,668 |
|
|
|
24,850,066 |
|
|
|
25,609,555 |
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
589,592 |
|
|
|
620,807 |
|
|
|
620,469 |
|
Other real estate |
|
|
129,485 |
|
|
|
89,721 |
|
|
|
72,605 |
|
Accrued income receivable |
|
|
131,745 |
|
|
|
156,227 |
|
|
|
197,549 |
|
Servicing assets (at fair value on September 30, 2009 - $180,335; December 31, 2008 -
$176,034; September 30, 2008 - $127,827) |
|
|
183,376 |
|
|
|
180,306 |
|
|
|
132,484 |
|
Other assets (See Note 9) |
|
|
1,153,680 |
|
|
|
1,115,597 |
|
|
|
1,412,219 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
606,508 |
|
|
|
605,792 |
|
|
|
608,172 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
46,067 |
|
|
|
53,163 |
|
|
|
67,662 |
|
Assets from discontinued operations (See Note 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,587 |
|
|
|
968,669 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
35,637,804 |
|
|
$ |
38,882,769 |
|
|
$ |
40,390,142 |
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
$ |
4,281,817 |
|
|
$ |
4,293,553 |
|
|
$ |
4,065,720 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
|
22,101,081 |
|
|
|
23,256,652 |
|
|
|
23,845,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
26,382,898 |
|
|
|
27,550,205 |
|
|
|
27,911,397 |
|
Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
2,807,891 |
|
|
|
3,551,608 |
|
|
|
3,730,039 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
3,077 |
|
|
|
4,934 |
|
|
|
507,011 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
2,649,821 |
|
|
|
3,386,763 |
|
|
|
4,242,487 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,051,661 |
|
|
|
1,096,338 |
|
|
|
811,362 |
|
Liabilities from discontinued operations (See Note 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,557 |
|
|
|
180,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
32,895,348 |
|
|
|
35,614,405 |
|
|
|
37,382,669 |
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 19) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, 30,000,000 shares authorized; 2,006,391 shares issued and outstanding as
of September 30, 2009 (December 31, 2008 - 24,410,000; September 30, 2008 -
23,475,000) (aggregate liquidation preference value September 30, 2009 - $50,160;
December 31, 2008 - $1,521,875; September 30, 2008 - $586,875)(See Notes 15 and 17) |
|
|
50,160 |
|
|
|
1,483,525 |
|
|
|
586,875 |
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value as of September 30, 2009 ($6.00 as of December 31,
2008 and September 30, 2008); 700,000,000 shares authorized as of September 30, 2009
(470,000,000 as of December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008); 639,544,895 shares
issued (December 31, 2008 - 295,632,080; September 30, 2008 - 295,335,063) and
639,541,515 outstanding (December 31, 2008 - 282,004,713; September 30, 2008 -
281,708,260) |
|
|
6,395 |
|
|
|
1,773,792 |
|
|
|
1,772,010 |
|
Surplus |
|
|
2,794,660 |
|
|
|
621,879 |
|
|
|
564,021 |
|
(Accumulated deficit) retained earnings |
|
|
(69,525 |
) |
|
|
(374,488 |
) |
|
|
384,062 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax of ($57,302) (December 31, 2008 -
($24,771); September 30, 2008 - ($22,374)) |
|
|
(39,223 |
) |
|
|
(28,829 |
) |
|
|
(91,983 |
) |
Treasury stock at cost, 3,380 shares as of September 30, 2009 (December 31, 2008 -
13,627,367 shares; September 30, 2008 - 13,626,803 shares) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(207,515 |
) |
|
|
(207,512 |
) |
|
|
|
|
2,742,456 |
|
|
|
3,268,364 |
|
|
|
3,007,473 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
35,637,804 |
|
|
$ |
38,882,769 |
|
|
$ |
40,390,142 |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
POPULAR, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(In thousands, except per share information) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
INTEREST INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
371,366 |
|
|
$ |
457,905 |
|
|
$ |
1,155,378 |
|
|
$ |
1,421,937 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
1,510 |
|
|
|
3,447 |
|
|
|
7,024 |
|
|
|
13,651 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
74,360 |
|
|
|
84,790 |
|
|
|
223,661 |
|
|
|
261,649 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
7,227 |
|
|
|
9,339 |
|
|
|
28,638 |
|
|
|
35,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
454,463 |
|
|
|
555,481 |
|
|
|
1,414,701 |
|
|
|
1,732,581 |
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
118,941 |
|
|
|
165,611 |
|
|
|
395,432 |
|
|
|
528,596 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
16,142 |
|
|
|
37,233 |
|
|
|
53,476 |
|
|
|
137,824 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
42,991 |
|
|
|
28,355 |
|
|
|
133,858 |
|
|
|
75,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
178,074 |
|
|
|
231,199 |
|
|
|
582,766 |
|
|
|
742,243 |
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
276,389 |
|
|
|
324,282 |
|
|
|
831,935 |
|
|
|
990,338 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
331,063 |
|
|
|
252,160 |
|
|
|
1,053,036 |
|
|
|
602,561 |
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
(54,674 |
) |
|
|
72,122 |
|
|
|
(221,101 |
) |
|
|
387,777 |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
54,208 |
|
|
|
52,433 |
|
|
|
161,412 |
|
|
|
155,319 |
|
Other service fees (See Note 20) |
|
|
97,614 |
|
|
|
95,302 |
|
|
|
298,584 |
|
|
|
306,649 |
|
Net (loss) gain on sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities |
|
|
(9,059 |
) |
|
|
(9,132 |
) |
|
|
220,792 |
|
|
|
69,430 |
|
Trading account profit |
|
|
7,579 |
|
|
|
6,669 |
|
|
|
31,241 |
|
|
|
38,547 |
|
(Loss) gain on sale of loans and valuation adjustments on loans
held-for-sale |
|
|
(8,728 |
) |
|
|
6,522 |
|
|
|
(35,994 |
) |
|
|
25,696 |
|
Other operating income |
|
|
18,430 |
|
|
|
36,134 |
|
|
|
44,579 |
|
|
|
92,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
105,370 |
|
|
|
260,050 |
|
|
|
499,513 |
|
|
|
1,076,254 |
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
|
102,822 |
|
|
|
118,948 |
|
|
|
315,224 |
|
|
|
360,963 |
|
Pension and other benefits |
|
|
27,725 |
|
|
|
29,282 |
|
|
|
96,820 |
|
|
|
98,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
130,547 |
|
|
|
148,230 |
|
|
|
412,044 |
|
|
|
459,515 |
|
Net occupancy expenses |
|
|
28,269 |
|
|
|
26,510 |
|
|
|
80,734 |
|
|
|
81,218 |
|
Equipment expenses |
|
|
24,983 |
|
|
|
26,305 |
|
|
|
76,289 |
|
|
|
84,312 |
|
Other taxes |
|
|
13,109 |
|
|
|
13,301 |
|
|
|
39,369 |
|
|
|
39,905 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
28,694 |
|
|
|
31,780 |
|
|
|
80,643 |
|
|
|
88,964 |
|
Communications |
|
|
11,902 |
|
|
|
12,574 |
|
|
|
36,115 |
|
|
|
38,137 |
|
Business promotion |
|
|
8,905 |
|
|
|
16,216 |
|
|
|
26,761 |
|
|
|
51,064 |
|
Printing and supplies |
|
|
2,857 |
|
|
|
3,269 |
|
|
|
8,664 |
|
|
|
10,763 |
|
FDIC deposit insurance |
|
|
16,506 |
|
|
|
4,625 |
|
|
|
61,954 |
|
|
|
9,237 |
|
Gain on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(79,304 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(79,304 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
31,753 |
|
|
|
36,139 |
|
|
|
104,955 |
|
|
|
104,485 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
2,379 |
|
|
|
3,966 |
|
|
|
7,218 |
|
|
|
8,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
220,600 |
|
|
|
322,915 |
|
|
|
855,442 |
|
|
|
976,548 |
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income tax |
|
|
(115,230 |
) |
|
|
(62,865 |
) |
|
|
(355,929 |
) |
|
|
99,706 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
6,331 |
|
|
|
148,308 |
|
|
|
(15,209 |
) |
|
|
152,467 |
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(121,561 |
) |
|
|
(211,173 |
) |
|
|
(340,720 |
) |
|
|
(52,761 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax |
|
|
(3,427 |
) |
|
|
(457,370 |
) |
|
|
(19,972 |
) |
|
|
(488,242 |
) |
|
NET LOSS |
|
$ |
(124,988 |
) |
|
$ |
(668,543 |
) |
|
$ |
(360,692 |
) |
|
$ |
(541,003 |
) |
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK (See Note
18) |
|
$ |
595,614 |
|
|
$ |
(679,772 |
) |
|
$ |
310,604 |
|
|
$ |
(561,213 |
) |
|
EARNINGS (LOSSES) PER COMMON SHARE BASIC AND DILUTED: (See Note
18) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (losses) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
$ |
(0.79 |
) |
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
(0.27 |
) |
Losses from discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(1.63 |
) |
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
(1.73 |
) |
|
Net earnings (losses) per common share |
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
$ |
(2.42 |
) |
|
$ |
0.94 |
|
|
$ |
(2.00 |
) |
|
DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER COMMON SHARE |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
5
POPULAR, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Preferred stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
1,483,525 |
|
|
$ |
186,875 |
|
Issuance of preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
Exchange of Series A and B preferred stock |
|
|
(536,715 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Exchange of Series C preferred stock |
|
|
(901,165 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Accretion of Series C preferred stock discount |
|
|
4,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
50,160 |
|
|
|
586,875 |
|
|
Common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
1,773,792 |
|
|
|
1,761,908 |
|
Common stock issued in exchange of Series A and B preferred stock |
|
|
1,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued in connection with early extinguishment of
debt (exchange of trust preferred securities for common stock) |
|
|
1,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued under the Dividend Reinvestment Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,102 |
|
Treasury stock retired |
|
|
(81,583 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change in par value (from $6.00 to $0.01) |
|
|
(1,689,389 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
6,395 |
|
|
|
1,772,010 |
|
|
Surplus: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
621,879 |
|
|
|
568,184 |
|
Common stock issued in exchange of Series A and B preferred stock |
|
|
291,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued in connection with early extinguishment of debt
(exchange of trust preferred securities for common stock) |
|
|
315,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance costs related to exchange of Series A and B preferred stock
and trust preferred securities |
|
|
(11,618 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Issuance costs of Series A and B preferred stock |
|
|
12,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued under the Dividend Reinvestment Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,072 |
|
Issuance cost of preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,065 |
) |
Stock options expense on unexercised options, net of forfeitures |
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
830 |
|
Treasury stock retired |
|
|
(125,556 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change in par value (from $6.00 to $0.01) |
|
|
1,689,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
2,794,660 |
|
|
|
564,021 |
|
|
(Accumulated deficit) retained earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
(374,488 |
) |
|
|
1,319,467 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
(360,692 |
) |
|
|
(541,003 |
) |
Excess of carrying amount of Series A and B preferred stock
exchanged over fair value of new shares of common stock |
|
|
230,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
Excess of carrying amount of Series C preferred stock exchanged
over fair value of new trust preferred securities |
|
|
485,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change adoption of fair value
option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(261,831 |
) |
Cash dividends declared on common stock |
|
|
(5,641 |
) |
|
|
(112,361 |
) |
Cash dividends declared on preferred stock |
|
|
(39,857 |
) |
|
|
(20,210 |
) |
Accretion of preferred stock discount 2008 Series C preferred stock |
|
|
(4,515 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
(69,525 |
) |
|
|
384,062 |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
(28,829 |
) |
|
|
(46,812 |
) |
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
|
|
(10,394 |
) |
|
|
(45,171 |
) |
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
(39,223 |
) |
|
|
(91,983 |
) |
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Treasury stock at cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
(207,515 |
) |
|
|
(207,740 |
) |
Purchase of common stock |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(358 |
) |
Reissuance of common stock |
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
Treasury stock retired |
|
|
207,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(207,512 |
) |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
$ |
2,742,456 |
|
|
$ |
3,007,473 |
|
|
Disclosure of changes in number of shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
Preferred Stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
24,410,000 |
|
|
|
7,475,000 |
|
|
|
7,475,000 |
|
Shares issued (2008 Series B) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,000,000 |
|
|
|
16,000,000 |
|
Shares issued (2008 Series C) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
935,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock Series A and B exchanged for common stock |
|
|
(21,468,609 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock Series C exchanged for trust preferred securities |
|
|
(935,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
2,006,391 |
|
|
|
24,410,000 |
|
|
|
23,475,000 |
|
|
Common Stock Issued: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
295,632,080 |
|
|
|
293,651,398 |
|
|
|
293,651,398 |
|
Issued under the Dividend Reinvestment Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,980,682 |
|
|
|
1,683,665 |
|
Treasury stock retired |
|
|
(13,597,261 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued in exchange of Series A and B preferred
stock and early extinguishment of debt (exchange of trust preferred securities for common stock) |
|
|
357,510,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
639,544,895 |
|
|
|
295,632,080 |
|
|
|
295,335,063 |
|
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
(3,380 |
) |
|
|
(13,627,367 |
) |
|
|
(13,626,803 |
) |
|
Common Stock outstanding |
|
|
639,541,515 |
|
|
|
282,004,713 |
|
|
|
281,708,260 |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
7
POPULAR, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(124,988 |
) |
|
$ |
(668,543 |
) |
|
$ |
(360,692 |
) |
|
$ |
(541,003 |
) |
|
Other
comprehensive income (loss) before tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
(1,360 |
) |
|
|
(1,690 |
) |
|
|
(2,117 |
) |
|
|
(2,882 |
) |
Adjustment of pension and postretirement benefit plans |
|
|
3,128 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
66,223 |
|
|
|
(110 |
) |
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on securities available-for-sale arising during the period |
|
|
82,934 |
|
|
|
(13,611 |
) |
|
|
63,535 |
|
|
|
(36,048 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) included in net (loss) income |
|
|
3,688 |
|
|
|
11,704 |
|
|
|
(173,868 |
) |
|
|
(14,669 |
) |
Unrealized net (losses) gains on cash flow hedges |
|
|
(995 |
) |
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
(2,618 |
) |
|
|
(1,160 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net (loss) income |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
1,169 |
|
|
|
5,920 |
|
|
|
2,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
87,432 |
|
|
|
(1,517 |
) |
|
|
(42,925 |
) |
|
|
(52,107 |
) |
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
(9,955 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
32,531 |
|
|
|
6,936 |
|
|
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
|
|
77,477 |
|
|
|
(1,535 |
) |
|
|
(10,394 |
) |
|
|
(45,171 |
) |
|
Comprehensive loss, net of tax |
|
$ |
(47,511 |
) |
|
$ |
(670,078 |
) |
|
$ |
(371,086 |
) |
|
$ |
(586,174 |
) |
|
Tax Effects Allocated to Each Component of Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Underfunding of pension and postretirement benefit plans |
|
$ |
(1,272 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(24,055 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on securities available-for-sale arising during the period |
|
|
(9,137 |
) |
|
$ |
1,694 |
|
|
|
(5,844 |
) |
|
$ |
5,374 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) included in net (loss) income |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
(959 |
) |
|
|
62,790 |
|
|
|
2,165 |
|
Unrealized net (losses) gains on cash flows hedges |
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
(297 |
) |
|
|
1,021 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net (loss) income |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(456 |
) |
|
|
(1,381 |
) |
|
|
(1,081 |
) |
|
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
$ |
(9,955 |
) |
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
|
$ |
32,531 |
|
|
$ |
6,936 |
|
|
Disclosure of accumulated other comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
$ |
(41,185 |
) |
|
$ |
(39,068 |
) |
|
$ |
(37,470 |
) |
|
Underfunding of pension and postretirement benefit plans |
|
|
(193,986 |
) |
|
|
(260,209 |
) |
|
|
(51,249 |
) |
Tax effect |
|
|
75,586 |
|
|
|
99,641 |
|
|
|
20,108 |
|
|
Net of tax amount |
|
|
(118,400 |
) |
|
|
(160,568 |
) |
|
|
(31,141 |
) |
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available-for-sale |
|
|
139,641 |
|
|
|
249,974 |
|
|
|
(23,625 |
) |
Tax effect |
|
|
(18,672 |
) |
|
|
(75,618 |
) |
|
|
1,589 |
|
|
Net of tax amount |
|
|
120,969 |
|
|
|
174,356 |
|
|
|
(22,036 |
) |
|
Unrealized losses on cash flows hedges |
|
|
(995 |
) |
|
|
(4,297 |
) |
|
|
(2,013 |
) |
Tax effect |
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
748 |
|
|
|
677 |
|
|
Net of tax amount |
|
|
(607 |
) |
|
|
(3,549 |
) |
|
|
(1,336 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
|
$ |
(39,223 |
) |
|
$ |
(28,829 |
) |
|
$ |
(91,983 |
) |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
8
POPULAR, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(360,692 |
) |
|
$ |
(541,003 |
) |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment |
|
|
49,033 |
|
|
|
55,233 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
1,053,036 |
|
|
|
621,552 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
7,218 |
|
|
|
8,948 |
|
Amortization and fair value adjustments of servicing assets |
|
|
17,598 |
|
|
|
53,679 |
|
Amortization of discount on junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
1,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain on sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities |
|
|
(220,792 |
) |
|
|
(64,010 |
) |
(Gains) losses from changes in fair value related to instruments measured at
fair value pursuant to the fair value option |
|
|
(1,674 |
) |
|
|
179,482 |
|
Net loss (gain) on disposition of premises and equipment |
|
|
1,696 |
|
|
|
(23,643 |
) |
Net loss on sale of loans and valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale |
|
|
41,202 |
|
|
|
54,527 |
|
Gain on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(79,304 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts on investments |
|
|
13,169 |
|
|
|
16,034 |
|
Net amortization of premiums and deferred loan origination fees and costs |
|
|
35,496 |
|
|
|
40,650 |
|
Fair value adjustment of other assets held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,702 |
|
Earnings from investments under the equity method |
|
|
(14,307 |
) |
|
|
(6,899 |
) |
Stock options expense |
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
830 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net of valuation |
|
|
(76,444 |
) |
|
|
72,261 |
|
Net disbursements on loans held-for-sale |
|
|
(919,719 |
) |
|
|
(2,000,449 |
) |
Acquisitions of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
(280,243 |
) |
|
|
(268,718 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
65,258 |
|
|
|
1,289,738 |
|
Net decrease in trading securities |
|
|
1,302,093 |
|
|
|
1,604,345 |
|
Net decrease in accrued income receivable |
|
|
24,935 |
|
|
|
8,194 |
|
Net decrease (increase) in other assets |
|
|
26,935 |
|
|
|
(245,990 |
) |
Net decrease in interest payable |
|
|
(57,763 |
) |
|
|
(49,180 |
) |
Net increase in postretirement benefit obligation |
|
|
3,652 |
|
|
|
1,810 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in other liabilities |
|
|
65,431 |
|
|
|
(35,120 |
) |
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
1,058,616 |
|
|
|
1,416,976 |
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
697,924 |
|
|
|
875,973 |
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (increase) decrease in money market investments |
|
|
(304,169 |
) |
|
|
697,215 |
|
Purchases of investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
(4,105,915 |
) |
|
|
(3,875,390 |
) |
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
(54,562 |
) |
|
|
(4,958,286 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(36,601 |
) |
|
|
(166,641 |
) |
Proceeds from calls, paydowns, maturities and redemptions of investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
1,261,801 |
|
|
|
2,377,740 |
|
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
136,535 |
|
|
|
4,724,818 |
|
Other |
|
|
62,480 |
|
|
|
154,067 |
|
Proceeds from sale of investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
3,825,502 |
|
|
|
2,444,509 |
|
Proceeds from sale of other investment securities |
|
|
52,294 |
|
|
|
49,341 |
|
Net repayments (disbursements) on loans |
|
|
666,618 |
|
|
|
(976,109 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of loans |
|
|
325,414 |
|
|
|
1,984,860 |
|
Acquisition of loan portfolios |
|
|
(37,965 |
) |
|
|
(4,505 |
) |
Mortgage servicing rights purchased |
|
|
(1,029 |
) |
|
|
(3,628 |
) |
Acquisition of premises and equipment |
|
|
(55,625 |
) |
|
|
(112,196 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment |
|
|
36,105 |
|
|
|
49,366 |
|
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets |
|
|
107,720 |
|
|
|
87,280 |
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
1,878,603 |
|
|
|
2,472,441 |
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in deposits |
|
|
(1,167,108 |
) |
|
|
(400,901 |
) |
Net decrease in federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
(743,717 |
) |
|
|
(1,707,225 |
) |
Net decrease in other short-term borrowings |
|
|
(1,857 |
) |
|
|
(994,969 |
) |
Payments of notes payable |
|
|
(807,002 |
) |
|
|
(1,312,938 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable |
|
|
61,100 |
|
|
|
1,182,917 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(71,438 |
) |
|
|
(154,877 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,174 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
389,935 |
|
Issuance costs and fees paid on exchange of preferred stock and trust preferred securities |
|
|
(24,618 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock acquired |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(358 |
) |
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(2,754,653 |
) |
|
|
(2,983,242 |
) |
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and due from banks |
|
|
(178,126 |
) |
|
|
365,172 |
|
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period |
|
|
784,987 |
|
|
|
818,825 |
|
|
Cash and due from banks at end of period |
|
$ |
606,861 |
|
|
$ |
1,183,997 |
|
|
Note: The Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008 include the cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities associated with
discontinued operations.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
10
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation
Note 2 Adoption of New Accounting Standards and Issued But Not Yet Effective Accounting Standards
Note 3 Discontinued Operations
Note 4 Restrictions on Cash and Due from Banks and Certain Securities
Note 5 Pledged Assets
Note 6 Investment Securities Available-For-Sale
Note 7 Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity
Note 8 Mortgage Servicing Rights
Note 9 Other Assets
Note 10 Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Note 11 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Note 12 Fair Value Measurement
Note 13 Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Note 14 Borrowings
Note 15 Exchange Offers
Note 16 Trust Preferred Securities
Note 17 Stockholders Equity
Note 18 Earnings (Losses) per Common Share
Note 19 Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees
Note 20 Other Service Fees
Note 21 Pension and Postretirement Benefits
Note 22 Restructuring Plans
Note 23 Income Taxes
Note 24 Stock-Based Compensation
Note 25 Supplemental Disclosure on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Note 26 Segment Reporting
Note 27 Subsequent Event
Note 28 Condensed Consolidating Financial Information of Guarantor and Issuers of Registered Guaranteed Securities
11
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation
Popular, Inc. (the Corporation or Popular) is a diversified, publicly owned financial holding
company subject to the supervision and regulation of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System. The Corporation has operations in Puerto Rico, the United States, the Caribbean and Latin
America. In Puerto Rico, the Corporation offers retail and commercial banking services through its
principal banking subsidiary, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (BPPR), as well as auto and equipment
leasing and financing, mortgage loans, investment banking, broker-dealer and insurance services
through specialized subsidiaries. In the United States, the Corporation operates Banco Popular
North America (BPNA), including its wholly-owned subsidiary E-LOAN. BPNA is a community bank
providing a broad range of financial services and products to the communities it serves. BPNA
operates branches in New York, California, Illinois, New Jersey and Florida. E-LOAN markets deposit
accounts under its name for the benefit of BPNA. The Corporation, through its subsidiary EVERTEC,
provides transaction processing services throughout the Caribbean and Latin America, as well as
internally servicing many of its subsidiaries system infrastructures and transactional processing
businesses. Note 26 to the consolidated financial statements presents further information about the
Corporations business segments.
The unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Popular, Inc. and its
majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation. These unaudited statements are, in the opinion of management, a fair
statement of the results for the periods reported and include all necessary adjustments, all of a
normal recurring nature, for a fair statement of such results.
The statement of condition data as of December 31, 2008 was derived from audited financial
statements. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America have been condensed or omitted from the statements presented as of September 30, 2009,
December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008 pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities
and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the audited consolidated financial statements of the Corporation for the year ended December
31, 2008, included in the Corporations 2008 Annual Report. The Corporations Form 10-K filed on
March 2, 2009 incorporates by reference the 2008 Annual Report.
Note 2 Adoption of New Accounting Standards and Issued But Not Yet Effective Accounting Standards
The
FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)
Effective July 1, 2009, the ASC became the single source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP) recognized by the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) to be applied by non-governmental entities.
Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) are also sources
of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The ASC superseded all existing non-SEC accounting and
reporting standards. All other non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the
ASC is non-authoritative. The Corporations policies were not affected by the conversion to ASC.
However, references to specific accounting guidance in the notes of the Corporations financial
statements have been changed to the appropriate section of the ASC.
12
Business Combinations (ASC Topic 805) (formerly SFAS No. 141-R)
In December 2007, the FASB issued guidance that establishes principles and requirements for how an
acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the
liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in an acquiree, including the recognition and
measurement of goodwill acquired in a business combination. The Corporation is required to apply
this guidance to all business combinations completed on or after January 1, 2009. For business
combinations in which the acquisition date was before the effective date, these provisions will
apply to the subsequent accounting for deferred income tax valuation allowances and income tax
contingencies and will require any changes in those amounts to be recorded in earnings. This
guidance on business combinations has not had a material effect on the consolidated financial
statements of the Corporation as of September 30, 2009.
Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements (ASC Subtopic 810-10) (formerly SFAS No. 160)
In December 2007, the FASB issued guidance to establish accounting and reporting standards for the
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. This guidance
requires entities to classify noncontrolling interests as a component of stockholders equity on
the consolidated financial statements and requires subsequent changes in ownership interests in a
subsidiary to be accounted for as an equity transaction. Additionally, it requires entities to
recognize a gain or loss upon the loss of control of a subsidiary and to remeasure any ownership
interest retained at fair value on that date. This statement also requires expanded disclosures
that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the
noncontrolling owners. This guidance was adopted by the Corporation on January 1, 2009. The
adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Corporations consolidated
financial statements.
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (ASC Subtopic 815-10) (formerly SFAS No. 161)
In March 2008, the FASB issued an amendment for disclosures about derivative instruments and
hedging activities. The standard expands the disclosure requirements for derivatives and hedged
items and has no impact on how the Corporation accounts for these instruments. The standard was
adopted by the Corporation in the first quarter of 2009. Refer to Note 10 to the consolidated
financial statements.
Subsequent Events (ASC Subtopic 855-10) (formerly SFAS No. 165)
In May 2009, the FASB issued guidance which establishes general standards of accounting for and
disclosures of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are
issued or are available to be issued. Specifically, this standard sets forth the period after the
balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or
transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements,
the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the
balance sheet date in its financial statements, and the disclosures that an entity should make
about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. This guidance was
effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009, and shall be applied
prospectively. In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Corporation evaluated
subsequent events through November 9, 2009. Refer to Note 27 for related disclosures.
Transfers of Financial Assets, SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (SFAS No. 166) (This statement has not yet been incorporated
into the ASC)
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, a revision of SFAS No. 140, which requires more
information about transfers of financial assets, including securitization transactions, and where
entities have continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. It
eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity (QSPEs), changes the requirements
for derecognizing financial assets, and requires additional disclosures. It also requires a
transferor to evaluate all existing QSPEs to determine whether they must be consolidated in
accordance with SFAS No. 167 Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R). This Statement must be
applied as of the beginning of each reporting entitys first annual reporting period that begins
after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period and for
interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is prohibited. Management is
currently evaluating the requirements of this pronouncement and has not yet determined the impact,
if any, which the adoption of this standard will have on the Corporations consolidated financial
statements.
13
Variable Interest Entities, SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS No.
167) (This statement has not yet been incorporated into the ASC)
SFAS No. 167, issued in June 2009, amends the consolidating guidance applicable to variable
interest entities and changes how a reporting entity determines when an entity that is
insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be
consolidated. The determination of whether a reporting entity is required to consolidate another
entity is based on, among other things, the other entitys purpose and design and the reporting
entitys ability to direct the activities of the other entity that most significantly impact the
other entitys economic performance. The amendments to the consolidated guidance affect all
entities currently within the scope of FIN 46(R), as well as qualifying special-purpose entities
(QSPEs) that are currently excluded from the scope of FIN 46(R). SFAS No. 167 will require a
reporting entity to provide additional disclosures about its involvement with variable interest
entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. A reporting entity
will be required to disclose how its involvement with a variable interest entity affects the
reporting entitys financial statements. SFAS No. 167 will be effective as of the beginning of the
first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2009. Management is currently evaluating the
requirements of this pronouncement and has not yet determined the impact, if any, which the
adoption of this standard will have on the Corporations consolidated financial statements.
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets and Repurchase Financing Transactions (ASC Subtopic
860-10) (formerly FASB Staff Position FAS 140-3)
The FASB provided guidance in February 2008 on whether the security transfer and contemporaneous
repurchase financing involving the transferred financial asset must be evaluated as one linked
transaction or two separate de-linked transactions. The guidance requires the recognition of the
transfer and the repurchase agreement as one linked transaction, unless all of the following
criteria are met: (1) the initial transfer and the repurchase financing are not contractually
contingent on one another; (2) the initial transferor has full recourse upon default, and the
repurchase agreements price is fixed and not at fair value; (3) the financial asset is readily
obtainable in the marketplace and the transfer and repurchase financing are executed at market
rates; and (4) the maturity of the repurchase financing is before the maturity of the financial
asset. The scope of this accounting guidance is limited to transfers and subsequent repurchase
financings that are entered into contemporaneously or in contemplation of one another. The
Corporation adopted the statement on January 1, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have a
material impact on the Corporations consolidated financial statements for 2009.
Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets (ASC Subtopic 350-30) (formerly FASB Staff
Position FAS 142-3)
In
April 2008, the FASB amended the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or
extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset. In
developing these assumptions, an entity should consider its own historical experience in renewing
or extending similar arrangements adjusted for entity specific factors or, in the absence of that
experience, the assumptions that market participants would use about renewals or extensions
adjusted for the entity specific factors. This guidance shall be applied prospectively to
intangible assets acquired after the effective date of January 1, 2009. The adoption of this
guidance did not have a material impact on the Corporations consolidated financial statements.
Equity Method Investment Accounting Considerations (ASC Subtopic 323-10) (formerly EITF 08-6)
This guidance clarifies the accounting for certain transactions and impairment considerations
involving equity method investments. It applies to all investments accounted for under the equity
method and provides guidance on the following: (1) how the initial carrying value of an equity
method investment should be determined; (2) how an impairment assessment of an underlying
indefinite-lived intangible asset of an equity method investment should be performed; (3) how an
equity method investees issuance of shares should be accounted
for; and (4) how to account for a
change in an investment from the equity method to the cost method. The adoption of this guidance in
January 2009 did not have a material impact on the Corporations consolidated financial statements.
14
Employers
Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets (ASC Subtopic 715-20) (formerly FASB
Staff Position FAS 132(R)-1)
This guidance requires additional disclosures in the financial statements of employers who are
subject to the disclosure requirements of postretirement benefit plan assets as follows: (a) the
investment allocation decision making process, including the factors that are pertinent to an
understanding of investment policies and strategies; (b) the fair value of each major category of
plan assets, disclosed separately for pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans; (c) the
inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets, including the level
within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements in their entirety fall; and
(d) significant concentrations of risk within plan assets. Additional detailed information is
required for each category above. Upon initial application, the provisions of this guidance are not
required for earlier periods that are presented for comparative
purposes. The Corporation will apply
the new disclosure requirements commencing with the annual financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2009. This guidance impacts disclosures only and will not have an effect on the
Corporations consolidated statements of condition or results of operations.
Recognition
and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (ASC Subtopic 320-10) (formerly FASB Staff Position FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2)
In April 2009, the FASB issued this guidance which is intended to provide greater clarity to
investors about the credit and noncredit component of an other-than-temporary impairment event. It
specifically amends the other-than-temporary impairment guidance for debt securities. The new
guidance improves the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairment on investment
securities and changes the calculation of the other-than-temporary impairment recognized in
earnings in the financial statements. However, it does not amend existing recognition and
measurement guidance related to other-than-temporary impairments of equity securities.
For debt securities, an entity is required to assess whether (a) it has the intent to sell the debt
security, or (b) it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the debt security
before its anticipated recovery. If either of these conditions is met, an other-than-temporary
impairment on the security must be recognized.
In instances in which a determination is made that a credit loss (defined as the difference between
the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis) exists
but the entity does not intend to sell the debt security and it is not more likely than not that
the entity will be required to sell the debt security before the anticipated recovery of its
remaining amortized cost basis (i.e., the amortized cost basis less any current-period credit
loss), the accounting guidance changed the presentation and amount of the other-than-temporary
impairment recognized in the statement of operations. In these instances, the impairment is
separated into (a) the amount of the total impairment related to the credit loss, and (b) the
amount of the total impairment related to all other factors. The amount of the total
other-than-temporary impairment related to the credit loss is recognized in the statement of
operations. The amount of the total impairment related to all other factors is recognized in other
comprehensive loss. Previously, in all cases, if an impairment was determined to be
other-than-temporary, an impairment loss was recognized in earnings in an amount equal to the
entire difference between the securitys amortized cost basis and its fair value at the balance
sheet date of the reporting period for which the assessment was made.
This guidance was effective and is to be applied prospectively for financial statements issued for
interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009.
At adoption an entity was required
to record a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the beginning of the period of adoption to
reclassify the noncredit component of a previously recognized other-than-temporary impairment from
retained earnings to accumulated other comprehensive loss if the
entity did not intend to sell the
security and it was not more likely than not that the entity would be required to sell the security
before the anticipated recovery of its amortized cost basis.
The
Corporation adopted this guidance for interim and annual reporting periods commencing with the
quarter ended June 30, 2009. The adoption of this new accounting guidance in
the second quarter of 2009 did not result in a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the beginning of the
period of adoption (April 1, 2009) since there were no previously recognized other-than-temporary
impairments related to outstanding debt securities. Refer to Notes 6 and 7 for disclosures as of
September 30, 2009.
15
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (ASC Subtopic 825-10) (formerly FASB
Staff Position FAS 107-1 and APB
28-1)
In April 2009, the FASB required providing disclosures on a quarterly basis about the fair value of
financial instruments that are not currently reflected on the statement of condition at fair value.
Originally the fair value for these assets and liabilities was only required for year-end
disclosures. The Corporation adopted this guidance effective with the financial statement
disclosures for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. This guidance only impacts disclosure requirements
and therefore did not have an impact on the Corporations financial condition or results of
operations. Refer to Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for required disclosures.
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have
Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That are Not Orderly (ASC Subtopic 820-10)
(formerly FASB Staff Position FAS 157-4)
This
guidance, issued in April 2009, provides additional guidance for estimating fair value when the
volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased. It also
includes guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate that a transaction is not orderly.
This guidance reaffirms the need to use judgment to ascertain if an active market has become
inactive and in determining fair values when markets have become inactive. Additionally, it also
emphasizes that even if there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity
for the asset or liability and regardless of the valuation techniques used, the objective of a fair
value measurement remains the same. Fair value is the price that would be received from the sale of
an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced
liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current
market conditions. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the
Corporations consolidated financial statements.
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2009-05,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC Topic
820)Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value
FASB
Accounting Standards Update 2009-05, issued on August 2009, includes amendments to ASC Subtopic
820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, for the fair value measurement of liabilities and
provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the
identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using
one or more of the following techniques: a valuation technique that uses (a) the quoted price of
the identical liability when traded as an asset, (b) quoted prices for similar liabilities or
similar liabilities when traded as assets, or another valuation technique that is consistent with
the principles of ASC Topic 820. Examples would be an income approach, such as a present value
technique, or a market approach, such as a technique that is based on the amount at the measurement
date that the reporting entity would pay to transfer the identical liability or would receive to
enter into an identical liability. The adoption of this guidance was effective upon issuance and did
not have a material impact on the Corporations consolidated financial statements.
Note 3 Discontinued Operations
As disclosed in the 2008 Annual Report, the Corporation discontinued the operations of Popular
Financial Holdings (PFH) in 2008 by selling substantially all assets and closing service branches
and other units.
For financial reporting purposes, the results of the discontinued operations of PFH are presented
as Assets / Liabilities from discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of condition
as of December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008 and as Loss from discontinued operations, net of
tax in the consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented.
Total assets of the PFH discontinued operations amounted to $13 million as of December 31, 2008 and
$969 million as of September 30, 2008. Total assets of the PFH discontinued operations as of
September 30, 2008 principally consisted of $626 million in loans, of which $584 million were
accounted at fair value pursuant to the fair value option, $37 million in mortgage servicing
rights, $280 million in servicing advances and related assets, and $26 million in residual
interests and other assets. As disclosed in the 2008 Annual Report, the Corporation substantially
sold these loan portfolios in late 2008. As of September 30, 2008, all loans and borrowings
recognized at fair value pursuant to the fair value option pertained to the discontinued operations
of PFH.
16
The following table provides financial information for the discontinued operations for the quarter
and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
($ in millions) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
30.7 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
Non-interest income (loss) |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
|
(256.4 |
) |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
(255.4 |
) |
Operating expenses |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
126.3 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
193.0 |
|
Loss on disposition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53.5 |
) |
|
Pre-tax loss from
discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(3.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(445.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(13.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(490.2 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
Loss from discontinued
operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
(3.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(457.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(20.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(488.2 |
) |
|
Non-interest loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 represented primarily increases
in indemnities and representation and warranty reserves associated to former sales agreements. The
operating expenses related principally to personnel costs for employees under transition,
attorneys fees and collection services.
The net loss for the discontinued operations reported for the third quarter of 2008 included
write-downs of assets held-for-sale to fair value, losses on the sale of loans, restructuring
charges and the recording of a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets of $171.2 million.
Management implemented a series of actions in 2008 that led to the discontinuance of the PFH
operations. These actions included two major restructuring plans, which are described in the 2008
Annual Report. These are the PFH Discontinuance Restructuring Plan and the PFH Branch Network
Restructuring Plan. The PFH Discontinuance Restructuring Plan commenced in the second half of 2008
and included the elimination of substantially all employment positions and termination of contracts
with the objective of discontinuing PFHs operations. The PFH Branch Network Restructuring Plan
resulted in the sale of a substantial portion of PFHs loan portfolio in the first quarter of 2008
and the closure of Equity Ones consumer service branches, which represented, at the time, the only
significant channel for PFH to continue originating loans.
PFH continues to employ 9 full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) that are primarily retained for a
transition period. Additional costs could be incurred during 2009 associated to leased premises
that are still occupied and the lease contract has not been terminated. These costs are not
expected to be significant to the Corporations results of operations.
PFH Discontinuance Restructuring Plan
During the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the PFH Discontinuance Restructuring
Plan resulted in charges, on a pre-tax basis, broken down as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
(In thousands) |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
Personnel costs |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
981 |
(a) |
Professional fees |
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
Total restructuring costs |
|
$ |
300 |
|
|
$ |
1,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Severance, retention bonuses and other benefits |
17
As of September 30, 2009, the PFH Discontinuance Restructuring Plan has resulted in combined
charges for 2008 and 2009, broken down as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairments on |
|
Restructuring |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
long-lived assets |
|
costs |
|
Total |
|
Year ended December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
3,916 |
|
|
$ |
4,124 |
|
|
$ |
8,040 |
|
Quarter ended: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
895 |
|
|
|
895 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,916 |
|
|
$ |
5,405 |
|
|
$ |
9,321 |
|
|
The PFH Discontinuance Restructuring Plan charges are included in the line item Loss from
discontinued operations, net of tax in the consolidated statements of operations.
The following table presents the activity
in the accrued balances for the PFH Discontinuance Restructuring Plan
during 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Restructuring Costs |
|
Balance as of January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
3,428 |
|
Charges during the quarter ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
895 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(1,711 |
) |
|
Balance as of March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
2,612 |
|
Charges during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
86 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(1,235 |
) |
|
Balance as of June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,463 |
|
Charges during the quarter ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
300 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(514 |
) |
|
Balance as of September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,249 |
|
|
The reserve balance as of September 30, 2009 is mostly related to severance costs, which are
expected to be paid substantially in the fourth quarter of 2009.
Note 4 Restrictions on Cash and Due from Banks and Certain Securities
The Corporations subsidiary banks are required by federal and state regulatory agencies to
maintain average reserve balances with the Federal Reserve Bank or other banks. Those required
average reserve balances were $705 million as of September 30, 2009 (December 31, 2008 $684
million; September 30, 2008 $630 million). Cash and due from banks as well as other short-term,
highly-liquid securities are used to cover the required average reserve balances.
In compliance with rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Corporation
may be required to establish a special reserve account for the benefit of brokerage customers of
its broker-dealer subsidiary, which may consist of securities segregated in the special reserve
account. There were no reserve requirements as of September 30, 2009. As of September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2008 the Corporation had securities with a market value of $0.3 million. These
securities were classified in the consolidated statement of condition within the other trading
securities category.
As required by the Puerto Rico International Banking Center Regulatory Act, as of September 30,
2009, December 31, 2008, and September 30, 2008, the Corporation maintained separately for its two
international banking entities (IBEs), $0.6 million in time deposits, equally divided for the two
IBEs, which were considered restricted assets.
As part of a line of credit facility with a financial institution, as of September 30, 2009,
December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008, the Corporation maintained restricted cash of $2 million
as collateral for the line of credit. The cash is being held in certificates of deposits which
mature in less than 90 days. The line of credit is used to support letters of credit.
18
As of September 30, 2009, the Corporation maintained restricted cash of $3 million to support a
letter of credit. The cash is being held in an interest-bearing money market account.
As of September 30, 2009, the Corporation had restricted cash of $2 million (December 31, 2008 and
September 30, 2008 $3 million) to support a letter of credit related to a service settlement
agreement until June 2010.
As of September 30, 2009, the Corporation had $10 million in cash equivalents restricted as to
usage for the potential payment of obligations contained in a loan sales agreement. This
restriction expired on November 3, 2009.
Note 5 Pledged Assets
Certain securities and loans were pledged principally to secure public and trust deposits, assets
sold under agreements to repurchase, other borrowings and credit facilities available, derivative
positions and loan servicing agreements. The classification and carrying amount of the
Corporations pledged assets, in which the secured parties are not permitted to sell or repledge
the collateral, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value |
|
$ |
2,183,586 |
|
|
$ |
2,470,591 |
|
|
$ |
2,647,930 |
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost |
|
|
25,769 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-sale measured at lower of cost or fair value |
|
|
2,636 |
|
|
|
35,764 |
|
|
|
36,218 |
|
Loans held-in-portfolio |
|
|
8,406,876 |
|
|
|
8,101,999 |
|
|
|
7,686,937 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,618,867 |
|
|
$ |
10,708,354 |
|
|
$ |
10,371,085 |
|
|
Pledged securities and loans in which the creditor has the right by custom or contract to
repledge are presented separately in the consolidated statements of condition.
19
Note 6 Investment Securities Available-For-Sale
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and approximate market value (or fair value
for certain investment securities where no market quotations are available) of investment
securities available-for-sale as of September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
|
Average |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Yield |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
$ |
29,528 |
|
|
$ |
1,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,136 |
|
|
|
3.80 |
% |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
184,261 |
|
|
|
4,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188,437 |
|
|
|
3.81 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
1,377,705 |
|
|
|
71,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,449,395 |
|
|
|
3.73 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
27,812 |
|
|
|
952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,764 |
|
|
|
5.01 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
26,882 |
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,682 |
|
|
|
5.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,616,660 |
|
|
|
77,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,694,278 |
|
|
|
3.79 |
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3.88 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
12,375 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
$ |
108 |
|
|
|
12,277 |
|
|
|
3.40 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
50,969 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
2,264 |
|
|
|
48,997 |
|
|
|
5.08 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
27,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
27,704 |
|
|
|
5.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
91,254 |
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
2,573 |
|
|
|
88,983 |
|
|
|
4.91 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
4.08 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
3,578 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,687 |
|
|
|
4.43 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
138,044 |
|
|
|
2,578 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
140,214 |
|
|
|
2.94 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
1,438,743 |
|
|
|
26,787 |
|
|
|
11,623 |
|
|
|
1,453,907 |
|
|
|
2.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,580,519 |
|
|
|
29,475 |
|
|
|
12,031 |
|
|
|
1,597,963 |
|
|
|
2.98 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
3.39 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
23,481 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
22,915 |
|
|
|
2.10 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
115,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,988 |
|
|
|
103,775 |
|
|
|
2.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
139,350 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
12,568 |
|
|
|
126,796 |
|
|
|
2.56 |
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
9,072 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
9,169 |
|
|
|
3.07 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
62,462 |
|
|
|
1,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,893 |
|
|
|
3.92 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
178,392 |
|
|
|
9,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,675 |
|
|
|
4.86 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
3,136,807 |
|
|
|
47,982 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
3,184,558 |
|
|
|
4.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,386,733 |
|
|
|
58,814 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
3,445,295 |
|
|
|
4.49 |
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
9,606 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
8,840 |
|
|
|
3.39 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,853,650 |
|
|
$ |
168,002 |
|
|
$ |
28,361 |
|
|
$ |
6,993,291 |
|
|
|
3.94 |
% |
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
|
Average |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Yield |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
$ |
456,551 |
|
|
$ |
45,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
502,118 |
|
|
|
3.83 |
% |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
123,315 |
|
|
|
2,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,170 |
|
|
|
4.46 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
4,361,775 |
|
|
|
262,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,623,959 |
|
|
|
4.07 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
27,811 |
|
|
|
1,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,908 |
|
|
|
4.96 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
26,877 |
|
|
|
1,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,971 |
|
|
|
5.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,539,778 |
|
|
|
267,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,807,008 |
|
|
|
4.09 |
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,566 |
|
|
|
6.10 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
2,259 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
|
2,257 |
|
|
|
4.95 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
67,975 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
3,269 |
|
|
|
64,938 |
|
|
|
4.77 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
29,423 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
29,229 |
|
|
|
5.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
104,157 |
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
3,515 |
|
|
|
100,990 |
|
|
|
4.95 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
5.36 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
6,837 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
6,877 |
|
|
|
5.20 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
156,240 |
|
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
156,030 |
|
|
|
3.38 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
1,363,705 |
|
|
|
9,090 |
|
|
|
28,913 |
|
|
|
1,343,882 |
|
|
|
3.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,526,961 |
|
|
|
9,926 |
|
|
|
29,919 |
|
|
|
1,506,968 |
|
|
|
3.15 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
4.96 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
30,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,909 |
|
|
|
28,005 |
|
|
|
2.30 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
158,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,364 |
|
|
|
120,303 |
|
|
|
3.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
190,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,276 |
|
|
|
148,748 |
|
|
|
3.32 |
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
18,673 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
18,711 |
|
|
|
3.94 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
67,570 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
67,657 |
|
|
|
3.86 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
116,059 |
|
|
|
3,456 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
119,289 |
|
|
|
4.85 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
635,159 |
|
|
|
11,127 |
|
|
|
3,438 |
|
|
|
642,848 |
|
|
|
5.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
837,461 |
|
|
|
14,866 |
|
|
|
3,822 |
|
|
|
848,505 |
|
|
|
5.22 |
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
19,581 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
9,492 |
|
|
|
10,150 |
|
|
|
5.01 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,674,513 |
|
|
$ |
337,998 |
|
|
$ |
88,024 |
|
|
$ |
7,924,487 |
|
|
|
4.01 |
% |
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
|
Average |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Yield |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
$ |
458,990 |
|
|
$ |
5,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
464,209 |
|
|
|
3.83 |
% |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
125,799 |
|
|
|
984 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
|
126,754 |
|
|
|
4.32 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
4,385,519 |
|
|
|
27,221 |
|
|
|
9,641 |
|
|
|
4,403,099 |
|
|
|
4.07 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
27,811 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,939 |
|
|
|
4.96 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
26,875 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,047 |
|
|
|
5.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,566,004 |
|
|
|
28,505 |
|
|
|
9,670 |
|
|
|
4,584,839 |
|
|
|
4.10 |
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,579 |
|
|
|
6.10 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
2,259 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2,266 |
|
|
|
4.95 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
67,004 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
2,519 |
|
|
|
64,541 |
|
|
|
4.78 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
30,464 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
30,315 |
|
|
|
5.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
104,227 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
2,691 |
|
|
|
101,701 |
|
|
|
4.95 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
654 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
656 |
|
|
|
5.15 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
4,351 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
4,345 |
|
|
|
5.43 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
157,176 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
1,577 |
|
|
|
155,844 |
|
|
|
4.20 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
1,221,661 |
|
|
|
1,978 |
|
|
|
23,249 |
|
|
|
1,200,390 |
|
|
|
4.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,383,842 |
|
|
|
2,231 |
|
|
|
24,838 |
|
|
|
1,361,235 |
|
|
|
4.12 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
4.96 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
24,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,103 |
|
|
|
23,152 |
|
|
|
3.87 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
179,599 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
11,746 |
|
|
|
167,902 |
|
|
|
4.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
204,407 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
12,849 |
|
|
|
191,608 |
|
|
|
4.29 |
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
5,518 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,576 |
|
|
|
3.90 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
89,306 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
89,487 |
|
|
|
3.90 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
73,110 |
|
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
72,894 |
|
|
|
4.80 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
687,443 |
|
|
|
4,082 |
|
|
|
8,964 |
|
|
|
682,561 |
|
|
|
5.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
855,377 |
|
|
|
5,225 |
|
|
|
10,084 |
|
|
|
850,518 |
|
|
|
5.18 |
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
19,520 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
4,990 |
|
|
|
14,632 |
|
|
|
4.86 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,592,367 |
|
|
$ |
41,497 |
|
|
$ |
65,122 |
|
|
$ |
7,568,742 |
|
|
|
4.23 |
% |
|
22
The following tables shows the Corporations amortized cost, gross unrealized losses and
market value of investment
securities available-for-sale, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual
securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of September 30 2009, December 31,
2008 and September 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 |
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
26,465 |
|
|
$ |
166 |
|
|
$ |
26,299 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
141,190 |
|
|
|
3,902 |
|
|
|
137,288 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
4,266 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
3,935 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
51,719 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
51,648 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
3,328 |
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
2,749 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
226,968 |
|
|
$ |
5,049 |
|
|
$ |
221,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
60,530 |
|
|
$ |
2,407 |
|
|
$ |
58,123 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
494,781 |
|
|
|
8,129 |
|
|
|
486,652 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
126,872 |
|
|
|
12,237 |
|
|
|
114,635 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
12,130 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
11,949 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
4,197 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
3,839 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
698,510 |
|
|
$ |
23,312 |
|
|
$ |
675,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
86,995 |
|
|
$ |
2,573 |
|
|
$ |
84,422 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
635,971 |
|
|
|
12,031 |
|
|
|
623,940 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
131,138 |
|
|
|
12,568 |
|
|
|
118,570 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
63,849 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
63,597 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
7,525 |
|
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
6,588 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
925,478 |
|
|
$ |
28,361 |
|
|
$ |
897,117 |
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 |
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
34,795 |
|
|
$ |
303 |
|
|
$ |
34,492 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
485,140 |
|
|
|
13,274 |
|
|
|
471,866 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
59,643 |
|
|
|
15,315 |
|
|
|
44,328 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
109,298 |
|
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
108,622 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
19,541 |
|
|
|
9,480 |
|
|
|
10,061 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
708,417 |
|
|
$ |
39,048 |
|
|
$ |
669,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
44,011 |
|
|
$ |
3,212 |
|
|
$ |
40,799 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
423,137 |
|
|
|
16,645 |
|
|
|
406,492 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
130,065 |
|
|
|
25,961 |
|
|
|
104,104 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
206,472 |
|
|
|
3,146 |
|
|
|
203,326 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
803,714 |
|
|
$ |
48,976 |
|
|
$ |
754,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
78,806 |
|
|
$ |
3,515 |
|
|
$ |
75,291 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
908,277 |
|
|
|
29,919 |
|
|
|
878,358 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
189,708 |
|
|
|
41,276 |
|
|
|
148,432 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
315,770 |
|
|
|
3,822 |
|
|
|
311,948 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
19,570 |
|
|
|
9,492 |
|
|
|
10,078 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,512,131 |
|
|
$ |
88,024 |
|
|
$ |
1,424,107 |
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 |
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
$ |
1,853,632 |
|
|
$ |
9,670 |
|
|
$ |
1,843,962 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
50,204 |
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
49,751 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
801,134 |
|
|
|
7,170 |
|
|
|
793,964 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
95,459 |
|
|
|
6,849 |
|
|
|
88,610 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
257,872 |
|
|
|
2,388 |
|
|
|
255,484 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
13,880 |
|
|
|
4,980 |
|
|
|
8,900 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,072,181 |
|
|
$ |
31,510 |
|
|
$ |
3,040,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
44,011 |
|
|
$ |
2,238 |
|
|
$ |
41,773 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
315,629 |
|
|
|
17,668 |
|
|
|
297,961 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
99,184 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
93,184 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
270,609 |
|
|
|
7,696 |
|
|
|
262,913 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
729,462 |
|
|
$ |
33,612 |
|
|
$ |
695,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
$ |
1,853,632 |
|
|
$ |
9,670 |
|
|
$ |
1,843,962 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
94,215 |
|
|
|
2,691 |
|
|
|
91,524 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
1,116,763 |
|
|
|
24,838 |
|
|
|
1,091,925 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
194,643 |
|
|
|
12,849 |
|
|
|
181,794 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
528,481 |
|
|
|
10,084 |
|
|
|
518,397 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
13,909 |
|
|
|
4,990 |
|
|
|
8,919 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,801,643 |
|
|
$ |
65,122 |
|
|
$ |
3,736,521 |
|
|
Management evaluates investment securities for other-than-temporary (OTTI) declines in fair
value on a quarterly basis. Once a decline in value is determined to be other-than- temporary, the
value of a debt security is reduced and a corresponding charge to earnings is recognized for
anticipated credit losses. Also, for equity securities that are considered other-than-temporarily
impaired, the excess of the securitys carrying value over its fair value at the evaluation date is
accounted for as a loss in the results of operations. The OTTI analysis requires management to
consider various factors, which include, but are not limited to: (1) the length of time and the
extent to which fair value has been less than the amortized cost basis, (2) the financial condition
of the issuer or issuers, (3) actual collateral attributes, (4) the payment structure of the debt
security and the likelihood of the issuer being able to make payments, (5) any rating changes by a
rating agency, (6) adverse conditions specifically related to the security, industry, or a
geographic area, and (7) managements intent to sell the security or whether it is more likely than
not that the Corporation would be required to sell the security before a forecasted recovery occurs.
As of September 30, 2009, management performed its quarterly analysis of all debt securities in an
unrealized loss position. Based on the analyses performed, management concluded that no material
individual debt security was other-than-temporarily impaired as of such date. As of September 30,
2009, the Corporation does not have the intent to sell debt securities in an unrealized loss
position and it is not more likely than not that the Corporation will have to
25
sell the investment securities prior to recovery of their amortized cost basis. Also, management
evaluated the Corporations portfolio of equity securities as of September 30, 2009. During the
quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Corporation recorded $3.6 million and $10.2
million, respectively, in losses on certain equity securities considered other-than-temporarily
impaired. Management has the intent and ability to hold the investments in equity securities that
are at a loss position as of September 30, 2009 for a reasonable period of time for a forecasted
recovery of fair value up to (or beyond) the cost of these investments.
The unrealized losses associated with Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political
subdivisions are primarily associated to approximately $54 million in Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
Appropriation Bonds (Appropriation Bonds). Of this total, $43 million are rated Ba1, one notch
below investment grade, by Moodys Investors Service (Moodys), while Standard & Poors (S&P)
rates them as investment grade. During early June, S&P Rating Services affirmed its BBB- rating on
the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico general obligations and appropriation debt outstanding, which
indicates S&Ps opinion that Puerto Ricos appropriation credit profile is not speculative grade.
The outlook indicated by S&P is stable. These securities will continue to be monitored as part of
managements ongoing OTTI assessments. Management expects to receive cash flows sufficient to
recover the entire amortized cost basis of the securities.
The unrealized losses reported for Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies are
principally associated to CMOs that were issued by U.S. government-sponsored entities and agencies,
primarily Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
(FHLMC), institutions which the government has affirmed its commitment to support, and Government
National Mortgage Association (GNMA), which has the full
faith and credit of the U.S. Government. These
collateralized mortgage obligations are rated AAA by the major rating agencies and are backed
by residential mortgages. The unrealized losses in this portfolio were primarily attributable
to changes in interest rates and levels of market liquidity relative to when the investment
securities were purchased and not due to credit quality of the securities.
The unrealized losses associated with private-label collateralized mortgage obligations are
primarily related to securities backed by residential mortgages. In addition to verifying the credit ratings for the
private label CMOs, management analyzed the underlying mortgage loan collateral for these bonds.
Various statistics or metrics were reviewed for each private-label CMO, including among others, the
weighted average loan-to-value, FICO score, and delinquency and foreclosure rates of the underlying
assets in the securities. As of September 30, 2009, there were no sub-prime or Alt-A securities
in the Corporations private-label CMO portfolios. For private-label CMOs with unrealized losses as
of September 30, 2009, credit impairment was assessed using a cash flow model that estimates the
cash flows on the underlying mortgages, using the security-specific collateral and transaction
structure. The model estimates cash flows from the underlying mortgage loans and distributes those
cash flows to various tranches of securities, considering the transaction structure and any
subordination and credit enhancements that exist in that structure. The cash flow model
incorporates actual cash flows through the current period and then
projects the expected cash
flows using a number of assumptions, including default rates, loss severity and prepayment rates.
Managements assessment also considered tests using more stressful parameters. Based on the
assessments, management concluded that the tranches of the private-label CMOs held by the
Corporation were not other-than-temporarily impaired as of September 30, 2009, thus management
expects to recover the amortized cost basis of the securities.
All of the Corporations securities classified as mortgage-backed securities were issued by U.S.
government-sponsored entities and agencies, primarily GNMA and FNMA, thus as previously expressed,
have the guarantee or support of the U.S. government. These mortgage-backed securities are rated
AAA by the major rating agencies and are backed by residential
mortgages. Most of the mortgage-backed securities
securities held as of September 30, 2009 with unrealized losses had been purchased at a premium
during 2009 and although their fair values have declined, they continue to exceed the par value of
the securities. The unrealized losses in this portfolio were generally attributable to changes in
interest rates relative to when the investment securities were purchased and not due to credit
quality of the securities.
26
Proceeds from the sale of investment securities available-for-sale during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 were $3.8 billion compared to $2.4 billion for the nine months ended September
30, 2008. Gross realized gains and losses on the sale of securities available-for-sale for the
quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Gross realized gains |
|
$ |
324 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
184,704 |
|
|
$ |
29,357 |
|
Gross realized losses |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(361 |
) |
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
Total net gross realized gains |
|
$ |
198 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
184,343 |
|
|
$ |
29,238 |
|
|
The following table states the names of issuers and the aggregate amortized cost and market
value of the securities of such issuer (includes available-for-sale and held-to-maturity
securities), in which the aggregate amortized cost of such securities exceeds 10% of stockholders
equity. This information excludes securities of the U.S. Government agencies and corporations.
Investments in obligations issued by a state of the U.S. and its political subdivisions and
agencies, which are payable and secured by the same source of revenue or taxing authority, other
than the U.S. Government, are considered securities of a single issuer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
Market Value |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
Market Value |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
Market Value |
|
FNMA |
|
$ |
1,067,001 |
|
|
$ |
1,089,443 |
|
|
$ |
1,198,645 |
|
|
$ |
1,197,648 |
|
|
$ |
1,129,613 |
|
|
$ |
1,120,659 |
|
FHLB |
|
|
1,395,778 |
|
|
|
1,469,493 |
|
|
|
4,389,271 |
|
|
|
4,651,249 |
|
|
|
4,936,497 |
|
|
|
4,953,787 |
|
Freddie Mac |
|
|
997,716 |
|
|
|
1,012,276 |
|
|
|
884,414 |
|
|
|
875,493 |
|
|
|
828,800 |
|
|
|
815,104 |
|
|
27
Note 7 Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and approximate market value (or fair
value for certain investment securities where no market quotations are available) of investment
securities held-to-maturity as of September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
|
Average |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Yield |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
$ |
25,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
25,763 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
% |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
7,015 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,022 |
|
|
|
4.30 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
109,415 |
|
|
|
2,349 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
111,717 |
|
|
|
5.51 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
17,107 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
16,281 |
|
|
|
5.79 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
48,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,502 |
|
|
|
45,098 |
|
|
|
4.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
182,137 |
|
|
|
2,408 |
|
|
|
4,427 |
|
|
|
180,118 |
|
|
|
5.12 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 10 years |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
5.45 |
|
|
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
3,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,572 |
|
|
|
3.11 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
1.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,822 |
|
|
|
2.73 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
212,950 |
|
|
$ |
2,408 |
|
|
$ |
4,445 |
|
|
$ |
210,913 |
|
|
|
4.46 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
|
Average |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Yield |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
$ |
1,499 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
% |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
106,910 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,918 |
|
|
|
2.82 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
108,860 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
$ |
367 |
|
|
|
108,844 |
|
|
|
5.50 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
16,170 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
16,554 |
|
|
|
5.75 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
52,730 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
5,141 |
|
|
|
47,704 |
|
|
|
5.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
284,670 |
|
|
|
974 |
|
|
|
5,624 |
|
|
|
280,020 |
|
|
|
4.52 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 10 years |
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
5.45 |
|
|
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
6,584 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,633 |
|
|
|
6.04 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
3.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
8,334 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,383 |
|
|
|
5.59 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
294,747 |
|
|
$ |
1,024 |
|
|
$ |
5,637 |
|
|
$ |
290,134 |
|
|
|
4.53 |
% |
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
|
Average |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Yield |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
$ |
526,486 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
526,497 |
|
|
|
2.07 |
% |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
101,910 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,923 |
|
|
|
5.44 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
13,860 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
|
13,990 |
|
|
|
4.93 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
16,171 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
15,591 |
|
|
|
5.75 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
52,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,010 |
|
|
|
49,720 |
|
|
|
5.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
184,671 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
3,618 |
|
|
|
181,224 |
|
|
|
5.31 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 10 years |
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
5.45 |
|
|
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
6,674 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
6,723 |
|
|
|
6.49 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,749 |
|
|
|
4.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
8,424 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
8,472 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
719,832 |
|
|
$ |
232 |
|
|
$ |
3,634 |
|
|
$ |
716,430 |
|
|
|
2.95 |
% |
|
The following table shows the Corporations amortized cost, gross unrealized losses and market
value of investment securities held-to-maturity, aggregated by investment category and length of
time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of September
30, 2009, December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 |
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
25,769 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
25,763 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
46,985 |
|
|
|
3,990 |
|
|
|
42,995 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
72,754 |
|
|
$ |
3,996 |
|
|
$ |
68,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
19,930 |
|
|
$ |
437 |
|
|
$ |
19,493 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
Others |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
20,402 |
|
|
$ |
449 |
|
|
$ |
19,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
25,769 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
25,763 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
66,915 |
|
|
|
4,427 |
|
|
|
62,488 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
Others |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
93,156 |
|
|
$ |
4,445 |
|
|
$ |
88,711 |
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 |
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
135,650 |
|
|
$ |
5,452 |
|
|
$ |
130,198 |
|
Others |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
135,900 |
|
|
$ |
5,452 |
|
|
$ |
130,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
9,535 |
|
|
$ |
172 |
|
|
$ |
9,363 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
Others |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,029 |
|
|
$ |
185 |
|
|
$ |
9,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
145,185 |
|
|
$ |
5,624 |
|
|
$ |
139,561 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
Others |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
145,929 |
|
|
$ |
5,637 |
|
|
$ |
140,292 |
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 |
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
48,644 |
|
|
$ |
3,618 |
|
|
$ |
45,026 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
48,644 |
|
|
$ |
3,618 |
|
|
$ |
45,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
$ |
251 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
237 |
|
Others |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,251 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
1,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
48,644 |
|
|
$ |
3,618 |
|
|
$ |
45,026 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
Others |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
49,895 |
|
|
$ |
3,634 |
|
|
$ |
46,261 |
|
|
As indicated in Note 6 to these consolidated financial statements, management evaluates
investment securities for other-than-temporary (OTTI) declines in fair value on a quarterly
basis.
The Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions classified as held-to-maturity
as of September 30, 2009 are primarily associated with securities issued by municipalities of
Puerto Rico and are generally not rated by a credit rating agency. The Corporation performs
periodic credit quality reviews on these issuers. The decline in fair value as of September 30,
2009 was attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality, thus no
other-than-temporary decline in value was necessary to be recorded in these held-to-maturity
securities as of September 30, 2009. As of September 30, 2009, the Corporation does not have the
intent to sell securities held-to-maturity and it is not more likely than not that the Corporation
will have to sell these investment securities prior to recovery of their amortized cost basis.
Note 8 Mortgage Servicing Rights
The Corporation recognizes as assets the rights to service loans for others, whether these rights
are purchased or result from asset transfers such as sales and securitizations.
Classes of mortgage servicing rights were determined based on the different markets or types of
assets being serviced. The Corporation recognizes the servicing rights of its banking subsidiaries
that are related to residential mortgage loans as a class of servicing rights. These mortgage
servicing rights (MSRs) are measured at fair value. Prior to November 2008, PFH also held
servicing rights to residential mortgage loan portfolios. The MSRs were segregated between loans
serviced by the Corporations banking subsidiaries and by PFH. PFH no longer services third-party
loans due to the discontinuance of the business. The PFH servicing rights were sold in the fourth
quarter
31
of 2008. Fair
value determination is performed on a subsidiary basis, with assumptions varying in accordance with
the types of assets or markets served.
The Corporation uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of MSRs. The
discounted cash flow model incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in
estimating future net servicing income, including estimates of prepayment speeds, discount rate,
cost to service, escrow account earnings, contractual servicing fee income, prepayment and late
fees, among other considerations. Prepayment speeds are adjusted for the Corporations loan
characteristics and portfolio behavior.
The following tables present the changes in MSRs measured using the fair value method for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential MSRs |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Banking subsidiaries |
|
Fair value at January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
176,034 |
|
Purchases |
|
|
1,029 |
|
Servicing from securitizations or asset transfers |
|
|
19,640 |
|
Changes due to payments on loans (1) |
|
|
(10,750 |
) |
Changes in fair value due to changes in valuation model
inputs or assumptions |
|
|
(5,618 |
) |
|
Fair value as of September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
180,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents changes due to collection / realization of expected cash flows over time. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential MSRs |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Banking subsidiaries |
|
PFH (2) |
|
Total |
|
Fair value at January 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
110,612 |
|
|
$ |
81,012 |
|
|
$ |
191,624 |
|
Purchases |
|
|
3,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,628 |
|
Servicing from securitizations or asset transfers |
|
|
22,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,033 |
|
Changes due to payments on loans (1) |
|
|
(8,136 |
) |
|
|
(20,298 |
) |
|
|
(28,434 |
) |
Changes in fair value due to changes in valuation model
inputs or assumptions |
|
|
(310 |
) |
|
|
(23,304 |
) |
|
|
(23,614 |
) |
|
Fair value as of September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
127,827 |
|
|
$ |
37,410 |
|
|
$ |
165,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents changes due to collection / realization of expected cash flows over time. |
|
(2) |
|
MSRs for PFH are included as part of Assets from discontinued operations in the
consolidated statement of condition as of September 30, 2008. |
|
Residential mortgage loans serviced for others were $17.7 billion as of September 30, 2009
(December 31, 2008 $17.6 billion; September 30, 2008 $20.0 billion, including $7.5 billion
related to the PFH discontinued operations).
Net mortgage servicing fees, a component of other service fees in the consolidated statements of
operations, include the changes from period to period in the fair value of the MSRs, which may
result from changes in the valuation model inputs or assumptions (principally reflecting changes in
discount rates and prepayment speed assumptions) and other changes,
including changes due to
collection / realization of expected cash flows. Mortgage servicing fees, excluding fair value
adjustments, for the Corporations continuing operations for the quarter and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 amounted to $11.7 million and $34.7 million, respectively, and $7.9 million and
$22.3 million, respectively, for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2008. The banking
subsidiaries receive servicing fees based on a percentage of the outstanding loan balance. As of
September 30, 2009, those weighted average mortgage servicing
fees were 0.26% (September 30, 2008
0.25%). Under these servicing agreements, the banking subsidiaries do not generally earn
significant prepayment penalty fees on the underlying loans serviced.
The section below includes information on assumptions used in the valuation model of the MSRs,
originated and purchased.
Banking subsidiaries
The Corporations banking subsidiaries retain servicing responsibilities on the sale of wholesale
mortgage loans and under pooling / selling arrangements of mortgage loans into mortgage-backed
securities, primarily GNMA and FNMA securities. Substantially all mortgage loans securitized by the
banking subsidiaries have fixed rates.
32
During the nine months period ended September 30, 2009, the Corporation retained servicing rights
on guaranteed mortgage securitizations (FNMA and GNMA) and whole loan sales involving approximately
$1.2 billion in principal balance outstanding. Gains of approximately $32.8 million were realized
on these transactions during the nine months period ended September 30, 2009.
Key economic assumptions used in measuring the servicing rights retained at the date of the
residential mortgage loan securitizations and whole loan sales by the banking subsidiaries during
the quarter ended September 30, 2009 and year ended December 31, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Prepayment speed |
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
11.6 |
% |
Weighted average life |
|
14.3 years |
|
8.6 years |
Discount rate (annual rate) |
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
Key economic assumptions used to estimate the fair value of MSRs derived from sales and
securitizations of mortgage loans performed by the banking subsidiaries and the sensitivity to
immediate changes in those assumptions as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originated MSRs |
|
(In thousands) |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Fair value of retained interests |
|
$ |
100,734 |
|
|
$ |
104,614 |
|
Weighted average life |
|
9.1 years |
|
|
10.2 years |
|
Weighted average prepayment speed (annual rate) |
|
|
11.0 |
% |
|
|
9.9 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
(3,235 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,734 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
$ |
(7,439 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,033 |
) |
Weighted average discount rate (annual rate) |
|
|
12.39 |
% |
|
|
11.46 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
(2,707 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,769 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
$ |
(6,385 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,142 |
) |
|
The banking subsidiaries also own servicing rights purchased from other financial
institutions. The fair value of purchased MSRs, their related valuation assumptions and the
sensitivity to immediate changes in those assumptions as of period end were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased MSRs |
|
(In thousands) |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Fair value of retained interests |
|
$ |
79,601 |
|
|
$ |
71,420 |
|
Weighted average life of
collateral |
|
9.6 years |
|
|
7.0 years |
|
Weighted average prepayment
speed (annual rate) |
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
14.4 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10%
adverse change |
|
$ |
(3,153 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,880 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20%
adverse change |
|
$ |
(6,310 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,096 |
) |
Weighted average discount rate
(annual rate) |
|
|
11.0 |
% |
|
|
10.6 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10%
adverse change |
|
$ |
(2,662 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,277 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20%
adverse change |
|
$ |
(5,343 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,054 |
) |
|
The sensitivity analyses presented in the tables above for servicing rights are
hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the figures indicate, changes in fair value
based on a 10 and 20 percent variation in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because
the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear.
Also, in the sensitivity tables included herein, the effect of a variation in a particular
assumption on the fair value of the retained interest is calculated without changing any other
assumption. In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another (for example,
increases in market interest rates may result in lower
prepayments and increased credit losses), which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities.
33
As of September 30, 2009, the Corporation serviced $4.5 billion (December 31, 2008 $4.9 billion;
September 30, 2008 $3.8 billion) in residential mortgage loans with credit recourse to the
Corporation.
Under the GNMA securitizations, the Corporation, as servicer, has the right to repurchase, at its
option and without GNMAs prior authorization, any loan that is collateral for a GNMA guaranteed
mortgage-backed security when certain delinquency criteria are met. At the time that individual
loans meet GNMAs specified delinquency criteria and are eligible for repurchase, the Corporation
is deemed to have regained effective control over these loans. As of September 30, 2009, the
Corporation had recorded $112 million in mortgage loans on its financial statements related to this
buy-back option program (December 31, 2008 $61 million; September 30, 2008 $47 million).
Note 9 Other Assets
The caption of other assets in the consolidated statements of condition consists of the following
major categories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
Net deferred tax assets (net of
valuation allowance) |
|
$ |
380,596 |
|
|
$ |
357,507 |
|
|
$ |
663,260 |
|
Bank-owned life insurance program |
|
|
230,579 |
|
|
|
224,634 |
|
|
|
222,298 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
144,949 |
|
|
|
136,236 |
|
|
|
153,698 |
|
Investments under the equity method |
|
|
97,817 |
|
|
|
92,412 |
|
|
|
117,766 |
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
81,249 |
|
|
|
109,656 |
|
|
|
50,335 |
|
Trade receivables from brokers and
counterparties |
|
|
8,275 |
|
|
|
1,686 |
|
|
|
17,100 |
|
Others |
|
|
210,215 |
|
|
|
193,466 |
|
|
|
187,762 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,153,680 |
|
|
$ |
1,115,597 |
|
|
$ |
1,412,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note: Other assets from discontinued operations as of December 31, 2008
and September 30, 2008 are presented as part of Assets from
discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of condition.
Refer to Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for further
information on the discontinued operations. |
|
Note 10 Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Refer to Note 33 to the consolidated financial statements included in the 2008 Annual Report for a
complete description of the Corporations derivative activities.
The use of derivatives is incorporated as part of the Corporations overall interest rate risk
management strategy to minimize significant unplanned fluctuations in earnings and cash flows that
are caused by interest rate volatility. The Corporations goal is to manage interest rate
sensitivity by modifying the repricing or maturity characteristics of certain balance sheet assets
and liabilities so that the net interest income is not, on a material basis, adversely affected by
movements in interest rates. The Corporation uses derivatives in its trading activities to
facilitate customer transactions, to take proprietary positions and as a means of risk management.
As a result of interest rate fluctuations, hedged fixed and variable interest rate assets and
liabilities will appreciate or depreciate in fair value. The effect of this unrealized appreciation
or depreciation is expected to be substantially offset by the Corporations gains or losses on the
derivative instruments that are linked to these hedged assets and liabilities. As a matter of
policy, the Corporation does not use highly leveraged derivative instruments for interest rate risk
management.
By using derivative instruments, the Corporation exposes itself to credit and market risk. If a
counterparty fails to fulfill its performance obligations under a derivative contract, the
Corporations credit risk will equal the fair value of the derivative asset. Generally, when the
fair value of a derivative contract is positive, this indicates that the counterparty owes the
Corporation, thus creating a repayment risk for the Corporation. To manage the level of credit
risk, the Corporation deals with counterparties of good credit standing, enters into master netting
agreements whenever possible and, when appropriate, obtains collateral. The derivative assets
include a $5.4 million negative adjustment as a result of the credit risk of the counterparty as of
September 30, 2009. In the other hand, when the fair
34
value of a derivative contract is negative, the Corporation owes the counterparty and, therefore,
the fair value of derivative liabilities incorporates nonperformance risk or the risk that the
obligation will not be fulfilled. The derivative liabilities include a $0.9 million positive
adjustment related to the incorporation of the Corporations own credit risk as of September 30,
2009.
Certain of the Corporations derivative instruments include financial covenants tied to the
corresponding banking subsidiary well-capitalized status and credit rating. These agreements could
require exposure collateralization, early termination or both. The aggregate fair value of all
derivative instruments with contingent features that were in a liability position as of September
30, 2009 was $79 million. Based on the contractual obligations
established on these derivative instruments, the Corporation has fully collateralized these positions by pledging
collateral of $93 million as of September 30, 2009.
Financial instruments designated as cash flow hedges or non-hedging derivatives outstanding as of
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Assets |
|
Derivative Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of |
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of |
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
Condition |
|
Fair |
|
Condition |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
Classification |
|
Value |
|
Classification |
|
Fair Value |
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward commitments |
|
$ |
104,200 |
|
|
Other Assets |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
$ |
996 |
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
|
$ |
104,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
996 |
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward contracts |
|
$ |
142,270 |
|
|
Trading Account Securities |
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
$ |
1,716 |
|
Interest rate swaps associated with: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- swaps with corporate clients |
|
|
1,015,007 |
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
75,528 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
85 |
|
- swaps offsetting position of corporate clients swaps |
|
|
1,015,007 |
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
85 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
80,387 |
|
Foreign currency and exchange rate commitments with clients |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
14 |
|
Foreign currency and exchange rate commitments with counterparty |
|
|
149 |
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate caps and floors |
|
|
139,914 |
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate caps and floors for the benefit of corporate clients |
|
|
139,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
265 |
|
Indexed options on deposits |
|
|
105,850 |
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
5,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bifurcated embedded options |
|
|
84,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing Deposits |
|
|
5,618 |
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
|
$ |
2,643,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
81,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
88,085 |
|
|
Total derivative assets and liabilities |
|
$ |
2,747,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
81,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
89,081 |
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Assets |
|
Derivative Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of |
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of |
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
Condition |
|
|
|
|
|
Condition |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
Classification |
|
Fair Value |
|
Classification |
|
Fair Value |
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward commitments |
|
$ |
112,500 |
|
|
Other Assets |
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
$ |
2,255 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
2,380 |
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
|
$ |
312,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,635 |
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward contracts |
|
$ |
272,301 |
|
|
Trading Account Securities |
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
$ |
4,733 |
|
Interest rate swaps associated with: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- swaps with corporate clients |
|
|
1,038,908 |
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
100,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- swaps
offsetting position of corporate clients swaps |
|
|
1,038,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
98,437 |
|
Foreign currency and exchange rate commitments with clients |
|
|
377 |
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
18 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
15 |
|
Foreign currency and exchange rate commitments with counterparty |
|
|
373 |
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
16 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
16 |
|
Interest rate caps |
|
|
128,284 |
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate caps for the benefit of corporate clients |
|
|
128,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
89 |
|
Indexed options on deposits |
|
|
208,557 |
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
8,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bifurcated embedded options |
|
|
178,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Bearing Deposits |
|
|
8,584 |
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
|
$ |
2,994,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
109,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
111,874 |
|
|
Total derivative assets and liabilities |
|
$ |
3,307,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
109,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
116,509 |
|
|
Cash Flow Hedges
The Corporation utilizes forward contracts to hedge the sale of mortgage-backed securities with
duration terms over one month. Interest rate forwards are contracts for the delayed delivery of
securities, which the seller agrees to deliver on a specified future date at a specified price or
yield. These forward contracts are hedging a forecasted transaction and thus qualify for cash flow
hedge accounting. Changes in the fair value of the derivatives are recorded in other comprehensive
income (loss). The amount included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) corresponding
to these forward contracts is expected to be reclassified to earnings in the next twelve months.
These contracts have a maximum remaining maturity of 82 days.
36
For cash flow hedges, gains and losses on derivative contracts that are reclassified from
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to current period earnings are included in the line
item which the hedged item is recorded and in the same period in which the forecasted transaction
affects earnings, as presented in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classification of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
Amount of Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in |
|
(Loss) Recognized |
|
|
Amount of |
|
Classification in the |
|
|
|
|
|
Income on |
|
in Income on |
|
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
Statement of |
|
Amount of Gain |
|
Derivatives |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
Recognized in |
|
Operations of the |
|
(Loss) |
|
(Ineffective Portion |
|
(Ineffective Portion |
|
|
OCI on |
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
Reclassified from |
|
and Amount |
|
and Amount |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
Reclassified from |
|
AOCI into |
|
Excluded from |
|
Excluded from |
|
|
(Effective |
|
AOCI into Income |
|
Income (Effective |
|
Effectiveness |
|
Effectiveness |
(In thousands) |
|
Portion) |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
Portion) |
|
Testing) |
|
Testing) |
|
Forward commitments |
|
$ |
(995 |
) |
|
Trading account profit |
|
$ |
(37 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash flow
hedges |
|
$ |
(995 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(37 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCI Other Comprehensive Income |
|
AOCI Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classification of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
Amount of Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in |
|
(Loss) Recognized |
|
|
Amount of |
|
Classification in the |
|
|
|
|
|
Income on |
|
in Income on |
|
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
Statement of |
|
Amount of Gain |
|
Derivatives |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
Recognized in |
|
Operations of the |
|
(Loss) |
|
(Ineffective Portion |
|
(Ineffective Portion |
|
|
OCI on |
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
Reclassified from |
|
and Amount |
|
and Amount |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
Reclassified from |
|
AOCI into |
|
Excluded from |
|
Excluded from |
|
|
(Effective |
|
AOCI into Income |
|
Income (Effective |
|
Effectiveness |
|
Effectiveness |
(In thousands) |
|
Portion) |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
Portion) |
|
Testing) |
|
Testing) |
|
Forward commitments |
|
$ |
(2,618 |
) |
|
Trading account profit |
|
$ |
(3,540 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(2,380 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash flow
hedges |
|
$ |
(2,618 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(5,920 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCI Other Comprehensive Income |
|
AOCI Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
Non-Hedging Activities
For the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Corporation recognized a loss of $6.6
million and $20.7 million, respectively, related to its non-hedging derivatives, as detailed in the
table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income on Derivatives |
|
|
Classification of Gain |
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Recognized in |
|
September 30, |
|
Nine months ended |
(In thousands) |
|
Income on Derivatives |
|
2009 |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
Forward contracts |
|
Trading account profit |
|
$ |
(5,142 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,990 |
) |
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
Other operating income |
|
|
(1,565 |
) |
|
|
(7,089 |
) |
Credit derivatives |
|
Other operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,599 |
) |
Foreign currency and
exchange rate commitments |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Foreign currency and
exchange rate commitments |
|
Other operating income |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Indexed options |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
1,415 |
|
|
|
669 |
|
Bifurcated embedded options |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(1,327 |
) |
|
|
248 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(6,614 |
) |
|
$ |
(20,739 |
) |
|
37
Forward Contracts
The Corporation has forward contracts to sell mortgage-backed securities with terms lasting less
than a month, which are accounted for as trading derivatives. Changes in their fair value are
recognized in trading gains and losses.
Interest Rates Swaps and Foreign Currency and Exchange Rate Commitments
In addition to using derivative instruments as part of its interest rate risk management strategy,
the Corporation also utilizes derivatives, such as interest rate swaps and foreign exchange
contracts, in its capacity as an intermediary on behalf of its customers. The Corporation minimizes
its market risk and credit risk by taking offsetting positions under the same terms and conditions
with credit limit approvals and monitoring procedures. Market value changes on these swaps and
other derivatives are recognized in income in the period of change.
Interest Rate Caps
The Corporation enters into interest rate caps as an intermediary on behalf of its customers and
simultaneously takes offsetting positions under the same terms and conditions, thus minimizing its
market and credit risks.
Note 11 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, allocated by reportable segments, were as follows (refer to Note 26 for the definition of the
Corporations reportable segments):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
|
Goodwill |
|
accounting |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
(In thousands) |
|
January 1, 2009 |
|
acquired |
|
adjustments |
|
Other |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Banking |
|
$ |
31,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,729 |
|
Consumer and Retail Banking |
|
|
117,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,000 |
|
Other Financial Services |
|
|
8,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(34 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,296 |
|
Banco Popular North America: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular North America |
|
|
404,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
404,237 |
|
E-LOAN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EVERTEC |
|
|
44,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,246 |
|
|
Total Popular, Inc. |
|
$ |
605,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
606,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
|
Goodwill |
|
accounting |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
(In thousands) |
|
January 1, 2008 |
|
acquired |
|
adjustments |
|
Other |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Banking |
|
$ |
35,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(3,631 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,740 |
|
Consumer and Retail Banking |
|
|
136,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,796 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,611 |
|
Other Financial Services |
|
|
8,621 |
|
|
$ |
153 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
|
8,789 |
|
Banco Popular North America: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular North America |
|
|
404,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
404,237 |
|
E-LOAN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EVERTEC |
|
|
46,125 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
(2,415 |
) |
|
|
44,795 |
|
|
Total Popular, Inc. |
|
$ |
630,761 |
|
|
$ |
1,153 |
|
|
$ |
(21,339 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,403 |
) |
|
$ |
608,172 |
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments consist of adjustments to the value of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed resulting from the completion of appraisals or other valuations, adjustments to
initial estimates recorded for transaction costs, if any, and contingent consideration paid during
a contractual contingency period. The purchase accounting adjustments in the EVERTEC reportable
segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 are related to contingency payments.
38
As of September 30, 2009, the Corporation had $6 million of identifiable intangibles other than
goodwill, with indefinite useful lives (December 31, 2008 $6 million; September 30, 2008 $17
million).
The following table reflects the components of other intangible assets subject to amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
(In thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Core deposits |
|
$ |
65,379 |
|
|
$ |
29,276 |
|
|
$ |
65,379 |
|
|
$ |
24,130 |
|
|
$ |
71,238 |
|
|
$ |
28,446 |
|
|
Other
customer relationships |
|
|
8,816 |
|
|
|
5,478 |
|
|
|
8,839 |
|
|
|
4,585 |
|
|
|
12,898 |
|
|
|
7,105 |
|
|
Other intangibles |
|
|
2,787 |
|
|
|
2,509 |
|
|
|
3,037 |
|
|
|
1,725 |
|
|
|
7,534 |
|
|
|
5,663 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
76,982 |
|
|
$ |
37,263 |
|
|
$ |
77,255 |
|
|
$ |
30,440 |
|
|
$ |
91,670 |
|
|
$ |
41,214 |
|
|
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, the Corporation recognized $2.4 million in
amortization related to other intangible assets with definite useful lives (September 30, 2008 -
$4.0 million). During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Corporation recognized $7.2
million in amortization related to other intangible assets with definite useful lives (September
30, 2008 $8.9 million).
The following table presents the estimated aggregate annual amortization of the intangible assets
with definite useful lives for each of the following fiscal years:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining 2009 |
|
$ |
2,264 |
|
Year 2010 |
|
|
7,671 |
|
Year 2011 |
|
|
6,982 |
|
Year 2012 |
|
|
5,967 |
|
Year 2013 |
|
|
5,784 |
|
Year 2014 |
|
|
5,146 |
|
|
Results of the Goodwill Impairment Test
The Corporations goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets having an indefinite
useful life are tested for impairment. Intangibles with indefinite lives are evaluated for
impairment at least annually and on a more frequent basis if events or circumstances indicate
impairment could have taken place. Such events could include, among others, a significant adverse
change in the business climate, an adverse action by a regulator, an unanticipated change in the
competitive environment and a decision to change the operations or dispose of a reporting unit.
The Corporation performed the annual goodwill impairment evaluation for the entire organization
during the third quarter of 2009 using July 31, 2009 as the annual evaluation date. The reporting
units utilized for this evaluation were those that are one level below the business segments, which
basically are the legal entities that compose the reportable segment. The Corporation follows
push-down accounting, as such all goodwill is assigned to the reporting units when carrying out a
business combination.
In accordance with accounting standards, the impairment evaluation is performed using a two-step
process. Step 1 of the goodwill evaluation process is to determine if potential impairment exists
in any of the Corporations reporting units, and is performed by comparing the fair value of the
reporting units with their carrying amount, including goodwill. The Step 2 is necessary only if the
reporting unit fails Step 1. Step 2 measures the amount of any impairment loss. The implied fair
value of goodwill shall be determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a
business combination is determined. That is, an entity shall allocate the fair value of a reporting
unit to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit (including any unrecognized intangible
assets, such as unrecognized core deposits and tradename intangible assets) as if the reporting
unit had been acquired in a business
39
combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the
price paid to acquire the reporting unit. The excess of the
fair value of a reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities is the
implied fair value of goodwill. The fair value of the assets and liabilities reflects market
conditions, thus volatility in prices could have a material impact on the determination of the
implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill at the impairment test date. If the implied fair
value of goodwill calculated in Step 2 is less than the carrying amount of goodwill for the
reporting unit, an impairment is indicated and the carrying value of goodwill is written down to
the calculated value.
In determining the fair value of a reporting unit, the Corporation generally uses a combination of
methods, including market price multiples of comparable companies and transactions, as well as
discounted cash flow analysis. Management evaluates the particular circumstances of each reporting
unit in order to determine the most appropriate valuation methodology. The Corporation evaluates
the results obtained under each valuation methodology to identify and understand the key value
drivers in order to ascertain that the results obtained are reasonable and appropriate under the
circumstances. Elements considered include current market and economic conditions, developments in
specific lines of business, and any particular features in the individual reporting units.
The computations require management to make estimates and assumptions. Critical assumptions that
are used as part of these evaluations include:
|
|
|
a selection of comparable publicly traded companies, based on nature of business,
location and size; |
|
|
|
a selection of comparable acquisition and capital raising transactions; |
|
|
|
the discount rate applied to future earnings, based on an estimate of the cost of
equity; |
|
|
|
the potential future earnings of the reporting unit; and |
|
|
|
the market growth and new business assumptions. |
For purposes of the market comparable approach, valuations were determined by calculating average
price multiples of relevant value drivers from a group of companies that are comparable to the
reporting unit being analyzed and applying those price multiples to the value drivers of the
reporting unit. Multiples used are minority based multiples and thus, no control premium adjustment
is made to the comparable companies market multiples. While the market price multiple is not an
assumption, a presumption that it provides an indicator of the value of the reporting unit is
inherent in the valuation. The determination of the market comparables also involves a degree of
judgment.
For
purposes of the discounted cash flows (DCF) approach,
the valuation is based on estimated future cash
flows. The financial projections used in the DCF valuation analysis for each reporting unit are
based on the most recent (as of the valuation date) financial projections presented to the
Corporations Asset / Liability Management Committee (ALCO). The growth assumptions included in
these projections are based on managements expectations for each reporting units financial
prospects considering economic and industry conditions as well as particular plans of each entity
(i.e. restructuring plans, de-leveraging, etc.) The cost of equity used to discount the cash flows
was calculated using the Ibbotson Build-Up Method and ranged from 11.24% to 17.78% for the 2009
analysis. The Ibbottson Build-Up Model builds up a cost of equity starting with the rate of return
of a riskless asset (10 year U.S. Treasury note) and adds to it additional risk elements such as
equity risk premium, size premium, and industry risk premium. The resulting discount rates were
analyzed in terms of reasonability given the current market conditions and adjustments were made
when necessary.
Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test performed during 2009 showed that the carrying amount of
BPNA exceeded its fair value, and thus, Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test was performed for
that reporting unit. Based on the results of Step 2, management concluded that there was no
goodwill impairment to be recognized for BPNA. The analysis of the results for Step 2 indicates
that the reduction in the fair value of the reporting unit was mainly attributed to the
deteriorated fair value of the loan portfolios and not to the fair value of the reporting unit as
going concern entity. The goodwill impairment assessment performed for BPNA considered BPNAs
financial condition as of September 30, 2009 and BPNAs financial projections. The current negative
performance of the reporting unit is principally related to deteriorated credit quality in its loan
portfolio, which agrees with the results of the Step 2 analysis. BPNAs provision for loan losses
amounted to $456.3 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, which represented 111% of
BPNAs net loss of $412.4 million for the period.
40
The assessments concluded that there is no goodwill impairment at BPNA primarily as a result of a
significant discount that resulted from the valuation of the loan portfolios. The fair value
determined for BPNAs loan portfolio
in the 2009 annual test represented a discount of 21.7%, which
compares to the 41.6% as of
December 31, 2008. The discount is mainly attributed to market participants expected rate of
returns, which affected the market discount on the commercial and construction loan portfolios and
deteriorated credit quality of the consumer and mortgage loan portfolios of BPNA.
For BPNA, the only subsidiary that failed Step 1, the Corporation determined the fair value of Step
1 utilizing a market value approach based on a combination of price multiples from comparable
companies and multiples from capital raising transactions of comparable companies. The market
multiples used included price to book and price to tangible book. Additionally, the Corporation
determined the reporting unit fair value using a DCF analysis based on
BPNAs financial projections, but assigned no weight to it given the current market approaches provide a more reasonable measure of fair value considering the reporting units financial performance and current market conditions. The Step 1 fair value for BPNA under both valuation approaches (market and DCF) was
below the carrying amount of its equity book value as of the valuation date (July 31), requiring
the completion of Step 2. In accordance with accounting standards, the Corporation performed a
valuation of all assets and liabilities of BPNA, including any recognized and unrecognized
intangible assets, to determine the fair value of BPNAs net assets. To complete Step 2, the
Corporation subtracted from BPNAs Step 1 fair value the determined fair value of the net assets to arrive at the implied fair value of
goodwill. The results of the Step 2 indicated that the implied fair value of goodwill exceeded the
goodwill carrying value of $404 million, resulting in no goodwill impairment. The reduction in
BPNAs Step 1 fair value was offset by a reduction in the fair value of its net assets, resulting
in an implied fair value of goodwill that exceeds the recorded book value of goodwill. If the Step
1 fair value of BPNA declines further in the future without a corresponding decrease in the fair
value of its net assets or if loan discounts improve without a corresponding increase in the Step 1
fair value, the Corporation may be required to record a goodwill impairment charge. The Corporation engaged a
third-party valuator to assist management in the annual evaluation of BPNAs goodwill (including
Step 1 and Step 2) as well as BPNAs loan portfolios as of the July 31 valuation date. Management
discussed the methodologies, assumptions and results supporting the relevant values for
conclusions and determined they were reasonable.
Furthermore, as part of the analyses, management performed a reconciliation of the aggregate fair
values determined for the reporting units to the market capitalization of Popular, Inc. concluding
that the fair value results determined for the reporting units in the July 31, 2009 assessment were
reasonable.
The goodwill impairment evaluation process requires the Corporation to make estimates and
assumptions with regard to the fair value of the reporting units. Actual values may differ
significantly from these estimates. Such differences could result in future impairment of goodwill
that would, in turn, negatively impact the Corporations results of operations and the reporting
units where the goodwill is recorded.
Management monitors events or changes in circumstances between annual tests to determine if these
events or changes in circumstances would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting
unit below its carrying amount. The economic situation in the United
States and Puerto Rico, including deterioration in the housing market
and credit market, has continued to negatively impact the financial
results of the Corporation during 2009. Accordingly, management is
continuing to closely monitor the fair value of the reporting units.
Note 12 Fair Value Measurement
ASC 820-10 Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures (formerly SFAS No. 157) establishes a fair
value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into
three levels in order to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and
disclosures. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of inputs as
follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
that the Corporation has the ability to access at the measurement date. Valuation on these
instruments does not necessitate a significant degree of judgment since valuations are
based on quoted prices that are readily available in an active market. |
|
|
|
Level 2 Quoted prices other than those included in Level 1 that are observable either
directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for |
41
|
|
|
identical or similar assets or liabilities
in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or that can be
corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the financial
instrument. |
|
|
|
Level 3 Inputs are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
Unobservable inputs reflect the Corporations own assumptions about assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. |
The Corporation maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs
by requiring that the observable inputs be used when available. Fair value is based upon quoted
market prices when available. If listed price or quotes are not available, the Corporation employs
internally-developed models that primarily use market-based inputs including yield curves, interest
rates, volatilities, and credit curves, among others. Valuation adjustments are limited to those
necessary to ensure that the financial instruments fair value is adequately representative of the
price that would be received or paid in the marketplace. These adjustments include amounts that
reflect counterparty credit quality, the Corporations credit standing, constraints on liquidity
and unobservable parameters that are applied consistently.
The estimated fair value may be subjective in nature and may involve uncertainties and matters of
significant judgment for certain financial instruments. Changes in the underlying assumptions used
in calculating fair value could significantly affect the results.
The Corporation adopted the provisions of ASC 820-10 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a nonrecurring basis on January 1,
2009.
42
Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following fair value hierarchy tables present information about the Corporations assets and
liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008
and September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored
entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,694 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and
political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
federal
agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,598 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
private
Label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,411 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
|
3,445 |
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
6,955 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
6,993 |
|
|
Trading account securities, excluding
derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and
political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities
federal agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
Total trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
206 |
|
|
$ |
241 |
|
|
$ |
447 |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
$ |
180 |
|
Derivatives (Refer to Note 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
7,242 |
|
|
$ |
455 |
|
|
$ |
7,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives (Refer to Note 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(89 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(89 |
) |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(89 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(89 |
) |
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
2008 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
502 |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored
entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,807 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and
political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
federal
agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,507 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
private
label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
812 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
849 |
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
7,883 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
7,925 |
|
|
Trading account securities, excluding
derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and
political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Residential
mortgage-backed securities
federal agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
588 |
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
Total trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
346 |
|
|
$ |
300 |
|
|
$ |
646 |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
176 |
|
|
$ |
176 |
|
Derivatives (Refer to Note 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans measured at fair value pursuant to
fair value option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
8,339 |
|
|
$ |
518 |
|
|
$ |
8,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives (Refer to Note 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(117 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(117 |
) |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(117 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(117 |
) |
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
2008 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
464 |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored
entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,585 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and
political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
federal
agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,361 |
|
Collateralized
mortgage obligations
private
label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
814 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
7,522 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
7,569 |
|
|
Trading account securities, excluding
derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and
political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities
federal agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
403 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
Total trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
207 |
|
|
$ |
237 |
|
|
$ |
444 |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
128 |
|
|
$ |
128 |
|
Derivatives (Refer to Note 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residual interests trading |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Loans measured at fair value pursuant to
fair value option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
7,780 |
|
|
$ |
1,027 |
|
|
$ |
8,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives (Refer to Note 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(52 |
) |
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable measured at fair value pursuant
to fair value option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(166 |
) |
|
|
(166 |
) |
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(54 |
) |
|
$ |
(166 |
) |
|
$ |
(220 |
) |
|
45
The following tables present the changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair
value on a recurring basis for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
|
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sales, |
|
|
|
|
|
earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
issuances, |
|
|
|
|
|
related to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses) |
|
(decrease) |
|
settlements, |
|
|
|
|
|
assets and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains |
|
included in |
|
in accrued |
|
paydowns |
|
Balance as |
|
liabilities still |
|
|
Balance |
|
(losses) |
|
other |
|
interest |
|
and |
|
of |
|
held as of |
|
|
as of June |
|
included in |
|
comprehensive |
|
receivable |
|
maturities |
|
September |
|
September 30, |
(In millions) |
|
30, 2009 |
|
earnings |
|
income |
|
/ payable |
|
(net) |
|
30, 2009 |
|
2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
available-for-sale |
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account
securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized
mortgage
obligations |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities-federal agencies |
|
|
284 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
233 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
(a) |
Other |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Total trading account
securities |
|
$ |
294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(53 |
) |
|
$ |
241 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
$ |
181 |
|
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
$ |
(4 |
)(b) |
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans measured at fair
value pursuant to fair
value option |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
511 |
|
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(49 |
) |
|
$ |
455 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
a) |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Trading account profit in the statement of operations |
|
b) |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Other service fees in the statement of operations |
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
|
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sales, |
|
|
|
|
|
earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
issuances, |
|
|
|
|
|
related to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses) |
|
(decrease) |
|
settlements, |
|
|
|
|
|
assets and |
|
|
Balance |
|
Gains |
|
included in |
|
in accrued |
|
paydowns |
|
Balance as |
|
liabilities still |
|
|
as of |
|
(losses) |
|
other |
|
interest |
|
and |
|
of |
|
held as of |
|
|
January 1, |
|
included in |
|
comprehensive |
|
receivable |
|
maturities |
|
September |
|
September 30, |
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
Earnings |
|
Income |
|
/ payable |
|
(net) |
|
30, 2009 |
|
2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
available-for-sale |
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account
securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized
mortgage
obligations |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities-federal agencies |
|
|
292 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
233 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
(a) |
Other |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Total trading account
securities |
|
$ |
300 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(60 |
) |
|
$ |
241 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
$ |
176 |
|
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
$ |
(6 |
)(c) |
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans measured at fair
value pursuant to fair
value option |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
518 |
|
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(49 |
) |
|
$ |
455 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
a) |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Trading account profit in the statement of operations |
|
b) |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax in the
statement of operations |
|
c) |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Other service fees in the statement of operations |
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
|
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sales, |
|
|
|
|
|
earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
issuances, |
|
|
|
|
|
related to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses) |
|
(decrease) |
|
settlements, |
|
|
|
|
|
assets and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains |
|
included in |
|
in accrued |
|
paydowns |
|
Balance as |
|
liabilities still |
|
|
Balance |
|
(losses) |
|
other |
|
interest |
|
and |
|
of |
|
held as of |
|
|
as of June |
|
included in |
|
comprehensive |
|
receivable |
|
maturities |
|
September |
|
September 30, |
(In millions) |
|
30, 2008 |
|
Earnings |
|
Income |
|
/ payable |
|
(net) |
|
30, 2008 |
|
2008 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
available-for-sale |
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account
securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized
mortgage
obligations |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed
securities-federal agencies |
|
|
301 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(73 |
) |
|
|
229 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
)(a) |
Other |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading account
securities |
|
$ |
310 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(74 |
) |
|
$ |
237 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
128 |
|
|
$ |
(7 |
)(c) |
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residual interests-available-for-sale |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residual interests -
trading |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
(32 |
)(b) |
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
(12 |
)(b) |
Loans measured at fair
value pursuant to fair
value option |
|
|
845 |
|
|
|
(137 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
(111 |
)(b) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,417 |
|
|
$ |
(197 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(192 |
) |
|
$ |
1,027 |
|
|
$ |
(163 |
) |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable measured at
fair value pursuant to
fair value option |
|
$ |
(174 |
) |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
(166 |
) |
|
$ |
(3 |
)(b) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
(174 |
) |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
(166 |
) |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
a) |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Trading account profit in the statement of operations |
|
b) |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax in the
statement of operations |
|
c) |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Other service fees in the statement of operations |
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
|
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sales, |
|
|
|
|
|
earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
issuances, |
|
|
|
|
|
related to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses) |
|
(decrease) |
|
settlements, |
|
|
|
|
|
assets and |
|
|
Balance |
|
Gains |
|
included in |
|
in accrued |
|
paydowns |
|
Balance as |
|
liabilities still |
|
|
as of |
|
(losses) |
|
other |
|
interest |
|
and |
|
of |
|
held as of |
|
|
January 1, |
|
included in |
|
comprehensive |
|
receivable |
|
maturities |
|
September |
|
September 30, |
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
earnings |
|
income |
|
/ payable |
|
(net) |
|
30, 2008 |
|
2008 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed
securities |
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
available-for-sale |
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account
securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized
mortgage
obligations |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-
backed securities-
federal agencies |
|
|
227 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
|
229 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
(a) |
Other |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading account
securities |
|
$ |
233 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
237 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
128 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
)(c) |
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residual interests
available-for-sale |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residual interests
trading |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
(43 |
)(b) |
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
(23 |
)(b) |
Loans measured at fair
value pursuant to fair
value option |
|
|
987 |
|
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
|
(230 |
) |
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
(96 |
)(b) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,495 |
|
|
$ |
(255 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
(210 |
) |
|
$ |
1,027 |
|
|
$ |
(161 |
) |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable measured at
fair value pursuant to
fair value option |
|
$ |
(201 |
) |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
(166 |
) |
|
$ |
(9 |
)(b) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
(201 |
) |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
(166 |
) |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
a) |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Trading account profit in the statement of operations |
|
b) |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax in the
statement of operations |
|
c) |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Other service fees in the statement of operations |
|
There were no transfers in and / or out of Level 3 for financial instruments measured at fair
value on a recurring basis during the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
49
Gains and losses (realized and unrealized) included in earnings for the quarters and nine months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 for Level 3 assets and liabilities included in the previous
tables are reported in the consolidated statement of operations as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended September 30, 2009 |
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized gains |
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(losses) relating to |
|
|
|
|
|
(losses) relating to |
|
|
Total gains (losses) |
|
assets / liabilities |
|
Total gains (losses) |
|
assets / liabilities |
|
|
included in |
|
still held at |
|
included in |
|
still held at |
(In millions) |
|
earnings |
|
reporting date |
|
earnings |
|
reporting date |
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other service fees |
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
Trading account profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from
discontinued
operations, net of
tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended September 30, 2008 |
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized gains |
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(losses) relating to |
|
|
|
|
|
(losses) relating to |
|
|
Total gains (losses) |
|
assets / liabilities |
|
Total gains (losses) |
|
assets / liabilities |
|
|
included in |
|
still held at |
|
included in |
|
still held at |
(In millions) |
|
earnings |
|
reporting date |
|
earnings |
|
reporting date |
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other service fees |
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
Trading account profit |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from
discontinued
operations, net of
tax |
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
(259 |
) |
|
|
(171 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
(200 |
) |
|
$ |
(166 |
) |
|
$ |
(264 |
) |
|
$ |
(170 |
) |
|
Additionally, the Corporation may be required to measure certain assets at fair value in
periods subsequent to initial recognition on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. The adjustments to fair value usually result from the application
of lower of cost or market accounting, identification of impaired loans requiring specific reserves
under ASC 310-10-35 Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan (formerly SFAS No. 114), or
write-downs of individual assets. The following tables present financial and non-financial assets
that were subject to a fair value measurement on a nonrecurring basis during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 and year ended December 31, 2008, and which were still included in the
consolidated statement of condition as of such dates. The amounts disclosed represent the aggregate
of the fair value measurements of those assets as of the end of the reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value as of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Quoted prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
active markets |
|
Significant other |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
for identical |
|
observable |
|
unobservable |
|
|
|
|
assets |
|
inputs |
|
inputs |
|
Total |
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
743 |
|
|
$ |
743 |
|
Other real estate owned (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Other foreclosed assets (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
776 |
|
|
$ |
776 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Relates mostly to certain impaired collateral dependent loans. The impairment was measured based on
the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from appraisals that take into
consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations,
in accordance with the provisions of ASC 310-10-35. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the fair value of foreclosed real estate and other collateral owned that were
measured at fair value. |
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value as of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Quoted prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
active markets |
|
Significant other |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
for identical |
|
observable |
|
unobservable |
|
|
|
|
assets |
|
inputs |
|
inputs |
|
Total |
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
523 |
|
|
$ |
523 |
|
Loans held-for-sale (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-sale (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
889 |
|
|
$ |
889 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Relates mostly to certain impaired collateral dependent loans. The impairment was measured based on
the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from appraisals that take into
consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations,
in accordance with the provisions of ASC 310-10-35. |
|
(2) |
|
Relates to lower of cost or fair value adjustments of loans held-for-sale and loans
transferred from loans held-in-portfolio to loans held-for-sale. These adjustments were
principally determined based on negotiated price terms for the loans. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value as of September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Quoted prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
active markets |
|
Significant other |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
for identical |
|
observable |
|
unobservable |
|
|
|
|
assets |
|
inputs |
|
inputs |
|
Total |
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
474 |
|
|
$ |
474 |
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-sale (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Securitization advances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
796 |
|
|
$ |
796 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Relates mostly to certain impaired collateral dependent loans. The impairment was measured
based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from appraisals that take into
consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations,
in accordance with the provisions of ASC 310-10-35. |
|
(2) |
|
Relates to lower of cost or fair value adjustments of loans held-for-sale and loans
transferred from loans held-in-portfolio to loans held-for-sale. These adjustments were
principally determined based on negotiated price terms for the loans. |
|
Following is a description of the Corporations valuation methodologies used for assets and
liabilities measured at fair value. The disclosure requirements exclude certain financial
instruments and non-financial instruments. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts of the
financial instruments presented in these note disclosures do not represent managements estimate of
the underlying value of the Corporation.
Trading Account Securities and Investment Securities Available-for-Sale
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities: The fair value of U.S. Treasury securities is based on yields
that are interpolated from the constant maturity treasury curve. These securities are
classified as Level 2. |
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities: The Obligations of U.S. Government
sponsored entities include U.S. agency securities. The fair value of U.S. agency securities
is based on an active exchange market and on quoted market prices for similar securities.
The U.S. agency securities are classified as Level 2. |
|
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions: Obligations of Puerto
Rico, States and political subdivisions include municipal bonds. The bonds are segregated
and the like characteristics divided into specific sectors. Market inputs used in the
evaluation process include all or some of the following: trades, bid price or spread, two
sided markets, quotes, benchmark curves including but not limited to Treasury benchmarks,
LIBOR and swap curves, market data feeds such as MSRB, discount and capital rates, and
trustee reports. The municipal bonds are classified as Level 2. |
51
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: Certain agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS) are priced
based on a bonds theoretical value from similar bonds defined by credit quality and market
sector. Their fair value incorporates an option adjusted spread. The agency MBS are
classified as Level 2. Other agency MBS such as GNMA Puerto Rico Serials are priced using
an internally-prepared pricing matrix with quoted prices from local broker dealers. These
particular MBS are classified as Level 3. |
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations: Agency and private collateralized mortgage
obligations (CMOs) are priced based on a bonds theoretical value from similar bonds
defined by credit quality and market sector and for which fair value incorporates an option
adjusted spread. The option adjusted spread model includes prepayment and volatility
assumptions, ratings (whole loans collateral) and spread adjustments. These investment
securities are classified as Level 2. |
|
|
|
Equity securities: Equity securities with quoted market prices obtained from an active
exchange market are classified as Level 1. Other equity securities that do not trade in
highly liquid markets are classified as Level 2. |
|
|
|
Corporate securities and mutual funds (included as other in the trading account
securities category): Quoted prices for these security types are obtained from broker
dealers. Given that the quoted prices are for similar instruments or do not trade in highly
liquid markets, the corporate securities and mutual funds are classified as Level 2. The
important variables in determining the prices of Puerto Rico tax-exempt mutual fund shares
are net asset value, dividend yield and type of assets in the fund. All funds trade based
on a relevant dividend yield taking into consideration the aforementioned variables. In
addition, demand and supply also affect the price. Corporate securities that trade less
frequently or are in distress are classified as Level 3. |
Derivatives
Interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and index options are traded in over-the-counter active
markets. These derivatives are indexed to an observable interest rate benchmark, such as LIBOR or
equity indexes, and are priced using an income approach based on present value and option pricing
models using observable inputs. Other derivatives are exchange-traded, such as futures and options,
or are liquid and have quoted prices, such as forward contracts or to be announced securities
(TBAs). All of these derivatives are classified as Level 2. The non-performance risk is
determined using internally-developed models that consider the collateral held, the remaining term,
and the creditworthiness of the entity that bears the risk, and uses available public data or
internally-developed data related to current spreads that denote their probability of default.
Mortgage servicing rights
Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices.
MSRs are priced internally using a discounted cash flow model. The valuation model considers
servicing fees, portfolio characteristics, prepayments assumptions, delinquency rates, late
charges, other ancillary revenues, cost to service and other economic factors. Due to the
unobservable nature of certain valuation inputs, the MSRs are classified as Level 3.
Loans held-in-portfolio considered impaired under ASC 310-10-35 that are collateral dependent
The impairment is measured based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from
appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in
similar locations, in accordance with the provisions of ASC 310-10-35. Currently, the associated
loans considered impaired are classified as Level 3.
Loans measured at fair value pursuant to lower of cost or fair value adjustments
Loans measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis pursuant to lower of cost or fair value were
priced based on bids received from potential buyers, secondary market prices, and discounting cash
flow models which incorporate internally-developed assumptions for prepayments and credit loss
estimates. These loans are classified as Level 3.
Other real estate owned and other foreclosed assets
Other real estate owned includes real estate properties securing mortgage, consumer, and commercial
loans. Other foreclosed assets include automobiles securing auto loans. The fair value of
foreclosed assets may be determined using an external appraisal, broker price opinion or an
internal valuation. These foreclosed assets are classified as
Level 3 given certain internal adjustments that may be made to external appraisals.
52
Note 13 Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair value of financial instruments is the amount at which an asset or obligation could be
exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation
sale. Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time based on the type of financial
instrument and relevant market information. Many of these estimates involve various assumptions and
may vary significantly from amounts that could be realized in actual transactions.
The information about the estimated fair values of financial instruments presented hereunder
excludes all nonfinancial instruments and certain other specific items.
Derivatives are considered financial instruments and their carrying value equals fair value. For
disclosures about the fair value of derivative instruments refer to Note 10 to the consolidated
financial statements.
For those financial instruments with no quoted market prices available, fair values have been
estimated using present value calculations or other valuation techniques, as well as managements
best judgment with respect to current economic conditions, including discount rates, estimates of
future cash flows, and prepayment assumptions.
The fair values reflected herein have been determined based on the prevailing interest rate
environment as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. In different interest
rate environments, fair value estimates can differ significantly, especially for certain fixed rate
financial instruments. In addition, the fair values presented do not attempt to estimate the value
of the Corporations fee generating businesses and anticipated future business activities, that is,
they do not represent the Corporations value as a going concern. Accordingly, the aggregate fair
value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of the Corporation. The methods and
assumptions used to estimate the fair values of significant financial instruments as of September
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are described in the paragraphs below.
Short-term financial assets and liabilities have relatively short maturities, or no defined
maturities, and little or no credit risk. The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated
statements of condition approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of those
instruments or because they carry interest rates which approximate market. Included in this
category are: cash and due from banks, federal funds sold and securities purchased under
agreements to resell, time deposits with other banks, bankers acceptances, federal funds purchased and assets sold under
agreements to repurchase, and short-term
borrowings. Resell and repurchase agreements with long-term maturities
are valued using discounted cash flows based on market rates currently available for agreements
with similar terms and remaining maturities.
Trading and investment securities, except for investments classified as other investment securities
in the consolidated statement of condition, are financial instruments that regularly trade on
secondary markets. The estimated fair value of these securities was determined using either market
prices or dealer quotes, where available, or quoted market prices of financial instruments with
similar characteristics. Trading account securities and securities available-for-sale are reported
at their respective fair values in the consolidated statements of condition since they are
marked-to-market for accounting purposes. These instruments are detailed in the consolidated
statements of condition and in Notes 6 and 7.
The estimated fair value for loans held-for-sale is based on secondary market prices. The fair
values of the loans held-in-portfolio have been determined for groups of loans with similar
characteristics. Loans were segregated by type such as commercial, construction, residential
mortgage, consumer, and credit cards. Each loan category was further segmented based on loan
characteristics, including interest rate terms, credit quality and vintage. Generally, the fair
values were estimated based on an exit price by discounting scheduled cash flows for the segmented
groups of loans using a discount rate that considers interest, credit and expected return by market
participant under current market conditions. Additionally, prepayment, default and recovery
assumptions have been applied in the mortgage loan portfolio valuations. Generally accepted
accounting principles do not require a fair valuation of the lease financing portfolio, therefore
it is included in the loans total at its carrying amount.
53
The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as non-interest bearing demand deposits,
savings, NOW, and
money market accounts is, for purposes of this disclosure, equal to the amount payable on demand as
of the respective dates. The fair value of certificates of deposit is based on the discounted value
of contractual cash flows using interest rates being offered on certificates with similar
maturities. The value of these deposits in a transaction between willing parties is in part
dependent of the buyers ability to reduce the servicing cost and the attrition that sometimes
occurs. Therefore, the amount a buyer would be willing to pay for these deposits could vary
significantly from the presented fair value.
Long-term borrowings were valued using discounted cash flows, based on market rates currently
available for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities and in certain instances using
quoted market rates for similar instruments as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
As part of the fair value estimation procedures of certain liabilities, including repurchase
agreements (regular and structured) and FHLB advances, the Corporation considered, where
applicable, the collaterization levels as part of its evaluation of
non-performance risk. Also, for certificates of deposit, the
non-performance risk is determine using internally-developed
models that consider, where applicable, the collateral held, amounts
insured, the remaining term, and the credit premium of the
institution.
Commitments to extend credit were valued using the fees currently charged to enter into similar
agreements. For those commitments where a future stream of fees is charged, the fair value was
estimated by discounting the projected cash flows of fees on commitments. The fair value of letters
of credit is based on fees currently charged on similar agreements.
Carrying or notional amounts, as applicable, and estimated fair values for financial instruments
were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
(In thousands) |
|
amount |
|
value |
|
amount |
|
value |
|
Financial Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and money market investments |
|
$ |
1,705,684 |
|
|
$ |
1,705,684 |
|
|
$ |
1,579,641 |
|
|
$ |
1,579,641 |
|
Trading securities |
|
|
446,368 |
|
|
|
446,368 |
|
|
|
645,903 |
|
|
|
645,903 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
6,993,291 |
|
|
|
6,993,291 |
|
|
|
7,924,487 |
|
|
|
7,924,487 |
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity |
|
|
212,950 |
|
|
|
210,913 |
|
|
|
294,747 |
|
|
|
290,134 |
|
Other investment securities |
|
|
174,943 |
|
|
|
176,286 |
|
|
|
217,667 |
|
|
|
255,830 |
|
Loans held-for-sale |
|
|
75,447 |
|
|
|
78,600 |
|
|
|
536,058 |
|
|
|
541,576 |
|
Loans held-in-portfolio, net |
|
|
23,188,668 |
|
|
|
20,014,249 |
|
|
|
24,850,066 |
|
|
|
17,383,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
26,382,898 |
|
|
$ |
26,533,222 |
|
|
$ |
27,550,205 |
|
|
$ |
27,793,826 |
|
Federal funds purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144,471 |
|
|
|
144,471 |
|
Assets sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
2,807,891 |
|
|
|
2,952,494 |
|
|
|
3,407,137 |
|
|
|
3,592,236 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
3,077 |
|
|
|
3,077 |
|
|
|
4,934 |
|
|
|
4,934 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
2,649,821 |
|
|
|
2,466,172 |
|
|
|
3,386,763 |
|
|
|
3,257,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
Fair |
|
Notional |
|
Fair |
(In thousands) |
|
amount |
|
Value |
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|
Commitments to extend credit |
|
$ |
6,951,406 |
|
|
$ |
561 |
|
|
$ |
7,116,977 |
|
|
$ |
943 |
|
Letters of credit |
|
|
180,400 |
|
|
|
1,672 |
|
|
|
199,795 |
|
|
|
3,938 |
|
54
Note 14 Borrowings
The composition of federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
Federal funds purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
144,471 |
|
|
$ |
139,951 |
|
Assets sold under
agreements to
repurchase |
|
$ |
2,807,891 |
|
|
|
3,407,137 |
|
|
|
3,590,088 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,807,891 |
|
|
$ |
3,551,608 |
|
|
$ |
3,730,039 |
|
|
Other short-term borrowings consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
Advances with the FHLB paying interest at maturity at
fixed rates ranging from 2.62% to 3.08% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
115,000 |
|
Advances under credit facilities with other institutions at a fixed rate of 3.25% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
Unsecured borrowings with private investors paying interest at a fixed rate of 0.45% |
|
$ |
1,750 |
|
|
$ |
3,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes purchased paying interest at maturity at
fixed rates ranging from 2.20% to 3.40% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,232 |
|
Term funds purchased paying interest at fixed rates
ranging from 2.53% to 2.75% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
343,000 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,327 |
|
|
|
1,386 |
|
|
|
1,779 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,077 |
|
|
$ |
4,934 |
|
|
$ |
507,011 |
|
|
Note: Refer to the Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, for rates and maturity information corresponding to the
borrowings outstanding as of such date.
55
Notes payable consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
Advances with the FHLB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with maturities ranging from 2010 through 2015 paying interest at monthly
fixed rates ranging from 1.48% to 5.06% (September 30, 2008 - 2.67% to
6.98%) |
|
$ |
1,105,429 |
|
|
$ |
1,050,741 |
|
|
$ |
1,241,717 |
|
maturing in 2010 paying interest quarterly at a fixed rate of 5.10% |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances under revolving lines of credit with maturities ranging from 2008 to
2009 paying interest quarterly at floating rates ranging from 0.20% to
0.27% over the 3- month LIBOR rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes maturing in 2030 paying interest monthly at fixed rates ranging from
3.00% to 6.00% |
|
|
3,100 |
|
|
|
3,100 |
|
|
|
3,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes with maturities ranging from 2009 to 2013 paying interest
semiannually at fixed rates ranging from 5.20% to 9.75% (September 30,
2008 - 3.88% to 7.00%) |
|
|
383,289 |
|
|
|
995,027 |
|
|
|
1,579,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes with maturities ranging from 2009 to 2013 paying interest
monthly at a floating rate of 3.00% over the 10-year U.S. Treasury note rate |
|
|
2,111 |
|
|
|
3,777 |
|
|
|
4,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes maturing in 2011 paying interest quarterly at a floating rate of
6.00% to 7.5% (September 30, 2008 - 0.40% to 3.25%) over the 3-month LIBOR
rate |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
435,543 |
|
|
|
449,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures with maturities
ranging from 2027 to 2034 with fixed interest rates ranging from
6.125% to 8.327% (Refer to Notes 15 and 16) |
|
|
439,800 |
|
|
|
849,672 |
|
|
|
849,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures ($936,000 less discount of
$517,167) with no stated maturity and a fixed interest rate of
5.00% until, but excluding December 5, 2013 and 9.00% thereafter (Refer to
Notes 15 and 16) |
|
|
418,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
27,259 |
|
|
|
28,903 |
|
|
|
28,967 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,649,821 |
|
|
$ |
3,386,763 |
|
|
$ |
4,242,487 |
|
|
Note: Refer to the Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, for rates and maturity information corresponding to
the borrowings outstanding as of such date. Key index rates as of September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, respectively, were as
follows: 3-month LIBOR rate = 0.29% and 4.05%; 10-year U.S. Treasury note = 3.31% and 3.83%.
As of September 30, 2009, the holders of $25 million of certain of the Corporations
fixed-rate term notes and $75 million of the Corporations
floating rate term notes have the right to require
the Corporation to purchase the notes on each quarterly interest payment date beginning in March
2010. These notes were issued by the Corporation in 2008 and mature in 2011, subject to the right
of investors to require their earlier repurchase by the Corporation. Effective on September 30,
2009, the holders of an additional $175 million of the
Corporations floating rate term notes agreed
with the Corporation to relinquish and waive the right to require the Corporation to repurchase the
notes. These notes, prior to the modification, had similar rights to the notes described above.
The Corporation agreed to pay the holders of these notes additional interest on the principal
amount of the notes at the rate of 1.50% per annum commencing on
October 1, 2009.
Included in the table above is $350 million in term notes with interest that adjusts in the event
of senior debt rating downgrades. As a result of rating downgrades by the major rating agencies in
January 2009, April 2009 and June 2009, the cost of the senior debt increased prospectively by an
additional 275 basis points during 2009. The senior debt consists of term notes of $75 million with
a fixed rate of 9.75% as of September 30, 2009, $25 million with a fixed rate of 9.41% as of
September 30, 2009 and $250 million in term notes with a floating rate of 6.00% over the 3-month
LIBOR as of September 30, 2009. These term notes mature in 2011.
56
The maturities of borrowings as of September 30, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase |
|
Short-term |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
agreements |
|
borrowings |
|
Notes payable |
|
Total |
|
Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
1,295,464 |
|
|
$ |
3,077 |
|
|
$ |
1,216 |
|
|
$ |
1,299,757 |
|
2010 |
|
|
350,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
386,481 |
|
|
|
736,719 |
|
2011 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
697,213 |
|
|
|
747,213 |
|
2012 |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
531,747 |
|
|
|
606,747 |
|
2013 |
|
|
49,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,273 |
|
|
|
182,273 |
|
2014 |
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,824 |
|
|
|
360,824 |
|
Later years |
|
|
638,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
470,234 |
|
|
|
1,108,423 |
|
No stated maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
418,833 |
|
|
|
418,833 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,807,891 |
|
|
$ |
3,077 |
|
|
$ |
2,649,821 |
|
|
$ |
5,460,789 |
|
|
Note 15 Exchange Offers
In June 2009, the Corporation commenced an offer to issue shares of its common stock in exchange
for its Series A preferred stock and Series B preferred stock and for trust preferred securities
(also referred as capital securities). On August 25, 2009, the Corporation completed the
settlement of the exchange offer and issued over 357 million new shares of common stock.
Exchange of preferred stock for common stock
The exchange by holders of shares of the Series A and B non-cumulative preferred stock for shares
of common stock resulted in the extinguishment of such shares of preferred stock and an issuance of shares of common stock.
In accordance with the terms of the exchange offer, the Corporation used a relevant price of $2.50
per share of its common stock and an exchange ratio of 80% of the preferred stock liquidation value
to determine the number of shares of its common stock issued in exchange for the tendered shares of
Series A and B preferred stock. The fair value of the common stock was $1.71 per share, which was
the price as of August 20, 2009, the expiration date of the exchange offer. The carrying
(liquidation) value of each share of Series A and B preferred stock exchanged was reduced and
common stock and surplus increased in the amount of the fair value of the common stock issued. The
Corporation recorded the par amount of the shares issued as common stock ($0.01 per common share).
The excess of the common stock fair value over the par amount was recorded in surplus. The excess
of the carrying amount of the shares of preferred stock over the fair value of the shares of common
stock was recorded as a reduction to accumulated deficit and an increase in earnings per common
share computations.
The results of the exchange offer with respect to the Series A and B preferred stock were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
liquidation |
|
|
|
|
Per security |
|
preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of |
|
preference |
|
|
|
|
liquidation |
|
outstanding |
|
Shares of |
|
preferred stock |
|
amount after |
|
Shares of |
Title of |
|
preference |
|
prior to |
|
preferred stock |
|
outstanding after |
|
exchange |
|
common stock |
Securities |
|
Amount |
|
exchange |
|
exchanged |
|
exchange |
|
(In thousands) |
|
issued |
|
6.375%
Non-cumulative
monthly income
preferred stock,
2003 Series A |
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
|
7,475,000 |
|
|
|
6,589,274 |
|
|
|
885,726 |
|
|
$ |
22,143 |
|
|
|
52,714,192 |
|
8.25%
Non-cumulative
monthly income
preferred stock,
Series B |
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
|
16,000,000 |
|
|
|
14,879,335 |
|
|
|
1,120,665 |
|
|
$ |
28,017 |
|
|
|
119,034,680 |
|
|
The exchange of shares of preferred
stock for shares of common stock resulted in a favorable impact to accumulated deficit of $230.4 million, which
is also considered
57
as part of earnings applicable to common stockholders in the earnings (losses)
per common share (EPS) computations. Refer to Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements
for a reconciliation of EPS.
Common stock issued in connection with early extinguishment of debt (exchange of trust
preferred securities for common stock)
Also, during the third quarter of 2009, the Corporation exchanged trust preferred securities (also
referred to as capital securities) issued by different trusts for shares of common stock of the
Corporation. See table below for a list of such securities and trusts. The trust preferred
securities were delivered to the trusts in return for the junior subordinated debentures (recorded
as notes payable in the Corporations financial statements) that had been issued by the Corporation
to the trusts in the past. The junior subordinated debentures were submitted for cancellation by
the indenture trustee under the applicable indenture. The Corporation recognized a pre-tax gain of
$80.3 million on the extinguishment of the applicable junior subordinated debentures that was
included in the consolidated statement of operations for the third quarter of 2009. This
transaction was accounted as an early extinguishment of debt.
In accordance with the terms of the exchange offer, the Corporation used a relevant price of $2.50
per share of its common stock and the exchange ratios referred to in the table below to determine
the number of shares of its common stock issued in exchange for the validly tendered trust
preferred securities. The fair value of the common stock was $1.71 per share, which was the price
as of August 20, 2009, the expiration date of the exchange offer. The carrying value of the
junior subordinated debentures was reduced and common stock and surplus increased in the amount of
the fair value of the common stock issued. The Corporation recorded the par amount of the shares
issued as common stock ($0.01 per common share). The excess of the common stock fair value over the
par amount was recorded in surplus. The excess of the carrying amount of the junior subordinated
debentures retired over the fair value of the common stock issued was recorded as a gain on early
extinguishment of debt in the consolidated statement of operations for the quarter ended September
30, 2009.
58
The results of the exchange offer with respect to the trust preferred securities were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
liquidation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate |
|
preference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
liquidation |
|
amount of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
preference |
|
junior |
|
|
Liquidation |
|
Trust |
|
Trust preferred |
|
Trust |
|
|
|
|
|
amount of |
|
subordinated |
|
|
preference |
|
preferred |
|
securities |
|
preferred |
|
Trust preferred |
|
trust preferred |
|
debentures |
|
|
amount per |
|
security |
|
outstanding |
|
securities |
|
securities |
|
securities after |
|
after |
Title of |
|
trust preferred |
|
exchange |
|
prior to |
|
exchanged for |
|
outstanding |
|
exchange |
|
exchange |
Securities |
|
security |
|
value |
|
exchange |
|
common stock |
|
after exchange |
|
(In thousands) |
|
(In thousands) |
|
8.327% Trust
Preferred
Securities (issued
by BanPonce Trust
I) |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$1,150 or 115% |
|
|
144,000 |
|
|
|
91,135 |
|
|
|
52,865 |
|
|
$ |
52,865 |
|
|
$ |
54,502 |
|
6.70% Cumulative
Monthly Income
Trust Preferred
Securities (issued
by Popular Capital
Trust I) |
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$30 or 120% |
|
|
12,000,000 |
|
|
|
4,757,480 |
|
|
|
7,242,520 |
|
|
$ |
181,063 |
|
|
$ |
186,664 |
|
6.564% Trust
Preferred
Securities (issued
by Popular North
America Capital
Trust I) |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$1,150 or 115% |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
158,349 |
|
|
|
91,651 |
|
|
$ |
91,651 |
|
|
$ |
94,486 |
|
6.125% Cumulative
Monthly Income
Trust Preferred
Securities (issued
by Popular Capital
Trust II) |
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$30 or 120% |
|
|
5,200,000 |
|
|
|
1,159,080 |
|
|
|
4,040,920 |
|
|
$ |
101,023 |
|
|
$ |
104,148 |
|
|
The increase in stockholders equity related to the exchange of trust preferred securities for
shares of common stock was approximately $390 million, net of
issuance costs, and including the
aforementioned gain on the early extinguishment of debt.
Exchange of preferred stock held by the U.S. Treasury for trust preferred securities
Also, on August 21, 2009, Popular, Inc. and Popular Capital Trust III entered into an exchange
agreement with the United States Department of the Treasury (U.S. Treasury) pursuant to which
the U.S. Treasury agreed with Popular that the U.S. Treasury would exchange all 935,000 shares of
Populars outstanding Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C, $1,000 liquidation
preference per share (the Series C Preferred Stock), owned by the U.S Treasury for 935,000 newly
issued trust preferred securities, $1,000 liquidation amount per capital security. The trust
preferred securities were issued to the U.S. Treasury on August 24, 2009. In connection with this
exchange, the trust used the Series C preferred stock, together with the proceeds of the issuance
and sale by the trust to the Corporation of $1 million aggregate liquidation amount of its fixed
rate common securities, to purchase $936 million aggregate principal amount of the junior
subordinated debentures issued by the Corporation.
59
The trust
preferred securities issued to the U.S. Treasury have a distribution
rate of 5% until, but excluding December 5, 2013 and 9% thereafter (which is the same as the dividend rate on the Series C
Preferred Stock). The common securities of the trust, in the amount of $1 million, are held by
Popular.
The sole asset and only source of funds to make payments on the trust preferred securities and the
common securities of the trust is $936 million of Populars Fixed Rate Perpetual Junior
Subordinated Debentures, Series A, issued by Popular to the trust. These debentures have an
interest rate of 5% until, but excluding December 5, 2013 and 9% thereafter. The debentures are perpetual and may
be redeemed by Popular at any time, subject to the consent of the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System.
Under the guarantee agreement dated as of August 24, 2009, Popular irrevocably and unconditionally
agrees to pay in full to the holders of the trust preferred securities the guarantee payments, as
and when due. The Corporations obligation to make the guaranteed payment may be satisfied by
direct payment of the required amounts to the holders of the trust preferred securities or by
causing the issuer trust to pay such amounts to the holders. The obligations of the Corporation
under the guarantee agreement constitute unsecured obligations and rank subordinate and junior in
right of payment to all senior debt. The obligations of the Corporation under the guarantee
agreement rank pari passu with the obligations of Popular under any similar guarantee agreements
issued by the Corporation on behalf of the holders of preferred or capital securities issued by any
statutory trust, among others stated in the guarantee agreement. Under the guarantee agreement,
the Corporation has guaranteed the payment of the liquidation amount of the trust preferred
securities upon liquidation of the trust, but only to the extent that the trust has funds available
to make such payments.
Under the exchange agreement, Populars agreement that, without the consent of the U.S.
Treasury, it would not increase its dividend rate per share of common stock above that in effect as
of October 14, 2008 or repurchase shares of its common stock until, in each case, the earlier of
December 5, 2011 or such time as all of the new trust preferred securities have been redeemed or
transferred by the U.S. Treasury, remains in effect.
The warrant to purchase 20,932,836 shares of Populars common stock at an exercise price of $6.70
per share that was initially issued to the U.S Treasury in connection with the issuance of the
Series C preferred stock on December 5, 2008 remains outstanding without amendment.
The trust preferred securities issued to the U.S. Treasury continue to qualify as Tier 1 regulatory
capital as of September 30, 2009. The trust preferred securities are subject to the 25% limitation
on Tier 1 capital.
Popular paid an exchange fee of $13 million to the U.S.
Treasury in connection with the exchange of
outstanding shares of Series C preferred stock for the new trust preferred securities. This
exchange fee will be amortized through interest expense using the interest yield method over the
estimated life of the junior subordinated debentures.
This transaction with the U.S. Treasury was accounted for as an extinguishment of previously issued
Series C preferred stock. The accounting impact of this transaction included (1) recognition of
junior subordinated debentures and derecognition of the Series C
preferred stock; (2) recognition of a favorable
impact to accumulated deficit resulting from the excess of (a) the carrying amount of the
securities exchanged (the Series C preferred stock) over (b) the fair value of the consideration
exchanged (the trust preferred securities); (3) the reversal of any unamortized discount
outstanding on the Series C preferred stock and (4) issuance costs. The reduction in total
stockholders equity related to U.S. Treasury exchange transaction was approximately $416 million,
which was principally impacted by the reduction of $935 million of aggregate liquidation preference
value of the Series C preferred stock, partially offset by $519 million discount on the junior
subordinated debentures described in item (2) above. This discount as well as the debt issue costs
will be amortized through interest expense using the interest yield method over the estimated life
of the junior subordinated debentures.
This particular exchange resulted in a favorable impact to accumulated deficit of $485.3 million,
which is also considered as part of earnings applicable to common stockholders in the earnings
(losses) per common share (EPS) computations. Refer to Note 18 to the consolidated financial
statements for a reconciliation of EPS.
The fair value of the trust preferred securities (junior subordinated debentures for purposes of
the Corporations financial statements) at the date of the exchange agreement was determined
internally using a discounted cash flow
60
model. The main considerations were (1) quarterly interest
payment of 5% until, but excluding December 5, 2013 and 9% thereafter;
(2) assumed maturity date of 30 years, and (3) assumed discount rate of 16%. The assumed discount
rate used for estimating the fair value was estimated by obtaining the yields at which
comparably-rated issuers were trading in the market and considering
the amount of trust preferred securities issued to the U.S. Treasury and the credit rating of the Corporation.
Note 16 Trust Preferred Securities
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, the Corporation had established four trusts (BanPonce Trust I,
Popular Capital Trust I, Popular North America Capital Trust I and Popular Capital Trust II) for
the purpose of issuing trust preferred securities (also referred to as capital securities) to the
public. The proceeds from such issuances, together with the proceeds of the related issuances of
common securities of the trusts (the common securities), were used by the trusts to purchase
junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (the junior subordinated debentures) issued by
the Corporation. The amounts outstanding in each of the four trusts as of September 30, 2009 were
impacted by the exchange offers described in Note 15 to these consolidated financial statements.
Also, as described in Note 15, in August 2009, the Corporation established the Popular Capital
Trust III for the purpose of exchanging the shares of Series C preferred stock held by the U.S.
Treasury for trust preferred securities issued by this trust. The proceeds from such issuances,
together with the proceeds of the related issuances of common securities of the trusts (the common
securities), were used by the trusts to purchase junior subordinated deferrable interest
debentures (the junior subordinated debentures) issued by the Corporation.
Refer to Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements for further information on the impact of
the Exchange Offer on the trust preferred securities.
The sole assets of the five trusts consisted of the junior subordinated debentures of the
Corporation and the related accrued interest receivable. These trusts are not consolidated by the
Corporation.
The junior subordinated debentures are included by the Corporation as notes payable in the
consolidated statements of condition, while the common securities issued by the issuer trusts are
included as other investment securities. The common securities of each trust are wholly-owned, or
indirectly wholly-owned, by the Corporation.
Financial data pertaining to the trusts as of September 30, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular North |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BanPonce |
|
Popular Capital |
|
America Capital |
|
Popular Capital |
|
Popular Capital |
Issuer |
|
Trust I |
|
Trust I |
|
Trust I |
|
Trust II |
|
Trust III |
|
Capital securities |
|
$ |
52,865 |
|
|
$ |
181,063 |
|
|
$ |
91,651 |
|
|
$ |
101,023 |
|
|
|
|
$935,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.000% until, but
excluding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 5, 2013 and |
Distribution rate |
|
|
8.327 |
% |
|
|
6.700 |
% |
|
|
6.564 |
% |
|
|
6.125 |
% |
|
9.000% thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common securities |
|
$ |
1,637 |
|
|
$ |
5,601 |
|
|
$ |
2,835 |
|
|
$ |
3,125 |
|
|
|
|
$1,000 |
Junior subordinated |
|
$ |
54,502 |
|
|
$ |
186,664 |
|
|
$ |
94,486 |
|
|
$ |
104,148 |
|
|
$936,000 aggregate |
debentures aggregate liquidation amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
liquidation preference amount (carrying value of $418,833, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of discount of $517,167) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stated maturity date |
|
|
February 2027 |
|
|
|
November 2033 |
|
|
|
September 2034 |
|
|
|
December 2034 |
|
|
No stated maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reference notes |
|
|
(a),(c),(f),(g) |
|
|
|
(b),(d),(f) |
|
|
|
(a),(c),(f) |
|
|
|
(b),(d),(f) |
|
|
|
|
(b),(d),(h) |
61
Financial data pertaining to the trusts as of December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular North |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BanPonce |
|
|
Popular Capital |
|
|
America Capital |
|
|
Popular Capital |
|
|
Popular Capital |
|
Issuer |
|
Trust I |
|
|
Trust I |
|
|
Trust I |
|
|
Trust II |
|
|
Trust III |
|
|
Capital securities |
|
$ |
144,000 |
|
|
$ |
300,000 |
|
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
|
$ |
130,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution rate |
|
|
8.327 |
% |
|
|
6.700 |
% |
|
|
6.564 |
% |
|
|
6.125 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Common securities |
|
$ |
4,640 |
|
|
$ |
9,279 |
|
|
$ |
7,732 |
|
|
$ |
4,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated
debentures aggregate
liquidation amount |
|
$ |
148,640 |
|
|
$ |
309,279 |
|
|
$ |
257,732 |
|
|
$ |
134,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stated maturity date |
|
February 2027 |
|
|
November 2033 |
|
|
September 2034 |
|
|
December 2034 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reference notes |
|
|
(a),(c),(e),(f),(g) |
|
|
|
(b),(d),(f) |
|
|
|
(a),(c),(f) |
|
|
|
(b),(d),(f) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Statutory business trust that is wholly-owned by Popular North America (PNA) and
indirectly wholly-owned by the Corporation. |
|
(b) |
|
Statutory business trust that is wholly-owned by the Corporation. |
|
(c) |
|
The obligations of PNA under the junior subordinated debentures and its guarantees of the
capital securities under the trust are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a subordinated
basis by the Corporation to the extent set forth in the applicable guarantee agreement. |
|
(d) |
|
These capital securities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a subordinated basis by
the Corporation to the extent set forth in the applicable guarantee agreement. |
|
(e) |
|
The original issuance was for $150 million. The Corporation had reacquired $6 million of
the 8.327% capital securities. |
|
(f) |
|
The Corporation has the right, subject to any required prior approval from the Federal
Reserve, to redeem after certain dates or upon the occurrence of certain events mentioned below,
the junior subordinated debentures at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount,
plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. The maturity of the junior
subordinated debentures may be shortened at the option of the Corporation prior to their stated
maturity dates (i) on or after the stated optional redemption dates stipulated in the agreements,
in whole at any time or in part from time to time, or (ii) in whole, but not in part, at any time
within 90 days following the occurrence and during the continuation of a tax event, an investment
company event or a capital treatment event as set forth in the indentures relating to the capital
securities, in each case subject to regulatory approval. |
|
(g) |
|
Same as (f) above, except that the investment company event does not apply for early
redemption. |
|
(h) |
|
The debentures are perpetual and may be redeemed by Popular at any time, subject to the
consent of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. |
Note 17 Stockholders Equity
On May 1, 2009, the stockholders of the Corporation approved an amendment to the Corporations
Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from
470,000,000 shares to 700,000,000 shares. The stockholders also approved a decrease in the par
value of the common stock of the Corporation from $6 per share to $0.01 per share. The decrease in
the par value of the Corporations common stock had no effect on the total dollar value of the
Corporations stockholders equity. During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation
transferred an amount equal to the product of the number of shares issued and outstanding and $5.99
(the difference between the old and new par values), from the common stock account to surplus
(additional paid-in capital).
On February 19, 2009, the Board of Directors of the Corporation resolved to retire 13,597,261
shares of the Corporations common stock that were held by the Corporation as treasury shares. It
is the Corporations accounting policy to account, at retirement, for the excess of the cost of the
treasury stock over its par value entirely to surplus. The impact of the retirement is depicted in
the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity.
The Corporations authorized preferred stock may be issued in one or more series, and the shares of
each series shall have such rights and preferences as shall be fixed by the Board of Directors when
authorizing the issuance of that particular series. The Corporations preferred stock outstanding
as of September 30, 2009 consisted of:
62
|
|
|
885,726 shares of 6.375% non-cumulative monthly income preferred stock, 2003 Series A,
no par value, liquidation preference value of $25 per share. Cash dividends declared and
paid on the 2003 Series A preferred stock amounted to $6.0 million for the nine months
September 30, 2009 (2008 $8.9 million). The Corporation did not pay dividends on the
Series A preferred stock during the third quarter of 2009 (2008 $3.0 million). |
|
|
|
|
1,120,665 shares of 8.25% non-cumulative monthly income preferred stock, 2008 Series B,
no par value, liquidation preference value of $25 per share. Cash dividends declared and
paid on the 2008 Series B preferred stock amounted $16.5 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 (2008 $11.3 million). The Corporation did not pay dividends on the
Series B preferred stock during the third quarter of 2009 (2008 $8.3 million). |
During the third quarter of 2009, the Corporation issued 357,510,076 new shares of common stock in
exchange of its Series A and Series B preferred stock and trust preferred securities, which
resulted in an increase in common stockholders equity of $923.0 million. This increase included
newly issued common stock and surplus of $612.4 million and a favorable impact to accumulated
deficit of $310.6 million, including $80.3 million in gains on the extinguishment of junior
subordinated debentures that relate to the trust preferred securities. Refer to Notes 15 and 16 for
information on the exchange offers.
As of December 31, 2008, the Corporation had outstanding 935,000 shares of its fixed rate
cumulative perpetual preferred stock, Series C, $1,000 liquidation preference per share issued to
the U.S. Department of Treasury (U.S. Treasury) in December 2008. Refer to Note 15 to the
consolidated financial statements for information on the exchange agreement dated August 21, 2009
related to these shares of preferred stock. In December 2008, the Corporation also issued to the
U.S. Treasury a warrant to purchase 20,932,836 shares of Populars common stock at an exercise
price of $6.70 per share, which continues outstanding in full and without amendment as of September
30, 2009. The Corporation paid cash dividends on the Series C preferred stock during the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 amounting to $20.8 million. No dividends on the Series C preferred
stock were paid in the third quarter of 2009.
Refer to the 2008 Annual Report for details on the terms of each class of preferred stock.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, no cash dividends per share were paid to shareholders
of the Corporations common stock (September 30, 2008 $0.16 per common share or $45.0 million).
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, cash dividends of $0.10 per common share
outstanding amounting to $28.2 million were paid to shareholders of the Corporations common stock
(September 30, 2008 $0.48 per common share or $134.7 million).
In June 2009, the Corporation announced the suspension of dividends on the Corporations common
stock and Series A and B preferred stock.
The dividends paid to holders of the Corporations preferred stock must be declared by the
Corporations Board of Directors. On a regular basis, the Board reviews various factors when
considering the payment of dividends on the Corporations outstanding preferred stock, including
its capital levels, recent and projected financial results and liquidity. The Board is not
obligated to declare dividends and dividends do not accumulate in the event they are not paid.
The Corporations common stock ranks junior to all series of preferred stock as to dividend rights
and/or as to rights on liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation. All series of
preferred stock are pari passu. Dividends on each series of preferred stock are payable if
declared. The Corporations ability to declare or pay dividends on, or purchase, redeem or
otherwise acquire, its common stock is subject to certain restrictions in the event that the
Corporation fails to pay or set aside full dividends on the preferred stock for the latest dividend
period. The ability of the Corporation to pay dividends in the future is limited by regulatory
requirements, legal availability of funds, recent
and projected financial results, capital levels and liquidity of the Corporation, general business
conditions and other factors deemed relevant by the Corporations Board of Directors.
63
The Banking Act of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico requires that a minimum of 10% of BPPRs net
income for the year be transferred to a statutory reserve account until such statutory reserve
equals the total of paid-in capital on common and preferred stock. Any losses incurred by a bank
must first be charged to retained earnings and then to the reserve fund. Amounts credited to the
reserve fund may not be used to pay dividends without the prior consent of the Puerto Rico
Commissioner of Financial Institutions. The failure to maintain sufficient statutory reserves would
preclude BPPR from paying dividends. BPPRs statutory reserve fund totaled $392 million as of
September 30, 2009 (December 31, 2008 $392 million; September 30, 2008 $374 million). There
were no transfers between the statutory reserve account and the retained earnings account during
the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
Note 18 Earnings (Losses) per Common Share
The computation of earnings (losses) per common share (EPS) follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands, except share information) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(121,561 |
) |
|
$ |
(211,173 |
) |
|
$ |
(340,720 |
) |
|
$ |
(52,761 |
) |
Net loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(3,427 |
) |
|
|
(457,370 |
) |
|
|
(19,972 |
) |
|
|
(488,242 |
) |
Preferred stock dividends (1) |
|
|
5,974 |
|
|
|
(11,229 |
) |
|
|
(39,857 |
) |
|
|
(20,210 |
) |
Preferred stock discount accretion |
|
|
(1,040 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,515 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Favorable impact from exchange of shares of Series A
and B preferred stock for common stock, net of
issuance costs (Refer to Note 15) |
|
|
230,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable impact from exchange of Series C preferred
stock to trust preferred securities (Refer to Note
15) |
|
|
485,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
485,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) applicable to common stock |
|
$ |
595,614 |
|
|
$ |
(679,772 |
) |
|
$ |
310,604 |
|
|
$ |
(561,213 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
425,672,578 |
|
|
|
281,489,469 |
|
|
|
330,325,348 |
|
|
|
280,841,638 |
|
Average potential common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding assuming dilution |
|
|
425,672,578 |
|
|
|
281,489,469 |
|
|
|
330,325,348 |
|
|
|
280,841,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted EPS from continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
$ |
(0.79 |
) |
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
(0.27 |
) |
Basic and diluted EPS from discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(1.63 |
) |
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
(1.73 |
) |
|
Basic and diluted EPS |
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
$ |
(2.42 |
) |
|
$ |
0.94 |
|
|
$ |
(2.00 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amount presented for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 represents the reversal of
dividends on Series C preferred stock considered accrued as of June 30, 2009 for EPS
purposes only. These cumulative dividends were not paid as dividends to the Series C
preferred stockholders
given the terms of the exchange agreement to trust
preferred securities, which was effected in August 2009. The exchange agreement is
discussed in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements. |
Potential common shares consist of common stock issuable under the assumed exercise of
stock options and under restricted stock awards using the treasury stock method. This method
assumes that the potential common shares are issued and the proceeds from exercise, in addition
to the amount of compensation cost attributed to future services, are used to purchase common
stock at the exercise date. The difference between the number of potential shares issued and the shares purchased is added as incremental shares to the actual number of shares outstanding to
compute diluted earnings per share. Warrants and stock options that result in lower potential shares issued than shares purchased under the treasury stock method are not included in the
computation of dilutive earnings per share since their inclusion would have an antidilutive
effect in earnings per share. For the quarter and nine-month period ended September 30, 2009,
there were 2,674,505 and 2,770,846 weighted average antidilutive stock options outstanding,
respectively (September 30, 2008 3,012,350 and 3,049,600). Additionally, the Corporation has
outstanding a warrant to purchase 20,932,836 shares of common stock, which have an antidilutive
effect as of September 30, 2009.
Note 19 Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees
Commercial letters of credit and stand-by letters of credit amounted to $18 million and $162
million, respectively, as
64
of September 30, 2009 (December 31, 2008 $19 million and $181 million;
September 30, 2008 $28 million and $175 million). There were also other commitments outstanding
and contingent liabilities, such as commitments to extend credit.
As of September 30, 2009, the Corporation recorded a liability of $0.6 million (December 31, 2008 -
$0.7 million and September 30, 2008 $0.6 million), which represents the fair value of the
obligations undertaken in issuing the guarantees under stand-by letters of credit. The fair value
approximates the fee received from the customer for issuing such commitments. These fees are
deferred and are recognized over the commitment period. The liability was included as part of
other liabilities in the consolidated statements of condition. The contract amounts in stand-by
letters of credit outstanding represent the maximum potential amount of future payments the
Corporation could be required to make under the guarantees in the event of nonperformance by the
customers. These stand-by letters of credit are used by the customer as a credit enhancement and
typically expire without being drawn upon. The Corporations stand-by letters of credit are
generally secured, and in the event of nonperformance by the customers, the Corporation has rights
to the underlying collateral provided, which normally includes cash and marketable securities, real
estate, receivables and others. Management does not anticipate any material losses related to these
instruments.
The Corporation securitizes mortgage loans into guaranteed mortgage-backed securities subject to
limited, and in certain instances, full or lifetime credit recourse on the loans that serve as
collateral for the mortgage-backed securities. Also, from time to time, the Corporation may sell
loans subject to certain representations and warranties from the Corporation to the purchaser.
These representations and warranties may relate to borrower creditworthiness, loan documentation,
collateral, prepayment and early payment defaults. The Corporation may be required to repurchase
the loans under the credit recourse agreements or representation and warranties. Generally, the
Corporation retains the right to service the loans when securitized or sold with credit recourse.
As of September 30, 2009, the Corporation serviced $4.5 billion (December 31, 2008 $4.9 billion
and September 30, 2008 $3.8 billion) in residential mortgage loans with credit recourse or other
servicer-provided credit enhancement. In the event of any customer default, pursuant to the credit
recourse provided, the Corporation is required to reimburse the third party investor for loss or
repurchase the loan. The maximum potential amount of future payments that the Corporation would be
required to make under the agreement in the event of nonperformance by the borrowers is equivalent
to the total outstanding balance of the residential mortgage loans serviced. In the event of
nonperformance, the Corporation has rights to the underlying collateral securing the mortgage loan.
Historically, the losses associated with these guarantees have not been significant. As of
September 30, 2009, the Corporation had reserves of approximately $16 million (December 31, 2008 -
$14 million and September 30, 2008 $8 million) to cover the estimated credit loss exposure. As of
September 30, 2009, the Corporation also serviced $13.2 billion (December 31, 2008 $12.7 billion
and September 30, 2008 $16.2 billion) in mortgage loans without recourse or other
servicer-provided credit enhancement. Although the Corporation may, from time to time, be required
to make advances to maintain a regular flow of scheduled interest and principal payments to
investors, including special purpose entities, this does not represent an insurance against losses.
These loans serviced are mostly insured by FHA, VA, and others.
As disclosed in the 2008 Annual Report, during 2008, the Corporation provided indemnifications for
the breach of certain representations or warranties in connection with certain sales of assets by
the discontinued operations of PFH. Generally, the primary indemnifications included:
|
|
Indemnification for breaches of certain key representations and warranties, including
corporate authority, due organization, required consents, no liens or encumbrances,
compliance with laws as to origination and servicing, no litigation relating to violation of
consumer lending laws, and absence of fraud. |
|
|
Indemnification for breaches of all other representations including general litigation,
general compliance with laws, ownership of all relevant licenses and permits, compliance with
the sellers obligations under the pooling and servicing agreements, lawful assignment of
contracts, valid security interest, good title and all files and documents are true and
complete in all material respects, among others. |
Certain of the representations and warranties covered under these indemnifications expire within a
definite time period; others survive until the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations,
and others do not expire. Certain of the indemnifications are subject to a cap or maximum aggregate
liability defined as a percentage of the purchase
65
price. In the event of a breach of a
representation, the Corporation may be required to repurchase the loan. The indemnifications
outstanding as of September 30, 2009 do not require the repurchase of loans under credit recourse
obligations. As of September 30, 2009, the Corporation has an indemnification reserve in other
liabilities of approximately $19 million for potential future claims under the indemnity clauses
(December 31, 2008 $16 million). If there is a breach of a representation or warranty, the
Corporation may be required to repurchase the loan. Popular, Inc. Holding Company and Popular North
America have agreed to guarantee certain obligations of PFH with respect to the indemnification
obligations. In addition, the Corporation agreed to restrict $10 million in cash or cash
equivalents for a period of one year, which expired in November 3, 2009.
The Corporation has also established reserves for representations and warranties on sold loans by
its subsidiary E-LOAN (the Company). As such, although the risk of loss or default is generally
assumed by the investors, the Company is required to make certain representations relating to
borrower creditworthiness, loan documentation and collateral. To the extent that the Company does
not comply with such representations, it may be required to repurchase loans or indemnify
investors for any related losses or borrower defaults. In connection with a majority of its loan
sale agreements, E-LOAN is also responsible for ensuring that the borrower makes a minimum number
of payments on each loan, or the Company may be required to refund the premium paid to it by the
loan purchaser. These reserves, which are included as part of other liabilities in the
consolidated statement of condition, amounted to $21 million as of September 30, 2009.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Corporation sold a lease financing portfolio
of approximately $0.3 billion. In conjunction with this sale, the Corporation recognized an
indemnification reserve of approximately $11 million as of
September 30, 2009 to provide for any losses on the breach of
certain representations and warranties included in the sale agreement. This reserve is included as
part of other liabilities in the consolidated statement of condition.
Popular, Inc. Holding Company (PIHC) fully and unconditionally guarantees certain borrowing
obligations issued by certain of its wholly-owned consolidated subsidiaries totaling $698 million
as of September 30, 2009 (December 31, 2008 $1.7 billion and September 30, 2008 $2.3 billion).
In addition, as of September 30, 2009, PIHC fully and
unconditionally guaranteed on a subordinated basis $1.4 billion of
capital securities (trust preferred securities) (December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008 $824
million) issued by wholly-owned issuing trust entities to the extent
set forth in the applicable guarantee agreement. Refer to Note 16 to the consolidated
financial statements for further information.
Legal Proceedings
The Corporation is a defendant in a number of legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of
business. Based on the opinion of legal counsel, management believes that the final disposition of
these matters, except for the matters described below which are in very early stages and management
cannot currently predict their outcome, will not have a material adverse effect on the
Corporations business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
Between May 14, 2009 and November 9, 2009, five putative class actions and two derivative claims
were filed in the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico and the Puerto Rico
Court of First Instance, San Juan Part, against Popular, Inc. and certain of its directors and
officers, among others. Two of the class actions (Hoff v. Popular, Inc., et al. and Otero v.
Popular, Inc., et al.) have now been consolidated. On October 19, 2009, the plaintiffs in the Hoff
case filed an amended complaint which includes as defendants the underwriters in the offering of
the Series B Preferred Stock in May 2008. The consolidated action purports to be on behalf of
purchasers of our securities between January 23, 2008 and February 19, 2009 and alleges that the
defendants violated Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and
Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act by issuing a series of allegedly false and/or misleading
statements and/or omitting to disclose material facts necessary to make statements made by us not
false and misleading. The consolidated action also alleges that the defendants violated Section
11, Section 12(a)(2) and Section 15 of the Securities Act by making allegedly untrue statements
and/or omitting to disclose material facts necessary to make statements made by us not false and
misleading in connection with the offering of the Series B Preferred Stock in May 2008. The
consolidated securities class action complaint seeks class certification, an award of
compensatory damages and reasonable costs and expenses, including counsel fees. The Corporation
and the individual defendants expect to move to dismiss the consolidated securities class action
complaint. The remaining class actions (Walsh v. Popular, Inc. et al.; Montanez v. Popular, Inc.,
et al.; and Dougan v. Popular, Inc., et al.) purport to be on behalf of employees participating in
the Popular, Inc. U.S.A. 401(k)
66
Savings and Investment Plan and the Popular, Inc. Puerto Rico
Savings and Investment Plan between January 23, 2008 and the dates of the complaints to recover
losses pursuant to Sections 409, 502(a)(2) and 502(a)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security
Act (ERISA) against the Corporation, certain directors, officers and members of plan committees,
each of whom is alleged to be a plan fiduciary. The complaints allege that the defendants breached
their alleged fiduciary obligations by, among other things, failing to eliminate Popular stock as
an investment alternative in the plans. The complaints seek to recover alleged losses to the plans
and equitable relief, including injunctive relief and a constructive trust, along with costs and
attorneys fees. These ERISA actions have now been consolidated. Pursuant to a stipulation among
the parties, plaintiffs are due to file a consolidated complaint on November 30, 2009. The
derivative claims (Garcia v. Carrión, et al. and Diaz v. Carrión, et al.) are brought purportedly
for the benefit of nominal defendant Popular, Inc. against certain executive officers and directors
and allege breaches of fiduciary duty, waste of assets and abuse of control in connection with our
issuance of allegedly false and misleading financial statements and financial reports and the
offering of the Series B Preferred Stock. The derivative complaints seek a judgment that the action
is a proper derivative action, an award of damages and restitution, and costs and disbursements,
including reasonable attorneys fees, costs and expenses. On October 9, 2009, the Court
coordinated the Garcia action with the consolidated securities class action for purposes of
discovery. On October 15, 2009, the Corporation and the individual defendants moved to dismiss the
Garcia complaint for failure to make a demand on the Board of Directors prior to initiating
litigation. Pursuant to a stipulation among the parties, plaintiffs are due to file an amended
complaint on November 20, 2009. The Diaz case, filed in local court, has been removed to the U.S.
District Court for the District of Puerto Rico. On October 13, 2009, the Corporation and the
individual defendants moved to consolidate the Garcia and Diaz actions. On October 26, 2009,
plaintiff moved to remand the Diaz case to the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance and to stay
defendants consolidation motion pending the outcome of the remand proceedings.
At this early stage, it is not possible for management to assess the probability of an adverse
outcome, or reasonably estimate the amount of any potential loss. It is possible that the ultimate
resolution of these matters, if unfavorable, may be material to our results of operations.
Note 20 Other Service Fees
The caption of other service fees in the consolidated statements of operations consists of the
following major categories that exceed one percent of the aggregate of total interest income plus
non-interest income for the quarters and nine-months ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Debit card fees |
|
$ |
26,986 |
|
|
$ |
28,170 |
|
|
$ |
80,867 |
|
|
$ |
79,880 |
|
Credit card fees and discounts |
|
|
23,497 |
|
|
|
27,138 |
|
|
|
70,951 |
|
|
|
81,664 |
|
Processing fees |
|
|
13,638 |
|
|
|
13,044 |
|
|
|
40,773 |
|
|
|
38,587 |
|
Insurance fees |
|
|
11,463 |
|
|
|
12,378 |
|
|
|
36,014 |
|
|
|
38,254 |
|
Sale and administration of
investment products |
|
|
8,181 |
|
|
|
6,890 |
|
|
|
25,204 |
|
|
|
25,966 |
|
Other fees |
|
|
13,849 |
|
|
|
7,682 |
|
|
|
44,775 |
|
|
|
42,298 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
97,614 |
|
|
$ |
95,302 |
|
|
$ |
298,584 |
|
|
$ |
306,649 |
|
|
67
Note 21 Pension and Postretirement Benefits
The Corporation has noncontributory defined benefit pension plans and supplementary benefit pension
plans for regular employees of certain of its subsidiaries.
In February 2009, BPPRs non-contributory defined pension and benefit restoration plans (the
Plans) were frozen with regards to all future benefit accruals after April 30, 2009. This action
was taken by the Corporation to generate significant cost savings in light of the severe economic
downturn and decline in the Corporations financial performance; this measure will be reviewed
periodically as economic conditions and the Corporations financial situation improve. The pension
obligation and the assets were remeasured as of February 28, 2009. The impact of the plans
curtailment was included in the first quarter of 2009 as disclosed in the table below.
The components of net periodic pension cost for the quarters and nine months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Plans |
|
Benefit Restoration Plans |
|
|
Quarters ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
Quarters ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Service cost |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,315 |
|
|
$ |
3,330 |
|
|
$ |
6,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
182 |
|
|
$ |
341 |
|
|
$ |
546 |
|
Interest cost |
|
$ |
8,041 |
|
|
|
8,611 |
|
|
|
24,630 |
|
|
|
25,833 |
|
|
$ |
391 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
1,225 |
|
|
|
1,383 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(6,221 |
) |
|
|
(10,169 |
) |
|
|
(19,320 |
) |
|
|
(30,507 |
) |
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
(420 |
) |
|
|
(932 |
) |
|
|
(1,260 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
Amortization of net loss |
|
|
3,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
Net periodic cost |
|
$ |
5,023 |
|
|
$ |
824 |
|
|
$ |
19,274 |
|
|
$ |
2,472 |
|
|
$ |
269 |
|
|
$ |
382 |
|
|
$ |
1,309 |
|
|
$ |
1,145 |
|
One-time settlement gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
Curtailment gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(341 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost |
|
$ |
5,023 |
|
|
$ |
824 |
|
|
$ |
20,094 |
|
|
$ |
2,472 |
|
|
$ |
269 |
|
|
$ |
358 |
|
|
$ |
968 |
|
|
$ |
1,121 |
|
|
The Plans experienced a steep decline in the fair value of plan assets for the year ended
December 31, 2008, which resulted in a significant increase in the actuarial loss component of
accumulated other comprehensive income as of December 31, 2008. The increase in net periodic
pension cost, shown above, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 versus the same period in
2008 was primarily due to the amortization of actuarial loss into pension expense and a lower
expected return on plan assets.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, contributions made to the pension and restoration
plans amounted to approximately $11.0 million. The total contributions expected to be paid during
the year 2009 for the pension and restoration plans amount to approximately $14.4 million.
The Corporation also provides certain health care benefits for retired employees of certain
subsidiaries. The components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the quarters and nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
549 |
|
|
$ |
485 |
|
|
$ |
1,647 |
|
|
$ |
1,455 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
2,026 |
|
|
|
1,967 |
|
|
|
6,078 |
|
|
|
5,901 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
(261 |
) |
|
|
(262 |
) |
|
|
(784 |
) |
|
|
(786 |
) |
|
Total net periodic cost |
|
$ |
2,314 |
|
|
$ |
2,190 |
|
|
$ |
6,941 |
|
|
$ |
6,570 |
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, contributions made to the postretirement benefit
plan amounted to approximately $3.4 million. The total contributions expected to be paid during the
year 2009 for the postretirement benefit plan amount to approximately $5.0 million.
68
Note 22 Restructuring Plans
As indicated in the 2008 Annual Report, on October 17, 2008, the Board of Directors of Popular,
Inc. approved two restructuring plans for the BPNA reportable segment. The objective of the
restructuring plans is to improve profitability in the short-term, increase liquidity and lower
credit costs and, over time, achieve a greater integration with corporate functions in Puerto Rico.
BPNA Restructuring Plan
The restructuring plan for BPNAs banking operations (the BPNA Restructuring Plan) contemplates
the following measures: closing, consolidating or selling approximately 40 underperforming branches
in all existing markets; the shutting down, sale or downsizing of lending businesses that do not
generate deposits or fee income; and the reduction of general expenses associated with functions
supporting the aforementioned branch and balance sheet initiatives. The Corporation expects to
complete the BPNA Restructuring Plan by the end of 2009. The following table details the expenses
recognized during the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2009 that were associated with
this particular restructuring plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
(In thousands) |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
Personnel costs |
|
$ |
1,054 |
(a) |
|
$ |
5,332 |
(a) |
Net occupancy expenses |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
453 |
(b) |
|
Total restructuring costs |
|
$ |
1,101 |
|
|
$ |
5,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Severance, retention bonuses and other benefits |
|
(b) |
|
Impairment on long-lived assets |
As of September 30, 2009, the BPNA Restructuring Plan has resulted in combined charges for
2008 and 2009, broken down as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairments on |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
long-lived assets |
|
Restructuring costs |
|
Total |
|
Year ended December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
5,481 |
|
|
$ |
14,195 |
|
|
$ |
19,676 |
|
Quarter ended: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
2,920 |
|
|
|
3,373 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,431 |
|
|
|
1,431 |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,101 |
|
|
|
1,101 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,934 |
|
|
$ |
19,647 |
|
|
$ |
25,581 |
|
|
The following table presents the activity during 2009 in the reserve for restructuring costs
associated with the BPNA Restructuring Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Restructuring Costs |
|
Balance as of January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
10,852 |
|
Charges during the quarter ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
3,373 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(4,585 |
) |
|
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
9,640 |
|
Charges during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
1,431 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(3,262 |
) |
|
Balance at June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
7,809 |
|
Charges during the quarter ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
1,101 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(1,170 |
) |
|
Balance as of September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
7,740 |
|
|
The reserve balances as of September 30, 2009 were mostly related to lease terminations.
Additional restructuring costs expected to be incurred associated with this restructuring plan are
estimated at $3.3 million and are mostly associated with lease terminations.
69
E-LOAN 2008 Restructuring Plan
The E-LOAN 2008 Restructuring Plan involved E-LOAN ceasing to operate as a direct lender, an event
that occurred in late 2008. E-LOAN continues to market deposit accounts under its name for the
benefit of BPNA. As part of the 2008 plan, all operational and support functions were transferred
to BPNA and EVERTEC. The 2008 E-LOAN Restructuring Plan is substantially complete as of September
30, 2009 since all operational and support functions were transferred to BPNA and EVERTEC and loan
servicing was transferred to a third-party provider. As of September 30, 2009, E-LOANs workforce
totaled 8 FTEs.
The following table details the expenses recognized during the quarter and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 that were associated with the E-LOAN 2008 Restructuring Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
(In thousands) |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
Personnel costs |
|
$ |
243 |
(a) |
|
$ |
2,946 |
(a) |
|
Total restructuring costs |
|
$ |
243 |
|
|
$ |
2,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Severance, retention bonuses and other benefits |
As of September 30, 2009, the E-LOAN 2008 Restructuring Plan has resulted in combined charges
for 2008 and 2009, broken down as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairments on |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
long-lived assets |
|
Restructuring costs |
|
Total |
|
Year ended December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
18,867 |
|
|
$ |
3,131 |
|
|
$ |
21,998 |
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,818 |
|
|
|
1,818 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
885 |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
18,867 |
|
|
$ |
6,077 |
|
|
$ |
24,944 |
|
|
The following table presents the activity in the reserve for restructuring costs associated
with the E-LOAN 2008 Restructuring Plan for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Costs |
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
3,015 |
|
Charges during the quarter ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
1,818 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(1,528 |
) |
|
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
3,305 |
|
Charges during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
885 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(1,708 |
) |
|
Balance at June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
2,482 |
|
Charges during the quarter ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
243 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(1,667 |
) |
|
Balance as of September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,058 |
|
|
The reserve balance as of September 30, 2009 was mostly associated with personnel costs.
Additional restructuring costs expected to be incurred associated with this restructuring plan are
estimated at $0.2 million.
The E-LOAN Restructuring Plan charges are part of the results of the BPNA reportable segment.
70
Note 23 Income Taxes
The reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits, including accrued interest, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Balance as of January 1 |
|
$ |
45.2 |
|
|
$ |
22.2 |
|
Additions for tax positions January through March |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Reductions as a result of settlements January through March |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31 |
|
$ |
46.3 |
|
|
$ |
23.6 |
|
Additions for tax positions April through June |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
Balance as of June 30 |
|
$ |
48.5 |
|
|
$ |
28.0 |
|
Additions
for tax positions-July through September |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Reductions as a result of lapse of the applicable statute of
limitation |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30 |
|
$ |
47.5 |
|
|
$ |
29.1 |
|
|
As of September 30, 2009, the related accrued interest approximated $6.3 million (September
30, 2008 $4.1 million). Management determined that as of September 30, 2009 and 2008 there was no
need to accrue for the payment of penalties.
After consideration of the effect on U.S. federal tax of unrecognized U.S. state tax benefits, the
total amount of unrecognized tax benefits, including U.S. and Puerto Rico, that if recognized,
would affect the Corporations effective tax rate, was approximately $45.7 million as of September
30, 2009 (September 30, 2008 $27.8 million).
The amount of unrecognized tax benefits may increase or decrease in the future for various reasons
including adding amounts for current tax year positions, expiration of open income tax returns due
to the statutes of limitation, changes in managements judgment about the level of uncertainty,
status of examinations, litigation and legislative activity and the addition or elimination of
uncertain tax positions.
The Corporation and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in Puerto Rico, the U.S. federal
jurisdiction, various U.S. states and political subdivisions, and foreign jurisdictions. As of
September 30, 2009, the following years remain subject to examination in the U.S. Federal
jurisdiction 2007 and thereafter; and in the Puerto Rico jurisdiction 2005 and thereafter. The
U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) commenced an examination of the Corporations U.S. operations
tax return for 2007 which is still in process. Although the outcomes of the tax audits are
uncertain, the Corporation believes that adequate amounts of tax and interest have been provided
for any adjustments that are expected to result from open years. The Corporation does not
anticipate a significant change to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12
months.
71
The following table presents the components of the Corporations deferred tax assets and
liabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax credits available for carryforward and other credits available |
|
$ |
10,346 |
|
|
$ |
74,676 |
|
Net operating losses carryforward available |
|
|
805,878 |
|
|
|
670,326 |
|
Deferred compensation |
|
|
1,797 |
|
|
|
2,628 |
|
Postretirement and pension benefits |
|
|
126,450 |
|
|
|
149,027 |
|
Deferred loan origination fees |
|
|
8,886 |
|
|
|
8,603 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
511,624 |
|
|
|
368,690 |
|
Deferred gains |
|
|
14,315 |
|
|
|
18,307 |
|
Intercompany deferred gains |
|
|
7,016 |
|
|
|
11,263 |
|
SFAS. No 159 - Fair value option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,132 |
|
Other temporary differences |
|
|
36,320 |
|
|
|
35,323 |
|
|
Total gross deferred tax assets |
|
|
1,522,632 |
|
|
|
1,351,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Differences between assigned values and the tax basis of the
assets and liabilities recognized in purchase business combinations |
|
|
24,619 |
|
|
|
21,017 |
|
Deferred loan origination costs |
|
|
10,235 |
|
|
|
11,228 |
|
Accelerated depreciation |
|
|
7,991 |
|
|
|
9,348 |
|
Unrealized net gain on securities available-for-sale |
|
|
35,231 |
|
|
|
78,761 |
|
Unrealized gain on derivatives |
|
|
1,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other temporary differences |
|
|
13,294 |
|
|
|
13,232 |
|
|
Total gross deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
92,446 |
|
|
|
133,586 |
|
|
Gross deferred tax assets less liabilities |
|
|
1,430,186 |
|
|
|
1,218,389 |
|
Less: Valuation allowance |
|
|
1,049,604 |
|
|
|
861,018 |
|
|
Net deferred tax assets |
|
$ |
380,582 |
|
|
$ |
357,371 |
|
|
A deferred tax asset should be reduced by a valuation allowance if based on the weight of all
available evidence, it is more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50%) that some portion or
the entire deferred tax asset will not be realized. The valuation allowance should be sufficient to
reduce the deferred tax asset to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. The
determination of whether a deferred tax asset is realizable is based on weighing all available
evidence, including both positive and negative evidence. The realization of deferred tax assets,
including carryforwards and deductible temporary differences, depends upon the existence of
sufficient taxable income of the same character during the carryback or carryforward period.
Accounting guidance requires the consideration of all sources of taxable income available to
realize the deferred tax asset, including the future reversal of existing temporary differences,
future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards, taxable
income in carryback years and tax-planning strategies.
The Corporations U.S. mainland operations are in a cumulative loss position for the three-year
period ended September 30, 2009. For purposes of assessing the realization of the deferred tax
assets in the U.S. mainland, this cumulative taxable loss position in recent years and the
financial results of the continuing business in the U.S. outweighed the positive evidence
objectively verifiable and has caused the Corporation to conclude that it is more likely than not
that the Corporation will not be able to realize the related deferred tax assets in the future. As
of September 30, 2009, the Corporations U.S. mainland operations net deferred tax assets amounted
to $1.03 billion with a valuation allowance of $1.05 billion. The additional valuation allowance of
$17 million is related to a deferred tax liability on the indefinite-lived intangible assets,
mainly at BPNA. Management will continue to reassess the realization of the deferred tax assets
each reporting period.
72
Note 24 Stock-Based Compensation
The Corporation maintained a Stock Option Plan (the Stock Option Plan), which permitted the
granting of incentive awards in the form of qualified stock options, incentive stock options, or
non-statutory stock options of the Corporation. In April 2004, the Corporations shareholders
adopted the Popular, Inc. 2004 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the Incentive Plan), which replaced and
superseded the Stock Option Plan. Nevertheless, all outstanding award grants under the Stock Option
Plan continue to remain in effect as of September 30, 2009 under the original terms of the Stock
Option Plan.
Stock Option Plan
Employees and directors of the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries were eligible to participate
in the Stock Option Plan. The Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee of the Board had the
absolute discretion to determine the individuals that were eligible to participate in the Stock
Option Plan. This plan provides for the issuance of Popular, Inc.s common stock at a price equal
to its fair market value at the grant date, subject to certain plan provisions. The shares are to
be made available from authorized but unissued shares of common stock or treasury stock. The
Corporations policy has been to use authorized but unissued shares of common stock to cover each
grant. The maximum option term is ten years from the date of grant. Unless an option agreement
provides otherwise, all options granted are 20% exercisable after the first year and an additional
20% is exercisable after each subsequent year, subject to an acceleration clause at termination of
employment due to retirement.
The following table presents information on stock options outstanding as of September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Not in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
Remaining Life of |
|
Options |
|
Weighted-Average |
Exercise Price |
|
Options |
|
Exercise Price of |
|
Options Outstanding |
|
Exercisable |
|
Exercise Price of |
Range per Share |
|
Outstanding |
|
Options Outstanding |
|
In Years |
|
(fully vested) |
|
Options Exercisable |
|
$ |
14.39 - $18.50 |
|
|
|
1,320,826 |
|
|
$ |
15.84 |
|
|
|
2.99 |
|
|
|
1,320,826 |
|
|
$ |
15.84 |
|
|
|
$ |
19.25 - $27.20 |
|
|
|
1,353,679 |
|
|
$ |
25.20 |
|
|
|
4.73 |
|
|
|
1,264,697 |
|
|
$ |
25.06 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
14.39 - $27.20 |
|
|
|
2,674,505 |
|
|
$ |
20.57 |
|
|
|
3.87 |
|
|
|
2,585,523 |
|
|
$ |
20.35 |
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding as of September 30, 2009 was $0.3 million
(September 30, 2008 $2.6 million). There was no intrinsic value of options exercisable as of
September 30, 2009 and 2008.
The following table summarizes the stock option activity and related information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
Weighted-Average |
(Not in thousands) |
|
Outstanding |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2008 |
|
|
3,092,192 |
|
|
$ |
20.64 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(40,842 |
) |
|
|
26.29 |
|
Expired |
|
|
(85,507 |
) |
|
|
19.67 |
|
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
2,965,843 |
|
|
$ |
20.59 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(46,657 |
) |
|
|
26.20 |
|
Expired |
|
|
(244,681 |
) |
|
|
19.74 |
|
|
Outstanding as of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
2,674,505 |
|
|
$ |
20.57 |
|
|
73
The stock options exercisable as of September 30, 2009 totaled 2,585,523 (September 30, 2008 -
2,694,783). There were no stock options exercised during the quarters and nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008. Thus, there was no intrinsic value of options exercised during the
quarters and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
There were no new stock option grants issued by the Corporation under the Stock Option Plan during
2008 and 2009.
For the quarter ended September 30, 2009, the Corporation recognized $0.1 million of stock option
expense, with an income tax expense of $40 thousand (September 30, 2008 $0.3 million, with a tax
benefit of $0.1 million). For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Corporation recognized
$162 thousand of stock option expense, with a tax benefit of $45 thousand (September 30, 2008 -
$0.8 million, with a tax benefit of $0.3 million). The total unrecognized compensation cost as of
September 30, 2009 related to non-vested stock option awards was $0.1 million and is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 3 months.
Incentive Plan
The Incentive Plan permits the granting of incentive awards in the form of Annual Incentive Awards,
Long-term Performance Unit Awards, Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock,
Restricted Units or Performance Shares. Participants in the Incentive Plan are designated by the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (or its delegate as determined by the Board).
Employees and directors of the Corporation and / or any of its subsidiaries are eligible to
participate in the Incentive Plan. The shares may be made available from common stock purchased by
the Corporation for such purpose, authorized but unissued shares of common stock or treasury stock.
The Corporations policy with respect to the shares of restricted stock has been to purchase such
shares in the open market to cover each grant.
Under the Incentive Plan, the Corporation has issued restricted shares, which become vested based
on the employees continued service with Popular. Unless otherwise stated in an agreement, the
compensation cost associated with the shares of restricted stock is determined based on a two-prong
vesting schedule. The first part is vested ratably over five years commencing at the date of grant
and the second part is vested at termination of employment after attainment of 55 years of age and
10 years of service. The five-year vesting part is accelerated at termination of employment after
attaining 55 years of age and 10 years of service.
The
following table summarizes the restricted stock activity under the
Incentive Plan for members of management:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
Weighted-Average |
(Not in thousands) |
|
Stock |
|
Grant Date Fair Value |
|
Non-vested at January 1, 2008 |
|
|
303,686 |
|
|
$ |
22.37 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(50,648 |
) |
|
|
20.33 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(4,699 |
) |
|
|
19.95 |
|
|
Non-vested as of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
248,339 |
|
|
$ |
22.83 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(104,791 |
) |
|
|
21.93 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(3,627 |
) |
|
|
19.95 |
|
|
Non-vested as of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
139,921 |
|
|
$ |
23.56 |
|
|
During the quarters and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, no shares of
restricted stock were awarded to management under the Incentive Plan corresponding to the
performance of 2008 and 2007.
Beginning in 2007, the Corporation authorized the issuance of performance shares, in addition to
restricted shares, under the Incentive Plan. The performance shares award consists of the
opportunity to receive shares of Popular, Inc.s common stock provided the Corporation achieves
certain performance goals during a 3-year performance cycle. The compensation cost associated with
the performance shares will be recorded ratably over a three-year
74
performance
period. The performance shares will be granted at the end of the three-year period and will be
vested at grant date, except when the participants employment is terminated by the Corporation
without cause. In such case, the participant will receive a pro-rata amount of shares calculated as
if the Corporation would have met the performance goal for the performance period. As of September
30, 2009, 35,397 (September 30, 2008 6,528) shares have been granted under this plan to
terminated employees.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, the Corporation recognized $0.6 million of restricted
stock expense related to management incentive awards, with a tax benefit of $0.2 million (September
30, 2008 $0.5 million, with a tax benefit of $0.2 million). For the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2009, the Corporation recognized $1.4 million of restricted stock expense related to
management incentive awards, with a tax benefit of $0.5 million (September 30, 2008 $1.7 million,
with a tax benefit of $0.6 million). The fair market value of the restricted stock vested was $1.8
million at grant date and $0.3 million at vesting date. This triggers a shortfall of $1.5 million
that was recorded as an additional income tax expense at the applicable income tax rate net of
deferred tax asset valuation allowance since the Corporation does not have any surplus due to
windfalls. During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, the Corporation recognized $0.3 million of
performance share expense, with a tax benefit of $107 thousand (September 30, 2008 $12 thousand,
with a tax benefit of $5 thousand). During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, the
Corporation recognized $0.6 million of performance share expense, with a tax benefit of $129
thousand (September 30, 2008 $0.9 million, with a tax benefit of $0.3 million). The total
unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock awards and performance shares
to members of management as of September 30, 2009 was $6.6 million and is expected to be recognized
over a weighted-average period of 2.2 years.
The
following table summarizes the restricted stock activity under the
Incentive Plan for members of the Board of Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
Weighted-Average |
(Not in thousands) |
|
Stock |
|
Grant Date Fair Value |
|
Non-vested at January 1, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
56,025 |
|
|
$ |
10.75 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(56,025 |
) |
|
|
10.75 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested as of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
251,993 |
|
|
$ |
2.65 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(251,993 |
) |
|
|
2.65 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested as of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, the Corporation granted 78,070 (September 30,
2008 5,467) shares of restricted stock to members of the Board of Directors of Popular, Inc. and
BPPR, which became vested at grant date. During this period, the Corporation recognized $0.1
million of restricted stock expense related to these restricted stock grants, with a tax benefit of
$47 thousand (September 30, 2008 $0.1 million, with a tax benefit of $45 thousand). For the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, the Corporation granted 251,993 (September 30, 2008 -
50,815) shares of restricted stock to members of the Board of Directors of Popular, Inc. and BPPR,
which became vested at grant date. During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, the
Corporation recognized $0.3 million of restricted stock expense related to these restricted stock
grants, with a tax benefit of $141 thousand (September 30, 2008 $0.3 million, with a tax benefit
of $0.1 million). The fair value at vesting date of the restricted stock vested during 2009 for
directors was $0.7 million.
75
Note 25 Supplemental Disclosure on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Additional disclosures on non-cash activities for the nine-month period are listed in the following
table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
Non-cash activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans transferred to other real estate |
|
$ |
116,200 |
|
|
$ |
78,521 |
|
Loans transferred to other property |
|
|
29,331 |
|
|
|
32,725 |
|
|
Total loans transferred to foreclosed assets |
|
|
145,531 |
|
|
|
111,246 |
|
Transfers from loans held-in-portfolio to loans
held-for-sale |
|
|
32,270 |
|
|
|
690,222 |
|
Transfers from loans held-for-sale to loans
held-in-portfolio |
|
|
175,043 |
|
|
|
60,032 |
|
Loans securitized into investment securities (a) |
|
|
1,112,061 |
|
|
|
1,357,249 |
|
Recognition of mortgage servicing rights on
securitizations or asset
transfers |
|
|
19,640 |
|
|
|
22,033 |
|
Treasury stock retired |
|
|
207,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in par value of common stock |
|
|
1,689,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trust preferred securities exchanged for new
common stock issued: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust preferred securities exchanged |
|
|
(397,911 |
) |
|
|
|
|
New common stock issued |
|
|
317,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock exchanged for new common stock
issued: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock exchanged (Series A and B) |
|
|
(524,079 |
) |
|
|
|
|
New common stock issued |
|
|
293,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock exchanged for new trust
preferred securities issued: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock exchanged (Series C) |
|
|
(901,165 |
) |
|
|
|
|
New trust
preferred securities issued (junior subordinated debentures) |
|
|
415,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes loans securitized into investment securities and
subsequently sold before quarter end. |
Note 26 Segment Reporting
The Corporations corporate structure consists of three reportable segments Banco Popular de
Puerto Rico, Banco Popular North America and EVERTEC. These reportable segments pertain only to the
continuing operations of Popular, Inc. As previously indicated in Note 3 to the consolidated
financial statements, the operations of Popular Financial Holdings, which were considered a
reportable segment in June 2008, were discontinued in the third quarter of 2008. Also, a corporate
group has been defined to support the reportable segments.
Management determined the reportable segments based on the internal reporting used to evaluate
performance and to assess where to allocate resources. The segments were determined based on the
organizational structure, which focuses primarily on the markets the segments serve, as well as on
the products and services offered by the segments.
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico:
Given that Banco Popular de Puerto Rico constitutes a significant portion of the Corporations
results of operations and total assets as of September 30, 2009, additional disclosures are
provided for the business areas included in this reportable segment, as described below:
|
|
Commercial banking represents the Corporations banking operations conducted at BPPR, which
are targeted mainly to corporate, small and middle size businesses. It includes aspects of the
lending and depository businesses, as well as other finance and advisory services. BPPR
allocates funds across business areas based on duration matched transfer pricing at market
rates. This area also incorporates income related with the investment
of excess funds, as well as a proportionate share of the investment function of BPPR.
|
76
|
|
Consumer and retail banking represents the branch banking operations of BPPR which focus on
retail clients. It includes the consumer lending business operations of BPPR, as well as the
lending operations of Popular Auto and Popular Mortgage. Popular Auto focuses on auto and
lease financing, while Popular Mortgage focuses principally in residential mortgage loan
originations. The consumer and retail banking area also incorporates income related with the
investment of excess funds from the branch network, as well as a proportionate share of the
investment function of BPPR. |
|
|
Other financial services include the trust and asset management service units of BPPR, the
brokerage and investment banking operations of Popular Securities, and the insurance agency
and reinsurance businesses of Popular Insurance, Popular Insurance V.I., Popular Risk
Services, and Popular Life Re. Most of the services that are provided by these subsidiaries
generate profits based on fee income. |
Banco Popular North America:
Banco Popular North Americas reportable segment consists of the banking operations of BPNA,
E-LOAN, Popular Equipment Finance, Inc. and Popular Insurance Agency, U.S.A. Popular Equipment
Finance, Inc. sold a substantial portion of its lease financing portfolio during the quarter ended
March 31, 2009 and also ceased originations as part of BPNAs strategic plan. BPNA operates through
a retail branch network in the U.S. mainland, while E-LOAN supports BPNAs deposit gathering
through its online platform. All direct lending activities at E-LOAN were ceased during the fourth
quarter of 2008. Popular Insurance Agency, U.S.A. offers investment and insurance services across
the BPNA branch network.
EVERTEC:
This reportable segment includes the financial transaction processing and technology functions of
the Corporation, including EVERTEC, with offices in Puerto Rico, Florida, the Dominican Republic
and Venezuela; and ATH Costa Rica, S.A., EVERTEC LATINOAMERICA, SOCIEDAD ANONIMA and T.I.I. Smart
Solutions Inc. located in Costa Rica. In addition, this reportable segment includes the equity
investments in Consorcio de Tarjetas Dominicanas, S.A. (CONTADO) and Servicios Financieros, S.A.
de C.V. (Serfinsa), which operate in the Dominican Republic and El Salvador, respectively. This
segment provides processing and technology services to other units of the Corporation as well as to
third parties, principally other financial institutions in Puerto Rico, the Caribbean and Central
America.
The Corporate group consists primarily of the holding companies: Popular, Inc., Popular North
America and Popular International Bank, excluding the equity investments in CONTADO and Serfinsa,
which due to the nature of their operations are included as part of the EVERTEC segment. The
Corporate group also includes the expenses of the four administrative corporate areas that are
identified as critical for the organization: Finance, Risk Management, Legal and People, and
Communications.
For segment reporting purposes, the impact of recording the valuation allowance on deferred tax
assets of the U.S. operations was assigned to each legal entity within PNA (including PNA holding
company as an entity) based on each entitys net deferred tax asset as of December 31, 2008 and
September 30, 2009, except for PFH. The impact of recording the valuation allowance at PFH was
allocated among continuing and discontinued operations. The portion attributed to the continuing
operations was based on PFHs net deferred tax asset balance at January 1, 2008. The valuation
allowance on deferred taxes, as it relates to the operating losses of PFH for the year 2008 and
nine months ended September 30, 2009, was assigned to the discontinued operations.
The tax impact in results of operations for PFH attributed to the recording of the valuation
allowance assigned to continuing operations was included as part of the Corporate group for segment
reporting purposes since it does not relate to any of the legal entities of the BPNA reportable
segment. PFH is no longer considered a reportable segment.
The accounting policies of the individual operating segments are the same as those of the
Corporation. Transactions between reportable segments are primarily conducted at market rates,
resulting in profits that are eliminated for reporting consolidated results of operations.
The results of operations included in the tables below for the quarters and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 exclude the results of operations of the discontinued business of PFH.
Segment assets as of
77
September 30, 2008 also exclude the assets of the discontinued operations.
2009
For the quarter ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular de |
|
Banco Popular |
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment |
(In thousands) |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
North America |
|
EVERTEC |
|
Eliminations |
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
$ |
217,859 |
|
|
$ |
77,588 |
|
|
$ |
(304 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
153,350 |
|
|
|
177,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
130,373 |
|
|
|
6,395 |
|
|
|
62,269 |
|
|
$ |
(36,160 |
) |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
1,270 |
|
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
9,665 |
|
|
|
2,679 |
|
|
|
2,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
191,889 |
|
|
|
70,045 |
|
|
|
41,706 |
|
|
|
(36,234 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
1,883 |
|
|
|
2,553 |
|
|
|
6,341 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(10,780 |
) |
|
$ |
(169,917 |
) |
|
$ |
10,839 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
23,872,592 |
|
|
$ |
11,443,083 |
|
|
$ |
257,456 |
|
|
$ |
(68,248 |
) |
|
For the quarter ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Reportable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Segments |
|
Corporate |
|
Eliminations |
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
$ |
295,143 |
|
|
$ |
(19,037 |
) |
|
$ |
283 |
|
|
$ |
276,389 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
331,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
331,063 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
162,877 |
|
|
|
5,401 |
|
|
|
(8,234 |
) |
|
|
160,044 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
2,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,379 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
15,224 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,430 |
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
(78,337 |
) |
|
|
(1,922 |
) |
|
|
(79,304 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
267,406 |
|
|
|
17,343 |
|
|
|
(2,654 |
) |
|
|
282,095 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
10,808 |
|
|
|
(5,171 |
) |
|
|
694 |
|
|
|
6,331 |
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(169,815 |
) |
|
$ |
52,323 |
|
|
$ |
(4,069 |
) |
|
$ |
(121,561 |
) |
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
35,504,883 |
|
|
$ |
5,401,904 |
|
|
$ |
(5,268,983 |
) |
|
$ |
35,637,804 |
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular de |
|
Banco Popular |
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment |
(In thousands) |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
North America |
|
EVERTEC |
|
Eliminations |
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
$ |
650,927 |
|
|
$ |
234,929 |
|
|
$ |
(785 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
486,343 |
|
|
|
566,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
626,627 |
|
|
|
15,892 |
|
|
|
194,279 |
|
|
$ |
(109,295 |
) |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
3,869 |
|
|
|
2,731 |
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
29,550 |
|
|
|
8,258 |
|
|
|
9,875 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
Gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
579,752 |
|
|
|
236,453 |
|
|
|
125,790 |
|
|
|
(109,103 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
|
(5,692 |
) |
|
|
18,406 |
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
175,861 |
|
|
$ |
(557,622 |
) |
|
$ |
38,805 |
|
|
$ |
(103 |
) |
|
78
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Reportable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Segments |
|
Corporate |
|
Eliminations |
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
$ |
885,071 |
|
|
$ |
(53,952 |
) |
|
$ |
816 |
|
|
$ |
831,935 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
1,053,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,053,036 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
727,503 |
|
|
|
4,799 |
|
|
|
(11,688 |
) |
|
|
720,614 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
7,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,218 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
47,661 |
|
|
|
1,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,033 |
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
(78,337 |
) |
|
|
(1,922 |
) |
|
|
(79,304 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
832,892 |
|
|
|
51,762 |
|
|
|
(6,159 |
) |
|
|
878,495 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
13,871 |
|
|
|
(29,989 |
) |
|
|
909 |
|
|
|
(15,209 |
) |
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(343,059 |
) |
|
$ |
6,039 |
|
|
$ |
(3,700 |
) |
|
$ |
(340,720 |
) |
|
2008
For the quarter ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular de |
|
Banco Popular |
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment |
(In thousands) |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
North America |
|
EVERTEC |
|
Eliminations |
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
$ |
238,373 |
|
|
$ |
89,424 |
|
|
$ |
(134 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
128,917 |
|
|
|
123,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
120,329 |
|
|
|
52,486 |
|
|
|
63,350 |
|
|
$ |
(37,020 |
) |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
2,241 |
|
|
|
1,506 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
10,292 |
|
|
|
3,525 |
|
|
|
3,569 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
184,406 |
|
|
|
91,285 |
|
|
|
46,710 |
|
|
|
(36,616 |
) |
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(2,548 |
) |
|
|
61,394 |
|
|
|
4,231 |
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
35,394 |
|
|
$ |
(139,043 |
) |
|
$ |
8,487 |
|
|
$ |
(236 |
) |
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
26,262,308 |
|
|
$ |
12,747,724 |
|
|
$ |
260,439 |
|
|
$ |
(241,376 |
) |
|
For the quarter ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Reportable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Segments |
|
Corporate |
|
Eliminations |
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
$ |
327,663 |
|
|
$ |
(3,670 |
) |
|
$ |
289 |
|
|
$ |
324,282 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
252,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252,160 |
|
Non-interest income (loss) |
|
|
199,145 |
|
|
|
(9,621 |
) |
|
|
(1,596 |
) |
|
|
187,928 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
3,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,966 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
17,368 |
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,952 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
285,785 |
|
|
|
17,160 |
|
|
|
(1,948 |
) |
|
|
300,997 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
62,927 |
|
|
|
106,929 |
|
|
|
(21,548 |
) |
|
|
148,308 |
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(95,398 |
) |
|
$ |
(137,964 |
) |
|
$ |
22,189 |
|
|
$ |
(211,173 |
) |
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
39,029,095 |
|
|
$ |
6,326,012 |
|
|
$ |
(5,933,634 |
) |
|
$ |
39,421,473 |
|
|
79
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular de |
|
Banco Popular |
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment |
(In thousands) |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
North America |
|
EVERTEC |
|
Eliminations |
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
$ |
726,256 |
|
|
$ |
277,227 |
|
|
$ |
(603 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
339,151 |
|
|
|
263,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
483,087 |
|
|
|
135,583 |
|
|
|
198,922 |
|
|
$ |
(112,601 |
) |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
3,749 |
|
|
|
4,527 |
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
31,296 |
|
|
|
10,793 |
|
|
|
10,849 |
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
568,923 |
|
|
|
276,105 |
|
|
|
138,975 |
|
|
|
(111,428 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
39,517 |
|
|
|
33,350 |
|
|
|
14,083 |
|
|
|
(436 |
) |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
226,707 |
|
|
$ |
(175,335 |
) |
|
$ |
33,740 |
|
|
$ |
(683 |
) |
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Reportable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Segments |
|
Corporate |
|
Eliminations |
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
$ |
1,002,880 |
|
|
$ |
(13,482 |
) |
|
$ |
940 |
|
|
$ |
990,338 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
602,521 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
602,561 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
704,991 |
|
|
|
(7,251 |
) |
|
|
(9,263 |
) |
|
|
688,477 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
8,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,948 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
52,884 |
|
|
|
1,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,621 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
872,575 |
|
|
|
47,949 |
|
|
|
(7,545 |
) |
|
|
912,979 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
86,514 |
|
|
|
86,627 |
|
|
|
(20,674 |
) |
|
|
152,467 |
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
84,429 |
|
|
$ |
(157,086 |
) |
|
$ |
19,896 |
|
|
$ |
(52,761 |
) |
|
80
Additional disclosures with respect to the Banco Popular de Puerto Rico reportable segment
are as follows:
2009
For the quarter ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Banco |
|
|
Commercial |
|
Consumer and |
|
Other Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
Popular de |
(In thousands) |
|
Banking |
|
Retail Banking |
|
Services |
|
Eliminations |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
77,277 |
|
|
$ |
137,449 |
|
|
$ |
3,010 |
|
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
$ |
217,859 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
98,536 |
|
|
|
54,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153,350 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
26,565 |
|
|
|
76,758 |
|
|
|
27,049 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
130,373 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,270 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
3,785 |
|
|
|
5,571 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,665 |
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
955 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
51,928 |
|
|
|
123,628 |
|
|
|
16,405 |
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
191,889 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(20,892 |
) |
|
|
17,776 |
|
|
|
4,919 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
1,883 |
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(30,498 |
) |
|
$ |
11,339 |
|
|
$ |
8,263 |
|
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
$ |
(10,780 |
) |
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
10,111,972 |
|
|
$ |
17,193,362 |
|
|
$ |
513,411 |
|
|
$ |
(3,946,153 |
) |
|
$ |
23,872,592 |
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Banco |
|
|
Commercial |
|
Consumer and |
|
Other Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
Popular de |
(In thousands) |
|
Banking |
|
Retail Banking |
|
Services |
|
Eliminations |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
225,595 |
|
|
$ |
415,675 |
|
|
$ |
9,195 |
|
|
$ |
462 |
|
|
$ |
650,927 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
316,005 |
|
|
|
170,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
486,343 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
131,192 |
|
|
|
421,565 |
|
|
|
74,313 |
|
|
|
(443 |
) |
|
|
626,627 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
3,190 |
|
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,869 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
12,518 |
|
|
|
16,080 |
|
|
|
952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,550 |
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
955 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
155,500 |
|
|
|
377,064 |
|
|
|
47,393 |
|
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
579,752 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(77,061 |
) |
|
|
66,202 |
|
|
|
11,986 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(51,261 |
) |
|
$ |
204,366 |
|
|
$ |
22,629 |
|
|
$ |
127 |
|
|
$ |
175,861 |
|
|
81
2008
For the quarter ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Banco |
|
|
Commercial |
|
Consumer and |
|
Other Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
Popular de |
(In thousands) |
|
Banking |
|
Retail Banking |
|
Services |
|
Eliminations |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
83,878 |
|
|
$ |
151,284 |
|
|
$ |
3,062 |
|
|
$ |
149 |
|
|
$ |
238,373 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
99,564 |
|
|
|
29,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,917 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
26,655 |
|
|
|
73,157 |
|
|
|
20,988 |
|
|
|
(471 |
) |
|
|
120,329 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
2,011 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,241 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
5,062 |
|
|
|
4,901 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,292 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
45,892 |
|
|
|
123,290 |
|
|
|
15,297 |
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
184,406 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(20,683 |
) |
|
|
15,662 |
|
|
|
2,558 |
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
(2,548 |
) |
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(19,378 |
) |
|
$ |
49,224 |
|
|
$ |
5,712 |
|
|
$ |
(164 |
) |
|
$ |
35,394 |
|
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
11,596,931 |
|
|
$ |
18,925,656 |
|
|
$ |
434,585 |
|
|
$ |
(4,694,864 |
) |
|
$ |
26,262,308 |
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Banco |
|
|
Commercial |
|
Consumer and |
|
Other Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
Popular de |
(In thousands) |
|
Banking |
|
Retail Banking |
|
Services |
|
Eliminations |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
265,637 |
|
|
$ |
451,270 |
|
|
$ |
8,919 |
|
|
$ |
430 |
|
|
$ |
726,256 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
217,582 |
|
|
|
121,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
339,151 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
87,811 |
|
|
|
319,103 |
|
|
|
76,763 |
|
|
|
(590 |
) |
|
|
483,087 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
3,155 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,749 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
12,414 |
|
|
|
17,944 |
|
|
|
938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,296 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
148,165 |
|
|
|
370,195 |
|
|
|
50,794 |
|
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
568,923 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(27,088 |
) |
|
|
55,064 |
|
|
|
11,473 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
39,517 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,238 |
|
|
$ |
202,446 |
|
|
$ |
22,020 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
226,707 |
|
|
Additional disclosures with respect to the Banco Popular North America reportable segment are
as follows:
2009
For the quarter ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Banco Popular |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular |
(In thousands) |
|
North America |
|
E-LOAN |
|
Eliminations |
|
North America |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
76,833 |
|
|
$ |
482 |
|
|
$ |
273 |
|
|
$ |
77,588 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
143,879 |
|
|
|
33,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177,713 |
|
Non-interest income (loss) |
|
|
16,573 |
|
|
|
(10,129 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
6,395 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
910 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
2,387 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,679 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
67,743 |
|
|
|
2,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,045 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
1,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,553 |
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(122,298 |
) |
|
$ |
(47,843 |
) |
|
$ |
224 |
|
|
$ |
(169,917 |
) |
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
12,076,358 |
|
|
$ |
626,462 |
|
|
$ |
(1,259,737 |
) |
|
$ |
11,443,083 |
|
|
82
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Banco Popular |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular |
(In thousands) |
|
North America |
|
E-LOAN |
|
Eliminations |
|
North America |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
226,564 |
|
|
$ |
7,453 |
|
|
$ |
912 |
|
|
$ |
234,929 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
462,254 |
|
|
|
104,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
566,693 |
|
Non-interest income (loss) |
|
|
43,376 |
|
|
|
(27,397 |
) |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
15,892 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
2,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,731 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
7,359 |
|
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,258 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
221,011 |
|
|
|
15,440 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
236,453 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
(5,855 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,692 |
) |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(423,578 |
) |
|
$ |
(134,867 |
) |
|
$ |
823 |
|
|
$ |
(557,622 |
) |
|
2008
For the quarter ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Banco Popular |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular |
(In thousands) |
|
North America |
|
E-LOAN |
|
Eliminations |
|
North America |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
84,029 |
|
|
$ |
5,015 |
|
|
$ |
380 |
|
|
$ |
89,424 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
83,934 |
|
|
|
39,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,243 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
48,487 |
|
|
|
4,218 |
|
|
|
(219 |
) |
|
|
52,486 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
1,056 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,506 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
3,064 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,525 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
76,203 |
|
|
|
15,078 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
91,285 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
19,961 |
|
|
|
41,378 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
61,394 |
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(51,702 |
) |
|
$ |
(87,443 |
) |
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
$ |
(139,043 |
) |
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
13,113,220 |
|
|
$ |
923,647 |
|
|
$ |
(1,289,143 |
) |
|
$ |
12,747,724 |
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Banco Popular |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular |
(In thousands) |
|
North America |
|
E-LOAN |
|
Eliminations |
|
North America |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
257,162 |
|
|
$ |
19,011 |
|
|
$ |
1,054 |
|
|
$ |
277,227 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
171,281 |
|
|
|
92,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263,370 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
120,656 |
|
|
|
15,485 |
|
|
|
(558 |
) |
|
|
135,583 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
3,178 |
|
|
|
1,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,527 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
9,382 |
|
|
|
1,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,793 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
223,173 |
|
|
|
52,922 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
276,105 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
19,358 |
|
|
|
13,822 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
33,350 |
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(48,554 |
) |
|
$ |
(127,097 |
) |
|
$ |
316 |
|
|
$ |
(175,335 |
) |
|
83
A breakdown of intersegment eliminations, particularly revenues, by segment in which the
revenues are recorded follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTERSEGMENT REVENUES* |
|
Quarter ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Banking |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
848 |
|
Consumer and Retail Banking |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
1,904 |
|
Other Financial Services |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
(180 |
) |
Banco Popular North America: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular North America |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(456 |
) |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
(2,737 |
) |
E-LOAN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(627 |
) |
EVERTEC |
|
|
(36,107 |
) |
|
|
(36,975 |
) |
|
|
(109,131 |
) |
|
|
(111,809 |
) |
|
Total intersegment revenues
from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
(36,160 |
) |
|
$ |
(37,020 |
) |
|
$ |
(109,295 |
) |
|
$ |
(112,601 |
) |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
For purposes of the intersegment revenues disclosure, revenues include interest income
(expense) related to internal funding and other income derived from intercompany
transactions, mainly related to processing / information technology services. |
A breakdown of revenues and selected balance sheet information by geographical area follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geographic Information |
|
Quarter ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Revenues (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico |
|
$ |
331,364 |
|
|
$ |
352,893 |
|
|
$ |
1,244,649 |
|
|
$ |
1,201,999 |
|
United States |
|
|
79,782 |
|
|
|
134,177 |
|
|
|
208,780 |
|
|
|
393,005 |
|
Other |
|
|
25,287 |
|
|
|
25,140 |
|
|
|
99,120 |
|
|
|
83,811 |
|
|
Total consolidated
revenues from
continuing operations |
|
$ |
436,433 |
|
|
$ |
512,210 |
|
|
$ |
1,552,549 |
|
|
$ |
1,678,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total revenues include net interest income, service charges on deposit accounts, other service fees, net gain (loss) on sale and valuation adjustments of
investment securities, trading account profit (loss), gain (loss) on sale of loans and valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale, and other operating income. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
Selected Balance Sheet Information: (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
22,802,274 |
|
|
$ |
24,886,736 |
|
|
$ |
24,817,377 |
|
Loans |
|
|
14,537,544 |
|
|
|
15,160,033 |
|
|
|
15,374,817 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
16,570,569 |
|
|
|
16,737,693 |
|
|
|
17,261,205 |
|
Mainland United States |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
11,669,207 |
|
|
$ |
12,713,357 |
|
|
$ |
13,281,147 |
|
Loans |
|
|
9,156,724 |
|
|
|
10,417,840 |
|
|
|
10,519,632 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
8,792,328 |
|
|
|
9,662,690 |
|
|
|
9,429,980 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,166,323 |
|
|
$ |
1,270,089 |
|
|
$ |
1,322,949 |
|
Loans |
|
|
777,248 |
|
|
|
691,058 |
|
|
|
686,720 |
|
Deposits (2) |
|
|
1,020,001 |
|
|
|
1,149,822 |
|
|
|
1,220,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Does not include balance sheet information of the
discontinued operations for the periods ended December 31, 2008 and
September 30, 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents deposits from BPPR operations located in the U.S. and British Virgin Islands. |
84
Note 27 Subsequent Event
On October 16, 2009, the Corporation completed the sale of six New Jersey bank branches pertaining
to BPNA with approximately $225 million in deposits. The Corporation did not sell loans as part of
the transaction. The transaction resulted in a gain of approximately $591 thousand, which will be
recorded in the fourth quarter of 2009.
Note
28 Condensed Consolidating Financial Information of Guarantor and Issuers of Registered Guaranteed Securities
The following condensed consolidating financial information presents the financial position of
Popular, Inc. Holding Company (PIHC) (parent only), Popular International Bank, Inc. (PIBI),
Popular North America, Inc. (PNA), and all other subsidiaries of the Corporation as of September
30, 2009, December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008, and the results of their operations and cash
flows for the periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
PIBI is an operating subsidiary of PIHC and is the holding company of its wholly-owned
subsidiaries: ATH Costa Rica S.A., EVERTEC LATINOAMERICA, SOCIEDAD ANONIMA, T.I.I. Smart Solutions
Inc., Popular Insurance V.I., Inc. and PNA.
PNA is an operating subsidiary of PIBI and is the holding company of its wholly-owned
subsidiaries:
|
|
|
PFH, including its wholly-owned subsidiaries Equity One, Inc. and Popular Mortgage
Servicing, Inc.; and |
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular North America (BPNA), including its wholly-owned subsidiaries Popular
Equipment Finance, Inc., Popular Insurance Agency, U.S.A., and E-LOAN, Inc. |
PIHC fully and unconditionally guarantees all registered debt securities issued by PNA.
The principal source of income for the PIHC consists of dividends from BPPR. As members subject to
the regulations of the Federal Reserve System, BPPR and BPNA must obtain the approval of the
Federal Reserve Board for any dividend if the total of all dividends declared by each entity
during the calendar year would exceed the total of its net income for that year, as defined by the
Federal Reserve Board, combined with its retained net income for the preceding two years, less any
required transfers to surplus or to a fund for the retirement of any preferred stock. The payment
of dividends by BPPR may also be affected by other regulatory requirements and policies, such as
the maintenance of certain minimum capital levels. As of September 30, 2009, BPPR could have
declared a dividend of approximately $56 million (December 31, 2008 $32 million; September 30,
2008 $92 million) without the approval of the Federal Reserve Board. As of September 30, 2009,
BPNA was required to obtain the approval of the Federal Reserve Board to declare a dividend. The
Corporation has never received dividend payments from its U.S. subsidiaries. Refer to Popular,
Inc.s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 for further information on dividend
restrictions imposed by regulatory requirements and policies on the payment of dividends by BPPR
and BPNA.
85
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CONDITION
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
PIBI |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
958 |
|
|
$ |
7,688 |
|
|
$ |
381 |
|
|
$ |
607,134 |
|
|
$ |
(9,300 |
) |
|
$ |
606,861 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
10,050 |
|
|
|
47,439 |
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
1,098,734 |
|
|
|
(57,811 |
) |
|
|
1,098,823 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,991,597 |
|
|
|
(1,949 |
) |
|
|
6,993,291 |
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost |
|
|
455,769 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,931 |
|
|
|
(430,000 |
) |
|
|
212,950 |
|
Other investment securities, at lower of cost or realizable value |
|
|
10,850 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4,492 |
|
|
|
159,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174,943 |
|
Trading account securities, at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
446,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
446,368 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
3,182,664 |
|
|
|
782,962 |
|
|
|
1,195,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,161,555 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-sale measured at lower of cost or fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,447 |
|
|
Loans held-in-portfolio |
|
|
171,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,600 |
|
|
|
24,528,725 |
|
|
|
(192,265 |
) |
|
|
24,512,966 |
|
Less Unearned income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,897 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,207,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,207,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
171,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,600 |
|
|
|
23,204,487 |
|
|
|
(192,265 |
) |
|
|
23,188,668 |
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
3,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
586,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
589,592 |
|
Other real estate |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,485 |
|
Accrued income receivable |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
131,568 |
|
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
131,745 |
|
Servicing assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183,376 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
42,384 |
|
|
|
70,624 |
|
|
|
20,336 |
|
|
|
1,050,561 |
|
|
|
(30,225 |
) |
|
|
1,153,680 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
606,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
606,508 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,067 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,878,366 |
|
|
$ |
913,785 |
|
|
$ |
1,226,326 |
|
|
$ |
35,502,628 |
|
|
$ |
(5,883,301 |
) |
|
$ |
35,637,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,291,058 |
|
|
$ |
(9,241 |
) |
|
$ |
4,281,817 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,158,892 |
|
|
|
(57,811 |
) |
|
|
22,101,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,449,950 |
|
|
|
(67,052 |
) |
|
|
26,382,898 |
|
Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements
to repurchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,807,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,807,891 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
$ |
26,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167,127 |
|
|
|
(190,265 |
) |
|
|
3,077 |
|
Notes payable at cost |
|
|
1,059,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
434,277 |
|
|
|
1,157,899 |
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
2,649,821 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
430,000 |
|
|
|
(430,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
50,050 |
|
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
|
37,878 |
|
|
|
996,043 |
|
|
|
(32,388 |
) |
|
|
1,051,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,135,910 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
472,155 |
|
|
|
32,008,910 |
|
|
|
(721,705 |
) |
|
|
32,895,348 |
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
50,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,160 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
6,395 |
|
|
|
3,961 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
52,322 |
|
|
|
(56,285 |
) |
|
|
6,395 |
|
Surplus |
|
|
2,787,750 |
|
|
|
3,292,438 |
|
|
|
3,176,208 |
|
|
|
4,495,509 |
|
|
|
(10,957,245 |
) |
|
|
2,794,660 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(62,615 |
) |
|
|
(2,353,525 |
) |
|
|
(2,435,062 |
) |
|
|
(1,062,519 |
) |
|
|
5,844,196 |
|
|
|
(69,525 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax |
|
|
(39,223 |
) |
|
|
(29,167 |
) |
|
|
13,023 |
|
|
|
8,406 |
|
|
|
7,738 |
|
|
|
(39,223 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
2,742,456 |
|
|
|
913,707 |
|
|
|
754,171 |
|
|
|
3,493,718 |
|
|
|
(5,161,596 |
) |
|
|
2,742,456 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,878,366 |
|
|
$ |
913,785 |
|
|
$ |
1,226,326 |
|
|
$ |
35,502,628 |
|
|
$ |
(5,883,301 |
) |
|
$ |
35,637,804 |
|
|
86
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CONDITION
DECEMBER 31, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
PIBI |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
89 |
|
|
$ |
7,668 |
|
|
$ |
777,994 |
|
|
$ |
(766 |
) |
|
$ |
784,987 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
89,694 |
|
|
|
40,614 |
|
|
|
450,246 |
|
|
|
794,521 |
|
|
|
(580,421 |
) |
|
|
794,654 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value |
|
|
188,893 |
|
|
|
5,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,730,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,924,487 |
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost |
|
|
431,499 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
291,998 |
|
|
|
(430,000 |
) |
|
|
294,747 |
|
Other investment securities, at lower of cost or
realizable value |
|
|
14,425 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
12,392 |
|
|
|
190,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217,667 |
|
Trading account securities, at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
645,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
645,903 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
2,611,053 |
|
|
|
324,412 |
|
|
|
1,348,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,283,706 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-sale measured at lower of cost or fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
536,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
536,058 |
|
|
Loans held-in-portfolio |
|
|
827,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,800 |
|
|
|
25,885,773 |
|
|
|
(868,620 |
) |
|
|
25,857,237 |
|
Less Unearned income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,364 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
882,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
882,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
827,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,800 |
|
|
|
24,878,662 |
|
|
|
(868,620 |
) |
|
|
24,850,066 |
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
22,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
598,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
620,807 |
|
Other real estate |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,721 |
|
Accrued income receivable |
|
|
1,033 |
|
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
1,861 |
|
|
|
204,955 |
|
|
|
(52,096 |
) |
|
|
156,227 |
|
Servicing assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,306 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
35,664 |
|
|
|
64,881 |
|
|
|
21,532 |
|
|
|
995,550 |
|
|
|
(2,030 |
) |
|
|
1,115,597 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
605,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
605,792 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,163 |
|
Assets from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,587 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,222,145 |
|
|
$ |
436,964 |
|
|
$ |
1,854,868 |
|
|
$ |
38,586,431 |
|
|
$ |
(6,217,639 |
) |
|
$ |
38,882,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,294,221 |
|
|
$ |
(668 |
) |
|
$ |
4,293,553 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,747,393 |
|
|
|
(490,741 |
) |
|
|
23,256,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,041,614 |
|
|
|
(491,409 |
) |
|
|
27,550,205 |
|
Federal funds purchased and assets sold under
agreements to repurchase |
|
$ |
44,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,596,817 |
|
|
|
(89,680 |
) |
|
|
3,551,608 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
42,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
|
828,285 |
|
|
|
(866,620 |
) |
|
|
4,934 |
|
Notes payable at cost |
|
|
793,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,488,942 |
|
|
|
1,106,521 |
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
3,386,763 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
430,000 |
|
|
|
(430,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
73,241 |
|
|
$ |
117 |
|
|
|
68,490 |
|
|
|
1,008,427 |
|
|
|
(53,937 |
) |
|
|
1,096,338 |
|
Liabilities from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
953,781 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
1,557,932 |
|
|
|
35,036,221 |
|
|
|
(1,933,646 |
) |
|
|
35,614,405 |
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
1,483,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,483,525 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
1,773,792 |
|
|
|
3,961 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
52,318 |
|
|
|
(56,281 |
) |
|
|
1,773,792 |
|
Surplus |
|
|
613,085 |
|
|
|
2,301,193 |
|
|
|
2,184,964 |
|
|
|
4,050,514 |
|
|
|
(8,527,877 |
) |
|
|
621,879 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(365,694 |
) |
|
|
(1,797,175 |
) |
|
|
(1,865,418 |
) |
|
|
(585,705 |
) |
|
|
4,239,504 |
|
|
|
(374,488 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax |
|
|
(28,829 |
) |
|
|
(71,132 |
) |
|
|
(22,612 |
) |
|
|
33,460 |
|
|
|
60,284 |
|
|
|
(28,829 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
(207,515 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(377 |
) |
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
(207,515 |
) |
|
|
|
|
3,268,364 |
|
|
|
436,847 |
|
|
|
296,936 |
|
|
|
3,550,210 |
|
|
|
(4,283,993 |
) |
|
|
3,268,364 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,222,145 |
|
|
$ |
436,964 |
|
|
$ |
1,854,868 |
|
|
$ |
38,586,431 |
|
|
$ |
(6,217,639 |
) |
|
$ |
38,882,769 |
|
|
87
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CONDITION
SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
PIBI |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
1,582 |
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
7,676 |
|
|
$ |
1,176,453 |
|
|
$ |
(1,778 |
) |
|
$ |
1,183,997 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
68,540 |
|
|
|
39,415 |
|
|
|
15,739 |
|
|
|
309,393 |
|
|
|
(123,590 |
) |
|
|
309,497 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,559,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,568,742 |
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost |
|
|
456,486 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
692,096 |
|
|
|
(430,000 |
) |
|
|
719,832 |
|
Other investment securities, at lower of cost or realizable value |
|
|
14,425 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
12,392 |
|
|
|
202,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
229,158 |
|
Trading account securities, at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
444,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
444,398 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
2,428,180 |
|
|
|
201,659 |
|
|
|
1,548,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,178,247 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-sale measured at lower of cost or market value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245,134 |
|
|
Loans held-in-portfolio |
|
|
812,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
901,000 |
|
|
|
26,539,342 |
|
|
|
(1,733,231 |
) |
|
|
26,519,805 |
|
Less Unearned income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183,770 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
726,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
726,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
812,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
901,000 |
|
|
|
25,629,152 |
|
|
|
(1,733,231 |
) |
|
|
25,609,555 |
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
22,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
597,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
620,469 |
|
Other real estate |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,605 |
|
Accrued income receivable |
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
7,798 |
|
|
|
197,312 |
|
|
|
(8,700 |
) |
|
|
197,549 |
|
Servicing assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,484 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
26,579 |
|
|
|
66,295 |
|
|
|
64,644 |
|
|
|
1,297,650 |
|
|
|
(42,949 |
) |
|
|
1,412,219 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
608,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
608,172 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,662 |
|
Assets from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
968,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
968,669 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,832,584 |
|
|
$ |
318,386 |
|
|
$ |
2,557,786 |
|
|
$ |
40,199,881 |
|
|
$ |
(6,518,495 |
) |
|
$ |
40,390,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,067,440 |
|
|
$ |
(1,720 |
) |
|
$ |
4,065,720 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,885,241 |
|
|
|
(39,564 |
) |
|
|
23,845,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,952,681 |
|
|
|
(41,284 |
) |
|
|
27,911,397 |
|
Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements
to repurchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
39,951 |
|
|
|
3,774,114 |
|
|
|
(84,026 |
) |
|
|
3,730,039 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,462 |
|
|
|
1,328,779 |
|
|
|
(899,230 |
) |
|
|
507,011 |
|
Notes payable |
|
$ |
778,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,187,762 |
|
|
|
2,110,425 |
|
|
|
(834,000 |
) |
|
|
4,242,487 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
430,000 |
|
|
|
(430,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
46,811 |
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
|
77,824 |
|
|
|
738,319 |
|
|
|
(51,663 |
) |
|
|
811,362 |
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
825,111 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
2,382,999 |
|
|
|
36,514,691 |
|
|
|
(2,340,203 |
) |
|
|
37,382,669 |
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
586,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
586,875 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
1,772,010 |
|
|
|
3,961 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
51,819 |
|
|
|
(55,782 |
) |
|
|
1,772,010 |
|
Surplus |
|
|
555,227 |
|
|
|
1,451,193 |
|
|
|
1,334,964 |
|
|
|
3,560,903 |
|
|
|
(6,338,266 |
) |
|
|
564,021 |
|
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) |
|
|
392,856 |
|
|
|
(1,085,414 |
) |
|
|
(1,151,358 |
) |
|
|
122,898 |
|
|
|
2,105,080 |
|
|
|
384,062 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
|
|
(91,983 |
) |
|
|
(51,425 |
) |
|
|
(8,821 |
) |
|
|
(50,053 |
) |
|
|
110,299 |
|
|
|
(91,983 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
(207,512 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(377 |
) |
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
(207,512 |
) |
|
|
|
|
3,007,473 |
|
|
|
318,315 |
|
|
|
174,787 |
|
|
|
3,685,190 |
|
|
|
(4,178,292 |
) |
|
|
3,007,473 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,832,584 |
|
|
$ |
318,386 |
|
|
$ |
2,557,786 |
|
|
$ |
40,199,881 |
|
|
$ |
(6,518,495 |
) |
|
$ |
40,390,142 |
|
|
88
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
PIBI |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income from subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,500 |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(22,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
1,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
371,173 |
|
|
|
(1,804 |
) |
|
$ |
371,366 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,511 |
|
|
|
(346 |
) |
|
|
1,510 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
8,469 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
72,613 |
|
|
|
(6,908 |
) |
|
|
74,360 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
10,478 |
|
|
|
7,842 |
|
|
|
15,177 |
|
|
|
452,524 |
|
|
|
(31,558 |
) |
|
|
454,463 |
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,280 |
|
|
|
(339 |
) |
|
|
118,941 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
17,892 |
|
|
|
(1,793 |
) |
|
|
16,142 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
19,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,524 |
|
|
|
19,757 |
|
|
|
(7,207 |
) |
|
|
42,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
19,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,539 |
|
|
|
156,929 |
|
|
|
(9,339 |
) |
|
|
178,074 |
|
|
Net interest (loss) income |
|
|
(9,467 |
) |
|
|
7,842 |
|
|
|
4,638 |
|
|
|
295,595 |
|
|
|
(22,219 |
) |
|
|
276,389 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
331,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
331,063 |
|
|
Net interest (loss) income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
(9,467 |
) |
|
|
7,842 |
|
|
|
4,638 |
|
|
|
(35,468 |
) |
|
|
(22,219 |
) |
|
|
(54,674 |
) |
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,208 |
|
Other service fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,240 |
|
|
|
(3,626 |
) |
|
|
97,614 |
|
Net gain (loss) on sale and valuation adjustments of investment
securities |
|
|
2,058 |
|
|
|
(3,574 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,485 |
) |
|
|
(2,058 |
) |
|
|
(9,059 |
) |
Trading account profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,579 |
|
Loss on sale of loans and valuation adjustments on loans
held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,728 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,728 |
) |
Other operating (loss) income |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
4,440 |
|
|
|
3,076 |
|
|
|
13,471 |
|
|
|
(2,550 |
) |
|
|
18,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
(7,416 |
) |
|
|
8,708 |
|
|
|
7,714 |
|
|
|
126,817 |
|
|
|
(30,453 |
) |
|
|
105,370 |
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
|
6,543 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,190 |
|
|
|
(994 |
) |
|
|
102,822 |
|
Pension, profit sharing and other benefits |
|
|
2,109 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,629 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
27,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
8,652 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,819 |
|
|
|
(1,018 |
) |
|
|
130,547 |
|
Net occupancy expenses |
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,269 |
|
Equipment expenses |
|
|
1,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,983 |
|
Other taxes |
|
|
855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,109 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
4,034 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
25,868 |
|
|
|
(1,214 |
) |
|
|
28,694 |
|
Communications |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
11,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,902 |
|
Business promotion |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,905 |
|
Printing and supplies |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,857 |
|
FDIC deposit insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,506 |
|
Gain on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77,381 |
) |
|
|
(1,923 |
) |
|
|
(79,304 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(41,604 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
(51,786 |
) |
|
|
125,664 |
|
|
|
(421 |
) |
|
|
31,753 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
(25,870 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(51,778 |
) |
|
|
302,814 |
|
|
|
(4,576 |
) |
|
|
220,600 |
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax and equity in losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
18,454 |
|
|
|
8,698 |
|
|
|
59,492 |
|
|
|
(175,997 |
) |
|
|
(25,877 |
) |
|
|
(115,230 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
5,303 |
|
|
|
693 |
|
|
|
6,331 |
|
|
Income (loss) before equity in losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
18,104 |
|
|
|
8,681 |
|
|
|
59,524 |
|
|
|
(181,300 |
) |
|
|
(26,570 |
) |
|
|
(121,561 |
) |
Equity in undistributed losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
(139,665 |
) |
|
|
(135,566 |
) |
|
|
(188,234 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
463,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(121,561 |
) |
|
|
(126,885 |
) |
|
|
(128,710 |
) |
|
|
(181,300 |
) |
|
|
436,895 |
|
|
|
(121,561 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,427 |
) |
Equity in undistributed losses of discontinued operations |
|
|
(3,427 |
) |
|
|
(3,427 |
) |
|
|
(3,427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS |
|
$ |
(124,988 |
) |
|
$ |
(130,312 |
) |
|
$ |
(132,137 |
) |
|
$ |
(184,727 |
) |
|
$ |
447,176 |
|
|
$ |
(124,988 |
) |
|
89
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
PIBI |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income from subsidiaries |
|
$ |
45,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(45,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
6,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,955 |
|
|
$ |
457,784 |
|
|
|
(30,400 |
) |
|
$ |
457,905 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
1,016 |
|
|
$ |
322 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
3,462 |
|
|
|
(1,458 |
) |
|
|
3,447 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
7,376 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
84,112 |
|
|
|
(7,015 |
) |
|
|
84,790 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
59,958 |
|
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
24,283 |
|
|
|
554,697 |
|
|
|
(83,873 |
) |
|
|
555,481 |
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,021 |
|
|
|
(410 |
) |
|
|
165,611 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,101 |
|
|
|
42,196 |
|
|
|
(9,255 |
) |
|
|
37,233 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
9,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,223 |
|
|
|
18,364 |
|
|
|
(29,497 |
) |
|
|
28,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
9,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,324 |
|
|
|
226,581 |
|
|
|
(39,162 |
) |
|
|
231,199 |
|
|
Net interest income (loss) |
|
|
50,502 |
|
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
(10,041 |
) |
|
|
328,116 |
|
|
|
(44,711 |
) |
|
|
324,282 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252,160 |
|
|
Net interest income (loss) after provision for loan losses |
|
|
50,502 |
|
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
(10,041 |
) |
|
|
75,956 |
|
|
|
(44,711 |
) |
|
|
72,122 |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,433 |
|
Other service fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,172 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
95,302 |
|
Net (loss) gain on sale and valuation adjustments of investment
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,147 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,132 |
) |
Trading account profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,669 |
|
Gain on sale of loans and valuation adjustments on loans
held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,522 |
|
Other operating income (loss) |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
3,474 |
|
|
|
(2,951 |
) |
|
|
37,244 |
|
|
|
(1,727 |
) |
|
|
36,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
50,596 |
|
|
|
(5,257 |
) |
|
|
(12,992 |
) |
|
|
274,011 |
|
|
|
(46,308 |
) |
|
|
260,050 |
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
|
5,149 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,708 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
118,948 |
|
Pension, profit sharing and other benefits |
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
6,317 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,806 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
148,230 |
|
Net occupancy expenses |
|
|
641 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
25,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,510 |
|
Equipment expenses |
|
|
1,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,305 |
|
Other taxes |
|
|
850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,301 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
6,941 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(204 |
) |
|
|
26,636 |
|
|
|
(1,596 |
) |
|
|
31,780 |
|
Communications |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
12,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,574 |
|
Business promotion |
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,216 |
|
Printing and supplies |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,269 |
|
FDIC deposit insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,625 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(15,905 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
(316 |
) |
|
|
52,811 |
|
|
|
(351 |
) |
|
|
36,139 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(510 |
) |
|
|
325,031 |
|
|
|
(1,948 |
) |
|
|
322,915 |
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax and equity in losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
50,277 |
|
|
|
(5,280 |
) |
|
|
(12,482 |
) |
|
|
(51,020 |
) |
|
|
(44,360 |
) |
|
|
(62,865 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
1,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,299 |
|
|
|
138,796 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
148,308 |
|
|
Income (loss) before equity in losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
48,313 |
|
|
|
(5,280 |
) |
|
|
(19,781 |
) |
|
|
(189,816 |
) |
|
|
(44,609 |
) |
|
|
(211,173 |
) |
Equity in undistributed losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
(259,486 |
) |
|
|
(243,789 |
) |
|
|
(225,347 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
728,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(211,173 |
) |
|
|
(249,069 |
) |
|
|
(245,128 |
) |
|
|
(189,816 |
) |
|
|
684,013 |
|
|
|
(211,173 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(457,370 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(457,370 |
) |
Equity in undistributed losses of discontinued operations |
|
|
(457,370 |
) |
|
|
(457,370 |
) |
|
|
(457,370 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,372,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS |
|
$ |
(668,543 |
) |
|
$ |
(706,439 |
) |
|
$ |
(702,498 |
) |
|
$ |
(647,186 |
) |
|
$ |
2,056,123 |
|
|
$ |
(668,543 |
) |
|
90
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
PIBI |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income from subsidiaries |
|
$ |
73,625 |
|
|
$ |
7,500 |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(96,125 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
7,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
$ |
1,154,719 |
|
|
|
(7,138 |
) |
|
$ |
1,155,378 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
923 |
|
|
|
2,156 |
|
|
|
7,026 |
|
|
|
(3,186 |
) |
|
|
7,024 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
29,943 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
622 |
|
|
|
213,976 |
|
|
|
(20,939 |
) |
|
|
223,661 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
111,429 |
|
|
|
8,482 |
|
|
|
17,819 |
|
|
|
1,404,359 |
|
|
|
(127,388 |
) |
|
|
1,414,701 |
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
398,515 |
|
|
|
(3,083 |
) |
|
|
395,432 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
60,496 |
|
|
|
(7,187 |
) |
|
|
53,476 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
45,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,880 |
|
|
|
58,919 |
|
|
|
(21,808 |
) |
|
|
133,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
45,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,922 |
|
|
|
517,930 |
|
|
|
(32,078 |
) |
|
|
582,766 |
|
|
Net interest income (loss) |
|
|
65,437 |
|
|
|
8,482 |
|
|
|
(33,103 |
) |
|
|
886,429 |
|
|
|
(95,310 |
) |
|
|
831,935 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,053,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,053,036 |
|
|
Net interest income (loss) after provision for loan losses |
|
|
65,437 |
|
|
|
8,482 |
|
|
|
(33,103 |
) |
|
|
(166,607 |
) |
|
|
(95,310 |
) |
|
|
(221,101 |
) |
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,412 |
|
Other service fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304,544 |
|
|
|
(5,960 |
) |
|
|
298,584 |
|
Net gain (loss) on sale and valuation adjustments of investment
securities |
|
|
3,008 |
|
|
|
(10,163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
230,005 |
|
|
|
(2,058 |
) |
|
|
220,792 |
|
Trading account profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,241 |
|
Loss on sale of loans and valuation adjustments on loans
held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,994 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,994 |
) |
Other operating income (loss) |
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
12,799 |
|
|
|
(423 |
) |
|
|
35,197 |
|
|
|
(3,670 |
) |
|
|
44,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
69,121 |
|
|
|
11,118 |
|
|
|
(33,526 |
) |
|
|
559,798 |
|
|
|
(106,998 |
) |
|
|
499,513 |
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
|
18,255 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
297,691 |
|
|
|
(994 |
) |
|
|
315,224 |
|
Pension, profit sharing and other benefits |
|
|
6,404 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,394 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
96,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
24,659 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
388,085 |
|
|
|
(1,018 |
) |
|
|
412,044 |
|
Net occupancy expenses |
|
|
1,947 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
78,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,734 |
|
Equipment expenses |
|
|
2,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
73,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,289 |
|
Other taxes |
|
|
2,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,369 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
11,025 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
73,547 |
|
|
|
(3,881 |
) |
|
|
80,643 |
|
Communications |
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
35,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,115 |
|
Business promotion |
|
|
728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,761 |
|
Printing and supplies |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,664 |
|
FDIC deposit insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,954 |
|
Gain on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77,381 |
) |
|
|
(1,923 |
) |
|
|
(79,304 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(65,059 |
) |
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
(51,768 |
) |
|
|
223,341 |
|
|
|
(1,259 |
) |
|
|
104,955 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
(20,865 |
) |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
(51,803 |
) |
|
|
936,126 |
|
|
|
(8,081 |
) |
|
|
855,442 |
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax and equity in losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
89,986 |
|
|
|
11,053 |
|
|
|
18,277 |
|
|
|
(376,328 |
) |
|
|
(98,917 |
) |
|
|
(355,929 |
) |
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(876 |
) |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
(15,611 |
) |
|
|
908 |
|
|
|
(15,209 |
) |
|
Income (loss) before equity in losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
90,862 |
|
|
|
11,007 |
|
|
|
17,953 |
|
|
|
(360,717 |
) |
|
|
(99,825 |
) |
|
|
(340,720 |
) |
Equity in undistributed losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
(431,582 |
) |
|
|
(547,385 |
) |
|
|
(567,624 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,546,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(340,720 |
) |
|
|
(536,378 |
) |
|
|
(549,671 |
) |
|
|
(360,717 |
) |
|
|
1,446,766 |
|
|
|
(340,720 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,972 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,972 |
) |
Equity in undistributed losses of discontinued operations |
|
|
(19,972 |
) |
|
|
(19,972 |
) |
|
|
(19,972 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS |
|
$ |
(360,692 |
) |
|
$ |
(556,350 |
) |
|
$ |
(569,643 |
) |
|
$ |
(380,689 |
) |
|
$ |
1,506,682 |
|
|
$ |
(360,692 |
) |
|
91
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
PIBI |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income from subsidiaries |
|
$ |
134,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(134,900 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
19,339 |
|
|
$ |
219 |
|
|
$ |
82,547 |
|
|
$ |
1,421,969 |
|
|
|
(102,137 |
) |
|
$ |
1,421,937 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
1,573 |
|
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
14,724 |
|
|
|
(3,673 |
) |
|
|
13,651 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
23,452 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
257,847 |
|
|
|
(21,046 |
) |
|
|
261,649 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
179,264 |
|
|
|
1,672 |
|
|
|
83,517 |
|
|
|
1,729,884 |
|
|
|
(261,756 |
) |
|
|
1,732,581 |
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
529,405 |
|
|
|
(809 |
) |
|
|
528,596 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
2,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,474 |
|
|
|
148,459 |
|
|
|
(31,909 |
) |
|
|
137,824 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
25,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,258 |
|
|
|
47,759 |
|
|
|
(95,026 |
) |
|
|
75,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
28,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,732 |
|
|
|
725,623 |
|
|
|
(127,744 |
) |
|
|
742,243 |
|
|
Net interest income (loss) |
|
|
150,632 |
|
|
|
1,672 |
|
|
|
(32,215 |
) |
|
|
1,004,261 |
|
|
|
(134,012 |
) |
|
|
990,338 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
602,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
602,561 |
|
|
Net interest income (loss) after provision for loan losses |
|
|
150,592 |
|
|
|
1,672 |
|
|
|
(32,215 |
) |
|
|
401,740 |
|
|
|
(134,012 |
) |
|
|
387,777 |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,319 |
|
Other service fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
313,641 |
|
|
|
(6,992 |
) |
|
|
306,649 |
|
Net (loss) gain on sale and valuation adjustments of investment
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,147 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,430 |
|
Trading account profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,547 |
|
Gain on sale of loans and valuation adjustments on loans
held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,696 |
|
Other operating (loss) income |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
10,628 |
|
|
|
(4,992 |
) |
|
|
90,838 |
|
|
|
(3,621 |
) |
|
|
92,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
150,575 |
|
|
|
3,153 |
|
|
|
(37,207 |
) |
|
|
1,104,358 |
|
|
|
(144,625 |
) |
|
|
1,076,254 |
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
|
17,142 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
345,541 |
|
|
|
(2,009 |
) |
|
|
360,963 |
|
Pension, profit sharing and other benefits |
|
|
4,091 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,476 |
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
98,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
21,233 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
440,017 |
|
|
|
(2,082 |
) |
|
|
459,515 |
|
Net occupancy expenses |
|
|
1,884 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
79,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,218 |
|
Equipment expenses |
|
|
2,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,312 |
|
Other taxes |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,905 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
14,386 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
78,873 |
|
|
|
(4,279 |
) |
|
|
88,964 |
|
Communications |
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
37,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,137 |
|
Business promotion |
|
|
1,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,064 |
|
Printing and supplies |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,763 |
|
FDIC deposit insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,237 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(42,645 |
) |
|
|
(301 |
) |
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
148,809 |
|
|
|
(1,183 |
) |
|
|
104,485 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
832 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
(189 |
) |
|
|
983,359 |
|
|
|
(7,544 |
) |
|
|
976,548 |
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax and equity in losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
149,743 |
|
|
|
3,063 |
|
|
|
(37,018 |
) |
|
|
120,999 |
|
|
|
(137,081 |
) |
|
|
99,706 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
2,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,073 |
) |
|
|
150,282 |
|
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
152,467 |
|
|
Income (loss) before equity in losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
147,114 |
|
|
|
3,063 |
|
|
|
(35,945 |
) |
|
|
(29,283 |
) |
|
|
(137,710 |
) |
|
|
(52,761 |
) |
Equity in undistributed losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
(199,875 |
) |
|
|
(291,506 |
) |
|
|
(265,535 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
756,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(52,761 |
) |
|
|
(288,443 |
) |
|
|
(301,480 |
) |
|
|
(29,283 |
) |
|
|
619,206 |
|
|
|
(52,761 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(488,242 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(488,242 |
) |
Equity in undistributed losses of discontinued operations |
|
|
(488,242 |
) |
|
|
(488,242 |
) |
|
|
(488,242 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,464,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS |
|
$ |
(541,003 |
) |
|
$ |
(776,685 |
) |
|
$ |
(789,722 |
) |
|
$ |
(517,525 |
) |
|
$ |
2,083,932 |
|
|
$ |
(541,003 |
) |
|
92
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
PIBI |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(360,692 |
) |
|
$ |
(556,350 |
) |
|
$ |
(569,643 |
) |
|
$ |
(380,689 |
) |
|
$ |
1,506,682 |
|
|
$ |
(360,692 |
) |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in undistributed losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
451,554 |
|
|
|
567,357 |
|
|
|
587,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,606,507 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment |
|
|
1,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
47,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,033 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,053,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,053,036 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,218 |
|
Amortization and fair value adjustment of servicing assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,598 |
|
Amortization
of discount on junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
1,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,948 |
|
Net (gain) loss on sale and valuation adjustment of
investment securities |
|
|
(3,008 |
) |
|
|
10,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(230,005 |
) |
|
|
2,058 |
|
|
|
(220,792 |
) |
Gains from changes in fair value related to instruments
measured at fair value pursuant to SFAS No. 159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,674 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,674 |
) |
Net loss (gain) on disposition of premises and equipment |
|
|
2,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,247 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,696 |
|
Net loss on sale of loans and valuation adjustments on
loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,202 |
|
(Gain) loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(26,439 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,898 |
) |
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
(1,922 |
) |
|
|
(79,304 |
) |
Net amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts
on investments |
|
|
343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,934 |
|
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
13,169 |
|
Net amortization of premiums and deferred loan
origination fees and costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,496 |
|
(Earnings) losses from investments under the equity method |
|
|
(676 |
) |
|
|
(12,799 |
) |
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
(1,302 |
) |
|
|
(14,307 |
) |
Stock options expense |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net of valuation |
|
|
(876 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
(76,800 |
) |
|
|
1,201 |
|
|
|
(76,444 |
) |
Net disbursements on loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(919,719 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(919,719 |
) |
Acquisitions of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(280,243 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(280,243 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,258 |
|
Net decrease in trading securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,302,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,302,093 |
|
Net decrease in accrued income receivable |
|
|
890 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
1,809 |
|
|
|
23,839 |
|
|
|
(1,899 |
) |
|
|
24,935 |
|
Net decrease in other assets |
|
|
7,799 |
|
|
|
5,796 |
|
|
|
976 |
|
|
|
58,671 |
|
|
|
(46,307 |
) |
|
|
26,935 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in interest payable |
|
|
2,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,497 |
) |
|
|
(52,539 |
) |
|
|
1,899 |
|
|
|
(57,763 |
) |
Net increase in postretirement benefit obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,652 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in other liabilities |
|
|
5,633 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(20,311 |
) |
|
|
33,972 |
|
|
|
46,176 |
|
|
|
65,431 |
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
443,923 |
|
|
|
570,774 |
|
|
|
509,131 |
|
|
|
1,141,499 |
|
|
|
(1,606,711 |
) |
|
|
1,058,616 |
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
83,231 |
|
|
|
14,424 |
|
|
|
(60,512 |
) |
|
|
760,810 |
|
|
|
(100,029 |
) |
|
|
697,924 |
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease (increase) in money market investments |
|
|
79,643 |
|
|
|
(6,825 |
) |
|
|
449,835 |
|
|
|
(304,212 |
) |
|
|
(522,610 |
) |
|
|
(304,169 |
) |
Purchases of investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
(249,603 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,047,796 |
) |
|
|
191,484 |
|
|
|
(4,105,915 |
) |
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
(51,539 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,023 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54,562 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,601 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,601 |
) |
Proceeds from calls, paydowns, maturities and
redemptions of investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
14,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,247,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,261,801 |
|
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
27,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,535 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,480 |
|
Proceeds from sale of investment securities
available-for-sale |
|
|
426,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,590,320 |
|
|
|
(191,484 |
) |
|
|
3,825,502 |
|
Proceeds from sale of other investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,294 |
|
Net repayments on loans |
|
|
655,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,200 |
|
|
|
679,468 |
|
|
|
(676,355 |
) |
|
|
666,618 |
|
Proceeds from sale of loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325,414 |
|
Acquisition of loan portfolios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,965 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,965 |
) |
Capital contribution to subsidiary |
|
|
(795,000 |
) |
|
|
(795,000 |
) |
|
|
(445,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,035,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer of shares of a subsidiary |
|
|
(42,971 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,029 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,029 |
) |
Acquisition of premises and equipment |
|
|
(268 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55,357 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55,625 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment |
|
|
14,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,105 |
|
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,720 |
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
78,762 |
|
|
|
(801,825 |
) |
|
|
56,006 |
|
|
|
1,709,625 |
|
|
|
836,035 |
|
|
|
1,878,603 |
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
PIBI |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,591,464 |
) |
|
|
424,356 |
|
|
|
(1,167,108 |
) |
Net decrease in federal funds purchased and
assets sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
(44,471 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(788,926 |
) |
|
|
89,680 |
|
|
|
(743,717 |
) |
Net decrease in other short-term borrowings |
|
|
(16,553 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
(661,159 |
) |
|
|
676,355 |
|
|
|
(1,857 |
) |
Payments of notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(798,380 |
) |
|
|
(8,622 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(807,002 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,099 |
|
|
|
60,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,100 |
|
Dividends paid to parent company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96,125 |
) |
|
|
96,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(71,438 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71,438 |
) |
Treasury stock acquired |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
Issuance costs and fees paid on exchange of
preferred stock and trust preferred
securities |
|
|
(28,562 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,944 |
|
|
|
(24,618 |
) |
Capital contribution from parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
795,000 |
|
|
|
795,000 |
|
|
|
445,000 |
|
|
|
(2,035,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(161,037 |
) |
|
|
795,000 |
|
|
|
(2,781 |
) |
|
|
(2,641,295 |
) |
|
|
(744,540 |
) |
|
|
(2,754,653 |
) |
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks |
|
|
956 |
|
|
|
7,599 |
|
|
|
(7,287 |
) |
|
|
(170,860 |
) |
|
|
(8,534 |
) |
|
|
(178,126 |
) |
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
7,668 |
|
|
|
777,994 |
|
|
|
(766 |
) |
|
|
784,987 |
|
|
Cash and due from banks at end of period |
|
$ |
958 |
|
|
$ |
7,688 |
|
|
$ |
381 |
|
|
$ |
607,134 |
|
|
$ |
(9,300 |
) |
|
$ |
606,861 |
|
|
94
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PIBI |
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
Holding |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(541,003 |
) |
|
$ |
(776,685 |
) |
|
$ |
(789,722 |
) |
|
$ |
(517,525 |
) |
|
$ |
2,083,932 |
|
|
$ |
(541,003 |
) |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in undistributed losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
688,117 |
|
|
|
779,748 |
|
|
|
753,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,221,642 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment |
|
|
1,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
53,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,233 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
621,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
621,552 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,948 |
|
Amortization and fair value adjustment of servicing assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,679 |
|
Net loss (gain) on sale and valuation adjustment of
investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73,157 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64,010 |
) |
Losses from changes in fair value related to instruments
measured at fair value pursuant to SFAS No. 159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179,482 |
|
Net loss (gain) on disposition of premises and equipment |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,700 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,643 |
) |
Net gain on sale of loans and valuation adjustments on
loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,527 |
|
Net amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts
on investments |
|
|
(1,754 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,034 |
|
Net amortization of premiums and deferred loan
origination fees and costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,650 |
|
Fair value adjustment of other assets held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,702 |
|
Losses (earnings) from investments under the equity method |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
(10,628 |
) |
|
|
4,991 |
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(1,328 |
) |
|
|
(6,899 |
) |
Stock options expense |
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
830 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net of valuation |
|
|
(339 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,072 |
) |
|
|
58,183 |
|
|
|
15,489 |
|
|
|
72,261 |
|
Net disbursements on loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,000,449 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,000,449 |
) |
Acquisitions of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(268,718 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(268,718 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,289,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,289,738 |
|
Net decrease in trading securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,604,664 |
|
|
|
(319 |
) |
|
|
1,604,345 |
|
Net decrease (increase) in accrued income receivable |
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
(7,319 |
) |
|
|
8,033 |
|
|
|
6,882 |
|
|
|
8,194 |
|
Net decrease (increase) in other assets |
|
|
8,425 |
|
|
|
4,081 |
|
|
|
(21,518 |
) |
|
|
(237,322 |
) |
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
(245,990 |
) |
Net (decrease) increase in interest payable |
|
|
(3,681 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
|
(40,092 |
) |
|
|
(6,882 |
) |
|
|
(49,180 |
) |
Net increase in postretirement benefit obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,810 |
|
Net increase (decrease) increase in other liabilities |
|
|
2,171 |
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
14,758 |
|
|
|
(36,511 |
) |
|
|
(15,491 |
) |
|
|
(35,120 |
) |
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
695,855 |
|
|
|
782,223 |
|
|
|
745,094 |
|
|
|
1,416,751 |
|
|
|
(2,222,947 |
) |
|
|
1,416,976 |
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
154,852 |
|
|
|
5,538 |
|
|
|
(44,628 |
) |
|
|
899,226 |
|
|
|
(139,015 |
) |
|
|
875,973 |
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (increase) decrease in money market investments |
|
|
(22,140 |
) |
|
|
(39,115 |
) |
|
|
(115,588 |
) |
|
|
773,819 |
|
|
|
100,239 |
|
|
|
697,215 |
|
Purchases of investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(181 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,875,209 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,875,390 |
) |
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
(577,103 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,381,183 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,958,286 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(166,641 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(166,641 |
) |
Proceeds from calls, paydowns, maturities and
redemptions of investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,377,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,377,740 |
|
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
748,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,976,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,724,818 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154,067 |
|
Proceeds from sale of investment securities
available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,436,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,444,509 |
|
Proceeds from sale of other investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,341 |
|
Net (disbursements) repayments on loans |
|
|
(687,353 |
) |
|
|
25,150 |
|
|
|
1,341,322 |
|
|
|
(916,687 |
) |
|
|
(738,541 |
) |
|
|
(976,109 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,984,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,984,860 |
|
Acquisition of loan portfolios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,505 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,505 |
) |
Capital contribution to subsidiary |
|
|
(1,512 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,628 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,628 |
) |
Acquisition of premises and equipment |
|
|
(578 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(111,618 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(112,196 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,366 |
|
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,280 |
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(540,186 |
) |
|
|
(5,850 |
) |
|
|
1,225,734 |
|
|
|
2,429,533 |
|
|
|
(636,790 |
) |
|
|
2,472,441 |
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PIBI |
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
Holding |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(261,806 |
) |
|
|
(139,095 |
) |
|
|
(400,901 |
) |
Net decrease in federal funds purchased and
assets sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(128,941 |
) |
|
|
(1,617,158 |
) |
|
|
38,874 |
|
|
|
(1,707,225 |
) |
Net decrease in other short-term borrowings |
|
|
(165,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(478,311 |
) |
|
|
(392,200 |
) |
|
|
40,542 |
|
|
|
(994,969 |
) |
Payments of notes payable |
|
|
(31,152 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(574,480 |
) |
|
|
(1,407,625 |
) |
|
|
700,319 |
|
|
|
(1,312,938 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable |
|
|
335,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,902 |
|
|
|
841,718 |
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
1,182,917 |
|
Dividends paid to parent company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(134,900 |
) |
|
|
134,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(154,877 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(154,877 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
15,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,174 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock |
|
|
386,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,793 |
|
|
|
389,935 |
|
Treasury stock acquired |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(358 |
) |
Capital contribution from parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,509 |
|
|
|
(1,509 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
385,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,173,830 |
) |
|
|
(2,970,761 |
) |
|
|
775,824 |
|
|
|
(2,983,242 |
) |
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks |
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
(312 |
) |
|
|
7,276 |
|
|
|
357,998 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
365,172 |
|
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period |
|
|
1,391 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
818,455 |
|
|
|
(1,797 |
) |
|
|
818,825 |
|
|
Cash and due from banks at end of period |
|
$ |
1,582 |
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
7,676 |
|
|
$ |
1,176,453 |
|
|
$ |
(1,778 |
) |
|
$ |
1,183,997 |
|
|
96
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
This report includes managements discussion and analysis (MD&A) of the consolidated financial
position and financial performance of Popular, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Corporation or
Popular). All accompanying tables, financial statements and notes included elsewhere in this
report should be considered an integral part of this analysis.
OVERVIEW
Popular, Inc. (the Corporation or Popular) is a diversified, publicly owned financial holding
company subject to the supervision and regulation of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System. The Corporation is a financial services provider with operations in Puerto Rico, the United
States, the Caribbean and Latin America. As the leading financial institution in Puerto Rico, the
Corporation offers retail and commercial banking services through its principal banking subsidiary,
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, as well as auto and equipment leasing and financing, mortgage loans,
investment banking, broker-dealer and insurance services through specialized subsidiaries. In the
United States, the Corporation operates Banco Popular North America (BPNA), including its
wholly-owned subsidiary E-LOAN. BPNA is a community bank providing a broad range of financial
services and products to the communities it serves. BPNA operates branches in New York, California,
Illinois, New Jersey and Florida. E-LOAN markets deposit accounts under its name for the benefit of
BPNA and offers loan customers the option of being referred to a trusted consumer lending partner.
The Corporation, through its subsidiary EVERTEC, provides transaction processing services
throughout the Caribbean and Latin America, as well as internally servicing many of its
subsidiaries system infrastructures and transactional processing businesses. Note 26 to the
consolidated financial statements presents information about the Corporations business segments.
The operations of PFH, the Corporations consumer and mortgage lending subsidiary in the U.S.
mainland, were discontinued in the later part of 2008. Refer to the Discontinued Operations section
of this MD&A for additional information.
The Corporation reported a net loss of $125.0 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2009,
compared with net loss of $668.5 million in the same quarter of 2008. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, the Corporations net loss totaled $360.7 million, compared to a net loss of
$541.0 million for the same period in 2008. Table A provides selected financial data and
performance indicators for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. As
indicated in previous filings with the SEC, in 2008, the Corporation discontinued the operations of
its U.S. mainland-based subsidiary Popular Financial Holdings (PFH), and thus, the results of PFH
are presented as part of Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax in Table A. The
discussions in this MD&A pertain to Popular, Inc.s continuing operations, unless otherwise
indicated.
The Corporations most significant transaction for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 was the
completion of the previously announced exchange offer to increase common equity. During the third
quarter of 2009, the Corporation undertook actions that resulted in total additions of $1.4 billion
to Tier 1 common equity. The Corporations Tier 1 common to risk-weighted assets ratio increased
from 2.45% as of June 30, 2009 to 6.88% as of September 30, 2009. See Reconciliation of Non-GAAP
Financial Measure section in this MD&A for a reconciliation of Tier 1 common to common
stockholders equity and a discussion of our use of this non-GAAP financial measure in this report.
On August 25, 2009, the Corporation completed the settlement of its previously announced exchange
offer to issue up to 390 million shares of its common stock in exchange of its Series A and Series
B preferred stock and trust preferred securities. As part of the exchange offer, the Corporation
issued over 357 million in new shares of common stock for a total of over 639 million common shares
outstanding as of September 30, 2009. This exchange offer contributed with an increase in common
stockholders equity of $923.0 million, which included $612.4 million in newly issued common stock
and surplus and $310.6 million favorable impact to accumulated deficit, including $80.3 million in
gains on the early extinguishment of junior subordinated debentures that are related to the trust
preferred securities.
Also, as announced on August 10, 2009, in connection with the exchange offer, the Corporation
agreed with the U.S. Treasury to exchange all $935 million of its outstanding shares of Series C
preferred stock of the Corporation for $935 million of newly issued trust preferred securities. The
trust preferred securities issued to the U.S. Treasury by
97
the trust have a distribution rate of 5%
until, but excluding December 5, 2013 and 9% thereafter (which is the same as the dividend rate on the previously
outstanding Series C Preferred Stock). The transaction with the U.S. Treasury settled on August
24, 2009 and resulted in a favorable impact to accumulated deficit of $485.3 million.
Refer to the Exchange Offer section in this MD&A for a more detailed description of the above
transactions.
The Corporations financial performance for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 when compared with
the same quarter of the previous year was impacted by a number of significant items summarized
below.
|
|
Income tax expense of $6.3 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared with income tax
expense of $148.3 million in the third quarter of 2008. The variance was primarily due to the
recognition during the third quarter of 2008 of a $189.2 million valuation allowance on the
deferred tax assets related to the Corporations U.S. continuing operations. Refer to the
Income Taxes section of this MD&A for further information on deferred tax assets. |
|
|
Operating expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 totaled $220.6 million compared
with $322.9 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2008. This decrease was principally
due to a favorable impact of $80.3 million resulting from the gain on the early extinguishment
of debt related to the exchange of trust preferred securities for common stock. This
favorable impact was accompanied by a reduction in personnel costs of $17.7 million mostly due
to the downsizing of the U.S. operations, partially offset by higher FDIC insurance costs. |
|
|
The Corporations allowance for loan losses increased to $1.2 billion as of September 30,
2009, an increase of $481 million from September 30, 2008. The Corporations allowance for
loan losses represented 4.95% of loans held-in-portfolio as of September 30, 2009, compared
with 2.76% as of September 30, 2008. The provision for loan losses totaled $331.1 million or
123% of net charge-offs for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, compared with $252.2 million
or 148% of net charge-offs for the third quarter of 2008. The increase in the provision for
loan losses for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same quarter in 2008 was
the result of higher general reserve requirements for commercial loans, construction loans,
U.S. mainland non-conventional residential mortgages and home equity lines of credit, combined
with specific reserves recorded for loans considered impaired. Persistent adverse economic
conditions and negative trends in employment levels and property values in the markets in
which the Corporation operates have continued to negatively affect the Corporations provision
for loan losses in the third quarter of 2009. Like many financial institutions, Popular has
experienced heightened credit losses, which have resulted in record levels of non-performing
assets, charge-offs and foreclosures. |
|
|
A decrease in net interest income of $47.9 million for the third quarter of 2009, compared
with the same quarter of 2008, was primarily due to lower average balances of interest-earning
assets, principally loans, due to the sale of most of the lease financing portfolio and the
downsizing or discontinuance of certain loan origination units in the U.S. mainland operations
and the slowdown of loan origination activity due to current market conditions. The
Corporations borrowings also decreased, driven by the reduction in earning assets they fund.
Contributing to the reduction in net interest income was the decrease by the Federal Reserve
(Fed) of the federal funds target rate from 2.00% in September 30, 2008 to between 0% and
0.25% as of September 30, 2009. This reduction in short-term market rates impacted the yield
of several of the Corporations earning assets during that period, including the yield on
commercial and construction loans with floating or adjustable rates and floating rate
collateralized mortgage obligations, as well as the yield of newly originated loans in a
declining interest rate environment. On the positive side, the decrease in rates contributed
to the decrease in the cost of interest-bearing deposits and short-term borrowings. Other
factors impacting negatively the Corporations net interest income for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009, when compared with the same quarter in 2008, were the increase in
non-performing loans, the issuance during the third quarter of 2009 of $935 million in
liquidation amount of trust preferred securities in exchange for Series C preferred stock
having an equivalent aggregate liquidation preference and which increase interest expense, and
the increase in the cost of $350 million in term notes due to rating downgrades. Offsetting
this negative variance was the early extinguishment of debt, specifically related to the
exchange of trust preferred securities for shares of common stock. |
|
|
The decrease in non-interest income for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 of $27.9
million, compared with the same quarter of 2008, was principally due
to increased representation and warranty reserves associated with past
loan sales given higher claims and loss severities. |
98
|
|
quarter ended September 30, 2008. Other non-interest income declined by $17.7 million mostly as a result of
$21.1 million in gains on the sale of real estate properties recorded in the third quarter of
2008. |
The discontinued operations of PFH in the U.S. mainland reported a net loss of $3.4 million for the
quarter ended September 30, 2009, compared to a net loss of $457.4 million for the quarter ended
September 30, 2008. The net loss in the third quarter of 2008 included write-downs of assets held-for-sale to fair value, losses on the
sale of loans, restructuring charges and an unfavorable impact to income tax due to the recording
of a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets of $171.2 million. Refer to the Discontinued
Operations section of this MD&A for further information.
Total assets amounted to $35.6 billion as of September 30, 2009, compared with $38.9 billion as of
December 31, 2008 and $40.4 billion as of September 30, 2008. The decline in total assets, when
compared to December 31, 2008, was principally in loans held-in-portfolio by $1.3 billion and in
the Corporations portfolio of investment securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity by
$1.0 billion. The current financial environment has required the Corporation to strengthen its
underwriting standards and ensure that it prices its loans appropriately. As a result of this
challenging financial environment, together with caution being exercised by customers, and
managements decision to exit selected businesses on the United States mainland, the Corporation
has seen a reduction in the volume of loans. The decline in the Corporations investment securities
available-for-sale and held-to-maturity from December 31, 2008 to the end of the third quarter of
2009 was mainly associated with maturing securities.
Refer to Table I in the Financial Condition section of this MD&A for the percentage allocation of
the composition of the Corporations financing to total assets. Deposits decreased from $27.6
billion as of December 31, 2008 to $26.4 billion as of September 30, 2009. Deposits totaled $27.9
billion as of September 30, 2008. The decrease in deposits occurred principally in the
Corporations U.S. mainland operations in part due to deleveraging strategies, including the
closure and consolidation of branches, as well as a gradual reduction in the pricing of deposits,
including internet deposits. Borrowed funds amounted to $5.5 billion as of September 30, 2009,
compared to $6.9 billion as of December 31, 2008 and $8.5 billion as of September 30, 2008. Note 14
to the consolidated financial statements provides additional information on the Corporations
borrowings as of such dates. The reduction in total borrowings of $1.4 billion from December 31,
2008 to September 30, 2009 was principally in repurchase agreements and unsecured senior debt.
Refer to the Statement of Condition and Liquidity Risk sections of this MD&A for variance
explanations and funding sources. The reduction in junior subordinated debentures from the
extinguishment of debt resulting from the exchange of trust preferred securities for common stock
was offset by the junior subordinated debentures issued as part of the exchange of the Series C
preferred stock of the U.S. Treasury for trust preferred securities.
99
TABLE A
Financial Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Condition Highlights |
|
As of September 30, |
|
Average for the nine months |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Variance |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Variance |
|
Money market investments |
|
$ |
1,098,823 |
|
|
$ |
309,497 |
|
|
$ |
789,326 |
|
|
$ |
1,194,107 |
|
|
$ |
651,043 |
|
|
$ |
543,064 |
|
Investment and trading securities |
|
|
7,827,552 |
|
|
|
8,962,130 |
|
|
|
(1,134,578 |
) |
|
|
8,237,875 |
|
|
|
8,949,770 |
|
|
|
(711,895 |
) |
Loans |
|
|
24,471,516 |
|
|
|
26,581,169 |
|
|
|
(2,109,653 |
) |
|
|
25,102,124 |
|
|
|
26,513,808 |
|
|
|
(1,411,684 |
) |
Total earning assets |
|
|
33,397,891 |
|
|
|
35,852,796 |
|
|
|
(2,454,905 |
) |
|
|
34,534,106 |
|
|
|
36,114,621 |
|
|
|
(1,580,515 |
) |
Total assets |
|
|
35,637,804 |
|
|
|
40,390,142 |
|
|
|
(4,752,338 |
) |
|
|
37,089,769 |
|
|
|
41,391,639 |
|
|
|
(4,301,870 |
) |
Deposits |
|
|
26,382,898 |
|
|
|
27,911,397 |
|
|
|
(1,528,499 |
) |
|
|
27,028,450 |
|
|
|
27,268,864 |
|
|
|
(240,414 |
) |
Borrowings |
|
|
5,460,789 |
|
|
|
8,479,537 |
|
|
|
(3,018,748 |
) |
|
|
6,021,727 |
|
|
|
7,519,439 |
|
|
|
(1,497,712 |
) |
Stockholders equity |
|
|
2,742,456 |
|
|
|
3,007,473 |
|
|
|
(265,017 |
) |
|
|
2,960,735 |
|
|
|
3,440,296 |
|
|
|
(479,561 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Highlights |
|
Third Quarter |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(In thousands, except per share information) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Variance |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Variance |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
276,389 |
|
|
$ |
324,282 |
|
|
|
($47,893 |
) |
|
$ |
831,935 |
|
|
$ |
990,338 |
|
|
|
($158,403 |
) |
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
331,063 |
|
|
|
252,160 |
|
|
|
78,903 |
|
|
|
1,053,036 |
|
|
|
602,561 |
|
|
|
450,475 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
160,044 |
|
|
|
187,928 |
|
|
|
(27,884 |
) |
|
|
720,614 |
|
|
|
688,477 |
|
|
|
32,137 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
220,600 |
|
|
|
322,915 |
|
|
|
(102,315 |
) |
|
|
855,442 |
|
|
|
976,548 |
|
|
|
(121,106 |
) |
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations before
income tax |
|
|
(115,230 |
) |
|
|
(62,865 |
) |
|
|
(52,365 |
) |
|
|
(355,929 |
) |
|
|
99,706 |
|
|
|
(455,635 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
6,331 |
|
|
|
148,308 |
|
|
|
(141,977 |
) |
|
|
(15,209 |
) |
|
|
152,467 |
|
|
|
(167,676 |
) |
|
Loss from continuing operations, net of income tax |
|
|
(121,561 |
) |
|
|
(211,173 |
) |
|
|
89,612 |
|
|
|
(340,720 |
) |
|
|
(52,761 |
) |
|
|
(287,959 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income
tax |
|
|
(3,427 |
) |
|
|
(457,370 |
) |
|
|
453,943 |
|
|
|
(19,972 |
) |
|
|
(488,242 |
) |
|
|
468,270 |
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
($124,988 |
) |
|
|
($668,543 |
) |
|
$ |
543,555 |
|
|
|
($360,692 |
) |
|
|
($541,003 |
) |
|
$ |
180,311 |
|
|
Net (loss) income applicable to common stock |
|
$ |
595,614 |
|
|
|
($679,772 |
) |
|
$ |
1,275,386 |
|
|
$ |
310,604 |
|
|
|
($561,213 |
) |
|
$ |
871,817 |
|
|
Earnings (losses) per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings (losses) from
continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
|
($0.79 |
) |
|
$ |
2.20 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
|
($0.27 |
) |
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
Basic and diluted losses from discontinued
operations |
|
|
($0.01 |
) |
|
|
($1.63 |
) |
|
$ |
1.62 |
|
|
|
($0.06 |
) |
|
|
($1.73 |
) |
|
$ |
1.67 |
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings (losses) Total |
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
|
($2.42 |
) |
|
$ |
3.82 |
|
|
$ |
0.94 |
|
|
|
($2.00 |
) |
|
$ |
2.94 |
|
|
Selected
Statistical Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Common Stock Data Market price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
$ |
2.83 |
|
|
$ |
11.17 |
|
|
$ |
5.52 |
|
|
$ |
14.07 |
|
Low |
|
|
1.04 |
|
|
|
5.12 |
|
|
|
1.04 |
|
|
|
5.12 |
|
End |
|
|
2.83 |
|
|
|
8.29 |
|
|
|
2.83 |
|
|
|
8.29 |
|
Book value per share at period end |
|
|
4.21 |
|
|
|
8.59 |
|
|
|
4.21 |
|
|
|
8.59 |
|
Dividends declared per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
Profitability
Ratios Return on assets |
|
|
(1.38 |
%) |
|
|
(6.55 |
%) |
|
|
(1.30 |
%) |
|
|
(1.75 |
%) |
Return on common equity |
|
|
(26.24 |
) |
|
|
(93.32 |
) |
|
|
(31.48 |
) |
|
|
(24.57 |
) |
Net interest spread (taxable equivalent) |
|
|
3.07 |
|
|
|
3.42 |
|
|
|
3.00 |
|
|
|
3.44 |
|
Net interest margin (taxable equivalent) |
|
|
3.51 |
|
|
|
3.89 |
|
|
|
3.45 |
|
|
|
3.92 |
|
|
Capitalization Ratios Average equity to assets |
|
|
7.74 |
% |
|
|
8.54 |
% |
|
|
7.98 |
% |
|
|
8.31 |
% |
Tier I capital to risk adjusted assets |
|
|
10.23 |
|
|
|
9.09 |
|
|
|
10.23 |
|
|
|
9.09 |
|
Total capital to risk adjusted assets |
|
|
11.53 |
|
|
|
10.35 |
|
|
|
11.53 |
|
|
|
10.35 |
|
Leverage ratio |
|
|
7.93 |
|
|
|
7.17 |
|
|
|
7.93 |
|
|
|
7.17 |
|
|
100
The following table provides a reconciliation of Net income (losses) applicable to common
stockholders and the computation of earnings (losses) per common share (EPS) for the quarters
and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, which highlights the impact of the exchange
offer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands, except share information) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(121,561 |
) |
|
$ |
(211,173 |
) |
|
$ |
(340,720 |
) |
|
$ |
(52,761 |
) |
Net loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(3,427 |
) |
|
|
(457,370 |
) |
|
|
(19,972 |
) |
|
|
(488,242 |
) |
Preferred stock dividends (1) |
|
|
5,974 |
|
|
|
(11,229 |
) |
|
|
(39,857 |
) |
|
|
(20,210 |
) |
Preferred stock discount accretion |
|
|
(1,040 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,515 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Favorable impact from exchange of Series C preferred
stock to trust preferred securities |
|
|
485,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
485,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable impact from exchange of shares of Series A
and B preferred stock for common stock, net of
issuance costs |
|
|
230,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) applicable to common stock |
|
$ |
595,614 |
|
|
$ |
(679,772 |
) |
|
$ |
310,604 |
|
|
$ |
(561,213 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
425,672,578 |
|
|
|
281,489,469 |
|
|
|
330,325,348 |
|
|
|
280,841,638 |
|
Average potential common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding assuming dilution |
|
|
425,672,578 |
|
|
|
281,489,469 |
|
|
|
330,325,348 |
|
|
|
280,841,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted EPS from continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
$ |
(0.79 |
) |
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
(0.27 |
) |
Basic and diluted EPS from discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(1.63 |
) |
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
(1.73 |
) |
|
Basic and diluted EPS |
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
$ |
(2.42 |
) |
|
$ |
0.94 |
|
|
$ |
(2.00 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amount presented for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 represents the reversal of dividends
on Series C preferred stock considered accrued as of June 30, 2009 for EPS purposes only. These
cumulative dividends were not paid as dividends to the Series C
preferred stockholders given the
terms of the exchange agreement to trust preferred securities, which was effected in August
2009. |
The Corporation, like other financial institutions, is subject to a number of risks, many of
which are outside of managements control, though efforts are made to manage those risks while
optimizing returns. Among the risks assumed are: (1) market risk, which is the risk that changes in
market rates and prices will adversely affect the Corporations financial condition or results of
operations; (2) liquidity risk, which is the risk that the Corporation will have insufficient cash
or access to cash to meet operating needs and financial obligations; (3) credit risk, which is the
risk that loan customers or other counterparties will be unable to perform their contractual
obligations; and (4) operational risk, which is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or
failed internal processes, people and systems, or from external events. In addition, the
Corporation is subject to legal, compliance and reputational risks, among others.
As a financial services company, the Corporations earnings are significantly affected by general
business and economic conditions. Lending and deposit activities and fee income generation are
influenced by the level of business spending and investment, consumer income, spending and savings,
capital market activities, competition, customer preferences, interest rate conditions and
prevailing market rates on competing products. The Corporation continuously monitors general
business and economic conditions, industry-related indicators and trends, competition, interest
rate volatility, credit quality indicators, loan and deposit demand, operational and systems
efficiencies, revenue enhancements and changes in the regulation of financial services companies.
The Corporation operates in a highly regulated environment and may be adversely affected by changes
in federal and local laws and regulations. Also, competition with other financial institutions
could adversely affect its profitability.
The description of the Corporations business contained in Item 1 of the Corporations Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, while not all inclusive, discusses additional information
about the business of the Corporation and risk factors, many beyond the Corporations control that,
in addition to the other information in this Form 10-Q, including Item 1A of Part II, readers
should consider.
Further discussion of operating results, financial condition and credit, market and liquidity risks
is presented in the narrative and tables included herein.
101
The Corporations common stock is traded on the National Association of Securities Dealers
Automated Quotations (NASDAQ) system under the symbols BPOP.
The information included in this report may contain certain forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on
managements current expectations and involve certain risks and uncertainties that may cause actual
results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements. Various factors,
some of which are beyond Populars control, could cause actual results to differ materially from
those expressed in, or implied by, such forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a
difference include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
the rate of declining growth in the economy and employment levels, as well as general
business and economic conditions; |
|
|
|
changes in interest rates, as well as the magnitude of such changes; |
|
|
|
the fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government and its agencies; |
|
|
|
changes in federal bank regulatory and supervisory policies, including required levels
of capital; |
|
|
|
the relative strength or weakness of the consumer and commercial credit sectors and of
the real estate markets in Puerto Rico and the other markets in which borrowers are
located; |
|
|
|
the performance of the stock and bond markets; |
|
|
|
competition in the financial services industry; |
|
|
|
possible legislative, tax or regulatory changes; and |
|
|
|
difficulties in combining the operations of acquired entities. |
For a discussion of such factors and certain risks and uncertainties to which the Corporation is
subject, see the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as
well as its filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Other than to the extent
required by applicable law, including the requirements of applicable securities laws, the
Corporation assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences
or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements.
EXCHANGE OFFERS
In June 2009, the Corporation commenced an offer to issue shares of its common stock in exchange
for its Series A preferred stock and Series B preferred stock and for trust preferred securities
(also referred as capital securities). On August 25, 2009, the Corporation completed the
settlement of the exchange offer and issued over 357 million new shares of common stock.
Exchange of preferred stock for common stock
The exchange by holders of shares of the Series A and B non-cumulative preferred stock for shares
of common stock resulted in the extinguishment of such shares of preferred stock and an issuance of
shares of common stock.
In accordance with the terms of the exchange offer, the Corporation used a relevant price of $2.50
per share of its common stock and an exchange ratio of 80% of the preferred stock liquidation value
to determine the number of shares of its common stock issued in exchange for the tendered shares of
Series A and B preferred stock. The fair value of the common stock was $1.71 per share, which was
the price as of August 20, 2009, the expiration date of the exchange offer. The carrying
(liquidation) value of each share of Series A and B preferred stock exchanged was reduced and
common stock and surplus increased in the amount of the fair value of the common stock issued. The
Corporation recorded the par amount of the shares issued as common stock ($0.01 per common share).
The excess of the common stock fair value over the par amount was recorded in surplus. The excess
of the carrying amount of the shares of preferred stock over the fair value of the shares of common
stock was recorded as a reduction to accumulated deficit and an increase in earnings per common
share computations.
102
The results of the exchange offer with respect to the Series A and B preferred stock were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
liquidation |
|
|
|
|
Per security |
|
Shares of |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of |
|
preference |
|
|
|
|
liquidation |
|
preferred stock |
|
Shares of |
|
preferred stock |
|
amount after |
|
Shares of |
Title of |
|
preference |
|
outstanding prior |
|
preferred stock |
|
outstanding after |
|
exchange |
|
common stock |
Securities |
|
Amount |
|
to exchange |
|
exchanged |
|
exchange |
|
(In thousands) |
|
issued |
|
6.375% Non-cumulative monthly income preferred stock, 2003 Series A |
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
|
7,475,000 |
|
|
|
6,589,274 |
|
|
|
885,726 |
|
|
$ |
22,143 |
|
|
|
52,714,192 |
|
8.25% Non-cumulative monthly income preferred stock, Series B |
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
|
16,000,000 |
|
|
|
14,879,335 |
|
|
|
1,120,665 |
|
|
$ |
28,017 |
|
|
|
119,034,680 |
|
|
The exchange of shares of preferred
stock for shares of common stock resulted in a favorable impact to
accumulated deficit of $230.4 million, which is also considered as part of earnings applicable to
common stockholders in the earnings (losses) per common share (EPS) computations. Refer to Note
18 to the consolidated financial statements for a reconciliation of EPS.
Common stock issued in connection with early extinguishment of debt (exchange of trust
preferred securities for common stock)
Also, during the third quarter of 2009, the Corporation exchanged trust preferred securities (also
referred to as capital securities) issued by different trusts for shares of common stock of the
Corporation. See table below for a list of such securities and trusts. The trust preferred
securities were delivered to the trusts in return for the junior subordinated debentures (recorded
as notes payable in the Corporations financial statements) that had been issued by the Corporation
to the trusts in the past. The junior subordinated debentures were submitted for cancellation by
the indenture trustee under the applicable indenture. The Corporation recognized a pre-tax gain of
$80.3 million on the extinguishment of the applicable junior subordinated debentures that was
included in the consolidated statement of operations for the third quarter of 2009. This
transaction was accounted as an early extinguishment of debt.
In accordance with the terms of the exchange offer, the Corporation used a relevant price of $2.50
per share of its common stock and the exchange ratios referred to in the table below to determine
the number of shares of its common stock issued in exchange for the validly tendered trust
preferred securities. The fair value of the common stock was $1.71 per share, which was the price
as of August 20, 2009, the expiration date of the exchange offer. The carrying value of the
junior subordinated debentures was reduced and common stock and surplus increased in the amount of
the fair value of the common stock issued. The Corporation recorded the par amount of the shares
issued as common stock ($0.01 per common share). The excess of the common stock fair value over the
par amount was recorded in surplus. The excess of the carrying amount of the junior subordinated
debentures retired over the fair value of the common stock issued was recorded as a gain on early
extinguishment of debt in the consolidated statement of operations for the quarter ended September
30, 2009.
103
The results of the exchange offer with respect to the trust preferred securities were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate |
|
liquidation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
liquidation |
|
preference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
preference |
|
amount of |
|
|
Liquidation |
|
Trust |
|
preferred |
|
Trust |
|
Trust |
|
amount of |
|
junior |
|
|
preference |
|
preferred |
|
securities |
|
preferred |
|
preferred |
|
trust preferred |
|
subordinated |
|
|
amount per |
|
security |
|
outstanding |
|
securities |
|
securities |
|
securities after |
|
debentures |
Title of |
|
trust preferred |
|
exchange |
|
prior to |
|
exchanged for |
|
outstanding |
|
exchange |
|
after exchange |
Securities |
|
security |
|
value |
|
exchange |
|
common stock |
|
after exchange |
|
(In thousands) |
|
(In thousands) |
|
8.327% Trust Preferred Securities (issued by BanPonce Trust I) |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,150 or 115% |
|
|
144,000 |
|
|
|
91,135 |
|
|
|
52,865 |
|
|
$ |
52,865 |
|
|
$ |
54,502 |
|
6.70% Cumulative Monthly Income Trust Preferred Securities (issued by Popular Capital Trust I) |
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
30 or 120% |
|
|
12,000,000 |
|
|
|
4,757,480 |
|
|
|
7,242,520 |
|
|
$ |
181,063 |
|
|
$ |
186,664 |
|
6.564% Trust Preferred Securities (issued by Popular North America Capital Trust I) |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,150 or 115% |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
158,349 |
|
|
|
91,651 |
|
|
$ |
91,651 |
|
|
$ |
94,486 |
|
6.125% Cumulative Monthly Income Trust Preferred Securities (issued by Popular Capital Trust II) |
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
30 or 120% |
|
|
5,200,000 |
|
|
|
1,159,080 |
|
|
|
4,040,920 |
|
|
$ |
101,023 |
|
|
$ |
104,148 |
|
|
The increase in stockholders equity related to the exchange of trust preferred securities for
shares of common stock was approximately $390 million, net of
issuance costs, and including the
aforementioned gain on the early extinguishment of debt.
Exchange of preferred stock held by the U.S. Treasury for trust preferred securities
Also, on August 21, 2009, Popular, Inc. and Popular Capital Trust III entered into an exchange
agreement with the United States Department of the Treasury (U.S. Treasury) pursuant to which
the U.S. Treasury agreed with Popular that the U.S. Treasury would exchange all 935,000 shares of
Populars outstanding Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C, $1,000 liquidation
preference per share (the Series C Preferred Stock), owned by the U.S Treasury for 935,000 newly
issued trust preferred securities, $1,000 liquidation amount per capital security. The trust
preferred securities were issued to the U.S. Treasury on August 24, 2009. In connection with this
exchange, the trust used the Series C preferred stock, together with the proceeds of the issuance
and sale by the trust to the Corporation of $1 million aggregate liquidation amount of its fixed
rate common securities, to purchase $936 million aggregate principal amount of the junior
subordinated debentures issued by the Corporation.
104
The trust
preferred securities issued to the U.S. Treasury have a distribution
rate of 5% until, but excluding December 5, 2013 and 9% thereafter (which is the same as the dividend rate on the Series C
Preferred Stock). The common securities of the trust, in the amount of $1 million, are held by
Popular.
The sole asset and only source of funds to make payments on the trust preferred securities and the
common securities of the trust is $936 million of Populars Fixed Rate Perpetual Junior
Subordinated Debentures, Series A, issued by Popular to the trust. These debentures have an
interest rate of 5% until, but excluding December 5, 2013 and 9% thereafter. The debentures are perpetual and may
be redeemed by Popular at any time, subject to the consent of the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System.
Under the guarantee agreement dated as of August 24, 2009, Popular irrevocably and unconditionally
agrees to pay in full to the holders of the trust preferred securities the guarantee payments, as
and when due. The Corporations obligation to make the guaranteed payment may be satisfied by
direct payment of the required amounts to the holders of the trust preferred securities or by
causing the issuer trust to pay such amounts to the holders. The obligations of the Corporation
under the guarantee agreement constitute unsecured obligations and rank subordinate and junior in
right of payment to all senior debt. The obligations of the Corporation under the guarantee
agreement rank pari passu with the obligations of Popular under any similar guarantee agreements
issued by the Corporation on behalf of the holders of preferred or capital securities issued by any
statutory trust, among others stated in the guarantee agreement. Under the guarantee agreement,
the Corporation has guaranteed the payment of the liquidation amount of the trust preferred
securities upon liquidation of the trust, but only to the extent that the trust has funds available
to make such payments.
Under the exchange agreement, Populars agreement that, without the consent of the U.S.
Treasury, it would not increase its dividend rate per share of common stock above that in effect as
of October 14, 2008 or repurchase shares of its common stock until, in each case, the earlier of
December 5, 2011 or such time as all of the new trust preferred securities have been redeemed or
transferred by the U.S. Treasury, remains in effect.
The warrant to purchase 20,932,836 shares of Populars common stock at an exercise price of $6.70
per share that was initially issued to the U.S Treasury in connection with the issuance of the
Series C preferred stock on December 5, 2008 remains outstanding without amendment.
The trust preferred securities issued to the U.S. Treasury continue to qualify as Tier 1 regulatory
capital as of September 30, 2009. The trust preferred securities are subject to the 25% limitation
on Tier 1 capital.
Popular paid an exchange fee of $13 million to the U.S. Treasury in connection with the exchange of
outstanding shares of Series C preferred stock for the new trust preferred securities. This exchange fee will be
amortized through interest expense using the interest yield method over the estimated life of the
junior subordinated debentures.
This transaction with the U.S. Treasury was accounted for as an extinguishment of previously issued
Series C preferred stock. The accounting impact of this transaction included (1) recognition of
junior subordinated debentures and derecognition of the Series C
preferred stock; (2) recognition of a favorable
impact to accumulated deficit resulting from the excess of (a) the carrying amount of the
securities exchanged (the Series C preferred stock) over (b) the fair value of the consideration
exchanged (the trust preferred securities); (3) the reversal of any unamortized discount
outstanding on the Series C preferred stock and (4) issuance costs. The reduction in total
stockholders equity related to U.S. Treasury exchange transaction was approximately $416 million,
which was principally impacted by the reduction of $935 million of aggregate liquidation preference
value of the Series C preferred stock, partially offset by $519 million discount on the junior
subordinated debentures described in item (2) above. This discount as well as the debt issue costs
will be amortized through interest expense using the interest yield method over the estimated life
of the junior subordinated debentures.
This particular exchange resulted in a favorable impact to accumulated deficit of $485.3 million,
which is also considered as part of earnings applicable to common stockholders in the earnings
(losses) per common share (EPS) computations. Refer to Note 18 to the consolidated financial
statements for a reconciliation of EPS.
The fair value of the trust preferred securities
(junior subordinated debentures for purposes of
the Corporations financial statements) at the date of the exchange agreement was determined
internally using a discounted cash flow
105
model. The main considerations were (1) quarterly interest
payment of 5% until, but excluding December 5, 2013 and 9% thereafter; (2) assumed maturity date of 30 years, and
(3) assumed discount rate of 16%. The assumed discount rate used for estimating the fair value was
estimated by obtaining the yields at which comparably-rated issuers were trading in the market and
considering the amount of trust preferred securities issued to the U.S. Treasury and the credit
rating of the Corporation.
SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On October 16, 2009, the Corporation completed the sale of six New Jersey bank branches pertaining
to BPNA with approximately $225 million in deposits. The Corporation did not sell loans as part of
the transaction. The transaction resulted in a gain of approximately $591 thousand, which will be
recorded in the fourth quarter of 2009.
ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS AND ISSUED BUT NOT YET EFFECTIVE ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)
Effective July 1, 2009, the ASC became the single source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP) recognized by the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) to be applied by non-governmental entities.
Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) are also sources
of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The ASC superseded all existing non-SEC accounting and
reporting standards. All other non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the
ASC is non-authoritative. The Corporations policies were not affected by the conversion to ASC.
However, references to specific accounting guidance in the notes of the Corporations financial
statements have been changed to the appropriate section of the ASC.
Business Combinations (ASC Topic 805) (formerly SFAS No. 141-R)
In December 2007, the FASB issued guidance that establishes principles and requirements for how an
acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the
liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in an acquiree, including the recognition and
measurement of goodwill acquired in a business combination. The Corporation is required to apply
this guidance to all business combinations completed on or after January 1, 2009. For business
combinations in which the acquisition date was before the effective date, these provisions will
apply to the subsequent accounting for deferred income tax valuation allowances and income tax
contingencies and will require any changes in those amounts to be recorded in earnings. This
guidance on business combinations has not had a material effect on the consolidated financial
statements of the Corporation as of September 30, 2009.
Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements (ASC Subtopic 810-10) (formerly SFAS
No. 160)
In December 2007, the FASB issued guidance to establish accounting and reporting standards for the
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. This guidance
requires entities to classify noncontrolling interests as a component of stockholders equity on
the consolidated financial statements and requires subsequent changes in ownership interests in a
subsidiary to be accounted for as an equity transaction. Additionally, it requires entities to
recognize a gain or loss upon the loss of control of a subsidiary and to remeasure any ownership
interest retained at fair value on that date. This statement also requires expanded disclosures
that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the
noncontrolling owners. This guidance was adopted by the Corporation on January 1, 2009. The
adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Corporations consolidated
financial statements.
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (ASC Subtopic 815-10) (formerly
SFAS No. 161)
In March 2008, the FASB issued an amendment for disclosures about derivative instruments and
hedging activities. The standard expands the disclosure requirements for derivatives and hedged
items and has no impact on how the Corporation accounts for these instruments. The standard was
adopted by the Corporation in the first quarter of 2009. Refer to Note 10 to the consolidated
financial statements.
106
Subsequent Events (ASC Subtopic 855-10) (formerly SFAS No. 165)
In May 2009, the FASB issued guidance which establishes general standards of accounting for and
disclosures of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are
issued or are available to be issued. Specifically, this standard sets forth the period after the
balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or
transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements,
the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the
balance sheet date in its financial statements, and the disclosures that an entity should make
about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. This guidance was
effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009, and shall be applied
prospectively. In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Corporation evaluated
subsequent events through November 9, 2009. Refer to Note 27 to the consolidated financial
statements for related disclosures.
Transfers of Financial Assets, SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (SFAS No. 166) (This statement has not yet been incorporated
into the ASC)
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, a revision of SFAS No. 140, which requires more
information about transfers of financial assets, including securitization transactions, and where
entities have continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. It
eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity (QSPEs), changes the requirements
for derecognizing financial assets, and requires additional disclosures. It also requires a
transferor to evaluate all existing QSPEs to determine whether they must be consolidated in
accordance with SFAS No. 167 Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R). This Statement must be
applied as of the beginning of each reporting entitys first annual reporting period that begins
after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period and for
interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is prohibited. Management is
currently evaluating the requirements of this pronouncement and has not yet determined the impact,
if any, which the adoption of this standard will have on the Corporations consolidated financial
statements.
Variable Interest Entities, SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS No.
167) (This statement has not yet been incorporated into the ASC)
SFAS No. 167, issued in June 2009, amends the consolidating guidance applicable to variable
interest entities and changes how a reporting entity determines when an entity that is
insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be
consolidated. The determination of whether a reporting entity is required to consolidate another
entity is based on, among other things, the other entitys purpose and design and the reporting
entitys ability to direct the activities of the other entity that most significantly impact the
other entitys economic performance. The amendments to the consolidated guidance affect all
entities currently within the scope of FIN 46(R), as well as qualifying special-purpose entities
(QSPEs) that are currently excluded from the scope of FIN 46(R). SFAS No. 167 will require a
reporting entity to provide additional disclosures about its involvement with variable interest
entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. A reporting entity
will be required to disclose how its involvement with a variable interest entity affects the
reporting entitys financial statements. SFAS No. 167 will be effective as of the beginning of the
first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2009. Management is currently evaluating the
requirements of this pronouncement and has not yet determined the impact, if any, which the
adoption of this standard will have on the Corporations consolidated financial statements.
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets and Repurchase Financing Transactions (ASC Subtopic
860-10) (formerly FASB Staff Position FAS 140-3)
The FASB provided guidance in February 2008 on whether the security transfer and contemporaneous
repurchase financing involving the transferred financial asset must be evaluated as one linked
transaction or two separate de-linked transactions. The guidance requires the recognition of the
transfer and the repurchase agreement as one linked transaction, unless all of the following
criteria are met: (1) the initial transfer and the repurchase financing are not contractually
contingent on one another; (2) the initial transferor has full recourse upon default, and the
repurchase agreements price is fixed and not at fair value; (3) the financial asset is readily
obtainable in the marketplace and the transfer and repurchase financing are executed at market
rates; and (4) the maturity of the repurchase financing is before the maturity of the financial
asset. The scope of this accounting guidance is limited to transfers and subsequent repurchase
financings that are entered into contemporaneously or in contemplation of one another. The
Corporation adopted the statement on January 1, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have a
material impact on the Corporations consolidated financial statements for 2009.
107
Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets (ASC Subtopic 350-30) (formerly FASB Staff
Position FAS 142-3)
In
April 2008, the FASB amended the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or
extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset. In
developing these assumptions, an entity should consider its own historical experience in renewing
or extending similar arrangements adjusted for entity specific factors or, in the absence of that
experience, the assumptions that market participants would use about renewals or extensions
adjusted for the entity specific factors. This guidance shall be applied prospectively to
intangible assets acquired after the effective date of January 1, 2009. The adoption of this
guidance did not have a material impact on the Corporations consolidated financial statements.
Equity Method Investment Accounting Considerations (ASC Subtopic 323-10) (formerly EITF 08-6)
This guidance clarifies the accounting for certain transactions and impairment considerations
involving equity method investments. It applies to all investments accounted for under the equity
method and provides guidance on the following: (1) how the initial carrying value of an equity
method investment should be determined; (2) how an impairment assessment of an underlying
indefinite-lived intangible asset of an equity method investment should be performed; (3) how an
equity method investees issuance of shares should be accounted
for; and (4) how to account for a
change in an investment from the equity method to the cost method. The adoption of this guidance in
January 2009 did not have a material impact on the Corporations consolidated financial statements.
Employers
Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets (ASC Subtopic 715-20) (formerly FASB
Staff Position FAS 132(R)-1)
This guidance requires additional disclosures in the financial statements of employers who are
subject to the disclosure requirements of postretirement benefit plan assets as follows: (a) the
investment allocation decision making process, including the factors that are pertinent to an
understanding of investment policies and strategies; (b) the fair value of each major category of
plan assets, disclosed separately for pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans; (c) the
inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets, including the level
within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements in their entirety fall; and
(d) significant concentrations of risk within plan assets. Additional detailed information is
required for each category above. Upon initial application, the provisions of this guidance are not
required for earlier periods that are presented for comparative
purposes. The Corporation will apply
the new disclosure requirements commencing with the annual financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2009. This guidance impacts disclosures only and will not have an effect on the
Corporations consolidated statements of condition or results of operations.
Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (ASC Subtopic 320-10) (formerly
FASB Staff Position FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2)
In April 2009, the FASB issued this guidance which is intended to provide greater clarity to
investors about the credit and noncredit component of an other-than-temporary impairment event. It
specifically amends the other-than-temporary impairment guidance for debt securities. The new
guidance improves the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairment on investment
securities and changes the calculation of the other-than-temporary impairment recognized in
earnings in the financial statements. However, it does not amend existing recognition and
measurement guidance related to other-than-temporary impairments of equity securities.
For debt securities, an entity is required to assess whether (a) it has the intent to sell the debt
security, or (b) it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the debt security
before its anticipated recovery. If either of these conditions is met, an other-than-temporary
impairment on the security must be recognized.
In instances in which a determination is made that a credit loss (defined as the difference between
the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis) exists
but the entity does not intend to sell the debt security and it is not more likely than not that
the entity will be required to sell the debt security before the anticipated recovery of its
remaining amortized cost basis (i.e., the amortized cost basis less any current-period credit
loss), the accounting guidance changed the presentation and amount of the other-than-temporary
impairment recognized in the statement of operations. In these instances, the impairment is
separated into (a) the amount of the total impairment related to the credit loss, and (b) the
amount of the total impairment related to all other factors. The amount of the total
other-than-temporary impairment related to the credit loss is recognized in the statement of
108
operations. The amount of the total impairment related to all other factors is recognized in other
comprehensive loss. Previously, in all cases, if an impairment was determined to be
other-than-temporary, an impairment loss was recognized in earnings in an amount equal to the
entire difference between the securitys amortized cost basis and its fair value at the balance
sheet date of the reporting period for which the assessment was made.
This guidance was effective and is to be applied prospectively for financial statements issued for
interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009.
At adoption an entity was required
to record a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the beginning of the period of adoption to
reclassify the noncredit component of a previously recognized other-than-temporary impairment from
retained earnings to accumulated other comprehensive loss if the
entity did not intend to sell the
security and it was not more likely than not that the entity would be required to sell the security
before the anticipated recovery of its amortized cost basis.
The
Corporation adopted this guidance for interim and annual reporting periods commencing with the
quarter ended June 30, 2009. The adoption of this new accounting guidance in
the second quarter of 2009 did not result in a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the beginning of the
period of adoption (April 1, 2009) since there were no previously recognized other-than-temporary
impairments related to outstanding debt securities. Refer to Notes 6 and 7 for disclosures as of
September 30, 2009.
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (ASC Subtopic 825-10) (formerly FASB
Staff Position FAS 107-1 and APB
28-1)
In April 2009, the FASB required providing disclosures on a quarterly basis about the fair value of
financial instruments that are not currently reflected on the statement of condition at fair value.
Originally the fair value for these assets and liabilities was only required for year-end
disclosures. The Corporation adopted this guidance effective with the financial statement
disclosures for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. This guidance only impacts disclosure requirements
and therefore did not have an impact on the Corporations financial condition or results of
operations. Refer to Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for required disclosures.
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have
Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That are Not Orderly (ASC Subtopic 820-10)
(formerly FASB Staff Position FAS 157-4)
This
guidance, issued in April 2009, provides additional guidance for estimating fair value when the
volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased. It also
includes guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate that a transaction is not orderly.
This guidance reaffirms the need to use judgment to ascertain if an active market has become
inactive and in determining fair values when markets have become inactive. Additionally, it also
emphasizes that even if there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity
for the asset or liability and regardless of the valuation techniques used, the objective of a fair
value measurement remains the same. Fair value is the price that would be received from the sale of
an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced
liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current
market conditions. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the
Corporations consolidated financial statements.
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2009-05,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC Topic
820)Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value
FASB
Accounting Standards Update 2009-05, issued on August 2009, includes amendments to ASC Subtopic
820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, for the fair value measurement of liabilities and
provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the
identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using
one or more of the following techniques: a valuation technique that uses (a) the quoted price of
the identical liability when traded as an asset, (b) quoted prices for similar liabilities or
similar liabilities when traded as assets, or another valuation technique that is consistent with
the principles of ASC Topic 820. Examples would be an income approach, such as a present value
technique, or a market approach, such as a technique that is based on the amount at the measurement
date that the reporting entity would pay to transfer the identical liability or would receive to
enter into an identical liability. The adoption of this guidance was effective upon issuance and did
not have a material impact on the Corporations consolidated financial statements.
109
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES / ESTIMATES
The accounting and reporting policies followed by the Corporation and its subsidiaries conform to
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America and general practices
within the financial services industry. Various elements of the Corporations accounting policies,
by their nature, are inherently subject to estimation techniques, valuation assumptions and other
subjective assessments. These estimates are made under facts and circumstances at a point in time
and changes in those facts and circumstances could produce actual results that differ from those
estimates.
Management has discussed the development and selection of the critical accounting policies and
estimates with the Corporations Audit Committee. The Corporation has identified as critical
accounting policies those related to Fair Value Measurement of Financial Instruments, Loans and
Allowance for Loan Losses, Income Taxes, Goodwill and Trademark and Pension and Postretirement
Benefit Obligations. For a summary of the Corporations critical accounting policies and estimates,
refer to that particular section in the MD&A included in Popular, Inc.s 2008 Financial Review and
Supplementary Information to Stockholders, incorporated by reference in Popular, Inc.s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the 2008 Annual Report). Also, refer to
Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in the 2008 Annual Report for a summary of
the Corporations significant accounting policies.
Fair value measurement of financial instruments
Refer to the Adoption of New Accounting Standards and Issued But Not Yet Effective Accounting
Standards section in this MD&A for a description of two newly adopted accounting standards which
impact the fair value measurement of financial instruments, including recognition accounting in
the statement of operations. These standards included (a) Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (ASC Subtopic 320-10) (formerly FASB Staff Position FAS 115-2
and FAS 124-2), and (b) Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the
Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That are Not
Orderly (ASC Subtopic 820-10) (formerly FASB Staff Position FAS 157-4). As previously
indicated, the adoption of the new accounting guidance did not have a significant impact in the
Corporations financial condition and results of operations.
Allowance for loan losses
The Corporations assessment of the allowance for loan losses is determined in accordance with
accounting guidance, specifically guidance of loss contingencies in ASC Subtopic 450-20 (formerly
SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies) and loan impairment guidance in ASC Section 310-10-35
(formerly SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan). Specifically
pertaining to the loss contingencies guidance, during the second quarter the Corporation enhanced
its assessment by establishing a more granular segmentation of loans with similar risk
characteristics, reducing the historical base loss periods employed, and strengthening the analysis
pertaining to the environmental factors considered. A more detailed description of the process used
to estimate the allowance for loan losses is included in the Credit Risk Management and Loan
Quality section of this MD&A. The provision for loan losses charged to current operations is based
on this determination.
Goodwill
The Corporations goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets having an indefinite useful
life are tested for impairment. Intangibles with indefinite lives are evaluated for impairment at
least annually and on a more frequent basis if events or circumstances indicate impairment could
have taken place. Such events could include, among others, a significant adverse change in the
business climate, an adverse action by a regulator, an unanticipated change in the competitive
environment and a decision to change the operations or dispose of a reporting unit.
As of September 30, 2009, goodwill totaled $607 million, compared with $606 million as of December
31, 2008. Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements provides an allocation of goodwill by
business segment.
The Corporation performed the annual goodwill impairment evaluation for the entire organization
during the third quarter of 2009 using July 31, 2009 as the annual evaluation date. The reporting
units utilized for this evaluation were those that are one level below the business segments
identified in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements, which basically are the legal
entities that compose the reportable segment. The Corporation follows push-down accounting, as such
all goodwill is assigned to the reporting units when carrying out a business combination.
110
In accordance with accounting standards, the impairment evaluation is performed using a two-step
process. Step 1 of the goodwill evaluation process is to determine if potential impairment exists
in any of the Corporations reporting units, and is performed by comparing the fair value of the
reporting units with their carrying amount, including goodwill. Step 2 is necessary only if the
reporting unit fails Step 1. Step 2 measures the amount of any impairment loss. The implied fair
value of goodwill shall be determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a
business combination is determined. That is, an entity shall allocate the fair value of a reporting
unit to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit (including any unrecognized intangible
assets, such as unrecognized core deposits and tradename intangible assets) as if the reporting
unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the
price paid to acquire the reporting unit. The excess of the fair value of a reporting unit over the
amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill. The fair
value of the assets and liabilities reflects market conditions, thus volatility in prices could
have a material impact on the determination of the implied fair value of the reporting unit
goodwill at the impairment test date. If the implied fair value of goodwill calculated in Step 2 is
less than the carrying amount of goodwill for the reporting unit, an impairment is indicated and
the carrying value of goodwill is written down to the calculated value.
In determining the fair value of a reporting unit, the Corporation generally uses a combination of
methods, including market price multiples of comparable companies and transactions, as well as
discounted cash flow analysis. Management evaluates the particular circumstances of each reporting
unit in order to determine the most appropriate valuation methodology. The Corporation evaluates
the results obtained under each valuation methodology to identify and understand the key value
drivers in order to ascertain that the results obtained are reasonable and appropriate under the
circumstances. Elements considered include current market and economic conditions, developments in
specific lines of business, and any particular features in the individual reporting units.
The computations require management to make estimates and assumptions. Critical assumptions that
are used as part of these evaluations include:
|
|
|
a selection of comparable publicly traded companies, based on nature of business,
location and size; |
|
|
|
a selection of comparable acquisition and capital raising transactions; |
|
|
|
the discount rate applied to future earnings, based on an estimate of the cost of
equity; |
|
|
|
the potential future earnings of the reporting unit; and |
|
|
|
the market growth and new business assumptions. |
For purposes of the market comparable approach, valuations were determined by calculating average
price multiples of relevant value drivers from a group of companies that are comparable to the
reporting unit being analyzed and applying those price multiples to the value drivers of the
reporting unit. Multiples used are minority based multiples and thus, no control premium adjustment
is made to the comparable companies market multiples. While the market price multiple is not an
assumption, a presumption that it provides an indicator of the value of the reporting unit is
inherent in the valuation. The determination of the market comparables also involves a degree of
judgment.
For
purposes of the discounted cash flows (DCF) approach, the valuation is based on estimated future cash
flows. The financial projections used in the DCF valuation analysis for each reporting unit are
based on the most recent (as of the valuation date) financial projections presented to the
Corporations Asset / Liability Management Committee (ALCO). The growth assumptions included in
these projections are based on managements expectations for each reporting units financial
prospects considering economic and industry conditions as well as particular plans of each entity
(i.e. restructuring plans, de-leveraging, etc.) The cost of equity used to discount the cash flows
was calculated using the Ibbotson Build-Up Method and ranged from 11.24% to 17.78% for the 2009
analysis. The Ibbottson Build-Up Model builds up a cost of equity starting with the rate of return
of a riskless asset (10 year U.S. Treasury note) and adds to it additional risk elements such as
equity risk premium, size premium, and industry risk premium. The resulting discount rates were
analyzed in terms of reasonability given the current market conditions and adjustments were made
when necessary.
Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test performed during 2009 showed that the carrying amount of
BPNA exceeded its fair value, and thus, Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test was performed for
that reporting unit. As of September 30, 2009, BPNAs goodwill amounted to $404 million. Based on the results of Step 2, management
111
concluded that there was no goodwill impairment to be recognized for BPNA. The analysis of the
results for Step 2 indicates that the reduction in the fair value of the reporting unit was mainly
attributed to the deteriorated fair value of the loan portfolios and not to the fair value of the
reporting unit as going concern entity. The goodwill impairment assessment performed for BPNA
considered BPNAs financial condition as of September 30, 2009 and BPNAs financial projections.
The current negative performance of the reporting unit is principally related to deteriorated
credit quality in its loan portfolio, which agrees with the results of the Step 2 analysis. BPNAs
provision for loan losses amounted to $456.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
which represented 111% of BPNAs net loss of $412.4 million for the period.
The assessments concluded that there is no goodwill impairment at BPNA primarily as a result of a
significant discount that resulted from the valuation of the loan portfolios. The fair value
determined for BPNAs loan portfolio in the 2009 annual test represented a discount of 21.7%, which
compares to the 41.6% as of December 31, 2008. The discount is mainly attributed to market
participants expected rate of returns, which affected the market discount on the commercial and
construction loan portfolios and deteriorated credit quality of the consumer and mortgage loan
portfolios of BPNA.
For BPNA, the only subsidiary that failed Step 1, the Corporation determined the fair value of Step
1 utilizing a market value approach based on a combination of price multiples from comparable
companies and multiples from capital raising transactions of comparable companies. The market
multiples used included price to book and price to tangible book. Additionally, the Corporation
determined the reporting unit fair value using a DCF analysis based on
BPNAs financial projections, but assigned no weight
to it given the current market approaches provide a more reasonable
measure of fair value considering the reporting units financial
performance and current market conditions.
The Step 1 fair value for BPNA under both valuation approaches (market and DCF) was
below the carrying amount of its equity book value as of the valuation date (July 31), requiring
the completion of Step 2. In accordance with accounting standards, the Corporation performed a
valuation of all assets and liabilities of BPNA, including any recognized and unrecognized
intangible assets, to determine the fair value of BPNAs net assets. To complete Step 2, the
Corporation subtracted from BPNAs Step 1 fair value the determined fair value of the net assets to arrive at the implied fair value of
goodwill. The results of the Step 2 indicated that the implied fair value of goodwill exceeded the
goodwill carrying value of $404 million, resulting in no goodwill impairment. The reduction in
BPNAs Step 1 fair value was offset by a reduction in the fair value of its net assets, resulting
in an implied fair value of goodwill that exceeds the recorded book value of goodwill. If the Step
1 fair value of BPNA declines further in the future without a corresponding decrease in the fair
value of its net assets or if loan discounts improve without a corresponding increase in the Step 1
fair value, the Corporation may be required to record a goodwill impairment charge. The Corporation engaged a
third-party valuator to assist management in the annual evaluation of BPNAs goodwill (including
Step 1 and Step 2) as well as BPNAs loan portfolios as of the July 31st valuation date.
Management discussed the methodologies, assumptions and results supporting the relevant values for
conclusion and determined they were reasonable.
For the
BPPR reporting unit, had the average reporting unit estimated fair value calculated in Step 1 using all
valuation methodologies been approximately 25% lower, there would still be no requirement to
perform a Step 2 analysis, thus there would be no indication of impairment on the $138 million of
goodwill recorded in BPPR. For the BPNA reporting unit, had the
estimated implied fair value of
goodwill calculated in Step 2 been approximately 67% lower, there would still be no impairment of
the $404 million of goodwill recorded in BPNA as of September 30, 2009. The goodwill balance of
BPPR and BPNA represent approximately 89% of the Corporations total goodwill balance.
Furthermore, as part of the analyses, management performed a reconciliation of the aggregate fair
values determined for the reporting units to the market capitalization of Popular, Inc. concluding
that the fair value results determined for the reporting units in the
July 31, 2009 assessment were
reasonable.
The goodwill impairment evaluation process requires the Corporation to make estimates and
assumptions with regard to the fair value of the reporting units. Actual values may differ
significantly from these estimates. Such differences could result in future impairment of goodwill
that would, in turn, negatively impact the Corporations results of operations and the reporting
units where the goodwill is recorded.
112
Management monitors events or changes in circumstances between annual tests to determine if these
events or changes in circumstances would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting
unit below its carrying amount. As indicated in this MD&A, the economic situation in the United States and Puerto Rico, including
deterioration in the housing market and credit market, has continued to negatively impact the
financial results of the Corporation during 2009. Accordingly, management is continuing to closely
monitor the fair value of the reporting units.
It is possible that the assumptions and conclusions regarding the valuation of the Corporations
reporting units could change adversely and could result in the recognition of goodwill impairment.
Such impairment could have a material adverse effect on the Corporations financial condition and
future results of operations. Declines in the Corporations market capitalization increase the risk
of goodwill impairment in the future.
NET INTEREST INCOME
Net interest income from continuing operations, on a taxable equivalent basis, is presented
with its different components on Tables B and C for the quarters and nine months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008, segregated by major categories of interest earning assets and interest bearing
liabilities.
The interest earning assets include the investment
securities and loans that are exempt from income
tax, principally in Puerto Rico. The main sources of tax-exempt interest income are investments in
obligations of the U.S. Government, some U.S. Government agencies and sponsored entities of the
Puerto Rico Commonwealth and its agencies. Assets held by the Corporations international banking
entities, which previously where tax exempt under Puerto Rico law, are currently subject to a
temporary 5% income tax rate. To facilitate the comparison of all interest related to these assets,
the interest income has been converted to a taxable equivalent basis, using the applicable
statutory income tax rates at each respective quarter and nine-month periods. The taxable
equivalent computation considers the interest expense disallowance required by the Puerto Rico tax
law.
Average outstanding securities balances are based upon amortized cost excluding any unrealized
gains or losses on securities available-for-sale. Non-accrual loans
have been included in their
respective average loans and leases categories. Loan fees collected and costs incurred in the
origination of loans are deferred and amortized over the term of the loan as an adjustment to
interest yield. Interest income for quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2009 included a
favorable impact of $4.8 million and $17.1 million, respectively, consisting principally of
amortization of loan origination fees and costs, prepayment penalties and late payment charges. The
favorable impact for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $3.5 million and
$13.0 million, respectively.
113
TABLE B
Analysis of Levels & Yields on a Taxable Equivalent Basis for Continuing Operations
Quarter ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
Average Volume |
|
Average Yields / Costs |
|
|
|
Interest |
|
Attributable to |
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Variance |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Variance |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Variance |
|
Rate |
|
Volume |
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
$ |
936 |
|
|
$ |
599 |
|
|
$ |
337 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
% |
|
|
2.29 |
% |
|
|
(1.65 |
%) |
|
Money market investments |
|
$ |
1,510 |
|
|
$ |
3,455 |
|
|
$ |
(1,945 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,679 |
) |
|
$ |
(266 |
) |
|
7,551 |
|
|
|
8,212 |
|
|
|
(661 |
) |
|
|
4.53 |
|
|
|
4.99 |
|
|
|
(0.46 |
) |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
85,459 |
|
|
|
102,537 |
|
|
|
(17,078 |
) |
|
|
(5,361 |
) |
|
|
(11,717 |
) |
|
517 |
|
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
6.79 |
|
|
|
7.83 |
|
|
|
(1.04 |
) |
|
Trading securities |
|
|
8,857 |
|
|
|
10,605 |
|
|
|
(1,748 |
) |
|
|
(1,333 |
) |
|
|
(415 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,004 |
|
|
|
9,350 |
|
|
|
(346 |
) |
|
|
4.25 |
|
|
|
4.98 |
|
|
|
(0.73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
95,826 |
|
|
|
116,597 |
|
|
|
(20,771 |
) |
|
|
(8,373 |
) |
|
|
(12,398 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,034 |
|
|
|
15,936 |
|
|
|
(902 |
) |
|
|
4.93 |
|
|
|
5.91 |
|
|
|
(0.98 |
) |
|
Commercial * |
|
|
186,969 |
|
|
|
236,661 |
|
|
|
(49,692 |
) |
|
|
(36,864 |
) |
|
|
(12,828 |
) |
|
707 |
|
|
|
1,115 |
|
|
|
(408 |
) |
|
|
8.29 |
|
|
|
7.81 |
|
|
|
0.48 |
|
|
Leasing |
|
|
14,665 |
|
|
|
21,772 |
|
|
|
(7,107 |
) |
|
|
1,290 |
|
|
|
(8,397 |
) |
|
4,443 |
|
|
|
4,607 |
|
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
6.35 |
|
|
|
7.09 |
|
|
|
(0.74 |
) |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
70,564 |
|
|
|
81,706 |
|
|
|
(11,142 |
) |
|
|
(8,305 |
) |
|
|
(2,837 |
) |
|
4,269 |
|
|
|
4,785 |
|
|
|
(516 |
) |
|
|
9.75 |
|
|
|
10.24 |
|
|
|
(0.49 |
) |
|
Consumer |
|
|
104,597 |
|
|
|
122,883 |
|
|
|
(18,286 |
) |
|
|
(7,310 |
) |
|
|
(10,976 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,453 |
|
|
|
26,443 |
|
|
|
(1,990 |
) |
|
|
6.13 |
|
|
|
6.98 |
|
|
|
(0.85 |
) |
|
|
|
|
376,795 |
|
|
|
463,022 |
|
|
|
(86,227 |
) |
|
|
(51,189 |
) |
|
|
(35,038 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
33,457 |
|
|
$ |
35,793 |
|
|
$ |
(2,336 |
) |
|
|
5.62 |
% |
|
|
6.46 |
% |
|
|
(0.84 |
%) |
|
Total earning assets |
|
$ |
472,621 |
|
|
$ |
579,619 |
|
|
$ |
(106,998 |
) |
|
$ |
(59,562 |
) |
|
$ |
(47,436 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,768 |
|
|
$ |
5,108 |
|
|
$ |
(340 |
) |
|
|
1.02 |
% |
|
|
1.77 |
% |
|
|
(0.75 |
%) |
|
NOW and money market** |
|
$ |
12,284 |
|
|
$ |
22,771 |
|
|
$ |
(10,487 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,541 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,946 |
) |
|
5,496 |
|
|
|
5,561 |
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
0.92 |
|
|
|
1.43 |
|
|
|
(0.51 |
) |
|
Savings |
|
|
12,733 |
|
|
|
20,040 |
|
|
|
(7,307 |
) |
|
|
(6,773 |
) |
|
|
(534 |
) |
|
12,109 |
|
|
|
12,480 |
|
|
|
(371 |
) |
|
|
3.08 |
|
|
|
3.91 |
|
|
|
(0.83 |
) |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
93,924 |
|
|
|
122,800 |
|
|
|
(28,876 |
) |
|
|
(27,405 |
) |
|
|
(1,471 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,373 |
|
|
|
23,149 |
|
|
|
(776 |
) |
|
|
2.11 |
|
|
|
2.85 |
|
|
|
(0.74 |
) |
|
|
|
|
118,941 |
|
|
|
165,611 |
|
|
|
(46,670 |
) |
|
|
(42,719 |
) |
|
|
(3,951 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,685 |
|
|
|
4,886 |
|
|
|
(2,201 |
) |
|
|
2.39 |
|
|
|
3.03 |
|
|
|
(0.64 |
) |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
16,142 |
|
|
|
37,233 |
|
|
|
(21,091 |
) |
|
|
(11,067 |
) |
|
|
(10,024 |
) |
|
2,676 |
|
|
|
2,235 |
|
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
6.37 |
|
|
|
5.05 |
|
|
|
1.32 |
|
|
Medium and long-term debt |
|
|
42,991 |
|
|
|
28,355 |
|
|
|
14,636 |
|
|
|
8,408 |
|
|
|
6,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,734 |
|
|
|
30,270 |
|
|
|
(2,536 |
) |
|
|
2.55 |
|
|
|
3.04 |
|
|
|
(0.49 |
) |
|
Total
interest bearing liabilities |
|
|
178,074 |
|
|
|
231,199 |
|
|
|
(53,125 |
) |
|
|
(45,378 |
) |
|
|
(7,747 |
) |
|
4,309 |
|
|
|
4,106 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing demand deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,414 |
|
|
|
1,417 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other sources of funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
33,457 |
|
|
$ |
35,793 |
|
|
$ |
(2,336 |
) |
|
|
2.11 |
% |
|
|
2.57 |
% |
|
|
(0.46 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.51 |
% |
|
|
3.89 |
% |
|
|
(0.38 |
%) |
|
Net interest margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest
income on a taxable equivalent basis |
|
|
294,547 |
|
|
|
348,420 |
|
|
|
(53,873 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,184 |
) |
|
$ |
(39,689 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.07 |
% |
|
|
3.42 |
% |
|
|
(0.35 |
%) |
|
Net interest spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable equivalent adjustment |
|
|
18,158 |
|
|
|
24,138 |
|
|
|
(5,980 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
276,389 |
|
|
$ |
324,282 |
|
|
$ |
(47,893 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: The changes that are not due solely to volume or rate are allocated to volume and rate
based on the proportion of the change in each category.
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes commercial construction loans. |
|
** |
|
Includes interest bearing demand deposits corresponding to certain government entities in Puerto
Rico. |
As shown in Table B, the decrease in net interest income, on a taxable equivalent basis, is
mainly due to a reduction in the Corporations earning assets. Factors that contributed to this
decrease included:
|
|
|
A reduction in the average balance of investment securities resulting from the sale of
approximately $3.4 billion in available-for-sale securities, mostly U.S. agency securities
(FHLB notes) during the first quarter of 2009, and subsequent reinvestment of approximately
$2.9 billion of the proceeds, primarily in GNMA mortgage-backed
securities. The remaining proceeds were used to reduce borrowings; |
|
|
|
A decrease in the commercial and construction loan portfolios as a result of lower
origination activity and increased loan charge-offs, in part due to the economic recession and downturn in the
housing sector, both in the Puerto Rico and U.S. mainland operations; |
114
|
|
|
A decrease in the lease financing portfolio mainly as a result of the Corporations
decision to exit the leasing business in the U.S. mainland operations. As a result, a
substantial portion of the lease financing portfolio from Popular Equipment Finance was
sold during the first quarter of 2009. In addition, lower origination activity in the
Puerto Rico lease financing operations also contributed to the reduction in average
balances; |
|
|
|
A reduction in the average balance of mortgage loans, in part, due to the Corporations
decision to exit certain mortgage loan origination activities, such as BPNAs
non-conventional mortgage business and the E-LOAN loan origination platform; and |
|
|
|
A decrease in the consumer loan portfolio because of a slowdown in the auto and consumer
loan origination activity in Puerto Rico, and the run-off of E-LOANs home equity lines of
credit (HELOCs) and closed-end second mortgage portfolios. |
In addition, the Corporation experienced compression in the net interest margin, on a taxable
equivalent basis. The factors that contributed to this reduction included:
|
|
|
The Federal Reserve (FED) lowered the federal funds target rate from 2.00% as of
September 30, 2008 to between 0% and 0.25% as of September 30, 2009. This reduction in
market rates impacted the yield of several of the Corporations earning assets during that
period. These assets include commercial and construction loans of which 68% have floating
or adjustable rates, floating rate home equity lines of credit and credit cards, floating
rate collateralized mortgage obligations, as well as the origination of loans in a low
interest rate environment; |
|
|
|
Increase in non-performing loans, mainly in the commercial, construction and mortgage
loans portfolios; |
|
|
|
Market risk management strategies have generated a higher balance of short-term
investments at lower rates, thus pressuring the net interest margin; |
|
|
|
The exchange of $935 million of Series C preferred stock for junior subordinated
debentures securities contributed to the increase in the average cost of borrowings by
approximately $6.8 million. The junior subordinated debentures were recorded at fair value
(which resulted in a discount), thus the results for the quarter reflect the discount
accretion as well as the contractual interest. Prior to the exchange, payments to the
holder of the Series C preferred stock were in the form of dividends whereas payment on the
subordinated debentures constitute interest. Partially offsetting this variance was
reduction in the interest expense by approximately $3.4 million on the junior subordinated
debentures which were extinguished as part of the exchange of trust preferred securities
for shares of common stock; and |
|
|
|
Rating downgrades that have occurred during 2009 have also contributed to the increase
in the average cost of $350 million of unsecured senior notes of the Corporation by
approximately $3.9 million during 2009. |
The net interest margin was impacted favorably during 2009 by decreases in the average cost of
short-term borrowings, as well as a decrease in the average cost of interest bearing deposits. The
former was in part due to managements decision to reduce the rates of certain non-maturity deposit
accounts as well as maturities of high cost certificates of deposits being renewed at lower rates.
As shown in Table C, net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 also decreases as a result of a reduction in the average balance of earning
assets and a lower net interest margin due to similar factors described above.
115
TABLE C
Analysis of Levels & Yields on a Taxable Equivalent Basis
Nine-month period ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
Average Volume |
|
Average Yields / Costs |
|
|
|
Interest |
|
Attributable to |
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Variance |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Variance |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Variance |
|
Rate |
|
Volume |
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,194 |
|
|
$ |
651 |
|
|
$ |
543 |
|
|
|
0.79 |
% |
|
|
2.97 |
% |
|
|
(2.18 |
%) |
|
Money market investments |
|
$ |
7,027 |
|
|
$ |
14,459 |
|
|
$ |
(7,432 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,091 |
) |
|
$ |
659 |
|
|
7,578 |
|
|
|
8,254 |
|
|
|
(676 |
) |
|
|
4.66 |
|
|
|
5.07 |
|
|
|
(0.41 |
) |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
264,553 |
|
|
|
313,800 |
|
|
|
(49,247 |
) |
|
|
(10,150 |
) |
|
|
(39,097 |
) |
|
660 |
|
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
6.75 |
|
|
|
7.35 |
|
|
|
(0.60 |
) |
|
Trading securities |
|
|
33,362 |
|
|
|
38,295 |
|
|
|
(4,933 |
) |
|
|
(3,036 |
) |
|
|
(1,897 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,432 |
|
|
|
9,601 |
|
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
4.31 |
|
|
|
5.09 |
|
|
|
(0.78 |
) |
|
|
|
|
304,942 |
|
|
|
366,554 |
|
|
|
(61,612 |
) |
|
|
(21,277 |
) |
|
|
(40,335 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,395 |
|
|
|
15,714 |
|
|
|
(319 |
) |
|
|
4.97 |
|
|
|
6.25 |
|
|
|
(1.28 |
) |
|
Commercial * |
|
|
572,368 |
|
|
|
734,934 |
|
|
|
(162,566 |
) |
|
|
(147,136 |
) |
|
|
(15,430 |
) |
|
798 |
|
|
|
1,115 |
|
|
|
(317 |
) |
|
|
8.37 |
|
|
|
7.97 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
Leasing |
|
|
50,041 |
|
|
|
66,672 |
|
|
|
(16,631 |
) |
|
|
3,174 |
|
|
|
(19,805 |
) |
|
4,491 |
|
|
|
4,769 |
|
|
|
(278 |
) |
|
|
6.58 |
|
|
|
7.23 |
|
|
|
(0.65 |
) |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
221,490 |
|
|
|
258,495 |
|
|
|
(37,005 |
) |
|
|
(22,502 |
) |
|
|
(14,503 |
) |
|
4,418 |
|
|
|
4,916 |
|
|
|
(498 |
) |
|
|
9.88 |
|
|
|
10.23 |
|
|
|
(0.35 |
) |
|
Consumer |
|
|
326,904 |
|
|
|
376,719 |
|
|
|
(49,815 |
) |
|
|
(18,258 |
) |
|
|
(31,557 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,102 |
|
|
|
26,514 |
|
|
|
(1,412 |
) |
|
|
6.23 |
|
|
|
7.23 |
|
|
|
(1.00 |
) |
|
|
|
|
1,170,803 |
|
|
|
1,436,820 |
|
|
|
(266,017 |
) |
|
|
(184,722 |
) |
|
|
(81,295 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
34,534 |
|
|
$ |
36,115 |
|
|
$ |
(1,581 |
) |
|
|
5.71 |
% |
|
|
6.67 |
% |
|
|
(0.96 |
%) |
|
Total earning assets |
|
$ |
1,475,745 |
|
|
$ |
1,803,374 |
|
|
$ |
(327,629 |
) |
|
$ |
(205,999 |
) |
|
$ |
(121,630 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,809 |
|
|
$ |
4,996 |
|
|
$ |
(187 |
) |
|
|
1.15 |
% |
|
|
1.92 |
% |
|
|
(0.77 |
%) |
|
NOW and money market ** |
|
$ |
41,437 |
|
|
$ |
71,919 |
|
|
$ |
(30,482 |
) |
|
$ |
(27,403 |
) |
|
|
(3,079 |
) |
|
5,545 |
|
|
|
5,606 |
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
0.99 |
|
|
|
1.56 |
|
|
|
(0.57 |
) |
|
Savings |
|
|
40,979 |
|
|
|
65,295 |
|
|
|
(24,316 |
) |
|
|
(22,627 |
) |
|
|
(1,689 |
) |
|
12,405 |
|
|
|
12,529 |
|
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
3.37 |
|
|
|
4.17 |
|
|
|
(0.80 |
) |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
313,016 |
|
|
|
391,382 |
|
|
|
(78,366 |
) |
|
|
(80,823 |
) |
|
|
2,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,759 |
|
|
|
23,131 |
|
|
|
(372 |
) |
|
|
2.32 |
|
|
|
3.05 |
|
|
|
(0.73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
395,432 |
|
|
|
528,596 |
|
|
|
(133,164 |
) |
|
|
(130,853 |
) |
|
|
(2,311 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,976 |
|
|
|
5,549 |
|
|
|
(2,573 |
) |
|
|
2.40 |
|
|
|
3.32 |
|
|
|
(0.92 |
) |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
53,476 |
|
|
|
137,824 |
|
|
|
(84,348 |
) |
|
|
(45,844 |
) |
|
|
(38,504 |
) |
|
3,046 |
|
|
|
1,971 |
|
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
|
5.88 |
|
|
|
5.14 |
|
|
|
0.74 |
|
|
Medium and long-term debt |
|
|
133,858 |
|
|
|
75,823 |
|
|
|
58,035 |
|
|
|
12,028 |
|
|
|
46,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,781 |
|
|
|
30,651 |
|
|
|
(1,870 |
) |
|
|
2.71 |
|
|
|
3.23 |
|
|
|
(0.52 |
) |
|
Total
interest bearing liabilities |
|
|
582,766 |
|
|
|
742,243 |
|
|
|
(159,477 |
) |
|
|
(164,669 |
) |
|
|
5,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,269 |
|
|
|
4,137 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
demand deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,484 |
|
|
|
1,327 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other sources of funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
34,534 |
|
|
$ |
36,115 |
|
|
$ |
(1,581 |
) |
|
|
2.26 |
% |
|
|
2.75 |
% |
|
|
(0.49 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.45 |
% |
|
|
3.92 |
% |
|
|
(0.47 |
%) |
|
Net interest margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income on a
taxable equivalent basis |
|
|
892,979 |
|
|
|
1,061,131 |
|
|
|
(168,152 |
) |
|
|
($41,330 |
) |
|
|
($126,822 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.00 |
% |
|
|
3.44 |
% |
|
|
(0.44 |
%) |
|
Net interest spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable equivalent adjustment |
|
|
61,044 |
|
|
|
70,793 |
|
|
|
(9,749 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
831,935 |
|
|
$ |
990,338 |
|
|
|
($158,403 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: The changes that are not due solely to volume or rate are allocated to volume and rate based
on the proportion of the change in each category.
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes commercial construction loans. |
|
** |
|
Includes interest bearing demand deposits corresponding to certain government entities in Puerto
Rico. |
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
The provision for loan losses for the continuing operations totaled $331.1 million, or 123% of
net charge-offs, for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, compared with $252.2 million, or 148% of
net charge-offs for the third quarter of 2008. The increase in the provision for loan losses for
the quarter ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same quarter in 2008 was the result of higher
general reserve requirements for commercial loans, construction loans, U.S. mainland
non-conventional residential mortgages and home equity lines of credit, combined with specific
reserves recorded for loans considered impaired.
116
The provision for loan losses for the continuing operations totaled $1.1 billion, or 145% of net
charge-offs, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared with $602.6 million, or 160% of
net charge-offs for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Similar factors to those described
for the quarterly results primarily influenced the variance for the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2009 compared to the same period in the previous year.
Additional information on net charge-offs, non-performing assets and the allowance for loan losses
is provided in the Credit Risk Management and Loan Quality section of this MD&A.
NON-INTEREST INCOME
Refer to Table D for a breakdown on non-interest income from continuing operations by major
categories for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
TABLE D
Non-Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ Variance |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ Variance |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
$ |
54,208 |
|
|
$ |
52,433 |
|
|
$ |
1,775 |
|
|
$ |
161,412 |
|
|
$ |
155,319 |
|
|
$ |
6,093 |
|
|
Other service fees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debit card fees |
|
|
26,986 |
|
|
|
28,170 |
|
|
|
(1,184 |
) |
|
|
80,867 |
|
|
|
79,880 |
|
|
|
987 |
|
Credit card fees and discounts |
|
|
23,497 |
|
|
|
27,138 |
|
|
|
(3,641 |
) |
|
|
70,951 |
|
|
|
81,664 |
|
|
|
(10,713 |
) |
Processing fees |
|
|
13,638 |
|
|
|
13,044 |
|
|
|
594 |
|
|
|
40,773 |
|
|
|
38,587 |
|
|
|
2,186 |
|
Insurance fees |
|
|
11,463 |
|
|
|
12,378 |
|
|
|
(915 |
) |
|
|
36,014 |
|
|
|
38,254 |
|
|
|
(2,240 |
) |
Sale and administration of investment products |
|
|
8,181 |
|
|
|
6,890 |
|
|
|
1,291 |
|
|
|
25,204 |
|
|
|
25,966 |
|
|
|
(762 |
) |
Mortgage servicing fees, net of fair value
adjustments |
|
|
4,869 |
|
|
|
(1,407 |
) |
|
|
6,276 |
|
|
|
18,301 |
|
|
|
13,809 |
|
|
|
4,492 |
|
Trust fees |
|
|
3,260 |
|
|
|
2,906 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
9,364 |
|
|
|
9,038 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
Other fees |
|
|
5,720 |
|
|
|
6,183 |
|
|
|
(463 |
) |
|
|
17,110 |
|
|
|
19,451 |
|
|
|
(2,341 |
) |
|
Total other service fees |
|
|
97,614 |
|
|
|
95,302 |
|
|
|
2,312 |
|
|
|
298,584 |
|
|
|
306,649 |
|
|
|
(8,065 |
) |
|
Net
(loss) gain on sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities |
|
|
(9,059 |
) |
|
|
(9,132 |
) |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
220,792 |
|
|
|
69,430 |
|
|
|
151,362 |
|
Trading account profit |
|
|
7,579 |
|
|
|
6,669 |
|
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
31,241 |
|
|
|
38,547 |
|
|
|
(7,306 |
) |
(Loss) gain
on sale of loans and valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale |
|
|
(8,728 |
) |
|
|
6,522 |
|
|
|
(15,250 |
) |
|
|
(35,994 |
) |
|
|
25,696 |
|
|
|
(61,690 |
) |
Other operating income |
|
|
18,430 |
|
|
|
36,134 |
|
|
|
(17,704 |
) |
|
|
44,579 |
|
|
|
92,836 |
|
|
|
(48,257 |
) |
|
Total non-interest income |
|
$ |
160,044 |
|
|
$ |
187,928 |
|
|
|
($27,884 |
) |
|
$ |
720,614 |
|
|
$ |
688,477 |
|
|
$ |
32,137 |
|
|
Non-interest income for the quarter and nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 was
negatively impacted by losses on sales of loans, which include adjustments in indemnities and
representation and warranty reserves, compared to gains on sales of loans in 2008, as detailed in
the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ Variance |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ Variance |
|
(Loss) gain on
sales of loans,
including
adjustments to
credit recourse and
representation and
warranty reserves |
|
$ |
(8,728 |
) |
|
$ |
6,877 |
|
|
$ |
(15,605 |
) |
|
$ |
(32,286 |
) |
|
$ |
25,923 |
|
|
$ |
(58,209 |
) |
Lower of cost or
market valuation
adjustment on loans
held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(355 |
) |
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
(3,708 |
) |
|
|
(227 |
) |
|
|
(3,481 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
(8,728 |
) |
|
$ |
6,522 |
|
|
$ |
(15,250 |
) |
|
$ |
(35,994 |
) |
|
$ |
25,696 |
|
|
$ |
(61,690 |
) |
|
The losses on sales of loans for the quarter and nine-month period ended September 30, 2009
were mainly the result of increases in the representation and warranty reserves for loans
previously sold by E-LOAN by $10.4 million and $28.8 million, respectively, given an upward trend
in loss severities and claims in the current economic environment. On the other hand, the gains in
2008 included the loans sold by E-LOAN, which stopped originating loans in the fourth quarter of
2008. The variance for the nine-month period was also impacted by the sale of approximately $0.3
billion in lease financings by Popular Equipment Finance, a subsidiary of BPNA, which resulted in a
loss during the first quarter of 2009 of approximately $13.8 million.
117
The decrease in other operating income by $17.7 million and $48.3 million, respectively, during the
third quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2009, when compared to the same periods of the
previous year, was mainly associated to $21.1 million in gains on the sale of a real estate
property by the U.S. banking subsidiary during the third quarter of 2008. Also contributing to the
variance for the nine-month period were $12.8 million in gains on the sale of six retail bank
branches of BPNA in Texas during the first quarter of 2008, lower gains on the sales of real estate
properties in the Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (BPPR)
reportable segment in 2009, the gain recognized during the third quarter of
2008 on the sale of substantially all assets of EVERTECs health processing division, and higher
derivative losses by $9.7 million, including unfavorable credit risk adjustments, in 2009.
Partially offsetting the decreases in other operating income for the quarter and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 were higher revenues derived from investments accounted under the equity method.
Other service fees reflect an increase of 2% for the third quarter of 2009, compared to the third
quarter of 2008. However, it declined by 3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, when
compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The favorable variance in mortgage servicing
fees was mainly due to higher fees due to a higher volume of loans serviced and lower valuation
adjustments in the fair value of the servicing rights when compared to 2008. There was a decrease
in credit card fees and discounts because of lower merchant income due to reduced volume of
purchases and lower late payment fees mainly from lower volume of accounts subject to a fee.
These unfavorable variances in non-interest income were partially offset by higher net gains on
sales of investment securities, net of valuation adjustments of investment securities, as shown on
the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ Variance |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ Variance |
|
Net gain on sale of investment securities |
|
$ |
198 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
183 |
|
|
$ |
236,638 |
|
|
$ |
78,577 |
|
|
$ |
158,061 |
|
Valuation adjustments of investment securities |
|
|
(9,257 |
) |
|
|
(9,147 |
) |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
(15,846 |
) |
|
|
(9,147 |
) |
|
|
(6,699 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
(9,059 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,132 |
) |
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
$ |
220,792 |
|
|
$ |
69,430 |
|
|
$ |
151,362 |
|
|
Net gains on sales of investment securities for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
included $182.7 million in gains derived from the sale of $3.4 billion in U.S. Treasury notes and
U.S. agencies during the first quarter of 2009 by BPPR and $52.3 million in gains from the sale of
equity securities in the second quarter of 2009 by the BPPR and EVERTEC reportable segments. For
the nine months ended in September 30, 2008, net gains on sale of investment securities included
approximately $49.3 million in gains related to the redemption of VISA shares of common stock held
by the Corporation during the first quarter of 2008 and $28.3 million in capital gains realized
from the sale of $2.4 billion in U.S. agency securities during the second quarter of 2008 by BPPR.
The valuation adjustments of investment securities for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
were mostly related to write-downs on equity securities available-for-sale and tax credit
investments classified as other investment securities in the consolidated statement of condition.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, there were lower trading account profits, compared
with the same period in 2008, mainly due to lower realized gains on the sale of mortgage-backed
securities.
118
OPERATING EXPENSES
Refer to Table E for a breakdown of operating expenses by major categories for the quarter and
nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared with the same periods in the previous year.
TABLE E
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ Variance |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ Variance |
|
Personnel costs |
|
$ |
130,547 |
|
|
$ |
148,230 |
|
|
$ |
(17,683 |
) |
|
$ |
412,044 |
|
|
$ |
459,515 |
|
|
$ |
(47,471 |
) |
Net occupancy expenses |
|
|
28,269 |
|
|
|
26,510 |
|
|
|
1,759 |
|
|
|
80,734 |
|
|
|
81,218 |
|
|
|
(484 |
) |
Equipment expenses |
|
|
24,983 |
|
|
|
26,305 |
|
|
|
(1,322 |
) |
|
|
76,289 |
|
|
|
84,312 |
|
|
|
(8,023 |
) |
Other taxes |
|
|
13,109 |
|
|
|
13,301 |
|
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
39,369 |
|
|
|
39,905 |
|
|
|
(536 |
) |
Professional fees |
|
|
28,694 |
|
|
|
31,780 |
|
|
|
(3,086 |
) |
|
|
80,643 |
|
|
|
88,964 |
|
|
|
(8,321 |
) |
Communications |
|
|
11,902 |
|
|
|
12,574 |
|
|
|
(672 |
) |
|
|
36,115 |
|
|
|
38,137 |
|
|
|
(2,022 |
) |
Business promotion |
|
|
8,905 |
|
|
|
16,216 |
|
|
|
(7,311 |
) |
|
|
26,761 |
|
|
|
51,064 |
|
|
|
(24,303 |
) |
Printing and supplies |
|
|
2,857 |
|
|
|
3,269 |
|
|
|
(412 |
) |
|
|
8,664 |
|
|
|
10,763 |
|
|
|
(2,099 |
) |
FDIC deposit insurance |
|
|
16,506 |
|
|
|
4,625 |
|
|
|
11,881 |
|
|
|
61,954 |
|
|
|
9,237 |
|
|
|
52,717 |
|
Gain on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(79,304 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(79,304 |
) |
|
|
(79,304 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(79,304 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
31,753 |
|
|
|
36,139 |
|
|
|
(4,386 |
) |
|
|
104,955 |
|
|
|
104,485 |
|
|
|
470 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
2,379 |
|
|
|
3,966 |
|
|
|
(1,587 |
) |
|
|
7,218 |
|
|
|
8,948 |
|
|
|
(1,730 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
220,600 |
|
|
$ |
322,915 |
|
|
$ |
(102,315 |
) |
|
$ |
855,442 |
|
|
$ |
976,548 |
|
|
$ |
(121,106 |
) |
|
Operating expenses were favorably impacted by a $79.3 million gain on early extinguishment of
debt recorded during the quarter ended September 30, 2009, related principally from the junior
subordinated debentures that were extinguished as a result of the exchange of trust preferred
securities for common stock in August 2009.
Operating expenses for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2009 included approximately
$1.3 million and $8.9 million, respectively, in costs associated with the restructuring plans in
place at BPNA and E-LOAN that were commenced during 2008. To facilitate the comparative analysis,
below are details on the restructuring plans that pertained to the continuing operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarter ended |
|
For the nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
BPNA |
|
E-LOAN 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
BPNA |
|
E-LOAN 2008 |
|
|
|
|
Restructuring |
|
Restructuring |
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring |
|
Restructuring |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Plan |
|
Plan |
|
Total |
|
Plan |
|
Plan |
|
Total |
|
Personnel costs |
|
$ |
1,054 |
|
|
$ |
243 |
|
|
$ |
1,297 |
|
|
$ |
5,332 |
|
|
$ |
2,946 |
|
|
$ |
8,278 |
|
Net occupancy expenses |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,101 |
|
|
$ |
243 |
|
|
$ |
1,344 |
|
|
$ |
5,905 |
|
|
$ |
2,946 |
|
|
$ |
8,851 |
|
|
The decrease in personnel costs for the continuing operations was primarily the result of a
reduction in headcount from 10,818 as of September 30, 2008 to 9,591 as of September 30, 2009. BPNA
and E-LOAN were the principal contributors to this reduction with a decrease of 912 FTEs on a
combined basis. There was also a reduction in headcount at the BPPR and EVERTEC reportable segments due
to cost control initiatives, which included lower headcount from attrition. Also, there were lower
incentive compensation and commissions. Furthermore, in February 2009, the Corporation suspended
its matching contributions to the Puerto Rico and U.S. mainland subsidiaries savings and
investment plans as part of the actions taken to control costs, as well as froze the BPPRs pension
plan with regards to all future benefit accruals after April 30, 2009.
Equipment expenses decreased due to lower amortization of software packages and depreciation of
technology equipment, in part because such software and equipment was fully amortized in 2008 or
early 2009. Also, the decrease is partially due to lower equipment requirement and software
licensing because of the downsizing of the Corporations U.S. mainland operations.
119
The reduction in professional fees was mostly due to the fact that in the third quarter of 2008,
the Corporation incurred consulting and advisory services associated to the U.S. sale transactions
and valuation services, which were not recurrent in 2009. Also, the
year-to-date reduction was
influenced by lower credit bureau fees and other loan origination related services given the
exiting by E-LOAN of the direct lending business during 2008, lower programming fees and temporary
services. These favorable variances were partially offset by higher collection costs due to higher
delinquencies in the loan portfolio.
The decrease in business promotion resulted principally from cost control measures on expenditures
in general, including advertising and mailing campaigns, among others, as well as the downsizing of
the Corporations U.S. mainland operations.
FDIC deposit insurance premiums increased principally due to increases in assessment rates and
additional premiums resulting from two temporary programs to further insure customer deposits at
FDIC-member banks, which include insuring deposit accounts up to $250,000 per customer (up from
$100,000) and non-interest bearing transactional accounts (unlimited coverage). Also, the 2009
FDIC deposit insurance expense reflects the impact of a $16.7 million special assessment in the
second quarter of 2009. For a discussion of factors that influenced this increase, refer to Item
1A. Risk Factors in this Form 10-Q, particularly the risk factor captioned Risks Relating to Our
Business Increases in FDIC insurance premiums may have a material adverse affect on our
earnings.
RESTRUCTURING PLANS (for the continuing operations)
As indicated in the 2008 Annual Report, on October 17, 2008, the Board of Directors of Popular,
Inc. approved two restructuring plans for the BPNA reportable segment. The objective of the
restructuring plans is to improve profitability in the short-term, increase liquidity and lower
credit costs and, over time, achieve a greater integration with corporate functions in Puerto Rico.
BPNA Restructuring Plan
The restructuring plan for BPNAs banking operations (the BPNA Restructuring Plan) contemplates
the following measures: closing, consolidating or selling approximately 40 underperforming branches
in all existing markets; the shutting down, sale or downsizing of lending businesses that do not
generate deposits or fee income; and the reduction of general expenses associated with functions
supporting the branch and balance sheet initiatives. The BPNA Restructuring Plan also contemplates
greater integration with the corporate functions in Puerto Rico.
As part of the BPNA Restructuring Plan, the Corporation exited certain businesses including, among
the principal ones, those related to the origination of non-conventional mortgages, equipment lease
financing, business loans to professionals, multifamily lending, mixed-used commercial loans and
credit cards. The Corporation holds the existing portfolios of the exited businesses in a run-off
mode. Also, the Corporation downsized the following businesses related to its U.S. mainland banking
operations: business banking, SBA lending, and consumer / mortgage lending.
The table previously presented in the Operating Expenses section above, details the expenses
recorded by the Corporation during the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2009 that were
associated with this particular restructuring plan. As of September 30, 2009, the reserve for
restructuring costs associated with the BPNA Restructuring Plan amounted to $8 million. During the
third quarter of 2009, restructuring charges associated to the BPNA Restructuring Plan amounted to
$1.1 million and were principally for severance costs. As of September 30, 2009, the BPNA
Restructuring Plan has resulted in combined charges for 2008 and 2009 of approximately $25.6
million. An additional $3.3 million in associated costs are expected to be incurred in 2009. Refer
to Note 22 to the consolidated financial statements for a detail of the activity in the reserve for
restructuring costs and a breakdown of charges.
All restructuring efforts at BPNA are expected to result in approximately $50 million in recurrent
annual cost savings. The majority of the savings are related to personnel costs since the
restructuring plan incorporates a headcount reduction of approximately 670 FTEs, or 30% of BPNAs
workforce. Management expects the headcount reduction to be achieved by the end of 2009. As a
result of the BPNA Restructuring Plan, FTEs at BPNA were 1,490 as of September 30, 2009, compared
to 2,110 at the same date in the previous year.
120
E-LOAN 2008 Restructuring Plan
In October 2008, the Corporations Board of Directors approved a restructuring plan for E-LOAN (the
E-LOAN 2008 Restructuring Plan), which involved E-LOAN to cease operating as a direct lender, an
event that occurred in late 2008. E-LOAN continues to market deposit accounts under its name for
the benefit of BPNA. The 2008 E-LOAN Restructuring Plan is substantially complete as of September
30, 2009 since all operational and support functions were transferred to BPNA and EVERTEC and loan
servicing was transferred to a third-party provider. As of September 30, 2009, E-LOANs workforce
totaled 8 FTEs, compared with 300 as of September 30, 2008.
As of September 30, 2009, the accrual for restructuring costs associated with the E-LOAN 2008
Restructuring Plan amounted to $1 million. Restructuring charges associated to the E-LOAN 2008
Restructuring Plan amounted to $0.2 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 and consisted
principally of severance costs. As of September 30, 2009, the E-LOAN 2008 Restructuring Plan has
resulted in combined charges for 2008 and 2009 of approximately $24.9 million. An additional $0.2
million in associated costs are expected to be incurred in 2009. Refer to Note 22 to the
consolidated financial statements for a detail of the activity in the reserve for restructuring
costs and a breakdown of charges.
The costs related to the E-LOAN Restructuring Plan are part of the results of the BPNA reportable
segment.
INCOME TAXES
Income tax expense for the continuing operations amounted to $6.3 million for the quarter
ended September 30, 2009, compared with income tax expense of $148.3 million for the same quarter
of 2008. The reduction in income tax expense was principally due to the fact that during the third
quarter of 2008, the Corporation initially recorded a valuation allowance on the deferred tax
assets (DTA) of the U.S. mainland operations. The recording of this valuation increased income
tax expense by $189.2 million on the continuing operations.
The components of the income tax expense (benefit) for the continuing operations were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of pre-tax |
|
|
|
|
|
% of pre-tax |
(In thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
income |
|
Amount |
|
income |
|
Computed income tax at statutory rates |
|
$ |
(47,186 |
) |
|
|
40.95 |
% |
|
$ |
(145,752 |
) |
|
|
40.95 |
% |
Benefits of net tax exempt interest income |
|
|
(11,895 |
) |
|
|
10.32 |
|
|
|
(38,751 |
) |
|
|
10.89 |
|
Effect of income subject to preferential tax rate |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
(59,298 |
) |
|
|
16.66 |
|
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance |
|
|
58,480 |
|
|
|
(50.75 |
) |
|
|
203,709 |
|
|
|
(57.23 |
) |
Difference in tax rates due to multiple
jurisdictions |
|
|
8,579 |
|
|
|
(7.44 |
) |
|
|
31,252 |
|
|
|
(8.78 |
) |
State taxes and others |
|
|
(1,622 |
) |
|
|
1.41 |
|
|
|
(6,369 |
) |
|
|
1.78 |
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
$ |
6,331 |
|
|
|
(5.49 |
%) |
|
$ |
(15,209 |
) |
|
|
4.27 |
% |
|
Income tax benefit amounted to $15.2 million for the nine-month period ended September 30,
2009, compared with income tax expense of $152.5 million for the same period in 2008. The reduction
in income tax expense was primarily due to the impact on the recording of a valuation allowance in
2008 as previously indicated and by lower income before tax attributable to the business in Puerto
Rico. Also, on March 9, 2009, several amendments or additions to the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue
Code were adopted, including a temporary five percent special surtax over the tax liability of all
corporations doing business in Puerto Rico for the years beginning on January 1, 2009 thru December 31,
2011. This increase in tax rate resulted in an income tax benefit as a result of adjusting the
deferred tax assets to reflect the increase in the tax rate.
These reductions were partially offset by a decrease in exempt interest income, net of disallowance
of expenses attributed to such exempt income.
121
Refer to Note 23 to the consolidated financial statements for a breakdown of the Corporations
deferred tax assets as of September 30, 2009.
REPORTABLE SEGMENT RESULTS
The Corporations reportable segments for managerial reporting purposes consist of Banco
Popular de Puerto Rico, EVERTEC and Banco Popular North America. These reportable segments pertain
only to the continuing operations of Popular, Inc. Also, a Corporate group has been defined to
support the reportable segments. For managerial reporting purposes, the costs incurred by the
Corporate group are not allocated to the reportable segments. For a description of the
Corporations reportable segments, including additional financial information and the underlying
management accounting process, refer to Note 26 to the consolidated financial statements.
The Corporate group had a net income of $52.3 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared with a
net loss of $138.0 million in the same quarter of 2008. The main contributor to this variance was
the $80.3 million gain on early extinguishment of debt related to the aforementioned exchange of
trust preferred securities for common stock in the third quarter of 2009. Also impacting the
results were higher net interest expense by approximately $15.4 million and an income tax benefit
of $5.2 million in the third quarter of 2009 compared to an income tax expense of $106.9 million in
the third quarter of 2008. The variance in net interest expense was principally related to an
additional interest expense on long-term debt as a result of the exchange of the $935 million of
the Corporations Series C preferred stock for $935 million of newly issued trust preferred
securities and a higher cost on senior debt due to rate increases resulting from downgrades on
Populars unsecured senior debt ratings, partially offset by
lower interest expense on the extinguished junior subordinated
debentures. The Corporate groups financial results for the quarter
and nine months ended September 30, 2008 included an unfavorable impact to income taxes due to an
allocation (for segment reporting purposes) of $116.3 million of the $360.4 million valuation
allowance on the deferred tax assets of the U.S. mainland operations to Popular North America
(PNA), holding company of the U.S. operations. PNA files a consolidated tax return. The Corporate
group had net income of $6.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared with
net losses of $157.1 million for the same period in 2008. Similar factors influenced the
year-to-date variances.
Highlights on the results of operations for the reportable segments are discussed below.
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
The Banco
Popular de Puerto Rico reportable segment reported a net loss of $10.8 million for the
quarter ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of $46.2 million when compared with the same quarter
in the previous year. The Corporations banking operations in Puerto Rico have continued to be
adversely impacted by the prolonged economic recession being experienced by the Puerto Rico economy
and housing market, which has resulted in higher credit losses. The main factors that contributed
to the variance in the results for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, when compared to the third
quarter of 2008, included:
|
|
|
lower net interest income by $20.5 million, or 9%, primarily due to a lower net interest
yield, which was principally driven by the reduction in the yield of earning assets,
principally commercial and construction loans. This decline can be attributed to two main
factors: (1) the reduction in rates by the Fed as described in the Net Interest Income
section of this MD&A and (2) an increase in non-performing loans. Also, the BPPR reportable
segment experienced a decrease in the yield of investment securities. Partially offsetting
this unfavorable impact to net interest income was a reduction in the Corporations average
cost of funds driven by a reduction in the cost of deposits and short-term borrowings due
to the decrease in rates by the Fed and managements actions to lower the rates paid on
certain deposits. Also, the unfavorable variance in net interest income was associated with
a decline in the average volume of investment securities and in the loan portfolio, in part
due to the slowdown of loan origination activity and increased levels of loan charge-offs.
This negative impact from the reduction in the average volume of earning assets was
partially offset by a reduction in the average volume of short-term borrowings; |
|
|
|
higher provision for loan losses by $24.4 million, or 19%, primarily related to the
construction, consumer and commercial loan portfolios. The BPPR reportable segment
experienced an increase of $36.5 million in net charge-offs for the quarter ended September
30, 2009, compared to the same quarter in the previous year, principally associated with an
increase in construction loan net charge-offs by $32.4 million, mainly |
122
|
|
|
related to the
partial charge-off of a particular construction lending relationship. As of September
30, 2009, there were $1.0 billion of individually evaluated impaired loans in the BPPR reportable segment with a
related allowance for loan losses of $194.9 million, compared to $563.6 million and $90.3
million, respectively, as of September 30, 2008. Non-performing loans in this reportable
segment increased by $733 million from September 30, 2008 to the same date in 2009, mainly
related to construction loans. The ratio of allowance for loan losses to loans
held-in-portfolio for the BPPR reportable segment was 4.31% as of September 30, 2009,
compared with 3.00% as of September 30, 2008. The provision for loan losses represented 109%
of net charge-offs for the third quarter of 2009, compared with 124% of net charge-offs in
the same period of 2008. The ratio of annualized net charge-offs to average loans held-in-portfolio
for the BPPR reportable segment was 3.70% for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009, compared
with 2.60% for the quarter ended September 30, 2008; |
|
|
|
higher non-interest income by $10.0 million, or 8%, mainly due to higher other service
fees by $5.7 million, principally caused by a favorable change in the fair value of the
servicing rights and higher fees due to a greater volume of loans serviced for others;
partially offset by lower credit card fees. This favorable variance was impacted by higher
investment banking fees in the Corporations broker-dealer subsidiary due to higher
commission income; |
|
|
|
higher operating expenses by $6.8 million, or 3%, mainly due to higher FDIC deposit
insurance premiums and higher net occupancy expenses, partially offset by lower business
promotion, personnel costs, amortization of intangibles and equipment expenses, among
others; and |
|
|
|
income tax expense of $1.9 million in the third quarter of 2009 compared to an income
tax benefit of $2.5 million in the third quarter of 2008. Refer to the Income Taxes section
of this MD&A for additional information. |
Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 totaled $175.9 million, a decrease of $50.8
million, or 22%, compared with the same period in the previous year. These results reflected:
|
|
|
lower net interest income by $75.3 million, or 10%; |
|
|
|
higher provision for loan losses by $147.2 million, or 43%; |
|
|
|
higher non-interest income by $143.5 million , or 30%, which was mainly due to higher
gains on the sale of investment securities by $157.1 million. In the additional disclosures
of the BPPR reportable segment presented in Note 26 to the consolidated financial
statements, the capital gain specifically related to the sale of the investment securities
available-for-sale in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was distributed $50.8
million to the commercial banking business and $176.4 million to the consumer and retail
banking business of BPPR. The transactions that impacted this variance were
described in the Non-Interest Income section of this MD&A; |
|
|
|
higher operating expenses by $10.2 million, or 2%, which was mainly due to higher FDIC
deposit insurance premiums, partially offset by lower personnel costs, business promotion,
professional fees and equipment expenses; and |
|
|
|
lower income tax expense of $38.3 million, or 97%. |
EVERTEC
EVERTECs net income for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 totaled $10.8 million, an increase of
$2.4 million, or 28%, when compared with the results of the same quarter in the previous year.
The principal factors that contributed to the variance in results for the quarter ended September
30, 2009, when compared with the third quarter of 2008, included:
|
|
|
lower non-interest income by $1.1 million, or 2%, primarily due to lower income derived
from Information Technology (IT) consulting services; partially offset by higher business
process outsourcing and higher electronic transaction processing fees
mainly related to payment services, item processing and point-of-sale (POS) terminals; |
|
|
|
lower operating expenses by $5.7 million, or 11%, primarily due to lower personnel
costs, equipment expenses, professional fees and other operating expenses; and |
|
|
|
higher income tax expense by $2.1 million, or 50%. |
123
Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 totaled $38.8 million, an increase of $5.1
million, or 15%, compared with the same period in the previous year. These results reflected:
|
|
|
lower non-interest income by $4.6 million, or 2%; |
|
|
|
lower operating expenses by $14.2 million, or 9%, primarily due to lower personnel
costs, equipment expenses, professional fees expenses and other operating expenses; and |
|
|
|
higher income tax expense by $4.3 million, or 31%. |
Banco Popular North America
Banco Popular North America reported a net loss of $169.9 million for the quarter ended September
30, 2009, compared to a net loss of $139.0 million for the third quarter of 2008. The main factors
that contributed to the quarterly variance in this reportable segment included:
|
|
|
lower net interest income by $11.8 million, or 13%, which was mainly due to lower
interest income on loans, partially offset by a reduction in deposit expenses; |
|
|
|
higher provision for loan losses by $54.5 million, or 44%, principally as a result of
higher general reserve requirements for commercial loans, construction loans, U.S.
non-conventional residential mortgages and home equity lines of credit, combined with
specific reserves recorded for individually evaluated impaired loans. There were higher net
charge-offs in commercial loans by $27.0 million, mortgage loans by $18.5 million,
construction loans by $11.2 million and consumer loans by $6.4 million. As of September 30,
2009, there were $523 million of individually evaluated impaired loans in the BPNA
reportable segment with a specific allowance for loan losses of $118.3 million, compared to
$189.8 million and $40.9 million, respectively, as of September 30, 2008. The increase in
the provision for loan losses considers inherent losses in the portfolios evidenced by an
increase in non-performing loans in this reportable segment by $354 million, when compared
to September 30, 2008. The ratio of allowance for loan losses to loans held-in-portfolio
for the BPNA reportable segment was 6.05% as of September 30, 2009, compared with 2.37% as
of September 30, 2008. The provision for loan losses represented 137% of net charge-offs
for the third quarter of 2009, compared with 185% of net charge-offs in the same period of
2008. The ratio of annualized net charge-offs to average loans held-in-portfolio for the Banco
Popular North America operations was 5.65% for the third quarter of
2009,
compared with 2.60% for the same quarter in 2008; |
|
|
|
lower non-interest income by $46.1 million, or 88%,
mainly due to the gain of $21.1
million on the sale of a real estate property recorded during the
third quarter of 2008. Also,
there were higher losses in the third quarter of 2009 as a result of an increase in
indemnification reserves associated to loans sold; |
|
|
|
lower operating expenses by $22.7 million, or 24%. This variance was principally the
result of lower personnel costs by $16.7 million and business
promotion expenses by $4.5 million.
Refer to the
Restructuring Plans section of this MD&A for details on the costs incurred to date related
to the BPNA and E-LOAN restructuring plans; and |
|
|
|
lower income tax expense of $58.8 million, or 96%, due to the recording of a valuation
allowance on the deferred tax assets in 2008. |
Net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 totaled $557.6 million, an increase of
$382.3 million, when compared with the same period in the previous year. These results
reflected:
|
|
|
lower net interest income by $42.3 million, or 15%; |
|
|
|
higher provision for loan losses by $303.3 million; |
|
|
|
lower non-interest income by $119.7 million, or 88%, which was mainly due to losses
associated to loan sales in 2009, principally the sale by Popular Equipment Finance
discussed in the Non-Interest Income section of this MD&A, and increases in indemnity
reserves for loans sold. Also, the results for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
included a $12.8 million gain on the sale of BPNAs Texas branches and a $21.1 million
gain in the sale of a real estate property; |
|
|
|
lower operating expenses by $44.0 million, or 15%, principally due to downsizing;
and |
|
|
|
income tax benefit of $5.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
compared with an income tax expense of $33.4 million for the same period of 2008. The
income tax benefit reported for 2009 relates to a tax refund as a result of the 2005
and 2006 net operating loss carrybacks. |
124
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Assets
Refer to the consolidated financial statements included in this report for the Corporations
consolidated statements of condition and to Table A for financial highlights of the statements of
condition.
The Corporations total assets as of September 30, 2009 amounted to $35.6 billion, compared with
$38.9 billion as of December 31, 2008. Total assets as of September 30, 2008 amounted to $40.4
billion as of September 30, 2008, which included $969 million in assets from discontinued
operations which were substantially sold during the fourth quarter of 2008. The decline in total
assets from December 31, 2008 to September 30, 2009 reflected deleveraging strategies which
impacted the lower volume of investment securities. Also, there was a substantial reduction in
loans reflecting the impact of loan sales, downsizing and exiting certain business lines, lower
volume of loan originations in part due to the continued slowdown in the economy in general, and an
increase in loan charge-offs.
A breakdown of the Corporations investment securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity on a
combined basis is presented in Table E. Also, Notes 6 and 7 to the consolidated financial
statements provide additional information with respect to the Corporations available-for-sale and
held-to-maturity investment securities portfolio.
TABLE F
Breakdown of Investment Securities Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Variance |
|
2008 |
|
Variance |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
56.9 |
|
|
$ |
502.1 |
|
|
$ |
(445.2 |
) |
|
$ |
464.2 |
|
|
$ |
(407.3 |
) |
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
1,694.3 |
|
|
|
4,808.5 |
|
|
|
(3,114.2 |
) |
|
|
5,111.3 |
|
|
|
(3,417.0 |
) |
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political
subdivisions |
|
|
271.1 |
|
|
|
385.7 |
|
|
|
(114.6 |
) |
|
|
286.4 |
|
|
|
(15.3 |
) |
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
1,598.0 |
|
|
|
1,507.0 |
|
|
|
91.0 |
|
|
|
1,361.2 |
|
|
|
236.8 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
127.0 |
|
|
|
149.0 |
|
|
|
(22.0 |
) |
|
|
191.9 |
|
|
|
(64.9 |
) |
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
3,445.3 |
|
|
|
848.5 |
|
|
|
2,596.8 |
|
|
|
850.5 |
|
|
|
2,594.8 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
(5.9 |
) |
Others |
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,206.2 |
|
|
$ |
8,219.2 |
|
|
$ |
(1,013.0 |
) |
|
$ |
8,288.6 |
|
|
$ |
(1,082.4 |
) |
|
The decline in the Corporations available-for-sale and held-to-maturity investment portfolios
from December 31, 2008 to the end of the third quarter of 2009 was mainly associated with the
repayment of maturing securities. As previously indicated in this MD&A, during the first quarter of
2009, the Corporation sold $3.4 billion of investment securities available-for-sale, principally
U.S. agency securities (FHLB notes). Funds received from this sale were reinvested primarily in
GNMA mortgage-backed securities.
The impact of the restructuring (sale and reinvestment) of the investment securities portfolio
during 2009 was to:
|
|
|
strengthen common equity by realizing a gain that was subject to market risk, if bond
prices were to decline; |
|
|
|
increase the Corporations regulatory capital ratios; |
|
|
|
redeploy most of the proceeds in securities with a risk weighting of 0% for regulatory
capital purposes, as compared to the 20% risk-weighting which applied to the FHLB notes
sold; and |
|
|
|
mitigate the impact of the portfolios restructuring on net interest income, by
reinvesting most of the sale proceeds in a higher-yielding asset class. |
The Corporation holds investment securities primarily for liquidity, yield enhancement and interest
rate risk management. The portfolio primarily includes very liquid, high quality debt securities.
Management evaluates investment securities for other-than-temporary (OTTI) declines in fair value
on a quarterly basis. Once a decline in value is determined to be other-than- temporary, the value
of a debt security is reduced and a corresponding charge to earnings is recognized for anticipated
credit losses. Also, for equity securities that are considered other-than-temporarily impaired, the
excess of the securitys carrying value over its fair value at the evaluation date is accounted for as a loss in the results of operations. The OTTI analysis requires
management to consider various factors, which include, but are not limited to: (1) the length of
time and the extent to which fair
125
value has been less than the amortized cost basis, (2) the
financial condition of the issuer or issuers, (3) actual collateral attributes, (4) the payment
structure of the debt security and the likelihood of the issuer being able to make payments, (5)
any rating changes by a rating agency, (6) adverse conditions specifically related to the security,
industry, or a geographic area, and (7) managements intent to sell the security or whether it is
more likely than not that the Corporation would be required to sell the security before a
forecasted recovery occurs.
As of September 30, 2009, management performed its quarterly analysis of all debt securities in an
unrealized loss position to determine if any securities were other-than-temporarily impaired. Based
on the analyses performed, management concluded that no material individual debt security was
other-than-temporarily impaired as of such date. As of September 30, 2009, the Corporation does not
have the intent to sell debt securities in an unrealized loss position and it is not more likely
than not that the Corporation will have to sell the investment securities prior to recovery of
their amortized cost basis. Also, management evaluated the Corporations portfolio of equity
securities as of September 30, 2009. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the
Corporation has recorded $10.2 million in losses on certain equity securities considered
other-than-temporarily impaired. Management has the intent and ability to hold the investments in
equity securities that are at a loss position as of September 30, 2009 for a reasonable period of
time for a forecasted recovery of fair value up to (or beyond) the cost of these investments.
Additional information is provided in Notes 6 and 7 to the consolidated financial statements.
A breakdown of the Corporations loan portfolio, the principal category of earning assets, at
period-end, is presented in Table G.
TABLE G
Loans Ending Balances (including loans held-for-sale)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vs. |
|
|
|
|
|
Vs. |
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
13,076,772 |
|
|
$ |
13,687,060 |
|
|
$ |
(610,288 |
) |
|
$ |
13,857,264 |
|
|
$ |
(780,492 |
) |
Construction |
|
|
1,882,069 |
|
|
|
2,212,813 |
|
|
|
(330,744 |
) |
|
|
2,134,250 |
|
|
|
(252,181 |
) |
Lease financing |
|
|
699,350 |
|
|
|
1,080,810 |
|
|
|
(381,460 |
) |
|
|
1,124,021 |
|
|
|
(424,671 |
) |
Mortgage (1) |
|
|
4,621,915 |
|
|
|
4,639,464 |
|
|
|
(17,549 |
) |
|
|
4,707,715 |
|
|
|
(85,800 |
) |
Consumer |
|
|
4,191,410 |
|
|
|
4,648,784 |
|
|
|
(457,374 |
) |
|
|
4,757,919 |
|
|
|
(566,509 |
) |
|
Total loans (2) |
|
$ |
24,471,516 |
|
|
$ |
26,268,931 |
|
|
$ |
(1,797,415 |
) |
|
$ |
26,581,169 |
|
|
$ |
(2,109,653 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes residential construction loans.
|
|
(2) |
|
Loans disclosed exclude the discontinued operations of PFH. |
The decrease in commercial and construction loan portfolios from December 31, 2008 and
September 30, 2008 to September 30, 2009 reflected the slowdown in origination activity and
increased loan charge-offs as a result of the downturn in the real estate market, along with a
deteriorated economic environment and credit quality. Also, as previously described in the
Corporations 2008 Annual Report and in the Restructuring Plans section of this MD&A, the
Corporations U.S. mainland banking operations exited and downsized certain loan origination
channels, thus impacting negatively the volume of loan originations.
The decline in the lease financing portfolio from December 31, 2008 to September 30, 2009 was
primarily the result of the sale of a lease financing portfolio from Popular Equipment Finance, as
described in the Non-Interest Income section of this MD&A. This sale also impacted the variance
from September 30, 2008. Also, there was a slowdown in loan originations in the Puerto Rico
operations.
The mortgage loan portfolio as of September 30, 2009 remained at levels similar to December 31,
2008. The Banco Popular de Puerto Rico reportable segment showed an increase of $148 million, and
was partially offset by a reduction at the BPNA reportable segment of $165 million since BPNA
ceased originating non-conventional mortgage loans as part of the BPNA Restructuring Plan.
The decrease in the consumer loan portfolio from December 31, 2008 to September 30, 2009 was mostly
reflected in personal and auto loans and HELOCs. There was a lower volume of personal and auto
loans in the Banco Popular de Puerto Rico reportable segment due to current economic conditions
which have impacted the volume of new loan
126
originations and the run-off of Popular Finances loan
portfolio. Popular Finance operations were closed in late 2008. Furthermore, there were reductions
in the consumer loan portfolio of BPNA, including E-LOAN, primarily due to the run-off of its auto
loan portfolio, closed-end second mortgages and HELOCs without any concentrated lending efforts in
these products.
Table H provides a breakdown of the Other Assets caption presented in the consolidated statements
of condition.
TABLE H
Breakdown of Other Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vs. |
|
|
|
|
|
Vs. |
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
Net deferred tax assets
(net of valuation allowance) |
|
$ |
380,596 |
|
|
$ |
357,507 |
|
|
$ |
23,089 |
|
|
$ |
663,260 |
|
|
$ |
(282,664 |
) |
Bank-owned life insurance program |
|
|
230,579 |
|
|
|
224,634 |
|
|
|
5,945 |
|
|
|
222,298 |
|
|
|
8,281 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
144,949 |
|
|
|
136,236 |
|
|
|
8,713 |
|
|
|
153,698 |
|
|
|
(8,749 |
) |
Investments under the equity method |
|
|
97,817 |
|
|
|
92,412 |
|
|
|
5,405 |
|
|
|
117,766 |
|
|
|
(19,949 |
) |
Derivative assets |
|
|
81,249 |
|
|
|
109,656 |
|
|
|
(28,407 |
) |
|
|
50,335 |
|
|
|
30,914 |
|
Trade receivables from brokers and
counterparties |
|
|
8,275 |
|
|
|
1,686 |
|
|
|
6,589 |
|
|
|
17,100 |
|
|
|
(8,825 |
) |
Others |
|
|
210,215 |
|
|
|
193,466 |
|
|
|
16,749 |
|
|
|
187,762 |
|
|
|
22,453 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,153,680 |
|
|
$ |
1,115,597 |
|
|
$ |
38,083 |
|
|
$ |
1,412,219 |
|
|
$ |
(258,539 |
) |
|
Note: Other assets from discontinued operations as of December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008 are presented as part of Assets from
discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of condition.
Other assets as of September 30, 2009 remained stable when compared with December 31, 2008.
When compared with September 30, 2008, the major variance was reflected in the category of net
deferred tax assets, which was principally the result of recording in the fourth quarter of 2008 a
full valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets of the Corporations U.S. operations. Refer to
Note 23 to the consolidated financial statements for a description of the Corporations deferred
tax assets as of September 30, 2009.
Deposits, borrowings and capital
The composition of the Corporations financing to total assets as of September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 is included in Table I as follows:
TABLE I
Financing to Total Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% decrease from |
|
% of total assets |
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, 2008 to |
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
(Dollars in millions) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Non-interest bearing deposits |
|
$ |
4,282 |
|
|
$ |
4,294 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
%) |
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
|
11.1 |
% |
Interest-bearing core deposits |
|
|
15,220 |
|
|
|
15,647 |
|
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
42.7 |
|
|
|
40.2 |
|
Other interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
6,881 |
|
|
|
7,609 |
|
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
Federal funds and repurchase
agreements |
|
|
2,808 |
|
|
|
3,552 |
|
|
|
(20.9 |
) |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(40.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
|
2,650 |
|
|
|
3,387 |
|
|
|
(21.8 |
) |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
Others |
|
|
1,052 |
|
|
|
1,121 |
|
|
|
(6.2 |
) |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
2,742 |
|
|
|
3,268 |
|
|
|
(16.1 |
) |
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
127
A breakdown of the Corporations deposits at period-end is included in Table J.
TABLE J
Deposits Ending Balances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, 2009 Vs. |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, 2009 Vs. |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
2008 |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
Demand deposits * |
|
$ |
4,894,509 |
|
|
$ |
4,849,387 |
|
|
$ |
45,122 |
|
|
$ |
4,731,724 |
|
|
$ |
162,785 |
|
Savings, NOW and
money market
deposits |
|
|
9,509,512 |
|
|
|
9,554,866 |
|
|
|
(45,354 |
) |
|
|
9,884,674 |
|
|
|
(375,162 |
) |
Time deposits |
|
|
11,978,877 |
|
|
|
13,145,952 |
|
|
|
(1,167,075 |
) |
|
|
13,294,999 |
|
|
|
(1,316,122 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
26,382,898 |
|
|
$ |
27,550,205 |
|
|
$ |
(1,167,307 |
) |
|
$ |
27,911,397 |
|
|
$ |
(1,528,499 |
) |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes interest and non-interest bearing demand deposits. |
Brokered certificates of deposit, which are included as part of time deposits, totaled $2.8
billion as of September 30, 2009, compared with $3.1 billion as of December 31, 2008 and September
30, 2008. Brokered certificates of deposit, which are typically sold through an intermediary to
retail investors, provide access to longer-term funds that may not be available in the Puerto Rico
market and provide the ability to raise additional funds without pressuring retail deposit pricing.
However, in a rising rate scenario, the pricing and availability of brokered certificates of
deposit may be more sensitive to market rates than retail deposits.
Besides the reduction in time deposits resulting from the Corporations lower reliance in brokered
certificates of deposit between December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2009, there was also a decline
in time deposits at the BPNA reportable segment. The latter was in part due to deleveraging
strategies, including the closure and consolidation of branches and lower volume of loans and
investment securities, as well as a gradual reduction in the pricing of deposits, including
deposits gathered through the internet platform of E-LOAN.
The increase in demand deposits from September 30, 2008 to September 30, 2009 was mainly in the
BPPR reportable segment and was reflected mostly in commercial deposits.
The decline in savings, NOW and money market deposits from September 30, 2008 to the same date in
2009 was related to both BPNA and BPPR. The reduction at BPPR was mostly in commercial accounts.
During 2008 and 2009, management took actions to lower the rates paid on certain deposits,
including internet deposits offered by BPNA through the E-LOAN deposit platform, in part associated
with the decline in rates by the Fed.
Core deposits have historically provided the Corporation with a sizable source of relatively stable
and low-cost funds. The Corporation considers as core deposits all non-interest bearing deposits,
savings deposits and certificates of deposit under $100,000, excluding brokered certificates of
deposits with denominations under $100,000. The Corporations core deposits totaled $19.5 billion,
or 74% of total deposits, as of September 30, 2009, compared to $19.9 billion or 72% as of
December 31, 2008, and $20.0 billion or 72% as of September 30, 2008.
The distribution of certificates of deposit with denominations of $100,000 and over as of September
30, 2009, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
3 months or less |
|
$ |
2,009,836 |
|
3 to 6 months |
|
|
1,100,445 |
|
6 to 12 months |
|
|
1,239,479 |
|
Over 12 months |
|
|
667,613 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,017,373 |
|
|
Borrowed funds amounted to $5.5 billion as of September 30, 2009, compared with $6.9 billion
as of December 31, 2008 and $8.5 billion as of September 30, 2008. Note 14 to the consolidated
financial statements provides additional information on the Corporations borrowings as of such dates. The decline in borrowings from
December 31, 2008 to September 30, 2009 was directly related to the maturity of unsecured senior
term notes of Popular North America during the 2009, which had been used to fund the Corporations
U.S. mainland operations. Term notes classified as
128
notes payable declined by $799 million from
December 31, 2008 to September 30, 2009. Assets sold under agreements to repurchase as of September
30, 2009 presented a reduction of $599 million when compared with December 31, 2008. This decline
was associated in part to lower financing needs as a result of a lower volume of investment
securities.
The decline of $3.0 billion in borrowings from September 30, 2008 to the same date in 2009 was due
to lower financing requirements as a result of the sale of PFH assets and other loan portfolios
during 2008 and 2009. Also, the decrease was the result of a general reduction in the Corporations
asset size given the maturities of investment securities, lower loan origination activity and the
downsizing of certain of the Corporations subsidiaries. From 2008 to 2009, the Corporation has
placed less reliance on short-term borrowings, principally advances from Federal Home Loan Banks
and credit facilities with other financial institutions. The decline was also related to the
maturity of the previously mentioned unsecured senior term notes.
As previously indicated in the Exchange Offers section of this MD&A, during the third quarter of
2009, the Corporation issued junior subordinated debentures with an aggregate liquidation amount of
$935 million as part of the exchange agreement with the U.S. Treasury. As of September 30, 2009,
the outstanding balance of these debentures was $419 million since it is reported net of a discount
amounting to $517 million. The discount resulted from the recording of the debentures at fair value
because on the accounting treatment of the exchange. The aforementioned increase in junior
subordinated debentures was partially offset by the reduction in previously outstanding junior
subordinated debentures of $410 million, associated with the exchange of trust preferred securities
for common stock as previously described in this MD&A.
Stockholders equity totaled $2.7 billion as of September 30, 2009, compared with $3.3 billion as
of December 31, 2008, and $3.0 billion as of September 30, 2008. During the third quarter of 2009,
the Corporation took steps to increase its common equity. Refer to the consolidated statements of
condition and statements of changes in stockholders equity included in this Form 10-Q for
additional information on the composition of stockholders equity as of September 30, 2009,
December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008, and to review the impact of the exchange offers in each
category of stockholders equity. Also, the disclosures of accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss), an integral component of stockholders equity, are included in the consolidated statements
of comprehensive income (loss).
On May 1, 2009, the stockholders of the Corporation approved an amendment to the Corporations
Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from
470,000,000 shares to 700,000,000 shares. The stockholders also approved a decrease in the par
value of the common stock of the Corporation from $6 per share to $0.01 per share. The decrease in
the par value of the Corporations common stock had no effect on the total dollar value of the
Corporations stockholders equity. During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation
transferred an amount equal to the product of the number of shares issued and outstanding and $5.99
(the difference between the old and new par values), from the common stock account to surplus
(additional paid-in capital).
In June 2009, management announced the suspension of dividends on the Corporations common stock
and Series A and B preferred stock.
The Banking Act of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico requires that a minimum of 10% of BPPRs net
income for the year be transferred to a statutory reserve account until such statutory reserve
equals the total of paid-in capital on common and preferred stock. Any losses incurred by the bank
must first be charged to retained earnings and then to the reserve fund. Amounts credited to the
reserve fund may not be used to pay dividends without the prior consent of the Puerto Rico
Commissioner of Financial Institutions. The failure to maintain sufficient statutory reserves would
preclude BPPR from paying dividends. BPPRs statutory reserve fund totaled $392 million as of
September 30, 2009 (December 31, 2008 $392 million; September 30, 2008 $374 million). There
were no transfers between the statutory reserve account and the retained earnings account during
the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
The Corporation continues to exceed the well-capitalized guidelines under the federal banking
regulations. The regulatory capital ratios and amounts of total risk-based capital, Tier 1
risk-based capital and Tier 1 leverage as of September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008, and September
30, 2008 are presented on Table K. As of such dates, BPPR and BPNA were well-capitalized.
129
TABLE K
Capital Adequacy Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
Risk-based capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital |
|
$ |
2,771,723 |
|
|
$ |
3,272,375 |
|
|
$ |
2,835,195 |
|
Supplementary (Tier II) capital |
|
|
350,323 |
|
|
|
384,975 |
|
|
|
394,452 |
|
|
Total capital |
|
$ |
3,122,046 |
|
|
$ |
3,657,350 |
|
|
$ |
3,229,647 |
|
|
Risk-weighted assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet items |
|
$ |
23,999,569 |
|
|
$ |
26,838,542 |
|
|
$ |
28,203,551 |
|
Off-balance sheet items |
|
|
3,082,839 |
|
|
|
3,431,217 |
|
|
|
2,990,003 |
|
|
Total risk-weighted assets |
|
$ |
27,082,408 |
|
|
$ |
30,269,759 |
|
|
$ |
31,193,554 |
|
|
Average assets |
|
$ |
34,958,245 |
|
|
$ |
38,702,787 |
|
|
$ |
39,557,133 |
|
|
Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I
capital (minimum required 4.00%) |
|
|
10.23 |
% |
|
|
10.81 |
% |
|
|
9.09 |
% |
Total capital (minimum required 8.00%) |
|
|
11.53 |
|
|
|
12.08 |
|
|
|
10.35 |
|
Leverage ratio * |
|
|
7.93 |
|
|
|
8.46 |
|
|
|
7.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
All banks are required to have a minimum Tier I leverage ratio of 3% or 4% of adjusted
quarterly average assets, depending on the banks classification. |
As of September 30, 2009, the capital adequacy minimum requirement for Popular, Inc. was (in
thousands): Total Capital of $2,166,593, Tier I Capital of $1,083,296, and Tier I Leverage of
$1,048,747 based on a 3% ratio or $1,398,330 based on a 4% ratio according to the Banks
classification.
Regulatory capital requirements for banking institutions are based on Tier 1 and Total
capital, which include both common stock and certain qualifying preferred stock and trust preferred
securities. Nonetheless, as overall economic conditions and credit quality in particular have
continued to worsen, there has been an increasing regulatory and market focus on Tier 1 common
equity and Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets ratio of banking institutions. Recent
losses reduced the Corporations Tier 1 common equity, but it improved during the third quarter of
2009 as a result of the exchange offers. The Corporations Tier 1 common/risk-weighted assets ratio
was 2.45% as of June 30, 2009 and increased to 6.88% as of September 30, 2009. Refer to the
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measure section below for a reconciliation of Tier 1 common
to common stockholders equity and a discussion of the Corporations use of this non-GAAP financial
measure in this Form 10-Q. Also, refer to the Exchange Offers in this Form 10-Q for further
information.
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measure:
The table below presents a reconciliation of Tier 1 common equity (also referred to as Tier 1
common) to common stockholders equity. Ratios calculated based upon Tier 1 common equity have
become a focus of regulators and investors, and management believes ratios based on Tier 1 common
equity assist investors in analyzing the Corporations capital position. In connection with the
Supervisory Capital Assessment Program (SCAP), the Federal Reserve began supplementing its
assessment of the capital adequacy of a bank holding company based on a variation of Tier 1
capital, known as Tier 1 common equity. Because Tier 1 common equity is not formally defined by
GAAP or, unlike Tier 1 capital, codified in the federal banking regulations, this measure is
considered to be a non-GAAP financial measure.
Non-GAAP financial measures have inherent limitations, are not required to be uniformly applied and
are not audited. To mitigate these limitations, the Corporation has procedures in place to
calculate these measures using the appropriate GAAP or regulatory components. Although these
non-GAAP financial measures are frequently used by stakeholders in the evaluation of a company,
they have limitations as analytical tools, and should not be considered in isolation, or as a
substitute for analyses of results as reported under GAAP.
130
The following table provides a reconciliation of common stockholders equity (GAAP) to Tier 1
common equity (non-GAAP):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
June 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
Common stockholders equity |
|
$ |
2,692,296 |
|
|
$ |
1,412,701 |
|
Less: Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net of tax (1) |
|
|
(121,735 |
) |
|
|
(48,296 |
) |
Less: Disallowed deferred tax assets (2) |
|
|
(195,894 |
) |
|
|
(167,223 |
) |
Less: Intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
(606,508 |
) |
|
|
(607,164 |
) |
Other disallowed intangibles |
|
|
(21,873 |
) |
|
|
(25,797 |
) |
Less: Aggregate adjusted carrying value of all non-financial equity investments |
|
|
(2,362 |
) |
|
|
(2,147 |
) |
Add: Pension liability adjustment, net of tax and accumulated net losses on
cash flow hedges (3) |
|
|
119,007 |
|
|
|
120,256 |
|
|
Total Tier 1 common equity |
|
$ |
1,862,931 |
|
|
$ |
682,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In accordance with regulatory risk-based capital guidelines, Tier 1
capital excludes net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale
debt securities and net unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity
securities with readily determinable fair values. In arriving at Tier
1 capital, institutions are required to deduct net unrealized losses
on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair
values, net of tax. |
|
(2) |
|
Approximately $167 million of the Corporations $381 million of net
deferred tax assets as of September 30, 2009 ($193 million and $390
million, respectively as of June 30, 2009), were included without
limitation in regulatory capital pursuant to the risk-based capital
guidelines, while approximately $196 million of such assets as of
September 30, 2009 ($167 million as of June 30, 2009) exceeded the
limitation imposed by these guidelines and, as disallowed deferred
tax assets, were deducted in arriving at Tier 1 capital. The
remaining $18 million of the Corporations other net deferred tax
assets as of September 30, 2009 ($30 million as of June 30, 2009)
represented primarily the following items (a) the deferred tax effects
of unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities,
which are permitted to be excluded prior to deriving the amount of net
deferred tax assets subject to limitation under the guidelines; (b)
the deferred tax asset corresponding to the pension liability
adjustment recorded as part of accumulated other comprehensive income;
and (c) the deferred tax liability associated with goodwill and other
intangibles. |
|
(3) |
|
The Federal Reserve Bank has granted interim capital relief for the
impact of pension liability adjustment. |
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
As disclosed in the 2008 Annual Report, the Corporation discontinued the operations of Popular
Financial Holdings in 2008 by selling substantially all assets and closing service branches and
other units.
For financial reporting purposes, the results of the discontinued operations of PFH are presented
as Assets / Liabilities from discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of condition
as of December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008 and as Loss from discontinued operations, net of
tax in the consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented.
Total assets of the PFH discontinued operations amounted to $13 million as of December 31, 2008 and
$969 million as of September 30, 2008. Total assets of the PFH discontinued operations as of
September 30, 2008 principally consisted of $626 million in loans, of which $584 million were
accounted at fair value pursuant to the fair value option, $37 million in mortgage servicing
rights, $280 million in servicing advances and related assets, and $26 million in residual
interests and other assets. As disclosed in the 2008 Annual Report, the Corporation sold
substantially all of these loan portfolios in late 2008. As of September 30, 2008, all loans and
borrowings recognized at fair value pursuant to the fair value option pertained to the discontinued
operations of PFH.
131
The following table provides financial information for the discontinued operations for the quarter
and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
($ in millions) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
30.7 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
Non-interest (loss) income |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
|
(256.4 |
) |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
(255.4 |
) |
Operating expenses |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
126.3 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
193.0 |
|
Loss on disposition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53.5 |
) |
|
Pre-tax loss from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(3.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(445.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(13.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(490.2 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
(3.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(457.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(20.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(488.2 |
) |
|
Non-interest loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 represented primarily increases
in indemnities and representation and warranty reserves associated to prior sales agreements. The
operating expenses related principally to personnel costs for employees under transition,
attorneys fees and collection services.
The net loss for the discontinued operations reported for the third quarter of 2008 included
write-downs of assets held-for-sale to fair value, losses on the sale of loans, restructuring
charges and the recording of a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets of $171.2 million.
Management implemented a series of actions in 2008 that led to the discontinuance of the PFH
operations. These actions included two major restructuring plans, which are described in the 2008
Annual Report. These are the PFH Discontinuance Restructuring Plan and the PFH Branch Network
Restructuring Plan. The PFH Discontinuance Restructuring Plan commenced in the second half of 2008
and included the elimination of substantially all employment positions and termination of contracts
with the objective of discontinuing PFHs operations. The PFH Branch Network Restructuring Plan
resulted in the sale of a substantial portion of PFHs loan portfolio in the first quarter of 2008
and the closure of Equity Ones consumer service branches, which represented, at the time, the only
significant channel for PFH to continue originating loans.
PFH continues to employ 9 full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) that are primarily retained for a
transition period. Additional costs could be incurred during 2009 associated to leased premises
that are still occupied and the lease contract has not been terminated. These costs are not
expected to be significant to the Corporations results of operations.
132
PFH Discontinuance Restructuring Plan
During the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the PFH Discontinuance Restructuring
Plan resulted in charges, on a pre-tax basis, broken down as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
(In thousands) |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
Personnel costs |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
981 |
(a) |
Professional fees |
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
Total restructuring costs |
|
$ |
300 |
|
|
$ |
1,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Severance, retention bonuses and other benefits |
As of September 30, 2009, the PFH Discontinuance Restructuring Plan has resulted in combined
charges for 2008 and 2009, broken down as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairments on |
|
Restructuring |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
long-lived assets |
|
costs |
|
Total |
|
Year ended December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
3,916 |
|
|
$ |
4,124 |
|
|
$ |
8,040 |
|
Quarter ended: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
895 |
|
|
|
895 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,916 |
|
|
$ |
5,405 |
|
|
$ |
9,321 |
|
|
The PFH Discontinuance Restructuring Plan charges are included in the line item Loss from
discontinued operations, net of tax in the consolidated statements of operations.
The
following table presents the activity in the accrued balances for the PFH Discontinuance Restructuring Plan
during 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Restructuring Costs |
|
Balance as of January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
3,428 |
|
Charges in the quarter ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
895 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(1,711 |
) |
|
Balance as of March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
2,612 |
|
Charges in the quarter ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
86 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(1,235 |
) |
|
Balance as of June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,463 |
|
Charges in the quarter ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
300 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(514 |
) |
|
Balance as of September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,249 |
|
|
The reserve balance included as other liabilities as of September 30, 2009 is mostly related
to severance costs, which are expected to be paid substantially in the fourth quarter of 2009.
133
CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT AND LOAN QUALITY
Non-performing assets
Non-performing assets include past-due loans that are no longer accruing interest,
renegotiated loans and real estate property acquired through foreclosure. A summary, including
certain credit quality metrics, is presented in Table L. For a summary of the Corporations policy
for placing loans on non-accrual status, refer to the sections of Loans and Allowance for Loan
Losses in Note 1 to the audited consolidated financial statements included in Popular, Inc.s 2008
Annual Report.
TABLE L
Non-Performing Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a |
|
|
|
|
|
As a |
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
As a |
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
percentage |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
percentage |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of loans |
|
|
|
|
|
of loans |
|
Vs. |
|
|
|
|
|
of loans |
|
Vs. |
|
|
September 30, |
|
HIP (1) |
|
December 31, |
|
HIP (1) |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
|
HIP (1) |
|
September 30, |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
by category |
|
2008 |
|
by category |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
by category |
|
2008 |
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
776,027 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
$ |
464,802 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
$ |
311,225 |
|
|
$ |
440,466 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
$ |
335,561 |
|
Construction |
|
|
768,987 |
|
|
|
40.9 |
|
|
|
319,438 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
449,549 |
|
|
|
235,241 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
533,746 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
10,309 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
11,345 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
(1,036 |
) |
|
|
12,736 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
(2,427 |
) |
Mortgage |
|
|
484,219 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
338,961 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
145,258 |
|
|
|
281,914 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
202,305 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
75,992 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
68,263 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
7,729 |
|
|
|
58,026 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
17,966 |
|
|
Total non-performing loans |
|
|
2,115,534 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
% |
|
|
1,202,809 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
912,725 |
|
|
|
1,028,383 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
1,087,151 |
|
Other real estate |
|
|
129,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,764 |
|
|
|
72,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,880 |
|
|
Total non-performing assets |
|
$ |
2,245,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,292,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
952,489 |
|
|
$ |
1,100,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,144,031 |
|
|
Accruing loans past due 90 days or
more |
|
$ |
202,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
150,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
52,295 |
|
|
$ |
125,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
77,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing assets to total assets |
|
|
6.30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.32 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.73 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to loans
held- in-portfolio |
|
|
4.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to
non-performing assets |
|
|
53.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to
non-performing loans |
|
|
57.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
HIP = held-in-portfolio |
Non-performing assets attributable to the continuing operations totaled $2.2 billion as of
September 30, 2009, compared with $1.3 billion as of December 31, 2008. The increase in
non-performing assets from December 31, 2008 to September 30, 2009 was primarily related to
increases in commercial, construction, and mortgage loans. Non-performing commercial and
construction loans increased from December 31, 2008 to September 30, 2009 primarily in the BPPR
reportable segment by $547 million and in the BPNA reportable segment by $214 million. The
increases in non-performing loans were concentrated in portfolios secured by real estate. As of
September 30, 2009, non-performing loans secured by real estate amounted to $1.3 billion or 14.0%
of total loans secured by real estate in the Puerto Rico operations and $572 million or 8.7%,
respectively, in the U.S. mainland operations. In terms of reserves, the total allowance for loan
losses to non-performing loans from continuing operations represented 57.07% as of September 30,
2009, compared to 73.40% as of December 31, 2008.
The increase in non-performing commercial loans from $465 million as of December 31, 2008 to $776
million as of September 30, 2009 resulted from the continuing downturn in the U.S. economy and the
recessionary economy in Puerto Rico that is now in its fourth year. The percentage of
non-performing commercial loans to commercial loans held-in-portfolio rose from 3.4% as of December
31, 2008 to 5.9% as of September 30, 2009. Non-performing commercial loans increased from December
31, 2008 to September 30, 2009 in the BPPR reportable segment by $181 million and in the BPNA
reportable segment by $130 million. There were 5 commercial loan relationships
greater than $10 million in non-accrual status as of September 30, 2009, compared with 2 commercial loan
relationships as of December 31, 2008.
134
The Corporations commercial loan portfolio secured by real estate (CRE), excluding construction
loans, amounted to $7.4 billion as of September 30, 2009, of which $3.4 billion was secured with
owner occupied properties. CRE non-performing loans amounted to $474 million, or 6.45% of CRE
loans as of September 30, 2009. The CRE non-performing loans ratios for the Corporations Puerto
Rico and U.S. mainland operations were 7.93% and 4.73%, respectively, as of September 30, 2009.
Non-performing construction loans increased $450 million from the end of 2008 to September 30, 2009
primarily in the BPPR reportable segment by $366 million and in the BPNA reportable segment by $84
million. Construction non-performing loans to construction loans held-in-portfolio increased from
14.44% as of December 31, 2008 to 40.86% as of September 30, 2009. There were 21 construction loan
relationships greater than $10 million in non-accrual status as of September 30, 2009, mostly
related to the Puerto Rico operations, compared with 6 as of December 31, 2008. The construction
non-performing loans to construction loans held-in-portfolio ratios were 48.49% for the BPPR
reportable segment and 27.47% for the BPNA reportable segment as of September 30, 2009. As of
December 31, 2008, these ratios were 15.02% and 13.37% for BPPR and BPNA reportable segments,
respectively. The construction loans in non-performing status for both reportable segments are
primarily residential real estate construction loans which have been adversely impacted by
depressed economic conditions, decreases in property values, oversupply in certain areas and
reduced absorption rates.
Recognition of interest income on commercial and construction loans is discontinued when the loans
are 90 days or more in arrears on payments of principal or interest or when other factors indicate
that the collection of principal and interest is doubtful. The
impaired portions on these loans are charged-off at no longer than 365 days past due.
Non-performing mortgage loans held-in-portfolio increased $145 million from December 31, 2008 to
September 30, 2009, mainly in the BPNA reportable segment by $51 million and the BPPR reportable
segment by $94 million. The higher level of non-performing residential mortgage loans was
principally attributed to Banco Popular North Americas non-conventional mortgage business in the
U.S. mainland operations and Puerto Ricos residential mortgage portfolio. Deteriorating economic
conditions have impacted the mortgage delinquency rates and have increased pressure in home prices
both in the United States and Puerto Rico. Nonetheless, the Puerto Rico housing market has not
experienced the level of losses affecting some regions in the United States. Total mortgage loans
net charge-offs in the BPPR reportable segment amounted to $5.0 million for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 and $8.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of
$4.0 million and $6.2 million, respectively, compared to the results for the same periods of the
previous years. Total mortgage loans net charge-offs in the BPNA reportable segment amounted to
$29.3 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 and $82.1 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, an increase of $18.5 million and $53.4 million, respectively, compared to the
results for the same periods of the previous year. BPNAs non-conventional mortgage loan portfolio
outstanding as of September 30, 2009 approximated $1.1 billion with a related allowance for loan
losses of $108 million or 9.86%. As indicated in the Restructuring Plans section of this MD&A, the
Corporation is no longer originating non-conventional mortgage loans at BPNA. Net charge-offs for
BPNAs non-conventional portfolio totaled $26.1 million with a ratio of 9.30% of annualized net
charge-offs to average non-conventional mortgage loans held-in-portfolio for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009. Recognition of interest income on mortgage loans is
discontinued when 90 days or more in arrears on payments of
principal or interest. The impaired portions on mortgage loans are
charged-off at 180 days past due.
The increase in non-performing consumer loans to $76 million as of September 30, 2009, when
compared to $68 million as of December 31, 2008, was principally associated with the BPPR
reportable segment. The increase of $7 million in the Puerto Rico non-performing consumer loans
was primarily related to the auto loans portfolio as a result of the recessionary economic
conditions. The increase of $1 million in the U.S. mainland non-performing consumer loans was
mainly attributed to E-LOANs home equity lines of credit and second lien mortgage loans which are
categorized by the Corporation as consumer loans. With the restructuring of E-LOAN, this subsidiary
ceased originating these types of loans. Home equity lending includes both home equity loans and
lines of credit. This type of lending, which is secured by a first or second mortgage on the
borrowers residence, allows customers to borrow against the equity in their home. Real estate
market values as of the time the loan or line is granted directly affect the amount of credit
extended and, in addition, changes in these values impact the severity of losses. E-LOANs
portfolio
of home equity lines of credit and second lien mortgages outstanding as of September 30, 2009
135
totaled
$580 million with a related allowance for loan losses of $91 million or 15.75%. Recognition
of interest income on closed-end consumer loans and home equity lines
of credit is discontinued when the loans are 90 days or more
in arrears on payments of principal or interest or when other factors indicate that the collection
of principal and interest is doubtful. Income is generally recognized on open-end consumer
loans, except for home equity lines of credit, until the loans are charged-off. Closed-end consumer loans and leases are charged-off when they are
120 days in arrears. Open-end consumer loans are charged-off when 180 days in arrears.
Other real estate, which represents real estate property acquired through foreclosure, increased by
$40 million from December 31, 2008 to September 30, 2009. This increase was principally due to an
increase in the BPPR reportable segment by $48 million, partially offset by a decrease of $8
million in other real estate pertaining to the BPNA reportable segment mainly driven by sales of
properties. With the slowdown in the housing market caused primarily by a continued economic
deterioration in certain geographic areas, there has been a softening effect on the market for
resale of repossessed real estate properties. As a result, defaulted loans have increased, and
these loans move through the default process to the other real estate classification. The
combination of increased flow of defaulted loans from the loan portfolio to other real estate owned
and the slowing of the liquidation market has resulted in an increase in the number of other real
estate units on hand.
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more are composed primarily of credit cards, FHA / VA and other
insured mortgage loans, and delinquent mortgage loans included in the Corporations financial
statements pursuant to GNMAs buy-back option program. Servicers of loans underlying GNMA
mortgage-backed securities must report as their own assets the defaulted loans that they have the
option to purchase, even when they elect not to exercise that option. Also, accruing loans past due
90 days or more include residential conventional loans purchased from other financial institutions
that, although delinquent, the Corporation has received timely payment from the sellers /
servicers, and, in some instances, have partial guarantees under recourse agreements.
In addition to the non-performing loans included in Table L, there were $233 million of performing
loans as of September 30, 2009, which in managements opinion are currently subject to potential
future classification as non-performing and are considered impaired. As of December 31, 2008 and
September 30, 2008, these potential problem loans approximated $206 million and $144 million,
respectively.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses, which represents managements estimate of credit losses
inherent in the loan portfolio, is maintained at a sufficient level to provide for estimated credit
losses on individually evaluated loans as well as estimated credit losses inherent in the remainder
of the loan portfolio. The Corporations management evaluates the adequacy of the allowance for
loan losses on a monthly basis. In this evaluation, management considers current economic
conditions and the resulting impact on Populars loan portfolio, the composition of the portfolio
by loan type and risk characteristics, historical loss experience, results of periodic credit
reviews of individual loans, regulatory requirements and loan impairment measurement, among other
factors.
The Corporation must rely on estimates and exercise judgment regarding matters where the ultimate
outcome is unknown such as economic developments affecting specific customers, industries or
markets. Other factors that can affect managements estimates are the years of historical data when
estimating losses, changes in underwriting standards, financial accounting standards and loan
impairment measurements, among others. Changes in the financial condition of individual borrowers,
in economic conditions, in historical loss experience and in the condition of the various markets
in which collateral may be sold may all affect the required level of the allowance for loan losses.
Consequently, the business, financial condition, liquidity, capital and results of operations could
also be affected.
The Corporations assessment of the allowance for loan losses is determined in accordance with
accounting guidance, specifically guidance of loss contingencies in ASC Subtopic 450-20 (formerly
SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies) and loan impairment guidance in ASC Section 310-10-35
(formerly SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan).
136
The accounting guidance provides for the recognition of a loss allowance for groups of homogeneous
loans. During the previous quarter, the Corporation enhanced the reserve assessment of homogeneous
loans by establishing a more
granular segmentation of loans with similar risk characteristics, reducing the historical base loss
periods employed, and strengthening the analysis pertaining to the environmental factors
considered. The determination for general reserves of the allowance for loan losses is based on
historical net loss rates (including losses from impaired loans) by loan type and by legal entity
adjusted for recent net charge-off trends and environmental factors. The environmental factors,
which include credit and economic indicators, are assessed to account for current market conditions
that are likely to cause estimated credit losses to differ from historical loss experience. For
subprime mortgage loans, the allowance for loan losses is established to cover at least one year of
projected losses which are inherent in these portfolios.
According to the FASBs criteria for specific impairment of a loan, up to December 31, 2008, the
Corporation defined as impaired loans those commercial borrowers with outstanding debt of $250,000
or more and with interest and /or principal 90 days or more past due. Also, specific commercial
borrowers with outstanding debt of $500,000 and over were deemed impaired when, based on current
information and events, management considered that it was probable that the debtor would be unable
to pay all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Effective January
1, 2009, the Corporation continues to apply the same definition except that it prospectively
increased the threshold of outstanding debt to $1,000,000 for the identification of newly impaired
commercial and construction loans. Although the FASBs criteria for specific impairment of a loan
excludes large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for
impairment (e.g. mortgage loans), it specifically requires that loan modifications considered
troubled debt restructurings be analyzed under its provisions.
An allowance for loan impairment is recognized to the extent that the carrying value of an impaired
loan exceeds the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective
rate, the observable market price of the loan, if available, or the fair value of the collateral if
the loan is collateral dependent. The fair value of the collateral is generally obtained from
appraisals. The Corporation periodically requires updated appraisal reports for loans that are
considered impaired. As a general procedure, the Corporation internally reviews appraisals as part
of the underwriting and approval process and also for credits considered impaired.
137
Table M summarizes the detail of the changes in the allowance for loan losses, including
charge-offs and recoveries by loan category for the quarters and nine months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008.
TABLE M
Allowance for Loan Losses and Selected Loan Losses Statistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third quarter |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Variance |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Variance |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
1,146,239 |
|
|
$ |
652,730 |
|
|
$ |
493,509 |
|
|
$ |
882,807 |
|
|
$ |
548,832 |
|
|
$ |
333,975 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
331,063 |
|
|
|
252,160 |
|
|
|
78,903 |
|
|
|
1,053,036 |
|
|
|
602,561 |
|
|
|
450,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,477,302 |
|
|
|
904,890 |
|
|
|
572,412 |
|
|
|
1,935,843 |
|
|
|
1,151,393 |
|
|
|
784,450 |
|
|
Losses charged to the allowance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
64,238 |
|
|
|
41,048 |
|
|
|
23,190 |
|
|
|
187,874 |
|
|
|
116,199 |
|
|
|
71,675 |
|
Construction |
|
|
96,495 |
|
|
|
52,339 |
|
|
|
44,156 |
|
|
|
217,990 |
|
|
|
57,529 |
|
|
|
160,461 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
5,501 |
|
|
|
5,446 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
16,650 |
|
|
|
16,440 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
36,143 |
|
|
|
11,907 |
|
|
|
24,236 |
|
|
|
92,906 |
|
|
|
30,842 |
|
|
|
62,064 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
84,608 |
|
|
|
71,861 |
|
|
|
12,747 |
|
|
|
260,699 |
|
|
|
188,715 |
|
|
|
71,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
286,985 |
|
|
|
182,601 |
|
|
|
104,384 |
|
|
|
776,119 |
|
|
|
409,725 |
|
|
|
366,394 |
|
|
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
5,124 |
|
|
|
4,507 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
17,546 |
|
|
|
10,991 |
|
|
|
6,555 |
|
Construction |
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
707 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
1,567 |
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
3,638 |
|
|
|
2,706 |
|
|
|
932 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
1,821 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
1,723 |
|
|
|
2,803 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
2,458 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
8,018 |
|
|
|
6,263 |
|
|
|
1,755 |
|
|
|
22,983 |
|
|
|
19,402 |
|
|
|
3,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
17,084 |
|
|
|
12,068 |
|
|
|
5,016 |
|
|
|
47,677 |
|
|
|
33,444 |
|
|
|
14,233 |
|
|
Net loans charged-off: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
59,114 |
|
|
|
36,541 |
|
|
|
22,573 |
|
|
|
170,328 |
|
|
|
105,208 |
|
|
|
65,120 |
|
Construction |
|
|
95,941 |
|
|
|
52,339 |
|
|
|
43,602 |
|
|
|
217,283 |
|
|
|
57,529 |
|
|
|
159,754 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
3,934 |
|
|
|
4,246 |
|
|
|
(312 |
) |
|
|
13,012 |
|
|
|
13,734 |
|
|
|
(722 |
) |
Mortgage |
|
|
34,322 |
|
|
|
11,809 |
|
|
|
22,513 |
|
|
|
90,103 |
|
|
|
30,497 |
|
|
|
59,606 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
76,590 |
|
|
|
65,598 |
|
|
|
10,992 |
|
|
|
237,716 |
|
|
|
169,313 |
|
|
|
68,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
269,901 |
|
|
|
170,533 |
|
|
|
99,368 |
|
|
|
728,442 |
|
|
|
376,281 |
|
|
|
352,161 |
|
|
Write-downs related to loans transferred to
loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,617 |
|
|
|
(3,617 |
) |
Change in allowance for loan losses from
discontinued operations
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,877 |
) |
|
|
7,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,015 |
) |
|
|
45,015 |
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
1,207,401 |
|
|
$ |
726,480 |
|
|
$ |
480,921 |
|
|
$ |
1,207,401 |
|
|
$ |
726,480 |
|
|
$ |
480,921 |
|
|
Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized net charge-offs to average loans
held-in-portfolio |
|
|
4.43 |
% |
|
|
2.60 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.91 |
% |
|
|
1.92 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses to net charge-offs |
|
|
1.23 |
x |
|
|
1.48 |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.45 |
x |
|
|
1.60 |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
A negative amount represents lower provision for loan losses recorded during the period
compared to net charge-offs. |
138
Table N presents annualized net charge-offs to average loans held-in-portfolio by loan
category for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
TABLE N
Annualized Net Charge-offs to Average Loans Held-in-Portfolio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
1.81 |
% |
|
|
1.06 |
% |
|
|
1.71 |
% |
|
|
1.03 |
% |
Construction |
|
|
19.45 |
|
|
|
9.82 |
|
|
|
13.83 |
|
|
|
3.76 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
2.23 |
|
|
|
1.52 |
|
|
|
2.40 |
|
|
|
1.66 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
3.16 |
|
|
|
1.07 |
|
|
|
2.75 |
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
7.18 |
|
|
|
5.48 |
|
|
|
7.17 |
|
|
|
4.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.43 |
% |
|
|
2.60 |
% |
|
|
3.91 |
% |
|
|
1.92 |
% |
|
Credit quality performance has continued to be under pressure during 2009. Generally, all of
the Corporations loan portfolios have been affected by the sustained deterioration of the economic
conditions affecting the markets in which the Corporation operates, including higher unemployment
levels, unprecedented reduced absorption rates of new housing units and declines in property
values.
The increase in construction loans net charge-offs for the quarter ended September 30, 2009,
compared with the same quarter in the previous year, was primarily related to a partial charge-off
of a particular construction borrower in the BPPR reportable segment, which had a specific reserve
established in a previous quarter. The construction loans net charge-offs for the BPPR reportable
segment amounted to $64.2 million for the quarter and $136.1 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, while for the BPNA reportable segment these amounts were $31.7 million and
$81.2 million, respectively. Construction loans net charge-offs recorded during the third quarter
of 2009 were mainly related to loans with specific reserves established in previous quarters. As
previously explained, the construction credits, which have been adversely impacted by depressed
economic conditions and decreases in property values, are primarily residential real estate
construction loans.
The increase in commercial loans net charge-offs for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, compared
to the same quarter in the previous year, was mostly associated with the deteriorated economic
conditions reflected across all industry sectors. The BPNA reportable segment had a ratio of
annualized commercial loans net charge-offs to average commercial loans held-in-portfolio of 2.34%
for the third quarter of 2009, compared with 0.44% for the same quarter in the previous year. This
increase was primarily attributed to the small business sector in the U.S. mainland operations.
The ratio of annualized commercial loans net charge-offs to average commercial loans
held-in-portfolio for the BPPR reportable segment was 1.40% for the quarter ended September 30,
2009, compared to 1.55% for the third quarter of 2008.
Mortgage loans net charge-offs as a percentage of average mortgage loans held-in-portfolio for the
continuing operations increased primarily in the U.S. mainland operations. The BPNA reportable
segment reported a ratio of annualized mortgage loans net charge-offs to average mortgage loans
held-in-portfolio of 7.51% for the third quarter of 2009, compared with 2.50% for the same quarter
in the previous year. Deteriorating economic conditions in the U.S. mainland housing market have
impacted the mortgage industry delinquency rates. The general level of property values in the U.S.
mainland, as measured by several indexes widely followed by the market, has declined. These
declines are the result of ongoing market adjustments that are aligning property values with income
levels and home inventories. The supply of homes in the market has increased substantially, and
additional property value decreases may be required to clear the overhang of excess inventory in
the U.S. market. Declining property values affect the credit quality of the Corporations U.S.
mainland mortgage loan portfolio because the value of the homes underlying the loans is the primary
source of repayment in the event of foreclosure. As indicated in the Restructuring Plans section of
this MD&A, the Corporation is no longer originating non-conventional mortgage loans at BPNA.
Mortgage loans net charge-offs in the BPPR reportable amounted to $5.0 million for the third
quarter of 2009, compared to net charge-offs of $1.0 million for the same quarter in the previous
year. The slowdown in the housing sector in Puerto Rico has increased pressure on home prices and
reduced sale activity. The ratio of annualized mortgage loans net charge-offs to average mortgage
loans held-in-portfolio in the BPPR reportable segment was 0.72% for the quarter ended September
30, 2009, compared with 0.15% for the same quarter in the previous year. BPPRs mortgage loans
are primarily fixed-rate fully amortizing, full-documentation loans that do not have the level
139
of
layered risk associated with subprime loans offered by certain major U.S. mortgage loan
originators. As in the U.S. mainland, the continued recessionary environment in Puerto Rico has
negatively impacted property values, thus increasing the level of losses. Deteriorating economic
conditions have impacted the mortgage delinquency rates in Puerto Rico increasing the levels of
non-accruing mortgage loans.
Consumer loans net charge-offs as a percentage of average consumer loans held-in-portfolio rose
mostly due to higher delinquencies in the U.S. mainland. Consumer loans net charge-offs in the BPNA
reportable segment rose for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, when compared with the same
quarter in the previous year, by $6.4 million. The ratio of annualized consumer loans net
charge-offs to average consumer loans held-in-portfolio in the BPNA reportable segment was 12.59%
for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, compared to 8.35% for the third quarter of 2008. The
increase in net charge-offs in consumer loans held-in-portfolio for the BPNA reportable segment was
mainly related to E-LOANs home equity lines of credit and second mortgages with net charge-offs
for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 of $25.0 million compared to $16.2 million for the same
quarter in the previous year. E-LOAN has ceased originating these types of loans. The deterioration
in the delinquency profile and the declines in property values have negatively impacted
charge-offs. Consumer loans net charge-offs in the BPPR reportable segment rose for the quarter
ended September 30, 2009, when compared with the same quarter in the previous year, by $4.6
million. The ratio of annualized consumer loans net charge-offs to average consumer loans
held-in-portfolio in the BPPR reportable segment was 5.36% for the quarter ended September 30,
2009, compared with 4.41% for the same quarter of 2008. This increase was mainly attributed to
BPPRs credit cards portfolio as a result of the current recessionary environment in Puerto Rico.
Similar factors influenced the variances in net charge-offs for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 when compared with the same period in the previous year.
The allowance for loan losses increased from December 31, 2008 to September 30, 2009 by $325
million. The allowance for loan losses represented 4.95% of loans held-in-portfolio as of September
30, 2009, compared with 3.43% as of December 31, 2008. The increase from December 31, 2008 to
September 30, 2009 was mainly attributed to reserves for commercial and construction loans due to
the continued deterioration of the economic and housing market conditions in Puerto Rico and in the
U.S. mainland.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, the Corporation recorded $108.6 million in provision
for loans considered specifically impaired of which $59.8 million and $41.0 million pertained to
construction and commercial loans, respectively. As of September 30, 2009, there were $1.5 billion
worth of impaired loans with a related specific allowance for loan losses of $313 million, compared
with impaired loans of $898 million and a specific allowance of $195 million as of December 31,
2008. Construction loans considered impaired amounted to $752 million or 49% of total impaired
loans with a specific allowance of $171 million or 55% of total specific reserves as of September
30, 2009. As of December 31, 2008, construction loans considered impaired amounted to $375 million
with a specific allowance of $120 million. The impaired construction loans as of September 30, 2009
were mainly related to the BPPR reportable segment with $579 million and the BPNA reportable
segment with $173 million. The related specific reserves for these impaired construction loans as
of such date amounted to $124 million and $47 million, respectively. In the current stressed
housing market, the value of the collateral securing the loan has become the most important factor
in determining the amount of loss incurred and the appropriate level of the allowance for loan
losses. The likelihood of losses that are equal to the entire recorded investment for a real
estate loan is remote. However, in some cases, during recent quarters declining real estate values
have resulted in the determination that the estimated value of the collaterals was insufficient to
cover all of the recorded investment in the loans.
As of September 30, 2009, the commercial portfolio includes a total of $124.9 million worth of loan
modifications for the BPPR reportable segment and $3.9 million for the BPNA reportable segment,
which were considered troubled debt restructurings (TDR) since they involved granting a concession
to borrowers under financial difficulties. These TDR commercial loans were evaluated for impairment
resulting in a reserve of $21.5 million for the BPPR reportable segment and $2.4 million for the
BPNA reportable segment as of September 30, 2009. The construction loan portfolio includes a total
of $87.1 million worth of loan modifications for the BPPR reportable segment and $61.4 million for
the BPNA reportable segment as of September 30, 2009, which were considered TDR. These TDR
construction loans were evaluated for impairment resulting in a reserve of $11.8 million for the
BPPR reportable segment and $11.7 million for the BPNA reportable segment as of September 30, 2009.
140
BPNAs non-conventional mortgage loan portfolio reported a total of $168 million worth of loan
modifications as of September 30, 2009, compared with $76 million as of December 31, 2008, which
were considered TDR. Although the criteria for specific impairment excludes large groups of
smaller-balance homogenous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment (e.g. mortgage
loans), it specifically requires its application to modifications considered TDR. These TDR
mortgage loans were evaluated for impairment resulting in a reserve of $35 million as of September
30, 2009, compared with a reserve of $14 million as of December 31, 2008.
The Corporations recorded investment in commercial, construction and mortgage loans that were
considered impaired and the related valuation allowance as of September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008
and September 30, 2008 were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
Recorded |
|
Valuation |
|
Recorded |
|
Valuation |
|
Recorded |
|
Valuation |
(In millions) |
|
Investment |
|
Allowance |
|
Investment |
|
Allowance |
|
Investment |
|
Allowance |
|
Impaired loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance required |
|
$ |
1,134.5 |
|
|
$ |
313.2 |
|
|
$ |
664.9 |
|
|
$ |
194.7 |
|
|
$ |
494.5 |
|
|
$ |
131.1 |
|
No valuation allowance required |
|
|
404.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
232.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
258.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
1,539.4 |
|
|
$ |
313.2 |
|
|
$ |
897.6 |
|
|
$ |
194.7 |
|
|
$ |
753.4 |
|
|
$ |
131.1 |
|
|
The following table sets forth an analysis of the activity in the specific reserves for
impaired loans for the quarter ended September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarter ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
Construction |
|
Commercial |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Loans |
|
Loans |
|
Loans |
|
Total |
|
Specific ALLL as of July 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
197,898 |
|
|
$ |
85,608 |
|
|
$ |
29,584 |
|
|
$ |
313,090 |
|
Provision for impaired loans |
|
|
59,814 |
|
|
|
41,004 |
|
|
|
7,743 |
|
|
|
108,561 |
|
Less: Net charge-offs |
|
|
86,681 |
|
|
|
19,911 |
|
|
|
1,835 |
|
|
|
108,427 |
|
|
Specific ALLL as of September
30, 2009 |
|
$ |
171,031 |
|
|
$ |
106,701 |
|
|
$ |
35,492 |
|
|
$ |
313,224 |
|
|
With respect to the $405 million portfolio of impaired commercial and construction loans for
which no allowance for loan losses was required as of September 30, 2009, management followed the
guidance for specific impairment of a loan. When a loan is impaired, the measurement of the
impairment may be based on: (1) the present value of the expected future cash flows of the impaired
loan discounted at the loans original effective interest rate; (2) the observable market price of
the impaired loan; or (3) the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. A
loan is collateral dependent if the repayment of the loan is expected to be provided solely by the
underlying collateral. The $405 million impaired commercial and construction loans were collateral
dependent loans in which management performed a detailed analysis based on the fair value of the
collateral less estimated costs to sell and determined that the collateral was deemed adequate to
cover any losses as of September 30, 2009.
Average impaired loans during the third quarter of 2009 and 2008 were $1.5 billion and $718
million, respectively. The Corporation recognized interest income on impaired loans of $5.1 million
and $2.2 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
Also, the Corporation recorded higher reserves to cover inherent losses in the home equity lines of
credit and second mortgages portfolios of the U.S. mainland operations. The persistent declines in
residential real estate values, combined with the reduced ability of certain homeowners to
refinance or repay their residential real estate obligations, have resulted in higher delinquencies
and losses in these U.S. mainland portfolios.
141
The following table sets forth information concerning the composition of the Corporations
allowance for loan and lease losses as of September 30, 2009 by loan category and by whether the
allowance and related provisions were calculated individually pursuant the requirements for
specific impairment or through a general valuation allowance:
TABLE O
Composition of the Allowance for Loan Losses by Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Commercial |
|
Construction |
|
Financing |
|
Mortgage |
|
Consumer |
|
Total |
|
Specific ALLL |
|
$ |
106,701 |
|
|
$ |
171,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
35,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
313,224 |
|
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
619,544 |
|
|
$ |
751,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
167,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,539,383 |
|
Specific ALLL to impaired loans |
|
|
17.22 |
% |
|
|
22.74 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.35 |
% |
|
General ALLL |
|
$ |
266,563 |
|
|
$ |
168,309 |
|
|
$ |
24,609 |
|
|
$ |
108,848 |
|
|
$ |
325,848 |
|
|
$ |
894,177 |
|
Loans held-in-portfolio,
excluding impaired loans |
|
$ |
12,456,324 |
|
|
$ |
1,130,093 |
|
|
$ |
699,350 |
|
|
$ |
4,379,509 |
|
|
$ |
4,191,410 |
|
|
$ |
22,856,686 |
|
General ALLL to loans
held-in-portfolio, excluding
impaired loans |
|
|
2.14 |
% |
|
|
14.89 |
% |
|
|
3.52 |
% |
|
|
2.49 |
% |
|
|
7.77 |
% |
|
|
3.91 |
% |
|
Total ALLL |
|
$ |
373,264 |
|
|
$ |
339,340 |
|
|
$ |
24,609 |
|
|
$ |
144,340 |
|
|
$ |
325,848 |
|
|
$ |
1,207,401 |
|
Total loans held-in-portfolio |
|
$ |
13,075,868 |
|
|
$ |
1,882,069 |
|
|
$ |
699,350 |
|
|
$ |
4,547,372 |
|
|
$ |
4,194,410 |
|
|
$ |
24,396,069 |
|
ALLL to loans held-in-portfolio |
|
|
2.85 |
% |
|
|
18.03 |
% |
|
|
3.52 |
% |
|
|
3.17 |
% |
|
|
7.77 |
% |
|
|
4.95 |
% |
|
The existing adverse economic conditions are expected to persist through 2010 thus it is
likely that the Corporation will continue to experience heightened credit losses, additional
significant provisions for loan losses, an increased allowance for loan losses and higher levels of
non-performing assets. While management believes that the Corporations allowance for loan losses
was adequate as of September 30, 2009, there is no certainty that it will be sufficient to cover
future credit losses in the portfolio because of continued adverse changes in the economy, market
conditions or events negatively affecting specific customers, industries or markets both in Puerto
Rico and the United States.
Management has implemented the following initiatives to manage the deterioration
of the loan portfolios and to help mitigate future credit costs:
|
|
|
increased and reorganized the resources at the commercial and construction loan
divisions; |
|
|
|
|
strengthened the workout units through enhanced collection tools and strategies to
mitigate losses focusing on early detection; |
|
|
|
|
adjusted underwriting criteria and reduced risk exposures; |
|
|
|
|
launched marketing campaigns with discounted offers and incentives to promote the sales
of residential units; |
|
|
|
|
enhanced critical credit risk management processes; |
|
|
|
|
modified approximately $168 million in non-conventional mortgages in the U.S. mainland
operations (as of September 30, 2009); and |
|
|
|
|
consolidated the Puerto Rico consumer finance operations into retail business. |
Commitments to extend credit, which include credit card lines, commercial lines of credit, and
other unused credit commitments, amounted to $7.0 billion as of September 30, 2009, $7.1 billion as
of December 31, 2008, and $7.3 billion as of September 30, 2008. Commercial letters of credit and
stand-by letters of credit amounted to $18 million and $162 million, respectively, as of September
30, 2009; $19 million and $181 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2008; and $28 million and
$175 million, respectively, as of September 30, 2008. In addition, the
142
Corporation has commitments to originate mortgage loans amounting to $55 million as of September 30, 2009, $71
million as of December 31, 2008 and $111 million as of September 30, 2008.
As of September 30, 2009, the Corporation maintained a reserve of approximately $18.2 million for
potential losses associated with unfunded loan commitments related to commercial and consumer lines
of credit, compared to $15.5 million as of December 31, 2008. The estimated reserve is principally
based on the expected draws on these facilities using historical trends and the application of the
corresponding reserve factors determined under the Corporations allowance for loan losses
methodology. This reserve for unfunded exposures remains separate and distinct from the allowance
for loan losses and is reported as part of other liabilities in the consolidated statement of
condition.
Geographical and government risk
As explained in the 2008 Annual Report, the Corporation is exposed to geographical and government
risk. The Corporations assets and revenue composition by geographical area and by business
segment reporting are presented in Note 26 to the consolidated financial statements.
A significant portion of the Corporations financial activities and credit exposure is concentrated
in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (the Island) and the Islands economy has been in recession
for the last four years with an unstable outlook given an oversupply in the housing market and
unemployment rising 16.4% for September 2009.
Since 2006, the Puerto Rico economy has been experiencing recessionary conditions. Based on
information published by the Puerto Rico Planning Board, the Puerto Rico real gross national
product decreased 2.5% during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008.
According to the latest information published by the Puerto Rico Planning Board on August 21, 2009,
the Puerto Rico Planning Board expects recessionary conditions to continue in Puerto Rico during
the fiscal year ended in June 30, 2009. During fiscal year 2009 the Planning Board forecasts a
reduction in real gross national product of between 4.1% and 5.5%. For fiscal year 2010, the
Planning Boards base-case projection is an increase in real gross national product of 0.7%. Refer
to Item 1A. Risk Factors, Weakness in the economy, employment and the real estate market in the
geographic footprint of Popular has adversely impacted and may continue to adversely impact
Popular for additional information on Puerto Ricos economic data.
The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico government is currently facing a fiscal deficit which has been
estimated at approximately $3.2 billion or over 30% of its annual budget. It continues to review
alternatives for reducing the deficit, as its access to the municipal bond market and its credit
ratings depend, in part, on achieving a balanced budget. Measures that the government has
implemented have included reducing expenses, including public-sector employment through layoffs of
employees. The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico government has announced layoffs for approximately
14,500 employees, of which approximately 11,700 are expected to take place in January 2010. Since
the government is an important source of employment on the Island, these measures could have the
effect of intensifying the current recessionary cycle. The Puerto Rico Labor Department reported an
unemployment rate of 16.4% for September 2009, compared with an unemployment rate of 12.0% for
September 2008.
This decline in the Islands economy has resulted in, among other things, a downturn in the
Corporations loan originations; an increase in the level of non-performing assets, loan loss
provisions and charge-offs, particularly in the construction loan portfolio; an increase in the
rate of foreclosure loss on mortgage loans; and a reduction in the value of the Corporations loans
and loan servicing portfolio, all of which adversely affected profitability. If the decline in
economic activity continues, there could be further adverse effects on the Corporations
profitability.
The level of real estate prices in Puerto Rico has been more stable than in other U.S. markets, but
the current economic environment has accelerated the devaluation of properties when compared with
prior periods. In addition, future developments in Puerto Rico and the U.S. mainland could further
pressure residential property values. Lower real estate values could increase loan delinquencies,
foreclosures and the cost of repossessing and disposing of real estate collateral. The higher end
of the housing market appears to have suffered a substantial slowdown in sales activity in recent
quarters, as reflected in the low absorption rates of projects financed in the Corporations
construction loan portfolio.
143
The current state of the economy and uncertainty in the private and public sectors has had an
adverse effect on the credit quality of the Corporations loan portfolios. The continuation of the
economic slowdown would cause those adverse effects to continue, as delinquency rates may increase
in the short-term, until sustainable growth resumes. Also, a potential reduction in consumer
spending may also impact growth in the Corporations other interest and non-interest revenue
sources.
As of September 30, 2009, the Corporation had $1.2 billion of credit facilities granted to or
guaranteed by the Puerto Rico Government and its political subdivisions, of which $215 million are
uncommitted lines of credit. Of these total credit facilities granted, $1.1 billion in loans were
outstanding as of September 30, 2009. A substantial portion of the Corporations credit exposure to
the Government of Puerto Rico are either collateralized loans or obligations that have a specific
source of income or revenues identified for their repayment. Some of these obligations consist of
senior and subordinated loans to public corporations that obtain revenues from rates charged for
services or products, such as water and electric power utilities. Public corporations have varying
degrees of independence from the central Government and many receive appropriations or other
payments from it. The Corporation also has loans to various municipalities in Puerto Rico for which
the good faith, credit and unlimited taxing power of the applicable municipality has been pledged
to their repayment. These municipalities are required by law to levy special property taxes in such
amounts as shall be required for the payment of all of its general obligation bonds and loans.
Another portion of these loans consist of special obligations of various municipalities that are
payable from the basic real and personal property taxes collected within such municipalities.
Furthermore, as of September 30, 2009, the Corporation had outstanding $271 million in Obligations
of Puerto Rico, States and Political Subdivisions as part of its investment portfolio. Refer to
Notes 6 and 7 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information. Of that total,
$267 million was exposed to the creditworthiness of the Puerto Rico Government and its
municipalities. Of that portfolio, $54 million are in the form of Puerto Rico Commonwealth
Appropriation Bonds. Of this total, $43 million are rated Ba1, one notch below investment grade, by
Moodys, while Standard & Poors Rating Services rates them as investment grade. As of September
30, 2009, the Puerto Rico Commonwealth Appropriation Bonds represented approximately $2 million in
unrealized losses in the investment securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity portfolios.
The Corporation continues to closely monitor the political and economic situation of the Island and
evaluates the portfolio for any declines in value that management may consider being
other-than-temporary.
As further detailed in Notes 6 and 7 to the consolidated financial statements, a substantial
portion of the Corporations investment securities represented exposure to the U.S. Government in
the form of U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities, as well
as mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by Ginnie Mae. In addition, $257 million of residential
mortgages and $371 million in commercial loans were insured or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or
its agencies as of September 30, 2009.
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
The Corporation measures fair value as required by ASC Topic 820 Fair Value Measurement and
Disclosures, which defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or
paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the
asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.
The Corporation currently measures at fair value on a recurring basis its trading assets,
available-for-sale securities, derivatives and mortgage servicing rights. On occasion, the
Corporation may be required to record at fair value other assets on a nonrecurring basis, such as
loans held-for-sale, impaired loans held-in-portfolio that are collateral dependent and certain
other assets. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically result from the application of
lower of cost or fair value accounting or write-downs of individual assets.
144
As required by ASC Topic 820, the Corporation categorizes its assets and liabilities measured at
fair value under the three-level hierarchy. The level within the hierarchy is based on whether the
inputs to the valuation methodology used for fair value measurement are observable or unobservable.
Observable inputs reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability based on market data obtained from external sources. Unobservable inputs reflect the
Corporations estimates about assumptions that market participants would use in
pricing the asset or liability based on the best information available. The hierarchy is broken
down into three levels based on the reliability of inputs as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
that the Corporation has the ability to access at the measurement date. No significant
degree of judgment for these valuations is needed, as they are based on quoted prices that
are readily available in an active market. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Quoted prices other than those included in Level 1 that are observable either
directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities
in markets that are not active, and other inputs that are observable or that can be
corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the financial
instrument. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that
are significant to the fair value measurement of the financial asset or liability.
Unobservable inputs reflect the Corporations own assumptions about what market
participants would use to price the asset or liability. The inputs are developed based on
the best available information, which might include the Corporations own data such as
internally-developed models and discounted cash flow analyses. |
The Corporation requires the use of observable inputs when available, in order to minimize the use
of unobservable inputs to determine fair value. The amount of judgment involved in estimating the
fair value of a financial instrument depends upon the availability of quoted market prices or
observable market parameters. In addition, it may be affected on other factors such as type of
instrument, the liquidity of the market for the instrument, transparency around the inputs to the
valuation, as well as the contractual characteristics of the instrument.
If listed prices or quotes are not available, the Corporation employs valuation models that
primarily use market-based inputs including yield curves, interest rate curves, volatilities,
credit curves, and discount, prepayment and delinquency rates, among other considerations. When
market observable data is not available, the valuation of financial instruments becomes more
subjective and involves substantial judgment. The need to use unobservable inputs generally results
from diminished observability of both actual trades and assumptions resulting from the lack of
market liquidity for those types of loans or securities. When fair values are estimated based on
modeling techniques such as discounted cash flow models, the Corporation uses assumptions such as
interest rates, prepayment speeds, default rates, loss severity rates and discount rates. Valuation
adjustments are limited to those necessary to ensure that the financial instruments fair value is
adequately representative of the price that would be received or paid in the marketplace.
Management believes that fair values are reasonable and consistent with the fair value measurement
guidance based on the Corporations internal validation procedure and consistency of the processes
followed, which include obtaining market quotes when possible or valuation techniques that
incorporate market-based inputs.
Refer to Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for information on the Corporations fair
value measurement disclosures required by the standard. As of September 30, 2009, approximately
$7.2 billion, or 94%, of the assets from continuing operations measured at fair value on a
recurring basis, used market-based or market-derived valuation inputs in their valuation
methodology and, therefore, were classified as Level 1 or Level 2. The majority of instruments
measured at fair value are classified as Level 2, including obligations of U.S. Government
sponsored entities, agency MBS, CMOs, obligations of Puerto Rico, states and political subdivisions
and derivative instruments. The Corporation uses prices from
third-party pricing sources to measure
the fair value of most of these financial instruments. These prices are compared for reasonability with
other sources and differences that exceed a pre-established threshold are furthered validated to
ensure compliance with the fair value measurement guidance. Validations may include comparisons
with secondary pricing services, as well as corroborations with secondary broker quotes and
relevant benchmark indices. Furthermore, the Corporation also reviews the fair value documentation
provided by the third-party pricing services and validates an indicative sample of the inputs
utilized by the third-party pricing services. The remaining 6% were classified as Level 3 since
their valuation methodology considered significant unobservable inputs. The financial assets
measured as Level 3 include mostly GNMA Puerto
145
Rico serial mortgage-backed securities and MSRs.
Additionally, the Corporations continuing operations reported
$743 million of financial assets
that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of September 30, 2009, all of which
were classified as Level 3 in the hierarchy.
Commencing in January 2009, the Corporation adopted the provisions of fair value measurement and
disclosures for nonfinancial assets, particularly impacting other real estate. Nonfinancial assets
from continuing operations reported under the guidelines of ASC 820-10 amounted to $33 million as
of September 30, 2009.
The fair value measurement and disclosure guidance in ASC Topic 820 also addresses measuring fair
value in situations where markets are inactive and transactions are not orderly. Transactions or
quoted prices for assets and liabilities may not be determinative of fair value when transactions
are not orderly and thus may require adjustments to estimate fair value. Price quotes based on
transactions that are not orderly should be given little, if any, weight in measuring fair value.
Price quotes based upon transactions that are orderly shall be considered in determining fair value
and the weight given is based on facts and circumstances. If sufficient information is not
available to determine if price quotes are based upon orderly transactions, less weight should be
given to the price quote relative to other transactions that are known to be orderly.
There were no significant changes in the Corporations valuation methodologies as of September 30,
2009 when compared with December 31, 2008. Refer to Note 12 to the consolidated financial
statements for a description of the Corporations valuation methodologies used for the principal
assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of September 30, 2009.
Trading Account Securities and Investment Securities Available-for-Sale
The majority of the values for trading account securities and investment securities
available-for-sale are obtained from third-party pricing service providers and, as indicated
earlier, are validated with alternate pricing sources when available. Securities not priced by a
secondary pricing source are documented and validated internally according to their significance to
the Corporations financial statements. Management has established materiality thresholds according
to the investment class to monitor and investigate material deviations in prices obtained from the
primary pricing service provider and the secondary pricing source used as support for the valuation
results. During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, the Corporation did not adjust any prices
obtained from pricing service providers or broker dealers.
Inputs were thoroughly evaluated for their consideration of current market conditions, including
the relative liquidity of the market, and if pricing methodology relies, to the extent possible, on
observable market and trade data. When a market quote for a specific security is not available, the
pricing service provider generally uses observable data to derive an exit price for the instrument,
such as benchmark yield curves and trade data for similar products. To the extent trading data is
not available, the pricing provider relies on specific information, including dialogue with
brokers, buy side clients, credit ratings, spreads to established benchmarks and transactions on
similar securities, to draw correlations based on the characteristics of the evaluated instrument.
If for any reason the pricing service provider cannot observe data required to feed its model, it
discontinues pricing the instrument. During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, none of the
Corporations investment securities were subject to pricing discontinuance by the pricing service
providers. The pricing methodology and approach of our primary pricing service providers is
concluded to be consistent with the fair value measurement guidance.
Furthermore, Management assesses the fair value of its portfolio of investment securities at least
on a quarterly basis, which includes analyzing changes in fair value that have resulted in losses
that may be considered other-than-temporary. Factors considered include, for example, the nature of
the investment, severity and duration of possible impairments, industry reports, sector credit
ratings, economic environment, creditworthiness of the issuers and any guarantees, and the ability
to hold the security until maturity or recovery. Any impairment that is considered
other-than-temporary is recorded directly in the statement of operations.
Securities are classified in the fair value hierarchy according to product type, characteristics
and market liquidity. At the end of each quarter, management assesses the valuation hierarchy for
each asset or liability measured. Fair value measurement quarterly analysis performed by the
Corporation includes validation procedures and review of market changes, pricing methodology,
assumption and level hierarchy changes, and evaluation of distressed transactions.
146
Most of the
Corporations investment securities available-for-sale are classified as Level 2 in the fair value
hierarchy given that the general investment strategy at the Corporation is principally buy and
hold with little trading activity.
GNMA Puerto Rico Serials, which are priced using a local demand price matrix prepared from local
dealer quotes and other local investments such as corporate securities, and local mutual funds
priced by local dealers, are classified as Level 3.
As of September 30, 2009, the Corporations portfolio of trading and investment securities
available-for-sale amounted to $7.4 billion and represented 97% of the Corporations assets from
continuing operations measured at fair value on a recurring basis. As of September 30, 2009, net
unrealized gains on the trading and available-for-sale investment securities portfolios
approximated $18 million and $140 million, respectively. Fair values for most of the Corporations
trading and investment securities available-for-sale are classified under the Level 2 category.
Trading and investment securities available-for-sale classified as Level 3, which are the
securities that involved the highest degree of judgment, represent only 4% of the Corporations
total portfolio of trading and investment securities available-for-sale.
Derivatives
Derivatives, such as interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and index options, are traded in
over-the-counter active markets. These derivatives are indexed to an observable interest rate
benchmark, such as LIBOR or equity indexes, and are priced using an income approach based on
present value and option pricing models using observable inputs. Other derivatives are
exchange-traded, such as futures and options, or are liquid and have quoted prices, such as forward
contracts or to be announced securities (TBAs). All of these derivatives held by the
Corporation are classified as Level 2. Valuations of derivative assets and liabilities reflect the
values associated with counterparty risk and nonperformance risk, respectively. The non-performance
risk, which measures the Corporations own credit risk, is determined using internally-developed
models that consider the collateral held, the remaining term, and the creditworthiness or credit
standing of the Corporation. The counterparty risk is also determined using internally-developed
models which incorporate the creditworthiness of the entity that bears the risk, collateral, and
uses available public data or internally-developed data related to current spreads that denote
their probability of default. To manage the level of credit risk, the Corporation deals with
counterparties of good credit standing, enters into master netting agreements whenever possible
and, when appropriate, obtains collateral. The derivative assets include a $5.4 million negative
adjustment as a result of the credit risk of the counterparty as of September 30, 2009. On the
other hand, derivative liabilities include a $0.9 million positive adjustment related to the
incorporation of the Corporations own credit risk as of September 30, 2009.
147
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
MARKET RISK
The financial results and capital levels of Popular, Inc. are constantly exposed to market risk.
Market risk represents the risk of loss due to adverse movements in market rates or prices, which
include interest rates, foreign exchange rates and equity prices; the failure to meet financial
obligations coming due because of the inability to liquidate assets or obtain adequate funding; and
the inability to easily unwind or offset specific exposures without significantly lowering prices
because of inadequate market depth or market disruptions.
The Corporation manages interest rate risk regularly through its Asset Liability Management
Committee (the Committee). The Committee meets on a regular basis and reviews various asset and
liability management information, including but not limited to, the banks liquidity positions,
projected sources and uses of funds, interest rate risk positions and economic conditions.
Interest rate risk (IRR), a component of market risk, is considered by management as a
predominant market risk in terms of its potential impact on profitability or market value. The
techniques for measuring the potential impact of the Corporations exposure to market risk from
changing interest rates that were described in the 2008 Annual Report were the same as those
applied by the Corporation as of September 30, 2009.
Net interest income simulation analysis performed by legal entity and on a consolidated basis is a
tool used by the Corporation in estimating the potential change in future earnings resulting from
hypothetical changes in interest rates. Sensitivity analysis is calculated on a monthly basis using
a simulation model which incorporates actual balance sheet figures detailed by maturity and
interest yields or costs. It also incorporates assumptions on balance sheet growth and expected
changes in its composition, estimated prepayments in accordance with projected interest rates,
pricing and maturity expectations on new volumes and other non-interest related data. Simulations
are processed using various interest rate scenarios to determine potential changes to the future
earnings of the Corporation.
Simulation analyses are based on many assumptions, including relative levels of market interest
rates, interest rate spreads, loan prepayments and deposit decay. Thus, they should not be relied
upon as indicative of actual results. Further, the estimates do not contemplate actions that
management could take to respond to changes in interest rates. By their nature, these
forward-looking computations are only estimates and may be different from what may actually occur
in the future.
The Corporation usually runs its net interest income simulations under interest rate scenarios in
which the yield curve is assumed to rise and decline gradually by the same amount. The rising rate
scenarios considered in these market risk disclosures reflect gradual parallel changes of 200 and
400 basis points during the twelve-month period ending September 30, 2010. Under a 200 basis points
rising rate scenario, projected net interest income increases by $42.4 million, while under a 400
basis points rising rate scenario, projected net interest income increases by $74.4 million. These
scenarios were compared against the Corporations flat interest rates forecast. Given the fact that
as of September 30, 2009, some market interest rates were close to zero, management has focused on
measuring the risk on net interest income on rising rate scenarios.
The Corporation uses the economic value of equity (EVE) analysis to attempt to measure the
sensitivity of its assets and liabilities to changes in interest rates. EVE is equal to the
estimated present value of the Corporations assets minus the estimated present value of the
liabilities. It is a useful tool to measure long-term interest rate risk because it captures cash
flows from all future periods.
EVE is estimated on a monthly basis and shock scenarios are prepared on a quarterly basis. The
shock scenarios consist of +/- 200 basis points parallel shocks. As previously mentioned, given the
low levels of current market rates, the Corporation will focus on measuring the risk in a rising
rate scenario. Minimum EVE ratio limits, expressed as EVE as a percentage of total assets, have
been established for base case and shock scenarios. In addition, management has also defined limits
for the increases / decreases in EVE resulting from the shock scenarios. As of September 30, 2009,
the Corporation was in compliance with these limits.
The Corporation maintains an overall interest rate risk management strategy that incorporates the
use of derivative instruments to minimize significant unplanned fluctuations in net interest income
or market value that are caused by
148
interest rate volatility. The market value of these derivatives is subject to interest rate
fluctuations and, as a result, could have a positive or negative effect in the Corporations net
interest income. Refer to Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for further information
on the Corporations derivative instruments.
The Corporation conducts business in certain Latin American markets through several of its
processing and information technology services and products subsidiaries. Also, it holds interests
in Consorcio de Tarjetas Dominicanas, S.A. (CONTADO) and Centro Financiero BHD, S.A. (BHD) in
the Dominican Republic. Although not significant, some of these businesses are conducted in the
countrys foreign currency. The resulting foreign currency translation adjustment, from operations
for which the functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar, is reported in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) in the consolidated statements of condition, except for
highly-inflationary environments in which the effects are included in other operating income in the
consolidated statements of operations. As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the
Corporation had approximately $41 million and $39 million, respectively, in an unfavorable foreign
currency translation adjustment as part of accumulated other comprehensive loss.
LIQUIDITY
For financial institutions, such as the Corporation, liquidity risk refers to the probability of
the institution not generating enough cash from either assets or liabilities to meet its
obligations when they become due, without incurring material losses. Cash requirements for a
financial institution are primarily derived from deposit withdrawals, contractual loan funding
commitments, the repayment of borrowings as they mature and the need to fund new and existing
investments as opportunities arise. An institutions liquidity may be pressured if, for example,
its credit rating is downgraded, it experiences a sudden and unexpected substantial cash outflow,
or some other event causes counterparties to avoid exposure to the institution. An institution is
also exposed to liquidity risk if the markets on which it depends on are subject to temporary
disruptions. The objective of effective liquidity management is to ensure that the Corporation
remains sufficiently liquid to meet all of its financial obligations; finance expected future
growth and maintains a reasonable safety margin for cash commitments under both normal and stressed
market conditions.
Liquidity is managed by the Corporation at the level of the holding companies that own the banking
and non-banking subsidiaries. Also, it is managed at the level of the banking and non-banking
subsidiaries.
Capital and credit markets have experienced significant disruption and volatility since the second
half of 2007, although they have been improving in recent months as evidenced by the contraction in
credit spreads and increases in issuance volumes in the capital markets. Also, the myriad funding
programs introduced by the U.S. Government have been helpful in restoring more normal market
conditions. Disrupted market conditions have increased our liquidity risk exposure due primarily to
increased risk aversion on the part of traditional credit providers. While the Corporations
management has implemented various strategies to reduce that exposure, such as reducing
substantially our use of short-term and long-term unsecured borrowings, promoting customer deposit
growth through traditional banking and internet channels, diversifying and increasing its
contingency funding sources as well as exiting certain non-banking subsidiaries, a resurgence of
substantial market stress could negatively influence the availability of credit to the Corporation,
as well as its cost.
Deposits, including customer deposits, brokered certificates of deposit, and public funds deposits,
continue to be the most significant source of funds for the Corporation, totaling $26.4 billion,
and funding 74% of the Corporations total assets as of September 30, 2009. Total deposits as of
September 30, 2009 declined by $1.2 billion compared with total deposits as of December 31, 2008.
In addition to traditional deposits, the Corporation maintains borrowing arrangements. These
borrowings consisted primarily of FHLB borrowings, securities sold under agreement to repurchase,
junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures, and term notes. Refer to Note 14 to the
consolidated financial statements for the composition of the Corporations borrowings as of
September 30, 2009. Also, refer to Note 19 to the consolidated financial statements for the
Corporations involvement in certain commitments and guarantees as of September 30, 2009.
149
Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase as of September 30, 2009
presented a reduction of $744 million compared with December 31, 2008, principally in repurchase
agreements which declined by $599 million. This decline was associated in part to the lower volume
of investment securities.
The following events had a significant impact on the Corporations liquidity and debt obligations
since December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
reduction in time deposits of $1.2 billion, including a decline of $0.3 billion in
brokered deposits; |
|
|
|
|
repayment of $799 million in term notes during the nine months ended September 30, 2009;
and |
|
|
|
|
a reduction in junior subordinated debentures of $410 million that were associated with
the four trusts that issued trust preferred securities prior to December 31, 2008 and an
increase of $419 million in junior subordinated debentures related to the new trust
preferred securities issued to the U.S. Treasury (in exchange for the preferred stock under
the TARP). The $419 million are net of a $517 million discount as of September 30, 2009.
Refer to the Exchange Offers section of this MD&A for further information. |
The maturities of certificates of deposits and borrowings for the Corporation as of September 30,
2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of |
|
Repurchase |
|
Short-term |
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
deposits |
|
agreements |
|
borrowings |
|
Notes payable |
|
Total |
|
Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
3,491 |
|
|
$ |
1,296 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
4,791 |
|
2010 |
|
|
6,074 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
6,811 |
|
2011 |
|
|
1,013 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
1,760 |
|
2012 |
|
|
733 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
1,340 |
|
2013 |
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
523 |
|
2014 |
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
625 |
|
Later years |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
1,171 |
|
No stated maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
11,979 |
|
|
$ |
2,808 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
2,650 |
|
|
$ |
17,440 |
|
|
There were no significant changes in other contractual obligations, such as purchases
obligations, capital leases, and operating leases, or pension and postretirement liabilities, and
uncertain tax positions as of September 30, 2009 when compared with December 31, 2008. Refer to
Note 19 to the consolidated financial statements and the Credit Risk Management and Loan Quality
section of this MD&A for information on commitments and guarantees.
The following sections provide further information on the Corporations major funding activities
and needs, as well as the risks involved in these activities.
Banking Subsidiaries
Primary sources of funding for the Corporations banking subsidiaries (BPPR and BPNA), or the
banking subsidiaries, include retail and commercial deposits, collateralized borrowings and, to a
lesser extent, loan sales. The principal uses of funds for the banking subsidiaries include loan
and investment portfolio growth, repayment of obligations as they become due, operational needs and
in the case of BPPR, dividend payments to the holding company. In addition, the Corporations
banking subsidiaries maintain borrowing facilities with the Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLB) and at
the discount window of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Fed), and have a considerable amount
of collateral pledged that can be used to quickly raise funds under these facilities. Borrowings
from the FHLB or the Fed discount window require the Corporation to pledge securities or whole
loans as collateral. The banking subsidiaries must maintain their FHLB memberships to continue
accessing this source of funding.
The Corporations ability to compete successfully in the marketplace for deposits depends on
various factors, including pricing, service, convenience and financial stability as reflected by
operating results and credit ratings (by nationally recognized credit rating agencies). Although a
downgrade in the credit rating of the Corporation may impact its ability to raise deposits or the
rate it is required to pay on such deposits, management does not believe that the impact should be
material. Deposits at all of the Corporations banking subsidiaries are federally insured and this
is expected to mitigate the effect of a downgrade in credit ratings. During the second quarter of
2009, the rating agencies downgraded the ratings of the Corporation and its banking subsidiaries.
The impact of the downgrades on our ability to attract and retain deposits has not been material to
date.
150
The Corporations banking subsidiaries have the ability to borrow funds from the FHLB at
competitive prices. As of September 30, 2009, the banking subsidiaries had short-term and long-term
credit facilities authorized with the FHLB aggregating $1.9 billion based on assets pledged with
the FHLB at that date, compared with $2.2 billion as of December 31, 2008. Outstanding borrowings
under these credit facilities totaled $1.1 billion as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
Such advances are collateralized by securities and mortgage loans, do not have restrictive
covenants and do not have any callable features. Refer to Note 14 to the consolidated financial
statements for additional information.
As of September 30, 2009, the banking subsidiaries had a borrowing capacity at the Fed discount
window of approximately $3.5 billion, which remained unused as of that date. This compares to a
borrowing capacity at the Fed discount window of $3.4 billion as of December 31, 2008 and $2.5
billion as of June 30, 2009, which was unused at those dates. This facility is a collateralized
source of credit that is highly reliable even under difficult market conditions. The amount
available under this borrowing facility is dependent upon the balance of loans and securities
pledged as collateral. Although the borrowing capacity at the Fed discount window from December 31,
2008 to September 30, 2009 was unfavorably impacted by a market-wide reduction by the Fed on the
lendable values of certain types of loans deposited as collateral based on assumptions regarding
their average risk characteristics, and an increase in delinquent loans, the Corporation provided
further collateral in the form of consumer loans during the third quarter of 2009 and replenished
the available credit line to the December 31, 2008 levels.
As of September 30, 2009, management believes that the banking subsidiaries had sufficient current
and projected liquidity to meet its cash flow obligations during the foreseeable future.
Bank Holding Companies
The principal sources of funding for the holding companies include cash on hand, investment
securities, dividends received from banking and non-banking subsidiaries (subject to regulatory
limits), asset sales, credit facilities available from affiliate banking subsidiaries and proceeds
from new borrowings. The principal uses of these funds include the repayment of maturing debt,
interest payments to holders of trust preferred securities (including the payment to the U.S.
Treasury amounting to $46.8 million a year based on an annual rate of 5%), and subsidiary funding
through capital contributions or debt. The Corporation suspended the payment of dividends to common
and preferred stockholders during 2009.
Banking laws place certain restrictions on the amount of dividends a bank may pay to its parent
company. As of September 30, 2009, BPPR could have declared a dividend of approximately $56 million
without the approval of the Federal Reserve Board, which compares to $32 million as of December 31,
2008. As of September 30, 2009, BPNA was required to obtain the approval of the Federal Reserve
Board to declare a dividend. The Corporation has never received dividend payments from its U.S.
mainland subsidiaries. Due to limitations resulting from lower earnings in 2009 in the Puerto Rico
operations, management expects that dividends from BPPR to the Corporations holding company will
be significantly lower than those received in previous years.
The Corporations bank holding companies (BHCs, Popular, Inc., Popular North America and Popular
International Bank, Inc.) have in the past borrowed in the money markets and the corporate debt
market primarily to finance their non-banking subsidiaries. These sources of funding have become
more difficult to obtain and costly due to disrupted market conditions and the reductions in the
Corporations credit ratings. However, the cash needs of the Corporations non-banking subsidiaries
other than to repay indebtedness are now minimal given that the PFH business was discontinued.
A principal use of liquidity at the BHC is to ensure its subsidiaries are adequately capitalized.
Operating losses at the BPNA banking subsidiary have required the BHCs to contribute equity capital
to ensure it meets regulatory guidelines for well-capitalized institutions. In the event that
additional capital contributions were necessary, management believes that the BHCs currently have
enough liquidity sources to meet potential capital needs from BPNA in the ordinary course of
business.
151
The maturities of the bank holding companies outstanding notes payable as of September 30, 2009
are shown in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Notes payable |
|
Year |
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
2010 |
|
|
2.0 |
|
2011 |
|
|
353.7 |
|
2012 |
|
|
274.1 |
|
2013 |
|
|
3.0 |
|
2014 |
|
|
|
|
Later years |
|
|
439.8 |
|
No stated maturity |
|
|
418.8 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,491.9 |
|
|
The repayment of these obligations represents a potential cash need which is expected to be
met with internal liquidity resources and / or new borrowings.
Given the weakened economy, current market conditions, and the Corporations recent credit rating
downgrades, which are described below, there is no assurance that the BHCs will, if it chooses to
do so, be able to obtain new borrowings or additional equity from external investors. The BHCs
liquidity position continues to be adequate with sufficient cash on hand, marketable securities and
other sources of liquidity which are expected to be enough to meet all BHCs obligations due through
the second quarter of 2011 in the ordinary course of business. In the third quarter of 2011, $350
million in debt obligations will mature, and incremental credit
losses could put pressure on the Corporations BHCs liquidity
position. The Corporation has developed several strategies to secure
sufficient liquidity resources will be available at that time.
Although there can be no certainty that the Corporation will be
successful in the implementation of these strategies, and the costs
of their implementation and their impact on the business is uncertain, management
believes that prospective liquidity challenges at the BHCs will
be manageable.
Risks to Liquidity
Capital and credit markets have experienced significant disruption and volatility since the second
half of 2007, although conditions in recent months have improved. Even though the Corporations
management has implemented various strategies to reduce exposure to capital market borrowings, such
as reducing our usage of short-term unsecured borrowings, promoting customer deposit growth through
traditional banking and internet channels, diversifying and increasing its contingency funding
sources as well as exiting certain non-banking subsidiaries, continued market stress could
negatively influence the availability of credit to the Corporation, as well as its cost.
Recent reductions of the Corporations credit ratings by the rating agencies could also affect its
ability to borrow funds, and could substantially raise the cost of our borrowings. Some of the
Corporations borrowings have rating triggers that call for an increase in their interest rate in
the event of a rating downgrade. In addition, changes in the Corporations ratings could lead
creditors and business counterparties to raise the collateral requirements, which could reduce the
Corporations ability to raise financing. Refer to Part II Other Information, Item 1A-Risk
Factors for additional information.
The importance of the Puerto Rico market for the Corporation is an additional risk factor that
could affect its financing activities. In the case of a further decay or deepening of the economic
recession in Puerto Rico, the credit quality of the Corporation could be further affected and
result in higher credit costs. The substantial integration of the Puerto Rico economy with the
U.S. mainland economy may also complicate the impact of a recession in Puerto Rico, as the current
U.S. cycle, concurrently with a slowdown in Puerto Rico, may make a recovery in the local economic
cycle more challenging. This was experienced during 2008 and the nine
months of 2009 and is expected for
the foreseeable future. The economy in Puerto Rico is experiencing its fourth year of recession.
Factors that the Corporation does not control, such as the economic outlook of its principal
markets and regulatory changes, could also affect its ability to obtain funding. In order to
prepare for the possibility of such scenario, management has adopted contingency plans for raising
financing under stress scenarios when important sources of funds that are usually fully available
are temporarily unavailable. These plans call for using alternate funding mechanisms such as the
pledging of certain asset classes and accessing secured credit lines and loan facilities put in
place with the FHLB and the Fed. The Corporation has a substantial amount of assets available for
raising funds through these channels.
152
Credit ratings of Populars debt obligations are an important factor for liquidity because they
impact the Corporations ability to borrow in the capital markets, its cost and access to funding
sources. Credit ratings are based on the financial strength, credit quality and concentrations in
the loan portfolio, the level and volatility of earnings, capital adequacy, the quality of
management, the liquidity of the balance sheet, the availability of a significant base of core
retail and commercial deposits, and the Corporations ability to access a broad array of wholesale
funding sources, among other factors. The Corporations principal credit ratings are at a level
below investment grade which may affect the Corporations ability to raise funds in the capital
markets. The Corporations counterparties are sensitive to the risk of a rating downgrade. As a
result of the recent downgrades, the cost of borrowing funds in the institutional market is
expected to increase. In addition, the ability of the Corporation to raise new funds or renew
maturing debt may be more difficult.
The Corporations ratings and outlook as of September 30, 2009 are presented in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
|
Short-term |
|
Long-term |
|
|
|
|
debt |
|
debt |
|
Outlook |
|
Fitch |
|
B |
|
B |
|
Negative |
Moodys |
|
W/R |
|
Ba1 |
|
Negative |
S&P |
|
B |
|
BB- |
|
Negative |
|
W/R withdrawn
In their June 2009 reports, the three rating agencies downgraded the Corporations credit
ratings following the announcement of the suspension of dividends on the Corporations common stock
and Series A and Series B preferred stock, and of the exchange offer to raise common equity. The
S&Ps report indicated that these actions reflect increasing pressures on the companys capital
position, operating performance, and liquidity. Based on S&Ps report, the downgrade also reflects
expectations for continued bottom-line losses stemming from increased credit losses and the
associated pressures on capital ratios. If credit quality deteriorates beyond their expectations,
S&P could lower the ratings further. Moodys said the downgrades were prompted by increased credit
concerns and the challenges Popular faces in raising its planned amount of common equity. Moodys
also addressed in its report the asset quality challenges currently faced by Popular. Any of the
rating agencies could change their ratings of the Corporation or the ratings outlook at any time
without previous notice. As of September 30, 2009, ratings remained unchanged against those
reported as of June 30, 2009. On September 24, 2009, Moodys confirmed the ratings of Popular, Inc.
and its subsidiaries after they concluded their review given the successful outcome of the exchange
offer.
The Corporations debt and preferred stock ratings are currently rated non-investment grade by
the rating agencies. The market for non-investment grade securities is much smaller and less liquid
than for investment grade securities. Therefore, if the company were to attempt to issue preferred
stock or debt securities in the capital markets, it is possible that there would not be sufficient
demand to complete a transaction and the cost could be substantially higher than for more highly
rated securities.
The Corporations banking subsidiaries have historically not used unsecured capital market
borrowings to finance its operations, and therefore are less sensitive to the level and changes in
the Corporations overall credit ratings. Their main funding sources are deposits and secured
borrowings. At the BHCs, the volume of capital market borrowings has declined substantially, as the
non-banking lending businesses that it had historically funded have been shut down and outstanding
unsecured senior debt has been reduced.
The Corporation has $350 million in senior debt issued by the bank holding companies with interest
that adjusts in the event of senior debt rating downgrades. As a result of rating downgrades
affected by the rating agencies during 2009, the cost of this senior debt increased prospectively
by 275 basis points, which represents an increase in the annual interest expense on the particular
debt of approximately $9.6 million. Further rating downgrades will result in increases to the
interest rate of such debt of 75 basis points per notch. Refer to Note 14 to the consolidated
financial statements for details on the terms of this senior debt. No other outstanding borrowings
have rate or maturity triggers associated with credit ratings. The Corporations banking
subsidiaries currently do not use borrowings that are rated
by the major rating agencies, as these banking subsidiaries are funded primarily with deposits and
secured borrowings.
153
Some of the Corporations derivative instruments include financial covenants tied to the banks
well-capitalized status and credit rating. These agreements could require exposure
collateralization, early termination or both. The fair value of derivative instruments in a
liability position subject to financial covenants approximated $79 million as of September 30,
2009. As of September 30, 2009, the Corporation provided collateral totaling $93 million to cover
the net liability position with counterparties on these derivative instruments.
In addition, licensing, servicing and custodial agreements that the Corporation has with third
parties, including the Federal National Mortgage Association, or FNMA, include ratings covenants.
Servicing rights represent a contractual right and not a beneficial ownership interest in the
underlying mortgage loans. Failure to service the loans in accordance with contract requirements
may lead to a termination of the servicing rights and the loss of future servicing fees. Based on
the Corporations failure to maintain an investment grade rating, those third parties have the
right to require the Corporation to increase collateral levels, engage a substitute custodian
and/or terminate their agreements with the Corporation. The termination of those agreements or the
inability to realize servicing income for the Corporations businesses could have an adverse effect
on those businesses. As of September 30, 2009, the Corporation
has pledged $55 million in
collateral with FNMA and expects that it would be able to meet the requirements of other
counterparties when needed.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Corporations management, with the participation of the Corporations Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Corporations disclosure
controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the
Corporations Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the
end of such period, the Corporations disclosure controls and procedures are effective in
recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be
disclosed by the Corporation in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act and
such information is accumulated and communicated to management, as appropriate, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosures.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the Corporations internal control over financial reporting (as such
term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the
quarter ended on September 30, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Corporations internal control over financial reporting.
Part II Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Corporation is a defendant in a number of legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course
of business. Based on the opinion of legal counsel, management believes that the final disposition
of these matters, except for the matters described below which are in very early stages and
management cannot currently predict their outcome, will not have a material adverse effect on the
Corporations business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
Between May 14, 2009 and November 9, 2009, five putative class actions and two derivative claims
were filed in the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico and the Puerto Rico
Court of First Instance, San Juan Part, against Popular, Inc. and certain of its directors and
officers, among others. Two of the class actions (Hoff v. Popular, Inc., et al. and Otero v.
Popular, Inc., et al.) have now been consolidated. On October 19, 2009, the plaintiffs in the Hoff
case filed an amended complaint which includes as defendants the underwriters in the offering
154
of
the Series B Preferred Stock in May 2008. The consolidated action purports to be on behalf of purchasers of our
securities between January 23, 2008 and February 19, 2009 and alleges that the defendants violated
Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and Section 20(a) of the
Exchange Act by issuing a series of allegedly false and/or misleading statements and/or omitting to
disclose material facts necessary to make statements made by us not false and misleading. The
consolidated action also alleges that the defendants violated Section 11, Section 12(a)(2) and
Section 15 of the Securities Act by making allegedly untrue statements and/or omitting to disclose
material facts necessary to make statements made by us not false and misleading in connection with
the offering of the Series B Preferred Stock in May 2008. The consolidated securities class action
complaint seeks class certification, an award of compensatory damages and reasonable costs and
expenses, including counsel fees. The Corporation and the individual defendants expect to move to
dismiss the consolidated securities class action complaint. The remaining class actions (Walsh v.
Popular, Inc. et al.; Montanez v. Popular, Inc., et al.; and Dougan v. Popular, Inc., et al.)
purport to be on behalf of employees participating in the Popular, Inc. U.S.A. 401(k) Savings and
Investment Plan and the Popular, Inc. Puerto Rico Savings and Investment Plan between January 23,
2008 and the dates of the complaints to recover losses pursuant to Sections 409, 502(a)(2) and
502(a)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) against the Corporation, certain
directors, officers and members of plan committees, each of whom is alleged to be a plan fiduciary.
The complaints allege that the defendants breached their alleged fiduciary obligations by, among
other things, failing to eliminate Popular stock as an investment alternative in the plans. The
complaints seek to recover alleged losses to the plans and equitable relief, including injunctive
relief and a constructive trust, along with costs and attorneys fees. These ERISA actions have now
been consolidated. Pursuant to a stipulation among the parties, plaintiffs are due to file a
consolidated complaint on November 30, 2009. The derivative claims (Garcia v. Carrión, et al. and
Diaz v. Carrión, et al.) are brought purportedly for the benefit of nominal defendant Popular, Inc.
against certain executive officers and directors and allege breaches of fiduciary duty, waste of
assets and abuse of control in connection with our issuance of allegedly false and misleading
financial statements and financial reports and the offering of the Series B Preferred Stock. The
derivative complaints seek a judgment that the action is a proper derivative action, an award of
damages and restitution, and costs and disbursements, including reasonable attorneys fees, costs
and expenses. On October 9, 2009, the Court coordinated the Garcia action with the consolidated
securities class action for purposes of discovery. On October 15, 2009, the Corporation and the
individual defendants moved to dismiss the Garcia complaint for failure to make a demand on the
Board of Directors prior to initiating litigation. Pursuant to a stipulation among the parties,
plaintiffs are due to file an amended complaint on November 20, 2009. The Diaz case, filed in local
court, has been removed to the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico. On October 13,
2009, the Corporation and the individual defendants moved to consolidate the Garcia and Diaz
actions. On October 26, 2009, plaintiff moved to remand the Diaz case to the Puerto Rico Court of
First Instance and to stay defendants consolidation motion pending the outcome of the remand
proceedings.
At this early stage, it is not possible for management to assess the probability of an adverse
outcome, or reasonably estimate the amount of any potential loss. It is possible that the ultimate
resolution of these matters, if unfavorable, may be material to our results of operations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the
factors discussed under Part IItem 1ARisk Factors in our 2008 Form 10-K, as supplemented and
updated by the discussion below. These factors could materially adversely affect our business,
financial condition, liquidity, results of operations and capital position, and could cause our
actual results to differ materially from our historical results or the results contemplated by the
forward-looking statements contained in this report. Also refer to the discussion in Part IItem
2Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this
report for additional information that may supplement or update the discussion of risk factors in
our 2008 Form 10-K.
The risks described in our 2008 Form 10-K and in this report are not the only risks facing us.
Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be
immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of
operations.
155
RISKS RELATING TO THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT AND OUR INDUSTRY
Difficult market conditions have adversely affected the financial industry and our results of
operations and financial condition.
Market instability and lack of investor confidence have led many lenders and institutional
investors to reduce or cease providing funding to borrowers, including other financial
institutions. This market turmoil and tightening of credit have led to an increased level of
commercial and consumer delinquencies, lack of consumer confidence, increased market volatility and
widespread reduction of business activity generally. The resulting economic pressure on consumers
and uncertainty about the financial markets have adversely affected our industry and our business,
results of operations and financial condition. We do not expect an improvement in the financial
markets in the near future. A worsening of these difficult conditions would likely exacerbate the
economic challenges facing us and others in the financial industry. In particular, we face the
following risks in connection with these events:
|
|
|
We expect to face increased regulation of our industry, including as a result of the
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA) and the recently announced Financial
Stability Plan. Compliance with these regulations may increase our costs and limit our
ability to pursue business opportunities. |
|
|
|
|
Our ability to assess the creditworthiness of our customers may be impaired if the
models and approaches we use to select, manage and underwrite our customers become less
predictive of future behaviors. |
|
|
|
|
The processes we use to estimate losses inherent in our credit exposure requires
difficult, subjective, and complex judgments, including forecasts of economic conditions
and how these economic conditions might impair the ability of our borrowers to repay their
loans. The reliability of these processes might be compromised if these variables are no
longer capable of accurate estimation. |
|
|
|
|
Competition in our industry could intensify as a result of increasing consolidation of
financial services companies in connection with current market conditions. |
|
|
|
|
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has already increased the assessments
that we will have to pay on our insured deposits during 2009 because market developments
have led to a substantial increase in bank failures and an increase in FDIC loss reserves,
which in turn has led to a depletion of the FDIC insurance fund and a reduction of the
FDICs ratio of reserves to insured deposits. We may be required to pay in the future
significantly higher FDIC assessments on our deposits if market conditions do not improve
or continue to deteriorate. |
|
|
|
|
We may suffer higher credit losses because of federal or state legislation or other
regulatory action that either (i) reduces the amount that our borrowers are required to pay
us, or (ii) limits our ability to foreclose on properties or collateral or makes
foreclosures less economically viable. In particular, there is legislation pending in the
U.S. Congress that would allow a Chapter 13 bankruptcy plan to cram down the value of
certain mortgages on a consumers principal residence to its market value and/or reset
debtor interest rate and monthly payments to an amount that permits them to remain in their
homes to our detriment. |
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, our overall credit quality continued to be
negatively affected by the sustained deterioration of the economic conditions affecting our
markets, including higher unemployment levels, unprecedented reduced demand for housing and
declines in property values.
As set forth under Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial
ConditionNon-Performing Assets in this Form 10-Q, the credit quality of our loan portfolio has
continued to be under pressure during 2009 due to adverse economic conditions, including higher
unemployment levels, unprecedented reduced demand for housing and declines in property values.
Non-performing assets attributable to continuing operations increased by $952 million as of
September 30, 2009 as compared with December 31, 2008 and by $1.1 billion as compared with
September 30, 2008. The allowance for loan losses of $1.2 billion as of September 30, 2009 was
156
4.95% of period-end loans held-in-portfolio, as compared to 3.43% of period-end loans
held-in-portfolio on December 31, 2008 and 2.76% of period-end loans held-in-portfolio on September
30, 2008.
The main factor driving our net losses in the first nine months of 2009 has been increasing credit
costs from several segments of our loan portfolio. Persistent adverse economic conditions, rising
unemployment and declining property values in the markets in which we operate have continued to
negatively affect our provision for loan losses. The existing adverse economic conditions are
expected to persist through 2010, thus it is likely that we will continue to experience heightened
credit losses, additional significant provisions for loan losses, an increased allowance for loan
losses and higher levels of non-performing assets.
Weakness in the economy, employment and the real estate market in the geographic footprint of
Popular has adversely impacted and may continue to adversely impact Popular.
A significant portion of our financial activities and credit exposure is concentrated in the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (the Island) and the Islands economy continues to deteriorate.
Since 2006, the Puerto Rico economy has been experiencing recessionary conditions. Based on
information published by the Puerto Rico Planning Board, the Puerto Rico real gross national
product decreased 2.5% during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008.
In August 2009, the Puerto Rico Planning Board revised its gross national product forecast for
fiscal year 2009 by projecting a base case scenario decline of 4.8%, a further decline of 1.4% from
the projection released in February 2009. The Planning Board, however, made an upward revision of
its gross national product forecast for fiscal year 2010 by projecting an increase of 0.7%. The
Planning Boards revised forecast for year 2010 takes into account the estimated effect on the
Puerto Rico economy of the Commonwealths fiscal stabilization plan and of the activity expected to
be generated by the disbursement of $1.73 billion from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
of 2009 (ARRA) and $280.3 million from the Commonwealths local stimulus package.
The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico government is currently facing a fiscal deficit which has been
estimated at approximately $3.2 billion or over 30% of its annual budget. It continues to review
alternatives for reducing the deficit, as its access to the municipal bond market and its credit
ratings depend, in part, on achieving a balanced budget. Measures that the government has
implemented have included reducing expenses, including public-sector employment through layoffs of
employees. The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico government has announced layoffs for approximately
14,500 employees, of which approximately 11,700 are expected to take place in January 2010. Since
the government is an important source of employment on the Island, these measures could have the
effect of intensifying the current recessionary cycle. The Puerto Rico Labor Department reported an
unemployment rate of 16.4% for September 2009, compared with an unemployment rate of 12.0% for
September 2008.
This decline in the Islands economy has resulted in, among other things, a downturn in our loan
originations; an increase in the level of our non-performing assets, loan loss provisions and
charge-offs, particularly in our construction loan portfolio; an increase in the rate of
foreclosure loss on mortgage loans; and a reduction in the value of our loans and loan servicing
portfolio, all of which have adversely affected our profitability. If the decline in economic
activity continues, there could be further adverse effects on our profitability.
The economy of Puerto Rico is very sensitive to the price of oil in the global market. The Island
does not have significant mass transit available to the public and most of its electricity is
powered by oil, making it highly sensitive to fluctuations in oil prices. A substantial increase in
its price could impact adversely the economy of Puerto Rico by reducing disposable income and
increasing the operating costs of most businesses and government. Consumer spending is particularly
sensitive to wide fluctuations in oil prices.
The level of real estate prices in Puerto Rico has been more stable than in other U.S. markets, but
the current economic environment has accelerated devaluation of properties when compared with
previous periods. In addition,
future developments in Puerto Rico and the mainland U.S. could further pressure residential
property values. Lower
157
real estate values could increase loan delinquencies, foreclosures and the
cost of repossessing and disposing of real estate collateral. The higher end of the housing market
appears to have suffered a substantial slowdown in sales activity in recent quarters, as reflected
in the low absorption rates of projects financed in the Corporations construction loan portfolio.
The current state of the economy and uncertainty in the private and public sectors has had an
adverse effect on the credit quality of our loan portfolios. The continuation of the economic
slowdown would cause those adverse effects to continue, as delinquency rates may increase in the
short-term, until sustainable growth resumes. Also, a potential reduction in consumer spending may
also impact growth in our other interest and non-interest revenue sources.
Adverse credit market conditions may continue to affect our ability to meet our liquidity needs.
The credit markets, although recovering, have recently experienced extreme volatility and
disruption. General credit market conditions remain challenging for most issuers, particularly for
non-investment grade issuers like us. We need liquidity to, among other things, pay our operating
expenses, interest on our debt, maintain our lending activities and repay or replace our maturing
liabilities. Without sufficient liquidity, we may be forced to curtail our operations. The
availability of additional financing will depend on a variety of factors such as market conditions,
the general availability of credit and our creditworthiness. Our cash flows and financial condition
could be materially affected by continued disruptions in the financial markets.
Legislative and regulatory actions taken now or in the future to address the current liquidity and
credit crisis in the financial industry may significantly affect our financial condition, results
of operations, liquidity or stock price.
Current economic conditions, particularly in the financial markets, have resulted in government
regulatory agencies and political bodies placing increased focus and scrutiny on the financial
services industry. The U.S. Government has intervened on an unprecedented scale, responding to what
has been commonly referred to as the financial crisis. In addition to the U.S. Treasury
Departments Capital Purchase Program (CPP) under the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP)
announced last fall and the new Capital Assistance Program (CAP) announced this spring, further
steps taken include enhancing the liquidity support available to financial institutions,
establishing a commercial paper funding facility, temporarily guaranteeing money market funds and
certain types of debt issuances, and increasing insurance on bank deposits. Also, the U.S.
Congress, through the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 and the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009, have imposed a number of restrictions and limitations on the operations
of financial services firms participating in the federal programs. Most recently, a financial
regulatory reform plan is being considered that would, if enacted, represent the most sweeping
reform of financial regulation and financial services since the 1930s.
These programs and proposals subject us and other financial institutions to additional
restrictions, oversight and costs that may have an adverse impact on our business, financial
condition, results of operations or the price of our common stock. The Administrations financial
reform plan would, if enacted, further substantially increase regulation of the financial services
industry and impose restrictions on the operations and general ability of firms within the industry
to conduct business consistent with historical practices. Federal and state regulatory agencies
also frequently adopt changes to their regulations or change the manner in which existing
regulations are applied. We cannot predict the substance or impact of pending or future
legislation, regulation or the application thereof. Compliance with such current and potential
regulation and scrutiny may significantly increase our costs, impede the efficiency of our internal
business processes, require us to increase our regulatory capital and limit our ability to pursue
business opportunities in an efficient manner.
158
The imposition of additional property tax payments in Puerto Rico may further deteriorate our
commercial, consumer and mortgage loan portfolios.
On March 9, 2009, the Governor of Puerto Rico signed into law the Special Act Declaring a State of
Fiscal Emergency and Establishing an Integral Plan of Fiscal Stabilization to Save Puerto Ricos
Credit, Act No. 7. The Act imposes a series of temporary and permanent measures, including the
imposition of a 0.591% special tax applicable to properties used for residential (excluding those
exempt as detailed in the Act) and commercial purposes, and payable to the Puerto Rico Treasury
Department. This temporary measure will be effective for tax years that commenced after June 30,
2009 and before July 1, 2012. The imposition of this special property tax could adversely affect
the disposable income of borrowers from the commercial, consumer and mortgage loan portfolios and
may cause an increase in our delinquency and foreclosure rates.
RISKS RELATING TO OUR BUSINESS
Our financial results for the third quarter and our financial condition continued to be affected by
the deterioration in the credit quality of our portfolio and economic conditions affecting the
markets in which we operate.
The credit quality of our portfolio continues to deteriorate and has had an adverse effect on our
financial results for the period ended September 30, 2009 and our financial condition as of
September 30, 2009. Continued adverse changes in the economy and negative trends in employment and
property values in the markets in which we operate, which are described more fully herein, continue
to have an adverse effect on our provision for loan losses. We will continue to evaluate our
allowance for loan losses and may be required to increase such amounts, perhaps substantially.
An increase in our allowance for loan losses would result in a reduction in our tangible common
equity. Given the focus on tangible common equity by regulatory authorities, rating agencies and
the market, we may be required to raise additional capital through the issuance of additional
common stock in future periods to replace that common equity.
Actions by the rating agencies or having capital levels below well-capitalized could raise the cost
of our obligations, which could affect our ability to borrow or to enter into hedging agreements in
the future and may have other adverse effects on our business.
Actions by the rating agencies have raised the cost of our borrowings. Borrowings amounting to $350
million have ratings triggers that call for an increase in their interest rate in the event of a
ratings downgrade. For example, as a result of rating downgrades effected by the major rating
agencies in January, April and June 2009, the cost of servicing $350 million of our senior debt
increased by an additional 275 basis points. Further rating downgrades will result in increases to
the interest rate of such debt of 75 basis points per notch.
Popular Inc.s debt and preferred stock ratings are currently rated non-investment grade by the
rating agencies. The market for non-investment grade securities is much smaller and less liquid
than for investment grade securities. Therefore, if we were to attempt to issue preferred stock or
debt securities in the capital markets, it is possible that there would not be sufficient demand to
complete a transaction and the cost could be substantially higher than for more highly rated
securities.
In addition, changes in our ratings and capital levels below well-capitalized could affect our
relationships with some creditors and business counterparties. For example, a portion of our
hedging transactions include ratings triggers or well-capitalized language that permit
counterparties to either request additional collateral or terminate our agreements with them based
on our below investment grade ratings. Although we have been able to meet any additional collateral
requirements thus far and expect that we would be able to enter into agreements with substitute
counterparties if any of our existing agreements were terminated, changes in our ratings or capital
levels below well capitalized could create additional costs for our businesses. In addition,
servicing, licensing and custodial agreements that we are party to with third parties, including
the Federal National Mortgage Association, or FNMA, include
159
ratings covenants. Servicing rights
represent a contractual right and not a beneficial ownership interest in the underlying mortgage
loans. Failure to service the loans in accordance with contract requirements may lead to a
termination of the servicing rights and the loss of future servicing fees. Based on our failure to
maintain an investment grade rating, those third parties have the right to require us to increase
collateral levels, engage a substitute custodian and/or terminate their agreements with us. None of
the agreements have been terminated as of November 9, 2009. The termination of those agreements or
the inability to realize servicing income for our businesses could have an adverse effect on those
businesses. Other counterparties are also sensitive to the risk of a ratings downgrade and the
implications for our businesses and may be less likely to engage in transactions with us, or may
only engage in them at a substantially higher cost, if our ratings remain below investment grade.
Increases in FDIC insurance premiums may have a material adverse affect on our earnings.
During 2008 and continuing in 2009, higher levels of bank failures have dramatically increased
resolution costs of the FDIC and depleted the deposit insurance fund. In addition, the FDIC
instituted two temporary programs effective through December 31, 2009, to further insure customer
deposits at FDIC-member banks: deposit accounts are now insured up to $250,000 per customer (up
from $100,000) and non-interest bearing transactional accounts are fully insured (unlimited
coverage). These programs have placed additional stress on the deposit insurance fund.
In order to maintain a strong funding position and restore reserve ratios of the deposit insurance
fund, the FDIC increased assessment rates of insured institutions uniformly by 7 cents for every
$100 of deposits beginning with the first quarter of 2009, with additional changes beginning April
1, 2009, which require riskier institutions to pay a larger share of premiums by factoring in rate
adjustments based on secured liabilities and unsecured debt levels. In February 2009, the FDIC
voted to amend the restoration plan and impose a special assessment of 20 cents for every $100 of
assessable deposits on insured institutions on June 30, 2009, which would be collected on September
30, 2009. In May 2009, the FDIC adopted a final rule, effective June 30, 2009, that will impose a
special assessment of 5 cents for every $100 on each insured depository institutions assets minus
its Tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009, subject to a cap equal to 10 cents per $100 of assessable
deposits for the second quarter 2009 risk-based capital assessment. This special assessment applied
to us and resulted in a $16.7 million expense in our second quarter of 2009. More recently, the
FDIC has proposed requiring banks to prepay three years worth of premiums to replenish its
depleted insurance fund. If this proposal is approved and we are required to make an upfront
payment equal to three years of assessments, our financial position and liquidity could be
significantly and adversely affected.
We are generally unable to control the amount of premiums that we are required to pay for FDIC
insurance. If there are additional bank or financial institution failures or our capital position
is further impaired, we may be required to pay even higher FDIC premiums than the recently
increased levels. Our expenses for 2009 were significantly and adversely affected by these
increased premiums. These announced increases and any future increases or required prepayments in
FDIC insurance premiums may materially adversely affect our results of operations.
We may need additional capital resources in the future and these capital resources may not be
available when needed or at all.
We may need to raise additional debt or equity financing in the future to maintain adequate
liquidity and capital resources or to finance future growth, investments or strategic acquisitions.
We cannot assure you that such financing will be available on acceptable terms or at all. If we are
unable to obtain additional financing, we may not be able to maintain adequate liquidity and
capital resources or to grow, make strategic acquisitions or investments.
160
Our funding sources may prove insufficient to replace deposits and support future growth.
Our banking subsidiaries rely on customer deposits, brokered deposits and advances from the Federal
Home Loan Bank (FHLB) to fund their operations. Although those banking subsidiaries have
historically been able to replace maturing deposits and advances if desired, no assurance can be
given that they would be able to replace those funds in the future if our financial condition or
general market conditions were to change. Our financial flexibility will be severely constrained if
our banking subsidiaries are unable to maintain access to funding or if adequate financing is not
available to accommodate future growth at acceptable interest rates. Finally, if we are required to
rely more heavily on more expensive funding sources to support future growth, revenues may not
increase proportionately to cover costs. In this case, profitability would be adversely affected.
Although we consider such sources of funds adequate for our liquidity needs, we may seek additional
debt financing in the future to achieve our long-term business objectives. There can be no
assurance additional borrowings, if sought, would be available to us or, on what terms. If
additional financing sources are unavailable or are not available on reasonable terms, our growth
and future prospects could be adversely affected.
As a holding company, we depend on dividends and distributions from our subsidiaries for liquidity.
We are a bank holding company and we depend on dividends from our banking and other operating
subsidiaries to fund our obligations. Our banking subsidiaries, BPPR and BPNA, are limited by law
in their ability to make dividend payments and other distributions to us based on their earnings
and capital position. A failure by our banking subsidiaries to generate sufficient cash flow to
make dividend payments to us may have a negative impact on our results of operation and financial
position.
Unforeseen disruptions in the brokered deposits market could compromise our liquidity position.
A relatively large portion of our funding is brokered deposits. Our total brokered deposits as of
September 30, 2009 were $2.8 billion or 11% of total deposits. An unforeseen disruption in the
brokered deposits market, stemming from factors such as legal, regulatory or financial risks, could
adversely affect our ability to fund a portion of our operations and/or meet obligations.
We may not have enough authorized shares of common stock if we are required to raise additional
equity capital in the future to satisfy liquidity and regulatory needs.
As a result of prevailing recessionary conditions, we have increased our provision for loan losses,
which has resulted in a reduction in the amount of our tangible common equity. Given the focus on
tangible common equity by regulatory authorities, rating agencies and the market, we may be
required to raise additional capital through the issuance of additional common stock in future
periods to replace that common equity. We issued more than 350 million shares of common stock in
the exchange offer that was conducted in the third quarter of 2009, which left us with only a
limited number of authorized and unreserved shares of common stock to issue in the future. As a
result, we will need to obtain stockholder consent to amend our certificate of incorporation to
increase the amount of authorized capital stock if we intend to issue significant amounts of common
stock in the future. We cannot be assured that our stockholders will approve such an increase.
We are subject to regulatory capital adequacy guidelines, and if we fail to meet these guidelines
our business and financial condition will be adversely affected.
Under regulatory capital adequacy guidelines, and other regulatory requirements, Popular, Inc. and
its banking subsidiaries must meet guidelines that include quantitative measures of assets,
liabilities and certain off balance sheet items, subject to qualitative judgments by regulators
regarding components, risk weightings and other factors. If we fail to meet these minimum capital
guidelines and other regulatory requirements, our business and financial condition will be
materially and adversely affected. If we fail to maintain well-capitalized status under the
regulatory framework, or are deemed not well-managed under regulatory exam procedures, or if we
experience certain regulatory
violations, our status as a financial holding company and our related eligibility for a streamlined
review process for acquisition proposals, and our ability to offer certain financial products will
be compromised.
161
Our business depends on the creditworthiness of our customers and the value of the assets securing
our loans.
If the credit quality of the customer base materially decreases or if the risk profile of a market,
industry or group of customers changes materially, our business, financial condition, allowance
levels, liquidity, capital and results of operations could be adversely affected. While we believe
that our allowance for loan losses was adequate as of September 30, 2009, there is no certainty
that it will be sufficient to cover future credit losses in the portfolio because of continued
adverse changes in the economy, market conditions or events negatively affecting specific
customers, industries or markets both in Puerto Rico and the United States. We periodically review
the allowance for loan losses for adequacy considering economic conditions and trends, collateral
values and credit quality indicators, including past charge-off experience and levels of past due
loans and non-performing assets.
Our risk management policies and procedures may leave us exposed to unidentified or unanticipated
risk, which could negatively affect us.
Management of risk requires, among other things, policies and procedures to record properly and
verify a large number of transactions and events. We have devoted resources to develop our risk
management policies and procedures and expect to continue to do so in the future. Nonetheless, our
policies and procedures may not be comprehensive given current market conditions. Some of our
methods for managing risk and exposures are based upon the use of observed historical market
behavior or statistics based on historical models. As a result, these methods may not fully predict
future exposures, which could be significantly greater than our historical measures indicate. Other
risk management methods depend on the evaluation of information regarding markets, clients or other
matters that is publicly available or otherwise accessible to us. This information may not always
be accurate, complete, up-to-date or properly evaluated.
Goodwill impairment could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and future
results of operations.
We performed our annual goodwill impairment evaluation for the entire organization during the third
quarter of 2009 using July 31, 2009 as the annual evaluation date. Based on the results of the
analysis, we concluded that there was no goodwill impairment as of that date. The fair value
determination for each reporting unit performed to determine if potential goodwill impairment
exists requires management to make estimates and assumptions. Critical assumptions that are used as
part of these evaluations include:
|
|
|
selection of comparable publicly traded companies, based on nature of business, location
and size; |
|
|
|
|
selection of comparable acquisition and capital raising transactions; |
|
|
|
|
the discount rate applied to future earnings, based on an estimate of the cost of
equity; |
|
|
|
|
the potential future earnings of the reporting unit; and |
|
|
|
|
market growth and new business assumptions. |
It is possible that the assumptions and conclusions regarding
the valuation of our reporting units could change adversely and could result in the recognition of
goodwill impairment. Such impairment could have a material adverse effect on our future results of
operations. As of September 30, 2009, we had approximately $607 million of goodwill remaining on
our balance sheet, of which $404 million was related to BPNA. Declines in our market
capitalization would increase the risk of goodwill impairment in 2010.
Defective and repurchased loans may harm our business and financial condition.
In connection with the sale and securitization of loans, we are required to make a variety of
customary representations and warranties regarding Popular and the loans being sold or securitized.
Our obligations with respect to these representations and warranties are generally outstanding for
the life of the loan, and they relate to, among other things:
162
|
|
|
compliance with laws and regulations; |
|
|
|
|
underwriting standards; |
|
|
|
|
the accuracy of information in the loan documents and loan file; and |
|
|
|
|
the characteristics and enforceability of the loan. |
A loan that does not comply with these representations and warranties may take longer to sell, may
impact our ability to obtain third-party financing for the loan, and be unsaleable or saleable only
at a significant discount. If such a loan is sold before we detect non-compliance, we may be
obligated to repurchase the loan and bear any associated loss directly, or we may be obligated to
indemnify the purchaser against any loss, either of which could reduce our cash available for
operations and liquidity. Management believes that it has established controls to ensure that loans
are originated in accordance with the secondary markets requirements, but mistakes may be made, or
certain employees may deliberately violate our lending policies. We seek to minimize repurchases
and losses from defective loans by correcting flaws, if possible, and selling or re-selling such
loans. We have established specific reserves for possible losses related to repurchases resulting
from representation and warranty violations on specific portfolios. Nonetheless, we do not expect
any such losses to be significant. Losses associated with defective loans may adversely impact our
results of operations or financial condition.
We are exposed to credit risk from mortgage loans that have been sold subject to recourse
arrangements.
In the past, we have retained, through recourse arrangements, part of the credit risk on sales of
mortgage loans, and we also service certain mortgage loan portfolios with recourse. Consequently,
we may suffer losses on these loans when the proceeds from a foreclosure sale of the property
underlying a defaulted mortgage loan are less than the outstanding principal balance of the loan
and the costs of holding and disposing of the related property.
Worsening in the financial condition of critical counterparties may result in higher losses than
expected.
The financial stability of several counterparties is critical for their continued financial
performance on covenants that require the repurchase of loans, posting of collateral to reduce our
credit exposure or replacement of delinquent loans. Many of these transactions expose us to credit
risk in the event of a default by our counterparty. Any such losses could adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
The resolution of significant pending litigation, if unfavorable, could have material adverse
financial effects or cause significant reputational harm to us, which in turn could seriously harm
our business prospects.
We face legal risks in our businesses, and the volume of claims and amount of damages and penalties
claimed in litigation and regulatory proceedings against financial institutions remain high.
Substantial legal liability or significant regulatory action against us could have material adverse
financial effects or cause significant reputational harm to us, which in turn could seriously harm
our business prospects. As more fully described under Legal Proceedings, two putative class actions
and one derivative claim have been filed in the United States District Court for the District of
Puerto Rico and another derivative suit has been filed in the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance
against Popular, Inc., certain of its directors and officers and others. Although at this early
stage, it is not possible for management to assess the probability of an adverse outcome, or
reasonably estimate the amount of any potential loss, it is possible that the ultimate resolution
of these matters, if unfavorable, may be material to our results of operations.
163
RISKS RELATING TO AN INVESTMENT IN OUR SECURITIES
Additional assistance from the U.S. Government may further dilute existing holders of our common
stock.
There may be new regulatory requirements or standards, or additional U.S. Government
programs or requirements ,or we could incur losses in the future that could result in, or require,
additional equity issuances. Such further equity issuances would further dilute the existing
holders of our common stock perhaps significantly.
The issuance of additional shares of our common stock or common equivalent securities in future
equity offerings, or as a result of the exercise of the warrant the U.S. Treasury holds, will
dilute the ownership interest of our existing common stockholders and could also involve U.S.
Government constraints on our operations.
Dividends on our common stock and preferred stock have been suspended and you may not receive funds
in connection with your investment in our common stock or preferred stock without selling your
shares.
Holders of our common stock and preferred stock are only entitled to receive such dividends as our
board of directors may declare out of funds legally available for such payments. During 2009, we
suspended dividend payments on our common stock and preferred stock. Furthermore, unless we have
redeemed all of the trust preferred securities issued to the U.S. Treasury or the U.S. Treasury has
transferred all of its trust preferred securities to third parties, the consent of the U.S.
Treasury will be required for us to, among other things, increase the dividend rate per share of
common stock above $0.08 per share or to repurchase or redeem equity securities, including our
common stock, subject to certain limited exceptions. This could adversely affect the market price
of our common stock. Also, we are a bank holding company and our ability to declare and pay
dividends is dependent on certain Federal regulatory considerations, including the guidelines of
the Federal Reserve regarding capital adequacy and dividends. Moreover, the Federal Reserve and the
FDIC have issued policy statements stating that the bank holding companies and insured banks should
generally pay dividends only out of current operating earnings. In the current financial and
economic environment, the Federal Reserve has indicated that bank holding companies should
carefully review their dividend policy and has discouraged dividend pay-out ratios that are at the
100% or higher level unless both asset quality and capital are very strong.
In addition, the terms of our outstanding junior subordinated debt securities held by each trust
that has issued trust preferred securities prohibit us from declaring or paying any dividends or
distributions on our capital stock, including our common stock and preferred stock, or purchasing,
acquiring, or making a liquidation payment on such stock, if we have given notice of our election
to defer interest payments but the related deferral period has not yet commenced or a deferral
period is continuing.
Accordingly, you may have to sell some or all of your shares of our common stock or preferred stock
in order to generate cash flow from your investment. You may not realize a gain on your investment
when you sell the common stock or preferred stock and may lose the entire amount of your
investment.
Offerings of debt, which would be senior to our common stock in the event of liquidation, and/or
preferred equity securities, which may be senior to our common stock for purposes of dividend
distributions or in the event of liquidation, may adversely affect the market price of our common
stock.
We may seek to increase our liquidity and/or capital resources by offering debt or preferred equity
securities, including medium-term notes, trust preferred securities, senior or subordinated notes
and preferred stock. In the event of liquidation, holders of our debt securities and shares of
preferred stock and lenders with respect to other borrowings may receive distributions of our
available assets prior to the holders of our common stock. Additional equity offerings may dilute
the holdings of our existing stockholders or reduce the market price of our common stock, or both.
Our board of directors is authorized to issue one or more classes or series of preferred stock from
time to time without any action on the part of the stockholders. Our board of directors also has
the power, without stockholder approval, to set the terms of any such classes or series of
preferred stock that may be issued, including voting rights, dividend rights, and preferences over
our common stock with respect to dividends or upon our dissolution, winding up and liquidation and
other terms. If we issue preferred shares in the future that has a preference over our common
164
stock
with respect to the payment of dividends or upon liquidation, or if we issue preferred shares with
voting rights that
dilute the voting power of the common stock, the rights of holders of our common stock or the
market price of our common stock could be adversely affected.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
In April 2004, the Corporations shareholders adopted the Popular, Inc. 2004 Omnibus Incentive
Plan. The Corporation has to date used shares purchased in the market to make grants under the
Plan. The maximum number of shares of common stock that may be granted under this Plan is
10,000,000.
The following table sets forth the details of purchases of Common Stock during the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 under the 2004 Omnibus Incentive Plan.
Not in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares |
|
Maximum Number of Shares |
|
|
Total Number of Shares |
|
Average Price Paid |
|
Purchased as Part of Publicly |
|
that May Yet be Purchased |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
per Share |
|
Announced Plans or Programs |
|
Under the Plans or Programs (a) |
|
July 1 July 31 |
|
|
694 |
|
|
$ |
2.08 |
|
|
|
694 |
|
|
|
8,440,347 |
|
August 1 August 31 |
|
|
78,070 |
|
|
|
1.29 |
|
|
|
78,070 |
|
|
|
8,362,277 |
|
September 1 September 30 |
|
|
1,003 |
|
|
|
2.83 |
|
|
|
1,003 |
|
|
|
8,361,274 |
|
|
Total September 30, 2009 |
|
|
79,767 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
|
79,767 |
|
|
|
8,361,274 |
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes shares forfeited. |
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
Restated
Certificate of Incorporation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
Computation of the ratios of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock
dividends. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
165
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
POPULAR, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: November 9, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Jorge A. Junquera
|
|
|
|
Jorge A. Junquera |
|
|
|
Senior Executive Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 9, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Ileana Gonzalez Quevedo
|
|
|
|
Ileana Gonzalez Quevedo |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President & Corporate Comptroller |
|
|
166