10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 1-12110
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Texas
|
|
76-6088377 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
3 Greenway Plaza, Suite 1300 |
|
|
Houston, Texas
|
|
77046 |
(Address of principle executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(713) 354-2500
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
N/A
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, If Changed Since Last Report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o No o Not applicable þ*
|
|
|
* |
|
As of May 7, 2010, the registrant has not been phased in to the interactive data requirements. |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of accelerated filer and
large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Yes o No þ
On May 3, 2010, 65,848,542 common shares of the registrant were outstanding.
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
Table of Contents
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements |
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate assets, at cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
748,604 |
|
|
$ |
747,921 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
4,527,523 |
|
|
|
4,512,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,276,127 |
|
|
|
5,260,045 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(1,191,604 |
) |
|
|
(1,149,056 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating real estate assets |
|
|
4,084,523 |
|
|
|
4,110,989 |
|
Properties under development, including land |
|
|
196,371 |
|
|
|
201,581 |
|
Investments in joint ventures |
|
|
42,994 |
|
|
|
43,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate assets |
|
|
4,323,888 |
|
|
|
4,356,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable affiliates |
|
|
32,657 |
|
|
|
36,112 |
|
Notes receivable affiliates |
|
|
46,118 |
|
|
|
45,847 |
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
92,983 |
|
|
|
102,114 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
28,553 |
|
|
|
64,156 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
3,680 |
|
|
|
3,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,527,879 |
|
|
$ |
4,607,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured |
|
$ |
1,590,473 |
|
|
$ |
1,645,926 |
|
Secured |
|
|
980,188 |
|
|
|
979,273 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
69,858 |
|
|
|
74,420 |
|
Accrued real estate taxes |
|
|
17,005 |
|
|
|
23,241 |
|
Distributions payable |
|
|
33,403 |
|
|
|
33,025 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
138,136 |
|
|
|
145,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,829,063 |
|
|
|
2,901,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perpetual preferred units |
|
|
97,925 |
|
|
|
97,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares of beneficial interest; $0.01 par value per share;
100,000 shares authorized; 80,567 and 79,543 issued; 77,793 and
76,996 outstanding, respectively |
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
770 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
2,548,722 |
|
|
|
2,525,656 |
|
Distributions in excess of net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
|
(520,798 |
) |
|
|
(492,571 |
) |
Notes receivable secured by common shares |
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
(101 |
) |
Treasury shares, at cost (12,879 and 12,897 shares, respectively) |
|
|
(461,517 |
) |
|
|
(462,188 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(42,093 |
) |
|
|
(41,155 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common equity |
|
|
1,524,991 |
|
|
|
1,530,411 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
75,900 |
|
|
|
78,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
1,600,891 |
|
|
|
1,609,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
4,527,879 |
|
|
$ |
4,607,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Property revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental revenues |
|
$ |
131,161 |
|
|
$ |
136,500 |
|
Other property revenues |
|
|
21,045 |
|
|
|
20,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property revenues |
|
|
152,206 |
|
|
|
157,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating and maintenance |
|
|
44,613 |
|
|
|
42,304 |
|
Real estate taxes |
|
|
18,445 |
|
|
|
18,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property expenses |
|
|
63,058 |
|
|
|
60,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-property income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee and asset management |
|
|
1,838 |
|
|
|
2,031 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
3,045 |
|
|
|
735 |
|
Income (loss) on deferred compensation plans |
|
|
3,482 |
|
|
|
(4,152 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-property income (loss) |
|
|
8,365 |
|
|
|
(1,386 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property management |
|
|
5,183 |
|
|
|
4,929 |
|
Fee and asset management |
|
|
1,194 |
|
|
|
1,135 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
7,404 |
|
|
|
8,232 |
|
Interest |
|
|
31,555 |
|
|
|
32,245 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
43,813 |
|
|
|
43,980 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
817 |
|
Expense (benefit) on deferred compensation plans |
|
|
3,482 |
|
|
|
(4,152 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expenses |
|
|
93,357 |
|
|
|
87,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on early retirement of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
166 |
|
Equity in income (loss) of joint ventures |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
4,051 |
|
|
|
8,129 |
|
Income tax expense current |
|
|
(270 |
) |
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
3,781 |
|
|
|
7,830 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
3,781 |
|
|
|
8,505 |
|
Less (income) loss allocated to noncontrolling
interests from continuing operations |
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
(521 |
) |
Less income allocated to perpetual preferred units |
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
2,285 |
|
|
$ |
6,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Earnings per share basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to common
shareholders |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, attributable to common
shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to common
shareholders |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, attributable to common
shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
66,475 |
|
|
|
55,552 |
|
Weighted average number of common and common dilutive equivalent
shares outstanding |
|
|
68,169 |
|
|
|
56,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
3,781 |
|
|
$ |
7,830 |
|
Less (income) loss allocated to noncontrolling interests from
continuing operations |
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
(521 |
) |
Less income allocated to perpetual preferred units |
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to common
shareholders |
|
|
2,285 |
|
|
|
5,559 |
|
Income from discontinued operations attributable to common
shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
2,285 |
|
|
$ |
6,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,781 |
|
|
$ |
8,505 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on cash flow hedging activities |
|
|
(6,817 |
) |
|
|
(2,936 |
) |
Reclassification of net losses on cash flow hedging activities |
|
|
5,879 |
|
|
|
5,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
2,843 |
|
|
|
10,845 |
|
Less (income) loss allocated to noncontrolling interests from
continuing operations |
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
(521 |
) |
Less income allocated to perpetual preferred units |
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
1,347 |
|
|
$ |
8,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares of |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Distributions |
|
|
secured by |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
beneficial |
|
|
paid-in |
|
|
in excess of |
|
|
common |
|
|
shares, at |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perpetual |
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
interest |
|
|
capital |
|
|
net income |
|
|
shares |
|
|
cost |
|
|
loss |
|
|
interests |
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
preferred units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
770 |
|
|
$ |
2,525,656 |
|
|
$ |
(492,571 |
) |
|
$ |
(101 |
) |
|
$ |
(462,188 |
) |
|
$ |
(41,155 |
) |
|
$ |
78,602 |
|
|
$ |
1,609,013 |
|
|
$ |
97,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(254 |
) |
|
|
2,031 |
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(938 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(938 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Common shares issued |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
17,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net share awards |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(180 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
|
|
Share awards placed into deferred
plans |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common share options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
Conversions and redemptions of
operating partnership units |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to perpetual
preferred units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
Cash distributions to equity holders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,512 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,298 |
) |
|
|
(31,810 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
778 |
|
|
$ |
2,548,722 |
|
|
$ |
(520,798 |
) |
|
$ |
(101 |
) |
|
$ |
(461,517 |
) |
|
$ |
(42,093 |
) |
|
$ |
75,900 |
|
|
$ |
1,600,891 |
|
|
$ |
97,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in excess of |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
net income |
|
|
receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares of |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
attributable |
|
|
secured by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perpetual |
|
|
|
beneficial |
|
|
paid-in |
|
|
to common |
|
|
common |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
preferred |
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
interest |
|
|
capital |
|
|
shareholders |
|
|
shares |
|
|
shares |
|
|
loss |
|
|
interests |
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
660 |
|
|
$ |
2,237,703 |
|
|
$ |
(312,309 |
) |
|
$ |
(295 |
) |
|
$ |
(463,209 |
) |
|
$ |
(51,056 |
) |
|
$ |
89,862 |
|
|
$ |
1,501,356 |
|
|
$ |
97,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
6,755 |
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net share awards |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of notes receivable
secured by common shares, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Share awards placed into deferred
plans |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common share options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
Conversions and redemptions of
operating partnership units |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,780 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Common shares repurchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchase of noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(748 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Distributions to perpetual
preferred units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
Cash distributions to equity holders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,406 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,124 |
) |
|
|
(41,530 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
666 |
|
|
$ |
2,242,940 |
|
|
$ |
(345,481 |
) |
|
$ |
(291 |
) |
|
$ |
(462,751 |
) |
|
$ |
(48,716 |
) |
|
$ |
85,731 |
|
|
$ |
1,472,098 |
|
|
$ |
97,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
7
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,781 |
|
|
$ |
8,505 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization, including discontinued operations |
|
|
43,507 |
|
|
|
43,060 |
|
Distributions of income from joint ventures |
|
|
1,336 |
|
|
|
1,427 |
|
Equity in (income) loss of joint ventures |
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
(408 |
) |
Interest from notes receivable affiliates |
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
Share-based compensation |
|
|
3,130 |
|
|
|
2,160 |
|
Gain on early retirement of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(166 |
) |
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
817 |
|
Accretion of discount on unsecured notes payable |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
Net change in operating accounts |
|
|
(10,858 |
) |
|
|
(4,330 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from operating activities |
|
$ |
41,752 |
|
|
$ |
51,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development and capital improvements |
|
$ |
(11,063 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,620 |
) |
Payments received on notes receivable other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,710 |
|
Increase in notes receivable affiliates |
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Investments in joint ventures |
|
|
(281 |
) |
|
|
(310 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(176 |
) |
|
|
1,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from investing activities |
|
$ |
(11,695 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,059 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in unsecured line of credit and short-term borrowings |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
96,000 |
|
Repayment of notes payable |
|
|
(56,120 |
) |
|
|
(100,009 |
) |
Proceeds from notes payable |
|
|
1,761 |
|
|
|
4,116 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of common shares |
|
|
17,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to common shareholders, perpetual preferred units and
noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(33,155 |
) |
|
|
(43,155 |
) |
Common share options exercised |
|
|
894 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of deferred financing costs |
|
|
(343 |
) |
|
|
(465 |
) |
Net decrease in accounts receivable affiliates |
|
|
3,455 |
|
|
|
917 |
|
Other |
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from financing activities |
|
$ |
(65,660 |
) |
|
$ |
(42,263 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(35,603 |
) |
|
|
(151 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
64,156 |
|
|
|
7,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
28,553 |
|
|
$ |
7,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest, net of interest capitalized |
|
$ |
23,006 |
|
|
$ |
27,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions declared but not paid |
|
$ |
33,403 |
|
|
$ |
43,136 |
|
Value of shares issued under benefit plans, net of cancellations |
|
|
13,709 |
|
|
|
7,779 |
|
Conversion of operating partnership units to common shares |
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
1,756 |
|
Accrual associated with construction and capital expenditures |
|
|
2,261 |
|
|
|
2,863 |
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
8
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. Description of Business
Business. Formed on May 25, 1993, Camden Property Trust, a Texas real estate investment trust
(REIT), is engaged in the ownership, development, construction, and management of multifamily
apartment communities. Our multifamily apartment communities are referred to as communities,
multifamily communities, properties, or multifamily properties in the following discussion.
As of March 31, 2010, we owned interests in or operated 185 multifamily properties comprising
63,658 apartment homes across the United States. In addition, we own land parcels we may develop
into multifamily apartment communities.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Principles of Consolidation. Our condensed consolidated financial statements include our
accounts and the accounts of other subsidiaries and joint ventures (including partnerships and
limited liability companies) over which we have control. All intercompany transactions, balances,
and profits have been eliminated in consolidation. Investments acquired or created are continuously
evaluated based on the accounting guidance relating to variable interest entities (VIEs), which
requires the consolidation of VIEs in which we are considered to be the primary beneficiary. If the
investment is determined not to be a VIE, then the investment is evaluated for consolidation
(primarily using a voting interest model) under the remaining consolidation guidance relating to
real estate. If we are the general partner in a limited partnership, or manager of a limited
liability company, we also consider the consolidation guidance relating to the rights of limited
partners or non-managing members, as the case may be, to assess whether any rights held by the
limited partners or non-managing members, as the case may be, overcome the presumption of control
by us.
Interim Financial Reporting. We have prepared these financial statements in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim
financial statements and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC). Accordingly, these statements do not include all information and footnote
disclosures normally included for complete financial statements. While we believe the disclosures
presented are adequate for interim reporting, these interim financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes included in our 2009 Form 10-K. In the
opinion of management, all adjustments and eliminations, consisting of normal recurring
adjustments, necessary for a fair representation of our financial statements have been included.
Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the
results which may be expected for the full year.
Asset Impairment. Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment annually or whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Impairment exists if estimated future undiscounted cash flows associated with long-lived assets are
not sufficient to recover the carrying value of such assets. We consider projected future
discounted cash flows, trends, strategic decisions regarding future development plans, and other
factors in our assessment of whether impairment conditions exist. When impairment exists, the
long-lived asset is adjusted to its fair value. While we believe our estimates of future cash flows
are reasonable, different assumptions regarding a number of factors, including market rents,
economic conditions, and occupancies, could significantly affect these estimates. In estimating
fair value, management uses appraisals, management estimates, and discounted cash flow calculations
which maximize inputs from a marketplace participants perspective. In addition, we evaluate our
investments in joint ventures and mezzanine construction financing and if, with respect to
investments, we believe there is an other than temporary decline in market value, or if, with
respect to mezzanine loans, it is probable we will not collect all scheduled amounts due in
accordance with the terms, we will record an impairment charge based on these evaluations. In
general, we provide mezzanine loans to affiliated joint ventures constructing or operating
multifamily assets. While we believe it is currently probable we will collect all scheduled amounts
due with respect to these mezzanine loans, current market conditions related to credit markets and
real estate market fundamentals inject a significant amount of uncertainty into the environment and
any further adverse economic or market development may cause us to re-evaluate our conclusions, and
could result in material impairment charges with respect to our mezzanine loans.
9
The value of our properties under development depends on market conditions, including
estimates of the project start date as well as estimates of demand for multifamily communities. We
have reviewed market trends and other marketplace information and have incorporated this
information as well as our current outlook into the assumptions we use in our impairment analyses.
Due to, among other factors, the judgment and assumptions applied in the impairment analyses and
the fact limited market information regarding the value of comparable land exists at this time, it
is possible actual results could differ substantially from those estimated.
We believe the carrying value of our operating real estate assets, properties under
development, and land is currently recoverable. However, if market conditions deteriorate beyond
our current expectations or if changes in our development strategy significantly affect any key
assumptions used in our fair value calculations, we may need to take material charges in future
periods for impairments related to existing assets. Any such material non-cash charges would have
an adverse effect on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Cash and Cash Equivalents. All cash and investments in money market accounts and other highly
liquid securities with a maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase are considered to
be cash and cash equivalents. We maintain the majority of our cash and cash equivalents at major
financial institutions in the United States and deposits with these financial institutions may
exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits; however, we regularly monitor the
financial stability of these financial institutions and believe we are not exposed to any
significant default risk.
Cost Capitalization. Real estate assets are carried at cost plus capitalized carrying
charges. Carrying charges are primarily interest and real estate taxes which are capitalized as
part of properties under development. Capitalized interest is generally based on our weighted
average unsecured interest rate. Most transaction and restructuring costs associated with the
acquisition of real estate assets are expensed. Expenditures directly related to the development
and improvement of real estate assets are capitalized at cost as land and buildings and
improvements. Indirect development costs, including salaries and benefits and other related costs
directly attributable to the development of properties, are also capitalized. All construction and
carrying costs are capitalized and reported in the balance sheet as properties under development
until the apartment homes are substantially completed. Upon substantial completion of the apartment
homes, the total cost for the apartment homes and the associated land is transferred to buildings
and improvements and land, respectively.
As discussed above, carrying charges are principally interest and real estate taxes
capitalized as part of properties under development and buildings and improvements. Capitalized
interest was approximately $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010, and
approximately $2.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009. Capitalized real estate taxes
were approximately $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010, and approximately $0.6
million for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
Where possible, we stage our construction to allow leasing and occupancy during the
construction period, which we believe minimizes the duration of the lease-up period following
completion of construction. Our accounting policy related to properties in the development and
leasing phase is to expense all operating expenses associated with completed apartment homes. We
capitalize renovation and improvement costs we believe extend the economic lives of depreciable
property. Capital expenditures subsequent to initial construction are capitalized and depreciated
over their estimated useful lives.
Depreciation and amortization is computed over the expected useful lives of depreciable
property on a straight-line basis with lives generally as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Useful Life |
Buildings and improvements |
|
5-35 years |
Furniture, fixtures, equipment, and other |
|
3-20 years |
Intangible assets (in-place leases and above and below market leases) |
|
underlying lease term |
10
Derivative Financial Instruments. Derivative financial instruments are recorded in the
condensed consolidated balance sheet at fair value and we do not apply master netting for financial
reporting purposes. Accounting
for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether
we have elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting, and
whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria
necessary to apply hedge accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the
exposure to variability in expected future cash flows or other types of forecasted transactions are
cash flow hedges. Hedge accounting generally provides for the matching of the timing of gain or
loss recognition on the hedging instrument with the recognition of the changes attributable to the
earnings effect of the hedged transactions. We may enter into derivative contracts which are
intended to economically hedge certain of our risks, even though hedge accounting does not apply or
we elect not to apply hedge accounting.
Income Recognition. Our rental and other property revenue is recorded when due from residents
and is recognized monthly as it is earned. Other property revenue consists primarily of utility
rebillings and administrative, application, and other transactional fees charged to our residents.
Our apartment homes are rented to residents on lease terms generally ranging from six to fifteen
months, with monthly payments due in advance. All sources of income, including from interest and
fee and asset management income, are recognized as earned. Nine of our properties are subject to
rent control. Operations of multifamily properties acquired are recorded from the date of
acquisition in accordance with the acquisition method of accounting. In managements opinion, due
to the number of residents, the types and diversity of submarkets in which the properties operate,
and the collection terms, there is no significant concentration of credit risk.
Reportable Segments. Our multifamily communities are geographically diversified throughout
the United States, and management evaluates operating performance on an individual property level.
As each of our apartment communities has similar economic characteristics, residents, and products
and services, our apartment communities have been aggregated into one reportable segment. Our
multifamily communities generate rental revenue and other income through the leasing of apartment
homes, which comprised approximately 96.9% and 98.3% of our total property revenues and total
non-property income, excluding income (loss) on deferred compensation plans, for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Use of Estimates. In the application of GAAP, management is required to make estimates and
assumptions which affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements, results of operations during the reporting periods, and related disclosures.
Our more significant estimates include estimates supporting our impairment analysis related to the
carrying values of our real estate assets, estimates of the useful lives of our assets, estimates
related to the valuation of our investments in joint ventures and mezzanine financing, and
estimates of expected losses of potential variable interest entities. These estimates are based on
historical experience and other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.
Future events rarely develop exactly as forecasted, and the best estimates routinely require
adjustment.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements. In December 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-17,
Consolidations (Topic 810) Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with
Variable Interest Entities, which codified the previously issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46R. ASU 2009-17 changes the consolidation
analysis for VIEs and requires a qualitative analysis to determine the primary beneficiary of the
VIE. The determination of the primary beneficiary of a VIE is based on whether the entity has the
power to direct matters which most significantly impact the activities of the VIE and has the
obligation to absorb losses, or the right to receive benefits, of the VIE which could potentially
be significant to the VIE. The ASU requires an ongoing reconsideration of the primary beneficiary
and also amends the events triggering a reassessment of whether an entity is a VIE. ASU 2009-17
requires additional disclosures for VIEs, including disclosures about a reporting entitys
involvement with VIEs, how a reporting entitys involvement with a VIE affects the reporting
entitys financial statements, and significant judgments and assumptions made by the reporting
entity to determine whether it must consolidate the VIE. ASU 2009-17 was effective for us beginning
January 1, 2010. Our adoption of ASU 2009-17 did not have a material effect on our financial
statements.
3. Per Share Data
Basic earnings per share are computed using net income attributable to common shareholders and
the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share reflect common
shares issuable from the assumed conversion of common share options and share awards granted and
units convertible into common shares. Only those items having a dilutive impact on our basic
earnings per share are included in diluted earnings per share. Our unvested share-based payment
transactions are considered participating securities and are reflected in the calculation of basic
and diluted earnings per share using the two-class method. The number of common share equivalent
securities excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation for the three months ended
March 31,
2010, and 2009 was approximately 3.6 million and 4.8 million, respectively. These securities,
which include common share options and share awards granted and units convertible into common
shares, were excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation as they were determined to be
anti-dilutive.
11
The following table presents information necessary to calculate basic and diluted earnings per
share for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Basic earnings per share calculation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to common
shareholders |
|
$ |
2,285 |
|
|
$ |
5,559 |
|
Amount allocated to participating securities |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to common
shareholders, net of amount allocated to participating
securities |
|
$ |
2,245 |
|
|
$ |
5,483 |
|
Income from discontinued operations attributable to common
shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders, adjusted basic |
|
$ |
2,245 |
|
|
$ |
6,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to common
shareholders, as adjusted per share |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
Income from discontinued operations attributable to common
shareholders per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders, as adjusted
per share |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
66,475 |
|
|
|
55,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share calculation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to common
shareholders, net of amount allocated to participating
securities |
|
$ |
2,245 |
|
|
$ |
5,483 |
|
Income allocated to common units |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to common
shareholders, as adjusted |
|
|
2,293 |
|
|
|
5,488 |
|
Income from discontinued operations attributable to common
shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders, as adjusted |
|
$ |
2,293 |
|
|
$ |
6,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to common
shareholders, as adjusted per share |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
Income from discontinued operations attributable to common
shareholders per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders, as adjusted
per share |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
66,475 |
|
|
|
55,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incremental shares issuable from assumed conversion of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common share options and share awards granted |
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common units |
|
|
1,521 |
|
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding, as adjusted |
|
|
68,169 |
|
|
|
56,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
4. Common Shares
We currently have an automatic shelf registration statement on file with the SEC which allows
us to offer, from time to time, an unlimited amount of common shares, preferred shares, debt
securities, or warrants. Our declaration of trust provides we may issue up to 110 million shares of
beneficial interest, consisting of 100 million common shares and 10 million preferred shares. As of
March 31, 2010, we had approximately 65.0 million common shares outstanding, net of treasury shares
and shares held in our deferred compensation arrangements, and no preferred shares outstanding.
In March 2010, we announced the creation of an at-the-market (ATM) share offering program
through which we can sell common shares having an aggregate offering price of up to $250 million
from time to time into the existing trading market at current market prices as well as through
negotiated transactions. We may, but shall have no obligation to, sell common shares through the
ATM share offering program in amounts and at times as we determine. Actual sales will depend on a
variety of factors we determine from time to time, including, among others, market conditions, the
trading price of our common shares and determinations of the appropriate sources of funding for us.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we issued approximately 0.4 million shares at an
average price of $43.64 per share for total net consideration of approximately $17.2 million
through the ATM share offering program. In addition, during the second quarter of 2010 through May
7, 2010, we issued approximately 0.8 million common shares at an average price of $45.27 per share for
total net consideration of approximately $36.8 million. Cumulative to date, we have issued
approximately 1.2 million common shares at an average price of $44.74 for total net consideration
of approximately $54.0 million. As of May 7, 2010, we had common shares having an aggregate
offering price of up to $195.0 million remaining available for issuance under the ATM program.
5. Investments in Joint Ventures
As of March 31, 2010, our equity investments in unconsolidated joint ventures, which we
account for utilizing the equity method of accounting, consisted of 25 joint ventures, with our
ownership percentages ranging from 15% to 72%. We provide property management services to the
majority of these joint ventures which own operating properties and may provide construction and
development services to the joint ventures which own properties under development. The following
table summarizes aggregate balance sheet and statement of income data for the unconsolidated joint
ventures as of the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,191.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,202.0 |
|
Total third-party debt |
|
|
982.5 |
|
|
|
980.9 |
|
Total equity |
|
|
143.7 |
|
|
|
151.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
33.7 |
|
|
$ |
33.7 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
Equity in income (loss)(1) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Equity in income (loss) excludes our ownership interest of fee income from various
property management services with our joint ventures. |
The joint ventures in which we have an interest have been funded in part with secured,
third-party debt. We have guaranteed no more than our proportionate interest, totaling
approximately $60.8 million, of five loans utilized for construction and development activities for
our joint ventures. Additionally, we eliminate fee income from property management services
provided to these joint ventures to the extent of our ownership.
Mezzanine loans we have made to affiliate joint ventures are recorded as Notes receivable -
affiliates as discussed in Note 6, Notes Receivable.
13
We may earn fees for property management, construction, development, and other services
related to joint ventures in which we own an interest. Fees earned for these services amounted to
approximately $1.8 million and $2.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
On April 15, 2010, a $24.5 million secured third-party construction note of one of our joint
ventures located in Houston, Texas, originally scheduled to mature in April 2010, was contractually
extended to April 2011. Concurrent with the construction note extension, our $8.2 million mezzanine
loan to this joint venture was converted into an additional common equity interest in the amount of
$7.2 million (with a preference on distribution of cash flows) and the remaining $1.0 million was
converted into an additional equity interest in the joint venture.
6. Notes Receivable
Notes receivable affiliates. We provided mezzanine construction financing with rates
ranging from the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 3% to a fixed maximum rate of 12% per
year, in connection with certain of our joint venture transactions. As of March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, the balance of Notes receivable affiliates totaled approximately $46.1
million and $45.8 million, respectively, on notes maturing through 2019. We eliminate the interest
and other income to the extent of our percentage ownership in the joint ventures. We have reviewed
the terms and conditions underlying these notes receivable and believe these notes are collectible,
and no impairment existed at March 31, 2010.
At March 31, 2010, our commitment to fund additional amounts under the mezzanine loans was an
aggregate of approximately $7.1 million.
Notes receivable secured by common shares. At March 31, 2010, one note receivable was
outstanding and had a balance of $0.1 million, which was secured 100% by common shares and reported
as a component of equity in our condensed consolidated balance sheet.
7. Notes Payable
The following is a summary of our indebtedness:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Commercial Banks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured line of credit and short-term borrowings |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$500 million term loan, due 2012 |
|
|
500.0 |
|
|
|
500.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500.0 |
|
|
|
500.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior unsecured notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$250.0 million 4.39% Notes, due 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55.3 |
|
$100.0 million 6.75% Notes, due 2010 |
|
|
57.8 |
|
|
|
57.8 |
|
$150.0 million 7.69% Notes, due 2011 |
|
|
87.9 |
|
|
|
87.9 |
|
$200.0 million 5.93% Notes, due 2012 |
|
|
189.4 |
|
|
|
189.4 |
|
$200.0 million 5.45% Notes, due 2013 |
|
|
199.5 |
|
|
|
199.4 |
|
$250.0 million 5.08% Notes, due 2015 |
|
|
249.1 |
|
|
|
249.0 |
|
$300.0 million 5.75% Notes, due 2017 |
|
|
246.1 |
|
|
|
246.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,029.8 |
|
|
|
1,084.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medium-term notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$10.0 million 4.90% Notes, due 2010 |
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
$14.5 million 6.79% Notes, due 2010 |
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
$35.0 million 4.99% Notes, due 2011 |
|
|
36.1 |
|
|
|
36.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60.7 |
|
|
|
61.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unsecured notes payable |
|
|
1,590.5 |
|
|
|
1,645.9 |
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Secured notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.09% - 6.00% Conventional Mortgage Notes, due 2011 - 2019 |
|
|
939.0 |
|
|
|
937.8 |
|
1.70% Tax-exempt Mortgage Note due 2028 |
|
|
41.2 |
|
|
|
41.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
980.2 |
|
|
|
979.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total notes payable |
|
$ |
2,570.7 |
|
|
$ |
2,625.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate debt included in secured notes (1.09% - 1.68%) |
|
$ |
187.3 |
|
|
$ |
186.9 |
|
Floating rate tax-exempt debt included in secured notes (1.70%) |
|
|
41.2 |
|
|
|
41.5 |
|
We have a $600 million unsecured credit facility which matures in January 2011. The
scheduled interest rate spreads are subject to change as our credit ratings change. Advances under
the line of credit may be priced at the scheduled rates, or we may enter into bid rate loans with
participating banks at rates below the scheduled rates. These bid rate loans have terms of six
months or less and may not exceed the lesser of $300 million or the remaining amount available
under the line of credit. The line of credit is subject to customary financial covenants and
limitations, all of which we are in compliance.
Our line of credit provides us with the ability to issue up to $100 million in letters of
credit. While our issuance of letters of credit does not increase our borrowings outstanding under
our line of credit, it does reduce the amount available. At March 31, 2010, we had outstanding
letters of credit totaling approximately $10.4 million and approximately $589.6 million available
under our unsecured line of credit.
As an alternative to our unsecured line of credit, from time to time we borrow using
competitively bid unsecured short-term notes with lenders who may or may not be a part of the
unsecured line of credit bank group. Such borrowings vary in term and pricing and are typically
priced at interest rates below those available under the unsecured line of credit.
At March 31, 2010 and 2009, the weighted average interest rate on our floating rate debt,
which includes our unsecured line of credit, was 1.2% and 1.7%, respectively.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we repaid the remaining principal amount of our
$250 million, 4.39% senior unsecured notes which matured on January 15, 2010 for a total of
approximately $55.3 million.
Our indebtedness, including our unsecured line of credit, had a weighted average maturity of
5.5 years at March 31, 2010. Scheduled repayments on outstanding debt assuming all contractual
extensions, including our line of credit and scheduled principal amortizations, and the weighted
average interest rate on maturing debt at March 31, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
(in millions) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
85.3 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
2011 |
|
|
155.0 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
2012 |
|
|
761.9 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
2013 |
|
|
227.2 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
2014 |
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
2015 and thereafter |
|
|
1,331.2 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,570.7 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
8. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives. We are exposed to certain risks arising from
both our business operations and economic conditions. We principally manage our exposures to a
wide variety of business and operational risks through management of our core business activities.
We manage economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk primarily by managing
the amount, sources, and duration of our debt funding and the use of derivative financial
instruments. Specifically, we may enter into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures
arising from business activities resulting in differences in the amount, timing, and duration of
our known or expected cash payments principally related to our borrowings.
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk. Our objectives in using interest rate derivatives are
to add stability to interest expense and to manage our exposure to interest rate movements. To
accomplish this objective, we primarily use interest rate swaps and caps as part of our interest
rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps involve the receipt of variable rate amounts
from a counterparty in exchange for us making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements
without exchange of the underlying notional amount. Interest rate caps involve the receipt of
variable rate amounts from a counterparty if interest rates rise above the strike rate on the
contract in exchange for an up front premium.
Designated Hedges. The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives
designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income
or loss and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period the hedged forecasted
transaction affects earnings. Over the next twelve months, we estimate an additional $22.1 million
will be reclassified to interest expense. During the three months ending March 31, 2010 and 2009,
such derivatives were used to hedge the variable cash flows associated with existing variable rate
debt. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives, if any, is
recognized directly in earnings. No portion was ineffective during the three months ended March 31,
2010 and 2009.
As of March 31, 2010, we had the following outstanding interest rate derivatives designated as
cash flow hedges of interest rate risk:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Derivative |
|
Number of Instruments |
|
|
Notional Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
|
2 |
|
|
$516.3 million |
Non-designated Hedges. Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and are
used to manage our exposure to interest rate movements and other identified risks. Non-designated
hedges are either specifically non-designated by management or do not meet strict hedge accounting
requirements. Changes in the fair value of derivatives not designated in hedging relationships are
recorded directly in earnings in other income or other expense.
As of March 31, 2010, we had the following outstanding interest rate derivative which was not
designated as a hedge of interest rate risk:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Derivative |
|
Number of Instruments |
|
|
Notional Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Cap |
|
|
1 |
|
|
$175.0 million |
16
The table below presents the fair value of our derivative financial instruments as well
as their classification in the condensed consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 2010 and December
31, 2009 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Values of Derivative Instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Sheet |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Location |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Location |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Location |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Location |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
$ |
42.1 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
$ |
41.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Cap |
|
Other Assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
Other Assets |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tables below present the effect of our derivative financial instruments on the
condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009 (in millions):
Effect of Derivative Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Recognized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Income on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Loss |
|
|
Location of Loss |
|
|
Amount of Loss |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Other |
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
(Ineffective Portion |
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized |
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income |
|
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
|
and Amount |
|
|
in Income on Derivative (Ineffective |
|
Derivatives in Cash |
|
(OCI) on Derivative |
|
|
into Income |
|
|
into Income (Effective |
|
|
Excluded from |
|
|
Portion and Amount Excluded from |
|
Flow Hedging |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
(Effectiveness |
|
|
Portion) |
|
|
Effectiveness |
|
|
Effectiveness Testing) |
|
Relationships |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Portion) |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Testing) |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
|
Not applicable |
|
|
Not applicable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain |
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in |
|
Derivatives not designated as |
|
Recognized in Income on |
|
|
Income on Derivative |
|
hedging instruments |
|
Derivative |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Cap |
|
Other income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Credit-risk-related Contingent Features. Derivative financial investments expose us to
credit risk in the event of non-performance by the counterparties under the terms of the interest
rate hedge agreements. We believe we minimize our credit risk on these transactions by transacting
with major creditworthy financial institutions. As part of our on-going control procedures, we
monitor the credit ratings of counterparties and our exposure to any single entity, which we
believe minimizes credit risk concentration. We believe the likelihood of realized losses from
counterparty non-performance is remote.
Our agreements with each of our derivative counterparties contain provisions which provide the
counterparty the right to declare a default on our derivative obligations if we are in default on
any of our indebtedness, subject to certain thresholds. For all instances,
these provisions include a default even if there is no acceleration of the indebtedness. Our agreements with each of our derivative counterparties also
provide if we consolidate with, merge with or into, or transfer all or substantially all our assets
to another entity and the creditworthiness of the resulting, surviving, or transferee entity is
materially weaker than ours, the counterparty has the right to terminate the derivative
obligations.
At March 31, 2010, the fair value of derivatives in a net liability position, which includes
accrued interest but excludes any adjustment for nonperformance risk (the termination value),
related to these agreements was
approximately $44.5 million. As of March 31, 2010, we had not posted any collateral related
to these agreements. If we were in breach of any of these provisions at March 31, 2010, or
terminated these agreements, we would have been required to settle our obligations at their
termination value of approximately $44.5 million.
17
9. Share-based Compensation
Options. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, 0.1 million options were exercised at
prices ranging from $25.88 to $36.87 per option. The total intrinsic value of options exercised
was approximately $1.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010. There were no options
exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2009. As of March 31, 2010, there was
approximately $3.0 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested options,
which is expected to be amortized over the next four years.
The following table summarizes share options outstanding and exercisable at March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options (1) |
|
|
Exercisable Options (1) |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Contractual |
|
Range of Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Life |
|
Prices |
|
Number |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Price |
|
|
(Years) |
|
$30.06-$41.91 |
|
|
614,378 |
|
|
$ |
33.05 |
|
|
|
222,771 |
|
|
$ |
38.30 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
$42.90-$44.00 |
|
|
525,095 |
|
|
|
43.31 |
|
|
|
469,200 |
|
|
|
43.24 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
$45.53-$73.32 |
|
|
734,563 |
|
|
|
49.60 |
|
|
|
504,851 |
|
|
|
50.32 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total options |
|
|
1,874,036 |
|
|
$ |
42.41 |
|
|
|
1,196,822 |
|
|
$ |
45.31 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding options and exercisable options at March
31, 2010 was $5.3 million and $0.8 million, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic values
were calculated as the excess, if any, between our closing share price of $41.63 per share
on March 31, 2010 and the strike price of the underlying award. |
Valuation Assumptions. Options generally have a vesting period of three to five years.
We estimate the fair values of each option award on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model. The following assumptions were used for options granted during the three
months ended March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
Weighted average fair value of options granted |
|
$11.69 |
Expected volatility |
|
35.6% - 39.2% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
3.6% - 3.7% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
4.1% - 4.4% |
Expected life (in years) |
|
7.0 - 9.0 |
Our computation of expected volatility for 2010 is based on the historical volatility of our
common shares over a time period equal to the expected life of the option and ending on the grant
date. The interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the award is based on the U.S.
Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The expected dividend yield on our common
shares is estimated using the annual dividends paid in the prior year and the market price on the
date of grant. Our computation of expected life for 2010 is estimated based on historical
experience of similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms of the share-based
awards.
Share Awards and Vesting. Share awards generally have a vesting period of five years. The
compensation cost for share awards is based on the market value of the shares on the date of grant
and is amortized over the vesting period. To estimate forfeitures, we use actual forfeiture
history. At March 31, 2010, the unamortized value of previously issued unvested share awards was
approximately $29.8 million. The total fair value of shares vested during the three months ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $9.6 million and $9.1 million, respectively.
Total compensation cost for option and share awards charged against income was approximately
$3.1 million and $2.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Total capitalized compensation cost for option and share awards was approximately $0.5 million and
$0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
18
The following table summarizes activity under our Share Incentive Plans for the three months
ended March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Options / |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Share Awards |
|
|
Exercise / |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Grant Price |
|
Balance at January 1, 2010 |
|
|
4,826,757 |
|
|
$ |
39.00 |
|
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
55,895 |
|
|
|
43.94 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(127,639 |
) |
|
|
31.76 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(28,432 |
) |
|
|
47.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net options |
|
|
(100,176 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
350,958 |
|
|
|
39.46 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(1,911 |
) |
|
|
33.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net share awards |
|
|
349,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2010 |
|
|
5,075,628 |
|
|
$ |
40.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable options at March 31, 2010 |
|
|
1,196,822 |
|
|
$ |
45.31 |
|
Vested share awards at March 31, 2010 |
|
|
2,376,781 |
|
|
$ |
38.62 |
|
10. Net Change in Operating Accounts
The effect of changes in the operating accounts on cash flows from operating activities is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Decrease in assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets, net |
|
$ |
842 |
|
|
$ |
4,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(3,678 |
) |
|
|
(6,171 |
) |
Accrued real estate taxes |
|
|
(6,236 |
) |
|
|
(4,487 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
(1,786 |
) |
|
|
2,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in operating accounts |
|
$ |
(10,858 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,330 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation. We are subject to various legal proceedings and claims which arise in the
ordinary course of business. Matters which arise out of allegations of bodily injury, property
damage, and employment practices are generally covered by insurance. While the resolution of these
legal proceedings and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes the final
outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on our condensed consolidated
financial statements.
Other Contingencies. In the ordinary course of our business, we issue letters of intent
indicating a willingness to negotiate for acquisitions, dispositions, or joint ventures and also
enter into arrangements contemplating various transactions. Such letters of intent and other
arrangements are non-binding as to either party unless and until a definitive contract is entered
into by the parties. Even if definitive contracts relating to the purchase or sale of real
property are entered into, these contracts generally provide the purchaser with time to evaluate
the property and conduct due diligence, during which periods the purchaser will have the ability to
terminate the contracts without penalty or forfeiture of any deposit or earnest money. There can be
no assurance definitive contracts will be entered into with respect to any matter covered by
letters of intent or we will
consummate any transaction contemplated by any definitive contract. Furthermore, due
diligence periods for real property are frequently extended as needed. An acquisition or sale of
real property becomes probable at the time the due diligence period expires and the definitive
contract has not been terminated. We are then at risk under a real property acquisition contract,
but generally only to the extent of any earnest money deposits associated with the contract, and
are obligated to sell under a real property sales contract.
19
Lease Commitments. At March 31, 2010, we had long-term leases covering certain land, office
facilities, and equipment. Rental expense totaled approximately $0.8 million for each of the three
months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. Minimum annual rental commitments for the remainder of 2010
are $1.8 million, and for the years ending December 31, 2011 through 2014 are approximately $2.4
million, $2.0 million, $1.9 million, and $1.8 million, respectively, and $1.7 million in the
aggregate thereafter.
Investments in Joint Ventures. We have entered into, and may continue in the future to enter
into, joint ventures or partnerships (including limited liability companies) through which we own
an indirect economic interest in less than 100% of the community or communities owned directly by
the joint venture or partnership. Our decision whether to hold the entire interest in an apartment
community ourselves, or to have an indirect interest in the community through a joint venture or
partnership, is based on a variety of factors and considerations, including: (i) our projection, in
some circumstances, that we will achieve higher returns on our invested capital or reduce our risk
if a joint venture or partnership vehicle is used; (ii) our desire to diversify our portfolio of
communities by market; (iii) our desire at times to preserve our capital resources to maintain
liquidity or balance sheet strength; and (iv) the economic and tax terms required by a seller of
land or of a community, who may prefer or who may require less payment if the land or community is
contributed to a joint venture or partnership. Investments in joint ventures or partnerships are
not limited to a specified percentage of our assets. Each joint venture or partnership agreement is
individually negotiated, and our ability to operate and/or dispose of a community in our sole
discretion is limited to varying degrees in our existing joint venture agreements and may be
limited to varying degrees depending on the terms of future joint venture agreements.
12. Income Taxes
We have maintained and intend to maintain our election as a REIT under the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended. In order for us to continue to qualify as a REIT we must meet a number of
organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute annual dividends
to our shareholders equal to a minimum of 90% of our REIT taxable income, computed without regard
to the dividends paid deduction and our net capital gains. As a REIT, we generally will not be
subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at the corporate level to the extent such
income is distributed to our shareholders annually. If our taxable income exceeds our dividends in
a tax year, REIT tax rules allow us to designate dividends from the subsequent tax year in order to
avoid current taxation on undistributed income. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable
year, we will be subject to federal and state income taxes at regular corporate rates, including
any applicable alternative minimum tax. In addition, we may not be able to requalify as a REIT for
the four subsequent taxable years. Historically, we have incurred only state and local income,
franchise, and excise taxes. Taxable income from non-REIT activities managed through taxable REIT
subsidiaries is subject to applicable federal, state, and local income taxes. Our operating
partnerships are flow-through entities and are not subject to federal income taxes at the entity
level. We have provided for income, franchise, and state income taxes in the condensed
consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31,
2010 and 2009. These taxes are primarily for entity level taxes on certain ventures, state taxes,
and federal taxes on certain of our taxable REIT subsidiaries. We have no significant temporary
differences or tax credits associated with our taxable REIT subsidiaries.
We believe we have no uncertain tax positions or unrecognized tax benefits requiring
disclosure as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
13. Dispositions and Assets Held for Sale
Discontinued Operations and Assets Held for Sale. For the three months ended March 31, 2009,
income from discontinued operations included the results of operations of one operating property,
containing 671 apartment homes, classified as held for sale at March 31, 2009 and subsequently sold
in the second quarter of 2009. During the fourth quarter of 2009, we reclassified the undeveloped
land parcels previously included in discontinued operations to continuing operations as management
made the decision not to sell these assets. As a result, we
reclassified approximately $0.1 million of expenses which were previously included in income
from discontinued operations to total property expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of
income and comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
20
There was no income from discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
The following is a summary of income from discontinued operations for the three months ended March
31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
Property revenues |
|
$ |
1,197 |
|
Property expenses |
|
|
522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
675 |
|
|
|
|
|
There were no sales of operating properties during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
2009.
14. Fair Value Disclosures
For financial assets and liabilities fair valued on a recurring basis, fair value is the price
we would receive to sell an asset or pay to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction with a
market participant at the measurement date and, in the absence of such data, internal information
that is consistent with what market participants would use in a hypothetical transaction which
occurs at the transaction date is used to estimate fair value.
Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable
inputs reflect our market assumptions; preference is given to observable inputs. These two types
of inputs create the following fair value hierarchy:
|
|
|
Level 1: Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2: Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices
for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and
model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value
drivers are observable. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Significant inputs to the valuation model are unobservable. |
The following table presents information about our financial assets and liabilities measured
at fair value as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 under the fair value hierarchy discussed
above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
(in millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Balance |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
compensation plan
investments |
|
$ |
42.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
42.7 |
|
|
$ |
49.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
49.7 |
|
Derivative
financial
instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
financial
instruments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
42.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
42.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
41.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
41.1 |
|
Deferred compensation plan investments. The estimated fair values of investment
securities classified as deferred compensation plan investments are included in Level 1 and are
based on quoted market prices utilizing public information for the same transactions or information
provided through third-party advisors. Our deferred compensation plan investments are recorded in
other assets in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. The
balance at March 31, 2010 also reflects approximately $11.1 million of participant withdrawals
from our deferred compensation plan investments during the quarter.
21
Derivative financial instruments. The estimated fair values of derivative financial
instruments are included in Level 2 and are valued using widely accepted valuation techniques
including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This
analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and
uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and volatility. The fair
values of interest rate swaps and caps are estimated using the market standard methodology of
netting the discounted fixed cash payments and the discounted expected variable cash receipts. The
variable cash receipts are based on an expectation of interest rates (forward curves) derived from
observable market interest rate curves. In addition, credit valuation adjustments, which consider
the impact of any credit enhancements to the contracts, are incorporated in the fair values to
account for potential nonperformance risk, both our own nonperformance risk and the respective
counterpartys nonperformance risk. The fair value of interest rate caps are determined using the
market standard methodology of discounting the future expected cash receipts which would occur if
variable interest rates rise above the strike rate of the caps. The variable interest rates used
in the calculation of projected receipts on the cap are based on an expectation of future interest
rates derived from observed market interest rate curves and volatilities.
Although we have determined the majority of the inputs used to value our derivatives fall
within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with our
derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads, to evaluate the
likelihood of default by us and our counterparties. However, as of March 31, 2010, we have
assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall
valuation of our derivative positions and have determined the credit valuation adjustments are not
significant to the overall valuation of our derivatives. As a result, we have determined our
derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Other Fair Value Disclosures. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the carrying value
of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued
expenses and other liabilities, and distributions payable approximated their fair value based on
the short-term nature of these instruments.
In calculating the fair value of our notes receivable and notes payable, interest rates and
spreads reflect current creditworthiness and market conditions available for the issuance of notes
receivable and notes payable with similar terms and remaining maturities. In instances where market
conditions are not available, we follow the guidance of the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
Topic of the Codification to estimate fair value in a non-active market. The following table
presents the carrying and estimated fair value of our notes receivable and notes payable at March
31, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Estimated |
|
(in millions) |
|
Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes receivable affiliates |
|
$ |
46.1 |
|
|
$ |
46.1 |
|
|
$ |
45.8 |
|
|
$ |
46.1 |
|
Fixed rate notes payable (1) |
|
|
2,342.2 |
|
|
|
2,378.2 |
|
|
|
2,396.8 |
|
|
|
2,380.9 |
|
Floating rate notes payable |
|
|
228.5 |
|
|
|
189.7 |
|
|
|
228.4 |
|
|
|
189.4 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes a $500 million term loan entered into in 2007 and $16.3
million of a construction loan entered into in 2008 which are
effectively fixed by the use of interest rate swaps. |
Nonrecurring Fair Value Disclosures. Nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities
measured on a nonrecurring basis primarily relate to impairment of long-lived assets or
investments. There were no events during the three months ended March 31, 2010 which required fair
value adjustments of our nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities.
22
15. Noncontrolling Interests
The following table summarizes the effect of changes in our ownership interest in subsidiaries
on the equity attributable to us for the three months ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
2,285 |
|
|
$ |
6,234 |
|
Transfers from the noncontrolling interests: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in equity for conversion of operating partnership units |
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
1,763 |
|
Increase in equity from purchase of noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in common shareholders equity and net transfers
from noncontrolling interests |
|
$ |
3,435 |
|
|
$ |
8,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated
financial statements and notes appearing elsewhere in this report, as well as Part I, Item 1A,
Risk Factors within our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Historical results and trends which might appear in the condensed consolidated financial statements
should not be interpreted as being indicative of future operations.
We consider portions of this report to be forward-looking within the meaning of Section 27A
of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, both as
amended, with respect to our expectations for future periods. Forward-looking statements do not
discuss historical fact, but instead include statements related to expectations, projections,
intentions, or other items relating to the future; forward-looking statements are not guarantees of
future performance, results, or events. Although we believe the expectations reflected in our
forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance our
expectations will be achieved. Any statements contained herein which are not statements of
historical fact should be considered forward-looking statements. Reliance should not be placed on
these forward-looking statements as they are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and
other factors beyond our control and could differ materially from our actual results and
performance.
Factors which may cause our actual results or performance to differ materially from those
contemplated by forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following:
|
|
|
volatility in capital and credit markets could adversely impact us; |
|
|
|
|
we could be negatively impacted by the condition of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac; |
|
|
|
|
unfavorable changes in economic conditions could adversely impact occupancy or rental
rates; |
|
|
|
|
short-term leases expose us to the effects of declining market rents; |
|
|
|
|
we face risks associated with land holdings and related activities; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties of selling real estate could limit our flexibility; |
|
|
|
|
compliance or failure to comply with laws requiring access to our properties by disabled
persons could result in substantial cost; |
|
|
|
|
competition could limit our ability to lease apartments or increase or maintain rental
income; |
|
|
|
|
development and construction risks could impact our profitability; |
|
|
|
|
our acquisition strategy may not produce the cash flows expected; |
|
|
|
|
competition could adversely affect our ability to acquire properties; |
|
|
|
|
losses from catastrophes may exceed our insurance coverage; |
|
|
|
|
investments through joint ventures involve risks not present in investments in which we
are the sole investor; |
|
|
|
|
we face risks associated with investments in and management of discretionary funds; |
|
|
|
|
we depend on our key personnel; |
|
|
|
|
changes in laws and litigation risks could affect our business; |
|
|
|
|
tax matters, including failure to qualify as a REIT, could have adverse consequences; |
|
|
|
|
insufficient cash flows could limit our ability to make required payments for debt
obligations or pay distributions to shareholders; |
|
|
|
|
we have significant debt, which could have important adverse consequences; |
|
|
|
|
we may be unable to renew, repay, or refinance our outstanding debt; |
|
|
|
|
variable rate debt is subject to interest rate risk; |
|
|
|
|
we may incur losses on interest rate hedging arrangements; |
|
|
|
|
issuances of additional debt may adversely impact our financial condition; |
|
|
|
|
failure to maintain current credit ratings could adversely affect our cost of funds,
related margins, liquidity, and access to capital markets; |
|
|
|
|
share ownership limits and our ability to issue additional equity securities may prevent
takeovers beneficial to shareholders; |
|
|
|
|
our share price will fluctuate; and |
|
|
|
|
we may reduce dividends on our equity securities. |
These forward-looking statements represent our estimates and assumptions as of the date of
this report, and
we assume no obligation to update or supplement forward-looking statements because of
subsequent events.
24
Unless the context requires otherwise, Camden, we, our, us, and the Company refer to
Camden Property Trust and Camdens consolidated subsidiaries and partnerships, collectively.
Executive Summary
During 2008 and 2009, a number of factors adversely affecting the demand for and rents
received by our multifamily communities were intense and pervasive across the United States, and
the conditions within the multifamily industry remain challenging. A prolonged recession, high
inventory levels of single-family homes and condominiums in the markets in which we operate,
overall weak consumer confidence, and high unemployment, among other factors, have persisted into
2010. We believe the effects of these factors on the multifamily industry have been further
magnified by high levels of home foreclosures, liquidity disruptions in the financial markets,
continued job losses, and lack of job growth. Our average apartment lease term is approximately
twelve months, and we believe the impact of an economic downturn affects us quickly due to the
short-term nature of our leases because our rental revenues are impacted by declines in market
rents more quickly than if our leases were for longer terms.
Based on these market conditions and our belief these conditions will continue in the near
future, we continue to be cautious regarding expected performance and expect a decline in property
revenues during 2010 as compared to 2009. However, positive impacts on our performance may result
from the continued expansion of the U. S. population, reductions in the U.S. home ownership rate,
more stringent lending criteria for prospective home-buyers, and long-term growth prospects for
population, employment, and household formations in our markets, although there can be no assurance
any of these factors will develop, continue or positively impact our operating results. We have
noted a recent improvement in some of our market conditions and while this may be a positive sign,
we are uncertain if this level of activity will increase or continue.
During the near term, we plan to continue to primarily focus on strengthening our capital and
liquidity position by generating positive cash flows from operations, reducing outstanding debt and
leverage ratios, and controlling and reducing overhead costs.
We review our long-lived assets for impairment on an annual basis or whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Our
impairment evaluations take into consideration the current and anticipated economic climate. Based
on our evaluations, we recorded significant impairment charges in the fourth quarter of 2009 for
land holdings for eight future projects and a land development joint venture we have put on hold
for the foreseeable future. We currently have five wholly-owned land parcels held for future
development we plan to develop, but the commencement of future developments may continue to be
impacted by macroeconomic issues, multifamily market conditions, and other factors. We will
continue to evaluate future development starts based on market, economic and capital market
conditions. However, if current conditions persist, there can be no assurance we will not have
further impairments in the future.
Subject to market conditions, we intend to continue to look for opportunities to acquire
existing communities through our investment in and management of our discretionary investment funds
(the Funds). Until the earlier of (i) December 31, 2011 or (ii) such time as 90% of their
committed capital is invested, subject to two one-year extensions, the Funds will be our exclusive
investment vehicles for acquiring fully developed multifamily properties, subject to certain
exceptions.
During the remainder of 2010, approximately $85.3 million of debt maturities, including
scheduled principal amortizations, are scheduled to mature. We intend to meet our long-term
liquidity requirements through cash flows generated from operations, draws on our unsecured credit
facility, proceeds from property dispositions and secured mortgage notes, and the use of debt and
equity offerings under our automatic shelf registration statement, including under our ATM share
offering program.
Despite the challenging conditions noted above, we believe we are well-positioned with a
strong balance sheet and sufficient liquidity to cover debt maturities and potential new
development funding requirements in the short-term. We believe this should allow us to take
advantage of investment opportunities in the future if and when they arise. Our properties are
geographically diverse and were 93% occupied as of March 31, 2010, little new multifamily rental
supply has been added to our markets, and the long-term growth prospects are positive. When
economic conditions improve, we believe the short-term nature of our leases and the limited
supply of new rental housing constructed should enhance our ability to realize revenue growth and
improvement in our operating results. There can, however, be no assurance any of these factors
will develop or positively impact us.
25
Property Portfolio
Our multifamily property portfolio, excluding land and joint venture properties which we do
not manage, is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Apartment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apartment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homes |
|
|
Properties |
|
|
Homes |
|
|
Properties |
|
Operating Properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Las Vegas, Nevada |
|
|
8,016 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
8,016 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Houston, Texas |
|
|
6,661 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
6,289 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Dallas, Texas |
|
|
6,119 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
6,119 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Washington, D.C. Metro |
|
|
6,068 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
6,068 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Tampa, Florida |
|
|
5,503 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
5,503 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Charlotte, North Carolina |
|
|
3,574 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
3,574 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Orlando, Florida |
|
|
3,557 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
3,557 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Atlanta, Georgia |
|
|
3,202 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
3,202 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Raleigh, North Carolina |
|
|
2,704 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2,704 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Southeast Florida |
|
|
2,520 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2,520 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Los Angeles/Orange County, California |
|
|
2,481 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2,481 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Austin, Texas |
|
|
2,454 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
2,454 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Phoenix, Arizona |
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Denver, Colorado |
|
|
2,171 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2,171 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
San Diego/Inland Empire, California |
|
|
1,196 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1,196 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,999 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
4,999 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Properties |
|
|
63,658 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
63,286 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Properties Under Development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston, Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Properties |
|
|
63,658 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
63,658 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Joint Venture Properties (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Las Vegas, Nevada |
|
|
4,047 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
4,047 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Houston, Texas (2) |
|
|
2,199 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2,199 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Phoenix, Arizona |
|
|
992 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
992 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Los Angeles/Orange County, California |
|
|
711 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
711 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Austin, Texas |
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Washington, D.C. Metro |
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Dallas, Texas |
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Denver, Colorado |
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,237 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
3,237 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Joint Venture Properties |
|
|
13,071 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
13,071 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Properties Owned 100% |
|
|
50,587 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
50,587 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Refer to Note 5, Investments in Joint Ventures in the notes to condensed consolidated
financial statements for further discussion of our joint venture investments. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes Camden Travis Street, a fully-consolidated joint venture, of which we retain a 25%
ownership. |
26
Stabilized Communities
We generally consider a property stabilized once it reaches 90% occupancy at the beginning of
a period. None of our recently completed properties reached stabilization during the three months
ended March 31, 2010.
Discontinued Operations and Assets Held for Sale
We intend to maintain a long-term strategy of managing our invested capital through the
selective sale of properties and expect to utilize the proceeds to reduce our outstanding debt and
leverage ratios and fund investments with higher anticipated growth prospects in our markets.
Income from discontinued operations includes the operations of properties, including land, sold
during the period or classified as held for sale as of March 31, 2009. There was no income from
discontinued operations during the three months ended March 31, 2010. The components of earnings
classified as discontinued operations include separately identifiable property-specific revenues,
expenses, depreciation, and interest expense. Any gain or loss on the disposal of the properties
held for sale, if any, is also classified as discontinued operations. As of March 31, 2009, we
had one operating property classified as held for sale, Camden West Oaks, a 671-unit community
built in 1982 located in Houston, Texas; this property was subsequently sold in the second quarter
of 2009.
During the fourth quarter of 2009, we reclassified two undeveloped land parcels previously
included in discontinued operations to continuing operations as management made the decision not to
sell these assets. As a result, we reclassified approximately $0.1 million of expenses which were
previously included in income from discontinued operations to total property expenses in the
condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the three months ended
March 31, 2009.
Development and Lease-Up Properties
At March 31, 2010, we had two completed consolidated properties in lease-up as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of |
|
|
Estimated |
|
($ in millions) |
|
Apartment |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
% Leased at |
|
|
Construction |
|
|
Date of |
|
Property and Location |
|
Homes |
|
|
Incurred |
|
|
5/2/10 |
|
|
Completion |
|
|
Stabilization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Camden Dulles Station |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oak Hill, VA |
|
|
366 |
|
|
$ |
72.3 |
|
|
|
95 |
% |
|
|
1Q09 |
|
|
|
2Q10 |
|
Camden Travis Street |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston, TX (1) |
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
30.5 |
|
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
1Q10 |
|
|
|
1Q11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
619 |
|
|
$ |
102.8 |
|
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Camden Travis Street is owned in a fully-consolidated joint venture, of which we retain a
25% ownership. |
Our condensed consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2010 included approximately $196.4
million related to properties under development and land, comprised of approximately $91.7 million
invested in land for projects we plan to develop, and approximately $104.7 million invested in land
tracts for which future development activities have been put on hold for the foreseeable future.
27
At March 31, 2010, we had investments in non-consolidated joint ventures which were developing
the following multifamily communities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Total |
|
|
% Leased |
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Apartment |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
at |
|
Property and Location |
|
Ownership % |
|
|
Homes |
|
|
Incurred |
|
|
5/2/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completed Communities (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Camden Amber Oaks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Austin, TX |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
348 |
|
|
$ |
35.3 |
|
|
|
89 |
% |
Braeswood Place |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston, TX |
|
|
72 |
% |
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
50.3 |
|
|
|
70 |
% |
Belle Meade |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston, TX |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
37.0 |
|
|
|
54 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Completed Communities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
807 |
|
|
$ |
122.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Acres |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Development (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lakes at 610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston, TX |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Town Lake (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Austin, TX |
|
|
72 |
% |
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
|
41.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Development Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.0 |
|
|
$ |
48.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Properties in lease-up as of March 31, 2010. |
|
(2) |
|
Properties in pre-development by joint venture partner. |
|
(3) |
|
We have discontinued development activities on this project as of December 31, 2009. |
Refer to Note 5, Investments in Joint Ventures in the notes to condensed consolidated
financial statements for further discussion of our joint venture investments.
Results of Operations
Changes in revenues and expenses related to our operating properties from period to period are
due primarily to the performance of stabilized properties in the portfolio, the lease-up of newly
constructed properties, acquisitions, and dispositions. Where appropriate, comparisons of income
and expense on communities included in continuing operations are made on a dollars-per-weighted
average apartment home basis in order to adjust for such changes in the number of apartment homes
owned during each period. Selected weighted averages for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Average monthly property revenue per apartment home |
|
$ |
1,003 |
|
|
$ |
1,047 |
|
Annualized total property expenses per apartment home |
|
$ |
4,987 |
|
|
$ |
4,871 |
|
Weighted average number of operating apartment homes owned 100% |
|
|
50,578 |
|
|
|
50,017 |
|
Weighted average occupancy of operating apartment homes owned 100% |
|
|
93.1 |
% |
|
|
93.8 |
% |
28
Property-level operating results
The following tables present the property-level revenues and property-level expenses,
excluding discontinued operations, for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the
same period in 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apartment |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homes At |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
Change |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
3/31/10 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Property revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same store communities |
|
|
47,359 |
|
|
$ |
140,015 |
|
|
$ |
147,097 |
|
|
$ |
(7,082 |
) |
|
|
(4.8 |
)% |
Non-same store communities |
|
|
2,862 |
|
|
|
9,312 |
|
|
|
7,894 |
|
|
|
1,418 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
Development and lease-up communities |
|
|
619 |
|
|
|
1,668 |
|
|
|
843 |
|
|
|
825 |
|
|
|
97.9 |
|
Dispositions/other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,211 |
|
|
|
1,198 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property revenues |
|
|
50,840 |
|
|
$ |
152,206 |
|
|
$ |
157,032 |
|
|
$ |
(4,826 |
) |
|
|
(3.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same store communities |
|
|
47,359 |
|
|
$ |
57,430 |
|
|
$ |
56,284 |
|
|
$ |
1,146 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
Non-same store communities |
|
|
2,862 |
|
|
|
3,541 |
|
|
|
3,278 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
Development and lease-up communities |
|
|
619 |
|
|
|
869 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
107.4 |
|
Dispositions/other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,218 |
|
|
|
924 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
31.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property expenses |
|
|
50,840 |
|
|
$ |
63,058 |
|
|
$ |
60,905 |
|
|
$ |
2,153 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same store communities are communities we owned and were stabilized as of January 1, 2009. Non-same
store communities are stabilized communities we have acquired, developed or re-developed after
January 1, 2009. Development and lease-up communities are non-stabilized communities we have
acquired or developed after January 1, 2009.
Same store analysis
Same store property revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2010 decreased $7.1 million,
or 4.8%, from the same period in 2009. Same store rental revenues decreased $7.3 million due to a
slight decline in average occupancy and a 5.5% decline in average rental rates for our same store
portfolio due to, among other factors, the challenges within the multifamily industry as discussed
in the Executive Summary. The decrease was partially offset by a $0.2 million increase in other
property revenue primarily due to other utility rebilling programs and offset by decreases in
miscellaneous income.
Property expenses from our same store communities increased $1.1 million, or 2.0%, for the
three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. The increases in same
store property expenses were primarily due to increases in expenses for our utility rebilling
programs, repairs and maintenance, and higher property insurance costs. These increases were
partially offset by lower real estate taxes as a result of declining rates and valuations at a
number of our communities and a slight decline in compensation costs primarily due to lower
incentive payments. Excluding the expenses associated with our utility rebilling programs, same
store property expenses for this period increased approximately $0.6 million, or 1.1%.
Non-same store analysis
Property revenues from non-same store and development and lease-up communities increased $2.2
million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. The
increases during the period were primarily due to five properties in our re-development and
development pipelines reaching stabilization during 2009. The increases were also due to the
completion and lease up of the remaining consolidated properties included in our development
pipeline during the three months ended March 31, 2010. See Development and Lease-Up Properties
above for additional detail of occupancy at properties in our development pipeline.
Property expenses from non-same store and development and lease-up communities increased $0.7
million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. The
increases during the period were primarily due to five properties in our re-development and
development pipelines reaching stabilization during 2009 and the completion and lease-up of the
remaining properties in our re-development and development pipelines during the three months ended
March 31, 2010.
29
Dispositions/other property analysis
Disposition/other property revenues related primarily to other non-multifamily rental
properties for each of the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
Dispositions/other property expenses increased $0.3 million for the three months ended March
31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. The increase was primarily related to increases
in property taxes expensed on land holdings for eight projects for which we decided in 2009 to
postpone development for the foreseeable future. As a result we ceased capitalization of expenses,
including property taxes.
Non-property income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Change |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Fee and asset management |
|
$ |
1,838 |
|
|
$ |
2,031 |
|
|
$ |
(193 |
) |
|
|
(9.5 |
)% |
Interest and other income |
|
|
3,045 |
|
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
2,310 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Income (loss) on deferred
compensation plans |
|
|
3,482 |
|
|
|
(4,152 |
) |
|
|
7,634 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-property income (loss) |
|
$ |
8,365 |
|
|
$ |
(1,386 |
) |
|
$ |
9,751 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Not a meaningful percentage |
Fee and asset management income decreased $0.2 million for the three months ended March
31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. The decrease was primarily related to declines in
development and construction fees earned on our development joint ventures in 2010 as compared to
2009 due to the completion of construction activities at several joint venture communities in 2009
and 2010. The decrease was also the result of lower fees earned on our stabilized joint ventures
due to declines in rental income during the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the
same period in 2009.
Interest and other income increased $2.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as
compared to the same period in 2009. The increase was primarily due to recognition of
approximately $2.7 million of other income relating to indemnification provisions in an operating
joint venture agreement which expired in January 2010. The increase in other income was partially
offset by a $0.3 million decrease in interest income primarily due to declines in interest income
on our mezzanine loan portfolio related to contractual reductions in interest rates on mezzanine
loans for development communities which have reached stabilization, reductions in interest earned
on certain variable rate mezzanine notes due to declines in LIBOR, and lower balances of
outstanding mezzanine loans.
Income on deferred compensation plans increased $7.6 million for the three months ended March
31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. This increase was related to the performance of
the investments held in deferred compensation plans for participants and was directly offset by the
expense related to these plans, as discussed below.
Other expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Change |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Property management |
|
$ |
5,183 |
|
|
$ |
4,929 |
|
|
$ |
254 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
Fee and asset management |
|
|
1,194 |
|
|
|
1,135 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
7,404 |
|
|
|
8,232 |
|
|
|
(828 |
) |
|
|
(10.0 |
) |
Interest |
|
|
31,555 |
|
|
|
32,245 |
|
|
|
(690 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
43,813 |
|
|
|
43,980 |
|
|
|
(167 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
817 |
|
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
(11.1 |
) |
Expense (benefit) on deferred
compensation plans |
|
|
3,482 |
|
|
|
(4,152 |
) |
|
|
7,634 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expenses |
|
$ |
93,357 |
|
|
$ |
87,186 |
|
|
$ |
6,171 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Not a meaningful percentage |
30
Property management expense, which represents regional supervision and accounting costs
related to property operations, increased approximately $0.3 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. The increase in 2010 was due to an increase
in salary and benefit expenses partially offset by a decrease in other discretionary expenses due
to various cost-saving measures.
Fee and asset management expense, which represents expenses related to third-party
construction projects and property management, increased approximately $0.1 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. This increase was primarily
due to an increase in legal expenses.
General and administrative expense decreased $0.8 million for the three months ended March 31,
2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. This decrease was primarily due to $1.0 million in
severance payments made in connection with the reduction in force of our construction and
development staff in January 2009 and a decrease in other discretionary expenses during the three
months ended March 31, 2010 due to various cost-saving measures. These decreases were partially
offset by an increase in salary and benefit expenses, including long-term incentive compensation,
during the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to 2009. General and administrative
expenses were 4.7% and 5.2% of total property revenues and non-property income, excluding income
(loss) on deferred compensation plans, for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2010 decreased approximately $0.7
million as compared to the same period in 2009. The decrease was primarily due to decreases in
indebtedness as a result of early retirement of outstanding debt of approximately $325.0 million
during the first six months of 2009 and payments of maturing secured and unsecured notes payable
during 2009 and 2010. Additionally, interest expense was lower during the first quarter of 2010
due to the reduction of balances outstanding on our unsecured line of credit as compared to the
same period in 2009. The early retirement of outstanding debt and reductions to the balances
outstanding on our line of credit in part resulted from approximately $272.1 million of net
proceeds received from the completion of our equity offering during the second quarter of 2009.
The decreases discussed above were partially offset by the increased interest expense incurred on
our $420 million credit facility entered into during the second quarter of 2009. The decreases
were further offset due to lower capitalized interest of approximately $1.1 million during the
first quarter 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009 as a result of the completion of units in
our development pipeline and our decision in fiscal year 2009 to postpone the development of land
holdings for eight future projects for the foreseeable future.
Depreciation and amortization decreased $0.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010
as compared to the same period in 2009 due to an increase in assets being fully depreciated in
2010, offset by new development and capital improvements placed in service during 2009.
Amortization of deferred financing costs decreased approximately $0.1 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. This decrease was primarily
due to the repurchase and retirement of certain series of notes during 2009, partially offset by
additional financing costs incurred on our $420 million credit facility entered into in the second
quarter of 2009.
Expense on deferred compensation plans increased $7.6 million during the three months ended
March 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. This increase was related to the
performance of the investments held in deferred compensation plans for participants and was
directly offset by the income related to these plans, as discussed above.
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
Change |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Gain on early retirement of debt
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
166 |
|
|
$ |
(166 |
) |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Equity in income (loss) of joint ventures |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
(513 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
Income tax expense current |
|
|
(270 |
) |
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
(9.7 |
) |
|
|
|
* |
|
Not a meaningful percentage |
31
Equity in income (loss) of joint ventures decreased $0.5 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. The decrease was primarily the result
of declining earnings by our stabilized operating joint ventures due to declines in rental income,
offset by increases resulting from certain of our developments held by joint ventures reaching or
nearing stabilization in late 2009 and early 2010.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, we incurred entity-level taxes for our
operating partnership and other state and local taxes totaling $0.3 million. The slight decrease
during the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009 was due to
lower state taxes resulting from lower revenues.
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
Change |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Income (loss)
allocated to
noncontrolling
interests from
continuing
operations |
|
$ |
(254 |
) |
|
$ |
521 |
|
|
$ |
(775 |
) |
|
|
(148.8 |
%) |
Income allocated to
perpetual preferred
units |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) allocated to noncontrolling interests from continuing operations decreased
$0.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. The
decrease was primarily due to the completion and lease-up of a property within a fully-consolidated
joint venture during the three months ended March 31, 2010, of which we retain a 25% ownership.
Funds from Operations (FFO)
Management considers FFO to be an appropriate measure of the financial performance of an
equity REIT. The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) currently
defines FFO as net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses)
associated with the sale of previously depreciated operating properties, real estate depreciation
and amortization, and adjustments for unconsolidated joint ventures. Our calculation of diluted
FFO also assumes conversion of all potentially dilutive securities, including certain
noncontrolling interests, which are convertible into common shares. We consider FFO to be an
appropriate supplemental measure of operating performance because, by excluding gains or losses on
dispositions of operating properties and depreciation, FFO can help one compare the operating
performance of a companys real estate between periods or as compared to different companies.
To facilitate a clear understanding of our consolidated historical operating results, we
believe FFO should be examined in conjunction with net income attributable to common shareholders
as presented in the condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income and data
included elsewhere in this report. FFO is not defined by GAAP and should not be considered as an
alternative to net income attributable to common shareholders as an indication of our operating
performance. Additionally, FFO as disclosed by other REITs may not be comparable to our
calculation.
32
Reconciliations of net income attributable to common shareholders to diluted FFO for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Funds from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
2,285 |
|
|
$ |
6,234 |
|
Real estate depreciation and amortization,
including discontinued operations |
|
|
42,639 |
|
|
|
43,010 |
|
Adjustments for unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
2,163 |
|
|
|
1,916 |
|
Income (loss) allocated to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations diluted |
|
$ |
46,982 |
|
|
$ |
51,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares basic |
|
|
66,475 |
|
|
|
55,552 |
|
Incremental shares issuable from assumed conversion of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common share options and awards granted |
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common units |
|
|
2,647 |
|
|
|
2,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares diluted |
|
|
69,295 |
|
|
|
58,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Financial Condition and Sources of Liquidity
We intend to maintain a strong balance sheet and preserve our financial flexibility, which we
believe should enhance our ability to identify and capitalize on investment opportunities as they
become available. We intend to maintain what management believes is a conservative capital
structure by:
|
|
|
extending and sequencing the maturity dates of our debt where practicable; |
|
|
|
|
managing interest rate exposure using what management believes to be prudent levels
of fixed and floating rate debt; |
|
|
|
|
maintaining what management believes to be conservative coverage ratios; and |
|
|
|
|
using what management believes to be a prudent combination of debt and common and
preferred equity. |
Our interest expense coverage ratio, net of capitalized interest, was 2.5 and 2.6 times for
the three months ended March 31, 2010, and 2009, respectively. Our interest expense coverage ratio
is calculated by dividing interest expense for the period into the sum of property revenues and
expenses, non-property income, other expenses, income from discontinued operations, depreciation,
amortization, and interest expense. This ratio is a method for calculating the amount of operating
cash flows available to cover interest expense. At March 31, 2010 and 2009, 72.8% and 79.9%,
respectively, of our properties (based on invested capital) were unencumbered. Our weighted
average maturity of debt, including our line of credit, was 5.5 years at March 31, 2010.
Due to the instability experienced during the challenging economic environment, we believe the
strength of an economic recovery is unclear and these conditions may not improve quickly. We plan
to continue to primarily focus on strengthening our capital and liquidity position by generating
positive cash flows from operations, reducing outstanding debt and leverage ratios, and controlling
and reducing construction and overhead costs.
Our primary source of liquidity is cash flow generated from operations. Other sources include
the availability under our unsecured credit facility and other short-term borrowings, secured
mortgage debt, proceeds from dispositions of properties and other investments, and access to the
capital markets including our ATM share offering program. We believe our liquidity and financial
condition are sufficient to meet all of our reasonably anticipated cash flow needs during 2010
including:
|
|
|
normal recurring operating expenses; |
|
|
|
|
current debt service requirements; |
|
|
|
|
recurring capital expenditures; |
33
|
|
|
initial funding of property developments, acquisitions, joint venture investments,
and notes receivable; and |
|
|
|
|
the minimum dividend payments required to maintain our REIT qualification under the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986. |
Factors which could increase or decrease our future liquidity include, but are not limited to,
current volatility in capital and credit markets, sources of financing, our ability to complete
asset sales, the effect our debt level and decreases in credit ratings could have on our costs of
funds and our ability to access capital markets, and changes in operating costs resulting from a
weakened economy, all of which could adversely impact occupancy and rental rates and our liquidity.
Cash Flows
Certain sources and uses of cash, such as the level of discretionary capital expenditures,
repurchases of debt and common shares, and distributions paid on our equity securities are within
our control and are adjusted as necessary based upon, among other factors, market conditions. The
following is a discussion of our cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
Net cash from operating activities was $41.8 million during the three months ended March 31,
2010 as compared to $51.2 million for the same period in 2009. The decrease was primarily due to
declines in property revenues and higher property expenses within our stabilized communities. See
further discussions of our first quarter 2010 operations as compared to 2009 in our Results of
Operations discussion above. The decrease in net cash from operating activities was also due to
the timing of payments in operating accounts, primarily relating to real estate taxes and other
liabilities.
Net cash used in investing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2010 totaled
$11.7 million as compared to $9.1 million during the three months ended March 31, 2009. Cash
outflows for property development and capital improvements were $11.1 million during the three
months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to $18.6 million for the same period in 2009 due to the
timing of completions of communities in our development pipeline and a reduction in construction
and development activity in 2010 as compared to 2009. The cash outflows during the three months
ended March 31, 2009 were offset primarily by proceeds received from payments in notes receivable -
other for approximately $8.7 million.
Net cash used in financing activities totaled $65.7 million for the three months ended March
31, 2010, primarily as a result of the repayment of maturing outstanding unsecured notes payable of
$55.3 million, and distributions paid to common shareholders, perpetual preferred unit holders, and
noncontrolling interest holders of $33.2 million. The cash outflows were partially offset by cash
receipts of $17.2 million relating to proceeds received from the issuance of 0.4 million common
shares under our ATM share offering program entered into in March 2010. Cash outflows were further
offset by decreases in accounts receivable from affiliates of approximately $3.5 million relating
to proceeds received from participant withdrawals from our rabbi trust and approximately $1.8
million for proceeds received from secured notes payable relating to a construction loan for a
consolidated joint venture. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we used approximately
$42.3 million in financing activities primarily to repay approximately $100.0 million of
outstanding notes payable consisting primarily of $90.5 million of maturing secured and unsecured
notes payable, and early retirement of existing senior unsecured notes of approximately $7.2
million. Net cash used in financing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2009 was
also attributable to distributions paid to common shareholders, perpetual preferred unit holders,
and noncontrolling interest holders of $43.2 million. The cash outflows during this same period
were offset by increases in balances outstanding under our line of credit of $96.0 million and
approximately $4.1 million for proceeds received from secured notes payable relating to a
construction loan for a consolidated joint venture.
34
Financial Flexibility
We have a $600 million unsecured credit facility which matures in January 2011. The scheduled
interest rate spreads are subject to change as our credit ratings change. Advances under the line
of credit may be priced at the scheduled rates, or we may enter into bid rate loans with
participating banks at rates below the scheduled rates. These bid rate loans have terms of six
months or less and may not exceed the lesser of $300 million or the remaining amount available
under the line of credit. The line of credit is subject to customary financial covenants and
limitations, all of which we are in compliance. We are currently in discussions with various
lenders regarding a new unsecured credit facility to replace our existing $600 million unsecured
credit facility.
Our line of credit provides us with the ability to issue up to $100 million in letters of
credit. While our issuance of letters of credit does not increase our borrowings outstanding under
our line of credit, it does reduce the amount available. At March 31, 2010, we had outstanding
letters of credit totaling approximately $10.4 million, and had approximately $589.6 million
available under our unsecured line of credit.
As an alternative to our unsecured line of credit, from time to time we borrow using
competitively bid unsecured short-term notes with lenders who may or may not be a part of the
unsecured line of credit bank group. Such borrowings vary in term and pricing and are typically
priced at interest rates below those available under the unsecured line of credit.
We currently have an automatic shelf registration statement on file with the SEC which allows
us to offer, from time to time, an unlimited amount of common shares, preferred shares, debt
securities, or warrants. Our declaration of trust provides we may issue up to 110 million shares of
beneficial interest, consisting of 100 million common shares and 10 million preferred shares. As of
March 31, 2010, we had approximately 65.0 million common shares outstanding, net of treasury shares
and shares held in our deferred compensation arrangements, and no preferred shares outstanding.
In March 2010, we announced the creation of an ATM share offering program through which we can
sell common shares having an aggregate offering price of up to $250 million from time to time into
the existing trading market at current market prices as well as through negotiated transactions.
We may, but shall have no obligation to, sell common shares through the ATM share offering program
in amounts and at times as we determine. Actual sales will depend on a variety of factors we
determine from time to time, including, among others, market conditions, the trading price of our
common shares and determinations of the appropriate sources of funding for us. During the three
months ended March 31, 2010, we issued approximately 0.4 million shares at an average price of
$43.64 per share for total net consideration of approximately $17.2 million through the ATM share
offering program. In addition, during the second quarter of 2010 through May 7, 2010, we issued
approximately 0.8 million common shares at an average price of $45.27 per share for total net consideration
of approximately $36.8 million. Cumulative to date, we have issued approximately 1.2 million
common shares at an average price of $44.74 for total net consideration of approximately $54.0
million. As of May 7, 2010, we had common shares having an aggregate offering price of up to
$195.0 million remaining available for issuance under the ATM program.
We believe our ability to access capital markets is enhanced by our senior unsecured debt
ratings by Moodys and Standard and Poors, which are currently Baa1 and BBB, respectively, with
stable outlooks, as well as by our ability to borrow on a secured basis from Fannie Mae or Freddie
Mac. However, we may not be able to maintain our current credit ratings and may not be able to
borrow on a secured or unsecured basis in the future. The capital and credit markets have been
experiencing continued volatility and disruption. We have noted a recent increase in issuances of
debt and equity by REITs at more attractive rates. While this may be a positive sign, we are
uncertain if this level of activity will increase or continue.
Future Cash Requirements and Contractual Obligations
One of our principal long-term liquidity requirements includes the repayment of maturing debt,
including borrowings under our unsecured line of credit used to fund development and acquisition
activities. During the remainder of 2010, approximately $85.3 million of debt maturities,
including scheduled principal amortizations, are scheduled to mature. We intend to meet our
long-term liquidity requirements through cash flows generated from operations, draws on our
unsecured credit facility, proceeds from property dispositions and secured mortgage notes, and the
use of debt and equity offerings under our automatic shelf registration statement, including under
our ATM share offering program.
In order for us to continue to qualify as a REIT we are required to distribute annual
dividends equal to a minimum of 90% of our REIT taxable income, computed without regard to the
dividends paid deduction and our net capital gains. In March 2010, we announced our Board of Trust
Managers had declared a dividend distribution of $0.45 per share to common shareholders of record
as of March 31, 2010. The dividend was subsequently paid on April 16, 2010. We paid equivalent
amounts per unit to holders of the common operating partnership units. This
distribution to common shareholders and holders of common operating partnership units equates
to an annualized dividend rate of $1.80 per share or unit.
35
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The joint ventures in which we have an interest have been funded in part with secured,
third-party debt. We are also committed to additional funding under mezzanine loans provided to
joint ventures. We have guaranteed no more than our proportionate interest, totaling approximately
$60.8 million, of five loans utilized for construction and development activities for our joint
ventures. Our commitment to fund additional amounts under the mezzanine loans was an aggregate of
approximately $7.1 million at March 31, 2010.
Inflation
Substantially all of our apartment leases are for a term generally ranging from six to fifteen
months. In an inflationary environment, we may realize increased rents at the commencement of new
leases or upon the renewal of existing leases. The short-term nature of our leases generally
minimizes our risk from the adverse affects of inflation.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Companys critical accounting policies have not changed materially from information
reported in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements. In December 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-17,
Consolidations (Topic 810) Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with
Variable Interest Entities, which codified the previously issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46R. ASU 2009-17 changes the consolidation
analysis for VIEs and requires a qualitative analysis to determine the primary beneficiary of the
VIE. The determination of the primary beneficiary of a VIE is based on whether the entity has the
power to direct matters which most significantly impact the activities of the VIE and has the
obligation to absorb losses, or the right to receive benefits, of the VIE which could potentially
be significant to the VIE. The ASU requires an ongoing reconsideration of the primary beneficiary
and also amends the events triggering a reassessment of whether an entity is a VIE. ASU 2009-17
requires additional disclosures for VIEs, including disclosures about a reporting entitys
involvement with VIEs, how a reporting entitys involvement with a VIE affects the reporting
entitys financial statements, and significant judgments and assumptions made by the reporting
entity to determine whether it must consolidate the VIE. ASU 2009-17 was effective for us beginning
January 1, 2010. Our adoption of ASU 2009-17 did not have a material effect on our financial
statements.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
No material changes to our exposures to market risk have occurred since our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. We carried out an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the
end of the period covered by this report pursuant to Securities Exchange Act (Exchange Act) Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e). Based on the evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by
this report are effective to ensure information required to be disclosed by us in our Exchange Act
filings is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the periods specified in the
Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms.
Changes in internal controls. There were no changes in our internal control over financial
reporting (identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) in Rules 13a-15
and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act) during our most recent fiscal quarter which have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
36
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Legal Proceedings |
For discussion regarding legal proceedings, see Note 11, Commitments and Contingencies, to
the condensed consolidated financial statements.
There have been no material changes to the Risk Factors previously disclosed in Item 1A in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
None
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
Other Information |
None
(a) Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of Chief Executive Officer dated May 7, 2010. |
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of Chief Financial Officer dated May 7, 2010. |
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. |
37
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on our behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael P. Gallagher
|
|
|
|
May 7, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael P. Gallagher
|
|
|
|
Date |
|
|
Vice President Chief Accounting Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Description of Exhibits |
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of Chief Executive Officer dated May 7, 2010. |
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of Chief Financial Officer dated May 7, 2010. |
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. |
39