e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
þ
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
|
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2010
OR
|
|
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period
from
to
Commission File Number:
001-14437
RTI INTERNATIONAL METALS,
INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Ohio
|
|
52-2115953
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
Westpointe Corporate Center One,
5th
Floor
1550 Coraopolis Heights Road
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
|
|
15108-2973
(Zip Code)
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
|
Registrants telephone number,
including area code:
(412) 893-0026
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act).
Yes o
No þ
Number of shares of the Corporations common stock
(Common Stock) outstanding as of October 29,
2010 was 30,119,344.
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC AND CONSOLIDATED
SUBSIDIARIES
As used in this report, the terms RTI,
Company, Registrant, we,
our, and us mean RTI International
Metals, Inc., its predecessors, and consolidated subsidiaries,
taken as a whole, unless the context indicates otherwise.
INDEX
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements.
|
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
102,593
|
|
|
$
|
100,247
|
|
|
$
|
317,129
|
|
|
$
|
310,655
|
|
Cost and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
88,418
|
|
|
|
82,426
|
|
|
|
258,482
|
|
|
|
263,047
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses
|
|
|
15,771
|
|
|
|
15,384
|
|
|
|
47,828
|
|
|
|
46,526
|
|
Research, technical, and product development expenses
|
|
|
783
|
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
|
2,536
|
|
|
|
1,493
|
|
Asset and asset-related charges (income)
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,262
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(2,228
|
)
|
|
|
1,971
|
|
|
|
11,545
|
|
|
|
(411
|
)
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
(519
|
)
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|
|
2,006
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
1,325
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(264
|
)
|
|
|
(7,231
|
)
|
|
|
(828
|
)
|
|
|
(12,007
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(2,884
|
)
|
|
|
(4,751
|
)
|
|
|
10,922
|
|
|
|
(9,087
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
13,891
|
|
|
|
3,901
|
|
|
|
6,060
|
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(16,775
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,652
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,862
|
|
|
$
|
(9,986
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.56
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.35
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.56
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.35
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
29,933,615
|
|
|
|
24,643,301
|
|
|
|
29,901,657
|
|
|
|
23,588,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
29,933,615
|
|
|
|
24,643,301
|
|
|
|
30,143,031
|
|
|
|
23,588,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
113,634
|
|
|
$
|
56,216
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
20,257
|
|
|
|
65,042
|
|
Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $677 and
$646
|
|
|
53,306
|
|
|
|
60,924
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
274,759
|
|
|
|
266,887
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
25,914
|
|
|
|
21,237
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
7,034
|
|
|
|
21,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
494,904
|
|
|
|
491,716
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment, net
|
|
|
254,605
|
|
|
|
252,301
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
41,339
|
|
|
|
41,068
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
13,851
|
|
|
|
14,299
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
51,811
|
|
|
|
53,814
|
|
Other noncurrent assets
|
|
|
1,077
|
|
|
|
1,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
857,587
|
|
|
$
|
854,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
42,035
|
|
|
$
|
39,193
|
|
Accrued wages and other employee costs
|
|
|
17,504
|
|
|
|
9,796
|
|
Unearned revenues
|
|
|
15,211
|
|
|
|
21,832
|
|
Current liability for post-retirement benefits
|
|
|
2,476
|
|
|
|
2,476
|
|
Current liability for pension benefits
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
19,241
|
|
|
|
30,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
96,607
|
|
|
|
103,955
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
Noncurrent liability for post-retirement benefits
|
|
|
35,320
|
|
|
|
34,530
|
|
Noncurrent liability for pension benefits
|
|
|
26,146
|
|
|
|
28,102
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
7,556
|
|
|
|
8,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
165,739
|
|
|
|
175,529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares
authorized; 30,852,598 and 30,724,351 shares issued;
30,121,657 and 30,010,998 shares outstanding
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
443,611
|
|
|
|
439,361
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost; 730,941 and 713,353 shares
|
|
|
(17,341
|
)
|
|
|
(16,996
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(29,690
|
)
|
|
|
(33,563
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
294,959
|
|
|
|
290,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
691,848
|
|
|
|
679,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
857,587
|
|
|
$
|
854,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
4,862
|
|
|
$
|
(9,986
|
)
|
Adjustment for non-cash items included in net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
16,600
|
|
|
|
15,985
|
|
Asset and asset-related charges (income)
|
|
|
(1,332
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(2,462
|
)
|
|
|
(11,571
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
3,099
|
|
|
|
3,668
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation activity
|
|
|
(350
|
)
|
|
|
(439
|
)
|
Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(345
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
7,104
|
|
|
|
15,363
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(9,498
|
)
|
|
|
5,423
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
2,730
|
|
|
|
5,635
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Unearned revenue
|
|
|
(2,499
|
)
|
|
|
(3,510
|
)
|
Other current assets and liabilities
|
|
|
13,159
|
|
|
|
(4,408
|
)
|
Other noncurrent assets and liabilities
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
31,611
|
|
|
|
16,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from disposal of property, plant, and equipment
|
|
|
1,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of short-term investments
|
|
|
(215
|
)
|
|
|
(40,000
|
)
|
Sale of short-term investments
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(22,859
|
)
|
|
|
(63,362
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
23,359
|
|
|
|
(103,362
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of employee stock options
|
|
|
983
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation activity
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
Financing fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(300
|
)
|
Borrowings on long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,181
|
|
Repayments on long-term debt
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(243,449
|
)
|
Purchase of common stock held in treasury
|
|
|
(345
|
)
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
Proceeds from equity offering, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
955
|
|
|
|
(114,743
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,493
|
|
|
|
1,651
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
57,418
|
|
|
|
(199,716
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
56,216
|
|
|
|
284,449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
113,634
|
|
|
$
|
84,733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Unrealized Gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) From
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
For Sale
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
30,010,998
|
|
|
$
|
307
|
|
|
$
|
439,361
|
|
|
$
|
(16,996
|
)
|
|
$
|
290,097
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
(39,932
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,327
|
|
|
$
|
679,206
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,862
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,744
|
|
|
|
1,744
|
|
Unrealized gain on investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Benefit plan amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,735
|
|
Shares issued for directors compensation
|
|
|
16,763
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued for restricted stock award plans
|
|
|
49,770
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense recognized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,099
|
|
Treasury stock purchased at cost
|
|
|
(13,288
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(345
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(345
|
)
|
Exercise of employee options
|
|
|
57,776
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
983
|
|
Forefeiture of restricted stock awards
|
|
|
(4,300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefits from stock-based compensation activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Shares issued for employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
3,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
30,121,657
|
|
|
$
|
309
|
|
|
$
|
443,611
|
|
|
$
|
(17,341
|
)
|
|
$
|
294,959
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
(37,816
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,071
|
|
|
$
|
691,848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
|
|
Note 1
|
BASIS OF
PRESENTATION:
|
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements of RTI International Metals, Inc. and its
subsidiaries (the Company or RTI) have
been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for
interim financial information and with the instructions to
Form 10-Q
and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X.
Accordingly, certain information and note disclosures normally
included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance
with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules
and regulations, although the Company believes that the
disclosures made are adequate to make the information not
misleading. In the opinion of management, these financial
statements contain all of the adjustments of a normal and
recurring nature considered necessary to state fairly the
results for the interim periods presented. The results for the
interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to
be expected for the full year.
The balance sheet at December 31, 2009 has been derived
from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date,
but does not include all of the information and notes required
by GAAP for complete financial statements. Although the Company
believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the
information presented not misleading, it is suggested that these
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements be read in
conjunction with accounting policies and Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Companys
2009 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The Company is a leading producer and global supplier of
titanium mill products and a manufacturer of fabricated titanium
and specialty metal components for the international aerospace,
defense, energy, and industrial and consumer markets. It is a
successor to entities that have been operating in the titanium
industry since 1951. The Company first became publicly traded on
the New York Stock Exchange in 1990 under the name RMI Titanium
Co. and the symbol RTI, and was reorganized into a
holding company structure in 1998 under the name RTI
International Metals, Inc.
The Company conducts business in three segments: the Titanium
Group, the Fabrication Group, and the Distribution Group.
The Titanium Group melts, processes, and produces a complete
range of titanium mill products which are further processed by
its customers for use in a variety of commercial aerospace,
defense, and industrial and consumer applications. With
operations in Niles, Ohio; Canton, Ohio; and Hermitage,
Pennsylvania; and a new facility under construction in
Martinsville, Virginia, the Titanium Group has overall
responsibility for the production of primary mill products
including, but not limited to, bloom, billet, sheet, and plate.
In addition, the Titanium Group produces ferro titanium alloys
for its steel-making customers. The Titanium Group also focuses
on the research and development of evolving technologies
relating to raw materials, melting and other production
processes, and the application of titanium in new markets.
The Fabrication Group is comprised of companies with significant
hard-metal expertise that extrude, fabricate, machine, and
assemble titanium and other specialty metal parts and
components. Its products, many of which are complex engineered
parts and assemblies, serve commercial aerospace, defense, oil
and gas, power generation, medical device, and chemical process
industries, as well as a number of other industrial and consumer
markets. With operations located in Houston, Texas; Washington,
Missouri; Laval, Canada; and a representative office in China,
the Fabrication Group provides value-added products and services
such as engineered tubulars and extrusions, fabricated and
machined components and
sub-assemblies,
as well as engineered systems for deepwater oil and gas
exploration and production infrastructure.
5
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
The Distribution Group stocks, distributes, finishes,
cuts-to-size,
and facilitates
just-in-time
delivery services of titanium, steel, and other specialty metal
products, primarily nickel-based specialty alloys. With
operations in Garden Grove, California; Windsor, Connecticut;
Sullivan, Missouri; Staffordshire, England; and Rosny-Sur-Seine,
France; the Distribution Group is in close proximity to its wide
variety of commercial aerospace, defense, and industrial and
consumer customers.
Both the Fabrication Group and the Distribution Group utilize
the Titanium Group as their primary source of titanium mill
products.
|
|
Note 3
|
ASSET AND
ASSET-RELATED CHARGES (INCOME):
|
In December 2009, the Company announced that it had indefinitely
delayed the construction of its premium-grade titanium sponge
production facility in Hamilton, Mississippi. The indefinite
delay was identified as a triggering event for an asset
impairment test. The Company reviewed the assets for
recoverability and determined that the assets were impaired. At
that time, the Company had spent approximately
$66.9 million related to the construction of the facility
and had additional contractual commitments of approximately
$7.8 million. The Company determined the fair value of the
assets to be $5.8 million. As a result, the Company
recorded an asset and asset-related impairment charge of
$68.9 million in December 2009. These assets were not
placed into service, therefore no depreciation expense related
to them had been recognized. The $7.8 million of additional
contractual commitments was recorded within other accrued
liabilities within the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet
at December 31, 2009.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010,
the Company recorded asset and asset-related charges (income)
totaling $(0.2) million and $(3.3) million,
respectively. These amounts were comprised of the favorable
settlement of several previously accrued contractual commitments
resulting in recognition of income totaling $0.2 million
and $6.6 million during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010, respectively, including
$1.9 million of vendor refunds, all of which was received
in cash during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Offsetting this income was a write-down of sponge-plant related
assets totaling $1.4 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010. These assets were recorded in
conjunction with the above-mentioned additional contractual
commitments and were written-down due to the settlement of these
contractual commitments as the Companys contractors were
able to return these assets to their vendors for credit, thereby
reducing the Companys contractual commitments and, to a
lesser extent, its sponge-plant related assets. There were no
such write-downs during the three months ended
September 30, 2010. In addition, during the nine months
ended September 30, 2010, the Company recognized additional
asset impairments totaling $1.9 million reflecting the
decrease in the expected future cash flows of the sponge plant
assets. There were no such asset impairments recognized during
the three months ended September 30, 2010.
A summary of the status of the Companys accrual for
additional contractual commitments as of September 30,
2010, and the activity for the nine months then ended is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sponge-Plant
|
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
|
Commitments
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
7,809
|
|
Settlements/adjustments
|
|
|
(4,625
|
)
|
Payments
|
|
|
(1,402
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
1,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
|
|
Note 4
|
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION:
|
Stock
Options
A summary of the status of the Companys stock options as
of September 30, 2010, and the activity during the nine
months then ended, is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
475,581
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
114,830
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(7,902
|
)
|
Expired
|
|
|
(17,032
|
)
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(57,776
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
507,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
281,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of stock options granted was estimated at the
date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based
upon the assumptions noted in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
2.26%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
0.00%
|
Expected lives (in years)
|
|
4.0
|
Expected volatility
|
|
66.00%
|
The weighted-average grant date fair value of stock option
awards granted during the nine months ended September 30,
2010 was $12.88.
Restricted
Stock
A summary of the status of the Companys nonvested
restricted stock as of September 30, 2010, and the activity
during the nine months then ended, is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested Restricted Stock Awards
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
171,387
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
66,533
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(73,331
|
)
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(4,300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
160,289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of restricted stock grants was calculated using
the market value of the Companys Common Stock on the date
of issuance. The weighted-average grant date fair value of
restricted stock awards granted during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 was $25.73.
7
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
Performance
Share Awards
A summary of the Companys performance share award activity
during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 is
presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Maximum Shares
|
|
Performance Share Awards
|
|
Activity
|
|
|
Eligible to Receive
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
73,380
|
|
|
|
146,760
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
49,450
|
|
|
|
98,900
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(5,300
|
)
|
|
|
(10,600
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
117,530
|
|
|
|
235,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of the performance share awards granted was
estimated by the Company at the grant date using a Monte Carlo
model. The weighted-average grant date fair value of performance
shares awarded during the nine months ended September 30,
2010 was $38.79.
Management evaluates the estimated annual effective income tax
rate on a quarterly basis based on current and forecasted
business levels and activities, including the mix of domestic
and foreign results and enacted tax laws. This estimated annual
effective tax rate is updated quarterly based upon actual
results and updated operating forecasts. Items unrelated to
current year ordinary income are recognized entirely in the
period identified as a discrete item of tax.
The quarterly income tax provision is ordinarily comprised of
tax on ordinary income using the most recent estimated annual
effective tax rate, adjusted for the effect of discrete items.
At September 30, 2010 however, the Companys low level
of expected 2010 pretax income produces significant variability
in the annual effective tax rate and a tax charge that would
significantly exceed
year-to-date
pretax income. Accordingly, the income tax charge recognized
through the third quarter is the amount of tax expense
associated with actual results generated through the nine month
period ended September 30, 2010.
The provision for income taxes for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 reflects a discrete period effective tax
rate applied to ordinary income of 62.4%. The annual effective
tax rate computed in the same period in 2009 was zero. These
rates differ from the federal statutory rate of 35% principally
as a result of the mix of domestic income and foreign losses
benefited at lower tax rates.
Inclusive of discrete items, the Company recognized a provision
for federal, state and foreign income taxes of
$6.1 million, or 55.5% of pretax income, and
$0.9 million, or (9.9)% of pretax income, for the nine
month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. Discrete items totaling $0.8 million reduced
the provision for income taxes for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and were comprised of a
$1.6 million charge associated with the enacted healthcare
legislation with the remainder associated with adjustments to
unrecognized tax benefits due to the effective settlement of an
income tax examination and other immaterial items. The provision
for the prior year to date period was comprised entirely of
discrete items of tax attributable to adjustments to
unrecognized tax benefits and normal adjustments for tax returns
filed during the period.
8
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
|
|
Note 6
|
EARNINGS
PER SHARE:
|
Basic earnings per share was computed by dividing net income
(loss) by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock
outstanding for each respective period. Diluted earnings per
share was calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the
weighted-average of all potentially dilutive shares of common
stock that were outstanding during the periods presented.
Actual weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding used
in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per
share for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(16,775
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,652
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,862
|
|
|
$
|
(9,986
|
)
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted-average shares outstanding
|
|
|
29,933,615
|
|
|
|
24,643,301
|
|
|
|
29,901,657
|
|
|
|
23,588,555
|
|
Effect of diluted securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding
|
|
|
29,933,615
|
|
|
|
24,643,301
|
|
|
|
30,143,031
|
|
|
|
23,588,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.56
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.35
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
(0.42
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.56
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.35
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
(0.42
|
)
|
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010,
options to purchase 546,240 and 269,746 shares of Common
Stock, at an average price of $30.72 and $46.92, respectively,
have been excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per
share because their effects were antidilutive. For the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2009, options to purchase
511,620 and 498,526 shares of Common Stock, at an average
price of $30.86 and $31.41, respectively, have been excluded
from the calculations of diluted earnings per share because
their effects were antidilutive.
Receivables are carried at net realizable value. Estimates are
made as to the Companys ability to collect outstanding
receivables, taking into consideration the amount, the
customers financial condition, and the age of the
receivable. The Company ascertains the net realizable value of
amounts owed and provides an allowance when collection becomes
doubtful. Receivables are expected to be collected in the normal
course of business and consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Trade and commercial customers
|
|
$
|
53,983
|
|
|
$
|
61,570
|
|
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(677
|
)
|
|
|
(646
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total receivables
|
|
$
|
53,306
|
|
|
$
|
60,924
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
Inventories are valued at cost as determined by the
last-in,
first-out (LIFO) method for approximately 62% of the
Companys inventories as of both September 30, 2010
and December 31, 2009. The remaining inventories are valued
at cost determined by a combination of the
first-in,
first-out (FIFO) and weighted-average cost methods.
Inventory costs generally include materials, labor, and
manufacturing overhead (including depreciation). When market
conditions indicate an excess of carrying cost over market
value, a
lower-of-cost-or-market
provision is recorded. Inventories consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Raw materials and supplies
|
|
$
|
132,529
|
|
|
$
|
145,062
|
|
Work-in-process
and finished goods
|
|
|
202,377
|
|
|
|
197,840
|
|
LIFO reserve
|
|
|
(60,147
|
)
|
|
|
(76,015
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories
|
|
$
|
274,759
|
|
|
$
|
266,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the
current cost of inventories exceeded their carrying value by
$60,147 and $76,015, respectively. The Companys FIFO
inventory value is used to approximate current costs.
|
|
Note 9
|
GOODWILL
AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS:
|
The Company does not amortize goodwill; however, the carrying
amount of goodwill is tested, at least annually, for impairment.
Absent any events throughout the year which would indicate a
potential impairment has occurred, the Company performs its
annual impairment testing during the fourth quarter.
While there have been no impairments during 2010, nor have there
been any events throughout 2010 which would indicate a potential
impairment has occurred, uncertainties or other factors that
could result in a potential impairment in future periods include
continued long-term production delays or a significant decrease
in expected demand related to the Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
program, as well as any cancellation of one of the other major
aerospace programs the Company currently supplies, including the
Joint Strike Fighter program or the Airbus family of aircraft,
including the A380 and A350XWB programs. In addition, the
Companys ability to ramp up its production of these
programs in a cost-efficient manner may also impact the results
of a future impairment test.
Goodwill. The carrying amount of goodwill
attributable to each segment at December 31, 2009 and
September 30, 2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium
|
|
|
Fabrication
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
2,548
|
|
|
$
|
37,386
|
|
|
$
|
9,833
|
|
|
$
|
49,767
|
|
Accumulated impairment loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,699
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,699
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net goodwill
|
|
|
2,548
|
|
|
|
28,687
|
|
|
|
9,833
|
|
|
|
41,068
|
|
Translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
2,548
|
|
|
|
37,657
|
|
|
|
9,833
|
|
|
|
50,038
|
|
Accumulated impairment loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,699
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,699
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net goodwill
|
|
$
|
2,548
|
|
|
$
|
28,958
|
|
|
$
|
9,833
|
|
|
$
|
41,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
Intangibles. Intangible assets consist of
customer relationships as a result of the Companys
previous acquisitions. These intangible assets, which were
valued at fair value, are being amortized over 20 years. In
the event that long-term demand or market conditions change and
the expected future cash flows associated with these assets is
reduced, a write-down or acceleration of the amortization period
may be required.
There were no intangible assets attributable to our Titanium
Group and Distribution Group at December 31, 2009 and
September 30, 2010. The carrying amount of intangible
assets attributable to our Fabrication Group at
December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2010 was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
$
|
14,299
|
|
|
$
|
(734
|
)
|
|
$
|
286
|
|
|
$
|
13,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 10
|
UNEARNED
REVENUE:
|
The Company reported a liability for unearned revenue of $15,211
and $21,832 as of September 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009, respectively. These amounts primarily represent payments
received in advance from commercial aerospace, defense, and
energy market customers on long-term orders, which the Company
has not recognized as revenues.
|
|
Note 11
|
OTHER
INCOME (EXPENSE):
|
Other income (expense) for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 was $(519) and $252,
respectively. Other income (expense) for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 was $(153) and $2,006,
respectively. Other income consists primarily of foreign
exchange gains and losses from international operations and fair
value adjustments related to the Companys foreign currency
forward contracts. See Note 15 to the Companys
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further
information on the Companys foreign currency forward
contracts.
|
|
Note 12
|
EMPLOYEE
BENEFIT PLANS:
|
Components of net periodic pension and other post-retirement
benefit cost for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 for those salaried and hourly
covered employees were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Other Post-Retirement Benefits
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
451
|
|
|
$
|
397
|
|
|
$
|
1,353
|
|
|
$
|
1,193
|
|
|
$
|
178
|
|
|
$
|
127
|
|
|
$
|
534
|
|
|
$
|
383
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
1,770
|
|
|
|
1,762
|
|
|
|
5,310
|
|
|
|
5,285
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
1,650
|
|
|
|
1,604
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(1,869
|
)
|
|
|
(1,929
|
)
|
|
|
(5,607
|
)
|
|
|
(5,788
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
627
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
910
|
|
|
|
910
|
|
Amortization of unrealized gains
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
2,104
|
|
|
|
1,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
1,185
|
|
|
$
|
920
|
|
|
$
|
3,553
|
|
|
$
|
2,758
|
|
|
$
|
1,031
|
|
|
$
|
965
|
|
|
$
|
3,094
|
|
|
$
|
2,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 13
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES:
|
From time to time, the Company is involved in litigation
relating to claims arising out of its operations in the normal
course of business. In the Companys opinion, the ultimate
liability, if any, resulting from these matters will have no
significant effect on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
Given the critical nature of many of the aerospace end uses for
the Companys products, including specifically their use in
critical rotating
11
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
parts of gas turbine engines, the Company maintains aircraft
products liability insurance of $350 million, which
includes grounding liability.
Tronox
LLC Litigation
In connection with our now indefinitely delayed plans to
construct a premium-grade titanium sponge production facility in
Hamilton, Mississippi, in 2008, a subsidiary of ours entered
into an agreement with Tronox LLC (Tronox) for the
long-term supply of titanium tetrachloride (TiCl4),
the primary raw material in the production of titanium sponge.
Tronox filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in
January 2009. On September 23, 2009, the subsidiary of the
Company filed a complaint in the United States Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of New York against Tronox challenging
the validity of the supply agreement. Tronox filed a motion to
dismiss the complaint, and on February 9, 2010 the
Bankruptcy Court issued an order granting the motion. The
Companys subsidiary has appealed the order, as it believes
that its claims seeking termination
and/or
rescission of the supply agreement and companion ground lease on
grounds of breach of warranty, nondisclosure, mistake and breach
of duty of good faith and fair dealing are meritorious; however,
due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation and because of
the pending appeal, the ultimate outcome of the matter is
uncertain. Pending the outcome of this litigation, management
estimates that additional future contractual expenses could be
up to $36 million.
Environmental
Matters
The Company is subject to environmental laws and regulations as
well as various health and safety laws and regulations that are
subject to frequent modifications and revisions. While the costs
of compliance for these matters have not had a material adverse
impact on the Company in the past, it is not possible to
accurately predict the ultimate effect these changing laws and
regulations may have on the Company in the future. The Company
continues to evaluate its obligation for environmental-related
costs on a quarterly basis and makes adjustments as necessary.
Given the status of the proceedings at certain of the
Companys sites and the evolving nature of environmental
laws, regulations, and remediation techniques, the
Companys ultimate obligation for investigative and
remediation costs cannot be predicted. It is the Companys
policy to recognize environmental costs in the financial
statements when an obligation becomes probable and a reasonable
estimate of exposure can be determined. When a single estimate
cannot be reasonably made, but a range can be reasonably
estimated, the Company accrues the amount it determines to be
the most likely amount within that range.
Based on available information, the Company believes that its
share of possible environmental-related costs is in a range from
$770 to $2,242 in the aggregate. At September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, the amounts accrued for future
environmental-related costs were $1,403 and $1,546,
respectively. Of the total amount accrued at September 30,
2010, $148 is expected to be paid out within the next twelve
months, and is included in other accrued liabilities. The
remaining $1,255 is recorded in other noncurrent liabilities.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010,
the Company made payments totaling $55 and $145 related to its
environmental liabilities.
As these proceedings continue toward final resolution, amounts
in excess of those already provided may be necessary to
discharge the Company from its obligations.
12
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
Duty
Drawback Investigation
The Company maintained a program through an authorized agent to
recapture duty paid on imported titanium sponge as an offset
against exports for products shipped outside the U.S. by
the Company or its customers. The agent, who matched the
Companys duty paid with the export shipments through
filings with U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(U.S. Customs), performed the recapture process.
Historically, the Company recognized a credit to Cost of Sales
when it received notification from its agent that a claim had
been filed and received by U.S. Customs. For the period
January 1, 2001 through March 31, 2007, the Company
recognized a reduction to Cost of Sales totaling
$14.5 million associated with the recapture of duty paid.
This amount represents the total of all claims filed by the
agent on the Companys behalf.
During 2007, the Company received notice from U.S. Customs
that it was under formal investigation with respect to
$7.6 million of claims previously filed by the agent on the
Companys behalf. The investigation relates to
discrepancies in, and lack of supporting documentation for,
claims filed through the Companys authorized agent. The
Company revoked the authorized agents authority and is
fully cooperating with U.S. Customs to determine the extent
to which any claims may be invalid or may not be supportable
with adequate documentation. In response to the investigation
noted above, the Company suspended the filing of new duty
drawback claims through the third quarter of 2007. The Company
is fully engaged and cooperating with U.S. Customs in an
effort to complete this investigation in an expeditious manner.
Concurrent with the U.S. Customs investigation, the Company
performed an internal review of the entire $14.5 million of
drawback claims filed with U.S. Customs to determine to
what extent any claims may have been invalid or may not have
been supported with adequate documentation. As a result, the
Company recorded charges totaling $10.5 million to Cost of
Sales through December 31, 2009. No additional charges were
recorded during the three or nine months ended
September 30, 2010.
These above-mentioned charges represent the Companys
current best estimate of probable loss. Of this amount,
$9.5 million was recorded as a contingent current liability
and $1.0 million was recorded as a write-off of an
outstanding receivable representing claims filed which had not
yet been paid by U.S. Customs. Through December 31,
2009, the Company repaid to U.S. Customs $4.0 million
for invalid claims. The Company made additional repayments
totaling $2.7 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010. As a result of these payments, the
Companys liability totaled $2.8 million as of
September 30, 2010. While the Companys internal
investigation into these claims is complete, there is not a
timetable of which it is aware for when U.S. Customs will
conclude its investigation.
While the ultimate outcome of the U.S. Customs
investigation is not yet known, the Company believes there is an
additional possible risk of loss between $0 and
$3.0 million based on current facts, exclusive of
additional amounts imposed for interest, which cannot be
quantified at this time. This possible risk of future loss
relates primarily to indirect duty drawback claims filed with
U.S. Customs by several of the Companys customers as
the ultimate exporter of record in which the Company shared in a
portion of the revenue.
Additionally, the Company is exposed to potential penalties
imposed by U.S. Customs on these claims. In December 2009,
the Company received formal pre-penalty notices from
U.S. Customs imposing penalties in the amount of
$1.7 million. While the Company has the opportunity to
negotiate with U.S. Customs to potentially obtain relief of
these penalties, due to the inherent uncertainty of the penalty
process, the Company has accrued the full amount of the
penalties as of December 31, 2009. There was no change to
the amount accrued for penalties during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010.
During the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company began filing new
duty drawback claims through a new authorized agent. Claims
filed through December 31, 2009 totaled $3.0 million.
During the three and nine
13
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
months ended September 30, 2010, the Company filed
additional claims totaling $3.7 million and
$5.5 million, respectively. As a result of the open
investigation discussed above, the Company has not recognized
any credits to cost of sales upon the filing of these new
claims. The Company intends to record these credits when payment
is received from U.S. Customs until a consistent history of
receipts against claims filed has been established.
Other
Matters
The Company is also the subject of, or a party to, a number of
other pending or threatened legal actions involving a variety of
matters incidental to its business. The Company is of the
opinion that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not
have a material adverse effect on the results of the operations,
cash flows, or the financial position of the Company.
|
|
Note 14
|
SEGMENT
REPORTING:
|
The Company has three reportable segments: the Titanium Group,
the Fabrication Group, and the Distribution Group.
The Titanium Groups products consist primarily of titanium
mill products and ferro titanium alloys. The mill products are
sold to a customer base consisting primarily of manufacturing
and fabrication companies in the supply chain for the commercial
aerospace, defense, and industrial and consumer markets.
Customers include prime aircraft manufacturers and their family
of subcontractors including fabricators, forge shops, extruders,
casting producers, fastener manufacturers, machine shops, and
metal distribution companies. Titanium mill products are
semi-finished goods and usually represent the raw or starting
material for these customers who then form, fabricate, machine,
or further process the products into semi-finished and finished
parts.
The Fabrication Group is comprised of companies with significant
hard-metal expertise that extrude, fabricate, machine, and
assemble titanium and other specialty metal parts and
components. Its products, many of which are complex engineered
parts and assemblies, serve the commercial aerospace, defense,
oil and gas, power generation, medical device, and chemical
process industries, as well as a number of other industrial and
consumer markets.
The Distribution Group stocks, distributes, finishes,
cuts-to-size,
and facilitates
just-in-time
delivery services of titanium, steel, and other specialty metal
products, primarily nickel-based specialty alloys.
Both the Fabrication Group and the Distribution Group utilize
the Titanium Group as their primary source of titanium mill
products. Intersegment sales are accounted for at prices that
are generally established by reference to similar transactions
with unaffiliated customers. Reportable segments are measured
based on segment operating income after an allocation of certain
corporate items such as general corporate overhead and expenses.
Assets of general corporate activities include unallocated cash
and deferred taxes.
14
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
A summary of financial information by reportable segment is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
32,263
|
|
|
$
|
28,853
|
|
|
$
|
101,660
|
|
|
$
|
86,280
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
20,006
|
|
|
|
25,586
|
|
|
|
67,062
|
|
|
|
94,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Titanium Group net sales
|
|
|
52,269
|
|
|
|
54,439
|
|
|
|
168,722
|
|
|
|
180,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
34,116
|
|
|
|
27,334
|
|
|
|
100,013
|
|
|
|
79,885
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
12,753
|
|
|
|
15,986
|
|
|
|
40,184
|
|
|
|
44,561
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fabrication Group net sales
|
|
|
46,869
|
|
|
|
43,320
|
|
|
|
140,197
|
|
|
|
124,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
36,214
|
|
|
|
44,060
|
|
|
|
115,456
|
|
|
|
144,490
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
835
|
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
2,116
|
|
|
|
1,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Distribution Group net sales
|
|
|
37,049
|
|
|
|
44,658
|
|
|
|
117,572
|
|
|
|
146,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
33,594
|
|
|
|
42,170
|
|
|
|
109,362
|
|
|
|
141,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated net sales
|
|
$
|
102,593
|
|
|
$
|
100,247
|
|
|
$
|
317,129
|
|
|
$
|
310,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium Group before corporate allocations
|
|
$
|
3,633
|
|
|
$
|
3,591
|
|
|
$
|
24,570
|
|
|
$
|
15,066
|
|
Corporate allocations
|
|
|
(2,328
|
)
|
|
|
(2,569
|
)
|
|
|
(6,441
|
)
|
|
|
(7,713
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Titanium Group operating income
|
|
|
1,305
|
|
|
|
1,022
|
|
|
|
18,129
|
|
|
|
7,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fabrication Group before corporate allocations
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
1,898
|
|
|
|
(291
|
)
|
|
|
(6,968
|
)
|
Corporate allocations
|
|
|
(3,205
|
)
|
|
|
(2,394
|
)
|
|
|
(8,784
|
)
|
|
|
(7,185
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fabrication Group operating loss
|
|
|
(3,018
|
)
|
|
|
(496
|
)
|
|
|
(9,075
|
)
|
|
|
(14,153
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution Group before corporate allocations
|
|
|
1,268
|
|
|
|
3,349
|
|
|
|
7,455
|
|
|
|
12,101
|
|
Corporate allocations
|
|
|
(1,783
|
)
|
|
|
(1,904
|
)
|
|
|
(4,964
|
)
|
|
|
(5,712
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Distribution Group operating income
|
|
|
(515
|
)
|
|
|
1,445
|
|
|
|
2,491
|
|
|
|
6,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(2,228
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,971
|
|
|
$
|
11,545
|
|
|
$
|
(411
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Total assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
370,622
|
|
|
$
|
365,725
|
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
248,938
|
|
|
|
239,847
|
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
124,273
|
|
|
|
140,666
|
|
General corporate assets
|
|
|
113,754
|
|
|
|
108,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated assets
|
|
$
|
857,587
|
|
|
$
|
854,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
|
|
Note 15
|
FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS:
|
When appropriate, the Company uses derivatives to manage its
exposure to changes in interest and exchange rates. The
Companys derivative financial instruments are recognized
on the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in the fair value of
derivative instruments designated as cash flow
hedges, to the extent the hedges are highly effective, are
recorded in other comprehensive income, net of tax effects. The
ineffective portions of cash flow hedges, if any,
are recorded into current period earnings. Amounts recorded in
other comprehensive income are reclassified into current period
earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings. Changes
in the fair value of derivative instruments designated as
fair value hedges, along with corresponding changes
in the fair values of the hedged assets or liabilities, are
recorded in current period earnings.
As of September 30, 2010, the Company maintained foreign
currency forward contracts, with notional amounts totaling
403, to manage foreign currency exposure related to
equipment purchases associated with the Companys ongoing
capital expansion projects. These forward contracts settle
throughout 2010. These forward contracts have not been
designated as hedging instruments; therefore changes in the fair
value of these forward contracts are recorded in current period
earnings within other income (expense).
A summary of the Companys derivative instrument portfolio
as of September 30, 2010, is below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Designated as
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
Hedging Instrument
|
|
Location
|
|
Asset Fair Value
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts
|
|
|
No
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
The Company had no interest rate swaps as of September 30,
2010.
|
|
Note 16
|
FAIR
VALUE MEASUREMENTS:
|
For certain of the Companys financial instruments and
account groupings, including cash, short-term investments,
accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued wages and other
employee costs, unearned revenue, other accrued liabilities, and
long-term debt, the carrying value approximates the fair value
of these instruments and groupings.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
defines fair value as an exit price, representing the amount
that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants.
As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be
determined based upon assumptions that market participants would
use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering
such assumptions, a three-tier fair value hierarchy prioritizes
the inputs utilized in measuring fair value as follows:
(Level 1) observable inputs such as quoted prices in
active markets; (Level 2) inputs other than the quoted
prices in active markets that are observable either directly or
indirectly; and (Level 3) unobservable inputs in which
there is little or no market data and which requires the Company
to develop its own assumptions. The hierarchy requires the
Company to use observable market data, when available, and to
minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair
value. On a recurring basis, the Company measures certain
financial assets and liabilities at fair value, including its
cash equivalents. The Company had no derivative instruments at
December 31, 2009.
The Companys cash and cash equivalents and short-term
investments are classified within Level 1 of the fair value
hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices.
The Companys foreign currency forward contracts are
estimated utilizing the terms of the contracts and available
forward pricing information. However, because these derivative
contracts are unique and not actively traded, the fair values
are classified as Level 2 estimates.
16
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
Listed below are the Companys assets and their fair values
that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of
September 30, 2010. There were no liabilities that are
measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of
September 30, 2010. There were no transfers between levels
for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Market
|
|
|
Other Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
113,634
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
113,634
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
20,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,257
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
133,891
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
133,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2010 the Company had no liabilities
that were measured on a non-recurring basis.
Listed below are the Companys assets, and their fair
values, that are measured and recorded on a non-recurring basis
as of September 30, 2010, and the losses recorded during
the nine months ended September 30, 2010 on those assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
Charges for
|
|
Charges for
|
|
|
Net Carrying
|
|
Quoted
|
|
Other
|
|
Significant
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Value as of
|
|
Market
|
|
Observable
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
Prices
|
|
Inputs
|
|
Inputs
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
2010
|
|
2010
|
|
Sponge plant construction-related assets
|
|
$
|
1,545
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,545
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,901
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company determined the fair value of its sponge
plant-related assets using Level 3 inputs. The fair values
of these assets were determined based upon quoted scrap metal
prices multiplied by the estimated weight of various metallic
components of the assets.
|
|
Note 17
|
CREDIT
AGREEMENT:
|
The Company maintains a $225 million revolving credit
facility under its Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the
Credit Agreement) which matures on
September 27, 2012. The Company had no borrowings
outstanding under the Credit Agreement during the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 or 2009. Borrowings under the
Credit Agreement bear interest at the option of the Company at a
rate equal to the London Interbank Offered Rate (the Libor
Rate) plus an applicable margin or a prime rate plus an
applicable margin. In addition, the Company pays a facility fee
in connection with the Credit Agreement. Both the applicable
margin and the facility fee vary based upon the Companys
Consolidated Net Debt to Consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the
Credit Agreement. Based upon the Companys Consolidated
EBITDA for the twelve months ended September 30, 2010, the
Company could borrow up to $98 million under the Credit
Agreement.
17
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
|
|
Note 18
|
NEW
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS:
|
In January 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance to
require new fair value measurement and classification
disclosures, and to clarify existing disclosures. The guidance
requires disclosures about transfers into and out of
Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy, and separate
disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements
relating to Level 3 measurements. The guidance is effective
for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15,
2009, with the exception that the Level 3 activity
disclosure requirement will be effective for interim periods for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. Adoption of
the revised guidance did not have an effect on the
Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
In February 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance
amending the disclosure requirements for events that occur after
the balance sheet date but before financial statements are
issued, eliminating the need to disclose the date through which
subsequent events have been evaluated. The new guidance became
effective upon issuance of the guidance on February 24,
2010. Adoption of the revised guidance did not have a material
effect on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
18
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
|
Forward-Looking
Statements
The following discussion should be read in connection with the
information contained in the condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements and condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements. The following information contains
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and is subject
to the safe harbor created by that Act. Such forward-looking
statements may be identified by their use of words like
expects, anticipates,
intends, projects, or other words of
similar meaning. Forward-looking statements are based on
expectations and assumptions regarding future events. In
addition to factors discussed throughout this quarterly report,
the following factors and risks should also be considered,
including, without limitation:
|
|
|
|
|
the future availability and prices of raw materials,
|
|
|
|
competition in the titanium industry,
|
|
|
|
the historic cyclicality of the titanium and commercial
aerospace industries,
|
|
|
|
changes in defense spending and cancellation or changes in
defense programs or initiatives,
|
|
|
|
changes in the Joint Strike Fighter production schedule,
|
|
|
|
the ability to obtain access to financial markets and to
maintain current covenant requirements,
|
|
|
|
long-term supply agreements and the impact if another party
fails to fulfill their requirements under existing contracts or
successfully manage its future development and production
schedule,
|
|
|
|
the impact of the current titanium inventory overhang
throughout the Companys supply chain,
|
|
|
|
the impact of Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
production delays,
|
|
|
|
our ability to attract and retain key personnel,
|
|
|
|
legislative challenges to the Specialty Metals Clause of the
Berry Amendment,
|
|
|
|
labor matters,
|
|
|
|
global economic activities,
|
|
|
|
the successful completion of our expansion projects,
|
|
|
|
our ability to execute on new business awards,
|
|
|
|
our order backlog and the conversion of that backlog into
revenue,
|
|
|
|
demand for the Companys products, and
|
|
|
|
other statements contained herein that are not historical facts.
|
Because such forward-looking statements involve risks and
uncertainties, there are important factors that could cause
actual results to differ materially from those expressed or
implied by such forward-looking statements. These and other risk
factors are set forth in this filing, as well as in other
filings filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) over the last 12 months,
copies of which are available from the SEC or may be obtained
upon request from the Company. Except as may be required by
applicable law, we undertake no duty to update our
forward-looking information.
Overview
RTI International Metals, Inc. (the Company,
RTI, we, us, or
our) is a leading producer and global supplier of
titanium mill products and a supplier of fabricated titanium and
specialty metal components for the international aerospace,
defense, energy, and industrial and consumer markets.
The Titanium Group melts, processes, and produces a complete
range of titanium mill products which are further processed by
its customers for use in a variety of commercial aerospace,
defense, and industrial and
19
consumer applications. With operations in Niles, Ohio; Canton,
Ohio; and Hermitage, Pennsylvania; and the new facility under
construction in Martinsville, Virginia, the Titanium Group has
overall responsibility for the production of primary mill
products including, but not limited to, bloom, billet, sheet,
and plate. In addition, the Titanium Group produces ferro
titanium alloys for its steel-making customers. The Titanium
Group also focuses on the research and development of evolving
technologies relating to raw materials, melting and other
production processes, and the application of titanium in new
markets.
The Fabrication Group is comprised of companies with significant
hard-metal expertise that extrude, fabricate, machine, and
assemble titanium and other specialty metal parts and
components. Its products, many of which are complex engineered
parts and assemblies, serve the commercial aerospace, defense,
oil and gas, power generation, medical device, and chemical
process industries, as well as a number of other industrial and
consumer markets. With operations located in Houston, Texas;
Washington, Missouri; Laval, Canada; and a representative office
in China, the Fabrication Group provides value-added products
and services such as engineered tubulars and extrusions,
fabricated and machined components and
sub-assemblies,
as well as engineered systems for deepwater oil and gas
exploration and production infrastructure.
The Distribution Group stocks, distributes, finishes,
cuts-to-size,
and facilitates
just-in-time
delivery services of titanium, steel, and other specialty metal
products, primarily nickel-based specialty alloys. With
operations in Garden Grove, California; Windsor, Connecticut;
Sullivan, Missouri; Staffordshire, England; and Rosny-Sur-Seine,
France; the Distribution Group services a wide variety of
commercial aerospace, defense, and industrial and consumer
customers.
Both the Fabrication and Distribution Groups access the Titanium
Group as their primary source of titanium mill products. For the
three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
approximately 38% and 47%, respectively, of the Titanium
Groups sales were to the Fabrication and Distribution
Groups. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009, approximately 40% and 52%, respectively, of the Titanium
Groups sales were to the Fabrication and Distribution
Groups.
Trends
and Uncertainties
Management believes that long-term demand indicators in the
titanium industry, driven largely by significant backlog in the
commercial aerospace market, remain strong as we move toward the
middle of the decade. Recently announced build rate increases by
Boeing and Airbus and a small increase in order activity in our
titanium mill product business support that belief. In addition,
we continue to win incremental value-added packages in
validation of our strategy to move further up the value chain.
On July 20, 2010, we entered into an amended and restated
long-term procurement frame contract with Airbus. Under the
terms of the contract, we have been selected as a supplier for
A350 seat track extrusions through 2020 and have been
awarded a five-year work package for A320 flap tracks.
Additionally, we have provided Airbus flexibility under
previously required volumes in 2010 and 2011, and accelerated
the move to a market share arrangement from 2015 to 2012,
wherein we will receive orders for a certain percentage of
Airbus covered mill products.
The effects of the cyclicality of the commercial aerospace
market are still negatively impacting spot market demand and
capacity utilization. Both the Boeing and Airbus supply chains
continue to have relatively high inventories created by slower
than anticipated production levels over the past two years. We
expect the inventory overhang and destocking in the supply chain
to abate during the second half of 2011 and shipments to
increase significantly thereafter. However, until production
levels increase, we continue to see significant near-term
uncertainty in the industry.
20
Three
Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared To Three Months
Ended September 30, 2009
Net Sales. Net sales for our reportable
segments, excluding intersegment sales, for the three months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
$ Increase/
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
(In millions except percents)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
32.3
|
|
|
$
|
28.9
|
|
|
$
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
34.1
|
|
|
|
27.3
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
24.9
|
%
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
36.2
|
|
|
|
44.0
|
|
|
|
(7.8
|
)
|
|
|
(17.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated net sales
|
|
$
|
102.6
|
|
|
$
|
100.2
|
|
|
$
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An increase of 57% in shipments of prime mill products to our
trade customers, offset by a 31% decrease in the average
realized selling prices of these products, resulted in a
$2.1 million increase in the Titanium Groups net
sales. The decrease in average realized selling prices was
primarily due to the increased mix of lower priced forged
products and the continued high proportion of sales under
long-term agreements with lower contract pricing versus the
comparable period in the prior year. A strengthening in
ferro-alloy demand from the specialty steel industry resulted in
an additional $1.3 million increase in net sales.
The increase in the Fabrication Groups net sales was
principally the result of an $11.6 million increase in
commercial aerospace sales primarily driven by the Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
Pi Box program
ramp-up.
This favorable volume impact was partially offset by a
$3.6 million decrease in our energy market revenues, as our
energy market customers continued to slow their activity in the
wake of the recent drilling moratorium and the relatively low
level of oil prices. In addition, the favorable volume was also
impacted by a decline in our military shipments, as the F-22 and
C-17 programs continue to wind down.
The decrease in the Distribution Groups net sales was
principally driven by lower demand due to higher than required
levels of titanium inventory throughout the supply chain, which
is a result of the slowdown in the commercial and military
aircraft markets. The Groups titanium products net sales
were $10.3 million lower than the prior year. This decrease
was slightly offset by a $2.5 million increase in net sales
of the Groups specialty alloys products, primarily due to
an increase in volume.
Gross Profit. Gross profit for our reportable
segments for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
$ Increase/
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
(In millions except percents)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
5.7
|
|
|
$
|
5.9
|
|
|
$
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)%
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
(34.0
|
)%
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
(24.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated gross profit
|
|
$
|
14.2
|
|
|
$
|
17.8
|
|
|
$
|
(3.6
|
)
|
|
|
(20.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in the Titanium Groups gross profit was
primarily related to lower average realized selling prices which
reduced gross profit by $3.3 million. This decrease was
largely offset by a higher margin sales mix which increased
gross profit by $2.3 million, and higher volume which
increased gross profit by $0.6 million. Additionally, gross
profit at the Titanium Group was favorably impacted by
$0.2 million due to higher ferro-alloy demand.
The decrease in the Fabrication Groups gross profit was
principally the result of production related inefficiencies,
scrap, and yield costs associated with the production
ramp-up of
the Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
Pi Box program.
21
The decrease in the Distribution Groups gross profit was
principally related to lower titanium sales levels in the
commercial and military aircraft markets coupled with a decrease
in average realized selling prices, which exceeded our decline
in product cost.
Selling, General, and Administrative
Expenses. Selling, general, and administrative
expenses (SG&A) for our reportable segments for
the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
$ Increase/
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
(In millions except percents)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
3.8
|
|
|
$
|
4.5
|
|
|
$
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
(15.6
|
)%
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated SG&A expenses
|
|
$
|
15.8
|
|
|
$
|
15.4
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in SG&A expenses was primarily related to a
$2.1 million increase in salaries and benefits in the
current year compared to the prior year, due in large part to
accrued incentive compensation in the current year. SG&A
expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2009 did
not include incentive compensation accruals as a result of our
decision to eliminate certain cash incentive compensation in
2009 in response to the challenging market conditions which
existed at the time. This increase was partially offset by a
reduction of $1.7 million in professional and consulting
expenses.
Research, Technical, and Product Development
Expenses. Research, technical, and product
development expenses were $0.8 million and
$0.5 million for the three months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009, respectively. This spending reflects our
continued focus on productivity and quality enhancements to our
operations.
Asset and Asset-Related Charges
(Income). Asset and asset-related charges
(income) for the three months ended September 30, 2010 were
$(0.2) million. Asset and asset-related charges (income)
consist of favorable settlements related to the Companys
accrued contractual commitments at the Companys
indefinitely delayed sponge plant which were offset in part due
to the write-down of sponge-plant-related assets related to
these settlements as our contractors were able to return these
assets to their vendors for refunds.
Operating Income (Loss). Operating income
(loss) for our reportable segments for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
$ Increase/
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
(In millions except percents)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
30.0
|
%
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)
|
|
|
(500.0
|
)%
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
(133.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.0
|
|
|
$
|
(4.2
|
)
|
|
|
(210.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in the Titanium Groups operating income was
primarily attributable to lower SG&A costs partially offset
by higher research, technical, and product development spending
and lower gross profit due to lower realized selling prices.
The increase in Fabrication Groups operating loss for the
quarter was principally the result of decreased gross profit
resulting from production inefficiencies, scrap, and yield costs
associated with the
ramp-up of
the Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
Pi Box program, as well as increased SG&A expenses.
The decrease in the Distribution Groups operating income
was largely due to lower demand in the titanium and other
specialty metals markets. The lower demand resulted in decreased
realized selling prices which exceeded our decline in product
cost.
22
Other Income (Expense). Other income (expense)
for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was
$(0.5) million and $0.3 million, respectively. Other
income (expense) consists primarily of foreign exchange gains
and losses from our international operations and fair value
adjustments related to our foreign currency forward contracts.
Interest Income and Interest Expense. Interest
income for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009 was $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively.
The decrease in interest income was principally related to lower
returns on invested cash, as well as lower overall cash
balances, compared to the prior year period. Interest expense
was $0.3 million and $7.2 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The
decrease in interest expense was primarily attributable to the
decrease in our long-term debt compared to the prior year as a
result of the payoff of our $225 million term loan in
September 2009. In addition, interest expense in 2009 included a
$4.9 million charge for the termination of our interest
rate swap agreements and a $0.8 million write-off of
deferred financing fees as a result of the payoff of our
$225 million term loan.
Provision for Income Taxes. We recognized a
provision for federal, state and foreign income taxes of
$13.9 million and $3.9 million related to pretax
losses of $2.9 million and $4.8 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
This increased charge for the three month period ended
September 30, 2010 reflects the recapture of the benefit
recorded for the six months ended June 30, 2010 based upon
an estimate of the annual effective tax rate of (52.1%) applied
to year to date income and a charge for tax expense associated
with actual results generated through the nine months ended
September 30, 2010. Discrete items of tax included in the
three month period ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 were
not material.
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared To Nine Months
Ended September 30, 2009
Net Sales. Net sales for our reportable
segments, excluding intersegment sales, for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
$ Increase/
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
(In millions except percents)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
101.7
|
|
|
$
|
86.3
|
|
|
$
|
15.4
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
%
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
79.9
|
|
|
|
20.1
|
|
|
|
25.2
|
%
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
115.4
|
|
|
|
144.5
|
|
|
|
(29.1
|
)
|
|
|
(20.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated net sales
|
|
$
|
317.1
|
|
|
$
|
310.7
|
|
|
$
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding the $15.4 million payment related to the
resolution of Airbus 2009 contractual obligations, the
Titanium Groups net sales were comparable to the prior
year. A 29% decrease in average realized selling prices of prime
mill products to our trade customers, partially offset by a 29%
increase in shipments of these products, resulted in a
$6.5 million reduction in the Titanium Groups net
sales. The decrease in average realized selling prices was
primarily due to an increased mix of lower priced forged
products and the continued high proportion of sales under
long-term agreements with lower contract pricing versus the
comparable period in the prior year. Offsetting these impacts
was an increase in ferro-alloy demand from the specialty steel
industry.
Excluding the $4.2 million of nonrecurring engineering
funds received related to the Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
program that were previously paid by the customer, the
Fabrication Groups net sales increased $15.9 million
compared to the prior year. The nonrecurring engineering funds
were received to offset certain agreed upon tooling expenses to
support the Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
program. A corresponding amount was recorded in cost of sales
during the current year. The increase in the Fabrication
Groups net sales was principally the result of a
$22.5 million increase in commercial aerospace sales,
primarily driven by the Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
Pi Box program
ramp-up as
well as other Boeing programs. Additionally, the Company
completed several engineered components to support the
containment of the oil spill in the Gulf of
23
Mexico. These favorable impacts were partially offset by a
decline in our military shipments as the F-22,
C-17, and
other programs continue to wind down.
The decrease in the Distribution Groups net sales was
principally driven by lower demand due to higher than required
levels of titanium inventory throughout the supply chain, which
is a result of the slowdown in the commercial and military
aircraft markets. The Groups titanium products net sales
were $32.1 million lower than the same period a year ago,
partially offset by a $3.0 million increase in net sales
for the Groups specialty alloys products, mostly due to
increased volume.
Gross Profit. Gross profit for our reportable
segments for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
$ Increase/
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
(In millions except percents)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
28.6
|
|
|
$
|
22.1
|
|
|
$
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
29.4
|
%
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
337.0
|
%
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
18.2
|
|
|
|
22.8
|
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
|
(20.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated gross profit
|
|
$
|
58.6
|
|
|
$
|
47.6
|
|
|
$
|
11.0
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding the $15.4 million payment related to the
resolution of Airbus 2009 contractual obligations and the
$2.5 million charge in the prior year associated with the
U.S. Customs investigation of our previously-filed duty
drawback claims, the Titanium Groups gross profit
decreased $11.4 million. The decrease in the Titanium
Groups gross profit was the result of lower sales levels
of prime products, reducing gross profit by $1.2 million,
and lower average realized selling prices, reducing gross profit
by $22.3 million. Partially offsetting these decreases,
gross profit at the Titanium Group was favorably impacted
$9.6 million due to a higher margin product mix and
$2.3 million due to higher ferro-alloy demand.
Additionally, the Titanium Group was favorably impacted
$0.2 million due to higher sales of Titanium Group-sourced
inventory by our Fabrication and Distribution Group businesses.
The increase in gross profit for the Fabrication Group was
primarily driven by the completion of several engineered
components to support the containment of the oil spill in the
Gulf of Mexico, increasing gross profit by $10.6 million.
In addition, the favorable volume, led by the
ramp-up of
the Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
Pi Box program, increased gross profit by $3.9 million,
compared to the first nine months of 2009. However, these
favorable impacts were partially offset by production
inefficiencies, scrap, and yield costs associated with the
production
ramp-up of
the Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
Pi Box program.
The decrease in the Distribution Groups gross profit was
primarily related to lower titanium sales levels in the
commercial and military aircraft markets, coupled with a
decrease in average realized selling prices that exceeded our
decline in product cost.
Selling, General, and Administrative
Expenses. SG&A for our reportable segments
for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
$ Increase/
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
(In millions except percents)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
11.2
|
|
|
$
|
13.4
|
|
|
$
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
(16.4
|
)%
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
20.9
|
|
|
|
16.7
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
25.1
|
%
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
15.7
|
|
|
|
16.4
|
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated SG&A expenses
|
|
$
|
47.8
|
|
|
$
|
46.5
|
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in SG&A expenses was primarily related to a
$3.8 million increase in salaries and benefits in the
current year compared to the prior year, due in large part to
accrued incentive compensation in the
24
current year. SG&A expenses for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 did not include incentive compensation
accruals as a result of our decision to eliminate certain cash
incentive compensation in 2009 in response to the challenging
market conditions which existed at the time. This increase is
partially offset by a reduction of $2.5 million in
professional and consulting expenses.
Research, Technical, and Product Development
Expenses. Research, technical, and product
development expenses were $2.5 million and
$1.5 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009, respectively. This spending reflects our
continued focus on productivity and quality enhancements to our
operations.
Asset and Asset-Related Charges
(Income). Asset and asset-related charges
(income) for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 were
$(3.3) million. Asset and asset-related charges (income)
consist of favorable settlements related to the Companys
accrued contractual commitments at the Companys
indefinitely delayed sponge plant which were offset in part due
to the write-down of sponge-plant-related assets related to
these settlements as our contractors were able to return these
assets to their vendors for refunds.
Operating Income (Loss). Operating income
(loss) for our reportable segments for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
$ Increase/
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
(In millions except percents)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
18.1
|
|
|
$
|
7.4
|
|
|
$
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
144.6
|
%
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
(9.1
|
)
|
|
|
(14.2
|
)
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
35.9
|
%
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)
|
|
|
(60.9
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
11.5
|
|
|
$
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
2975.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding the $15.4 million payment related to the
resolution of Airbus 2009 contractual obligations and the
$2.5 million charge in 2009 associated with the
U.S. Customs investigation of our previously filed duty
drawback claims, operating income decreased $7.2 million
for the Titanium Group compared to the prior year. The decrease
was primarily attributable to lower gross profit due to lower
volume and lower realized selling prices.
The reduced operating loss for the Fabrication Group was the
result of the completion of several engineered components for
our energy market customers to support the containment of the
oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico and higher volume on value-added
fabricated parts. These increases were partially offset by
higher production costs and SG&A expenses during the year
as we continue to ramp up the Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
Pi Box program.
The decrease in the Distribution Groups operating income
was largely due to lower demand in the titanium markets. The
lower demand resulted in decreased realized selling prices that
exceeded our decline in product cost. This decrease was
partially offset by a decrease in compensation-related expenses
and other cost management actions.
Other Income (Expense). Other income (expense)
for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was
$(0.2) million and $2.0 million, respectively. Other
income (expense) consists primarily of foreign exchange gains
and losses from our international operations and fair value
adjustments related to our foreign currency forward contracts.
Interest Income and Interest Expense. Interest
income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009 was $0.4 million and $1.3 million, respectively.
The decrease was principally related to lower returns on
invested cash, as well as lower overall cash balances, compared
to the prior year period. Interest expense was $0.8 million
and $12.0 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The decrease in
interest expense was primarily attributable to the decrease in
our long-term debt compared to the prior year as a result of the
payoff of our $225 million term loan in September 2009. In
addition, interest
25
expense in 2009 included a $4.9 million charge for the
termination of our interest rate swap agreements and a
$0.8 million write-off of deferred financing fees as a
result of the payoff of our $225 million term loan.
Provision for Income Taxes. We recognized a
provision for federal, state and foreign income taxes of
$6.1 million and $0.9 million related pretax income
(loss) of $10.9 million and $(9.1) million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The provision for income taxes for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 reflects a discrete period effective tax
rate applied to ordinary income of 62.4%. The annual effective
tax rate computed in the same period in 2009 was zero. These
rates differ from the federal statutory rate of 35% principally
as a result of the mix of domestic income and foreign losses
benefited at lower tax rates.
Discrete items totaling $0.8 million reduced the provision
for income taxes for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 and were comprised of a $1.6 million charge associated
with the enacted healthcare legislation with the remainder
associated with adjustments to unrecognized tax benefits due to
the effective settlement of an income tax examination, and other
immaterial items. The provision for the prior year to date
period was comprised entirely of discrete items of tax
attributable to adjustments to unrecognized tax benefits and
normal adjustments for tax returns filed during the period.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
In connection with our long-term supply agreements for the Joint
Strike Fighter (JSF) program and the Airbus family
of commercial aircraft, including the A380 and A350XWB programs,
we are constructing a new titanium forging and rolling facility
in Martinsville, Virginia, and new melting facilities in Canton
and Niles, Ohio, with anticipated capital spending of
approximately $140 million. The Niles melting facility is
substantially complete, while we have capital spending of
approximately $5 million remaining on the Canton melting
facility and expect it will begin operations in 2011. We have
capital expenditures of approximately $55 million remaining
related to the Martinsville, Virginia facility and anticipate
that it will begin production in 2012. We expect this facility
to enable us to enhance our throughput and shorten our lead
times on certain products, primarily titanium sheet and plate.
We continually evaluate market conditions as we move forward
with these capital projects in an effort to match our
operational capabilities with anticipated demand.
We maintain a $225 million revolving credit facility under
our Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the Credit
Agreement) which matures on September 27, 2012. We
had no borrowings outstanding under the Credit Agreement during
the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Borrowings under
the Credit Agreement bear interest, at our option, at a rate
equal to the London Interbank Offered Rate (the Libor
Rate) plus an applicable margin or a prime rate plus an
applicable margin. In addition, we pay a facility fee in
connection with the Credit Agreement. Both the applicable margin
and the facility fee vary based upon our consolidated net debt
to consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the Credit Agreement.
The Credit Agreement financial covenants and rates are described
below:
|
|
|
|
|
Our leverage ratio (the ratio of Net Debt to Consolidated
EBITDA, as defined in the Credit Agreement) was (5.0) at
September 30, 2010. If this ratio were to exceed 3.25 to 1,
we would be in default under our Credit Agreement and our
ability to borrow under our Credit Agreement would be impaired.
|
|
|
|
Our interest coverage ratio (the ratio of Consolidated EBITDA to
Net Interest, as defined in the Credit Agreement) was 116.5 at
September 30, 2010. If this ratio were to fall below 2.0 to
1, we would be in default under our Credit Agreement and our
ability to borrow under our Credit Agreement would be impaired.
|
Consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the Credit Agreement, allows
for adjustments related to unusual gains and losses, certain
noncash items, and certain non-recurring charges. Based on our
Consolidated EBITDA for the twelve months ended
September 30, 2010, we could borrow up to $98 million
under the Credit Agreement. At September 30, 2010, we were
in compliance with our financial covenants under the Credit
Agreement.
26
While our current financial forecasts indicate we will maintain
our compliance with these covenants, certain events, some of
which are beyond our control, including further long-term delays
in the Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
or JSF production schedule, or deeper reductions in global
aircraft demand, may cause us to be in default of one or more of
the covenants in the future. In the event of a default under our
Credit Agreement, absent a waiver from our lenders or an
amendment to our Credit Agreement, the interest rate on the
Credit Agreement could increase materially. Such a development
could have a material adverse impact on our results of
operations, financial position and cash flows if we were to
borrow under the Credit Agreement. In addition, a failure to
maintain our financial covenants may impair our ability to
borrow under our Credit Agreement. If we default or anticipate
an expected future default under one or more of our covenants,
we will need to renegotiate our Credit Agreement, seek other
sources of liquidity, or both.
Provided we continue to meet our financial covenants under the
Credit Agreement, we expect that our cash and cash equivalents
of $113.6 million, short-term investments of
$20.3 million, and our undrawn $225 million revolving
credit facility, combined with internally generated funds will
provide us sufficient liquidity to meet our operating needs and
current capital expansion plans.
Cash provided by operating activities. Cash
provided by operating activities for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 was $31.6 million and
$16.7 million, respectively. This increase is primarily due
to the increase in our net income for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, partially offset by increased
inventories.
Cash provided by (used in) investing
activities. Cash provided by (used in) investing
activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009, was $23.4 million and $(103.4) million,
respectively. This change is due primarily to the sale of
short-term investments totaling $45.0 million in the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 compared to a purchase of
short-term investments totaling $40.0 million in the same
period in the prior year. Additionally, we have had a
significant decrease in our capital expenditures compared to the
same period in the prior year as we have slowed the pace of
construction at our Martinsville, Virginia rolling facility to
match market conditions.
Cash provided by (used in) financing
activities. Cash provided by (used in) financing
activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009, was $1.0 million and $(114.7) million,
respectively. The Company has not had significant financing
activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Financing activities utilized cash in 2009 as a result of our
repayment of all outstanding amounts, totaling
$243.4 million, under our $225 million term loan,
Canadian credit facility, and Canadian interest-free loan
agreement, partially offset by the $127.4 million in net
proceeds from our equity offering.
Duty
Drawback Investigation
We maintained a program through an authorized agent to recapture
duty paid on imported titanium sponge as an offset against
exports for products shipped outside the U.S. by the
Company or its customers. The agent, who matched the
Companys duty paid with the export shipments through
filings with U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(U.S. Customs), performed the recapture process.
Historically, the Company recognized a credit to cost of sales
when it received notification from its agent that a claim had
been filed and received by U.S. Customs. For the period
from January 1, 2001 through March 31, 2007, the
Company recognized a reduction to cost of sales totaling
$14.5 million associated with the recapture of duty paid.
This amount represents the total of all claims filed by the
agent on the Companys behalf.
During 2007, the Company received notice from U.S. Customs
that it was under formal investigation with respect to
$7.6 million of claims previously filed by the agent on the
Companys behalf. The investigation relates to
discrepancies in, and lack of supporting documentation for,
claims filed through the Companys authorized agent. The
Company revoked the authorized agents authority and is
fully cooperating with U.S. Customs to determine the extent
to which any claims may be invalid or may not be supportable
with adequate documentation. In response to the investigation
noted above, the Company suspended the filing of new duty
drawback claims through the third quarter of 2007. The Company
is fully engaged and cooperating with U.S. Customs in an
effort to complete the investigation in an expeditious manner.
27
Concurrent with the U.S. Customs investigation, we
performed an internal review of the entire $14.5 million of
drawback claims filed with U.S. Customs to determine to
what extent any claims may have been invalid or may not have
been supported with adequate documentation. As a result, we
recorded charges totaling $10.5 million to cost of sales
through December 31, 2009. No additional charges were
recorded during the three or nine months ended
September 30, 2010.
These abovementioned charges represent our current best estimate
of probable loss. Of this amount, $9.5 million was recorded
as a contingent current liability and $1.0 million was
recorded as a write-off of an outstanding receivable
representing claims filed which had not yet been paid by
U.S. Customs. Through December 31, 2009, we had repaid
to U.S. Customs $4.0 million for invalid claims. We
made additional repayments totaling $2.7 million during the
nine months ended September 30, 2010. As a result of these
payments, the Companys liability totaled $2.8 million
as of September 30, 2010. While our internal investigation
into these claims is complete, there is not a timetable of which
we are aware for when U.S. Customs will conclude its
investigation.
While the ultimate outcome of the U.S. Customs
investigation is not yet known, we believe there is an
additional possible risk of loss between $0 and
$3.0 million based on current facts, exclusive of
additional amounts imposed for interest, which cannot be
quantified at this time. This possible risk of future loss
relates primarily to indirect duty drawback claims filed with
U.S. Customs by several of our customers as the ultimate
exporter of record in which we shared in a portion of the
revenue.
Additionally, we are exposed to potential penalties imposed by
U.S. Customs on these claims. In December 2009, we received
formal pre-penalty notices from U.S. Customs imposing
penalties in the amount of $1.7 million. While we have the
opportunity to negotiate with U.S. Customs to potentially
obtain relief of these penalties, due to the inherent
uncertainty of the penalty process, we have accrued the full
amount of the penalty as of December 31, 2009. There was no
change to the amount accrued for penalties during the nine
months ended September 30, 2010.
During the fourth quarter of 2007, we began filing new duty
drawback claims through a new authorized agent. Claims filed
through December 31, 2009 totaled $3.0 million. During
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, we
filed additional claims totaling $3.7 million and
$5.5 million, respectively. As a result of the open
investigation discussed above, we have not recognized any
credits to cost of sales upon the filing of these new claims. We
intend to record these credits when payment is received from
U.S. Customs until a consistent history of receipts against
claims filed has been established.
Backlog
The Companys order backlog for all markets was
approximately $346 million as of September 30, 2010,
as compared to $342 million at December 31, 2009. Of
the backlog at September 30, 2010, approximately
$91 million is likely to be realized over the remainder of
2010. We define backlog as firm business scheduled for release
into our production process for a specific delivery date. We
have numerous contracts that extend multiple years, including
the Airbus, JSF and Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
long-term supply agreements, which are not included in backlog
until a specific release into production or a firm delivery date
has been established.
Tronox
LLC Litigation
In connection with our now indefinitely delayed plans to
construct a premium-grade titanium sponge production facility in
Hamilton, Mississippi, in 2008, a subsidiary of ours entered
into an agreement with Tronox LLC (Tronox) for the
long-term supply of titanium tetrachloride (TiCl4),
the primary raw material in the production of titanium sponge.
Tronox filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in
January 2009. On September 23, 2009, a subsidiary of the
Company filed a complaint in the United States Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of New York against Tronox challenging
the validity of the supply agreement. Tronox filed a motion to
dismiss the complaint, and on February 9, 2010 the
Bankruptcy Court issued an order granting the motion. The
Companys subsidiary has appealed the order, as it believes
that its claims seeking termination
and/or
rescission of the supply agreement and companion ground lease on
grounds of breach of warranty, nondisclosure, mistake and breach
of duty of good faith and fair dealing are meritorious; however,
28
due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation and because of
the pending appeal, the ultimate outcome of the matter is
uncertain. Pending the outcome of this litigation, management
estimates that additional future contractual expenses could be
up to $36 million, including a potential charge of up to
$8.3 million during the three months ended
December 31, 2010, related to disputed 2011 payments under
this contract.
Environmental
Matters
We are subject to environmental laws and regulations as well as
various health and safety laws and regulations that are subject
to frequent modifications and revisions. While the costs of
compliance for these matters have not had a material adverse
impact on the Company in the past, it is not possible to
accurately predict the ultimate effect these changing laws and
regulations may have on the Company in the future. We continue
to evaluate our obligation for environmental-related costs on a
quarterly basis and make adjustments as necessary.
Given the status of the proceedings at certain of our sites and
the evolving nature of environmental laws, regulations, and
remediation techniques, our ultimate obligation for
investigative and remediation costs cannot be predicted. It is
our policy to recognize environmental costs in the financial
statements when an obligation becomes probable and a reasonable
estimate of exposure can be determined. When a single estimate
cannot be reasonably made, but a range can be reasonably
estimated, we accrue the amount we determine to be the most
likely amount within that range.
Based on available information, we believe our share of possible
environmental-related costs is in a range from $0.8 million
to $2.2 million in the aggregate. At September 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009, the amounts accrued for future
environmental-related costs were $1.4 and $1.5 million,
respectively. Of the total amount accrued at September 30,
2010, $0.1 million is expected to be paid out within the
next twelve months and is included in other accrued liabilities.
The remaining $1.3 million is recorded in other noncurrent
liabilities. During the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010, we made payments totaling
$0.1 million related to our environmental liabilities.
As these proceedings continue toward final resolution, amounts
in excess of those already provided may be necessary to
discharge us from our obligations for these sites, which include
the Ashtabula River.
New
Accounting Standards
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued authoritative guidance to require new
fair value measurement and classification disclosures, and to
clarify existing disclosures. The guidance requires disclosures
about transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2 of the fair
value hierarchy, and separate disclosures about purchases,
sales, issuances and settlements relating to Level 3
measurements. The guidance is effective for interim and annual
periods beginning after December 15, 2009, with the
exception that the Level 3 activity disclosure requirement
will be effective for interim periods for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2010. Adoption of the revised guidance
did not have an effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In February 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance
amending the disclosure requirements for events that occur after
the balance sheet date but before financial statements are
issued, eliminating the need to disclose the date through which
subsequent events have been evaluated. The new guidance became
effective upon issuance of the guidance on February 24,
2010. Adoption of the revised guidance did not have an effect on
our Consolidated Financial Statements.
29
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
|
There have been no significant changes in our exposure to market
risk from the information provided in Item 7A. Quantitative
Disclosures about Market Risk on our
Form 10-K
filed with the SEC on February 22, 2010.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures.
|
As of September 30, 2010, an evaluation was performed under
the supervision and with the participation of the Companys
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures. Based on that evaluation, the Companys
management concluded that the Companys disclosure controls
and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2010.
There were no changes in the Companys internal control
over financial reporting during the quarter ended
September 30, 2010 that materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys
internal control over financial reporting.
30
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
In addition to the other information set forth in this report,
you should carefully consider the factors discussed in
Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 22, 2010,
which could materially affect our business, financial condition,
financial results, or future performance. Reference is made to
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements of this report which is
incorporated herein by reference. Except as presented below,
there have been no material changes from the risk factors
described in our Form 10-K.
Fluctuations
in our income tax obligations and effective income tax rate may
result in volatility of our earnings and stock
price
We are subject to income taxes in many U.S. and certain foreign
jurisdictions. Our effective income tax rate (calculated by
application of U.S. GAAP) in a given financial statement
period may be materially impacted by changes in the mix and
level of earnings. As a result, there could be ongoing
variability period to period in our income tax rates and
reported net income.
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
|
The Company may repurchase shares of Common Stock under the RTI
International Metals, Inc. share repurchase program approved by
the Companys Board of Directors on April 30, 1999.
The repurchase program authorizes the repurchase of up to
$15 million of RTI Common Stock. No shares were purchased
under the program during the three months ended
September 30, 2010. At September 30, 2010,
approximately $3 million of the $15 million remained
available for repurchase. There is no expiration date specified
for the share repurchase program.
In addition to the share repurchase program, employees may
surrender shares to the Company to pay tax liabilities
associated with the vesting of restricted stock awards under the
2004 Stock Plan. The number of shares of Common Stock
surrendered to satisfy tax liabilities during the three months
ended September 30, 2010, were 1,960. No shares of Common
Stock were surrendered to satisfy tax liabilities during the
three months ended September 30, 2009.
The exhibits listed on the Index to Exhibits are filed herewith
and incorporated herein by reference.
31
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Procurement Frame Contract between EADS
Deutschland GmbH and RTI International Metals, Inc. dated
July 20, 2010, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
for the event dated July 22, 2010.
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by
Item 307 of
Regulation S-K
as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and
pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
filed herewith.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer required by
Item 307 of
Regulation S-K
as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and
pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
filed herewith.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed
herewith.
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed
herewith.
|
33