e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended October 3, 2010
Commission File Number 0-9286
COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
56-0950585 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
4100 Coca-Cola Plaza, Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(704) 557-4400
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
|
|
Class |
|
Outstanding at October 29, 2010 |
Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value
|
|
|
7,141,447 |
|
Class B Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value
|
|
|
2,044,202 |
|
COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 3, 2010
INDEX
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
First Nine Months |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
395,364 |
|
|
$ |
374,556 |
|
|
$ |
1,160,223 |
|
|
$ |
1,088,566 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
222,247 |
|
|
|
217,236 |
|
|
|
672,395 |
|
|
|
623,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
173,117 |
|
|
|
157,320 |
|
|
|
487,828 |
|
|
|
464,576 |
|
Selling, delivery and administrative expenses |
|
|
139,455 |
|
|
|
131,024 |
|
|
|
406,689 |
|
|
|
386,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
33,662 |
|
|
|
26,296 |
|
|
|
81,139 |
|
|
|
78,115 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
8,841 |
|
|
|
8,866 |
|
|
|
26,453 |
|
|
|
28,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
24,821 |
|
|
|
17,430 |
|
|
|
54,686 |
|
|
|
50,056 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
7,610 |
|
|
|
1,043 |
|
|
|
18,936 |
|
|
|
11,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
17,211 |
|
|
|
16,387 |
|
|
|
35,750 |
|
|
|
38,128 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to the
noncontrolling interest |
|
|
1,678 |
|
|
|
959 |
|
|
|
3,514 |
|
|
|
1,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
Consolidated |
|
$ |
15,533 |
|
|
$ |
15,428 |
|
|
$ |
32,236 |
|
|
$ |
36,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share based on
net income attributable to Coca-Cola
Bottling Co. Consolidated: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
$ |
1.69 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
3.51 |
|
|
$ |
3.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of Common Stock
shares outstanding |
|
|
7,141 |
|
|
|
7,141 |
|
|
|
7,141 |
|
|
|
7,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B Common Stock |
|
$ |
1.69 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
3.51 |
|
|
$ |
3.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of Class B Common
Stock shares outstanding |
|
|
2,044 |
|
|
|
2,022 |
|
|
|
2,039 |
|
|
|
2,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share based on
net income attributable to Coca-Cola
Bottling Co. Consolidated: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
3.50 |
|
|
$ |
3.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of Common Stock
shares outstanding assuming dilution |
|
|
9,225 |
|
|
|
9,203 |
|
|
|
9,220 |
|
|
|
9,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B Common Stock |
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
1.67 |
|
|
$ |
3.48 |
|
|
$ |
3.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of Class B Common
Stock shares outstanding assuming dilution |
|
|
2,084 |
|
|
|
2,062 |
|
|
|
2,079 |
|
|
|
2,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
$ |
.25 |
|
|
$ |
.25 |
|
|
$ |
.75 |
|
|
$ |
.75 |
|
Class B Common Stock |
|
$ |
.25 |
|
|
$ |
.25 |
|
|
$ |
.75 |
|
|
$ |
.75 |
|
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
3
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
In Thousands (Except Share Data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited |
|
|
|
Oct. 3, |
|
|
Jan. 3, |
|
|
Sept. 27, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
30,424 |
|
|
$ |
17,770 |
|
|
$ |
25,062 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
4,512 |
|
Accounts receivable, trade, less allowance for
doubtful accounts of $1,261, $2,187 and $1,971,
respectively |
|
|
115,554 |
|
|
|
92,727 |
|
|
|
96,263 |
|
Accounts receivable from The Coca-Cola Company |
|
|
20,165 |
|
|
|
4,109 |
|
|
|
17,460 |
|
Accounts receivable, other |
|
|
23,382 |
|
|
|
17,005 |
|
|
|
17,015 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
62,686 |
|
|
|
59,122 |
|
|
|
67,762 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
31,817 |
|
|
|
35,016 |
|
|
|
25,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
287,528 |
|
|
|
230,249 |
|
|
|
253,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
312,759 |
|
|
|
326,701 |
|
|
|
319,456 |
|
Leased property under capital leases, net |
|
|
48,029 |
|
|
|
51,548 |
|
|
|
52,727 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
40,645 |
|
|
|
46,508 |
|
|
|
46,001 |
|
Franchise rights |
|
|
520,672 |
|
|
|
520,672 |
|
|
|
520,672 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
102,049 |
|
|
|
102,049 |
|
|
|
102,049 |
|
Other identifiable intangible assets, net |
|
|
4,983 |
|
|
|
5,350 |
|
|
|
5,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,316,665 |
|
|
$ |
1,283,077 |
|
|
$ |
1,299,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
4
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
In Thousands (Except Share Data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited |
|
|
|
Oct. 3, |
|
|
Jan. 3, |
|
|
Sept. 27, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of debt |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Current portion of obligations under capital leases |
|
|
3,861 |
|
|
|
3,846 |
|
|
|
3,759 |
|
Accounts payable, trade |
|
|
38,377 |
|
|
|
36,794 |
|
|
|
32,597 |
|
Accounts payable to The Coca-Cola Company |
|
|
43,394 |
|
|
|
27,880 |
|
|
|
43,601 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
65,119 |
|
|
|
61,978 |
|
|
|
64,208 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
26,385 |
|
|
|
25,963 |
|
|
|
23,195 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
10,056 |
|
|
|
5,521 |
|
|
|
12,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
187,192 |
|
|
|
161,982 |
|
|
|
179,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
158,359 |
|
|
|
158,548 |
|
|
|
142,239 |
|
Pension and postretirement benefit obligations |
|
|
81,021 |
|
|
|
89,306 |
|
|
|
99,066 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
108,417 |
|
|
|
106,968 |
|
|
|
103,788 |
|
Obligations under capital leases |
|
|
56,386 |
|
|
|
59,261 |
|
|
|
60,247 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
523,025 |
|
|
|
537,917 |
|
|
|
552,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,114,400 |
|
|
|
1,113,982 |
|
|
|
1,138,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, $1.00 par value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized
30,000,000 shares; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued 10,203,821 shares |
|
|
10,204 |
|
|
|
10,204 |
|
|
|
10,204 |
|
Class B Common Stock, $1.00 par value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized
10,000,000 shares; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued 2,672,316, 2,649,996 and 2,649,996 shares,
respectively |
|
|
2,671 |
|
|
|
2,649 |
|
|
|
2,649 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
104,758 |
|
|
|
103,464 |
|
|
|
103,562 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
133,347 |
|
|
|
107,995 |
|
|
|
108,295 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(43,779 |
) |
|
|
(46,767 |
) |
|
|
(54,038 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207,201 |
|
|
|
177,545 |
|
|
|
170,672 |
|
Less-Treasury stock, at cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common 3,062,374 shares |
|
|
60,845 |
|
|
|
60,845 |
|
|
|
60,845 |
|
Class B
Common 628,114 shares |
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated |
|
|
145,947 |
|
|
|
116,291 |
|
|
|
109,418 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
56,318 |
|
|
|
52,804 |
|
|
|
52,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
202,265 |
|
|
|
169,095 |
|
|
|
161,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,316,665 |
|
|
$ |
1,283,077 |
|
|
$ |
1,299,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
5
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(UNAUDITED)
In Thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B |
|
|
in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Excess of |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Par Value |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
of CCBCC |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance on Dec. 28, 2008 |
|
$ |
9,706 |
|
|
$ |
3,127 |
|
|
$ |
103,582 |
|
|
$ |
79,021 |
|
|
$ |
(57,873 |
) |
|
$ |
(61,254 |
) |
|
$ |
76,309 |
|
|
$ |
50,397 |
|
|
$ |
126,706 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,146 |
|
|
|
1,982 |
|
|
|
38,128 |
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustments, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Pension and postretirement
benefit adjustments,
net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,981 |
|
|
|
1,982 |
|
|
|
41,963 |
|
Cash dividends paid
Common ($.75 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,232 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,232 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,232 |
) |
Class B Common
($.75 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,640 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,640 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,640 |
) |
Issuance of 20,000 shares
of Class B Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of Class B
Common Stock into
Common Stock |
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
(498 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance on Sept. 27, 2009 |
|
$ |
10,204 |
|
|
$ |
2,649 |
|
|
$ |
103,562 |
|
|
$ |
108,295 |
|
|
$ |
(54,038 |
) |
|
$ |
(61,254 |
) |
|
$ |
109,418 |
|
|
$ |
52,379 |
|
|
$ |
161,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance on Jan. 3, 2010 |
|
$ |
10,204 |
|
|
$ |
2,649 |
|
|
$ |
103,464 |
|
|
$ |
107,995 |
|
|
$ |
(46,767 |
) |
|
$ |
(61,254 |
) |
|
$ |
116,291 |
|
|
$ |
52,804 |
|
|
$ |
169,095 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,236 |
|
|
|
3,514 |
|
|
|
35,750 |
|
Ownership share of
Southeastern OCI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustments, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
Pension and postretirement
benefit adjustments,
net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,224 |
|
|
|
3,514 |
|
|
|
38,738 |
|
Cash dividends paid
Common ($.75 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,356 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,356 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,356 |
) |
Class B Common
($.75 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,528 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,528 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,528 |
) |
Issuance of 22,320 shares of
Class B Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
1,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance on Oct. 3, 2010 |
|
$ |
10,204 |
|
|
$ |
2,671 |
|
|
$ |
104,758 |
|
|
$ |
133,347 |
|
|
$ |
(43,779 |
) |
|
$ |
(61,254 |
) |
|
$ |
145,947 |
|
|
$ |
56,318 |
|
|
$ |
202,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
6
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
In Thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Nine Months |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
35,750 |
|
|
$ |
38,128 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
44,163 |
|
|
|
45,526 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
421 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
2,188 |
|
|
|
6,470 |
|
Loss on sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
1,211 |
|
|
|
767 |
|
Impairment of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain on property, plant and equipment damaged in flood |
|
|
(881 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of debt costs |
|
|
1,760 |
|
|
|
1,811 |
|
Amortization of deferred gain related to terminated
interest rate agreements |
|
|
(907 |
) |
|
|
(1,770 |
) |
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
1,588 |
|
|
|
1,464 |
|
Insurance proceeds received for flood damage |
|
|
1,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in current assets less current liabilities |
|
|
(22,043 |
) |
|
|
(13,063 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in other noncurrent assets |
|
|
4,434 |
|
|
|
(12,606 |
) |
Decrease in other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
(5,368 |
) |
|
|
(8,813 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
28,374 |
|
|
|
20,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
64,124 |
|
|
|
58,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(29,011 |
) |
|
|
(29,776 |
) |
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
1,373 |
|
|
|
4,942 |
|
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
(4,512 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(26,638 |
) |
|
|
(29,346 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,062 |
|
Borrowings
(repayments) under revolving credit facility |
|
|
(15,000 |
) |
|
|
30,000 |
|
Repayment
current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(176,693 |
) |
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(6,884 |
) |
|
|
(6,872 |
) |
Payments for the termination of interest rate lock agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(340 |
) |
Principal payments on capital lease obligations |
|
|
(2,860 |
) |
|
|
(2,364 |
) |
Debt issuance costs paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,042 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(24,832 |
) |
|
|
(49,335 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash |
|
|
12,654 |
|
|
|
(20,345 |
) |
Cash at beginning of period |
|
|
17,770 |
|
|
|
45,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of period |
|
$ |
30,424 |
|
|
$ |
25,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Class B Common Stock in connection with stock award |
|
$ |
1,316 |
|
|
$ |
1,130 |
|
Capital lease obligations incurred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
660 |
|
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
7
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1. Significant Accounting Policies
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
and its majority owned subsidiaries (the Company). All significant intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated.
The consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments which, in the opinion of management,
are necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. All such
adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial reporting and the instructions to Form
10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all information and
footnotes required by GAAP. The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
Certain
prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current
classifications.
The accounting policies followed in the presentation of interim financial results are consistent
with those followed on an annual basis. These policies are presented in Note 1 to the consolidated
financial statements included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
January 3, 2010 filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
2. Seasonality of Business
Historically, operating results for the third quarter and the first nine months of the fiscal year
have not been representative of results for the entire fiscal year. Business seasonality results
primarily from higher unit sales of the Companys products in the second and third quarters versus
the first and fourth quarters of the fiscal year. Fixed costs, such as depreciation expense, are
not significantly impacted by business seasonality.
3. Piedmont Coca-Cola Bottling Partnership
On July 2, 1993, the Company and The Coca-Cola Company formed Piedmont Coca-Cola Bottling
Partnership (Piedmont) to distribute and market nonalcoholic beverages primarily in portions of
North Carolina and South Carolina. The Company provides a portion of the nonalcoholic
beverage products to Piedmont at cost and receives a fee for managing the operations of
Piedmont pursuant to a management agreement. These intercompany transactions are eliminated in the
consolidated financial statements.
Noncontrolling interest as of October 3, 2010, January 3, 2010 and September 27, 2009 represents
the portion of Piedmont owned by The Coca-Cola Company. The Coca-Cola Companys interest in
Piedmont was 22.7% for all periods presented.
8
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
4. Inventories
Inventories were summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct. 3, |
|
Jan. 3, |
|
Sept. 27, |
In Thousands |
|
2010 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Finished products |
|
$ |
36,149 |
|
|
$ |
33,686 |
|
|
$ |
40,576 |
|
Manufacturing materials |
|
|
8,284 |
|
|
|
8,275 |
|
|
|
7,968 |
|
Plastic shells, plastic pallets and other inventories |
|
|
18,253 |
|
|
|
17,161 |
|
|
|
19,218 |
|
|
Total inventories |
|
$ |
62,686 |
|
|
$ |
59,122 |
|
|
$ |
67,762 |
|
|
5. Property, Plant and Equipment
The principal categories and estimated useful lives of property, plant and equipment were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct. 3, |
|
Jan. 3, |
|
Sept. 27, |
|
Estimated |
In Thousands |
|
2010 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Useful Lives |
|
Land |
|
$ |
12,966 |
|
|
$ |
12,671 |
|
|
$ |
12,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings |
|
|
117,131 |
|
|
|
111,314 |
|
|
|
110,059 |
|
|
10-50 years |
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
132,088 |
|
|
|
127,068 |
|
|
|
124,410 |
|
|
5-20 years |
Transportation equipment |
|
|
151,215 |
|
|
|
156,692 |
|
|
|
165,867 |
|
|
4-17 years |
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
35,613 |
|
|
|
36,573 |
|
|
|
37,363 |
|
|
4-10 years |
Cold drink dispensing equipment |
|
|
314,352 |
|
|
|
312,079 |
|
|
|
309,727 |
|
|
6-15 years |
Leasehold and land improvements |
|
|
67,152 |
|
|
|
64,390 |
|
|
|
61,937 |
|
|
5-20 years |
Software for internal use |
|
|
68,449 |
|
|
|
65,290 |
|
|
|
65,022 |
|
|
3-10 years |
Construction in progress |
|
|
2,944 |
|
|
|
7,907 |
|
|
|
2,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment, at cost |
|
|
901,910 |
|
|
|
893,984 |
|
|
|
888,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation
and amortization |
|
|
589,151 |
|
|
|
567,283 |
|
|
|
569,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
$ |
312,759 |
|
|
$ |
326,701 |
|
|
$ |
319,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization expense was $14.9 million and $15.1 million in the third quarter of
2010 (Q3 2010) and the third quarter of 2009 (Q3 2009), respectively. Depreciation and
amortization expense was $44.2 million and $45.5 million in the first nine months of 2010 (YTD
2010) and the first nine months of 2009 (YTD 2009), respectively. These amounts included
amortization expense for leased property under capital leases.
9
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
6. Leased Property Under Capital Leases
Leased property under capital leases was summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct. 3, |
|
Jan. 3, |
|
Sept. 27, |
|
Estimated |
In Thousands |
|
2010 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Useful Lives |
|
Leased property under capital leases |
|
$ |
76,877 |
|
|
$ |
76,877 |
|
|
$ |
76,877 |
|
|
3-20 years |
Less: Accumulated amortization |
|
|
28,848 |
|
|
|
25,329 |
|
|
|
24,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased property under capital leases, net |
|
$ |
48,029 |
|
|
$ |
51,548 |
|
|
$ |
52,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 3, 2010, real estate represented $47.7 million of the leased property under capital
leases and $46.2 million of this real estate is leased from related parties as described in Note
19 to the consolidated financial statements.
The Company modified a related party lease and terminated a second lease in the first quarter of
2009 (Q1 2009). See Note 19 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information
on the lease modification.
The Companys outstanding lease obligations for these capital leases were $60.2 million, $63.1
million and $64.0 million as of October 3, 2010, January 3, 2010 and September 27, 2009,
respectively.
7. Franchise Rights and Goodwill
There was no change in the carrying amounts of franchise rights and goodwill in the periods
presented. The Company performs its annual impairment test of franchise rights and goodwill as of
the first day of the fourth quarter. During YTD 2010, the Company did not experience any
triggering events or changes in circumstances that indicated the carrying amounts of the Companys
franchise rights or goodwill exceeded fair values. As such, the Company has not recognized any
impairments of franchise rights or goodwill.
8. Other Identifiable Intangible Assets
Other identifiable intangible assets were summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct. 3, |
|
Jan. 3, |
|
Sept. 27, |
|
Estimated |
In Thousands |
|
2010 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Useful Lives |
|
Other identifiable intangible assets |
|
$ |
8,665 |
|
|
$ |
8,665 |
|
|
$ |
8,665 |
|
|
1-20 years |
Less: Accumulated amortization |
|
|
3,682 |
|
|
|
3,315 |
|
|
|
3,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other identifiable intangible assets, net |
|
$ |
4,983 |
|
|
$ |
5,350 |
|
|
$ |
5,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other identifiable intangible assets primarily represent customer relationships and
distribution rights.
10
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
9. Other Accrued Liabilities
Other accrued liabilities were summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct. 3, |
|
Jan. 3, |
|
Sept. 27, |
In Thousands |
|
2010 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Accrued marketing costs |
|
$ |
15,809 |
|
|
$ |
9,738 |
|
|
$ |
9,987 |
|
Accrued insurance costs |
|
|
18,012 |
|
|
|
18,086 |
|
|
|
17,940 |
|
Accrued taxes (other than income taxes) |
|
|
2,830 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
2,480 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
Employee benefit plan accruals |
|
|
10,985 |
|
|
|
12,015 |
|
|
|
12,126 |
|
Checks and transfers yet to be presented for
payment from zero balance cash accounts |
|
|
9,795 |
|
|
|
11,862 |
|
|
|
11,950 |
|
All other accrued liabilities |
|
|
7,688 |
|
|
|
9,869 |
|
|
|
6,725 |
|
|
Total other accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
65,119 |
|
|
$ |
61,978 |
|
|
$ |
64,208 |
|
|
10. Debt
Debt was summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
Interest |
|
Oct. 3, |
|
Jan. 3, |
|
Sept. 27, |
In Thousands |
|
Maturity |
|
Rate |
|
Paid |
|
2010 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Revolving Credit Facility |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varies |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
Senior Notes |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
Semi-annually |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
Senior Notes |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
5.30 |
% |
|
Semi-annually |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
Senior Notes |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
Semi-annually |
|
|
164,757 |
|
|
|
164,757 |
|
|
|
164,757 |
|
Senior Notes |
|
|
2019 |
|
|
|
7.00 |
% |
|
Semi-annually |
|
|
110,000 |
|
|
|
110,000 |
|
|
|
110,000 |
|
Unamortized discount on Senior Notes |
|
|
2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,732 |
) |
|
|
(1,840 |
) |
|
|
(1,875 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
523,025 |
|
|
|
537,917 |
|
|
|
552,882 |
|
Less: Current portion of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
523,025 |
|
|
$ |
537,917 |
|
|
$ |
552,882 |
|
|
11
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
10. Debt
On March 8, 2007, the Company entered into a $200 million revolving credit facility ($200 million
facility), replacing its $100 million revolving credit facility. The $200 million facility
matures in March 2012 and includes an option to extend the term for an additional year at the
discretion of the participating banks. The $200 million facility bears interest at a floating
base rate or a floating rate of LIBOR plus an interest rate spread of .35%, dependent on the
length of the term of the interest period. In addition, the Company must pay an annual facility
fee of .10% of the lenders aggregate commitments under the facility. Both the interest rate
spread and the facility fee are determined from a commonly-used pricing grid based on the
Companys long-term senior unsecured debt rating. The $200 million facility contains two financial
covenants: a fixed charges coverage ratio and a debt to operating cash flow ratio, each as
defined in the credit agreement. The fixed charges coverage ratio requires the Company to
maintain a consolidated cash flow to fixed charges ratio of 1.5 to 1 or higher. The operating
cash flow ratio requires the Company to maintain a debt to cash flow ratio of 6.0 to 1 or lower.
The Company is currently in compliance with these covenants. These covenants do not currently,
and the Company does not anticipate they will, restrict its liquidity or capital resources. On
July 1, 2009, the Company borrowed $55.0 million under the $200 million facility and used the
proceeds, along with $2.4 million of cash on hand, to repay at maturity the Companys $57.4
million outstanding 7.20% Debentures due July 2009. On October 3, 2010, the Company had no
outstanding borrowings on the $200 million facility. The Company had $15 million and $30 million
of outstanding borrowings on the $200 million facility as of January 3, 2010 and September 27,
2009, respectively.
In April 2009, the Company issued $110 million of unsecured 7% Senior Notes due 2019. The
proceeds plus cash on hand were used to repay the $119.3 million debt maturity on May 1, 2009.
On February 10, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement for an uncommitted line of credit.
Under this agreement, the Company may borrow up to a total of $20 million for periods of 7 days,
30 days, 60 days or 90 days. On October 3, 2010, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under
the uncommitted line of credit.
The Company had a weighted average interest rate of 5.8%, 5.6% and 5.5% for its debt and capital
lease obligations as of October 3, 2010, January 3, 2010 and September 27, 2009, respectively. The
Companys overall weighted average interest rate on its debt and capital lease obligations was 5.9%
for YTD 2010 compared to 5.7% for YTD 2009. As of October 3, 2010, approximately 4.8% of the
Companys debt and capital lease obligations of $583.3 million was subject to changes in short-term
interest rates.
The Companys public debt is not subject to financial covenants but does limit the incurrence of
certain liens and encumbrances as well as the incurrence of indebtedness by the Companys
subsidiaries in excess of certain amounts.
All of the outstanding long-term debt has been issued by the Company with none being issued by any
of the Companys subsidiaries. There are no guarantees of the Companys debt.
12
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
11. Derivative Financial Instruments
Interest
The Company periodically uses interest rate hedging products to modify risk from interest rate
fluctuations. The Company has historically altered its fixed/floating rate mix based upon
anticipated cash flows from operations relative to the Companys debt level and the potential
impact of changes in interest rates on the Companys overall financial condition. Sensitivity
analyses are performed to review the impact on the Companys financial position and coverage of
various interest rate movements. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for
trading purposes nor does it use leveraged financial instruments.
On September 18, 2008, the Company terminated six outstanding interest rate swap agreements with a
notional amount of $225 million receiving $6.2 million in cash proceeds including $1.1 million for
previously accrued interest receivable. After accounting for the previously accrued interest
receivable, the Company is amortizing the gain of $5.1 million over the remaining term of the
underlying debt. During YTD 2010 and YTD 2009, $0.7 million and $1.0 million of the gain,
respectively, was amortized. The remaining amount to be amortized is $2.7 million. All of the
Companys interest rate swap agreements were LIBOR-based.
The Company had no interest rate swap agreements outstanding at October 3, 2010, January 3, 2010
and September 27, 2009.
Commodities
The Company is subject to the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in commodity prices. In
the normal course of business, the Company manages these risks through a variety of strategies,
including the use of derivative instruments. The Company does not use derivative instruments for
trading or speculative purposes. All derivative instruments are recorded at fair value as either
assets or liabilities in the Companys consolidated balance sheets. These derivative instruments
are not designated as hedging instruments under GAAP and are used as economic hedges to manage
commodity price risk. Currently the Company has derivative instruments to hedge some or all of its
projected diesel fuel and aluminum purchase requirements. These derivative instruments are marked
to market on a monthly basis and recognized in earnings consistent with the expense classification
of the underlying hedged item. Settlements of derivative agreements are included in cash flows
from operating activities on the Companys consolidated statements of cash flows.
The Company uses several different financial institutions for commodity derivative instruments to
minimize the concentration of credit risk. While the Company is exposed to credit loss in the
event of nonperformance by these counterparties, the Company does not anticipate nonperformance by
these parties. The Company has master agreements with the counterparties to its derivative
financial agreements that provide for net settlement of derivative transactions.
13
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
11. Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company used derivative instruments to hedge substantially all of the diesel fuel purchases
for 2009 and is using derivative instruments to hedge substantially all of the diesel fuel
purchases for 2010. These derivative instruments relate to diesel fuel used by the Companys
delivery fleet. During the first quarter of 2009, the Company began using derivative instruments
to hedge approximately 75% of the projected 2010 aluminum purchase requirements. During the
second quarter of 2009, the Company entered into derivative agreements to hedge approximately 75%
of the projected 2011 aluminum purchase requirements.
The following summarizes Q3 2010 and Q3 2009 net gains and losses on the Companys fuel and
aluminum derivative financial instruments and the classification, either as cost of sales or
selling, delivery and administrative (S,D&A) expenses, of such net gains and losses in the
consolidated statements of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
In Thousands |
|
Classification of Gain (Loss) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Fuel hedges
contract premium
and contract settlement |
|
S,D&A expenses |
|
$ |
(213 |
) |
|
$ |
(138 |
) |
Fuel hedges
mark-to-market
adjustment |
|
S,D&A expenses |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
(497 |
) |
Aluminum
hedges contract
premium and contract settlement |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum
hedges mark-to-market
adjustment |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
3,003 |
|
|
|
1,440 |
|
|
Total Net Gain (Loss) |
|
|
|
$ |
2,970 |
|
|
$ |
805 |
|
|
The following summarizes YTD 2010 and YTD 2009 net gains and losses on the Companys fuel and
aluminum derivative financial instruments and the classification of such net gains and losses in
the consolidated statements of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Nine Months |
In Thousands |
|
Classification of Gain (Loss) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Fuel hedges
contract premium
and contract settlement |
|
S,D&A expenses |
|
$ |
(243 |
) |
|
$ |
(947 |
) |
Fuel hedges
mark-to-market
adjustment |
|
S,D&A expenses |
|
|
(1,274 |
) |
|
|
2,921 |
|
Aluminum
hedges contract
premium and contract settlement |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum
hedges mark-to-market
adjustment |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(3,210 |
) |
|
|
5,326 |
|
|
Total Net Gain (Loss) |
|
|
|
$ |
(4,118 |
) |
|
$ |
7,300 |
|
|
14
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
11. Derivative Financial Instruments
The following summarizes the fair values and classification in the consolidated balance sheets of
derivative instruments held by the Company as of October 3, 2010, January 3, 2010 and September
27, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
Oct. 3, |
|
Jan. 3, |
|
Sept. 27, |
In Thousands |
|
Classification |
|
2010 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel hedges at fair market value |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$ |
343 |
|
|
$ |
1,617 |
|
|
$ |
584 |
|
Unamortized cost of fuel hedging agreements |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
859 |
|
Aluminum hedges at fair market value |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
5,660 |
|
|
|
3,303 |
|
|
|
968 |
|
Unamortized cost of aluminum hedging agreements |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
2,284 |
|
|
|
967 |
|
|
|
716 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
8,533 |
|
|
$ |
6,750 |
|
|
$ |
3,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel hedges at fair market value |
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
353 |
|
Unamortized cost of fuel
hedging agreements |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
246 |
|
Aluminum hedges at fair market value |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,582 |
|
|
|
7,149 |
|
|
|
4,358 |
|
Unamortized cost of aluminum
hedging agreements |
|
Other assets |
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
2,453 |
|
|
|
2,935 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
2,233 |
|
|
$ |
9,602 |
|
|
$ |
7,892 |
|
The following table summarizes the Companys outstanding derivative agreements as of October 3, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
Latest |
In Thousands |
|
Amount |
|
Maturity |
|
Fuel hedging agreements |
|
$ |
2,621 |
|
|
December 2010 |
Aluminum hedging agreements |
|
|
36,258 |
|
|
December 2011 |
12. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair values of
its financial instruments:
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash, Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable
The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable and accounts
payable approximate carrying values due to the short maturity of these items.
Public Debt Securities
The fair values of the Companys public debt securities are based on estimated current market
prices.
15
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
12. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Non-Public Variable Rate Debt
The carrying amounts of the Companys variable rate borrowings approximate their fair values.
Deferred Compensation Plan Assets/Liabilities
The fair values of deferred compensation plan assets and liabilities, which are held in mutual
funds, are based upon the quoted market value of the securities held within the mutual funds.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The fair values for the Companys fuel hedging and aluminum hedging agreements are based on
current settlement values. The fair values of the fuel hedging and aluminum hedging agreements at
each balance sheet date represent the estimated amounts the Company would have received or paid
upon termination of these agreements. Credit risk related to the derivative financial instruments
is managed by requiring high standards for its counterparties and periodic settlements. The
Company considers nonperformance risk in determining the fair value of derivative financial
instruments.
The carrying amounts and fair values of the Companys debt, deferred compensation plan assets and
liabilities, and derivative financial instruments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct. 3, 2010 |
|
Jan. 3, 2010 |
|
Sept. 27, 2009 |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
In Thousands |
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|
Public debt securities |
|
$ |
(523,025 |
) |
|
$ |
(580,380 |
) |
|
$ |
(522,917 |
) |
|
$ |
(557,758 |
) |
|
$ |
(522,882 |
) |
|
$ |
(559,627 |
) |
Non-public variable rate debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,000 |
) |
|
|
(15,000 |
) |
|
|
(30,000 |
) |
|
|
(30,000 |
) |
Deferred compensation plan
assets |
|
|
9,040 |
|
|
|
9,040 |
|
|
|
8,471 |
|
|
|
8,471 |
|
|
|
7,996 |
|
|
|
7,996 |
|
Deferred compensation plan
liabilities |
|
|
(9,040 |
) |
|
|
(9,040 |
) |
|
|
(8,471 |
) |
|
|
(8,471 |
) |
|
|
(7,996 |
) |
|
|
(7,996 |
) |
Fuel hedging agreements |
|
|
343 |
|
|
|
343 |
|
|
|
1,617 |
|
|
|
1,617 |
|
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
937 |
|
Aluminum hedging agreements |
|
|
7,242 |
|
|
|
7,242 |
|
|
|
10,452 |
|
|
|
10,452 |
|
|
|
5,326 |
|
|
|
5,326 |
|
The fair values of the fuel hedging and aluminum hedging agreements at October 3, 2010, January 3,
2010 and September 27, 2009 represented the estimated amount the Company would have received upon
termination of these agreements.
GAAP requires that assets and liabilities carried at fair value be classified and disclosed in one
of the following categories:
Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market
data.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.
16
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
12. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following table summarizes, by assets and liabilities, the valuation of the Companys deferred
compensation plan, aluminum hedging agreements and fuel hedging agreements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct. 3, 2010 |
|
Jan. 3, 2010 |
|
Sept. 27, 2009 |
In Thousands |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation plan assets |
|
$ |
9,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel hedging agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
937 |
|
Aluminum hedging agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,326 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation plan liabilities |
|
|
9,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company maintains a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for certain executives and other
highly compensated employees. The investment assets are held in mutual funds. The fair value of
the mutual funds is based on the quoted market value of the securities held within the funds (Level
1). The related deferred compensation liability represents the fair value of the investment
assets.
The Companys fuel hedging agreements are based upon NYMEX rates that are observable and quoted
periodically over the full term of the agreement and are considered Level 2 items.
The Companys aluminum hedging agreements are based upon LME rates that are observable and quoted
periodically over the full term of the agreement and are considered Level 2 items.
The Company does not have Level 3 assets or liabilities. Also, there were no transfers of
assets or liabilities between Level 1 and Level 2 for any of the periods presented.
13. Other Liabilities
Other liabilities were summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct. 3, |
|
Jan. 3, |
|
Sept. 27, |
In Thousands |
|
2010 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Accruals for executive benefit plans |
|
$ |
89,322 |
|
|
$ |
85,382 |
|
|
$ |
83,825 |
|
Other |
|
|
19,095 |
|
|
|
21,586 |
|
|
|
19,963 |
|
|
Total other liabilities |
|
$ |
108,417 |
|
|
$ |
106,968 |
|
|
$ |
103,788 |
|
|
17
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
14. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is a member of South Atlantic Canners, Inc. (SAC), a manufacturing cooperative from
which it is obligated to purchase 17.5 million cases of finished product on an annual basis
through May 2014. The Company is also a member of Southeastern Container (Southeastern), a
plastic bottle manufacturing cooperative from which it is obligated to purchase at least 80% of
its requirements of plastic bottles for certain designated territories. See Note 19 to the
consolidated financial statements for additional information concerning SAC and Southeastern.
The Company guarantees a portion of SACs and Southeasterns debt and lease obligations. The
amounts guaranteed were $35.7 million, $30.5 million and $38.4 million as of October 3, 2010,
January 3, 2010 and September 27, 2009, respectively. The Company has not recorded any liability
associated with these guarantees and holds no assets as collateral against these guarantees. The
guarantees relate to the debt and lease obligations of SAC and Southeastern, which resulted
primarily from the purchase of production equipment and facilities. These guarantees expire at
various dates through 2021. The members of both cooperatives consist solely of Coca-Cola
bottlers. The Company does not anticipate either of these cooperatives will fail to fulfill its
commitments. The Company further believes each of these cooperatives has sufficient assets,
including production equipment, facilities and working capital, and the ability to adjust selling
prices of their products which adequately mitigate the risk of material loss from the Companys
guarantees. In the event either of these cooperatives fails to fulfill its commitments under the
related debt and lease obligations, the Company would be responsible for payments to the lenders
up to the level of the guarantees. If these cooperatives had borrowed up to their borrowing
capacity, the Companys maximum exposure under these guarantees on October 3, 2010 would have been
$25.2 million for SAC and $25.2 million for Southeastern and the Companys maximum total exposure,
including its equity investment, would have been $30.8 million for SAC and $40.9 million for
Southeastern.
The Company has been purchasing plastic bottles from Southeastern and finished products from SAC
for more than ten years and has never had to pay against these guarantees.
The Company has an equity ownership in each of the entities in addition to the guarantees of
certain indebtedness and records its investment in each under the equity method. As of October 3,
2010, SAC had total assets of approximately $43.9 million and total debt of approximately $17.8
million. SAC had total revenues for YTD 2010 of approximately $132.6 million. As of October 3,
2010, Southeastern had total assets of approximately $405 million and total debt of
approximately $212 million. Southeastern had total revenue for YTD 2010 of approximately $446
million.
The Company has standby letters of credit, primarily related to its property and casualty
insurance programs. On October 3, 2010, these letters of credit totaled $23.1 million. The
Company was required to maintain $4.5 million of restricted cash for letters of credit beginning
in the second quarter of 2009 which was reduced to $3.5 million in the second quarter of 2010.
The Company participates in long-term marketing contractual arrangements with certain prestige
properties, athletic venues and other locations. The future payments related to these contractual
arrangements as of October 3, 2010 amounted to $18.7 million and expire at various dates through
2018.
18
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
14. Commitments and Contingencies
During May 2010, Nashville, Tennessee experienced a severe rain storm which caused extensive flood
damage in the area. The Company has a production/sales distribution facility located in the
flooded area. Due to damage incurred during this flood, the Company recorded a loss of
approximately $.2 million on uninsured cold drink equipment. This loss was offset by gains of
approximately $1.1 million for the excess of insurance proceeds received as compared to the net
book value of production equipment damaged as a result of the flood. In YTD 2010, the Company
recorded a receivable of $7.1 million for insured losses of which $1.5 million has already been
collected as of the end of Q3 2010. The Company does not expect to incur any significant expenses
related to the Nashville area flood for the remainder of 2010.
The Company is involved in various claims and legal proceedings which have arisen in the ordinary
course of its business. Although it is difficult to predict the ultimate outcome of these claims
and legal proceedings, management believes the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have
a material adverse effect on the financial condition, cash flows or results of operations of the
Company. No material amount of loss in excess of recorded amounts is believed to be reasonably
possible as a result of these claims and legal proceedings.
The Company is subject to audit by tax authorities in jurisdictions where it conducts business.
These audits may result in assessments that are subsequently resolved with the tax authorities or
potentially through the courts. Management believes the Company has adequately provided for any
assessments that are likely to result from these audits; however, final assessments, if any, could
be different than the amounts recorded in the consolidated financial statements.
15. Income Taxes
The Companys effective tax rate, as calculated by dividing income tax expense by income before
income taxes, for YTD 2010 and YTD 2009 was 34.6% and 23.8%, respectively. The Companys effective
tax rate, as calculated by dividing income tax expense by the difference of income before income
taxes minus net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest, for YTD 2010 and YTD 2009 was
37.0% and 24.8%, respectively. The increase in the effective tax rate
for YTD 2010 was due to a larger adjustment to the reserve for
uncertain tax positions in 2009 as compared to 2010 and the elimination of the
tax deduction associated with Medicare Part D subsidy as required by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) enacted on March 23, 2010 and the Health Care and Education
Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Reconciliation Act) enacted on March 30, 2010.
19
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
15. Income Taxes
The following table provides a reconciliation of the income tax expense at the statutory federal
rate to actual income tax expense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Nine Months |
In Thousands |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Statutory expense |
|
$ |
17,910 |
|
|
$ |
16,826 |
|
State income taxes, net of federal effect |
|
|
2,165 |
|
|
|
2,094 |
|
Manufacturing deduction benefit |
|
|
(1,791 |
) |
|
|
(1,197 |
) |
Meals and entertainment |
|
|
774 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
Adjustment for uncertain tax positions |
|
|
(1,080 |
) |
|
|
(7,070 |
) |
Tax law change related to Medicare Part D subsidy |
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
$ |
18,936 |
|
|
$ |
11,928 |
|
|
The Company had $4.5 million of uncertain tax positions as of October 3, 2010, including accrued interest, of which $2.4
million would affect the Companys effective tax rate if recognized. The
Company had $5.6 million of uncertain tax positions as of January 3, 2010, including accrued interest, of which $3.5
million would affect the Companys effective tax rate if recognized. The
Company had $3.0 million of uncertain tax positions as of September 27, 2009, including accrued interest, all of which would
affect the Companys effective tax rate if recognized. While it is
expected that the amount of uncertain tax positions may change in the next 12 months, the Company
does not expect the change to have a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements.
The Company recognizes potential interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in
income tax expense. As of October 3, 2010, the Company had approximately $.4 million of accrued
interest related to uncertain tax positions. As of January 3, 2010, the Company had approximately
$.9 million of accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions. As of September 27, 2009, the
Company had approximately $.8 million of accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions.
Income tax expense included an interest credit of approximately $.5 million in YTD 2010 and an
interest credit of approximately $1.7 million in YTD 2009.
The PPACA and the Reconciliation Act include provisions that will reduce the tax benefits available
to employers that receive Medicare Part D subsidies. As a result, during the first quarter of
2010, the Company recorded tax expense totaling $.5 million related to changes made to the tax
deductibility of Medicare Part D subsidies.
In Q1 2009, the Company reached an agreement with a taxing authority to settle prior tax positions
for which the Company had previously provided reserves due to uncertainty of resolution. As a
result, the Company reduced the liability for uncertain tax positions by $1.7 million. The net
effect of the adjustment was a decrease to income tax expense in YTD 2009 of approximately $1.7
million.
In Q3 2009, the Company reduced its liability for uncertain tax positions by $5.4 million. The net
effect of the adjustment was a decrease to income tax expense of approximately $5.4 million. The
reduction of the liability for uncertain tax positions was due mainly to the lapse of applicable
statute of limitations.
20
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
15. Income Taxes
In Q3 2010, the Company reduced its liability for uncertain tax positions by $1.7 million. The net
effect of the adjustment was a decrease to income tax expense by
approximately $1.7 million. The reduction of the liability for
uncertain tax positions was due mainly to the lapse of the applicable statute of limitations.
Various tax years from 1992 remain open to examination by taxing jurisdictions to which the Company
is subject due to loss carryforwards.
16. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Accumulated other comprehensive loss is comprised of adjustments relative to the Companys pension
and postretirement medical benefit plans, foreign currency translation adjustments required for a
subsidiary of the Company that performs data analysis and provides consulting services outside the
United States and the Companys share of Southeasterns other comprehensive loss.
A summary of accumulated other comprehensive loss for Q3 2010 and Q3 2009 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 4, |
|
Pre-tax |
|
Tax |
|
Oct. 3, |
In Thousands |
|
2010 |
|
Activity |
|
Effect |
|
2010 |
|
Net pension activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial loss |
|
$ |
(38,809 |
) |
|
$ |
1,365 |
|
|
$ |
(535 |
) |
|
$ |
(37,979 |
) |
Prior service costs |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
Net postretirement benefits activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial loss |
|
|
(12,592 |
) |
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
(12,343 |
) |
Prior service costs |
|
|
6,834 |
|
|
|
(446 |
) |
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
6,563 |
|
Transition asset |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Ownership share of Southeastern OCI |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(44,595 |
) |
|
$ |
1,343 |
|
|
$ |
(527 |
) |
|
$ |
(43,779 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 28, |
|
Pre-tax |
|
Tax |
|
Sept. 27, |
In Thousands |
|
2009 |
|
Activity |
|
Effect |
|
2009 |
|
Net pension activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial loss |
|
$ |
(53,880 |
) |
|
$ |
2,339 |
|
|
$ |
(921 |
) |
|
$ |
(52,462 |
) |
Prior service costs |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
Net postretirement benefits activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial loss |
|
|
(9,361 |
) |
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
(9,229 |
) |
Prior service costs |
|
|
7,917 |
|
|
|
(446 |
) |
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
7,647 |
|
Transition asset |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(55,319 |
) |
|
$ |
2,113 |
|
|
$ |
(832 |
) |
|
$ |
(54,038 |
) |
|
21
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
16. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
A summary of accumulated other comprehensive loss for YTD 2010 and YTD 2009 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan. 3, |
|
Pre-tax |
|
Tax |
|
Oct. 3, |
In Thousands |
|
2010 |
|
Activity |
|
Effect |
|
2010 |
|
Net pension activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial loss |
|
$ |
(40,626 |
) |
|
$ |
4,355 |
|
|
$ |
(1,708 |
) |
|
$ |
(37,979 |
) |
Prior service costs |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
Net postretirement benefits activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial loss |
|
|
(13,470 |
) |
|
|
1,092 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(12,343 |
) |
Prior service costs |
|
|
7,376 |
|
|
|
(1,338 |
) |
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
6,563 |
|
Transition asset |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Ownership share of Southeastern OCI |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(46,767 |
) |
|
$ |
4,154 |
|
|
$ |
(1,166 |
) |
|
$ |
(43,779 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 28, |
|
Pre-tax |
|
Tax |
|
Sept. 27, |
In Thousands |
|
2008 |
|
Activity |
|
Effect |
|
2009 |
|
Net pension activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial loss |
|
$ |
(56,717 |
) |
|
$ |
7,017 |
|
|
$ |
(2,762 |
) |
|
$ |
(52,462 |
) |
Prior service costs |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
Net postretirement benefits activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial loss |
|
|
(9,625 |
) |
|
|
653 |
|
|
|
(257 |
) |
|
|
(9,229 |
) |
Prior service costs |
|
|
8,459 |
|
|
|
(1,339 |
) |
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
7,647 |
|
Transition asset |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(57,873 |
) |
|
$ |
6,325 |
|
|
$ |
(2,490 |
) |
|
$ |
(54,038 |
) |
|
17. Capital Transactions
The Company has two classes of common stock outstanding, Common Stock and Class B Common Stock.
The Common Stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Marketsm under the symbol COKE.
There is no established public trading market for the Class B Common Stock. Shares of the Class B
Common Stock are convertible on a share-for-share basis into shares of Common Stock at any time at
the option of the holders of Class B Common Stock.
No cash dividend or dividend of property or stock other than stock of the Company, as specifically
described in the Companys certificate of incorporation, may be declared and paid on the Class B
Common Stock unless an equal or greater dividend is declared and paid on the Common Stock. During
YTD 2010 and YTD 2009, dividends of $.75 per share were declared and paid on both Common Stock and
Class B Common Stock.
22
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
17. Capital Transactions
Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote per share and each share of Class B Common
Stock is entitled to 20 votes per share at all meetings of stockholders. Except as otherwise
required by law, holders of the Common Stock and Class B Common Stock vote together as a single
class on all matters brought before the Companys stockholders. In the event of liquidation,
there is no preference between the two classes of common stock.
On May 12, 1999, the stockholders of the Company approved a restricted stock award program for J.
Frank Harrison, III, the Companys Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer,
consisting of 200,000 shares of the Companys Class B Common Stock. Under the award, shares of
restricted stock were granted at a rate of 20,000 shares per year over a ten-year period. The
vesting of each annual installment was contingent upon the Company achieving at least 80% of the
overall goal achievement factor in the Companys Annual Bonus Plan. The restricted stock award did
not entitle Mr. Harrison, III to participate in dividend or voting rights until each installment
had vested and the shares were issued. The restricted stock award expired at the end of fiscal
year 2008. On March 4, 2009, the Compensation Committee determined an additional 20,000 shares of
restricted Class B Common Stock vested and such shares were issued to Mr. Harrison, III for the
fiscal year ended December 28, 2008.
On April 29, 2008, the stockholders of the Company approved a Performance Unit Award Agreement for
Mr. Harrison, III consisting of 400,000 performance units (Units). Each Unit represents the
right to receive one share of the Companys Class B Common Stock, subject to certain terms and
conditions. The Units vest in annual increments over a ten-year period starting in fiscal year
2009. The number of Units that vest each year will equal the product of 40,000 multiplied by the
overall goal achievement factor (not to exceed 100%) under the Companys Annual Bonus Plan. The
Performance Unit Award Agreement replaced the restricted stock award program.
Each annual 40,000 Unit tranche has an independent performance requirement as it is not
established until the Companys Annual Bonus Plan targets are approved each year by the Companys
Board of Directors. As a result, each 40,000 Unit tranche is considered to have its own service
inception date, grant-date and requisite service period. The Companys Annual Bonus Plan targets,
which establish the performance requirements for the Performance Unit Award Agreement, are
approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors in the first quarter of each
year. The Performance Unit Award Agreement does not entitle Mr. Harrison, III to participate in
dividends or voting rights until each installment has vested and the shares are issued. Mr.
Harrison, III may satisfy tax withholding requirements in whole or in part by requiring the
Company to settle in cash such number of Units otherwise payable in Class B Common Stock to meet
the maximum statutory tax withholding requirements.
On March 9, 2010, the Compensation Committee determined that 40,000 Units vested for the fiscal
year ended January 3, 2010. Of such Units, 22,320 were settled for 22,320 shares of Class B
Common Stock and 17,680 were settled in cash to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection
with the vesting of the Units.
Compensation expense for the Performance Unit Award Agreement recognized in YTD 2010 was $1.6
million, which was based upon a share price of $52.94 on October 1, 2010. Compensation expense
recognized in YTD 2009 was $1.5 million, which was based upon a share price of $48.80 on September
25, 2009.
23
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
17. Capital Transactions
On February 19, 2009, The Coca-Cola Company converted 497,670 shares of the Companys Class B
Common Stock into an equivalent number of shares of the Companys Common Stock.
The increase in the total number of shares outstanding in YTD 2010 was due to the issuance of the
22,320 shares of Class B Common Stock related to the Performance Unit Award Agreement. The
increase in the total number of shares outstanding in YTD 2009 was due to the issuance of 20,000
shares of Class B Common Stock related to the restricted stock award.
18. Benefit Plans
Pension Plans
Retirement benefits under the two Company-sponsored pension plans are based on the employees
length of service, average compensation over the five consecutive years that give the highest
average compensation and average Social Security taxable wage base during the 35-year period
before reaching Social Security retirement age. Contributions to the plans are based on the
projected unit credit actuarial funding method and are limited to the amounts currently deductible
for income tax purposes. On February 22, 2006, the Board of Directors of the Company approved an
amendment to the principal Company-sponsored pension plan to cease further benefit accruals under
the plan effective June 30, 2006.
The components of net periodic pension cost were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
First Nine Months |
|
In Thousands |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
58 |
|
|
$ |
68 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
2,864 |
|
|
|
2,788 |
|
|
|
8,578 |
|
|
|
8,365 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(2,894 |
) |
|
|
(2,270 |
) |
|
|
(8,630 |
) |
|
|
(6,810 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
1,365 |
|
|
|
2,339 |
|
|
|
4,355 |
|
|
|
7,017 |
|
|
Net periodic pension cost |
|
$ |
1,359 |
|
|
$ |
2,884 |
|
|
$ |
4,373 |
|
|
$ |
8,652 |
|
|
The Company contributed $8.7 million to its Company-sponsored pension plans during YTD 2010. The
Company has made additional payments of $.9 million subsequent to the end of Q3 2010. These
contributions represent all required payments for 2010.
Postretirement Benefits
The Company provides postretirement benefits for a portion of its current employees. The Company
recognizes the cost of postretirement benefits, which consist principally of medical benefits,
during employees periods of
active service. The Company does not pre-fund these benefits and has the right to modify or
terminate certain of these benefits in the future.
24
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
18. Benefit Plans
The components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
First Nine Months |
|
In Thousands |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
182 |
|
|
$ |
158 |
|
|
$ |
572 |
|
|
$ |
473 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
1,886 |
|
|
|
1,672 |
|
Amortization of unrecognized transitional assets |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
1,092 |
|
|
|
653 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
(446 |
) |
|
|
(446 |
) |
|
|
(1,338 |
) |
|
|
(1,339 |
) |
|
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost |
|
$ |
773 |
|
|
$ |
481 |
|
|
$ |
2,193 |
|
|
$ |
1,440 |
|
|
401(k) Savings Plan
The Company provides a 401(k) Savings Plan for substantially all of its employees who are not part
of collective bargaining agreements. The Company suspended matching contributions to its 401(k)
Savings Plan effective April 1, 2009. The Company maintained the option to match its employees
401(k) Savings Plan contributions based on the financial results for 2009. The Company
subsequently decided to match the first 5% of its employees contributions (consistent with Q1 2009
matching contribution percentage) for the entire year of 2009.
The Company will match the first 3% of its employees contributions for 2010. The Company
maintains the option to increase the matching contributions an additional 2%, for a total of 5%,
for the Companys employees based on the financial results for 2010. Based on the financial
results of the first quarter of 2010, the Company decided to increase the matching contributions an
additional 2% for that quarter, which was approved and paid in the second quarter of 2010. Based
on the financial results of the second quarter of 2010, the Company decided to increase the
matching contributions an additional 2% for that quarter which was approved and paid in the third
quarter of 2010. The total cost for this benefit in YTD 2010 and YTD 2009 was $6.8 million and
$6.7 million, respectively.
Multi-Employer Benefits
The
Company entered into a new agreement in the third quarter of 2008
after one of its collective
bargaining contracts expired in July 2008. The new agreement allowed the Company to freeze its
liability to Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Plan (Central States), a
multi-employer defined benefit pension fund, while preserving the pension benefits previously
earned by the employees. As a result of freezing the Companys liability to Central States, the
Company recorded a charge of $13.6 million in the second half of 2008. The Company paid $3.0
million in the fourth quarter of 2008 to the Southern States Savings and Retirement Plan under the
agreement to freeze the Central States liability. The remaining $10.6 million was the present value
amount, using a discount rate of 7% that will be paid to Central States over the next 20 years and
was recorded in other liabilities. The Company paid approximately $1 million in 2009 and will pay
approximately $1 million annually over the next 19 years.
25
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
19. Related Party Transactions
The Companys business consists primarily of the production, marketing and distribution of
nonalcoholic beverages of The Coca-Cola Company, which is the sole owner of the secret formulas
under which the primary components (either concentrate or syrup) of its beverage products are
manufactured. As of October 3, 2010, The Coca-Cola Company had a 27.0% interest in the Companys
total outstanding Common Stock and Class B Common Stock on a combined basis, representing 5.2% of
the total votes of the Companys Common Stock and Class B Common Stock voting together as a single
class.
The following table summarizes the significant transactions between the Company and The Coca-Cola
Company:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Nine Months |
|
In Millions |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Payments by the Company for concentrate, syrup,
sweetener and other purchases |
|
$ |
301.6 |
|
|
$ |
277.4 |
|
Marketing funding support payments to the Company |
|
|
33.8 |
|
|
|
35.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments by the Company net of marketing funding support |
|
$ |
267.8 |
|
|
$ |
242.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments by the Company for customer marketing programs |
|
$ |
38.6 |
|
|
$ |
39.4 |
|
Payments by the Company for cold drink equipment parts |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
Fountain delivery and equipment repair fees paid to the Company |
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
Presence marketing funding support provided by
The Coca-Cola Company on the Companys behalf |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
Payments to the Company to facilitate the distribution of
certain brands and packages to other Coca-Cola bottlers |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
.6 |
|
Sales of finished products to The Coca-Cola Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
The Company had a production arrangement with Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. (CCE) to buy and sell
finished products at cost. Sales to CCE under this arrangement were $37.6 million and $38.2
million in YTD 2010 and YTD 2009, respectively. Purchases from CCE under this arrangement were
$19.4 million and $16.3 million in YTD 2010 and YTD 2009, respectively. In addition, CCE began
distributing one of the Companys own brands (Tum-E Yummies) in the first quarter of 2010. Total
sales to CCE for this brand were $10.5 million in YTD 2010.
The Coca-Cola Company has significant equity interest in the Company
and acquired the North American operations of CCE on October 2,
2010.
Along with all other Coca-Cola bottlers in the United States, the Company is a member in Coca-Cola
Bottlers Sales and Services Company, LLC (CCBSS), which was formed in 2003 for the
purposes of facilitating various procurement functions and distributing certain specified beverage
products of The Coca-Cola Company with the intention of enhancing the efficiency and
competitiveness of the Coca-Cola bottling system in the United States. CCBSS negotiates the
procurement for the majority of the Companys raw materials (excluding concentrate). The Company
pays an administrative fee to CCBSS for its services.
Administrative fees to CCBSS for its services were $.6 million and $.5 million in YTD 2010 and YTD
2009, respectively.
26
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
19. Related Party Transactions
The Company is a member of SAC, a manufacturing cooperative. SAC sells finished products to the
Company and Piedmont at cost. Purchases from SAC by the Company and Piedmont for finished products
were $100.6 million and $100.2 million in YTD 2010 and YTD 2009, respectively. The Company also
manages the operations of SAC pursuant to a management agreement. Management fees earned from SAC
were $1.1 million in YTD 2010 and $.9 million in YTD 2009. The Company has also guaranteed a
portion of debt for SAC. Such guarantee amounted to $18.0 million as of October 3, 2010. The
Company has not recorded any liability associated with this guarantee and holds no assets as
collateral against this guarantee. The Companys equity investment in SAC was $5.6 million as of
October 3, 2010, January 3, 2010 and September 27, 2009.
The Company is a shareholder in two entities from which it purchases substantially all its
requirements for plastic bottles. Net purchases from these entities were $55.5 million in YTD 2010
and $51.3 million in YTD 2009. In connection with its participation in Southeastern, the Company
has guaranteed a portion of the entitys debt. Such guarantee amounted to $17.7 million as of
October 3, 2010. The Company has not recorded any liability associated with this guarantee and
holds no assets as collateral against this guarantee. The Companys equity investment in one of
these entities, Southeastern, was $15.7 million, $13.2 million and $13.3 million as of October 3,
2010, January 3, 2010 and September 27, 2009, respectively.
The Company monitors its investments in cooperatives and would be required to write down its
investment if an impairment is identified and the Company determined it to be other-than temporary.
No impairment of the Companys investments in cooperatives has been identified as of October 3,
2010 nor was there any impairment in 2009 or 2008.
The Company leases from Harrison Limited Partnership One (HLP) the Snyder Production Center
(SPC) and an adjacent sales facility, which are located in Charlotte, North Carolina. HLP is
directly and indirectly owned by trusts of which J. Frank Harrison, III, Chairman of the Board of
Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Deborah H. Everhart, a director of the
Company, are trustees and beneficiaries. The current lease was to expire on December 31, 2010. On
March 23, 2009, the Company modified the lease agreement (new terms to begin January 1, 2011) with
HLP related to the SPC lease. The modified lease would not have changed the classification of the
existing lease had it been in effect in the first quarter of 2002, when the capital lease was
recorded, as the Company received a renewal option to extend the term of the lease, which it
expected to exercise. The modified lease did not extend the term of the existing lease (remaining
lease term was reduced from approximately 22 years to approximately 12 years). Accordingly, the
present value of the leased property under capital leases and capital lease obligations was
adjusted by an amount equal to the difference between the future minimum lease payments under the
modified lease agreement and the present value of the existing obligation on the modification date.
The capital lease obligations and leased property under capital leases were both decreased by $7.5
million in March 2009. The annual base rent the Company is obligated to pay under the modified
lease is subject to an adjustment for an inflation factor. The prior lease annual base rent was
subject to adjustment for an inflation factor and for increases or decreases in interest rates,
using LIBOR as the measurement device. The principal balance outstanding under this capital lease
as of October 3, 2010 was $27.7 million. Rental payments related to this lease were $2.4 million
and $2.6 million in YTD 2010 and YTD 2009, respectively.
27
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
19. Related Party Transactions
The Company leases from Beacon Investment Corporation (Beacon) the Companys headquarters office
facility and an adjacent office facility. The lease expires on December 31, 2021. Beacons sole
shareholder is J. Frank Harrison, III. The principal balance outstanding under this capital lease
as of October 3, 2010 was $29.6 million. Rental payments related to the lease were $2.9 million
and $2.8 million YTD 2010 and YTD 2009, respectively.
20. Net Sales by Product Category
Net sales by product category were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
First Nine Months |
In Thousands |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Bottle/can sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sparkling beverages (including energy products) |
|
$ |
259,824 |
|
|
$ |
257,289 |
|
|
$ |
783,531 |
|
|
$ |
749,488 |
|
Still beverages |
|
|
66,109 |
|
|
|
58,253 |
|
|
|
172,917 |
|
|
|
162,703 |
|
|
Total bottle/can sales |
|
|
325,933 |
|
|
|
315,542 |
|
|
|
956,448 |
|
|
|
912,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales to other Coca-Cola bottlers |
|
|
36,589 |
|
|
|
31,822 |
|
|
|
107,273 |
|
|
|
98,433 |
|
Post-mix and other |
|
|
32,842 |
|
|
|
27,192 |
|
|
|
96,502 |
|
|
|
77,942 |
|
|
Total other sales |
|
|
69,431 |
|
|
|
59,014 |
|
|
|
203,775 |
|
|
|
176,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
395,364 |
|
|
$ |
374,556 |
|
|
$ |
1,160,223 |
|
|
$ |
1,088,566 |
|
|
Sparkling beverages are carbonated beverages while still beverages are noncarbonated beverages.
28
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
21. Net Income Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic net income per share and diluted net income
per share under the two-class method:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
First Nine Months |
|
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Numerator for basic and diluted net income per
Common Stock and Class B Common Stock share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
Consolidated |
|
$ |
15,533 |
|
|
$ |
15,428 |
|
|
$ |
32,236 |
|
|
$ |
36,146 |
|
Less dividends: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
1,785 |
|
|
|
1,785 |
|
|
|
5,356 |
|
|
|
5,285 |
|
Class B Common Stock |
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
1,528 |
|
|
|
1,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total undistributed earnings |
|
$ |
13,236 |
|
|
$ |
13,138 |
|
|
$ |
25,352 |
|
|
$ |
29,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock undistributed earnings
basic |
|
$ |
10,291 |
|
|
$ |
10,239 |
|
|
$ |
19,721 |
|
|
$ |
22,511 |
|
Class B Common Stock undistributed earnings
basic |
|
|
2,945 |
|
|
|
2,899 |
|
|
|
5,631 |
|
|
|
6,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
undistributed earnings basic |
|
$ |
13,236 |
|
|
$ |
13,138 |
|
|
$ |
25,352 |
|
|
$ |
29,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
undistributed earnings diluted |
|
$ |
10,246 |
|
|
$ |
10,194 |
|
|
$ |
19,635 |
|
|
$ |
22,438 |
|
Class B Common Stock undistributed earnings
diluted |
|
|
2,990 |
|
|
|
2,944 |
|
|
|
5,717 |
|
|
|
6,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
undistributed earnings diluted |
|
$ |
13,236 |
|
|
$ |
13,138 |
|
|
$ |
25,352 |
|
|
$ |
29,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for basic net income per Common
Stock share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends on Common Stock |
|
$ |
1,785 |
|
|
$ |
1,785 |
|
|
$ |
5,356 |
|
|
$ |
5,285 |
|
Common Stock
undistributed earnings basic |
|
|
10,291 |
|
|
|
10,239 |
|
|
|
19,721 |
|
|
|
22,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for basic net income per Common
Stock share |
|
$ |
12,076 |
|
|
$ |
12,024 |
|
|
$ |
25,077 |
|
|
$ |
27,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for basic net income per Class B
Common Stock share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends on Class B Common Stock |
|
$ |
512 |
|
|
$ |
505 |
|
|
$ |
1,528 |
|
|
$ |
1,587 |
|
Class B Common Stock undistributed earnings
basic |
|
|
2,945 |
|
|
|
2,899 |
|
|
|
5,631 |
|
|
|
6,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for basic net income per Class B
Common Stock share |
|
$ |
3,457 |
|
|
$ |
3,404 |
|
|
$ |
7,159 |
|
|
$ |
8,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
21. Net Income Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
First Nine Months |
|
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Numerator for diluted net income per
Common Stock share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends on Common Stock |
|
$ |
1,785 |
|
|
$ |
1,785 |
|
|
$ |
5,356 |
|
|
$ |
5,285 |
|
Dividends on Class B Common Stock
assumed converted to Common Stock |
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
1,528 |
|
|
|
1,587 |
|
Common Stock undistributed earnings
diluted |
|
|
13,236 |
|
|
|
13,138 |
|
|
|
25,352 |
|
|
|
29,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for diluted net income per
Common Stock share |
|
$ |
15,533 |
|
|
$ |
15,428 |
|
|
$ |
32,236 |
|
|
$ |
36,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for diluted net income per Class B
Common Stock share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends on Class B Common Stock |
|
$ |
512 |
|
|
$ |
505 |
|
|
$ |
1,528 |
|
|
$ |
1,587 |
|
Class B Common Stock undistributed earnings
diluted |
|
|
2,990 |
|
|
|
2,944 |
|
|
|
5,717 |
|
|
|
6,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for diluted net income per Class B
Common Stock share |
|
$ |
3,502 |
|
|
$ |
3,449 |
|
|
$ |
7,245 |
|
|
$ |
8,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
21. Net Income Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
First Nine Months |
|
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Denominator for basic net income per Common
Stock and Class B Common Stock share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock weighted average shares
outstanding basic |
|
|
7,141 |
|
|
|
7,141 |
|
|
|
7,141 |
|
|
|
7,047 |
|
Class B Common Stock weighted average shares
outstanding basic |
|
|
2,044 |
|
|
|
2,022 |
|
|
|
2,039 |
|
|
|
2,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted net income per Common
Stock and Class B Common Stock share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock weighted average shares
outstanding diluted (assumes conversion of
Class B Common Stock to Common Stock) |
|
|
9,225 |
|
|
|
9,203 |
|
|
|
9,220 |
|
|
|
9,194 |
|
Class B Common Stock weighted average shares
outstanding diluted |
|
|
2,084 |
|
|
|
2,062 |
|
|
|
2,079 |
|
|
|
2,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
$ |
1.69 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
3.51 |
|
|
$ |
3.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B Common Stock |
|
$ |
1.69 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
3.51 |
|
|
$ |
3.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
3.50 |
|
|
$ |
3.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B Common Stock |
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
1.67 |
|
|
$ |
3.48 |
|
|
$ |
3.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTES TO TABLE
(1) |
|
For purposes of the diluted net income per share computation for Common Stock, all shares of
Class B Common Stock are assumed to be converted; therefore, 100% of undistributed earnings is
allocated to Common Stock. |
|
(2) |
|
For purposes of the diluted net income per share computation for Class B Common Stock,
weighted average shares of Class B Common Stock are assumed to be outstanding for the entire
period and not converted. |
|
(3) |
|
Denominator for diluted net income per share for Common Stock and Class B Common Stock
includes the dilutive effect of shares relative to the Performance Unit Award. |
31
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
22. Risks and Uncertainties
Approximately 88% of the Companys YTD 2010 bottle/can volume to retail customers are products of
The Coca-Cola Company, which is the sole supplier of these products or of the concentrates or
syrups required to manufacture these products. The remaining 12% of the Companys YTD 2010
bottle/can volume to retail customers are products of other beverage companies and the Company.
The Company has beverage agreements under which it has various requirements to meet. Failure to
meet the requirements of these beverage agreements could result in the loss of distribution rights
for the respective product.
The Coca-Cola Company recently acquired the North American operations of CCE, and the Companys
primary competitors were recently acquired by their franchisor. These transactions may cause
uncertainty within the Coca-Cola bottler system or adversely impact the Company and its business.
At this time, it is unknown whether the transactions will have a material impact on the Companys
business and financial results.
The Companys products are sold and distributed directly by its employees to retail stores and
other outlets. During YTD 2010, approximately 69% of the Companys bottle/can volume to retail
customers was sold for future consumption, while the remaining bottle/can volume to retail
customers of approximately 31% was sold for immediate consumption. During YTD 2009, approximately
68% of the Companys bottle/can volume to retail customers was sold for future consumption, while
the remaining bottle/can volume to retail customers of approximately 32% was sold for immediate
consumption. The Companys largest customers, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Food Lion, LLC, accounted
for approximately 25% and 10%, respectively, of the Companys total bottle/can volume to retail
customers in YTD 2010. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Food Lion, LLC accounted for approximately 19%
and 11%, respectively, of the Companys total bottle/can volume to retail customers in YTD 2009.
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. accounted for 17% of the Companys total net sales during YTD 2010. Wal-Mart
Stores, Inc. accounted for 15% of the Companys total net sales during YTD 2009.
The Company obtains all of its aluminum cans from two domestic suppliers. The Company currently
obtains all of its plastic bottles from two domestic entities. See Note 14 and Note 19 to the
consolidated financial statements for additional information.
The Company is exposed to price risk on such commodities as aluminum, corn and resin which affects
the cost of raw materials used in the production of finished products. The Company both produces
and procures these finished products. Examples of the raw materials affected are aluminum cans and
plastic bottles used for packaging and high fructose corn syrup used as a product ingredient.
Further, the Company is exposed to commodity price risk on crude oil which impacts the Companys
cost of fuel used in the movement and delivery of the Companys products. The Company participates
in commodity hedging and risk mitigation programs administered both by CCBSS and by the Company.
In addition, there is no limit on the price The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies can
charge for concentrate.
Certain liabilities of the Company are subject to risk due to changes in both long-term and
short-term interest rates. These liabilities include floating rate debt, leases, retirement benefit
obligations and the Companys pension liability.
32
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
22. Risks and Uncertainties
Approximately 7% of the Companys labor force is covered by collective bargaining agreements. One
collective bargaining contract covering approximately .5% of the Companys employees will expire
during the fourth quarter of 2010. One collective bargaining contract covering approximately .5%
of the Companys employees expired in the first quarter of 2010 and the Company entered into a new
agreement during the first quarter of 2010.
23. Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
Changes in current assets and current liabilities affecting cash flows were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Nine Months |
In Thousands |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Accounts receivable, trade, net |
|
$ |
(22,827 |
) |
|
$ |
3,586 |
|
Accounts receivable from The Coca-Cola Company |
|
|
(16,056 |
) |
|
|
(14,006 |
) |
Accounts receivable, other |
|
|
(4,972 |
) |
|
|
(4,025 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(5,014 |
) |
|
|
(2,265 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
3,128 |
|
|
|
(4,355 |
) |
Accounts payable, trade |
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
(9,786 |
) |
Accounts payable to The Coca-Cola Company |
|
|
15,514 |
|
|
|
8,290 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
3,141 |
|
|
|
6,704 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
(1,554 |
) |
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
4,535 |
|
|
|
4,348 |
|
|
Increase in current assets less current liabilities |
|
$ |
(22,043 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,063 |
) |
|
Non-cash activity
Additions to property, plant and equipment of $1.2 million have been accrued but not paid and are
recorded in accounts payable, trade as of October 3, 2010. Of that amount, $.2 million was related
to the Nashville flood damage.
Additions to property, plant and equipment included $1.5 million for a trade-in allowance on
manufacturing equipment in YTD 2010.
24. New Accounting Pronouncements
Recently Adopted Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued new guidance which replaces
the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which enterprise, if any, has
a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity (VIE) with an approach focused
on identifying which enterprise
33
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
24. New Accounting Pronouncements
has the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impacts the entitys
economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the
entity. The new guidance was effective for annual reporting periods that begin after November 15,
2009. The Companys adoption of this new guidance did not have a material impact on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued new guidance which eliminates the exceptions for qualifying
special-purpose entities from consolidation guidance and the exception that permitted sale
accounting for certain mortgage securitization when a transferor has not surrendered control over
the transferred financial assets. The new guidance was effective for annual reporting periods that
begin after November 15, 2009. The Companys adoption of this new guidance did not have a material
impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued new guidance that clarifies the decrease-in-ownership of
subsidiaries provisions of GAAP. The new guidance clarifies to which subsidiaries the
decrease-in-ownership provision of Accounting Standards Codification 810-10 apply. The new
guidance was effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2010. The Companys adoption of
this new guidance did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued new guidance related to the disclosures about transfers into and
out of Levels 1 and 2 fair value classifications and separate disclosures about
purchases, sales, issuances and settlements relating to the Level 3 fair value classification.
The new guidance also clarifies existing fair value disclosures about the level of disaggregation
and about inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value. The new guidance was
effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2010 except for the requirement to provide the
Level 3 activity of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis, which is
effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2011. The Companys adoption of this new
guidance did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements. The
Company also does not expect the Level 3 requirements of the new guidance effective in the first
quarter of 2011 to have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
34
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(M,D&A) should be read in conjunction with Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidateds (the Company)
consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial
statements. M,D&A includes the following sections:
|
|
|
Our Business and the Nonalcoholic Beverage Industry a general description of the
Companys business and the nonalcoholic beverage industry. |
|
|
|
|
Areas of Emphasis a summary of the Companys key priorities. |
|
|
|
|
Overview of Operations and Financial Condition a summary of key information and trends
concerning the financial results for the third quarter of 2010 (Q3 2010) and the first
nine months of 2010 (YTD 2010) and changes from the third quarter of 2009 (Q3 2009) and
the first nine months of 2009 (YTD 2009). |
|
|
|
|
Discussion of Critical Accounting Policies, Estimates and New Accounting Pronouncements
a discussion of accounting policies that are most important to the portrayal of the
Companys financial condition and results of operations and that require critical judgments
and estimates and the expected impact of new accounting pronouncements. |
|
|
|
|
Results of Operations an analysis of the Companys results of operations for Q3 2010
and YTD 2010 compared to Q3 2009 and YTD 2009. |
|
|
|
|
Financial Condition an analysis of the Companys financial condition as of the end of
Q3 2010 compared to year-end 2009 and the end of Q3 2009 as presented in the consolidated
financial statements. |
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources an analysis of capital resources, cash sources and
uses, investing activities, financing activities, off-balance sheet arrangements, aggregate
contractual obligations and hedging activities. |
|
|
|
|
Cautionary Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements. |
The consolidated financial statements include the consolidated operations of the Company and its
majority-owned subsidiaries including Piedmont Coca-Cola Bottling Partnership (Piedmont). The
noncontrolling interest consists of The Coca-Cola Companys interest in Piedmont, which was 22.7%
for all periods presented.
During May 2010, Nashville, Tennessee experienced a severe rain storm which caused extensive flood
damage in the area. The Company has a production/sales distribution facility located in the
flooded area. Due to damage incurred during this flood, the Company recorded a loss of $.2 million
on uninsured cold drink equipment. This loss was offset by gains of $1.1 million for the excess
of insurance proceeds received as compared to the net book value of production equipment damaged as
a result of the flood. In YTD 2010, the Company recorded a receivable of $7.1 million for insured
losses of which $1.5 million has already been collected as of YTD 2010. The Company does not
expect to incur any significant expenses related to the Nashville area flood for the remainder of
2010.
Our Business and the Nonalcoholic Beverage Industry
The Company produces, markets and distributes nonalcoholic beverages, primarily products of The
Coca-Cola Company, which include some of the most recognized and popular beverage brands in the
world. The Company is the largest independent bottler of products of
The Coca-Cola Company in the
United States, distributing these products in eleven states primarily in the Southeast. The
Company also distributes several other beverage brands. These product offerings include both
sparkling and still beverages. Sparkling beverages are carbonated beverages including energy
products. Still beverages are noncarbonated beverages such as bottled water, tea, ready to drink
35
coffee, enhanced water, juices and sports drinks. The Company had net sales of approximately $1.4
billion in 2009.
The nonalcoholic beverage market is highly competitive. The Companys competitors include bottlers
and distributors of nationally and regionally advertised and marketed products and private label
products. In each region in which the Company operates, between 85% and 95% of sparkling beverage
sales in bottles, cans and other containers are accounted for by the Company and its principal
competitors, which in each region includes the local bottler of Pepsi-Cola and, in some regions,
the local bottler of Dr Pepper, Royal Crown and/or 7-Up products. During the last several years,
industry sales of sugar sparkling beverages, other than energy products,
have declined. The
decline in sugar sparkling beverages has generally been offset by volume growth in other
nonalcoholic product categories. The sparkling beverage category (including energy products)
represents 82% of the Companys YTD 2010 bottle/can net sales.
The principal methods of competition in the nonalcoholic beverage industry are point-of-sale
merchandising, new product introductions, new vending and dispensing equipment, packaging changes,
pricing, price promotions, product quality, retail space management, customer service, frequency of
distribution and advertising. The Company believes it is competitive in its territories with
respect to each of these methods.
Historically, operating results for the third quarter and the first nine months of the fiscal year
have not been representative of results for the entire fiscal year. Business seasonality results
primarily from higher unit sales of the Companys products in the second and third quarters versus
the first and fourth quarters of the fiscal year. Fixed costs, such as depreciation expense, are
not significantly impacted by business seasonality.
The Company performs its annual impairment test of franchise rights and goodwill as of the first
day of the fourth quarter. During YTD 2010, the Company did not experience any triggering events
or changes in circumstances that indicated the carrying amounts of the Companys franchise rights
or goodwill exceeded fair values. As such, the Company has not recognized any impairments of
franchise rights or goodwill.
The Coca-Cola Company recently acquired the North American operations of Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc.
(CCE), and the Companys primary competitors were recently acquired by their franchisor. These
transactions may cause uncertainty within the Coca-Cola bottler system or adversely impact the
Company and its business. At this time, it is unknown whether the transactions will have a
material impact on the Companys business and financial results.
Net sales by product category were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
First Nine Months |
In Thousands |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Bottle/can sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sparkling beverages (including energy products) |
|
$ |
259,824 |
|
|
$ |
257,289 |
|
|
$ |
783,531 |
|
|
$ |
749,488 |
|
Still beverages |
|
|
66,109 |
|
|
|
58,253 |
|
|
|
172,917 |
|
|
|
162,703 |
|
|
Total bottle/can sales |
|
|
325,933 |
|
|
|
315,542 |
|
|
|
956,448 |
|
|
|
912,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales to other Coca-Cola bottlers |
|
|
36,589 |
|
|
|
31,822 |
|
|
|
107,273 |
|
|
|
98,433 |
|
Post-mix and other |
|
|
32,842 |
|
|
|
27,192 |
|
|
|
96,502 |
|
|
|
77,942 |
|
|
Total other sales |
|
|
69,431 |
|
|
|
59,014 |
|
|
|
203,775 |
|
|
|
176,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
395,364 |
|
|
$ |
374,556 |
|
|
$ |
1,160,223 |
|
|
$ |
1,088,566 |
|
|
36
Areas of Emphasis
Key priorities for the Company include revenue management, product innovation and beverage
portfolio expansion, distribution cost management and productivity.
Revenue Management
Revenue management requires a strategy which reflects consideration for pricing of brands and
packages within product categories and channels, highly effective working relationships with
customers and disciplined fact-based decision-making. Revenue management has been and continues to
be a key performance driver which has significant impact on the Companys results of operations.
Product Innovation and Beverage Portfolio Expansion
Sparkling beverage volume, other than energy products, has declined over the past several years.
Innovation of both new brands and packages has been and will continue to be critical to the
Companys overall revenue. New packaging introductions included the 2-liter contour bottle during
2009.
The Company has invested in its own brand portfolio with products such as Tum-E Yummies, a vitamin
C enhanced flavored drink, Country Breeze tea and diet Country Breeze tea. These brands enable the
Company to participate in strong growth categories and capitalize on distribution channels that may
include the Companys traditional Coca-Cola franchise territory as well as third party distributors
outside the Companys traditional Coca-Cola franchise territory. While the growth prospects of
Company-owned or exclusively licensed brands appear promising, the cost of developing, marketing
and distributing these brands is anticipated to be significant as well.
Distribution Cost Management
Distribution costs represent the costs of transporting finished goods from Company locations to
customer outlets. Total distribution costs amounted to $140.3 million and $138.7 million in YTD
2010 and YTD 2009, respectively. Over the past several years, the Company has focused on converting
its distribution system from a conventional routing system to a predictive system. This conversion
to a predictive system has allowed the Company to more efficiently handle increasing numbers of
products. In addition, the Company has closed a number of smaller sales distribution centers over
the past several years reducing its fixed warehouse-related costs.
The Company has three primary delivery systems for its current business:
|
|
|
bulk delivery for large supermarkets, mass merchandisers and club stores; |
|
|
|
|
advanced sales delivery for convenience stores, drug stores, small supermarkets and
certain on-premise accounts; and |
|
|
|
|
full service delivery for its full service vending customers. |
Distribution cost management will continue to be a key area of emphasis for the Company.
Productivity
A key driver in the Companys selling, delivery and administrative (S,D&A) expense management
relates to ongoing improvements in labor productivity and asset productivity.
37
Overview of Operations and Financial Condition
The following items affect the comparability of the financial results presented below:
|
|
|
Q3 2010 and YTD 2010 |
|
|
|
|
a $.1 million pre-tax favorable mark-to-market adjustment and a $1.3 million pre-tax
unfavorable mark-to-market adjustment to S,D&A expenses related to the Companys 2010 fuel
hedging program in Q3 2010 and YTD 2010, respectively; |
|
|
|
|
a $3.0 million pre-tax favorable mark-to-market adjustment and a $3.2 million pre-tax
unfavorable mark-to-market adjustment to cost of sales related to the Companys 2010 and
2011 aluminum hedging program in Q3 2010 and YTD 2010, respectively; |
|
|
|
|
a $.1 million and a $.9 million pre-tax favorable adjustment to cost of sales related to
the gain on the replacement of flood damaged production equipment in Q3 2010 and YTD 2010,
respectively; |
|
|
|
|
a $.2 million pre-tax unfavorable adjustment to S,D&A expenses related to the loss
recorded on the disposal of uninsured vending equipment from the Nashville area flood in
YTD 2010; |
|
|
|
|
a $.1 million pre-tax favorable adjustment to S,D&A expenses related to the gain on
replacement of flood damaged building fixtures in Q3 2010; |
|
|
|
|
a $.5 million unfavorable adjustment to income tax expense related to the elimination of
the deduction related to Medicare Part D subsidy in the first quarter of 2010; and |
|
|
|
|
a $1.7 million credit to income tax expense related to the reduction of the liability
for uncertain tax positions in Q3 2010 due mainly to the lapse of applicable statutes of
limitations. |
|
|
|
|
Q3 2009 and YTD 2009 |
|
|
|
|
a $1.4 million and $5.3 million pre-tax favorable mark-to-market adjustment to cost of
sales related to the Companys 2010 and 2011 aluminum hedging programs in Q3 2009 and YTD
2009, respectively; |
|
|
|
|
a $1.7 million credit to income tax expense related to the agreement with a state tax
authority to settle certain prior tax positions in the first quarter of 2009 (Q1 2009); |
|
|
|
|
a $5.4 million credit to income tax expense related to the reduction of the liability
for uncertain tax positions in Q3 2009 due mainly to the lapse of applicable statutes of
limitations; and |
|
|
|
|
a $.5 million pre-tax unfavorable mark-to-market adjustment and $2.9 million pre-tax
favorable mark-to-market adjustment to S,D&A expenses related to the Companys 2009 and
2010 fuel hedging programs in Q3 2009 and YTD 2009, respectively. |
38
The following overview provides a summary of key information concerning the Companys financial
results for
Q3 2010 and YTD 2010 compared to Q3 2009 and YTD 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
Change |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
395,364 |
|
|
$ |
374,556 |
|
|
$ |
20,808 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
Gross margin |
|
|
173,117 |
|
|
|
157,320 |
|
|
|
15,797 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
S,D&A expenses |
|
|
139,455 |
|
|
|
131,024 |
|
|
|
8,431 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
Income from operations |
|
|
33,662 |
|
|
|
26,296 |
|
|
|
7,366 |
|
|
|
28.0 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
8,841 |
|
|
|
8,866 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Income before income taxes |
|
|
24,821 |
|
|
|
17,430 |
|
|
|
7,391 |
|
|
|
42.4 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
7,610 |
|
|
|
1,043 |
|
|
|
6,567 |
|
|
NM* |
Net income |
|
|
17,211 |
|
|
|
16,387 |
|
|
|
824 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Net income attributable to the Company |
|
|
15,533 |
|
|
|
15,428 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Basic net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
$ |
1.69 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Class B Common Stock |
|
$ |
1.69 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Diluted net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B Common Stock |
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
1.67 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Nine Months |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
Change |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,160,223 |
|
|
$ |
1,088,566 |
|
|
$ |
71,657 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
Gross margin |
|
|
487,828 |
|
|
|
464,576 |
|
|
|
23,252 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
S,D&A expenses |
|
|
406,689 |
|
|
|
386,461 |
|
|
|
20,228 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Income from operations |
|
|
81,139 |
|
|
|
78,115 |
|
|
|
3,024 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
26,453 |
|
|
|
28,059 |
|
|
|
(1,606 |
) |
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
Income before income taxes |
|
|
54,686 |
|
|
|
50,056 |
|
|
|
4,630 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
18,936 |
|
|
|
11,928 |
|
|
|
7,008 |
|
|
|
58.8 |
|
Net income |
|
|
35,750 |
|
|
|
38,128 |
|
|
|
(2,378 |
) |
|
|
(6.2 |
) |
Net income attributable to the Company |
|
|
32,236 |
|
|
|
36,146 |
|
|
|
(3,910 |
) |
|
|
(10.8 |
) |
Basic net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
$ |
3.51 |
|
|
$ |
3.94 |
|
|
$ |
(0.43 |
) |
|
|
(10.9 |
) |
Class B Common Stock |
|
$ |
3.51 |
|
|
$ |
3.94 |
|
|
$ |
(0.43 |
) |
|
|
(10.9 |
) |
Diluted net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
$ |
3.50 |
|
|
$ |
3.93 |
|
|
$ |
(0.43 |
) |
|
|
(10.9 |
) |
Class B Common Stock |
|
$ |
3.48 |
|
|
$ |
3.92 |
|
|
$ |
(0.44 |
) |
|
|
(11.2 |
) |
The Companys net sales increased 5.6% in Q3 2010 compared to Q3 2009. The increase in net sales
was primarily due to a 2.1% increase in bottle/can sales price per unit and a $4.4 million increase
in sales of the Companys own brand portfolio (primarily Tum-E Yummies). The 2.1% increase in
bottle/can sales price per unit was primarily due to higher per unit prices in sparkling beverages
except energy products and a change in product mix primarily due to decreased sales of future
consumption 12-ounce cans which have a lower sales price per unit compared to immediate consumption
prices partially offset by lower sales price per unit for still beverages. The Companys net sales
increased 6.6% in YTD 2010 compared to YTD 2009. The increase in net sales was primarily due to a
6.8% increase in bottle/can volume and a $15.2 million increase in sales of the
Companys own brand portfolio (primarily Tum-E Yummies) partially offset by a 1.8% decrease in
average sales
39
price per bottle/can unit. The increase in bottle/can volume was primarily due to an
increase in volume in all product categories. The decrease in average sales price per bottle/can
unit was primarily due to decreased sales prices in all product categories and a change in product
mix primarily due to increased sales of future consumption 12-ounce cans which have a lower sales
price per unit compared to immediate consumption products. The increases in sales of the Companys
own brand portfolio were primarily due to CCEs distribution of the Companys Tum-E Yummies
products beginning in the first quarter of 2010.
Gross margin dollars increased 10.0% in Q3 2010 compared to Q3 2009. The Companys gross margin
percentage increased to 43.8% for Q3 2010 from 42.0% for Q3 2009. The increase in gross margin
percentage was primarily due to higher sales price per bottle/can unit. Gross margin dollars
increased 5.0% in YTD 2010 compared to YTD 2009. The Companys gross margin percentage decreased
to 42.0% for YTD 2010 from 42.7% in YTD 2009. The decrease in gross margin percentage was
primarily due to lower sales prices per bottle/can unit and increased costs due to the Companys
aluminum hedging program.
S,D&A expenses increased 6.4% in Q3 2010 from Q3 2009 and increased 5.2% in YTD 2010 compared to
YTD 2009. The increase in S,D&A expenses in Q3 2010 from Q3 2009 was primarily attributable to an
increase in employee costs related to an auto allowance program, an increase in employee salaries
(including bonus and incentive expense) and an increase in professional fees due to consulting
project support offset partially by a decrease in fuel costs and a decrease in property and
casualty insurance expense. The increase in S,D&A expenses in YTD 2010 from YTD 2009 was primarily
attributable to an increase in employee costs related to the auto allowance program, an increase in
employee salaries (including bonus and incentive expense), an increase in professional fees and an
increase in fuel costs offset partially by a decrease in bad debt expense, a decrease in
depreciation expense, a decrease in employee benefit costs and a decrease in property and casualty
insurance expense.
Net interest expense was unchanged in Q3 2010 compared to Q3 2009 and decreased 5.7% in YTD 2010
compared to YTD 2009. The decrease in YTD 2010 compared to YTD 2009 was due to lower debt
borrowing levels. The Companys overall weighted average interest rate increased to 5.9% during
YTD 2010 from 5.7% during YTD 2009.
Net debt and capital lease obligations were summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct. 3, |
|
Jan. 3, |
|
Sept. 27, |
In Thousands |
|
2010 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Debt |
|
$ |
523,025 |
|
|
$ |
537,917 |
|
|
$ |
552,882 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
60,247 |
|
|
|
63,107 |
|
|
|
64,006 |
|
|
Total debt and capital lease obligations |
|
|
583,272 |
|
|
|
601,024 |
|
|
|
616,888 |
|
Less: Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
33,924 |
|
|
|
22,270 |
|
|
|
29,574 |
|
|
Total net debt and capital lease obligations (1) |
|
$ |
549,348 |
|
|
$ |
578,754 |
|
|
$ |
587,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The non-GAAP measure Total net debt and capital lease obligations is used to
provide investors with additional information which management believes is helpful in the
evaluation of the Companys capital structure and financial leverage. |
40
Discussion of Critical Accounting Policies, Estimates and New Accounting Pronouncements
Critical Accounting Policies
In the ordinary course of business, the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions
relating to the reporting of results of operations and financial position in the preparation of its
consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates under
different assumptions and conditions. The Company included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended January 3, 2010 a discussion of the Companys most critical accounting policies,
which are those most important to the portrayal of the Companys financial condition and results of
operations and require managements most difficult, subjective and complex judgments, often as a
result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.
The Company did not make changes in any critical accounting policies during YTD 2010. Any changes
in critical accounting policies and estimates are discussed with the Audit Committee of the Board
of Directors of the Company during the quarter in which a change is made.
New Accounting Pronouncements
Recently
Adopted Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued new guidance which replaced
the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which enterprise, if any, has
a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity (VIE) with an approach focused on
identifying which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most
significantly impacts the entitys economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the
right to receive benefits from the entity. The new guidance was effective for annual reporting
periods that begin after November 15, 2009. The Companys adoption of this new guidance did not
have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued new guidance which eliminates the exceptions for qualifying
special-purpose entities from consolidation guidance and the exception that permitted sale
accounting for certain mortgage securitization when a transferor has not surrendered control over
the transferred financial assets. The new guidance was effective for annual reporting periods that
begin after November 15, 2009. The Companys adoption of this new guidance did not have a material
impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued new guidance that clarifies the decrease-in-ownership of
subsidiaries provisions of generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The new guidance
clarifies to which subsidiaries the decrease-in-ownership provision of Accounting Standards
Codification 810-10 apply. The new guidance was effective for the Company in the first quarter of
2010. The Companys adoption of this new guidance did not have a material impact on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued new guidance related to the disclosures about transfers into and
out of Levels 1 and 2 fair value classifications and separate disclosures about purchases, sales,
issuances and settlements relating to the Level 3 fair value classification. The new guidance
also clarifies existing fair value disclosures about the level of disaggregation and about inputs
and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value. The new guidance was effective for the
Company in the first quarter of 2010 except for the requirement to provide the Level 3 activity of
purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis,
which is effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2011. The Companys adoption of this
new
41
guidance did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
The Company also does not expect the Level 3 requirements of the new guidance effective in the
first quarter of 2011 to have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
Results of Operations
Q3 2010 Compared to Q3 2009 and YTD 2010 Compared to YTD 2009
Net Sales
Net sales increased $20.8 million, or 5.6%, to $395.4 million in Q3 2010 compared to $374.6 million
in Q3 2009. Net sales increased $71.7 million, or 6.6% to $1,160.2 million in YTD 2010 compared
to $1,088.6 million in YTD 2009.
The increase in net sales for Q3 2010 compared to Q3 2009 was the result of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Q3 2010 |
|
|
Attributable to: |
(In Millions) |
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
|
2.1% increase in bottle/can sales price per unit primarily due to higher per unit prices in sparkling
beverages except energy products and a change in product mix primarily due to a lower percentage of future
consumption 12-ounce can sales which have a lower sales price per unit than immediate consumption products
partially offset by lower per unit prices for still beverages |
|
4.4 |
|
|
Increase in sales of the Companys own brand portfolio (primarily Tum-E Yummies) |
|
3.6 |
|
|
1.2% increase in bottle/can volume primarily due to a volume increase in still
beverages and energy products partially offset by a volume decrease in sparkling beverages
excluding energy products |
|
3.0 |
|
|
8.9% increase in sales price per unit for sales to other Coca-Cola bottlers |
|
1.8 |
|
|
5.6% increase in sales volume to other Coca-Cola bottlers primarily due to an
increase in still beverages |
|
1.2 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
$ |
20.8 |
|
|
Total increase in net sales |
|
|
|
|
The increase in net sales for YTD 2010 compared to YTD 2009 was the result of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2010 |
|
|
Attributable to: |
(In Millions) |
|
$ |
61.9 |
|
|
6.8% increase in bottle/can volume primarily due to a volume increase in all beverages |
|
(17.7 |
) |
|
1.8% decrease in bottle/can sales price per unit primarily due to lower per unit prices in
all product categories and a change in product mix primarily due to a higher percentage of
future consumption 12-ounce can sales which have a lower sales price per unit than immediate
consumption products |
|
15.2 |
|
|
Increase in sales of the Companys own brand portfolio (primarily Tum-E Yummies) |
|
4.5 |
|
|
4.6% increase in sales volume to other Coca-Cola bottlers primarily due to an
increase in still beverages |
|
4.3 |
|
|
4.2% increase in sales price per unit for sales to other Coca-Cola bottlers |
|
3.5 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
$ |
71.7 |
|
|
Total increase in net sales |
|
|
|
|
42
Bottle/can volume in Q3 2010 was negatively impacted by the second quarter of 2010 including the
July 4th holiday weekend while the second quarter of 2009 ended on June 28, 2009.
In YTD 2010, the Companys bottle/can sales to retail customers accounted for 82% of the Companys
total net sales compared to 84% in YTD 2009. Bottle/can net pricing is based on the invoice price
charged to customers reduced by promotional allowances. Bottle/can net pricing per unit is
impacted by the price charged per package, the volume generated in each package and the channels in
which those packages are sold. The increase in the Companys bottle/can net pricing per unit in Q3
2010 compared to Q3 2009 was primarily due to sales price increases in sparkling beverages except
energy products and a change in product mix primarily due to decreased sales of future consumption
12-ounce cans which have a lower sales price per unit compared to immediate consumption prices
partially offset by lower sales price per unit for still beverages. The decrease in the Companys
bottle/can net pricing per unit in YTD 2010 compared to YTD 2009 was primarily due to sales price
decreases in all product categories and a change in product mix primarily due to increased sales of
future consumption 12-ounce cans which have a lower sales price per unit compared to immediate
consumption products.
The increase in sales of the Companys own brand portfolio in Q3 2010 and YTD 2010 compared to Q3
2009 and YTD 2009 was primarily due to CCE beginning distribution of Tum-E Yummies in the first
quarter of 2010.
Product category sales volume in Q3 2010 and Q3 2009 and YTD 2010 and YTD 2009 as a percentage of
total bottle/can sales volume and the percentage change by product category was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bottle/Can Sales Volume |
|
Bottle/Can Sales Volume |
Product Category |
|
Q3 2010 |
|
Q3 2009 |
|
% Increase (Decrease) |
Sparkling beverages (including
energy products) |
|
|
81.7 |
% |
|
|
85.0 |
% |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
Still beverages |
|
|
18.3 |
% |
|
|
15.0 |
% |
|
|
23.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total bottle/can sales volume |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bottle/Can Sales Volume |
|
Bottle/Can Sales Volume |
Product Category |
|
YTD 2010 |
|
YTD 2009 |
|
% Increase |
Sparkling beverages (including
energy products) |
|
|
84.2 |
% |
|
|
85.5 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
|
Still beverages |
|
|
15.8 |
% |
|
|
14.5 |
% |
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total bottle/can sales volume |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys products are sold and distributed through various channels. These channels include
selling directly to retail stores and other outlets such as food markets, institutional accounts
and vending machine outlets. During both YTD 2010 and YTD 2009, approximately 69% of the Companys
bottle/can volume was sold for future consumption, while the remaining bottle/can volume of
approximately 31% was sold for immediate consumption. The Companys largest customer, Wal-Mart
Stores, Inc., accounted for approximately 25% of the Companys total bottle/can volume during YTD
2010. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. accounted for approximately 19% of the Companys total bottle/can
volume during YTD 2009. The Companys second largest customer, Food Lion, LLC, accounted for
approximately 10% of the Companys total bottle/can volume during YTD 2010. Food Lion, LLC
accounted for approximately 11% of the Companys total bottle/can volume during YTD 2009. All of
the Companys beverage sales are to customers in the United States.
The Company recorded delivery fees in net sales of $5.7 million and $5.9 million in YTD 2010 and
YTD 2009, respectively. These fees are used to offset a portion of the Companys delivery and
handling costs.
43
Cost of Sales
Cost of sales includes the following: raw material costs, manufacturing labor, manufacturing
overhead including depreciation expense, manufacturing warehousing costs and shipping and handling
costs related to the movement of finished goods from manufacturing locations to sales distribution
centers.
Cost of sales increased 2.3%, or $5.0 million, to $222.2 million in Q3 2010 compared to $217.2
million in Q3 2009. Cost of sales increased 7.8%, or $48.4 million, to $672.4 million in YTD
2010 compared to $624.0 million in YTD 2009.
The increase in cost of sales for Q3 2010 compared to Q3 2009 was principally attributable to the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
Q3 2010 |
|
|
Attributable to: |
(In Millions) |
|
|
|
$ |
(2.9 |
) |
|
Decrease in raw material costs such as concentrate, aluminum and high fructose corn syrup |
|
2.3 |
|
|
Increase in sales of the Companys own brand portfolio (primarily Tum-E Yummies) |
|
2.2 |
|
|
1.2% increase in bottle/can volume primarily due to a volume increase in still
beverages and energy products partially offset by a volume decrease in sparkling beverages
excluding energy products |
|
1.7 |
|
|
5.6% increase in sales volume to other Coca-Cola bottlers primarily due to an increase
in still beverages |
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
Decrease in cost due to the Companys aluminum hedging program |
|
0.5 |
|
|
Decrease in marketing funding support received primarily from The Coca-Cola Company |
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
Gain on the replacement of flood damaged production equipment |
|
3.0 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
|
Total increase in cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
The increase in cost of sales for YTD 2010 compared to YTD 2009 was principally attributable to the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2010 |
|
|
Attributable to: |
(In Millions) |
|
$ |
36.4 |
|
|
6.8% increase in bottle/can volume primarily due to a volume increase in all beverages |
|
(16.1 |
) |
|
Decrease in raw material costs such as concentrate, aluminum and high fructose corn syrup |
|
9.9 |
|
|
Increase in sales of the Companys own brand portfolio (primarily Tum-E Yummies) |
|
7.9 |
|
|
Increase in cost due to the Companys aluminum hedging program |
|
4.4 |
|
|
4.6% increase in sales volume to other Coca-Cola bottlers primarily due to an increase
in still beverages |
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
Gain on the replacement of flood damaged production equipment |
|
0.8 |
|
|
Decrease in marketing funding support received primarily from The Coca-Cola Company |
|
6.0 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
$ |
48.4 |
|
|
Total increase in cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
The Company relies extensively on advertising and sales promotion in the marketing of its products.
The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies that supply concentrates, syrups and finished
products to the Company make substantial marketing and advertising expenditures to promote sales in
the local territories served by the Company. The Company also benefits from national advertising
programs conducted by The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies. Certain of the marketing
expenditures by The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies are made pursuant to
annual arrangements. Although
The Coca-Cola Company has advised the Company that it intends to continue to provide marketing
funding support, it is not obligated to do so under the Companys Beverage Agreements. Significant
decreases in
44
marketing funding support from The Coca-Cola Company or other beverage companies could
adversely impact operating results of the Company in the future.
The Companys production facility located in Nashville, Tennessee was damaged by a flood in May
2010. The Company recorded a gain of $.9 million from the replacement of production equipment
damaged by the flood in YTD 2010. The gain was based on replacement value insurance coverage that
exceeded the net book value of the damaged production equipment.
Total marketing funding support from The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies, which
includes direct payments to the Company and payments to customers for marketing programs, was $13.8
million for Q3 2010 compared to $14.3 million for Q3 2009. Total marketing funding support from
The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies, which includes direct payments to the Company
and payments to customers for marketing programs, was $40.3 million for YTD 2010 compared to $41.1
million for YTD 2009.
Gross Margin
Gross margin dollars increased 10.0%, or $15.8 million, to $173.1 million in Q3 2010 compared to
$157.3 million in Q3 2009. Gross margin as a percentage of net sales increased to 43.8% for Q3
2010 from 42.0% for Q3 2009. Gross margin dollars increased 5.0% or $23.3 million, to $487.8
million in YTD 2010 compared to $464.6 million in YTD 2009. Gross margin as a percentage of net
sales decreased to 42.0% for YTD 2010 from 42.7% in YTD 2009.
The increase in gross margin dollars for Q3 2010 compared to Q3 2009 was primarily the result of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Q3 2010 |
|
|
Attributable to: |
(In Millions) |
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
|
2.1% increase in bottle/can sales price per unit primarily due to higher per unit prices in sparkling
beverages except energy products and a change in product mix primarily due to a lower percentage of future
consumption 12-ounce can sales which have a lower sales price per unit than immediate consumption products
partially offset by lower per unit prices for still beverages |
|
3.0 |
|
|
8.9% increase in sales price per unit for sales to other Coca-Cola bottlers |
|
2.9 |
|
|
Decrease in raw material costs such as concentrate, aluminum and high fructose corn
syrup |
|
2.1 |
|
|
Increase in sales of the Companys own brand portfolio (primarily Tum-E Yummies) |
|
1.7 |
|
|
Decrease in cost due to the Companys aluminum hedging program |
|
1.4 |
|
|
1.2% increase in bottle/can volume primarily due to a volume increase in still
beverages and energy products partially offset by a volume decrease in sparkling beverages
excluding energy products |
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
Decrease in marketing funding support received primarily from The Coca-Cola Company |
|
0.1 |
|
|
5.6% increase in sales volume to other Coca-Cola bottlers primarily due to an increase
in still beverages |
|
0.1 |
|
|
Gain on the replacement of flood damaged production equipment |
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
$ |
15.8 |
|
|
Total increase in gross margin |
|
|
|
|
45
The increase in gross margin dollars for YTD 2010 compared to YTD 2009 was primarily the
result of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2010 |
|
|
Attributable to: |
(In Millions) |
|
|
|
$ |
25.5 |
|
|
6.8% increase in bottle/can volume primarily due to a volume increase in all beverages |
|
(17.7 |
) |
|
1.8% decrease in bottle/can sales price per unit primarily due to lower per unit prices in
all product categories and a change in product mix primarily due to a higher percentage of
future consumption 12-ounce can sales which have a lower sales price per unit than immediate
consumption products |
|
16.1 |
|
|
Decrease in raw material costs such as concentrate, aluminum and high fructose corn syrup |
|
(7.9 |
) |
|
Increase in cost due to the Companys aluminum hedging program |
|
5.3 |
|
|
Increase in sales of the Companys own brand portfolio (primarily Tum-E Yummies) |
|
4.3 |
|
|
4.2% increase in sales price per unit for sales to other Coca-Cola bottlers |
|
0.9 |
|
|
Gain on the replacement of flood damaged production equipment |
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
Decrease in marketing funding support received primarily from The Coca-Cola Company |
|
0.1 |
|
|
4.6% increase in sales volume to other Coca-Cola bottlers primarily due to an increase
in still beverages |
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
$ |
23.3 |
|
|
Total increase in gross margin |
|
|
|
|
The increase in gross margin percentage in Q3 2010 compared to Q3 2009 was primarily due to higher
sales prices per bottle/can unit. The decrease in gross margin percentage in YTD 2010 compared to
YTD 2009 was primarily due to lower sales price per bottle/can unit and increased costs due to the
Companys aluminum hedging program.
The Companys gross margins may not be comparable to other companies, since some entities include
all costs related to their distribution network in cost of sales. The Company includes a portion
of these costs in S,D&A expenses.
S,D&A Expenses
S,D&A expenses include the following: sales management labor costs, distribution costs from sales
distribution centers to customer locations, sales distribution center warehouse costs,
depreciation expense related to sales centers, delivery vehicles and cold drink equipment,
point-of-sale expenses, advertising expenses, cold drink equipment repair costs, amortization of
intangibles and administrative support labor and operating costs such as treasury, legal,
information services, accounting, internal control services, human resources and executive
management costs.
S,D&A expenses increased by $8.4 million, or 6.4%, to $139.5 million in Q3 2010 from $131.0 million
in Q3 2009. S,D&A expenses as a percentage of net sales increased from 35.0% in Q3 2009 to 35.3%
in Q3 2010. S,D&A expenses increased by $20.2 million, or 5.2%, to $406.7 million in YTD 2010 from
$386.5 million in YTD 2009. S,D&A expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased from 35.5% in
YTD 2009 to 35.1% in YTD 2010.
46
The increase in S,D&A expenses for Q3 2010 compared to Q3 2009 was primarily due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Q3 2010 |
|
|
Attributable to: |
(In Millions) |
|
|
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
Increase in employee salaries including bonus and incentive expense |
|
2.1 |
|
|
Increase in professional fees primarily due to consulting project support |
|
1.7 |
|
|
Payments to employees participating in the Companys auto allowance program (program implemented in
phases beginning in the second quarter of 2009) |
|
0.9 |
|
|
Increase in
marketing expenses |
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
Decrease in property and casualty insurance expense |
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
Decrease fuel costs primarily due to mark-to-market adjustment on fuel hedging ($.5
million loss in Q3 2009 as compared to $.1 million gain in Q3 2010) |
|
2.2 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
$ |
8.4 |
|
|
Total increase in S,D&A expenses |
|
|
|
|
The increase in S,D&A expenses for YTD 2010 compared to YTD 2009 was primarily due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2010 |
|
|
Attributable to: |
(In Millions) |
|
|
|
$ |
7.0 |
|
|
Payments to employees participating in the Companys auto allowance program (program implemented in phases
beginning in the second quarter of 2009) |
|
7.0 |
|
|
Increase in employee salaries including bonus and incentive expense |
|
4.0 |
|
|
Increase in fuel costs primarily due to the mark-to-market adjustment on fuel hedging ($2.9 million gain
in YTD 2009 as compared to $1.3 million loss in YTD 2010) |
|
3.6 |
|
|
Increase in professional fees primarily due to consulting project support |
|
1.2 |
|
|
Increase in
marketing expenses |
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
Decrease in bad debt expense due to improvement in customer trade receivable portfolio
performance |
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
Decrease in employee benefit costs primarily due to decreased pension expense |
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
Decrease in property and casualty insurance expense |
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
Decrease in depreciation expense primarily due to new auto allowance program |
|
6.4 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
$ |
20.2 |
|
|
Total increase in S,D&A expenses |
|
|
|
|
Shipping and handling costs related to the movement of finished goods from manufacturing locations
to sales distribution centers are included in cost of sales. Shipping and handling costs related
to the movement of finished goods from sales distribution centers to customer locations are
included in S,D&A expenses and totaled $140.3 million and $138.7 million in YTD 2010 and YTD 2009,
respectively.
The net impact of the Companys fuel hedging program was to increase fuel costs by $1.5 million in
YTD 2010 and decrease fuel costs by $2.0 million in YTD 2009.
Primarily due to the performance of the Companys pension plan investments during 2009, the
Companys expense recorded in S,D&A expenses related to the two Company-sponsored pension plans
decreased by $1.2 million from $2.5 million in Q3 2009 to $1.3 million in Q3 2010 and by $3.5
million from $7.4 million in YTD 2009 to $3.9 million in YTD 2010.
The Company suspended matching contributions to its 401(k) Savings Plan effective April 1, 2009.
The Company maintained the option to match its employees 401(k) Savings Plan contributions based
on the financial results for 2009. The Company subsequently decided to match the first 5% of its
employees contributions (consistent with the first quarter of 2009 matching contribution
percentage) for the entire year of 2009. The Company will match the first 3% of its employees
contributions for 2010. The Company
47
maintains the option to increase the matching contributions an additional 2%, for a total of 5%,
for the Companys employees based on the financial results for 2010. Based on the financial
results of the first quarter of 2010, the Company decided to increase the matching contributions an
additional 2% for that quarter, which was approved and paid in the second quarter of 2010. Based
on the financial results of the second quarter of 2010, the Company decided to increase the
matching contributions an additional 2% for that quarter, which was
approved and paid in Q3 2010. The total costs for this benefit
recorded in S,D&A expenses for YTD 2010 and YTD 2009 was
$6.0 million and $5.9 million, respectively.
On March 23, 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) was signed into law.
On March 30, 2010, a companion bill, the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010
(Reconciliation Act), was also signed into law. The PPACA and the Reconciliation Act, when taken
together, represent comprehensive healthcare reform legislation that will likely affect the cost
associated with providing employer-sponsored medical plans. At this point, the Company is in the
process of determining the impact this legislation will have on the Companys employer-sponsored
medical plans.
Interest Expense
Net interest expense was unchanged in Q3 2010 compared to Q3 2009 and decreased 5.7%, or $1.6
million, in YTD 2010 compared to YTD 2009. The decrease in interest expense in YTD 2010 compared
to YTD 2009 was due to lower debt borrowing levels. The Companys overall weighted average interest
rate increased to 5.9% during YTD 2010 from 5.7% during YTD 2009. See the Liquidity and Capital
Resources Hedging Activities Interest Rate Hedging section of M,D&A for additional
information.
Income Taxes
The Companys effective tax rate, as calculated by dividing income tax expense by income before
income taxes, for YTD 2010 and YTD 2009 was 34.6% and 23.8%, respectively. The Companys effective
tax rate, as calculated by dividing income tax expense by the difference of income before income
taxes minus net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest, for YTD 2010 and YTD 2009 was
37.0% and 24.8%, respectively. The increase in the effective tax rate for YTD 2010 resulted
primarily from lower reductions in the reserve for uncertain tax
positions in 2010 as compared to 2009 and the elimination of the
tax deduction associated with Medicare Part D subsidy as required by the PPACA enacted on March 23,
2010 and the Reconciliation Act enacted on March 30, 2010. During YTD 2010, the
Company recorded tax expense totaling $.5 million related to changes made to the tax deductibility
of Medicare Part D subsidies.
In the first quarter of 2009, the Company reached an agreement with a taxing authority to settle
prior tax positions for which the Company had previously provided reserves due to uncertainty of
resolution. As a result, the Company reduced the liability for uncertain tax positions by $1.7
million. The net effect of the adjustment was a decrease to income tax expense in YTD 2009 of
approximately $1.7 million. In Q3 2009, the Company reduced its liability for uncertain tax
positions by $5.4 million. The net effect of the adjustment was a decrease to income tax expense
of approximately $5.4 million. The reduction of the liability for uncertain tax positions was due
mainly to the lapse of applicable statute of limitations. In Q3 2010, the Company reduced its
liability for uncertain tax positions by $1.7 million. The net effect of the adjustment was a
decrease to income tax expense of approximately $1.7 million. The reduction of the liability for
uncertain tax positions was due mainly to the lapse of the applicable statute of limitations. See
Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information. The Companys income
tax rate for the remainder of 2010 is dependent upon the results of operations and may change if
the results in 2010 are different from current expectations.
48
Noncontrolling Interest
The Company recorded net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest of $3.5 million in YTD
2010 compared to $2.0 million in YTD 2009 related to the portion of Piedmont owned by The Coca-Cola
Company. The increased amount in YTD 2010 was due to higher income at Piedmont.
Financial Condition
Total assets of $1.3 billion at October 3, 2010 increased from January 3, 2010 primarily due to
increases in cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable offset by a decrease in property,
plant and equipment, net. Property, plant and equipment, net
decreased primarily due to the reduction of transportation equipment
that resulted from the implementation of a new auto allowance program
during fiscal year 2009.
Net working capital, defined as current assets less current liabilities, increased by $32.1 million
to $100.3 million at October 3, 2010 from January 3, 2010 and increased by $26.7 million at October
3, 2010 from September 27, 2009.
Significant changes in net working capital from January 3, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
An increase in cash and cash equivalents of $12.7 million primarily due to cash flow from
operations. |
|
|
|
An increase in accounts
receivable, trade of $22.8 million primarily due to increased
sales. |
|
|
|
An increase in inventories
of $3.6 million due primarily to normal seasonal increase. |
|
|
|
An increase in accounts receivable from and an increase in accounts payable to The
Coca-Cola Company of $16.1 million and $15.5 million, respectively, primarily due to the
timing of payments. |
|
|
|
An increase in accrued interest payable of $4.5 million due to the timing of payments. |
Significant changes in net working capital from September 27, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
An increase in cash and cash equivalents of $5.4 million primarily due to cash flow from
operations. |
|
|
|
An increase in accounts
receivable, trade of $19.3 million primarily due to increased
sales. |
|
|
|
A decrease in inventories of
$5.1 million due primarily to the decreased demand for future
consumption products during Q3 2010. |
|
|
|
An increase in accounts receivable from and a decrease in accounts payable to The Coca-Cola
Company of $2.7 million and $.2 million, respectively, primarily due to the timing of
payments. |
|
|
|
An increase in accounts
payable, trade of $5.8 million primarily due to the timing of payments. |
|
|
|
An increase in prepaid
expenses and other current assets of $6.4 million primarily due to hedging
activities. |
Debt and capital lease obligations were $583.3 million as of October 3, 2010 compared to $601.0
million as of January 3, 2010 and $616.9 million as of September 27, 2009. Debt and capital lease
obligations as of October 3, 2010 included $60.2 million of capital lease obligations related
primarily to Company facilities.
49
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Capital Resources
The Companys sources of capital include cash flows from operations, available credit facilities
and the issuance of debt and equity securities. Management believes the Company has sufficient
resources available to finance its business plan, meet its working capital requirements and
maintain an appropriate level of capital spending. The amount and frequency of future dividends
will be determined by the Companys Board of Directors in light of the earnings and financial
condition of the Company at such time, and no assurance can be given that dividends will be
declared in the future.
As of October 3, 2010, the Company had all $200 million available under the $200 million revolving
credit facility ($200 million facility) to meet its cash requirements. The $200 million facility
contains two financial covenants: a fixed charges coverage ratio and a debt to operating cash flow
ratio, each as defined in the credit agreement. The fixed charges coverage ratio requires the
Company to maintain a consolidated cash flow to fixed charges ratio of 1.5 to 1 or higher. The
operating cash flow ratio requires the Company to maintain a debt to cash flow ratio of 6.0 to 1 or
lower. The Company is currently in compliance with these covenants and has been throughout 2010.
In April 2009, the Company issued $110 million of unsecured 7% Senior Notes due 2019.
The Company had debt maturities of $119.3 million in May 2009 and $57.4 million in July 2009. On
May 1, 2009, the Company used the proceeds from the $110 million 7% Senior Notes due 2019 plus cash
on hand to repay the debt maturity of $119.3 million. The Company used cash flow generated from
operations and $55.0 million in borrowings under its $200 million facility to repay the $57.4
million debt maturity on July 1, 2009. The Company currently believes that all of the banks
participating in the Companys $200 million facility have the ability to and will meet any funding
requests from the Company.
The Company has obtained the majority of its long-term financing, other than capital leases, from
public markets. As of October 3, 2010, $523.0 million of the Companys total outstanding balance
of debt and capital lease obligations of $583.3 million was financed through publicly offered debt.
The Company had capital lease obligations of $60.2 million as of October 3, 2010. There were no
amounts outstanding on either the $200 million facility or on the uncommitted line of credit as of
October 3, 2010.
Cash Sources and Uses
The primary sources of cash for the Company have been cash provided by operating activities,
investing activities and financing activities. The primary uses of cash have been for capital
expenditures, the payment of debt and capital lease obligations,
dividend payments, income tax
payments and pension payments.
50
A summary of activity for YTD 2010 and YTD 2009 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Nine Months |
In Millions |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Cash Sources |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities (excluding income tax
and pension payments) |
|
$ |
86.9 |
|
|
$ |
82.2 |
|
Proceeds from reduction of restricted cash |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from lines of credit, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.0 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
108.1 |
|
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
Total cash sources |
|
$ |
89.3 |
|
|
$ |
225.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Uses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
29.0 |
|
|
$ |
29.8 |
|
Payment of debt and capital lease obligations |
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
179.1 |
|
Investment in restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Dividends |
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
Income tax payments |
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
Pension payments |
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
.3 |
|
|
Total cash uses |
|
$ |
76.6 |
|
|
$ |
245.5 |
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash |
|
$ |
12.7 |
|
|
$ |
(20.3 |
) |
|
Investing Activities
Additions to property, plant and equipment during YTD 2010 were $31.7 million of which $1.2 million
were accrued in accounts payable, trade as unpaid including $.2 million related to the Nashville
flood damage and $1.5 million was a trade-in allowance on manufacturing equipment. This compared
to $29.8 million in total additions to property, plant and equipment during YTD 2009. Capital
expenditures during YTD 2010 were funded with cash flows from operations. The Company anticipates
total additions to property, plant and equipment in fiscal year 2010 will be in the range of $55
million to $60 million. Additions to property, plant and equipment during 2009 were $55.0 million
of which $11.6 million were accrued in accounts payable, trade as unpaid. Leasing is used for
certain capital additions when considered cost effective relative to other sources of capital. The
Company currently leases its corporate headquarters, two production facilities and several sales
distribution facilities and administrative facilities.
Financing Activities
On March 8, 2007, the Company entered into the $200 million facility replacing its $100 million
revolving credit facility. The $200 million facility matures in March 2012 and includes an option
to extend the term for an additional year at the discretion of the participating banks. The $200
million facility bears interest at a floating base rate or a floating rate of LIBOR plus an
interest rate spread of .35%, dependent on the length of the term of the interest period. In
addition, the Company must pay an annual facility fee of .10% of the lenders aggregate
commitments under the facility. Both the interest rate spread and the facility fee are determined
from a commonly-used pricing grid based on the Companys long-term senior unsecured debt rating.
The $200 million facility contains two financial covenants: a fixed charges coverage ratio and a
debt to operating cash flow ratio, each as defined in the credit agreement. The fixed charges
coverage ratio requires the Company to maintain a
consolidated cash flow to fixed charges ratio of 1.5 to 1 or higher. The operating cash flow
ratio requires the
51
Company to maintain a debt to operating cash flow ratio of 6.0 to 1 or lower.
The Company is currently in compliance with these covenants. These covenants do not currently,
and the Company does not anticipate they will, restrict its liquidity or capital resources. On
July 1, 2009, the Company borrowed $55 million under the $200 million facility and used the
proceeds, along with $2.4 million of cash on hand, to repay at maturity the Companys $57.4
million outstanding 7.2% Debentures due 2009. On October 3, 2010, the Company had no outstanding
borrowings on the $200 million facility. On January 3, 2010 and September 27, 2009, the Company
had $15.0 million and $30.0 million outstanding under the $200 million facility, respectively.
In April 2009, the Company issued $110 million of 7% Senior Notes due 2019. The proceeds plus cash
on hand were used on May 1, 2009 to repay at maturity the $119.3 million outstanding 6.375%
Debentures due 2009.
On February 10, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement for an uncommitted line of credit.
Under this agreement, the Company may borrow up to a total of $20 million for periods of 7 days, 30
days, 60 days or 90 days. On October 3, 2010, the Company had no amount outstanding under the
uncommitted line of credit.
All of the outstanding debt has been issued by the Company with none having been issued by any of
the Companys subsidiaries. There are no guarantees of the Companys debt. The Company or its
subsidiaries have entered into four capital leases.
At October 3, 2010, the Companys credit ratings were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt |
Standard & Poors |
|
BBB |
Moodys |
|
Baa2 |
The Companys credit ratings are reviewed periodically by the respective rating agencies. Changes
in the Companys operating results or financial position could result in changes in the Companys
credit ratings. Lower credit ratings could result in higher borrowing costs for the Company or
reduced access to capital markets, which could have a material impact on the Companys financial
position or results of operations. There were no changes in these credit ratings from the prior
year and the credit ratings are currently stable.
The Companys public debt is not subject to financial covenants but does limit the incurrence of
certain liens and encumbrances as well as indebtedness by the Companys subsidiaries in excess of
certain amounts.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company is a member of two manufacturing cooperatives and has guaranteed $35.7 million of debt
and related lease obligations for these entities as of October 3, 2010. In addition, the Company
has an equity ownership in each of the entities. The members of both cooperatives consist solely
of Coca-Cola bottlers. The Company does not anticipate either of these cooperatives will fail to
fulfill their commitments. The Company further believes each of these cooperatives has sufficient
assets, including production equipment, facilities and working capital, and the ability to adjust
selling prices of their products to adequately mitigate the risk of material loss from the
Companys guarantees. As of October 3, 2010, the Companys maximum exposure, if the entities
borrowed up to their borrowing capacity, would have been $71.7 million including the Companys
equity interests. See Note 14 and Note 19 to the consolidated financial statements for additional
information about these entities.
52
Aggregate Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes the Companys contractual obligations and commercial commitments as
of October 3, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct. 2010- |
|
Oct. 2011- |
|
Oct. 2013- |
|
After |
In Thousands |
|
Total |
|
Sept. 2011 |
|
Sept. 2013 |
|
Sept. 2015 |
|
Sept. 2015 |
|
Contractual obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt, net of interest |
|
$ |
523,025 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
150,000 |
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
273,025 |
|
Capital lease obligations,
net of interest |
|
|
60,247 |
|
|
|
3,861 |
|
|
|
8,358 |
|
|
|
9,875 |
|
|
|
38,153 |
|
Estimated interest on
long-term debt and capital
lease obligations (1) |
|
|
179,869 |
|
|
|
32,959 |
|
|
|
58,354 |
|
|
|
46,167 |
|
|
|
42,389 |
|
Purchase obligations (2) |
|
|
326,865 |
|
|
|
89,145 |
|
|
|
178,290 |
|
|
|
59,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities (3) |
|
|
111,251 |
|
|
|
9,938 |
|
|
|
17,842 |
|
|
|
12,763 |
|
|
|
70,708 |
|
Operating leases |
|
|
18,596 |
|
|
|
3,810 |
|
|
|
4,624 |
|
|
|
3,131 |
|
|
|
7,031 |
|
Long-term contractual
arrangements (4) |
|
|
18,706 |
|
|
|
6,531 |
|
|
|
9,686 |
|
|
|
2,294 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
Postretirement obligations |
|
|
45,449 |
|
|
|
2,898 |
|
|
|
5,445 |
|
|
|
5,871 |
|
|
|
31,235 |
|
Purchase orders (5) |
|
|
35,774 |
|
|
|
35,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations |
|
$ |
1,319,782 |
|
|
$ |
184,916 |
|
|
$ |
432,599 |
|
|
$ |
239,531 |
|
|
$ |
462,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes interest payments based on contractual terms and current interest
rates for variable rate debt. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents an estimate of the Companys obligation to purchase 17.5 million cases
of finished product on an annual basis through May 2014 from South Atlantic Canners, a
manufacturing cooperative. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes obligations under executive benefit plans, the liability to exit from a
multi-employer pension plan and other long-term liabilities. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes contractual arrangements with certain prestige properties, athletics
venues and other locations, and other long-term marketing commitments. |
|
(5) |
|
Purchase orders include commitments in which a written purchase order has been
issued to a vendor, but the goods have not been received or the services have not been
performed. |
The Company has $4.5 million of uncertain tax positions including accrued interest as of
October 3, 2010 (excluded from other long-term liabilities in the table above because the Company is
uncertain as to if or when such amounts will be recognized) of which $2.4 million would affect the
Companys effective tax rate if recognized. While it is expected that the amount of uncertain tax
positions may change in the next 12 months, the Company does not expect the change to have a
significant impact on the consolidated financial statements. See Note 15 to the consolidated
financial statements for additional information.
The Company is a member of Southeastern Container, a plastic bottle manufacturing cooperative,
from which the Company is obligated to purchase at least 80% of its requirements of plastic
bottles for certain designated territories. This obligation is not included in the Companys
table of contractual obligations and commercial commitments since there are no minimum purchase
requirements.
As of October 3, 2010, the Company has $23.1 million of standby letters of credit, primarily
related to its property and casualty insurance programs. See Note 14 to the consolidated
financial statements for additional information related to commercial commitments, guarantees,
legal and tax matters.
The Company has made contributions to the Company-sponsored pension plans of $8.7 million in YTD
2010. The Company made additional payments of $.9 million subsequent to the end of Q3 2010. These
53
contributions represent all required contributions for 2010. The Company
continues to monitor and review the funding position of the Company-sponsored pension plans and
may make additional contributions during 2010. Postretirement medical care payments are expected
to be approximately $2.5 million in 2010. See Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements
for additional information related to pension and postretirement obligations.
Hedging Activities
Interest Rate Hedging
The Company periodically uses interest rate hedging products to mitigate risk from interest rate
fluctuations. The Company has historically altered its fixed/floating rate mix based upon
anticipated cash flows from operations relative to the Companys debt level and the potential
impact of changes in interest rates on the Companys overall financial condition. Sensitivity
analyses are performed to review the impact on the Companys financial position and coverage of
various interest rate movements. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for
trading purposes nor does it use leveraged financial instruments.
The Company has not had any interest rate swap agreements outstanding since September 2008.
Interest expense was reduced due to the amortization of deferred gains on previously terminated
interest rate swap agreements and forward interest rate agreements by $.9 million and $1.8 million
during YTD 2010 and in YTD 2009, respectively.
The weighted average interest rate of the Companys debt and capital lease obligations was 5.8% as
of October 3, 2010 compared to 5.6% as of January 3, 2010, and 5.5% as of September 27, 2009. The
Companys overall weighted average interest rate on its debt and capital lease obligations
increased to 5.9% in YTD 2010 from 5.7% in YTD 2009. Approximately 4.8% of the Companys debt and
capital lease obligations of $583.3 million as of October 3, 2010 was maintained on a floating rate
basis and was subject to changes in short-term interest rates.
Fuel Hedging
The Company used derivative instruments to hedge substantially all of the projected diesel fuel
purchases for 2010 and 2009. These derivative instruments relate to diesel fuel used by the
Companys delivery fleet. The Company pays a fee for these instruments which is amortized over the
corresponding period of the instrument. The Company accounts for its fuel hedges on a
mark-to-market basis with any expense or income being reflected as an adjustment of fuel costs.
The Company uses several different financial institutions for commodity derivative instruments to
minimize the concentration of credit risk. The Company has master agreements with the
counterparties to its derivative financial agreements that provide for net settlement of derivative
transactions.
In October 2008, the Company entered into derivative contracts to hedge substantially all of its
projected diesel fuel purchases for 2009 establishing an upper and lower limit on the Companys
price of diesel fuel.
In February 2009, the Company entered into derivative contracts to hedge substantially all of its
projected diesel purchases for 2010 establishing an upper limit on the Companys price of diesel
fuel.
The net impact of the Companys fuel hedging program was to increase fuel costs by $1.5 million in
YTD 2010 and decrease fuel costs by $2.0 million in YTD 2009.
54
Aluminum Hedging
At the end of the first quarter of 2009, the Company began using derivative instruments to hedge
approximately 75% of the projected 2010 aluminum purchase requirements. The Company pays a fee for
these instruments which is amortized over the corresponding period of the instruments. The Company
accounts for its aluminum hedges on a mark-to-market basis with any expense or income being
reflected as an adjustment to cost of sales.
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company entered into derivative contracts to hedge
approximately 75% of the projected 2011 aluminum purchase requirements.
The net impact of the Companys aluminum hedging program was to increase cost of sales by $2.6
million in YTD 2010 and decrease cost of sales by $5.3 million in YTD 2009.
55
Cautionary Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as information included in future filings by the
Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission and information contained in written material,
press releases and oral statements issued by or on behalf of the Company, contains, or may contain,
forward-looking management comments and other statements that reflect managements current outlook
for future periods. These statements include, among others, statements relating to:
|
|
|
the Companys belief that the covenants on its $200 million facility will not restrict
its liquidity or capital resources; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys belief that other parties to certain contractual arrangements will perform
their obligations; |
|
|
|
|
potential marketing funding support from The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage
companies; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys belief that disposition of certain claims and legal proceedings will not
have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, cash flows or results of
operations and that no material amount of loss in excess of recorded amounts is reasonably
possible; |
|
|
|
|
managements belief that the Company has adequately provided for any ultimate amounts
that are likely to result from tax audits; |
|
|
|
|
managements belief that the Company has sufficient resources available to finance its
business plan, meet its working capital requirements and maintain an appropriate level of
capital spending; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys belief that the cooperatives whose debt and lease obligations the Company
guarantees have sufficient assets and the ability to adjust selling prices of their
products to adequately mitigate the risk of material loss and that the cooperatives will
perform their obligations under their debt and lease agreements; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys key priorities which are revenue management, product innovation and
beverage portfolio expansion, distribution cost management and productivity; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys hypothetical calculation of the impact of a 1% increase in interest rates
on outstanding floating rate debt and capital lease obligations for the next twelve months
as of October 3, 2010; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys belief that cash contributions in 2010 to its two Company-sponsored
pension plans will be approximately $9.6 million; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys belief that postretirement medical care payments are expected to be
approximately $2.5 million in 2010; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys expectation that additions to property, plant and equipment in 2010 will
be in the range of $55 million to $60 million; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys beliefs and estimates regarding the impact of the adoption of certain new
accounting pronouncements; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys beliefs that the growth prospects of Company-owned or exclusive licensed
brands appear promising and the cost of developing, marketing and distributing these brands
may be significant; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys belief that all of the banks participating in the Companys $200 million
facility have the ability to and will meet any funding requests from the Company; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys belief that it is competitive in its territories with respect to the
principal methods of competition in the nonalcoholic beverage industry; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys estimate that a 10% increase in the market price of certain commodities
over the current market prices would cumulatively increase costs during the next 12 months
by approximately $27 million assuming no change in volume; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys belief that innovation of new brands and packages will continue to be
critical to the Companys overall revenue; |
56
|
|
|
the Companys expectation that it will not incur any significant expenses related to the
Nashville area flood for the remainder of 2010; and |
|
|
|
|
the Companys expectation that uncertain tax positions may change over the next 12
months as a result of tax audits but will not have a significant impact on the consolidated
financial statements. |
These statements and expectations are based on currently available competitive, financial and
economic data along with the Companys operating plans, and are subject to future events and
uncertainties that could cause anticipated events not to occur or actual results to differ
materially from historical or anticipated results. Factors that could impact those statements and
expectations or adversely affect future periods include, but are not limited to, the factors set
forth in Part II, Item 1A. of this Form 10-Q and in Item 1A. Risk Factors of the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 2010.
Caution should be taken not to place undue reliance on the Companys forward-looking statements,
which reflect the expectations of management of the Company only as of the time such statements are
made. Except as required by law, the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise
any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
57
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
The Company is exposed to certain market risks that arise in the ordinary course of business. The
Company may enter into derivative financial instrument transactions to manage or reduce market
risk. The Company does not enter into derivative financial instrument transactions for trading
purposes. A discussion of the Companys primary market risk exposure and interest rate risk is
presented below.
Debt and Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company is subject to interest rate risk on its fixed and floating rate debt. The Company
periodically uses interest rate hedging products to modify risk from interest rate fluctuations.
The Company has historically altered its fixed/floating rate mix based upon anticipated cash flows
from operations relative to the Companys overall financial condition. Sensitivity analyses are
performed to review the impact on the Companys financial position and coverage of various interest
rate movements. The counterparties to these interest rate hedging arrangements were major
financial institutions with which the Company also had other financial relationships. The Company
did not have any interest rate hedging products as of October 3, 2010. The Company has
historically maintained between 40% and 60% of total borrowings at variable interest rates after
taking into account all of the interest rate hedging activities. While this has been the target
range for the percentage of total borrowings at variable interest rates, the financial position of
the Company and market conditions may result in strategies outside of this range at certain points
in time. Approximately 4.8% of the Companys debt and capital lease obligations of $583.3 million
as of October 3, 2010 was subject to changes in short-term interest rates.
As it relates to the Companys variable rate debt and variable rate leases, assuming no changes in
the Companys financial structure, if market interest rates average 1% more over the next twelve
months than the interest rates as of October 3, 2010, interest expense for the following twelve
months would increase by approximately $.1 million. This amount was determined by calculating the
effect of the hypothetical interest rate on the Companys variable rate debt and variable rate
leases. This calculated, hypothetical increase in interest expense for the following twelve months
may be different from the actual increase in interest expense from a 1% increase in interest rates
due to varying interest rate reset dates on the Companys floating rate debt.
Raw Material and Commodity Price Risk
The Company is also subject to commodity price risk arising from price movements for certain other
commodities included as part of its raw materials. The Company manages this commodity price risk
in some cases by entering into contracts with adjustable prices. The Company has not historically
used derivative commodity instruments in the management of this risk. The Company estimates that a
10% increase in the market prices of these commodities over the current market prices would
cumulatively increase costs during the next 12 months by approximately $27 million assuming no
change in volume.
The Company entered into derivative instruments to hedge essentially all of the projected diesel
fuel purchases for 2010 and 2009. These derivative instruments relate to diesel fuel used by the
Companys delivery fleet. The Company pays a fee for these instruments which is amortized over the
corresponding period of the instrument. The Company currently accounts for its fuel hedges on a
mark-to-market basis with any expense or income being reflected as an adjustment of fuel costs.
At the end of the first quarter of 2009, the Company began using derivative instruments to hedge
approximately 75% of the projected 2010 aluminum purchase requirements. During the second quarter
of 2009, the Company entered into derivative contracts to hedge approximately 75% of the projected
2011 aluminum purchase requirements. The Company pays a fee for these instruments which is
amortized over the corresponding period
58
of the instruments. The Company accounts for its aluminum hedges on a mark-to-market basis with
any expense or income being reflected as an adjustment to cost of sales.
Effects of Changing Prices
The principal effect of inflation on the Companys operating results is to increase costs. The
Company may raise selling prices to offset these cost increases; however, the resulting impact on
retail prices may reduce the volume of product purchased by consumers.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under
the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Companys
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)), pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) of the
Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective for the purpose of
providing reasonable assurance the information required to be disclosed in the reports the Company
files or submits under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to
the Companys management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
There has been no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the
quarter ended October 3, 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
59
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Except for the risk factor set forth below, there have been no material changes to the factors
disclosed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended January 3, 2010.
Increases in the cost of employee benefits, including current employees medical benefits and
postretirement benefits, could impact the Companys financial results and cash flow.
On March 23, 2010 the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) was signed into law.
On March 30, 2010, a companion bill, the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010
(Reconciliation Act), was also signed into law. The PPACA and the Reconciliation Act, when
taken together, represent comprehensive healthcare reform legislation that will likely affect the
cost associated with providing employer-sponsored medical plans. At this point, the Company is in
the process of determining the impact this legislation will have on the Companys
employer-sponsored medical plans. Additionally, the PPACA and the Reconciliation Act include
provisions that will reduce the tax benefits available to employers that receive Medicare Part D
subsidies.
60
Item 6. Exhibits.
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
The registrant, by signing this report, agrees to furnish the Securities and
Exchange Commission, upon its request, a copy of any instrument which defines the
rights of holders of long-term debt of the registrant and its consolidated
subsidiaries which authorizes a total amount of securities not in excess of 10 percent
of the total assets of the registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Form of Master Bottle Contract (Cola Beverage Agreement), made and entered
into, effective January 27, 1989, between The Coca-Cola Company and Coca-Cola Bottling
Co. Consolidated (the Company), together with Form of Home Market Amendment to
Master Bottle Contract, effective as of October 29, 1999 (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Form of Allied Bottle Contract (Allied Beverage Agreement), made and entered
into effective January 11, 1990, between The Coca-Cola Company and the Company (as
successor to Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Anderson, S.C.) (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated January 27, 1989, between The Coca-Cola Company and the
Company, modifying the Cola Beverage Agreements and Allied Beverage Agreements (filed
herewith). |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Form of Marketing and Distribution Agreement (Still Beverage Agreement), made
and entered into effective October 1, 2000, between The Coca-Cola Company and the
Company (as successor to Metrolina Bottling Company), with respect to Dasani (filed
herewith). |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Form of Letter Agreement, dated December 10, 2001, between The Coca-Cola
Company and the Company, together with Letter Agreement dated December 14, 1994,
modifying the Still Beverage Agreements (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
10.6*
|
|
Incident Pricing Letter Agreement, dated March 16, 2009, between The Coca-Cola
Company and the Company (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
12
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed
herewith). |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed
herewith). |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
* |
|
Certain portions of the exhibit have been omitted and filed separately with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested for such
portions of the exhibit. |
61
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED
(REGISTRANT)
|
|
Date: November 12, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ James E. Harris
|
|
|
|
James E. Harris |
|
|
|
Principal Financial Officer of the Registrant
and
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 12, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ William J. Billiard
|
|
|
|
William J. Billiard |
|
|
|
Principal Accounting Officer of the Registrant
and
Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
|
|
62