The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. S-4
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
February 6, 2008
Registration
No. 333-[ ]
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form S-4
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF
1933
THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES
GROUP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
6712
|
|
25-1435979
|
(State or other
jurisdiction of incorporation)
|
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
One PNC Plaza
249 Fifth Avenue
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222-2707
(412) 762-2000
(Address, including Zip Code,
and Telephone Number, including Area Code, of Registrants
Principal Executive Offices)
Richard J. Johnson
Chief Financial Officer
One PNC Plaza
249 Fifth Avenue
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222-2707
(412) 762-2000
(Name, Address, including Zip
Code, and Telephone Number, including Area Code, of Agent for
Service)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With copies to:
|
|
|
H. Rodgin Cohen, Esq.
|
|
Jean Svoboda, Esq.
|
|
Edward D. Herlihy, Esq.
|
Mark J. Menting, Esq.
|
|
Sr. Vice President, General Counsel
|
|
Nicholas G. Demmo, Esq.
|
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
|
|
Sterling Financial Corporation
|
|
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
|
125 Broad Street
|
|
1097 Commercial Avenue
|
|
51 West 52nd Street
|
New York, New York 10004
|
|
East Petersburg, Pennsylvania 17520
|
|
New York, New York 10019
|
(212) 558-4000
|
|
(717) 735-4908
|
|
(212) 403-1000
|
Approximate date of commencement of the proposed sale of the
securities to the public: As soon as practicable
after this Registration Statement becomes effective and upon
completion of the merger described in the enclosed document.
If the securities being registered on this Form are being
offered in connection with the formation of a holding company
and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check the
following
box. o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, check the following box and list the
Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier
effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum
|
|
|
Amount of
|
Title of Each Class of
|
|
|
to Be
|
|
|
Offering Price per Share
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Registration
|
Securities to be Registered
|
|
|
Registered(1)
|
|
|
of Common Stock
|
|
|
Offering Price(2)
|
|
|
Fee(2)
|
Common stock, par value $5.00 per share
|
|
|
4,935,381
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$260,544,771
|
|
|
$10,239.41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The maximum number of shares of The
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. common stock estimated to be
issuable upon the completion of the PNC/Sterling merger
described herein. This number is based on the number of shares
of Sterling Financial Corporation common stock estimated to be
outstanding, or reserved for issuance under various plans, as of
immediately prior to completion of the merger, and the exchange
of each share of Sterling common stock and share of Sterling
common stock reserved for issuance under various plans for cash
and shares of PNC common stock pursuant to the formula set forth
in the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 19,
2007, by and between PNC and Sterling, assuming the five-day
average closing price of PNC common stock was $64.72, which was
the average of the closing prices of PNC common stock for the
five trading days beginning January 29, 2008 and ending
February 4, 2008.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Estimated solely for purposes of
calculating the registration fee required by Section 6(b)
of the Securities Act, and calculated pursuant to
Rules 457(f)(1), 457(f)(3) and 457(c) under the Securities
Act, the proposed maximum aggregate offering price of the
registrants common stock was calculated based upon the
market value of shares of Sterling common stock (the securities
to be cancelled in the merger) in accordance with
Rule 457(c) under the Securities Act as follows:
(A) the product of (1) $15.69, the average of the high and
low prices per shares of Sterling common stock on
February 4, 2008, as quoted on the NASDAQ Global Select
Market, multiplied by (2) 30,750,231, the maximum number of
shares of Sterling common stock which may be exchanged in the
merger, less (B) the amount of cash paid by the Registrant
in exchange for shares of Sterling common stock (which equals
approximately $224 million).
|
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the
Registration Statement shall become effective on such dates as
the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may
determine.
The
information in this proxy statement/prospectus is not complete
and may be changed. We may not sell the securities offered by
this proxy statement/prospectus until the registration statement
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective.
This proxy statement/prospectus does not constitute an offer to
sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities in any
jurisdiction where an offer or solicitation is not permitted.
|
PRELIMINARY
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION DATED FEBRUARY 6,
2008
MERGER
PROPOSED YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT
Dear Sterling Shareholder:
On July 19, 2007, Sterling Financial Corporation agreed to
merge with The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. We are sending
you this proxy statement/prospectus to notify you of the special
meeting of Sterling shareholders being held to vote on the plan
of merger and related matters and to ask you to vote at the
special meeting in favor of the plan of merger.
If the merger is completed, Sterling will merge with and into
PNC, and you will be entitled to elect to receive your merger
consideration in the form of PNC common stock, cash or a
combination of both. Subject to the election and adjustment
procedures described in this document, you will be entitled to
receive, in exchange for each share of Sterling common stock you
hold at the time of the merger, consideration, without interest,
with a value equal to the sum of (i) 0.1543 multiplied by
the average closing price of PNC common stock on the New York
Stock Exchange, which we refer to as the NYSE, during the five
trading days ending the day before the completion of the merger
and (ii) $7.60. We expect that the merger will generally be
tax-free to you as to shares of PNC common stock you receive in
the merger and generally taxable to you as to the cash you
receive.
The implied value of the merger consideration will fluctuate
with the market price of PNC common stock. As explained in more
detail in this document, whether you make a cash election, a
stock election or no election, the value of the consideration
you will receive as of the completion date will be substantially
the same and will be based on the average pre-closing PNC
trading price.
As an example, if the average closing price of PNC common stock
on the NYSE for the five trading days ending the day before the
completion of the merger is $[ ],
which was the closing price of PNC common stock on the NYSE on
[ ],
2008 (the most recent practicable date prior to the mailing of
this proxy statement), each share of Sterling common stock would
be converted into the right to receive either approximately
$[ ] in cash or approximately
0.[ ] shares
of PNC common stock. Based on that PNC closing price, the
0.[ ] shares
of PNC common stock would have a market value of approximately
$[ ]. As an additional example, if
the average closing price of PNC common stock on the NYSE for
the five trading days ending the day before the completion of
the merger is $73.21, which was the closing price for PNC common
stock on July 18, 2007 (the last trading day prior to the
announcement of the merger), each share of Sterling common stock
would be converted into the right to receive approximately
$18.90 in cash or approximately 0.2582 of a share of PNC common
stock. A chart showing the cash and stock merger consideration
at various hypothetical closing prices of PNC common stock is
provided on pages 2 and 40 of this document.
The market prices of both PNC common stock and Sterling common
stock will fluctuate before the merger. You should obtain
current stock price quotations for PNC common stock and Sterling
common stock. PNC common stock is listed on the NYSE under the
symbol PNC and Sterling common stock is quoted on
the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol
SLFI.
The special meeting of the shareholders of Sterling will be held
on [ ] at
[ ], EST, at the
[ ]. Your vote is important.
A majority of the votes cast at the Sterling special meeting
is required to adopt the plan of merger, and a majority of the
outstanding shares, represented in person or by proxy, is
necessary to constitute a quorum in order to transact business
at the special meeting. Regardless of whether you plan to attend
the special shareholders meeting, please take the time to
vote your shares in accordance with the instructions contained
in this document. The Sterling board of directors recommends
that Sterling shareholders vote FOR adoption of the
plan of merger.
This document describes the special meeting, the merger, the
documents related to the merger and other related matters.
Please carefully read this entire document, including Risk
Factors beginning on page 15, for a discussion of the
risks relating to the proposed merger. You also can obtain
information about PNC from documents that it has filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and about Sterling from the
information in this document.
|
|
|
|
|
Glenn R. Walz
|
|
|
J. Roger Moyer Jr.
|
|
Chairman
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Sterling Financial Corporation
|
|
|
Sterling Financial Corporation
|
|
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved the PNC common
stock to be issued under this document or determined if this
document is accurate or adequate. Any representation to the
contrary is a criminal offense.
The date of this document is
[ ],
and it is first being mailed or otherwise delivered to Sterling
shareholders on or about
[ ].
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION
101 North Pointe Boulevard
Lancaster, PA 17601
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF
SHAREHOLDERS
Sterling Financial Corporation will hold a special meeting of
shareholders at [ ], at
[ ], EST, on
[ ] to consider and vote upon
the following proposals:
|
|
|
|
|
to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of
July 19, 2007, between The PNC Financial Services Group,
Inc. and Sterling Financial Corporation, as it may be amended
from time to time, which provides for, among other things, the
merger of Sterling Financial Corporation with and into The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
to approve the adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary,
to solicit additional proxies, in the event that there are not
sufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to approve
the proposal to adopt the plan of merger; and
|
|
|
|
to approve such other matters as may be appropriate in
connection with the approval of the plan of merger and the
transactions contemplated thereby.
|
The Sterling board of directors has fixed the close of business
on
[ ]
as the record date for the special meeting. Only Sterling
shareholders of record at that time are entitled to notice of,
and to vote at, the special meeting, or any adjournment or
postponement of the special meeting.
Assuming a quorum is present, a majority of the votes cast at
the Sterling special meeting is required to adopt the plan of
merger.
Regardless of whether you plan to attend the special meeting,
please submit your proxy with voting instructions. Please vote
as soon as possible. If you hold stock in your name as a
shareholder of record, please complete, sign, date and return
the accompanying proxy card in the enclosed self-addressed,
stamped envelope. You may also authorize a proxy to vote your
shares by either visiting the website or calling the toll-free
number shown on your proxy card. If you hold your stock in
street name through a bank or broker, please direct
your bank or broker to vote in accordance with the instructions
you have received from your bank or broker. This will not
prevent you from voting in person, but it will help to secure a
quorum and avoid added solicitation costs. Any holder of
Sterling common stock who is present at the special meeting may
vote in person instead of by proxy, thereby canceling any
previous proxy. In any event, a proxy may be revoked in writing
at any time before its exercise at the special meeting in the
manner described in the accompanying document.
The Sterling board of directors has approved the merger and
the plan of merger and recommends that Sterling shareholders
vote FOR adoption of the plan of merger,
FOR the approval of the adjournment, if necessary,
and FOR approval of other matters appropriate in
connection with the plan of merger.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
JEAN SVOBODA
Sr. Vice President, General Counsel
and Corporate Secretary
[ ],
2008
Lancaster, Pennsylvania
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. PLEASE VOTE YOUR SHARES
PROMPTLY, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE SPECIAL
MEETING. YOU CAN FIND INSTRUCTIONS FOR VOTING ON THE
ENCLOSED PROXY CARD.
REFERENCES
TO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
This document incorporates important business and financial
information about PNC from documents that are not included in or
delivered with this document. You can obtain documents
incorporated by reference in this document, other than certain
exhibits to those documents, by requesting them in writing or by
telephone from PNC at the following address:
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
One PNC Plaza
249 Fifth Avenue
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
15222-2707
Attention: Shareholder Relations
(800) 843-2206
Email: investor.relations@pnc.com
You will not be charged for any of these documents that you
request. Sterling shareholders requesting documents should do so
by [ ] in order to receive
them before the special meeting.
See Where You Can Find More Information on
page 74.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
iii
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
Annex A
|
|
Supplemental Information Regarding Sterling Financial Corporation
|
Annex B
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 19, 2007, by
and between
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. and Sterling Financial
Corporation
|
Annex C
|
|
Opinion of Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.
|
ii
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER AND SPECIAL MEETING
The questions and answers below highlight only selected
procedural information from this document. They do not contain
all of the information that may be important to you. You should
read carefully the entire document and the additional documents
incorporated by reference into this document to fully understand
the voting procedures for the special meeting.
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What is the proposed transaction for which I am being asked
to vote? |
|
A: |
|
You are being asked to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger,
dated as of July 19, 2007, between The PNC Financial
Services Group, Inc. and Sterling Financial Corporation, as it
may be amended from time to time, which provides for, among
other things, the merger of Sterling Financial Corporation with
and into The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. |
|
Q: |
|
What do I need to do now? |
|
A: |
|
With respect to the meeting after you have carefully
read this document and have decided how you wish to vote your
shares, please vote your shares promptly. If you hold stock in
your name as a shareholder of record, you must complete, sign,
date and mail your proxy card in the enclosed postage paid
return envelope as soon as possible. You may also authorize a
proxy to vote your shares by telephone or through the Internet
as instructed on the proxy card. If you hold your stock in
street name through a bank or broker, you must
direct your bank or broker to vote in accordance with the
instructions you have received from your bank or broker.
Submitting your proxy card, authorizing a proxy by telephone or
through the Internet, or directing your bank or broker to vote
your shares will ensure that your shares are represented and
voted at the special meeting. |
|
|
|
With respect to the merger you should complete and
return the form of election (which is being separately mailed to
Sterling shareholders following the mailing of this document),
together with your stock certificates, to Computershare, the
exchange agent for the merger, according to the instructions
printed on the form or, if your shares are held in street
name, according to your brokers instructions. |
|
Q: |
|
When must I elect the type of merger consideration that I
prefer to receive? |
|
A: |
|
If you wish to elect the type of merger consideration you
receive in the merger, you should carefully review and follow
the instructions set forth in the form of election, which is
being separately mailed to Sterling shareholders following the
mailing of this document. You will need to complete, sign and
date the form of election and transmittal materials and return
them to the exchange agent, Computershare, at the address given
in the materials, together with the certificates representing
shares of Sterling common stock, prior to the election deadline.
The election deadline will be
[ ],
although this may change if agreed to by PNC and Sterling. If
PNC and Sterling agree to change the election deadline, PNC and
Sterling will issue a press release announcing the change. If
you do not submit a properly completed and signed form of
election to the exchange agent by the election deadline, you
will have no control over the type of merger consideration you
may receive and, consequently, may receive only cash, only PNC
common stock or a combination of cash and PNC common stock in
the merger. If you hold shares in street name, you
must follow your brokers instructions to make an election.
If you are allocated shares of Sterling common stock in
Sterlings 401(k) Retirement Plan, you should follow the
instructions that will be delivered to you separately. |
|
Q: |
|
If I am a Sterling shareholder, should I send in my Sterling
stock certificates with my proxy card? |
|
A: |
|
No. Please DO NOT send your Sterling stock certificates
with your proxy card. You should carefully review and follow the
instructions set forth in the form of election, which is being
mailed to Sterling shareholders separately following the mailing
of this document, regarding the surrender of your share
certificates. You should then, prior to the election deadline,
send your Sterling common stock certificates to the exchange
agent, together with your completed, signed form of election. |
iii
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Why is my vote important? |
|
A: |
|
Because the merger cannot be completed without the affirmative
vote of a majority of the votes cast at the special meeting, and
because a majority of the outstanding Sterling common stock
entitled to vote is necessary to constitute a quorum in order to
transact business at the special meeting, every
shareholders vote is important. The Sterling board of
directors recommends that you vote FOR adoption of
the plan of merger. |
|
Q: |
|
If my shares of common stock are held in street name by my
broker, will my broker automatically vote my shares for me? |
|
A: |
|
No. Your broker cannot vote your shares without
instructions from you. You should instruct your broker as to how
to vote your shares, following the directions your broker
provides to you. Please check the voting form used by your
broker. |
|
Q: |
|
What if I fail to instruct my broker? |
|
A: |
|
If you do not provide your broker with instructions, your broker
generally will not be permitted to vote your shares on the
merger proposal (a so-called broker non-vote).
Because only those votes cast for and
against the merger proposal are counted, a failure
to provide your broker instructions will have no effect on the
vote to approve the merger proposal. For purposes of determining
the number of votes cast with respect to the merger proposal,
only those votes cast for or against the
proposal are counted. Broker non-votes, if any are
submitted by brokers or nominees in connection with the special
meeting, will not be counted as votes for or
against for purposes of determining the number of
votes cast but will be treated as present for quorum purposes. |
|
Q: |
|
Can I attend the special meeting and vote my shares in
person? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. All shareholders, including shareholders of record and
shareholders who hold their shares through banks, brokers,
nominees or any other holder of record, may attend the special
meeting. Holders of record of Sterling common stock can vote in
person at the special meeting. If you are not a shareholder of
record, you must obtain a proxy, executed in your favor, from
the record holder of your shares, such as a broker, bank or
other nominee, to be able to vote in person at the special
meeting. If you plan to attend the special meeting, you must
hold your shares in your own name or have a letter from the
record holder of your shares confirming your ownership and you
must bring a form of personal photo identification with you in
order to be admitted. |
|
Q: |
|
Can I change my vote? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. You may revoke any proxy at any time before it is voted by
(1) signing and returning a proxy card with a later date,
or by submitting another proxy via the Internet or by telephone,
(2) delivering a written revocation letter to the Secretary
of Sterling, or (3) attending the special meeting in
person, notifying the Secretary and voting by ballot at the
special meeting. The Sterling Secretarys mailing address
is 1097 Commercial Avenue, MC
294-953,
East Petersburg, PA 17520. |
|
|
|
Any shareholder entitled to vote in person at the special
meeting may vote in person regardless of whether a proxy has
been previously given, and such vote will revoke any previous
proxy, but the mere presence (without notifying the Secretary of
Sterling) of a shareholder at the special meeting will not
constitute revocation of a previously given proxy. |
|
Q: |
|
When do you expect to complete the merger? |
|
A: |
|
We expect to complete the merger in the first half of 2008.
However, we cannot assure you when or if the merger will occur.
Among other things, we cannot complete the merger until we
obtain the approval of Sterling shareholders at the special
meeting. |
|
Q: |
|
Whom should I call with questions about the shareholders
meeting or the merger? |
|
A: |
|
Sterling shareholders should call Georgeson Inc.,
Sterlings proxy solicitor and information agent, at
(800) 319-6872
with any questions about the merger and related transactions. |
iv
SUMMARY
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in
this document and may not contain all of the information that is
important to you. We urge you to carefully read the entire
document and the other documents to which we refer in order to
fully understand the merger and the related transactions. See
Where You Can Find More Information on page 74.
Each item in this summary refers to the page of this document on
which that subject is discussed in more detail.
THE
MERGER (page 23)
The terms and conditions of the merger are contained in the plan
of merger, which is attached as Annex B to this document.
Please carefully read the plan of merger as it is the legal
document that governs the merger.
Sterling
Will Merge into PNC
We are proposing the merger of Sterling with and into PNC. As a
result, PNC will continue as the surviving company. For
information about Sterling and issues facing it as a result of
developments related to its subsidiary, Equipment Finance, LLC,
please see Recent Developments Regarding Sterling
beginning on page 68 and The Merger
Background of the Merger beginning on page 23.
Sterling
Shareholders Will Receive Cash and/or Shares of PNC Common Stock
in the Merger Depending on Their Election and Any Proration
(page 39)
You will have the right to elect to receive merger
consideration, without interest, for each of your shares of
Sterling common stock in the form of cash or shares of PNC
common stock, or both, subject to proration in the circumstances
described below. In the event of proration, you may receive a
portion of the merger consideration in a form other than that
which you elected.
The implied value of the merger consideration will fluctuate
with the market price of PNC common stock and will be determined
based on the average closing price of PNC common stock on the
NYSE for the five trading days ending the day before the
completion of the merger. As explained in more detail in this
document, whether you make a cash election or a stock election,
the value of the consideration you receive as of the date of
completion of the merger will be substantially the same and will
be based on the average PNC closing price used to calculate the
merger consideration. If you are a record holder, you may
specify different elections with respect to different shares
that you hold (if, for example, you own 100 shares of
Sterling common stock, you could make a cash election with
respect to 50 shares and a stock election with respect to
the other 50 shares).
As an example, based on the average of the closing prices of PNC
common stock on the NYSE for the five trading days ending on
[ ], 2008, for each share of
Sterling common stock held, you would receive either
approximately $[ ] in cash or 0.[ ] of a share of PNC common
stock, subject to possible proration. We will compute the actual
amount of cash and number of shares of PNC common stock that
each Sterling shareholder will receive in the merger using the
formula contained in the plan of merger. For a summary of the
formula contained in the plan of merger, see The Plan of
Merger Consideration To Be Received in the
Merger beginning on page 39.
1
Set forth below is a table showing the consideration that you
would receive in a cash election, on the one hand, or in a stock
election, on the other hand, under the merger consideration
formula if the actual average of the closing prices of PNC
common stock on the NYSE for the five trading days ending the
day before the completion of the merger were equal to the
hypothetical range contained in the table. The table does not
reflect the fact that cash will be paid instead of fractional
shares. As described below, regardless of whether you make a
cash election or a stock election, you may nevertheless receive
a mix of cash and stock due to proration and adjustment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Election: Stock
|
|
|
|
Cash Election:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration per Share
|
|
Hypothetical Five-Day
|
|
Cash Consideration
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of PNC
|
|
|
Market
|
|
Average Closing Prices
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
OR
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Value (*)
|
|
|
$50.00
|
|
$
|
15.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3064
|
|
|
$
|
15.32
|
|
$51.00
|
|
$
|
15.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3033
|
|
|
$
|
15.47
|
|
$52.00
|
|
$
|
15.62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3004
|
|
|
$
|
15.62
|
|
$53.00
|
|
$
|
15.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2977
|
|
|
$
|
15.78
|
|
$54.00
|
|
$
|
15.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2950
|
|
|
$
|
15.93
|
|
$55.00
|
|
$
|
16.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2925
|
|
|
$
|
16.09
|
|
$56.00
|
|
$
|
16.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2900
|
|
|
$
|
16.24
|
|
$57.00
|
|
$
|
16.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2877
|
|
|
$
|
16.40
|
|
$58.00
|
|
$
|
16.55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2853
|
|
|
$
|
16.55
|
|
$59.00
|
|
$
|
16.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2831
|
|
|
$
|
16.70
|
|
$60.00
|
|
$
|
16.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2810
|
|
|
$
|
16.86
|
|
$61.00
|
|
$
|
17.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2789
|
|
|
$
|
17.01
|
|
$62.00
|
|
$
|
17.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2769
|
|
|
$
|
17.17
|
|
$63.00
|
|
$
|
17.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2749
|
|
|
$
|
17.32
|
|
$64.00
|
|
$
|
17.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2731
|
|
|
$
|
17.48
|
|
$65.00
|
|
$
|
17.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2712
|
|
|
$
|
17.63
|
|
$66.00
|
|
$
|
17.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2694
|
|
|
$
|
17.78
|
|
$67.00
|
|
$
|
17.94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2678
|
|
|
$
|
17.94
|
|
$68.00
|
|
$
|
18.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2660
|
|
|
$
|
18.09
|
|
$69.00
|
|
$
|
18.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2645
|
|
|
$
|
18.25
|
|
$70.00
|
|
$
|
18.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2629
|
|
|
$
|
18.40
|
|
$71.00
|
|
$
|
18.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2614
|
|
|
$
|
18.56
|
|
$72.00
|
|
$
|
18.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2599
|
|
|
$
|
18.71
|
|
$73.00
|
|
$
|
18.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2584
|
|
|
$
|
18.86
|
|
$74.00
|
|
$
|
19.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2570
|
|
|
$
|
19.02
|
|
$75.00
|
|
$
|
19.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2556
|
|
|
$
|
19.17
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Market value based on hypothetical
five-day
average closing price on the NYSE of PNC common stock. |
The examples above are illustrative only. The value of the
merger consideration that you actually receive will be based on
the actual average closing price of PNC common stock on the NYSE
for the five trading days ending the day before the completion
of the merger, as described below. The actual average closing
price may be outside the range of the amounts set forth above,
and as a result, the actual value of the merger consideration
per share of PNC common stock may not be shown in the above
table.
2
Regardless
of Whether You Make a Cash Election or a Stock Election, You May
Nevertheless Receive a Mix of Cash and Stock
(page 39)
The aggregate number of shares of PNC common stock that will be
issued in the merger is approximately
[ ] million, based on the
number of shares of Sterling common stock outstanding on
[ ],
2008, and the aggregate amount of cash that will be paid in the
merger is approximately $[ ] million. If more Sterling
shareholders make valid elections to receive either PNC common
stock or cash than is available as merger consideration under
the plan of merger, those Sterling shareholders electing the
over-subscribed form of consideration will have the
over-subscribed consideration proportionately reduced and
substituted with consideration in the other form, despite their
election.
What
Holders of Sterling Stock Options Will Receive
(page 44)
When we complete the merger, stock options to purchase shares of
Sterling common stock that are outstanding immediately before
completion of the merger will become options to acquire shares
of PNC common stock. The number of shares of PNC common stock
subject to such stock options and the exercise price of such
options will be adjusted to reflect the exchange ratio.
In Order
to Make a Valid Election, You Must Properly Complete and Deliver
the Form of Election (page 44)
If you wish to elect the type of merger consideration you prefer
to receive in the merger, you should carefully review and follow
the instructions set forth in the form of election, which is
being mailed to Sterling shareholders separately following the
mailing of this document. You will need to sign, date and
complete the form of election and transmittal materials and
return them to the exchange agent at the address given in the
materials, together with the certificates representing shares of
Sterling common stock (or a properly completed notice of
guaranteed delivery) prior to the election deadline. The form of
election also includes delivery instructions for shares held in
book-entry form. You should NOT send your stock certificates
with your proxy card.
The election deadline will be
[ ],
although this may change if agreed to by PNC and Sterling. If
PNC and Sterling agree to change the election deadline, PNC and
Sterling will issue a press release announcing the change. If
you fail to submit a properly completed and signed form of
election, together with your stock certificates (or a properly
completed notice of guarantee), by the election deadline, you
will be deemed not to have made an election. As a non-electing
holder, you will be paid merger consideration in an amount per
share that is equivalent in value to the amount paid per share
to holders making elections, but you may be paid all in cash,
all in PNC common stock, or in part cash and in part PNC
common stock, depending on the remaining pool of cash and PNC
common stock available for paying merger consideration after
honoring the cash elections and stock elections that other
shareholders have made, and without regard to your preference.
If you hold shares in street name, you must follow
your brokers instructions to make an election.
Once you have tendered your Sterling stock certificates to the
exchange agent, you may not transfer your shares of Sterling
common stock represented by those stock certificates until the
merger is completed, unless you revoke your election by written
notice to the exchange agent that is received prior to the
election deadline. If the merger is not completed and the plan
of merger is terminated, stock certificates will be returned by
the exchange agent.
The
Merger Has Been Structured to Be Tax-Free to Sterling
Shareholders to the Extent They Receive PNC Common Stock
(page 56)
The exchange by U.S. holders of Sterling common stock for
PNC common stock has been structured to be generally tax free
for U.S. federal income tax purposes, except that:
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. holders of Sterling common stock that receive both
cash and PNC common stock generally will recognize gain, but not
loss, to the extent of the cash received;
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. holders of Sterling common stock that receive only
cash generally will recognize gain or loss; and
|
|
|
|
U.S. holders of Sterling common stock generally will
recognize gain or loss with respect to cash received instead of
fractional shares of PNC common stock that such holders would
otherwise be entitled to receive.
|
For further information, please refer to Material United
States Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger.
The United States federal income tax consequences described
above may not apply to all holders of Sterling common stock.
Your tax consequences will depend on your individual situation.
Accordingly, please consult your tax advisor for a full
understanding of the particular tax consequences of the merger
to you.
Comparative
Market Prices and Share Information (pages 13 and
66)
PNC common stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol
PNC. Sterling common stock is quoted on the NASDAQ
Global Select Market under the symbol SLFI. The
following table shows the closing sale prices of PNC common
stock and Sterling common stock as reported on the NYSE and
NASDAQ on July 18, 2007, the last trading day before we
announced the merger, and on [ ],
the last practicable trading day prior to mailing this document.
The table also presents the equivalent value of the merger
consideration per share of Sterling common stock on
July 18, 2007 and [ ],
calculated by multiplying the closing price of PNC common stock
on those dates by 0.2582 and [ ],
respectively, each representing the fraction of a share of PNC
common stock that Sterling shareholders electing to receive PNC
common stock would receive in the merger for each share of
Sterling common stock, assuming that the average of the closing
prices of PNC common stock on the NYSE for the five trading days
ending the day before the completion of the merger was the
closing price of PNC common stock on July 18, 2007 and
[ ], 2008, respectively, and
assuming no proration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sterling Common
|
|
|
Equivalent per
|
|
|
|
PNC Common Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Share Value
|
|
|
At July 18, 2007
|
|
$
|
73.21
|
|
|
$
|
10.55
|
|
|
$
|
18.90
|
|
At [ ]
|
|
$
|
[ ]
|
|
|
$
|
[ ]
|
|
|
$
|
[ ]
|
|
The market price of PNC common stock and Sterling common stock
will fluctuate prior to the merger. You should obtain current
stock price quotations for the shares.
Keefe,
Bruyette & Woods, Inc. Has Provided an Opinion to the
Sterling Board of Directors Regarding the Merger Consideration
(page 28)
On July 18, 2007, the date that the Sterling board of
directors approved the merger, Keefe, Bruyette &
Woods, Inc., which we refer to as KBW, Sterlings financial
advisor, rendered an oral opinion to Sterlings board of
directors, that, as of that date and subject to a number of
factors and assumptions, the consideration to be paid to
Sterling shareholders in the merger was fair to such holders
from a financial point of view. KBW confirmed its oral opinion
by delivering to the Sterling board of directors a written
opinion dated as of July 19, 2007. The full text of
KBWs written opinion is attached as Annex C to this
proxy statement/prospectus. Sterlings shareholders are
urged to read the opinion in its entirety. KBWs opinion
does not constitute a recommendation to any Sterling shareholder
as to how the shareholder should vote at the Sterling special
meeting on the plan of merger or any related matter.
Sterling and KBW have entered into an agreement relating to the
services to be provided by KBW in connection with the merger.
Sterling has agreed to pay KBW, at the time of closing, a cash
fee equal to 1.00% of the market value of the aggregate
consideration offered in exchange for the outstanding shares of
common stock and options of Sterling, minus $250,000 that was
paid to KBW concurrently with the execution of the plan of
merger and $500,000 payable promptly after the mailing of this
proxy statement/prospectus. Pursuant to the KBW engagement
agreement, Sterling has also agreed to reimburse KBW for
reasonable out-of-pocket expenses and disbursements incurred in
connection with its retention and to indemnify KBW against
certain liabilities, including liabilities under the federal
securities laws.
4
The
Sterling Board of Directors Recommends That Sterling
Shareholders Vote FOR Approval of the Plan of Merger
(page 27)
The Sterling board of directors believes that the merger is in
the best interests of Sterling and its shareholders and has
approved the merger and the plan of merger. The Sterling board
of directors recommends that Sterling shareholders vote
FOR adoption of the plan of merger.
Sterlings
Directors and Officers Have Financial Interests in the Merger
That May Differ from Your Interests (page 36)
In considering the information contained in this document, you
should be aware that Sterlings executive officers and
directors have financial interests in the merger that may be
different from, or in addition to, the interests of Sterling
shareholders. These additional interests of Sterlings
executive officers and directors may create potential conflicts
of interest and cause these persons to view the proposed
transaction differently than you may view it as a shareholder.
Sterlings board of directors was aware of these interests
and took them into account in its decision to approve the plan
of merger. For information concerning these interests, please
see the discussion under the caption The
Merger Sterlings Directors and Executive
Officers Have Financial Interests in the Merger.
Holders
of Sterling Common Stock Do Not Have Dissenters Rights
(page 34)
Under Pennsylvania law, shareholders of a corporation are not
entitled to exercise dissenters rights if shares of the
corporation are listed on a national securities exchange or held
beneficially or of record by more than 2,000 persons.
Because shares of Sterlings common stock are quoted on the
NASDAQ Global Select Market and Sterling has more than
2,000 shareholders, Sterling shareholders do not have the
right to exercise dissenters rights or seek an appraisal of the
value of their shares in connection with the merger.
Conditions
That Must Be Satisfied or Waived for the Merger to Occur
(page 51)
Currently, we expect to complete the merger in the first half of
2008. As more fully described in this document and in the plan
of merger, the completion of the merger depends on a number of
conditions being satisfied or, where legally permissible,
waived. These conditions include, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
approval by Sterling shareholders;
|
|
|
|
the receipt of all regulatory consents and approvals in
connection with the merger of Sterling into PNC and the merger
of certain banking subsidiaries of PNC and Sterling (in each
case unless the failure to obtain such consents and approvals
would not reasonably be expected to have a material adverse
effect on Sterling or PNC measured on a scale relative to
Sterling) without a condition or a restriction that would have a
material adverse effect on Sterling or PNC, with materiality
being measured on a scale relative to Sterling; and
|
|
|
|
the receipt of legal opinions by each company regarding the tax
treatment of the merger.
|
We cannot be certain when, or if, the conditions to the merger
will be satisfied or waived, or that the merger will be
completed.
Termination
of the Plan of Merger (page 52)
We may mutually agree to terminate the plan of merger before
completing the merger, even after shareholder approval. In
addition, either of us may decide to terminate the plan of
merger, even after shareholder approval, if any order
permanently prohibiting the merger becomes final and
non-appealable or if the other party breaches the plan of merger
in a way that would entitle the party seeking to terminate the
agreement not to consummate the merger, subject to the right of
the breaching party to cure the breach within 30 days
following written notice (unless it is not possible to cure the
breach). Either of us may terminate the plan of merger if the
merger has not been completed by July 19, 2008, unless the
reason the merger has not been completed by that date is a
breach of the plan of merger by the company seeking to terminate
the plan of
5
merger. Either of us may terminate the plan of merger if the
Sterling shareholders fail to approve the plan of merger at the
special meeting.
PNC may terminate the plan of merger if the Sterling board of
directors (1) fails to recommend that Sterling shareholders
approve the merger or withdraws, qualifies, or modifies its
recommendation (or resolves to take such action) in a manner
adverse to PNC or (2) publicly recommends or endorses an
alternative business combination proposal (or resolves to do
so). PNC may also terminate the plan of merger if Sterling
breaches its obligation to call and hold a shareholder meeting
to consider the merger or its obligation to not solicit
competing acquisition proposals.
Termination
Fee (page 53)
In the event that PNC terminates the plan of merger because the
Sterling board of directors publicly recommends or endorses an
alternative business combination proposal in a manner adverse to
PNC (or resolves to do so), Sterling will pay PNC a
$7 million termination fee. If Sterling consummates an
alternative transaction relating to such competing proposal at
any time, or consummates any other alternative transaction
before the twelve-month anniversary of the termination of the
plan of merger, Sterling will pay PNC a $14 million
termination fee.
In addition, we have agreed that if certain events occur related
to an alternative business combination proposal and thereafter
the plan of merger is terminated by:
|
|
|
|
|
either Sterling or PNC because the Sterling shareholders do not
approve the merger at the shareholder meeting;
|
|
|
|
PNC because the Sterling board of directors fails to recommend
that Sterling shareholders approve the merger or withdraws,
qualifies, or modifies its recommendation in a manner adverse to
PNC (or resolves to take such action);
|
|
|
|
PNC because Sterling breaches its obligation to call and hold a
shareholder meeting to consider the merger or its obligation to
not solicit competing acquisition proposals; or
|
|
|
|
PNC because of a willful breach by Sterling that cannot be cured
or, if curable, is not cured within 30 days written
notice to Sterling of the breach;
|
and in connection with any of the above-listed events:
|
|
|
|
|
Sterling consummates an alternative transaction before the
twelve-month anniversary of the termination of the plan of
merger, Sterling will pay PNC a $21 million termination fee.
|
|
|
|
Sterling enters into any agreement related to any acquisition
proposal before the twelve-month anniversary of the termination
of the plan of merger, Sterling will pay PNC a $7 million
termination fee. If Sterling consummates an alternative
transaction relating to such agreement, Sterling will pay PNC a
$14 million termination fee.
|
Regulatory
Approvals Required for the Merger (page 34)
Sterling and PNC have agreed to use their reasonable best
efforts to obtain all regulatory approvals required to complete
the transactions contemplated by the plan of merger. These
approvals include approval from the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, which we refer to as the Federal Reserve
Board, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which we
refer to as the OCC, and state regulatory authorities, including
the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and the Delaware State
Bank Commissioner. PNC and Sterling have completed, or will
complete, the filing of applications and notifications to obtain
the required regulatory approvals. In obtaining the required
regulatory approvals, PNC is not required to agree to any
restriction or condition that would have a material adverse
effect on Sterling or PNC, measured on a scale relative to
Sterling.
6
The Federal Reserve Board approved the transaction on
January 25, 2008, the Pennsylvania Department of Banking
approved the transaction on September 17, 2007 and the
Delaware State Bank Commissioner approved the transaction on
December 31, 2007.
The
Rights of Sterling Shareholders Who Receive Stock Consideration
Will Be Different After the Merger (page 39)
The rights of Sterling shareholders are governed by Pennsylvania
law and by Sterlings amended and restated articles of
incorporation and amended and restated bylaws. The rights of PNC
shareholders are governed by Pennsylvania law and by PNCs
amended and restated articles of incorporation and amended and
restated bylaws. After the completion of the merger, the rights
of both shareholders will be governed by Pennsylvania law and
PNCs amended and restated articles of incorporation and
amended and restated bylaws. Beginning on page 60 of this
document, there is a description of shareholder rights under
each of the PNC and Sterling governing documents, and of the
material differences between them.
Sterling
Will Hold its Special Meeting on [ ], 2008
(page 20)
The special meeting will be held on
[ ], at
[ ], EST, at
[ ]. At the special meeting,
Sterling shareholders will be asked to:
|
|
|
|
|
adopt the plan of merger;
|
|
|
|
approve the adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary, to
solicit additional proxies, in the event that there are not
sufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to adopt the
plan of merger; and
|
|
|
|
approve such other matters as may be appropriate in connection
with the plan of merger.
|
Record Date. Only holders of record of
Sterling common stock at the close of business on
[ ] will be entitled to vote
at the special meeting. Each share of Sterling common stock is
entitled to one vote. As of the record date of
[ ], there were approximately
[ ] shares of Sterling common
stock entitled to vote at the special meeting.
Required Vote. A majority of the votes cast at
the Sterling special meeting is required to approve the plan of
merger, and a majority of the outstanding Sterling common stock
entitled to vote is necessary to constitute a quorum in order to
transact business at the special meeting.
As of the record date, directors and executive officers of
Sterling and their affiliates had the right to vote
approximately [ ] shares of
Sterling common stock, or [ ]% of
the outstanding Sterling common stock entitled to be voted at
the special meeting.
Information
About the Companies (page 59)
The
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. is a Pennsylvania
corporation, a bank holding company and a financial holding
company under U.S. federal law. PNC is one of the largest
diversified financial services companies in the United States
based on assets, with businesses engaged in retail banking,
corporate and institutional banking, asset management and global
fund processing services. PNC provides many of its products and
services nationally and others in PNCs primary geographic
markets located in Pennsylvania; New Jersey; Washington, DC;
Maryland; Virginia; Ohio; Kentucky; and Delaware. PNC also
provides certain global fund processing services
internationally. PNC stock is listed on the NYSE under the
symbol PNC. As of September 30, 2007, PNC had
total consolidated assets of approximately $131.4 billion,
total consolidated deposits of approximately $78.4 billion
and total consolidated stockholders equity of
approximately $14.5 billion. The principal executive
offices of PNC are located at One PNC Plaza, 249 Fifth
Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
15222-2707,
and its telephone number is
(412) 762-2000.
7
Sterling
Financial Corporation
Sterling Financial Corporation (NASDAQ: SLFI) is a
diversified financial services company based in Lancaster,
Pennsylvania. Sterling Banking Services Group affiliates offer a
full range of banking services in south-central Pennsylvania,
northern Maryland and northern Delaware. The group also offers
correspondent banking services in the mid-Atlantic region to
other companies within the financial services industry, and
banking related insurance services. Sterling Financial Services
Group affiliates provide specialty commercial financing; fleet
and equipment leasing; and investment, trust and brokerage
services. The principal executive offices of Sterling are
located at 101 North Pointe Boulevard, Lancaster, Pennsylvania
17601 and its telephone number is
(717) 581-6030.
For information about Sterling and issues facing it as a result
of developments related to its subsidiary, Equipment Finance,
LLC, please see Recent Developments Regarding
Sterling beginning on page 68 and The
Merger Background of the Merger beginning on
page 23.
8
SELECTED
CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA OF PNC
Set forth below are highlights from PNCs consolidated
financial data as of and for the years ended December 31,
2002 through 2006 and as of and for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 and 2007. The results of operations for
the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2007 are not
necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the full
year or any other interim period. PNC management prepared the
unaudited information on the same basis as it prepared
PNCs audited consolidated financial statements. In the
opinion of PNC management, this information reflects all
adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments,
necessary for a fair presentation of this data for those dates.
You should read this information in conjunction with PNCs
consolidated financial statements and related notes included in
PNCs Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006, as amended by
Form 10-K/A, and PNCs Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as amended by
Form 10-Q/A, which are incorporated by reference in this
document and from which this information is derived. See
Where You Can Find More Information on page 74.
PNC
Summary of Consolidated Financial Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007(a)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006 (b),(c)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
Earnings (in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
2,122
|
|
|
$
|
1,679
|
|
|
$
|
2,245
|
|
|
$
|
2,154
|
|
|
$
|
1,969
|
|
|
$
|
1,996
|
|
|
$
|
2,197
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
2,956
|
|
|
|
5,358
|
|
|
|
6,327
|
|
|
|
4,173
|
|
|
|
3,572
|
|
|
|
3,263
|
|
|
|
3,197
|
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
3,083
|
|
|
|
3,474
|
|
|
|
4,443
|
|
|
|
4,306
|
|
|
|
3,712
|
|
|
|
3,467
|
|
|
|
3,223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest and income taxes
|
|
|
1,868
|
|
|
|
3,481
|
|
|
|
4,005
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
1,777
|
|
|
|
1,615
|
|
|
|
1,862
|
|
Minority interest in income of BlackRock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
579
|
|
|
|
1,215
|
|
|
|
1,363
|
|
|
|
604
|
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
1,289
|
|
|
|
2,219
|
|
|
|
2,595
|
|
|
|
1,325
|
|
|
|
1,197
|
|
|
|
1,029
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
(Loss) Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
1,289
|
|
|
|
2,219
|
|
|
|
2,595
|
|
|
|
1,325
|
|
|
|
1,197
|
|
|
|
1,029
|
|
|
|
1,184
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,289
|
|
|
$
|
2,219
|
|
|
$
|
2,595
|
|
|
$
|
1,325
|
|
|
$
|
1,197
|
|
|
$
|
1,001
|
|
|
$
|
1,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per common share data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
3.92
|
|
|
$
|
7.60
|
|
|
$
|
8.89
|
|
|
$
|
4.63
|
|
|
$
|
4.25
|
|
|
$
|
3.68
|
|
|
$
|
4.23
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
3.92
|
|
|
|
7.60
|
|
|
|
8.89
|
|
|
|
4.63
|
|
|
|
4.25
|
|
|
|
3.68
|
|
|
|
4.18
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
3.92
|
|
|
$
|
7.60
|
|
|
$
|
8.89
|
|
|
$
|
4.63
|
|
|
$
|
4.25
|
|
|
$
|
3.58
|
|
|
$
|
4.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007(a)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006 (b),(c)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
Diluted earnings(loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
3.85
|
|
|
$
|
7.46
|
|
|
$
|
8.73
|
|
|
$
|
4.55
|
|
|
$
|
4.21
|
|
|
$
|
3.65
|
|
|
$
|
4.20
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
3.85
|
|
|
|
7.46
|
|
|
|
8.73
|
|
|
|
4.55
|
|
|
|
4.21
|
|
|
|
3.65
|
|
|
|
4.15
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
3.85
|
|
|
$
|
7.46
|
|
|
$
|
8.73
|
|
|
$
|
4.55
|
|
|
$
|
4.21
|
|
|
$
|
3.55
|
|
|
$
|
4.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared
|
|
$
|
1.81
|
|
|
$
|
1.60
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
$
|
1.94
|
|
|
$
|
1.92
|
|
Period end balances (in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
131,366
|
|
|
$
|
98,436
|
|
|
$
|
101,820
|
|
|
$
|
91,954
|
|
|
$
|
79,723
|
|
|
$
|
68,168
|
|
|
$
|
66,377
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
78,409
|
|
|
|
64,572
|
|
|
|
66,301
|
|
|
|
60,275
|
|
|
|
53,269
|
|
|
|
45,241
|
|
|
|
44,982
|
|
Total borrowed funds
|
|
|
27,453
|
|
|
|
14,695
|
|
|
|
15,028
|
|
|
|
16,897
|
|
|
|
11,964
|
|
|
|
11,453
|
|
|
|
9,116
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
14,539
|
|
|
|
10,758
|
|
|
|
10,788
|
|
|
|
8,563
|
|
|
|
7,473
|
|
|
|
6,645
|
|
|
|
6,859
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Amounts for 2007 reflect the impact of PNCs March 2,
2007 acquisition of Mercantile Bankshares Corporation. |
|
(b) |
|
Noninterest income for 2006 included the pretax impact of the
following: gain on the BlackRock/Merrill Lynch Investment
Managers (MLIM) transaction of $2.1 billion;
securities portfolio rebalancing loss of $196 million; and
mortgage loan portfolio repositioning loss of $48 million.
Noninterest expense for 2006 included the pretax impact of
BlackRock/MLIM transaction integration costs of
$91 million. An additional $10 million of integration
costs, recognized in the fourth quarter of 2006, were included
in noninterest income as a negative component of the asset
management line. The after-tax impact of these items was as
follows: BlackRock/MLIM transaction gain
$1.3 billion; securities portfolio rebalancing
loss $127 million; mortgage loan portfolio
repositioning loss $31 million; and
BlackRock/MLIM transaction integration costs
$47 million. |
|
|
|
The aggregate after-tax impact of these items increased net
income for the year ended December 31, 2006 by
$1.1 billion. On a per share basis, the aggregate after-tax
impact of these items increased net income by $3.72 per basic
common share or $3.67 per diluted common share. |
|
(c) |
|
Due to the significant one-time adjustments for PNC during 2006,
the results for that year may not be typical. |
10
SELECTED
CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA OF STERLING
Set forth below are highlights from Sterlings consolidated
financial data as of and for the year ended December 31,
2006 and as of and for the nine months ended September 30,
2007. The results of operations for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the
results of operations for the full year or any other interim
period. You should read this information in conjunction with
Sterlings consolidated financial statements and related
notes included in Annex A from which this information is
derived.
Sterling
Summary of Consolidated Financial Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(Restated)(1)
|
|
|
Earnings (in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
Noninterest expenses
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Applicable income tax benefit
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations(2)(3)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)(2)(3)
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Common Share Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)(2)(3)
|
|
$
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)(2)(3)
|
|
$
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
Cash dividends declared
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.58
|
|
Period end balances (in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
3,241
|
|
|
$
|
3,077
|
|
Total Deposits
|
|
|
2,735
|
|
|
|
2,616
|
|
Total Borrowed Funds
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
Total Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The year ended December 31, 2006 consolidated financial
statements have been restated to give effect to losses
associated with the write-off of certain finance receivables
within Sterlings subsidiary Equipment Finance, LLC. These
losses arose due to the fraudulent activity at EFI, discussed
under the heading Introduction in Annex A to
this proxy statement/prospectus. The net effect of this
restatement was a cumulative after-tax adjustment to
January 1, 2006 stockholders equity of
$162.0 million. |
|
|
|
The year ended December 31, 2006 consolidated financial
statements were restated as follows: a reduction to net interest
income of $43.6 million, an increase in the provision for
loan losses of $12.4 million, a reduction in noninterest
income of $941,000, an increase in noninterest expenses of
$5.7 million, and a |
11
|
|
|
|
|
reduction of net income of $39.8 million. Amounts as of
December 31, 2006 have been restated as follows: a
reduction in total loans, net of allowance for loan losses, of
$281.0 million; a reduction of total assets of
$203.0 million; and a reduction of stockholders
equity of $201.8 million. See Note 2 to the
consolidated financial statements in Annex A for additional
information regarding the effect of the fraudulent activities at
EFI. |
|
(2) |
|
Sterling incurred EFI-related investigation, legal, accounting
and other costs, including losses related to the repurchase of
previously sold loans and other losses related to fraudulent
payments, of $14.0 million after taxes ($0.47 per share
loss) and $7.1 million after taxes ($0.24 per share loss)
for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and the year
ended December 31, 2006, respectively. Sterling also
incurred merger-related expenses totaling $1.1 million
after taxes ($0.04 per share loss) in the nine months ended
September 30, 2007, which relate to the cost of the
acceleration of the vesting of stock options and restricted
stock upon the signing of the plan of merger and other costs
associated with the pending merger with PNC. |
|
(3) |
|
Sterling has not established a reserve or recorded any amounts
for any of the litigation described under the heading
Recent Developments Regarding Sterling. |
12
COMPARATIVE
PER SHARE DATA
The following table sets forth for PNC common stock and Sterling
common stock certain historical, pro forma and pro
forma-equivalent per share financial information. The pro forma
and pro forma-equivalent per share information gives effect to
the merger as if the merger had been effective on the dates
presented, in the case of the book value data, and as if the
merger had become effective on January 1, 2006, in the case
of the net income and dividends declared data. The pro forma
data in the tables assume that the merger is accounted for using
the purchase method of accounting and represents a current
estimate based on available information of the combined
companys results of operations. The pro forma financial
adjustments record the assets and liabilities of Sterling at
their estimated fair values and are subject to adjustment as
additional information becomes available and as additional
analyses are performed. See Accounting Treatment on
page 55. The information in the following table is based,
in the case of PNC, on, and should be read together with, the
historical financial information that PNC has presented in its
prior filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which
we refer to as the SEC. See Where You Can Find More
Information on page 74. In the case of Sterling, the
information in the following table is based on Sterlings
restated financial information for the periods presented. See
Information About the Companies Sterling
Financial Corporation on page 59.
We anticipate that the merger will provide the combined company
with financial benefits that include reduced operating expenses
and revenue enhancement opportunities. The pro forma
information, while helpful in illustrating the financial
characteristics of the combined company under one set of
assumptions, does not reflect the impact of possible revenue
enhancements, expense efficiencies, asset dispositions and share
repurchases, among other factors, that may result as a
consequence of the merger and, accordingly, does not attempt to
predict or suggest future results. It also does not necessarily
reflect what the historical results of the combined company
would have been had our companies been combined during these
periods. The Comparative Per Share Data Table for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007 and the year ended
December 31, 2006 combines the historical income per share
data of PNC and its subsidiaries and Sterling and its
subsidiaries giving effect to the merger as if the merger had
become effective on January 1, 2006, using the purchase
method of accounting. Upon completion of the merger, the
operating results of Sterling will be reflected in the
consolidated financial statements of PNC on a prospective basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equivalent
|
|
|
|
PNC
|
|
|
Sterling
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Sterling
|
|
|
|
Historical (a),(b)
|
|
|
Historical (d),(e),(f)
|
|
|
Combined(c)
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Earnings per share from continuing operations for the twelve
months ended December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
8.89
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
8.71
|
|
|
$
|
2.25
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
8.73
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
8.56
|
|
|
|
2.21
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
3.92
|
|
|
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
|
3.81
|
|
|
|
0.98
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
3.85
|
|
|
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
|
3.75
|
|
|
|
0.97
|
|
Dividends Declared:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
2.15
|
|
|
|
0.58
|
|
|
|
2.15
|
|
|
|
0.56
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
1.81
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
1.81
|
|
|
|
0.47
|
|
Book Value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
36.80
|
|
|
|
4.34
|
|
|
|
37.35
|
|
|
|
9.64
|
|
As of September 30, 2007
|
|
|
43.12
|
|
|
|
3.74
|
|
|
|
43.52
|
|
|
|
11.24
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Amounts for 2007 reflect the impact of PNCs March 2,
2007 acquisition of Mercantile Bankshares Corporation. |
13
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Noninterest income for 2006 included the pretax impact of the
following: gain on the BlackRock/MLIM transaction of
$2.1 billion; securities portfolio rebalancing loss of
$196 million; and mortgage loan portfolio repositioning
loss of $48 million. Noninterest expense for 2006 included
the pretax impact of BlackRock/MLIM transaction integration
costs of $91 million. An additional $10 million of
integration costs, recognized in the fourth quarter of 2006,
were included in noninterest income as a negative component of
the asset management line. The after-tax impact of these items
was as follows: BlackRock/MLIM transaction gain
$1.3 billion; securities portfolio rebalancing
loss $127 million; mortgage loan portfolio
repositioning loss $31 million; and
BlackRock/MLIM transaction integration costs
$47 million. |
The aggregate after-tax impact of these items increased net
income for the year ended December 31, 2006 by
$1.1 billion. On a per share basis, the aggregate after-tax
impact of these items increased net income by $3.72 per basic
common share or $3.67 per diluted common share.
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Due to the significant one-time adjustments for PNC during 2006,
the pro forma combined results for that year may not be typical.
If the one-time adjustments are excluded, the difference between
PNCs historical results and the pro forma combined results
would decrease significantly. |
|
(d) |
|
The year ended December 31, 2006 consolidated financial
statements have been restated to give effect to losses
associated with the write-off of certain finance receivables
within Sterlings subsidiary Equipment Finance, LLC. These
losses arose due to the fraudulent activity at EFI, discussed
under the heading Introduction in Annex A to
this proxy statement/prospectus. The net effect of this
restatement was a cumulative after-tax adjustment to
January 1, 2006 stockholders equity of
$162.0 million. |
|
|
|
The year ended December 31, 2006 consolidated financial
statements were restated as follows: a reduction to net interest
income of $43.6 million, an increase in the provision for
loan losses of $12.4 million, a reduction in noninterest
income of $941,000, an increase in noninterest expenses of
$5.7 million, and a reduction of net income of
$39.8 million. Amounts as of December 31, 2006 have
been restated as follows: a reduction in total loans, net of
allowance for loan losses, of $281.0 million; a reduction
of total assets of $203.0 million; and a reduction of
stockholders equity of $201.8 million. See
Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in
Annex A for additional information regarding the effect of
the fraudulent activities at EFI. |
|
(e) |
|
Sterling incurred EFI-related investigation, legal, accounting
and other costs, including losses related to the repurchase of
previously sold loans and other losses related to fraudulent
payments, of $14.0 million after taxes ($0.47 per share
loss) and $7.1 million after taxes ($0.24 per share loss)
for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and the year
ended December 31, 2006, respectively. Sterling also
incurred merger-related expenses totaling $1.1 million
after taxes ($0.04 per share loss) in the nine months ended
September 30, 2007, which relate to the cost of the
acceleration of the vesting of stock options and restricted
stock upon the signing of the plan of merger and other costs
associated with the pending merger with PNC. |
|
(f) |
|
Sterling has not established a reserve or recorded any amounts
for any of the litigation described under the heading
Recent Developments Regarding Sterling. |
14
RISK
FACTORS
In addition to general investment risks and the other
information contained in or incorporated by reference into this
document, including the matters under the caption
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements and the matters discussed under the caption
Risk Factors included in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed by PNC for the year ended December 31, 2006 as
updated by subsequently filed
Forms 10-Q,
10-K/A and 10-Q/A, you should carefully consider the following
factors in deciding whether to vote for adoption of the plan of
merger.
Because
the Market Price of PNC Common Stock Will Fluctuate, Sterling
Shareholders Cannot Be Sure of the Trading Price of the Merger
Consideration They Will Receive.
Upon completion of the merger, each share of Sterling common
stock will be converted into the right to receive merger
consideration consisting of shares of PNC common stock
and/or cash
pursuant to the terms of the plan of merger. The value of the
merger consideration to be received by Sterling shareholders
will be based on the average closing price of PNC common stock
on the NYSE for the five trading days ending on the day before
the completion of the merger. This average price may vary from
the closing price of PNC common stock on the date we announced
the merger, on the date this document was mailed to Sterling
shareholders and on the date of the meeting of the Sterling
shareholders. Any change in the market price of PNC common stock
prior to completion of the merger will affect the value of the
merger consideration that Sterling shareholders will receive
upon completion of the merger. Accordingly, at the time of the
Sterling special meeting and prior to the election deadline,
Sterling shareholders will not necessarily know or be able to
calculate the amount of the cash consideration they would
receive or the exchange ratio used to determine the number of
any shares of PNC common stock they would receive upon
completion of the merger. Sterling is not permitted to resolicit
the vote of Sterling shareholders solely because of changes in
the market price of either companys stock. Stock price
changes may result from a variety of factors, including general
market and economic conditions, changes in our respective
businesses, operations and prospects, and regulatory
considerations. Many of these factors are beyond our control.
You should obtain current market quotations for shares of PNC
common stock and for shares of Sterling common stock.
We May
Fail to Realize All of the Anticipated Benefits of the
Merger.
The success of the merger will depend, in part, on our ability
to realize the anticipated benefits and cost savings from
combining the businesses of PNC and Sterling. However, to
realize these anticipated benefits and cost savings, we must
successfully combine the businesses of PNC and Sterling. If we
are not able to achieve these objectives, the anticipated
benefits and cost savings of the merger may not be realized
fully or at all or may take longer to realize than expected.
Upon completion of the merger, PNC would become subject to the
litigation matters described under the heading Recent
Developments at Sterling Civil Litigation to
the extent such matters are still outstanding. PNC does not
currently believe that the potential liability in connection
with such matters would be material to its business.
PNC and Sterling have operated and, until the completion of the
merger, will continue to operate, independently. It is possible
that the integration process could result in the loss of key
employees, the disruption of each companys ongoing
businesses or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures
and policies that adversely affect our ability to maintain
relationships with clients, customers, depositors and employees
or to achieve the anticipated benefits of the merger.
Integration efforts between the two companies will also divert
management attention and resources. These integration matters
could have an adverse effect on each of Sterling and PNC during
the transition period.
The
Market Price of PNC Common Stock After the Merger May Be
Affected by Factors Different from Those Affecting the Shares of
Sterling or PNC Currently.
The businesses of PNC and Sterling differ and, accordingly, the
results of operations of the combined company and the market
price of the combined companys shares of common stock may
be affected by factors different from those currently affecting
the independent results of operations of Sterling. For a
discussion of
15
the businesses of PNC and Sterling and of certain factors to
consider in connection with those businesses, see the documents
incorporated by reference in this document and referred to under
Where You Can Find More Information, and the
discussion of Sterlings business and other information in
Annex A.
Sterling
Shareholders Will Have a Reduced Ownership and Voting Interest
After the Merger and Will Exercise Less Influence Over
Management.
Sterlings shareholders currently have the right to vote in
the election of the Sterling board of directors and on other
matters affecting Sterling. When the merger occurs, each
Sterling shareholder that receives shares of PNC common stock
will become a shareholder of PNC with a percentage ownership of
the combined organization that is much smaller than the
shareholders percentage ownership of Sterling. In fact, it
is expected that the former shareholders of Sterling as a group
will own approximately 1% of the outstanding shares of PNC
immediately after the merger. Because of this, Sterlings
shareholders will have less influence on the management and
policies of PNC than they now have on the management and
policies of Sterling.
Sterling
Will Be Subject to Business Uncertainties While the Merger Is
Pending.
Uncertainty about the effect of the merger on employees and
customers may have an adverse effect on Sterling and
consequently on PNC. These uncertainties may impair
Sterlings ability to attract, retain and motivate key
personnel until the merger is consummated, and could cause
customers, vendors and others that deal with Sterling to seek to
change existing business relationships with Sterling. Retention
of certain employees may be challenging during the pendency of
the merger, as certain employees may experience uncertainty
about any future role with PNC. If key employees depart because
of issues related to the uncertainty and difficulty of
integration or a desire not to remain with PNC, PNCs
business following the merger could be negatively affected.
Sterling
Shareholders May Receive a Form of Consideration Different from
What They Elect.
Although each Sterling shareholder may elect to receive all
cash, all PNC common stock, or a combination thereof in the
merger, the cash and stock elections are subject to proration
and adjustment to preserve the proportion of the aggregate
number of PNC shares to be issued to the aggregate cash
consideration to be paid in the merger. As a result, even if you
make an all-cash election or an all-stock election, you may
nevertheless receive a mix of cash and stock consideration. In
addition, if you elect to receive a combination of stock and
cash, you may not receive the desired mix.
If You
Are a Sterling Shareholder and You Tender Shares of Sterling
Common Stock to Make an Election, You Will Not Be Able to Sell
Those Shares, Unless You Revoke Your Election Prior to the
Election Deadline.
If you are a registered Sterling shareholder and want to make a
valid cash or stock election, you will have to deliver your
stock certificates (or follow the procedures for guaranteed
delivery), and a properly completed and signed form of election
to the exchange agent. For further details on the determination
of the election deadline, see The Plan of
Merger Conversion of Shares; Exchange of
Certificates and Book-Entry Shares; Elections as to Form of
Consideration Form of Election. The election
deadline will be the later of the day before the special meeting
and the date the parties believe to be as near as practicable to
five business days before the closing of the merger, unless
otherwise agreed to by PNC and Sterling. You will not be able to
sell any shares of Sterling common stock that you have delivered
as part of your election unless you revoke your election before
the deadline by providing written notice to the exchange agent.
If you do not revoke your election, you will not be able to
liquidate your investment in Sterling common stock for any
reason until you receive cash
and/or PNC
common stock in the merger. In the time between the election
deadline and the closing of the merger, the trading price of
Sterling or PNC common stock may decrease, and you might
otherwise want to sell your shares of Sterling common stock to
gain access to cash, make other investments, or reduce the
potential for a decrease in the value of your investment. The
date that you will receive your merger consideration depends on
the completion date of the merger, which is uncertain. The
completion date of the merger might be later than expected due
to unforeseen events, such as delays in obtaining regulatory
approvals.
16
The
Merger Is Subject to the Receipt of Consents and Approvals from
Government Entities that May Impose Conditions that Could Have
an Adverse Effect on PNC.
Before the merger may be completed, various waivers, approvals
or consents must be obtained from the Federal Reserve Board,
various other bank regulatory and other authorities and the
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. These governmental
entities may impose conditions on the completion of the merger
or require changes to the terms of the merger. Although PNC and
Sterling do not currently expect that any such conditions or
changes will be imposed, there can be no assurance that they
will not be, and such conditions or changes could have the
effect of delaying completion of the merger or imposing
additional costs on or limiting the revenues of PNC following
the merger, any of which might have an adverse effect on PNC
following the merger. The Federal Reserve Board approved the
transaction on January 25, 2008, the Pennsylvania
Department of Banking approved the transaction on
September 17, 2007 and the Delaware State Bank Commissioner
approved the transaction on December 31, 2007. PNC is not
obligated to complete the merger if the regulatory approvals
received in connection with the completion of the merger include
any condition or restrictions that would reasonably be expected
to have a material adverse effect on Sterling or PNC, measured
relative to Sterling, but PNC could choose to waive this
condition.
Sterlings
Executive Officers and Directors Have Financial Interests in the
Merger that May Be Different from, or in Addition to, the
Interests of Sterling Shareholders.
Sterlings executive officers and directors have financial
interests in the merger that may be different from, or in
addition to, the interests of Sterling shareholders. For
example, the executive officers and certain key employees of
Sterling may receive bonus or retention payments or new equity
awards with respect to PNC common stock.
Sterlings board of directors was aware of these interests
and took them into account in its decision to approve and adopt
the plan of merger. For information concerning these interests,
please see the discussion under the caption The
Merger Sterlings Directors and Executive
Officers Have Financial Interests in the Merger.
The
Shares of PNC Common Stock to Be Received by Sterling
Shareholders Receiving the Stock Consideration as a Result of
the Merger Will Have Different Rights from the Shares of
Sterling Common Stock.
Upon completion of the merger, Sterling shareholders who receive
the stock consideration will become PNC shareholders and their
rights as shareholders will be governed by the amended and
restated articles incorporation and amended and restated bylaws
of PNC. The rights associated with Sterling common stock are
different from the rights associated with PNC common stock. See
the section of this proxy statement/prospectus titled
Comparison of Shareholders Rights beginning on
page 60 for a discussion of the different rights
associated with PNC common stock.
17
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This document contains or incorporates by reference a number of
forward-looking statements, including statements about the
financial conditions, results of operations, earnings outlook
and prospects of PNC, Sterling and the potential combined
company and may include statements for the period following the
completion of the merger. Forward-looking statements are
typically identified by words such as plan,
believe, expect, anticipate,
intend, outlook, estimate,
forecast, project and other similar
words and expressions.
The forward-looking statements involve certain risks and
uncertainties. The ability of either PNC or Sterling to predict
results or the actual effects of its plans and strategies, or
those of the combined company, is subject to inherent
uncertainty. Factors that may cause actual results or earnings
to differ materially from such forward-looking statements
include those set forth under the heading Risk
Factors beginning on page 15, as well as, among
others, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
those discussed and identified in public filings with the SEC
made by PNC;
|
|
|
|
completion of the merger is dependent on, among other things,
receipt of shareholder and regulatory approvals, the timing of
which cannot be predicted with precision and which may not be
received at all;
|
|
|
|
the merger may be more expensive to complete than anticipated,
including as a result of unexpected factors or events;
|
|
|
|
the integration of Sterlings business and operations with
those of PNC may take longer than anticipated, may be more
costly than anticipated and may have unanticipated adverse
results relating to Sterlings or PNCs existing
businesses;
|
|
|
|
the anticipated cost savings and other synergies of the merger
may take longer to be realized or may not be achieved in their
entirety, and attrition in key client, partner and other
relationships relating to the merger may be greater than
expected; and
|
|
|
|
additionally, with respect to Sterlings business:
|
|
|
|
|
|
operating, legal and regulatory risks;
|
|
|
|
economic, political and competitive forces impacting
Sterlings various lines of business;
|
|
|
|
recently enacted, proposed and future banking legislation and
regulations that have had, and will continue to have or may
have, a significant impact on the financial services industry;
|
|
|
|
the risk that Sterlings analysis of these risks and forces
could be incorrect
and/or that
the strategies developed to address them could be unsuccessful;
|
|
|
|
the possibility that increased demand or prices for
Sterlings financial services and products may not occur;
|
|
|
|
volatility in the levels of interest rates, as well as the
difference between short- and long-term rates as reflected in
the shape of the yield curve;
|
|
|
|
the possibility of a downturn in the real estate market in
south-central Pennsylvania, northern Maryland and certain
counties in Delaware, where Sterlings business activities
and credit exposure are concentrated;
|
|
|
|
integration of Sterlings acquired affiliates may not occur
as quickly or smoothly as anticipated, and projected synergies
may not occur on the projected time frame or at all;
|
|
|
|
the risk that the fair values of the business segments will not
continue to exceed their carrying value;
|
|
|
|
changes/volatility in the securities markets; and
|
|
|
|
other risks and uncertainties.
|
Because these forward-looking statements are subject to
assumptions and uncertainties, actual results may differ
materially from those expressed or implied by these
forward-looking statements. You are cautioned not
18
to place undue reliance on these statements, which speak only as
of the date of this document or the date of any document
incorporated by reference in this document.
All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements
concerning the merger or other matters addressed in this
document and attributable to PNC or Sterling or any person
acting on their behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety
by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this
document. Except to the extent required by applicable law or
regulation, PNC and Sterling undertake no obligation to update
these forward-looking statements to reflect events or
circumstances after the date of this document or to reflect the
occurrence of unanticipated events.
19
THE
STERLING SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
This section contains information about the special meeting of
Sterling shareholders that has been called to consider and adopt
the plan of merger of Sterling with and into PNC, with PNC as
the surviving corporation in the merger.
Together with this document, we are also sending you a notice of
the special meeting and a form of proxy that is solicited by the
Sterling board of directors. The special meeting will be held on
[ ], at
[ ] EST, at
[ ], subject to any adjournments or
postponements.
Matters
to Be Considered
The purpose of the special meeting is to vote on a proposal to
adopt the plan of merger and related matters.
You also will be asked to vote upon a proposal to approve the
adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary, to solicit
additional proxies in the event that there are not sufficient
votes at the time of the special meeting to adopt the plan of
merger.
Proxies
Each copy of this document mailed to holders of Sterling common
stock is accompanied by a form of proxy with instructions for
voting. If you hold stock in your name as a shareholder of
record, you should complete and return the proxy card
accompanying this document to ensure that your vote is counted
at the special meeting, or at any adjournment or postponement of
the special meeting, regardless of whether you plan to attend
the special meeting. You may also authorize a proxy to vote your
shares by telephone or through the Internet as instructed on the
proxy card.
If you hold your stock in street name through a bank
or broker, you must direct your bank or broker to vote in
accordance with the instructions you have received from your
bank or broker.
If you hold stock in your name as a shareholder of record, you
may revoke any proxy at any time before it is voted by
(1) signing and returning a proxy card with a later date or
submitting another proxy via the Internet or by telephone,
(2) delivering a written revocation letter to
Sterlings Secretary or (3) attending the special
meeting in person, notifying the Secretary, and voting by ballot
at the special meeting. If you hold your stock in street
name through a bank or broker, you must follow your
banks or brokers instructions to revoke your proxy.
Any shareholder entitled to vote in person at the special
meeting may vote in person regardless of whether a proxy has
been previously given, and such vote will revoke any previous
proxy but the mere presence (without notifying Sterlings
Secretary) of a shareholder at the special meeting will not
constitute revocation of a previously given proxy.
Written notices of revocation and other communications about
revoking your proxy should be addressed to:
Sterling
Financial Corporation
1097 Commercial Avenue, MC
294-953
East Petersburg, PA 17520
Attention: Corporate Secretary
All shares represented by valid proxies that we receive through
this solicitation, and that are not revoked, will be voted in
accordance with your instructions on the proxy card. If you make
no specification on your proxy card as to how you want your
shares voted before signing and returning it, your proxy will be
voted FOR adoption of the plan of merger and
FOR approval of the proposal to adjourn the special
meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies in the
event that there are not sufficient votes at the time of the
special meeting to adopt the plan of merger.
20
Sterling
401(k) Retirement Plan Participants
Sterling has engaged Fiduciary Counselors Inc. as an independent
fiduciary to manage the Sterling common stock investment fund in
the Sterling Financial Corporation 401(k) Retirement Plan, which
we refer to as the 401(k) Plan. If you are a Sterling 401(k)
Plan participant who, as of the record date, has shares of
Sterling common stock allocated to your account under the 401(k)
Plan, you are entitled to give voting instructions for those
shares to Fiduciary Counselors. You also have the right, with
respect to the shares of Sterling common stock allocated to your
account, to elect to receive merger consideration consisting of
cash, shares of PNC common stock, or a combination of both. The
election procedures are described under the heading The
Plan of Merger Consideration to Be Received in the
Merger beginning on page 39. As explained in that
section, regardless of whether you make a cash election or a
stock election, you might nevertheless receive a mix of cash and
stock due to proration and adjustment.
Fiduciary Counselors has retained Ellen Philip Associates to
provide proxy tabulation services for the 401(k) Plan in
connection with the merger. You will receive a separate voting
instruction card and form of election for your 401(k) Plan
shares, and Fiduciary Counselors will make sure that your voting
instructions and election of merger consideration remain
confidential. Fiduciary Counselors will instruct the trustee of
the 401(k) Plan to vote the shares allocated to your account as
you direct, provided that your instructions are not contrary to
the fiduciary standards of the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974, as amended. If you do not provide voting
instructions to Fiduciary Counselors by the voting deadline,
Fiduciary Counselors will determine how to vote the shares
allocated to your account, and any other shares for which
Fiduciary Counselors receives no voting instructions by the
deadline. If a matter arises at the meeting, or at another time
when Fiduciary Counselors has no practical means for receiving
participant direction, Fiduciary Counselors will determine how
to vote on that matter. To allow sufficient time for voting of
the shares held by the 401(k) Plan, your voting instructions,
whether by proxy, telephone or Internet, must be received by
5:00 p.m., EST, on [ ], 2008.
Solicitation
of Proxies
Sterling will bear the entire cost of soliciting proxies from
you. In addition to solicitation of proxies by mail, Sterling
will request that banks, brokers and other record holders send
proxies and proxy material to the beneficial owners of Sterling
common stock and secure their voting instructions. Sterling will
reimburse the record holders for their reasonable expenses in
taking those actions. Sterling has also made arrangements with
Georgeson, Inc. to assist in soliciting proxies and has agreed
to pay them $8,500 plus reasonable expenses for these services.
If necessary, Sterling may use several of its employees,
officers or directors, who will not be specially compensated, to
solicit proxies from Sterling shareholders, either personally or
by telephone, facsimile, letter or other electronic means.
PNC and Sterling will share equally the expenses incurred in
connection with the printing and mailing of this document.
Record
Date
The close of business on
[ ] has
been fixed as the record date for determining the Sterling
shareholders entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the
special meeting. At that time, approximately
[ ] shares of Sterling common
stock were outstanding, held by approximately
[ ] holders
of record. Sterling shareholders are entitled to one vote on
each matter considered and voted on at the special meeting for
each share of Sterling common stock held of record at the close
of business on the record date.
Voting
Rights and Vote Required
The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a
majority of the outstanding shares of Sterling common stock
entitled to vote is necessary to constitute a quorum at the
special meeting. Abstentions will be counted for the purpose of
determining whether a quorum is present.
21
Under applicable Pennsylvania law, a majority of the votes cast
at the Sterling special meeting is required to approve the plan
of merger. For purposes of determining the number of votes cast
with respect to a matter, only those votes cast for
and against a proposal are counted. Abstentions and
any broker non-votes will be treated as shares that are present
for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum but will
not be counted for or against a proposal.
As of the record date, directors and executive officers of
Sterling and their affiliates had the right to vote
approximately [ ] shares of
Sterling common stock, or [ ]% of
the outstanding Sterling common stock at that date.
Approval of any proposal to adjourn or postpone the meeting, if
necessary, for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies may
be obtained by approval of the holders of a majority of the
shares of Sterling common stock present in person or represented
by proxy at the special meeting, whether or not a quorum is
present.
Recommendation
of the Sterling Board of Directors
The Sterling board of directors has adopted the plan of merger
and the transactions it contemplates, including the merger. The
Sterling board of directors determined that the merger, plan of
merger and the transactions contemplated by the plan of merger
are advisable and in the best interests of Sterling and its
shareholders and recommends that you vote FOR
adoption of the plan of merger, FOR the approval of
the adjournment, if necessary, and FOR the approval
of other matters appropriate in connection with the plan of
merger. See The Merger Reasons for the Merger;
Recommendation of Sterlings Board of Directors for a
more detailed discussion of the Sterling board of
directors recommendation.
Attending
the Meeting
All holders of Sterling common stock, including shareholders of
record and shareholders who hold their shares through banks,
brokers, nominees or any other holder of record, may attend the
special meeting. Shareholders of record can vote in person at
the special meeting. If you are not a shareholder of record, you
must obtain a proxy executed in your favor from the record
holder of your shares, such as a broker, bank or other nominee,
to be able to vote in person at the special meeting. If you plan
to attend the special meeting, you must hold your shares in your
own name or have a letter from the record holder of your shares
confirming your ownership and you must bring a form of personal
photo identification with you in order to be admitted.
22
THE
MERGER
The following discussion describes certain aspects of the
merger. We urge you to read carefully this entire document,
including the plan of merger and the financial advisor opinion
attached as Annexes to this document, for a more complete
understanding of the merger.
Sterlings board of directors has adopted the plan of
merger and approved the merger. The plan of merger provides for
combining our companies through the merger of Sterling with and
into PNC, with PNC as the surviving corporation. We expect to
complete the merger of Sterling and PNC in the first half of
2008, although delays may occur.
Please see The Plan of Merger beginning on
page 38 for additional and more detailed information
regarding the legal documents that govern the merger, including
information about the conditions to the merger and the
provisions for terminating or amending the plan of merger.
Background
of the Merger
The banking and financial services industry has seen significant
consolidation and changes over the last several years. During
that time, Sterlings board of directors has kept abreast
of these developments, and Sterling has completed several
acquisitions, as a result of which Sterling diversified its
business and expanded its geographic reach. From time to time,
other financial institutions have expressed interest in pursuing
a merger-of-equals or acquisition transaction with Sterling, but
until recently Sterling has not engaged in substantial
discussions relating to such a transaction.
The decision to enter into the merger agreement is the result of
an extensive deliberative process by Sterlings board of
directors and was reached after an evaluation of Sterlings
strategic alternatives. As Sterling has previously disclosed, in
early April 2007, Sterling management received information
suggesting irregularities in certain financing contracts at its
commercial finance subsidiary, Equipment Finance LLC, which we
refer to as EFI. EFI is a wholly owned subsidiary of BLC Bank,
N.A., formerly known as Bank of Lancaster County, N.A., which is
the principal banking subsidiary of Sterling. Sterling acquired
EFI in February 2002. Upon receiving information regarding the
irregularities, management immediately notified the chairman of
the board of directors, the boards audit committee and
Sterlings independent auditor, Ernst & Young
LLP, and the audit committee hired legal counsel, Stradley Ronon
Stevens & Young, LLP, to conduct an independent
investigation. With the audit committees approval,
Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young engaged a forensic
accounting firm, KPMG LLP, to assist in the investigation.
Sterling also retained Promontory Financial Group, which we
refer to as Promontory, to review its internal controls and
procedures and assist with regulatory matters.
In its early stages, the investigation revealed evidence of a
sophisticated loan scheme orchestrated deliberately by EFI
officers and employees over an extended period of time to
conceal credit delinquencies, falsify financing contracts and
related documents, and subvert Sterlings established
controls and reporting systems. Please see Recent
Developments Regarding Sterling Results of the
Independent Investigation for further information.
As a result of the events related to EFI, Sterling announced on
April 19, 2007 that it would delay its first quarter
earnings release and, on April 30, 2007, announced that
Sterlings previously issued financial statements and
earnings press releases and similar communications for fiscal
periods commencing on or after January 1, 2004 should no
longer be relied upon in light of these irregularities. Sterling
also stated that the impact of the irregularities may be
material for prior years, depending on the results of the
investigation. In the period from February 2002 through
December 31, 2006, EFI contributed an aggregate of
approximately $56 million (or approximately 33%) to
Sterlings aggregate consolidated reported net income of
approximately $167.5 million.
As the investigation progressed, the board of directors and
management began to evaluate the ramifications of the loan
scheme at EFI. Sterling considered on an ongoing basis the
liquidity of the company and its subsidiaries. On May 7,
2007, Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc., which we refer to
as KBW, first met with the board of directors, along with
Promontory and senior management, to discuss Sterlings
financial
23
position and to discuss strategic options, which included
remaining independent and raising additional capital, selling
certain assets
and/or
business units, and entering into a business combination. After
that meeting, KBW was requested to prepare a presentation for
the board of directors analyzing Sterlings options.
On May 15, 2007, Sterlings management met with the
board of directors to discuss capital and liquidity plans,
including a plan to consolidate four of Sterlings
subsidiary banks. As the board of directors had previously
requested, KBW made a presentation to the board of directors
analyzing Sterlings strategic options, including an equity
capital raising and pursuing a business combination with a third
party. After considering the strategic options available and
KBWs experience, as more fully described under
Opinion of Sterlings Financial
Advisor, Sterling formally engaged KBW to assist it in
identifying and evaluating its strategic options. In connection
with the discussions, senior management recommended that
Sterling assess the possibility of raising capital, and at the
same time solicit offers from potential partners for a business
combination. At that meeting, Sterlings board of directors
formed a special committee, the Merger and Acquisition
Committee, which we refer to as the Committee, and appointed as
its members directors Terrence L. Hormel, Michael A. Carenzo and
director, president and chief executive officer J. Roger Moyer,
as well as Tito L. Lima, Sterlings chief financial
officer, and Thomas P. Dautrich, chairman of BLC Bank. The
Committee was directed to facilitate exploration of
Sterlings strategic options and lead any discussions of a
business combination, with decisions to be made only by the full
board of directors.
Sterlings board of directors met again on May 22,
2007 to review the progress in analyzing and quantifying the
estimated EFI-related losses. The board of directors also
considered a plan for consolidation of four of Sterlings
subsidiary bank charters to consolidate the capital at its
subsidiary banks. In addition, the board of directors and
management then discussed strategic options and progress in the
review of potential strategic partners, including a timetable
for contacting prospective partners.
On May 24, 2007, Sterling publicly reported that it had
determined that, under U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles, it would be required to record a material impairment
of certain assets of EFI, which it expected to record as a
cumulative after-tax charge to the financial statements for the
year ended December 31, 2006, estimated to be in the range
of $145 million to $165 million based upon the results
of the investigations preliminary findings.
This charge was expected to cause the capital ratios of Sterling
and Bank of Lancaster County, the direct parent company of EFI,
to decline to unacceptable levels. Therefore, also on
May 24, 2007, Sterling implemented a plan to mitigate the
effect on capital ratios by maximizing the use of regulatory
capital of its subsidiary banks. This plan included the
consolidation of three of Sterlings subsidiary banks into
Bank of Lancaster County, which the OCC approved on an expedited
basis as of May 25, 2007. The consolidated entity was
renamed BLC Bank, N.A.
In connection with the efforts to manage Sterlings and its
subsidiaries liquidity situation, management and the board
of directors were mindful that EFI had funding arrangements from
two third-party financial institutions for a total of
$45 million, which were guaranteed by Sterling. One
outstanding line matured on May 31, 2007. Due to EFIs
financial position, Sterling negotiated a one-month extension of
the maturity of that line to June 30, 2007 and sought a new
line of credit to replace the maturing obligations.
In late May 2007, after discussions with the Committee, KBW
contacted seventeen potential transaction partners on
Sterlings behalf. Nine of the seventeen parties indicated
possible interest in pursuing a transaction with Sterling.
Subject to confidentiality agreements, KBW provided certain
information about Sterling to those nine parties on May 31 and
invited them to provide initial indications of interest. On
June 8, 2007, Sterlings board of directors approved
the engagement of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP as special
counsel to advise on strategic options.
In response to KBWs contacts with potential transaction
partners, indications of interest were received from financial
institutions on June 15.
The Committee met on June 15 to discuss the indications of
interest received and again on June 18 to determine its
recommendation to the board of directors. Sterlings board
of directors met to discuss the initial indications of interest
on June 19. At that meeting, the board of directors
discussed all strategic options
24
available to Sterling, which included remaining independent with
no capital raising, raising equity capital, selling certain
assets or business units, and pursuing a business combination
with a third party. Presentations were made by management, the
Committee, KBW and Sullivan & Cromwell. The board of
directors considered the possibility of raising equity capital
and the large amount of capital that would need to be raised to
meet Sterlings and its subsidiaries capital needs
and the resulting significant dilution that Sterlings
existing shareholders would suffer, as well as timing
considerations due to the likely requirement for Sterlings
financial restatement to be completed before capital could be
publicly raised and the prospects for success. The presentations
regarding a possible business combination with a third party
also included discussion in detail of the proposals from each of
the four institutions that had submitted initial indications of
interest at a specific preliminary price or range of prices,
financial and other information regarding Sterling, and the
legal duties and responsibilities of the directors in evaluating
the proposals. After considering Sterlings strategic
options and the information presented by KBW, the board of
directors authorized the Committee and Sterlings financial
and legal advisors to invite the two financial institutions that
had submitted the highest valued initial indications of interest
(one of which was PNC) to conduct due diligence and submit final
indications of interest. The board of directors also made clear
that it would continue to consider the possibility of Sterling
remaining as an independent institution.
Meanwhile, between May and July, several lawsuits, which are
described in more detail under Recent Developments
Regarding Sterling Civil Litigation on
page 70, were filed against Sterling, EFI and certain of
their directors and officers.
On June 26, 2007, Sterling secured a line of credit from
Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company in the amount of
$80 million, $70 million of which Sterling invested in
BLC Bank as a capital infusion to provide funds to repay the
loans described above. This investment also raised the capital
levels of BLC Bank, and with the increase in capital provided by
the consolidation of three other Sterling subsidiary banks into
BLC Bank, provided enough capital to meet BLC Banks
immediate needs.
During the period from June 25 to July 13, 2007, the two
selected potential transaction partners conducted extensive due
diligence on Sterling. Sterling requested that final indications
of interest be submitted no later than July 16, 2007, and
provided both potential partners with the same draft merger
agreement and related materials and requested that each raise
and seek to resolve issues prior to submitting final indications.
Each of the potential transaction partners submitted revised
indications of interest on July 16. PNCs proposal
included two purchase prices, the higher of which PNC proposed
to couple with a downward purchase price adjustment mechanic
based on matters relating to EFI. The other party indicated a
somewhat lower purchase price with no adjustment mechanism. The
indications from both parties included a mixture of stock and
cash, and neither indication contained a financing contingency.
Both parties bids provided for a retention bonus pool for
certain Sterling employees and addressed displacement and
severance benefits, and both parties indicated a desire to offer
Sterlings directors positions on local advisory boards
following completion of a transaction.
The Committee and its advisors held a number of meetings on July
16 and July 17, and KBW continued to negotiate with both
parties regarding price, timing and other terms and conditions.
Sullivan & Cromwell began negotiations with both
potential parties on a draft merger agreement.
PNC and the other party were asked to provide their final best
offer. On July 17, PNC revised its offer, indicating a
purchase price of $19.00 per share and the other institution
increased its purchase price to $18.25 per share. PNC indicated
that its revised offer was contingent upon executing a
definitive merger agreement before the opening of trading on
July 19.
In the evening of July 17, the Committee determined to move
forward with negotiations with PNC and to cooperate as much as
possible to meet PNCs deadline while remaining in contact
with the second institution. A special meeting of the board of
directors was called for the morning of July 18.
On the morning of July 18, the special meeting of the board
of directors was called to order. Mr. Moyer provided an
overview of the events of the prior days and weeks and the
status of the bids, and Mr. Hormel described the
involvement of the Committee since June 19, when the board
of directors had voted to proceed
25
to negotiate with the two institutions. Sterlings
strategic options were again reviewed, and Sullivan &
Cromwell discussed the duties of the board of directors when
considering the bids. Sullivan & Cromwell also
summarized the negotiations process to date, and KBW explained
the bids and the bid history in detail. KBW noted that
PNCs bid then had a value of $19.00 per share of Sterling
common stock, based on the closing price of PNCs stock on
July 17, 2007, with a mix of stock and cash consideration
of 60%/40%, respectively. This was approximately 4% higher than
the offer from the other bidder and an approximate 78% premium
over Sterlings stock price, based on Sterling and
PNCs closing stock prices on July 17. KBW also noted
that the final PNC bid did not include a purchase price
adjustment mechanism. PNCs bid was conditioned on entering
into employment agreements with six senior executives of
Sterling and included a retention bonus pool for other employees
to be determined in consultation with Sterling. KBW noted
PNCs required timetable, which involved execution of a
definitive agreement before PNC publicly announced its second
quarter earnings on the morning of July 19.
KBW then presented an analysis of the financial aspects of the
bids, including the dividend impact for Sterlings
shareholders, the historical performance of the bidders
stock, the effects of the proposed mergers on the bidders, the
bidders respective businesses and financial information,
performance of the bidders stocks after announcing
previous mergers, and the bidders branch footprints and
potential overlap with Sterlings branches. KBW also
discussed non-financial characteristics of the two bidders. KBW
reminded the board of directors of KBWs financial analysis
of Sterlings other strategic alternatives at the board of
directors June 19 meeting.
Sullivan & Cromwell summarized the merger agreement
that had been provided previously to the board members.
Sullivan & Cromwell noted its belief that Sterling
would be able to finalize the merger agreement terms with either
bidder.
The meeting was recessed late in the morning, with the directive
from the board of directors that the Committee, Sterling senior
management and Sterlings advisors continue to negotiate
with PNC during the day with a view toward signing a definitive
merger agreement that night if definitive arrangements could be
reached.
Late in the evening, the special meeting of the board of
directors was reconvened. Sullivan & Cromwell reported
that the merger agreement and related materials continued to be
negotiated with PNC and that substantial progress had been made.
It was reported that the employment agreements requested by PNC
had been negotiated with five executives and that the sixth
executive would not be executing an agreement, which was
acceptable to PNC.
While Sullivan & Cromwell worked to finalize the
merger agreement with PNCs counsel, KBW provided an update
on stock market developments and the effects on the values of
the two bids. In KBWs view, the price difference between
the two bids had not changed significantly. KBW discussed the
expected impact of the announcement of PNCs second quarter
earnings on PNCs stock price and the deal value.
KBW provided an oral opinion that the merger consideration
proposed by PNC was fair, from a financial point of view, to
holders of the shares of Sterling common stock, as of July 18
and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions stated
in that opinion and in KBWs written opinion.
The meeting went into recess while negotiations with PNC
continued. Later in the evening, the meeting was reconvened.
Sullivan & Cromwell reported that a final agreement had
been reached. After further discussion, and on the basis of that
agreement, the board of directors agreed to accept the merger
agreement proposed by PNC. One board member abstained from
voting; all other members of the board of directors approved the
merger agreement.
Early in the morning on July 19, the PNC board of directors
held a special meeting at which members of PNCs senior
management and PNCs outside legal and financial advisors
made various presentations about, and the board discussed, the
potential strategic combination with Sterling and the proposed
terms of the merger. At this meeting, the PNC board unanimously
approved the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated
by the merger agreement. Prior to the opening of the financial
markets in New York City on July 19, 2007, Sterling and PNC
executed the merger agreement and announced the transaction.
26
Reasons
for the Merger; Recommendation of Sterlings Board of
Directors
The Sterling board of directors believes that the merger is in
the best interests of Sterling and its shareholders. The
Sterling board of directors therefore has approved the merger
agreement and recommends that the Sterling shareholders vote
FOR the adoption of the merger agreement.
In reaching its decision, the board of directors, with advice
from its financial and legal advisors, considered a number of
factors, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Strategic Alternatives. The board of directors
carefully considered all of the strategic alternatives available
to Sterling, including pursuing a business combination with a
third party, remaining independent, and attempting to raise
equity capital. The board discussed these alternatives at its
May 15, June 19, and July 18 special meetings and
received advice from KBW as its financial advisor and from
Sullivan & Cromwell as its special legal counsel. The
Committee had also been fully engaged in the strategic
decision-making process from May 15 to July 18. In
comparing a business combination to the alternative of capital
raising, the board of directors considered the significant
dilution that existing Sterling shareholders would suffer as the
result of raising equity capital, and also considered that
Sterling would likely have to complete the restatement of its
financial statements to proceed with raising capital, just as it
would have to in a merger. Sterling would also continue to face
the various significant legal and regulatory issues described in
detail above under Background of the
Merger and on
pages 69-72
under Recent Developments Regarding Sterling
Civil Litigation, Regulatory
Matters and Other Investigations.
The board of directors therefore concluded that the merger with
PNC is the best strategic alternative, taking into account the
range of possible shareholder values and the likelihood of
completing a transaction and restoring value to Sterlings
shareholders as quickly as possible.
|
|
|
|
Future Prospects. The board of directors
concluded, after reviewing Sterlings business, operations,
financial condition, earnings and prospects, and issues relating
to the problems caused by the EFI-related matters and the likely
resolution of those issues, and taking into account KBWs
and Sterling managements and the Committees due
diligence review of PNC, that merging with PNC is a more
desirable alternative for Sterlings shareholders than
remaining an independent company. Among other things, the board
of directors considered the capital issues facing Sterling and
BLC Bank, the litigation described in more detail beginning on
page 70 under Recent Developments Regarding
Sterling Civil Litigation, and the regulatory
issues faced by Sterling if it remains independent. Furthermore,
the board of directors considered that the principal alternative
to a business combination, raising equity capital, would heavily
dilute existing Sterling shareholders, could require substantial
reduction in expenses through, among other means, the
termination of Sterling employees, as well as possible
divestitures of certain of Sterlings business lines, and
would likely require Sterling to complete the restatement of its
financial statements before proceeding. The board of directors
also considered the reputation and business practices and
experience of PNC and its management as they might affect the
business of Sterling and its subsidiaries, the prospects for
Sterling as an independent entity, and the customers, depositors
and employees of Sterling and its subsidiaries and the
communities which they serve.
|
|
|
|
Merger Consideration. The board of directors
considered the value of the consideration offered by PNC and the
likely effects of price changes on the stock portion of the
consideration between signing and closing and the fixed nature
of the cash portion of the consideration, which would not
fluctuate, and that the consideration, at the time of their
decision, represented an approximate 79% premium over the market
price of Sterlings common stock on July 18, 2007. The
board of directors also considered the adequacy of the merger
consideration, not only in relation to the current market price
of Sterlings common stock, but also in relation to the
historical, present and anticipated future operating results and
financial position of Sterling, the value of Sterling in a
freely negotiated transaction and the prospects and future value
of Sterling as an independent entity. The board of directors
considered that PNCs bid was approximately 4% higher than
the other bidders and that other factors were consistent
with approval of PNCs bid in relation to the other bidder.
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
Likelihood of Prompt Regulatory Approval and
Closing. The board of directors assessed closing
certainty, price certainty, and speed to closing with PNC and
PNCs expected ability to work with Sterling through the
restatement process and related issues. The board of directors
considered PNCs recent acquisition history, including the
successful consummation of its transaction with Riggs National
Corporation and the timing between signing and closing of recent
transactions, as well as the overlap of its branches with
Sterlings branches compared to the other bidders. The
board of directors also perceived PNCs interest in
consummating a transaction with Sterling to be very high.
|
|
|
|
Social and Economic Impact. As required by
Sterlings Articles of Incorporation, the board of
directors considered the social and economic impact that the
merger, if consummated, would have upon the customers,
depositors and employees of Sterling and its subsidiaries and
upon the communities which they serve. The board of directors
viewed PNCs record in this area favorably, particularly
its history of outstanding Community Reinvestment
Act ratings.
|
|
|
|
Terms of the Merger Agreement. The merger
agreement allows Sterling shareholders to elect to receive PNC
stock or cash or a combination of PNC stock and cash for their
Sterling shares, subject to the allocation procedures in the
merger agreement. With the assistance of its legal and financial
advisors, the board of directors considered these matters and
the other terms of the merger agreement in its decision to
approve and recommend the merger agreement.
|
|
|
|
KBWs Fairness Opinion and Analysis. The
board of directors considered as favorable to its determination
the opinion, analyses and presentations of KBW described under
the heading Opinion of Sterlings
Financial Advisor beginning on this page, including the
oral opinion of KBW, which subsequently was confirmed in
writing, that, as of the date of the written fairness opinion
and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set
forth therein, the aggregate merger consideration to be offered
to Sterlings shareholders in the merger was fair from a
financial point of view to the holders of such stock.
|
The reasons set forth above are not intended to be exhaustive,
but include material facts considered by the board of directors
in approving the merger agreement. In reaching its
determination, the board of directors did not assign any
relative or specific weights to different factors, and
individual directors may have given different weights to
different factors. Based on these reasons and others, the board
of directors believes that the merger is in the best interests
of Sterling and its shareholders, and, therefore, those
directors voting unanimously approved the merger agreement, with
one director abstaining from the vote.
Opinion
of Sterlings Financial Advisor
On May 15, 2007, Sterling Financial Corporation executed an
engagement agreement with KBW. KBWs engagement encompassed
assisting Sterling as its financial advisor in evaluating and
recommending strategic alternatives in connection with a
possible business combination with select other institutions.
Sterling selected KBW because KBW is a nationally recognized
investment-banking firm with substantial experience in
transactions similar to the merger and is familiar with
Sterling, its directors and executive officers and its business.
As part of its investment banking business, KBW is continually
engaged in the valuation of financial businesses and their
securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions.
On July 18, 2007, Sterlings board of directors held a
meeting to evaluate the proposed merger of Sterling with and
into PNC. At this meeting, KBW reviewed the financial aspects of
the proposed merger and rendered an oral opinion that, as of
such date, the consideration to be paid to Sterling shareholders
in the merger was fair to such holders from a financial point of
view. Sterlings board of directors approved the plan of
merger at this meeting. As of July 19, 2007, KBW confirmed
the oral opinion by delivery of a written opinion to
Sterlings board of directors.
The full text of KBWs written opinion is attached as
Annex C to this document and is incorporated herein by
reference. Sterlings shareholders are urged to read the
opinion in its entirety for a description of the procedures
followed, assumptions made, matters considered, and
qualifications and limitations on the review
28
undertaken by KBW. The description of the opinion set forth
herein is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full
text of such opinion.
KBWs opinion speaks only as of the date of the opinion.
The opinion is directed to Sterlings board of directors
and addresses only the fairness, from a financial point of view,
of the consideration offered to the Sterling shareholders. It
does not address the underlying business decision to proceed
with the merger and does not constitute a recommendation to any
Sterling shareholder as to how the shareholder should vote at
the Sterling special meeting on the merger or any related matter.
In rendering its opinion, KBW:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed, among other things,
|
|
|
|
|
|
the plan of merger,
|
|
|
|
Annual Reports to shareholders and Annual Reports on
Form 10-K
of PNC,
|
|
|
|
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
of PNC, and
|
|
|
|
certain financial information regarding Sterlings
financial condition and earnings;
|
|
|
|
|
|
held discussions with members of senior management of Sterling
and PNC regarding,
|
|
|
|
|
|
past and current business operations,
|
|
|
|
regulatory relationships,
|
|
|
|
financial condition, and
|
|
|
|
future prospects of the respective companies;
|
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed the market prices, valuation multiples, publicly
reported financial condition and results of operations for PNC
and compared them with those of certain publicly traded
companies that KBW deemed to be relevant;
|
|
|
|
compared the proposed financial terms of the merger with the
financial terms of certain other transactions that KBW deemed to
be relevant;
|
|
|
|
evaluated the potential pro forma impact of the merger on PNC,
including cost savings, that management of PNC expects to result
from a combination of the businesses of Sterling and
PNC; and
|
|
|
|
performed other studies and analyses that it considered
appropriate.
|
In conducting its review and arriving at its opinion, KBW relied
upon and assumed the accuracy and completeness of all of the
financial and other information provided to or otherwise made
available to KBW or that was discussed with, or reviewed by or
for KBW, or that was publicly available. KBW did not attempt, or
assume any responsibility, to verify such information
independently. KBW relied upon the management of Sterling and
PNC as to the reasonableness and achievability of the financial
and operating forecasts and estimates (and assumptions and bases
therefor) provided to KBW. KBW assumed, without independent
verification, that the aggregate allowances for loan and lease
losses for Sterling and PNC are adequate to cover those losses.
KBW did not make or obtain any evaluations or appraisals of any
assets or liabilities of Sterling or PNC, nor did they examine
or review any individual credit files.
The estimates furnished to KBW and used by it in certain of its
analyses were prepared by Sterlings senior management
team. Such estimates were not prepared with a view towards
public disclosure. The estimates were based on numerous
variables and assumptions, which are inherently uncertain,
including factors related to general economic and competitive
conditions. Accordingly, actual results could vary significantly
from those set forth in the estimates. In its analysis, KBW used
certain publicly available financial information and earnings
estimates on PNC and made no attempt to independently verify
their accuracy.
For purposes of rendering its opinion, KBW assumed that, in all
respects material to its analyses:
|
|
|
|
|
the merger will be completed substantially in accordance with
the terms set forth in the plan of merger;
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties of each party in the plan of
merger and in all related documents and instruments referred to
in the plan of merger are true and correct;
|
|
|
|
each party to the plan of merger and all related documents will
perform all of the covenants and agreements required to be
performed by such party under such documents;
|
|
|
|
all conditions to the completion of the merger will be satisfied
without any waivers; and
|
|
|
|
in the course of obtaining the necessary regulatory,
contractual, or other consents or approvals for the merger, no
restrictions, including any divestiture requirements,
termination or other payments or amendments or modifications,
that may be imposed, will have a material adverse effect on the
future results of operations or financial condition of the
combined entity or the contemplated benefits of the merger,
including the cost savings, revenue enhancements and related
expenses expected to result from the merger.
|
KBW further assumed that the merger will be accounted for as a
purchase transaction under generally accepted accounting
principles, and that the merger will qualify as a tax-free
reorganization for United States federal income tax purposes.
KBWs opinion is not an expression of an opinion as to the
prices at which shares of Sterling common stock or PNC common
stock will trade since the announcement of the proposed merger
or the actual value of the PNC common shares when issued
pursuant to the merger, or the prices at which the PNC common
shares will trade following the completion of the merger.
In performing its analyses, KBW made numerous assumptions with
respect to industry performance, general business, economic,
market and financial conditions and other matters, which are
beyond the control of KBW, Sterling and PNC. Any estimates
contained in the analyses performed by KBW are not necessarily
indicative of actual values or future results, which may be
significantly more or less favorable than suggested by these
analyses. Additionally, estimates of the value of businesses or
securities do not purport to be appraisals or to reflect the
prices at which such businesses or securities might actually be
sold. Accordingly, these analyses and estimates are inherently
subject to substantial uncertainty. In addition, the KBW opinion
was among several factors taken into consideration by
Sterlings board of directors in making its determination
to approve the plan of merger and the merger. Consequently, the
analyses described below should not be viewed as determinative
of the decision of Sterlings board of directors with
respect to the fairness of the consideration to be paid in the
merger.
Summary
of Analysis by KBW
The following is a summary of the material analyses presented by
KBW to Sterlings board of directors, in connection with
its written fairness opinion. The summary is not a complete
description of the analyses underlying the KBW opinion or the
presentation made by KBW to Sterlings board of directors,
but summarizes the material analyses performed and presented in
connection with such opinion. The preparation of a fairness
opinion is a complex analytic process involving various
determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods
of financial analysis and the application of those methods to
the particular circumstances. Therefore, a fairness opinion is
not readily susceptible to partial analysis or summary
description. In arriving at its opinion, KBW did not attribute
any particular weight to any analysis or factor that it
considered, but rather made qualitative judgments as to the
significance and relevance of each analysis and factor. The
financial analyses summarized below include information
presented in tabular format. Accordingly, KBW believes that its
analyses and the summary of its analyses must be considered as a
whole and that selecting portions of its analyses and factors or
focusing on the information presented below in tabular format,
without considering all analyses and factors or the full
narrative description of the financial analyses, including the
methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could
create a misleading or incomplete view of the process underlying
its analyses and opinion. The tables alone do not constitute a
complete description of the financial analyses.
Summary of Proposal. The terms of the plan of
merger call for each outstanding share of Sterling common stock
to receive per share consideration of $7.60 in cash plus
0.1543 shares of PNC common stock. Sterling shareholders
will have the right to elect to receive either stock or cash or
a combination of stock and
30
cash, subject to proration as described under The Plan of
Merger Consideration to Be Received in the
Merger Proration.
Selected Peer Group Analysis. Using publicly
available information, KBW compared the financial performance,
financial condition and market performance of PNC to the
following depository institutions that KBW considered comparable
to PNC.
Companies included in PNCs peer group were:
|
|
|
Wachovia Corporation
Wells Fargo & Company
U.S. Bancorp
SunTrust Banks, Inc.
National City Corporation
|
|
Regions Financial Corporation
BB&T Corporation
Fifth Third Bancorp
KeyCorp
Comerica Incorporated
|
To perform this analysis, KBW used financial information as of
or for the three- or
twelve-month
period ended March 31, 2007. Market price information was
as of July 13, 2007, and 2007 and 2008 earnings estimates
were taken from First Call, a nationally recognized earnings
estimate consolidator. Certain financial data prepared by KBW,
and as referenced in the tables presented below, may not
correspond to the data presented in PNCs historical
financial statements as a result of the different periods,
assumptions and methods used by KBW to compute the financial
data presented.
KBWs analysis showed the following concerning PNCs
financial performance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PNC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peer Group
|
|
Financial Performance Measures:
|
|
PNC
|
|
|
Median
|
|
|
Latest Twelve Months Core Return on Average Equity(1)
|
|
|
13.9
|
%
|
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
Latest Twelve Months Core Return on Average Assets(1)
|
|
|
1.42
|
%
|
|
|
1.32
|
%
|
Net Interest Margin
|
|
|
2.95
|
%
|
|
|
3.54
|
%
|
Latest Twelve Months Efficiency Ratio
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
|
|
58
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Core income is defined as net income before extraordinary items,
less the after-tax portion of investment securities gains or
losses and nonrecurring items. |
KBWs analysis showed the following concerning PNCs
financial condition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PNC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peer Group
|
|
Financial Performance Measures:
|
|
PNC
|
|
|
Median
|
|
|
Tangible Equity / Tangible Assets
|
|
|
5.62
|
%
|
|
|
6.40
|
%
|
Loans / Deposits
|
|
|
82
|
%
|
|
|
110
|
%
|
Latest Twelve Months Net Charge-offs / Average Loans
|
|
|
0.28
|
%
|
|
|
0.26
|
%
|
Loan Loss Reserves / Loans
|
|
|
1.06
|
%
|
|
|
1.08
|
%
|
Non Performing Assets / Assets
|
|
|
0.18
|
%
|
|
|
0.39
|
%
|
KBWs analysis showed the following concerning PNCs
market performance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PNC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peer Group
|
|
Financial Performance Measures:
|
|
PNC
|
|
|
Median
|
|
|
Price to Earnings Multiple, based on 2007 GAAP estimated earnings
|
|
|
13.1
|
x
|
|
|
12.4
|
x
|
Price to Earnings Multiple, based on 2008 GAAP estimated earnings
|
|
|
11.9
|
x
|
|
|
11.6
|
x
|
Price to Tangible Book Multiple Value
|
|
|
389
|
%
|
|
|
308
|
%
|
Dividend Yield
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
Comparable Transaction Analysis. KBW reviewed
publicly available information related to select comparably
sized acquisitions of bank holding companies nationwide
announced after January 1, 2003, with
31
aggregate transaction values between $250 million and
$1.0 billion. The transactions included in the group were:
|
|
|
Acquiror
|
|
Acquiree
|
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
Susquehanna Bancshares, Inc.
TD Banknorth Inc.
New York Community Bancorp, Inc.
Fulton Financial Corporation
Community Banks, Inc.
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
Partners Trust Financial Group, Inc.
North Fork Bancorporation, Inc.
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
Mercantile Bankshares Corp.
|
|
Yardville National Bancorp
Community Banks, Inc.
Interchange Financial Services Corp.
Atlantic Bank of New York
Columbia Bancorp
PennRock Financial Services Corp.
Riggs National Corporation
BSB Bancorp, Inc.
Trust Company of New Jersey
United National Bancorp
F&M Bancorp
|
Transaction multiples for the merger were derived from an offer
price of $19.00 per share for Sterling. Sterlings
financial condition and estimated earnings per share were
adjusted for the pro-forma impact of Equipment Finance, LLC,
which we refer to as EFI, per company management. For each
precedent transaction, KBW derived and compared, among other
things, the implied ratio of price per common share paid for the
acquired company to:
|
|
|
|
|
tangible book value per share of the acquired company based on
the latest publicly available financial statements of the
company available prior to the announcement of the acquisition;
|
|
|
|
the projected forward earnings per share of the acquired company
publicly available prior to the time the transaction was
announced;
|
|
|
|
tangible equity premium to core deposits based on the latest
publicly available financial statements of the company available
prior to the announcement of the acquisition; and
|
|
|
|
market premium based on the latest closing price
1-day prior
to the announcement of the acquisition.
|
The results of the analysis are set forth in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable
|
|
|
Comparable
|
|
|
Comparable
|
|
|
|
PNC/Sterling
|
|
|
Transactions
|
|
|
Transactions
|
|
|
Transactions
|
|
Transaction Price to:
|
|
Merger
|
|
|
Median
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
Tangible Book Value
|
|
|
748
|
%
|
|
|
261
|
%
|
|
|
442
|
%
|
|
|
175
|
%
|
Projected 2007 Estimated Earnings per Share
|
|
|
19.9
|
x
|
|
|
20.1
|
x
|
|
|
22.1
|
x
|
|
|
18.5
|
x
|
Core Deposit Premium
|
|
|
20.7
|
%
|
|
|
21.2
|
%
|
|
|
33.5
|
%
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
Market Premium(1)
|
|
|
73.7
|
%
|
|
|
16.7
|
%
|
|
|
48.8
|
%
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on Sterlings closing price of $10.94 on
July 13, 2007. |
No company or transaction used as a comparison in the above
analysis is identical to Sterling, PNC or the proposed merger.
Accordingly, an analysis of these results is not mathematical.
Rather, it involves complex considerations and judgments
concerning differences in financial and operating
characteristics of the companies.
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. KBW performed a
discounted cash flow analysis to estimate a range for the
implied equity value per share of Sterling common stock based on
a continued independence scenario. In this analysis, KBW assumed
discount rates ranging from 11.0% to 15.0% to derive
(i) the present value of the estimated free cash flows that
Sterling could generate over a five year period and
(ii) the present value of Sterlings terminal value at
the end of year five. Terminal values for Sterling were
calculated based on a range of 12.5x to 14.5x estimated year six
earnings per share. In performing this analysis, KBW used
Sterling managements 2007 and 2008 earnings estimates.
Based on managements estimates KBW assumed 10.0% earnings
per share growth thereafter. Further, KBW assumed that Sterling
would issue $75 million in common
32
equity to increase its tangible common equity to tangible assets
ratio to 5.50%. In determining cash flows available to
shareholders, KBW used forecasted dividend payout ratios
(percentages of earnings per share payable to shareholders),
which assume the maintenance of a minimum ratio of tangible
common equity to tangible assets of 5.50%.
Based on these assumptions, KBW derived an implied equity value
per share of Sterling common stock ranging from $9.95 to $13.38.
The discounted cash flow analysis is a widely used valuation
methodology, but the results of such methodology are highly
dependent on the assumptions that must be made, including asset
and earnings growth rates, terminal values, dividend payout
rates, and discount rates. The analysis did not purport to be
indicative of the actual values or expected values of Sterling
common stock.
Forecasted Pro Forma Financial Analysis. KBW
analyzed the estimated financial impact of the merger on
PNCs 2008 estimated earnings per share and 2008 estimated
cash earnings per share. Cash earnings per share is determined
by adding per share amortization of intangible assets to
earnings per share. For PNC, KBW used the First Call consensus
estimate of earnings per share for 2008. For Sterling, KBW used
managements estimates of earnings per share for 2008. In
addition, KBW assumed that the merger will result in cost
savings equal to PNC managements estimates. Based on its
analysis, KBW determined that the merger would be slightly
accretive to both PNCs estimated GAAP earnings per share
and cash earnings per share in 2008.
Furthermore, the analysis indicated that PNCs Leverage
Ratio, Tier 1 Risk Based Capital Ratio and Total Risk Based
Capital Ratio would all remain well capitalized by
regulatory standards. For all of the above analysis, the actual
results achieved by PNC following the merger may vary from the
projected results, and the variations may be material.
Other Analyses. KBW reviewed the relative
financial and market performance of Sterling and PNC to a
variety of relevant industry peer groups and indices. KBW also
reviewed earnings estimates, balance sheet composition,
historical stock performance and other financial data for PNC.
The Sterling board has retained KBW as an independent contractor
to act as financial adviser to Sterling regarding the merger. As
part of its investment banking business, KBW is continually
engaged in the valuation of banking businesses and their
securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions,
negotiated underwritings, competitive biddings, secondary
distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private
placements and valuations for estate, corporate and other
purposes. As specialists in the securities of banking companies,
KBW has experience in, and knowledge of, the valuation of
banking enterprises. In the ordinary course of its business as a
broker-dealer, KBW may, from time to time, purchase securities
from, and sell securities to, Sterling and PNC. As a market
maker in securities KBW may from time to time have a long or
short position in, and buy or sell, debt or equity securities of
Sterling and PNC for KBWs own account and for the accounts
of its customers.
Sterling and KBW have entered into an agreement relating to the
services to be provided by KBW in connection with the merger.
Sterling has agreed to pay KBW, at the time of closing, a cash
fee equal to 1.00% of the market value of the aggregate
consideration offered in exchange for the outstanding shares of
common stock and options of Sterling, minus $250,000 that was
paid to KBW concurrently with the execution of the plan of
merger and $500,000 payable promptly after the mailing of this
proxy statement/prospectus. Pursuant to the KBW engagement
agreement, Sterling also agreed to reimburse KBW for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses and disbursements incurred in connection
with its retention and to indemnify against certain liabilities,
including liabilities under the federal securities laws.
Board of
Directors and Management of PNC Following Completion of the
Merger
Upon completion of the merger, the current directors and
officers of PNC are expected to continue in their current
positions. Information about the current PNC directors and
executive officers can be found in PNCs proxy statement
dated March 23, 2007, which is incorporated by reference in
this document. See Where You Can Find More
Information on page 74.
33
Public
Trading Markets
PNC common stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol
PNC. Sterling common stock is quoted on the NASDAQ
Global Select Market under the symbol SLFI. Upon
completion of the merger, Sterling common stock will be delisted
from NASDAQ and deregistered under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, which we refer to as the Exchange Act. The
PNC common stock issuable in the merger will be listed on the
NYSE.
The shares of PNC common stock to be issued in connection with
the merger will be freely transferable under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, which we refer to as the Securities Act,
except for shares issued to any shareholder who is an affiliate
of Sterling, as discussed in The Plan of
Merger Resales of PNC Stock by Affiliates
beginning on page 53.
Sterling
Shareholders Do Not Have Dissenters Rights in the
Merger
Under Pennsylvania law, shareholders of a corporation are not
entitled to exercise dissenters rights if shares of the
corporation are listed on a national securities exchange or held
beneficially or of record by more than 2,000 persons.
Because shares of Sterlings common stock are quoted on the
NASDAQ Global Select Market and Sterling has more than
2,000 shareholders, Sterling shareholders do not have the
right to exercise dissenters rights. If the plan of merger is
adopted and the merger is completed, shareholders who voted
against the adoption of the plan of merger will be treated the
same as shareholders who voted for the adoption of the plan of
merger and their shares will automatically be converted into the
right to receive the merger consideration.
Regulatory
Approvals Required for the Merger
We have agreed to use our reasonable best efforts to obtain all
regulatory approvals required to complete the transactions
contemplated by the plan of merger. These approvals include
approval from the Federal Reserve Board, the OCC, the
Pennsylvania Department of Banking, the Delaware State Bank
Commissioner and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, as
well as various other federal and regulatory authorities. PNC
and Sterling have completed, or will complete, the filing of
applications and notifications to obtain the required regulatory
approvals.
Federal Reserve Board. The merger is subject
to approval by the Federal Reserve Board pursuant to
Section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956. On
August 8, 2007, PNC filed the required application with the
Federal Reserve Board for approval of the merger.
The Federal Reserve Board is prohibited from approving any
transaction under the applicable statutes that (1) would
result in a monopoly, (2) would be in furtherance of any
combination or conspiracy to monopolize or to attempt to
monopolize the business of banking in any part of the United
States, or (3) may have the effect in any section of the
United States of substantially lessening competition, tending to
create a monopoly or resulting in a restraint of trade, unless
the Federal Reserve Board finds that the anti-competitive
effects of the transaction are clearly outweighed in the public
interest by the probable effect of the transaction in meeting
the convenience and needs of the communities to be served. The
Federal Reserve Board may not approve an interstate acquisition
without regard to state law if the applicant controls, or after
completion of the acquisition the combined entity would control,
more than 10 percent of the total deposits of insured
depository institutions in the United States.
In addition, in reviewing a transaction under the applicable
statutes, the Federal Reserve Board will consider the financial
and managerial resources of the companies and their subsidiary
banks and the convenience and needs of the community to be
served as well as the companies effectiveness in combating
money-laundering activities. In connection with its review, the
Federal Reserve Board will provide an opportunity for public
comment on the application for the merger, and is authorized to
hold a public meeting or other proceeding if it determines that
would be appropriate.
Under the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977, which we refer to
as the CRA, the Federal Reserve Board must take into account the
record of performance of each of PNC and Sterling in meeting the
credit needs
34
of the entire communities, including low- and moderate-income
neighborhoods, served by the company and its subsidiaries. Each
of PNCs and Sterlings depository institutions has a
satisfactory or better CRA rating.
The Federal Reserve Board approved the transaction on
January 25, 2008.
OCC. PNC has filed an application with the
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency to approve the merger
of BLC Bank, National Association with and into PNC Bank,
National Association, which is intended to become effective
after the merger of Sterling with and into PNC, under the Bank
Merger Act and the National Bank Act. In evaluating an
application filed under the Bank Merger Act, the OCC uses
substantially the same criteria as the Federal Reserve Board, as
described above.
Other Requisite Approvals, Notices and
Consents. The merger is also subject to the prior
approval of the Pennsylvania Department of Banking, the Delaware
State Bank Commissioner and the Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority. Applications or notifications may also be required to
be filed with various other regulatory authorities in connection
with the merger. The Pennsylvania Department of Banking approved
the transaction on September 17, 2007 and the Delaware
State Bank Commissioner approved the transaction on
December 31, 2007.
Antitrust Considerations. At any time before
or after the acquisition is completed, the Antitrust Division of
the United States Department of Justice or the United States
Federal Trade Commission, which we refer to as the Antitrust
Division and the FTC, respectively, could take action under the
antitrust laws as it deems necessary or desirable in the public
interest, including seeking to enjoin the acquisition or seeking
divestiture of substantial assets of PNC or Sterling on their
subsidiaries. Private parties also may seek to take legal action
under the antitrust laws under some circumstances. PNC and
Sterling can give no assurance that a challenge to the merger on
antitrust grounds will not be made, or, if such a challenge is
made, that PNC and Sterling will prevail.
In addition, the merger may be reviewed by the state attorneys
general in the various states in which PNC and Sterling operate.
Although PNC and Sterling believe there are substantial
arguments to the contrary, these agencies may claim the
authority, under the applicable state and federal antitrust laws
and regulations, to investigate
and/or
disapprove the merger. There can be no assurance that one or
more state attorneys general will not attempt to file an
antitrust action to challenge the merger.
Timing. We cannot assure you that all of the
regulatory approvals described above will be obtained, and, if
obtained, we cannot assure you as to the date of any approvals
or the absence of any litigation challenging such approvals.
Likewise, we cannot assure you that the Antitrust Division, the
FTC or any state attorney general will not attempt to challenge
the merger on antitrust grounds, and, if such a challenge is
made, we cannot assure you as to its result.
Pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act, a transaction approved
by the Federal Reserve Board may not be completed until
30 days after approval is received, during which time the
Antitrust Division may challenge the merger on antitrust
grounds. The commencement of an antitrust action would
stay that is, suspend the
effectiveness of an approval unless a court specifically were to
order otherwise. With the approval of the Federal Reserve Board
and the concurrence of the Antitrust Division, the waiting
period may be reduced to no less than 15 days.
PNC and Sterling believe that the merger does not raise
substantial antitrust or other significant regulatory concerns
and that they will be able to obtain all requisite regulatory
approvals on a timely basis without the imposition of any
condition that would have a material adverse effect on PNC or
Sterling. In connection with obtaining any required regulatory
approvals, PNC is not required to agree to conditions or
restrictions that would have a material adverse effect on either
PNC or Sterling, measured on a scale relative to Sterling.
We are not aware of any material governmental approvals or
actions that are required for completion of the merger other
than those described above. It is presently contemplated that if
any such additional governmental approvals or actions are
required, those approvals or actions will be sought. There can
be no assurance, however, that any additional approvals or
actions will be obtained.
35
Sterlings
Directors and Executive Officers Have Financial Interests in the
Merger
Stock
Incentive Programs
Under the plan of merger, each Sterling stock option and
restricted share that was unvested, including those held by our
directors and executive officers, became vested pursuant to the
terms of the Sterling Financial Corporation 1996 Stock Incentive
Plan and the Sterling Financial Corporation 2006 Equity
Compensation Plan on the date that the plan of merger was
executed. Each stock option that is not exercised before the
completion of the merger will be converted, under the terms of
the plan of merger, into an option to purchase a number of
shares of PNC common stock as described under The Plan of
Merger Treatment of Sterling Stock Options. As
of [ ], Sterling executive officers
as a group held Sterling stock options on
[ ] shares with an average
exercise price of $[ ] and no
restricted stock.
Employment
Agreements
In conjunction with the merger, PNC entered into employment
agreements with Sterling executive officers J. Roger
Moyer, Jr., Tito L. Lima, J. Bradley Scovill, Thomas J.
Sposito, II, Chad M. Clabaugh, Gregory S. Lefever, D.
Kathleen Phillips, E. Dennis Ginder and Kathleen A. Prime, that
will become effective as of the completion of the merger and
supersede their existing employment agreements with Sterling.
Unless earlier terminated pursuant to the terms of their
employment agreements with Sterling, the term of the new
employment agreements will extend from completion of the merger
until the following dates: for Messrs. Moyer, Sposito,
Lefever and Ginder, the third anniversary of the completion of
the merger; for Mr. Clabaugh, the second anniversary of the
completion of the merger; for Mr. Scovill, 18 months
after the completion of the merger; and for Mr. Lima,
Ms. Phillips and Ms. Prime, the first anniversary of
the completion of the merger. Under the terms of the employment
agreements with PNC, these executive officers are entitled to
the following: (i) an annual base salary at a rate of not
less than the amount set forth below, (ii) an annual bonus
with a target amount as set forth below (subject to achievement
of PNCs and the executives performance targets,
except with respect to Mr. Lima, Ms. Phillips and
Ms. Prime) and in an amount equal to at least the
guaranteed minimum bonus amount set forth below,
(iii) benefits generally available to similarly situated
employees of PNC, (iv) with respect to Messrs. Moyer,
Sposito, Lefever and Ginder, a grant of restricted stock on the
date of the completion of the merger equal to the amount set
forth below divided by the average of the reported high and low
trading prices on the NYSE for a share of PNC common stock on
the date of grant, (v) a restrictive covenant payment equal
to the amount set forth below which will be payable on the
1st payroll date following the later of the date of the
completion of the merger, or January 2, 2008, and
(vi) a stay bonus equal to the amounts, and payable at the
times, set forth below.
The following chart summarizes the material terms of the
compensation payable under the employment agreements with PNC to
each of the executive officers named above:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Restrictive
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
|
|
|
Annual
|
|
Guaranteed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Covenant
|
|
|
Stay Bonus
|
|
Base
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
Minimum
|
|
Name
|
|
Title
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Payment
|
|
|
Payment
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Target
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
Moyer
|
|
Market President of South Central Pennsylvania
|
|
$
|
300,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,260,000
|
|
|
$50,000 at 1st anniversary and $50,000 at 2nd anniversary
|
|
$
|
440,000
|
|
|
$150,000
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
Lima
|
|
Senior Vice President
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
$
|
666,106
|
|
|
$36,000 at 1st anniversary
|
|
$
|
240,000
|
|
|
None
|
|
$
|
36,000
|
|
Scovill
|
|
Executive Vice President of Retail Banking
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
$
|
935,156
|
|
|
$156,569 at 18 month anniversary
|
|
$
|
285,000
|
|
|
$71,250
|
|
$
|
42,750
|
|
Sposito
|
|
Executive Vice President of Retail Market Manager
|
|
$
|
250,000
|
|
|
$
|
525,000
|
|
|
$30,000 at 1st anniversary and $30,000 at 2nd anniversary
|
|
$
|
210,000
|
|
|
$52,500
|
|
$
|
31,500
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Restrictive
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
|
|
|
Annual
|
|
Guaranteed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Covenant
|
|
|
Stay Bonus
|
|
Base
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
Minimum
|
|
Name
|
|
Title
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Payment
|
|
|
Payment
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Target
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
Clabaugh
|
|
Market Sales & Service Manager
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
$
|
593,331
|
|
|
$20,000 at 1st anniversary and $20,000 at 2nd anniversary
|
|
$
|
171,410
|
|
|
$42,852.50
at 1st anniversary and $42,852.50
at 2nd anniversary
|
|
$
|
25,711.50
|
|
Lefever
|
|
Market President of Lancaster County
|
|
$
|
150,000
|
|
|
$
|
482,797
|
|
|
$20,000 at 1st anniversary and $20,000 at 2nd anniversary
|
|
$
|
175,000
|
|
|
$43,750
|
|
$
|
26,250
|
|
Phillips
|
|
Chief Information Officer
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
$
|
367,926
|
|
|
$45,000 at 1st anniversary
|
|
$
|
180,000
|
|
|
None
|
|
$
|
45,000
|
|
Ginder
|
|
Senior Vice President Business Banking
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
294,086
|
|
|
$20,000 at 1st anniversary and $20,000 at 2nd anniversary
|
|
$
|
170,000
|
|
|
$42,500
|
|
$
|
25,500
|
|
Prime
|
|
Senior Vice President Human Resources
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
$
|
278,967
|
|
|
$95,000 at 1st anniversary
|
|
$
|
180,000
|
|
|
None
|
|
$
|
45,000
|
|
Upon termination of one of the above-named executives by PNC
without cause or by the executive for good
reason (as each term is defined in the employment
agreements), the executive will be entitled to receive a
severance payment equal to the following, in a lump sum:
(a) the remaining annual base salary for the term of
employment, or, in the case of Ms. Phillips and
Ms. Prime, an amount equal to $180,000, and (b) to the
extent not paid, the aggregate of the restrictive covenant
payment, the stay bonus payment, and the annual bonus (at the
guaranteed minimum level) on the dates that those payments would
otherwise have been paid. In addition, in the event of any such
termination, any restricted shares that remain unvested will
immediately vest. Severance amounts will be reduced to the
extent that the amounts would be subject to the so-called
golden parachute excise tax under Section 280G
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
The employment agreements include non-solicitation, no-hire,
non-competition and confidentiality provisions. The officers
agreed (a) to keep non-public trade secrets and other
similar information confidential, and (b) during their
employment and for 12 months following termination of
employment with PNC, not to solicit customers and prospective
customers of PNC, not to hire employees of PNC and not to
compete with the business of PNC and its affiliates within
35 miles of any branch or office of PNC or its affiliates.
In addition, under the terms of the plan of merger, PNC has
agreed to (1) provide the executive officers (and all other
employees) with credit for all of their years of service with
Sterling and its predecessors for the purpose of eligibility,
vesting and benefit accruals (other than benefit accruals under
a defined benefit pension plan and as would result in
duplication of benefits), (2) cause all pre-existing
condition limitations and eligibility waiting periods under
group health plans of PNC for the executives and their eligible
dependents to be waived, and (3) credit any deductibles or
out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the executives and their
beneficiaries and dependents during the portion of the calendar
year prior to their participation in PNCs health plans.
Advisory
Boards
PNC currently plans to invite certain members of the board of
directors of Sterling to serve on a regional advisory board of
PNC Bank, National Association, after the completion of the
merger. Those directors will receive compensation in amounts
consistent with market practice for this type of arrangement.
37
Indemnification
and Insurance
The plan of merger requires PNC to indemnify and advance
expenses to present and former directors and officers of
Sterling and its subsidiaries against all costs or expense,
judgments, fines, losses, claims, damages, penalties, amounts
paid in settlement or other liabilities incurred in connection
with any claim, action, suit, proceeding or investigation
arising out of actions or omissions prior to the completion of
the merger, to the extent provided under Sterlings amended
and restated articles of incorporation or amended and restated
bylaws or indemnification agreements in effect on the date of
the plan of merger and, in addition, to the fullest extent
permitted by law.
The plan of merger provides that, for a period of six years
after completion of the merger, PNC will use its reasonable best
efforts to provide directors and officers liability
insurance to reimburse current and former directors and officers
with respect to claims arising at or prior to the completion of
the merger. The insurance will contain at least the same
coverage and amounts and contain terms and conditions that are
not less advantageous than the current coverage provided by
Sterling, except that PNC is not required to incur annual
premium expense greater than 250% of Sterlings current
annual directors and officers liability insurance
premium.
THE PLAN
OF MERGER
The following describes certain aspects of the merger,
including material provisions of the plan of merger. The
following description of the plan of merger is subject to, and
qualified in its entirety by reference to, the plan of merger,
which is attached to this document as Annex B and is
incorporated by reference in this document. We urge you to read
the plan of merger carefully and in its entirety, as it is the
legal document governing this merger.
Terms of
the Merger
Each of the Sterling board of directors and the PNC board of
directors has approved the plan of merger which provides for the
merger of Sterling with and into PNC. PNC will be the surviving
corporation in the merger. Each share of PNC common or preferred
stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to completion of
the merger will remain issued and outstanding as one share of
common or preferred stock of PNC, as applicable, and each share
of Sterling common stock issued and outstanding at the effective
time of the merger will be converted into either cash or PNC
common stock, as described below. See
Consideration To Be Received in the
Merger.
The PNC amended and restated articles of incorporation will be
the articles of incorporation, and the PNC amended and restated
bylaws will be the bylaws, of the combined company after
completion of the merger.
Closing
and Effective Time of the Merger
The merger will be completed only if all of the following occur:
|
|
|
|
|
the plan of merger is adopted by Sterling shareholders;
|
|
|
|
we obtain all regulatory consents and approvals in connection
with the merger of Sterling into PNC and the merger of certain
banking subsidiaries of PNC and Sterling (in each case unless
the failure to obtain such consents or approvals would not
reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on
Sterling or PNC measured on a scale relative to Sterling)
without a condition or a restriction that would have a material
adverse effect on Sterling or PNC, with materiality being
measured on a scale relative to Sterling; and
|
|
|
|
all other conditions to the merger discussed in this document
and the plan of merger are either satisfied or waived.
|
The merger will become effective when articles of merger are
filed with the Department of State of the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania. However, we may agree to a later time for
completion of the merger and specify that time in accordance
with Pennsylvania law. In the plan of merger, we have agreed to
cause the
38
completion of the merger to occur no later than the fifth
business day following the satisfaction or waiver of the last of
the conditions specified in the plan of merger, or on another
mutually agreed date. If these conditions are first satisfied or
waived during the two weeks immediately prior to the end of a
fiscal quarter of PNC, then PNC may postpone the completion of
the merger until the first full week after the end of that
quarter. It currently is anticipated that the completion of the
merger will occur in the first half of 2008, but we cannot
guarantee when or if the merger will be completed.
Consideration
To Be Received in the Merger
As a result of the merger, each Sterling shareholder will have
the right, with respect to each share of Sterling common stock
held, to elect to receive merger consideration consisting of
either cash or shares of PNC common stock, subject to adjustment
as described below. The implied value of the merger
consideration will fluctuate with the market price of PNC common
stock and will be determined based on the average of the closing
prices of PNC common stock for the five trading days ending on
the day before the date of completion of the merger.
Whether a Sterling shareholder makes a cash election or a stock
election, the value of the consideration that such shareholder
will receive as of the completion date will be substantially the
same and will be based on the average PNC closing price used to
calculate the merger consideration.
Set forth below is a table showing the consideration that you
would receive in a cash election, on the one hand, or in a stock
election, on the other hand, under the merger consideration
formula if the actual average of the closing prices of PNC
common stock on the NYSE for the five trading days ending the
day before the completion of the merger were equal to the
hypothetical range contained in the table. The table does not
reflect the fact that cash will be paid instead of fractional
shares. As described below, regardless of whether you make a
cash election or a stock election, you may nevertheless receive
a mix of cash and stock due to proration and adjustment.
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration
|
|
Hypothetical
|
|
Cash Election:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Election:
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
Five-Day Average
|
|
Cash Consideration
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of PNC
|
|
|
Market
|
|
Closing Prices
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
OR
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Value(*)
|
|
|
$50.00
|
|
$
|
15.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3064
|
|
|
$
|
15.32
|
|
$51.00
|
|
$
|
15.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3033
|
|
|
$
|
15.47
|
|
$52.00
|
|
$
|
15.62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3004
|
|
|
$
|
15.62
|
|
$53.00
|
|
$
|
15.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2977
|
|
|
$
|
15.78
|
|
$54.00
|
|
$
|
15.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2950
|
|
|
$
|
15.93
|
|
$55.00
|
|
$
|
16.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2925
|
|
|
$
|
16.09
|
|
$56.00
|
|
$
|
16.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2900
|
|
|
$
|
16.24
|
|
$57.00
|
|
$
|
16.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2877
|
|
|
$
|
16.40
|
|
$58.00
|
|
$
|
16.55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2853
|
|
|
$
|
16.55
|
|
$59.00
|
|
$
|
16.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2831
|
|
|
$
|
16.70
|
|
$60.00
|
|
$
|
16.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2810
|
|
|
$
|
16.86
|
|
$61.00
|
|
$
|
17.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2789
|
|
|
$
|
17.01
|
|
$62.00
|
|
$
|
17.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2769
|
|
|
$
|
17.17
|
|
$63.00
|
|
$
|
17.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2749
|
|
|
$
|
17.32
|
|
$64.00
|
|
$
|
17.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2731
|
|
|
$
|
17.48
|
|
$65.00
|
|
$
|
17.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2712
|
|
|
$
|
17.63
|
|
$66.00
|
|
$
|
17.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2694
|
|
|
$
|
17.78
|
|
$67.00
|
|
$
|
17.94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2678
|
|
|
$
|
17.94
|
|
$68.00
|
|
$
|
18.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2660
|
|
|
$
|
18.09
|
|
$69.00
|
|
$
|
18.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2645
|
|
|
$
|
18.25
|
|
$70.00
|
|
$
|
18.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2629
|
|
|
$
|
18.40
|
|
$71.00
|
|
$
|
18.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2614
|
|
|
$
|
18.56
|
|
$72.00
|
|
$
|
18.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2599
|
|
|
$
|
18.71
|
|
$73.00
|
|
$
|
18.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2584
|
|
|
$
|
18.86
|
|
$74.00
|
|
$
|
19.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2570
|
|
|
$
|
19.02
|
|
$75.00
|
|
$
|
19.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2556
|
|
|
$
|
19.17
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Market value based on hypothetical
five-day
average closing price on the NYSE of PNC common stock. |
The examples above are illustrative only. The value of the
merger consideration that you actually receive will be based on
the actual average closing price of PNC common stock on the NYSE
for the five trading days ending the day before the completion
of the merger, as described below. The actual average closing
price may be outside the range of the amounts set forth above,
and as a result, the actual value of the merger consideration
per share of PNC common stock may not be shown in the above
table.
Sterling shareholders must return their properly completed and
signed form of election to the exchange agent prior to the
election deadline. If you are a Sterling shareholder and you do
not return your form of election by the election deadline or
improperly complete or do not sign your form of election, you
will receive cash, shares of PNC common stock or a mixture of
cash and shares of PNC common stock, based on what is available
after giving effect to the valid elections made by other
shareholders, as well as the adjustment described below.
If you are a Sterling shareholder, you may specify different
elections with respect to different shares held by you (for
example, if you have 100 shares, you could make a cash
election with respect to 50 shares and a stock election
with respect to the other 50 shares).
40
Cash
Election
The plan of merger provides that each Sterling shareholder who
makes a valid cash election will have the right to receive, in
exchange for each share of Sterling common stock held by such
holder, an amount in cash equal to the Per Share Consideration
(determined as described below), without interest, subject to
proration and adjustment as described below. We sometimes refer
to this cash amount as the cash consideration. For
example, based on the average of the closing prices of PNC
common stock for the five trading days ending
[ ], 2008, if the merger had been
completed on [ ], 2008, the cash
consideration would have been approximately
$[ ].
The Per Share Consideration is the amount, rounded
to the nearest whole cent, obtained by adding (A) $7.60 and
(B) the product, rounded to the nearest ten-thousandth, of
0.1543 and the PNC Closing Price.
The PNC Closing Price is the average of the closing
sale prices of PNC common stock on the NYSE for the five trading
days immediately preceding the completion date of the merger.
Stock
Election
The plan of merger provides that each Sterling shareholder who
makes a valid stock election will have the right to receive, in
exchange for each share of Sterling common stock held, a
fraction of a share of PNC common stock equal to the Per Share
Stock Consideration (determined as described below), subject to
proration and adjustment as described below. We sometimes refer
to such fraction of a share of PNC common stock as the
stock consideration. Based on the average of the
closing prices of PNC common stock for the five trading days
ended [ ], 2008, if the merger had
been completed on [ ], 2008, the
stock consideration would have been 0.[ ] of a share of PNC
common stock.
The Per Share Stock Consideration is defined in the
plan of merger as the quotient obtained by dividing the Per
Share Consideration (determined as described above) by the PNC
Closing Price (determined as described above).
No fractional shares of PNC common stock will be issued to any
holder of Sterling common stock upon completion of the merger.
For each fractional share that would otherwise be issued, PNC
will pay cash in an amount equal to the fraction multiplied by
the PNC Closing Price. No interest will be paid or accrued on
cash payable to holders in lieu of fractional shares.
Non-Election
Shares
If you are a Sterling shareholder and you do not make an
election to receive cash or PNC common stock in the merger, your
elections are not received by the exchange agent by the election
deadline, your forms of election are improperly completed
and/or are
not signed, or you do not send together with your forms of
elections your certificates representing shares of Sterling
common stock (or a properly completed notice of guaranteed
delivery followed by delivery of the certificates within three
trading days), you will be deemed not to have made an
election. Shareholders not making an election may be
paid in cash, PNC common stock or a mix of cash and shares of
PNC common stock depending on, and after giving effect to, the
number of valid cash elections and stock elections that have
been made by other Sterling shareholders using the proration
adjustment described below.
Proration
The total number of shares of PNC common stock that will be
issued in the merger would be approximately
[ ] and the cash that would be
paid would be approximately $[ ],
based on the number of Sterling shares outstanding on
[ ], 2008. If the number of shares
of Sterling common stock outstanding increases prior to the date
of completion of the merger due to the exercise of outstanding
options to purchase or receive shares of Sterling common stock,
the aggregate number of shares of PNC common stock to be issued
in the merger and the aggregate amount of cash to be paid will
be increased accordingly.
41
The cash and stock elections are subject to proration and
adjustment to preserve the proportion of the aggregate number of
shares of PNC common stock to be issued to the aggregate cash
consideration to be paid in the merger. As a result, even if you
make an all cash election or an all stock election, you may
nevertheless receive a mix of cash and stock consideration.
Adjustment
if Stock Election is Oversubscribed
Cash may be paid to Sterling shareholders who make stock
elections if the stock election is oversubscribed. The shares of
Sterling common stock for which valid stock elections are made
are known as the stock election shares. The number
of shares of Sterling common stock that will be converted into
shares of PNC common stock in the merger is equal to the
stock conversion number, which is equal to the
aggregate number of shares to be exchanged in the merger minus
the number obtained by dividing (x) the aggregate number of
shares to be exchanged in the merger multiplied by $7.60 by
(y) the Per Share Consideration. If the stock election
shares are greater than the stock conversion number, the stock
election is oversubscribed, in which case:
|
|
|
|
|
Sterling shareholders making a cash election, and those
shareholders who failed to make valid elections, will receive
merger consideration consisting only of cash for each share of
Sterling common stock;
|
|
|
|
the exchange agent will allocate from among the stock election
shares pro rata to the holders of those shares in accordance
with their respective numbers of stock election shares, a
sufficient number of stock election shares, referred to as
converted stock election shares, so that the
difference between (1) the number of stock election shares
less (2) the number of the converted stock election shares
equals as closely as practicable the stock conversion number,
and each converted stock election share will be, as of the
effective time of the merger, converted into the right to
receive the cash consideration; and
|
|
|
|
each other stock election share that is not a converted stock
election share will be converted into the right to receive the
stock consideration.
|
Example
A. Oversubscription of Stock Election
Assuming that:
|
|
|
|
|
the average price of PNCs common stock on the NYSE for the
five trading days preceding the completion of the merger is
$60.11,
|
|
|
|
there are 29,109,000 shares of Sterling issued and
outstanding,
|
|
|
|
there are 20,000,000 stock election shares, and
|
|
|
|
no election is made with respect to all other outstanding shares,
|
then the stock conversion number is approximately 16,003,052 and
a Sterling shareholder making a stock election with respect to
1,000 shares would receive the stock consideration with
respect to 800 shares (1,000 x 16,003,052
¸
20,000,000) and the cash consideration with respect to the
remaining 200 shares. Therefore, the Per Share
Consideration would be $16.88 ($7.60 + (0.1543 x $60.11)) and
that Sterling shareholder would receive approximately
224 shares of PNC common stock (800 x $16.88
¸
$60.11) and approximately $3,376.00 in cash (200 x $16.88),
which does not include cash that would be received for
fractional shares.
Adjustment
if Cash Election is Oversubscribed
PNC common stock may be issued to Sterling shareholders who make
cash elections if the cash election is oversubscribed, in which
case:
|
|
|
|
|
each stock election share will be converted into the right to
receive the stock consideration;
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
the exchange agent will allocate from among the shares with
respect to which no valid election has been made, referred to as
non-election shares, pro rata to the holders of
non-election shares in accordance with their respective numbers
of non-election shares, a sufficient number of non-election
shares so that the sum of that number and the number of stock
election shares equals as closely as practicable the stock
conversion number, and each such allocated non-election share,
each referred to as a stock-selected non-election
share, will be converted into the right to receive the
stock consideration, except that if the sum of all non-election
shares and stock election shares is equal to or less than the
stock conversion number, all non-election shares will be
stock-selected non-election shares;
|
|
|
|
if the sum of stock election shares and non-election shares is
less than the stock conversion number, the exchange agent will
allocate from among the shares with respect to which a valid
cash election was made, referred to as cash election
shares, pro rata to the holders of cash election shares in
accordance with their respective numbers of cash election
shares, a sufficient number of cash election shares so that the
sum of that number, the number of all stock election shares, and
the number of all non-election shares equals as closely as
practicable the stock conversion number, and each such allocated
cash election share, each referred to as a converted cash
election share, will be converted into the right to
receive the stock consideration; and
|
|
|
|
each cash election share that is not a stock-selected
non-election share or a converted cash election share will be
converted into the right to receive the cash consideration.
|
Example B. Oversubscription of Cash Election
Assuming that:
|
|
|
|
|
the average price of PNCs common stock on the NYSE for the
five trading days preceding the completion of the merger is
$60.11,
|
|
|
|
there are 29,109,000 shares of Sterling issued and
outstanding,
|
|
|
|
there are 20,000,000 cash election shares, and
|
|
|
|
and no election is made with respect to all other outstanding
shares,
|
then the stock conversion number is approximately 16,003,052.
The Sterling shareholders that made no valid election would
receive only stock consideration, which would leave
approximately 6,894,052 shares that need to receive the
stock consideration (16,003,052 9,109,000). A
Sterling shareholder making a cash election with respect to
1,000 shares would receive the stock consideration with
respect to approximately 345 shares (1,000 x 6,894,052
¸
20,000,000) and the cash consideration with respect to the
remaining 655 shares. Therefore, the Per Share
Consideration would be $16.88 ($7.60 + (0.1543 x $60.11)) and
that Sterling shareholder would receive approximately
96 shares of PNC common stock (345 x $16.88
¸
$60.11) and approximately $11,056.40 in cash (655 x $16.88),
which does not include cash that would be received for
fractional shares.
Adjustment
if the Stock Election Equals the Stock Conversion
Number
If the number of stock election shares is equal to the stock
conversion number, the stock election is sufficient. If the
stock election is sufficient, then:
|
|
|
|
|
a Sterling shareholder making a cash election will receive the
cash consideration for each share of Sterling common stock as to
which he or she made a cash election;
|
|
|
|
a Sterling shareholder making a stock election will receive the
stock consideration for each share of Sterling common stock as
to which he or she made a stock election; and
|
|
|
|
a Sterling shareholder who made no election or who did not make
a valid election with respect to any of his or her shares will
receive the cash consideration for each share of Sterling common
stock for which he or she made no election or did not make a
valid election.
|
43
401(k)
Plan Participants
Fiduciary Counselors will instruct the trustee of the 401(k)
Plan to elect cash or PNC common stock as merger consideration
as you direct. If you do not return a properly completed form of
election by the deadline, you will be treated as if you had
elected to receive PNC common stock. The merger consideration
will be allocated to your account in the 401(k) Plan and will be
subject to the same rules that apply to other portions of your
401(k) Plan account. Any merger consideration you receive in
cash will be allocated initially to the Vanguard LifeStrategy
Income Fund. Any merger consideration you receive in PNC common
stock will be allocated initially to the PNC common stock fund,
which will replace the Sterling common stock fund in the 401(k)
Plan. You may transfer all or part of the merger consideration
to any other available investment funds in the 401(k) Plan by
following the normal investment transfer procedures. However, no
participant in the 401(k) Plan will be permitted to direct
contributions or investment transfers into the PNC common stock
fund after the merger. Regardless of whether you elect cash or
PNC common stock, the merger consideration will not be subject
to tax until it is distributed from your 401(k) Plan account.
Treatment
of Sterling Stock Options
Each outstanding option to acquire Sterling common stock granted
under Sterlings stock option and incentive plans will be
converted automatically at the effective time of the merger into
an option to purchase PNC common stock and will continue to be
governed by the terms of the Sterling stock plan and related
grant agreements under which it was granted, except that:
|
|
|
|
|
the number of shares of PNC common stock subject to the
converted stock options will be equal to the product of the
number of shares of Sterling common stock subject to the
Sterling stock option and the Per Share Stock Consideration
(determined as described above under the heading
Consideration To Be Received in the
Merger), rounded down to the nearest whole share; and
|
|
|
|
the exercise price per share of PNC common stock subject to the
converted stock option will be equal to the exercise price per
share of Sterling common stock under the Sterling stock option
divided by the Per Share Stock Consideration, rounded up to the
nearest whole cent.
|
Conversion
of Shares; Exchange of Certificates and Book-Entry Shares;
Elections as to Form of Consideration
The conversion of Sterling common stock into the right to
receive the merger consideration will occur automatically at the
effective time of the merger. As promptly as reasonably
practicable after completion of the merger, the exchange agent
will exchange certificates and book-entry shares representing
shares of Sterling common stock for merger consideration,
without interest, to be received in the merger pursuant to the
terms of the plan of merger. Computershare will be the exchange
agent in the merger and will receive your form of election,
exchange certificates for the merger consideration and perform
other duties as explained in the plan of merger.
If any PNC shares are to be issued, or cash payment made, in a
name other than that in which the Sterling stock certificates or
book-entry shares surrendered in exchange for the merger
consideration are registered, the person requesting the exchange
must pay any transfer or other taxes required by reason of the
issuance of the new PNC shares or the payment of the cash
consideration in a name other than that of the registered holder
of the Sterling stock certificate surrendered, or must establish
to the satisfaction of PNC or Computershare that any such taxes
have been paid or are not applicable.
Form
of Election
The form of election and related transmittal materials are being
mailed to Sterling shareholders separately following the mailing
of this document. The form of election and related documents
will allow you to make cash or stock elections or a combination
of both.
44
Unless otherwise agreed to by PNC and Sterling, the election
deadline will be 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on the later of
[ ], 2008, which is the day prior
to the Sterling shareholders meeting, and the date that
the parties believe to be as near as practicable to five
business days prior to the anticipated closing.
If you wish to elect the type of merger consideration you will
receive in the merger, you should carefully review and follow
the instructions that will accompany the form of election.
Shareholders who hold their shares of Sterling common stock in
street name or through a bank, broker or other
nominee should follow the instructions of the bank, broker or
other nominee for making an election with respect to such shares
of Sterling common stock. Shares of Sterling common stock as to
which the holder has not made a valid election prior to the
election deadline will be treated as though they had not made an
election.
To make a valid election, each Sterling shareholder must submit
a properly completed form of election, together with stock
certificates, so that it is actually received by the exchange
agent at or prior to the election deadline in accordance with
the instructions on the form of election. Neither PNC nor the
exchange agent is under any obligation to notify you of any
defect in a form of election. A form of election will be
properly completed only if accompanied by certificates (or
book-entry transfer of uncertificated shares) representing all
shares of Sterling common stock covered by the form of election
(or appropriate evidence as to the loss, theft or destruction,
appropriate evidence as to the ownership of that certificate by
the claimant, and appropriate and customary indemnification, as
will be described in the form of election). If you are a
Sterling shareholder and you cannot deliver your stock
certificates to the exchange agent by the election deadline, you
may deliver a notice of guaranteed delivery promising to deliver
your stock certificates, as will be described in the form of
election, so long as (1) the guarantee of delivery is from
a firm which is a member of any registered national securities
exchange or a commercial bank or trust company in the United
States and (2) the actual stock certificates are in fact
delivered to the exchange agent within three trading days of
execution of the guarantee of delivery.
Generally, an election may be revoked or changed, but only by
written notice received by the exchange agent prior to the
election deadline accompanied by a properly completed and signed
revised form of election. If an election is revoked, or the plan
of merger is terminated, and any certificates have been
transmitted to the exchange agent, the exchange agent will
promptly return those certificates to the shareholder who
submitted those certificates via first-class mail or, in the
case of shares of Sterling common stock tendered by book-entry
transfer into the exchange agents account at the
Depository Trust Company, or DTC, by crediting
to an account maintained by such shareholder with DTC promptly
following the termination of the merger or revocation of the
election. Sterling shareholders will not be entitled to revoke
or change their elections following the election deadline. As a
result, if you have made elections, you will be unable to revoke
your elections or sell your shares of Sterling common stock
during the interval between the election deadline and the date
of completion of the merger.
Shares of Sterling common stock as to which the holder has not
made a valid election prior to the election deadline, including
as a result of revocation, will be deemed non-election shares.
If it is determined that any purported cash election or stock
election was not properly made, the purported election will be
deemed to be of no force or effect and the holder making the
purported election will be deemed not to have made an election
for these purposes, unless a proper election is subsequently
made on a timely basis.
Letter
of Transmittal
Soon after the completion of the merger, the exchange agent will
mail a letter of transmittal to only those persons who were
Sterling shareholders at the effective time of the merger and
who have not previously submitted a form of election and
properly surrendered shares of Sterling common stock to the
exchange agent. This mailing will contain instructions on how to
surrender shares of Sterling common stock (if these shares have
not already been surrendered) in exchange for the merger
consideration the holder is entitled to receive under the plan
of merger.
If a certificate for Sterling common stock has been lost, stolen
or destroyed, the exchange agent will issue the consideration
properly payable under the plan of merger upon receipt of
appropriate evidence as to that
45
loss, theft or destruction, appropriate evidence as to the
ownership of that certificate by the claimant, and appropriate
and customary indemnification.
Withholding
The exchange agent will be entitled to deduct and withhold from
the cash consideration or cash instead of fractional shares
payable to any Sterling shareholder the amounts it is required
to deduct and withhold under any federal, state, local or
foreign tax law. If the exchange agent withholds any amounts,
these amounts will be treated for all purposes of the merger as
having been paid to the shareholders from whom they were
withheld.
Dividends
and Distributions
Until Sterling shares of common stock are surrendered for
exchange, any dividends or other distributions declared after
the effective time with respect to PNC common stock into which
shares of Sterling common stock may have been converted will
accrue but will not be paid. PNC will pay to former Sterling
shareholders any unpaid dividends or other distributions,
without interest, only after they have duly surrendered their
Sterling stock certificates.
Prior to the effective time of the merger, Sterling and its
subsidiaries may not declare or pay any dividend or distribution
on its capital stock or repurchase any shares of its capital
stock, other than:
|
|
|
|
|
dividends paid by any Sterling subsidiary to another Sterling
subsidiary or its parent company consistent with past
practice; and
|
|
|
|
dividends on preferred stock of subsidiaries, the common stock
of which is owned directly or indirectly by Sterling; and
|
|
|
|
the acceptance of shares of Sterling common stock in payment of
the exercise of a stock option granted under a Sterling stock
option plan, to the extent that such stock options may be
exercised.
|
Representations
and Warranties
The plan of merger contains customary representations and
warranties of Sterling and PNC relating to their respective
businesses. With the exception of certain representations that
must be true and correct in all material respects, no
representation or warranty will be deemed untrue or incorrect as
a consequence of the existence of any fact, circumstance or
event unless that fact, circumstance or event, individually or
when taken together with all other facts, circumstances or
events inconsistent with any representation, has had or is
reasonably likely to materially impair the ability of the
company making the representation to consummate the merger, or
is materially adverse to the business, financial condition or
results of operations of the company making the representation
and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole. In determining whether
any such materially adverse effect has occurred or is reasonably
likely to occur, the parties will disregard effects resulting
from (1) events, conditions or trends in economic, business
or financial conditions generally or affecting the bank or bank
holding company businesses generally (including changes in
interest rates and changes in the markets for securities),
except to the extent the event, condition or trend has a
disproportionate adverse effect on such party, (2) changes
in generally accepted accounting principles or regulatory
accounting requirements generally affecting the banking or bank
holding company businesses but not uniquely relating to such
party, (3) changes in laws, regulations, or interpretations
of laws or regulations generally affecting the banking or bank
holding company businesses, but not uniquely relating to such
party, (4) actions or omissions of a party taken with the
prior written consent of the other party in contemplation of the
transactions contemplated by the plan of merger or actions that
are taken by the parties, consistent with the terms of the plan
of merger, to consummate the transactions contemplated by the
plan of merger, (5) changes in national or international
political or social conditions including the engagement by the
United States in hostilities, whether or not pursuant to the
declaration of a national emergency or war, or the occurrence of
any military or terrorist attack upon or within the United
States, or any of its territories, possessions or diplomatic or
consular offices or upon any military installation, equipment or
personnel of the United States, or (6) announcement of the
plan of merger or the
46
merger. The representations and warranties in the plan of merger
do not survive the effective time of the merger.
Each of PNC and Sterling has made representations and warranties
to the other regarding, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
corporate matters, including due organization and qualification;
|
|
|
|
capitalization;
|
|
|
|
power and authority to execute, deliver and perform its
obligations under the plan of merger;
|
|
|
|
shareholder vote requirement;
|
|
|
|
required government filings and consents;
|
|
|
|
the absence of conflicts with, or violations of,
(1) organizational documents, (2) applicable law or
(3) material agreements, indentures or other instruments,
in each case as a result of the merger or entry into the plan of
merger;
|
|
|
|
financial reports and regulatory documents;
|
|
|
|
absence of material adverse changes;
|
|
|
|
legal proceedings;
|
|
|
|
regulatory investigations and orders;
|
|
|
|
compliance with applicable law;
|
|
|
|
brokers fees payable in connection with the merger;
|
|
|
|
environmental liabilities;
|
|
|
|
tax matters;
|
|
|
|
derivative instruments;
|
|
|
|
insurance coverage; and
|
|
|
|
the inapplicability of state takeover laws.
|
In addition, Sterling has made other representations and
warranties about itself to PNC as to:
|
|
|
|
|
its subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
material contracts, exclusivity arrangements, and other certain
types of contracts;
|
|
|
|
employee matters, including employee benefit plans;
|
|
|
|
labor matters; and
|
|
|
|
absence of related party transactions.
|
PNC also has made representations and warranties to Sterling
regarding the availability of cash to pay the cash portion of
the merger consideration and the authorization and valid
issuance of the PNC common stock to pay the stock portion of the
merger consideration.
The representations and warranties described above and included
in the plan of merger were made by each of PNC and Sterling to
the other. These representations and warranties were made as of
specific dates, may be subject to important qualifications and
limitations agreed to by PNC and Sterling in connection with
negotiating the terms of the plan of merger, and may have been
included in the plan of merger for the purpose of allocating
risk between PNC and Sterling rather than to establish matters
as facts. The plan of merger is described in, and included as an
annex to, this document only to provide you with information
regarding its terms and conditions, and not to provide any other
factual information regarding Sterling, PNC or their respective
businesses. Accordingly, the representations and warranties and
other provisions of the plan of
47
merger should not be read alone, but instead should be read only
in conjunction with the information provided elsewhere in this
document and in the documents incorporated by reference into
this document. See Where You Can Find More
Information on page 74.
Covenants
and Agreements
Each of Sterling and PNC has undertaken customary covenants that
place restrictions on it and its subsidiaries until the
effective time of the merger. In general, each of PNC and
Sterling agreed to use its reasonable best efforts in good faith
to take all actions and to do all things to permit the
completion of the merger as soon as possible. Each of the
parties has also agreed not to take any action that would
prevent or delay the merger from qualifying as a reorganization
for tax purposes, or, except as required by law, to take any
action that is reasonably likely to result in any of the
conditions to the merger not being satisfied or that is a
material violation of the plan of merger.
Sterling has agreed that, with certain exceptions and except
with PNCs prior written consent (which is not to be
unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned), Sterling will
not, and will not permit any of its subsidiaries to, among other
things, undertake the following actions:
|
|
|
|
|
to operate its business other than in the ordinary course of
business or fail to use reasonable efforts to preserve intact
its business organization and assets and maintain its rights,
franchises and existing relations with customers, suppliers,
employees and business associates;
|
|
|
|
issue, sell or otherwise permit to become outstanding, or
dispose of or encumber or pledge or propose the creation of, any
additional shares of Sterling common stock other than pursuant
to rights existing on the date of the plan of merger;
|
|
|
|
permit any shares of Sterling common stock to become subject to
new grants or other rights;
|
|
|
|
declare or pay any dividends or other distributions on any
shares of its capital stock, except as set forth above in
Conversion of Shares; Exchange of Certificates
and Book-Entry Shares; Elections as to Form of
Consideration Dividends and Distributions;
|
|
|
|
take certain actions relating to director, officer or employee
agreements, compensation, benefits, hiring and promotion;
|
|
|
|
undertake certain corporate transactions, such as mergers and
acquisitions, or other transactions, such as sales of assets or
incurrence or waivers of indebtedness outside the ordinary
course of business or to the extent such actions are material to
Sterling and its subsidiaries as a whole;
|
|
|
|
amend it articles of incorporation or bylaws or similar
governing documents;
|
|
|
|
make any change to its financial accounting methods, except as
required by applicable law, generally accepted accounting
principles or applicable regulatory accounting requirements;
|
|
|
|
other than in the ordinary course, and subject to certain other
limitations, enter into, renew, amend in any respect or
terminate any contract or agreement;
|
|
|
|
settle any claim, action or proceeding, other than payments in
cash in the ordinary course of business consistent with past
practice that do not exceed $100,000 individually or $250,000 in
the aggregate, and that do not create negative precedent for
claims that are likely to be material to Sterling or, after the
closing, PNC;
|
|
|
|
make any capital expenditures in excess of $50,000 per project
or related series of projects or $250,000 in the aggregate,
other than in the ordinary course of business;
|
|
|
|
make, change, or revoke any material tax election, adopt or
change any taxable year or period, change any material tax
accounting method, file any material amended tax return, settle
any material tax claim or surrender any material claim for a
refund of taxes;
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
file any application to open, relocate or close any, or open or
close any, branch or automated banking facility; or
|
|
|
|
agree to do any of the actions prohibited by the preceding
bullets.
|
Sterling has agreed to use its reasonable best efforts in good
faith to restate, complete or provide, as applicable, financial
statements or such other financial and other information,
including the audit opinion of its outside independent
accountants, as necessary to cause the registration statement
(of which this proxy statement/prospectus is a part) to be
declared effective by the SEC and the proxy statement to be
cleared with the SEC as soon as practicable. As promptly as
practicable and prior to the completion of the merger, Sterling
agrees that it will complete the restatement of its financial
statements and the review of the loan portfolio of its
subsidiary, EFI. Sterling also agrees to use its reasonable best
efforts to facilitate the completion of the investigation and
resulting report to Sterlings audit committee described
under Recent Developments Regarding Sterling
Results of the Independent Investigation, which has since
been completed.
PNC has agreed that, except with Sterlings prior written
consent (which is not to be unreasonably withheld, delayed or
conditioned), PNC will not, and will not permit any of its
subsidiaries to:
|
|
|
|
|
amend its organizational documents in a way that would affect
Sterlings shareholders adversely relative to other holders
of PNC common stock; and
|
|
|
|
declare or pay any extraordinary or special dividend or make any
other extraordinary or special distributions with respect to its
stock.
|
PNC also agrees to take certain actions in order to assume at
the time of the consummation of the merger Sterlings
obligations with respect to its outstanding trust preferred
securities and also with respect to certain of Sterlings
other debt obligations.
The plan of merger also contains mutual covenants relating to
the preparation of this document and the holding of the special
meeting of Sterling shareholders, access to information of the
other company, notification to the other party of certain
matters and public announcements with respect to the
transactions contemplated by the plan of merger. Sterling and
PNC have also agreed to use reasonable best efforts to prepare
as promptly as possible all documentation, to effect all filings
and to obtain all third party and governmental permits,
consents, approvals and authorizations necessary to consummate
the transactions contemplated by the plan of merger.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, PNC is not required to take any
action in connection with obtaining the necessary governmental
and third party consents that would reasonably be expected to
have a material adverse effect on PNC or Sterling, measured
relative to Sterling.
Bank
Mergers
PNC and Sterling have agreed to enter into a merger agreement
pursuant to which BLC Bank, N.A. will merge with and into PNC
Bank, National Association and a merger agreement pursuant to
which Delaware Sterling Bank & Trust Company will
merge with and into PNC Bank, Delaware. The bank mergers are
intended to become effective after the closing of the merger of
the parent companies.
Reasonable
Best Efforts of Sterling to Obtain the Required Shareholder
Vote
Sterling has agreed to take all actions to hold a meeting of its
shareholders as promptly as practicable for the purpose of
obtaining shareholder approval of the plan of merger.
Sterlings board of directors may withdraw, modify, or
condition its recommendation to approve the plan of merger only
if Sterlings board of directors determines, in good faith
after consultation with its outside financial and legal
advisors, that the failure to take such action would breach its
fiduciary obligations under applicable law. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the plan of merger requires Sterling to submit the
plan of merger to a shareholder vote even if its board of
directors no longer recommends approval of the plan of merger,
in which event the board may communicate its basis for its lack
of a recommendation to shareholders.
49
Agreement
Not to Solicit Other Offers
Sterling also has agreed that it, its subsidiaries and their
officers and directors will not, and Sterling will use all
reasonable best efforts to cause its employees and agents not
to, directly or indirectly, initiate, solicit or encourage any
inquiries or the making or implementation of any
Acquisition Proposal (as defined below) or engage in
any discussions or negotiations concerning, or provide
confidential information with respect to, an Acquisition
Proposal.
However, prior to the special meeting, Sterling is permitted to
consider and participate in discussions and negotiations with
respect to an Acquisition Proposal only if the Sterling board of
directors determines in good faith (after consultation with
outside legal counsel and financial advisors) that such action
is required in order to comply with its fiduciary duties and
Sterling has first entered into a confidentiality agreement with
the party proposing the Acquisition Proposal on terms comparable
to the confidentiality agreement with PNC.
Sterling has agreed:
|
|
|
|
|
to notify PNC within one day after receipt of any Acquisition
Proposal or any inquiry that could reasonably lead to an
Acquisition Proposal, or any material change to any Acquisition
Proposal, or any request for nonpublic information relating to
Sterling or any of its subsidiaries or for access to the
properties, books or records of Sterling or any of its
subsidiaries by any person or entity that informs the board of
directors of Sterling that it is considering making, or has
made, an Acquisition Proposal, and to provide PNC with relevant
information regarding such inquiry, proposal, modification or
amendment;
|
|
|
|
to keep PNC fully informed of the identity of the person making,
the material terms of, and the status and details of any
Acquisition Proposal and any related developments;
|
|
|
|
to cease any existing discussions or negotiations with any
persons with respect to any Acquisition Proposal, and to use
reasonable best efforts to cause all persons other than PNC who
have been furnished with confidential information in connection
with an Acquisition Proposal within the 12 months prior to
the date of the plan of merger to return or destroy such
information;
|
|
|
|
to use reasonable best efforts to enforce any existing
confidentiality or standstill agreements, and to take all steps
necessary to terminate any approval that may have been given
under any such provisions authorizing any person to make an
Acquisition Proposal; and
|
|
|
|
not to approve or take any action to render inapplicable to any
Acquisition Proposal any anti-takeover provision under the
Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law or any similar takeover
laws.
|
Acquisition Proposal means any proposal or offer as
to any of the following (other than the merger) involving
Sterling or any of its significant subsidiaries:
|
|
|
|
|
any merger, consolidation, share exchange, business combination,
or other similar transaction;
|
|
|
|
any sale, lease, exchange, pledge, transfer or other disposition
of 25% or more of the consolidated assets or liabilities of
Sterling or any of its significant subsidiaries in a single
transaction or series of transactions;
|
|
|
|
any tender offer or exchange offer for, or other acquisition of,
25% or more of the outstanding shares of capital stock of
Sterling or any of its significant subsidiaries; or
|
|
|
|
any public announcement of a proposal, plan or intention to do,
or any agreement to engage in, any of the actions listed in the
foregoing bullets.
|
Expenses
and Fees
In general, each of PNC and Sterling will be responsible for all
expenses incurred by it in connection with the negotiation and
completion of the transactions contemplated by the plan of
merger. However, the costs and expenses of copying, printing and
mailing this document will be borne equally by Sterling and PNC.
50
Employee
Matters
PNC has agreed to honor all Sterling compensation and benefit
plans in accordance with their terms, subject to any amendments
or termination required by the plan of merger or permitted by
the terms of the applicable plans. If any Sterling employee
compensation or benefits are changed or terminated by PNC, PNC
will provide those Sterling employees who continue to be
employed by PNC following the merger with compensation and
benefits that are, in the aggregate, substantially similar to
the compensation and benefits provided to similarly situated
employees of PNC.
In addition, PNC has agreed, to the extent any Sterling employee
participates in PNC compensation and benefit plans following the
merger, to recognize each such employees service with
Sterling prior to the completion of the merger for purposes of
eligibility, vesting and benefit accruals (other than benefit
accruals under defined benefit pension plans or that would
result in a duplication of benefits). For one year following the
merger, Sterling employees who continue to be employed by PNC
following the merger will participate in PNCs Displaced
Employee Assistance Plan and will receive severance benefits
equal to the greater of (i) the benefits payable under
PNCs Displaced Employee Assistance Plan or (ii) the
benefits payable under Sterlings Corporate Severance
Package Merger and Acquisition Related Downsizing had it not
been terminated. Following the one year anniversary of the
merger, such continuing employees will participate in PNCs
Displaced Employee Assistance Plan.
PNC has agreed to waive any coverage limitations for
pre-existing conditions under any PNC health plans, to the
extent such limitation would have been waived or satisfied under
a corresponding Sterling plan and to give credit for any
co-payment and deductibles paid under a corresponding Sterling
health plan for purposes of satisfying any applicable deductible
and out-of-pocket requirements under any health plan of PNC.
However, PNC has no obligation to continue the employment of any
Sterling employee, except Sterling employees that have entered
into separate employment agreements with PNC, for any period
following the merger and may review employee benefits programs
from time to time and make such changes as it deems appropriate.
Indemnification
and Insurance
The plan of merger requires PNC to indemnify and advance
expenses to present and former directors and officers of
Sterling and its subsidiaries against all costs or expense,
judgments, fines, losses, claims, damages, penalties, amounts
paid in settlement or other liabilities incurred in connection
with any claim, action, suit, proceeding or investigation
arising out of actions or omissions prior to the completion of
the merger, to the extent provided under Sterlings amended
and restated articles of incorporation or amended and restated
bylaws or indemnification agreements in effect on the date of
the plan of merger and, in addition, to the fullest extent
permitted by law.
The plan of merger provides that, for a period of six years
after completion of the merger, PNC will use its reasonable best
efforts to provide directors and officers liability
insurance to reimburse current and former directors and officers
with respect to claims arising at or prior to the completion of
the merger. The insurance will contain at least the same
coverage and amounts and contain terms and conditions that are
not less advantageous than the current coverage provided by
Sterling, except that PNC is not required to incur annual
premium expense greater than 250% of Sterlings current
annual directors and officers liability insurance
premium.
Conditions
to Complete the Merger
Our respective obligations to complete the merger are subject to
the fulfillment or waiver of certain conditions, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the approval of the merger by Sterling shareholders;
|
|
|
|
the receipt of all regulatory consents and approvals in
connection with the merger of Sterling into PNC and the merger
of certain banking subsidiaries of PNC and Sterling (in each
case unless the failure to
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
obtain such consents and approvals would not reasonably be
expected to have a material adverse effect on Sterling or PNC
measured on a scale relative to Sterling) without a condition or
a restriction that would have a material adverse effect on
Sterling or PNC, with materiality being measured on a scale
relative to Sterling;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the absence of any law, statute, rule, regulation, judgment,
decree, injunction or other order by any court or other
governmental entity, which is in effect and prohibits completion
of the merger;
|
|
|
|
the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this
document is a part with respect to the PNC common stock to be
issued in the merger under the Securities Act and the absence of
any stop order or proceedings initiated or threatened by the SEC
for that purpose; and
|
|
|
|
the receipt of all permits and other authorizations under United
States securities laws and other authorizations necessary to
complete the merger and to issue the shares of PNC common stock
in connection with the merger.
|
Each of PNCs and Sterlings obligations to complete
the merger is also separately subject to the satisfaction or
waiver of a number of conditions including:
|
|
|
|
|
the receipt by each of PNC and Sterling of a legal opinion with
respect to certain United States federal income tax consequences
of the merger;
|
|
|
|
the truth and correctness of the representations and warranties
of each other party in the plan of merger, subject to the
materiality standard provided in the plan of merger; and
|
|
|
|
the performance by each other party in all material respects of
their obligations under the plan of merger and the receipt by
each party of certificates from the other party to that effect.
|
We cannot provide assurance as to when or if all of the
conditions to the merger can or will be satisfied or waived by
the appropriate party. As of the date of this document, we have
no reason to believe that any of these conditions will not be
satisfied.
Termination
of the Plan of Merger
The plan of merger can be terminated at any time prior to
completion by mutual consent, if authorized by each of our
boards of directors, or by either party in the following
circumstances:
|
|
|
|
|
if the other party breaches the plan of merger in a way that
would entitle the party seeking to terminate the agreement not
to consummate the merger, unless the breach is capable of being,
and is, cured within 30 days of notice of the breach;
|
|
|
|
if the merger has not been completed by July 19, 2008,
unless the failure to complete the merger by that date is due to
the terminating partys breach of the plan of merger;
|
|
|
|
if the Sterling shareholders fail to approve the merger at the
special meeting; or
|
|
|
|
if there is any final, non-appealable order permanently
enjoining or prohibiting the completion of the merger.
|
In addition, PNC may terminate the plan of merger if the
Sterling board of directors (1) fails to recommend that
Sterling shareholders approve the merger or withdraws,
qualifies, or modifies its recommendation (or resolves to take
such action) in a manner adverse to PNC or (2) publicly
recommends or endorses an Acquisition Proposal (as
defined above in Agreement Not to Solicit
Other Offers), or resolves to do so. PNC may also
terminate the plan of merger if Sterling breaches its obligation
to call and hold a shareholder meeting to consider the merger or
its obligation not to solicit competing acquisition proposals.
Effect of Termination. If the plan of merger
is terminated, it will become void, and there will be no
liability on the part of PNC or Sterling, except that
(1) both PNC and Sterling will remain liable for any
52
willful breach of the plan of merger and (2) designated
provisions of the plan of merger, including the payment of fees
and expenses and the confidential treatment of information, will
survive the termination.
Termination
Fee
In the event that PNC terminates the plan of merger because the
Sterling board of directors publicly recommends or endorses an
Acquisition Proposal (as defined above in
Agreement Not to Solicit Other Offers)
in a manner adverse to PNC (or resolves to do so), Sterling will
pay PNC a $7 million termination fee. If Sterling
consummates an alternative transaction relating to such
Acquisition Proposal at any time, or consummates any other
alternative transaction before the twelve-month anniversary of
the termination of the plan of merger, Sterling will pay PNC a
$21 million termination fee, less any termination fee
previously paid.
In addition, we have agreed that if certain events occur
relating to an alternative business combination proposal and
thereafter the plan of merger is terminated by:
|
|
|
|
|
either Sterling or PNC because the Sterling shareholders do not
approve the merger at the shareholder meeting;
|
|
|
|
PNC because the Sterling board of directors fails to recommend
that Sterling shareholders approve the merger or withdraws,
qualifies, or modifies its recommendation in a manner adverse to
PNC (or resolves to take such action);
|
|
|
|
PNC because Sterling breaches its obligation to call and hold a
shareholder meeting to consider the merger or its obligation to
not solicit competing acquisition proposals; or
|
|
|
|
PNC because of a willful breach by Sterling that cannot be cured
or, if curable, is not cured within 30 days written notice
to Sterling of the breach;
|
and in connection with any of the above-listed events:
|
|
|
|
|
Sterling consummates an alternative transaction before the
twelve-month anniversary of the termination of the plan of
merger, Sterling will pay PNC a $21 million termination fee.
|
|
|
|
Sterling enters into any agreement related to any Acquisition
Proposal before the twelve-month anniversary of the termination
of the plan of merger, Sterling will pay PNC a $7 million
termination fee. If Sterling consummates an alternative
transaction relating to such agreement, Sterling will pay PNC a
$14 million termination fee.
|
Amendment,
Waiver and Extension of the Plan of Merger
Subject to applicable law, the parties may amend the plan of
merger by written agreement. At any time prior to the completion
of the merger, each of PNC and Sterling, to the extent legally
allowed, may waive in whole or in part any conditions to that
partys obligation to complete the merger.
Resales
of PNC Stock by Affiliates
Shares of PNC common stock to be issued to Sterling shareholders
in the merger have been registered under the Securities Act, and
may be traded freely and without restriction by those
shareholders not deemed to be affiliates (as that term is
defined under the Securities Act) of Sterling. Any subsequent
transfers of shares, however, by any person who is an affiliate
of Sterling at the time the merger is submitted for a vote of
the Sterling shareholders will, under existing law, require:
|
|
|
|
|
the further registration under the Securities Act of the PNC
stock to be transferred;
|
|
|
|
compliance with Rule 145 promulgated under the Securities
Act, which permits limited sales under certain
circumstances; or
|
|
|
|
the availability of another exemption from registration.
|
53
An affiliate of Sterling is a person who directly,
or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, is
controlled by, or is under common control with, Sterling. These
restrictions are expected to apply to the directors and
executive officers of Sterling and the holders of 10% or more of
the outstanding Sterling common stock. The same restrictions
apply to the spouses and certain relatives of those persons and
any trusts, estates, corporations or other entities in which
those persons have a 10% or greater beneficial or equity
interest.
PNC will give stop transfer instructions to the exchange agent
with respect to the shares of PNC common stock to be received by
persons subject to these restrictions, and the certificates for
their shares will be appropriately legended. PNC is not required
to further register the sale of PNC common stock to be issued to
affiliates of Sterling.
Sterling has agreed in the plan of merger to use all reasonable
best efforts to cause each person who is an affiliate of
Sterling for purposes of Rule 145 under the Securities Act
to deliver to PNC a written agreement intended to ensure
compliance with the Securities Act.
54
ACCOUNTING
TREATMENT
The merger will be accounted for as a purchase, as
that term is used under generally accepted accounting
principles, for accounting and financial reporting purposes.
Under purchase accounting, the assets (including identifiable
intangible assets) and liabilities (including executory
contracts and other commitments) of Sterling as of the effective
time of the merger will be recorded at their respective fair
values and added to those of PNC. Any excess of purchase price
over the fair values is recorded as goodwill. Consolidated
financial statements of PNC issued after the merger would
reflect these fair values and would not be restated
retroactively to reflect the historical financial position or
results of operations of Sterling.
55
MATERIAL
UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE
MERGER
The following section describes the material United States
federal income tax consequences of the merger to
U.S. holders (as defined below) of Sterling
common stock. This summary is based upon the provisions of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
Code), applicable current and proposed United States
Treasury Regulations, judicial authorities and administrative
rulings and practice, all as in effect as of the date of this
registration statement and all of which are subject to change,
possibly on a retroactive basis.
For purposes of this discussion, the term
U.S. holder means a beneficial owner of
Sterling common stock that is for United States federal income
tax purposes: (i) a citizen or resident of the United
States; (ii) a corporation, or other entity taxable as a
corporation, created or organized in or under the laws of the
United States or any state thereof or the District of Columbia;
(iii) a trust if it (a) is subject to the primary
supervision of a court within the United States and one or more
United States persons have the authority to control all
substantial decisions of the trust or (b) has valid
election in effect under applicable United States Treasury
Regulations to be treated as a United States person; or
(iv) an estate the income of which is subject to United
States federal income tax regardless of its source.
The United States federal income tax consequence to a partner in
an entity or arrangement treated as a partnership, for United
States federal income tax purposes, that holds Sterling common
stock generally will depend on the status of the partner and the
activities of the partnership. Partners in a partnership holding
Sterling common stock should consult their own tax advisors.
This discussion assumes that a U.S. holder holds Sterling
common stock as a capital asset within the meaning of
Section 1221 of the Code (generally, property held for
investment). This discussion does not address all aspects of
United States federal income taxation that may be relevant to a
U.S. holder in light of such holders particular
circumstances or to U.S. holders subject to special
treatment under the United States federal income tax laws
(including, for example, insurance companies, dealers or brokers
in securities or currencies, traders in securities who elect
mark-to-market treatment, tax-exempt organizations, financial
institutions, mutual funds, entities or arrangements treated as
partnerships for United States federal income tax purposes (and
holders holding Sterling common stock through such entities or
arrangements), United States expatriates, holders liable for the
alternative minimum tax, U.S. holders who hold Sterling
common stock as part of a hedging, straddle,
constructive sale, conversion or other integrated transaction,
holders whose functional currency for United States federal
income tax purposes is not the U.S. dollar, and
U.S. holders who acquired their Sterling common stock
through the exercise of employee stock options or other
compensation arrangements). In addition, the discussion does not
address any aspects of foreign, state, local, estate or gift
taxation that may be applicable to a U.S. holder.
Holders of Sterling common stock should consult with their
own tax advisors as to the particular tax consequences to them
of the merger, including the applicability and effect of the
alternative minimum tax and any state, local or foreign and
other tax laws.
Tax
Consequences of the Merger Generally
PNC and Sterling have structured the merger to qualify as a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Code. It is a condition to PNCs obligation to complete the
merger that PNC receive an opinion of its counsel, Wachtell,
Lipton, Rosen & Katz, dated the closing date of the
merger, to the effect that the merger will be treated as a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Code and that each of PNC and Sterling will be a party to the
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(b) of the
Code. It is a condition to Sterlings obligation to
complete the merger that Sterling receive an opinion of its
counsel, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, dated the closing
date of the merger, to the effect that the merger will be
treated as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code and that each of PNC and
Sterling will be a party to the reorganization within the
meaning of Section 368(b) of the Code. These opinions will
be based on facts, representations and assumptions set forth or
referred to in the opinions and on representation letters from
PNC and Sterling.
56
These tax opinions are not binding on the Internal Revenue
Service or any court, and neither PNC nor Sterling intends to
request any ruling from the Internal Revenue Service as to the
United States federal income tax consequences of the merger.
Consequently, no assurance can be given that the Internal
Revenue Service will not assert, or that a court would not
sustain, a position contrary to any of the conclusions set forth
below.
Assuming the merger qualifies as a reorganization within the
meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code, the material United
States federal income tax consequences of the merger to
U.S. holders of Sterling common stock are, in general, as
follows:
U.S. Holders Who Receive Solely PNC Common
Stock. If, pursuant to the merger, a
U.S. holder exchanges all of its shares of Sterling common
stock solely for shares of PNC common stock, such holder
generally will not recognize gain or loss, except with respect
to cash received instead of fractional shares of PNC common
stock (as discussed below). The aggregate adjusted tax basis of
the shares of PNC common stock received (including any
fractional shares deemed received and exchanged for cash) will
be equal to the aggregate adjusted tax basis in the shares of
Sterling common stock surrendered. The holding period of the PNC
common stock received (including any fractional shares deemed
received and exchanged for cash) will include the holding period
of the Sterling common stock surrendered in the merger.
U.S. Holders Who Receive Solely Cash. If,
pursuant to the merger, a U.S. holder exchanges all of its
shares of Sterling common stock solely for cash, such holder
generally will recognize capital gain or loss equal to the
difference between the amount of cash received and such
holders adjusted tax basis in the Sterling common stock
surrendered. The gain or loss recognized will be long-term
capital gain or loss if, as of the effective date of the merger,
the U.S. holders holding period in the Sterling
common stock surrendered exceeds one year. The deductibility of
capital losses is subject to limitations. If a U.S. holder
acquired different blocks of Sterling common stock at different
times or different prices, such U.S. holder must determine
its tax basis and holding period separately with respect to each
such block of Sterling common stock. In some cases, if the
U.S. holder actually or constructively owns PNC common
stock immediately before the merger, and holds it after the
merger, the cash received in the merger could be treated as
having the effect of the distribution of a dividend, under the
tests set forth in Section 302 of the Code, in which case
such cash received would be treated as dividend income. In such
cases, U.S. holders that are corporations should consult
their tax advisors regarding the potential applicability of the
extraordinary dividend provisions of the Code.
U.S. Holders Who Receive a Combination of PNC Common
Stock and Cash. If, pursuant to the merger, a
U.S. holder exchanges its shares of Sterling common stock
for a combination of PNC common stock and cash (other than cash
received in lieu of a fractional share), such holder generally
will recognize gain (but not loss) in an amount equal to the
lesser of (1) the sum of the amount of cash and the fair
market value of the PNC common stock received, minus the
adjusted tax basis of the Sterling common stock surrendered in
exchange therefor, and (2) the amount of cash received by
the holder. If a U.S. holder of Sterling common stock
acquired different blocks of Sterling common stock at different
times or different prices, the holder should consult the
holders tax advisor regarding the manner in which gain or
loss should be determined. Any recognized gain generally will be
long-term capital gain if, as of the effective date of the
merger, the U.S. holders holding period with respect
to the Sterling common stock surrendered exceeds one year. In
some cases, if the U.S. holder actually or constructively
owns PNC common stock other than PNC common stock received in
the merger, the recognized gain could be treated as having the
effect of the distribution of a dividend under the tests set
forth in Section 302 of the Code, in which case such gain
would be treated as dividend income. In such cases,
U.S. holders that are corporations should consult their tax
advisors regarding the potential applicability of the
extraordinary dividend provisions of the Code. The
aggregate tax basis of the PNC common stock received (including
any fractional shares deemed received and exchanged for cash) by
a U.S. holder that exchanges its shares of Sterling common
stock for a combination of PNC common stock and cash will be
equal to the aggregate adjusted tax basis of the shares of
Sterling common stock surrendered, reduced by the amount of cash
received by the holder (excluding any cash received instead of
fractional shares of PNC common stock) and increased by the
amount of gain, if any, recognized by the holder (excluding any
gain
57
recognized with respect to cash received instead of fractional
shares of PNC common stock) on the exchange. The holding period
of the PNC common stock received (including any fractional
shares deemed received and exchanged for cash) will include the
holding period of the Sterling common stock surrendered.
U.S. holders receiving a combination of PNC common stock
and cash should consult their tax advisors regarding the manner
in which cash and PNC common stock should be allocated among the
holders shares of Sterling common stock and the manner in
which the above rules would apply in the holders
particular circumstances.
Cash
Instead of Fractional Shares
A U.S. holder who receives cash instead of a fractional
share of PNC common stock generally will be treated as having
received such fractional share pursuant to the merger and then
as having received cash in exchange for such fractional share.
Gain or loss generally will be recognized based on the
difference between the amount of cash received instead of the
fractional share and the tax basis allocated to such fractional
share of PNC common stock. Such gain or loss generally will be
long-term capital gain or loss if, as of the effective date of
the merger, the holding period for the fractional share
(including the holding period for the shares of Sterling common
stock surrendered therefor) is greater than one year.
Information
Reporting and Backup Withholding
Cash payments received in the merger may, under certain
circumstances, be subject to information reporting and backup
withholding (currently at a rate of 28%), unless the holder
provides proof of an applicable exemption or furnishes its
taxpayer identification number, and otherwise complies with all
applicable requirements of the backup withholding rules. Any
amounts withheld from payments to a holder under the backup
withholding rules are not additional tax and will be allowed as
a refund or credit against the holders United States
federal income tax liability, provided that the required
information is timely furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.
58
INFORMATION
ABOUT THE COMPANIES
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc.
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. is a Pennsylvania
corporation, a bank holding company and a financial holding
company under U.S. federal law. PNC is one of the largest
diversified financial services companies in the United States
based on assets, with businesses engaged in retail banking,
corporate and institutional banking, asset management and global
fund processing services. PNC provides many of its products and
services nationally and others in PNCs primary geographic
markets located in Pennsylvania; New Jersey; Washington, DC;
Maryland; Virginia; Ohio; Kentucky; and Delaware. PNC also
provides certain global fund processing services
internationally. PNC stock is listed on the NYSE under the
symbol PNC. As of September 30, 2007, PNC had
total consolidated assets of approximately $131.4 billion,
total consolidated deposits of approximately $78.4 billion
and total consolidated stockholders equity of
approximately $14.5 billion. The principal executive
offices of PNC are located at One PNC Plaza, 249 Fifth
Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
15222-2707,
and its telephone number is
(412) 762-2000.
Additional information about PNC and its subsidiaries is
included in documents incorporated by reference in this
document. See Where You Can Find More Information on
page 74.
Sterling
Financial Corporation
Sterling Financial Corporation (NASDAQ: SLFI) is a diversified
financial services company based in Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
Sterling Banking Services Group affiliates offer a full range of
banking services in south-central Pennsylvania, northern
Maryland and northern Delaware. The group also offers
correspondent banking services in the mid-Atlantic region to
other companies within the financial services industry, and
banking related insurance services. Sterling Financial Services
Group affiliates provide specialty commercial financing; fleet
and equipment leasing; and investment, trust and brokerage
services. The principal executive offices of Sterling are
located at 101 North Pointe Boulevard, Lancaster, Pennsylvania
17601 and its telephone number is
(717) 581-6030.
For more information about Sterling, see Annex A,
Supplemental Information Regarding Sterling Financial
Corporation.
The information about Sterling provided in this proxy
statement/prospectus does not include financial statements and
related financial information covering the entire period
typically required by SEC regulations. In lieu thereof,
Sterling, with the concurrence of the SEC staff, has included in
this proxy statement/prospectus audited financial statements as
of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, and as of and
for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007. Other
financial information of Sterling, including under the heading
Selected Consolidated Historical Financial Data of
Sterling on page 11 and Comparative Per
Share Data on page 13 and in
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations in Annex A, also
is limited to this time period. Sterling believes, in light of
the information provided in this proxy statement/prospectus and
the difficulties facing Sterling, that the omitted information
is not a material omission in the proxy statement/prospectus.
59
COMPARISON
OF SHAREHOLDERS RIGHTS
PNC and Sterling are both incorporated under Pennsylvania law.
Any differences, therefore, in the rights of holders of PNC
common stock and Sterling common stock arise primarily from
differences in their respective articles of incorporation and
bylaws. Upon completion of the merger, the articles of
incorporation and bylaws of PNC in effect immediately prior to
the effective time of the merger will be the articles of
incorporation and bylaws of the combined company. Consequently,
after the effective time of the merger, the rights of former
Sterling stockholders will be determined by reference to the PNC
amended and restated articles of incorporation and amended and
restated bylaws, which we may refer to as its articles of
incorporation and bylaws, respectively. The
material differences between the rights of holders of PNC common
stock and Sterling common stock resulting from the differences
in their governing corporate instruments are summarized below.
This summary contains a list of the material differences but is
not meant to be relied upon as an exhaustive list or a detailed
description of the provisions discussed and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to the Pennsylvania Business Corporation
Law (PBCL) and the governing instruments of PNC and
Sterling, to which you are referred. The governing instruments
are subject to amendment in accordance with their terms. Copies
of the governing corporate instruments are available, without
charge, to any person, including any beneficial owner to whom
this document is delivered, by following the instructions listed
under Where You Can Find More Information.
Authorized
Capital
PNC
PNC is authorized under its articles of incorporation to issue
800,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $5.00 per
share, and 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value
$1.00 per share. As of December 31, 2007,
340,516,212 shares of PNC common stock were issued and
outstanding and 322,098 shares of preferred stock were
issued and outstanding.
Sterling
Sterling is authorized under its articles of incorporation to
issue 70,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $5.00
per share, and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock,
without par value. As of [ ],
[ ] shares of Sterling common
stock were issued and outstanding and no shares of preferred
stock were issued and outstanding.
Number of
Directors
PNC
The board of directors of PNC has 18 directors. The bylaws
of PNC provide that the number of directors will be not less
than 5 nor more than 36.
Sterling
Sterlings bylaws provide that its board of directors is
composed of between one and 25 directors. Presently, the
board of directors has 12 members.
Vacancies
PNC
Vacancies on PNCs board of directors, including vacancies
resulting from an increase in the number of directors, may be
filled by a majority of the remaining directors though less than
a quorum.
Sterling
Sterlings bylaws provide that vacancies on Sterlings
board of directors, for whatever reason, including vacancies
resulting from death, resignation, retirement, or an increase in
the number of directors, may be filled
60
by a majority vote of the remaining directors, even if less than
a quorum. Any director elected by Sterlings board of
directors to fill a vacancy shall hold office until the next
annual meeting of shareholders to elect his successor.
Special
Meetings of the Board
PNC
Special meetings of PNCs board of directors may be called
by the chairman of the board of directors, the chief executive
officer, the president, any vice chairman, or at the written
request of any three directors.
Sterling
Special meetings of the board of directors may be called by the
chairman of the board of the directors, by the president, or at
the request of three or more directors.
Stockholder
Rights Plans
PNC
While the PBCL authorizes a corporation to adopt a shareholder
rights plan, PNC does not have a shareholder rights plan
currently in effect.
Sterling
Sterling does not have a shareholder rights plan.
Classified
Board of Directors and Cumulative Voting
PNC
Pennsylvania law permits classified boards but PNC has not
adopted one.
Sterling
Sterlings board of directors is divided into three
classes, each serving three-year terms, so that as nearly as
possible of one-third of the directors are elected at each
annual meeting of shareholders. The board, however, does not
have to maintain exact equality of the number of directors in
each class.
Removal
of Directors
PNC
PNCs articles of incorporation do not expressly provide
for removal of directors. The PBCL provides that any director
may be removed by a vote of shareholders entitled to elect
directors. Shareholder removal of directors is restricted if the
board of directors is classified, if shareholders vote
cumulatively when electing directors, or if the bylaws contain
provisions addressing shareholder removal of directors, but none
of these restrictions apply to PNC. Directors may remove a
fellow director if he or she has been judicially declared of
unsound mind, has been convicted of an offense punishable by
imprisonment for more than one year or has failed to accept the
office, or upon any other proper cause that the bylaws may
specify. A court may remove a director upon application in a
derivative suit in cases of fraudulent or dishonest acts, gross
abuse of authority or discretion, or for any other proper cause.
Sterling
Sterlings articles of incorporation provide that the
affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding
Sterling stock entitled to vote in the election of directors can
remove any director or the entire board of directors from office
with cause. An affirmative vote of the holders of at least 75%
of the outstanding Sterling stock entitled to vote in the
election of directors can remove directors without cause.
61
Special
Meetings of Stockholders
PNC
Special meetings of the shareholders may be called, at any time,
only by the board of directors, the chairman of the board, the
president or a vice chairman of the board. While the PBCL
provides generally that in addition to the foregoing persons, a
group of shareholders entitled to cast at least 20% of the votes
that all shareholders are entitled to cast at the particular
meeting may call a special meeting, this provision does not
apply to, among others, corporations, such as PNC, that have a
class of voting shares registered under the Exchange Act, which
we refer to as registered corporations. Only business brought
before the meeting (1) pursuant to PNCs notice of
such meeting, (2) by the presiding officer or (3) at
the direction of a majority of the board, may be conducted at
such special meeting of shareholders.
Sterling
Sterlings chief executive officer or the executive
committee of the board of directors or the board of directors,
pursuant to a resolution adopted by the affirmative vote of a
majority of the board of directors, may each call a special
meeting of shareholders. Shareholders may not call special
meetings.
Notice of
Meetings of Shareholders
PNC
PNCs bylaws require at least five days written
notice of meetings of shareholders.
Sterling
Sterlings bylaws require at least ten days written
notice of meetings of shareholders.
Actions
by Stockholders without a Meeting
PNC
Under the PBCL, an action may be authorized by the shareholders
of a registered corporation without a meeting by less than
unanimous consent only if permitted by its articles of
incorporation. PNCs articles of incorporation do not
authorize such action.
Sterling
Sterlings articles of incorporation and bylaws provide
that no action required to be taken or which may be taken at any
annual or special meeting of the shareholders or of a class of
the shareholders of the corporation may be taken without a duly
called meeting. Additionally, the power of Sterlings
shareholders to consent in writing to action without a meeting
is specifically denied, except that action may be taken without
a meeting, if: (1) the number of shareholders of record is
three or less, and (2) a consent in writing setting forth
the action so taken is signed by all of the shareholders of
record and is filed with Sterlings secretary.
Amendment
of Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
PNC
PNCs articles of incorporation do not expressly provide
for amendment. Under the PBCL, an amendment to the articles of
incorporation can be proposed by adoption of a resolution by the
PNC board. An amendment must be submitted to a vote and approved
by a majority of the shareholders entitled to vote thereon and,
if any class or series of shares is entitled to vote thereon as
a class, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast in
each such class vote, except for amendments on matters specified
in Section 1914(c) of the PBCL that do not require
shareholder approval.
PNCs bylaws may be altered, amended, added to or repealed
by a vote of a majority of the PNC board at any regular meeting
of the PNC board or at any special meeting of the PNC board
called for that purpose.
62
However, PNCs articles of incorporation provide that the
authority to make, amend, and repeal bylaws, while vested in the
PNC board, is subject to the power of the shareholders to change
such action. Moreover, the PNC board may not adopt or change a
bylaw on certain subjects committed expressly to the
shareholders by Section 1504(b) of the PBCL.
Sterling
A majority of the board of directors and a majority of the
outstanding shares, voting together, can amend Sterlings
articles of incorporation. In addition, Sterlings articles
of incorporation may be amended by the affirmative vote of not
less than 75% of the outstanding common stock.
The power to make, amend, alter, change or repeal
Sterlings bylaws is vested in the board of directors. This
authority, however, is subject to the power of Sterlings
shareholders to make, amend, alter, change or repeal
Sterlings bylaws by an affirmative vote of not less than
75% of the outstanding stock entitled to vote.
Preemptive
Rights
PNC
PNC shareholders do not have preemptive rights.
Sterling
Each Sterling shareholder has the preemptive right to purchase:
(1) shares of the $5.00 par value Sterling common
stock which are to be issued for cash, and (2) any other
securities or obligations to be issued for cash by Sterling
which are entitled to vote in the election of directors. The
Sterling board of directors has full, complete and exclusive
authority to establish the terms and conditions upon which such
preemptive rights shall be extended to and may be exercised by
shareholders.
These preemptive rights do not apply with respect to sales of
treasury stock, the sale or issuance of shares pursuant to a
dividend reinvestment plan, the sale or issuance of shares to
employees of Sterling pursuant to any compensation plan, or the
issuance of shares pursuant to a merger, consolidation or other
business acquisition transaction.
Anti-Takeover
Provisions
PNC
PNC is subject to certain anti-takeover provisions of the PBCL.
Control Transactions: If any person or group
acquires at least 20% of the voting stock of PNC (with certain
exceptions for continuous ownership, shares acquired through
stock splits or stock dividends, underwriting shares, shares
held solely of record on behalf of a beneficial owner, and
shares acquired in transactions exempt from the registration
requirements of the Securities Act), each other holder of the
voting stock of PNC is entitled to an appraisal procedure under
which the controlling shareholder is required to pay each other
holder the fair value of his shares. Fair value is
determined taking into account all relevant factors, including
an increment representing a proportion of any value payable for
acquisition of control of the corporation. The minimum fair
value is the highest price per share paid by the controlling
person or group within the
90-day
period ending on and including the date of the control
transaction.
Business Combinations: PNC is prohibited from
engaging in any business combination with an interested
shareholder at any time, unless:
|
|
|
|
|
the business combination transaction or the transaction that
caused the person to become an interested shareholder was
approved by PNCs board of directors prior to the time the
person became an interested shareholder;
|
|
|
|
the business combination is approved by the holders of all of
the outstanding common shares;
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
the business combination is approved by the holders of a
majority of the outstanding voting stock, excluding shares held
by the interested shareholder, at a shareholders meeting
called for such purpose no earlier than five years after the
interested shareholders share acquisition date; or
|
|
|
|
all of the following conditions are met: (1) the aggregate
consideration paid by the interested shareholder meets certain
minimum per share requirements, is in cash or the same form as
the interested shareholder has used to acquire the largest
number of shares acquired in the past and is distributed
promptly; (2) the interested shareholder has not become the
beneficial owner of additional shares of common stock between
the date the interested shareholder became an interested
shareholder and the business combination; and (3) the
business combination (A) is approved by the holders of a
majority of the outstanding voting stock, excluding shares held
by the interested shareholder, at a meeting called for this
purpose no earlier than three months after the interested
shareholder became (and if at the time of the meeting the
interested shareholder remains) the beneficial owner of at least
80% of the outstanding voting stock, or (B) is approved by
a majority of votes cast by shareholders at a meeting called for
this purpose no earlier than five years after the interested
shareholder became an interested shareholder.
|
A business combination includes transactions such as
mergers, sales and leases of assets, issuances of securities,
reclassifications of securities and similar transactions. An
interested shareholder generally is any person who,
together with certain affiliates, beneficially owns 20% or more
of PNCs voting stock.
A corporation can expressly elect not to be governed by the
PBCLs control transaction and business combination
provisions by amending its articles of incorporation with board
of directors and shareholder approval, or, under certain
conditions, its bylaws, but PNC has not so opted out.
Control Share Acquisition: The PBCL prevents a
person or group acquiring different levels of voting power (20%,
33% and 50%) from voting any shares over the applicable
threshold, unless disinterested shareholders approve
such voting rights. PNC has opted out of this provision.
Disgorgement: The PBCL requires that any
person or group that publicly announces that it may acquire
control of a corporation, or that acquires or publicly discloses
an intent to acquire 20% or more of the voting power of a
corporation, to disgorge to the corporation any profits that it
receives from sales of the corporations equity securities
purchased over the prior 18 months. PNC has opted out of
this provision.
Constituency statute: The PBCL expands the
factors and groups (including shareholders) which a
corporations board of directors can consider in
determining whether an action is in the best interests of the
corporation.
Sterling
Sterling is subject to the same provisions of the PBCL relating
to business combinations and control transactions as is PNC,
with the following differences.
Control Transactions: Sterling has likewise
not opted out of this provision.
Business Combinations: In addition to, and not
instead of, the rights under the business combination provisions
of the PBCL, Sterlings articles of incorporation require
an affirmative vote of 75% of the outstanding shares entitled to
vote to approve a business combination with an interested
shareholder, or a
662/3%
vote if the business combination was approved by a board
resolution adopted by a majority of the continuing directors.
A business combination is defined similarly to the
definition in the PBCL, except that certain size thresholds are
lower than in the PBCL. An interested shareholder is
defined similarly to the definition in the PBCL, except that a
person, together with certain affiliates, must beneficially own
15% or more of Sterlings voting stock. A continuing
director means any member of Sterlings board of
directors who is unaffiliated with and is not a representative
of an interested shareholder and who was a member of
Sterlings board of directors prior to the time that any
interested shareholder became an interested shareholder, and
(b) any successor of a continuing director who is
unaffiliated with and is not a representative of an interested
64
shareholder and who is recommended to succeed a continuing
director by a majority of the continuing directors then members
of Sterlings board of directors.
Control Share Acquisition: Sterling has not
opted out of this provision.
Disgorgement: Sterling has not opted out of
this provision.
Constituency statute: In addition to the
constituency statute under the PBCL, Sterlings articles of
incorporation require, rather than permit, that Sterlings
board of directors give due consideration to various financial,
legal, social and economic factors and various non-shareholder
constituencies when evaluating whether certain acquisition
proposals are in the best interests of Sterling.
Sterling has the following additional anti-takeover provision in
its articles of incorporation.
Redemption right: If any person acquires
beneficial ownership of 30% or more of the outstanding Sterling
common stock, Sterling must within 30 days thereafter
extend to each Sterling shareholder, other than such person,
together with certain affiliates, an offer to redeem at any time
within 60 days of the date of such offer, all or any part
of the Sterling common stock owned by him at a redemption price
per share equal to the greatest of book value per share, the
highest price paid by the acquiring person for Sterling common
stock within the past 18 months, or the highest trading
price of Sterling common stock within the past 18 months.
Sterling is not required to extend a redemption offer to any
shareholder if a majority of the continuing directors, by
resolution adopted before the person involved has acquired
beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the outstanding Sterling
common stock, approves the acquisition by such person of 30% or
more of the outstanding Sterling common stock.
65
COMPARATIVE
MARKET PRICES AND DIVIDENDS
PNC common stock is listed on the NYSE (trading symbol: PNC) and
Sterling common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select
Market (trading symbol: SLFI) as more fully discussed under the
heading Listing of Sterling Common Stock on
the NASDAQ Global Select Market. The following table sets
forth the high and low sales prices of shares of PNC common
stock and Sterling common stock as reported on the NYSE and
NASDAQ, respectively, and the quarterly cash dividends declared
per share for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PNC Common Stock
|
|
|
Sterling Common Stock
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
71.42
|
|
|
$
|
61.78
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
22.00
|
|
|
$
|
19.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
72.00
|
|
|
|
65.30
|
|
|
|
0.55
|
|
|
|
21.90
|
|
|
|
19.74
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
73.55
|
|
|
|
68.09
|
|
|
|
0.55
|
|
|
|
22.79
|
|
|
|
20.75
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
75.15
|
|
|
|
67.61
|
|
|
|
0.55
|
|
|
|
24.20
|
|
|
|
21.31
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
76.41
|
|
|
|
68.60
|
|
|
|
0.55
|
|
|
|
24.05
|
|
|
|
21.02
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
76.15
|
|
|
|
70.31
|
|
|
|
0.63
|
|
|
|
22.44
|
|
|
|
9.25
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
75.99
|
|
|
|
64.00
|
|
|
|
0.63
|
|
|
|
18.10
|
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
74.56
|
|
|
|
63.54
|
|
|
|
0.63
|
|
|
|
18.48
|
|
|
|
15.18
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter (through [ ])
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
For a discussion of restrictions on the ability of Sterling to
pay dividends, please refer to Annex A, Supplemental
Information Regarding Sterling Financial Corporation
Business Supervision and Regulation.
On July 18, 2007, the last full trading day before the
public announcement of the plan of merger, the high and low
sales prices of shares of PNC common stock as reported on the
NYSE were $73.87 and $72.60, respectively. On
[ ], the last full trading day
before the date of this document, the high and low sale prices
of shares of PNC common stock as reported on the NYSE were
$[ ] and
$[ ], respectively.
On July 18, 2007, the last full trading day before the
public announcement of the plan of merger, the high and low
sales prices of shares of Sterling common stock as reported on
NASDAQ were $10.71 and $10.30, respectively. On
[ ], the last full trading day
before the date of this document, the high and low sale prices
of shares of Sterling common stock as reported on NASDAQ were
$[ ] and
$[ ], respectively.
As of [ ], the last date prior to
printing this document for which it was practicable to obtain
this information, there were approximately
[ ] registered holders of PNC
common stock and approximately
[ ] registered holders of
Sterling common stock.
PNC shareholders and Sterling shareholders are advised to obtain
current market quotations for PNC common stock and Sterling
common stock. The market price of PNC common stock and Sterling
common stock will fluctuate between the date of this document
and the completion of the merger. No assurance can be given
concerning the market price of PNC common stock or Sterling
common stock before or after the effective date of the merger.
Listing
of Sterling Common Stock on the NASDAQ Global Select
Market
Because Sterling has not filed its Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarters ended March 31, 2007, June 30, 2007,
and September 30, 2007, it is not in compliance with the
continuing listing requirements set forth in NASDAQ Marketplace
Rule 4310(c)(14). Based on a plan for regaining compliance
with this requirement, Sterling presented a plan to the NASDAQ
Listing Qualifications Panel, which we refer to as the
66
Panel, on June 28, 2007. The Panel, on August 14,
2007, granted Sterlings request for continued listing of
its common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market until
November 12, 2007. On October 3, 2007, the NASDAQ
Listing and Hearing Review Council, which we refer to as the
Council, called Sterlings case for review. Because
Sterling was not able to satisfy the terms of its plan for
regaining compliance by November 12, the Panel, on
November 13, 2007, issued a decision to delist
Sterlings common stock from the NASDAQ Global Select
Market. However, during the pending review of Sterlings
case by the Council, the delisting decision was stayed and
Sterlings common stock continues to be listed and traded
on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. On January 22, 2008,
the Council granted an extension for delisting Sterlings
common stock until March 24, 2008, at which time Sterling
must be compliant with the NASDAQ listing requirements, or its
common stock will be delisted as of March 26, 2008.
67
RECENT
DEVELOPMENTS REGARDING STERLING
In connection with the preliminary results of the independent
investigation described in more detail under The
Merger Background of the Merger and below
under Results of the Independent
Investigation, Sterling initially reported on May 24,
2007 that Sterling expected to record a cumulative after-tax
charge to the December 31, 2006 financial statements of
approximately $145 million to $165 million.
On November 14, 2007, Sterling reported that, as Sterling
worked toward finalizing its evaluation of the impact of the
loan scheme, the audit committee, upon the recommendation of
management, through its Disclosure Committee concluded on
November 13, 2007 that an additional cumulative after-tax
charge of approximately $35 million may be necessary under
generally accepted accounting principles. This additional charge
related to certain financing contracts delinquent more than
120 days that would be charged off completely, regardless
of underlying collateral values and payments from customers, and
previously recorded goodwill related to the EFI acquisition that
Sterling deemed impaired. Sterling believes that a portion of
these assets will be recovered as a result of Sterlings
collection and repossession efforts. With this additional
charge, Sterlings current cumulative after-tax estimate of
the write-down of assets is approximately $200 million.
The independent investigation has been completed. Stradley Ronon
Stevens & Young, LLP, the law firm engaged by the
audit committee to conduct the independent investigation,
presented the findings of the investigation to Sterlings
audit committee on November 12, 2007 and to the board of
directors on November 13, 2007.
Results
of the Independent Investigation
The independent investigation into irregularities at EFI was
initiated in April when Sterling management received information
suggesting irregularities related to certain financing contracts
at EFI. Upon receiving information about the irregularities,
management immediately notified the chairman of the board of
directors, the boards audit committee, and Sterlings
independent auditors, Ernst & Young LLP, and the audit
committee hired legal counsel, Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young LLP, to conduct an independent investigation. With the
audit committees approval, Stradley Ronon
Stevens & Young engaged a forensic accounting firm,
KPMG LLP, to assist in the investigation. The investigators
conducted approximately 100 interviews of current and former EFI
and Sterling employees, reviewed approximately 300 boxes of
documents, reviewed nearly 700,000 electronic documents, and
reviewed information pertaining to more than 4,000 active and
inactive EFI loans dating back to 2002, when Sterling acquired
EFI.
The investigators concluded that two of EFIs senior
officers, its chief operating officer and its executive vice
president, with the assistance of a number of other EFI
employees, certain customers, and other third parties,
perpetuated a fraud scheme that subverted virtually every aspect
of EFIs loan process, including its internal controls.
This confirmed the initial findings Sterling announced on
May 24.
In addition, the investigators reported there was no evidence
that any member of Sterling management or any non-EFI personnel
of Sterling or its affiliates participated in or had any
knowledge of the scheme.
Sterlings board of directors adopted a number of
corrective measures, most of which have been completed, for the
purpose of remediating and preventing any repetition of the
events at EFI.
Restatement
Status and Related Matters
Sterling has completed the restatement of its financial
statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006
and has completed its financial statements as of and for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007, and these financial
statements have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP. If
the merger is not completed, Sterling expects to continue to
work to complete the restatement of all of its financial
statements required to become current in its reporting
obligations under the federal securities laws and regulations
and NASDAQ listing rules.
68
In the event the merger is not completed, Sterling believes that
it would experience serious operational difficulties and other
negative consequences. Sterling would be required to implement
its alternative liquidity and capital plans, including taking
the actions set forth in its corrective action plans submitted
to its primary banking regulators, in order to return BLC Bank
to well managed and well capitalized
status. Sterling would continue not to pay dividends to its
shareholders or on trust preferred securities until capital
levels are restored and would need to raise significant amounts
of capital in a dilutive manner. If Sterling were not successful
in executing one or more of its alternatives to raise a
sufficient amount of capital or improve the liquidity position
at Sterling, serious consequences could occur, including:
enforcement actions from bank regulatory authorities and other
governmental authorities; the loss of employees; responses to
and defenses of the actions and litigation described below under
Civil Litigation and that may arise in
the future; responses to requests by governmental entities for
information and documents and entering into related agreements,
orders or settlements; remedial measures, including, changes to
Sterlings management and/or policies and internal controls
and procedures; and actions with respect to Sterlings
capital levels. If all strategic alternatives in the corrective
action plans fail, bank regulatory enforcement and remedial
action may be possible against Sterling and/or its subsidiaries,
which may include restricting ongoing business and operations
and may possibly result in civil money penalties.
Regulatory
Matters
As noted in The Merger Background of the
Merger, Sterling and BLC Bank experienced capital
constraints resulting from the financial irregularities at EFI.
In May 2007, as a result of regulatory, supervisory, and
examination activities related to the EFI situation, Sterling
and BLC Bank became subject to requirements that they obtain
approval of the Federal Reserve Board and the OCC, respectively,
prior to adding new directors or employing new senior executive
officers and that they refrain from making golden
parachute payments as defined in applicable regulations
without prior regulatory approval. Under applicable regulations,
BLC Bank also became subject to restrictions on its ability to
pay dividends and management fees, restrictions on asset growth
and expansion, and restrictions on deposit interest rates and
brokered deposits.
Sterling is registered with the Federal Reserve Board as a
financial holding company under the amendments of
the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 to the Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956. Under these provisions, a financial holding company
is granted certain advantages in regulatory procedures and
powers, which we refer to as GLB Procedures and Powers. Among
other things, to qualify as a financial holding company, each of
the holding companys insured depository institution
subsidiaries must be well managed and well
capitalized as defined in applicable regulations. As a
result of supervisory, regulatory, and examination activities,
Sterling was advised by the Federal Reserve Board that Sterling
no longer satisfies financial holding company requirements for
purposes of the GLB Procedures and Powers due to BLC Banks
undercapitalized and less than well
managed status. Pursuant to regulations applicable to
financial holding companies, Sterling submitted a plan on
August 7, 2007 to enhance management and improve the
overall condition of BLC Bank by December 17, 2007, or such
longer period as may be permitted by the Federal Reserve Board.
In light of the pending merger, on December 6, 2007,
Sterling submitted a request to the Federal Reserve Board for an
extension of the December 17 compliance date until
June 14, 2008 to achieve the required enhancements, which
the Federal Reserve Board granted on January 8, 2008. The
action plan includes the implementation of a comprehensive
enterprise risk management plan, the continued centralized
oversight of EFI, the implementation of a plan to centralize
controls at Sterlings other financial services group
subsidiaries, and the continued implementation of
Sterlings liquidity and capital plans.
Pursuant to regulations applicable to financial holding
companies, Sterling also submitted a plan to restore BLC
Banks capital to specified levels by February 4,
2008, or such longer period as may be permitted by the Federal
Reserve Board. In light of the pending merger, on
December 6, 2007, Sterling submitted a request to the
Federal Reserve Board for an extension until June 14, 2008
to achieve the specified capital levels, which the Federal
Reserve Board granted on January 8, 2008. In its capital
restoration plan, and in addition to the restrictions noted
above, Sterling committed that, until specified capital levels
are achieved, Sterling will not pay dividends either to its
shareholders or on trust preferred securities and will not
engage in
69
any new activities or make new investments permissible pursuant
to the GLB Procedures and Powers without prior approval of the
Federal Reserve Board.
Until Sterling is able to satisfy the financial holding company
requirements, Sterling may also be subject to limitations on its
current activities. The failure to satisfy the requirements in
its management and capital restoration plans in a timely fashion
could result in Sterlings loss of Sterlings
financial holding company status and additional consequences
described in Annex A.
Quantitative measures that have been established by regulation
to ensure capital adequacy require Sterling and its banking
subsidiaries to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of total and
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets and Tier 1
capital to risk-weighted assets. Sterling management believes
that, as of September 30, 2007, Sterling and BLC Bank did
not meet the minimum capital adequacy requirements to which they
were subject. For the period ended December 31, 2006,
management believes that Sterling and Bank of Lancaster County
did not meet the minimum capital adequacy requirements due to
the restatement of prior period losses related to EFI. As a
result, under applicable regulations and in addition to the
restrictions described above, BLC Bank must submit a capital
restoration plan to the OCC within a specified period of time
and Sterling must execute a guarantee to the effect the BLC Bank
will comply with the capital restoration plan. BLC Bank also
will be required to pay higher assessments for FDIC deposit
insurance than depository institutions that are better
capitalized. See also Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
OperationsCapital in Annex A.
Civil
Litigation
Based upon the facts and circumstances known to Sterling and its
counsel regarding the pending or threatened civil litigation
described below, Sterling has not established a reserve or
accrued liability for any amount in its September 30, 2007
balance sheet.
Securities
Class-Action
Lawsuits in Federal Court
Several putative
class-action
lawsuits have been filed on behalf of persons who acquired
Sterling common stock during the period from April 27, 2004
through May 24, 2007. Each complaint alleges, in substance,
that Sterlings public statements and filings fraudulently
omitted information and included fraudulent misrepresentations,
in April and May 2007, about the improprieties at EFI and their
impact upon Sterlings earnings, and that the price for
Sterling stock was fraudulently inflated during the class period
because of the omissions and misrepresentations. Each complaint
alleges claims (1) under Section 10(b) of the Exchange
Act, and (2) against Controlling Persons or
Controlling Defendants, under Section 20(a) of
the Exchange Act. The specific lawsuits are listed below:
Steve Macrina v. J. Roger Moyer, Jr., Thomas
Dautrich, George W. Graner, Equipment Finance LLC, and Bank of
Lancaster, N.A., 07 Civ. 4108 (Southern District of New
York) (filed May 25, 2007)
Raymond D. Buckwalter v. Sterling Financial Corporation,
Equipment Finance LLC, J. Roger Moyer, Jr., Thomas
Dautrich, George W. Graner, Bradley Scovill, and John Doe
Defendants 1-20, 2:07-cv-02171-LS (Eastern District of
Pennsylvania) (filed May 29, 2007)
Brian Johnson v. J. Roger Moyer, Jr., J. Bradley
Scovill and Tito Lima, 1:07-cv-04652 (Southern District of
New York) (filed June 1, 2007)
Castle Strategic Trading, LLC v. J. Roger
Moyer, Jr., Thomas Dautrich, George W. Graner, Equipment
Finance LLC, and Bank of Lancaster, N.A., 07 Civ. 5594
(Southern District of New York) (filed June 12, 2007)
Jeffrey M. Cooley v. Sterling Financial Corporation, J.
Roger Moyer, Jr., J. Bradley Scovill and Tito Lima, 07
CV 5671 (Southern District of New York) (filed June 14,
2007)
Kevin Simpson v. Sterling Financial Corporation, Bank of
Lancaster County, N.A., Equipment Finance LLC, J. Roger
Moyer, Jr., Tito Lima, J. Bradley Scovill, George W.
Graner, Thomas Dautrich, and John Doe NOS. 1-20,
2:07-cv-02171-LS (Eastern District of Pennsylvania) (filed
June 20, 2007)
70
Miller et al v. Sterling Financial Corp., Equipment
Finance LLC, J. Roger Moyer, Jr., Thomas Dautrich, George
W. Graner, J. Bradley Scovill, and John Doe NOS. 1-20,
2:07-cv-02694-LS (Eastern District of Pennsylvania) (filed
June 28, 2007)
Kenneth G. Stoudt et al v. Sterling Financial
Corp., Equipment Finance LLC, J. Roger Moyer, Jr., Thomas
Dautrich, George W. Graner, J. Bradley Scovill, and Tito L.
Lima, 2:07-cv-02914-LS (Eastern District of Pennsylvania)
(filed July 16, 2007)
Frederica F. Haas et al v. Sterling Financial
Corp., Equipment Finance LLC, J. Roger Moyer, Jr., Thomas
Dautrich, George W. Graner, J. Bradley Scovill, and Tito L.
Lima, 2:07-cv-03094-LS (Eastern District of Pennsylvania)
(filed July 30, 2007)
On October 30, 2007, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation ordered that the lawsuits filed originally in New
York be transferred to the U.S. District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania and, with the consent of that
court, assigned to the Honorable Lawrence F. Stengel for
coordinated pretrial proceedings.
At a status conference on December 18, 2007, Judge Stengel
appointed the Public Employees Retirees Association of New
Mexico and the New Mexico Educational Retirement Board as lead
plaintiffs. On consent, the court also gave plaintiffs
60 days to file a consolidated amended complaint, and
Sterling another 60 days to respond by motion or otherwise.
Certain Sterling shareholders who are members of the purported
class and who received Sterling common shares as consideration
in transactions where Sterling acquired the entity have informed
Sterling that they are considering filing claims against
Sterling in addition to those asserted in the purported
securities class action for breach of contract and federal and
state securities law violations.
Potential
Shareholder Derivative Litigation
Sterling received a shareholder demand letter, dated
June 6, 2007, from Brian M. Felgoise, an attorney acting on
behalf of then-undisclosed shareholders. Mr. Felgoise
demanded that (1) the Sterling board of directors appoint a
Special Litigation Committee to investigate and remediate
possible breaches of duties by certain unnamed officers and
directors during the period from April 2004 through May 24,
2007, and (2) that Sterling file suit against these unnamed
individuals to recover damages, including bonuses, the costs of
investigations, and the proceeds of insider trading.
Mr. Felgoise stated that he would commence litigation on
behalf of Sterling if it did not take the demanded steps within
90 days.
In response to Sterlings request for additional
information, Mr. Felgoise disclosed that he represents Judy
Horowitz, identified as a Pennsylvania resident and Sterling
shareholder since 1990. Mr. Felgoise also stated that an
investigation should be directed at those individuals who were
members of the board of directors of Sterling and who were
responsible for the financial reporting for Sterling.
Mr. Felgoise also requested that the board of directors
investigate whether the aforementioned individuals have
properly disclosed all of the material factors regarding the
sale to PNC, whether the price of $565 million
in cash and stock is fair and reasonable, and whether any
other bids were solicited, received
and/or
rejected.
On August 29, 2007, Sterling informed Mr. Felgoise
that, prior to his June 6, 2007 demand letter, Sterling had
commenced an internal investigation into the improprieties at
EFI, and that the board of directors would determine what kinds
of measures, in addition to the actions previously announced,
may be appropriate upon the completion of this independent
investigation. The response also informed Mr. Felgoise that
Sterlings sale to PNC was approved by the board of
directors and properly disclosed in the Companys documents
and public filings. In his response on September 18, 2007,
Mr. Felgoise requested additional details about the
internal investigation; on October 16, 2007, Sterling
informed Mr. Felgoise that the independent investigation
was being conducted by the law firm of Stradley Ronon
Stevens & Young, with the assistance of KPMG, and that
Sterling expected the investigation to conclude in 2007.
71
Civil
Litigation in State Court
On September 24, 2007, Univest National Bank &
Trust Co. filed suit against EFI and Sterling, in the Court
of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, Pennsylvania. Univest
alleges that, beginning in 2005, it purchased from EFI 31 loans
with a present value of $6.2 million, and that the loans
had a higher rate of delinquency than was represented to it by
Sterling and EFI. Univest brings claims of (1) breach of
contract against EFI; (2) rescission for negligent
misrepresentation/nondisclosure against EFI and Sterling;
(3) fraudulent misrepresentation against EFI and Sterling;
(4) breach of fiduciary duty against EFI;
(5) conversion against EFI; (6) aiding and abetting
breach of fiduciary duty against Sterling; and
(7) conspiracy against EFI and Sterling. Univest seeks
damages of $1,987,224.76, along with punitive damages, costs,
interest, and other relief as the court deems appropriate.
On December 10, 2007, Woodlands Bank filed suit against
Sterling and EFI in the Court of Common Pleas of Lycoming
County, Pennsylvania for claims allegedly arising out of
Woodlands purchase of certain equipment loans from EFI.
Woodlands asserts the following claims against Sterling
and/or EFI:
(1) breach of contract; (2) rescission for negligent
misrepresentation/non-disclosure; (3) fraudulent
misrepresentation; (4) breach of fiduciary duty;
(5) conversion; and (6) aiding and abetting breach of
fiduciary duty. Woodlands seeks $7,848,210.99 (the alleged value
of the 55 outstanding equipment loans purchased by Woodlands),
plus interest, costs, and attorneys fees for its claims of
breach of contract and rescission. In addition to that relief,
Woodlands also seeks punitive damages and costs of the suit for
its other claims.
On November 28, 2007, First Commonwealth Bank filed a writ
of summons with respect to Sterling and EFI in the Court of
Common Pleas of Indiana County, Pennsylvania in connection with
claims allegedly arising out of First Commonwealths
purchase of certain equipment loans from EFI. A complaint has
not been filed in this action.
On June 5, 2007, EFI received a letter from NexTier Bank
demanding that EFI immediately repurchase all loans assigned by
EFI to NexTier Bank pursuant to a master assignment agreement.
According to the demand letter, the loan in question had an
aggregate outstanding principal balance, as of June 1,
2007, of approximately $1.2 million.
On December 27, 2007, Sterling and EFI received a letter
from counsel for Farmers and Merchants Trust Company of
Chambersburg, which we refer to as F&M, demanding that EFI
immediately repurchase from F&M all of the outstanding
loans purchased by F&M pursuant to three specified loan
purchase agreements.
Other
Investigations
The SEC is conducting a non-public investigation into the EFI
situation. Sterling is cooperating with the SEC and providing
information in response to SEC requests. The United States
Attorneys Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
also is investigating the EFI situation. Sterling is cooperating
with that investigation and providing information in response to
the United States Attorneys Offices requests.
72
LEGAL
MATTERS
The validity of the PNC common stock to be issued in connection
with the merger will be passed upon for PNC by George P.
Long, III, Senior Counsel and Corporate Secretary of PNC.
Certain U.S. federal income tax consequences relating to
the merger will also be passed upon for PNC by Wachtell, Lipton,
Rosen & Katz, and for Sterling by Sullivan &
Cromwell LLP.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of PNC incorporated in
this proxy statement/prospectus by reference from PNCs
Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A
Amendment No. 1 and managements report on the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/prospectus
from PNCs Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A
Amendment No. 2, for the year ended December 31, 2006
have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an
independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in
their reports which are incorporated herein by reference (which
reports (1) express an unqualified opinion on the
consolidated financial statements and include explanatory
paragraphs relating to the restatement of the consolidated
statements of cash flows, PNCs adoption of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standard No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension
and Other Postretirement Plans an amendment of FASB
Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R) and
PNCs use of the equity method of accounting to recognize
its investment in BlackRock, Inc, (2) express an
unqualified opinion on managements assessment regarding
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
and (3) express an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting), and have been so
incorporated in reliance upon the reports of such firm given
upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of Sterling as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2006, and as of and for the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2007, appearing in
this proxy statement/prospectus and registration statement have
been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent
registered public accounting firm, as set forth in their report
thereon appearing elsewhere herein, and are included in reliance
upon such report given on the authority of such firm as experts
in accounting and auditing.
OTHER
MATTERS
According to the Sterling articles of incorporation and bylaws,
business to be conducted at a special meeting of shareholders
may only be brought before the meeting pursuant to a notice of
meeting. Included within the notice of meeting must be a
statement of the general nature of the business to be transacted
at the special meeting.
Sterling
2008 Annual Meeting Shareholder Proposals
Sterling will hold a 2008 annual meeting of shareholders only if
the merger is not completed as contemplated by the plan of
merger. If it is determined that the merger will not be
completed as contemplated by the plan of merger, Sterling will
provide notice of the date fixed for the annual meeting, as well
as the deadline for submitting shareholder proposals for such
meeting and to have shareholder proposals included in
Sterlings proxy statement.
Householding
Information
Pursuant to SEC rules, Sterling sends a single proxy statement
to multiple shareholders who share the same address and who have
the same last name, unless we receive instructions to the
contrary from one or more of the shareholders. This method of
delivery is known as householding. Upon written or
oral request, a separate copy of the proxy statement, as
applicable, will be delivered promptly to a shareholder at a
shared address to which a single copy of the documents was
previously delivered or, if you wish to receive a separate proxy
statement
and/or
annual report in the future, please call Shareholder Relations
at
(717) 735-4066
or send a written request to Shareholder Relations, Sterling
Financial Corporation, 101 North Pointe Boulevard, Lancaster,
Pennsylvania 17601.
73
COMMISSION
POSITION ON INDEMNIFICATION FOR SECURITIES ACT
LIABILITIES
The PNC bylaws provide for indemnification for current and
former directors, officers, employees, or agents serving at the
request of the corporation to the fullest extent permitted by
Pennsylvania law. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities
arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors,
officers or persons controlling the registrant pursuant to the
foregoing provisions, the registrant has been informed that in
the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public
policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore
unenforceable.
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
PNC has filed with the SEC a registration statement under the
Securities Act that registers the distribution to Sterling
shareholders of the shares of PNC common stock to be issued in
connection with the merger. The registration statement,
including the attached exhibits and schedules, contains
additional relevant information about PNC and PNC stock. The
rules and regulations of the SEC allow us to omit certain
information included in the registration statement from this
document.
You may read and copy this information at the Public Reference
Room of the SEC at 100 F Street, NE, Room 1580,
Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the
operation of the SECs Public Reference Room by calling the
SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC also maintains an internet website that contains
reports, proxy statements and other information about issuers,
like PNC and Sterling, who file electronically with the SEC. The
address of the site is www.sec.gov. The reports and other
information filed by PNC with the SEC are also available at
PNCs internet website. The address of the site is
www.pnc.com. The reports and other information filed by Sterling
with the SEC are also available at Sterlings internet
website. The address of the site is www.sterlingfi.com. We have
included the web addresses of the SEC, PNC, and Sterling as
inactive textual references only. Except as specifically
incorporated by reference into this document, information on
those websites is not part of this document.
The SEC allows PNC to incorporate by reference information in
this document. This means that PNC can disclose important
information to you by referring you to another document filed
separately with the SEC. The information incorporated by
reference is considered to be a part of this document, except
for any information that is superseded by information that is
included directly in this document.
This document incorporates by reference the documents listed
below that PNC previously filed with the SEC. They contain
important information about PNC and its financial condition.
74
|
|
|
PNC SEC Filings
|
|
|
(SEC File No. 001-09718; CIK No. 0000713676)
|
|
Period or Date Filed
|
|
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006 (as amended by
Form 10-K/A
filed on February 4, 2008 and
Form 10-K/A
filed on February 6, 2008)
|
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
|
|
Quarters ended March 31, 2007 (as amended by Form 10-Q/A
filed on February 4, 2008), June 30, 2007 (as amended by
Form 10-Q/A filed on February 4, 2008) and September
30, 2007 (as amended by Form 10-Q/A filed on
February 4, 2008)
|
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
|
|
Filed on January 10, 2007, January 24, 2007, February 2, 2007,
February 9, 2007, February 20, 2007, March 6, 2007, March 7,
2007, March 8, 2007, March 28, 2007, March 30, 2007, April 30,
2007, June 13, 2007, June 14, 2007, July 3, 2007, July 19, 2007,
July 25, 2007, August 13, 2007, October 1, 2007,
January 22, 2008 and February 4, 2008 (two filings)
(other than the portions of those documents not deemed to be
filed)
|
The description of PNC common stock set forth in a registration
statement filed pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act
and any amendment or report filed for the purpose of updating
those descriptions
|
|
|
In addition, PNC also incorporates by reference additional
documents that it files with the SEC under Sections 13(a),
13(c), 14 and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, between the date of this document and the date of the
Sterling special meeting. These documents include periodic
reports, such as Annual Reports on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
and Current Reports on
Form 8-K,
as well as proxy statements.
Sterling is currently not eligible to incorporate in this
document by reference any documents that it filed, or may file
in the future, with the SEC under Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14
and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
PNC has supplied all information contained or incorporated by
reference in this document relating to PNC, as well as all pro
forma financial information, and Sterling has supplied all
information relating to Sterling.
Documents incorporated by reference, as well as certain other
documents described in this proxy statement/prospectus, are
available from PNC and Sterling without charge, excluding any
exhibits to those documents unless the exhibit is specifically
incorporated by reference as an exhibit in this document. You
can obtain documents incorporated by reference in this document
and certain other documents described in this document by
requesting them in writing or by telephone from the appropriate
company at the following addresses:
|
|
|
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
|
|
Sterling Financial Corporation
|
One PNC Plaza
|
|
101 North Pointe Boulevard
|
249 Fifth Avenue
|
|
Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17601-4133
|
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
15222-2707
|
|
Attention: Shareholder Relations
|
Attention: Shareholder Relations
|
|
Telephone: (717) 735-4066
|
Telephone:
(800) 843-2206
|
|
|
Email: investor.relations@pnc.com
|
|
|
Sterling shareholders requesting documents should do so by
[ ] to receive them before the
special meeting. You will not be charged for any of these
documents that you request. If you request any incorporated
documents or certain other documents from PNC or Sterling, PNC
or Sterling will mail them to you by first class mail or another
equally prompt means after it receives your request.
75
Neither PNC nor Sterling has authorized anyone to give any
information or make any representation about the merger or our
companies that is different from, or in addition to, that
contained in this document or in any of the materials that have
been incorporated in this document. Therefore, if anyone does
give you information of this sort, you should not rely on it. If
you are in a jurisdiction where offers to exchange or sell, or
solicitations of offers to exchange or purchase, the securities
offered by this document or the solicitation of proxies is
unlawful, or if you are a person to whom it is unlawful to
direct these types of activities, then the offer presented in
this document does not extend to you. The information contained
in this document speaks only as of the date of this document
unless the information specifically indicates that another date
applies.
This document contains a description of the representations
and warranties that each of PNC and Sterling made to the other
in the plan of merger. Representations and warranties made by
PNC, Sterling and other applicable parties are also set forth in
contracts and other documents (including the plan of merger)
that are attached or filed as exhibits to this document or are
incorporated by reference into this document. These
representations and warranties were made as of specific dates,
may be subject to important qualifications and limitations
agreed to between the parties in connection with negotiating the
terms of the plan of merger, and may have been included in the
plan of merger for the purpose of allocating risk between the
parties rather than to establish matters as facts. These
materials are included or incorporated by reference only to
provide you with information regarding the terms and conditions
of the plan of merger, and not to provide any other factual
information regarding Sterling, PNC or their respective
businesses. Accordingly, the representations and warranties and
other provisions of the plan of merger should not be read alone,
but instead should be read only in conjunction with the other
information provided elsewhere in this document or incorporated
by reference into this document.
76
ANNEX
A
Supplemental
Information Regarding Sterling Financial Corporation
Table of
Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
|
|
|
A-3
|
|
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
|
|
|
A-15
|
|
|
|
|
A-17
|
|
|
|
|
A-19
|
|
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
|
|
|
A-54
|
|
|
|
|
A-58
|
|
A-1
INTRODUCTION
Restatement
of the Financial Information
This annex to the proxy statement/prospectus includes, with
respect to Sterling Financial Corporation (which we refer to as
Sterling, the company, we,
or us), a restatement of its consolidated balance
sheet as of December 31, 2006 and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders equity and cash
flows for the year ended December 31, 2006. Sterlings
decision to restate these financials is the result of a
voluntary, independent investigation that was initiated by
Sterling and conducted by the audit committee of the board of
directors as a result of significant fraudulent activity that
occurred in its forestry commercial financing subsidiary,
Equipment Finance, LLC (EFI) (which we refer to in
this annex as the EFI Matter). The restatement is to
correct the financial statements for fraudulent activities
identified at EFI as more fully described in
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and Note 2,
Restatement of the Consolidated Financial Statements
to the consolidated financial statements.
On April 30, 2007, Sterling announced that the previously
issued financial statements included in its reports on
Form 10-K,
Form 10-Q
and
Form 8-K
filed by Sterling from January 1, 2004 through
April 19, 2007, and the reports on the audited financial
statements and related internal controls issued by its
independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst &
Young LLP, and all earnings releases issued and similar
communications issued by Sterling for 2004 through 2006, should
no longer be relied upon due to the expected material impact of
the irregularities. The financial information included in this
report supersedes the previously issued financial statements for
2006 and managements discussion and analysis thereof.
For purposes of providing comparative analysis in the
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations section of this annex, balance sheet
line items as of December 31, 2006 are compared to the
balance sheet items as at September 30, 2007. Results of
operations, changes in shareholders equity, cash flows,
and average balances, for the
12-month
period ended December 31, 2006 are compared to the
12-month
period ended September 30, 2007 (which includes the
unaudited three months ended December 31, 2006, plus the
nine months ended September 30, 2007).
Independent
Investigation
On April 19, 2007, Sterling announced that in early April
2007, Sterling management received information suggesting
irregularities in certain financing contracts at EFI. Upon
receiving information regarding the irregularities, management
immediately notified the chairman of the board of directors, the
boards audit committee, and Sterlings independent
auditors, Ernst & Young LLP and the audit committee
hired legal counsel, Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young,
LLP (which we refer to as Stradley Ronon), to
conduct an independent investigation. With the audit
committees approval, Stradley Ronon engaged a forensic
accounting firm, KPMG LLP, to assist in the investigation (we
refer to Stradley Ronon and KPMG as the
investigators). Sterling also retained Promontory
Financial Group to review its internal controls and procedures
and related matters.
On May 24, 2007, Sterling publicly reported that it had
determined that, under U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles, it would be required to record a material impairment
of certain assets of EFI, which it expected to record as a
cumulative after-tax charge to the financial statements for the
year ended December 31, 2006, estimated to be in the range
of $145 million to $165 million based upon the results
of the investigations preliminary findings. These assets
included EFI financing contracts, interest associated with those
contracts, and potential goodwill attributable to EFI.
On November 14, 2007, Sterling reported that, as Sterling
worked toward finalizing its evaluation of the impact of the EFI
Matter, the audit committee, upon the recommendation of
management, through its disclosure committee, concluded on
November 13, 2007 that an additional cumulative after-tax
charge of approximately $35 million may be necessary under
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. This
additional charge related to certain financing contracts
delinquent more than 120 days that would be charged off
completely, regardless of underlying collateral values and
payments from customers, and previously recorded goodwill
related to the EFI acquisition that Sterling deemed impaired.
A-2
The independent investigation has been completed. Stradley Ronon
presented its findings of the independent investigation to
Sterlings audit committee on November 12, 2007 and to
the board of directors on November 13, 2007.
Results
of the Independent Investigation
The investigators conducted approximately 100 interviews of
current and former EFI and Sterling employees, reviewed
approximately 300 boxes of documents, reviewed nearly 700,000
electronic documents, and reviewed information pertaining to
more than 4,000 active and inactive EFI loan documents dating
back to 2002, when Sterling acquired EFI.
The investigators concluded that two of EFIs senior
officers, its chief operating officer, and its executive vice
president, with the assistance of a number of other EFI
employees, certain customers and other third parties,
perpetuated a fraud scheme that subverted virtually every aspect
of EFIs loan process, including its internal controls. The
investigators concluded that these employees colluded to
misapply cash receipts, underwrite contracts to third parties
that did not have the financial wherewithal to repay the loan,
and used various deceptive methods to conceal credit
delinquencies, non-accrual finance receivables, repossession
information, and other loan quality monitoring statistics in
order to deceive Sterling management and other parties utilizing
such information to evaluate the performance of EFI. The
investigators concluded that a significant amount of EFI finance
receivables were either completely invalid or were in a
significant non-performing status.
In addition, the investigators reported that there was no
evidence that any member of Sterling management or any non-EFI
personnel of Sterling or any of its affiliates participated in
or had any knowledge of the scheme.
Sterlings board of directors adopted a number of
corrective measures, most of which have been completed, for the
purpose of remediating and preventing any repetition of the
events at EFI.
BUSINESS
Sterling Financial Corporation is a $3.2 billion financial
holding company headquartered in Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
Sterling was incorporated in Pennsylvania in 1987. Through its
banking and non-banking subsidiaries, Sterling provides a full
range of banking and financial services to individuals and
businesses through the following four business segments:
Community Banking and Related Services; Leasing; Commercial
Finance; and Trust and Investment Services. The Other segment
includes the parent company and discontinued operations.
In October 2006, Sterling completed the acquisition of Bay Net
Financial, Inc. and its wholly owned thrift subsidiary, Bay Net
A Community Bank. At the date of acquisition, Bay Net Financial,
Inc. was merged into Sterling, and Bay Net A Community Bank
merged with Sterlings wholly owned subsidiary, First
National Bank of North East. The resulting bank changed its name
to Bay First Bank, N.A. as part of the bank merger.
Sterling acquired Bay Net Financial, Inc. in order to enhance
its banking franchise in Cecil, Harford and neighboring counties
of Maryland.
On December 27, 2006, Sterling announced changes to its
Insurance Related Services segment that resulted in the
divestiture of three related lines of business associated with
this segment. On December 26, 2006, Sterling entered into a
definitive agreement to sell Corporate Healthcare Strategies,
LLC and Professional Services Group. On December 27, 2006,
Sterling entered into a definitive agreement to sell certain
insurance assets of its personal property and casualty insurance
agency, Lancaster Insurance Group, LLC. Sterling closed on each
of these transactions on December 31, 2006. As a result of
these actions, Sterling discontinued operations in the Insurance
Related Services segment and this segment is no longer
reportable.
All prior period results included herein have been reclassified
to conform to the current presentation which displays the
operating results of the divested businesses as discontinued
operations. These
A-3
reclassifications had no effect on net income or
stockholders equity. Unless otherwise noted, the remaining
discussion and tabular data relate only to Sterlings
continuing operations.
Community
Banking and Related Services
The Community Banking and Related Services segment provides
financial services to consumers, businesses, financial
institutions and governmental units in south central
Pennsylvania, northern Maryland and northern Delaware. These
services include providing various types of loans to customers,
accepting deposits, mortgage banking and other traditional
banking services. Major revenue sources include net interest
income and service fees on deposit accounts. Expenses include
personnel and branch network support charges. The Community
Banking and Related Services segment lends money to the Leasing
and Commercial Finance segments, which represents the
inter-segment eliminations.
As a result of the EFI Matter, the capital levels of Sterling
and its banking subsidiary Bank of Lancaster County, N.A., the
direct parent of EFI, were significantly depleted. In order to
rebuild capital levels at Bank of Lancaster County, Sterling, on
May 25, 2007, merged its banking subsidiaries Bank of
Hanover and Trust Company, Pennsylvania State Bank, and Bay
First Bank, N.A. into Bank of Lancaster County, which changed
its name to BLC Bank, N.A. (which we refer to as BLC
Bank). Each of the branches of the respective former banks
continue to operate under their respective pre-merger trade
name, as divisions of BLC Bank, with the same personnel and the
same types of products and services. These actions were taken as
part of the capital restoration plan which Sterling developed to
address the events at EFI, as more fully discussed in the main
body of the proxy statement/prospectus under the heading
Recent Developments Regarding Sterling.
The Community Banking and Related Services segment at
September 30, 2007 was comprised of our banking affiliates,
as summarized below (dollars in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank Name
|
|
Offices
|
|
|
Markets Served
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
BLC Bank, N.A.(1)
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
Adams County, PA
|
|
$
|
2,356
|
|
|
$
|
2,696
|
|
|
$
|
3,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Berks County, PA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chester County, PA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumberland County, PA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dauphin County, PA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lancaster County, PA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lebanon County, PA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
York County, PA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carroll County, MD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cecil County, MD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harford County, MD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware Sterling Bank & Trust Company
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
New Castle County, DE
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For the purpose of this table, BLC Bank, N.A. includes only the
banking subsidiaries, which include Bank of Hanover and
Trust Company, Pennsylvania State Bank, Bay First Bank and
Bank of Lancaster County. |
In addition to its network of 68 office locations, the Community
Banking and Related Services segment delivers its services
through alternative delivery channels, including the ATM
network, Internet and telephone banking.
The Community Banking and Related Services segments
geographic market is comprised of diverse economies in
Pennsylvania, Maryland and Delaware with agriculture,
manufacturing, tourism, government, healthcare, technology,
education and financial services all contributing to the overall
strength of the economy. No single sector dominates the
regions economy.
A-4
The banks are subject to regulation and periodic examination by
their regulators, including the Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency for BLC Bank, N.A. and the Delaware Office of the State
Bank Commissioner and the FDIC for the state chartered,
non-member bank, Delaware Sterling Bank &
Trust Company. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,
to the maximum extent provided by law, insures the banks
deposits.
At September 30, 2007, the Community Banking and Related
Services segment represented approximately 85% of
Sterlings consolidated assets, and had net income of
$9.3 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2007. The Community Banking and Related Services segment has
absorbed $15.3 million or 78.6% of the investigation costs
associated with the EFI Matter during this period.
Leasing
Town & Country Leasing, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary
of BLC Bank, represents the sole affiliate within the Leasing
segment. This segment provides fleet management, equipment
financing and leasing alternatives to customers headquartered
primarily in Pennsylvania and surrounding states. Through its
customers branch offices, the Leasing segment conducts
business in all 50 states.
At September 30, 2007, the Leasing segment represented
approximately 9% of Sterlings consolidated assets, and had
net income of $2.1 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007. Major revenue sources include net
interest income and rental income on operating leases. Expenses
include personnel, support and depreciation charges on operating
leases.
Commercial
Finance
Equipment Finance, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of BLC Bank,
represents the sole affiliate within the Commercial Finance
segment. Prior to the discovery of financial irregularities in
April 2007, EFI specialized in financing forestry and
land-clearing equipment for the soft wood pulp business utilized
primarily in the paper industry through equipment dealers.
EFIs primary area of operation is the southeastern United
States.
On April 19, 2007, Sterling announced that it had received
information suggesting irregularities in certain financing
contracts at EFI. For further discussion of ongoing matters with
respect to EFI, please refer to the discussion in the main body
of the proxy statement/prospectus under the heading Recent
Developments Regarding Sterling.
At September 30, 2007, the Commercial Finance segment
represented approximately 4% of Sterlings consolidated
assets, which is comprised primarily of a current and deferred
tax asset associated with the losses incurred due to the EFI
Matter discussed earlier, and the segment had a net loss of
$12.1 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2007. The major remaining revenue source is recovery income from
managements collections of previously charged-off loans.
Operating expenses include personnel and support charges.
Trust
and Investment Services
The Trust and Investment Services segment consists of Sterling
Financial Trust Company, Church Capital Management, LLC
(which we refer to as Church Capital) and Bainbridge
Securities, Inc. Church Capital is an investment advisor
registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (which we
refer to as the SEC) and Bainbridge Securities is a
broker dealer and member firm of the Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority (commonly known as FINRA) that
offers complementary products and services to the more
traditional wealth management services.
This segment includes both corporate asset and personal wealth
management services. The corporate asset management business
provides retirement planning services, investment management,
custody and other corporate trust services to small to medium
size businesses in Sterlings market area. Personal wealth
management services include investment management, brokerage,
estate and tax planning, as well as trust management and
administration for high net worth individuals and their families.
A-5
For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007, the
Trust and Investment Services segment had net income of
$1.4 million. In addition, the Trust and Investment
Services segment had assets under administration of
approximately $2.8 billion. Major revenue sources include
management and estate fees and commissions on security
transactions. Expenses primarily consist of personnel and
support charges, as well as amortization of intangible assets.
Other
The parent company and discontinued operations are included in
the Other category of the Segment Reporting footnote
(Note 24). Sterlings major sources of operating
funds, as a parent company, are dividends received from its
subsidiaries and reimbursement of operating expenses from its
subsidiaries. In addition, in 2007, the parent company obtained
a 364-day
$80.0 million line of credit from Manufacturers and Traders
Trust Company (hereafter referred to as M&T
Bank), secured by the stock of BLC Bank, and drew upon
$70.0 million of it to provide additional capital to BLC
Bank. Sterlings expenses are primarily operating expenses.
Dividends that Sterling pays to its shareholders are funded
primarily by dividends paid to Sterling by its subsidiaries. Due
to the EFI Matter and the related negative impact on capital,
BLC Bank is precluded from paying dividends to Sterling until
capital levels at BLC Bank have been restored to well
capitalized after which payment of dividends will be
conditioned on approval by BLC Banks primary regulator.
For more detailed financial information pertaining to our
operating segments, please refer to Note 24 of the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Sterling and its subsidiaries do not have any portion of their
businesses dependent on a single or limited number of customers,
the loss of which would have a material adverse effect on their
businesses. No substantial portions of their loans or
investments are concentrated within a single industry or group
of related industries, although a significant amount of loans
are secured by real estate located in south central Pennsylvania
and northern Maryland. The businesses of Sterling and its
subsidiaries are not seasonal in nature.
Competition
The financial services industry in Sterlings market areas
is highly competitive, including competition from commercial
banks, savings banks, credit unions, finance companies and
non-bank providers of financial services. Several of
Sterlings competitors have legal lending limits that
exceed those of Sterlings subsidiaries, as well as funding
sources in the capital markets that exceed Sterlings
availability. The increased competition has resulted from a
changing legal and regulatory climate, as well as from the
economic climate.
Environmental
Compliance
Although we believe our operations are in material compliance
with applicable environmental laws and regulations, risks of
significant costs and liabilities are inherent in the lending
environment, and we cannot assure that significant costs and
liabilities will not be incurred. Moreover, it is possible that
other developments, such as increasingly strict environmental
laws and regulations and enforcement policies, and claims for
damages to property or persons resulting from our
customers properties for which we provided loans, could
result in substantial costs and possible liability to us. We
believe that changes in environmental laws and regulations will
not have a material adverse effect on our financial position,
results of operations or cash flows in the near term.
Supervision
and Regulation
Bank holding companies and banks operate in a highly regulated
environment and are regularly examined by federal and state
regulatory authorities. The following discussion highlights
various federal and state laws and regulations and the potential
impact of such laws and regulations on Sterling and its
subsidiaries. To the extent that this information describes
statutory or regulatory provisions, it is qualified in its
entirety by reference to the particular statutory or regulatory
provisions themselves. Proposals to change laws and regulations
are frequently introduced in Congress, the state legislatures,
and before the various regulatory agencies. Sterling cannot
determine the likelihood or timing of any such proposals or
legislation or the impact
A-6
they may have on Sterling and its subsidiaries. A change in law,
regulations or regulatory policy may have a material effect on
the business of Sterling and its subsidiaries. As discussed
elsewhere in this document, as a result of the losses related to
the EFI Matter, Sterlings and Bank of Lancaster
Countys capital were significantly depleted. In response,
Sterling developed a capital restoration plan. First, Sterling
merged four of its subsidiary banks and BLC Bank in May 2007
into one charter, BLC Bank, in order to consolidate capital.
Second, Sterling obtained an $80.0 million
364-day line
of credit from M&T Bank, secured by the stock of BLC Bank,
$70.0 million of which was drawn upon and contributed to
BLC Bank as capital.
In addition to the following discussion of the supervision and
regulation to which Sterling and its subsidiary banks are
subject, please refer to the discussion in the main body of the
proxy statement/prospectus under the headings Recent
Developments Regarding Sterling, and The
Merger Background of the Merger with regard to
the capital and liquidity issues resulting from the EFI Matter
and its regulatory consequences.
Bank
Holding Company Regulation
Sterling is a bank holding company that has also elected to
become a financial holding company. As a bank
holding company, Sterling is subject to the regulations of the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (which we refer
to as the Federal Reserve) under the Bank Holding
Company Act of 1956, as amended (which we refer to as the
BHC Act). Bank holding companies are required to
file periodic reports with, and are subject to examination by,
the Federal Reserve. The BHC Act requires a bank holding company
to serve as a source of financial and managerial strength to its
banking subsidiaries, which may result in providing adequate
capital funds to the banks during periods of financial stress or
adversity.
The BHC Act prohibits Sterling from acquiring direct or indirect
control of more than 5% of the outstanding voting stock of any
bank or thrift, or substantially all of the assets of any bank
or thrift, or merging with another bank holding company, without
the prior approval of the Federal Reserve. The BHC Act allows
interstate bank acquisitions and interstate branching by
acquisition and consolidation subject to certain limitations.
The Pennsylvania Department of Banking also must approve any
similar consolidation. Pennsylvania law permits Pennsylvania
financial holding companies to control an unlimited number of
banks.
In addition, the BHC Act restricts our non-banking activities to
those that are determined by the Federal Reserve to be financial
in nature, incidental to such financial activity, or
complementary to a financial activity. The BHC Act does not
place geographic restrictions on the activities of non-bank
subsidiaries of financial holding companies.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act
requires a bank holding company to guarantee the compliance of
any insured depository institution subsidiary that may become
undercapitalized, as defined by regulations, with
the terms of any capital restoration plan filed by such
subsidiary with its appropriate federal banking agency, up to
specified limits.
Financial
Services Modernization Legislation
In November 1999, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999, or the GLB
Act, was enacted. As a result of the passage of the GLB Act, new
opportunities became available to financial institution holding
companies as a result of the removal of restrictions under a
regulatory framework that had its origin in the Great Depression
of the 1930s. In addition, the GLB Act also contains provisions
that expressly preempt any state law restricting the
establishment of financial affiliations, primarily related to
insurance.
The general effect of the GLB Act is to permit banks, other
depository institutions, insurance companies and securities
firms to enter into combinations that result in a single
financial services organization that offer customers a wider
array of financial services and products through a new entity
known as a financial holding company.
Financial activities is broadly defined to include
not only banking, insurance and securities activities, but other
activities incidental to such financial activities or
complementary activities that do not pose a substantial risk to
the safety and soundness of depository institutions or the
financial system generally.
A-7
The GLB Act also permits national banks to engage in expanded
activities through the formation of financial subsidiaries.
Since April 2001, Sterling has been registered with the Federal
Reserve as a financial holding company and has
utilized the opportunities available under the GLB Act
(amendment) to expand into a diversified holding company.
Sterling acquired Equipment Finance, LLC in February 2002,
Church Capital Management LLC and Bainbridge Securities, Inc. in
October 2003, Stoudt Advisors in May 2004, Lancaster Insurance
Group, LLC in June 2004, and the assets of Infinity Investment
Advisors in December 2005. Sterling also acquired several banks
during that time.
Nevertheless, the GLB Act may have the result of increasing the
amount of competition that Sterling faces from larger
institutions and other types of companies offering financial
products, many of which may have substantially more financial
resources than does Sterling.
As noted above, Sterling is registered with the Federal Reserve
as a financial holding company under the GLB Act.
Among other things, to qualify as a financial holding company,
each of the holding companies insured depository
institution subsidiaries must be well managed and
well capitalized as defined in applicable
regulations. In this regard, Sterling has been advised by the
Federal Reserve that Sterling no longer satisfies the
requirements to be eligible to be a financial holding company.
Pursuant to regulations applicable to financial holding
companies, Sterling submitted a plan to enhance management and
improve the overall condition of BLC Bank. The action plan
includes the implementation of a comprehensive enterprise risk
management plan, the continued centralized oversight of EFI, the
implementation of a plan to centralize controls at
Sterlings other financial services group subsidiaries, and
the continued implementation of Sterlings liquidity and
capital plans
Pursuant to regulations applicable to financial holding
companies, Sterling also submitted a plan to restore BLC
Banks capital to specified levels. In its capital
restoration plan, and in addition to the restrictions noted
above, Sterling committed that, until specified capital levels
are achieved, Sterling will not pay dividends either to its
shareholders or on trust preferred securities and will not
engage in any new activities or make new investments permissible
pursuant to the GLB Act without prior approval of the Federal
Reserve.
Until Sterling is able to satisfy the financial holding company
requirements, Sterling may also be subject to limitations on its
current activities. The failure to satisfy the requirements in
its management and capital restoration plans in a timely fashion
could result in Sterlings loss of Sterlings
financial holding company status and additional consequences.
USA
Patriot Act of 2001
On October 26, 2001, the USA Patriot Act of 2001 was
enacted. The USA Patriot Act contains the International Money
Laundering Abatement and Financial Anti-Terrorism Act of 2001
(which we refer to as the IMLAFA), which sets forth
anti-money laundering measures affecting insured depository
institutions, broker-dealers and other financial institutions.
The IMLAFA requires U.S. financial institutions to adopt
policies and procedures to combat money laundering and grants
the Secretary of the Treasury broad authority to establish
regulations and to impose requirements and restrictions on the
operations of financial institutions.
Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
In July 2002, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was enacted. The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act represents a comprehensive revision of laws
affecting corporate governance, accounting obligations and
corporate reporting. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act is applicable to all
companies with equity securities registered under, or that file
reports under, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In
particular, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act established: (i) new
requirements for audit committees addressing independence,
expertise and responsibilities; (ii) additional
responsibilities regarding financial statements for the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the reporting
company; (iii) new standards for auditors and regulation of
audits; (iv) increased disclosure and reporting obligations
for the reporting company and its directors and executive
officers; and (v) new and increased civil and criminal
penalties for violations of the securities laws. Many of
A-8
the provisions were effective immediately, while other
provisions became effective over a period of time and are
subject to rulemaking by the SEC and the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board. Because Sterlings common stock
is registered with the SEC, it is subject to this Act.
Since 2002, the SEC and the NASDAQ have issued new regulations
affecting our corporate governance and heightening our
disclosure requirements. The new requirements include enhanced
proxy statement disclosures on corporate governance and
executive compensation, stricter independence requirements for
the board of directors and its committees, posting of various
SEC reports on our website, and documentation, testing and
analysis of our internal controls and procedures.
Regulation W
Sterling and its banking affiliates are subject to
Regulation W, which provides guidance on permissible
activities and transactions between a bank and its affiliated
companies. In general, subject to certain specified exemptions,
a bank and its subsidiaries cannot engage in covered
transactions (as defined below) with affiliates:
|
|
|
|
|
that amount to more than 10% of the banks capital and
surplus, in the case of covered transactions with any one
affiliate; and
|
|
|
|
that amount to more than 20% of the banks capital and
surplus, in the case of covered transactions with all affiliates.
|
In addition, a bank and its subsidiaries may engage in covered
transactions and other specified transactions only on terms and
under circumstances that are substantially the same, or at least
as favorable to the bank or its subsidiary, as those prevailing
at the time for comparable transactions with nonaffiliated
companies. A covered transaction includes:
|
|
|
|
|
a loan or extension of credit to an affiliate;
|
|
|
|
a purchase of, or an investment in, securities issued by an
affiliate;
|
|
|
|
a purchase of assets from an affiliate, with some exceptions;
|
|
|
|
the acceptance of securities issued by an affiliate as
collateral for a loan or extension of credit to any
party; and
|
|
|
|
the issuance of a guarantee, acceptance or letter of credit on
behalf of an affiliate.
|
In addition, under Regulation W:
|
|
|
|
|
a bank and its subsidiaries may not purchase a low-quality asset
from an affiliate;
|
|
|
|
covered transactions and other specified transactions between a
bank or its subsidiaries and an affiliate must be on terms and
conditions that are consistent with safe and sound banking
practices; and
|
|
|
|
with some exceptions, each loan or extension of credit by a bank
to an affiliate must be secured by collateral with a market
value ranging from 100% to 130%, depending on the type of
collateral, of the amount of the loan or extension of credit.
|
Check
21
The Check Clearing for the
21st Century
Act, or Check 21 as it is commonly known, became
effective on October 28, 2004. Check 21 facilitates check
collection by creating a new negotiable instrument called a
substitute check that permits, but does not require,
banks to replace original checks with substitute checks or
information from the original check and process the check
information electronically. Banks that do not use substitute
checks must comply with certain notice and recredit rights.
Check 21 is expected to cut the time and cost involved in
physically transporting paper items and reduce float (i.e., the
time between the deposit of a check in a bank and payment),
especially in cases in which items were not already being
delivered
same-day or
overnight.
A-9
Dividends
Sterling is a legal entity separate and distinct from its
subsidiary banks and non-bank subsidiaries. Its revenues, on a
parent company only basis, result almost entirely from dividends
paid to Sterling by its subsidiaries. Federal and state laws
regulate the payment of dividends by our subsidiaries, as
outlined in the Supervision and Regulation
Regulation of the Banks section below.
Further, Federal Reserve policy dictates that bank holding
companies should pay dividends only out of current earnings.
Federal banking regulators also have the authority to prohibit
banks and bank holding companies from paying a dividend if they
deem such payment to be an unsafe or unsound practice.
As a direct result of the events at EFI, as discussed under the
headings Introduction and Business, BLC
Bank did not meet the minimum capital adequacy requirements to
be deemed to be well capitalized due to the
significance of the losses incurred at EFI. Sterling developed a
capital restoration plan, in consultation with its banking
regulators, to restore its capital and BLC Banks capital.
As part of this plan, BLC Bank is restricted from paying
dividends to Sterling until such time as Sterlings capital
levels are restored. Further, Sterling is restricted from paying
dividends to its shareholders until such time as Sterlings
capital levels are restored.
FDIC
Insurance
The subsidiary banks are subject to Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation assessments. The FDIC has adopted a risk-related
premium assessment system. Under this system, FDIC insurance
premiums are assessed based on capital and supervisory measures.
Under the risk-related premium assessment system, the FDIC, on a
semiannual basis, assigns each institution to one of three
capital groups, well capitalized, adequately
capitalized, or under capitalized, and further
assigns such institution to one of three subgroups within a
capital group corresponding to the FDICs judgment of its
strength based on supervisory evaluations, including examination
reports, statistical analysis, and other information relevant to
gauging the risk posed by the institution. Only institutions
with a total risk-based capital to risk-adjusted assets ratio of
10% or greater, a Tier 1 capital to risk-adjusted assets
ratio of 6% or greater, and a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 5%
or greater, are assigned to the well-capitalized group. As of
September 30, 2007, BLC Bank and Delaware Sterling
Bank & Trust Company qualify as under
capitalized and well capitalized respectively,
under these regulatory standards. As such, BLC Bank is subject
to certain restrictions. See the section entitled Recent
Developments Regarding Sterling Regulatory
Matters in the main body of the proxy statement/prospectus.
Federal
Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005
The Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005 (which we refer
to as the Reform Act) was signed into law on
February 8, 2006 and amended current laws regarding the
federal deposit insurance system. The legislation merged the
Bank Insurance Fund and the Savings Association Insurance Fund
to form the Deposit Insurance Fund (which we refer to as the
DIF), eliminated any disparities in bank and thrift
risk-based premium assessments, reduced the administrative
burden of maintaining and operating two separate funds and
established certain new insurance coverage limits and a
mechanism for possible periodic increases. The legislation also
gave the FDIC greater discretion to identify the relative risks
all institutions present to the DIF and to set risk-based
premiums.
Major provisions in the legislation include:
|
|
|
|
|
merging the Savings Association Insurance Fund and Bank
Insurance Fund, which became effective March 31, 2006;
|
|
|
|
maintaining basic deposit and municipal account insurance
coverage at $100,000 but providing for a new basic insurance
coverage for retirement accounts of $250,000. Insurance coverage
for basic deposit and retirement accounts could be increased for
inflation every five years in $10,000 increments beginning in
2011;
|
A-10
|
|
|
|
|
providing the FDIC with the ability to set the designated
reserve ratio within a range of between 1.15% and 1.50%, rather
than maintaining 1.25% at all times regardless of prevailing
economic conditions;
|
|
|
|
providing a one-time assessment credit of $4.7 billion to
banks and savings associations in existence on December 31,
1996, which may be used to offset future premiums with certain
limitations;
|
|
|
|
requiring the payment of dividends of 100% of the amount that
the insurance fund exceeds 1.5% of the estimated insured
deposits and the payment of 50% of the amount that the insurance
fund exceeds 1.35% of the estimated insured deposits (when the
reserve is greater than 1.35% but no more than 1.5%); and
|
|
|
|
providing for a new risk-based assessment system that allows the
FDIC to establish separate risk-based assessments for large and
small members of the DIF.
|
On November 2, 2006, the FDIC set the designated reserve
ratio for the deposit insurance fund at 1.25% of estimated
insured deposits, and adopted final regulations to implement the
risk-based deposit insurance assessment system mandated by the
Reform Act, which is intended to more closely tie each
banks deposit insurance assessments to the risk it poses
to the deposit insurance fund. Under the new risk-based
assessment system, the FDIC will evaluate each
institutions risk based on three primary factors:
supervisory ratings for all insured institution, financial
ratios for most institutions, and long-term debt issuer ratings
for large institutions that have them. An institutions
assessment rate will depend upon the level of risk it poses to
the deposit insurance system as measured by these factors. The
new rates for most institutions will vary between 5 and 7 cents
for every $100 of domestic insurable deposits.
The new assessment rates took effect on January 1, 2007.
However, the Reform Act provides credits to institutions that
paid high premiums in the past to bolster the FDICs
insurance reserves, as a result of which the FDIC has announced
that a majority of banks will have assessment credits to
initially offset a portion of their premiums in 2007.
Institutions that are not well capitalized will have certain
limitations on the amount of assessment credits that can be
applied against the 2007 premiums.
As discussed earlier, BLC Banks current capital level is
categorized as undercapitalized. BLC Bank is
regulated by Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (which we
refer to as the OCC). As a result of the losses
related to the EFI Matter, Sterlings and BLC Banks
capital were significantly depleted. Until such time as BLC Bank
has restored its capital to a level satisfactory to the OCC, BLC
Bank is restricted from paying dividends to Sterling which has
had a negative impact on Sterlings dividend policy. In the
second quarter of 2007, Sterling announced that it had
suspended, for an indeterminate amount of time, the payment of
dividends to its shareholders. This action was taken primarily
because Sterling relies on receiving dividends from BLC Bank to
pay such dividends.
Regulation
of Banks
The operations of Sterlings banking subsidiaries are
subject to federal and state statutes, and are subject to the
regulations of the OCC, the FDIC and the Delaware Office of the
State Bank Commissioner.
The OCC, the primary supervisory authority over national banks,
and the FDIC, the primary regulator of state chartered banks,
regularly examine the subsidiary banks in such areas as
reserves, loans, investments, management practices, electronic
banking and other aspects of operations. These examinations are
designed for the protection of the banks depositors rather
than our shareholders. The subsidiary banks must file quarterly
and annual reports with the FDIC and Federal Reserve.
The National Bank Act requires Sterlings subsidiary
national banks to obtain the prior approval of the OCC for the
payment of dividends if the total of all dividends declared by
the bank in one year would exceed the banks net profits,
as defined and interpreted by regulation, for the two preceding
years, less any required transfers to surplus. In addition, the
banks may only pay dividends to the extent that their retained
net profits, including the portion transferred to surplus,
exceed statutory bad debts, as defined by regulation. Under
Pennsylvania statutes, a state chartered bank is restricted,
unless prior regulatory approval is obtained, in the
A-11
amount of dividends that it may declare in relation to its
accumulated profits, less any required transfer to surplus.
These restrictions have not had, nor are they expected to have,
any impact on our dividend policy.
Sterling and our subsidiary banks are affected by the monetary
and fiscal policies of government agencies, including the
Federal Reserve and FDIC. Through open market securities
transactions and changes in its discount rate and reserve
requirements, the Federal Reserve exerts considerable influence
over the cost and availability of funds for lending and
investment. The impact of monetary and fiscal policies on future
business and earnings of Sterling cannot be predicted at this
time.
Regulation
of Other Subsidiaries
Sterling Financial Trust Company, a wholly owned subsidiary
of BLC Bank, is required by the Pennsylvania Department of
Banking to maintain a minimum of $1 million in cash and
securities.
Bainbridge Securities, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of
Sterling, is subject to regulation by FINRA.
Other
From time to time, various federal and state legislation is
proposed that could result in additional regulation of, and
restrictions on, the business of Sterling and its subsidiaries,
or otherwise change the business environment. Management cannot
predict whether any future legislation will have a material
effect on the business of Sterling.
Products
and Services with Reputation Risk
Sterling and its subsidiaries offer a diverse range of financial
and banking products and services. In the event one or more
customers
and/or
governmental agencies become dissatisfied or object to any
product or service offered by Sterling or any of its
subsidiaries, negative publicity with respect to any such
products or services, whether legally justified or not, could
have a negative impact on Sterlings reputation. The
discontinuance of any product or service, whether or not any
customer or governmental agency has challenged any such product
or service, could have a negative impact on Sterlings
reputation.
Employees
As of September 30, 2007, Sterling had approximately
1,000 full-time equivalent employees. None of these
employees are represented by a collective bargaining agreement.
PROPERTIES
As of September 30, 2007, Sterling and its affiliates
occupy 76 office locations in Lancaster, York, Adams, Lebanon,
Berks, Chester, Bucks, Cumberland and Dauphin Counties,
Pennsylvania, Cecil, Carroll and Harford Counties, Maryland and
New Castle County, Delaware. The majority of these offices are
utilized by the banking affiliates to service the needs of their
retail and business customers. Offices at 42 locations are
occupied under leases, and at five locations the affiliate owns
the building, but leases the land. The remainder of the
locations is owned by one of the bank affiliates.
Included in the above locations are the corporate headquarters,
located in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, and operations centers
located in East Petersburg and Hanover, Pennsylvania, which are
owned by the bank affiliates. A portion of space in the
Lancaster and East Petersburg buildings is leased to third
parties.
All real estate owned by the subsidiary banks is free and clear
of encumbrances. The leases of the subsidiary banks expire
intermittently over the years through 2028, and most are subject
to one or more renewal options. During 2007, aggregate annual
rentals for real estate were approximately 1.72% of our
operating expenses.
A-12
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
As described in the main body of the proxy statement/prospectus
under the heading Recent Developments Regarding
Sterling, Sterling and its subsidiaries are parties to
several material pending legal proceedings. Other than as set
forth under such heading and except for ordinary, routine
litigation incidental to its business, Sterling and its
subsidiaries are not parties to, and none of their respective
properties is subject to, any legal proceedings nor is any such
proceeding known to be contemplated by governmental authorities.
MARKET
FOR STERLINGS COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
Please see the main body of the proxy statement/prospectus under
the heading Comparative Market Prices and Dividends
for additional information on Sterlings common stock.
Securities
Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation
Plans
The following table sets forth, as of September 30, 2007,
the number of outstanding options, warrants and rights granted
by Sterling to participants in equity compensation plans, as
well as the number of securities remaining available for future
issuance under these plans. The table provides this information
separately for equity compensation plans that have and have not
been approved by shareholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities Remaining
|
|
|
|
to be Issued Upon
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Available for Future Issuance
|
|
|
|
Exercise of
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Under Equity Compensation
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Plans Excluding Securities
|
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
Reflected in Column (A)
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
(A)
|
|
|
(B)
|
|
|
(C)
|
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 Directors Stock Compensation Plan
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
104,092
|
|
1996 Stock Incentive Plan
|
|
|
1,297,085
|
|
|
$
|
17.02
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
2006 Equity Compensation Plan
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
2,489,900
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Shareholders
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
1,297,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,593,992
|
|
A-13
Stockholder
Return Performance Graph
The following graph shows the cumulative total shareholder
return on Sterlings common stock during the period
commencing on December 31, 2001 and ending on
September 30, 2007, as compared with that of the
Standard & Poors 500 Index (S&P 500 Index)
and the SNL NASDAQ Bank Index. The stock performance graph
assumes that $100 was invested on December 31, 2001 and
that any dividends were reinvested.
Total
Return Performance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period Ending
|
|
Index
|
|
|
12/31/01
|
|
|
|
12/31/02
|
|
|
|
12/31/03
|
|
|
|
12/31/04
|
|
|
|
12/31/05
|
|
|
|
12/31/06
|
|
|
|
09/30/07
|
|
Sterling Financial Corporation
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
124.94
|
|
|
|
|
150.66
|
|
|
|
|
199.38
|
|
|
|
|
176.54
|
|
|
|
|
216.74
|
|
|
|
|
158.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S&P 500 Index
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
77.90
|
|
|
|
|
100.24
|
|
|
|
|
111.14
|
|
|
|
|
116.59
|
|
|
|
|
135.00
|
|
|
|
|
147.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SNL NASDAQ Bank Index
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
102.85
|
|
|
|
|
132.76
|
|
|
|
|
152.16
|
|
|
|
|
147.52
|
|
|
|
|
165.62
|
|
|
|
|
147.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-14
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
Five
Percent Beneficial Owners
The following table shows each person who, on January 18,
2008, was known to Sterling to be the beneficial owner of more
than 5% of Sterlings outstanding common stock. For this
purpose, Securities and Exchange Commission
Rule 13d-3
defines a beneficial owner as any person who, directly or
indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding,
relationship, or otherwise has or shares with respect to
securities (i) voting power, which includes power to vote
or to direct the voting of the securities or
(ii) investment power, which includes the power to dispose
of or direct the disposition of the securities. A person is
deemed to be the beneficial owner of any securities as to which
such person has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within
60 days, such as through the exercise of stock options.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Address
|
|
Amount and Nature of
|
|
|
of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Beneficial Ownership
|
|
% of Class
|
|
Howard E. Groff, Sr.
|
|
|
2,017,774
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
111 E. State Street
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarryville, PA 17566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mr. Groff holds sole voting and investment power over all
of these shares. |
Directors
and Executive Officers
The following table shows the beneficial ownership (based on the
definition of beneficial owner in SEC
Rule 13d-3
described above) of Sterlings common stock, as of
January 18, 2008, by (i) each current director,
(ii) Sterlings chief executive officer (who is listed
as a director), chief financial officer and the three other most
highly compensated executive officers for the year ended
December 31, 2007, and (iii) all of Sterlings
current directors and executive officers as a group. Unless
otherwise indicated by footnote, each person listed has sole
voting power with respect to the shares shown as beneficially
owned by such person. Shares of common stock which are subject
to stock options exercisable within 60 days of
January 18, 2008 are deemed to be outstanding for the
purpose of computing the amount and percentage of outstanding
common stock owned by such person. Unless otherwise noted, the
percentage of all Sterling common stock owned by each person is
less than 1%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership
|
|
|
Percentage of Class
|
|
Albright, Jr., Richard H.
|
|
|
94,375
|
(1)
|
|
|
Carenzo, Michael A.
|
|
|
16,962
|
(2)
|
|
|
Chivinski, Anthony D.
|
|
|
3,743
|
(3)
|
|
|
Groff, Jr., Howard E.
|
|
|
62,070
|
(4)
|
|
|
Henderson, Joan R.
|
|
|
11,709
|
(5)
|
|
|
Hormel, Terrence L.
|
|
|
61,607
|
(6)
|
|
|
Hosler, David E.
|
|
|
16,628
|
|
|
|
Miller, Jr., William E.
|
|
|
43,954
|
(7)
|
|
|
Moyer, Jr., J. Roger
|
|
|
230,692
|
(8)
|
|
|
Sprecher, W. Garth
|
|
|
6,632
|
|
|
|
Stefan, John E.
|
|
|
499,724
|
(9)
|
|
|
Walz, Glenn R.
|
|
|
28,799
|
(10)
|
|
|
Named Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lima, Tito L.
|
|
|
21,165
|
(11)
|
|
|
Scovill, J. Bradley
|
|
|
122,838
|
(12)
|
|
|
Sposito II, Thomas J.
|
|
|
65,302
|
(13)
|
|
|
Clabaugh, Chad M.
|
|
|
36,293
|
(14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Directors and Executive Officers as a group (20) in
total)
|
|
|
1,494,410
|
(15)
|
|
|
A-15
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes 6,029 shares owned jointly with spouse, 13,401
owned directly by spouse, and 33,327 shares owned by
Albright Family Enterprises, L.P. of which Dr. Albright is
a general partner. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes 8,902 shares owned directly by spouse. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes 3,043 shares owned jointly with spouse. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes 13,056 shares owned directly by spouse and
139 shares owned as custodian for children. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes 772 shares owned directly by the estate of spouse. |
|
(6) |
|
Includes 6,531 shares owned directly by spouse. |
|
(7) |
|
Includes 2,573 shares owned directly by spouse to which
Mr. Miller disclaims beneficial ownership. Mr. Miller
has the right to purchase an additional 5,500 shares
pursuant to the exercise of stock options. |
|
(8) |
|
Includes 511 shares owned jointly with spouse, and
5,522 shares owned directly by mother for whom
Mr. Moyer holds power of attorney and with respect to which
Mr. Moyer shares voting and investment power.
Mr. Moyer has the right to purchase an additional
103,966 shares pursuant to the exercise of stock options. |
|
(9) |
|
Includes 8,431 shares owned jointly with spouse,
131,248 shares owned directly by spouse, and
32,590 shares owned directly by child. Mr. Stefan
disclaims beneficial ownership of shares owned directly by
spouse. Mr. Stefan has the right to acquire an additional
93,262 shares pursuant to the exercise of stock options. |
|
(10) |
|
Includes 15,941 shares owned directly by spouse. |
|
(11) |
|
Mr. Lima has the right to acquire an additional
18,500 shares pursuant to the exercise of options. |
|
(12) |
|
Includes 46 shares owned jointly with spouse.
Mr. Scovill has the right to acquire an additional
77,955 shares pursuant to the exercise of stock options. |
|
(13) |
|
Mr. Sposito has the right to acquire an additional
49,051 shares pursuant to the exercise of stock options. |
|
(14) |
|
Mr. Clabaugh has the right to acquire an additional
32,437 shares pursuant to the exercise of stock options. |
|
(15) |
|
Includes all executive officers as a group who have
(i) shared voting and shared investment power and
(ii) shares that can be acquired upon the exercise of stock
options that are currently exercisable or that will become
exercisable within 60 days. |
A-16
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended,
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended,
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
(Restated)(1)
|
|
|
|
(Dollars and shares in thousands,
|
|
|
|
except per share data)
|
|
|
Summaries of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
134,196
|
|
|
$
|
161,891
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
77,910
|
|
|
|
83,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
56,286
|
|
|
|
78,396
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
7,083
|
|
|
|
17,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
49,203
|
|
|
|
60,777
|
|
Non-interest income
|
|
|
57,827
|
|
|
|
68,214
|
|
Non-interest expenses
|
|
|
122,506
|
|
|
|
132,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
(15,476
|
)
|
|
|
(3,353
|
)
|
Applicable income taxes
|
|
|
(7,982
|
)
|
|
|
(5,137
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(7,494
|
)
|
|
|
1,784
|
|
Discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,130
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(7,494
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,346
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
$
|
3,240,846
|
|
|
$
|
3,076,822
|
|
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
2,068,747
|
|
|
|
2,056,104
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
2,735,414
|
|
|
|
2,615,912
|
|
Borrowed money
|
|
|
340,202
|
|
|
|
283,670
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
110,473
|
|
|
|
128,773
|
|
Per Common Share Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
Cash dividends declared
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
0.58
|
|
Book value
|
|
|
3.74
|
|
|
|
4.34
|
|
Realized book value(2)
|
|
|
3.74
|
|
|
|
4.25
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
29,511
|
|
|
|
29,029
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
29,710
|
|
|
|
29,436
|
|
Dividend payout ratio(3)
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
A-17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
Performance Ratios (based on income from continuing
operations)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average assets
|
|
|
(0.32
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)%
|
Return on average equity
|
|
|
(8.63
|
)%
|
|
|
(2.69
|
)%
|
Return on average realized equity(2)
|
|
|
(8.63
|
)%
|
|
|
(2.73
|
)%
|
Return on average tangible equity(4)
|
|
|
(4.64
|
)%
|
|
|
(1.24
|
)%
|
Average equity to average assets
|
|
|
3.69
|
%
|
|
|
4.27
|
%
|
Efficiency ratio(5)
|
|
|
108.36
|
%
|
|
|
84.79
|
%
|
Selected Asset Quality Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans to total loans
|
|
|
0.50
|
%
|
|
|
0.18
|
%
|
Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding
|
|
|
0.35
|
%
|
|
|
0.90
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses to total loans
|
|
|
1.15
|
%
|
|
|
1.08
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans
|
|
|
232.25
|
%
|
|
|
593.09
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The twelve months ended December 31, 2006 financial
statements have been restated to give effect to losses
associated with the write-off of certain finance receivables
within Sterlings subsidiary Equipment Finance, LLC. These
losses arose due to the EFI Matter, discussed in Note 2 to
the consolidated financial statements. The effect of this
restatement was a cumulative after-tax adjustment to
January 1, 2006 stockholders equity of
$162.0 million. |
|
|
|
The year ended December 31, 2006 financial statements were
restated as follows: a reduction to net interest income of
$43.6 million, an increase in the 2006 provision for loan
losses of $12.4 million, a reduction in 2006 non-interest
income of $941,000, an increase in 2006 non-interest expenses of
$5.7 million, and a reduction of 2006 net income of
$39.8 million. Previously reported amounts as of
December 31, 2006 have been restated as follows: a
reduction in total loans, net of allowance for loan losses of
$281.0 million, a reduction of total assets of
$203.0 million, and a reduction of stockholders
equity of $201.8 million. See Note 2 to the
consolidated financial statements for additional information
regarding the effect of the EFI Matter. |
|
(2) |
|
Excludes accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) totaling
$262,000 and $2.8 million as of September 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, respectively. |
|
(3) |
|
Dividends declared per share divided by basic earnings per share
on net income including discontinued operations. A negative
ratio is reported as zero. |
|
(4) |
|
Excludes amortization of intangible assets of $790,000 and
$928,000, net of tax, for 2007 and 2006, respectively, and
average goodwill and intangibles of $77.0 million and
$70.4 million as of September 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, respectively. |
|
(5) |
|
Calculated after netting depreciation of equipment on operating
leases with related rental income. |
A-18
QUARTERLY
FINANCIAL DATA
The following is a summary of the quarterly results of
operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and dividend income
|
|
$
|
45,283
|
|
|
$
|
44,850
|
|
|
$
|
44,063
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
27,430
|
|
|
|
25,864
|
|
|
|
24,616
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
17,853
|
|
|
|
18,986
|
|
|
|
19,447
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
1,243
|
|
|
|
1,608
|
|
|
|
4,232
|
|
Securities gains
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
3,373
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
Non-interest income
|
|
|
17,956
|
|
|
|
18,381
|
|
|
|
17,659
|
|
Non-interest expenses
|
|
|
46,466
|
|
|
|
40,618
|
|
|
|
35,422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
(11,868
|
)
|
|
|
(1,486
|
)
|
|
|
(2,122
|
)
|
Income tax expenses (benefit)
|
|
|
(4,694
|
)
|
|
|
(1,597
|
)
|
|
|
(1,691
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(7,174
|
)
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
(431
|
)
|
Discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(7,174
|
)
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
(431
|
)
|
Per share information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
Diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.150
|
|
A-19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and dividend income
|
|
$
|
43,532
|
|
|
$
|
41,529
|
|
|
$
|
39,323
|
|
|
$
|
37,507
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
24,023
|
|
|
|
22,078
|
|
|
|
19,699
|
|
|
|
17,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
19,509
|
|
|
|
19,451
|
|
|
|
19,624
|
|
|
|
19,812
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
2,841
|
|
|
|
2,978
|
|
|
|
7,707
|
|
|
|
4,093
|
|
Securities gains
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
Non-interest income
|
|
|
17,508
|
|
|
|
16,902
|
|
|
|
16,343
|
|
|
|
15,976
|
|
Non-interest expenses
|
|
|
35,461
|
|
|
|
33,184
|
|
|
|
31,721
|
|
|
|
31,978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(958
|
)
|
|
|
515
|
|
|
|
(2,929
|
)
|
|
|
19
|
|
Income tax expenses (benefit)
|
|
|
(1,426
|
)
|
|
|
(779
|
)
|
|
|
(1,873
|
)
|
|
|
(1,059
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
468
|
|
|
|
1,294
|
|
|
|
(1,056
|
)
|
|
|
1,078
|
|
Discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(215
|
)
|
|
|
(5,041
|
)
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
(3,747
|
)
|
|
|
(953
|
)
|
|
|
1,101
|
|
Per share information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
Diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared
|
|
|
0.150
|
|
|
|
0.150
|
|
|
|
0.140
|
|
|
|
0.140
|
|
A-20
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion provides managements analysis of
the consolidated financial condition and results of operations
of Sterling Financial Corporation and its wholly owned
subsidiaries, BLC Bank, N.A., Delaware Sterling Bank &
Trust Company, HOVB Investment Co., T & C
Leasing, Inc. (inactive), BankersRe Insurance Group, SPC
(formerly Pennbanks Insurance Company, SPC), Church Capital
Management LLC, Bainbridge Securities, Inc., Lancaster Insurance
Group, LLC and Sterling Mortgage Services, Inc. (inactive). The
consolidated financial statements also include Town &
Country Leasing, LLC, Sterling Financial Trust Company,
Equipment Finance, LLC, and Sterling Community Development
Corporation, LLC all wholly owned subsidiaries of BLC Bank, N.A.
On May 25, 2007, BLC Bank, N.A. was formed by the merger of
Bank of Lancaster County, N.A., Bank of Hanover, Bay First Bank,
N.A. and Pennsylvania State Bank. Prior to May 25, 2007,
each of these insured depository institutions were wholly owned
subsidiaries of Sterling.
In December 2006, Sterling completed the divestiture of
Corporate Healthcare Strategies, LLC, Professional Services
Group and various insurance assets of its personal property and
casualty insurance agency, Lancaster Insurance Group, LLC. The
results of operations of the divested businesses have been
reclassified as discontinued operations. These reclassifications
had no effect on net income or stockholders equity. Unless
otherwise noted, the remaining discussion and tabular data
relate only to Sterlings continuing operations. For
further discussion related to this impairment charge, see the
section below entitled Goodwill.
Restatement
On April 19, 2007, Sterling announced that in early April
2007, Sterling management received information suggesting
irregularities in certain financing contracts at EFI. Upon
receiving information regarding the irregularities, management
immediately notified the chairman of the board of directors and
the boards audit committee, and the audit committee hired
legal counsel, Stradley Ronon, to conduct an independent
investigation. On April 30, 2007, Sterling announced that
its previously issued financial statements included in the
reports on
Form 10-K,
Form 10-Q
and
Form 8-K
filed by Sterling from January 1, 2004 through
April 19, 2007, and the reports on the audited financial
statements and related internal controls issued by its
independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst &
Young LLP, and all earnings releases issued and similar
communications issued by Sterling for 2004 through 2006, should
no longer be relied upon due to the expected material impact of
these irregularities.
The independent investigation has been completed and the
findings have been presented to Sterlings audit committee
and to the board of directors. For a discussion of the
independent investigation, its findings and the action taken by
the board of directors as a result thereof, please refer to the
discussion in the main body of the proxy statement/prospectus
under the headings The Merger Background of
the Merger and Recent Developments Regarding
Sterling, and in this annex to the proxy
statement/prospectus under the heading Introduction.
One of the principal actions taken by the board of directors in
response to the EFI Matter is the restatement of Sterlings
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2006 and the
related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity and comprehensive income and cash
flows for the year then ended. The restatement included
recording an opening January 1, 2006 retained earnings
adjustment of $162.0 million to reflect the after-tax
impact of matters that occurred prior to 2006. In addition,
Sterling recorded multiple balance sheet and income statement
line item adjustments as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2006. See Note 2 to the consolidated
financial statements for more information regarding the
financial details of the restatement. The discussion and
analysis that follows, which is intended to assist in
understanding and evaluating the major changes in the financial
condition and results of operations of Sterling, should be read
in conjunction with the audited financial statements and
footnotes appearing in the section below headed Financial
Statements.
A-21
Critical
Accounting Policies
Sterlings consolidated financial statements are prepared
in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) and follow general practices within the
industries in which it operates. Application of these principles
requires management to make estimates, assumptions, and
judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial
statements and accompanying notes. These estimates, assumptions,
and judgments are based on information available as of the date
of the financial statements; accordingly, as this information
changes, the financial statements could reflect different
estimates, assumptions, and judgments. Certain policies
inherently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates,
assumptions, and judgments and as such have a greater
possibility of producing results that could be materially
different than originally reported. Estimates, assumptions, and
judgments are necessary when assets and liabilities are required
to be recorded at fair value, when a decline in the value of an
asset not carried on the financial statements at fair value
warrants an impairment write-down or valuation reserve to be
established, or when an asset or liability needs to be recorded
contingent upon a future event. Carrying assets and liabilities
at fair value inherently results in more financial statement
volatility. The fair values and the information used to record
valuation adjustments for certain assets and liabilities are
based either on quoted market prices or are provided by other
third-party sources.
The most significant accounting policies followed by Sterling
are presented in Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements. These policies, along with the disclosures presented
in the other financial statement notes and in this financial
review, provide information on how significant assets and
liabilities are valued in the financial statements and how those
values are determined. Based on the valuation techniques used
and the sensitivity of financial statement amounts to the
methods, assumptions, and estimates underlying those amounts,
management has identified the determination of the restatement
of EFIs finance receivables outstanding, related interest
income and the related allowance for loan losses, the allowance
for loan losses for all other loans and the evaluation of
goodwill impairment to be the accounting areas that require the
most subjective or complex judgments, and as such could be most
subject to revision as new information becomes available.
Management was required to make judgments and assumptions in
order to form its conclusion regarding the validity of finance
receivables outstanding, related interest income and the related
allowance for loan losses. Management, with the assistance of
the investigators, performed an analysis on the current and
historical EFI loan portfolio to determine the validity of each
individual loan contract. This analysis included the following
procedures:
|
|
|
|
|
Analyzed information relevant to the loan contract, including
UCC filings, proof of insurance, customer correspondence, loan
accounting system records;
|
|
|
|
Determined whether an actual loan proceeds check was disbursed
to an unrelated third party such as an equipment dealer;
|
|
|
|
Attempted to confirm the existence of the contract with the
customer;
|
|
|
|
Reconstructed the historical cash receipt detail for customer
relationships;
|
|
|
|
Performed customer visits to confirm the existence of collateral
and evaluate its condition of underlying collateral.
|
For each loan outstanding, management made a determination
whether each agreement was valid or invalid based on the
completeness and the quality of the records reviewed. Once the
validity of a loan was determined, management determined if the
loan was performing consistently with its contractual terms.
Based on this evaluation, management determined that loans
previously thought to be paying according to their contractual
terms were in fact significantly delinquent, in most cases over
120 days past due. Management has attempted to determine a
range of liquidation values for the collateral underlying each
non-performing valid loan; and also to estimate the amount of
potential future cash payments that could be received for these
past due loans however, given the age of the delinquencies and
the status of managements collection and repossession
efforts, management cannot with any certainty estimate a range
of recovery through cash
A-22
collection or repossession, and therefore has not included any
estimate of such amount in the carrying value of the EFI finance
receivable balance.
Management determined, with concurrence of its primary banking
regulator, that all finance receivables within an individual
customer relationship should be charged down to a zero value
against the allowance for loan loss at the point that the first
receivable within the relationship is past due 120 days,
regardless of whether cash has been received subsequent to the
date of charge-off and managements estimation of recovery
that may occur through repossession and subsequent liquidation
of collateral. Any cash received either from the borrower, or
due to liquidation of collateral, is reflected as a recovery in
the allowance for loan loss. Management established a reserve
for finance receivables that are current to 119 days past
due based on its evaluation of delinquency status, timing and
frequency of payments, and information obtained from customer
field visits.
The allowance for loan losses for all other loans represents
managements estimate of probable credit losses inherent in
the loan portfolio. Determining the amount of the allowance for
loan losses is considered a critical accounting estimate because
it requires significant judgment and the use of estimates
related to the amount, timing, and probability of expected
future cash flows on impaired loans, estimated losses on pools
of homogeneous loans based on historical loss experience, and
consideration of current economic trends and conditions, all of
which may be susceptible to significant change. The loan
portfolio also represents the largest asset type on the
consolidated balance sheet. See section entitled Allowance
for Loan Loss within this Managements Discussion and
Analysis and Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements which describes the methodology used to determine the
allowance for loan losses.
With the adoption of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets, on January 1, 2002, Sterling
is no longer required to amortize goodwill resulting from
business acquisitions. Goodwill is now subject to impairment
testing at least annually to determine whether write-downs of
the recorded balances are necessary, or earlier if indicators of
impairment exist during an intervening period. Sterling tests
for impairment based on the goodwill maintained at each defined
reporting unit. Various market valuation methodologies are used
to determine the fair value of the reporting unit. If the fair
values of the reporting units exceed their book values, no
write-downs of recorded goodwill are necessary. If the fair
value of the reporting unit is less than its book value, an
impairment expense may be required to be recorded to write down
the related goodwill to the proper carrying value. During the
third quarter of 2006, Sterling recorded an after tax impairment
charge of $5.2 million, to its Insurance Related Services
segment. The impairment charge was reclassified to discontinued
operations at December 31, 2006, as a result of the
divestiture of the three related lines of business associated
with the Insurance Related segment.
During the third quarter of 2007, Sterling completed an
impairment test for each of its reporting units and determined
that no goodwill impairment existed on the goodwill within each
of its reporting units.
As part of its process to restate its historical financial
statements due to the EFI Matter, Sterling wrote off 100%, or
$17 million, of the goodwill associated with EFI as part of
the opening January 1, 2006 retained earnings adjustment
because management determined that the goodwill was impaired
prior to that date. The decision was due to the magnitude of the
losses incurred through that date, and managements
intention, going forward, to focus solely on only managing the
existing receivables outstanding at EFI and maximizing
collections for this portfolio. No significant new loan
originations are expected for this business going forward.
See the section entitled Goodwill within this
Managements Discussion and Analysis for further
information.
Non-GAAP Presentations
Sterling, in referring to its net income, is referring to income
determined in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP). Although we believe that the
non-GAAP financial measures enhance a readers
understanding of our business and performance, these non-GAAP
measures should not be considered an alternative to GAAP.
A-23
This Managements Discussion and Analysis refers to certain
non-GAAP financial measures used to monitor performance,
including the efficiency ratio, return on average realized
equity and return on average tangible equity. The efficiency
ratio is a non-GAAP financial measure that we believe provides
readers with important information regarding Sterlings
results of operations. Comparison of Sterlings efficiency
ratio with that of other companies may not be appropriate, as
they may calculate their efficiency ratio in a different manner.
Sterlings calculation of its efficiency ratio is computed
by dividing non-interest expenses, less depreciation on
operating leases, by the sum of tax equivalent net interest
income and non-interest income, less depreciation on operating
leases. Sterling nets the depreciation on operating leases
against related income, as it is consistent with utilizing net
interest income presentation for comparable capital leases,
which nets interest expense against interest income. The
efficiency ratio excludes gains/losses on securities activities.
Return on average realized equity is a non-GAAP financial
measure, as it is calculated by taking net income, divided by
average stockholders equity, excluding average other
accumulated comprehensive income. We believe the presentation of
return on realized equity provides a reader with a better
understanding of our financial performance based on economic
transactions, as it excludes the impact of unrealized gains and
losses on securities available for sale and derivatives used in
cash flow hedges, which can fluctuate based on interest rate
volatility.
Return on average tangible equity is a non-GAAP financial
measure, as it is calculated by taking net income excluding the
amortization of intangible assets, divided by average
stockholders equity less average goodwill and intangible
assets. We believe that by excluding the impact of purchase
accounting, the return on average tangible equity provides the
reader with an important view of our financial performance.
Inflation
and Interest Rates
The majority of assets and liabilities of a financial
institution are monetary in nature and, therefore, differ
greatly from most commercial and industrial companies that have
significant investments in fixed assets or inventories. However,
inflation does have an important impact on the growth of total
assets and on non-interest expenses, which tend to rise during
periods of general inflation. Inflationary pressures over the
last few years have been modest, although the potential for
future inflationary pressure is always present given changing
trends in the economy.
During the past several years, the Federal Reserve has been very
active in monitoring economic data, and has used interest rates
to help stimulate economic growth and control inflation.
Starting in 2001, short-term interest rates decreased, with
sharp reductions in 2001 and more modest reductions in 2002 and
2003. However, in 2004, the Federal Reserve began a measured
effort to control inflationary pressures and raised the federal
funds rate 17 times in 25 basis points (b.p.)
increments through mid-2006. The federal funds rate remained
unchanged until September 2007 when the Federal Reserve lowered
the rate 50 b.p.
Management recognizes that asset/liability management, including
the effect of rate changes on interest earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities, is a critical component of
managing Sterlings business.
A-24
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
(All dollar amounts presented within tables are in thousands,
except per share data)
Executive
Summary
The consolidated balance sheets reflected in the consolidated
financial statements included herein are as of
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006. The
statements of operations, changes in stockholders equity,
and cash flows reflected in the consolidated financial
statements are for the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2007 and the 12 months ended
December 31, 2006. For purposes of providing comparative
analysis within this Managements Discussion and Analysis,
management has compared balance sheet line items using the
balances as of December 31, 2006 and September 30,
2007. For comparative analysis within this Managements
Discussion and Analysis for its results of operations, changes
in stockholders equity, cash flows, and for average
balances, management compared the
12-month
period ended December 31, 2006 to the
12-month
period ended September 30, 2007 (three months ended
December 31, 2006, unaudited, plus nine months ended
September 30, 2007). The following table reconciles the
results of operations reflected in the consolidated financial
statements included herein to the amounts used by management for
comparative analysis within this Managements Discussion
and Analysis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Fluctuation
|
|
|
Fluctuation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and dividend income
|
|
$
|
134,196
|
|
|
$
|
43,532
|
|
|
$
|
177,728
|
|
|
$
|
161,891
|
|
|
$
|
15,837
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
77,910
|
|
|
|
24,023
|
|
|
|
101,933
|
|
|
|
83,495
|
|
|
|
18,438
|
|
|
|
22.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
56,286
|
|
|
|
19,509
|
|
|
|
75,795
|
|
|
|
78,396
|
|
|
|
(2,601
|
)
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)%
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
7,083
|
|
|
|
2,841
|
|
|
|
9,924
|
|
|
|
17,619
|
|
|
|
(7,695
|
)
|
|
|
(43.7
|
)%
|
Non-interest income
|
|
|
57,827
|
|
|
|
17,835
|
|
|
|
75,662
|
|
|
|
68,214
|
|
|
|
7,448
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
Non-interest expense
|
|
|
122,506
|
|
|
|
35,461
|
|
|
|
157,967
|
|
|
|
132,344
|
|
|
|
25,623
|
|
|
|
19.4
|
%
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
(7,982
|
)
|
|
|
(1,426
|
)
|
|
|
(9,408
|
)
|
|
|
(5,137
|
)
|
|
|
(4,271
|
)
|
|
|
83.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(7,494
|
)
|
|
|
468
|
|
|
|
(7,026
|
)
|
|
|
1,784
|
|
|
|
(8,810
|
)
|
|
|
(493.8
|
)%
|
Discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(215
|
)
|
|
|
(215
|
)
|
|
|
(5,130
|
)
|
|
|
4,915
|
|
|
|
(95.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(7,494
|
)
|
|
$
|
253
|
|
|
$
|
(7,241
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,346
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,895
|
)
|
|
|
116.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive
Overview
In January 2007, Sterlings executive management team and
board of directors identified three performance measurements
that they believed were key elements for enhancing shareholder
value. These included: 1) increasing diluted earnings per
share; 2) return on realized equity; and 3) the
efficiency ratio. In January 2007, the board of directors
approved the terms and set the 2007 performance goals, based on
these company-wide financial factors, with the primary emphasis
on diluted earnings per share growth and secondarily on
efficiency ratio and return on tangible equity.
The primary source of Sterlings revenues are interest
income derived from loans and investments less their deposit and
borrowed funding costs, as well as fees from banks and financial
services provided to customers, and net rental income on
operating leases. Revenues are influenced by general economic
factors, including market interest rates, the economy of the
markets served and stock market conditions, as well as
competitive factors within the markets.
The EFI Matter significantly inhibited managements ability
to meet the performance goals established due to the attention
devoted to the EFI Matter throughout 2007, regulatory
restrictions imposed on Sterling, the additional amount of
capital required to be raised in the form of debt financing, the
lower than anticipated interest income from EFI, and the costs
associated with the independent investigation, regulatory and
A-25
compliance matters, and internal controls remediation.
Additionally, general market conditions, including the reduced
interest margin of Sterling combined with increasing credit
losses in its Community Banking and Leasing segments negatively
impacted the results of operations.
In 2007, return on average realized equity decreased to (6.18)%,
compared to (2.73)% in 2006. The decrease in return on average
realized equity is primarily due to the loss incurred in the
Commercial Finance segment coupled with investigation, legal,
accounting and other costs incurred as a result of the EFI
Matter. Return on average tangible equity was (3.21)% in 2007,
compared to (1.24)% in 2006.
Net interest income decreased $2.6 million, from
$78.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 to
$75.8 million for the 12 months ended September 2007,
a 3.3% decrease. The net interest margin for 2007 was at 3.13%
as compared to 3.43% in 2006. Margin compression resulted from
increasing cost of funds and the negative impact of greater cash
balances retained resulting from the liquidity strategy
implemented relative to the EFI Matter.
The provision for loan losses was $9.9 million for the
12 months ended September 30, 2007, compared to
$17.6 million (restated) for the year ended
December 31, 2006. This decrease in provision expense in
2007, as compared to 2006, is primarily the result of lower net
charge-offs in the EFI portfolio. Lower EFI net charge-offs
year-over-year resulted from the stabilization of the EFI Matter
in April/May 2007, versus a full year in 2006.
Non-interest income was $75.7 million for the
12 months ended September 30, 2007, a 10.9% increase
from the $68.2 million earned in 2006. Excluding securities
gains, non-interest income grew $4.8 million or 7.2%.
Within Sterlings Community Banking segment, service
charges and commissions increased $1.6 million, or 10.8%.
The increase was due to growth in deposits which generated
higher transaction fees, primarily from Sterlings
overdraft protection program and debit card issuances. Within
Sterlings financial services segments, rental income from
operating leases, generated by the leasing segment, increased
$3.1 million, or 9.7%. The increase in rental income was
driven by a higher level of operating leases, which grew 8.9%
year-over-year, and also due to higher interest rates. Trust and
investment management income generated by the Trust and
Investment Services segment increased approximately $179,000 or
1.8%. This growth resulted from an increase in assets under
management of 7.5%, partially offset by lower income earned on
the segments mutual fund products.
Securities gains were $4.2 million in 2007, compared to
$1.5 million in 2006. In 2007, Sterling divested
substantially all of its equity securities portfolio as part of
its capital restoration plan.
Non-interest expense was $158.0 million for the
12 months ended September 30, 2007, an increase of
19.4% compared to $132.3 million in 2006. Excluding
investigation, legal, accounting and other costs of
$19.5 million related to the EFI Matter and financial
restatement effort, non-interest expenses increased
approximately $6.1 million, or 4.6%. Contributing to this
increase were higher salaries and employee benefits of
$1.3 million, higher net occupancy expenses of
$1.4 million, higher furniture and equipment expenses of
$960,000 and higher other operating expenses of
$1.2 million. In addition, depreciation on operating lease
assets was higher by $2.4 million as a result of the growth
in the business. Partially offsetting these higher expenses was
a decrease in other EFI losses of $1.7 million.
The increase in Sterlings efficiency ratio from 84.79% in
2006 to 103.77% in 2007 was primarily driven by investigation,
legal, accounting and other cost incurred in relation to the EFI
Matter and financial restatement efforts. Excluding
approximately $19.5 million in such costs, 2007s
efficiency ratio would have been 88.11%.
A more thorough discussion of Sterlings results of
operations is included in the following pages.
Net
Interest Income
The primary component of Sterlings revenue is net interest
income, which is the difference between interest income and fees
on interest-earning assets and interest expense on
interest-bearing liabilities. Earning assets include loans,
securities and federal funds sold. Interest-bearing liabilities
include deposits, borrowed
A-26
funds and subordinated debentures. To compare the tax-exempt
yields to taxable yields, amounts are adjusted to pretax
equivalents based on a 35% Federal corporate income tax rate.
Net interest income is affected by changes in interest rates,
volume of interest-bearing assets and liabilities and the
composition of those assets and liabilities. The net
interest rate spread and net interest margin
are two common statistics related to changes in net interest
income. The net interest rate spread represents the difference
between the yields earned on interest-earning assets and the
rates paid for interest-bearing liabilities. The net interest
margin is defined as the ratio of net interest income to average
earning assets. Through the use of demand deposits and
stockholders equity, the net interest margin typically
exceeds the net interest rate spread, as these funding sources
are non-interest bearing.
Table 1 below presents net interest income on a fully taxable
equivalent basis, net interest rate spread and net interest
margin for the 12 months ending September 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006. Table 2 below analyzes the changes in
net interest income for the periods broken down by their rate
and volume components.
Net interest income, on a tax equivalent basis, totaled
$81.8 million in 2007 compared to $84.6 million in
2006, a decrease of $2.8 million, or 3.3%. The first
quarter of 2007 included the write-off of unamortized issuance
costs related to the repayment of the subordinated debentures
issued to Sterling Financial Statutory Trust I. Excluding
this item, net interest income would have decreased
$2.3 million, or 2.8%.
The year-over-year decrease reflects a net interest margin
compression of 30 basis points from 3.43% in 2006 to 3.13%
in 2007, offset by an increase in the average balance of
interest-earning assets of 6.0%. Excluding the impact of the
write-off of unamortized issuance costs, net interest margin in
2007 would have been 3.15%.
The overall increase in interest-earning assets came from growth
in the loan portfolios principally in the commercial loan
category. Year-over-year, total average loans increased
$115.1 million, or 5.8%, including approximately
$38.7 million related to the Bay Net acquisition in October
2006.
The growth in loans was funded by growth in deposits. Average
total deposits increased by $227.2 million, or 9.6%,
including approximately $54.3 million from the acquisition
of Bay Net in October 2006. The remainder of the increase
reflects increased deposit gathering efforts required due to the
necessity to increase cash holdings because of reduced Federal
Reserve cash availability, as well as Sterlings overall
customer relationship model and its market position in several
attractive markets. This growth in deposits was primarily due to
an increase of $164.3 million, or 15.7%, in time deposits.
As a result, Sterlings mix of deposits shifted toward
higher costing funds as evidenced by an increase in the average
time deposits as a percentage of average total deposits from
50.6% in 2006 to 52.6% in 2007.
Year-over-year, average total borrowings decreased
$10.5 million, or 3.1%. Again, as part of the liquidity
strategy implemented relative to the EFI Matter, Sterling
borrowed $190.0 million from the Federal Home Loan Bank in
the second quarter of 2007. However, on average these borrowings
were offset by maturities which had not been replaced due to
deposit growth.
Net interest margin decreased to 3.13% from 3.43% resulting from
a number of factors:
|
|
|
|
|
As noted previously, growth in loans has accounted for all of
the growth in earning assets. Generally, loans carry a higher
yield than alternative interest-earning assets, namely
securities and other investments. Thus, this improved mix of
earning assets has helped to increase the overall yield on
earning assets by 21 basis points from 2006 to 2007.
|
A-27
|
|
|
|
|
The rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities increased
41 basis points from 2006 to 2007, exceeding the increase
in the yield on earning assets. The increase in the cost of
funds resulted from both a general trend of increases in the
rates paid on deposit accounts, as well as a shift in the
funding mix with an increasing percentage of deposit growth
coming from comparatively higher yielding money market and time
deposits.
|
|
|
|
The combination of the above factors contributed to a narrowing
of the spread between the yield on interest-earning assets and
the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities of 20 basis
points from 2006 to 2007. In addition to this narrowing of the
spread, the decrease in net free funds, namely the decrease in
stockholders equity and greater non-earning cash balances,
contributed the additional 10 basis points of the decline
in margin. Greater non-earning cash balances resulted from the
liquidity strategy implemented relative to the EFI Matter.
|
A-28
Table
1 Distribution of Assets, Liabilities and
Stockholders Equity, Interest Rates and Interest
Differential-Tax Equivalent Yields
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
2006 (Restated)
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
$
|
16,090
|
|
|
$
|
848
|
|
|
|
5.27
|
%
|
|
$
|
17,080
|
|
|
$
|
887
|
|
|
|
5.19
|
%
|
Other short-term investments
|
|
|
46,917
|
|
|
|
2,449
|
|
|
|
5.22
|
%
|
|
|
7,811
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
4.03
|
%
|
Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
805
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
4.97
|
%
|
|
|
915
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
4.92
|
%
|
U.S. Government agencies
|
|
|
222,199
|
|
|
|
10,320
|
|
|
|
4.64
|
%
|
|
|
196,063
|
|
|
|
8,716
|
|
|
|
4.45
|
%
|
State and political subdivisions
|
|
|
214,948
|
|
|
|
15,142
|
|
|
|
7.04
|
%
|
|
|
226,458
|
|
|
|
15,995
|
|
|
|
7.06
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
20,108
|
|
|
|
1,228
|
|
|
|
6.11
|
%
|
|
|
39,650
|
|
|
|
2,208
|
|
|
|
5.57
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
|
|
|
458,060
|
|
|
|
26,730
|
|
|
|
5.84
|
%
|
|
|
463,086
|
|
|
|
26,964
|
|
|
|
5.82
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
1,372,197
|
|
|
|
100,838
|
|
|
|
7.35
|
%
|
|
|
1,260,057
|
|
|
|
89,896
|
|
|
|
7.13
|
%
|
Consumer
|
|
|
396,749
|
|
|
|
28,658
|
|
|
|
7.22
|
%
|
|
|
396,050
|
|
|
|
27,404
|
|
|
|
6.92
|
%
|
Residential mortgages
|
|
|
101,028
|
|
|
|
6,306
|
|
|
|
6.24
|
%
|
|
|
91,070
|
|
|
|
5,624
|
|
|
|
6.18
|
%
|
Leases
|
|
|
132,186
|
|
|
|
10,395
|
|
|
|
7.86
|
%
|
|
|
137,481
|
|
|
|
9,997
|
|
|
|
7.27
|
%
|
Finance receivables
|
|
|
91,406
|
|
|
|
7,482
|
|
|
|
8.19
|
%
|
|
|
93,792
|
|
|
|
7,011
|
|
|
|
7.48
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
2,093,566
|
|
|
|
153,679
|
|
|
|
7.34
|
%
|
|
|
1,978,450
|
|
|
|
139,932
|
|
|
|
7.07
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest earning assets
|
|
|
2,614,633
|
|
|
|
183,706
|
|
|
|
7.03
|
%
|
|
|
2,466,427
|
|
|
|
168,098
|
|
|
|
6.82
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(23,146
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,583
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
|
100,903
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-interest earning assets
|
|
|
389,277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
342,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets related to discontinued operations
|
|
|
2,243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
3,083,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,867,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing demand
|
|
$
|
825,511
|
|
|
$
|
21,888
|
|
|
|
2.65
|
%
|
|
$
|
784,851
|
|
|
$
|
19,068
|
|
|
|
2.43
|
%
|
Savings
|
|
|
264,485
|
|
|
|
5,580
|
|
|
|
2.11
|
%
|
|
|
238,764
|
|
|
|
3,856
|
|
|
|
1.61
|
%
|
Time
|
|
|
1,210,617
|
|
|
|
55,356
|
|
|
|
4.57
|
%
|
|
|
1,046,314
|
|
|
|
42,602
|
|
|
|
4.07
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
2,300,613
|
|
|
|
82,824
|
|
|
|
3.60
|
%
|
|
|
2,069,929
|
|
|
|
65,526
|
|
|
|
3.17
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
94,761
|
|
|
|
5,901
|
|
|
|
6.23
|
%
|
|
|
104,051
|
|
|
|
5,741
|
|
|
|
5.52
|
%
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
144,823
|
|
|
|
7,072
|
|
|
|
4.88
|
%
|
|
|
146,210
|
|
|
|
6,462
|
|
|
|
4.42
|
%
|
Subordinated debentures
|
|
|
87,856
|
|
|
|
6,136
|
|
|
|
6.98
|
%
|
|
|
87,630
|
|
|
|
5,766
|
|
|
|
6.58
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowings
|
|
|
327,440
|
|
|
|
19,109
|
|
|
|
5.84
|
%
|
|
|
337,891
|
|
|
|
17,969
|
|
|
|
5.32
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
2,628,053
|
|
|
|
101,933
|
|
|
|
3.88
|
%
|
|
|
2,407,820
|
|
|
|
83,495
|
|
|
|
3.47
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest-bearing demand deposits
|
|
|
283,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
286,835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
50,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities related to discontinued operations
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
122,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
$
|
3,083,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,867,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest rate spread
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.15
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.35
|
%
|
Net interest income (FTE)/net interest margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,773
|
|
|
|
3.13
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,603
|
|
|
|
3.43
|
%
|
Taxable-equivalent adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,978
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,207
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
75,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
78,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-29
Yields on tax-exempt assets have been computed on a fully
taxable equivalent basis assuming a 35% tax rate. For yield
calculation purposes, non-accruing loans are included in the
average loan balance.
Table
2 Analysis of Changes in Net Interest
Income
The rate-volume variance analysis set forth in the table below,
which is computed on a taxable equivalent basis, compares
changes in net interest income for the periods indicated by
their rate and volume components. The change in interest
income/expense due to both volume and rate has been allocated to
change in rate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 Versus 2006
|
|
|
|
Due to Changes in
|
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
$
|
(51
|
)
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
Other short-term investments
|
|
|
1,577
|
|
|
|
557
|
|
|
|
2,134
|
|
Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
U.S. Government agencies
|
|
|
1,162
|
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
1,604
|
|
State and political subdivisions
|
|
|
(813
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(853
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(1,088
|
)
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
(980
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
|
|
|
(744
|
)
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
(234
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
2,942
|
|
|
|
10,942
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
1,206
|
|
|
|
1,254
|
|
Residential mortgages
|
|
|
615
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
682
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
(385
|
)
|
|
|
783
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
Finance receivables
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
8,100
|
|
|
|
5,647
|
|
|
|
13,747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
8,882
|
|
|
|
6,726
|
|
|
|
15,608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing demand
|
|
|
988
|
|
|
|
1,832
|
|
|
|
2,820
|
|
Savings
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
1,309
|
|
|
|
1,724
|
|
Time
|
|
|
6,689
|
|
|
|
6,065
|
|
|
|
12,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
8,092
|
|
|
|
9,206
|
|
|
|
17,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
(513
|
)
|
|
|
673
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
671
|
|
|
|
610
|
|
Subordinated debentures
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowings
|
|
|
(559
|
)
|
|
|
1,699
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
7,533
|
|
|
|
10,905
|
|
|
|
18,438
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
1,349
|
|
|
$
|
(4,179
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,830
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses totaling $9.9 million for the
twelve months ended September 30, 2007 decreased by
$7.7 million from $17.6 million in the twelve months
ended December 31, 2006. This decrease
A-30
resulted primarily from $9.7 million lower provision
expense in the EFI portfolio because of the magnitude of EFI
losses incurred in the previous year, and the reduced loan
originations in 2007. Partially offsetting this decrease,
provision expense for the bank subsidiaries and Town &
Country increased by $2.0 million, driven by loan growth,
an increase in non-performing assets and a decline in overall
quality of the commercial loan and leasing portfolios.
See further discussion in Asset Quality below.
Non-interest
Income
Sterlings primary sources of non-interest income are
service charges and fees generated through its Community Banking
segments, trust, brokerage and investment management fees
generated through its Trust and Investment Services segment and
from income generated through its Leasing segment.
Details of non-interest income for the twelve months ended
September 30, 2007 and the twelve months ended
December 31, 2006 are as follows:
Table
3 Non-interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 Versus 2006
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Trust and investment management income
|
|
$
|
10,107
|
|
|
$
|
9,928
|
|
|
$
|
179
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
|
|
10,246
|
|
|
|
9,130
|
|
|
|
1,116
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
%
|
Other service charges, commissions and fees
|
|
|
5,946
|
|
|
|
5,481
|
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
Brokerage fees and commissions
|
|
|
2,900
|
|
|
|
3,087
|
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
(6.1
|
)%
|
Mortgage banking income
|
|
|
2,098
|
|
|
|
1,930
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
Rental income on operating leases
|
|
|
35,414
|
|
|
|
32,269
|
|
|
|
3,145
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
Other operating income
|
|
|
4,793
|
|
|
|
4,904
|
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)%
|
Securities gains
|
|
|
4,158
|
|
|
|
1,485
|
|
|
|
2,673
|
|
|
|
180.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
75,662
|
|
|
$
|
68,214
|
|
|
$
|
7,448
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust and investment management income grew 1.8% to
$10.1 million in 2007 compared to $9.9 million in
2006. The higher revenue levels were primarily due to an
increase in the level of assets under management which grew
7.5%. Partially offsetting this growth was lower income earned
on the segments mutual fund products.
Service charges on deposit accounts totaled $10.2 million
for the twelve months ended September 30, 2007. This
reflects an increase of 12.2% from 2006. An increase in the
number of household accounts along with a higher level of
overdraft fees and cash management analysis fees contributed to
the growth in service charges. In 2007, overdraft fees charged
on a per item basis were increased. Additionally, the twelve
months ended September 30, 2007 includes eleven months of
income from the acquisition of Bay Net compared to two months in
2006.
Other service charges, commissions and fees totaled
$5.9 million in 2007 which is an increase of $465,000 or
8.5% compared to 2006. Growth in debit card fees contributed to
the largest portion of this increase. Debit card fees have
continued to increase as the number of customers who have debit
cards has grown. In addition, fees grew due to an increase in
the portion of revenues retained from Sterlings debit card
service provider. Other areas of higher fee income growth
include merchant income, letter of credit fees, and fees
received related to the processing of Sterlings official
checks, which have grown due to higher volumes and higher
interest rates.
Brokerage fees and commissions were down $187,000 or 6.1% in
2007 to $2.9 million. This decrease resulted primarily from
the impact of lowering the pricing on selected services during
2006, in order to enhance Bainbridge Securities
competitiveness in the market place.
A-31
Mortgage banking income grew 8.7% to $2.1 million in 2007
compared to $1.9 million in 2006. Contributing to this
improvement was an increase in the level of mortgage
originations, of which most were sold and a corresponding gain
recognized. Also, within the loans that were sold, a higher
proportion was sold with their servicing rights as opposed to
retaining their servicing rights. Releasing the servicing rights
generates a larger gain than retaining the servicing. Partially
offsetting the higher revenue was a decrease in servicing income
as the level of the sold loan portfolio serviced by Sterling has
declined.
Rental income on operating leases was $35.4 million in 2007
compared to $32.3 million in 2006, an increase of
$3.1 million, or 9.7%. The growth in rental income was the
direct result of a higher level of operating leases which grew
8.9% over the same timeframe. Higher average interest rates also
contributed to the overall rise in rental income.
Other operating income totaled $4.8 million for the twelve
months ended September 30, 2007, and was down 2.3% compared
to 2006. An increase in revenue generated from an investment in
bank owned life insurance (BOLI) made by Sterling in March 2007,
was offset by lower gains recognized on the sale of finance
receivables at Sterlings affiliates, Equipment Finance,
LLC and Town and Country Leasing, LLC.
Securities gains and losses, all from the available-for-sale
portfolio, are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
Debt securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
111
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
4,181
|
|
|
|
1,521
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,150
|
|
|
|
1,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,158
|
|
|
$
|
1,485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains and losses on debt securities are realized as part of
ongoing investment portfolio and balance sheet management
strategies. For the twelve months ended September 30, 2007,
Sterling experienced net gains on sales of the debt security
portfolio of $8,000 versus $13,000 in 2006.
Equity security gains and losses are generated primarily through
Sterlings equity portfolio of financial institution sector
stocks. Net securities gains on equities were $4.2 million
for the twelve months ended September 30, 2007 versus
$1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Gains are typically taken as the result of ongoing asset
liability management strategies and capitalizing on appreciated
values on certain equity security portfolio positions. In 2006,
Sterling utilized the proceeds to fund investments in customer
relationship initiatives. In 2007, the proceeds were principally
used as part of Sterlings capital restoration plan.
Non-interest
Expense
Total non-interest expenses were $158.0 million for the
twelve months ended September 30, 2007, an increase of
$25.6 million, or 19.4%, over $132.3 million in the
twelve months ended December 31, 2006.
A-32
Table
4 Non-interest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 Versus 2006
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
$
|
58,964
|
|
|
$
|
57,686
|
|
|
$
|
1,278
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
Net occupancy
|
|
|
8,051
|
|
|
|
6,661
|
|
|
|
1,390
|
|
|
|
20.9
|
%
|
Furniture & equipment
|
|
|
9,002
|
|
|
|
8,042
|
|
|
|
960
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
Professional services
|
|
|
23,349
|
|
|
|
3,940
|
|
|
|
19,409
|
|
|
|
492.6
|
%
|
Depreciation on operating lease assets
|
|
|
28,893
|
|
|
|
26,459
|
|
|
|
2,434
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
Taxes other than income
|
|
|
2,801
|
|
|
|
2,317
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
20.9
|
%
|
Intangible asset amortization
|
|
|
1,606
|
|
|
|
1,428
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
12.5
|
%
|
Other EFI losses
|
|
|
4,645
|
|
|
|
6,386
|
|
|
|
(1,741
|
)
|
|
|
(27.3
|
)%
|
Other
|
|
|
20,656
|
|
|
|
19,425
|
|
|
|
1,231
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
157,967
|
|
|
$
|
132,344
|
|
|
$
|
25,623
|
|
|
|
19.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits totaled $59.0 million for
the twelve months ended September 30, 2007 and increased
$1.3 million, or 2.2%, over 2006. The increases were
attributable to the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
Normal merit increases to existing employees.
|
|
|
|
Impact of eleven months of Bay Net Bank versus two months in
2006.
|
|
|
|
The cost associated with accelerating the vesting of outstanding
stock options and restricted stock to become immediately
exercisable due to the signing of the merger agreement with PNC.
|
|
|
|
The cost of retention bonuses for key employees to remain at
Sterling for a specified period of time, pending the merger with
PNC.
|
|
|
|
Partially offsetting the increases were lower incentive
compensation expense and no profit sharing expense in 2007.
|
Net occupancy expense increased to $8.1 million in 2007, up
from $6.7 million in 2006. This increase is primarily due
to improvements and renovations at various existing branch
office locations, exit costs associated with abandoning a future
branch site, and higher snow removal costs incurred in early
2007. In addition, Sterling opened two new branch offices during
2007 and added two branches through the acquisition of Bay Net
Bank late in 2006.
Furniture and equipment charges were $9.0 million and
$8.0 million in 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase
of $960,000 from 2006 to 2007 was the result of planned
increases in service contracts and depreciation expense to
support a major customer acquisition and retention strategy
introduced in 2006. In addition, depreciation expense increased
as a result of a new telephone system aimed at enhancing
Sterlings level of internal and external customer service.
Professional services expense totaled $23.3 million in
2007, up $19.4 million from 2006. Legal and advisory costs
associated with the investigation into financing contract
irregularities at EFI totaled $18.9 million in 2007.
Excluding these costs, professional services expense grew by
11.8% in 2007 compared to 2006. The majority of this increase
was driven by higher accounting and auditing fees.
Depreciation of equipment on operating leases was
$28.9 million in 2007, compared to $26.5 million in
2006. This increase was due to continued growth in the leasing
business and is directly related to the increase in rental
income on operating leases noted above.
Taxes other than income were $2.8 million for the twelve
months ended September 30, 2007, an increase from
$2.3 million in 2006. Taxes other than income consist
primarily of taxes based on stockholders equity. During
2006, Sterling was able to recognize a tax refund due to the
lower equity base caused by the losses incurred at EFI.
A-33
Intangible asset amortization increased $178,000, or 12.5%, to
$1.6 million in 2007. Additional amortization expense
related to the acquisition of Bay Net Bank accounted for all of
this increase.
Other EFI losses totaled $4.6 million in 2007 compared to
$6.4 million in 2006. Other EFI losses include losses
stemming from breaches of certain servicing responsibilities by
EFI, for which Sterling has indemnified third parties and losses
related to financing contracts and payments that management
believes to be invalid.
Other non-interest expense totaled $20.7 million in 2007,
compared to $19.4 million in 2006. This category consists
of marketing, lending related expenses, insurance, telephone,
postage, and other sundry operating expenses. These expenses
increased $1.2 million or 6.3% in 2007 compared to 2006.
Contributing to this increase was higher FDIC insurance costs,
higher regulatory exam costs, and additional board of
directors fees. The additional costs in these categories
are attributable to the higher level of review and assessed risk
at Sterling resulting from the EFI Matter.
One of Sterlings key measures of performance is the
efficiency ratio, which expresses non-interest expense,
excluding merger related and restructuring charges, as a
percentage of tax-equivalent net interest income and
non-interest income excluding gains on sales of securities. In
calculating its efficiency ratio, Sterling nets depreciation on
operating leases with the related rental income to more
consistently present operating results with the presentation
used in the banking industry.
Sterlings efficiency ratio deteriorated to 103.77% for the
twelve months ended September 30, 2007 from 84.79% in 2006
due to legal, advisory, accounting and other costs incurred in
2007 related to the EFI Matter. Excluding these one-time costs,
the efficiency ratio for 2007 would have been 88.11%.
Income
Taxes
Sterling recognized income tax benefits from continuing
operations of $9.4 million and $5.1 million for the
twelve months ended September 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, respectively. The increase in the income
tax benefit period over period was consistent with the higher
losses experienced during the twelve months ended
September 30, 2007.
In connection with the losses associated with the EFI Matter,
Sterling is in the process of amending previously filed tax
returns in order to obtain a refund of previously paid taxes.
Included on the balance sheet is a receivable for the refund for
previously paid taxes of $53.2 million related to the
refund of taxes previously paid, which is based on
Sterlings best estimate of the amount that it will be able
to carryback to prior years. It is possible that the actual
amount of losses available to be carried back may be different
than this estimate. To the extent that it can not carryback
these losses to prior years, Sterling believes that it will have
sufficient income in the future to offset against these losses.
Discontinued
Operations
In December 2006, Sterling completed the divestiture of
Corporate Healthcare Strategies, LLC, Professional Services
Group and various insurance assets of its personal property and
casualty insurance agency, Lancaster Insurance Group, LLC. The
results of operations of the divested businesses have been
reclassified as discontinued operations. These reclassifications
had no effect on net income or stockholders equity.
Discontinued operations generated an after tax loss of
$5.1 million in 2006. The loss in 2006 was primarily driven
by an impairment charge of $5.2 million, after tax,
recorded in the third quarter of 2006.
FINANCIAL
CONDITION
Sterlings assets were approximately $3.2 billion at
September 30, 2007, representing growth of
$164.0 million or 5.3% when compared to $3.1 billion
at December 31, 2006. The increase was primarily attributed
to a higher balance of cash and cash equivalents which grew
$169.8 million. Other changes included a $47.2 million
decrease in securities available for sale, a $25.8 million
increase in bank owned life insurance, and a $14.3 million
or 0.7% increase in loans. The growth in assets was funded by a
higher level of deposits, which grew $119.5 million or 4.6%
and an increase in long-term debt which increased
$49.3 million. Equity decreased $18.3 million or 14.2%
due to losses in 2007 recognized at EFI.
A-34
Cash and
Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents increased to $318.5 million at
September 30, 2007 versus $148.7 million at
December 31, 2006. The increase in cash at Sterling is due
primarily to the implementation of an aggressive liquidity plan
aimed at significantly enhancing Sterlings cash position
in anticipation of potential liquidity concerns that could have
arisen as a result of a loss of confidence by Sterlings
customers. In addition, cash held at Sterling increased due to
the reduction in available float funding at the
Federal Reserve, due to Sterlings reduced capital levels,
which required Sterling to increase cash on hand in order to
timely meet customer needs. For a more detailed discussion on
Sterlings actions with respect to its liquidity plan,
please refer to the liquidity discussion further in this report.
Securities
Sterling utilizes investment securities as a primary tool for
managing interest rate risk, to generate interest and dividend
income, to provide liquidity and to provide collateral for
certain deposits and borrowings. As of September 30, 2007,
securities totaled $432.5 million, which represented a net
decrease of $49.1 million or 10.2% from the
December 31, 2006 balance of $481.5 million. Proceeds
from maturities, sales and calls totaled $113.0 million.
Purchases of $63.7 million were completed primarily to meet
pledging requirements.
The activity discussed above decreased holdings in all
categories, with the largest decreases in agency, municipal and
corporate securities. These changes resulted from a number of
factors, including maturities and calls as well as a continued
effort to reduce the credit risk associated with corporate
securities. Offsetting these decreases were purchases made to
maintain a sufficient level of securities that are qualified to
serve as collateral for public funds and other deposits
requiring pledged securities.
In addition to the cash flow activity noted above, the decrease
in the portfolio reflected a reduction in the balance of net
unrealized gains on its available for sale portfolio. At
September 30, 2007, the securities portfolio included net
unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities of
$1.3 million versus net unrealized gains of
$5.6 million at December 31, 2006. The decrease in
unrealized gains resulted primarily from the realization of
gains on equity securities.
Sterlings securities portfolio includes debt and equity
instruments that are subject to varying degrees of credit and
market risk. This risk arises from general market conditions,
factors impacting specific industries, as well as corporate news
that may impact specific issues. Management continuously
monitors its debt securities, including routine updating of
credit ratings, monitoring market, industry and corporate news,
as well as volatility in market prices. Sterling uses various
indicators in determining whether a debt security is
other-than-temporarily-impaired, including whether it is
probable that the contractual interest and principal will not be
collected in full. One such indicator is credit ratings. As of
September 30, 2007, there were no holdings below investment
grade. Another factor in managements evaluation is whether
Sterling has the positive intent and ability to hold the
under-water securities to maturity. At September 30, 2007,
Sterling determined, based on its liquidity plan, that it had
availability from other sources sufficient to meet its expected
liquidity needs. For equity securities, management will
determine that a loss is considered other-than
temporary when it has an observable market value that is
less than its recorded value for more than six months, unless
management determines an event that causes other-than temporary
impairment has occurred prior to the six month time period.
A-35
Table
5 Investment Securities
The following table shows the amortized cost of the
held-to-maturity securities owned by Sterling as of the dates
indicated. Securities are stated at cost adjusted for
amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
State and political subdivisions
|
|
|
6,751
|
|
|
|
10,901
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
7,003
|
|
|
|
11,162
|
|
Non-marketable equity securities
|
|
|
12,633
|
|
|
|
10,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
19,636
|
|
|
$
|
21,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-marketable equity securities consist of Federal Reserve Bank
stock, Federal Home Loan Bank stock, and Atlantic Central
Bankers Bank stock.
The following table shows the amortized cost and fair value of
the available-for-sale securities owned as of the dates
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
805
|
|
|
$
|
805
|
|
U.S. Government agencies bonds
|
|
|
187,694
|
|
|
|
185,127
|
|
|
|
211,066
|
|
|
|
207,667
|
|
State and political subdivisions
|
|
|
201,105
|
|
|
|
204,969
|
|
|
|
207,831
|
|
|
|
213,001
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
20,322
|
|
|
|
20,310
|
|
|
|
23,461
|
|
|
|
23,440
|
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
2,036
|
|
|
|
2,049
|
|
|
|
8,356
|
|
|
|
8,397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
411,157
|
|
|
|
412,455
|
|
|
|
451,519
|
|
|
|
453,310
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
2,903
|
|
|
|
6,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
411,537
|
|
|
$
|
412,844
|
|
|
$
|
454,422
|
|
|
$
|
460,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All mortgage-backed securities are those of U.S. Government
agencies.
The available-for-sale equity securities are comprised of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Government sponsored enterprise stock
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
3,088
|
|
Equity mutual fund
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Community bank stocks
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
2,288
|
|
|
|
2,623
|
|
Large cap financial services company stocks
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
562
|
|
|
|
940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
380
|
|
|
$
|
389
|
|
|
$
|
2,903
|
|
|
$
|
6,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These holdings are maintained for long-term appreciation in
these segments of the market.
A-36
Table
6 Investment Securities (Yields)
The following tables show the maturities of debt securities at
amortized cost as of September 30, 2007, and approximate
weighted average yields of such securities. Yields on state and
political subdivision securities are shown on a tax equivalent
basis, assuming a 35% federal income tax rate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over 1 thru 5
|
|
|
Over 5 thru 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year and Less
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Over 10 Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Held-to-Maturity
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
|
4.15
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
|
4.15
|
%
|
State and political subdivisions
|
|
|
1,635
|
|
|
|
7.34
|
%
|
|
|
4,861
|
|
|
|
6.93
|
%
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
6.52
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
6,751
|
|
|
|
7.01
|
%
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
8.75
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
7.05
|
%
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
7.93
|
%
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
2.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
7.25
|
%
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
2.09
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,856
|
|
|
|
6.83
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,875
|
|
|
|
6.94
|
%
|
|
$
|
255
|
|
|
|
6.52
|
%
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
|
7.08
|
%
|
|
$
|
7,003
|
|
|
|
6.89
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over 1 thru 5
|
|
|
Over 5 thru 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year and Less
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Over 10 Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Available-for-Sale
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
U.S. Government agencies
|
|
$
|
5,113
|
|
|
|
3.52
|
%
|
|
$
|
117,925
|
|
|
|
4.11
|
%
|
|
$
|
49,540
|
|
|
|
5.42
|
%
|
|
$
|
12,549
|
|
|
|
5.95
|
%
|
|
$
|
185,127
|
|
|
|
4.57
|
%
|
State and political subdivisions
|
|
|
4,146
|
|
|
|
6.40
|
%
|
|
|
31,440
|
|
|
|
6.54
|
%
|
|
|
81,030
|
|
|
|
6.43
|
%
|
|
|
88,353
|
|
|
|
6.81
|
%
|
|
|
204,969
|
|
|
|
6.61
|
%
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
362
|
|
|
|
5.44
|
%
|
|
|
6,621
|
|
|
|
4.84
|
%
|
|
|
1,896
|
|
|
|
4.80
|
%
|
|
|
11,431
|
|
|
|
5.74
|
%
|
|
|
20,310
|
|
|
|
5.35
|
%
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
|
|
6.09
|
%
|
|
|
909
|
|
|
|
6.87
|
%
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
4.37
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4.59
|
%
|
|
|
2,049
|
|
|
|
6.30
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,625
|
|
|
|
4.96
|
%
|
|
$
|
156,895
|
|
|
|
4.69
|
%
|
|
$
|
132,600
|
|
|
|
5.95
|
%
|
|
$
|
112,335
|
|
|
|
6.50
|
%
|
|
$
|
412,455
|
|
|
|
5.61
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is no issuer of securities in which the aggregate book
value of that issuer, other than securities of the
U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government agencies, exceeds
10% of stockholders equity.
Loans
Loans outstanding at September 30, 2007 totaled
$2.1 billion and increased $14.3 million, or 0.7%,
compared to December 31, 2006. During 2007 Sterling sold
approximately $50.0 million of loans to help improve the
capital ratios by reducing risk weighted assets. This action was
necessary as a result of the losses incurred at EFI.
Additionally, uncertainties caused by the EFI Matter and the
pending acquisition of Sterling by PNC has caused a slow down of
loan growth in 2007. As the following table outlines, the growth
in the loan portfolio was primarily driven by commercial and
agricultural loans which increased $19.2 million, or 3.8%,
and real estate construction loans which increased
$15.1 million, or 8.7%. Partially offsetting this growth
was a decline in the consumer loan portfolio of
$13.9 million, or 3.4% and a decline in the forestry-
A-37
related finance receivables of $3.3 million, or 63.7%. The
remainder of the loan portfolio was relatively flat from
period-to-period.
Table
7 Loan Portfolio
The following table sets forth the composition of
Sterlings loan portfolio as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
Commercial and agricultural
|
|
$
|
523,318
|
|
|
$
|
504,084
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
653,739
|
|
|
|
656,366
|
|
Financial institutions
|
|
|
16,424
|
|
|
|
16,375
|
|
Real estate-construction
|
|
|
188,910
|
|
|
|
173,824
|
|
Real estate-mortgage
|
|
|
99,326
|
|
|
|
101,946
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
389,792
|
|
|
|
403,691
|
|
Forestry-related finance receivables (net of unearned income)
|
|
|
1,853
|
|
|
|
5,110
|
|
Other finance receivables (net of unearned income)
|
|
|
87,641
|
|
|
|
86,698
|
|
Lease financing receivables (net of unearned income)
|
|
|
131,883
|
|
|
|
130,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,092,886
|
|
|
$
|
2,078,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table
8 Loan Maturity and Interest Sensitivity
The following table sets forth the maturity of the commercial
loan portfolio as of September 30, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After One But
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within One
|
|
|
Within Five
|
|
|
After Five
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Commercial and agricultural, financial and commercial real estate
|
|
$
|
291,548
|
|
|
$
|
228,805
|
|
|
$
|
673,128
|
|
|
$
|
1,193,481
|
|
Real estate-construction
|
|
|
86,747
|
|
|
|
69,893
|
|
|
|
32,270
|
|
|
|
188,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
378,295
|
|
|
$
|
298,698
|
|
|
$
|
705,398
|
|
|
$
|
1,382,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans subject to annual renewal provisions are included in the
within one year category in the table above.
Commercial loans due after one year totaling $229.2 million
have variable interest rates, $480.4 million have a fixed
rate of interest for a period of time, and then convert to
another interest rate, and the remaining $294.6 million in
commercial loans have fixed rates.
Asset
Quality
Sterlings loan portfolios are subject to varying degrees
of credit risk. Asset quality within the commercial loan
portfolios experienced some decline during the first nine months
of calendar 2007. Sterling has experienced increases in
delinquencies, non-performing loans, including non-accruals and
charge-offs. The slowdown in the residential housing market has
affected land developers, residential builders, re-sales, and
industries tied to the residential housing market, such as
transportation and companies providing products to the housing
market. Sterling continues to experience these trends in the
calendar fourth quarter. While Sterling has experienced a
decline in credit quality, credit risk continues to be mitigated
through prudent underwriting standards, on-going credit review,
and monitoring and reporting asset quality measures.
Additionally, loan diversification, limiting exposure to a
single industry or borrower and requiring collateral also
reduces Sterlings credit risk.
Sterlings commercial, consumer and residential mortgage
loans are principally to borrowers in south central
Pennsylvania, northern Maryland, and northern Delaware. While
these areas have been affected by the
A-38
residential housing slowdown, the affect has been less than in
many other markets. A substantial portion of the debtors
ability to honor their obligations is, however, affected by the
level of economic activity in the market area.
Non-performing assets include non-accrual and restructured
loans, accruing loans past due 90 days or more and other
foreclosed assets. Sterlings general policy has been to
cease accruing interest on loans when management determines that
a reasonable doubt exists as to the collectibility of additional
interest. When management places a loan on non-accrual status,
it reverses unpaid interest credited to income in the current
year, and charges unpaid interest accrued in prior years to the
allowance for loan losses. Sterling typically returns
non-accrual loans to performing status when the borrower brings
the loan current and performs in accordance with contractual
terms for a reasonable period of time. Sterling categorizes a
loan as restructured if it changes the terms of the loan such as
interest rate, repayment schedule or both, to terms that it
otherwise would not have granted originally.
Table
9 Nonaccrual, Past Due and Restructured
Loans
The following table presents information concerning the
aggregate amount of nonaccrual, past due and restructured loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans
|
|
$
|
7,739
|
|
|
$
|
3,345
|
|
Accruing loans, past due 90 days or more
|
|
|
2,654
|
|
|
|
452
|
|
Restructured loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans
|
|
|
10,393
|
|
|
|
3,797
|
|
Foreclosed assets
|
|
|
986
|
|
|
|
870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets
|
|
$
|
11,379
|
|
|
$
|
4,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income that would have been recorded under original
terms
|
|
$
|
353
|
|
|
$
|
368
|
|
Interest income recorded
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans to total loans
|
|
|
0.50
|
%
|
|
|
0.18
|
%
|
Non-performing assets to total loans and foreclosed assets
|
|
|
0.54
|
%
|
|
|
0.22
|
%
|
Non-performing assets to total assets
|
|
|
0.35
|
%
|
|
|
0.15
|
%
|
As of September 30, 2007, non-performing assets were
$11.4 million, an increase of $6.7 million, or 143.8%,
from December 31, 2006. The increase is a mixture of
commercial loans, real estate loans and leasing.
Potential problem loans are defined as performing loans, which
have characteristics that cause management to have doubts as to
the ability of the borrower to perform under present loan
repayment terms and which may result in the reporting of these
loans as non-performing loans in the future. Total potential
problem loans were approximately $4.3 million at
September 30, 2007 and $6.5 million at
December 31, 2006. The decrease is a result of payoffs, pay
downs, or the migration to non-performing status of the credits
reported at December 31, 2006.
As of September 30, 2007, Sterling had a loan to a fuel
distribution company, with a total exposure of $5.7 million
and a related loan loss reserve of $332,000. In early January
2008, Sterling received information related to this relationship
of adverse events that occurred in November and December 2007.
This resulted in the recognition of an additional loan loss
reserve of $3.8 million in the December 31, 2007
financial statements.
A-39
Allowance
for Loan Losses
Sterling maintains the allowance for loan losses at a level that
management believes is adequate to absorb potential losses
inherent in the loan portfolio and is established through a
provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Quarterly,
Sterling utilizes a defined methodology in determining the
adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. This methodology
considers specific credit reviews, historical loan loss
experience, and qualitative factors.
Management assigns internal risk ratings to all commercial
relationships with aggregate borrowings or commitments to extend
credit in excess of limits as dictated by internal credit
policies. When management determines a loan has uncertain
collectibility of principal and interest, management places that
loan on the problem list, and evaluates it on a
quarterly basis in order to estimate potential losses.
Managements analysis considers:
|
|
|
|
|
Adverse situations that may affect the borrowers ability
to repay;
|
|
|
|
Estimated value of underlying collateral; and
|
|
|
|
Prevailing market conditions.
|
For loans on its problem list where management
determines that a specific reserve allocation is not required
and for the remaining pass-rated loans, Sterling
assigns a general loss factor based on historical performance to
determine the reserve. For homogeneous loan types, such as
consumer and residential mortgage loans, management bases
specific factors on the average loss ratio for the previous two
years for each specific loan pool. Additionally, management
adjusts projected loss ratios based on other factors, including
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Trends in delinquency levels;
|
|
|
|
Trends in non-performing and potential problem loans;
|
|
|
|
Trends in composition, volume and terms of loans;
|
|
|
|
Effects in changes in lending policies or underwriting
procedures;
|
|
|
|
Experience, ability and depth of management;
|
|
|
|
National and local economic conditions;
|
|
|
|
Concentrations in lending activities; and
|
|
|
|
Other factors as management may deem appropriate.
|
Management determines the unallocated portion of the allowance
for loan losses based on the following criteria:
|
|
|
|
|
Potential for the lack of precision in Sterlings allowance
for loan loss loan assessment;
|
|
|
|
Other potential exposures in the loan portfolio;
|
|
|
|
Variances in managements assessment of national and local
economic conditions; and
|
|
|
|
Other internal or external factors that management believes
appropriate at that time.
|
Management believes this methodology accurately reflects losses
inherent in the portfolio. Management charges actual loan losses
to the allowance for loan losses. As such, management determines
the level of provision for loan losses based on the methodology
discussed above combined with an overall analysis of the loan
portfolio.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements included herein, of the $237.2 million of EFI
finance receivables reflected in the December 31, 2005
financial statements previously issued, and subsequently
withdrawn, $222.6 million were charged off during the
restatement process as an adjustment to January 1, 2006
opening retained earnings. Additionally, while the collateral
for the substantial portion of
A-40
these receivables has been observed at customer locations, and a
retail value and liquidation value had
been estimated by management based on industry pricing
guidelines, management is presently uncertain as to the ability
to quickly repossess and liquidate such collateral and realize
any significant recovery amount. For these reasons, with
concurrence by its primary banking regulators, managements
accounting policy related to the reserving for these receivables
requires all receivables in a single customer relationship be
charged down to zero at the point that the first receivable
within the relationship is past due more than 120 days,
regardless if cash has been received subsequent to charge-off or
management estimates potential recovery through repossession or
collateral liquidation. Any new finance receivable contract
entered into with a borrower subsequent to the initial
charge-off date was immediately charged-off in its entirety at
the date of origination. All cash received from the borrower or
due to repossession and liquidation of collateral is reflected
as a recovery to the allowance for loan loss.
In determining the accounting policy for the EFI finance
receivables, management considered these loans to be homogenous
loans with similar characteristics of borrower profile,
collateral type, interest rates and terms.
With respect to the portfolio of finance receivables for EFI,
management expects that there will be some level of repossession
and liquidation of collateral that will provide recoveries to
Sterling. Additionally, management continues to work with
customers who have aged receivables outstanding to restructure
these receivables and establish a payment plan. However,
management can not predict the timing or the amount of cash that
will be received as a result of these efforts and therefore has
not included any estimates of such amount in the carrying value
of the forestry related finance receivables.
As part of the restatement, Sterling reflected
$208.5 million of forestry-related finance receivables as
charge-offs previous to January 1, 2006 because, in
accordance with the EFI charge-off policy, the customers to
which these receivables were associated were determined to be
greater than 120 days past due on their aggregate
contractual obligations. During 2006, an additional
$28.7 million of charge-offs were recorded, including
$20.2 million of additional originations to those customer
relationships that were charged-off at December 31, 2005.
During 2007, an additional $11.6 million of charge-offs
were recorded, including $8.3 million of additional
originations to those customer relationships that were
charged-off at December 31, 2006.
During 2006 and the nine months ended September 30, 2007,
Sterling received $10.0 million and $7.6 million,
respectively, of cash payments from customer relationships that
had been previously charged-off. These payments are reflected as
recoveries to the allowance for loan losses.
A-41
A summary of the activity in the allowance for loan losses is as
follows:
Table
10 Summary of Loan Loss Experience
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine-Month
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
22,517
|
|
|
$
|
22,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance acquired in acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans charged off during year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and agricultural
|
|
|
1,044
|
|
|
|
493
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
Real estate mortgage
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
1,216
|
|
|
|
1,935
|
|
Other finance receivables
|
|
|
1,092
|
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
Forestry-related finance receivables
|
|
|
11,611
|
|
|
|
28,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs
|
|
|
14,978
|
|
|
|
32,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and agricultural
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate mortgage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
442
|
|
Other finance receivables
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
Forestry-related finance receivables
|
|
|
8,928
|
|
|
|
14,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries
|
|
|
9,517
|
|
|
|
15,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans charged off
|
|
|
5,461
|
|
|
|
17,722
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
7,083
|
|
|
|
17,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
24,139
|
|
|
$
|
22,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of net loans charged off to average loans outstanding
|
|
|
0.35
|
%
|
|
|
0.90
|
%
|
Ending allowance for loan losses to net loans charged off
|
|
|
3.3x
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
x
|
Net loans charged off to provision for loan losses
|
|
|
77.1
|
%
|
|
|
100.58
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of total loans outstanding
|
|
|
1.15
|
%
|
|
|
1.08
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of non-performing loans
|
|
|
232.25
|
%
|
|
|
593.09
|
%
|
The allowance for loan losses increased $1.6 million, from
$22.5 million at December 31, 2006, to
$24.1 million at September 30, 2007. The allowance
represented 1.2% of loans outstanding at September 30,
2007, and represented an increase in reserve levels to
outstanding loans.
During 2007, Sterling recorded provision for loan losses
totaling $7.1 million, as compared to $17.6 million in
2006. The decrease of $10.5 million is principally the
result of lower net charge-offs in the EFI portfolio.
A-42
Table
11 Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans% to
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans% to
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Total Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Total Loans
|
|
|
Commercial, financial and agricultural
|
|
$
|
17,214
|
|
|
|
57
|
%
|
|
$
|
15,305
|
|
|
|
56
|
%
|
Real estate mortgage and construction
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
Consumer
|
|
|
2,918
|
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
2,345
|
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
Other finance and lease financing receivables
|
|
|
3,356
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
2,936
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Forestry-related finance receivables
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
1,317
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
24,139
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
22,517
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management believes that the allocation of the allowance for
loan losses between the various loan portfolios adequately
reflects the inherent risk in each loan portfolio. The
allocation methodology is based on historical net loss
experience, leading indicators of credit quality and other
pertinent factors. Additionally, management periodically reviews
the methodology and may make revisions to ensure the allowance
for loan losses allocated to each loan portfolio continues to
reflect potential losses inherent in such portfolios. Management
charges actual loan losses to the allowance for loan losses and
bases the provision for loan losses on the overall analysis
taking the methodology into account.
The loan loss reserve for the EFI portfolio is based on
managements loss expectations specific to this portfolio.
The appropriate level of loan loss reserves are discussed in
more detail in the discussion on the allowance for loan losses.
The largest reserve allocation is to the commercial, financial
and agricultural loan portfolio, which represents approximately
71% of the reserve balance. This reflects the continued higher
level of non-performing loans, net charge-offs, increases in
loans and changes in other factors that impact the potential
risks in the portfolio. This loan portfolio, along with leases,
continues to represent the greatest risk exposure to Sterling.
These loans generally are larger than the remainder of the
portfolio and the related collateral is not as marketable.
Additionally, other factors, such as competition for higher
quality credits are considered in allocating this reserve
balance.
The unallocated portion of the allowance reflects potential risk
of error in the specific and general reserve allocations, other
potential exposure in the loan portfolio, variances in
managements assessment of national and local economic
conditions and other internal or external factors that
management believes appropriate at the time. In 2007, the
unallocated portion of the allowance remained at levels fairly
immaterial with respect to the overall allowance for loan losses.
While management believes Sterlings allowance for loan
losses is adequate based on information currently available,
future adjustments to the reserve and enhancements to the
methodology may be necessary due to changes in economic
conditions and managements assumptions as to future
delinquencies or loss rates.
Assets
Held for Operating Leases
Assets held for operating leases were $90.5 million at
September 30, 2007, which exceeded the $89.0 million
at December 31, 2006 by $1.5 million, or 1.7%. The
growth in operating leases during 2007 reflected the increased
number of customers entering into operating leases.
Operating leases have residual value risk associated with them.
If, at the end of the lease term, the fair value of the leased
property is less than the residual value calculated at lease
origination, a loss on disposal could result. Sterling mitigates
this risk by continuously monitoring residual values, and in
many instances, uses values from various industry publications
and discussions with industry experts. Further, the lease terms
include provisions that the lessee shares the risk of loss on
disposal of equipment, up to the first 50% of the
A-43
residual value. As a result of Sterlings approach to
managing residual risk, related losses have been immaterial
historically.
Goodwill
Goodwill decreased by $221,000 from December 31, 2006
through September 30, 2007, due to a purchase accounting
adjustment related to the Bay First Bank acquisition and
amortization of branch purchase goodwill.
In April 2006, Sterling announced the realignment of the
management of its three trust and investment services
affiliates, Church Capital Management, LLC, Bainbridge
Securities, Inc. and Sterling Financial Trust Company. The
original acquisition agreements for Church Capital Management
and Bainbridge Securities included contingent consideration
payments to the principals of both companies based upon them
attaining certain required performance measurements over a five
year period from the date of acquisition. Under the guidance of
Statement No. 141, the contingent payments were to be
treated as additional consideration and capitalized as goodwill
at the time the future payments were earned. Per the terms of
the original acquisition agreements, the realignment of the
trust and investment services segment triggered a change to the
terms of the contingency payments, thereby accelerating the
recognition of the goodwill in the amount of $6.6 million
and converting the contingent payments into installment payments
to be released bi-annually from escrow over seven years,
regardless of the performance of Church Capital Management or
Bainbridge Securities.
In October 2006, Sterling completed the acquisition of Bay Net
Financial, Inc. and its wholly owned thrift subsidiary, Bay Net
A Community Bank. At the date of acquisition, Bay Net Financial,
Inc. was merged into Sterling, and Bay Net A Community Bank
merged with Sterlings wholly owned subsidiary, First
National Bank of North East. The resulting bank changed its name
to Bay First Bank, N.A. as part of the bank merger.
Sterling acquired Bay Net Financial, Inc. in order to enhance
its banking franchise in the Cecil, Harford and neighboring
counties of Maryland.
In accordance with Statement No. 141, Sterling used the
purchase method of accounting to record this transaction. The
portion of the purchase price related to goodwill of
$14.4 million was recorded in the banking segment in
accordance with FAS 141 because all of the assets and
liabilities acquired are related to the banking reporting
segment.
As part of its process to restate the historical financial
statements due to the EFI Matter, Sterling determined that the
goodwill associated with EFI was impaired prior to
December 31, 2005 and therefore wrote off 100%, or
$17 million, of goodwill in its opening January 1,
2006 retained earnings. The decision was due primarily to the
magnitude of the losses incurred as of that date and
managements intention, going forward, to focus solely on
managing the existing book of business of EFI and maximizing
collections for this portfolio.
During 2006, management monitored certain trends in the business
activities of its insurance services segment, which was
primarily comprised of the activity of Corporate Healthcare
Strategies, LLC (which we refer to as CHS). This
evaluation included:
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring the impact, if any, that a change in a key small
group health insurance carrier would have on longer term
customer retention and the related impact on long term
commission growth of the insurance segment;
|
|
|
|
Determining how an industry-wide shift from self funded to fully
insured health plans experienced during 2006 would impact our
long term revenue projections on our wholesale stop-loss product
line; and
|
|
|
|
Determining the impact of macro-trends in the insurance market
due to changes in the business practices of certain major
insurance providers in our markets.
|
In addition to these trends, in the third quarter of 2006,
management had an early indication of lower premium renewals for
the 2007 policy period. During the third quarter end closing
process, management and
A-44
the board of directors, made the determination that the above
circumstances were expected to have a prolonged negative impact
on the performance of Sterlings insurance segment and
therefore concluded that indicators of impairment existed.
In accordance with the provisions of Statement No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Asset (Statement
No. 142), goodwill of a reporting unit is tested for
impairment on an annual basis. Additionally, goodwill is tested
for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or
circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the
fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. A
two-step impairment test is used to identify potential goodwill
impairment and measure the amount of a goodwill impairment loss
to be recognized, if any. The first step of the goodwill
impairment test, used to identify potential impairment, compares
the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount,
including goodwill. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit
exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill test is
performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any, by
comparing the implied fair value of the goodwill with the
carrying amount of that goodwill. In evaluating impairment, the
fair value estimates are based on quoted market prices in active
markets. If quoted market prices are not available, the fair
value estimates are based on the best information available,
including prices for similar assets and liabilities and the
results of using other valuation techniques such as the present
value of future cash flows.
In accordance with the provisions of Statement No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets (Statement No. 144) an intangible asset
that is subject to amortization is tested for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its
carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is
recognized only if the carrying amount of the intangible asset
is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. The carrying
amount of the intangible asset is not recoverable if it exceeds
the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from
the use and eventual disposition of the asset. An impairment
loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of
the intangible asset exceeds its fair value.
Sterling performed a valuation of this reporting segment, which
first included a valuation of its identifiable intangible assets
under Statement No. 144, primarily a customer list
intangible, which resulted in an approximate impairment loss of
$1.4 million, and then its goodwill, which resulted in an
approximate loss of $6.6 million. The impairment charge of
$8.0 million ($5.2 million, net of tax) was recorded
in the income statement under non-interest expenses, as goodwill
and intangible asset impairment at September 30, 2006 and
then reclassed to discontinued operations as a result of the
divestiture of CHS in December 2006.
On December 31, 2006, Sterling divested three related lines
of business associated with its insurance segment, Corporate
Healthcare Strategies, LLC, Professional Services Group and
certain insurance assets of its personal property and casualty
insurance agency, Lancaster Insurance Group, LLC. Upon the sale
of the above businesses, Sterling recorded a loss on disposal of
$41,000, which was recorded in other operating income. Included
in the lines of business sold were $4.7 million of goodwill
and $2.3 million of intangible assets.
Bank
Owned Life Insurance
Bank owned life insurance (BOLI) represents the cash surrender
value for life insurance policies on certain employees who have
provided positive consent allowing the Bank to be the
beneficiary of such policies. The increase of $25.8 million
in BOLI is a result of the purchase of additional life insurance
policies in March 2007.
Deposits
Sterling continues to rely heavily on deposit growth as the
primary source of funds for lending activities. Total deposits
grew from $2.6 billion at December 31, 2006 to
$2.7 billion at September 30, 2007, an increase of
$119.5 million or 4.6%.
Average deposits for the twelve months ended September 30,
2007 were $227.2 million, or 9.6% greater than average
deposits for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006.
This growth was generally achieved through the continued
development in new markets with targeted promotional efforts. In
addition, as part of its
A-45
enhanced liquidity plan, Sterlings banks enhanced their
deposit pricing in non-maturity and time deposits to levels that
were competitive in the markets served by Sterling. This action
was taken to enhance liquidity and bolster customer confidence.
Table
12 Average Deposit Balances and Rates Paid
The following table summarizes the average amounts of deposits
and rates paid for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Non-interest-bearing demand deposits
|
|
$
|
283,331
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
286,835
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Interest-bearing demand deposits
|
|
|
825,511
|
|
|
|
2.65
|
%
|
|
|
784,851
|
|
|
|
2.43
|
%
|
Savings deposits
|
|
|
264,485
|
|
|
|
2.11
|
%
|
|
|
238,764
|
|
|
|
1.61
|
%
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
1,210,617
|
|
|
|
4.57
|
%
|
|
|
1,046,314
|
|
|
|
4.07
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,583,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,356,764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table
13 Deposit Maturity
The following table summarizes the maturities of time deposits
of $100,000 or more as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Three months or less
|
|
$
|
39,797
|
|
|
$
|
63,642
|
|
Over three through six months
|
|
|
95,980
|
|
|
|
42,129
|
|
Over six through twelve months
|
|
|
142,261
|
|
|
|
62,418
|
|
Over twelve months
|
|
|
54,619
|
|
|
|
97,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
332,657
|
|
|
$
|
265,193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term
Borrowings
Short-term borrowings are comprised of federal funds purchased,
securities sold under repurchase agreements, U.S. Treasury
demand notes, Federal Home Loan Bank advances and borrowings
from other financial institutions. As of September 30,
2007, short-term borrowings totaled $86.1 million, an
increase of $7.3 million from the December 31, 2006
balance of $78.8 million. This net increase was primarily
attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
Decreases in securities sold under repurchase agreements and
U.S. Treasury demand notes reflecting fluctuations
experienced in the normal course of business;
|
|
|
|
Increase in short-term advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank
as part of liquidity management; and
|
|
|
|
Advance on short-term line of credit at the holding company
(explained below) used to repay a short-term line of credit
which had previously funded forestry-related finance
receivables; net of
|
|
|
|
Fluctuation in federal funds purchased to meet day-to-day cash
needs, including those purchased from Sterlings
Correspondent Services Group whereby federal funds lines have
been established for a number of community bank clients.
|
On June 26, 2007, Sterling entered into a Credit Agreement
with M&T Bank for a
364-day line
of credit in the amount of $80.0 million secured by the
stock of BLC Bank. The interest rate payable on this loan is
currently 7.125% and the Credit Agreement contains
representations, warranties and covenants and provisions
defining events of default. Sterling is subject to on-going
reporting, disclosure and minimum ratio requirements. Sterling
used the proceeds of this loan to make a $70 million
capital contribution to BLC Bank
A-46
to reinforce operating capital and to repay $45.0 million
of outstanding debt of its affiliate, EFI. The loan is
collateralized by 100% of the common stock of BLC Bank. At
September 30, 2007, Sterling and BLC Bank were not in
compliance with the financial covenants of the governing loan
documents. However, Sterling and M&T Bank entered into an
agreement whereby M&T Bank agreed to a waiver of compliance
with the financial covenants, as reflected in Sterlings
financial statements as of September 30, 2007.
Long-Term
Debt
Long-term debt consists of advances from the Federal Home Loan
Bank and borrowings from other financial institutions. Long-term
debt totaled $166.5 million at September 30, 2007, an
increase of $49.3 million from the December 31, 2006
balance of $117.2 million. The increase resulted from the
addition of $95.0 million of advances from the Federal Home
Loan Bank as part of the liquidity management strategy.
Offsetting this were scheduled principal payments and maturities.
Subordinated
Debentures
Sterling sponsors four non-consolidated subsidiary trusts,
Sterling Financial Statutory Trusts II, III, IV and V,
of which 100% of the common equity is owned by Sterling. The
trusts were formed for the purpose of issuing
corporation-obligated mandatorily redeemable capital securities
(the capital securities) to third party investors and investing
the proceeds from the sale of such capital securities solely in
junior subordinated debt securities of Sterling (the
debentures). The debentures held by each trust are the sole
assets of that trust, and totaled $87.6 million as of
September 30, 2007.
In March 2007, Sterling Financial Statutory Trust V issued
$20.0 million of capital securities to third party
investors, and simultaneously invested the proceeds into a
$20.6 million junior subordinated debenture by Sterling.
The debenture bears interest at a floating rate of LIBOR plus
165 basis points and is due in June 2037, with the first
redemption date in March 2012.
Also in March 2007, the junior subordinated debentures issued to
Sterling Financial Statutory Trust I were paid in full for
$20.6 million.
As discussed in the section titled Introduction, the
impact of the EFI Matter on the capital of the company was
significant. In accordance with the terms of each of the
subordinated debentures, Sterling exercised its right to defer
paying the interest on these debentures for up to 20 consecutive
periods without being in default. Since the third quarter of
2007, Sterling has elected to defer the payments required under
these debentures until Sterlings and BLC Banks
capital levels have strengthened to a level which Sterling deems
necessary to support resuming this activity, conditioned on
approval from the Federal Reserve. A total of $1.3 million
of interest on these four debenture issuances was deferred as of
September 30, 2007. It is unknown at what point Sterling
will be able to commence making these interest payments.
Derivative
Financial Instruments
Sterling is a party to derivative instruments in the normal
course of business to manage its own exposure to fluctuations in
interest rates and to meet the financing needs of its customers.
A-47
Asset
Liability Management
Interest
rate derivatives
Sterling enters into derivative transactions principally to
manage the risk of price or interest rate movements on the value
of certain assets and liabilities and on future cash flows. A
summary of the interest rate contracts is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pay fixed/receive floating
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
Pay floating/receive fixed
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
(379
|
)
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
(810
|
)
|
Interest rate floors purchased
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps have been entered into to hedge the
variability in future expected cash flows related to floating
rate assets and liabilities.
|
|
|
|
Interest rate floors have been purchased to hedge the
variability in future expected cash flows related to floating
rate assets in exchange for the payment of a premium when the
contract is initiated.
|
Gains and losses on derivative instruments reclassified from
accumulated other comprehensive income to current-period
earnings are included in the line item in which the hedged cash
flows are recorded. At September 30, 2007, other
comprehensive income included a deferred after-tax unrealized
loss of $262,000 versus $582,000 at December 31, 2006.
A portion of the amount in other comprehensive income was
reclassified from other comprehensive income to the appropriate
income statement line item as net settlements occur. In
addition, the premiums paid for interest rate floors are
amortized over the term of the contract and recognized in the
appropriate income statement line item. Sterling recognized
interest income and interest expense, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended
|
|
Twelve Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
Interest income-commercial loans
|
|
$
|
(575
|
)
|
|
$
|
(456
|
)
|
Interest expense-borrowed funds
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
27
|
|
Equity
derivatives
A summary of the equity derivatives is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
Shares Covered
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
Shares Covered
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
Purchased put options
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additionally during 2006, Sterling wrote call options on certain
equity security holdings (covered calls). Sterling received a
premium in exchange for selling the call options. The buyer of
the option had the right to purchase a specified number of
shares at a future date at an agreed upon price level, or strike
price. The options are recorded at fair value (initially the
premium received) with the changes in fair value recognized in
other non-interest income. At September 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, there were no outstanding options.
|
|
|
|
Sterling has purchased equity put options to protect the company
from the risk that the fair value of certain equity security
holdings might be adversely impacted by changes in market price.
Sterling has the right to sell a specified number of shares
through a future date at an agreed upon price level, or strike
price. The options are recorded at fair value (initially the
premium paid) with the changes in fair value recognized in other
non-interest expense.
|
A-48
Sterling recognized non-interest income and non-interest expense
related to this activity as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended
|
|
Twelve Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
Other non-interest income.
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
Other non-interest expense
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
Customer
Related
Sterling enters into interest rate contracts (including interest
rate caps and interest rate swap agreements) to facilitate
customer transactions and meet their financing needs. This
portfolio is actively managed and hedged with offsetting
contracts, with identical terms, with third-party
counterparties. A summary of the customer related interest rate
contracts and offsetting contracts with third-party
counterparties is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Notional Amount
|
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
|
Notional Amount
|
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pay fixed/receive floating
|
|
$
|
49,454
|
|
|
$
|
(590
|
)
|
|
$
|
42,288
|
|
|
$
|
(271
|
)
|
Pay floating/receive fixed
|
|
|
49,454
|
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
|
42,288
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
Interest rate caps written
|
|
|
12,101
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
18,510
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Interest rate caps purchased
|
|
|
12,101
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
18,510
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Changes in the estimated fair value of customer related
contracts and related interest settlements, net of the
offsetting counterparty contracts, are recorded in non-interest
income. Fees collected from customers for these transactions are
recognized over the life of the contract. Fees included in other
non-interest income are $68,000 for the twelve months ended
September 30, 2007, $54,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2006.
Sterling believes it has reduced market risk on its customer
related derivative contracts through the offsetting contractual
relationships with counterparties. However, if a customer or
counterparty fails to perform, credit risk is equal to the
extent of the fair value gain in a derivative. When the fair
value of a derivative instrument contract is positive, this
generally indicates that the counterparty or customer owes
Sterling, and results in credit risk to Sterling. When the fair
value of a credit risk is negative, Sterling owes the customer
or counterparty, and therefore, has no credit risk. Sterling
minimizes the credit risk in derivative instruments by including
derivative credit risk in its credit underwriting procedures,
and by entering into transactions with higher quality
counterparties that are reviewed periodically by management.
Capital
The management of capital in a regulated financial services
industry must properly balance return on equity to stockholders
while maintaining sufficient capital levels and related
risk-based capital ratios to satisfy regulatory requirements.
Additionally, capital management must also consider acquisition
opportunities that may exist, and the resulting accounting
treatment.
Typically, Sterlings capital management strategy would be
focused on providing an attractive rate of return to
shareholders while, at the same time, maintaining a well
capitalized status at each of its banking subsidiaries.
Since April 2007, Sterlings capital management strategy
shifted to focus primarily on conservation of capital, given the
financial impact of the EFI Matter. Please refer to the
discussion below for a more detailed explanation of
Sterlings capital management strategies.
One capital management strategy that Sterling has employed is
the use of trust preferred securities through its wholly owned
special purpose subsidiary trusts, Sterling Financial Statutory
Trust II, III, IV, and V. The proceeds from the
preferred securities were invested in junior subordinated
deferrable interest debentures of Sterling, at terms consistent
with the trust preferred capital securities. Sterlings
treatment of the preferred capital securities is consistent with
long-term debt, and the related dividends being presented as
interest expense. Sterlings obligations under the
debentures and related documents, taken together, constitute a
full and unconditional guarantee by Sterling of the Statutory
Trusts obligations under the trust preferred securities.
A-49
The capital securities held by the trusts qualify as Tier 1
capital for Sterling under Federal Reserve guidelines. In 2004,
the Federal Reserve issued rules that retain Tier 1 capital
treatment for trust preferred securities but with stricter
limits. Under the new rules, after a five-year transition
period, the aggregate amount of trust preferred securities and
certain other capital elements would retain its current limit of
25% of Tier 1 capital elements, net of goodwill. The amount
of trust preferred securities and certain other elements in
excess of the limit could be included in Tier 2 capital,
subject to restrictions. Sterling has $85.0 million in
trust preferred securities as of September 30, 2007, of
which $36.7 million has been included as Tier 1
capital in its regulatory capital calculations.
In May 2003, Sterlings board of directors authorized the
repurchase of up to 1,303,365 shares of its common stock.
Shares repurchased are held for reissuance in connection with
Sterlings stock compensation plans and for general
corporate purposes. During 2007 and 2006, Sterling repurchased
299,500 and 445,000 shares respectively of its common
stock, at an average price of $21.41 for both periods under this
repurchase plan. As of September 30, 2007,
57,853 shares remain authorized for repurchase.
In a strategy to conserve capital and as required under
Sterlings capital restoration plan, Sterling suspended
paying dividends to its shareholders until such time as its
capital is restored.
Equally important as the management of Sterlings capital
is the management of the capital of Sterlings
subsidiaries. As such, one of Sterlings initiatives with
respect to its subsidiaries capital was to rebuild capital
at BLC Bank, given that the EFI Matter occurred at a wholly
owned subsidiary of BLC Bank. Sterling merged its banking
subsidiaries Bank of Hanover and Trust Company,
Pennsylvania State Bank, and Bay First Bank, N.A. into Bank of
Lancaster County, which changed its name to BLC Bank, N.A.
In another initiative to conserve capital at BLC Bank and in
accordance with the terms of each of the four trust indentures
for Sterlings trust preferred securities, Sterling
exercised its right to defer paying the interest on the trust
preferred securities. Under the terms of the trust indentures,
Sterling can defer paying interest on the trust preferred
securities for up to 20 consecutive quarters without being in
default. Since the third quarter of 2007, Sterling has elected
and given timely notice of its intent to defer the quarterly
payments on the trust preferred securities. This action was
taken because Sterling relies on dividends from its subsidiaries
to fund such interest payments. As a result of BLC Banks
capital position after the EFI Matter, Sterling and BLC Bank
have agreed with the Federal Reserve that BLC Bank will refrain
from paying dividends to Sterling until specified capital levels
at BLC Bank are achieved. Sterling intends to defer interest
payments on the trust preferred securities until BLC Banks
capital level has strengthened to a level that Sterling deems
sufficient to support resuming such interest payments, and
Sterling has received approval from the Federal Reserve to
resume such interest payments. It is currently unknown when
Sterling will be able to resume making these interest payments.
Interest due on the trust preferred securities will accrue
during the deferral periods
Finally, to strengthen BLC Banks capital, Sterling entered
into an $80.0 million
364-day line
of credit with M&T Bank, secured by the stock of BLC Bank,
$70.0 million of which was drawn upon and contributed to
BLC Bank to be used as capital by BLC Bank.
Sterling and its banking subsidiaries are subject to various
regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal and
state banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital
requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly
additional discretionary actions by regulators that could have a
direct material effect on Sterling and the subsidiary
banks operating model. Under capital adequacy guidelines
and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action,
Sterling and its banking subsidiaries must meet specific capital
guidelines that involve quantitative measures of their assets,
liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated
under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and
reclassifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by
the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other
factors. Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable
to bank holding companies.
Quantitative measures that have been established by regulation
to ensure capital adequacy require Sterling and its banking
subsidiaries to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of total and
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets and Tier 1
capital to average assets. Management believes that, as of
September 30, 2007,
A-50
Sterling and BLC Bank did not meet the minimum capital adequacy
requirements to which they were subject. For the period ended
December 31, 2006, management believes that Sterling and
Bank of Lancaster County did not meet the minimum capital
adequacy requirements due to the restatement of prior period
losses related to EFI. To take corrective action, in May 2007,
Sterling and BLC Bank took several steps to improve capital and
capital ratio positions. These steps included: the consolidation
of the Bank of Hanover, Pennsylvania State Bank and Bay First
Bank charters into Bank of Lancaster County and Bank of
Lancaster County changing its name to BLC Bank, N.A.; Sterling
borrowing $80 million from M&T Bank, $70 million
of which was drawn down and contributed to BLC Bank; and the
sale of certain assets. Additionally, Sterling and BLC Bank
developed a capital restoration plan, in consultation with their
banking regulators, to restore Sterlings and BLC
Banks capital levels.
As of September 30, 2007, the most recent notification from
its primary banking regulator, BLC Bank was categorized as
undercapitalized, while Delaware Sterling
Bank & Trust Company was categorized as
well capitalized under the regulatory framework for
prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well
capitalized or adequately capitalized
institutions must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1
risk-based and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the
following tables.
Table
14 Risk-Based Capital
Sterlings and its bank subsidiaries actual capital amounts
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum To Be Adequately
|
|
|
Minimum To Be Well
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized Under Prompt
|
|
|
Capitalized Under Prompt
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Corrective Action Provisions
|
|
|
Corrective Action Provisions
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-based capital to risk weighted assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sterling (consolidated)
|
|
$
|
44,920
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
194,302
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
BLC Bank, N.A.
|
|
|
157,631
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
|
191,641
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
239,551
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
Delaware Sterling Bank & Trust Company
|
|
|
3,616
|
|
|
|
17.6
|
%
|
|
|
1,642
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
2,053
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
Tier 1 risk-based capital to risk weighted assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sterling (consolidated)
|
|
|
22,460
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
97,151
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
BLC Bank, N.A.
|
|
|
132,816
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
95,820
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
143,731
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
Delaware Sterling Bank & Trust Company
|
|
|
3,507
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
%
|
|
|
821
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
1,232
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
Tier 1 risk-based capital to average assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sterling (consolidated)
|
|
|
22,460
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
120,878
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
BLC Bank, N.A.
|
|
|
132,816
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
121,502
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
151,878
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Delaware Sterling Bank & Trust Company
|
|
|
3,507
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
|
2,053
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
2,567
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
As of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-based capital to risk weighted assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sterling (consolidated)
|
|
$
|
82,880
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
193,910
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Bank of Lancaster County, N.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
118,279
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
147,848
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
Bank of Hanover and Trust Company
|
|
|
73,936
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
|
|
45,754
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
57,193
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
Pennsylvania State Bank
|
|
|
23,248
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
|
|
16,354
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
20,442
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
Bay First Bank, N.A.
|
|
|
19,106
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
%
|
|
|
12,383
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
15,479
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
Delaware Sterling Bank & Trust Company
|
|
|
4,306
|
|
|
|
27.8
|
%
|
|
|
1,238
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
1,548
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
Tier 1 risk-based capital to risk weighted assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sterling (consolidated)
|
|
|
41,440
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
96,955
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Bank of Lancaster County, N.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
59,139
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
88,709
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
Bank of Hanover and Trust Company
|
|
|
68,380
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
|
|
22,877
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
34,316
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
Pennsylvania State Bank
|
|
|
21,053
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
|
|
8,229
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
12,265
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
Bay First Bank, N.A.
|
|
|
17,699
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
|
|
6,192
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
9,287
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
Delaware Sterling Bank & Trust Company
|
|
|
4,224
|
|
|
|
27.3
|
%
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
Tier 1 risk-based capital to average assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sterling (consolidated)
|
|
|
41,440
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
111,587
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Bank of Lancaster County, N.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
65,005
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
81,256
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Bank of Hanover and Trust Company
|
|
|
68,380
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
32,180
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
40,225
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Pennsylvania State Bank
|
|
|
21,053
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
|
|
10,306
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
12,883
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Bay First Bank, N.A.
|
|
|
17,699
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
|
7,851
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
9,813
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Delaware Sterling Bank & Trust Company
|
|
|
4,224
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
|
|
1,345
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
1,681
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
A-51
As a result of the financial impact of the EFI Matter,
Sterlings and BLC Banks capital levels and ratios
were significantly depleted. As such, management developed and
implemented several strategies in May 2007, in order to
strengthen these capital levels and ratios. Those strategies
included:
|
|
|
|
|
Merging Bank of Hanover and Trust Company, Pennsylvania
State Bank and Bay First Bank, N.A. into Bank of Lancaster
County, N.A. to create a newly named BLC Bank, N.A.
|
|
|
|
Sterling entered into an $80.0 million
364-day line
of credit with M&T Bank, secured by stock of BLC Bank,
$70.0 million of which was drawn upon and contributed to
BLC Bank.
|
The following table depicts the proforma capital ratios for BLC
Bank as of December 31, 2006, assuming that Sterling had
merged its banks, as outlined above, by such date. Further, the
table below depicts a comparison of BLC Banks proforma
capital ratios as of December 31, 2006, to the levels
required for BLC Bank to be considered at Minimum and Well
Capitalized capitalization levels, as provided under the
regulatory framework for prompt corrective action.
To compute the pro forma capital levels and ratios for BLC Bank,
N.A., the financial statements of Bank of Lancaster County,
N.A., Bank of Hanover, Pennsylvania State Bank and Bay First
Bank, N.A. were consolidated and intercompany transactions
totaling $83.9 million, as of December 31, 2006, were
eliminated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum to be
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum to be Adequately
|
|
|
Well
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized Under Prompt
|
|
|
Capitalized Under Prompt
|
|
|
|
Proforma
|
|
|
Corrective Action Provisions
|
|
|
Corrective Action Provisions
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital to risk weighted assets BLC Bank, N.A.
|
|
$
|
74,231
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
191,025
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
238,781
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets BLC Bank, N.A.
|
|
|
49,789
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
95,512
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
143,269
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
Tier 1 capital to average assets BLC Bank, N.A.
|
|
|
49,789
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
112,039
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
140,048
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
When comparing BLC Banks pro forma capital ratios as of
December 31, 2006 to actual capital ratios as of
September 30, 2007, total capital to risk-weighted assets,
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets and Tier 1
capital to average assets as of September 30, 2007,
increased by 347 basis points, 345 basis points and
259 basis points, respectively. Those increases were
primarily the result of the additional capital infused into BLC
Bank (as outlined above).
Liquidity
Effective liquidity management ensures that the cash flow
requirements of depositors and borrowers, as well as the
operating cash needs of Sterling, are met.
Sterlings funds are available from a variety of sources,
including assets that are readily convertible to cash (federal
funds sold, short-term investments), securities portfolio,
scheduled repayments of loan receivables, deposit base,
borrowing capacity (short and long term) with the Federal
Reserve, a number of correspondent banks and the Federal Home
Loan Bank (FHLB), the ability to package residential mortgage
loans originated for sale and the ability to sell finance leases
through our correspondent bank relationships.
As a result of the EFI Matter, Sterling implemented several
steps to enhance the liquidity position of its banks. These
actions were taken in anticipation of potential liquidity
concerns that could have been caused by a loss of confidence by
the banks depositors coupled with reduced access to
external borrowings. Although Sterlings banks experienced
relatively low impact from depositors actions, several of
Sterlings and its banks external borrowing sources
pulled back on line availability
and/or
required collateral against borrowings.
The following are some of the more critical actions Sterling and
its banks took to enhance its liquidity position and position
its banks to deal with potential liquidity concerns:
|
|
|
|
|
BLC Bank borrowed an additional $190.0 million from the
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB), stratified through various
maturities ranging from one month to 36 months.
|
A-52
|
|
|
|
|
Sterling, the parent company, entered into a
364-day
$80.0 million line of credit with M&T Bank, secured by
the stock of BLC Bank, $70.0 million of which was drawn
upon and contributed to BLC Bank. This action was taken to
enhance liquidity as well as capital levels at BLC Bank.
|
|
|
|
BLC Bank sold approximately $50.0 million of various types
of commercial loans and leases to various correspondent banks.
This action was taken to enhance BLC Banks liquidity and
capital ratios as well as establish a process by which further
sales could have been executed if necessary.
|
|
|
|
Sterlings banks enhanced their deposit pricing in
non-maturity and time deposits. This action was taken to enhance
liquidity, bolster depositor confidence, as well as to attract
new households and retain customers.
|
|
|
|
Sterling temporarily suspended payments of dividends on its
Trust Preferred Securities, as allowed under those agreements.
This action was taken to preserve liquidity at the parent
company (from the third quarter 2007 forward).
|
|
|
|
Sterling temporarily suspended payment of dividends to its
shareholders (from the second quarter 2007 forward). This action
was taken to preserve capital as well as liquidity at the parent
company.
|
As reflected above, Sterlings actions with respect to
liquidity were designed to enhance Sterlings liquidity
position and preserve its capital position. Through the date of
this document, Sterling and its banks have experienced
relatively low levels of deposit outflows, although Sterling has
experienced a change in its deposit mix. While some non-maturity
deposit balances decreased, time deposits increased resulting
from Sterlings household attraction and pricing strategies.
Currently, Sterling believes the liquidity position of its
banking subsidiaries is sufficient to support significant levels
of cash demands on its banks. As of September 30, 2007, the
parent companys cash position totaled $7.0 million,
as compared to $18.0 million at December 31, 2006.
Sterlings cash and cash equivalents totaled
$318.5 million at September 30, 2007, as compared to
$148.7 million at December 31, 2006. As of
September 30, 2007, BLC Bank had unused borrowing capacity
from the Federal Reserve, its correspondent banks and the FHLB
totaling $621.0 million as compared to $561.0 million
at December 31, 2006.
The liquidity of the parent company represents an important
aspect of liquidity management. The parent companys net
cash outflows consist principally of dividends to shareholders,
interest payments on its trust preferred securities, and
unallocated corporate expenses. In order to preserve capital and
liquidity at the parent company, in the second quarter of 2007
Sterling suspended the payment of dividends to its shareholders
and in the third quarter of 2007 suspended payment of interest
on its junior subordinated debentures. With regard to cash
inflows to the parent company, the main source of these funds is
dividends from its subsidiaries. Since the second quarter of
2007, BLC Bank has not declared or paid dividends to the parent
company, due to its current capital levels. Given the actions
taken by Sterling with respect to liquidity, management believes
that Sterlings cash position at September 30, 2007 is
sufficient to cover expected cash demands.
A-53
Contractual
Obligations, Commitments and Off-balance Sheet
Arrangements
Sterling enters into contractual obligations in its normal
course of business to fund loan growth, for asset/liability
management purposes, to meet required capital needs and for
other corporate purposes. The following table presents
significant fixed and determinable contractual obligations by
payment date. Further discussion of the nature of each
obligation is included in the referenced note to the
consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due In
|
|
|
|
Note
|
|
|
Total Amount
|
|
|
One Year
|
|
|
One to
|
|
|
Three to
|
|
|
Over Five
|
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
|
Committed
|
|
|
or Less
|
|
|
Three Years
|
|
|
Five Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Deposits without a stated maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,318,878
|
|
|
$
|
1,318,878
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Time Deposits
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
1,416,536
|
|
|
|
1,144,041
|
|
|
|
247,826
|
|
|
|
24,200
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
Short-Term Borrowings
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
86,108
|
|
|
|
86,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
166,464
|
|
|
|
61,228
|
|
|
|
85,031
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
20,171
|
|
Subordinated debentures
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
87,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,630
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
22,952
|
|
|
|
2,537
|
|
|
|
4,325
|
|
|
|
3,283
|
|
|
|
12,807
|
|
Uncertain tax positions
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,098,818
|
|
|
$
|
2,612,792
|
|
|
$
|
337,272
|
|
|
$
|
27,517
|
|
|
$
|
121,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sterling is a party to derivative instruments in the normal
course of business, to assist in asset liability management and
reduce exposure in earnings volatility caused by fluctuations in
interest and market conditions and to meet the financing needs
of its customers. Derivative contracts are carried at fair value
on the consolidated balance sheet with the fair value
representing the net present value of the expected future cash
receipts or payments based on market and interest rate
conditions as of the balance sheet date. The fair values of the
contracts can change daily as market and interest rate
conditions fluctuate. These derivative contracts require monthly
cash settlement. Because the derivative liabilities recorded on
the balance sheet do not represent the amounts that will
ultimately be paid under the contract, they are not included in
the table of contractual obligations discussed above. Further
discussion of derivative instruments is included in Notes 1
and 16 to the consolidated financial statements.
A schedule of significant commitments at September 30, 2007
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit:
|
|
|
|
|
Unused home equity lines of credit
|
|
$
|
107,026
|
|
Other commitments to extend credit
|
|
|
574,204
|
|
Standby letters of credit
|
|
|
97,761
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
778,991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Further discussion of these commitments to extend credit is
included in Note 16 to the consolidated financial
statements. In addition, Sterling has commitments and
obligations under employee benefit plans as discussed in
Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements.
Sterling has no off-balance sheet arrangements through the use
of special-purpose entities.
New
Financial Accounting Standards
Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements discusses
the expected impact on Sterlings financial condition or
results of operations for recently issued or proposed accounting
standards that have not been adopted. To the extent that we
anticipate a significant impact to Sterlings financial
condition or results of operations, appropriate discussion is
included in the applicable note to the consolidated financial
statements.
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Financial institutions can be exposed to several market risks
that may impact the value or future earnings capacity of an
organization. These risks involve interest rate risk, foreign
currency exchange risk, commodity
A-54
price risk and equity market price risk. Sterlings primary
market risk is interest rate risk. Interest rate risk is
inherent because as a financial institution, Sterling derives a
significant amount of its operating revenue from
purchasing funds (customer deposits and borrowings)
at various terms and rates. These funds are then invested into
earning assets (loans, leases, investments, etc.) at various
terms and rates. This risk is further discussed below.
Equity market risk is not a significant risk to Sterling, as
marketable equity securities on a cost basis comprise less than
1% of corporate assets. Sterlings exposure to foreign
currency exchange risk is inconsequential. Sterling does not
have any exposure to commodity price risk.
Interest
Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is the exposure to fluctuations in
Sterlings future earnings (earnings at risk) and value
(value at risk) resulting from changes in interest rates. This
exposure results from differences between the amounts of
interest earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities that
reprice within a specified time period as a result of scheduled
maturities and repayment, contractual interest rate changes, or
the exercise of explicit or embedded options.
The primary objective of Sterlings asset/liability
management process is to maximize current and future net
interest income within acceptable levels of interest rate risk
while satisfying liquidity and capital requirements. Management
recognizes that a certain amount of interest rate risk is
inherent and appropriate yet is not essential to Sterlings
profitability. Thus the goal of interest rate risk management is
to maintain a balance between risk and reward such that net
interest income is maximized while risk is maintained at a
tolerable level.
Management endeavors to control the exposures to changes in
interest rates by understanding, reviewing and making decisions
based on its risk position. Sterlings Asset Liability
Committee is responsible for these decisions. Sterling primarily
uses the security portfolios and borrowings to manage its
interest rate risk position. Additionally, pricing, promotion
and product development activities are directed in an effort to
emphasize the loan and deposit term or repricing characteristics
that best meet current interest rate risk objectives. Finally,
Sterling has utilized off-balance sheet instruments to a limited
degree to manage its interest rate risk position.
The Asset Liability Committee operates under management policies
defining guidelines and limits on the level of risk. These
policies are approved annually by the board of directors.
Sterling uses simulation analysis to assess earnings at risk and
net present value analysis to assess value at risk. These
methods allow management to regularly monitor both the direction
and magnitude of Sterlings interest rate risk exposure.
These modeling techniques involve assumptions and estimates that
inherently cannot be measured with complete precision. Key
assumptions in the analyses include maturity and repricing
characteristics of both assets and liabilities, prepayments on
amortizing assets, other imbedded options, non-maturity deposit
sensitivity and loan and deposit pricing. These assumptions are
inherently uncertain due to the timing, magnitude and frequency
of rate changes and changes in market conditions and management
strategies, among other factors. However, the analyses are
useful in quantifying risk and provide a relative gauge of
Sterlings interest rate risk position over time.
Earnings
at Risk
Simulation analysis evaluates the effect of immediate upward and
downward changes in market interest rates on future net interest
income. The analysis involves changing the interest rates used
in determining net interest income over the next twelve months.
The resulting percentage change in net interest income in
various rate scenarios is an indication of Sterlings
shorter-term interest rate risk. The analysis utilizes a
static balance sheet approach. The measurement date
balance sheet composition (or mix) is maintained over the
simulation time period, with maturing and repayment dollars
being rolled back into like instruments for new terms at current
market rates. Additional assumptions are applied to modify
volumes and pricing under the
A-55
various rate scenarios. These include prepayment assumptions on
mortgage assets, the sensitivity of non-maturity deposit rates,
and other factors deemed significant.
The simulation analysis results are presented in Table 15a.
These results indicate that Sterling would expect net interest
income to decline 9.9% over the next twelve months assuming an
immediate upward shift in market interest rates of
200 basis points and to increase by 5.1% if rates shifted
downward in the same manner. This profile reflects a liability
sensitivity position. The magnitude of the impact of rising
rates versus declining rates is not equal due to optionality in
certain assets and liabilities. Specifically, conversion
features on FHLB advances create greater liability sensitivity
in rising rate scenarios where call options on securities and
prepayment risk on securities and loans create greater asset
sensitivity in declining rate scenarios. All measurements were
within the guidelines set by policy.
At December 31, 2006, annual net interest income was
expected to decline by 2.3% in the upward scenario and to
decline by 0.3% in the downward scenario. The current risk
position indicates more liability sensitivity than the prior
year-end measurements. The primary factors contributing to the
increased liability sensitivity are the rolling down
of time deposit and FHLB advance maturities as well as the
growth in short-term CDs and short-term borrowings, the
decrease in forestry related receivables and the increase in
non-interest bearing assets offset in part by the lower volume
of moderately sensitive core deposits.
Value
at Risk
The net present value analysis provides information on the risk
inherent in the balance sheet that might not be taken into
account in the simulation analysis due to the shorter time
horizon used in that analysis. The net present value of the
balance sheet is defined as the discounted present value of
expected asset cash flows minus the discounted present value of
the expected liability cash flows. The analysis involves
changing the interest rates used in determining the expected
cash flows and in discounting the cash flows. The resulting
percentage change in net present value in various rate scenarios
is an indication of the longer term repricing risk and options
embedded in the balance sheet.
The net present value analysis results are presented in Table
15b. These results indicate that the net present value would
decrease 11.5% assuming an immediate upward shift in market
interest rates of 200 basis points and to increase 5.1% if
rates shifted downward in the same manner. The risk position of
Sterling is within the guidelines set by policy.
At December 31, 2006, the analysis indicated that the net
present value would decrease 7.0% assuming an immediate upward
shift in market interest rates of 200% and to increase 2.1% if
rates shifted downward in the same manner. The current risk
position indicates greater liability sensitivity than the prior
year-end measurement. The factors leading to this change are
consistent with those impacting the earnings at risk measurement
noted previously.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 15a
|
|
Table 15b
|
Change in
|
|
% Change in
|
|
Change in
|
|
% Change in
|
Market Interest Rates
|
|
Net Interest Income
|
|
Market Interest Rates
|
|
Present Value of Equity
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(200
|
)
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
(0.3
|
%)
|
|
|
(200
|
)
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
(0.0
|
%)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
+100
|
|
|
|
(4.8
|
%)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
%)
|
|
|
+100
|
|
|
|
(5.7
|
%)
|
|
|
(3.3
|
%)
|
|
+200
|
|
|
|
(9.9
|
%)
|
|
|
(2.3
|
%)
|
|
|
+200
|
|
|
|
(11.5
|
%)
|
|
|
(7.0
|
%)
|
A-56
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Sterling Financial Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Sterling Financial Corporation (Sterling) as of
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, and the
related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for the nine-month
period ended September 30, 2007 and the year ended
December 31, 2006. These financial statements are the
responsibility of Sterlings management. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an
audit of Sterlings internal control over financial
reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control
over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
Sterlings internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe our audits provide
a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Sterling Financial Corporation at
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, and the
consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for
the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007 and the year
ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 2, Sterling restated previously issued
financial statements as of December 31, 2006 and for the
year then ended to correct for fraudulent activities identified
within its Equipment Finance LLC subsidiary.
As discussed in Note 15, Sterling adopted FIN 48:
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 109, as of January 1, 2007.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
January 30, 2008
A-57
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
308,399
|
|
|
$
|
87,683
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
10,098
|
|
|
|
61,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
318,497
|
|
|
|
148,700
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits in banks
|
|
|
5,889
|
|
|
|
6,339
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
2,761
|
|
|
|
3,119
|
|
Mortgage loans held for sale
|
|
|
4,684
|
|
|
|
4,136
|
|
Securities held-to-maturity (fair value 2007
$19,687; 2006 $21,644)
|
|
|
19,636
|
|
|
|
21,530
|
|
Securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
412,844
|
|
|
|
460,016
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income
|
|
|
2,092,886
|
|
|
|
2,078,621
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(24,139
|
)
|
|
|
(22,517
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
2,068,747
|
|
|
|
2,056,104
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
46,487
|
|
|
|
48,987
|
|
Assets held for operating lease, net
|
|
|
90,514
|
|
|
|
88,960
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
71,230
|
|
|
|
71,451
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
5,162
|
|
|
|
6,312
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
3,260
|
|
|
|
3,177
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
13,101
|
|
|
|
13,979
|
|
Refund for previously paid taxes
|
|
|
53,168
|
|
|
|
52,414
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
57,894
|
|
|
|
49,035
|
|
Bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
30,938
|
|
|
|
5,149
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
36,034
|
|
|
|
37,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,240,846
|
|
|
$
|
3,076,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest-bearing
|
|
$
|
285,882
|
|
|
$
|
311,881
|
|
Now and money market
|
|
|
784,459
|
|
|
|
884,893
|
|
Savings
|
|
|
248,537
|
|
|
|
266,583
|
|
Time
|
|
|
1,416,536
|
|
|
|
1,152,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
2,735,414
|
|
|
|
2,615,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
86,108
|
|
|
|
78,833
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
166,464
|
|
|
|
117,207
|
|
Subordinated debentures
|
|
|
87,630
|
|
|
|
87,630
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
17,766
|
|
|
|
10,332
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
36,991
|
|
|
|
38,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
3,130,373
|
|
|
|
2,948,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par value, 10.0 million shares
authorized; no shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $5.00 par value, 70.0 million
shares authorized; issued: 2007
29.5 million shares; 2006
29.7 million shares
|
|
|
148,642
|
|
|
|
148,642
|
|
Capital surplus
|
|
|
88,066
|
|
|
|
88,279
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(121,589
|
)
|
|
|
(109,408
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
2,756
|
|
Common stock in treasury, at cost ( 2007
222,000 shares; 2006 64,000 shares)
|
|
|
(4,908
|
)
|
|
|
(1,496
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
110,473
|
|
|
|
128,773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,240,846
|
|
|
$
|
3,076,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
A-58
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the
|
|
|
|
For the
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Ended,
|
|
|
|
Ended,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands,
|
|
|
|
except per share data)
|
|
|
Interest and dividend income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including fees
|
|
$
|
115,399
|
|
|
$
|
139,157
|
|
Debt securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
|
8,059
|
|
|
|
10,626
|
|
Tax-exempt
|
|
|
7,199
|
|
|
|
10,089
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
708
|
|
|
|
817
|
|
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
887
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
2,299
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest and dividend income
|
|
|
134,196
|
|
|
|
161,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
62,877
|
|
|
|
65,526
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
4,651
|
|
|
|
5,741
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
5,715
|
|
|
|
6,462
|
|
Subordinated debentures
|
|
|
4,667
|
|
|
|
5,766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
77,910
|
|
|
|
83,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
56,286
|
|
|
|
78,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
7,083
|
|
|
|
17,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
49,203
|
|
|
|
60,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust and investment management income
|
|
|
7,398
|
|
|
|
9,928
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
|
|
7,867
|
|
|
|
9,130
|
|
Other service charges, commissions and fees
|
|
|
4,530
|
|
|
|
5,481
|
|
Brokerage fees and commissions
|
|
|
2,228
|
|
|
|
3,087
|
|
Mortgage banking income
|
|
|
1,583
|
|
|
|
1,930
|
|
Rental income on operating leases
|
|
|
26,813
|
|
|
|
32,269
|
|
Other operating income
|
|
|
3,577
|
|
|
|
4,904
|
|
Securities gains, net
|
|
|
3,831
|
|
|
|
1,485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income
|
|
|
57,827
|
|
|
|
68,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
|
43,911
|
|
|
|
57,686
|
|
Net occupancy
|
|
|
6,261
|
|
|
|
6,661
|
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
|
6,888
|
|
|
|
8,042
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
22,310
|
|
|
|
3,940
|
|
Depreciation on operating lease assets
|
|
|
21,895
|
|
|
|
26,459
|
|
Taxes other than income
|
|
|
2,173
|
|
|
|
2,317
|
|
Intangible asset amortization
|
|
|
1,216
|
|
|
|
1,428
|
|
Other EFI losses
|
|
|
1,980
|
|
|
|
6,386
|
|
Other
|
|
|
15,872
|
|
|
|
19,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expenses
|
|
|
122,506
|
|
|
|
132,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
(15,476
|
)
|
|
|
(3,353
|
)
|
Income tax (benefit) expenses
|
|
|
(7,982
|
)
|
|
|
(5,137
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
|
|
(7,494
|
)
|
|
|
1,784
|
|
Discontinued operations, net of taxes of $0, and $(2,723)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,130
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
(7,494
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,346
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared
|
|
$
|
0.150
|
|
|
$
|
0.580
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
A-59
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings/
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Escrowed
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Surplus
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2006, as originally reported
|
|
|
28,913,229
|
|
|
$
|
145,692
|
|
|
$
|
79,351
|
|
|
$
|
72,849
|
|
|
$
|
4,042
|
|
|
$
|
(3,848
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
298,086
|
|
Adjustments to opening retained earnings retroactively applied
to previous periods due to correction for fraudulent activity at
subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(162,014
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(162,014
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2006
|
|
|
28,913,229
|
|
|
|
145,692
|
|
|
|
79,351
|
|
|
|
(89,165
|
)
|
|
|
4,042
|
|
|
|
(3,848
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,072
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,784
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,784
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,130
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,130
|
)
|
Change in net unrealized gain(loss) on securities AFS, net of
reclassification adjustment and tax effects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,017
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,017
|
)
|
Change in unrealized loss on cash flow derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
Unrealized postretirement benefit accrual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(344
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(344
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,632
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Bay Net, Inc.
|
|
|
575,449
|
|
|
|
2,877
|
|
|
|
10,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,043
|
|
Release of Church escrowed shares
|
|
|
177,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,883
|
|
Release of Bainbridge escrowed shares
|
|
|
2,662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
15,166
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(550
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Treasury stock issued:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors compensation plan
|
|
|
13,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
457,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,002
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,604
|
|
Shares issued in connection with contingent consideration
provisions of CHS acquisition
|
|
|
29,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
652
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,824
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Purchase of treasury shares
|
|
|
(445,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,341
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,341
|
)
|
Treasury shares acquired on sale of CHS
|
|
|
(76,499
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,782
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,782
|
)
|
Cash dividends declared
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,897
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,897
|
)
|
Income tax benefit of nonqualified stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,187
|
|
Non-cash compensation cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006
|
|
|
29,664,161
|
|
|
|
148,642
|
|
|
|
88,279
|
|
|
|
(109,408
|
)
|
|
|
2,756
|
|
|
|
(1,496
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,773
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,494
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,494
|
)
|
Change in net unrealized gain(loss) on securities AFS, net of
reclassification adjustment and tax effects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,831
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,831
|
)
|
Change in unrealized loss on cash flow derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
Unrealized postretirement benefit accrual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,988
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock issued:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
131,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,447
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,501
|
|
Restricted stock issued
|
|
|
10,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
(216
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury shares
|
|
|
(299,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,596
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,596
|
)
|
Cash dividends declared
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,437
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,437
|
)
|
Non-cash compensation cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles for the
adoption of FIN 48, Accounting For Uncertain Tax
Positions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(250
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(250
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2007
|
|
|
29,506,745
|
|
|
$
|
148,642
|
|
|
$
|
88,066
|
|
|
$
|
(121,589
|
)
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
|
$
|
(4,908
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
110,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
A-60
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Ended,
|
|
|
|
Ended,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(7,494
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,784
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,130
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
26,674
|
|
|
|
31,902
|
|
Net accretion of investment securities
|
|
|
(747
|
)
|
|
|
(587
|
)
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
1,216
|
|
|
|
1,428
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
7,083
|
|
|
|
17,619
|
|
Provision for deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(8,294
|
)
|
|
|
(5,285
|
)
|
Stock option compensation cost
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
Gain on sales of finance leases and receivables
|
|
|
(245
|
)
|
|
|
(1,082
|
)
|
Net gain on sales of securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
(3,831
|
)
|
|
|
(1,485
|
)
|
Gain on sales of mortgage loans
|
|
|
(482
|
)
|
|
|
(464
|
)
|
Loss on sale of affiliate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans held for sale
|
|
|
65,235
|
|
|
|
67,802
|
|
Originations of mortgage loans held for sale
|
|
|
(65,300
|
)
|
|
|
(68,274
|
)
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
878
|
|
|
|
(1,301
|
)
|
(Increase) decrease in bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
(25,789
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in other assets
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
(5,112
|
)
|
(Increase) decrease in assets related to discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,020
|
|
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable
|
|
|
7,434
|
|
|
|
1,533
|
|
Increase (decrease) in liabilities related to discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities
|
|
|
1,275
|
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
|
|
(829
|
)
|
|
|
40,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (increase) decrease in interest-bearing deposits in other
banks
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
(649
|
)
|
Net (increase) decrease in short-term investments
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
(963
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
9,611
|
|
|
|
25,549
|
|
Proceeds from maturities or calls of securities held-to-maturity
|
|
|
19,559
|
|
|
|
13,884
|
|
Proceeds from maturities or calls of securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
83,841
|
|
|
|
141,286
|
|
Purchases of securities held-to-maturity
|
|
|
(17,657
|
)
|
|
|
(6,119
|
)
|
Purchases of securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
(45,997
|
)
|
|
|
(161,169
|
)
|
Net loans and direct finance leases made to customers
|
|
|
(88,674
|
)
|
|
|
(205,463
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of loans
|
|
|
46,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of finance leases and receivables
|
|
|
23,017
|
|
|
|
53,385
|
|
Purchases of equipment acquired for operating leases, net
|
|
|
(23,449
|
)
|
|
|
(41,783
|
)
|
Purchases of premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
(3,413
|
)
|
|
|
(9,802
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment
|
|
|
1,133
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
Net cash received (paid) for business combinations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
5,145
|
|
|
|
(181,331
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in deposits
|
|
|
119,502
|
|
|
|
314,546
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings
|
|
|
7,275
|
|
|
|
(61,740
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
95,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt
|
|
|
(45,743
|
)
|
|
|
(63,998
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
Cash dividends
|
|
|
(5,449
|
)
|
|
|
(16,512
|
)
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
(6,596
|
)
|
|
|
(9,341
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of treasury stock
|
|
|
1,492
|
|
|
|
7,483
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
165,481
|
|
|
|
180,679
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
169,797
|
|
|
|
39,429
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year
|
|
|
148,700
|
|
|
|
109,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of year
|
|
$
|
318,497
|
|
|
$
|
148,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
71,787
|
|
|
$
|
80,635
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
15,081
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
A-61
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
|
|
Note 1
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Basis of Presentation and Consolidation The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Sterling Financial Corporation (Sterling) and its wholly owned
subsidiaries, BLC Bank, N.A., Delaware Sterling Bank &
Trust Company (Delaware Sterling), HOVB Investment Co.,
T & C Leasing, Inc. (inactive), BankersRe Insurance
Group, SPC (formerly Pennbanks Insurance Company, SPC), Church
Capital Management LLC, Bainbridge Securities, Inc., Lancaster
Insurance Group, LLC and Sterling Mortgage Services, Inc.
(inactive). The consolidated financial statements also include:
Town & Country Leasing, LLC (Town &
Country), Sterling Financial Trust Company, Equipment
Finance, LLC (EFI) and Sterling Community Development
Corporation, LLC, which are all wholly owned subsidiaries of BLC
Bank, N.A. On May 25, 2007, BLC Bank, N.A. was formed by
the merger of Bank of Lancaster County, N.A., Bank of Hanover,
Bay First Bank, and Pennsylvania State Bank. These insured
depository institutions were wholly owned subsidiaries of
Sterling prior to their merger on May 25, 2007. All
significant intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
In December 2006, Sterling completed the divestiture of
Corporate Healthcare Strategies, LLC, Professional Services
Group and various insurance assets of its personal property and
casualty insurance agency, Lancaster Insurance Group, LLC. The
results of operations of the divested businesses have been
reclassified as discontinued operations. These reclassifications
had no effect on net income or stockholders equity. Unless
otherwise noted, the remaining discussion and tabular data
relate only to Sterlings continuing operations.
Restatement The financial statements for the
year ended 2006, including opening retained earnings as of
January 1, 2006, have been restated to give effect to the
EFI Matter. The impact of the restatement was a reduction of
January 1, 2006 opening retained earnings of
$162.0 million. See Note 2, Restatement of
Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the
effect on the 2006 financial statements.
Use of Estimates In preparing consolidated
financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles, management is required to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet and
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Business Sterling, through its subsidiaries,
provides a full range of financial services to individual and
corporate customers located in south central Pennsylvania,
northern Maryland and northern Delaware. Town &
Country provides financing to customers generally located within
a one hundred mile radius of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, although
they have assets located in all 50 states. Additionally,
Sterlings Equipment Finance, LLC subsidiary, finances
forestry and land clearing equipment to customers primarily
located in the southeastern United States.
Concentration of Credit Risk Sterling
operates primarily in its defined market area and, accordingly,
the banks have extended credit primarily to commercial entities
and individuals in this area whose ability to honor their
contracts is influenced by the regions economy. Sterling
is limited (by banking regulatory authorities) in extending
credit established by bank regulatory authorities by legal
lending limits to any single group of borrowers.
Cash and Cash Equivalents For purposes of the
consolidated statements of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents
include cash and balances due from banks and federal funds sold,
generally which mature in one day.
Interest-bearing Deposits in Banks
Interest-bearing deposits in banks mature within one year and
are carried at cost.
A-62
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
Securities Debt securities that management
has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are
classified as held-to-maturity and recorded at
amortized cost. Securities not classified as held-to-maturity,
including marketable equity securities with readily determinable
fair values, are classified as available-for-sale
and recorded at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses
excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive
income. Non-marketable equity securities consist of Federal
Reserve Bank stock, Federal Home Loan Bank stock, and Atlantic
Central Bankers Bank stock and are carried at cost.
Purchase premiums and discounts are recognized in interest
income using the interest method over terms of the securities
using the interest method. Declines in the fair value of
held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities below their
cost that are deemed to be other-than-temporary are reflected in
earnings in the period that management concludes that
other-than-temporary impairment occurs. Sterling uses various
indicators in determining whether a security is
other-than-temporarily impaired, including, for equity
securities, if the market value is below its cost for an
extended period of time, generally six months, or for debt
securities, when it is probable that the contractual interest
and principal will not be collected or Sterling does not have
the intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity.
Gains and losses on the sale of securities are recorded on the
trade date and are determined using the specific identification
method.
Mortgage Loans Held for Sale Loans originated
and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at the
lower of cost or estimated fair value in the aggregate. Net
unrealized losses, if any, are recognized through a valuation
allowance by charges to income.
Loans Sterling grants mortgage, commercial
and consumer loans and leasing alternatives to customers. The
ability of Sterlings debtors to honor their contracts is
dependent upon the real estate and general economic conditions
in the market area.
Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold until
maturity or pay-off are reported at their outstanding principal
balance adjusted for charge-offs, and any deferred fees or costs
on originated loans. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid
principal balance.
Lease contracts which meet the appropriate criteria specified in
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13,
Accounting for Leases, are classified as direct finance
leases. Direct finance leases are recorded upon acceptance of
the equipment by the customer. Unearned lease income represents
the excess of the gross lease investment over the cost of the
leased equipment, which is recognized over the lease term at a
constant rate of return on the net investment in the lease.
Loan and lease origination fees and loan origination costs are
deferred and recognized as an adjustment of the related loan
yield using the interest method.
The accrual of interest on loans is generally discontinued at
the time the loan is 90 days delinquent, unless, the loan
is well secured and in the process of collection. Loans (except
EFI finance receivables) are placed on nonaccrual status or
charged-off at an earlier date if collection of principal or
interest is considered doubtful. When management places a loan
on nonaccrual status, it reverses unpaid interest credited to
income in the current year, and charges unpaid interest accrued
in prior years to the allowance for loan losses. Any cash on
these loans is applied first to reduce the carrying value of the
loan or, if principal is considered fully collectible,
recognized as interest income until qualifying for return to
accrual status. Loans are returned to accrual status when all
the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought
current and future payments are reasonably assured. EFI finance
receivables are placed on non-accrual status at 90 days
past due.
Allowance for Loan Losses Sterling maintains
the allowance for loan losses at a level believed adequate by
management to absorb probable losses inherent in the loan
portfolio. It is established and maintained through a provision
for loan losses charged to earnings. Quarterly, Sterling
utilizes a defined
A-63
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
methodology in determining the adequacy of the allowance for
loan losses, which considers specific credit reviews, past loan
loss historical experience, and qualitative factors.
Loans other than EFI Management assigns
internal risk ratings to all commercial relationships with
aggregate borrowings or commitments to extend credit in excess
of specified limits as dictated by internal credit policies.
Utilizing migration analysis for the previous eight quarters,
management develops a loss factor, which it then uses to
estimate losses on impaired loans and potential problem loans.
When management finds loans with uncertain collectibility of
principal and interest, it places those loans on the
problem list, and evaluates them on a quarterly
basis in order to estimate potential losses. Managements
analysis considers adverse situations that may affect the
borrowers ability to repay, estimated value of underlying
collateral, and prevailing market conditions. If management
determines that a specific reserve allocation is not required,
it assigns a general loss factor based on historical performance
to determine the reserve necessary for each loan. For
homogeneous loan types, such as consumer and residential
mortgage loans, management bases the general loss factor on the
average loss ratio for the previous two years for each specific
loan pool adjusted for current conditions, including trends in
delinquency levels, trends in non-performing and potential
problem loans, trends in composition, volume and terms of loans,
effects of changes in lending policies or underwriting
procedures, experience, ability and depth of management,
national and local economic conditions, concentrations in
lending activities, and other factors that management may deem
appropriate.
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information
and events, it is probable that Sterling will be unable to
collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due
according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.
Factors considered by management in determining impairment
include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of
collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due.
Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment
shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management
determines the significance of payment delays and payment
shortfalls on a
case-by-case
basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances
surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of
the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrowers prior
payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to
the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a
loan-by-loan
basis for commercial and construction loans by either the
present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the
loans effective interest rate, the loans obtainable
market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is
collateral dependent.
EFI Finance Receivables In determining the
allowance for loan loss for the EFI portfolio, management
considered, for each finance receivable with a range of
delinquency between current and 119 days past due, the
delinquency status, timing and frequency of payments, and
information obtained from visits with the customer and
observations of the collateral. All finance receivables within a
customer relationship delinquent 120 days or more are
charged-off to zero irrespective of potential collateral value
or potential future cash recovery due to the significant
uncertainty regarding the timing or amount of such recoveries.
Any related subsequent cash receipts arising from customer
payments, liquidation of collateral or contract insurance
proceeds are recognized as recoveries.
Management determines the unallocated portion of the allowance
for loan losses based on the following criteria: risk of error
in the specific and general reserve allocations; other potential
exposure in the loan portfolio; variances in managements
assessment of national and local economic conditions; and other
internal or external factors that management believes
appropriate at that time.
Management believes the above methodology accurately reflects
losses inherent in the portfolio. Management charges actual
losses to the allowance for loan losses. Management periodically
updates the methodology discussed above, which reduces the
difference between actual losses and estimated losses.
A-64
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
Servicing Servicing assets are recognized as
separate assets when rights are retained through the sale of
financial assets. Capitalized servicing rights are reported in
other assets and are amortized into non-interest income in
proportion to, and over the period of, the estimated future net
servicing income of the underlying financial assets. Servicing
assets are evaluated for impairment based upon the fair value of
the rights as compared to amortized cost. Impairment is
determined by stratifying rights by predominant characteristics,
such as interest rate and terms. Fair value is determined based
upon discounted cash flows using market-based assumptions.
Impairment is recognized through a valuation allowance for
individual stratum, to the extent the fair value is less than
the capitalized amount for the stratum.
Credit Related Financial Instruments In the
ordinary course of business, Sterling has entered into
commitments to extend credit, commercial letters of credit and
standby letters of credit. Such financial instruments are
recorded when they are funded.
Derivative Financial Instruments As part of
Sterlings asset/liability management strategies, it uses
interest rate contracts, which include swaps, cap, and floor
agreements, to hedge various exposures or to modify interest
rate characteristics of various balance sheet accounts.
Derivatives that are used as part of the asset/liability
management process are linked to specific assets or liabilities
and have high correlation between the contract and the
underlying item being hedged, both at inception and throughout
the hedge period. Sterling formally documents all relationships
between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its
risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking each
hedge transaction.
Sterling offers interest rate contracts to its customers,
including interest rate caps and swap agreements. This portfolio
is actively managed and offset with contracts with third-party
counterparties that have identical terms.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,
(Statement 133) as amended, requires all derivative
instruments to be carried at fair value on the balance sheet.
Statement 133 provides special hedge accounting provisions,
which permit the change in fair value of the hedged item related
to risk being hedged to be recognized in earnings in the same
period and in the same income statement line as the change in
fair value of the derivative.
Sterlings derivatives consist of cash flow hedges, which
are designed to mitigate exposures to variability in expected
cash flows. Cash flow hedges are accounted for by recording the
fair value of the derivative instrument on the balance sheet as
either a freestanding asset or liability, with a corresponding
offset recorded in other comprehensive income within
stockholders equity, net of tax. Amounts are reclassified
from other comprehensive income to the income statement in the
period or periods the hedged transaction affects earnings. Under
the cash flow hedge method, derivative gains and losses not
effective in hedging the change in expected cash flows of the
hedged item are recognized immediately in income in the interest
income or expense line. At the hedges inception and at
least quarterly thereafter, an assessment is performed to
determine whether changes in the cash flows of the derivative
instruments have been highly effective in offsetting changes in
the cash flows of the hedged items and whether they are expected
to be highly effective in the future. If it is determined that a
derivative instrument has not been or will not continue to be
highly effective as a hedge, hedge accounting is discontinued
prospectively.
Foreclosed Assets Assets acquired through, or
in lieu of, loan foreclosure are held for sale and are initially
recorded at the lower of fair value or carrying value at the
date of foreclosure. Any initial charge necessary is reflected
as a charge to the allowance for loan losses. Subsequent to
foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management
and the assets are carried at the lower of carrying amount or
fair value less cost to sell. Revenues and expenses from
operations and changes in the valuation allowance are included
in other non-interest expenses.
A-65
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
Premises and Equipment Land is carried at
cost. Buildings, furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements
are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and
amortization. Depreciation is computed primarily on the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
asset.
Assets Held for Operating Leases Leases that
do not meet the criteria of direct finance leases are accounted
for as operating leases. Leased equipment is recorded at cost
and depreciated over the lease term, to the estimated residual
value at the expiration of the lease term, generally on a
straight-line basis. Sterling periodically reviews estimated net
realizable values and records losses in current earnings if the
estimated residual balance indicates impairment.
Goodwill Goodwill represents the excess of
the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the tangible
and identifiable intangible assets acquired. Sterling segments
goodwill into two different categories, goodwill associated with
business acquisitions and goodwill associated with branch
purchases, and it is included in the reporting segment based on
the specific business acquired within those segments. As a
result of the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,
(Statement 142) business acquisition goodwill is no
longer ratably amortized into the income statement over an
estimated life, but rather is tested at least annually for
impairment. Consistent with the provisions of Statement
No. 147, Acquisitions of Certain Financial
Institutions an amendment of FASB Statements
No. 72 and 144 and FASB Interpretation No. 9,
Sterling continues to amortize its branch purchase goodwill over
a twenty-year period.
Intangible Assets Intangible assets represent
purchased assets that lack physical substance but can be
distinguished from goodwill because of contractual or other
legal rights. Sterlings intangible assets have finite
lives and are amortized over their estimated useful lives.
Intangible assets are also subject to impairment testing when an
indication of impairment exists.
Income Taxes Deferred income tax assets and
liabilities are determined using the liability (or balance
sheet) method. Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or
liability is determined based on the tax effects of the
temporary differences between the book and tax bases of the
various balance sheet assets and liabilities and gives current
recognition to changes in tax rates and laws.
Sterling has various state and federal net operating loss carry
backs and carry forwards. Sterling evaluates the likelihood that
it will be able to use the loss carry-forwards in the future
and, to the extent necessary, will make a valuation allowance
for the portion deemed not realizable. At September 30,
2007, Sterling believes it will realize its carry backs and have
sufficient future taxable income to utilize its federal loss
carryforwards and therefore did not record any valuation
allowance. Sterling does not believe that it will be able to
fully utilize its state loss carry-forwards and therefore has
provided a valuation allowance for a portion of the related
deferred tax asset.
Advertising Sterling expenses advertising
costs as incurred. The expenses for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 were $1.7 million, and for the year
ended December 31, 2006, was $2.5 million.
Revenue Recognition Non-interest income is
generally recognized as earned over the related service period.
Stock Compensation Plan In December 2004, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based
Payment, (Statement 123R). Statement 123R
addresses the accounting for share-based payments to employees,
including grants of employee stock options. Under the new
standard, companies are no longer able to account for
share-based compensation transactions using the intrinsic method
in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees. Instead, companies are required
to account for such transactions using a fair-value
A-66
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
method and recognize the expense in the consolidated statement
of income. Statement 123R was effective for periods
beginning after June 15, 2005. Sterling adopted
Statement 123R on January 1, 2006.
Under Statement 123R, Sterling must determine the
appropriate fair value model to be used for valuing share-based
payments, the amortization method for compensation cost and the
transition method to be used at the date of adoption. The
permitted transition methods include either retrospective or
prospective adoption. Under the retrospective method, prior
periods may be restated either as of the beginning of the year
of adoption or for all periods presented. The prospective method
requires that compensation expense be recorded for all unvested
stock options at the beginning of the first quarter of adoption
of Statement 123R, while the retrospective method would
record compensation expense for all unvested stock options
beginning with the first period presented. Sterling has adopted
the prospective method.
Earnings Per Share Basic earnings per share
represent income available to common stockholders divided by the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the
period. Diluted earnings per share reflect additional common
shares that would have been outstanding if potential dilutive
common shares had been issued. Potential common shares that may
be issued by Sterling used in the dilutive per share calculation
consist solely of outstanding stock options and are determined
using the treasury stock method.
Earnings per common share have been computed based on the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
|
Ended,
|
|
|
Ended,
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
Net (loss) income from continuing operations available to
stockholders
|
|
$
|
(7,494
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,784
|
|
Net loss from discontinued operations available to stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,130
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to stockholders
|
|
$
|
(7,494
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,346
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of shares outstanding
|
|
|
29,511,121
|
|
|
|
29,029,400
|
|
Effect of dilutive stock options
|
|
|
198,393
|
|
|
|
406,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of shares outstanding used to calculate diluted
earnings per common share
|
|
|
29,709,514
|
|
|
|
29,436,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
A-67
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
Comprehensive Income Accounting principles
generally require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains and
losses be included in net income. Although certain changes in
assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on
available-for-sale securities, interest rate derivatives and
unrecognized postretirement benefit costs are reported as
separate components of the equity section of the balance sheet,
such items, along with net income, are components of
comprehensive income. The components of other comprehensive
income and related tax effects are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
|
Ended,
|
|
|
Ended,
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(7,494
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,784
|
|
Net loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,130
|
)
|
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax expense (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
(455
|
)
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
Tax effect
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income
|
|
|
(3,831
|
)
|
|
|
(1,485
|
)
|
Tax effect
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives used in cash
flow hedging transactions
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
Tax effect
|
|
|
(172
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
Change in unrecognized postretirement benefit cost
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
(529
|
)
|
Tax effect
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,494
|
)
|
|
|
(1,286
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
(9,988
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,632
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ending accumulated balances for each item included in
accumulated other comprehensive income, net of related income
taxes, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
|
Ended,
|
|
|
Ended,
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Accumulated unrealized gains on securities available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
851
|
|
|
$
|
3,682
|
|
Accumulated unrealized losses on derivatives used in cash flow
hedging transactions
|
|
|
(262
|
)
|
|
|
(582
|
)
|
Accumulated unrecognized postretirement benefit cost
|
|
|
(327
|
)
|
|
|
(344
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
|
$
|
2,756
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements In February
2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Financial Accounting Standards No. 155, Accounting for
Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments (Statement 155).
Statement 155 amends FASB Statements No. 133 and 140, and
improves the financial reporting of certain hybrid financial
instruments by requiring more consistent accounting that
eliminates exemptions and provides a means to simplify the
accounting for these instruments. Specifically, Statement 155
allows financial instruments that have embedded derivatives to
be accounted for as a whole (eliminating the need to bifurcate
the derivative from its host) if the holder elects to account
for the whole instrument on a fair value basis. Statement 155 is
effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after
the beginning of an
A-68
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
entitys first fiscal year that begins after
September 15, 2006. Upon adoption on January 1, 2007,
Statement 155 did not impact results of operations and financial
condition.
In March 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial
Assets (Statement 156). This statement amends Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 140, Accounting for
Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments
of Liabilities (Statement 140), to permit entities to choose
to either subsequently measure servicing rights at fair value
and report changes in fair value in earnings, or amortize
servicing rights in proportion to and over the estimated net
servicing income or loss and, assess the rights for impairment
or the need for an increased obligation. Statement 156 is
effective for separately recognized servicing assets and
liabilities acquired or issued after the beginning of an
entitys first fiscal year that begins after
September 15, 2006. Upon adoption on January 1, 2007,
Statement 156 did not impact results of operation and financial
condition.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
(Statement 157), which defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value under GAAP, and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. Statement 157 applies
to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair
value measurements. Upon adoption on January 1, 2008,
Statement 157 did not materially impact Sterlings results
of operations and financial condition.
On September 29, 2006, the FASB issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans (Statement 158), which amends Statement No. 87
and Statement No. 106 to require recognition of the
overfunded or underfunded status of pension and other
postretirement benefit plans on the balance sheet. Under
Statement 158, gains and losses, prior service costs and
credits, and any remaining transition amounts under Statement
No. 87 and Statement No. 106 that have not yet been
recognized through net periodic benefit cost will be recognized
in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax effects,
until they are amortized as a component of net periodic cost.
The measurement date, the date at which the benefit obligation
and plan assets are measured, is required to be the
companys fiscal year end. Statement 158 is effective for
publicly-held companies for fiscal years ending after
December 15, 2006, except for the measurement date
provisions, which are effective for fiscal years ending after
December 15, 2008. On December 31, 2006, Sterling
adopted certain provisions of Statement 158 which resulted in
the recognition of the funded status of its pension and
postretirement plans as a liability on the Consolidated Balance
Sheet, and the recognition of unrecognized actuarial
gains/losses, and prior service costs totaling $344,000 as a
separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income,
net of tax. Refer to Note 18 for further discussion of
Sterlings pension and postretirement plans.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities-Including an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (Statement 159).
Statement 159 permits entities to choose to measure many
financial instruments and certain other items at fair value.
Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value
option has been elected will be recognized in earnings at each
subsequent reporting date. Management does not anticipate that
Statement 159 will materially impact results of operation and
financial condition, upon adoption on January 1, 2008.
|
|
Note 2
|
Restatement
of the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2006 and
the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity and comprehensive income and cash
flows for the year then ended have been restated. The
restatement was to correct the financial statements for
fraudulent activities that were identified in April 2007 at its
wholly owned subsidiary, Equipment Finance, LLC (EFI).
A-69
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
Background
In April 2007, Sterling management received information
suggesting that there were irregularities related to certain
financing contracts in its forestry commercial financing
subsidiary, EFI (which we refer to as the EFI
Matter). Upon notification, Sterlings audit
committee retained independent legal counsel, Stradley Ronon
Stevens & Young, LLP (which we refer to as
Stradley Ronon), and forensic accountants, KPMG LLP
(we refer to Stradley Ronon and KPMG collectively as the
investigators) to perform an independent
investigation (which we refer to as the
investigation) related to the information received.
On April 30, 2007, Sterling announced that its previously
issued financial statements and all earnings press releases and
similar communications issued by Sterling for fiscal periods
commencing on or after January 1, 2004, should no longer be
relied upon in light of these irregularities. On May 24,
2007, Sterling announced that based on preliminary results of
the investigation, Sterling expected to record a cumulative
after-tax charge of approximately $145.0 million to
$165.0 million. As announced in November 2007 and as a
result of the investigation and further analysis by Sterling,
this amount was increased to approximately $200.0 million.
These charges related to misconduct that existed at least since
Sterling acquired EFI in 2002 and therefore impacted all
financial statements filed from 2002 through 2006.
The investigators concluded that two of EFIs senior
officers, its chief operating officer, and its executive vice
president, with the assistance of a number of other EFI
employees, certain customers, and other third parties,
perpetuated a fraud scheme that subverted virtually every aspect
of EFIs loan process, including its internal controls. The
investigators concluded that these employees colluded to create
fictitious loans, misapply cash receipts, and underwrite
contracts to third parties that did not have the financial
wherewithal to repay the loan, and used various deceptive
methods to conceal credit delinquencies, non-accrual finance
receivables, repossession information, and other loan quality
monitoring statistics in order to deceive Sterling management
and other parties utilizing such information to evaluate the
performance of EFI. The investigators concluded that a
significant amount of EFI finance receivables were in a
significant non-performing status and subject to charge-off or
were completely invalid.
The investigators reported that there was no evidence that any
member of Sterling management or any non-EFI personnel of
Sterling or its affiliates participated in or had any knowledge
of the scheme.
Impact of
the EFI Matter on the Financial Statements
The financial statements included herein have been restated to
reflect the results of the investigation and Sterlings
analysis of the effect of the EFI Matter on the consolidated
financial statements. Sterling recorded an adjustment to
January 1, 2006 retained earnings of $162.0 million,
including a $17.2 million goodwill impairment, to reflect
the after-tax impact of the irregularities that occurred prior
to 2006. The following table summarizes the effects of the
restatement to both the December 31, 2006 consolidated
balance sheet and the 2006 consolidated statement of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006, as
|
|
|
Related to
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally
|
|
|
Activity Prior to
|
|
|
Related to
|
|
|
2006,
|
|
|
|
Ref.
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
January 1, 2006
|
|
|
2006 Activity
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
$
|
86,472
|
|
|
$
|
(441
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,652
|
|
|
$
|
87,683
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147,489
|
|
|
|
(441
|
)
|
|
|
1,652
|
|
|
|
148,700
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits in banks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,339
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,119
|
|
Mortgage loans held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,136
|
|
A-70
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006, as
|
|
|
Related to
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally
|
|
|
Activity Prior to
|
|
|
Related to
|
|
|
2006,
|
|
|
|
Ref.
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
January 1, 2006
|
|
|
2006 Activity
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Securities held-to-maturity (fair value 2006 $21,644)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,530
|
|
Securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
460,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
460,016
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income
|
|
|
B
|
|
|
|
2,360,526
|
|
|
|
(222,578
|
)
|
|
|
(59,327
|
)
|
|
|
2,078,621
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
B
|
|
|
|
(23,427
|
)
|
|
|
(1,082
|
)
|
|
|
1,992
|
|
|
|
(22,517
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,337,099
|
|
|
|
(223,660
|
)
|
|
|
(57,335
|
)
|
|
|
2,056,104
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,987
|
|
Assets held for operating lease, net
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
|
89,120
|
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
88,960
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
D
|
|
|
|
88,670
|
|
|
|
(17,219
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,451
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,312
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,177
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,979
|
|
Refund for previously paid taxes
|
|
|
E
|
|
|
|
8,066
|
|
|
|
31,997
|
|
|
|
12,351
|
|
|
|
52,414
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
F
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,473
|
|
|
|
8,562
|
|
|
|
49,035
|
|
Bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,149
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
F
|
|
|
|
36,602
|
|
|
|
697
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
37,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,279,835
|
|
|
$
|
(168,276
|
)
|
|
|
(34,737
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,076,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest-bearing
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
311,881
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
311,881
|
|
Now and money market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
884,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
884,893
|
|
Savings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266,583
|
|
Time
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,152,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,152,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,615,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,615,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,833
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,207
|
|
Subordinated debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,630
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
10,332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,332
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
G
|
|
|
|
39,336
|
|
|
|
(6,262
|
)
|
|
|
5,061
|
|
|
|
38,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,949,250
|
|
|
$
|
(6,262
|
)
|
|
|
5,061
|
|
|
$
|
2,948,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par value, 10.0 million shares
authorized; no shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $5.00 par value, 70.0 million
shares authorized; issued: 2006 29.7 million
shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,642
|
|
Capital surplus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,279
|
|
Retained earnings/accumulated deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,404
|
|
|
|
(162,014
|
)
|
|
|
(39,798
|
)
|
|
|
(109,408
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,756
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,756
|
|
Common stock in treasury, at cost (2006
64,000 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,496
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,496
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
H
|
|
|
|
330,585
|
|
|
|
(162,014
|
)
|
|
|
(39,798
|
)
|
|
|
128,773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,279,835
|
|
|
$
|
(168,276
|
)
|
|
|
(34,737
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,076,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-71
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Twelve
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Twelve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended,
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Months Ended,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Related to
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 as Originally
|
|
|
Activity
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Ref
|
|
|
reported
|
|
|
During 2006
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Interest and dividend income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
182,806
|
|
|
$
|
(43,649
|
)
|
|
$
|
139,157
|
|
Debt securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,626
|
|
Tax-exempt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,089
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
817
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
887
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest and dividend income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205,540
|
|
|
|
(43,649
|
)
|
|
|
161,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,526
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,526
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,741
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,462
|
|
Subordinated debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,045
|
|
|
|
(43,649
|
)
|
|
|
78,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
B
|
|
|
|
5,171
|
|
|
|
12,448
|
|
|
|
17,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,874
|
|
|
|
(56,097
|
)
|
|
|
60,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust and investment management income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,928
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,130
|
|
Other service charges, commissions and fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,481
|
|
Brokerage fees and commissions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,087
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,087
|
|
Mortgage banking income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,930
|
|
Rental income on operating leases
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
|
32,306
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
32,269
|
|
Other operating income
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
|
5,808
|
|
|
|
(904
|
)
|
|
|
4,904
|
|
Securities gains, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,155
|
|
|
|
(941
|
)
|
|
|
68,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
|
57,847
|
|
|
|
(161
|
)
|
|
|
57,686
|
|
Net occupancy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,661
|
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,042
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,940
|
|
Depreciation on operating lease assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,459
|
|
Taxes other than income
|
|
|
F
|
|
|
|
2,838
|
|
|
|
(521
|
)
|
|
|
2,317
|
|
Intangible asset amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,428
|
|
Other EFI losses
|
|
|
G
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,386
|
|
|
|
6,386
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,640
|
|
|
|
5,704
|
|
|
|
132,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,389
|
|
|
|
(62,742
|
)
|
|
|
(3,353
|
)
|
Income tax (benefit) expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,807
|
|
|
|
(22,944
|
)
|
|
|
(5,137
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,582
|
|
|
|
(39,798
|
)
|
|
|
1,784
|
|
Discontinued operations, net of taxes of $(2,723)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,130
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,130
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
36,452
|
|
|
$
|
(39,798
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,346
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-72
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Twelve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended,
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Twelve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Months Ended,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Originally
|
|
|
Activity During
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Ref
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Per share information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.43
|
|
|
$
|
(1.37
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
I
|
|
|
$
|
1.26
|
|
|
$
|
(1.37
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.41
|
|
|
$
|
(1.35
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
I
|
|
|
$
|
1.24
|
|
|
$
|
(1.35
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.580
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
0.580
|
|
Notes
to Restated Financial Statements
A. Cash and Due From Banks Reflects
adjustments to timing of cash receipts and cash disbursements.
B. Finance Receivables Outstanding and Related Interest
Income, and the Allowance for Loan Losses
Validity
of Finance Receivables
Management, building on the initial analysis done by the
investigators, performed an analysis on the current and
historical EFI loan portfolio to determine the validity of each
individual loan contract. This analysis included all or some of
the following procedures:
|
|
|
|
|
Analyzed information relevant to the loan contract, including
UCC filings, proof of insurance, customer correspondence, loan
accounting system records;
|
|
|
|
Determined whether a loan proceeds check was disbursed to an
unrelated third party such as an equipment dealer;
|
|
|
|
Attempted to confirm the existence of the contract with the
customer as well as determine customer relationships;
|
|
|
|
Reconstructed the historical cash receipt detail for customer
relationships;
|
|
|
|
Performed customer visits to confirm the existence of collateral
and evaluate its condition.
|
For each loan outstanding, management made a subjective
determination whether each agreement was valid or invalid based
on the completeness and the quality of the records reviewed.
Loans determined to be invalid were either included within the
January 1, 2006 adjustment to retained earnings if
originated prior to 2006 or written off as fraud losses within
Other EFI Losses on the consolidated statement of operations if
they were originated in 2006.
For loans determined to be valid, management evaluated if the
loan was performing in accordance with its contractual terms.
Management determined that certain loans previously reflected in
the EFI accounting records as paying according to their
contractual terms were actually significantly delinquent, and in
most cases
A-73
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
over 120 days past due. These past due relationships were
charged off to the allowance for loan loss as a credit loss.
Management attempted to determine a range of liquidation values
for the collateral underlying each non-performing valid loan and
also to estimate the amount of potential future cash payments
that could be received for these past due loans. However, given
the age of the delinquencies and the status of managements
collection and repossession efforts, management cannot with any
certainty estimate a range of recovery through cash collection
or repossession, and therefore has not included any estimate of
such amount in the carrying value of the EFI finance receivables
balance.
The result of managements evaluation is a reduction to the
January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2006 finance
receivable balances of $222.6 million and
$59.3 million respectively, to the originally reported
amounts.
Allowance
for Loan Losses
Management established a reserve for finance receivables that
are current to 119 days past due based on its evaluation of
delinquency status, timing and frequency of payments, and
information obtained from customer field visits.
As part of managements evaluation of the factors used to
make a subjective judgment as to the validity of the EFI
receivables, management learned that customers often had
multiple contracts with EFI in various names of companies or
DBAs. Once the full customer relationships
were identified, Sterlings allowance for loan losses
accounting policy, developed in conjunction with BLC Banks
primary banking regulator, required that as soon as the first
loan within the broader customer relationship migrated to
120 days past due, all contracts within that customer
relationship were to be charged down to a zero value against the
allowance for loan loss, regardless of whether cash has been
received after the date of charge off and regardless of
managements estimate of recovery that may occur through
repossession and subsequent liquidation of collateral.
Any cash received related to charged off loans either from the
borrower, or through liquidation of collateral, is reflected as
a recovery in the allowance for loan loss.
During 2006, total charge offs were adjusted $28.9 million
from $4.1 million to $33.0 million for finance
receivables that either migrated to over 120 days past due
during 2006, or loans newly originated during 2006 to customers
considered non-performing prior to the date of origination.
Management was required to make subjective judgments and
assumptions in order to form its conclusion regarding the
validity of a receivable and its decision as to the period in
which to charge off a finance receivable outstanding. These
financial statements were prepared using these best judgments
and assumptions because management believes they most accurately
reflect the activities of EFI during 2006.
The following reflects the rollforward of the allowance for loan
loss from the period January 1, 2006 through
December 31, 2006:
A-74
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Restated
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2006
|
|
$
|
21,003
|
|
|
$
|
1,082
|
|
|
$
|
22,085
|
|
Allowance acquired in acquisition
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
Loans charged-off
|
|
|
(4,048
|
)
|
|
|
(28,928
|
)
|
|
|
(32,976
|
)
|
Recoveries related to previously charged off loans
|
|
|
766
|
|
|
|
14,488
|
|
|
|
15,254
|
|
Provision for loan loss
|
|
|
5,171
|
|
|
|
12,448
|
|
|
|
17,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
23,427
|
|
|
$
|
(910
|
)
|
|
$
|
22,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sterling increased its provision for loan losses by
$12.4 million to $17.6 million during 2006 to reflect
the increased charge-off activity within the EFI portfolio at
each balance sheet date, and to provide for the additional
charge off of finance receivables described above. Recoveries
increased $14.5 million in 2006 due to cash received on
finance receivables previously charged off.
Management expects that there may be a level of repossession and
liquidation of collateral that will provide future recoveries to
Sterling. Additionally, management continues to work with
customers who have aged receivables outstanding to restructure
their contracts and establish a payment plan. Management is also
evaluating the ability to repossess equipment and liquidate the
repossessions as an additional source of collection. Management
cannot predict the timeframe in which the cash may be collected
or the amount of cash that it might receive as a result of these
efforts.
Interest income, deferred fees, and late charges were reduced in
2006 by $43.6 million as a result of interest income
previously recognized on finance receivables that management
charged off.
C. Other Operating Income Reflects
adjustments to costs and fees originally deferred on certain
operating leases and deferral of previously recorded gains on
sales of EFI receivables as explained in more detail in Other
Liabilities below.
D. Goodwill As part of its process to
restate its historical financial statements due to the EFI
Matter, Sterling wrote off 100%, or $17.2 million, of the
goodwill associated with EFI as part of the January 1, 2006
retained earnings adjustment because management determined that
the goodwill was impaired prior to that date.
E. Refund for Previously Paid Taxes
Refund for previously paid taxes increased
$44.3 million due to Sterlings intention to file
amended returns for refunds for prior taxes paid due to the
additional losses recorded related to the EFI Matter.
F. Deferred Tax Assets and Other Assets
Deferred tax assets increased by $49.0 million at
December 31, 2006 due to the net operating loss
carryforward created by the losses incurred on the charge-off of
finance receivables and temporary differences between the timing
of charge-offs for tax purposes versus the timing of charge-offs
for book purposes. See Note 15, Income Taxes, for more
information regarding Sterlings deferred tax assets. Other
assets increased $767,000 primarily due to a receivable for
overpayment of capital stock tax.
G. Other Liabilities Throughout 2005 and
2006, Sterling sold $38.6 million of EFI finance
receivables to third parties in the form of whole-loan sales
contracts. These sales were accounted for as transfers at the
time of the transaction under Financial Accounting Standards
No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of
Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities
(Statement 140). As part of the process to evaluate the validity
of the EFI receivables, as described above, management
identified $598,000 and $180,000 of finance receivables sold in
2006 and 2007 which were deemed to have underlying fictitious
contracts (invalid
A-75
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
contracts). Management treated these contracts as
financing transactions rather than sales in the restated
financial statements. In addition, management identified
$4.7 million of finance receivables where breaches of
servicing responsibilities may have occurred (potentially
breached contracts). As a result, Sterling indemnified the
third parties for those contracts. For those receivables,
management recorded a liability to third parties in the restated
financial statements at the point where the purported breach
occurred. The expense associated with these invalid contracts
and potentially breached contracts are both recorded within
Other EFI Loss on the consolidated statement of operations.
There were $4.1 million and $2.3 million recorded
within Other Liabilities in the statement of financial condition
at December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2007,
respectively, related to these liabilities to third parties. Any
cash received from the customer after the date in which it was
expensed as a loss is reflected as an adjustment to Other EFI
Loss within the consolidated statement of operations.
As discussed in Note 16, Commitments and Contingencies,
civil litigation has been threatened and filed against EFI and
Sterling for claims arising from the sale of finance receivables
to third parties. Management cannot assess the probability as to
the likelihood of a loss being incurred and therefore has not
accrued an estimate of any loss due to these claims. For certain
transfers of receivables where management determined it was not
practicable to estimate the amount of liability, if any, due
under the indemnification provisions of the master assignment
agreement, management deferred recognition of the gain
associated with these transfers as required by paragraph 71
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140, Accounting
for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and
Extinguishments of Liabilities (Statement 140). As of
December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2007, the amount
deferred totaled $5.6 million and $6.7 million,
respectively, and is reflected within other liabilities and
deferred gains on the statement of financial condition.
Adjustments to these amounts occur as payments are made to the
third parties as required by the master assignment agreements,
and are reflected as recoveries through the allowance for loan
losses.
Offsetting the adjustments noted above, the losses related to
the EFI Matter changed the companys tax position from a
deferred tax liability position to a deferred tax asset
position. Due to the change in the deferred tax position, the
company reclassed $9.3 million from a deferred tax
liability to net against deferred tax assets as of
January 1, 2006.
H. Total Stockholders Equity
Retained earnings decreased $201.8 million as of
December 31, 2006 due to $162.0 million of adjustments
made to opening January 1, 2006 stockholders equity,
and an additional $39.8 million of additional losses
incurred during 2006, all related to the EFI Matter. On a per
share basis, basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per
share for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006 reflect
additional losses of $1.37 and $1.35, respectively.
|
|
Note 3
|
Agreement
and Plan of Merger with The PNC Financial Services Group,
Inc.
|
On July 19, 2007, Sterling entered into a definitive
Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement) with The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. (PNC) pursuant to which PNC will
acquire Sterling in a stock and cash transaction valued at
approximately $565 million, based on PNCs closing
price of $73.87 on July 17, 2007. Under the terms of the
Merger Agreement and subject to the election and adjustment
procedures described in the proxy statement/prospectus, a
Sterling shareholder will be entitled to receive, for each share
of common stock held by such shareholder at the time of the
merger, consideration, without interest, with a value equal to
the sum of (i) 0.1543 multiplied by the average closing
price of PNC common stock on the New York Stock Exchange during
the five trading days ending the day before the completion of
the merger and (ii) $7.60. As explained in more detail in
the proxy statement/prospectus, the value of the consideration a
Sterling shareholder will receive as of the completion date of
the merger will be based on the average pre-closing PNC trading
price.
A-76
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
The Merger Agreement between PNC and Sterling contemplates a
merger whereby Sterling will be merged with and into PNC with
PNC surviving the merger. Sterlings bank subsidiaries have
also entered into agreements whereby Sterlings subsidiary
banks will be merged with and into subsidiary banks of PNC
following the effective time of the merger. Upon effectiveness
of the merger, each Sterling shareholder will be entitled to
elect to receive the merger consideration in shares of PNC
common stock, in cash, or both subject to election, allocation
and proration procedures as provided for in the Merger Agreement.
The Merger Agreement has been approved by the boards of
directors of both Sterling and PNC. The merger is subject to
Sterlings shareholders approving the merger, regulatory
approvals and other customary closing conditions. In addition,
certain Sterling executives entered into employment agreements
with PNC, which will become effective upon completion of the
merger. The companies anticipate completing the transaction in
the first half of 2008.
|
|
Note 4
|
Acquisitions
and Divestitures
|
During 2006, management monitored certain trends in the business
activities of its insurance services segment, which was
primarily comprised of the activity of Corporate Healthcare
Strategies, LLC (which we refer to as CHS). This
evaluation included:
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring the impact, if any, that a change in a key small
group health insurance carrier would have on longer term
customer retention and the related impact on long term
commission growth of the insurance segment;
|
|
|
|
Determining how an industry-wide shift from self funded to fully
insured health plans experienced during 2006 would impact our
long term revenue projections on our wholesale stop-loss product
line; and
|
|
|
|
Determining the impact of macro-trends in the insurance market
due to changes in the business practices of certain major
insurance providers in our markets.
|
In addition to these trends, in the third quarter of 2006,
management had an early indication of lower premium renewals for
the 2007 policy period. During the third quarter end closing
process, management and the board of directors, made the
determination that the above circumstances were expected to have
a prolonged negative impact on the performance of
Sterlings insurance segment and therefore concluded that
indicators of impairment existed.
Sterling performed a valuation of this reporting unit, which
first included a valuation of its identifiable intangible assets
under Statement 144, primarily a customer list intangible,
which resulted in an approximate impairment loss of
$1.4 million and then its goodwill, which resulted in an
approximate loss of $6.6 million. The impairment charge of
$8.0 million ($5.2 million, net of tax) was recorded
in the income statement under non-interest expenses, as goodwill
and intangible asset impairment at September 30, 2006 and
then reclassed to discontinued operations as a result of the
divestiture of CHS at the end of December 2006.
On December 31, 2006 Sterling divested three related lines
of business associated with its insurance segment, Corporate
Healthcare Strategies, LLC, Professional Services Group and
certain insurance assets of its personal property and casualty
insurance agency, Lancaster Insurance Group, LLC. Upon the sale
of the above businesses, Sterling recorded a loss on disposal of
$41,000, which was recorded in other operating income. Included
in the lines of business sold were $4.7 million of goodwill
and $2.3 million of intangible assets.
As a result of the divestiture of the above related lines of
business, the insurance segment no longer meets the criteria as
a reportable segment. All prior period results included herein
have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation
which displays the operating results of the divested businesses
as discontinued operations. These reclassifications had no
effect on net income or stockholders equity. Unless
A-77
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
otherwise noted, the remaining discussion and tabular data
relate only to Sterlings continuing operations. For
further discussion see Note 24, Segment Reporting.
Following is a summary of the income and expense of
Sterlings discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
8
|
|
Non-interest income
|
|
|
6,193
|
|
Non-interest expense
|
|
|
14,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
(7,853
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(2,723
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
(5,130
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
There was no activity during 2007 related to discontinued
operations.
Bay Net Bank, N.A. In October 2006, Sterling
completed the acquisition of Bay Net Financial, Inc. and its
wholly owned thrift subsidiary, Bay Net A Community Bank. At the
date of acquisition, Bay Net Financial, Inc. was merged into
Sterling, and Bay Net A Community Bank merged with
Sterlings wholly owned subsidiary First National Bank of
North East. The resulting bank changed its name to Bay
First Bank, N.A. as part of the bank merger. Sterling
acquired Bay Net Financial, Inc. in order to enhance its banking
franchise in Cecil, Harford and neighboring counties of Maryland.
In connection with this transaction, Sterling acquired all of
the outstanding shares of Bay Net Financial, Inc. common stock
for cash consideration of $8.6 million, shares of
Sterlings common stock valued at $12.8 million, and
the exchange of stock options to Sterlings options fair
valued at $240,000.
In accordance with Statement No. 141, Business
Combinations, Sterling used the purchase method of
accounting to record this transaction. The purchase price
allocation included $1.2 million to core deposit
intangibles, which had a weighted average life of 7 years.
The portion of the purchase price related to goodwill of
$14.4 million was recorded in the banking segment in
accordance with Statement No. 131, Disclosures about
Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, as all of
the assets and liabilities acquired are related to the banking
reporting unit. The goodwill acquired in connection with Bay Net
Financial, Inc. will not be amortized for tax purposes.
|
|
Note 5
|
Restrictions
on Cash and Due from Banks
|
Sterlings subsidiary banks are required to maintain
reserves, in the form of cash and balances with the Federal
Reserve Bank, against deposit liabilities. The average amount of
these reserve balances for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 was approximately $22.8 million.
Balances maintained at the Federal Reserve Bank are included in
cash and due from banks.
Cash and cash equivalents increased to $318.5 million at
September 30, 2007 versus $148.7 million at
December 31, 2006. The increase in cash held at Sterling is
due to the reduction in available float funding at
the Federal Reserve, which had required Sterling to increase its
cash on hand in order to timely meet customer needs. In
addition, the increase reflects the buildup of cash resulting
from Sterlings liquidity plan as discussed in the
Managements Discussion and Analysis.
A-78
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
The amortized cost and fair value of securities were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government agencies
|
|
$
|
187,694
|
|
|
$
|
322
|
|
|
$
|
2,889
|
|
|
$
|
185,127
|
|
State and political subdivisions
|
|
|
201,105
|
|
|
|
4,280
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
204,969
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
20,322
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
20,310
|
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
2,036
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
2,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
411,157
|
|
|
|
4,814
|
|
|
|
3,516
|
|
|
|
412,455
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
411,537
|
|
|
$
|
4,857
|
|
|
$
|
3,550
|
|
|
$
|
412,844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-to-maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
State and political subdivisions
|
|
|
6,751
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,802
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
7,003
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,054
|
|
Non-marketable equity securities
|
|
|
12,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
19,636
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
$
|
805
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
805
|
|
U.S. Government agencies
|
|
|
211,066
|
|
|
|
594
|
|
|
|
3,993
|
|
|
|
207,667
|
|
State and political subdivisions
|
|
|
207,831
|
|
|
|
5,546
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
213,001
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
23,461
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
23,440
|
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
8,356
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
8,397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
451,519
|
|
|
|
6,402
|
|
|
|
4,611
|
|
|
|
453,310
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
2,903
|
|
|
|
3,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
454,422
|
|
|
$
|
10,205
|
|
|
$
|
4,611
|
|
|
$
|
460,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-to-maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
State and political subdivisions
|
|
|
10,901
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,015
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
11,162
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,276
|
|
Non-marketable equity securities
|
|
|
10,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
21,530
|
|
|
$
|
114
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-79
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
Non-marketable equity securities consist of Federal Reserve Bank
stock, Federal Home Loan Bank stock and Atlantic Central Bankers
Bank stock.
The amortized cost and fair value of securities at
September 30, 2007, by contractual maturity, are shown
below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual
maturities or call dates because borrowers may have the right to
call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment
penalties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
Available-for-Sale
|
|
|
Held-to-Maturity
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
10,294
|
|
|
$
|
10,263
|
|
|
$
|
1,856
|
|
|
$
|
1,861
|
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
152,133
|
|
|
|
150,274
|
|
|
|
4,861
|
|
|
|
4,901
|
|
Due in five years through ten years
|
|
|
129,118
|
|
|
|
130,704
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
Due after ten years
|
|
|
99,290
|
|
|
|
100,904
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
390,835
|
|
|
|
392,145
|
|
|
|
6,974
|
|
|
|
7,025
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
20,322
|
|
|
|
20,310
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
411,157
|
|
|
$
|
412,455
|
|
|
$
|
7,003
|
|
|
$
|
7,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables present a breakdown by consecutive months
of gross unrealized losses and fair value by investment category.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
U.S. Government agencies
|
|
|
14,375
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
131,261
|
|
|
|
2,808
|
|
|
|
145,636
|
|
|
|
2,889
|
|
State and political subdivisions
|
|
|
8,872
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
25,624
|
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
34,496
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
949
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
7,752
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
8,701
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,335
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
164,776
|
|
|
|
3,337
|
|
|
|
189,111
|
|
|
|
3,516
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
24,536
|
|
|
$
|
213
|
|
|
$
|
164,776
|
|
|
$
|
3,337
|
|
|
$
|
189,312
|
|
|
$
|
3,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-80
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
$
|
749
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
749
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
U.S. Government agencies
|
|
|
15,015
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
130,561
|
|
|
|
3,964
|
|
|
|
145,576
|
|
|
|
3,993
|
|
State and political subdivisions
|
|
|
4,728
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
24,057
|
|
|
|
362
|
|
|
|
28,785
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
911
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
9,392
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
10,303
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
895
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
645
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
1,540
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,298
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
164,655
|
|
|
|
4,558
|
|
|
|
186,953
|
|
|
|
4,611
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
22,298
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
164,655
|
|
|
$
|
4,558
|
|
|
$
|
186,953
|
|
|
$
|
4,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2007, there were a total of 183
securities that were in an unrealized loss position, including
146 that have had an unrealized loss for more than
12 months.
Various indicators are used in determining whether a security is
other-than-temporarily impaired, including equity securities, if
the market value is below its cost for an extended period of
time, or for debt securities, when it is probable that the
contractual interest and principal will not be collected.
Sterling reviews its securities for impairment at least
quarterly, and as a result of this review, no impairment charges
were recorded during the nine months ended September 30,
2007, $30,000 was recorded in the year ended December 31,
2006. The unrealized losses as of December 31, 2006 and
September 30, 2007 are primarily attributable to changes in
interest rates (i.e., increase in rates since the date of
acquiring the debt security). Management does not believe any
individual unrealized loss in the table above represents an
other-than-temporary impairment and has the positive intent and
ability to hold those securities to recovery.
Securities pledged to secure government and other public
deposits, trust deposits, short-term borrowings and other
balances as required or permitted by law were
$301.8 million at September 30, 2007 and
$313.6 million at December 31, 2006.
Proceeds from sales of securities available-for-sale were
$9.6 million and $25.5 million for the nine-month
period ended September 30, 2007, and year ended
December 31, 2006, respectively. Gross gains of
$3.8 million and $1.6 million were realized on these
sales for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007,
and year ended December 31, 2006 respectively. Gross losses
of $0 and $147,000 were recognized for the nine-month period
ended September 30, 2007, and December 31, 2006,
respectively.
A-81
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
A summary of the balances of loans follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Commercial and agricultural
|
|
$
|
523,318
|
|
|
$
|
504,084
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
653,739
|
|
|
|
656,366
|
|
Financial institutions
|
|
|
16,424
|
|
|
|
16,375
|
|
Real estate construction
|
|
|
188,910
|
|
|
|
173,824
|
|
Real estate mortgage
|
|
|
99,326
|
|
|
|
101,946
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
389,792
|
|
|
|
403,691
|
|
Forestry-related finance receivables (net of unearned income
2007 $372; 2006 $962)
|
|
|
1,853
|
|
|
|
5,110
|
|
Other finance receivables (net of unearned income
2007 $12,965; 2006 $12,927)
|
|
|
87,641
|
|
|
|
86,698
|
|
Lease financing receivables (net of unearned income
2007 $18,814; 2006 $17,391)
|
|
|
131,883
|
|
|
|
130,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$
|
2,092,886
|
|
|
$
|
2,078,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans include net unamortized deferred fees of
$1.7 million as of September 30, 2007 and
$2.0 million as of December 31, 2006.
Information concerning impaired loans is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance
|
|
$
|
7,739
|
|
|
$
|
3,345
|
|
Impaired loans without a valuation allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
|
7,739
|
|
|
|
3,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance related to impaired loans
|
|
$
|
1,001
|
|
|
$
|
378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Average investment in impaired loans
|
|
$
|
5,758
|
|
|
$
|
4,408
|
|
Interest income recognized on impaired loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income recognized on a cash basis on impaired loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The impaired loan balance consisted only of non-accrual loans at
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006. In addition
to impaired loans, Sterling had loans over 90 days past
due, which were still accruing interest, of approximately
$2.7 million and $500,000 at September 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, respectively. There were no loans
considered to be troubled debt restructurings at
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006.
A-82
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
Changes in the allowance for loan losses are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
|
Ended,
|
|
|
Ended,
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
22,517
|
|
|
$
|
22,085
|
|
Allowance acquired in acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
Provisions for loan losses
|
|
|
7,083
|
|
|
|
17,619
|
|
Loans charged off
|
|
|
(14,978
|
)
|
|
|
(32,976
|
)
|
Recoveries of loans previously charged off
|
|
|
9,517
|
|
|
|
15,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
24,139
|
|
|
$
|
22,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans serviced for others are not included in the accompanying
Consolidated Balance Sheets. The unpaid principal of mortgage
loans serviced for others was $493.5 million and
$507.1 million at September 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, respectively. Additionally, finance
receivables and leases serviced for others were
$66.0 million and $70.0 million at September 30,
2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.
|
|
Note 8
|
Mortgage
Banking Activities
|
Changes in the mortgage servicing rights asset is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
3,183
|
|
|
$
|
3,011
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights capitalized
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
706
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights amortized
|
|
|
(448
|
)
|
|
|
(534
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
3,267
|
|
|
$
|
3,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information concerning the activity in the related mortgage
servicing rights valuation allowance is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Change in valuation allowance increase (decrease)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For valuation purposes, at September 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, Sterling assumed a weighted average
discount rate of 9.51% and 9.52% respectively and assumed
prepayments speeds were consistent with published rates for the
industry. Additional factors such as economic data, market
trading information, credit risk and professional judgment were
used in determining the valuation allowance.
A-83
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
|
|
Note 9
|
Premises
and Equipment
|
A summary of the cost and accumulated depreciation of premises
and equipment follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Useful Lives
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,081
|
|
|
$
|
7,653
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
10 - 40 years
|
|
|
|
32,772
|
|
|
|
33,080
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
over lease term
|
|
|
|
6,292
|
|
|
|
5,914
|
|
Equipment, furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
3 - 10 years
|
|
|
|
53,816
|
|
|
|
52,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,961
|
|
|
|
99,190
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,474
|
)
|
|
|
(50,203
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
46,487
|
|
|
$
|
48,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The subsidiaries of Sterling lease certain facilities under
operating leases which expire on various dates through 2028.
Renewal options are available on these leases. Minimum future
rental payments as of September 30, 2007, under
non-cancelable real estate leases, are payable as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Due October 1, 2007 through September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
2,537
|
|
Due October 1, 2008 through September 30, 2009
|
|
|
2,295
|
|
Due October 1, 2009 through September 30, 2010
|
|
|
2,030
|
|
Due October 1, 2010 through September 30, 2011
|
|
|
1,704
|
|
Due October 1, 2011 through September 30, 2012
|
|
|
1,579
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
12,807
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum future rental payments
|
|
$
|
22,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total rent expense charged to operations amounted to
$2.1 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2007 and $2.1 million for the year ended December 31,
2006.
Information concerning net investment in direct financing
leases, included in loans as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Minimum lease payment receivable
|
|
$
|
149,851
|
|
|
$
|
147,187
|
|
Residual values
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Lease origination costs
|
|
|
845
|
|
|
|
697
|
|
Unearned income
|
|
|
(18,814
|
)
|
|
|
(17,391
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
131,883
|
|
|
$
|
130,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The allowance for uncollectible lease payments, included in the
allowance for loan losses, was $3.6 million at
September 30, 2007.
A-84
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
Investments in property on operating leases and property held
for lease by major classes are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
Automobiles
|
|
$
|
32,032
|
|
|
$
|
30,483
|
|
Heavy truck, trailers and buses
|
|
|
35,933
|
|
|
|
33,055
|
|
Trucks, light and medium duty
|
|
|
55,988
|
|
|
|
55,530
|
|
Other
|
|
|
60,437
|
|
|
|
55,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184,390
|
|
|
|
174,260
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(93,876
|
)
|
|
|
(85,300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
90,514
|
|
|
$
|
88,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum future rentals on non-cancelable finance and operating
leases as of September 30, 2007, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Due October 1, 2007 through September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
53,982
|
|
|
$
|
34,352
|
|
Due October 1, 2008 through September 30, 2009
|
|
|
41,837
|
|
|
|
20,898
|
|
Due October 1, 2009 through September 30, 2010
|
|
|
28,804
|
|
|
|
10,841
|
|
Due October 1, 2010 through September 30, 2011
|
|
|
17,260
|
|
|
|
3,390
|
|
Due October 1, 2011 through September 30, 2012
|
|
|
7,138
|
|
|
|
473
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum future rentals
|
|
$
|
149,626
|
|
|
$
|
70,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 11
|
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
|
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by business
segment were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Trust & Investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking
|
|
|
Finance
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2006
|
|
$
|
34,747
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,804
|
|
|
$
|
50,551
|
|
Additions to goodwill
|
|
|
14,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,615
|
|
|
|
20,988
|
|
Amortization of branch purchase goodwill
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006
|
|
|
49,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,419
|
|
|
|
71,451
|
|
Adjustment to Bay First Bank, N.A. goodwill
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
Amortization of branch purchase goodwill
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2007
|
|
$
|
48,811
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,419
|
|
|
$
|
71,230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-85
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
A summary of intangible assets is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Finite-lived assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit intangible
|
|
$
|
5,368
|
|
|
$
|
(2,815
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,368
|
|
|
$
|
(2,255
|
)
|
Customer list
|
|
|
3,897
|
|
|
|
(2,128
|
)
|
|
|
3,897
|
|
|
|
(1,709
|
)
|
Trademark
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
|
(269
|
)
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
|
(217
|
)
|
Covenants not to compete
|
|
|
988
|
|
|
|
(596
|
)
|
|
|
988
|
|
|
|
(477
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,733
|
|
|
|
(5,808
|
)
|
|
|
10,733
|
|
|
|
(4,658
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-finite lived intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademark
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,970
|
|
|
$
|
(5,808
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,970
|
|
|
$
|
(4,658
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For further discussion related to goodwill and intangible
assets, see Note 2, Acquisitions and Divestitures.
The weighted average original lives of intangible assets by
class are as follows: core deposits are 9 years; customer
list is 7 years; trademark is 7 years; and covenants
not to compete are 6 years.
Amortization expense for the next five years is expected to be:
|
|
|
|
|
Due October 1, 2007 through September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
1,530
|
|
Due October 1, 2008 through September 30, 2009
|
|
|
1,428
|
|
Due October 1, 2009 through September 30, 2010
|
|
|
1,237
|
|
Due October 1, 2010 through September 30, 2011
|
|
|
519
|
|
Due October 1, 2011 through September 30, 2012
|
|
|
364
|
|
The aggregate amount of time deposits in denominations of
$100,000 or more at September 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006 were $332.7 million and
$265.2 million, respectively.
At September 30, 2007, the scheduled maturities of time
deposits, including those in denominations of $100,000 or more,
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Due October 1, 2007 through September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
1,144,041
|
|
Due October 1, 2008 through September 30, 2009
|
|
|
163,797
|
|
Due October 1, 2009 through September 30, 2010
|
|
|
84,029
|
|
Due October 1, 2010 through September 30, 2011
|
|
|
15,177
|
|
Due October 1, 2011 through September 30, 2012
|
|
|
9,023
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,416,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-86
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
|
|
Note 13
|
Short-Term
Borrowings and Long-Term Debt
|
Short-term borrowings and weighted average interest rates
consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
5.25
|
%
|
Securities sold under repurchase agreements
|
|
|
4,003
|
|
|
|
4.04
|
%
|
|
|
6,492
|
|
|
|
4.38
|
%
|
Interest-bearing demand notes issued to the U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
747
|
|
|
|
4.52
|
%
|
|
|
2,341
|
|
|
|
5.04
|
%
|
Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
5.30
|
%
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5.43
|
%
|
Lines of credit
|
|
|
71,358
|
|
|
|
7.13
|
%
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
6.26
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
86,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
78,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The securities sold under repurchase agreements represent
collateral to the lending party and are obligations of
U.S. agencies and corporations. These securities are
maintained under Sterlings control. As of
September 30, 2007, Sterling had unused short-term funding
commitments totaling $621 million.
Long-term debt consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
FHLB advances:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable advances, 3.13%-6.99%, due
2008-2014,
with a weighted average interest rate of 5.37% and 5.29% at
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively
|
|
$
|
62,618
|
|
|
$
|
67,718
|
|
Nonredeemable fixed rate advances, 3.80%-5.25%, due
2007-2010,
with a weighted average interest rate of 5.05% and 3.97% at
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively
|
|
|
101,210
|
|
|
|
36,850
|
|
Nonredeemable fixed rate, due in 2011, amortizing advance with a
rate of 3.00% at September 30, 2007 and a weighted average
interest rate of 3.68% at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
541
|
|
Notes payable to financial institution, with an original
maturity of 36 months due in 2008 with a rate of 4.62% at
September 30, 2007 and a weighted average interest rate of
4.93% at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
2,106
|
|
|
|
9,320
|
|
Notes payable to financial institution with an original term of
36 months due in 2007 with equal monthly principal payments
and a variable rate of interest based on the 30-day LIBOR rate.
The rate resets monthly and was 5.19% and 5.42% at
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
2,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
166,464
|
|
|
$
|
117,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The contractual maturities of long-term debt, as of
September 30, 2007, are shown below. Actual maturities may
differ from contractual maturities due to the convertible
features of the FHLB advances, which may be prepaid by Sterling,
in the event the FHLB converts them to adjustable rate.
A-87
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
Due October 1, 2007 through September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
61,228
|
|
Due October 1, 2008 through September 30, 2009
|
|
|
30,015
|
|
Due October 1, 2009 through September 30, 2010
|
|
|
55,016
|
|
Due October 1, 2010 through September 30, 2011
|
|
|
17
|
|
Due October 1, 2011 through September 30, 2012
|
|
|
17
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
20,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
166,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under the terms of the notes payable to financial institutions,
Sterling is required to meet certain conditions, including
specific financial ratios, as measured on a periodic basis. Due
to the EFI Matter, Sterling was not in compliance with covenants
of the $2.1 million note payable to a financial institution
due in 2008. Sterling does not have a formal waiver, but the
financial institution has indicated that it would not call the
debt. Sterling is not allowed any further advances under the
credit facility.
On June 26, 2007, Sterling, the parent company, entered
into a Credit Agreement with M&T Bank for a
364-day line
of credit in the amount of $80.0 million. The interest rate
payable on this loan is currently 7.125% and the Credit
Agreement contains representations, warranties and covenants and
provisions defining events of default. Sterling is subject to
on-going reporting, disclosure and minimum ratio requirements.
Sterling used the proceeds of this loan to make a
$70 million capital contribution to BLC Bank to reinforce
operating capital and to repay $45.0 million of outstanding
debt of its affiliate, EFI. The loan is collateralized by 100%
of the common stock of BLC Bank. At September 30, 2007,
Sterling and BLC Bank were not in compliance with the financial
covenants of the governing loan documents. However, Sterling and
M&T Bank entered into an agreement whereby M&T Bank
agreed to a waiver of compliance of the financial covenants as
reflected in Sterlings financial statements as of
September 30, 2007.
Although Sterling, on a consolidated basis, has a sufficient
amount of liquidity to satisfy its current obligations, the EFI
Matter placed a significant strain on BLCs regulatory
capital, and has resulted in its primary banking regulator
placing restrictions on BLC Banks ability to dividend
monies to Sterling. Sterlings primary source of cash is
dividend income from BLC. At September 30, 2007 Sterling
has a $71.4 million borrowing due June 24, 2008.
Should the PNC transaction not be completed by this date, and
management is unable to negotiate an extension of this
borrowing, management has developed a plan to either obtain
funds directly to repay the borrowing or improve the capital
position at BLC in order to obtain more ready access to
liquidity at Sterling.
Management has determined that it could execute one or a
combination of the following alternatives to raise a sufficient
amount of capital or improve the liquidity position at Sterling
necessary to satisfy this short term borrowing. These
alternatives include:
|
|
|
|
|
Raising common or preferred equity at Sterling through a
combination of a rights offering to existing shareholders, a
secondary offering to the public, or raising private equity;
|
|
|
|
Selling existing assets or lines of business that are not
integral to core banking operations, in order to relieve minimum
capital holding requirements;
|
|
|
|
Potentially renegotiating the terms and covenants of
Sterlings line of credit with M&T Bank.
|
A-88
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
|
|
Note 14
|
Junior
Subordinated Debentures Owed to Unconsolidated Subsidiary Trusts
and
Corporation-Obligated
Mandatorily Redeemable Capital Securities of Subsidiary Trusts
Holding Solely Debentures of the Corporation
|
Sterling sponsors four non-consolidated subsidiary trusts,
Sterling Financial Statutory Trusts II, III, IV and V,
of which 100% of the common equity is owned by Sterling. The
trusts were formed for the purpose of issuing
corporation-obligated mandatorily redeemable capital securities
(the capital securities) to third party investors and investing
the proceeds from the sale of such capital securities solely in
junior subordinated debt securities of Sterling (the
debentures). The debentures held by each trust are the sole
assets of that trust, and totaled $87.6 million as of
September 30, 2007.
In March 2007, Sterling Financial Statutory Trust V issued
$20.0 million of capital securities to third party
investors, and simultaneously invested the proceeds into a
$20.6 million junior subordinated note payable by Sterling.
The debenture bears interest at a floating rate of LIBOR plus
165 basis points and is due in June 2037, with the first
redemption date in March 2012.
Also in March 2007, the capital securities issued by Sterling
Financial Statutory Trust I were redeemed in full.
A summary of the junior subordinated debentures from Sterling to
the subsidiary trusts is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Debenture issued to Sterling Financial Statutory Trust I,
first redeemable, in whole or part, by Sterling in March 2007.
Interest payable quarterly at a floating rate of LIBOR plus
360 basis points and matures in 2032. Redeemed in full on
March 26, 2007
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,619
|
|
Debenture issued to Sterling Financial Statutory Trust II,
first redeemable, in whole or part, by Sterling in June 2008.
Interest payable quarterly at a fixed rate of 5.55%, and matures
in 2033
|
|
|
36,083
|
|
|
|
36,083
|
|
Debenture issued to Sterling Financial Statutory Trust III,
first redeemable, in whole or part, by Sterling in December
2009. Interest payable quarterly at a fixed rate of 6.00%, and
matures in 2034
|
|
|
15,464
|
|
|
|
15,464
|
|
Debenture issued to Sterling Financial Statutory Trust IV,
first redeemable, in whole or part, by Sterling in March 2010.
Interest payable quarterly at a fixed rate of 6.19% and matures
in 2035
|
|
|
15,464
|
|
|
|
15,464
|
|
Debenture issued to Sterling Financial Statutory Trust V,
first redeemable, in whole or part, by Sterling in March 2012.
Interest payable quarterly at a floating rate of LIBOR plus
165 basis points (7.34% at September 30,
2007) and matures in 2037
|
|
|
20,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
87,630
|
|
|
$
|
87,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As discussed elsewhere in this document, in accordance with the
terms of each of the four trust indentures, Sterling exercised
its right to defer paying the interest on the debentures for up
to 20 consecutive periods without being in default. Since the
third quarter of 2007, Sterling has elected and given timely
notice of its intent to defer the quarterly payments on these
debentures. Sterling intends to defer these payments until
Sterlings and BLC Banks capital levels have
strengthened to a level which Sterling deems appropriate to
support resuming these payments, conditioned upon approval from
the Federal Reserve. It is currently unknown when Sterling will
be able to resume making these interest payments; however, the
interest accrues during the deferral periods.
A-89
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
The allocation of income tax expense (benefit) from continuing
operations between current and deferred is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
324
|
|
State
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
(176
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(8,056
|
)
|
|
|
(4,994
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
(238
|
)
|
|
|
(291
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,294
|
)
|
|
|
(5,285
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(7,982
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,137
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reason for the differences between the federal statutory
income tax rate and the effective tax rates are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended,
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended,
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Statutory rate
|
|
|
(35.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(35.0
|
)%
|
Increase (decrease) resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt interest income
|
|
|
(18.9
|
)%
|
|
|
(120.9
|
)%
|
Disallowed interest
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
14.4
|
%
|
Dividends paid deduction
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(8.5
|
)%
|
Low-income housing credits
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)%
|
State tax (benefit), net of federal impact
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(6.9
|
)%
|
Uncertain tax position resolution
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
Other, net
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rates
|
|
|
(51.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(153.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The income tax provision (benefit) includes $1.4 million
and $520,000 of income taxes relating to realized securities
gains (losses) for the nine months ended September 30, 2007
and twelve months ended December 31, 2006, respectively.
A-90
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
The significant components of Sterlings deferred tax
assets and liabilities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
$
|
8,948
|
|
|
$
|
8,424
|
|
Employee benefit plans
|
|
|
3,057
|
|
|
|
2,856
|
|
Accrued directors fees
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
|
602
|
|
Federal and state net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
27,294
|
|
|
|
19,271
|
|
Restructuring charge reserve
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
Securities impairment reserve
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
Forestry-related finance receivable credit losses
|
|
|
36,394
|
|
|
|
33,867
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5,746
|
|
|
|
10,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,059
|
|
|
|
75,653
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(2,445
|
)
|
|
|
(2,435
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,614
|
|
|
|
73,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing
|
|
|
(11,237
|
)
|
|
|
(11,244
|
)
|
Premises and equipment
|
|
|
(1,042
|
)
|
|
|
(1,168
|
)
|
Deferred loan fees
|
|
|
(520
|
)
|
|
|
(381
|
)
|
Securities accretion and mark to market
|
|
|
(6,193
|
)
|
|
|
(6,884
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
(560
|
)
|
|
|
(2,045
|
)
|
Purchase accounting amortization
|
|
|
(1,840
|
)
|
|
|
(2,126
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(328
|
)
|
|
|
(335
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,720
|
)
|
|
|
(24,183
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
57,894
|
|
|
$
|
49,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net deferred tax asset is recorded separately in the balance
sheet. As of September 30, 2007, Sterling has federal and
state net operating loss carryforwards of $69.6 million
(tax benefit of $27.3 million) that expire through the year
2026. Management does not believe that some of the state net
operating loss carryforwards will be utilized prior to their
expiration, and as such, a valuation allowance has been provided
in the amount of $2.4 million as of September 30, 2007.
Sterling adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,
on January 1, 2007. As a result of the implementation of
Interpretation 48, Sterling recognized a $250,000 increase in
the liability for taxes, which was accounted for as a decrease
to the January 1, 2007 balance of retained earnings. On
January 1, 2007, Sterling had unrecognized tax benefit
reserves related to uncertain tax positions of $512,000. Of this
amount, approximately $395,000 related to tax treatment for
equipment operating leases. The remaining balance of
approximately $117,000 is for uncertain tax positions due to
acquisitions and state tax positions.
Sterlings unrecognized tax benefit reserve decreased by a
net $262,000 during the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2007 as a result of a lapse of the statute of
limitations totaling $383,000, offset by Sterling accruing
interest and penalties of $121,000 relating to unrecognized tax
benefits within the miscellaneous expense line item of the
consolidated statements of income.
A-91
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
512
|
|
Additions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
121
|
|
Reductions to tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
(383
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2007
|
|
$
|
250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 16
|
Commitments
and Contingent Liabilities
|
Credit-Related
Financial Instruments
Sterlings credit-related financial instruments include
commitments to extend credit and letters of credit. Such
commitments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and
interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the
consolidated balance sheets.
Sterlings exposure to credit loss is represented by the
contractual amount of these commitments. Sterling follows the
same credit policies in making commitments as it does for
on-balance sheet instruments.
The following outstanding instruments have contract amounts that
represent credit risk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unused home equity lines of credit
|
|
$
|
107,026
|
|
|
$
|
103,565
|
|
Other commitments to extend credit
|
|
|
574,204
|
|
|
|
681,194
|
|
Standby letters of credit
|
|
|
97,761
|
|
|
|
93,080
|
|
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a
customer, as long as there is no violation of any condition
established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed
expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require
the payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected
to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts
do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Each
customers creditworthiness is evaluated on a
case-by-case
basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary
upon extension of credit, is based on managements credit
evaluation of the customer and generally consists of real
estate. Excluded from these amounts are commitments to extend
credit in the form of check credit or related plans.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by
Sterling to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third
party. Those letters of credit are primarily issued to support
public and private borrowing arrangements. Essentially, all
letters of credit issued have expiration dates within one year.
The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is
essentially the same as that involved in extending loan
facilities to customers.
Derivative
Financial Instruments
Sterling is a party to derivative instruments in the normal
course of business to manage its own exposure to fluctuations in
interest rates and to meet the financing needs of its customers.
A-92
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
Asset
Liability Management
Interest
rate derivatives
Sterling enters into derivative transactions principally to
manage the risk of price or interest rate movements on the value
of certain assets and liabilities and on future cash flows. A
summary of the interest rate contracts is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pay fixed/receive floating
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
Pay floating/receive fixed
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
(379
|
)
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
(810
|
)
|
Interest rate floors purchased
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps have been entered into to hedge the
variability in future expected cash flows related to floating
rate assets and liabilities.
|
|
|
|
Interest rate floors have been purchased to hedge the
variability in future expected cash flows related to floating
rate assets in exchange for the payment of a premium when the
contract is initiated.
|
Gains and losses on derivative instruments reclassified from
accumulated other comprehensive income to current-period
earnings are included in the line item in which the hedged cash
flows are recorded. At September 30, 2007, other
comprehensive income included a deferred after-tax unrealized
loss of $262,000 versus $582,000 at December 31, 2006.
A portion of the amount in other comprehensive income was
reclassified from other comprehensive income to the appropriate
income statement line item as net settlements occur. In
addition, the premiums paid for interest rate floors are
amortized over the term of the contract and recognized in the
appropriate income statement line item. Sterling recognized
interest income and interest expense, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
|
Ended,
|
|
|
Ended,
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
Impact to interest income-commercial loans
|
|
$
|
(440
|
)
|
|
$
|
(456
|
)
|
Impact to interest expense-borrowed funds
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
27
|
|
Equity
derivatives
A summary of the equity derivatives is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Covered
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Covered
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Written call options
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Purchased put options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2006, Sterling wrote call options on certain equity
security holdings (covered calls). Sterling received a premium
in exchange for selling the call options. The buyer of the
option had the right to purchase a specified number of shares at
a future date at an agreed upon price level, or strike price.
The options are recorded at fair value (initially the premium
received) with the changes in fair value recognized in other
non-interest income. At September 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, there were no outstanding call options.
|
A-93
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
Sterling has purchased equity put options to protect the company
from the risk that the fair value of certain equity security
holdings might be adversely impacted by changes in market price.
Sterling has the right to sell a specified number of shares
through a future date at an agreed upon price level, or strike
price. The options are recorded at fair value (initially the
premium paid) with the changes in fair value recognized in other
non-interest expense.
|
Sterling recognized non-interest income and non-interest expense
related to its equity derivative activity as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
|
Ended,
|
|
|
Ended,
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
Other non-interest income
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
Other non-interest expense
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
Customer
Related
Sterling enters into interest rate contracts (including interest
rate caps and interest rate swap agreements) to facilitate
customer transactions and meet their financing needs. This
portfolio is actively managed and hedged with offsetting
contracts, with identical terms, with third-party
counterparties. A summary of the customer related interest rate
contracts and offsetting contracts with third-party
counterparties is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pay fixed/receive floating
|
|
$
|
49,454
|
|
|
$
|
(590
|
)
|
|
$
|
42,288
|
|
|
$
|
(271
|
)
|
Pay floating/receive fixed
|
|
|
49,454
|
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
|
42,288
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
Interest rate caps written
|
|
|
12,101
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
18,510
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Interest rate caps purchased
|
|
|
12,101
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
18,510
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Changes in the estimated fair value of customer related
contracts and related interest settlements, net of the
offsetting counterparty contracts, are recorded in non-interest
income. Fees collected from customers for these transactions are
recognized over the life of the contract. Fees included in other
non-interest income are $53,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 and $54,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2006.
Sterling believes it has reduced market risk on its customer
related derivative contracts through the offsetting contractual
relationships with counterparties. However, if a customer or
counterparty fails to perform, credit risk is equal to the
extent of the fair value gain in a derivative. When the fair
value of a derivative instrument contract is positive, this
generally indicates that the counterparty or customer owes
Sterling, and results in credit risk to Sterling. When the fair
value of a credit risk is negative, Sterling owes the customer
or counterparty, and therefore, has no credit risk. Sterling
minimizes the credit risk in derivative instruments by including
derivative credit risk in its credit underwriting procedures,
and by entering into transactions with higher quality
counterparties that are reviewed periodically by management.
Civil
Litigation
Based upon the facts and circumstances known to Sterling and its
counsel regarding the pending or threatened civil litigation
described below, Sterling has not established a reserve or
accrued liability for any amount in its September 30, 2007
balance sheet.
A-94
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
Securities
Class-Action
Lawsuits in Federal Court
Several putative
class-action
lawsuits have been filed on behalf of persons who acquired
Sterling common stock during the period from April 27, 2004
through May 24, 2007. Each complaint alleges, in substance,
that Sterlings public statements and filings fraudulently
omitted information and included fraudulent misrepresentations,
in April and May 2007, about the improprieties at EFI and their
impact upon Sterlings earnings, and that the price for
Sterling stock was fraudulently inflated during the class period
because of the omissions and misrepresentations. Each complaint
alleges claims (1) under Section 10(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act),
and (2) against Controlling Persons or
Controlling Defendants, under Section 20(a) of
the Exchange Act.
The specific lawsuits are listed below:
Steve Macrina v. J. Roger Moyer, Jr., Thomas
Dautrich, George W. Graner, Equipment Finance LLC, and Bank of
Lancaster, N.A., 07 Civ. 4108 (Southern District of New
York) (filed May 25, 2007)
Raymond D. Buckwalter v. Sterling Financial Corporation,
Equipment Finance LLC, J. Roger Moyer, Jr., Thomas
Dautrich, George W. Graner, Bradley Scovill, and John Doe
Defendants 1-20, 2:07-cv-02171-LS (Eastern District of
Pennsylvania) (filed May 29, 2007)
Brian Johnson v. J. Roger Moyer, Jr., J. Bradley
Scovill and Tito Lima, 1:07-cv-04652 (Southern District of
New York) (filed June 1, 2007)
Castle Strategic Trading, LLC v. J. Roger
Moyer, Jr., Thomas Dautrich, George W. Graner, Equipment
Finance LLC, and Bank of Lancaster, N.A., 07 Civ. 5594
(Southern District of New York) (filed June 12, 2007)
Jeffrey M. Cooley v. Sterling Financial Corporation, J.
Roger Moyer, Jr., J. Bradley Scovill and Tito Lima, 07
CV 5671 (Southern District of New York) (filed June 14,
2007)
Kevin Simpson v. Sterling Financial Corporation, Bank of
Lancaster County, N.A., Equipment Finance LLC, J. Roger
Moyer, Jr., Tito Lima, J. Bradley Scovill, George W.
Graner, Thomas Dautrich, and John Doe NOS. 1 20,
2:07-cv-02171-LS (Eastern District of Pennsylvania) (filed
June 20, 2007)
Miller et al v. Sterling Financial Corp., Equipment
Finance LLC, J. Roger Moyer, Jr., Thomas Dautrich, George
W. Graner, J. Bradley Scovill, and John Doe NOS. 1 -
20, 2:07-cv-02694-LS (Eastern District of Pennsylvania)
(filed June 28, 2007)
Kenneth G. Stoudt et al v. Sterling Financial
Corp., Equipment Finance LLC, J. Roger Moyer, Jr., Thomas
Dautrich, George W. Graner, J. Bradley Scovill, and Tito L.
Lima, 2:07-cv-02914-LS (Eastern District of Pennsylvania)
(filed July 16, 2007)
Frederica F. Haas et al v. Sterling Financial
Corp., Equipment Finance LLC, J. Roger Moyer, Jr., Thomas
Dautrich, George W. Graner, J. Bradley Scovill, and Tito L.
Lima, 2:07-cv-03094-LS (Eastern District of Pennsylvania)
(filed July 30, 2007)
On October 30, 2007, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation ordered that the lawsuits filed originally in New
York be transferred to the U.S. District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania and, with the consent of that
court, assigned to the Honorable Lawrence F. Stengel for
coordinated pretrial proceedings.
At a status conference on December 18, 2007, Judge Stengel
appointed the Public Employees Retirees Association of New
Mexico and the New Mexico Education Retirement Board as lead
plaintiffs. On consent, the court also gave plaintiffs
60 days to file a consolidated amended complaint, and
Sterling another 60 days to respond by motion or otherwise.
A-95
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
Certain Sterling shareholders who are members of the purported
class and who received Sterling common shares as consideration
in transactions where Sterling acquired the entity have informed
Sterling that they are considering filing claims against
Sterling in addition to those asserted in the purported
securities class action for breach of contract and federal and
state securities act violations.
Potential
Shareholder Derivative Litigation
Sterling received a shareholder demand letter, dated
June 6, 2007, from Brian M. Felgoise, an attorney acting on
behalf of then-undisclosed shareholders. Mr. Felgoise
demanded that (1) the Sterling board of directors appoint a
Special Litigation Committee to investigate and remediate
possible breaches of duties by certain unnamed officers and
directors during the period from April 2004 through May 24,
2007, and (2) that Sterling file suit against these unnamed
individuals to recover damages, including bonuses, the costs of
investigations, and the proceeds of insider trading.
Mr. Felgoise stated that he would commence litigation on
behalf of Sterling if it did not take the demanded steps within
90 days.
In response to Sterlings request for additional
information, Mr. Felgoise disclosed that he represents Judy
Horowitz, identified as a Pennsylvania resident and Sterling
shareholder since 1990. Mr. Felgoise also stated that an
investigation should be directed at those individuals who were
members of the board of directors of Sterling and who were
responsible for the financial reporting for Sterling.
Mr. Felgoise also requested that the board of directors
investigate whether the aforementioned individuals have
properly disclosed all of the material factors regarding the
sale to PNC, whether the price of $565 million
in cash and stock is fair and reasonable, and whether any
other bids were solicited, received
and/or
rejected.
On August 29, 2007, Sterling informed Mr. Felgoise
that, prior to his June 6, 2007 demand letter, Sterling had
commenced an internal investigation into the improprieties at
EFI, and that the board of directors would determine what kinds
of measures, in addition to the actions previously announced,
may be appropriate upon the completion of this independent
investigation. The response also informed Mr. Felgoise that
Sterlings sale to PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., was
approved by the board of directors and properly disclosed in
Sterlings documents and public filings. In his response on
September 18, 2007, Mr. Felgoise requested additional
details about the internal investigation; on October 16,
2007, Sterling informed Mr. Felgoise that that the
independent investigation was being conducted by the law firm of
Stradley Ronon, with the assistance of KPMG LLP, and that
Sterling expected the investigation to conclude in 2007.
Civil
Litigation in State Court
On September 24, 2007, Univest National Bank &
Trust Co. filed suit against EFI and Sterling, in the Court
of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, Pennsylvania. Univest
alleges that, beginning in 2005, it purchased from EFI 31 loans
with a present value of $6.2 million, and that the loans
had a higher rate of delinquency than was represented to it by
Sterling and EFI. Univest brings claims of (1) breach of
contract against EFI; (2) rescission for negligent
misrepresentation/nondisclosure against EFI and Sterling;
(3) fraudulent misrepresentation against EFI and Sterling;
(4) breach of fiduciary duty against EFI;
(5) conversion against EFI; (6) aiding and abetting
breach of fiduciary duty against Sterling; (7) and
conspiracy against EFI and Sterling. Univest seeks damages of
$1,987,224.76, along with punitive damages, costs, interest, and
other relief as the court deems appropriate.
On December 10, 2007, Woodlands filed suit against Sterling
and EFI in the Court of Common Pleas of Lycoming County,
Pennsylvania for claims allegedly arising out of Woodlands
purchase of certain equipment loans from EFI. Woodlands asserts
the following claims against Sterling
and/or EFI:
(1) breach of contract; (2) rescission for negligent
misrepresentation/non-disclosure; (3) fraudulent
misrepresentation; (4) breach of fiduciary duty;
(5) conversion; and (6) aiding and abetting breach of
fiduciary duty. Woodlands seeks $7,848,210.99 (the alleged value
of the 55 outstanding equipment loans), plus interest, costs,
and attorneys
A-96
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
fees for its claims of breach of contract and rescission. In
addition to that relief, Woodlands also seeks punitive damages
and costs of the suit for its other claims.
On November 28, 2007, First Commonwealth Bank filed a writ
of summons with respect to Sterling and EFI in the Court of
Common Pleas of Indiana, County, Pennsylvania in connection with
claims allegedly arising out of First Commonwealths
purchase of certain equipment loans from EFI. A complaint has
not been filed in such action.
On June 5, 2007, EFI received a letter from NexTier Bank
demanding that EFI immediately repurchase all loans assigned by
EFI to NexTier Bank pursuant to a master assignment agreement.
According to the demand letter, the loan in question had an
aggregate outstanding principal balance, as of June 1,
2007, of approximately $1.2 million.
On December 27, 2007, Sterling and EFI received a letter
from counsel for Farmers and Merchants Trust Company of
Chambersburg (F&M) demanding that EFI
immediately repurchase from F&M all of the outstanding
loans purchased by F&M pursuant to three specified loan
purchase agreements.
|
|
Note 17
|
Stockholders
Equity and Regulatory Matters
|
Sterling maintains a dividend reinvestment and stock purchase
plan. Under the plan, shareholders may purchase additional
shares of Sterlings common stock at the prevailing market
prices with reinvested dividends and voluntary cash payments.
Sterling reserved 2,691,650 shares of Sterlings
common stock to be issued under the dividend reinvestment and
stock purchase plan. Shares available to be issued under the
plan at September 30, 2007 totaled 2,074,134.
Sterling maintains a directors stock compensation plan
(Directors Plan). This plan, which was approved by
Sterlings shareholders at the 2005 annual shareholders
meeting, had 125,000 shares (as adjusted) of common stock
reserved for issuance. Pursuant to the Directors Plan,
each non-employee director of Sterling and each non-employee
director of its subsidiaries is entitled to receive a set number
of shares of Sterlings common stock based upon a
methodology approved annually by the board of directors and
valued as of the first business day of July each year. However,
in 2007, no shares of Sterling common stock were paid as
directors fees. Rather, in lieu of stock, the directors received
in a lump sum cash payment, the value of the average of the
closing price of Sterlings common stock for the five
(5) business days preceding Sterlings September board
of directors meeting (September
18-24,
2007) multiplied by the number of shares approved for that
board (i.e., 700 for Sterling board members). Shares available
to be issued under the Directors Plan at
September 30, 2007 totaled 104,092.
In May 2003, Sterlings board of directors authorized the
repurchase of up to 1,303,365 shares (as adjusted) of its
common stock. Shares repurchased are held for reissuance in
connection with Sterlings stock compensation plans and for
general corporate purposes. During 2006, Sterling repurchased
445,000 shares of its common stock, at an average price of
$21.41 under this repurchase plan. During the first quarter of
2007, Sterling repurchased 299,500 shares of its common
stock, also at an average price of $21.41. Sterling suspended
all repurchases in the second quarter of 2007. Remaining shares
authorized for repurchase under the plan as of
September 30, 2007 totaled 57,853.
Quantitative measures that have been established by regulation
to ensure capital adequacy require Sterling and its banking
subsidiaries to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of total and
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets and Tier 1
capital to average assets. Management believes, as of
September 30, 2007, that Sterling and BLC Bank did not meet
the minimum capital adequacy requirements to be considered
well-capitalized. For the period ended
December 31, 2006, management believes that Sterling and
Bank of Lancaster County did not meet the minimum capital
adequacy requirements due to the losses recorded related to EFI.
To take corrective action, in the second quarter of 2007,
Sterling and Bank of Lancaster County took
A-97
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
several steps to improve capital and capital ratio positions.
These steps included: the consolidation of the Bank of Hanover,
Pennsylvania State Bank and Bay First Bank charters into Bank of
Lancaster County and Bank of Lancaster County changing its name
to BLC Bank, N.A.; Sterling borrowing $70 million from an
external source, and infusing it into BLC Bank; and the sale of
certain assets.
As of September 30, 2007, based on the most recent
notification from its banking regulator, BLC Bank was
categorized as under capitalized, while Delaware
Sterling Bank & Trust Company was categorized as
well capitalized under the regulatory framework for
prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well
capitalized or adequately capitalized
institutions must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1
risk-based and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the
following tables.
A-98
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum to be
|
|
|
Minimum to be Well
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adequately Capitalized
|
|
|
Capitalized Under
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Prompt Corrective
|
|
|
Prompt Corrective
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Action Provisions
|
|
|
Action Provisions
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-based capital to risk weighted assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sterling (consolidated)
|
|
$
|
44,920
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
194,302
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
BLC Bank, N.A.
|
|
|
157,631
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
|
191,641
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
239,551
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
Delaware Sterling Bank & Trust Company
|
|
|
3,616
|
|
|
|
17.6
|
%
|
|
|
1,642
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
2,053
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
Tier 1 risk-based capital to risk weighted assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sterling (consolidated)
|
|
|
22,460
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
97,151
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
BLC Bank, N.A.
|
|
|
132,816
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
95,820
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
143,731
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
Delaware Sterling Bank & Trust Company
|
|
|
3,507
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
%
|
|
|
821
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
1,232
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
Tier 1 risk-based capital to average assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sterling (consolidated)
|
|
|
22,460
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
120,878
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
BLC Bank, N.A.
|
|
|
132,816
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
121,502
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
151,878
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Delaware Sterling Bank & Trust Company
|
|
|
3,507
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
|
2,053
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
2,567
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
As of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-based capital to risk weighted assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sterling (consolidated)
|
|
$
|
82,880
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
193,910
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Bank of Lancaster County, N.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
118,279
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
147,848
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
Bank of Hanover and Trust Company
|
|
|
73,936
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
|
|
45,754
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
57,193
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
Pennsylvania State Bank
|
|
|
23,248
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
|
|
16,354
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
20,442
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
Bay First Bank, N.A.
|
|
|
19,106
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
%
|
|
|
12,383
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
15,479
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
Delaware Sterling Bank & Trust Company
|
|
|
4,306
|
|
|
|
27.8
|
%
|
|
|
1,238
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
1,548
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
Tier 1 risk-based capital to risk weighted assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sterling (consolidated)
|
|
|
41,440
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
96,955
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Bank of Lancaster County, N.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
59,139
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
88,709
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
Bank of Hanover and Trust Company
|
|
|
68,380
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
|
|
22,877
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
34,316
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
Pennsylvania State Bank
|
|
|
21,053
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
|
|
8,229
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
12,265
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
Bay First Bank, N.A.
|
|
|
17,699
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
|
|
6,192
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
9,287
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
Delaware Sterling Bank & Trust Company
|
|
|
4,224
|
|
|
|
27.3
|
%
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
Tier 1 risk-based capital to average assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sterling (consolidated)
|
|
|
41,440
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
111,587
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Bank of Lancaster County, N.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
65,005
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
81,256
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Bank of Hanover and Trust Company
|
|
|
68,380
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
32,180
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
40,225
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Pennsylvania State Bank
|
|
|
21,053
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
|
|
10,306
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
12,883
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Bay First Bank, N.A.
|
|
|
17,699
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
|
7,851
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
9,813
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Delaware Sterling Bank & Trust Company
|
|
|
4,224
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
|
|
1,345
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
1,681
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
A-99
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
|
|
Note 18
|
Employee
Benefit Plans
|
Sterling sponsors a qualified postretirement benefit plan that
provides certain healthcare insurance benefits for retired
employees who have reached minimum age and years of service
eligibility requirements.
The change in benefit obligation and the change in fair value of
plan assets related to other postretirement benefits for each of
the years in the two-year period ended September 30, 2007
and December 31, 2006, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Postretirement
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change in benefit obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
2,743
|
|
|
$
|
2,707
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
Benefit payments
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
Change in discount rate and plan amendments
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of period
|
|
|
2,830
|
|
|
|
2,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Benefit payments
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of funded status
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status of plans
|
|
|
(2,830
|
)
|
|
|
(2,743
|
)
|
Unrecognized net transition obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized prior service costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized net losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued benefit expense
|
|
$
|
(2,830
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,743
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The discount rate used in determining the accrued postretirement
benefit expense was 6.00% in 2007 compared to 5.75% in 2006.
A-100
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
The components of the retirement benefit costs are presented
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
|
Ended,
|
|
|
Ended,
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
Retirement benefit costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
107
|
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
Amortization of transition losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Actuarial losses
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net retirement benefits costs
|
|
$
|
228
|
|
|
$
|
305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sterling sponsors a qualified postretirement benefit plan that
provides certain healthcare insurance benefits for retired
employees who have reached minimum age and years of service
eligibility requirements.
The change in benefit obligation and the change in fair value of
plan assets related to other postretirement benefits for each of
the years in the two-year period ended September 30, 2007
and December 31, 2006, are as follows:
Healthcare cost trend rates assumed with respect to other
postretirement benefits in measuring the accumulated
postretirement benefit were 9.0% at September 30, 2007
grading down 0.5% per year to an ultimate rate of 5.0%. The
healthcare cost trend rate assumption has a significant effect
on the amounts reported. The following table reflects the effect
of a 1.0% point increase and a 1.0% point decrease in the
healthcare cost trend rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1% Point Increase
|
|
1% Point Decrease
|
|
Effect on total of service and interest cost components
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
(33
|
)
|
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
(249
|
)
|
The measurement date for the postretirement benefits is
September 30th of each year. Sterling estimates
contributions to be paid into the postretirement benefit plan
for 2008 to be approximately $305,000.
Sterling Financial Corporation sponsors a 401(k) retirement plan
(the 401(k) Plan) for its eligible employees. Under
the salary deferral feature of the 401(k) Plan, a participant
may contribute up to 20% of their compensation. Sterling
matches contributions equal to 100% of the first 2%, 50%
on the next 2% and 25% on the next 4% of the employees
contributions subject to federal limitations. The employees may
direct the investment of those contributions to one or all of
the several funds available. Matching contributions are fully
vested and are invested based on the employees direction.
Under the performance incentive feature of the 401(k) Plan,
additional contributions are made to participant accounts for
each plan year in an amount determined by the board of directors
based on Sterling achieving certain financial performance
objectives. The performance incentive feature was paid entirely
in Sterling common stock. In 2007, there was no expense for the
performance incentive feature of the 401(k) Plan. The total
expense for employer contributions for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 was $898,000. Total expense for the
performance incentive feature and employer contributions was
$2.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.
The number of Sterling shares owned at September 30, 2007,
in the Sterling 401(k) Plan totaled 1.3 million shares with
an approximate market value of $22.1 million based on the
closing price of Sterling stock at that date. Dividends totaling
approximately $430,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 were reinvested in additional shares of
Sterling common stock.
A-101
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
Until June 15, 2007, the 401(k) Plan allowed participants
to invest their contributions in Sterling common stock and to
transfer amounts from other investment funds under the Plan into
the Sterling common stock fund. Because the shares of Sterling
common stock offered to participants were not registered under
the Securities Act of 1933, a participant who purchased shares
might have the right under the federal securities laws to
rescind the purchase and recover the consideration paid for the
shares (with interest, less any amount of income received from
the shares). If the participant sold the shares for an amount
less than the purchase price, the participant might have the
right to damages. Sterling believes that these rights would
apply to shares purchased by Plan participants during the period
from June 26, 2006, until the elimination of Sterling
common stock as an investment option on June 15, 2007.
During this period, participants purchased approximately
78,000 shares under the Plan at an average purchase price
of approximately $21.37 per share.
Sterlings affiliates have non-qualified supplemental
retirement and deferred compensation contracts with certain
directors and key employees to provide these individuals with a
mechanism to defer a portion of their compensation, provide
additional retirement benefits or to provide their beneficiary a
benefit in the event of pre-retirement death. At
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the present
value of the future liability was $7.0 million and
$6.9 million, respectively. Sterling has funded these plans
through the purchase of life insurance policies, which have an
aggregate cash surrender value of $37.2 million and
$11.1 million at September 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, respectively. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2007, $198,000 was charged to expense in
connection with these plans. For the year ended
December 31, 2006, $405,000 was charged to expense in
connection with these plans.
|
|
Note 19
|
Stock
Compensation
|
Sterling maintained an omnibus stock incentive plan (the 1996
Stock Incentive Plan) under which incentive and non-qualified
stock options, stock appreciation rights, or restricted stock
has been issued. Only incentive and non-qualified stock options
have been issued under the plan. The options were granted
periodically to key employees at a price not less than the fair
value of the shares at the date of grant, and had a term of ten
years. On November 19, 2006, the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan
expired and $1.5 million options were outstanding.
In May 2006, Sterlings shareholders approved an omnibus
stock incentive plan (the 2006 Equity Compensation Plan) under
which incentive and non-qualified stock options, stock
appreciation rights, or restricted stock may be issued. As of
September 30, 2007 only shares of restricted stock have
been issued under this plan. As of September 30, 2007,
Sterling had 2.5 million shares of common stock reserved
for issuance under the 2006 Equity Compensation Plan and 10,100
restricted shares had been issued, all of which vested upon the
execution of Sterlings merger agreement with PNC.
Effective January 1, 2006, Sterling adopted the fair value
recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payment,
(Statement 123R), using the modified-prospective-transition
method. Under the transition method, compensation cost
recognized in 2006 includes compensation cost for all
share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006,
based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with
the provisions of Statement 123R. Results for prior periods
have not been restated.
The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date
of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model that uses
the assumptions noted in the following table. Because the
Black-Scholes option valuation model incorporates ranges of
assumptions for inputs, those ranges are disclosed. Expected
volatilities are based on historic volatilities of
Sterlings stock, and other factors. Sterling uses
historical data to estimate option exercise and employee
termination within the valuation model. The expected term of
options granted is based on the simplified formula allowed by
the SECs Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 and
represents the
A-102
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
period of time that options granted are expected to be
outstanding. The risk-free rate for periods within the
contractual life of the option is based on the
U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
2.70
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
Expected life (in years)
|
|
|
6
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
A summary of option activity is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
|
Intrinsic Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2007
|
|
|
1,529,331
|
|
|
$
|
16.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(138,588
|
)
|
|
|
11.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
955,852
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited and expired
|
|
|
(93,658
|
)
|
|
|
19.96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
1,297,085
|
|
|
|
17.02
|
|
|
|
5.7 years
|
|
|
|
2,765,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
1,297,085
|
|
|
|
17.02
|
|
|
|
5.7 years
|
|
|
|
2,765,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2006
|
|
|
1,688,788
|
|
|
$
|
15.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
256,000
|
|
|
|
20.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options assumed in acquisition
|
|
|
70,194
|
|
|
|
9.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(472,436
|
)
|
|
|
14.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,724,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited and expired
|
|
|
(13,215
|
)
|
|
|
20.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
1,529,331
|
|
|
|
16.37
|
|
|
|
6.6 years
|
|
|
|
9,730,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
1,279,331
|
|
|
|
15.94
|
|
|
|
6.0 years
|
|
|
|
9,007,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted
during 2006 was $6.51.
As of September 30, 2007, all compensation cost related to
share-based compensation arrangements was recognized.
Sterling received $1.5 million of cash from stock option
exercises during the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
All stock option transactions are settled through a third party
registered broker.
Pursuant to the 2006 Equity Compensation Plan and the 1996 Stock
Option Plan, outstanding options automatically vest upon a
change in control, as defined in the plans. For the
purposes of the plans, a change in control occurs when a
definitive agreement to sell Sterling is entered into. As
discussed in Note 3, the announcement of The PNC Financial
Services Group, Inc. acquisition of Sterling qualified as a
change in control as defined. Therefore 100% of the
granted but unvested options immediately vested, and Sterling
recognized equity based compensation expense of $930,000.
On February 27, 2007, the board of directors awarded eight
members of senior management a total of 10,100 shares of
restricted stock at closing market price of $21.35. These shares
were awarded from the 2006 Equity Compensation Plan, which had
been adopted by the board of directors on January 27, 2006
and
A-103
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
approved by shareholders at the 2006 annual meeting. These
awards were subject to a three year cliff vesting schedule based
upon service.
On July 19, 2007, per the terms of the plan document and
award agreement, and as a result of the signing of the
definitive agreement of merger with The PNC Financial Services
Group, Inc., the vesting of these awards was accelerated and
these restricted stock awards became fully vested, and Sterling
recognized equity based compensation expense of $216,000.
|
|
Note 20
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
Certain directors and officers of Sterling Financial Corporation
and its subsidiaries, their immediate families and companies in
which they are principal owners (more than 10%), were indebted
to the subsidiary banks during 2006 and 2007. All loans were
made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates
and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable
transactions with other persons. Total loans to these persons at
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 amounted to
$2.6 million and $14.7 million, respectively. During
2007, $94,000 of new loans were made and repayments totaled
$12.2 million. Unfunded commitments to these persons at
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 totaled
$1.2 million and $9.1 million, respectively.
Effective December 31, 2007, Sterling sold Corporate
Healthcare Strategies, LLC and Professional Services Group to
David K. Stoudt, the former president of the Sterling affiliate.
See Note 4, Acquisitions and Divestitures, for further
discussion.
Effective December 31, 2006, Sterling sold the personal and
casualty insurance accounts of Lancaster Insurance Group to
Murray Insurance Associates, Inc. David E. Hosler, a director of
Sterling, is chief operating officer of Murray Insurance
Associates, Inc.
|
|
Note 21
|
Restrictions
on Dividends, Loans and Advances
|
Federal and state banking regulations place certain restrictions
on dividends paid and loans or advances made to Sterling by its
subsidiary banks. The amount of dividends that may be paid from
the subsidiary banks to Sterling totaled $0 at
September 30, 2007 because dividends paid by the subsidiary
banks are prohibited if the effect thereof would cause the
banks capital to be reduced below applicable minimum
capital requirements.
Under current Federal Reserve regulations, the subsidiary banks
are limited to the amounts they may loan to their affiliates,
including Sterling. Covered transactions, including loans, with
a single affiliate, may not exceed 10%, and the aggregate of all
covered transactions with all affiliates may not exceed 20%, of
each bank subsidiarys capital and surplus (as defined by
regulation).
At September 30, 2007, the maximum amount available for
loans to Sterling totaled $21.9 million, of which $0 was
outstanding as of September 30, 2007.
|
|
Note 22
|
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
|
The fair value of a financial instrument is the current amount
that would be exchanged between willing parties, other than in a
forced liquidation. Fair value is best determined based upon
quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no
quoted market prices for Sterlings various financial
instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not
available, fair values are based on estimates using present
value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are
significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the
discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly,
the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate
settlement of the instrument. FASB Statement No. 107.
A-104
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
excludes certain financial instruments and all non-financial
instruments from its disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the
aggregate fair value amounts presented may not necessarily
represent the underlying fair value of Sterling.
The following methods and assumptions were used by Sterling in
estimating fair value disclosures for financial instruments:
Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying
amounts of cash, due from banks and federal funds sold
approximate fair value.
Interest-bearing deposits in banks and short-term
investments: The carrying amounts of interest-bearing
deposits and short-term investments maturing within 90 days
approximate their fair values. Fair values of other
interest-bearing deposits and short-term investments are
estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on current
rates for similar type instruments.
Securities: Fair values for securities,
excluding restricted equity securities, are based on quoted
market prices, if available. If a quoted market price is not
available, fair value is estimated using quoted market prices
for similar securities. The carrying value of restricted stock
approximates fair value based on the redemption provisions of
the security.
Mortgage loans held for sale: Fair values of
mortgage loans held for sale are based on commitments on hand
from investors or prevailing market prices.
Loans receivable: Fair values for loans are
estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest
rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to
borrowers of similar credit quality. Lease contracts are
specifically exempt from fair value reporting and are not
included in this table.
Mortgage Servicing Rights: Fair values of
mortgage servicing rights are estimated based on the present
value of expected net servicing income discounted at a current
market rate. The net present value cash flow analysis is
prepared using the assumptions that are currently used by
bidders of servicing portfolios.
Deposit liabilities: The fair values disclosed
for demand deposits (e.g., interest and non-interest checking,
passbook savings and certain types of money market accounts)
are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the
reporting date (i.e. their carrying amount). Fair values for
fixed-rate certificates of deposits are estimated using a
discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates
currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of
aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.
Short-term borrowings: The carrying amounts of
short-term borrowings maturing within 90 days and floating
rate short-term borrowings approximate their fair values. Fair
values of other short-term borrowings are estimated using
discounted cash flow analyses based on Sterlings current
incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing
arrangements.
Long-term debt and subordinated
debentures: The fair values of Sterlings
long-term debt are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses
based on current borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing
arrangements.
Accrued interest: The carrying amounts of
accrued interest approximate fair value.
Derivative assets and liabilities: The fair
values for derivative instruments are based on cash flow
projection models obtained from third parties.
Off-balance sheet instruments: Fair values for
off-balance sheet, credit-related financial instruments are
based on fees currently charged to enter into similar
agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of
A-105
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
the agreements and the counterparties credit standing. The
fair values of off-balance sheet instruments are not significant
at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006.
The estimated fair values and related carrying or notional
amounts of Sterlings financial instruments are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Financial Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
318,497
|
|
|
$
|
318,497
|
|
|
$
|
148,700
|
|
|
$
|
148,700
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits in banks
|
|
|
5,889
|
|
|
|
5,889
|
|
|
|
6,339
|
|
|
|
6,339
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
2,761
|
|
|
|
2,761
|
|
|
|
3,119
|
|
|
|
3,119
|
|
Mortgage loans held for sale
|
|
|
4,684
|
|
|
|
4,684
|
|
|
|
4,136
|
|
|
|
4,136
|
|
Securities held-to-maturity
|
|
|
19,636
|
|
|
|
19,687
|
|
|
|
21,530
|
|
|
|
21,644
|
|
Securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
412,844
|
|
|
|
412,844
|
|
|
|
460,016
|
|
|
|
460,016
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
|
1,939,670
|
|
|
|
1,943,972
|
|
|
|
1,928,063
|
|
|
|
1,908,448
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
13,101
|
|
|
|
13,101
|
|
|
|
13,979
|
|
|
|
13,979
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
3,260
|
|
|
|
5,875
|
|
|
|
3,177
|
|
|
|
5,948
|
|
Derivative assets
|
|
|
1,144
|
|
|
|
1,144
|
|
|
|
1,164
|
|
|
|
1,164
|
|
Financial Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
2,735,414
|
|
|
$
|
2,746,278
|
|
|
$
|
2,615,912
|
|
|
$
|
2,622,316
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
86,108
|
|
|
|
86,108
|
|
|
|
78,833
|
|
|
|
78,833
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
166,464
|
|
|
|
169,225
|
|
|
|
117,207
|
|
|
|
118,418
|
|
Subordinated debentures
|
|
|
87,630
|
|
|
|
86,742
|
|
|
|
87,630
|
|
|
|
89,629
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
17,766
|
|
|
|
17,766
|
|
|
|
10,332
|
|
|
|
10,332
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
|
1,390
|
|
|
|
1,390
|
|
|
|
1,826
|
|
|
|
1,826
|
|
A-106
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
|
|
Note 23
|
Condensed
Financial Statements of Parent Company
|
Financial information pertaining only to Sterling Financial
Corporation is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
6,887
|
|
|
$
|
18,423
|
|
Securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
1,952
|
|
Investment in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank subsidiaries
|
|
|
231,152
|
|
|
|
161,549
|
|
Non-bank subsidiaries
|
|
|
28,445
|
|
|
|
31,821
|
|
Due from affiliates
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
17,362
|
|
|
|
18,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
284,121
|
|
|
$
|
232,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
$
|
71,358
|
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated debentures
|
|
|
87,630
|
|
|
|
87,630
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
14,660
|
|
|
|
11,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
173,648
|
|
|
|
103,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
110,473
|
|
|
|
128,773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
284,121
|
|
|
$
|
232,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-107
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
|
Ended,
|
|
|
Ended,
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Statements of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends from banking subsidiaries
|
|
$
|
5,550
|
|
|
$
|
35,037
|
|
Dividends from non-banking subsidiaries
|
|
|
4,558
|
|
|
|
5,558
|
|
Dividends on securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Gains on securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
Management fees from subsidiaries
|
|
|
24,070
|
|
|
|
31,323
|
|
Other
|
|
|
421
|
|
|
|
473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income
|
|
|
34,791
|
|
|
|
72,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
6,023
|
|
|
|
6,154
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
32,118
|
|
|
|
35,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expense
|
|
|
38,141
|
|
|
|
41,679
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and equity in undistributed net
income of subsidiaries
|
|
|
(3,350
|
)
|
|
|
31,017
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(5,088
|
)
|
|
|
(3,289
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,738
|
|
|
|
34,306
|
|
Equity in undistributed income of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking subsidiaries
|
|
|
(6,100
|
)
|
|
|
(28,935
|
)
|
Non-banking subsidiaries
|
|
|
(3,132
|
)
|
|
|
(3,587
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
(7,494
|
)
|
|
|
1,784
|
|
Undistributed earnings from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,130
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(7,494
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,346
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-108
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
|
Ended,
|
|
|
Ended,
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(7,494
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,784
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,130
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
827
|
|
|
|
1,952
|
|
Equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries
|
|
|
9,235
|
|
|
|
37,654
|
|
Gains on securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
|
(249
|
)
|
Non-cash compensation cost
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
Decrease (increase) in other assets
|
|
|
(4,317
|
)
|
|
|
(3,831
|
)
|
Increase in other liabilities
|
|
|
5,039
|
|
|
|
3,256
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
4,594
|
|
|
|
36,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(276
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales and maturities of securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
1,499
|
|
|
|
610
|
|
Investment in and advances to banking subsidiaries
|
|
|
(73,000
|
)
|
|
|
(11,266
|
)
|
Sale or repayment of advances from subsidiaries
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in non-banking subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,699
|
|
Purchase of premises and equipment
|
|
|
(416
|
)
|
|
|
(2,684
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(71,694
|
)
|
|
|
(8,917
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from subordinated note from subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in short-term borrowings
|
|
|
66,358
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
Proceeds from long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,000
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
Cash dividends on common stock
|
|
|
(5,449
|
)
|
|
|
(16,512
|
)
|
Cash paid in lieu of fractional shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of treasury stock
|
|
|
(6,596
|
)
|
|
|
(9,341
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of treasury stock
|
|
|
1,501
|
|
|
|
6,860
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(250
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
55,564
|
|
|
|
(18,796
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
|
(11,536
|
)
|
|
|
8,329
|
|
Cash:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year
|
|
|
18,423
|
|
|
|
10,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of year
|
|
$
|
6,887
|
|
|
$
|
18,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-109
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
|
|
Note 24
|
Segment
Reporting
|
Sterling operates four major lines of business: Community
Banking and Related Services; Leasing; Commercial Finance; and
Trust and Investment Services.
Information about reportable segments and reconciliation of such
information to the consolidated financial statements follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking & Related
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Leasing
|
|
|
Finance
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Elimination
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and dividend income
|
|
$
|
143,359
|
|
|
$
|
13,072
|
|
|
$
|
345
|
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
|
$
|
214
|
|
|
$
|
(22,911
|
)
|
|
$
|
134,196
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
70,446
|
|
|
|
10,916
|
|
|
|
13,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,023
|
|
|
|
(22,911
|
)
|
|
|
77,910
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
4,189
|
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
|
|
1,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,083
|
|
Non-interest income
|
|
|
18,901
|
|
|
|
28,367
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
9,862
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
57,827
|
|
Non-interest expenses
|
|
|
77,308
|
|
|
|
25,990
|
|
|
|
3,678
|
|
|
|
7,724
|
|
|
|
8,047
|
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
122,506
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
10,317
|
|
|
|
3,328
|
|
|
|
(18,102
|
)
|
|
|
2,255
|
|
|
|
(13,274
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,476
|
)
|
Income tax (benefit) expenses
|
|
|
994
|
|
|
|
1,258
|
|
|
|
(5,989
|
)
|
|
|
843
|
|
|
|
(5,088
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,982
|
)
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
9,323
|
|
|
|
2,070
|
|
|
|
(12,113
|
)
|
|
|
1,412
|
|
|
|
(8,186
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,494
|
)
|
Assets
|
|
|
3,322,912
|
|
|
|
307,623
|
|
|
|
115,615
|
|
|
|
27,724
|
|
|
|
21,322
|
|
|
|
(554,350
|
)
|
|
|
3,240,846
|
|
Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2006
(restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and dividend income
|
|
$
|
171,396
|
|
|
$
|
16,057
|
|
|
$
|
805
|
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
|
$
|
(26,591
|
)
|
|
$
|
161,891
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
74,314
|
|
|
|
13,361
|
|
|
|
16,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,154
|
|
|
|
(26,591
|
)
|
|
|
83,495
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
3,728
|
|
|
|
986
|
|
|
|
12,905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,619
|
|
Non-interest income
|
|
|
18,766
|
|
|
|
34,413
|
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
|
|
13,184
|
|
|
|
987
|
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
68,214
|
|
Non-interest expenses
|
|
|
76,551
|
|
|
|
32,621
|
|
|
|
8,644
|
|
|
|
10,472
|
|
|
|
4,201
|
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
132,344
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
35,569
|
|
|
|
3,502
|
|
|
|
(35,992
|
)
|
|
|
2,803
|
|
|
|
(9,235
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,353
|
)
|
Income tax (benefit) expenses
|
|
|
8,948
|
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
|
|
(13,153
|
)
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
|
|
(3,289
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,137
|
)
|
Net income (loss) from continued operations
|
|
|
26,621
|
|
|
|
2,214
|
|
|
|
(22,839
|
)
|
|
|
1,734
|
|
|
|
(5,946
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,784
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,130
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,130
|
)
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
26,621
|
|
|
|
2,214
|
|
|
|
(22,839
|
)
|
|
|
1,734
|
|
|
|
(11,076
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,346
|
)
|
Assets
|
|
|
3,088,960
|
|
|
|
305,971
|
|
|
|
113,359
|
|
|
|
29,045
|
|
|
|
23,469
|
|
|
|
(483,982
|
)
|
|
|
3,076,822
|
|
In December 2006, Sterling divested of Corporate Healthcare
Strategies, LLC, Professional Services Group, and various
insurance assets of Lancaster Insurance Group, LLC. As a result
of the divestiture of the three related lines of business,
Sterlings insurance activities no longer meet the criteria
as a reportable segment. Therefore, we have eliminated the
Insurance Related Services as a reportable segment.
The Community Banking and Related Services segment provides
financial services to consumers, businesses, financial
institutions and governmental units in southern Pennsylvania,
northern Maryland and northern Delaware. These services include
providing various types of loans to customers, accepting
deposits, mortgage banking and other traditional banking
services. Major revenue sources include net interest income and
service fees on deposit accounts. Expenses include personnel and
branch support network support charges. The Community Banking
and Related Services segment lends money to the Leasing and
Commercial Finance segments, and represents the intersegment
elimination.
A-110
STERLING
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(All
dollar amounts presented in the tables are in thousands, except
per share data)
The Leasing segment provides vehicle and equipment financing
alternatives to businesses primarily located in south central
Pennsylvania and northeastern Maryland, although assets are
located throughout the United States. Major revenue sources
include net interest income and rental income on operating
leases. Expenses include personnel, support and depreciation
charges on operating leases.
The Commercial Finance segment specializes in financing forestry
and land-clearing equipment through equipment dealers. Major
revenue source is net interest income. Expenses include
personnel and support charges.
The Trust and Investment Services segment includes both
corporate asset and personal wealth management services. The
corporate asset management business provides retirement planning
services, investment management, custody and other corporate
trust services to small to medium size business in
Sterlings market area. Personal wealth management services
include investment management, brokerage, estate and tax
planning, as well as trust management and administration for
high net worth individuals and their families. Major revenue
sources include management and estate fees and commissions on
security transactions. Expenses primarily consist of personnel
and support charges, as well as amortization of intangible
assets.
Other is comprised of unallocated parent company income and
expense and discontinued operations.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those
described in the summary of significant accounting policies.
Transactions between segments, principally loans, were at terms
consistent with that which would be obtained from a third party.
Sterlings reportable segments are strategic business units
that offer different products and services. They are managed
separately because each segment appeals to different markets
and, accordingly, require different technology and marketing
strategies. Sterlings chief operating decision-maker
utilizes interest income, interest expense, non-interest income,
non-interest expense, and the provision for income taxes in
making decisions and determining resources to be allocated to
the segments.
A-111
ANNEX
B
EXECUTION COPY
AGREEMENT
AND PLAN OF MERGER
dated as of July 19, 2007
between
THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
and
STERLING FINANCIAL CORPORATION
B-1
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
RECITALS
|
A.
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
B-7
|
|
B.
|
|
Company
|
|
|
B-7
|
|
C.
|
|
Intention of the Parties
|
|
|
B-7
|
|
D.
|
|
Approvals
|
|
|
B-7
|
|
|
ARTICLE I
The Merger
|
1.1
|
|
The Merger
|
|
|
B-7
|
|
1.2
|
|
Effective Time
|
|
|
B-8
|
|
1.3
|
|
Closing
|
|
|
B-8
|
|
1.4
|
|
Bank Mergers
|
|
|
B-8
|
|
|
ARTICLE II
Conversion or Cancellation of Shares
|
2.1
|
|
Conversion or Cancellation of Shares
|
|
|
B-8
|
|
2.2
|
|
Fractional Shares
|
|
|
B-11
|
|
2.3
|
|
Exchange of Old Certificates for New Certificates.
|
|
|
B-11
|
|
2.4
|
|
Adjustment of Consideration
|
|
|
B-13
|
|
2.5
|
|
Withholding Rights
|
|
|
B-13
|
|
|
ARTICLE III
Conduct of Business Pending Merger
|
3.1
|
|
Company Forbearances
|
|
|
B-13
|
|
3.2
|
|
Parent Forbearances
|
|
|
B-15
|
|
|
ARTICLE IV
Representations
|
4.1
|
|
Disclosure Schedules
|
|
|
B-15
|
|
4.2
|
|
Standard
|
|
|
B-15
|
|
4.3
|
|
Representations
|
|
|
B-16
|
|
|
ARTICLE V
Covenants
|
5.1
|
|
Reasonable Best Efforts; Amended Financial Statements
|
|
|
B-23
|
|
5.2
|
|
Shareholder Approvals.
|
|
|
B-23
|
|
5.3
|
|
Registration Statement/Proxy Statement.
|
|
|
B-24
|
|
5.4
|
|
Press Releases
|
|
|
B-25
|
|
5.5
|
|
Access; Information.
|
|
|
B-25
|
|
5.6
|
|
Acquisition Proposals
|
|
|
B-26
|
|
5.7
|
|
Affiliate Agreements
|
|
|
B-26
|
|
5.8
|
|
Takeover Laws and Provisions
|
|
|
B-27
|
|
5.9
|
|
Regulatory Applications.
|
|
|
B-27
|
|
5.10
|
|
Options
|
|
|
B-27
|
|
5.11
|
|
Indemnification and Insurance.
|
|
|
B-28
|
|
5.12
|
|
Benefit Plans.
|
|
|
B-29
|
|
5.13
|
|
Notification of Certain Matters
|
|
|
B-29
|
|
B-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
5.14
|
|
Exemption from Liability Under Section 16(b)
|
|
|
B-30
|
|
5.15
|
|
Assumption by Parent of Indenture Obligations
|
|
|
B-30
|
|
5.16
|
|
Credit Agreement
|
|
|
B-30
|
|
5.17
|
|
Other Actions
|
|
|
B-30
|
|
5.18
|
|
Additional Actions
|
|
|
B-30
|
|
|
ARTICLE VI
Conditions
|
6.1
|
|
Conditions to Each Partys Obligation to Effect the Merger
|
|
|
B-30
|
|
6.2
|
|
Conditions to Obligation of Parent
|
|
|
B-31
|
|
6.3
|
|
Conditions to Obligation of the Company
|
|
|
B-32
|
|
|
ARTICLE VII
Termination
|
7.1
|
|
Termination by Mutual Consent
|
|
|
B-32
|
|
7.2
|
|
Termination by Parent
|
|
|
B-32
|
|
7.3
|
|
Termination by the Company
|
|
|
B-33
|
|
7.4
|
|
Effect of Termination and Abandonment
|
|
|
B-33
|
|
7.5
|
|
Termination Fee
|
|
|
B-33
|
|
|
ARTICLE VIII
Miscellaneous
|
8.1
|
|
Survival
|
|
|
B-34
|
|
8.2
|
|
Modification or Amendment
|
|
|
B-34
|
|
8.3
|
|
Waiver of Conditions
|
|
|
B-34
|
|
8.4
|
|
Counterparts
|
|
|
B-34
|
|
8.5
|
|
Governing Law
|
|
|
B-34
|
|
8.6
|
|
Notices
|
|
|
B-34
|
|
8.7
|
|
Entire Agreement, Etc
|
|
|
B-35
|
|
8.8
|
|
Definition of subsidiary and affiliate;
Covenants with Respect to Subsidiaries and Affiliates
|
|
|
B-35
|
|
8.9
|
|
Specific Performance
|
|
|
B-35
|
|
8.10
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
B-35
|
|
8.11
|
|
Interpretation; Effect.
|
|
|
B-35
|
|
8.12
|
|
Severability
|
|
|
B-36
|
|
8.13
|
|
No Third Party Beneficiaries
|
|
|
B-36
|
|
8.14
|
|
Waiver of Jury Trial
|
|
|
B-36
|
|
8.15
|
|
Submission to Jurisdiction; Selection of Forum
|
|
|
B-36
|
|
B-3
INDEX OF
DEFINED TERMS
|
|
|
|
|
Location of
|
Term
|
|
Definition
|
|
Acquisition Proposal
|
|
5.6
|
Affiliate
|
|
8.8
|
Approvals
|
|
5.9(a)
|
Articles of Merger
|
|
1.2(a)
|
Bank Mergers
|
|
1.4
|
Benefit Plans
|
|
4.3(m)(1)
|
Cash Election
|
|
2.1(d)
|
Cash Election Shares
|
|
2.1(d)
|
Chosen Courts
|
|
8.15
|
Closing
|
|
1.3
|
Closing Date
|
|
1.3
|
Company
|
|
Preamble
|
Company Acquisition Agreement
|
|
7.5(a)
|
Company Common Stock
|
|
Recital B
|
Company Insiders
|
|
5.14
|
Company Meeting
|
|
5.2(a)
|
Company Option
|
|
5.10(a)
|
Company Options
|
|
5.10(a)
|
Company Section 16 Information
|
|
5.14
|
Confidentiality Agreement
|
|
5.5(c)
|
Consideration
|
|
2.1(a)(2)
|
Converted Cash Election Share
|
|
2.1(e)(1)(C)
|
Converted Stock Election Share
|
|
2.1(e)(2)(B)
|
Disclosure Schedule
|
|
4.1
|
Effective Time
|
|
1.2(a)
|
Election
|
|
2.1(d)
|
Election Deadline
|
|
2.3(b)(1)
|
Election Form
|
|
2.1(d)
|
Employees
|
|
4.3(m)(1)
|
Environmental Laws
|
|
4.3(o)
|
ERISA
|
|
4.3(m)(1)
|
ERISA Affiliate
|
|
4.3(m)(3)
|
ERISA Plans
|
|
4.3(m)(2)
|
Exchange Act
|
|
5.6
|
Exchange Agent
|
|
2.1(d)
|
Exchange Fund
|
|
2.3(a)
|
Exchangeable Shares
|
|
2.1(f)(2)
|
Governing Documents
|
|
3.1(h)
|
Governmental Entity
|
|
4.3(f)(1)
|
Indemnified Liabilities
|
|
5.11(a)
|
Indemnified Party
|
|
5.11(a)
|
Insurance Amount
|
|
5.11(b)
|
B-4
|
|
|
|
|
Location of
|
Term
|
|
Definition
|
|
Internal Revenue Code
|
|
Recital C
|
IRS
|
|
4.3(m)(2)
|
Liens
|
|
4.3(c)(2)
|
Material Adverse Effect
|
|
4.2(b)
|
Materially Burdensome Regulatory Condition
|
|
5.9(a)
|
Measurement Price
|
|
2.2
|
Merger
|
|
1.1(a)
|
Material Contract
|
|
4.3(k)
|
Multiemployer Plan
|
|
4.3(m)(2)
|
New Certificate
|
|
2.3(a)
|
New Share
|
|
2.3(a)
|
No-Election
|
|
2.1(d)
|
No-Election Shares
|
|
2.1(d)
|
NYSE
|
|
2.2
|
Old Certificate
|
|
2.1(c)
|
Old Share
|
|
2.1(c)
|
Parent
|
|
Preamble
|
Parent Common Stock
|
|
Recital A
|
Parent Preferred Stock
|
|
Recital A
|
Parent Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
Recital A
|
Parent Series B Preferred Stock
|
|
Recital A
|
Parent Series C Preferred Stock
|
|
Recital A
|
Parent Series D Preferred Stock
|
|
Recital A
|
Parent Series H Preferred Stock
|
|
Recital A
|
Parent Series I Preferred Stock
|
|
Recital A
|
Parent Share Price
|
|
2.1(f)
|
PBCL
|
|
1.1(b)
|
Pension Plan
|
|
4.3(m)(2)
|
Per Share Cash Consideration
|
|
2.1(a)(2)
|
Per Share Stock Consideration
|
|
2.1(a)(1)
|
Per Share Consideration
|
|
2.1(f)(3)
|
Person
|
|
2.3(e)
|
Plan
|
|
Preamble
|
Previously Disclosed
|
|
3.1
|
Proxy Statement
|
|
5.3
|
Registration Statement
|
|
5.3
|
Regulatory Approvals
|
|
4.3(f)(2)
|
Regulatory Authorities
|
|
4.3(i)(1)
|
Regulatory Filings
|
|
4.3(g)(1)
|
Representatives
|
|
5.6
|
Rights
|
|
4.3(b)(3)
|
SEC
|
|
4.3(f)(1)
|
Securities Act
|
|
4.3(g)(1)
|
Significant Subsidiary
|
|
5.6
|
B-5
|
|
|
|
|
Location of
|
Term
|
|
Definition
|
|
Signing Cash Amount
|
|
2.1(f)(3)
|
Signing Exchange Ratio
|
|
2.1(f)(3)
|
Stock Conversion Number
|
|
2.1(e)(1)
|
Stock Election Shares
|
|
2.1(d)
|
Stock-Selected No-Election Share
|
|
2.1(e)(1)(B)
|
Subsidiary
|
|
8.8
|
Surviving Corporation
|
|
1.1(a)
|
Takeover Laws
|
|
4.3(s)
|
Takeover Provisions
|
|
4.3(s)
|
Tax
|
|
4.3(p)(3)
|
Tax Returns
|
|
4.3(p)(1)
|
Taxes
|
|
4.3(p)(3)
|
Termination Date
|
|
7.2(b)
|
B-6
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER, dated as of July 19,
2007, (this Plan), between The PNC Financial
Services Group, Inc. (Parent) and Sterling
Financial Corporation (Company).
RECITALS
A. Parent. Parent is a
Pennsylvania corporation with its principal executive offices
located in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. As of July 16, 2007,
Parent has (i) 800,000,000 authorized shares of common
stock, par value $5.00 per share (Parent Common
Stock), of which not more than 341,222,683 shares
are outstanding; and (ii) 20,000,000 authorized shares of
preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share (Parent
Preferred Stock), of which 98,583 shares have
been designated as $1.80 Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock,
Series A, (Parent Series A Preferred
Stock) of which 6,642 shares are outstanding,
38,542 shares have been designated as $1.80 Cumulative
Convertible Preferred Stock, Series B (Parent
Series B Preferred Stock), of which
1,393 shares are outstanding, 1,433,935 shares have
been designated as $1.60 Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock,
Series C (Parent Series C Preferred
Stock), of which 132,276 shares are outstanding,
1,766,140 shares have been designated as $1.80 Cumulative
Convertible Preferred Stock, Series D (Parent
Series D Preferred Stock), of which
189,888 shares are outstanding, 338,100 shares have
been designated as $2.60 Cumulative Nonvoting Preferred Stock,
Series E, of which no shares are outstanding,
6,000,000 shares have been designated as Fixed/Adjustable
Rate Noncumulative Preferred Stock, Series F, of which no
shares are outstanding, 450,000 shares have been designated
as Series G Junior Participating Preferred Share Purchase
Rights, of which no shares are outstanding, 7,500 shares
have been designated as 7.00% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock,
Series H (Parent Series H Preferred
Stock), of which no shares are outstanding, and
5,000 shares have been designated as Fixed-to-Floating Rate
Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series I
(Parent Series I Preferred Stock), of
which no shares are outstanding.
B. Company. The Company is a
Pennsylvania corporation with its principal executive offices
located in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. As of the date hereof, the
Company has (i) 70,000,000 authorized shares of common
stock, par value $5.00 per share (Company Common
Stock), of which not more than 29,425,302 shares
are outstanding and (ii) 10,000,000 authorized shares of
preferred stock, of which no shares are outstanding.
C. Intention of the
Parties. Each of the parties to this Plan
intends that the Merger (as hereinafter defined) shall qualify
as a reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Internal Revenue
Code) and that this Plan shall constitute a plan
of reorganization for purposes of Sections 354 and
361 of the Internal Revenue Code.
D. Approvals. The board of
directors of each of Parent and the Company has
(1) determined that this Plan and the transactions
contemplated hereby are advisable and in the best interests of
Parent and the Company, respectively, and in the best interests
of their respective shareholders, (2) determined that this
Plan and the transactions contemplated hereby are consistent
with, and in furtherance of, its respective business strategies
and (3) authorized and approved this Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual promises and
obligations, the parties hereto approve, adopt and make this
Plan and prescribe the terms and conditions hereof and the
manner and mode of carrying it into effect, which are as follows:
ARTICLE I
The Merger
1.1 The
Merger. (a) Subject to the terms and
conditions of this Plan, at the Effective Time (as hereinafter
defined), the Company shall merge with and into Parent (the
Merger), and the separate corporate existence
of the Company shall thereupon cease. Parent shall be the
surviving corporation in the Merger (hereinafter sometimes
referred to as the Surviving Corporation) and
shall continue to be governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania.
B-7
(b) The Merger shall have the effects specified in this
Plan and the Business Corporation Law of the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania (the PBCL).
(c) At the Effective Time, the Articles of Incorporation of
Parent, as then in effect, shall be the articles of
incorporation of the Surviving Corporation and the By-Laws of
Parent, as then in effect, shall be the By-Laws of the Surviving
Corporation.
(d) The name of the Surviving Corporation shall be the name
of Parent.
1.2 Effective
Time. (a) Subject to the terms and
conditions of this Plan, on or before the Closing Date, the
parties will execute and Parent will cause articles of merger to
be filed with the Department of State of the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania as provided in Sections 1926 and 1927 of the
PBCL (the Articles of Merger). The Merger
shall become effective at such time as the Articles of Merger
has been filed, or at such other time as may be specified
therein. The date and time at which the Merger becomes effective
is herein referred to as the Effective Time.
(b) Parent and the Company will each cause the Effective
Time to occur not later than the fifth business day following
the satisfaction or waiver of the last of the conditions
specified in Sections 6.1(a), (b), (d) and (e) of
this Plan. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this
Section 1.2(b), Parent and the Company may cause the
Effective Time to occur on such earlier or later day following
the satisfaction or waiver of such conditions as they may agree,
consistent with the provisions of the PBCL. If the last of the
conditions set forth in Article VI are satisfied or waived
during the two weeks immediately prior to the end of a calendar
quarter of Parent, then Parent may postpone the Effective Time
until the first full week after the end of that fiscal quarter,
provided that it is understood and agreed that Parent may
not postpone the Effective Time longer than such one week
period, including by asserting that any of the conditions
specified in Sections 6.1(a), (b), (d) and (e) of
this Plan are no longer satisfied or waived.
1.3 Closing. The closing of
the Merger (the Closing) shall take place at
such time and place as Parent and the Company shall agree, on
the date when the Effective Time is to occur (the
Closing Date).
1.4 Bank Mergers. As soon as
practicable after the execution and delivery of this Plan,
(1) PNC Bank, National Association and BLC Bank, National
Association shall enter into an agreement, pursuant to which BLC
Bank, National Association will merge with and into PNC Bank,
National Association and (2) Delaware Sterling Bank and
Trust Company shall enter into an agreement with a Parent
bank subsidiary to be specified by Parent, pursuant to which
Delaware Sterling Bank and Trust Company will merge with
and into such Parent bank subsidiary ((1) and
(2) collectively the Bank Mergers). The
parties intend that the Bank Mergers will become effective
simultaneously with or immediately following the Effective Time.
ARTICLE II
Conversion or Cancellation of Shares
2.1 Conversion or Cancellation of
Shares. At the Effective Time, by virtue of
the Merger and without any action on the part of any shareholder:
(a) Company Common Stock. Each share of
Company Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to
the Effective Time, other than Exception Shares (as hereinafter
defined), shall be converted into the right to receive, at the
election of each holder thereof, but subject to the election and
allocation procedures of Sections 2.1(d) and (e), the other
provisions of this Section 2.1 and possible adjustment as
set forth in Section 2.4, either:
(1) that number of fully paid and nonassessable shares of
Parent Common Stock equal to the result obtained by dividing the
Per Share Consideration by the Parent Share Price (the
Per Share Stock Consideration), or
(2) an amount in cash, without interest, equal to the Per
Share Consideration (the Per Share Cash
Consideration and, together with the Per Share Stock
Consideration, the Consideration).
B-8
(b) Parent Common Stock. Each share of
Parent Common Stock outstanding immediately prior to the
Effective Time shall remain outstanding as one share of common
stock of the Surviving Corporation.
(c) Cancellation of Old Shares. Each
share of Company Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately
prior to the Effective Time, other than Exception Shares, is
hereinafter defined as an Old Share. Old
Shares shall cease to be outstanding, shall be canceled and
retired and shall cease to exist, and each holder of a
certificate (an Old Certificate) formerly
representing Old Shares shall thereafter cease to have any
rights with respect to such shares, except the right to receive,
without interest, upon exchange of such Old Certificate in
accordance with Section 2.3, the Consideration.
(d) Subject to the allocation procedures set forth in
Section 2.1(e), each record holder of Company Common Stock
will be entitled (i) to elect to receive shares of Parent
Common Stock (a Stock Election) for all or
some of the shares of Company Common Stock (Stock
Election Shares) held by such record holder,
(ii) to elect to receive cash (a Cash
Election) for all or some of the shares of Company
Common Stock (Cash Election Shares) held by
such record holder or (iii) to indicate that such holder
makes no such election (a No-Election) for
all or some of the shares of Company Common Stock
(No-Election Shares) held by such record
holder. All such elections (each, an
Election) shall be made on a form designed
for that purpose and agreed to by Parent and the Company (an
Election Form). Any shares of Company Common
Stock for which the record holder has not, as of the Election
Deadline (as defined below), properly submitted to the Exchange
Agent a properly completed Election Form will be deemed
No-Election Shares. A record holder acting in different
capacities or acting on behalf of other persons in any way will
be entitled to submit an Election Form for each capacity in
which such record holder so acts with respect to each person for
which it so acts. The exchange agent (the Exchange
Agent) will be a bank or trust company in the United
States selected by Parent and reasonably acceptable to the
Company.
(e) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Plan,
the allocation among the holders of shares of Company Common
Stock of rights to receive the Per Share Stock Consideration or
the Per Share Cash Consideration will be made as follows:
(1) Number of Stock Elections Less Than the
Stock Conversion Number. If the aggregate
number of Stock Election Shares (on the basis of Election Forms
received as of the Election Deadline) is less than a number
equal to the number of Exchangeable Shares minus the result
obtained by dividing (x) the product of the number of
Exchangeable Shares and the Signing Cash Amount by (y) the
Per Share Consideration (the Stock Conversion
Number), then
(A) each Stock Election Share will be, as of the Effective
Time, converted into the right to receive the Per Share Stock
Consideration,
(B) the Exchange Agent will allocate from among the
No-Election Shares, pro rata to the holders of No-Election
Shares in accordance with their respective numbers of
No-Election Shares, a sufficient number of No-Election Shares so
that the sum of such number and the number of Stock Election
Shares equals as closely as practicable the Stock Conversion
Number, and each such allocated No-Election Share (each, a
Stock-Selected No-Election Share) will be, as
of the Effective Time, converted into the right to receive the
Per Share Stock Consideration, provided that if the sum
of all No-Election Shares and Stock Election Shares is equal to
or less than the Stock Conversion Number, all No-Election Shares
will be Stock-Selected No-Election Shares,
(C) if the sum of Stock Election Shares and
No-Election Shares is less than the Stock Conversion Number, the
Exchange Agent will allocate from among the Cash Election
Shares, pro rata to the holders of Cash Election Shares in
accordance with their respective numbers of Cash Election
Shares, a sufficient number of Cash Election Shares so that the
sum of such number, the number of all Stock Election Shares and
the number of all No-Election Shares equals as closely as
practicable the Stock Conversion Number, and each such allocated
Cash Election Share (each, a Converted Cash Election
Share) will be, as of the Effective Time, converted
into the right to receive the Per Share Stock
Consideration, and
B-9
(D) each No-Election Share and Cash Election Share
that is not a Stock-Selected No-Election Share or a Converted
Cash Election Share (as the case may be) will be, as of the
Effective Time, converted into the right to receive the Per
Share Cash Consideration.
(2) Number of Stock Elections Greater Than the
Stock Conversion Number. If the aggregate
number of Stock Election Shares (on the basis of Election Forms
received by the Election Deadline) is greater than the Stock
Conversion Number, then
(A) each Cash Election Share and No-Election Share
will be, as of the Effective Time, converted into the right to
receive the Per Share Cash Consideration,
(B) the Exchange Agent will allocate from among the
Stock Election Shares, pro rata to the holders of Stock Election
Shares in accordance with their respective numbers of Stock
Election Shares, a sufficient number of Stock Election Shares
(Converted Stock Election Shares) so that the
difference of (x) the number of Stock Election Shares less
(y) the number of the Converted Stock Election Shares
equals as closely as practicable the Stock Conversion Number,
and each Converted Stock Election Share will be, as of the
Effective Time, converted into the right to receive the Per
Share Cash Consideration, and
(C) each Stock Election Share that is not a Converted
Stock Election Share will be, as of the Effective Time,
converted into the right to receive the Per Share Stock
Consideration.
(3) Number of Stock Elections is Equal to the
Stock Conversion Number. If the aggregate
number of Stock Election Shares (on the basis of Election Forms
received by the Election Deadline) is equal to the Stock
Conversion Number, then
(A) each Stock Election Share will be, as of the
Effective Time, converted into the right to receive the Per
Share Stock Consideration, and
(B) each Cash Election Share and No-Election Share
will be, as of the Effective Time, converted into the right to
receive the Per Share Cash Consideration.
(f) Certain Definitions.
(1) Parent Share
Price means the arithmetic average of the
last reported per share sales prices of Parent Common Stock on
the New York Stock Exchange (the NYSE), as
reported in the New York City edition of The Wall Street
Journal or, if not reported therein, another authoritative
source mutually agreed to by Parent and the Company, for each of
the five full consecutive trading days ending on the trading day
immediately prior to the Closing Date.
(2) Exchangeable
Shares means the aggregate number of shares
of Company Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior
to the Effective Time, excluding Exception Shares, rounded to
the nearest whole share.
(3) Per Share
Consideration means the sum, rounded to the
nearest whole cent, of (a) $7.60 (the Signing Cash
Amount) plus (b) the product, rounded to
the nearest one ten-thousandth, of 0.1543 (such number being the
Signing Exchange Ratio) and the Parent Share
Price.
(g) Exception Shares. At the
Effective Time, (1) each Exception Share owned by Parent or
the Company shall be cancelled and retired and shall cease to
exist and no consideration shall be delivered in exchange
therefor, and (2) each Exception Share held by any direct
or indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Parent or the Company
shall be converted into the right to receive the Per Share Stock
Consideration. The Per Share Stock Consideration payable
pursuant to this Section 2.1(g) shall not be subject to,
and will not be deemed to be Stock Election Shares or otherwise
taken into account in calculating, adjustments under
Section 2.1(e). Exception Share means a
share of Company Common Stock owned or held, other than in a
bona fide fiduciary or agency capacity or in satisfaction of a
debt previously contracted in good faith, by Parent, the Company
or a subsidiary of either.
B-10
2.2 Fractional
Shares. Notwithstanding any other provision
of this Article II, no fractional shares of Parent Common
Stock will be issued pursuant to the Merger. Instead, Parent
will pay or cause to be paid to the holder of any Old Shares
that would, pursuant to paragraph 2.1, otherwise be
entitled to receive fractional shares of Parent Common Stock an
amount in cash, rounded to the nearest cent and without
interest, equal to the product of (i) the fraction of a
share to which such holder would otherwise have been entitled
and (ii) the Measurement Price. As used in this Plan, the
term Measurement Price means the average of
the daily high and low per share sales prices of Parent Common
Stock on the New York Stock Exchange (the
NYSE), as reported in the New York City
edition of The Wall Street Journal or, if not reported
therein, in another authoritative source mutually agreed by
Parent and the Company, for the last trading day immediately
prior to the Closing Date.
2.3 Exchange of Old Certificates for New
Certificates.
(a) Exchange Agent. At or before
the Effective Time, Parent shall make available or cause to be
made available to the Exchange Agent certificates or, at
Parents option, evidence of shares in book entry form
(each, a New Certificate), representing the
shares of Parent Common Stock (each, a New
Share) and cash in amounts sufficient to allow the
Exchange Agent to make all deliveries of New Certificates and
payments that may be required in exchange for Old Certificates
pursuant to this Article II (collectively, the
Exchange Fund). Any portion of the Exchange
Fund that remains unclaimed by the shareholders of the Company
as of the first anniversary of the Effective Time may, to the
extent permitted by applicable law, be paid to Parent. In such
event, any holder of Old Certificates who has not theretofore
exchanged his or her Old Certificates for New Certificates
and/or cash
pursuant to this Article II shall thereafter be entitled to
look exclusively to Parent, and only as a general creditor
thereof in the case of cash, for the shares of Parent Common
Stock and/or
cash to which he or she may be entitled upon exchange of such
Old Certificates pursuant to this Article II, in each case,
without any interest thereon. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
neither the Exchange Agent nor any party hereto, shall be liable
to any holder of Old Certificates for any amount properly
delivered to a public official pursuant to applicable abandoned
property, escheat or similar laws.
(b) Exchange Procedures.
(1) Parent shall cause the Exchange Agent to provide
the Form of Election to holders of record of Company Common
Stock (other than holders of Exception Shares), together with
appropriate transmittal materials, at the time of mailing of the
Proxy Statement to the holders of record of Company Common
Stock, or on such other date as the Company and Parent shall
mutually agree so as to minimize the impact of limitations under
applicable law relating to Parent share repurchases that might
apply with respect thereto, and thereafter from time to time as
the Company may reasonably request until three days prior to the
Election Deadline, to each person who is a holder of record of
Company Common Stock for purposes of the Company Meeting.
Elections shall be made by mailing to the Exchange Agent a duly
completed Form of Election. A Form of Election may specify which
specific shares covered thereby are subject to a Cash Election,
a Stock Election or a No-Election. To be effective, a Form of
Election must be (1) properly completed, signed and
submitted to the Exchange Agent at its designated office, by
5:00 p.m. local time (in the city in which the principal
office of the Exchange Agent is located) on the later of the day
prior to the Company Meeting and the date that the parties
believe to be as near as practicable to five business days prior
to the anticipated Closing Date, taking into account PNCs
intention to minimize the impact of limitations under applicable
law relating to Parent share repurchases that might apply (or
such other time and date as the Company and Parent may mutually
agree) (the Election Deadline) and
(2) accompanied by the certificate(s) representing the
shares of Company Common Stock as to which the election is being
made (or by an appropriate guarantee of delivery of such
certificate(s) by a commercial bank or trust company in the
United States or a member of a registered national security
exchange or of the NASD, provided that such certificates
are in fact delivered to the Exchange Agent within three trading
days after the date of execution of such guarantee of delivery;
failure to deliver shares of Company Common Stock covered by
such a guarantee of delivery within the time set forth on such
guarantee shall be deemed to invalidate any otherwise properly
made Election, unless otherwise determined by Parent, in its
sole discretion). Parent will determine, in its sole and
absolute discretion, which authority it may delegate in whole or
in part to the Exchange Agent, whether Forms of Election have
been properly completed, signed and submitted or revoked. The
decision of Parent (or the Exchange Agent, as the
B-11
case may be) in such matters shall be conclusive and binding.
Neither Parent nor the Exchange Agent will be under any
obligation to notify any person of any defect in a Form of
Election submitted to the Exchange Agent. A holder of shares of
Company Common Stock that does not submit an effective Form of
Election prior to the Election Deadline shall be deemed to have
made a No-Election. An election may be revoked, but only by
written notice received by the Exchange Agent prior to the
Election Deadline. Any certificate(s) representing shares of
Company Common Stock that have been submitted to the Exchange
Agent in connection with an election shall be returned without
charge to the holder thereof in the event such election is
revoked as aforesaid and such holder requests in writing the
return of such certificate(s). Upon any such revocation, unless
a duly completed Form of Election is thereafter submitted prior
to the Election Deadline and otherwise in accordance with this
Section, such shares shall be deemed No-Election Shares. The
Exchange Agent, in consultation with Parent and the Company,
will make all computations to give effect to this Section.
(2) As promptly as reasonably practicable following
the Effective Time, taking into account the computations
contemplated by Section 2.1(e), each holder of record of
Company Common Stock that has surrendered the certificates
representing its Company Common Stock will be entitled to
receive a New Certificate representing the shares of Parent
Common Stock issuable in exchange therefor
and/or a
check representing cash payable pursuant to this
Article II. No interest will accrue or be paid with respect
to any New Certificates or cash to be delivered upon surrender
of Old Certificates. If any New Certificate is to be issued or
cash is to be paid in a name other than that in which the Old
Certificate surrendered in exchange therefor is registered, it
will be a condition to the exchange that the person requesting
the exchange (1) pay any transfer or other Taxes required
by reason of the issuance of the New Certificate or the making
of the cash payment in a name other than the name of the holder
of the surrendered Old Certificate or (2) establish to the
satisfaction of Parent (or the Exchange Agent, as the case may
be) that any such Taxes have been paid or are not applicable.
(3) As promptly as reasonably practicable following
the Effective Time Parent shall cause the Exchange Agent to mail
or deliver to each person who was, immediately prior to the
Effective Time, a holder of record of Company Common Stock and
who theretofore has not submitted such holders Old
Certificates with an Election Form, a form of letter of
transmittal (which shall specify that delivery shall be
effected, and risk of loss and title to Old Certificates shall
pass, only upon proper delivery of such certificates to the
Exchange Agent) containing instructions for use in effecting the
surrender of Old Certificates in exchange for the consideration
to which such person may be entitled pursuant to this
Article II.
(c) Distributions with Respect to Unexchanged
Shares. No dividends or other distributions with
respect to Parent Common Stock having a record date after the
Effective Time will be paid to any holder of Company Common
Stock until such holder has surrendered the Old Certificate
representing such stock as provided herein. Subject to the
effect of applicable law, following surrender of any such Old
Certificates, there shall be paid to the holder of New
Certificates issued in exchange therefor, without interest, the
amount of dividends or other distributions with a record date
after the Effective Time previously payable with respect to the
shares of Parent Common Stock represented thereby. To the extent
permitted by law, holders of Company Common Stock who receive
Parent Common Stock in the Merger shall be entitled to vote
after the Effective Time at any meeting of Parent shareholders
the number of whole shares of Parent Common Stock into which
their respective shares of Company Common Stock are converted,
regardless of whether such holders of Company Common Stock have
exchanged their Old Certificates for New Certificates in
accordance with the provisions of this Plan, but beginning
30 days after the Effective Time no such holder shall be
entitled to vote on any matter until such holder surrenders such
Old Certificate for exchange as provided in
Section 2.3(b)(1).
(d) Transfers. At or after the
Effective Time, there shall be no transfers on the stock
transfer books of the Surviving Corporation of Old Shares.
(e) Lost, Stolen or Destroyed
Certificates. If any Old Certificate shall have
been lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the making of an affidavit
of that fact by the individual, bank, corporation, partnership,
trust, association or other entity or organization (any of the
foregoing, a Person) claiming such Old
Certificate to be lost, stolen or destroyed and, if required by
the Surviving Corporation or the Exchange Agent, the posting by
such Person of a bond in such reasonable amount as the Surviving
Corporation or the Exchange Agent may
B-12
direct as indemnity against any claim that may be made against
it with respect to such Old Certificate, the Surviving
Corporation or the Exchange Agent shall, in exchange for such
lost, stolen or destroyed Old Certificate, issue or cause to be
issued a New Certificate and pay or cause to be paid the
amounts, if any, deliverable in respect to the Old Shares
formerly represented by such Old Certificate pursuant to this
Article II.
2.4 Adjustment of
Consideration. If Parent changes (or the
board of directors of Parent sets a related record date that
will occur before the Effective Time for a change in) the number
or kind of shares of Parent Common Stock outstanding by way of a
stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization, reclassification,
reorganization or similar transaction, the Signing Exchange
Ratio will be adjusted proportionately to account for such
change.
2.5 Withholding Rights. Each
of Parent, the Surviving Corporation and the Exchange Agent
shall be entitled to deduct and withhold from the consideration
otherwise payable to any Person pursuant to this Agreement such
amounts as it is required to deduct and withhold under the Code
and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, or any
provision of state, local or foreign Tax law. To the extent that
amounts are so deducted or withheld by Parent, the Surviving
Corporation or the Exchange Agent, as the case may be, such
withheld amounts shall be treated for all purposes of this Plan
as having been paid to the Person in respect to which such
deduction and withholding was made.
ARTICLE III
Conduct of Business Pending Merger
3.1 Company
Forbearances. The Company agrees that from
the date hereof until the Effective Time, except as expressly
contemplated by this Plan or as set forth in the corresponding
paragraph of its Disclosure Schedule (Previously
Disclosed), without the prior written consent of
Parent (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld,
delayed or conditioned), it will not, and will cause each of its
subsidiaries not to:
(a) Ordinary Course. Conduct its
business and the business of its subsidiaries other than in the
ordinary and usual course or fail to use reasonable efforts to
preserve intact their business organizations and assets and
maintain their rights, franchises and existing relations with
customers, suppliers, employees and business associates, or take
any action reasonably likely to materially impair its ability to
perform its obligations under this Plan or to consummate the
transactions contemplated hereby and thereby.
(b) Capital Stock. (1) Issue,
sell or otherwise permit to become outstanding, or dispose of or
encumber or pledge or authorize or propose the creation of, any
additional shares of its stock other than pursuant to Rights
outstanding on the date hereof, (2) enter into any
agreement with respect to the foregoing or (3) permit any
additional shares of its stock to become subject to new grants,
other Rights or similar stock-based employee rights.
(c) Dividends, Etc. (1) Make,
declare, pay or set aside for payment any dividend (other than
(A) dividends from its direct or indirect wholly owned
subsidiaries to it or another of its wholly owned subsidiaries
and (B) dividends on preferred stock of subsidiaries, the
common stock of which is wholly owned directly or indirectly by
the Company, in accordance with the terms thereof or
(2) directly or indirectly adjust, split, combine, redeem,
reclassify, purchase or otherwise acquire, any shares of its
capital stock.
(d) Compensation; Employment Agreements;
Etc. Enter into or amend or renew any employment,
change of control, retention, consulting, severance or similar
agreements or arrangements with any of its directors, officers
or employees or those of its subsidiaries or grant any increase
in, set aside assets to fund or accelerate the payment or
vesting of, compensation or benefits or pay or provide any
compensation or benefits not required to be paid or provided,
except (1) for normal individual increases in annual base
salary or hourly pay rate to employees who are not directors or
executive officers, at times, in amounts and on other terms and
conditions in the ordinary course of business consistent with
past practice, (2) for other changes that are required by
applicable law or as appropriate to effectuate
B-13
amendments with respect to Section 409A of the Internal
Revenue Code (including but not limited to qualify for the
short-term deferral exception to Section 409A), provided
that such amendments with respect to Section 409A do not
materially increase the cost to Parent of such arrangements
(provided that for this purpose a change in payment form to a
lump sum payment shall not be considered a material increase in
cost), and (3) to satisfy Previously Disclosed contractual
obligations.
(e) Benefit Plans. Enter into,
establish, adopt or amend any Benefit Plan, except (1) as
may be required by applicable law or as appropriate to
effectuate amendments with respect to Section 409A of the
Internal Revenue Code (including but not limited to qualify for
the short-term deferral exception to Section 409A),
provided that such amendments with respect to Section 409A
do not materially increase the cost to Parent of such
arrangements (provided that for this purpose a change in payment
form to a lump sum payment shall not be considered a material
increase in cost), (2) to satisfy Previously Disclosed
contractual obligations, (3) for technical amendments that
are immaterial to both the Company and any participant or
(4) as required by the Benefit Plan or this Plan.
(f) Dispositions. Sell, transfer,
mortgage, encumber or otherwise dispose of or discontinue any of
its assets, deposits, business or properties except for sales,
transfers, mortgages, encumbrances or other dispositions or
discontinuances in the ordinary course of business consistent
with past practice and in a transaction that, together with
other such transactions, is not material to it and its
subsidiaries, taken as a whole.
(g) Acquisitions. Acquire (other
than by way of foreclosures or acquisitions of control in a
fiduciary or similar capacity or in satisfaction of debts
previously contracted in good faith, in each case in the
ordinary and usual course of business consistent with past
practice) all or any portion of the assets, business, deposits
or properties of any other entity except in the ordinary course
of business consistent with past practice and in a transaction
that, together with other such transactions, is not material to
it and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole.
(h) Governing Documents. Amend its
articles of incorporation, bylaws or similar governing documents
(Governing Documents) or the Governing
Documents of any of its subsidiaries, except as contemplated by
this Plan.
(i) Accounting Methods. Implement
or adopt any change in its accounting principles, practices or
methods, other than as may be required by generally accepted
accounting principles, applicable regulatory accounting
requirements or applicable law.
(j) Contracts. Enter into, renew or
terminate any contract or agreement or amendment thereof, other
than loans, funding arrangements and other transactions made in
the ordinary course of the banking business, that calls for
aggregate annual payments of $250,000 or more and which is not
terminable on 60 days or less notice without payment of a
premium or penalty, provided that no such contract or agreement
or amendment thereof shall contain (1) any non-competition
or exclusive dealing obligations or other obligation which
purports to limit or restrict in any respect the ability of the
Company or its subsidiaries to solicit customers or the manner
in which, or the localities in which, all or any portion of the
business of the Company or its Subsidiaries (or, following
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, the
ability of Parent or any of its subsidiaries) is or would be
conducted, (2) any agreement that grants any right of first
refusal or right of first offer or similar right or that limits
or purports to limit the ability of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries (or, following consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby, the ability of Parent or any of its
subsidiaries) to own, operate, sell, transfer, pledge or
otherwise dispose of any assets or business or (3) any
provision whereby the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby would (A) constitute a breach or
violation of, or a default under, or give rise to any Lien, any
acceleration of remedies or, any right of termination or the
loss of any benefit under, such contract or agreement or
(B) require any consent or approval under any such contract
or agreement.
(k) Claims. Settle any claim,
action or proceeding against it, except for settlements
involving only monetary remedies in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice not in excess of
B-14
$100,000 individually or $250,000 in the aggregate for all such
settlements effected after the date hereof and would not create
precedent for claims that are reasonably likely to be material
to and the Company or its subsidiaries or, after the Effective
Time, Parent or its subsidiaries.
(l) Adverse
Actions. Notwithstanding anything herein to the
contrary, (1) take any action or knowingly fail to take any
reasonable action that would, or is reasonably likely to,
prevent, impede or delay the Merger from qualifying as a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Internal Revenue Code or (2) take any action that is
reasonably likely to result in (A) any of the conditions to
the Merger set forth in Article VI not being satisfied in a
timely manner or (B) a material violation of any provision
of this Plan except, in each case, as may be required by
applicable law or regulation.
(m) Capital Expenditures. Other
than in the ordinary course of business, make any capital
expenditures in excess of (1) $50,000 per project or
related series of projects or (2) $250,000 in the aggregate.
(n) Certain Tax Matters. Make,
change or revoke any material Tax election, change any material
method of Tax accounting, adopt or change any taxable year or
period, enter into any closing agreement with respect to Taxes,
file any material amended Tax Return, settle or compromise any
material claim for Taxes, or surrender any material claim for a
refund of Taxes.
(o) Branch Leases. Make application
for the opening, relocation or closing of any, or open or close
any, branch or automated banking facility.
(p) Commitments. Agree or commit to
do any of the foregoing.
3.2 Parent
Forbearances. Parent agrees that from the
date hereof until the Effective Time, except as expressly
contemplated by this Plan or as Previously Disclosed or as
expressly required pursuant to this Plan, without the prior
written consent of the Company (which consent shall not be
unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned), it will not,
and, in the case of (b) only, will cause each of its
subsidiaries not to:
(a) Governing Documents. Amend its
Governing Documents in a manner that would affect the
Companys shareholders adversely relative to other holders
of Parent common stock.
(b) Adverse
Actions. Notwithstanding anything herein to the
contrary, (1) take any action or knowingly fail to take any
reasonable action that would, or is reasonably likely to,
prevent, impede or delay the Merger from qualifying as a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Internal Revenue Code, (2) take any action that is
reasonably likely to result in (A) any of the conditions to
the Merger set forth in Article VI not being satisfied in a
timely manner or (B) a material violation of any provision
of this Plan except, in each case, as may be required by
applicable law or regulation or (3) declare or pay any
extraordinary or special dividends on or make any other
extraordinary or special distributions in respect of any of its
capital stock.
ARTICLE IV
Representations
4.1 Disclosure Schedules. On
or prior to the date hereof, Parent has delivered to the Company
a schedule and the Company has delivered to Parent a schedule
(respectively, each schedule a Disclosure
Schedule) setting forth, among other things, items the
disclosure of which is necessary or appropriate either in
response to an express disclosure requirement contained in a
provision hereof or as an exception to one or more
representations contained in Section 4.3 or to one or more
of its covenants contained herein; provided that the mere
inclusion of an item in a Disclosure Schedule as an exception to
a representation shall not be deemed an admission by a party
that such item was required to be disclosed therein.
4.2 Standard. (a) For
all purposes of this Plan, no representation of Parent or the
Company contained in Section 4.3 (other than the
representations contained in Section 4.3(b), which shall be
true and correct in all material respects, and in
Section 4.3(g)(3), which shall be true and correct in all
respects) shall be deemed untrue and no party hereto shall be
deemed to have breached a representation, as a consequence of
the
B-15
existence of any fact, event or circumstance unless such fact,
circumstance or event, individually or taken together with all
other facts, events or circumstances inconsistent with any
representation contained in Section 4.3 (read for this
purpose without regard to any individual reference to
materiality or Material Adverse Effect
set forth therein) has had or is reasonably likely to have a
Material Adverse Effect with respect to Parent or the Company,
as the case may be.
(b) The term Material Adverse
Effect means an effect which (1) is materially
adverse to the business, financial condition or results of
operations of Parent or the Company, as the context may dictate,
and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or (2) materially
impairs the ability of Parent or the Company to consummate the
Merger; provided, however, that in determining
whether a Material Adverse Effect has occurred under
clause (1) there shall be excluded any effect to the extent
attributable to or resulting from (A) any changes in laws,
regulations or interpretations of laws or regulations generally
affecting the banking or bank holding company businesses, but
not uniquely relating to Parent or the Company, (B) any
change in generally accepted accounting principles or regulatory
accounting requirements, generally affecting the banking or bank
holding company businesses, but not uniquely relating to Parent
or the Company, (C) events, conditions or trends in
economic, business or financial conditions generally or
affecting the banking or bank holding company businesses
generally (including changes in interest rates and changes in
the markets for securities), except to the extent any such
events, conditions or trends in economic, business or financial
conditions have a disproportionate adverse effect upon such
party, (D) changes in national or international political
or social conditions including the engagement by the United
States in hostilities, whether or not pursuant to the
declaration of a national emergency or war, or the occurrence of
any military or terrorist attack upon or within the United
States, or any of its territories, possessions or diplomatic or
consular offices or upon any military installation, equipment or
personnel of the United States, (E) actions or omissions of
Parent or the Company taken with the prior written consent of
the other party in contemplation of the transactions
contemplated hereby or actions that are taken by the parties,
consistent with the terms hereof, to consummate the transactions
contemplated hereby or (F) the announcement of this Plan
and the transactions contemplated hereby.
4.3 Representations. Except
as Previously Disclosed, the Company hereby represents and
warrants to Parent, and Parent hereby represents and warrants to
the Company, to the extent applicable, in each case with respect
to itself and its subsidiaries, as follows:
(a) Organization, Standing and
Authority. It is a corporation duly organized,
validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the
jurisdiction of its incorporation. It is duly qualified to do
business and is in good standing in the states of the United
States and any foreign jurisdictions where its ownership or
leasing of property or assets or the conduct of its business
requires it to be so qualified.
(b) Capital Stock.
(1) The information in Recital A, in the case of
Parent, and in Recital B, in the case of the Company, is true
and correct.
(2) Its outstanding shares of common stock have been
duly authorized and are validly issued and outstanding, fully
paid and nonassessable, not subject to any preemptive rights and
were not issued in violation of any preemptive rights.
(3) Except as set forth in this Plan or as Previously
Disclosed, and except, in the case of Parent, pursuant to
(A) Parent Series A Preferred Stock, Parent
Series B Preferred Stock, Parent Series C Preferred
Stock, Parent Series D Preferred Stock, Parent
Series H Preferred Stock and Parent Series I Preferred
Stock and (B) Parents dividend reinvestment plan and
stock repurchase plans entered into by Parent from time to time,
as of the date hereof, there are no shares of its common stock
authorized and reserved for issuance, it does not have any
Rights outstanding with respect to its common stock, and it does
not have any commitment to authorize, issue or sell any of its
common stock or Rights, except pursuant to this Plan,
outstanding options to purchase its common stock and the Benefit
Plans. As used herein, Rights means, with
respect to any Person, securities or obligations convertible
into or exercisable or exchangeable for, or giving any Person
any right to subscribe for or acquire, or any
B-16
options, calls or commitments relating to, or any stock
appreciation right or other instrument the value of which is
determined in whole or in part by reference to the market price
or value of, shares of capital stock or earnings of such Person.
In the case of the Company, no stock option granted under any
Benefit Plan has any reload feature nor does any
Person have any right to be granted a stock option with such a
feature. In the case of the Company, no subsidiary of the
Company owns shares of Company Common Stock.
(4) In the case of Parent, any shares of Parent
Common Stock issued in connection with the Merger have been duly
authorized and are validly issued and outstanding, fully paid
and nonassessable, not subject to any preemptive rights and were
not issued in violation of any preemptive rights.
(c) Subsidiaries.
(1) The Company has Previously Disclosed a list of
all of its subsidiaries.
(2) In the case of the Company, (A) it owns,
directly or indirectly, all the issued and outstanding equity
securities of each of its subsidiaries, (B) no equity
securities of any of its subsidiaries are or may become required
to be issued (other than to it or its wholly owned subsidiaries)
by reason of any Right or otherwise, (C) there are no
contracts, commitments, understandings or arrangements by which
any of its subsidiaries is or may be bound to sell or otherwise
transfer any equity securities of any its subsidiaries (other
than to it or its wholly owned subsidiaries), (D) there are
no contracts, commitments, understandings, or arrangements
relating to its rights to vote or to dispose of such securities
and (E) all the equity securities of each subsidiary held
by it or its subsidiaries have been duly authorized and are
validly issued and outstanding, fully paid and nonassessable
(except as provided in 12 U.S.C. § 55 or
comparable state laws) and are owned by it or its subsidiaries
free and clear of all liens, pledges, security interests,
claims, provisions, preemptive or subscriptive rights or other
encumbrances or restrictions of any kind or Rights
(Liens).
(3) In the case of the Company, each of its
subsidiaries has been duly organized and is validly existing in
good standing under the laws of the jurisdiction of its
organization, and is duly qualified to do business and in good
standing in the jurisdictions where its ownership or leasing of
property or the conduct of its business requires it to be so
qualified.
(d) Corporate Power. It and each of
its subsidiaries has the corporate or other power and authority
to carry on its business as it is now being conducted and to own
all its properties and assets; and it has the corporate power
and authority to execute, deliver and perform its obligations
under this Plan and to consummate the transactions contemplated
hereby and thereby.
(e) Corporate Authority.
(1) Subject to receipt of the shareholder approval
described in Section 4.3(e)(3), this Plan and the
transactions contemplated hereby and thereby have been
authorized by all necessary corporate action. This Plan is its
valid and legally binding obligation, enforceable in accordance
with its terms (except as enforceability may be limited by
applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium,
fraudulent transfer and similar laws of general applicability
relating to or affecting creditors rights or by general
equity principles).
(2) In the case of Parent, no vote of the holders of
any class or series of Parents capital stock is necessary
to approve and adopt this Plan and the transactions contemplated
hereby.
(3) In the case of the Company, the affirmative vote
of a majority of the votes cast by holders of shares of Company
Common Stock to adopt this Plan is the only vote of the holders
of any class or series of the Companys capital stock
necessary to approve and adopt this Plan and the transactions
contemplated hereby.
(f) Regulatory Approvals; No Defaults.
(1) No consents or approvals of, or filings or
registrations with, any governmental or regulatory authority,
agency, court, commission or other entity, domestic or foreign
(Governmental Entity) or with
B-17
any third party are required to be made or obtained by it or any
of its subsidiaries in connection with the execution, delivery
or performance by it of this Plan or to consummate the Merger
except for (A) filings and approvals of applications with
and by federal and state banking authorities as Previously
Disclosed, (B) filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC), the National Association of
Securities Dealers, and state securities authorities,
(C) filings and approvals under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act, if any, (D) the shareholder
approval described in Section 5.2(a), (E) any
consents, notices or approvals required pursuant to any
investment advisory contract or the Investment Advisers Act of
1940, and (F) the filing of the Articles of Merger with the
Department of State of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania pursuant
to the PBCL.
(2) Subject to receipt of the regulatory approvals
referred to in the preceding paragraph (the Regulatory
Approvals), and the expiration of related waiting
periods, and required filings under federal and state securities
laws, the execution, delivery and performance of this Plan and
the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby do not
and will not (A) constitute a breach or violation of, or a
default under, or give rise to any Lien, any acceleration of
remedies, any right of termination or the loss of any benefit
under, any law, rule or regulation or any judgment, decree,
order, governmental permit or license, or material agreement,
indenture or instrument of it or of any of its subsidiaries or
to which it or any of its subsidiaries or properties is subject
or bound, (B) constitute a breach or violation of, or a
default under, its Governing Documents or (C) require any
consent or approval under any such law, rule, regulation,
judgment, decree, order, governmental permit or license,
material agreement, indenture or instrument.
(3) As of the date hereof, it (a) knows of no
reason why (1) all Regulatory Approvals from any
Governmental Entity required for the consummation of the
transactions contemplated by this Plan should not be obtained on
a timely basis or (2) the opinion of tax counsel referred
to, in the case of Parent, in Section 6.2(c) and, in the
case of the Company, in Section 6.3(c) should not be
obtained on a timely basis and (b) has no reason to believe
that the Merger will fail to qualify as a reorganization under
Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code.
(g) Financial Reports and Regulatory Documents;
Material Adverse Effect.
(1) Its Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, and all other
reports, registration statements, definitive proxy statements or
information statements filed by it or any of its subsidiaries
subsequent to December 31, 2006 under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended (Securities Act), or under
Section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act or
under the securities regulations of the SEC, in the form filed
(collectively, its Regulatory Filings) with
the SEC as of the date filed, (A) complied in all material
respects as to form with the applicable requirements under the
Securities Act or the Exchange Act, as the case may be, and
(B) did not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein
or necessary to make the statements therein, in the light of the
circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; and
each of the balance sheets or statements of condition contained
in or incorporated by reference into any such Regulatory Filing
(including the related notes and schedules thereto) fairly
presented in all material respects its financial position and
that of its subsidiaries as of its date, and each of the
statements of income and changes in shareholders equity
and cash flows or equivalent statements in such Regulatory
Filings (including any related notes and schedules thereto)
fairly presented in all material respects, the results of
operations, changes in shareholders equity and changes in
cash flows, as the case may be, of it and its subsidiaries for
the periods to which they relate, in each case in accordance
with GAAP consistently applied during the periods involved,
except in each case as may be noted therein, subject to normal
year-end audit adjustments in the case of unaudited statements.
(2) Since December 31, 2006, it and its
subsidiaries have not incurred any liability other than in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice.
(3) In the case of the Company only, since
December 31, 2006, (A) it and its subsidiaries have
conducted their businesses in the ordinary and usual course
consistent with past practice (excluding the incurrence of
expenses related to this Plan and the transactions contemplated
hereby) and (B) no event
B-18
has occurred or circumstance arisen that, individually or taken
together with all other facts, circumstances and events
(described in any paragraph of Section 4.3 or otherwise),
has had or is reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse
Effect with respect to it.
(4) In the case of the Parent only, since
December 31, 2006, no event has occurred or circumstance
arisen that, individually or taken together with all other
facts, circumstances and events (described in any paragraph of
Section 4.3 or otherwise), has had or is reasonably likely
to have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to it.
(h) Litigation. Except as
Previously Disclosed, there is no suit, action or proceeding
pending or, to the knowledge of it, threatened against or
affecting it or any of its subsidiaries (and it is not aware of
any basis for any such suit, action or proceeding)
(1) that, individually or in the aggregate, is material to
it and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or (2) that is
reasonably likely to prevent or delay it in any material respect
from performing its obligations under, or consummating the
transactions contemplated by, this Plan.
(i) Regulatory Matters.
(1) Except as Previously Disclosed, neither it nor
any of its subsidiaries is a party to or is subject to any
written order, decree, agreement, memorandum of understanding or
similar arrangement with, or a commitment letter or similar
submission to, or extraordinary supervisory letter from, any
Governmental Entity charged with the supervision or regulation
of financial institutions or issuers of securities or engaged in
the insurance of deposits or the supervision or regulation of it
or any of its subsidiaries (collectively, the
Regulatory Authorities).
(2) Except as Previously Disclosed, neither it nor
any of its subsidiaries has been advised by any Regulatory
Authority that such Regulatory Authority is contemplating
issuing or requesting (or is considering the appropriateness of
issuing or requesting) any such written order, decree,
agreement, memorandum of understanding, commitment letter,
supervisory letter or similar submission. Except as Previously
Disclosed, there are no formal or informal investigations
relating to any material regulatory matters pending before any
Governmental Entity with respect to it or its subsidiaries.
(j) Compliance with Laws. Except as
Previously Disclosed, it and each of its subsidiaries:
(1) conducts its business in compliance with all
applicable federal, state, local and foreign statutes, laws,
regulations, ordinances, rules, judgments, orders or decrees
applicable thereto or to the employees conducting such
businesses, including, without limitation, the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing
Act, the Community Reinvestment Act, the Home Mortgage
Disclosure Act, the Uniting and Strengthening America by
Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct
Terrorism (USA PATRIOT) Act of 2001, the Bank Secrecy Act and
all other applicable fair lending laws and other laws relating
to discriminatory business practices; and
(2) has all permits, licenses, authorizations, orders
and approvals of, and has made all filings, applications and
registrations with, all Governmental Entities that are required
in order to permit them to own or lease their properties and to
conduct their businesses as presently conducted; all such
permits, licenses, certificates of authority, orders and
approvals are in full force and effect and, to its knowledge, no
suspension or cancellation of any of them is threatened.
(k) Material Contracts;
Defaults. Except for those agreements and other
documents filed as exhibits to its Regulatory Filings, as of the
date hereof, neither it nor any of its subsidiaries is a party
to, bound by or subject to any agreement, contract, arrangement,
commitment or understanding (1) that is a material
contract within the meaning of Item 601(b)(10) of the
SECs
Regulation S-K,
(2) in the case of the Company, (A) that contains
(x) any non-competition or exclusive dealing agreements or
other agreement or obligation which purports to limit or
restrict in any respect the ability of the Company or its
subsidiaries (or, following consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby, Parent or any of its subsidiaries) to
solicit customers or the manner in which, or the localities in
which, all or any portion of
B-19
the business of the Company and its subsidiaries (or, following
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, Parent or
any of its subsidiaries) is or would be conducted or
(y) any agreement that grants any right of first refusal or
right of first offer or similar right or that limits or purports
to limit the ability of the Company or any of its subsidiaries
(or, following consummation of the transactions contemplated
hereby, Parent or any of its subsidiaries) to own, operate,
sell, transfer, pledge or otherwise dispose of any assets or
business, (B) that involves performance of services or
delivery of goods or materials to, or expenditures by, the
Company or any of its subsidiaries of an amount or value in
excess of $200,000 over its remaining term, other than loans,
funding arrangements and other transactions made in the ordinary
course of the banking business, or any such agreement, contract,
arrangement, commitment or understanding that is terminable on
60 days or less notice without payment of any termination
fee or penalty, (C) with respect to the employment of any
directors, officers, employees or consultants, other than in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice,
(D) with or to a labor union or guild (including any
collective bargaining agreement), (E) containing a
most favored nation clause or other similar term
providing preferential pricing or treatment to a party (other
than the Company or its subsidiaries) that is material to the
Company or its subsidiaries, or (F) providing for the
indemnification by the Company or its subsidiaries of any Person
(other than customary agreements with vendors providing goods or
services to the Company or its subsidiaries where the potential
indemnity obligations thereunder are not reasonably expected to
be material to the Company). Each agreement, contract,
arrangement, commitment or understanding of the type described
in this Section 4.3(k), whether or not Previously
Disclosed, is referred to as a Company Material
Contract. Neither the Company nor any of its
subsidiaries is in default under any Company Material Contract,
and there has not occurred any event that, with the lapse of
time or the giving of notice or both, would constitute such a
default.
(l) No Brokers; Fairness Opinion.
(1) No action has been taken by it that would give
rise to any claim against any party hereto for a brokerage
commission, finders fee or other like payment with respect
to the transactions contemplated by this Plan, except as
Previously Disclosed.
(2) Prior to the execution of this Plan, the Company
has received an opinion from Keefe, Bruyette & Woods,
Inc. to the effect that as of the date thereof and subject to
the matters set forth therein, the Consideration is fair, from a
financial point of view, to the holders of Company Common Stock.
Such opinion has not been amended or rescinded as of the date of
this Plan.
(m) Employee Benefit Plans. In the
case of the Company,
(1) All benefit, employment, severance, change in
control and other compensation and benefits plans, contracts,
agreements, policies or arrangements covering the Companys
and each of their subsidiaries current or former employees of it
and its subsidiaries (the Employees) and its
current or former directors, including, but not limited to,
employee benefit plans within the meaning of
Section 3(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974, as amended (ERISA), and supplemental
pension and executive retirement, qualified and non-qualified
deferred compensation, rabbi trust, stock option, stock
purchase, stock appreciation rights, stock based, incentive and
bonus plans and agreements (the Benefit
Plans), other than Benefit Plans that are not
material, are Previously Disclosed. Copies of all Benefit Plans
and all amendments thereto, all summary plan descriptions, the
most recently filed Form 5500 and the most recent IRS
determination letter have been made available to the other party.
(2) All Benefit Plans, other than multiemployer
plans within the meaning of Section 3(37) of ERISA
(each a Multiemployer Plan) are in
substantial compliance with ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code and
other applicable laws. Each Benefit Plan which is subject to
ERISA (the ERISA Plans) that is an
employee pension benefit plan within the meaning of
Section 3(2) of ERISA (Pension Plan),
and that is intended to be qualified under Section 401(a)
of the Internal Revenue Code has received a favorable
determination letter from the Internal Revenue Service (the
IRS), and it is not aware of any
circumstances that are reasonably likely to result in the loss
of the qualification of such plan under Section 401(a) of
the Internal Revenue Code.
B-20
(3) Neither the Company nor its subsidiaries
maintains or has during the past five years maintained a pension
plan which is a defined benefit plan. None of the Company, its
subsidiaries or any entity which is considered one employer with
it under Section 4001 of ERISA (ERISA
Affiliate) has contributed to a Multiemployer Plan
within the past five years.
(4) All material contributions required to be made
under each Benefit Plan have been timely made and all
obligations to make contributions in respect of each Benefit
Plan have been properly accrued and reflected in the Regulatory
Filings as of the date of such filings.
(5) As of the date hereof, there is no material
pending or, to the knowledge of the Company threatened,
litigation relating to the Benefit Plans. Neither the Company
nor any of its subsidiaries has any obligations for retiree
health and life benefits under any ERISA Plan or collective
bargaining agreement.
(6) Neither the execution of this Plan, shareholder
approval of this Plan nor the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby will (w) entitle any of its employees
or any of its subsidiaries to severance pay or any increase in
severance pay upon any termination of employment after the date
hereof, (x) accelerate the time of payment or vesting or
result in any payment or funding (through a grantor trust or
otherwise) of compensation or benefits under, increase the
amount payable or result in any other obligation pursuant to,
any of the Benefit Plans, or (y) result in payments under
any of the Benefit Plans which would not be deductible under
Section 162(m) or Section 280G of the Internal Revenue
Code.
(n) Labor Matters. Neither the
Company nor any of its subsidiaries is a party to or is bound by
any collective bargaining agreement, contract or other agreement
or understanding with a labor union or labor organization, nor
is the Company or any of its subsidiaries the subject of a
proceeding asserting that the Company or any such subsidiary has
committed an unfair labor practice (within the meaning of the
National Labor Relations Act) or seeking to compel the Company
or any of its subsidiaries to bargain with any labor
organization as to wages or conditions of employment, nor is
there any strike or other material labor dispute involving the
Company or any of its subsidiaries pending or, to the
Companys knowledge, threatened, nor to the Companys
knowledge is there any activity involving its or any of its
subsidiaries employees seeking to certify a collective
bargaining unit or engaging in other organizational activity.
(o) Environmental Matters. To its
knowledge, neither its conduct nor its operation or the conduct
or operation of its subsidiaries nor any condition of any
property presently or previously owned, leased or operated by
any of them (including, without limitation, in a fiduciary or
agency capacity), violates or violated Environmental Laws and no
condition has existed or event has occurred with respect to any
of them or any such property that, with notice or the passage of
time, or both, is reasonably likely to result in liability under
Environmental Laws. To its knowledge, no property on which it or
any of its subsidiaries holds a Lien, violates or violated
Environmental Laws and no condition has existed or event has
occurred with respect to any such property that, with notice or
the passage of time, or both, is reasonably likely to result in
liability under Environmental Laws. Neither it nor any of its
subsidiaries has received any written notice from any person or
entity that it or its subsidiaries or the operation or condition
of any property ever owned, leased, operated, or held as
collateral or in a fiduciary capacity by any of them are or were
in violation of or otherwise are alleged to have liability under
any Environmental Law, including, but not limited to,
responsibility (or potential responsibility) for the cleanup or
other remediation of any pollutants, contaminants, or hazardous
or toxic wastes, substances or materials at, on, beneath, or
originating from, any such property. Environmental
Laws means all applicable local, state and federal
environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including
the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, the
Clean Water Act, the Federal Clean Air Act, and the Occupational
Safety and Health Act, each as amended, regulations promulgated
thereunder, and state counterparts.
B-21
(p) Tax Matters.
(1) (A) All returns, amended returns or other
reports (including elections, declarations, disclosures,
schedules, estimates and information returns) with respect to
Taxes (as hereinafter defined) (Tax Returns)
that are required to be filed (taking into account any
extensions of time within which to file) by or with respect to
it and its subsidiaries have been duly and timely filed, and all
such Tax Returns are complete and accurate, (B) all Taxes
shown to be due on the Tax Returns referred to in
clause (A) have been paid in full, (C) all Taxes that
it or any of its subsidiaries is obligated to withhold from
amounts owing to any employee, creditor or third party have been
paid over to the proper Governmental Entity in a timely manner,
to the extent due and payable, and (D) neither it nor any
of its subsidiaries has taken or agreed to take any action or is
aware of any fact or circumstance that would prevent or impede,
or would be reasonably likely to prevent or impede, the Merger
from qualifying as a reorganization under Section 368(a) of
the Code.
(2) In the case of the Company, (A) the Tax
Returns referred to in clause (A) of subsection (p)(1) have
been examined by the Internal Revenue Service or the appropriate
Tax authority or the period for assessment of the Taxes in
respect of which such Tax Returns were required to be filed has
expired, (B) all deficiencies asserted or assessments made
as a result of such examinations have been paid in full,
(C) no issues that have been raised by the relevant taxing
authority in connection with the examination of any of the Tax
Returns referred to in clause (A) of subsection (p)(1) are
currently pending, and (D) no extensions or waivers of
statutes of limitation have been given by or requested with
respect to any of its Taxes or those of its subsidiaries.
(3) In the case of the Company, (A) it has made
available to Parent true and correct copies of the
U.S. federal income Tax Returns filed by it and its
subsidiaries for each of the three most recent fiscal years
ended; (B) it has made provision in accordance with GAAP,
in the financial statements included in the Regulatory Filings
filed prior to the date hereof, for all Taxes that accrued on or
before the end of the most recent period covered by its
Regulatory Filings filed prior to the date hereof;
(C) neither it nor any of its subsidiaries is a party to
any Tax allocation or sharing agreement, is or has been a member
of an affiliated group filing consolidated or combined Tax
returns (other than a group of which the Company is or was the
common parent) or otherwise has any liability for the Taxes of
any person (other than its own Taxes and those of its
subsidiaries); (D) neither it nor any of its subsidiaries
has participated in a listed transaction as defined
in Treasury
Regulation Section 1.6011-4;
(E) no Liens for Taxes exist with respect to any of its
assets or properties or those of its subsidiaries, except for
statutory Liens for Taxes not yet due and payable or that are
being contested in good faith and reserved for in accordance
with GAAP; (F) neither it nor any of its subsidiaries has
been a party to any distribution occurring during the last three
years in which the parties to such distribution treated the
distribution as one to which Section 355 of the Internal
Revenue Code applied; and (G) no Tax is required to be
withheld pursuant to Section 1445 of the Internal Revenue
Code as a result of the transfer contemplated by this Plan.
(4) As used herein, Tax and
Taxes means all federal, state, local or
foreign taxes, charges, fees, levies or other assessments,
however denominated, including, without limitation, all net
income, gross income, gains, gross receipts, sales, use, ad
valorem, goods and services, capital, production, transfer,
franchise, windfall profits, license, withholding, payroll,
employment, disability, employer health, excise, estimated,
severance, stamp, occupation, property, environmental,
unemployment or other taxes, custom duties, fees, assessments or
charges of any kind whatsoever, together with any interest and
any penalties, additions to tax or additional amounts imposed by
any taxing authority whether arising before, on or after the
Closing Date.
(q) Derivative Instruments. All
interest rate swaps, caps, floors, option agreements, futures
and forward contracts and other similar risk management
arrangements, whether entered into for its own account, or for
the account of one or more of its subsidiaries or their
customers, if any, were entered into (1) in accordance with
prudent business practices and all applicable laws, rules,
regulations and regulatory policies and (2) with
counterparties believed to be financially responsible at the
time; and each of them constitutes the valid and legally binding
obligation of such party or one of its subsidiaries, enforceable
in
B-22
accordance with its terms (except as enforceability may be
limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization,
moratorium, fraudulent transfer and similar laws of general
applicability relating to or affecting creditors rights or
by general equity principles), and are in full force and effect.
Neither it nor its subsidiaries, nor to its knowledge, any other
party thereto, is in breach of any of its obligations under any
such agreement or arrangement.
(r) Insurance. It and its
subsidiaries are insured with reputable insurers against such
risks and in such amounts as its management reasonably has
determined to be prudent in accordance with industry practices.
All of the insurance policies, binders, or bonds maintained by
it or its subsidiaries are in full force and effect; it and its
subsidiaries are not in material default thereunder.
(s) Takeover Laws and
Provisions. It has taken all action required to
be taken by it in order to exempt this Plan and the transactions
contemplated hereby from, and this Plan and the transactions
contemplated hereby are exempt from, the requirements of any
moratorium, control share, fair
price, affiliate transaction, business
combination or other antitakeover laws and regulations of
any state (collectively, Takeover Laws). It
has taken all action required to be taken by it in order to make
this Plan and the transactions contemplated hereby comply with,
and this Plan and the transactions contemplated hereby comply
with, the requirements of any Articles, Sections or provisions
of its Governing Documents concerning business
combinations, fair price, voting
requirements, constituency requirements or
other related provisions (collectively, Takeover
Provisions).
(t) Available Funds. In the case of
Parent, Parent has or will have available to it all funds
necessary to satisfy all of its obligations hereunder and in
connection with the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated by this Plan.
(u) Transactions with
Affiliates. In the case of the Company, there are
no outstanding amounts payable to or receivable from, or
advances by the Company or any of its subsidiaries to, and
neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries is otherwise a
creditor or debtor to, any present or former director or
executive officer of the Company or any of its subsidiaries,
other than as part of the normal and customary terms of such
Persons respective employment or service as a director
with the Company or any of its subsidiaries. Neither the Company
nor any subsidiary of the Company is a party to any transaction
or agreement with any present or former director or executive
officer of the Company, other than the terms of such
Persons respective employment or service as a director
with the Company or any of its subsidiaries.
ARTICLE V
Covenants
5.1 Reasonable Best Efforts; Amended Financial
Statements. (a) Subject to the terms and
conditions of this Plan, each of Parent and the Company agrees
to use its respective reasonable best efforts in good faith to
take, or cause to be taken, all actions, and to do, or cause to
be done, all things necessary, proper or desirable, or advisable
under applicable laws, so as to permit consummation of the
Merger as soon as possible and otherwise to enable consummation
of the transactions contemplated hereby and shall cooperate
fully with the other party hereto to that end.
(b) The Company agrees to use its reasonable best
efforts in good faith to restate, complete or provide, as
applicable, such financial statements or such other financial
and other information, including the audit opinion of its
outside independent accountants, as shall be necessary, after
giving effect to any waivers that may be obtained, to cause the
Registration Statement to be declared effective by the SEC and
the Proxy Statement to be cleared with the SEC as soon as
practicable.
5.2 Shareholder Approvals.
(a) The Company agrees to take in accordance with
applicable law and its Governing Documents all action necessary
to convene a meeting of its shareholders (including any
adjournment or postponement, the Company
Meeting), as promptly as practicable, to consider and
vote upon the adoption and approval of this
B-23
Plan, as well as any other matters required to be approved by
the Companys shareholders for consummation of the Merger.
(b) The board of directors of the Company has adopted
resolutions recommending to the shareholders of the Company the
adoption of this Plan, and the board of directors of the Company
shall recommend to the shareholders of the Company the adoption
of this Plan and the other matters required to be approved or
adopted in order to carry out the intentions of this Plan.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the board of directors of the
Company may withdraw, modify, condition or refuse to recommend
the adoption of this Plan and the other matters required to be
approved or adopted in order to carry out the intentions of this
Plan if the board of directors of the Company determines, in
good faith after consultation with its outside financial and
legal advisors, that the failure to take such action would
breach its fiduciary obligations under applicable law.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Plan and such other matters
shall be submitted to the shareholders of the Company at the
Company Meeting for the purpose of approving the Plan and such
other matters and nothing contained herein shall be deemed to
relieve the Company of such obligation, provided,
however, that if the board of directors of the Company
shall have withdrawn, modified, conditioned or refused to
recommend the adoption of this Plan and such other matters in
accordance with the terms of this Plan, then in submitting this
Plan to the Companys shareholders, the board of directors
of the Company may submit this Plan to the Companys
shareholders without recommendation (although the resolutions
adopting this Plan as of the date hereof may not be rescinded or
amended), in which event the board of directors of the Company
may communicate the basis for its lack of a recommendation to
the Companys shareholders in the Proxy Statement (as
defined in Section 5.3(a)) or an appropriate amendment or
supplement thereto to the extent required by applicable law.
5.3 Registration Statement/Proxy
Statement. (a) Subject to
Section 5.1(b), the parties agree jointly to prepare and
file with the SEC a registration statement on
Form S-4
or other applicable form (the Registration
Statement) to be filed by Parent with the SEC in
connection with the issuance of Parent Common Stock in the
Merger as soon as reasonably possible (including the proxy
statement and prospectus and other proxy solicitation materials
of the Company constituting a part thereof (the Proxy
Statement) and all related documents). The parties
agree to cooperate in the preparation of the Registration
Statement and the Proxy Statement. Subject to
Section 5.1(b), each of Parent and the Company agrees to
use all reasonable best efforts to cause the Registration
Statement to be declared effective under the Securities Act as
promptly as reasonably practicable after filing thereof, and the
Company shall thereafter mail or deliver the Proxy Statement to
its shareholders; provided, however, that the parties will
coordinate the timing of the mailing of the Proxy Statement and
related Election materials so as to minimize the impact of
limitations under applicable law relating to Parent share
repurchases that might apply with respect thereto. Parent also
agrees to use all reasonable best efforts to obtain all
necessary state securities law or Blue Sky permits
and approvals required to carry out the transactions
contemplated by this Plan. Each of Parent and the Company agrees
to furnish all information concerning it, its subsidiaries,
officers, directors and shareholders as may be reasonably
requested in connection with the foregoing.
(b) Each of Parent and the Company agrees (1) as
to itself and its subsidiaries, that none of the information
supplied or to be supplied by it for inclusion or incorporation
by reference in (a) the Registration Statement will, at the
time the Registration Statement and each amendment or supplement
thereto, if any, becomes effective under the Securities Act,
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to
make the statements therein not misleading and (b) the
Proxy Statement and any amendment or supplement thereto will, at
the date of mailing to shareholders and at the time of the
Company Meeting contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein
or necessary to make the statements therein, in the light of the
circumstances under which such statement was made, not
misleading and (2) that the Registration Statement and
Proxy Statement shall comply with all applicable laws as they
relate to Parent and the Company. Each of Parent and the Company
further agrees that, if it shall become aware prior to the
Effective Date of any information furnished by it that would
cause any of the statements in the Proxy Statement or the
Registration Statement to be false or misleading with respect to
any material fact, or to omit to state any material fact
B-24
necessary to make the statements therein not false or
misleading, to promptly inform the other party thereof and to
take the necessary steps to correct the Proxy Statement or the
Registration Statement.
(c) Parent agrees to advise the Company, promptly
after Parent receives notice thereof, of the time when the
Registration Statement has become effective or any supplement or
amendment has been filed, of the issuance of any stop order or
the suspension of the qualification of Parent Common Stock for
offering or sale in any jurisdiction, of the initiation or
threat of any proceeding for any such purpose, or of any request
by the SEC for the amendment or supplement of the Registration
Statement or for additional information.
5.4 Press Releases. Parent
and the Company shall consult with each other before issuing any
press release with respect to the Merger or this Plan and shall
not issue any such press release or make any such public
statement without the prior consent of the other party, which
shall not be unreasonably withheld; provided,
however, that a party may, without the prior consent of
the other party (but after prior consultation, to the extent
practicable in the circumstances) issue such press release or
make such public statement as may upon the advice of counsel be
required by law or the rules and regulations of the NASDAQ
Global Select Market or the NYSE, as the case may be. Parent and
the Company shall cooperate to develop all public announcement
materials and make appropriate management available at
presentations related to the transactions contemplated by this
Plan as reasonably requested by the other party.
5.5 Access; Information.
(a) Each of Parent and the Company agrees that upon
reasonable notice and subject to applicable laws relating to the
exchange of information, it shall afford the other party, and
the other partys officers, employees, counsel, accountants
and other authorized representatives, such access during normal
business hours throughout the period prior to the Effective Time
to the books, records (including, without limitation, tax
returns and work papers of independent auditors), properties,
personnel and to such other information as any party may
reasonably request and, during such period, it shall furnish
promptly to such other party (1) a copy of each material
report, schedule and other document filed by it pursuant to the
requirements of federal or state securities or banking laws ,
and (2) all other information concerning the business,
properties and personnel of it as the other may reasonably
request; provided that the foregoing shall not require
Parent or the Company (A) to permit any inspection, or to
disclose any information, that in the reasonable judgment of
Parent or the Company, as the case may be, would result in
disclosure of any trade secrets of third parties or violate any
of its obligations with respect to confidentiality if Parent or
the Company, as the case may be, shall have used reasonable
efforts to obtain the consent of such third party to such
inspection or disclosure or (B) to disclose any privileged
information of Parent or the Company, as the case may be, or any
of its subsidiaries. All requests for information made pursuant
to this Section 5.5 shall be directed to an executive
officer of Parent or the Company, as the case may be, or such
Person as may be designated by either of their executive
officers, as the case may be.
(b) Each party agrees that it will not, and will
cause its representatives not to, use any information obtained
pursuant to this Section 5.5 (as well as any other
information obtained prior to the date hereof in connection with
the entering into of this Plan) for any purpose unrelated to the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Plan.
Subject to the requirements of law, each party will keep
confidential, and will cause its representatives to keep
confidential, all information and documents obtained pursuant to
this Section 5.5 (as well as any other information obtained
prior to the date hereof in connection with the entering into of
this Plan) unless such information (1) was already known to
such party, (2) becomes available to such party from other
sources not known by such party to be bound by a confidentiality
obligation, (3) is disclosed with the prior written
approval of the providing party or (4) is or becomes
readily ascertainable from publicly available sources. If this
Plan is terminated or the transactions contemplated by this Plan
shall otherwise fail to be consummated, each party shall
promptly cause all copies of documents or extracts thereof
containing information and data as to the other party to be
returned to the other party, except to the extent such action
would be inconsistent with applicable law, regulation, legal
process, or the applicable partys internal policies and
procedures.
(c) In addition to the confidentiality arrangements
contained in this Plan, all information provided or obtained in
connection with the transactions contemplated by this Plan
(including pursuant to clause (a) above)
B-25
will be held by Parent or the Company, as the case may be in
accordance with and subject to the terms of the Confidentiality
Agreement, dated May 15, 2007, between Parent and the
Company (the Confidentiality Agreement). In
the event of a conflict or inconsistency between the terms of
this Plan and the Confidentiality Agreement, the terms of this
Plan will govern.
5.6 Acquisition
Proposals. (a) The Company agrees that
after the date hereof neither it nor any of its subsidiaries nor
any of its respective officers and directors or the officers and
directors of any of its subsidiaries shall, and it shall direct
and use all reasonable best efforts to cause its employees and
agents, including any investment banker, attorney or accountant
retained by it or by any of its subsidiaries (collectively, its
Representatives) not to, initiate, solicit or
encourage, directly or indirectly, any inquiries or the making
or implementation of any Acquisition Proposal, or, except to the
extent that the board of directors of the Company determines, in
good faith, after consultation with its outside financial and
legal advisors, that such action is required in order for the
board of directors of the Company to comply with its fiduciary
duties, engage in any negotiations concerning, or provide any
confidential information or data to, or have any discussions
with, any Person relating to an Acquisition Proposal or
otherwise facilitate any effort or attempt to implement or make
an Acquisition Proposal (and in any event, the Company shall not
provide any confidential information or data to any Person in
connection with an Acquisition Proposal unless such Person shall
have executed a confidentiality agreement on terms at least as
favorable as those contained in the Confidentiality Agreement).
Acquisition Proposal means any proposal or
offer with respect to the following involving the Company or any
of its Significant Subsidiaries: (1) any merger,
consolidation, share exchange, business combination or other
similar transaction; (2) any sale, lease, exchange, pledge,
transfer or other disposition of 25% or more of its consolidated
assets or liabilities in a single transaction or series of
transactions; (3) any tender offer or exchange offer for,
or other acquisition of, 25% or more of the outstanding shares
of its capital stock; or (4) any public announcement of a
proposal, plan or intention to do any of the foregoing or any
agreement to engage in any of the foregoing, other than the
Merger provided for in this Plan.. Notwithstanding anything in
this Plan to the contrary, the Company shall (i) promptly
(but in no event later than 24 hours) advise Parent, orally
and in writing, of (x) the receipt by it (or any of the
other persons referred to above) of any Acquisition Proposal, or
any inquiry which could reasonably be expected to lead to an
Acquisition Proposal, or any material modification of or
material amendment to any Acquisition Proposal, or any request
for nonpublic information relating to the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or for access to the properties, books or records
of the Company or any subsidiary by any Person or entity that
informs the board of directors of the Company or any subsidiary
that it is considering making, or has made, an Acquisition
Proposal, (y) the material terms and conditions of such
proposal or inquiry (whether written or oral) or modification or
amendment to an Acquisition Proposal, and (z) the identity
of the person making any such proposal or inquiry and
(ii) keep Parent fully informed of the status and details
of any such proposal or inquiry and any developments with
respect thereto. The Company shall use its reasonable best
efforts to enforce any existing confidentiality or standstill
agreements in accordance with the terms thereof, and shall
immediately take all steps necessary to terminate any approval
that may have been heretofore given under any such provisions
authorizing any Person to make an Acquisition Proposal.
Significant Subsidiary has the meaning
ascribed to that term in
Rule 1-02
of
Regulation S-X
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act).
(b) The Company and its subsidiaries shall
immediately cease and cause to be terminated any existing
discussions or negotiations with any Persons (other than Parent)
conducted heretofore with respect to any of the foregoing, and
shall use reasonable best efforts to cause all Persons other
than Parent who have been furnished confidential information
regarding the Company or its subsidiaries in connection with the
solicitation of or discussions regarding an Acquisition Proposal
within the 12 months prior to the date hereof promptly to
return or destroy such information. Neither the Company nor the
board of directors of the Company shall approve or take any
action to render inapplicable to any Acquisition Proposal any
applicable Takeover Laws or Takeover Provisions.
5.7 Affiliate
Agreements. The Company shall use its
reasonable best efforts to cause each director, executive
officer and other person who is an affiliate (for
purposes of Rule 145 under the Securities Act) of
B-26
the Company to deliver to Parent, as soon as practicable after
the date of this Plan, a written agreement in the
form Previously Disclosed.
5.8 Takeover Laws and
Provisions. No party hereto shall take any
action that would cause the transactions contemplated by this
Plan to be subject to requirements imposed by any Takeover Law
and each of them shall take all necessary steps within its
control to exempt (or ensure the continued exemption of) the
transactions contemplated by this Plan from, or if necessary
challenge the validity or applicability of, any applicable
Takeover Law, as now or hereafter in effect. No party hereto
shall take any action that would cause the transactions
contemplated by this Plan not to comply with any Takeover
Provisions and each of them shall take all necessary steps
within its control to make the transactions contemplated by this
Plan comply with (or continue to comply with) the Takeover
Provisions.
5.9 Regulatory Applications.
(a) Parent and the Company shall cooperate and use
their respective reasonable best efforts to prepare as promptly
as possible all documentation, to effect all filings and to
obtain all permits, consents, approvals and authorizations of
all third parties and Governmental Entities necessary to
consummate the transactions contemplated by this Plan, and
Parent shall make all necessary regulatory filings within
20 days of the date hereof. Each of Parent and the Company
shall have the right to review in advance, and to the extent
practicable each will consult with the other, in each case
subject to applicable laws relating to the exchange of
information, with respect to all material written information
submitted to any third party or any Governmental Entity in
connection with the transactions contemplated by this Plan. In
exercising the foregoing right, each of the parties hereto
agrees to act reasonably and as promptly as practicable. Each
party hereto agrees that it will consult with the other party
hereto with respect to the obtaining of all material permits,
consents, approvals and authorizations (collectively,
Approvals) of all third parties and
Governmental Entities necessary or advisable to consummate the
transactions contemplated by this Plan and each party will keep
the other party appraised of the status of material matters
relating to such Approvals and completion of the transactions
contemplated hereby. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing
contained herein shall be deemed to require Parent to take any
action, or commit to take any action, or agree to any condition
or restriction, in connection with obtaining the foregoing
permits, consents, approvals and authorizations, that would
reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect
(measured on a scale relative to the Company and its
subsidiaries taken as a whole) on Parent, the Company or the
Surviving Corporation (a Materially Burdensome
Regulatory Condition).
(b) Each party agrees, upon request, to furnish the
other party with all information concerning itself, its
subsidiaries, directors, officers and shareholders and such
other matters as may be reasonably necessary or advisable in
connection with any filing, notice or application made by or on
behalf of such other party or any of its subsidiaries with or to
any third party or Governmental Entity.
5.10 Options.
(a) Treatment of Options. At the
Effective Time, each option granted by the Company to purchase
shares of Company Common Stock that is outstanding and
unexercised under any employee stock option or equity
compensation plan or arrangement of the Company (any such option
to purchase Company Common Stock being referred to as a
Company Option or the Company
Options), whether or not vested or exercisable, shall
be converted at the Effective Time into an option to purchase a
number of shares of Parent Common Stock (a Parent
Option) equal to the product (rounded down to the
nearest whole share) of (x) the number of shares of Company
Common Stock subject to the Company Option immediately prior to
the Effective Time and (y) the Per Share Stock
Consideration, at an exercise price per share of Parent Common
Stock (rounded up to the nearest whole cent) subject to the
Parent Option equal to the quotient obtained by dividing
(x) the exercise price per share of Company Common Stock
subject to the Company Option immediately prior to the Effective
Time by (y) the Per Share Stock Consideration. As of the
Effective Time, Parent shall assume such Company Options and the
plans under which they have been issued. With respect to any
Company Options that are incentive stock options (as
defined in Section 422(b) of the Internal Revenue Code),
the foregoing adjustments shall be effected in a manner
consistent with Section 424(a) of the Internal
B-27
Revenue Code. Prior to the Effective Time, the board of
directors of the Company shall take all action necessary or
appropriate to effectuate the foregoing.
(b) Actions. Prior to the Effective
Time, the Company may, after consultation with Parent, take any
actions it determines are warranted (but without expenditure of
any funds) to give effect to the transactions contemplated by
Section 5.10(a).
5.11 Indemnification and
Insurance.
(a) Following the Effective Time, Parent shall
indemnify, defend and hold harmless and advance expenses to the
present and former directors and officers of the Company or any
of its subsidiaries (including all of its banking subsidiaries),
and any such person presently or formerly serving at the request
of the Company or any of its subsidiaries as a director,
officer, employee, agent, trustee or fiduciary of another
corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other
enterprise or under or with respect to any employee benefit plan
(each, an Indemnified Party and collectively,
the Indemnified Parties) against all costs or
expenses (including reasonable attorneys fees), judgments,
fines, losses, claims, damages, penalties, amounts paid in
settlement or other liabilities (collectively,
Indemnified Liabilities) incurred in
connection with any claim, action, suit, proceeding or
investigation, whether civil, criminal, administrative or
investigative, arising out of actions or omissions occurring at
or prior to the Effective Time (including the transactions
contemplated by this Plan), whether asserted or claimed prior
to, at or after the Effective Time (x) to the same extent
as such persons are indemnified or have the right to advancement
of expenses pursuant to the Governing Documents and
indemnification agreements, if any, in effect on the date of
this Plan with the Company or any of its subsidiaries and, in
the case of the directors and executive officers of the Company
(y) without limitation of, and in addition to, clause (x),
to the fullest extent permitted by law. In the event of any such
Indemnified Liabilities, (i) Parent shall pay the
reasonable fees and expenses of counsel selected by an
Indemnified Party promptly after statements therefor are
received and shall otherwise advance to such Indemnified Party
upon request reimbursement of documented expenses reasonably
incurred and (ii) Parent and the applicable Indemnified
Parties shall cooperate in the defense of such matter. If any
Indemnified Party is required to bring any action to enforce
rights or to collect moneys due under this Plan and is
successful in obtaining a decision that it is entitled to
enforcement of any right or collection of any money in such
action, Parent shall reimburse such Indemnified Party for all of
its expenses reasonably incurred in connection with bringing and
pursuing such action including, without limitation, reasonable
attorneys fees and costs.
(b) For a period of six years from the Effective
Time, Parent shall use its reasonable best efforts to provide
directors and officers liability insurance
(including excess coverage) and fiduciary liability insurance in
respect of any Company Benefit Plans that serves to reimburse
the present and former officers and directors of the Company or
any of its subsidiaries (including all of its banking
subsidiaries) with respect to claims against such directors and
officers arising from facts or events occurring at or prior to
the Effective Time (including, without limitation, the
transactions contemplated by this Plan) which insurance shall
contain at least the same coverage and amounts, and contain
terms and conditions no less advantageous, as that coverage
currently provided by the Company, provided that in no
event shall Parent be required to expend annually in the
aggregate an amount in excess of 250% of the annual premiums
currently paid by the Company (which current amount has been
Previously Disclosed) for such insurance (the Insurance
Amount), and provided further that if Parent is
unable to maintain such policy (or such substitute policy) as a
result of the preceding proviso, Parent shall obtain as much
comparable insurance as is available for the Insurance Amount.
(c) Any Indemnified Party wishing to claim
indemnification under Section 5.11(a), upon learning of any
claim, action, suit, proceeding or investigation described
above, shall notify Parent thereof; provided that the
failure to so notify shall not affect the obligations of Parent
under Section 5.11(a) unless and to the extent that Parent
is actually and materially prejudiced as a result of such
failure. Parent hereby acknowledges notice of all matters
Previously Disclosed.
(d) If Parent or any of its successors or assigns
shall consolidate with or merge into any other entity and shall
not be the continuing or surviving entity of such consolidation
or merger or shall transfer all or substantially all of its
assets or deposits to any other entity, or engage in any similar
transaction, then and in
B-28
each case, Parent shall cause proper provision to be made so
that the successors and assigns of Parent shall assume the
obligations set forth in this Section 5.11.
(e) The provisions of this Section 5.11 are
intended to be for the benefit of, and shall be enforceable by,
each Indemnified Party and his or her heirs and representatives.
The indemnification rights granted in this Section 5.11 are
in addition to, and not in substitution for, any other rights to
indemnification or contribution that any Indemnified Party may
have by contract or otherwise.
5.12 Benefit
Plans. (a) Parent shall from and after
the Effective Time, assume and comply with the Benefit Plans and
Parent agrees to honor and perform the Companys and its
subsidiaries obligations under such plans and agreements
in accordance with their terms. Parent shall provide the
employees of the Company and its subsidiaries with
(A) benefits under employee benefit plans that are no less
favorable in the aggregate than those provided by the Company
and its subsidiaries on the date hereof, provided that for this
purpose benefits under employee benefit plans of Parent shall be
deemed to be no less favorable in the aggregate than those
provided by the Company and its subsidiaries on the date hereof
and (B) until the first anniversary of the Effective Time,
severance benefits on a
person-by-person
basis that are equal to the better of either (x) the
severance benefits provided under the Companys Corporate
Severance Package Merger and Acquisition Related Downsizing or
(y) the severance benefits provided by Parent from time to
time. In the case of clause (y), any such severance benefits
shall be provided pursuant to the terms and conditions of
Parents Displaced Employee Assistance Plan, and in the
case of clause (x), any such severance benefits shall be subject
to the employees execution and non-revocation of a release
and, to the extent that Parent consults with the Chief Executive
Officer of the Company about such terms and conditions, such
benefits shall be provided pursuant to the procedures and
administrative terms and conditions of Parents Displaced
Employee Assistance Plan. For purposes of clarity, severance
benefits shall be provided under either clause (x) or
(y) and there shall not be any combination thereof. In
addition Parent shall (1) provide employees of the Company
and its subsidiaries credit for all years of service with the
Company or any of its subsidiaries and their predecessors prior
to the Effective Time for the purpose of eligibility, vesting
and benefit accruals (other than benefit accruals under a
defined benefit pension plan and as would result in duplication
of benefits), (2) cause any and all pre-existing condition
limitations (to the extent such limitations did not apply to a
pre-existing condition under comparable Benefit Plans) and
eligibility waiting periods under group health plans of Parent
to be waived with respect to employees of the Company and its
subsidiaries who remain as employees of Parent or its
subsidiaries (and their eligible dependents) and (3) cause
to be credited any deductibles or out-of-pocket expenses
incurred by employees of the Company and its subsidiaries and
their beneficiaries and dependents during the portion of the
calendar year prior to their participation in Parents
health plans with the objective that there be no double counting
during the year in which the Closing Date occurs of such
deductibles or out-of-pocket expenses. Parent and the Company
agree to honor, or to cause to be honored, in accordance with
their terms, all vested or accrued benefit obligations to, and
contractual rights of, current and former employees of the
Company and its subsidiaries, including, without limitation, any
benefits or rights arising as a result of the transactions
contemplated by this Plan (either alone or in combination with
any other event); it being understood and agreed by the parties
hereto that the transactions contemplated by this Plan shall
constitute a change in control of the Company for
purposes of the Benefit Plans that have been Previously
Disclosed.
(b) This Section 5.12 shall inure exclusively to
the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their
respective successors, assigns, executors and legal
representatives. Without limiting the generality of
Section 8.13, nothing in this Section 5.12, express or
implied: (i) is intended to confer on any person other than
the parties hereto or their respective successors and assigns
any rights, remedies, obligations or liabilities under or by
reason of this Plan; (ii) shall require the Parent to
maintain any specific Benefit Plan or to guarantee employment of
any employee for any period of time after the Effective Time;
and (iii) shall constitute an amendment to any Benefit Plan
or any Parent compensation or benefit plan or arrangement.
5.13 Notification of Certain
Matters. Each of Parent and the Company shall
give prompt notice to the other of any fact, event or
circumstance known to it that (1) is reasonably likely,
individually or taken together with all other facts, events and
circumstances known to it, to result in any Material Adverse
Effect with
B-29
respect to it or (2) would cause or constitute a material
breach of any of its representations, covenants or agreements
contained herein.
5.14 Exemption from Liability Under
Section 16(b). Parent and the Company
agree that, in order to most effectively compensate and retain
the Company Insiders (as defined below) in connection with the
Merger, both prior to and after the Effective Time, it is
desirable that the Company Insiders not be subject to a risk of
liability under Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act to the
fullest extent permitted by applicable law. Assuming that the
Company delivers to Parent the Company Section 16
Information (as defined below) in a timely fashion prior to the
Effective Time, the board of directors of Parent, or a committee
of non-employee directors thereof (as such term is defined for
purposes of
Rule 16b-3(d)
under the Exchange Act), shall reasonably promptly thereafter
and in any event prior to the Effective Time adopt a resolution
providing in substance that the receipt by the Company Insiders
(as defined below) of Parent Common Stock in exchange for shares
of Company Common Stock pursuant to the transactions
contemplated hereby and to the extent such securities are listed
in the Company Section 16 Information, are intended to be
exempt from liability pursuant to Section 16(b) under the
Exchange Act to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.
Company Section 16 Information shall
mean information accurate in all material respects regarding the
Company Insiders, the number of shares of Company Common Stock
held by each such Company Insider and expected to be exchanged
for Parent Common Stock in the Merger, and the number and
description of the options to purchase shares of Company Common
Stock held by each such Company Insider and expected to be
converted into options to purchase shares of Parent Common Stock
in connection with the Merger; provided that the
requirement for a description of any Company Options shall be
deemed to be satisfied if copies of all plans, and forms of
agreements, under which such Options have been granted have been
made available to Parent. Company Insiders
shall mean those present or former officers and directors of the
Company who are subject to the reporting requirements of
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act and who are listed in the
Company Section 16 Information.
5.15 Assumption by Parent of Indenture
Obligations. As of the Effective Time, Parent
shall assume expressly by supplemental indenture the obligations
of the Company under (i) the Indenture, dated as of
March 22, 2007, (ii) the Indenture, dated as of
February 28, 2005, (iii) the Indenture, dated as of
December 4, 2004, and (iv) the Indenture, dated as of
June 26, 2003, each as more specifically identified on
Section 5.15 of the Disclosure Schedule, and Parent agrees
to honor and perform the Companys obligations under such
indentures in accordance with their terms.
5.16 Credit Agreement. Not
later than thirty days after the date hereof, in connection with
that certain Credit Agreement described more fully on
Schedule 5.16, Parent and the Company shall execute an
agreement in the form described therein providing that on the
Closing Date the obligations under that agreement will be
satisfied as described therein.
5.17 Other Actions. As
promptly as practicable after the date hereof, but in any event
prior to Closing, (a) the Company shall complete the
restatement of its financial statements and the review of its
Equipment Finance, LLC loan portfolio currently in process and
(b) the Company shall use its reasonable best efforts to
facilitate the completion by Stradley Ronon Stevens &
Young, LLP of its investigation and its report thereof to the
audit committee of the board of directors of the Company.
5.18 Additional
Actions. Schedule 5.18 is incorporated
herein by reference.
ARTICLE VI
Conditions
6.1 Conditions to Each Partys Obligation
to Effect the Merger. The respective
obligation of each of Parent and the Company to consummate the
Merger is subject to the fulfillment or written waiver by Parent
and the Company prior to the Effective Time of each of the
following conditions:
(a) Shareholder Approval. This Plan
and the Merger shall have been duly adopted and approved by the
requisite votes of the shareholders of the Company.
B-30
(b) Governmental and Regulatory
Consents. All statutory waiting periods
applicable to the consummation of the Merger shall have expired
or been terminated, and, other than the filing provided for in
Section 1.2(a), all notices, reports and other filings
required to be made prior to the Effective Time by Parent or the
Company or any of their respective subsidiaries with, and all
regulatory consents, registrations, approvals, permits and
authorizations required to be obtained prior to the Effective
Time by Parent or the Company or any of their respective
subsidiaries from, any Governmental Entity in connection with
the consummation of the Merger, the Bank Mergers and the other
transactions contemplated hereby by Parent and the Company shall
have been made or obtained (as the case may be) and become
final, unless the failure to obtain any such consent or approval
would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on Parent (measured on a
scale relative to the Company and its subsidiaries, taken as a
whole) or the Company, and, in the case of the obligations of
Parent only, no such consent, registration, approval, permit or
authorization shall have resulted in the imposition of any
Materially Burdensome Regulatory Condition.
(c) No Prohibitions. No United
States or state court or other Governmental Entity of competent
jurisdiction shall have enacted, issued, promulgated, enforced
or entered any law, statute, rule, regulation, judgment, decree,
injunction or other order (whether temporary, preliminary or
permanent) which is in effect and prohibits consummation of the
Merger.
(d) Registration Statement. The
Registration Statement shall have become effective under the
Securities Act and no stop order suspending the effectiveness of
the Registration Statement shall have been issued and no
proceedings for that purpose shall have been initiated or
threatened by the SEC or any other Governmental Entity.
(e) Blue Sky Approvals. All permits
and other authorizations under the Securities Laws (other than
that referred to in Section 6.1(d)) and other
authorizations necessary to consummate the Merger and to issue
the shares of Parent Common Stock to be issued in the Merger
shall have been received and be in full force and effect.
6.2 Conditions to Obligation of
Parent. The obligation of Parent to
consummate the Merger is also subject to the fulfillment, or the
written waiver by Parent prior to the Effective Time, of each of
the following conditions:
(a) Representations. The
representations of the Company set forth in this Plan shall be,
giving effect to Sections 4.1 and 4.2, true and correct as
of the date of this Plan and as of the Effective Time as though
made at and as of the Effective Time (except that
representations that by their terms speak specifically as of the
date of this Plan or some other date shall be true and correct
as of such date) and Parent shall have received a certificate,
dated the Closing Date, signed on behalf of the Company by the
Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the
Company to such effect.
(b) Performance of Obligations of the
Company. The Company shall have performed all
obligations required to be performed by it under this Plan at or
prior to the Effective Time in all material respects, and Parent
shall have received a certificate, dated the Closing Date,
signed on behalf of the Company by the Chief Executive Officer
and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company to such effect.
(c) Opinion of Tax Counsel. Parent
shall have received an opinion from Wachtell, Lipton,
Rosen & Katz, special counsel to Parent, dated the
Closing Date, to the effect that, on the basis of the facts,
representations and assumptions set forth or referred to in such
opinion, (1) the Merger will be treated for federal income
tax purposes as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code and
(2) each of Parent and the Company will be a party to that
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(b) of the
Internal Revenue Code. In rendering its opinion, Wachtell,
Lipton, Rosen & Katz may require and rely upon
representations contained in letters from each of Parent and the
Company.
B-31
6.3 Conditions to Obligation of the
Company. The obligation of the Company to
consummate the Merger is also subject to the fulfillment, or the
written waiver by the Company, prior to the Effective Time of
each of the following conditions:
(a) Representations. The
representations of Parent set forth in this Plan shall be,
giving effect to Sections 4.1 and 4.2, true and correct as
of the date of this Plan and as of the Effective Time as though
made at and as of the Effective Time (except that
representations that by their terms speak specifically as of the
date of this Plan or some other date shall be true and correct
as of such date); and the Company shall have received a
certificate, dated the Closing Date, signed on behalf of Parent
by the Chief Executive Officer or the Chief Financial Officer of
Parent to such effect.
(b) Performance of Obligations of
Parent. Parent shall have performed all
obligations required to be performed by it under this Plan at or
prior to the Effective Time in all material respects, and the
Company shall have received a certificate, dated the Closing
Date, signed on behalf of Parent by the Chief Executive Officer
or the Chief Financial Officer of Parent to such effect.
(c) Opinion of Tax Counsel. The
Company shall have received an opinion of Sullivan &
Cromwell LLP, special counsel to the Company, dated the Closing
Date, to the effect that on the basis of the facts,
representations and assumptions set forth or referred to in such
opinion, (1) the Merger will be treated for federal income
tax purposes as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, and
(2) each of Parent and the Company will be a party to that
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(b) of the
Internal Revenue Code. In rendering its opinion,
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP may require and rely upon
representations contained in letters from each of Parent and the
Company.
ARTICLE VII
Termination
7.1 Termination by Mutual
Consent. This Plan may be terminated and the
Merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time
(whether or not the shareholders of Company Common Stock have
adopted and approved this Plan), upon the mutual consent of
Parent and the Company, by action of their respective boards of
directors.
7.2 Termination by
Parent. This Plan may be terminated and the
Merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time
by action of the board of directors of Parent:
(a) if there has been a breach of any representation,
covenant or agreement made by the Company in this Plan, or any
such representation shall have become untrue after the date of
this Plan, such that Section 6.2(a) or 6.2(b) would not be
satisfied and such breach or condition is not curable or, if
curable, is not cured within 30 days after written notice
thereof is given by Parent to the Company;
(b) if the Merger shall not have been consummated by
the twelve month anniversary of the date hereof (the
Termination Date), provided that the
right to terminate this Plan shall not be available if Parent
has breached in any material respect its obligations under this
Plan in any manner that shall have proximately and substantially
contributed to the occurrence of the failure of the Merger to be
consummated;
(c) if the approval of the Companys
shareholders required by Section 6.1(a) shall not have been
obtained at its shareholders meeting or at any adjournment
or postponement thereof;
(d) if any order permanently restraining, enjoining
or otherwise prohibiting consummation of the Merger shall become
final and non-appealable (whether before or after the approval
by the shareholders of the Company); or
(e) if (1) the board of directors of the Company
has failed to recommend that the shareholders of the Company
vote in favor of this Plan and the transactions contemplated
hereby or has withdrawn, modified or qualified such
recommendation in a manner adverse to Parent (or has resolved to
take such
B-32
action), (2) the Company has failed to substantially comply
with its obligations under Section 5.2 or 5.6, or
(3) the board of directors of the Company has publicly
recommended or endorsed an Acquisition Proposal other than the
Merger (or has resolved to take such action).
7.3 Termination by the
Company. This Plan may be terminated and the
Merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time,
whether before or after the approval by shareholders of the
Company referred to in Section 6.1(a), by action of the
board of directors of the Company:
(a) if the Merger shall not have been consummated by
the Termination Date; provided that the right to
terminate this Plan pursuant to this clause (a) shall not
be available if the Company has breached in any material respect
its obligations under this Plan in any manner that shall have
proximately and substantially contributed to the occurrence of
the failure of the Merger to be consummated;
(b) if the approval of the Companys
shareholders required by Section 6.1(a) shall not have been
obtained at its shareholders meeting or at any adjournment
or postponement thereof;
(c) if any order permanently restraining, enjoining
or otherwise prohibiting consummation of the Merger shall become
final and non-appealable (whether before or after the approval
by the shareholders of the Company); or
(d) if there has been a breach of any representation,
covenant or agreement made by Parent in this Plan, or any such
representation shall have become untrue after the date of this
Plan, such that Section 6.3(a) or 6.3(b) would not be
satisfied and such breach or condition is not curable or, if
curable, is not cured within 30 days after written notice
thereof is given by the Company to Parent.
7.4 Effect of Termination and
Abandonment. In the event of termination of
this Plan and the abandonment of the Merger pursuant to this
Article VII, this Plan (other than as set forth in
Sections 5.5(b) and (c), 7.5 and 8.10) shall become void
and of no effect with no liability on the part of any party
hereto (or of any of its directors, officers, employees, agents,
legal and financial advisors or other representatives);
provided, however, no such termination shall
relieve any party hereto of any liability or damages resulting
from any willful breach of this Plan.
7.5 Termination Fee.
(a) In the event that (1) a Company
Pre-Termination Takeover Proposal Event (as hereinafter
defined) shall occur after the date of this Plan and thereafter
this Plan is terminated by either Parent or the Company pursuant
to Section 7.2(c) or 7.3(b), respectively, by Parent
pursuant to Section 7.2(e)(1) or (2), or by Parent pursuant
to Section 7.2(a) as a result of a willful breach by the
Company, and (2) prior to the date that is twelve
(12) months after the date of such termination the Company
consummates an Acquisition Proposal or enters into any
acquisition or other similar agreement, including any letter of
intent, related to any Acquisition Proposal (each, a
Company Acquisition Agreement), then the
Company shall, (x) on the date such Company Acquisition
Agreement is entered into, pay Parent a fee equal to $7,000,000
by wire transfer of same day funds and (y) on the date an
Acquisition Proposal is consummated (if consummated within one
year of the date of termination, or if consummated at any time
(without regard to such one-year period) if the Acquisition
Proposal is the Acquisition Proposal relating to the Company
Acquisition Agreement addressed in the preceding clause (x)),
pay Parent a fee equal to $21,000,000 by wire transfer of same
day funds, less any fee paid pursuant to the preceding clause
(x).
(b) In the event that this Plan is terminated by
Parent pursuant to Section 7.2(e)(3), then the Company
shall, (1) on the date of such termination, pay Parent a
fee equal to $7,000,000 by wire transfer of same day funds and
(2) on the date the Company consummates an Acquisition
Proposal (if consummated within one year of the date of
termination, or at any time if the Acquisition Proposal is the
Acquisition Proposal that resulted in such termination), pay
Parent a fee equal to $14,000,000 by wire transfer of same day
funds.
(c) For purposes of this Section 7.5, a
Pre-Termination Takeover Proposal Event
shall be deemed to occur if, prior to the event giving rise to
the right to terminate this Plan, a bona fide Acquisition
Proposal shall have been made known to the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries or has been made directly to its
B-33
shareholders generally or any Person shall have publicly
announced an intention (whether or not conditional) to make an
Acquisition Proposal.
(d) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, the
maximum aggregate amount of fees payable under this
Section 7.5 shall be $21,000,000.
(e) The Company acknowledges that the agreements contained
in this Section 7.5 are an integral part of the
transactions contemplated by this Plan, and that, without these
agreements, Parent would not enter into this Plan; accordingly,
if the Company fails promptly to pay the amount due pursuant to
this Section 7.5, and, in order to obtain such payment,
Parent commences a suit which results in a judgment against the
Company for the fee set forth in this Section 7.5, the
Company shall pay to Parent its costs and expenses (including
attorneys fees and expenses) in connection with such suit,
together with interest on the amount of the fee at the rate on
six-month U.S. Treasury obligations plus 300 basis
points in effect on the date such payment was required to be
made.
ARTICLE VIII
Miscellaneous
8.1 Survival. Except for the
agreements and covenants contained in Articles I and II,
Sections 5.10, 5.11, 5.12, 5.14 and 7.5 and this
Article VIII, the representations, agreements and covenants
contained in this Plan shall be deemed only to be conditions of
the Merger and shall not survive the Effective Time.
8.2 Modification or
Amendment. Subject to applicable law, at any
time prior to the Effective Time, the parties hereto may modify
or amend this Plan, by written agreement executed and delivered
by duly authorized officers of the respective parties.
8.3 Waiver of
Conditions. The conditions to each
partys obligation to consummate the Merger are for the
sole benefit of such party and may be waived by such party as a
whole or in part to the extent permitted by applicable law. No
waiver shall be effective unless it is in a writing signed by a
duly authorized officer of the waiving party that makes express
reference to the provision or provisions subject to such waiver.
8.4 Counterparts. For the
convenience of the parties hereto, this Plan may be executed in
any number of separate counterparts, each such counterpart being
deemed to be an original instrument, and all such counterparts
shall together constitute the same agreement. The execution and
delivery of this Plan may be effected by telecopier.
8.5 Governing Law. This
Plan shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the
laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania applicable to contracts
made and to be performed entirely within the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania.
8.6 Notices. Any notice,
request, instruction or other document to be given hereunder by
any party to the other shall be in writing and shall be deemed
to have been duly given (a) on the date of delivery if
delivered personally, or by facsimile, upon confirmation of
receipt, (b) on the first business day following the date
of dispatch if delivered by a recognized
next-day
courier service, or (c) on the third business day following
the date of mailing if delivered by registered or certified
mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid. All notices
hereunder shall be delivered as set forth below, or pursuant to
such other instructions as may be designated in writing by the
party to receive such notice.
|
|
|
To Parent:
|
|
To the Company:
|
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
|
|
Sterling Financial Corporation
|
One PNC Plaza
|
|
101 North Pointe Boulevard
|
249 Fifth Avenue
|
|
Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17601-4133
|
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222
|
|
Attention: J. Roger Moyer, Jr.
|
Attention: Mergers & Acquisition
Department
|
|
Facsimile: (717) 735-4881
|
Facsimile.:
(412) 762-6238
|
|
|
B-34
|
|
|
with copies to:
|
|
with copies to:
|
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
|
|
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
|
51 West
52nd
Street
|
|
125 Broad Street
|
New York, NY 10019
|
|
New York, NY 10004-2498
|
Attention: Edward D. Herlihy
Nicholas G. Demmo
|
|
Attention: H. Rodgin Cohen and
Mark J. Menting
|
Facsimile: 212-403-2000
|
|
Facsimile: 212-558-3588
|
8.7 Entire Agreement,
Etc. This Plan (including the Disclosure
Schedules) and the Confidentiality Agreement constitute the
entire agreement, and supersedes all other prior agreements,
understandings, representations, both written and oral, between
the parties, with respect to the subject matter hereof, and this
Plan shall not be assignable by operation of law or otherwise
(any attempted assignment in contravention of this
Section 8.7 being null and void).
8.8 Definition of subsidiary and
affiliate; Covenants with Respect to Subsidiaries
and Affiliates. (a) When a reference is
made in this Plan to a subsidiary of a Person, the term
subsidiary has the meaning ascribed to that
term in
Rule 1-02
of Registration S-X under the Exchange Act. When a reference is
made in this Plan to an affiliate of a Person, the term
affiliate (or Affiliate) means
those other Persons that, directly or indirectly, control, are
controlled by, or are under common control with, such Person.
(b) Insofar as any provision of this Plan shall require a
subsidiary or an affiliate of a party to take or omit to take
any action, such provision shall be deemed a covenant by Parent
or the Company, as the case may be, to cause such action or
omission to occur.
8.9 Specific
Performance. The parties hereto agree that if
any of the provisions of this Plan were not performed in
accordance with their specific terms or were otherwise breached,
irreparable damage would occur, no adequate remedy at law would
exist and damages would be difficult to determine, and that the
parties will be entitled to specific performance of the terms
hereof, in addition to any other remedy at law or equity.
8.10 Expenses. Each party
will bear all expenses incurred by it in connection with this
Plan and the transactions contemplated hereby, except that
Parent and Company will each bear and pay one-half of the costs
(excluding the fees and disbursements of counsel, financial
advisors and accountants) incurred in connection with the
copying, printing and distributing of the Registration Statement
and the Proxy Statement for the approval of the Merger.
8.11 Interpretation; Effect.
(a) In this Plan, except as context may otherwise require,
references:
(1) to the Preamble, Recitals, Sections, Annexes or
Schedules are to the Preamble to, a Recital or Section of, or
Annex or Schedule to, this Plan;
(2) to this Plan are to this Plan, and the Annexes and
Schedules to it, taken as a whole;
(3) to the transactions contemplated hereby
includes the transactions provided for in this Plan including
the Merger;
(4) to any agreement (including this Plan), contract,
statute or regulation are to the agreement, contract, statute or
regulation as amended, modified, supplemented, restated or
replaced from time to time (in the case of an agreement or
contract, to the extent permitted by the terms thereof); and to
any section of any statute or regulation include any successor
to the section; and
(5) to any Governmental Entity includes any successor to
that Governmental Entity.
(b) The words hereby, herein,
hereof, hereunder and similar terms are
to be deemed to refer to this Plan as a whole and not to any
specific Section.
B-35
(c) The words include, includes or
including are to be deemed followed by the words
without limitation.
(d) The word party is to be deemed to refer to
the Company or Parent.
(e) The word person is to be interpreted
broadly to include any individual, savings association, bank,
trust company, corporation, limited liability company,
partnership, association, joint-stock company, business trust or
unincorporated organization.
(f) The table of contents and article and section headings
are for reference purposes only and do not limit or otherwise
affect any of the substance of this Plan.
(g) This Plan is the product of negotiation by the parties,
having the assistance of counsel and other advisers. The parties
intend that this Plan not be construed more strictly with regard
to one party than with regard to the other.
(h) The disclosure in any Section of a Disclosure Schedule
shall apply only to the indicated section of this Plan except to
the extent that it is reasonably apparent that such disclosure
is relevant to another section of this Plan.
8.12 Severability. The
provisions of this Plan shall be deemed severable and the
invalidity or unenforceability of any provision shall not affect
the validity or enforceability of the other provisions hereof.
If any provision of this Plan, or the application thereof to any
Person or entity or any circumstance, is found by a court or
other Governmental Entity of competent jurisdiction to be
invalid or unenforceable, (a) a suitable and equitable
provision shall be substituted therefor in order to carry out,
so far as may be valid and enforceable, the intent and purpose
of such invalid or unenforceable provision and (b) the
remainder of this Plan and the application of such provision to
other Persons, entities or circumstances shall not be affected
by such invalidity or unenforceability, nor shall such
invalidity or unenforceability affect the validity or
enforceability of such provision, or the application thereof, in
any other jurisdiction.
8.13 No Third Party
Beneficiaries. Nothing contained in this
Plan, expressed or implied, is intended to confer upon any
Person, other than the parties hereto, any benefit, right or
remedies except that the provisions of Sections 5.11 and
5.14 shall inure to the benefit of the Persons referred to
therein.
8.14 Waiver of Jury
Trial. Each party hereto acknowledges and
agrees that any controversy which may arise under this Plan is
likely to involve complicated and difficult issues, and
therefore each party hereby irrevocably and unconditionally
waives any right such party may have to a trial by jury in
respect of any litigation, directly or indirectly, arising out
of, or relating to, this Plan, or the transactions contemplated
by this Plan. Each party certifies and acknowledges that
(a) no representative, agent or attorney of any other party
has represented, expressly or otherwise, that such other party
would not, in the event of litigation, seek to enforce the
foregoing waiver, (b) each party understands and has
considered the implications of this waiver, (c) each party
makes this waiver voluntarily, and (d) each party has been
induced to enter into this Plan by, among other things, the
mutual waivers and certifications in this Section 8.14.
8.15 Submission to Jurisdiction; Selection of
Forum. Each party hereto agrees that it shall
bring any action or proceeding in respect of any claim arising
out of or related to this Plan or the Merger exclusively in any
United States District Court located in Pennsylvania or any
Pennsylvania State court (the Chosen Courts),
and solely in connection with claims arising under this Plan or
the Merger that are the subject of this Plan
(a) irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of
the Chosen Courts, (b) waives any objection to laying venue
in any such action or proceeding in the Chosen Courts,
(c) waives any objection that the Chosen Courts are an
inconvenient forum or do not have jurisdiction over any party
hereto and (d) agrees that service of process upon such
party in any such action or proceeding shall be effective if
notice is given in accordance with Section 8.6 of this Plan.
[next page is a signature page]
B-36
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Plan has been duly executed and
delivered by the duly authorized officers of the parties hereto
as of the date first above written.
THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ David
J. Williams
|
Name: David J. Williams
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Senior Vice President
|
STERLING FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ J.
Roger Moyer Jr.
|
Name: J. Roger Moyer Jr.
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
B-37
ANNEX
C
February 5,
2008
The Board of Directors
Sterling Financial Corporation
101 North Pointe Boulevard
Lancaster, Pennsylvania
17601-4133
Members of the Board:
You have requested our opinion as investment bankers as to the
fairness, from a financial point of view, to the shareholders of
Sterling Financial Corporation (Sterling) of the
Merger Consideration, as defined below, in the proposed merger
(the Merger) of Sterling with and into PNC Financial
Services Group, Inc. (PNC), pursuant to the
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 19, 2007,
between Sterling and PNC (the Agreement). Merger
Consideration hereinafter means the number of whole shares of
PNC Common Stock, cash or a combination thereof, plus cash in
lieu of any fractional share interest, into which shares of
Sterling Common Stock shall be converted, as set forth in
Article II of the Agreement. The terms and conditions of
the Merger are more fully set forth in the Agreement.
Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc., as part of its
investment banking business, is continually engaged in the
valuation of bank and bank holding company securities in
connection with acquisitions, negotiated underwritings,
secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities,
private placements and valuations for various other purposes. As
specialists in the securities of banking companies, we have
experience in, and knowledge of, the valuation of the banking
enterprises. In the ordinary course of our business as a
broker-dealer, we may, from time to time purchase securities
from, and sell securities to, Sterling and PNC, and as a market
maker in securities, we may from time to time have a long or
short position in, and buy or sell, debt or equity securities of
Sterling and PNC for our own account and for the accounts of our
customers. To the extent we have any such position as of the
date of this opinion it has been disclosed to Sterling. We have
acted exclusively for the Board of Directors of Sterling in
rendering this fairness opinion and will receive a fee from
Sterling for our services.
In connection with this opinion, we have reviewed, analyzed and
relied upon material bearing upon the financial and operating
condition of Sterling and PNC and the Merger, including among
other things, the following: (i) the Agreement;
(ii) the Annual Reports to Stockholders and Annual Reports
on
Form 10-K
for the three years ended December 31, 2006 of PNC;
(iii) certain interim reports to stockholders and Quarterly
Reports on
Form 10-Q
of PNC and certain other communications from Sterling and PNC to
their respective stockholders; and (iv) other financial
information concerning the businesses and operations of Sterling
and PNC furnished to us by Sterling and PNC for purposes of our
analysis. We have also held discussions with senior management
of Sterling and PNC regarding the past and current business
operations, regulatory relations, financial condition and future
prospects of their respective companies and such other matters
as we have deemed relevant to our inquiry. In addition, we have
compared certain financial and stock market information for
Sterling and PNC with similar information for certain other
companies the securities of which are publicly traded, reviewed
the financial terms of certain recent business combinations in
the banking industry and performed such other studies and
analyses as we considered appropriate.
In conducting our review and arriving at our opinion, we have
relied upon the accuracy and completeness of all of the
financial and other information provided to us or publicly
available (except in the case of Sterling to the extent Sterling
has publicly disclosed that such information may not be relied
on) and we have not
Keefe, Bruyette &
Woods 787 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10019
212.887.7777 Toll Free:
800.966.1559 www.kbw.com
C-1
assumed any responsibility for independently verifying the
accuracy or completeness of any such information. We have relied
upon the management of Sterling and PNC as to the reasonableness
and achievability of the financial and operating forecasts and
projections (and the assumptions and bases therefor) provided to
us, and we have assumed that such forecasts and projections
reflect the best currently available estimates and judgments of
such managements and that such forecasts and projections will be
realized in the amounts and in the time periods currently
estimated by such managements. We are not experts in the
independent verification of the adequacy of allowances for loan
and lease losses and we have assumed that the aggregate
allowances for loan and lease losses for Sterling and PNC are
adequate to cover such losses. In rendering our opinion, we have
not made or obtained any evaluations or appraisals of the
property of Sterling and PNC, nor have we examined any
individual credit files.
We have assumed that, in all respects material to our analyses,
the following: (i) the Merger will be completed
substantially in accordance with the terms set forth in the
Agreement; (ii) the representations and warranties of each
party in the Agreement and in all related documents and
instruments referred to in the Agreement are true and correct;
(iii) each party to the Agreement and all related documents
will perform all of the covenants and agreements required to be
performed by such party under such documents; (iv) all
conditions to the completion of the Merger will be satisfied
without any waivers; and (v) in the course of obtaining the
necessary regulatory, contractual, or other consents or
approvals for the Merger, no restrictions, including any
divestiture requirements, termination or other payments or
amendments or modifications, will be imposed that will have a
material adverse effect on the future results of operations or
financial condition of the combined entity or the contemplated
benefits of the Merger, including the cost savings, revenue
enhancements and related expenses expected to result from the
Merger.
We have considered such financial and other factors as we have
deemed appropriate under the circumstances, including, among
others, the following: (i) managements estimates of
current financial position and results of operations of
Sterling; (ii) the historical and current financial
position and results of operations of PNC;
(iii) managements estimates of assets and liabilities
of Sterling; (iv) the assets and liabilities of PNC; and
(v) the nature and terms of certain other merger
transactions involving banks and bank holding companies. We have
also taken into account our assessment of general economic,
market and financial conditions and our experience in other
transactions, as well as our experience in securities valuation
and knowledge of the banking industry generally. Our opinion is
necessarily based upon conditions as they exist and can be
evaluated on the date hereof and the information made available
to us through the date hereof.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion that,
as of the date hereof, the Merger Consideration is fair, from a
financial point of view, to holders of the shares of Sterling
common stock.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.
C-2
PART II
INFORMATION
NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
|
|
Item 20.
|
Indemnification
of Directors and Officers.
|
Section 1741 of the Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law
(PBCL) provides, in general, that a corporation
shall have the power to indemnify any person who was or is a
party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened,
pending or completed action or proceeding, whether civil,
criminal, administrative or investigative (other than an action
by or in the right of the corporation), by reason of the fact
that the person is or was a representative of the corporation,
or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a
representative of another enterprise. Such indemnity may be
against expenses (including attorneys fees), judgments,
fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably
incurred by the person in connection with the action or
proceeding, if the person acted in good faith and in a manner
the person reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the
best interests of the corporation and if, with respect to any
criminal proceeding, the person did not have reasonable cause to
believe his conduct was unlawful.
Section 1742 of the PBCL provides, in general, that a
corporation shall have the power to indemnify any person who was
or is a party, or is threatened to be made a party, to any
threatened, pending or completed action by or in the right of
the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of
the fact that the person is or was a representative of the
corporation or is or was serving at the request of the
corporation as a representative of another entity. Such
indemnity may be against expenses (including attorneys
fees) actually and reasonably incurred by the person in
connection with the defense or settlement of the action if the
person acted in good faith and in a manner the person reasonably
believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the
corporation, except no indemnification shall be made in respect
of any claim, issue, or matter as to which the person has been
adjudged to be liable to the corporation unless and only to the
extent that the court of common pleas of the judicial district
embracing the county in which the registered office of the
corporation is located or the court in which the action was
brought shall determine upon application that, despite the
adjudication of liability but in view of all the circumstances
of the case, the person is fairly and reasonably entitled to
indemnity for the expenses that the court of common pleas or
other court deems proper.
Section 1743 of the PBCL provides, in general, that a
corporation must indemnify any representative of a business
corporation who has been successful on the merits or otherwise
in defense of any action or proceeding referred to in
Section 1741 or Section 1742 or in defense of any
claim, issue, or matter therein, against expenses (including
attorney fees) actually and reasonably incurred therein.
Section 1747 of the PBCL provides, in general, that a
corporation shall have the power to purchase and maintain
insurance on behalf of any person who is or was a representative
of the corporation or is or was serving at the request of the
corporation as a representative of another entity against any
liability asserted against the person in any capacity, or
arising out of the persons status as such, regardless of
whether the corporation would have the power to indemnify him
against that liability under the provisions of the PBCL.
Article VII, Section 2 of PNCs bylaws provides
for indemnification to the fullest extent authorized by the laws
of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for any person who was or is
a director or officer of PNC, or is serving or shall have served
at the request of PNC as a director, officer, employee or agent
of another entity. PNCs bylaws also permit PNC, upon
authorization by its board of directors, to purchase and
maintain insurance on behalf of any person to the full extent
permitted by the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
The foregoing is only a general summary of certain aspects of
Pennsylvania law and PNCs bylaws dealing with
indemnification of directors and officers, and does not purport
to be complete. It is qualified in its entirety by reference to
the detailed provisions of Sections 1741, 1742, and 1743 of
the PBCL and Article VII, Section 2 of the bylaws of
PNC.
II-1
|
|
Item 21.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules.
|
(a) Exhibits. The following is a list of Exhibits to this
Registration Statement
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 19, 2007, by
and between The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. and Sterling
Financial Corporation (included in Part I as Annex B
to the document included in this Registration Statement)
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Registrant, as
in effect on the date hereof, incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 3.4 of Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2007
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Registrant, as in effect on the
date hereof, incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 3.5 of the Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2005
|
|
5
|
.1
|
|
Opinion of George P. Long, as to the validity of the shares of
PNC common stock*
|
|
8
|
.1
|
|
Opinion of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP as to tax matters*
|
|
8
|
.2
|
|
Opinion of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz as to tax
matters*
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of George P. Long (included in Exhibit 5.1 to this
Registration Statement)
|
|
23
|
.2
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
|
|
23
|
.3
|
|
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, former Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm of The PNC Financial Services
Group, Inc.
|
|
23
|
.4
|
|
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm of BlackRock, Inc.
|
|
23
|
.5
|
|
Consent of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP (included in
Exhibit 8.1 to this Registration Statement)
|
|
23
|
.6
|
|
Consent of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz (included in
Exhibit 8.2 to this Registration Statement)
|
|
24
|
.1
|
|
Powers of Attorney
|
|
99
|
.1
|
|
Form of Proxy Card for Special Meeting of Shareholders of
Sterling Financial Corporation*
|
|
99
|
.2
|
|
Consent of Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
To be filed by amendment. |
The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes:
(1) To file, during any period in which offers or sales are
being made, a post-effective amendment to the registration
statement: (i) to include any prospectus required by
Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended
(the Securities Act); (ii) to reflect in the
prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date
of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective
amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate,
represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in
the registration statement (notwithstanding the foregoing, any
increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the
total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that
which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end
of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the
form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to
Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and
price represent no more than a 20% change in the maximum
aggregate offering price set forth in the Calculation of
Registration Fee table in the effective registration
statement); and (iii) to include any material information
with respect to the plan of distribution not previously
disclosed in the registration statement or any material change
to such information in the registration statement.
(2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability
under the Securities Act, each such post-effective amendment
shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to
the securities offered
II-2
therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall
be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
(3) To remove from registration by means of a
post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered
which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.
(4) That, for purposes of determining any liability under
the Securities Act, each filing of the Registrants annual
report pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (and, where applicable, each
filing of an employee benefit plans annual report pursuant
to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended) that is incorporated by reference in the registration
statement shall be deemed to be a new registration statement
relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of
such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial
bona fide offering thereof.
(5) That prior to any public reoffering of the securities
registered hereunder through use of a prospectus which is a part
of the registration statement, by any person or party who is
deemed to be an underwriter within the meaning of
Rule 145(c), the Registrant undertakes that such reoffering
prospectus will contain the information called for by the
applicable registration form with respect to reofferings by
persons who may be deemed underwriters, in addition to the
information called for by the other items of the applicable form.
(6) That every prospectus (i) that is filed pursuant
to paragraph (5) above, or (ii) that purports to meet
the requirements of Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act
and is used in connection with an offering of securities subject
to Rule 415, will be filed as a part of an amendment to the
registration statement and will not be used until such amendment
has become effective, and that for the purpose of determining
liabilities under the Securities Act, each such post-effective
amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement
relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of
such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial
bona fide offering thereof.
(7) To respond to requests for information that is
incorporated by reference into the prospectus pursuant to
Items 4, 10(b), 11 or 13 of
Form S-4,
within one business day of receipt of such request, and to send
the incorporated documents by first class mail or other equally
prompt means. This includes information contained in documents
filed subsequent to the effective date of the registration
statement through the date of responding to the request.
(8) To supply by means of a post-effective amendment all
information concerning a transaction, and the company being
acquired involved therein, that was not the subject of and
included in the registration statement when it became effective.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and
controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing
provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that
in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such
indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the
Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event
that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other
than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid
by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant
in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is
asserted by such director, officer, or controlling person in
connection with the securities being registered, the registrant
will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been
settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of
appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in
the Securities Act and will be governed by the final
adjudication of such issue.
[Remainder
of Page Intentionally Left Blank]
II-3
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, The
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. has duly caused this
registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the city of
Pittsburgh, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, on February 6,
2008.
THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
Name: James E. Rohr
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, this registration statement has been signed by the
following persons in the capacities indicated on
February 6, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James
E. Rohr
James
E. Rohr
|
|
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard
J. Johnson
Richard
J. Johnson
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ Samuel
R. Patterson
Samuel
R. Patterson
|
|
Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
*
Richard
O. Berndt
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
Charles
E. Bunch
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
Paul
W. Chellgren
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
Robert
N. Clay
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
George
A. Davidson, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
Kay
Coles James
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
Richard
B. Kelson
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
Bruce
C. Lindsay
|
|
Director
|
II-4
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
|
|
|
*
Anthony
A. Massaro
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
Jane
G. Pepper
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
Donald
J. Shepard
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
Lorene
K. Steffes
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
Dennis
F. Strigl
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
Stephen
G. Thieke
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
Thomas
J. Usher
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
George
H. Walls, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
Helge
H. Wehmeier
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*By:
|
/s/ George
P. Long, III
|
|
George P. Long, III
Attorney-in-Fact
II-5
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 19, 2007, by
and between The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. and Sterling
Financial Corporation (included in Part I as Annex B
to the document included in this Registration Statement)
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Registrant, as
in effect on the date hereof, incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 3.4 of Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2007
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Registrant, as in effect on the
date hereof, incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 3.5 of the Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2005
|
|
5
|
.1
|
|
Opinion of George P. Long, as to the validity of the shares of
PNC common stock*
|
|
8
|
.1
|
|
Opinion of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP as to tax matters*
|
|
8
|
.2
|
|
Opinion of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz as to tax
matters*
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of George P. Long (included in Exhibit 5.1 to this
Registration Statement)
|
|
23
|
.2
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
|
|
23
|
.3
|
|
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, former Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm of The PNC Financial Services
Group, Inc.
|
|
23
|
.4
|
|
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm of BlackRock, Inc.
|
|
23
|
.5
|
|
Consent of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP (included in
Exhibit 8.1 to this Registration Statement)
|
|
23
|
.6
|
|
Consent of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz (included in
Exhibit 8.2 to this Registration Statement)
|
|
24
|
.1
|
|
Powers of Attorney
|
|
99
|
.1
|
|
Form of Proxy Card for Special Meeting of Shareholders of
Sterling Financial Corporation*
|
|
99
|
.2
|
|
Consent of Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
To be filed by amendment. |