F.N.B. Corporation 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission
file number 001-31940
F.N.B. CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Florida
|
|
25-1255406 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
One F.N.B. Boulevard, Hermitage, PA
|
|
16148 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: 724-981-6000
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding at April 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value
|
|
86,001,843 Shares |
F.N.B. CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
March 31, 2008
INDEX
1
F.N.B. CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
Dollars in thousands, except par value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
108,517 |
|
|
$ |
130,235 |
|
Interest bearing deposits with banks |
|
|
1,266 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
387,936 |
|
|
|
358,421 |
|
Securities held to maturity (fair value of $631,224 and $665,914) |
|
|
626,946 |
|
|
|
667,553 |
|
Mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
9,038 |
|
|
|
5,637 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income of $24,259 and $25,747 |
|
|
4,440,037 |
|
|
|
4,344,235 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(53,396 |
) |
|
|
(52,806 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loans |
|
|
4,386,641 |
|
|
|
4,291,429 |
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
80,922 |
|
|
|
80,472 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
242,120 |
|
|
|
242,120 |
|
Core deposit and other intangible assets, net |
|
|
18,364 |
|
|
|
19,439 |
|
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
135,075 |
|
|
|
133,885 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
167,765 |
|
|
|
158,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
6,164,590 |
|
|
$ |
6,088,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing demand |
|
$ |
634,831 |
|
|
$ |
626,141 |
|
Savings and NOW |
|
|
2,058,147 |
|
|
|
2,037,160 |
|
Certificates and other time deposits |
|
|
1,743,676 |
|
|
|
1,734,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deposits |
|
|
4,436,654 |
|
|
|
4,397,684 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
71,248 |
|
|
|
63,760 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
465,590 |
|
|
|
449,823 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
496,445 |
|
|
|
481,366 |
|
Junior subordinated debt owed to unconsolidated subsidiary trusts |
|
|
151,031 |
|
|
|
151,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
5,620,968 |
|
|
|
5,543,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $0.01 par value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized - 500,000,000 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued - 60,689,537 and 60,602,218 shares |
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
602 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
509,593 |
|
|
|
508,891 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
43,727 |
|
|
|
42,426 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
(9,007 |
) |
|
|
(6,738 |
) |
Treasury stock 75,835 and 47,970 shares at cost |
|
|
(1,294 |
) |
|
|
(824 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
|
543,622 |
|
|
|
544,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
6,164,590 |
|
|
$ |
6,088,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
2
F.N.B. CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Dollars in thousands, except per share data
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Interest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including fees |
|
$ |
76,409 |
|
|
$ |
77,925 |
|
Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
10,430 |
|
|
|
11,009 |
|
Nontaxable |
|
|
1,606 |
|
|
|
1,380 |
|
Dividends |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
Other |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Interest Income |
|
|
88,525 |
|
|
|
90,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
27,592 |
|
|
|
30,246 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
4,007 |
|
|
|
4,728 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
5,222 |
|
|
|
4,880 |
|
Junior subordinated debt owed to
unconsolidated subsidiary trusts |
|
|
2,739 |
|
|
|
2,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Interest Expense |
|
|
39,560 |
|
|
|
42,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income |
|
|
48,965 |
|
|
|
47,920 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
3,583 |
|
|
|
1,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income After Provision
for Loan Losses |
|
|
45,382 |
|
|
|
46,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Interest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges |
|
|
10,186 |
|
|
|
9,618 |
|
Insurance commissions and fees |
|
|
3,922 |
|
|
|
4,419 |
|
Securities commissions and fees |
|
|
1,520 |
|
|
|
1,276 |
|
Trust fees |
|
|
2,224 |
|
|
|
2,162 |
|
Gain on sale of securities |
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
740 |
|
Gain on sale of mortgage loans |
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
1,144 |
|
|
|
965 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,977 |
|
|
|
1,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Interest Income |
|
|
22,168 |
|
|
|
20,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Interest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
25,256 |
|
|
|
22,266 |
|
Net occupancy |
|
|
3,816 |
|
|
|
3,804 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
3,115 |
|
|
|
3,361 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
1,073 |
|
|
|
1,103 |
|
Other |
|
|
11,103 |
|
|
|
11,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Interest Expense |
|
|
44,363 |
|
|
|
41,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Income Taxes |
|
|
23,187 |
|
|
|
25,093 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
6,696 |
|
|
|
7,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
16,491 |
|
|
$ |
17,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income per Common Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Dividends per Common Share |
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
0.235 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
3
F.N.B. CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Dollars in thousands
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compre- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compre- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
hensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hensive |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at January 1, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
602 |
|
|
$ |
508,891 |
|
|
$ |
42,426 |
|
|
$ |
(6,738 |
) |
|
$ |
(824 |
) |
|
$ |
544,357 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
16,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,491 |
|
Change in other comprehensive
(loss) |
|
|
(2,269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
14,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $0.24/share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,584 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,584 |
) |
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(470 |
) |
|
|
(286 |
) |
Restricted stock compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
626 |
|
Tax benefit of stock-based
compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107 |
) |
Adjustment to initially apply
EITF 06-04 and 06-10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(606 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(606 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
603 |
|
|
$ |
509,593 |
|
|
$ |
43,727 |
|
|
$ |
(9,007 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,294 |
) |
|
$ |
543,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
601 |
|
|
$ |
506,024 |
|
|
$ |
33,321 |
|
|
$ |
(1,546 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,028 |
) |
|
$ |
537,372 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
17,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,370 |
|
Change in other comprehensive
(loss) |
|
|
(1,454 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,454 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,454 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
15,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $0.235/share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,193 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,193 |
) |
Purchase of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,665 |
) |
|
|
(3,665 |
) |
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(203 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,638 |
|
|
|
3,393 |
|
Restricted stock compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
340 |
|
Tax benefit of stock-based
compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting for uncertainties
in income taxes (FIN 48 -
see
the Income Taxes note) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,174 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,174 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
602 |
|
|
$ |
506,624 |
|
|
$ |
35,121 |
|
|
$ |
(3,000 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,055 |
) |
|
$ |
538,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
4
F.N.B. CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Dollars in thousands
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
16,491 |
|
|
$ |
17,370 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, amortization and accretion |
|
|
3,439 |
|
|
|
3,895 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
3,583 |
|
|
|
1,847 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
(360 |
) |
|
|
3,241 |
|
Gain on sale of securities |
|
|
(744 |
) |
|
|
(740 |
) |
Tax benefit of stock-based compensation |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
(303 |
) |
Net change in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest receivable |
|
|
522 |
|
|
|
(249 |
) |
Interest payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(554 |
) |
Mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
(3,401 |
) |
|
|
572 |
|
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
(1,190 |
) |
|
|
(1,026 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
1,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by operating activities |
|
|
18,435 |
|
|
|
26,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits with banks |
|
|
(784 |
) |
|
|
947 |
|
Loans |
|
|
(100,323 |
) |
|
|
(9,290 |
) |
Securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
(92,879 |
) |
|
|
(110,683 |
) |
Sales |
|
|
799 |
|
|
|
2,145 |
|
Maturities |
|
|
60,255 |
|
|
|
88,205 |
|
Securities held to maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,980 |
) |
Maturities |
|
|
40,506 |
|
|
|
35,075 |
|
Increase in premises and equipment |
|
|
(2,509 |
) |
|
|
(545 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows used in investing activities |
|
|
(94,935 |
) |
|
|
(14,126 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits, savings and NOW accounts |
|
|
29,677 |
|
|
|
33,927 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
9,293 |
|
|
|
(11,740 |
) |
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
15,767 |
|
|
|
348 |
|
Increase in long-term debt |
|
|
57,110 |
|
|
|
27,381 |
|
Decrease in long-term debt |
|
|
(42,031 |
) |
|
|
(46,595 |
) |
Purchase of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,665 |
) |
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
(342 |
) |
|
|
2,000 |
|
Tax benefit of stock-based compensation |
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
303 |
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(14,584 |
) |
|
|
(14,193 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
54,782 |
|
|
|
(12,234 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Decrease in Cash and Due from Banks |
|
|
(21,718 |
) |
|
|
(311 |
) |
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period |
|
|
130,235 |
|
|
|
122,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Due from Banks at End of Period |
|
$ |
108,517 |
|
|
$ |
122,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
5
F.N.B. CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
March 31, 2008
BUSINESS
F.N.B. Corporation (the Corporation) is a diversified financial services company headquartered
in Hermitage, Pennsylvania. Its primary businesses include community banking, consumer finance,
wealth management and insurance. The Corporation operates its community banking business through a
full service branch network in Pennsylvania and Ohio and loan production offices in Pennsylvania,
Ohio, Florida and Tennessee. The Corporation operates its wealth management and insurance
businesses within the existing branch network. It also conducts selected consumer finance business
in Pennsylvania, Ohio and Tennessee.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The Corporations accompanying consolidated financial statements include subsidiaries in which
the Corporation has a controlling financial interest. Companies in which the Corporation controls
operating and financing decisions (principally defined as owning a voting or economic interest
greater than 50%) are also consolidated. Variable interest entities are consolidated if the
Corporation is exposed to the majority of the variable interest entitys expected losses and/or
residual returns (i.e., the Corporation is considered to be the primary beneficiary). The
Corporation owns and operates First National Bank of Pennsylvania (FNBPA), First National Trust
Company, First National Investment Services Company, LLC, F.N.B. Investment Advisors, Inc., First
National Insurance Agency, LLC, Regency Finance Company and F.N.B. Capital Corporation, LLC, and
results for each of these entities are included in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include all adjustments that are necessary,
in the opinion of management, to fairly reflect the Corporations financial position and results of
operations. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. Certain
prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
Certain information and note disclosures normally included in consolidated financial
statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) have
been condensed or omitted pursuant to rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (Commission). The interim operating results are not necessarily indicative of operating
results for the full year. These interim consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, included in the
Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Commission on February 29, 2008.
USE OF ESTIMATES
The accounting and reporting policies of the Corporation conform with GAAP. The preparation
of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. Material
estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant changes include the allowance for loan
losses, securities valuation, goodwill and other intangible assets and income taxes.
MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS
On April 1, 2008, the Corporation completed its acquisition of Omega Financial Corporation
(Omega), a diversified financial services company with $1.8 billion in assets based in State
College, Pennsylvania. The all-stock transaction, valued at approximately $393.0 million, resulted
in the Corporation issuing 25,362,525 shares of its common stock in exchange for 12,544,150 shares
of Omega common stock. As of March 31, 2008, Omega had total loans and deposits of $1.1 billion
and $1.3 billion, respectively. Omegas banking subsidiary, Omega Bank, was merged into FNBPA on
April 1, 2008.
6
Pending Acquisition
On February 15, 2008, the Corporation announced the signing of a definitive merger agreement
to acquire Iron and Glass Bancorp, Inc. (IRGB), a bank holding company with approximately $300.0
million in assets based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The transaction is valued at approximately
$86.1 million. Under the terms of the merger agreement, IRGB shareholders will be entitled to
receive either $75.00 cash or 5.00 shares of F.N.B. Corporation common stock, or a combination of
cash and shares, for each share of IRGB common stock, subject to a proration of 45% cash and 55%
stock, if either cash or stock is oversubscribed. The transaction is expected to be completed in
the third quarter of 2008, pending regulatory approvals, the approval of shareholders of IRGB and
the satisfaction of other closing conditions.
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
In March 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Financial Accounting
Standards Board Statement (FAS) 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133, which enhances disclosures about derivatives
and hedging activities and thereby improves the transparency of financial reporting. FAS 161 is
effective for the Corporation on January 1, 2009. The Corporation has not yet determined the
impact that the adoption of FAS 161 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
Business Combinations
In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS 141R, Business Combinations, which establishes
principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements
the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any non-controlling interest in the
acquiree and the goodwill acquired. FAS 141R also establishes disclosure requirements which will
enable users to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. FAS 141R is
effective for the Corporation for acquisitions made after January 1, 2009. The Corporation has not
yet determined the impact that the adoption of FAS 141R will have on its consolidated financial
statements.
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements
In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements, an Amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 51. FAS 160 establishes
accounting and reporting standards for ownership interest in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. FAS 160 is effective for the Corporation on January 1, 2009.
Earlier adoption is prohibited. The Corporation has not yet determined the impact that the
adoption of FAS 160 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards
In June 2007, the FASB ratified the consensus reached in Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
06-11, Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards. EITF 06-11
applies to companies that have share-based payment arrangements that entitle employees to receive
dividends or dividend equivalents on equity-classified nonvested shares when those dividends or
dividend equivalents are charged to retained earnings and result in an income tax deduction.
Companies that have share-based payment arrangements that fall within the scope of EITF 06-11 will
be required to increase capital surplus for any realized income tax benefit associated with
dividend or dividend equivalents paid to employees for equity classified nonvested equity awards.
Any increase recorded to capital surplus is required to be included in a companys pool of excess
tax benefits that are available to absorb potential future tax deficiencies on share-based payment
awards. The application of this guidance did not impact the Corporations consolidated financial
statements since dividends accrued on its unvested awards are subject to forfeiture.
Accounting for Collateral Assignment Split Dollar Life Insurance
In March 2007, the FASB ratified EITF 06-10, Accounting for Collateral Assignment Split Dollar
Life Insurance. EITF 06-10 concludes that an employer should recognize a liability for the
postretirement benefit related to a collateral assignment split dollar life insurance arrangement
in accordance with either FAS 106, Employers Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than
Pensions, or APB Opinion No. 12, Ominbus Opinion 1967, if the employer has agreed to maintain a
life insurance policy during the employees retirement or to provide the employee
7
with a death benefit based on the substantive arrangement with the employee. EITF 06-10 also
concludes that an employer should recognize and measure an asset based on the nature and substance
of the collateral assignment split dollar life insurance arrangement. The determination of the
nature and substance of the arrangement should involve an evaluation of all available information,
including an assessment of the future cash flows to which the employer is entitled and the
employees obligation and ability to repay the employer. The Corporation adopted EITF 06-10 on
January 1, 2008 resulting in a decrease of $0.7 million in retained earnings and an increase of
$0.7 million in accrued bank owned life insurance.
Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split Dollar
Life Insurance Arrangements
In September 2006, the FASB ratified EITF 06-04, Accounting for Deferred Compensation and
Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements. EITF 06-04
concludes that an employer should recognize a liability for the future benefits related to an
endorsement split dollar life insurance arrangement in accordance with either FAS 106 or APB
Opinion No. 12, Ominbus Opinion 1967. The Corporation adopted EITF 06-04 on January 1, 2008
resulting in an increase of $0.1 million in retained earnings and a decrease of $0.1 million in
accrued bank owned life insurance.
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
In February 2007, the FASB issued FAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities, which allows companies to report certain financial assets and liabilities at
fair value with the changes in fair value included in earnings. In general, a company may elect
the fair value option for an eligible financial asset or financial liability when it first
recognizes the instrument on its balance sheet or enters into an eligible firm commitment. A
company may also elect the fair value option for eligible items that exist on the effective date of
FAS 159. A companys decision to elect the fair value option for an eligible item is irrevocable.
The Corporation was required to apply the new guidance prospectively beginning January 1, 2008.
The Corporation did not elect the fair value option for eligible financial assets or financial
liabilities upon adoption.
Fair Value Measurements
In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS 157, Fair Value Measurements, which replaces the
different definitions of fair value in existing accounting literature with a single definition,
sets out a framework for measuring fair value and requires additional disclosures about fair value
measurements. The statement clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the
assumptions market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability and establishes a
fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions. The
Corporation adopted the provisions of FAS 157 on January 1, 2008. For additional information
regarding FAS 157, see the Fair Value Measurements footnote included in this Report.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) 157-2, which delays the effective
date of FAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least
annually). The provisions of FSP 157-2 are effective for the Corporation on January 1, 2009.
SECURITIES
Following is a summary of the fair value of securities available for sale (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agencies and corporations |
|
$ |
153,762 |
|
|
$ |
162,839 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities of U.S. government agencies |
|
|
115,406 |
|
|
|
72,267 |
|
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions |
|
|
72,236 |
|
|
|
71,490 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
39,389 |
|
|
|
46,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities |
|
|
380,793 |
|
|
|
352,803 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
7,143 |
|
|
|
5,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
387,936 |
|
|
$ |
358,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
Following is a summary of the amortized cost of securities held to maturity (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agencies and corporations |
|
$ |
1,007 |
|
|
$ |
11,004 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities of U.S. government agencies |
|
|
520,056 |
|
|
|
547,046 |
|
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions |
|
|
98,822 |
|
|
|
102,179 |
|
Corporate and other debt securities |
|
|
7,061 |
|
|
|
7,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
626,946 |
|
|
$ |
667,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation sold $0.1 million of equity securities at a gain of less than $0.1 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2008 and sold $2.1 million of equity securities at a gain of $0.6
million for the three months ended March 31, 2007. Additionally, the Corporation recognized a
one-time gain of $0.7 million relating to the VISA, Inc. initial public offering during the three
months ended March 31, 2008. The Corporation also recognized a gain of $0.1 million relating to
$6.1 million of called securities during the three months ended March 31, 2007. None of the
security sales or calls were at a loss.
Securities are periodically reviewed for other-than-temporary impairment based upon a number
of factors, including, but not limited to, the length of time and extent to which the market value
has been less than cost, the financial condition of the underlying issuer, the ability of the
issuer to meet contractual obligations, the likelihood of the securitys ability to recover any
decline in its market value and managements intent and ability to retain the security for a period
of time sufficient to allow for a recovery in market value or maturity. Among the factors that are
considered in determining managements intent and ability is a review of the Corporations capital
adequacy, interest rate risk position and liquidity. The assessment of a securitys ability to
recover any decline in market value, the ability of the issuer to meet contractual obligations and
managements intent and ability require considerable judgment. A decline in value that is
considered to be other-than-temporary is recorded as a loss within non-interest income in the
consolidated statement of income.
Following are summaries of the age of unrealized losses and the associated fair value (in
thousands):
Securities available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months |
|
|
Greater than 12 Months |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities of U.S.
government agencies |
|
$ |
10,438 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,438 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
States of the U.S. and political
subdivisions |
|
|
9,256 |
|
|
|
(173 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,256 |
|
|
|
(173 |
) |
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
36,536 |
|
|
|
(9,861 |
) |
|
|
2,853 |
|
|
|
(1,161 |
) |
|
|
39,389 |
|
|
|
(11,022 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
1,419 |
|
|
|
(431 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,419 |
|
|
|
(431 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
57,649 |
|
|
$ |
(10,465 |
) |
|
$ |
2,853 |
|
|
$ |
(1,161 |
) |
|
$ |
60,502 |
|
|
$ |
(11,626 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months |
|
|
Greater than 12 Months |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities of U.S.
government agencies |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14,673 |
|
|
$ |
(138 |
) |
|
$ |
14,673 |
|
|
$ |
(138 |
) |
States of the U.S. and political
subdivisions |
|
|
23,806 |
|
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
11,934 |
|
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
35,740 |
|
|
|
(355 |
) |
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
34,407 |
|
|
|
(3,879 |
) |
|
|
3,568 |
|
|
|
(451 |
) |
|
|
37,975 |
|
|
|
(4,330 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
(302 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
(312 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
58,849 |
|
|
$ |
(4,336 |
) |
|
$ |
30,188 |
|
|
$ |
(799 |
) |
|
$ |
89,037 |
|
|
$ |
(5,135 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
Securities held to maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months |
|
|
Greater than 12 Months |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities of U.S.
government agencies |
|
$ |
67,322 |
|
|
$ |
(3,677 |
) |
|
$ |
12,917 |
|
|
$ |
(1,002 |
) |
|
$ |
80,239 |
|
|
$ |
(4,679 |
) |
States of the U.S. and political
subdivisions |
|
|
4,099 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
4,139 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
4,929 |
|
|
|
(335 |
) |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,029 |
|
|
|
(335 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
76,350 |
|
|
$ |
(4,025 |
) |
|
$ |
13,057 |
|
|
$ |
(1,003 |
) |
|
$ |
89,407 |
|
|
$ |
(5,028 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months |
|
|
Greater than 12 Months |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities of U.S.
government agencies |
|
$ |
47,051 |
|
|
$ |
(432 |
) |
|
$ |
280,433 |
|
|
$ |
(3,433 |
) |
|
$ |
327,484 |
|
|
$ |
(3,865 |
) |
States of the U.S. and political
subdivisions |
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,206 |
|
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
38,236 |
|
|
|
(134 |
) |
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
5,726 |
|
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,846 |
|
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
53,807 |
|
|
$ |
(533 |
) |
|
$ |
317,759 |
|
|
$ |
(3,567 |
) |
|
$ |
371,566 |
|
|
$ |
(4,100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2008, securities with unrealized losses for less than 12 months include 11
investments in mortgage-backed securities of U.S. government agencies, 18 investments in states of
the U.S. and political subdivision securities, 24 investments in corporate debt securities and 14
investments in equity securities. As of March 31, 2008, securities with unrealized losses of
greater than 12 months include 3 investments in mortgage-backed securities of U.S. government
agencies, 1 investment in states of the U.S. and political subdivision securities and 3 investments
in corporate debt securities. The Corporation has concluded that it has both the intent and
ability to hold these securities for the time necessary to recover the amortized cost or until
maturity.
As of March 31, 2008, management does not believe any unrealized loss individually or in the
aggregate represents an other-than-temporary impairment. The unrealized losses at March 31, 2008
were primarily the result of changes in interest rates.
BORROWINGS
Following is a summary of short-term borrowings (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Securities sold under repurchase agreements |
|
$ |
292,244 |
|
|
$ |
276,552 |
|
Federal funds purchased |
|
|
57,800 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
115,299 |
|
|
|
112,779 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
465,590 |
|
|
$ |
449,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
Following is a summary of long-term debt (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
$ |
439,029 |
|
|
$ |
427,099 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
56,555 |
|
|
|
53,404 |
|
Convertible debt |
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
658 |
|
Other long-term debt |
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
496,445 |
|
|
$ |
481,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporations banking affiliate has available credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank
(FHLB) of $1.7 billion, of which $439.0 million was used as of March 31, 2008. These advances are
secured by loans collateralized by 1-4 family mortgages and FHLB stock and are scheduled to mature
in various amounts periodically through the year 2012. Effective interest rates paid on these
advances range from 2.12% to 5.75% for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2.79% to 5.75% for
the year ended December 31, 2007. Additionally, the Corporations banking affiliate has a $25.0
million letter of credit from the FHLB, which was in use as of March 31, 2008.
JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBT OWED TO UNCONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARY TRUSTS
The Corporation has two unconsolidated subsidiary trusts (collectively, the Trusts), F.N.B.
Statutory Trust I (Statutory Trust I) and F.N.B. Statutory Trust II (Statutory Trust II), of which
100% of the common equity of each is owned by the Corporation. The Trusts are not consolidated
because the Corporation is not the primary beneficiary, as evaluated under FAS Interpretation (FIN)
46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51. The Trusts were
formed for the purpose of issuing Corporation-obligated mandatorily redeemable capital securities
(trust preferred securities) to third-party investors. The proceeds from the sale of trust
preferred securities and the issuance of common equity by the Trusts were invested in junior
subordinated debt securities (subordinated debt) issued by the Corporation, which are the sole
assets of each Trust. The Trusts pay dividends on the trust preferred securities at the same rate
as the distributions paid by the Corporation on the junior subordinated debt held by the Trusts.
Distributions on the subordinated debt issued to the Trusts are recorded as interest expense
by the Corporation. The trust preferred securities are subject to mandatory redemption, in whole
or in part, upon repayment of the subordinated debt. The subordinated debt, net of the
Corporations investment in the Trusts, qualifies as Tier 1 capital under the Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System guidelines. The Corporation has entered into agreements which, when
taken collectively, fully and unconditionally guarantee the obligations under the trust preferred
securities subject to the terms of each of the guarantees.
The following table provides information relating to the Trusts as of March 31, 2008 (dollars
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statutory |
|
Statutory |
|
|
Trust I |
|
Trust II |
Trust preferred securities |
|
$ |
125,000 |
|
|
$ |
21,500 |
|
Common securities |
|
|
3,866 |
|
|
|
665 |
|
Junior subordinated debt |
|
|
128,866 |
|
|
|
22,665 |
|
Stated maturity date |
|
|
3/31/33 |
|
|
|
6/15/36 |
|
Optional redemption date |
|
|
3/31/08 |
|
|
|
6/15/11 |
|
Interest rate |
|
|
8.08 |
% |
|
|
7.17 |
% |
|
variable; |
fixed until 6/15/11; |
|
LIBOR plus |
then LIBOR plus |
|
325 basis points |
165 basis points |
INTEREST RATE SWAPS
In February 2005, the Corporation entered into an interest rate swap with a notional
amount of $125.0 million, whereby it paid a fixed rate of interest and received a variable rate
based on the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (LIBOR). The effective date of the swap was January 3,
2006 and the maturity date of the swap was March 31, 2008. The interest rate swap was a designated
cash flow hedge designed to convert the variable interest rate to a fixed rate on
11
$125.0 million of subordinated debentures. The swap was considered to be highly effective and
assessment of the hedging relationship was evaluated under Derivative Implementation Group Issue
No. G7 using the hypothetical derivative method.
The Corporations interest rate swap program for commercial loans provides the customer with
fixed rate loans while creating a variable rate asset for the Corporation. The notional amount of
swaps under this program totalled $98.2 million as of March 31, 2008.
COMMITMENTS, CREDIT RISK AND CONTINGENCIES
The Corporation has commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit that
involve certain elements of credit risk in excess of the amount stated in the consolidated balance
sheet. The Corporations exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the customer
is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The credit risk associated with
loan commitments and standby letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in
extending loans to customers and is subject to normal credit policies. Since many of these
commitments expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily
represent future cash flow requirements.
Following is a summary of off-balance sheet credit risk information (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Commitments to extend credit |
|
$ |
987,602 |
|
|
$ |
938,277 |
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
|
62,481 |
|
|
|
76,708 |
|
At March 31, 2008, funding of approximately 74.4% of the commitments to extend credit was
dependent on the financial condition of the customer. The Corporation has the ability to withdraw
such commitments at its discretion. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other
termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Based on managements credit evaluation of
the customer, collateral may be deemed necessary. Collateral requirements vary and may include
accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment and income-producing commercial
properties.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Corporation that may
require payment at a future date. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is
essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. The obligations are not
recorded in the Corporations consolidated financial statements. The Corporations exposure to
credit loss in the event the customer does not satisfy the terms of the agreement equals the
notional amount of the obligation less the value of any collateral.
The Corporation and its subsidiaries are involved in various pending and threatened legal
proceedings in which claims for monetary damages and other relief are asserted. These actions
include claims brought against the Corporation and its subsidiaries where the Corporation acted as
one or more of the following: a depository bank, lender, underwriter, fiduciary, financial
advisor, broker or was engaged in other business activities. Although the ultimate outcome for any
asserted claim cannot be predicted with certainty, the Corporation believes that it and its
subsidiaries have valid defenses for all asserted claims. Reserves are established for legal
claims when losses associated with the claims are judged to be probable and the amount of the loss
can be reasonably estimated.
Based on information currently available, advice of counsel, available insurance coverage and
established reserves, the Corporation does not anticipate, at the present time, that the aggregate
liability, if any, arising out of such legal proceedings will have a material adverse effect on the
Corporations consolidated financial position. However, the Corporation cannot determine whether
or not any claims asserted against it will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated
results of operations in any future reporting period. It is possible, in the event of unexpected
future developments, that the ultimate resolution of these matters, if unfavorable, may be material
to the Corporations consolidated results of operations for a particular period.
12
EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average
number of shares of common stock outstanding net of unvested shares of restricted stock.
Diluted earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net income adjusted for
interest expense on convertible debt by the weighted average number of shares of common stock
outstanding, adjusted for the dilutive effect of potential common shares issuable for stock
options, warrants, restricted shares and convertible debt, as calculated using the treasury stock
method. Such adjustments to the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding are
made only when such adjustments dilute earnings per common share.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share
(dollars in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net income basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
16,491 |
|
|
$ |
17,370 |
|
Interest expense on convertible debt |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income after assumed conversion diluted earnings
per share |
|
$ |
16,497 |
|
|
$ |
17,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
60,219,800 |
|
|
|
60,105,023 |
|
Net effect of dilutive stock options, warrants,
restricted stock and convertible debt |
|
|
372,372 |
|
|
|
528,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
60,592,172 |
|
|
|
60,633,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCK INCENTIVE PLANS
Restricted Stock
The Corporation issues restricted stock awards, consisting of both restricted stock and
restricted stock units, to key employees under its Incentive Compensation Plans (Plans). The grant
date fair value of the restricted stock awards is equal to the price of the Corporations common
stock on the grant date. For the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Corporation issued 245,255
restricted stock awards with a weighted average grant date fair value of $3.3 million. The
Corporation did not issue any restricted stock awards for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
The Corporation has available up to 2,992,790 shares of common stock to issue under these Plans.
Under the Plans, more than half of the restricted stock awards granted to management are
earned if the Corporation meets or exceeds certain financial performance results when compared to
its peers. These performance-related awards are expensed ratably from the date that the likelihood
of meeting the performance measure is probable through the end of a four-year vesting period. The
service-based awards are expensed ratably over a three-year vesting period. The Corporation also
issues discretionary service-based awards to certain employees that vest over five years.
The unvested restricted stock awards are eligible to receive cash dividends which are
ultimately used to purchase additional shares of stock. Any additional shares of stock ultimately
received as a result of cash dividends are subject to forfeiture if the requisite service period is
not completed or the specified performance criteria are not met. These awards are subject to
certain accelerated vesting provisions upon retirement, death, disability or in the event of a
change of control as defined in the award agreements.
Share-based compensation expense related to restricted stock awards was $0.6 million and $0.3
million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, the tax benefit of which was $0.2
million and $0.1 million, respectively.
13
The following table summarizes certain information concerning restricted stock awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant |
|
|
|
|
|
Grant |
|
|
Awards |
|
Price |
|
Awards |
|
Price |
Unvested awards outstanding at beginning of
period |
|
|
387,064 |
|
|
$ |
17.59 |
|
|
|
302,264 |
|
|
$ |
18.54 |
|
Granted |
|
|
245,255 |
|
|
|
13.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(96,707 |
) |
|
|
18.79 |
|
|
|
(54,448 |
) |
|
|
18.56 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(374 |
) |
|
|
18.24 |
|
|
|
(442 |
) |
|
|
16.91 |
|
Dividend reinvestment |
|
|
8,426 |
|
|
|
15.24 |
|
|
|
3,452 |
|
|
|
16.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested awards outstanding at end of period |
|
|
543,664 |
|
|
|
15.50 |
|
|
|
250,826 |
|
|
|
18.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total fair value of awards vested was $1.3 million and $1.0 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
As of March 31, 2008, there was $5.6 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to
unvested restricted stock awards granted including $0.6 million that is subject to accelerated
vesting under the plans immediate vesting upon retirement provision for awards granted prior to
the adoption of FAS 123R, Share-Based Payment, on January 1, 2006. The components of the
restricted stock awards as of March 31, 2008 are as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service- |
|
Performance- |
|
|
|
|
Based |
|
Based |
|
|
|
|
Awards |
|
Awards |
|
Total |
Unvested awards |
|
|
212,210 |
|
|
|
331,454 |
|
|
|
543,664 |
|
Unrecognized compensation expense |
|
$ |
2,019 |
|
|
$ |
3,595 |
|
|
$ |
5,614 |
|
Intrinsic value |
|
$ |
3,313 |
|
|
$ |
5,174 |
|
|
$ |
8,487 |
|
Weighted average remaining life (in years) |
|
|
2.49 |
|
|
|
2.91 |
|
|
|
2.74 |
|
Stock Options
There were no stock options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2008 or 2007. All
outstanding stock options were granted at prices equal to the fair market value at the date of the
grant, are primarily exercisable within ten years from the date of the grant and were fully vested
as of January 1, 2006. The Corporation issues shares of treasury stock or authorized but unissued
shares to satisfy stock option exercises. Shares issued upon the exercise of stock options were
5,257 and 128,981 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The following table summarizes certain information concerning stock option awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Shares |
|
Price |
|
Shares |
|
Price |
Options outstanding at beginning of period |
|
|
1,139,845 |
|
|
$ |
11.75 |
|
|
|
1,450,225 |
|
|
$ |
11.69 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(5,258 |
) |
|
|
12.90 |
|
|
|
(134,814 |
) |
|
|
11.72 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(25,423 |
) |
|
|
13.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding and exercisable at
end of period |
|
|
1,109,164 |
|
|
|
11.70 |
|
|
|
1,315,411 |
|
|
|
11.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The intrinsic value of outstanding and exercisable stock options at March 31, 2008 was $3.5
million.
14
Warrants
The Corporation assumed warrants to issue 123,394 shares of common stock at an exercise price
of $10.00 in conjunction with a previous acquisition. Such warrants are exercisable and will
expire on various dates in 2009. The Corporation has reserved shares of common stock for issuance
in the event these warrants are exercised. As of March 31, 2008, warrants to purchase 55,919
shares of common stock remain outstanding.
RETIREMENT AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
The Corporation sponsors the F.N.B. Corporation Retirement Income Plan (RIP), a qualified
noncontributory defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all salaried employees hired
prior to January 1, 2008. The RIP covers employees who satisfy minimum age and length of service
requirements. During 2006, the Corporation amended the RIP such that effective January 1, 2007,
benefits are earned based on the employees compensation each year. The plan amendment resulted in
a remeasurement that produced a net unrecognized service credit of $14.0 million, which is being
amortized over the average period of future service of active employees of 13.5 years. Benefits of
the RIP for service provided prior to December 31, 2006 are generally based on years of service and
the employees highest compensation for five consecutive years during their last ten years of
employment. During 2007, the Corporation amended the RIP such that it is closed to new
participants who commence employment with the Corporation on or after January 1, 2008. The
Corporations funding guideline has been to make annual contributions to the RIP each year, if
necessary, such that minimum funding requirements have been met. Based on the funded status of the
plan, the Corporation does not expect to make a contribution to the RIP in 2008.
The Corporation also sponsors two supplemental non-qualified retirement plans. The ERISA
Excess Retirement Plan provides retirement benefits equal to the difference, if any, between the
maximum benefit allowable under the Internal Revenue Code and the amount that would be provided
under the RIP, if no limits were applied. The Basic Retirement Plan (BRP) is applicable to certain
officers who are designated by the Board of Directors. Officers participating in the BRP receive a
benefit based on a target benefit percentage based on years of service at retirement and a
designated tier as determined by the Board of Directors. When a participant retires, the basic
benefit under the BRP is a monthly benefit equal to the target benefit percentage times the
participants highest average monthly cash compensation during five consecutive calendar years
within the last ten calendar years of employment. This monthly benefit is reduced by the monthly
benefit the participant receives from Social Security, the qualified RIP, the ERISA Excess
Retirement Plan and the annuity equivalent of the two percent automatic contributions to the
qualified 401(k) defined contribution plan and the ERISA Excess Lost Match Plan.
The net periodic benefit cost for the defined benefit plans includes the following
components (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
792 |
|
|
$ |
849 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
1,648 |
|
|
|
1,544 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(2,186 |
) |
|
|
(2,143 |
) |
Amortization of unrecognized net transition asset |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
Amortization of unrecognized prior service
(credit) cost |
|
|
(273 |
) |
|
|
(272 |
) |
Amortization of unrecognized loss |
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension benefit cost |
|
$ |
142 |
|
|
$ |
170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporations subsidiaries participate in a qualified 401(k) defined contribution plan
under which eligible employees may contribute a percentage of their salary. The Corporation
matches 50 percent of an eligible employees contribution on the first 6 percent that the employee
defers. Employees are generally eligible to participate upon completing 90 days of service and
having attained age 21. As an offset to the decrease in RIP benefits, beginning with 2007, the
Corporation began making an automatic two percent contribution and may make an additional
contribution of up to two percent depending on the Corporation achieving its performance goals for
the plan year. The Corporations contribution expense was $0.9 million and $0.8 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
15
The Corporation also sponsors an ERISA Excess Lost Match Plan for certain officers. This plan
provides retirement benefits equal to the difference, if any, between the maximum benefit allowable
under the Internal Revenue Code and the amount that would have been provided under the qualified
401(k) defined contribution plan, if no limits were applied.
The Corporation sponsors a pre-Medicare eligible postretirement medical insurance plan for
retirees of certain affiliates between the ages of 62 and 65. During 2006, the Corporation amended
the plan such that only employees who are age 60 or older as of January 1, 2007 are eligible for
employer paid coverage. The postretirement plan amendment resulted in a remeasurement that
produced a net unrecognized service credit of $2.7 million, which has been amortized over the
remaining service period of eligible employees of 1.3 years and was fully recognized during 2007.
The Corporation has no plan assets attributable to this plan and funds the benefits as claims
arise. Benefit costs related to this plan are recognized in the periods in which employees provide
the service for such benefits. The Corporation reserves the right to terminate the plan or make
plan changes at any time.
The net periodic postretirement benefit cost includes the following components (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Amortization of unrecognized prior service credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(421 |
) |
Amortization of unrecognized loss |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost |
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
(374 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net periodic postretirement benefit cost increased for the three months ended March 31,
2008 compared to the same period in 2007 due to the amortization of the unrecognized service credit
resulting from the postretirement plan amendment effective January 1, 2007.
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The components of comprehensive income, net of related tax, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
16,491 |
|
|
$ |
17,370 |
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (losses) gains on securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arising during the period |
|
|
(1,581 |
) |
|
|
(421 |
) |
Less: reclassification adjustment for
gains included in net income |
|
|
(484 |
) |
|
|
(481 |
) |
Unrealized (loss) gain on swap |
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
(226 |
) |
Pension and postretirement amortization |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
(326 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(2,269 |
) |
|
|
(1,454 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
14,222 |
|
|
$ |
15,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accumulated balances related to each component of other comprehensive income (loss) are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Unrealized
(losses) gains on securities |
|
$ |
(2,686 |
) |
|
$ |
1,721 |
|
Unrealized gain on swap |
|
|
|
|
|
|
747 |
|
Unrecognized pension and postretirement obligations |
|
|
(6,321 |
) |
|
|
(5,468 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
(9,007 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Following is a summary of supplemental cash flow information (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Interest paid on deposits and other borrowings |
|
$ |
39,560 |
|
|
$ |
43,121 |
|
Income taxes paid |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers of loans to other real estate owned |
|
|
1,240 |
|
|
|
760 |
|
Transfers of other real estate owned to loans |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
BUSINESS SEGMENTS
The Corporation operates in four reportable segments: Community Banking, Wealth Management,
Insurance and Consumer Finance.
|
|
|
The Community Banking segment offers services traditionally offered by full-service
commercial banks, including commercial and individual demand, savings and time deposit
accounts and commercial, mortgage and individual installment loans. |
|
|
|
|
The Wealth Management segment provides a broad range of personal and corporate fiduciary
services including the administration of decedent and trust estates. In addition, it
offers various alternative products, including securities brokerage and investment advisory
services, mutual funds and annuities. |
|
|
|
|
The Insurance segment includes a full-service insurance agency offering all lines of
commercial and personal insurance through major carriers. The Insurance segment also
includes a reinsurer. |
|
|
|
|
The Consumer Finance segment is primarily involved in making installment loans to
individuals and purchasing installment sales finance contracts from retail merchants. The
Consumer Finance segment activity is funded through the sale of the Corporations
subordinated notes at the finance companys branch offices. |
The following tables provide financial information for these segments of the Corporation (in
thousands). The information provided under the caption Parent and Other represents operations
not considered to be reportable segments and/or general operating expenses of the Corporation, and
includes the parent company, other non-bank subsidiaries and eliminations and adjustments which are
necessary for purposes of reconciling to the consolidated amounts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community |
|
Wealth |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
Parent and |
|
|
|
|
Banking |
|
Management |
|
Insurance |
|
Finance |
|
Other |
|
Consolidated |
At or for the Three Months
Ended March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
80,668 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
105 |
|
|
$ |
7,853 |
|
|
$ |
(119 |
) |
|
$ |
88,525 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
35,523 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,509 |
|
|
|
2,526 |
|
|
|
39,560 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
45,145 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
6,344 |
|
|
|
(2,645 |
) |
|
|
48,965 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
2,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,583 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
15,492 |
|
|
|
4,005 |
|
|
|
3,362 |
|
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
(1,316 |
) |
|
|
22,168 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
34,257 |
|
|
|
3,062 |
|
|
|
2,646 |
|
|
|
3,584 |
|
|
|
(259 |
) |
|
|
43,290 |
|
Intangible amortization |
|
|
956 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,073 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
6,638 |
|
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
836 |
|
|
|
(1,375 |
) |
|
|
6,696 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
16,256 |
|
|
|
614 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
1,496 |
|
|
|
(2,327 |
) |
|
|
16,491 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
5,978,644 |
|
|
|
7,172 |
|
|
|
22,588 |
|
|
|
155,192 |
|
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
6,164,590 |
|
Total intangibles |
|
|
246,661 |
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
10,768 |
|
|
|
1,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260,484 |
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community |
|
Wealth |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
Parent and |
|
|
|
|
Banking |
|
Management |
|
Insurance |
|
Finance |
|
Other |
|
Consolidated |
At or for the Three Months
Ended March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
83,214 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
129 |
|
|
$ |
7,772 |
|
|
$ |
(664 |
) |
|
$ |
90,487 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
38,775 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,583 |
|
|
|
2,207 |
|
|
|
42,567 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
44,439 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
6,189 |
|
|
|
(2,871 |
) |
|
|
47,920 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,847 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
13,578 |
|
|
|
3,705 |
|
|
|
3,690 |
|
|
|
577 |
|
|
|
(634 |
) |
|
|
20,916 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
31,900 |
|
|
|
2,851 |
|
|
|
2,496 |
|
|
|
3,843 |
|
|
|
(297 |
) |
|
|
40,793 |
|
Intangible amortization |
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,103 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
7,478 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
(1,204 |
) |
|
|
7,723 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
16,783 |
|
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
779 |
|
|
|
1,245 |
|
|
|
(2,004 |
) |
|
|
17,370 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
5,848,147 |
|
|
|
6,611 |
|
|
|
24,980 |
|
|
|
152,598 |
|
|
|
(16,532 |
) |
|
|
6,015,804 |
|
Total intangibles |
|
|
250,979 |
|
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
|
11,213 |
|
|
|
1,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
265,272 |
|
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Corporation uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain
financial assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Securities available for
sale and derivatives are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to
time, the Corporation may be required to record at fair value other assets on a nonrecurring basis,
such as mortgage loans held for sale, certain impaired loans, other real estate owned (OREO) and
certain other assets.
Fair value is defined as an exit price, representing the price that would be received to sell
an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at
the measurement date. Fair value measurements are not adjusted for transaction costs. Fair value
is a market-based measure considered from the perspective of a market participant who holds the
asset or owes the liability rather than an entity-specific measure.
In determining fair value, the Corporation uses various valuation approaches, including
market, income and cost approaches. FAS 157 establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring
fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs
by requiring that observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that
market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data
obtained from sources independent of the Corporation. Unobservable inputs reflect
the Corporations assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing
an asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances.
The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted market prices in
active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to
unobservable inputs (level 3 measurement). The fair value hierarchy under FAS 157 is broken down
into three levels based on the reliability of inputs as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
valuation is based upon unadjusted quoted market prices for identical instruments traded in
active
markets |
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
valuation is based upon quoted market prices for similar instruments traded in active markets,
quoted market prices for identical or similar instruments traded in markets that are not
active and
model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the
market |
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value
measurement and
unobservable |
A financial instruments level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of
input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
18
Following is a description of valuation methodologies used for financial instruments recorded
at fair value on either a recurring or nonrecurring basis:
Securities Available For Sale
Securities available for sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis using a market
approach. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are
not available, fair values are obtained from an independent pricing service. The pricing service
uses a variety of techniques to arrive at fair value including market maker bids and quotes of
significantly similar securities and matrix pricing. Matrix pricing is a mathematical technique
used principally to value certain securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for
specific securities but comparing the securities to benchmark or comparable securities.
Fair values for investment securities based on quoted market prices on an active exchange are
classified as Level 1. Level 2 fair values include substantially all of the Corporations fixed
income investments. These fair values are obtained through third-party data service providers who
use alternative approaches to determine fair value when market quotes are not readily accessible or
available. Securities classified as Level 3 are not listed on any exchange, are based on
unobservable inputs and include situations where there is limited market activity.
Derivative Financial Instruments
Fair value for derivatives is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including
discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis
reflects contractual terms of the derivative, including the period to maturity and uses observable
market based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities.
To comply with the provisions of FAS 157, the Corporation incorporates credit valuation
adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own non-performance risk and the respective
counterpartys non-performance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of
its derivative contracts for the effect of non-performance risk, the Corporation has considered the
impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds,
mutual puts and guarantees.
Although the Corporation has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its
derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments
associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads
to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties. However, as of March 31,
2008, the Corporation has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation
adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit
valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives. As a
result, the Corporation has determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are
classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Mortgage Loans Held For Sale
These
loans are carried at the lower of cost or fair value. Under
lower-of-cost-or-fair value
accounting, periodically, it may be necessary to record nonrecurring fair value adjustments. Fair
value, when recorded, is based on independent quoted market prices
and is classified as Level 2.
Impaired Loans
Certain commercial and commercial real estate loans considered impaired as defined in FAS 114
are reserved for at the time the loan is identified as impaired according to the fair value of the
collateral less estimated selling costs. Collateral may be real estate and/or business assets
including equipment, inventory and accounts receivable.
The value of real estate is determined based on appraisals by qualified licensed appraisers.
The value of business assets is generally based on amounts reported on the businesss financial
statements. Appraised and reported values may be discounted based on managements historical
knowledge, changes in market conditions from the time of valuation and/or managements knowledge of
the client and the clients business. Since not all valuation inputs are observable, these
nonrecurring fair value determinations are classified as Level 2 or Level 3 based on the lowest
level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
19
Impaired loans are reviewed and evaluated on at least a quarterly basis for additional
impairment and adjusted accordingly, based on the same factors identified above.
Other Real Estate Owned
OREO is comprised of commercial and residential real estate properties obtained in partial or
total satisfaction of loan obligations. OREO acquired in settlement of indebtedness is recorded at
the lower of carrying amount of the loan or fair value less costs to sell. Subsequently, these
assets are carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value less costs to sell. Accordingly,
it may be necessary to record nonrecurring fair value adjustments. Fair value, when recorded, is
generally based upon appraisals by qualified licensed appraisers and
is classified as Level 2.
The following table presents the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on
a recurring basis as of March 31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets measured at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale |
|
$ |
5,406 |
|
|
$ |
382,334 |
|
|
$ |
196 |
|
|
$ |
387,936 |
|
Other assets (interest rate swaps) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,406 |
|
|
$ |
386,935 |
|
|
$ |
196 |
|
|
$ |
392,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities measured at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities (Interest rate swaps) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents additional information about assets measured at fair value on a
recurring basis and for which the Corporation has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
14,338 |
|
Total gains (losses) realized/unrealized: |
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
|
|
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
(1,755 |
) |
Purchases, issuances and settlements |
|
|
|
|
Transfers in and/or (out) of Level 3 |
|
|
(12,387 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
196 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation did not have any gains or losses for the three months ended March 31, 2008
included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets
still held at March 31, 2008.
The Corporation reviews fair value hierarchy classifications on a quarterly basis. Changes in
the observability of the valuation attributes may result in reclassification of certain financial
assets or liabilities. Such reclassifications are reported as transfers in/out of Level 3 at fair
value during the quarter in which the changes occur.
At March 31, 2008, there were approximately $12.4 million of trust preferred securities
transferred from Level 3 to Level 2. These securities were classified as Level 2 because all
significant assumptions in their valuation at March 31, 2008 are
now observable. Valuations at December 31, 2007 used significant
unobservable assumptions. These unobservable assumptions
reflected the Corporations own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in
pricing the securities.
20
In accordance with GAAP, from time to time, the Corporation measures certain assets at fair
value on a nonrecurring basis. These adjustments to fair value usually result from the application
of lower of cost or market accounting or write-downs of individual assets. Valuation methodologies
used to measure these fair value adjustments were previously described. For assets measured at
fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the first quarter of 2008 that were still held in the
balance sheet at March 31, 2008, the following table provides
the hierarchy level and the fair value of the related assets or portfolios (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at March 31, 2008 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
2008 |
|
Impaired loans |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
470 |
|
|
$ |
1,044 |
|
|
$ |
1,514 |
|
|
$ |
1,499 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans with a carrying amount of $2.9 million were written down to $1.4 million
through the allowance for loan losses (fair value of $1.5 million less estimated costs to sell of
$0.1 million), resulting in a loss of $1.5 million, which was included in the provision for loan
losses for the quarter ended March 31, 2008.
OREO with a carrying amount of $0.5 million were written down to $0.3 million (fair value of
$0.3 million less immaterial estimated costs to sell), resulting in a loss of $0.2 million, which
was included in earnings for the quarter ended March 31, 2008.
21
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
F.N.B. Corporation
We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of F.N.B. Corporation and subsidiaries
(F.N.B. Corporation) as of March 31, 2008, and the related condensed consolidated statements of
income, stockholders equity and cash flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2008 and
2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of F.N.B. Corporations management.
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying
analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the
expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do
not express such an opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the
condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of F.N.B. Corporation as of
December 31, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity, and
cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein) and in our report dated February 26,
2008, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our
opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2007, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated
balance sheet from which it has been derived.
/s/Ernst & Young LLP
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
May 7, 2008
22
PART I.
ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Managements discussion and analysis represents an overview of the consolidated results of
operations and financial condition of the Corporation and highlights material changes to the
financial condition and results of operations at and for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto. Results of operations for the periods included in this review are
not necessarily indicative of results to be obtained during any future period.
IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements in this report are forward-looking within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which statements generally can be identified by the use
of forward-looking terminology, such as may, will, expect, estimate, anticipate,
believe, target, plan, project or continue or the negatives thereof or other variations
thereon or similar terminology, and are made on the basis of managements current plans and
analyses of the Corporation, its business and the industry as a whole. These forward-looking
statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, economic
conditions, competition, interest rate sensitivity and exposure to regulatory and legislative
changes. The above factors in some cases have affected, and in the future could affect, the
Corporations financial performance and could cause actual results to differ materially from those
expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements. The Corporation does not undertake to
publicly update or revise its forward-looking statements even if experience or future changes make
it clear that any projected results expressed or implied therein will not be realized.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A description of the Corporations critical accounting policies is included in the
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of
the Corporations 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K under the heading Application of Critical
Accounting Policies. There have been no significant changes in critical accounting policies since
the year ended December 31, 2007.
OVERVIEW
The Corporation is a diversified financial services company headquartered in Hermitage,
Pennsylvania. Its primary businesses include community banking, consumer finance, wealth
management and insurance. The Corporation operates its community banking business through a full
service branch network in Pennsylvania and Ohio and loan production offices in Pennsylvania, Ohio,
Florida and Tennessee. The Corporation operates its wealth management and insurance businesses
within the existing branch network. It also conducts selected consumer finance business in
Pennsylvania, Ohio and Tennessee.
The Corporation owns and operates FNBPA, First National Trust Company, First National
Investment Services Company, LLC, F.N.B. Investment Advisors, Inc., First National Insurance
Agency, LLC, Regency Finance Company and F.N.B. Capital Corporation, LLC.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2007
Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2008 was $16.5 million or $0.27 per diluted
share, compared to net income for the same period of 2007 of $17.4 million or $0.29 per diluted
share. The Corporations return on average equity was 12.14%, return on average tangible equity
(which is calculated by dividing net income less amortization of intangibles by average equity less
average intangibles) was 24.24%, return on average assets was 1.09% and return on average tangible
assets (which is calculated by dividing net income less amortization of intangibles by average
assets less average intangibles) was 1.18% for the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to
13.06%, 26.79%, 1.17% and 1.28%, respectively, for the same period in 2007.
23
The following table provides information regarding the average balances and yields earned on
interest earning assets and the average balances and rates paid on interest bearing liabilities
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Income/ |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Income/ |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Rate |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits with banks |
|
$ |
1,440 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
|
3.04 |
% |
|
$ |
1,609 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
|
4.36 |
% |
Federal funds sold |
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2.89 |
|
|
|
4,433 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
5.17 |
|
Taxable investment securities (1) |
|
|
827,917 |
|
|
|
10,440 |
|
|
|
5.03 |
|
|
|
882,819 |
|
|
|
11,031 |
|
|
|
4.99 |
|
Non-taxable investment securities (2) |
|
|
179,666 |
|
|
|
2,428 |
|
|
|
5.41 |
|
|
|
160,502 |
|
|
|
2,112 |
|
|
|
5.26 |
|
Loans (2) (3) |
|
|
4,407,703 |
|
|
|
76,907 |
|
|
|
7.01 |
|
|
|
4,255,063 |
|
|
|
78,386 |
|
|
|
7.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
interest earning assets (2) |
|
|
5,417,023 |
|
|
|
89,788 |
|
|
|
6.66 |
|
|
|
5,304,426 |
|
|
|
91,604 |
|
|
|
6.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
105,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(53,330 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52,856 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment |
|
|
80,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
553,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
560,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,104,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,006,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing demand |
|
$ |
1,459,286 |
|
|
|
6,892 |
|
|
|
1.90 |
|
|
$ |
1,362,696 |
|
|
|
8,644 |
|
|
|
2.57 |
|
Savings |
|
|
586,950 |
|
|
|
1,853 |
|
|
|
1.27 |
|
|
|
602,931 |
|
|
|
2,513 |
|
|
|
1.69 |
|
Certificates and other time |
|
|
1,741,920 |
|
|
|
18,847 |
|
|
|
4.35 |
|
|
|
1,762,630 |
|
|
|
19,089 |
|
|
|
4.39 |
|
Treasury management accounts |
|
|
293,558 |
|
|
|
2,295 |
|
|
|
3.09 |
|
|
|
257,582 |
|
|
|
2,987 |
|
|
|
4.64 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
171,081 |
|
|
|
1,712 |
|
|
|
3.96 |
|
|
|
138,898 |
|
|
|
1,741 |
|
|
|
5.01 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
476,916 |
|
|
|
5,222 |
|
|
|
4.40 |
|
|
|
497,948 |
|
|
|
4,880 |
|
|
|
3.98 |
|
Junior subordinated debt |
|
|
151,031 |
|
|
|
2,739 |
|
|
|
7.29 |
|
|
|
151,031 |
|
|
|
2,713 |
|
|
|
7.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest bearing liabilities (2) |
|
|
4,880,742 |
|
|
|
39,560 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
|
|
|
4,773,716 |
|
|
|
42,567 |
|
|
|
3.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing demand |
|
|
602,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
622,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
74,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,557,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,467,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
546,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
539,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,104,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,006,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess of interest earning assets over
interest bearing liabilities |
|
$ |
536,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
530,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fully tax-equivalent net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.73 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.73 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-equivalent adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
48,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
47,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The average balances and yields earned on securities are based on historical cost. |
|
(2) |
|
The interest income amounts are reflected on a fully taxable equivalent (FTE) basis which
adjusts for the tax benefit of income on certain tax-exempt loans and investments using the
federal statutory tax rate of 35% for each period presented. The yields on earning assets and
the net interest margin are presented on an FTE and annualized basis. The rates paid on
interest bearing liabilities are also presented on an annualized basis. The Corporation
believes this measure to be the preferred industry measurement of net interest income and
provides relevant comparison between taxable and non-taxable amounts. |
|
(3) |
|
Average balances include non-accrual loans. Loans consist of average total loans less
average unearned income. The amount of loan fees included in interest income on loans is
immaterial. |
24
Net Interest Income
Net interest income, which is the Corporations major source of revenue, is the difference
between interest income from earning assets (loans, securities, federal funds sold and interest
bearing deposits with banks) and interest expense paid on liabilities (deposits, treasury
management accounts, short- and long-term borrowings and junior subordinated debt). For the three
months ended March 31, 2008, net interest income, which comprised 68.8% of net revenue (net
interest income plus non-interest income) as compared to 69.6% for the same period in 2007, was
affected by the general level of interest rates, changes in interest rates, the shape of the yield
curve and changes in the amount and mix of interest earning assets and interest bearing
liabilities.
Net interest income, on an FTE basis, was $50.2 million for the three months ended March 31,
2008 and $49.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007. Average earning assets increased
$112.6 million or 2.1% and average interest bearing liabilities increased $107.0 million or 2.2%
from the same period in 2007. The Corporations net interest margin was 3.73% for both the first
quarter of 2008 and 2007. Lower yields on interest earning assets and lower balances of
non-interest bearing demand deposits were offset by lower rates paid on interest bearing
liabilities. Details on changes in tax equivalent net interest income attributed to changes in
interest earning assets, interest bearing liabilities, yields and cost of funds can be found in the
preceding table.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding changes in net interest income
attributable to changes in the volumes of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities
and changes in the rates for the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared to the three months
ended March 31, 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Net |
|
Interest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits with banks |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
Federal funds sold |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
Securities |
|
|
(451 |
) |
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
(275 |
) |
Loans |
|
|
3,101 |
|
|
|
(4,580 |
) |
|
|
(1,479 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,610 |
|
|
|
(4,426 |
) |
|
|
(1,816 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing demand |
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
(2,349 |
) |
|
|
(1,752 |
) |
Savings |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
(767 |
) |
|
|
(660 |
) |
Certificates and other time |
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
(242 |
) |
Treasury management accounts |
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
(1,081 |
) |
|
|
(692 |
) |
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
(357 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
Long-term debt |
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
Junior subordinated debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,083 |
|
|
|
(4,090 |
) |
|
|
(3,007 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Change |
|
$ |
1,527 |
|
|
$ |
(336 |
) |
|
$ |
1,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amount of change not solely due to rate or volume changes was allocated
between the change due to rate and the change due to volume based on the net size of
the rate and volume changes. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest income amounts are reflected on an FTE basis which adjusts for the
tax benefit of income on certain tax-exempt loans and investments using the federal
statutory tax rate of 35% for each period presented. The Corporation believes this
measure to be the preferred industry measurement of net interest income and provides
relevant comparison between taxable and non-taxable amounts. |
Interest income, on an FTE basis, of $89.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008
decreased by $1.8 million or 2.0% from the same period of 2007. Average interest earning assets of
$5.4 billion for the first three months of 2008 grew $112.6 million or 2.1% from the same period of
2007 driven by an increase of $152.6 million in average loans, partially offset by a decrease of
$35.7 million in investment securities. The increase in average loans was the result of organic
growth, particularly in the commercial loan category, while the decrease in average investment
securities partially funded loan growth. The yield on interest earning assets decreased 32 basis
points to 6.66% for the first three months of 2008. Interest income for the first three months of
2007 included $0.8 million of interest received on previously non-accruing loans.
25
Interest expense of $39.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 decreased by $3.0
million or 7.1% from the same period of 2007. This decrease was primarily attributable to a
decrease of 36 basis points in the Corporations cost of funds to 3.25% during the first three
months of 2008. Also, average interest bearing liabilities increased $107.0 million or 2.2% to
average $4.9 billion for the first three months of 2008. This growth was primarily attributable to
a combined increase of $80.6 million or 4.1% in the core deposit categories of interest bearing
demand deposit and savings, a $36.0 million or 14.0% increase in treasury management accounts and
an increase of $32.2 million or 23.2% in other short-term borrowings, partially offset by a
decrease in certificates and other time deposits of $20.7 million or 1.2% and a decrease in
long-term debt of $21.0 million or 4.2%. Average interest bearing demand and savings increased due
to organic growth resulting from an expanded suite of deposit products designed to attract and
retain customers. Average
treasury management accounts increased primarily due to the implementation of a strategic
initiative to increase and expand commercial customer relationships.
Provision for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses is determined based on managements estimates of the appropriate
level of allowance for loan losses needed to absorb probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio,
after giving consideration to charge-offs and recoveries for the period.
The provision for loan losses of $3.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008
increased $1.7 million or 94.0% from the same period of 2007,
reflecting loan growth, higher net loan charge-offs and increased
specific reserves for certain loans, compared to the first quarter of
2007 which reflected improving credit quality trends. During the first three months
of 2008, net charge-offs totaled $3.0 million or 0.27% (annualized) as a percentage of average
loans compared to $2.5 million or 0.23% (annualized) as a percentage of average loans for the same
period of 2007. The ratio of non-performing loans to total loans was 0.76% at March 31, 2008
compared to 0.63% at March 31, 2007 and the ratio of non-performing assets to total loans plus OREO
was 0.95% and 0.76%, respectively, for those same periods. For additional information, refer to
the Allowance for Loan Losses section of this discussion and analysis.
Non-Interest Income
Total non-interest income of $22.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 increased
$1.3 million or 6.0% from the same period of 2007. This increase resulted primarily from increases
in all major fee businesses except insurance-related fees, combined with an increase in other
non-interest income.
Service charges on loans and deposits of $10.2 million for the first three months of 2008
increased $0.6 million or 5.9% from the same period of 2007
reflecting increases in NSF and check card fees.
Insurance commissions and fees of $3.9 million for the first three months of 2008 decreased
$0.5 million or 11.2% from the same period of 2007 primarily due to a decrease in contingent fee
income.
Securities commissions and fees of $1.5 million for the first three months of 2008 increased
$0.2 million or 19.1% compared to the same period of 2007 primarily due to higher annuity and
securities sales.
Trust fees of $2.2 million for the first three months of 2008 increased slightly compared to
the same period of 2007 due to growth in assets under management resulting from organic growth in
overall trust assets and higher equity valuations.
Gain on sale of securities of $0.7 million for the first three months of 2008 remained stable
compared to the same period of 2007. During 2008, most of the gain related to the Visa, Inc.
initial public offering. The Corporation is a member of Visa USA since it issues Visa debit cards.
As such, a portion of the Corporations ownership interest in Visa was redeemed in exchange for
$0.7 million. This entire amount was recorded as gain on sale of securities since the
Corporations cost basis in Visa is zero.
Gain on sale of mortgage loans of $0.5 million for the first three months of 2008 increased
$0.1 million or 22.9% from the same period of 2007 due to increased mortgage loan origination
volume in 2008.
26
Income from bank owned life insurance of $1.1 million for the first three months of 2008
increased $0.2 million or 18.5% from the same period of 2007. This increase was primarily
attributable to increases in crediting rates paid on the insurance policies.
Other non-interest income of $2.0 million for the first three months of 2008 increased $0.6
million or 44.4% from the same period of 2007 primarily due to fees earned through an interest rate
swap program for larger commercial customers who desire fixed rate loans while the Corporation
benefits from a variable rate asset, thereby helping to reduce volatility in its net interest
income.
Non-Interest Expense
Total non-interest expense of $44.4 million for the first three months of 2008 increased $2.5
million or 5.9% from the same period of 2007. This increase primarily resulted from an increase
in salaries and employee benefit costs.
Salaries and employee benefits of $25.3 million for the first three months of 2008 increased
$3.0 million or 13.4% from the same period of 2007. This increase was attributable to normal
annual compensation and benefit increases combined with additional costs associated with the
transition of the Corporations senior leadership and higher accrued expense for the Corporations
long-term restricted stock program. Additionally, the first three
months of 2007 included a credit of $0.4
million relating to the restructuring of the postretirement benefit plan.
Combined net occupancy and equipment expense of $6.9 million for the first three months of
2008 decreased $0.2 million or 3.3% from the same period of 2007 reflecting the Corporations
continued focus on expense control despite the opening of new loan production offices in 2007 and
2008.
Amortization of intangibles expense was $1.1 million for both the first three months of 2008
and 2007.
Other non-interest expenses of $11.1 million for the first three months of 2008 decreased $0.3
million or 2.3% from the same period of 2007. The decrease was primarily due to the Corporations
continued focus on expense control.
Income Taxes
The Corporations income tax expense of $6.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008
decreased by $1.0 million from the same period in 2007. Income taxes and the effective tax rate
for the three months ended March 31, 2008 were favorably impacted by $0.2 million due to the
resolution of a previously uncertain tax position. The effective tax rate was 28.9% for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 and 30.8% for the same period in the prior year. Both periods tax rates are
lower than the 35.0% federal statutory tax rate due to the tax benefits primarily resulting from
tax-exempt instruments and excludable dividend income.
LIQUIDITY
The Corporations goal in liquidity management is to satisfy the cash flow requirements of
depositors and borrowers as well as the operating cash needs of the Corporation with cost-effective
funding. The Board of Directors of the Corporation has established an Asset/Liability Policy in
order to achieve and maintain earnings performance consistent with long-term goals while
maintaining acceptable levels of interest rate risk, a well-capitalized balance sheet and
adequate levels of liquidity. The Board of Directors of the Corporation has also established a
Contingency Funding Policy to address liquidity crisis conditions. These policies designate the
Corporate Asset/Liability Committee (ALCO) as the body responsible for meeting these objectives.
The ALCO, which includes members of executive management, reviews liquidity on a periodic basis and
approves significant changes in strategies that affect balance sheet or cash flow positions.
Liquidity is centrally managed on a daily basis by the Corporations Treasury Department.
Liquidity sources from assets include payments from loans and investments as well as the
ability to securitize, pledge or sell loans, investment securities and other assets. The
Corporation continues to originate mortgage loans, most of which are sold in the secondary market.
Mortgage loan originations totaled $39.9 million and $35.0 million for the three months ended March
31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Proceeds from the sale of mortgage loans totaled $28.5 million
and $25.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
27
Liquidity sources from liabilities are generated primarily through deposits. As of March 31,
2008 and December 31, 2007, deposits comprised 72.0% and 72.2% of total liabilities, respectively.
To a lesser extent, the Corporation also makes use of wholesale sources of liquidity that include
federal funds purchased, treasury management accounts and public funds. In addition, the
Corporation has the ability to borrow funds from the FHLB, Federal Reserve Bank and the capital
markets. FHLB advances are a competitively priced and reliable source of funds. As of March 31,
2008, total availability from the FHLB was $1.7 billion, or 28.3% of total assets, while
outstanding advances were $439.0 million, or 7.1% of total assets. As of December 31, 2007,
outstanding FHLB advances were $427.1 million, or 7.0% of total assets, while the total
availability from these sources was $1.9 billion, or 30.4% of total assets. Additionally, the
Corporations banking affiliate has a $25.0 million letter of credit from the FHLB, which was in
use as of March 31, 2008.
The principal source of the parent companys cash flow is dividends from its subsidiaries.
These dividends may be impacted by the parents or the subsidiaries capital needs, statutory laws
and regulations, corporate policies, contractual restrictions and other factors. The parent also
may draw on approved lines of credit of $90.0 million with several major domestic banks, which were
unused as of March 31, 2008. In addition, the Corporation also issues subordinated notes on a
regular basis.
The Corporation periodically repurchases shares of its common stock for re-issuance under
various employee benefit plans and the Corporations dividend reinvestment plan. During the three
months ended March 31, 2008, the Corporation did not purchase
any shares of its common stock in the open market, however, it paid $0.4
million upon the acquisition of 27,865 shares back into treasury, as a result of the net share
election for the payment of taxes due to the vesting of restricted stock. For the same period of
2007, the Corporation purchased 210,000 shares of its common stock totaling $3.7 million and received $2.8
million as a result of re-issuance of 207,128 shares.
The ALCO regularly monitors various liquidity ratios and forecasts of cash position.
Management believes the Corporation has sufficient liquidity available to meet its normal operating
and contingency funding cash needs.
MARKET RISK
Market risk refers to potential losses arising from changes in interest rates, foreign
exchange rates, equity prices and commodity prices. The Corporation is primarily exposed to
interest rate risk inherent in its lending and deposit taking activities as a financial
intermediary. To succeed in this capacity, the Corporation offers an extensive variety of
financial products to meet the diverse needs of its customers. These products sometimes contribute
to interest rate risk for the Corporation when product groups do not complement one another. For
example, depositors may want short-term deposits while borrowers desire long-term loans.
Changes in market interest rates may result in changes in the fair value of the Corporations
financial instruments, cash flows and net interest income. The ALCO is responsible for market risk
management: devising policy guidelines, risk measures and limits, and managing the amount of
interest rate risk and its effect on net interest income and capital. The Corporations Treasury
Department manages interest rate risk. The Corporation uses derivative financial instruments for
market risk management purposes (principally interest rate risk) and not for trading or speculative
purposes.
Interest rate risk is comprised of repricing risk, basis risk, yield curve risk and options
risk. Repricing risk arises from differences in the cash flow or repricing between asset and
liability portfolios. Basis risk arises when asset and liability portfolios are related to
different market rate indexes, which do not always change by the same amount. Yield curve risk
arises when asset and liability portfolios are related to different maturities on a given yield
curve; when the yield curve changes shape, the risk position is altered. Options risk arises from
embedded options within asset and liability products as certain borrowers have the option to
prepay their loans when rates fall while certain depositors can redeem their certificates of
deposit early when rates rise.
The Corporation uses a sophisticated asset/liability model to measure its interest rate risk.
Interest rate risk measures utilized by the Corporation include earnings simulation, economic value
of equity (EVE) and gap analysis.
Gap analysis and EVE are static measures that do not incorporate assumptions regarding future
business. Gap analysis, while a helpful diagnostic tool, displays cash flows for only a single
rate environment. EVEs long-term horizon helps identify changes in optionality and longer-term
positions. However, EVEs liquidation perspective does not translate into the earnings-based
measures that are the focus of managing and valuing a going concern. Net interest
28
income simulations explicitly measure the exposure to earnings from changes in market rates of
interest. The Corporations current financial position is combined with assumptions regarding
future business to calculate net interest income under various hypothetical rate scenarios. The
ALCO reviews earnings simulations over multiple years under various interest rate scenarios.
Reviewing these various measures provides the Corporation with a reasonably comprehensive view of
its interest rate profile.
The following gap analysis compares the difference between the amount of interest earning
assets (IEA) and interest bearing liabilities (IBL) subject to repricing over a period of time. A
ratio of more than one indicates a higher level of repricing assets over repricing liabilities for
the time period. Conversely, a ratio of less than one indicates a higher level of repricing
liabilities over repricing assets for the time period.
The following table presents the amounts of IEA and IBL as of March 31, 2008 that are subject
to repricing within the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within |
|
|
2-3 |
|
|
4-6 |
|
|
7-12 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
1 Month |
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
|
1 Year |
|
Interest Earning Assets (IEA) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
1,306,065 |
|
|
$ |
337,113 |
|
|
$ |
322,977 |
|
|
$ |
567,107 |
|
|
$ |
2,533,262 |
|
Investments |
|
|
37,808 |
|
|
|
114,085 |
|
|
|
98,816 |
|
|
|
206,777 |
|
|
|
457,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,343,873 |
|
|
|
451,198 |
|
|
|
421,793 |
|
|
|
773,884 |
|
|
|
2,990,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Bearing Liabilities
(IBL) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-maturity deposits |
|
|
712,913 |
|
|
|
280,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
993,021 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
115,472 |
|
|
|
165,984 |
|
|
|
294,921 |
|
|
|
486,553 |
|
|
|
1,062,930 |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
491,085 |
|
|
|
21,394 |
|
|
|
26,632 |
|
|
|
68,393 |
|
|
|
607,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,319,470 |
|
|
|
467,486 |
|
|
|
321,553 |
|
|
|
554,946 |
|
|
|
2,663,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period Gap |
|
$ |
24,403 |
|
|
$ |
(16,288 |
) |
|
$ |
100,240 |
|
|
$ |
218,938 |
|
|
$ |
327,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Gap |
|
$ |
24,403 |
|
|
$ |
8,115 |
|
|
$ |
108,355 |
|
|
$ |
327,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IEA/IBL (Cumulative) |
|
|
1.02 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
1.05 |
|
|
|
1.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Gap to IEA |
|
|
0.45 |
% |
|
|
0.15 |
% |
|
|
1.99 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cumulative twelve-month IEA to IBL ratio changed to 1.12 for March 31, 2008 from 1.03 for
December 31, 2007.
The allocation of non-maturity deposits to the one-month maturity category is based on the
estimated sensitivity of each product to changes in market rates. For example, if a products rate
is estimated to increase by 50% as much as the market rates, then 50% of the account balance was
placed in this category. The current allocation is representative of the estimated sensitivities
for a +/- 100 basis point change in market rates.
The measures were calculated using rate shocks, representing immediate rate changes that move
all market rates by the same amount. The variance percentages represent the change between the net
interest income or EVE calculated under the particular rate shock versus the net interest income or
EVE that was calculated assuming market rates as of March 31, 2008.
29
The following table presents an analysis of the potential sensitivity of the Corporations net
interest income and EVE to changes in interest rates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
ALCO |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Guidelines |
Net interest income change (12 months): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ 200 basis points |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
(2.0 |
)% |
|
|
+/-5.0 |
% |
+ 100 basis points |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
(0.5 |
)% |
|
|
+/-5.0 |
% |
- 100 basis points |
|
|
(3.3 |
)% |
|
|
(1.7 |
)% |
|
|
+/-5.0 |
% |
- 200 basis points |
|
|
(11.9 |
)% |
|
|
(4.7 |
)% |
|
|
+/-5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Economic value of equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ 200 basis points |
|
|
(3.8 |
)% |
|
|
(4.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
+ 100 basis points |
|
|
(0.6 |
)% |
|
|
(1.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
- 100 basis points |
|
|
(5.6 |
)% |
|
|
(3.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
- 200 basis points |
|
|
(15.0 |
)% |
|
|
(9.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
The Corporations overall level of interest rate risk is considered to be relatively low and
stable. This is evidenced by a stable net interest margin despite the recent market rate
volatility. The Corporation has a neutral interest rate risk position. This is why net interest
income and EVE decrease slightly under higher rate shock scenarios.
The Corporation also has various asset categories with call options, which grant option
holders the right to prepay when rates decline. The extreme nature of rate shock scenarios
triggers a high level of asset prepayments, causing net interest income and EVE to decrease under
lower rate shock scenarios. The yield curve continued to decline and steepen during the first
quarter of 2008. This was primarily the result of the economic weakness caused by the subprime
mortgage crisis. Applying the down rate shocks to these lower interest rates as of March 31, 2008
caused higher asset prepayments for the measurement period. For example, the -200 basis points
shock reduces the 3-month Treasury and the 10-year Treasury to 0.25% and 1.50%, respectively.
Further, spreads on assets are assumed to be static for all rate scenarios. A widening of spreads,
which is typical in lower rate environments, would slow asset prepayments. The Board Risk
Committee deems this shock scenario to be improbable and approved that no immediate actions were
necessary to address the policy exception caused by that rate scenario. The ALCO will continue to
manage its exposure to asset prepayment risk in a gradual manner. With the increased economic
weakness and lower rates, loan customers typically prefer to lock-in long-term, fixed rates with
the Corporation, creating pressure for a higher sensitivity to higher rates.
During the first quarter of 2008, the ALCO has utilized several strategies to maintain the
Corporations interest rate risk position at an acceptable level. For example, the Corporation
successfully promoted longer-term certificates of deposit and utilized long-term FHLB advances. On
the lending side, the Corporation regularly sells long-term fixed-rate residential mortgages to the
secondary market and has been successful in the origination of commercial loans with short-term
repricing characteristics. The investment portfolio is used, in part, to supplement the
Corporations interest rate risk position. The duration of the investment portfolio was unchanged
for the first quarter of 2008. Finally, the Corporation has made use of interest rate swaps to
lessen its interest rate risk position. For additional information regarding interest rate swaps,
see the Interest Rate Swaps footnote included in this Report.
The Corporation recognizes that asset/liability models such as those used by the Corporation
to measure its interest rate risk are based on methodologies that may have inherent shortcomings.
Furthermore, asset/liability models require certain assumptions be made, such as prepayment rates
on interest earning assets and pricing impact on non-maturity deposits, which may differ from
actual experience. These business assumptions are based upon the Corporations experience,
business plans and published industry experience. While management believes such assumptions to be
reasonable, there can be no assurance that modeled results will be achieved.
30
DEPOSITS AND TREASURY MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTS
Following is a summary of deposits and treasury management accounts (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
$ |
634,831 |
|
|
$ |
626,141 |
|
Savings and NOW |
|
|
2,058,147 |
|
|
|
2,037,160 |
|
Certificates of deposit and other time deposits |
|
|
1,743,676 |
|
|
|
1,734,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
4,436,654 |
|
|
|
4,397,684 |
|
Treasury management accounts |
|
|
292,244 |
|
|
|
276,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits and treasury management accounts |
|
$ |
4,728,898 |
|
|
$ |
4,674,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits and treasury management accounts increased by $54.7 million or 1.2% to $4.7
billion at March 31, 2008 compared to December 31, 2007. The growth in savings and NOW deposits
was due to the Corporations expanded suite of deposit products and customer preferences in a lower
interest rate environment.
LOANS
The loan portfolio consists principally of loans to individuals and small- and medium-sized
businesses within the Corporations primary market area of Pennsylvania and northeastern Ohio. The
Corporation, through its banking affiliate, also operates commercial loan production offices in
Pennsylvania and Florida as well as mortgage loan production offices in Ohio and Tennessee. The
Corporation had commercial loans in Florida totaling $278.1 million or 6.3% of total loans as of
March 31, 2008. In addition, the portfolio contains consumer finance loans to individuals in
Pennsylvania, Ohio and Tennessee, which totaled $146.7 million or 3.3% of total loans as of March
31, 2008.
Following is a summary of loans, net of unearned income (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
2,338,110 |
|
|
$ |
2,232,860 |
|
Direct installment |
|
|
928,513 |
|
|
|
941,249 |
|
Consumer lines of credit |
|
|
254,663 |
|
|
|
251,100 |
|
Residential mortgages |
|
|
458,406 |
|
|
|
465,881 |
|
Indirect installment |
|
|
429,140 |
|
|
|
427,663 |
|
Other |
|
|
31,205 |
|
|
|
25,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,440,037 |
|
|
$ |
4,344,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned income on loans was $24.3 million and $25.7 million at March 31, 2008 and December
31, 2007, respectively.
Total loans increased by $95.8 million or 2.2% to $4.4 billion at March 31, 2008. This growth
was driven by solid commercial loan growth of $105.3 million or 4.7% due to the Corporations
continued focus on loan growth in the Pittsburgh and Harrisburg, Pennsylvania markets.
The majority of the Corporations loan portfolio consists of commercial loans, which includes
commercial real estate loans and commercial and industrial loans. As of both March 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, commercial real estate loans were $1.4 billion, or 32.2% and 32.1% of total
loans, respectively.
NON-PERFORMING ASSETS
Non-performing loans include non-accrual loans and restructured loans. Non-accrual loans
represent loans for which interest accruals have been discontinued. Restructured loans are loans in
which the borrower has been granted a concession on the interest rate or the original repayment
terms due to financial distress.
31
The Corporation discontinues interest accruals when principal or interest is due and has
remained unpaid for 90 to 180 days depending on the loan type. When a loan is placed on
non-accrual status, all unpaid interest is reversed. Non-accrual loans may not be restored to
accrual status until all delinquent principal and interest has been paid.
Non-performing loans are closely monitored on an ongoing basis as part of the Corporations
loan review and work-out process. The potential risk of loss on these loans is evaluated by
comparing the loan balance to the fair value of any underlying collateral or the present value of
projected future cash flows. Losses are recognized where appropriate.
Following is a summary of non-performing assets (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Non-accrual loans |
|
$ |
29,949 |
|
|
$ |
29,211 |
|
Restructured loans |
|
|
3,628 |
|
|
|
3,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans |
|
|
33,577 |
|
|
|
32,679 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
8,538 |
|
|
|
8,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets |
|
$ |
42,115 |
|
|
$ |
40,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset quality ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans as a percent of total loans |
|
|
0.76 |
% |
|
|
0.75 |
% |
Non-performing assets as a percent of total loans + OREO |
|
|
0.95 |
% |
|
|
0.94 |
% |
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
The allowance for loan losses represents managements estimate of probable loan losses
inherent in the loan portfolio at a specific point in time, which includes estimated losses
associated with specifically identified loans, as well as estimated probable credit losses inherent
in the remainder of the loan portfolio. Additions are made to the allowance through both periodic
provisions charged to income and recoveries of losses previously incurred. Reductions to the
allowance occur as loans are charged off. Management evaluates the adequacy of the allowance at
least quarterly, and in doing so relies on various factors including, but not limited to,
assessment of historical loss experience, delinquency and non-accrual trends, portfolio growth,
underlying collateral coverage and current economic conditions. This evaluation is subjective and
requires material estimates that may change over time.
The components of the allowance for loan losses represent estimates based upon FAS 5,
Accounting for Contingencies, and FAS 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan. FAS 5
applies to homogeneous loan pools such as consumer installment loans, residential mortgages and
consumer lines of credit, as well as commercial loans that are not individually evaluated for
impairment under FAS 114. FAS 114 is applied to commercial loans that are considered impaired.
Under FAS 114, a loan is impaired when, based upon current information and events, it is
probable that the loan will not be repaid according to its contractual terms, including both
principal and interest. Management performs individual assessments of impaired loans to determine
the existence of loss exposure and, where applicable, the extent of loss exposure based upon the
present value of expected future cash flows available to pay the loan, or based upon the fair value
of collateral less estimated selling costs where a loan is collateral dependent. The fair value of
collateral is measured in accordance with FAS 157. Commercial loans excluded from FAS 114
individual impairment analysis are collectively evaluated by management to estimate reserves for
loan losses inherent in those loans in accordance with FAS 5. Additional information relating to
these measures is available in the Fair Value Measurements section of this Report.
In estimating loan loss contingencies, management applies historical loan loss rates and also
considers how the loss rates may be impacted by changes in current economic conditions, delinquency
and non-performing loan trends, changes in loan underwriting guidelines and credit policies, as
well as the results of internal loan reviews. Homogeneous loan pools are evaluated using similar
criteria that are based upon historical loss rates of various loan types. Historical loss rates
are adjusted to incorporate changes in existing conditions that may impact, both positively or
negatively, the degree to which these loss histories may vary. This determination inherently
involves a high degree of
32
uncertainty and considers current risk factors that may not have occurred in the Corporations
historical loan loss experience.
Following is a summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
52,806 |
|
|
$ |
52,575 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(3,732 |
) |
|
|
(3,282 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
(2,993 |
) |
|
|
(2,458 |
) |
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
3,583 |
|
|
|
1,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
53,396 |
|
|
$ |
51,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of unearned income |
|
|
1.20 |
% |
|
|
1.22 |
% |
Non-performing loans |
|
|
159.03 |
% |
|
|
195.05 |
% |
The allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2008 increased $1.4 million, representing a 2.8%
increase in the reserve for loan losses since March 31, 2007,
primarily the result of loan growth and the impact of loan ratings
downgrades, including the recording
of a specific reserve of $2.0 million relating to one Florida developer in late 2007. The
allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2008 increased $0.6 million or 1.1% from December 31, 2007.
The provision for loan losses of $3.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008
increased $1.7 million or 94.0% from the same period of 2007,
reflecting loan growth, higher net loan charge-offs and increased
specific reserves for certain loans, compared to the first quarter of
2007 which reflected improving credit quality trends.
Charge-offs reflect the realization of losses in the portfolio that were estimated previously
through provisions for credit losses. Loans charged off during the first three months of 2008
increased $0.4 million from the same period in the prior year to $3.7 million. Net charge-offs
(annualized) as a percentage of average loans increased to 0.27% for the first three months of 2008
compared to 0.23% for the same period of 2007.
Management considers numerous factors when estimating reserves for loan losses, including
historical charge-off rates and subsequent recoveries. Consideration is given to the impact of
changes in qualitative factors that influence the Corporations credit quality, such as the local
and regional economies that the Corporation serves. Assessment of relevant economic factors
indicates that the Corporations primary markets historically tend to lag the national economy,
with local economies in the Corporations market areas also improving or weakening, as the case may
be, but at a more measured rate than the national trends. Regional economic factors influencing
managements estimate of reserves include uncertainty of the labor markets in the regions the
Corporation serves and a contracting labor force due, in part, to productivity growth and industry
consolidations. Higher interest rates and energy costs directly affect borrowers having floating
rate loans as increasing debt service requirements pressure customers that now face higher loan
payments. Higher interest rates and energy costs also affect consumer loan customers who carry
historically high debt levels. Consumer credit risk and loss exposures are evaluated using a
combination of historical loss experience and an analysis of the rate at which delinquent loans
ultimately result in charge-offs to estimate credit quality migration and expected losses within
the homogeneous loan pools.
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND REGULATORY MATTERS
The assessment of capital adequacy depends on a number of factors such as asset quality,
liquidity, earnings performance, changing competitive conditions and economic forces. The
Corporation seeks to maintain a strong capital base to support its growth and expansion activities,
to provide stability to current operations and to promote public confidence.
The Corporation has an effective shelf registration statement filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. Pursuant to this registration statement, the Corporation may, from time to
time, issue and sell in one or
33
more offerings any combination of common stock, preferred stock, debt securities or trust preferred
securities having a total dollar value up to $200.0 million. As of March 31, 2008, the Corporation
has not issued any such stock or securities.
The Corporation and FNBPA are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered
by the federal banking agencies. Quantitative measures established by regulators to ensure capital
adequacy require the Corporation and FNBPA to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of total and Tier
1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined) and of leverage
ratio (as defined). Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory
actions, and possibly additional discretionary actions, by regulators that, if undertaken, could
have a direct material effect on the Corporations consolidated financial statements. Under
capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the
Corporation and FNBPA must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of
assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting
practices. The Corporations and FNBPAs capital amounts and classifications are also subject to
qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.
The Corporations management believes that, as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the
Corporation and FNBPA met all capital adequacy requirements to which either of them were subject.
As of March 31, 2008, the most recent notification from the Federal Banking Agencies
categorized the Corporation and FNBPA as well-capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt
corrective action. There are no conditions or events since the notification management believes
have changed this categorization.
Following are the capital ratios as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 for the
Corporation and FNBPA (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well-Capitalized |
|
Minimum Capital |
|
|
Actual |
|
Requirements |
|
Requirements |
|
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital (to risk-weighted assets): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.N.B. Corporation |
|
$ |
505,070 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
% |
|
$ |
449,982 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
$ |
359,986 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
FNBPA |
|
|
462,842 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
% |
|
|
433,362 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
346,690 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.N.B. Corporation |
|
|
439,268 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
% |
|
|
269,989 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
179,993 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
FNBPA |
|
|
415,358 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
% |
|
|
260,017 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
173,345 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage Ratio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.N.B. Corporation |
|
|
439,268 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
292,348 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
233,878 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
FNBPA |
|
|
415,358 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
283,732 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
226,986 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital (to risk-weighted assets): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.N.B. Corporation |
|
$ |
501,400 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
$ |
437,905 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
$ |
350,324 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
FNBPA |
|
|
460,834 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
|
426,062 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
340,849 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.N.B. Corporation |
|
|
436,758 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
262,743 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
175,162 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
FNBPA |
|
|
414,228 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
% |
|
|
255,637 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
170,425 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage Ratio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.N.B. Corporation |
|
|
436,758 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
292,482 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
233,985 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
FNBPA |
|
|
414,228 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
284,200 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
227,360 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
34
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The information called for by this item is provided under the caption Market Risk in Item 2 -
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. There are
no material changes in the information provided under Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk included in the Corporations 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed
with the Commission on February 29, 2008.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. The Corporations management, with the
participation of the Corporations principal executive and financial officers, evaluated the
Corporations disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13(a) 15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q. Based on this evaluation, the Corporations management, including the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this
quarterly report, the Corporations disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of such
date at the reasonable assurance level as discussed below to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by the Corporation in the reports it files under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission and that such information is accumulated
and communicated to the Corporations management, including its principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
LIMITATIONS ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CONTROLS. The Corporations management, including the CEO
and CFO, does not expect that the Corporations disclosure controls and internal controls will
prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can
provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.
Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide
absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Corporation
have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in
decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.
In addition, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of
two or more people or by management override of the controls.
CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROLS. The CEO and CFO have evaluated the changes to the Corporations
internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the Corporations fiscal quarter
ended March 31, 2008, as required by paragraph (d) of Rules 13a 15 and 15d 15 under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and have concluded that there were no such changes
that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporations internal
controls over financial reporting.
35
PART II
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Corporation and its subsidiaries are involved in various pending and threatened legal
proceedings in which claims for monetary damages and other relief are asserted. These actions
include claims brought against the Corporation and its subsidiaries where the Corporation acted as
one or more of the following: a depository bank, lender, underwriter, fiduciary, financial
advisor, broker or was engaged in other business activities. Although the ultimate outcome for any
asserted claim cannot be predicted with certainty, the Corporation believes that it and its
subsidiaries have valid defenses for all asserted claims. Reserves are established for legal
claims when losses associated with the claims are judged to be probable and the amount of the loss
can be reasonably estimated.
Based on information currently available, advice of counsel, available insurance coverage and
established reserves, the Corporation does not anticipate, at the present time, that the aggregate
liability, if any, arising out of such legal proceedings will have a material adverse effect on the
Corporations consolidated financial position. However, the Corporation cannot determine whether
or not any claims asserted against it will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated
results of operations in any future reporting period. It is possible, in the event of unexpected
future developments, that the ultimate resolution of these matters, if unfavorable, may be material
to the Corporations consolidated results of operations for a particular period.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There are no material changes in the risk factors previously disclosed in the Corporations
2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on February 29, 2008.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
NONE
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
NONE
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
F.N.B. Corporation held a Special Meeting of Shareholders on March 19, 2008 for the purpose
of approving the merger with Omega Financial Corporation. Proxies were solicited pursuant
to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and there was no solicitation in
opposition to the Corporations solicitations.
The proposal to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated November 8, 2007, between
F.N.B. Corporation and Omega Financial Corporation pursuant to which Omega Financial
Corporation will merge with and into F.N.B. Corporation and F.N.B. Corporation will issue
up to 26,600,000 shares of F.N.B. Corporation common stock was approved with 44,125,221
shares voted for, 996,137 shares voted against and 197,272 abstentions.
The proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary, to permit further solicitation of
proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to approve the
merger proposal was approved with 42,932,187 shares voted for, 1,891,467 shares voted
against and 494,976 abstentions.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
NONE
36
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
2.1 |
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of February 14, 2008 between F.N.B. Corporation and
Iron and Glass Bancorp, Inc. (incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrant;s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed on February 15, 2008). |
|
10.1 |
|
Form of Restricted Stock Units Agreement for Named Executive Officers (pursuant to 2007
Incentive Compensation Plan) (incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrant;s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed on January 23, 2008). |
|
10.2 |
|
Form of Restricted Stock Units Agreement for CEO Stephen Gurgovits (pursuant to 2007
Incentive Compensation Plan) (incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Registrant;s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed on January 23, 2008). |
|
10.3 |
|
Amended 2007 Performance-Based Restricted Stock Award for Stephen Gurgovits (pursuant to 2007
Incentive Compensation Plan) (incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 10.3 to the
Registrant;s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed on January 23, 2008). |
|
10.4 |
|
Amended 2007 Service-Based Restricted Stock Award for Stephen Gurgovits (pursuant to 2007
Incentive Compensation Plan) (incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Registrant;s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed on January 23, 2008). |
|
11 |
|
Computation of Per Share Earnings * |
|
15 |
|
Letter Re: Unaudited Interim Financial Information. (filed herewith). |
|
31.1. |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 302. (filed herewith). |
|
31.2. |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 302. (filed herewith). |
|
32.1. |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 906. (filed herewith). |
|
32.2. |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 906. (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
* |
|
This information is provided under the heading Earnings Per Share in Item 1, Part I in
this Report on Form 10-Q. |
37
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.N.B. Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated:
May 7, 2008
|
|
/s/Robert V. New, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert V. New, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated:
May 7, 2008
|
|
/s/Brian F. Lilly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian F. Lilly |
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated:
May 7, 2008
|
|
/s/Vincent J. Calabrese |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vincent J. Calabrese |
|
|
|
|
Corporate Controller |
|
|
|
|
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
38