Book Online or Call 1-855-SAUSALITO

Sign In  |  Register  |  About Sausalito  |  Contact Us

Sausalito, CA
September 01, 2020 1:41pm
7-Day Forecast | Traffic
  • Search Hotels in Sausalito

  • CHECK-IN:
  • CHECK-OUT:
  • ROOMS:

NCLA Pushes Court to Reel in Unlawful Fishery Monitoring Rule After Supreme Court Sinks Chevron Deference

Washington, D.C., Sept. 27, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The New Civil Liberties Alliance has filed a Supplemental Brief urging the court to vacate the Industry-Funded Monitoring (IFM) Omnibus Amendment, issued by the New England Fishery Management Council (NEFMC) and applied to nearly all fisheries in the region. Implemented by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) February 2020 Final Rule, the Herring Rule is just the first of many industry-funded monitoring programs. To enforce the Amendment, NOAA must issue separate rules for each fishery. NCLA has consistently sought to vacate both the Rule and the Amendment.

This request follows the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Loper Bright Enterprises, Inc. v. Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. Department of Commerce, where the Court overturned Chevron deference, eliminating judicial deference to agency interpretations of allegedly ambiguous or silent statutes.

The key issue now before the court is whether the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA) actually authorizes the agency’s controversial amendment. NCLA argues that Congress never authorized the Secretary of Commerce, under the MSA, to force New England fishermen into contracts with onboard observers. The costly Industry-Funded Monitoring program was imposed without proper statutory authorization, and without Chevron deference, this unlawful rule and amendment must be struck down.

Now that Chevron deference has been overruled, courts are required to evaluate agency actions based on the statute’s language, without substituting the agency’s interpretations for what Congress wrote. This legal shift rightfully restores judicial authority to determine the meaning of the law to the courts, rather than relying on agency’s often self-aggrandizing interpretations.

NCLA believes Americans’ liberty interests are better protected when regulators are no longer able to substitute their own views for those that Congress actually set down in law. The Omnibus Amendment goes beyond its statutory limits, and NCLA calls on the court to declare it unlawful and vacate the Final Rule.

NCLA released the following statements:

“With the death of Chevron deference in Loper Bright and Relentless this unlawful rule should die with it.”
— John Vecchione, Senior Litigation Counsel, NCLA

For more information visit the case page here.

ABOUT NCLA

NCLA is a nonpartisan, nonprofit civil rights group founded by prominent legal scholar Philip Hamburger to protect constitutional freedoms from violations by the Administrative State. NCLA’s public-interest litigation and other pro bono advocacy strive to tame the unlawful power of state and federal agencies and to foster a new civil liberties movement that will help restore Americans’ fundamental rights.

###


Joe Martyak
New Civil Liberties Alliance
202-869-5208
joe.martyak@ncla.legal
Data & News supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Stock quotes supplied by Barchart
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.
 
 
Photos copyright by Jay Graham Photographer
Copyright © 2010-2020 Sausalito.com & California Media Partners, LLC. All rights reserved.